Love Fear and the Destiny of Nations - KAICIID Image of the Other Conference Vienna Nov 2013
-
Upload
phil-clothier -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
425 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Love Fear and the Destiny of Nations - KAICIID Image of the Other Conference Vienna Nov 2013
Love Fear and the Destiny of NationsBeliefs Divide, Values Unite through Dialogue
2
Nothing changes without dialogue. It isn’t always easy and it takes time and commitment. (Tools and a little knowledge really help!)
Beliefs divide & values unite.
Leaders want to lead better, citizens want to be involved. Most people are not sure how.
Supporting Leaders in Building Values-Driven Organisations
This is Preera
Preera was founded in 1997, and today consists of 45 management consultants in Stockholm and Gothenburg. We are one of the initiators of The Transformation Alliance, a group of independent management consultancy firms in six European countries. Together we help organisations and businesses create sustainable and powerful results.
Introduction to the work
6
materialisticshort-term focuseducational opportunitiesuncertainty about the futurecorruptionelitismmaterial needswasted resourcesgender discriminationblame
accountabilityfamilyemployment opportunitiesfinancial stabilityoptimismdependable public serviceshonestysocial responsibilityhuman rightspoverty reduction
Iceland National Assessment 2008
familyhonestyresponsibilityaccountabilityfinancial stabilitytrustfriendshippositive attitudehumour/funadaptabilityrespect
Personal Values Desired CultureCurrent Culture
Cultural Entropy 53%
www.valuescentre.com 7
Iceland
Iceland Economic Collapse 2008
www.valuescentre.com 8
Iceland
Iceland National Assembly 2009/2010
1200 Citizens + 300 Government, NGOs & Institution Leaders + 500 Volunteers
Themes: Education, Economy, Equal rights, Family, Environment, Public administration, Welfare, Sustainability
economic growthcaring for elderlyaffordable housingconcern for future generationsjob securitysocial justicecaring for the disadvantagedenvironmental awarenesshuman rightsmaterial wealth
caring for elderlyeconomic growthconcern for future generationsjob securityenvironmental awarenesscaring for the disadvantagedaffordable housingeducationhonestyprosperity
Latvian Desired Culture
Russian Desired Culture
11
familycaringhonestyresponsibilityhumor/ funaccountabilityrespectpositive attitudeintegrityfriendship
caringfamilyhumor/ funhonestyfriendshipresponsibilitycompassionrespectaccountabilitypositive attitude
Democrat Personal Values Republican Personal Values
Beliefs Divide, Values Unite
13
Values – The building blocks of culture
14
Mass Individuation
15
Personal dialogue
Workplace dialogue
Societal dialogue
National dialogue
Global dialogue
Conscious Dialogue
16
Who is here and what is most important to you?
17
Which values are most important to you?
AccountabilityAchievementBalance (home/work)CommitmentCompassionCompetenceContinuous learningCooperationCourageCreativityEnthusiasmEfficiencyEthics
ExcellenceFairnessFamilyFinancial gainFriendshipsFuture generationsHealthHonestyHumor/funIndependenceIntegrityInitiativeIntuition
Making a differenceOpen communicationOpennessPersonal fulfillmentPersonal growthPowerRespectResponsibilityRisk-takingSelf-disciplineSuccessTrustWisdom
1) Choose three values that are important to you in your life2) What are your beliefs that support these values3) What behaviours do you exhibit that support these values
18
Moving deeper – 7 levels story
19
Organisation A Organisation B
Valueclient satisfaction making a differenceintegrity teamwork humor/fun quality ethicsfinancial stability
Level26545371
Valueblameshort term focusinternal competitionbuck passingrisk aversecustomer satisfaction information hoardingprofit
Level21231221
A Tale of Two Companies
Service
Making a Difference
Internal Cohesion
Transformation
Self-Esteem
Relationship
Survival
Cultural Entropy8%
Cultural Entropy57%
This is where LOVE & FEAR comes into the story
20
Cultural Entropy
Cultural Entropy measures that percentage of fear, dysfunction, negative and destructive energy in the organisation
40% = Crisis
10% = Healthy
21
Are your company core values lived?
long hours (L)being the bestcost reduction (L)poor communication (L)client collaborationbureaucracy (L)confusion (L)arrogance (L)hierarchy (L)silo mentality (L)
Cultural Entropy 37%
accountabilitycustomer satisfaction being the best commitment compassion continuous improvement integrityteamwork cost effectivenessrespect
Cultural Entropy 9%
Core Valuesclient collaborationteamworkdeliverymeritocracyintegrity
Core Values (I-Care)integritycompassionaccountabilityrespectexcellence
being the bestaccountabilityclient satisfactionhonestyteamworkachievementbrand imageexcellencestaff engagementtrust
long hours (L)being the bestcost reductionpoor communication (L)client collaborationbureaucracy (L)confusion (L)arrogance (L)hierarchy (L)results orientationsilo mentality (L)
Cultural Entropy 12% Cultural Entropy 37%
Executive TeamCurrent Culture
EmployeesCurrent Culture
23
Maslow’s Needs to Barrett’s Consciousness
Know and Understand
Physiological
Safety
Love & Belonging
Self-esteemAbraham Maslow
Know and Understand
N e e d s C o n s c i o u s n e s s
Self-Actualization
Richard Barrett
24
Story of a full spectrum organisation
Service to humanity and societal contribution
External collaboration, community involvement
Sense of purpose & strong internal community
Ongoing improvement and employee participation
High performance systems, high quality output
Positive relationships that support organisation needs
Financial viability and employee safety
4 Transformation
1. Survival
7. Service
6. Making a Difference
5. Internal Cohesion
3. Self esteem
2. Relationship
25
7 Levels of Organisational Consciousness
Positive Focus / (Excessive Focus)
Service
Making a Difference
Internal Cohesion
Transformation
Self-esteem
Relationship
SurvivalFinancial StabilityShareholder value, organisational growth, employee health, safety. (control, corruption, greed)
Employee RecognitionLoyalty, open communication, customer satisfaction, friendship. (manipulation, blame)
High PerformanceSystems, processes, quality, best practices, pride in performance. (bureaucracy, complacency)
Continuous Renewal and LearningAccountability, adaptability, empowerment, teamwork, goals orientation, personal growth
Building Internal CommunityShared values, vision, commitment, integrity, trust, passion, creativity, openness, transparency
Strategic Alliances and PartnershipsEnvironmental awareness, community involvement, employee fulfilment, coaching/mentoring
Service To Humanity and the PlanetSocial responsibility, future generations, long-term perspective, ethics, compassion, humility
26
“I do not have enough. I am not loved enough. I am not enough.”
The sum of all human fears in one single tweet
63 Characters
27
Underlying Fears that Drive Deficiency Needs
Level 3 – I am not enoughI do not have enough power, authority or respect to satisfy my need for self-esteem
Level 1 – I don’t have enoughI do not have enough money, safety, protection, health, food, etc, to satisfy my need for survival
Level 2 – I am not loved enoughI do not have enough love, caring, attention, etc, to satisfy my need for belonging
www.valuescentre.com
Break
Sweden; case study in progress
National Values Assessment
30
25 national assessements
Cooperation partners - Swedish National Values Assessment
31
Purpose
>>To create an increased understanding for the challenges in our society and in our organisations through adding knowledge about our values<<
32
Which nationalities does these individuals have?
2023-04-1133
Which nationalities does these individuals have?
2023-04-1134
• Caring• Family• Honesty• Humour/fun• Friendship• Fairness• Compassion• Independence• Respect• Patience
• Humour/fun• Family • Responsibility• Honesty• Accountability• Compassion• Positive attitude• Fairness• Adaptability• Independence
• Honesty• Family• Friendship• Independence• Respect • Accountability• Humor/fun• Listening• Generosity• Politeness
cost cutting (L) 304 1(O)
teamwork 280 4(R)
accountability 269 4(I)
result oriented 254 3(O)
confusion (L) 238 3(O)
hierarchy (L) 231 3(O)
humour/ fun 221 5(O)
commitment 219 5(I)
bureaucracy (L) 203 3(O)
short term focus (L) 199 1(O)
employee health 530 1(O)
humour/ fun 349 5(O)
teamwork 342 4(R)
employee recognition 323 2(R)
accountability 312 4(I)
financial stability 296 1(O)
adaptability 287 4(I)
quality 285 3(O)
commitment 281 5(I)
employee commitment 263 5(O)
Values Plot March 12, 2013Copyright 2013 Barrett Values Centre
I = IndividuellR = Relationsvärdering
Understruket med svart = PV & CCOrange = PV, CC & DC
Orange = CC & DCBlå = PV & DC
P = PositivL = Möjligtvis begränsande (vit cirkel)
O = OrganisationsvärderingS = Samhällsvärdering
Värderingar som matchar
PV - CC 2CC - DC 4PV - DC 3
Hälsoindex(PL)
PV-10-0CC - 5-5 DC-10-0
humour/ fun 470 5(I)
family 422 2(R)
responsibility 383 4(I)
honesty 357 5(I)
accountability 315 4(R)
compassion 290 7(R)
positive attitude 284 5(I)
fairness 279 5(R)
adaptability 257 4(I)
independence 228 4(I)
Nivå Personliga värderingar (PV) Nuvarande kulturella värderingar (CC) Önskade kulturella värderingar (DC)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
IRS (P)=6-4-0 IRS (L)=0-0-0 IROS (P)=2-1-2-0 IROS (L)=0-0-5-0 IROS (P)=3-2-5-0 IROS (L)=0-0-0-0
Swedish values, organizational perspective
Sweden has a different view on clients, development and accountabilityWords lacking on Sweden’s top 10:
• Customer satisfaction
• Accountability
• Continuous improvements
Unique words on Sweden’s top 10:
• Confusion
• Quality
36
unemployment (L) 599 1(O)
bureaucracy (L) 457 3(O)
uncertainty about the future (L)
438 1(I)
freedom of speech 395 4(O)
wasted resources (L) 354 3(O)
materialistic (L) 338 1(I)
blame (L) 334 2(R)
peace 332 7(S)
short-term focus (L) 319 1(O)
educational opportunities 279 3(O)
employment opportunities 612 1(O)
financial stability 490 1(I)
concern for future generations
405 7(S)
effective healthcare 335 1(O)
nature conservancy 330 6(S)
democratic processes 277 4(R)
environmental awareness 262 6(S)
long-term perspective 256 7(S)
caring for the elderly 253 4(S)
equality 239 4(R)
Values Plot March 12, 2013Copyright 2013 Barrett Values Centre
I = IndividualR = Relationship
Black Underline = PV & CCOrange = PV, CC & DC
Orange = CC & DCBlue = PV & DC
P = PositiveL = Potentially Limiting (white circle)
O = OrganisationalS = Societal
Matches
PV - CC 0CC - DC 0PV - DC 0
Health Index(PL)
PV-10-0CC - 3-7 DC-10-0
humour/ fun 470 5(I)
family 422 2(R)
responsibility 383 4(I)
honesty 357 5(I)
accountability 315 4(R)
compassion 290 7(R)
positive attitude 284 5(I)
fairness 279 5(R)
adaptability 257 4(I)
independence 228 4(I)
Level Personal Values (PV) Current Culture Values (CC) Desired Culture Values (DC)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
IRS (P)=6-4-0 IRS (L)=0-0-0 IROS (P)=0-0-2-1 IROS (L)=2-1-4-0 IROS (P)=1-2-2-5 IROS (L)=0-0-0-0
Swedish values, national perspective
cost cutting (L) 348 1(O)
environmental awareness 326 6(S)
unemployment (L) 325 1(O)
bureaucracy (L) 310 3(O)
uncertainty about the future (L)
271 1(I)
wasted resources (L) 266 3(O)
short-term focus(L) 260 1(O)
diversity 257 4(R)
educational opportunities 256 3(O)
financial stability 254 1(I)
employment opportunities 627 1(O)
financial stability 499 1(I)
concern for future generations
439 7(S)
democratic processes 313 4(R)
environmental awareness
326 6(S)
nature conservancy 295 6(S)
long-term perspective 289 7(S)
reliable utilities 273 3(O)
citizen participation 260 4(O)
educational opportunities
229 3(O)
Values Plot March 25, 2013Copyright 2013 Barrett Values Centre
I = IndividuellR = Relationsvärdering
Understruket med svart = PV & CCOrange = PV, CC & DC
Orange = CC & DCBlå = PV & DC
P = PositivL = Möjligtvis begränsande (vit cirkel)
O = OrganisationsvärderingS = Samhällsvärdering
Värderingar som matchar
PV - CC 0CC - DC 3PV - DC 0
Hälsoindex(PL)
PV-10-0CC - 4-6 DC-10-0
family 450 2(R)
humour/fun 442 5(I)
responsibility 360 4(I)
honesty 331 5(I)
accountability 327 4(R)
compassion 275 7(R)
positive attitude 267 5(I)
adaptability 239 4(I)
fairness 233 5(R)
friendship 227 2(R)
Nivå Personliga värderingar (PV) Nuvarande kulturella värderingar (CC) Önskade kulturella värderingar (DC)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
IRS (P)=5-5-0 IRS (L)=0-0-0 IROS (P)=1-1-1-1 IROS (L)=1-0-5-0 IROS (P)=1-1-4-4 IROS (L)=0-0-0-0
Swedish values, municipality perspective
UK Community & National Assessment
Current UK Community View
• quality of life• family• buy local• helpfulness• friendship• community services• safety• drugs/ alcohol (L)• uncertainty about the
future (L)• sense of community
Current UK Nation View
• bureaucracy (L)• crime/ violence (L)• uncertainty about the
future (L)• corruption (L)• blame (L)• wasted resources (L)• media influence (L)• conflict/ aggression (L)• drugs/ alcohol (L)• apathy (L)
Dialogue tools for Transformation
Quality in results
Quality in relations
Quality in thinking
Quality in actions
Why spend time on dialogue?The circle of quality – quality in all areas creates an amplifying system
Visible
Invisible
The four ground rules of dialogue
• Listen – with the intention of understanding, not answering
• Respect
• Await
• Speak undisguised
2023-04-1142
Citizen dialogue:
A generic term for models aiming at increasing the collaboration and co-creation between the citizens of a society and their elected decisiontakers
2023-04-1143
The Preera journey together with SALAR
Business network
Funding
2023-04-1144
Transformation toolbox
Facilitation experience
The 8 Success factors
Control questions as pre-requisites
1) Is the issue possible to influence?
2) Are we as decision makers willing to be influenced?
One out of two is not enough…
2023-04-1145
1. Only invite if real influence can be obtained
Development scenarios for influence
46
Distance Intimacy
Co-creation(empowerment)
Control(power)
”I am listening, asking questions, share, plant seeds and act!”
”I am managing and listening, but related to things on my agenda and on my terms!”
”I am open and listen but in reality not willing to change ”
”I am elected by the citizens! I know what the people want and need!”
Basic ideas
2023-04-1147
Information Collaboration
Service consumer Co-creator
Citizen participation – can be much more than just dialogue
Com
pete
nce
Degree of influenceLow High
Low
High
INFORMATION
CONSULTATION
DIALOGUE
IMPACT
CO-DECISION
Staircase of participation
The 8 Success factors
Wider range of options – more views on the topic
Greater chance to influence final decision
Higher ”Return on involvement”
2023-04-1149
2. Involve early in the process
Municipalities/ County Councils
Citizens
Proposal
Investigations, analysis, etc.
Protests
This is how it seems to be in Sweden todayEnergy
Time
Municipalities/ County Councils
Citizens
Proposal
Investigations, analysis, etc.
Dialogue
Panels, consultations, etc.
Implementation
Need for an alternative approachEnergy
Time
The 8 Success factors
Ensure a systematic approach that holds:
• Process
• Methods
• Execution
• Feedback
• Decision points that fits the needs in the specific case.
Then stick to the approach
2023-04-1152
3. Work systematically
Action listsStakeholder analysis
Communi-cation plan
Traditional project management toolkit
2023-04-1153
Understand Create Realize Learn/ReflectNeed Value
Project plan
The 8 Success factors
Prior to, and during a citizen dialogue process, identify and try to involve all groups and individuals affected by the issue.
Try to make them participate or forward their view.
Increase your efforts on groups who’s voices aren’t normally so
loudly heard.
2023-04-1154
4. Identify all the stakeholders
Target group analysisWhat are the characteristics of the target group of this initiative?
Act
ive
Affected
Little
Very
Less Much
A
B
The 8 Success factors
• Run the process on the terms of the citizens.
• If possible, try to incorporate with already existing arenas. Use information channels that are recognized by, and relevant for, the citizens.
• Also, try to make the participation attractive for different categories of citizens
2023-04-1156
5. Citizen focus
You might need different methods for different target groups
Act
ive
Affected
Little
Very
Less Much
A
BFocus groups
Citizen panels
SMS-surveys
Facebook groups Café
dialogues
The 8 Success factors
• When participating in citizen dialogue the politicians are not party politicians.
• The role is to be a representative from the political system aiming at establish a better platform for coming (party)political prioritizations and decisions.
2023-04-1158
6. Separate the roles
Separate learning from decisionmakingDefine the time in a meeting as part of the working process. Both are required!
LEARNING
DECISION
DialogueParticipation to gain influenceRespect for the differencesSystemical approach to be predictableQuestions drive power and energyFind alternatives in views and solutionsSeek for expertise in various places
AccountabilityMake decisionsChoose among the alternativesPrioritizeClear rolesAccept and loyalty
Green zone and Red zone issues
• I put my energy in areas where I have a possibility to actually have influence.
• I accept what I cannot influence.
• I understand the difference.
A way to define and manage the dialogue area
Areas that are NOT open to work with and alternatives aren’t being considered.
Issues that are outside the mandate and influence of the group.
Areas that are open to work with and to create alternative solutions.
Topics where the thinking and actions of the group might have real impact on the outcome of the issue.
GREEN ZONE RED ZONE
The 8 Success factors
Give feedback to those who are concerned and involved
• Progress
• Non-progress
• Appreciate the efforts
2023-04-1161
7. Continuous feedback
The 8 Success factors
• When implemented, align the way of working in the democratic process to include citizen dialogue.
• Politicians, officials, and citizens need to see and understand the process and the roles.
2023-04-1162
8. Align the way of working
Whole Systems Change
Powerful metrics that enable leaders to measure and manage cultures.www.valuescentre.com
64
Whole System Change
Individual
Collective
Interior Exterior
Character Personality
Culture Society
Leaders’ Values Change
Society Changes
Culture Changes
VISION
It's all about doing many things, simultaneouslyComplexity requires individual and organizational transformation, on many levels
STUKTUR
STRATEGY
STRUCTURE
CULTURE
LEADERSHIP
Change is difficult, and very personal!
Creating change is like passing through the eye of a needle, here symbolized by a door.
Any organizational change starts with personal change in the individual!
Are you ready?
Which "door" you need to pass? What motivates you to take that step?
Now!
Targeted future!
67
Values & Culture – Dialogue Tools and Materials(Nothing changes without dialogue!!)
Get ConnectedA practical guide to grow a desired culturewww.valuescentre.com/getconnected
Personal Values AssessmentDiscover and explore the values that influence your words and actions every daywww.valuescentre.com/pva
Why?
The Answer is Unity.What is the question?
Thank you for your time!
We would love to continue the dialogue with you:
Phil Clothier, Barrett Values Centre
+44 1706 82 4692
Emilie Widarsson, Preera
+46 708 43 90 66