LinkedIn Executive Education Research
-
Upload
forest-baker-phd -
Category
Education
-
view
165 -
download
0
Transcript of LinkedIn Executive Education Research
©2016 LinkedIn Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Executive
Education Survey
Key Findings
48% of attendees didn’t comparison shop EE programs
– Implication: Reach them early in the decision process. Don’t wait for them to find you.
Attendees are likely to recommend their program to colleagues
– Implication: Keep in touch with former attendees to increase word-of-mouth
recommendations
Senior leadership & HR teams (approvers) are a large referral source
– Implication: Make sure they are aware of your programs and how their org will benefit
Programs that are tailored to a specific function are very appealing
– Implication: Market your “tailored” programs to professionals in the appropriate functions
and industries.
Methodology
Sample: US LinkedIn members who listed “executive education” on profile
553 respondents completed the survey (Oct/Nov 2016)
16 questions in the survey
6-min average completion time
$10 incentive
Who Completed the Survey
Respondents were senior professionals:
92% had 10+ years of experience and 55% were Director+
N = 553
19 Median Years of
Experience
17%
38% 16%
29%
CXO/Owner/Partner
Director/VP
Manager
IndividualContributor
Seniority
10th Percentile = 10 90th Percentile = 31
Respondents represented a broad mix of functions
N = 553
Function
25%
4%
5%
6%
6%
6%
8%
15%
24%
Other
Consulting
HR/Legal
IT
Engineering/Product Management
Accounting/Finance/Purchasing
Marketing/Communications
Operations/Quality/Project Management
BD/Sales
The most common topic was management/leadership
N = 553
7%
4%
6%
9%
10%
16%
48%
Other
Nonprofit or Social Enterprise
Operations or Information Technology
Marketing, Public Relations, or Sales
Finance, Accounting, or Economics
Innovation, Strategy, or Growth
General Management, Leadership, or Corporate Governance
Executive Education Program Topic
EE program was not required for advancement
10% of respondents said that the EE program they completed was required by their organization for training or promotion
N = 553
Discovery
51% learned about their EE program through word of mouth
1%
13%
4%
9%
22%
24%
27%
I don’t know
Other
Advertising - digital, radio, mail, TV, newspaper, etc.
Found it while looking at a school’s website or program brochure
Found it while searching for executive education program on theweb
A colleague/peer told me about it
My boss or HR/training department told me about it
% of Respondents
N = 553
How did you first discover this executive education program?
Consideration
48% never researched/considered alternative programs
N = 553
Before you enrolled in this executive education program, did you research and consider similar programs offered by other universities or institutions?
1%
29%
22%
48%
I don’t know
Considered 2 or more other programs
Considered 1 other program
No - I did not consider other programs
% of Respondents
Employer Support
Most important factor in getting support from their employer:
They understood how their organization would benefit
47%
24%
20%
8%
4%
9%
18%
69%
The amount of time that you would miss work wasreasonable
The cost of attending the program was reasonable
The program was offered by a prestigious schooland/or instructor
Your employer understood how their organizationwould benefit from you attending the program
% of Respondents Who Assigned: Most Impact Least Impact
Among the following factors, which do you think had the most impact and which had the least impact on getting your employer’s financial support?
N = 428
Program Outcomes
Built Valuable Relationships
59% of respondents reported building valuable relationships with other attendees or instructors
N = 553
Gained Valuable Knowledge or Skills
89% of respondents felt that their program helped them gain valuable knowledge or skills
N = 553
Solved Actual Challenges
71% of respondents said the program helped them solve challenges that their organization faced
N = 553
Would Recommend EE Program to a Colleague
76% of respondents said they would recommend the EE program they completed to a colleague
N = 553
Ideal Program Features
Hypothetical scenario: Comparing two EE programs
Imagine that you were considering attending an executive education program
that:
Costs $15K (including room and board)
Is 6 days of full-time instruction (you will stay on location during the
program)
Take place at a university that is a 5-hour flight away
However, you found an alternative program that was exactly the same,
except for a few features. Among these features, which would be most
appealing and which would be least appealing about the alternative
program?
Participants were asked to assign “Most Appealing” and
“Least Appealing” to these 7 features
More tailored to your specific industry
More tailored to your specific function
Offered by a more prestigious/well-known university
Recommended by a colleague who took it in the past
Provided online with real-time lectures and discussions
3 days of full-time instruction (shorter)
Costs $5K (cheaper)
They evaluated 4 features at a time across 8 different sets
Validity check: The first 7 choices were used to predict the
last choice. Predictions were correct for 63% of respondents.
Use prior answers to predict respondents’ choice for “most appealing” in this set of features
Feature with greatest appeal to the entire market:
Program that is more tailored to a specific function
N = 350. Zero-centered, interval scale (based on LN(SQRT(M/L)). M = total “Most” votes, L = total “Least” votes.
Among these factors, which would be most appealing and which would be least appealing about the alternative program?
55%
25%
27%
20%
21%
15%
11%
13%
15%
20%
31%
35%
29%
32%
Online
Shorter
Recommended
Cheaper
More Prestigious
More Tailored to Industry
More Tailored to Function
% of Times Assigned Most Appealing Least Appealing
Relative Appeal of Features
100
85
78
75
47
37
0