LaSalle UNITS 1 AND 2 UFSAR, REVISION 22 AND FIRE … · 2016. 9. 16. · lasalle units 1 and 2...

LaSalle UNITS 1 AND 2

UFSAR, REVISION 22

AND

FIRE PROTECTION REPORT (FPR), REVISION 7

THE SECURITY SENSITIVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN REDACTED

FROM THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT.

THIS DOCUMENT PROVIDES THE REDACTED VERSION.

THE REDACTED INFORMATION WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT

IS INDICATED BY SOLID BLACKEDOUT REGIONS.

•

•

SCALEo 40 Miles~I5_~;;;;;j.iiiiIb 50 Kilometers~ H

SITEo

.....

•LA SALLE COUNTY STATION

UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.1-1

LOCATION OF THE SITE WITHINTHE STATE OF ILLINOIS

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

•

•

Township

LA SALLE COUNTY

0. __ 8 16 24

Scale in Miles

¥

LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.1-2

LOCATION OF THE SITE WITH RESPECT TOLA SALLE COUNTY AND BROOKFIELD TOWNSHIP

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

MAJOR STRUCTURES,ANT) Sll'J~ lAYOUT

LASALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANAI...YSIS REJ)O_R_T__~

. FIGURE 2.1 ..3

tr-. .M !fO 1000,.. -9SCAlf II 'rr,

\

I.

•

•

•I..ASALLE COUNTY STATION


FIGURE 2.1-4

f:XCLUSION AREA

··v·-[J-·-0-···0···I I

" " " II

Interstate Hi.ghways

U.S. Highways

State Highwoys

County Hi ghways

Railroads


FIGURE 2.1-5

TRANSPORTATION ROUTESIN THE SITE VICINITY

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

N

s

FIGURE 2.1-6

0-10 MILE INSE T

1970 AND PROJECTED POPULATIONSWITHIN 50 MILES


EAST SECTOR1970- 639941980- 691911990- 759642000- 837462010- 923282020-101794

1910 9339071960 . 11054431990 - 12375142000 - 136.. 361.2010 - 150"2072020 . 165837'

TOTAL POPULA TlON DISTRIBUTIONo . 50 MilES

ESE SECTOR1970-465511980-"90291990-535142000-589952010-650402020-7 t 710

ENE SECTOR1970-114318'980~133e20

1990-149"662000-1647922010-181F782020-200290

40769..237246095508175602161766

SE SECTOR1970- 152551980-148641990~ 159152000-175-172010-193502020-Z 1333

HE SECTOR1910-20762'91980-2661481990~3294742000-3632312010-4004772020-4 4101512

7173683072698013683897-42

SSE SECTORUHO~135"O

tteo-13Ze."80·142562000~ '5720'OtO~1r332

aOto- Ut108

800lH seCTOR1810-23&7718aO-2.tti1"0-213222000-3012720'0"'332082020-3.'1.

SSW SECTOR1970-135631980-146371D90-160602000-1770820'O-19&2~

2020-21522

1174913146, ..5....160331167819..89

SW SECTOA1970-.'1211980-422771990-458112000"505762010-557582020~e1A70

wsw SECTOR1970-24"611880-2S4511990-216902000~30S26

2010-336592020-37109

NORTk SECTOR1970- 6e3911~60- 8662i

NNW SECTOR l~aO- 9866e NNE Sl::C-OFl

1970·11487 2000~108186 /:;rO-177101

lV80-,S<$S5 2010-119938 1980-2g928

UU~O-20H~1 2020 -132229 h,9C-24,B26

2000~222eO~'·G'>?666·2

2010-2454' 2010-293935

2020-21056 2020-324678

.'315

NW S£CTOR5130266054

1910~32·U3 72829 100446H~80~32e11 80295 12068519aO~36681 88524 1355252000,,39228 1494112010-43251 1647272020,-41681 181617

1177824600 114341.871 3476 2031225277 3486 2239395817 3760 2468916415 .,45 2121907011 4510

5038

91727919498918

WNW &ECTOR 9989 1117531e10~&_e22

10983 1232.001180~5e273

12112 135834UtOO-e'088 13352 1497552000-87346 14720

20'0-1.2&3 91413807

2020~818669823

55856498

10711 71631187413093

7898

,.434 8707

~ST SECTOR1810-216181980-2260119~O-2~627

2000-21 t'512010-289342020-33005

c..•.~..•••....•..•.•:·••.1'.

NNWSECTOR1975-541980-541990-58

2000-602010-612020-62

FIGURE 2. 1-7

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

PRESENT (1975) AND PROJECTEDPOPULATIONS


TOTAL POPUlAliONo - 5 MILES

1975 - 1106

1980 - 1081

1990 - 1165

2000 - 12042010 - 12432020 - 1273

EASTSECTOR1975-461980-471990-502000-512010-522020-55

ESESECTOR1975-411980-411990-452000-,472010-472020-48

ENESECTOR1975~25

1980-251990-282000-2820 1O~292020-30

NESECTOR1975,3621980-3101990-4022000-4142010-4202020-425

331339368379384388

/

222224252626

1313141515 1615 179

191019 SE1120 SECTOR11

11 20 1975-3811 1980-39

25 1990-4330 2000-4434 2010-4533 2020-463232 SSE

SECTOR1975-431980-491990-552000-542010-532020-54

9910101011

t'.f __

SlCTOR1975-541980-551990-602000-622010-632020-64

161618181919

SOUTH SECTOR1975-381980-421990-482000-462010-472020-47

NORTH SECTOR1975-91980-91990-102000-102010-102020-11

131213131414

131314151515

313234353636

991010101 1

161212141516

SSWSECTOR1975-561980-611990-682000-542010-672020-68

594645535760

655566

565559646464

NWSECTOR1975-1241980-1101990-1142000- 1272010-1312020-135

131010121213

SWSECTOR1975-341980-281990-262000-322010-342020-36

WNWSECTOR1975-541980-451990-462000-522010-542020-57

wswSECTOR1975-621980--521990-542000-592010-642020-66

WESTSECTOR1975-671980-541990-552000-642010-662020-69

•

5 /0 Miles.'_==--=::::J_IIt'==::=:========::j1° 5 /0 Kilometers.


. FI GURE 2. 1-8

CITIES WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

FIGURE 2.1-9

,REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

25 Miles, ,

30 Kilometersj

SCALE

PRESENT AND PROJECTED POPULATIONCENTERS WITHIN 50 HILES OF THE SlTE


o 10~_ ......

Note:For details of populationcenters, see Table 2.1-7.

o 55- ...

1~!!!l~~~~~iIiiiiiii~~1o -5 Ki lometersl~5iiiiiiiiit."!!!!5iiiiiiiiiil!!!!!!t


FIGURE 2.1-10

TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND TRANSPORTATIONROUTES WITHIN THE LPZ

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

zo~..oJ:::> 10a.o0..

A

oAa

o

a

1980

oo

oo&

LEGENDo Na NN E6. NEo ENE

Curve based on SOO people/sq. mile


FIGURE 2.1-111980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN

50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 1 of 4)

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

zo~..oJ:::> 10a.o0..

A

oAa

o

a

1980

oo

oo&

LEGENDo Na NN E6. NEo ENE

Curve based on SOO people/sq. mile




REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

1980

t Aa

z <>0 8~..J::::> 10Q.0 iQ.

a

LEGENDo Ea ESE6 SE<> SSE

Curve based on 500 peoplelsq. mile




REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

1980

t Aa

z <>0 8~..J::::> 10Q.0 iQ.

a

LEGENDo Ea ESE6 SE<> SSE

Curve based on 500 peoplelsq. mile




REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

1980

AA A e

00 <> a

a<>a

z0

~..J:::> 100..0a.. Q

<>

LEGENDo sa ssw4 sw<> wsw

Curve baled on eoo people/sq. mile

o'--........-.r..---.L.---I'--..L.--£---"'----L_.l..--..&.__~ 10 20 30 40 50

MILES


FIGURE 2. 1-111980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN


REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

1980

AA A e

00 <> a

a<>a

z0

~..J:::> 100..0a.. Q

<>


Curve baled on eoo people/sq. mile

o'--........-.r..---.L.---I'--..L.--£---"'----A._.l..--..&.__~ 10 20 30 40 50

MILES


FIGURE 2. 1-111980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN


REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

1980

aa a

6 6

6 6 8 8a 8<>

z 00

~ 6.J::::> 10 aa..0 0a..

LEGENDo Wa WNWA NW<> NNW

Curve based on 500 people/sq. mile




REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

1980

aa a

6 6

6 6 8 8a 8<>

z 00

~ 6.J::::> 10 aa..0 0a..

LEGENDo Wa WNWA NW<> NNW





REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

2020


NNNENEEN E

LEGENDoaA<>

00

8i0

z 0 a0 A~..J a:;) 10Q.0Q.

A

<>

5 10




REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

2020


NNNENEEN E

LEGENDoaA<>

00

8i0

z 0 a0 A~..J a:;) 10Q.0Q.

A

<>

5 10




REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

LEGENDo Ea ESE• SE<> SSE

2020

Curve based" on 1000 people/sq. mile

,

0a

00

&,. ,.6 a

<>z 80

~-J:::) 10 9a.00... e




REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

LEGENDo Ea ESE• SE<> SSE

2020

Curve based" on 1000 people/sq. mile

,

0a

00

&,. ,.6 a

<>z 80

~-J:::) 10 9a.00... e




REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

2020



I

I 6z0

~4

..J:::> 10 aa..0CL.

<>

e


FIGURE' 2.1-122020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN


REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

2020



I

I 6z0

~4

..J:::> 10 aa..0CL.

<>

e


FIGURE' 2.1-122020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN


REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

LEGENDo wa WNWA NW .

<> NNW

Curve based on 1000 people/sq. m",le

2020

A

8

a Da

.6 A

8A .6 8a 8<>

<> 0

z A0

~ a..J 0:::) toa..~




REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

LEGENDo wa WNWA NW .

<> NNW

Curve based on 1000 people/sq. m",le

2020

A

8

a Da

.6 A

8A .6 8a 8<>

<> 0

z A0

~ a..J 0:::) toa..~




REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

•

•

•

01.-

I

0 10 20 KilometersP- M

,LEGENDAirports

o No paved runway

® No paved runway(Restricted use)

<> Hard surface runway


FIGURE 2.2-1

AIRPORTS AND FLIGHT PATTERNS WITHIN20 MILES OF THE SITE

REV. 2 - APRIL 1986

•

•

•

01.-

I

0 10 20 KilometersP- M

,LEGENDAirports

o No paved runway

® No paved runway(Restricted use)

<> Hard surface runway


FIGURE 2.2-1

AIRPORTS AND FLIGHT PATTERNS WITHIN20 MILES OF THE SITE

REV. 2 - APRIL 1986

SCALE

-- - ! o I - - - ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijji 0

Mi les

LEGEND

- Natural Gas Pipeline ._-- Refined Products Pipeline

(gasoline, kerosene, a LPG) •• _ •. Crude Oil Pipeline ••••••••. Diluent Pipeline

~ MILITARY FACILITIES

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.2-2 MILITARY FACILITIES AND

GAS PIPELINES WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE

REV. 18 - APRIL 2010

i I I ~

I I i I

I I i I :

~D:VlESS • •m....£"SON ""£BAG I• 3 3 5I

NO. OF TORNADOES CARROLl OGlE DE• 8 6PER COUNTY (1916-1969) KALB

54YEAR PERIOD WHITESIDE LEE 36 6

BUREAU5

5

4

LA SALLE

oSIT

LIVINGSTON5

VERMILION.......- ......19

CHRISTIAN

8 FAYETTE EFFINGHAM JASPER2 7 4-

CLAYMARION 22

WAYNEJEFFERSON 2

8

Scale of Mileso 20 40 60 80 100, .II,~=:lli!!!!!!!!!!!lt:'=::::i'__li:'=::::::ll

UNION• 4


FIGURE 2.3-1NUMBER OF TORNADOES PER COUNTY

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

~D:VlESS • •m....£"SON ""£BAG I• 3 3 5I

NO. OF TORNADOES CARROLl OGlE DE• 8 6PER COUNTY (1916-1969) KALB

54YEAR PERIOD WHITESIDE LEE 36 6

BUREAU5

5

4

LA SALLE

oSIT

LIVINGSTON5

VERMILION.......- ......19

CHRISTIAN

8 FAYETTE EFFINGHAM JASPER2 7 4-

CLAYMARION 22

WAYNEJEFFERSON 2

8

Scale of Mileso 20 40 60 80 100, .II,~=:lli!!!!!!!!!!!lt:'=::::i'__li:'=::::::ll

UNION• 4


FIGURE 2.3-1NUMBER OF TORNADOES PER COUNTY

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

Nr

w-

IS

0.26- . 3.01-8 1.50 7.00 .CALM· i IIIIUIIIC,tW'.

1.51- > 7.03.00

MPS

NOTE:ANNUAL VALUES BASED ONDATA COLLECTED OCTOBER 1.1976THROUGH S;'PTEMBER 30.1978

- E


FIGURE 2.3-2

ANNUAL WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

REV. 0 - APRIL 198

Nr

w-

IS

0.26- . 3.01-8 1.50 7.00 .CALM· i IIIIUIIIC,tW'.

1.51- > 7.03.00

MPS

NOTE:ANNUAL VALUES BASED ONDATA COLLECTED OCTOBER 1.1976THROUGH S;'PTEMBER 30.1978

- E


FIGURE 2.3-2

ANNUAL WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

REV. 0 - APRIL 198

NNW

w-

wsw

Ni

IS

NNE

SSE

NE

ENE

- E

J•

0.26- 3.01-8 1.50 7.00 .CALM I IIIUllllf;;:;ZM4Jd1.51- =- 7.03.00

MPS

,..-----------------,LA SALLE COUNTY STATION IUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT,

FIGURE 2.3-3OCTOBER 1976 AND OCTOBER 1977

WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

NNW

w-

wsw

Ni

IS

NNE

SSE

NE

ENE

- E

J•

0.26- 3.01-8 1.50 7.00 .CALM I IIIUllllf;;:;ZM_1.51- =- 7.03.00

MPS

,..-----------------,LA SALLE COUNTY STATION IUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT,

FIGURE 2.3-3OCTOBER 1976 AND OCTOBER 1977

WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

0.2:6,- 3.01-

8ALM 1.50 I SI~il~~I""C;4.-.:!*"'+"'<'~.. 1.51- . > :".0

3.00-MPS

N,

IS

- E


FIGURE 2.3-4

NOVEMBER 1976 AND NOVEMBER 1977WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

0.2:6,- 3.01-

8ALM 1.50 I SI~il~~I""C;4.-.:!*"'+"'<'~.. 1.51- . > :".0

3.00-MPS

N,

IS

- E


FIGURE 2.3-4

NOVEMBER 1976 AND NOVEMBER 1977WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

·NNW

NW

WNW12.95

w~...-........14.32

WSW11.23

sw

ssw

0.26 - 3.01-

8 1.50 7.00CALM ·~--C:=:::JnIlIIlIlG1!'JIII-"'!I$~·,*;~::I·3

1.51.- ;> 7.03.00

MPS

NI

s

NNE

NE

ENE

- E

ESE

SE

LA SALl.:E COUNTY STAT:ONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.3-5DECEMBER 1976 AND DECEMBER 1977

WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVELL- -:-~~~-.----

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

·NNW

NW

WNW12.95

w~...-........14.32

WSW11.23

sw

ssw

0.26 - 3.01-

8 1.50 7.00CALM ·~--C:=:::JnIlIIlIlG1!'JIII-"'!I$~·,*;~::I·3

1.51.- ;> 7.03.00

MPS

NI

s

NNE

NE

ENE

- E

ESE

SE

LA SALl.:E COUNTY STAT:ONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.3-5DECEMBER 1976 AND DECEMBER 1977

WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVELL- -:-~~~-.----

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

WNW

0.26- 3.01-8 1.50 7.00CALM I. Jlllllnll:·;:Z;,@U

1.51- > 7.03.00

UPS

NI

IS

- E

LA SAL~E COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.3-6

JANUARY 1977 AND JANUARY 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

WNW

0.26- 3.01-8 1.50 7.00CALM I. JIIIIIIUI:·;:Z;,@U

1.51- > 7.03.00

UPS

NI

IS

- E

LA SAL~E COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.3-6

JANUARY 1977 AND JANUARY 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

0.26- 3.01-e 1.50 7.00 .CA LM 1 111IIIJII tfMk·:{$I

. 1 .5. 1 ... > 7.0. 3.00

MPS

NI

- E

LA SALL.E COUNTY STATION. UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.3-7 t

FEBRUARY 1977 AND FEBRUARY 1978JWIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

._----REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

0.26- 3.01-e 1.50 7.00 .CA LM 1 111IIIJII tfMk·:{$I

. 1 .5. 1 ... > 7.0. 3.00

MPS

NI

- E

LA SALL.E COUNTY STATION. UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.3-7 t

FEBRUARY 1977 AND FEBRUARY 1978JWIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

._----REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

w-

0.26- 3.01-

8 1:.50 7.00CALM '---(1==:::lIJnJnUlJlJJ.!lllC!-f::':;'~""".1!:=-Z:}:-::3;••'

1.51- ;> 1.03.00

MPS

N

IS

- E

LA 5<ALLE COUNTY STATION.UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.3-8

MARCH 1977 AND MARCH 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LE;EL

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

w-

0.26- 3.01-

8 1:.50 7.00CALM '---(1==:::lIJnJnUlJlJJ.!lllC!-f::':;'~""".1!:=-Z:}:-::3;••'

1.51- ;> 1.03.00

MPS

N

IS

- E

LA 5<ALLE COUNTY STATION.UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.3-8

MARCH 1977 AND MARCH 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LE;EL

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

NNW

NW

WNW

w -

WSW

sw

ssw

8.026- 3.01-1.50 7.00

CALM I . UIJUUllflI:"'!C+""""c-:··-:ar.-1.51- :> 7.03.00

MPS

N

s

NNE

NE

ENE

- E

ESE

SE

SSE

LA SALLE COUNTY STATiON fUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT i

FIGURE 2.3-9

APRIL 1977 AND APRIL 1978WIND ROSE 37S-FOOT LE'~

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

NNW

NW

WNW

w -

WSW

sw

ssw

8.026- 3.01-1.50 7.00

CALM I . UIJUUllflI:"'!C+""""c-:··-:ar.-1.51- :> 7.03.00

MPS

N

s

NNE

NE

ENE

- E

ESE

SE

SSE

LA SALLE COUNTY STATiON fUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT i

FIGURE 2.3-9

APRIL 1977 AND APRIL 1978WIND ROSE 37S-FOOT LE'~

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

w-

0.26- 3.01-8 1.50 7.00CAL~ , nIiIIIiIrb:t:'~L~JMI

, 1.51- > 7.03.00

MPS

N

- E


FIGURE 2.3-10

MAY 1977 AND MAY 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

w-

0.26- 3.01-8 1.50 7.00CAL~ , nIiIIIiIrb:t:'~L~JU1

, 1.51- > 7.03.00

MPS

N

- E


FIGURE 2.3-10

MAY 1977 AND MAY 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

w-

0.26- 3.01-e 1.50 7.00CALM ~ I '111111111: t: ,::JI

1.51- > 7.03.00 '

MPS

NI

- E

LA SALLE COUNTY STAT!ON IUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.3-11 ~JUNE 1977 AND JUNE 1978 ,I,

WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVELI

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

NNW

NW

WNW

w-

wsw

sw

.026- 3.0'-8 1.50 7.00CALM I aunnu::::¥£.SG

1.51- :> 7.03.00

MPS

N

s

NNE

NE

ENE

-e

ESE

SE

SSE

LA SALLJ=: COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.3-12

JULY 1977 AND JULY 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

- -- -------------. - c·_ ..~·__ "

NNW

WNW

w-

wsw

sw

0.26- 3.01-e 1.50 7.00CALM I IIJUIIJlEt.:::::;;3

1.51-_ :> 7.03.00

MPS

NNNE

NE

ENE

-E

ESE

SE

11.05S


FIGURE 2.3-13

AUGUST 1977 AND AUGUST 1978WINO ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

a..-.....-------R~E~V~.~O-- ~A~P~R~I:"="L~1~9 8~4

w-

0.28- 3.01-

8A L M 1.50 I I~J;li~i~U ·:::SCJ£.

1.51- > 1.03.00

MPS

NI

-E

s


FIGURE 2.3-14

SEPTEr·mER 1977 AND SEPTEt1BER 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL

L.. ~~~~~~~JREV. 0 - APRIL 1984

"I.A'fT QIIIAOI I!L. , 10' -0"

100e ,. 100

100100..... 100

.00100... 10C:

.00100....100

100100

• 100

100100U. 100

100100

• .00

100100

••• .00

~ 100 1II0AO-IIIIII 100~ • 100""':r:! 100III 11I0"0:It 100

••• 100

e 100100

•• 100

'00too I!K 1II0AO

••• 100

100100 IItOAO

• 100

100 iii AD100 III0AO.... 100

100 11I0"0

"W 100

100TOO _III0AO -

N"W 100

100

OISTANCI U~,.. ISI

LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL ·SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.3-15

TOPOGRAPHIC PROFILES OF THE AREA 0 TO5 MILES FROM THE LA SALLE COUNTY STATIon

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

,.I,.AlfT (U"'O. IL.. rIO" 0"

10100

"OA~~It lOa

100100

NN. lOa

lOa100

.N'CANAl,.

lOa"."..

toO100....lao

lao100 CIIlIIK

/lao

lOa"OAO CI'IIK100 A.Ill. /

~... lOa

100100 C"IEK 7

II 100

lOa100 .....- AOAD CRUIK \ / "OAD

U. lao

100A ". AD '" A100

AOAO.~ laos! lOa! 100 ROAD CAllI(... lao

100100 "'OAO AOAO~

CII.IK

•• lOa

lOa100

••w

lao100

R.A •• 100

100100

WNW 100

lao100

HW 100

100100

NN. lao

lao

D'STAMCI (~II"111

LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL-SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.3-16

TOPOGRAPHIC PROFILES OF THE AREA 5 TO 10MIL ES FRO~1 THE I A S.4 I lE COUNTY ST.4TIO~:

....... ---------------------~REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

10 MilesJo,~.C::l.IBI.II::JMiI·"=~~K i Iometers

5

l

-----Y--:S::T~AT iONr' LA SALLE ~~E~~rNALYSIS REPORT ..I UPDATED_F_~f_JA_L_________ :

7 tFIGURE 2.3-1 "

Q MT I C ~r-u T"l .:1. 1· -. I. l.. - 'fJ:"~ATURES ~~ 1'0' ;.~.~'1 5TATI C'l ITOPOGRAPHIS'J~'"LA SALLl:. C v"AlpRIL 1984 rRADI US OF i ~.'- REV.

REV.

o, 10 MilesI----

10 KilometersI

TY STATIONLA SALLE ~OF~T~ ANALYS IS REPORTUPDATED FINAL SA

FIGURE 2.4-1

SITE LOCATION PLAN

o - APRIL 198


FIGURE 2.4-2

HYDROSPHERE

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

F

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

:,

F

SURFACE WATER WITHIN A 5-MILE RADIUS OF THE PLANT SITE

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

°0 FIGURE 2.4- 3

GENERAL SITE PLAN

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

•

2000 0LiI rl

FEET2000 4000

; ;6000,


FIGURE 2.4-4

DRAINAGE AREA

REV. 0 - APRIL 1~

320300

I-0:::o~Q..o

280260240220140 160 180 200RIVER MILES ABOVE GRAFTON, ILLINOIS

12010080604020

g3 I I ~ ¥ (!)

-' H.W.+5.7 L.W.Df~Oz-I--. r-1'----- .J-

fLO~PORiPOOL(Illa olzg~ ze

-I<DCL':o .J_-Ix

~d5~

..to0-O~ ~ UJ. 2~9 cll&.la: ,~

il~cDBRANDON ROAD POOL ./ UJ..J

r-- - IQ-J ~2«z .!1~40 ZescD

~~ /~ (1)0

:1-9 1-' V~ ~ DRESDEN iSLAND poo':,jdS..J ,..-;-r~--:d ' II

I g ~»: /' I...J G: / •~----.-,- i -, I hJi MARS~'=!..S_P..29U /0

1/II: UJ

"" ! ~ ./ ....-~ :2 c~

"-~Q ~ //0: -c(/) ,.

f.0 dS /(f)~ 1943 HIGH WATER" STARVE 0 ROC K POOL I(IS ~-0. U_s- _....--

..-- - .. _, ..!LLINOIS_ ~ pLAJt£$ _CHICAGO SANITARY_0- 1-----zt'n ¥ ~--- I-0 0

--I -- RIVER RIVER ,- - SHIP CANAL -...J- 9 ~---- I-J<n ---- c(-'" I1--"'-"- 0:

A )

.. i------_.~ 0 I ~I~~% ~-- ... L&JZ 0.. PEORIA POOL j t=J::lt-f-

~ .-~-----J\j~ ~o~~ -----~ I

10-- --<.!)

f (1)1 x )..OW WAlkER DATUM (,L.W.OJ(.!) ~---- :3 LA GRANGE P~OL I >Iz FOR LAKE MJCHIGA••i= .... w _~- -- ~---~--- rvvV ZIUl =576.8 rNTI~RNAT'ONAL

u

~ / ::) crzr' A 01° GREAT LAKES DATUM (I.G.L.D.);:)..., ALTON POOL r--_ o ·(/) (I,...- ---,.....---- J ~ ..-.J \I··\r-.j witt:

~ -'JWTHALWEG -J>~iX

~~'r- «~

-'tv-----~ II._'----_.'_._-390

o

~90

580

510

~60

~50

540

..; e300«<ft 520N(ft

..Jera

<n2

500to-LL

490~

480enz0 470....c>w 460.Jw

480

440

430

420

410

400

SOURCE: REFERENCE 2.4- ILA SALLE COUNTY STATION


FIGURE 2.4-5

ILLINOIS WATERWAY PROFILE

REV. 0 - APRIL 1914

LSCS - UFSAR

Rev. 14, APRIL 2002

800 r-------,--------r------.-----.,------.,-------,

6543

TIME IN HOURS

2

--0+---- 768 CFS (USED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OFI FLOOD HYDR7GRAPHS) IREFERENCE 71. FOR COMPARISON ONLY}

600 I-----if---+--+-I--+---+-----+-----+-----l------l

700 +---~-......-~ ----+------+-----+------+-------1

500

(I)l.L.0

~ 400l.L.l.L.0Z:::>a:

300

I200

I100


FIGURE 2.4-7

15-MINUTE UNIT HYDROGRAPHS

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

• • •

LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANAlYSIS REPORT

104 -JUl~

.-L&Jl&Ju..

103 ~

.JbJ>I.&J-J

702 a:t.LI.-c:(~..J..Ji=

701 U)

w:I':cf-J

700

250200150100·50

l43,880 CF S, PEAK P tie fr

704.3 FT. MSL MAXIMU.. LAKE LEVELr,\. ..\.

"

'.' .., ........................r

lLAK[ SnLLW4TER LEVEl WITH

"""-.. ..--...,oo-'T. LONG AU.ILlA,V SPILLWAY

..........._.....(~REST ELEVATION 702.1 fT. MSL)

..-"- L /l " ....... , , I

i "-..--...--,..-"--"'--'

.1, / ..~ ..""'"!I!

.'/',-... .......... .,.,

t7,760 CFS, PEAK SPF r+-PW, HYORGGR"PH

r---~SPF "'fOR06RAPH

~ l J \r-"\. ..-.r-L..~

10

oo

15

30

40

I.&Jto!)ex 20c:(J:UUl(5

TIME IN HOURS FIGURE 2.4-8HYDROGRAPH OF PMF WITH ANTECEDENT SPFMIl VARIATION Of LAKE lEVEL WITH TIME~-------------_ ....REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

• • •

------AREA

----- CAPACITY

ELEVATiON AREA CAPACITY(fEET MSL) (ACRES) (ACRE- FEET)

610 15 20

680 512 1883

690 1537 132 U

700 20&8 31106

702 2162 35926

103 219~ 38t04

704 2248 40332

106 2295 44875

o500IN ACRE S

lOOO

AREA150020002500

" ~. V\

/\\\ /\V

~

/ \~

V ~

V \,/' \~ ,

V \\

/ \ ,,V ",

/ ...~,

'"".i/ -'ro-,

" \.\.".;,

"\\

685

67

705

710

670

700

680

-Jen~

t- 695wwl.L

z 690ot-ea:>w-oJW

LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAl SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

665o 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000CAPACiTY IN ACRE-FEET

35000 40000 45000

fIGURE 2.4-9

AREA AND CAPACITY OF LAKE

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

• • •

RATE OF fLOW IN CFSELEVATION THROUGH THROUGH(fEETMSU ~~~lta:,~ ~~RVlCE TOTAL

lLLWAY100.0 0 t80 180101.0 0 leO l80

702.0 0 180 180702.5 0 180 t80103.0 314 l82 496704.0 1661 182 1849

--f-106.0 6175 183 6358"---

f I ~VI /~",""t---OlSCHARGE THROUGH ~I SERVICE SPILLWAY .,,"i l ... ",'"

I OISCHARL THROU6H .......~.I· AUXIUARY SPILLWAY ~,."

';"':::"'-TOT AL

i· .., '" IHSOtARGE~",.

705

706

0::5 702~1-----.J------+-----l------i------I-------II--------t

>0:LUUlLU0:

..JCIl:Et- 704LUwU.

~

Zo 703

~w..JLU

701

70003000 4000 5000DtSCHARGE IN C.F. S.

2000100 --...'----_.__-L__-__-J. ---l~ .l__ ..L_ ...J_ ......

o 1000


FIGURE 2.4-10

OUTFLOW RATING

REV. 0 - APRIL 1994

o 4900SCALE: FT. LA SALLE COUNTY STATION

UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT+.... -

FIGURE 2.4-11

PLAN OF AUXILIARY SPILLWAY

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

• • •

SC4lE IN FEET


FIGURE 2.4-12

CENTERlINE SECTION OFAUXILIARY SPILLWAY

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

• • •

SECTION A-A 10 8 6 4 2 0 10,...,.,-...-SCALE IN FEET

20i

LA SALLE COUNTY STATtONUPDATED FINAL SAfETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.4-12a

CEHlERt'HE SECTION OFAUXILIARY SPILLWAY

(t-tOOIFIEO)REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

••

•tOF

AUXILIAR

YSP

ILLW

AY(STA

.346

+001

_----

700'

685'

695'

690'

EL.70

5'

c: -0 or

~>

r-~(I)

0.,,>

»2

c:en

......-tr

><.....

.zr

......-t"

~P1

r-e

............0

en(,/)·n

:r:a......

c=;::oz

::c~O

-<)::II

fT1

r-""e

Ul

N~z

-a(/').

......

fT1

~~-t

r-n

I,-t

.....z-<

:E.t-t

w::t:-

»0

r(J)

-<:z

-<-t

a~~

"Vl-t

~6

~z

;:0 -I

o ~ to ~ H ~ ......

\0 00 ~~ t%j <: .

•

FIGURE 2.4-13a

SERVICE SPILLWAY PLANSCALE FEET

8 4 0 4 8 12 16t'""""""I MijMPLAN•

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

•

•SECTION F-F

8 4 0 4 8 f2 16~

SCALE FEE T

UNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.4-13b

SERVICE SPILLWAY SECTIONS

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

(1.3)A'

(2.0)G,

(2.3)F2

(2.3) FI

2000 1000 0 2000i i

SCALE IN FEET

(0.6) c'

(1.4)C,

(2.8)F ~~~(2-.48)~E-,~~(-a~9~)E~~~-~-.48)~D-2~~-(-a42)~D~(2~)C2

•( ) FREEBOARD REQUIRED IN FEET

FOR 40MPH SUSTAINED OVERLANDWINOS IN MOST CRITICAL DIRECTION

LA SALLE; COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.4-14

FREEBOARD REQUIREMENTS

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

705.7'

4000

FEET

o 2000

SCALE

! 705.7'

LEGEND

!TOP OF 81KE/TOP OF ROADt~IO N LELEVAn N ;'1:LEVATION

2 +00 1705,0 I ! 705 7 I

22+00 ! 706.0' I 706.7'

82+00 ! 706.0' /706.7'

99+00 /706.S' I 707.3 t

202+00/705. O' I 705.7'195+00/706.0' I 706.7'

1173+00 /706.0' /706.7'

707. 3~


FIGURE 2.4-15

TOP-OF-DIKE AND TOP-OF-ROADELEVATIONS

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

2 + 00 1105,0 1 / 105 7 1

• 22+00 / 106.0' I 706.7'

82+00 ! 106.0' /706.7'

99+00 /706.S' I 707.3 1

105.7'

/705.7'

LEGEND

!TOP OF 81KE/TOP OF ROAD t ~IO N LELEVAn N ~LEVATION

o 2000 4000

SCALE FEET

202+00/705.0' I 705.7'

195+00/706.0' I 106.7'

1173+00 /706.0' 1706.7'

707. 3~

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.4-15

TOP-OF-DIKE AND TOP-OF-ROAD ELEVATIONS

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

•

2 + 00 /705 0' / 705 7 '

• 22+00 / 706.0' / 706.7'

82+00 /706.0' /706.7'

99+00 /706.6' / 707.3'

•

347+81.7 705.7'

344+18.3/705.0' /705.7'

LEGEND

ITOP OF 8IKE/lOP OF ROAD t ~IO N LELEVATI N LELEVATION

o 2000 4000

SCALE FEET

202+00/705.0' /705.7'

195+00/706.0' / 706.7'

1,73+00 /706.0' /706.7'

707. 3~

LA SALLE COU NTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.4-15

TOP-OF-OIKE AND TOP-OF-ROAD ELEVATIONS

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

NOTES

LEGEND

• Public ground water supplywithin 10miles

5,Scale in Miles

a.. '5

'-

FIGURE 2.4-16

MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL GROUNDWATERUSE WITHI~ 25 MILES

2. Data for major municipal andindustrial pumping centerswithin the regional area orepresented in Table 2.4-13.


l Data for public ground watersupplies within 10 miles arepresented in Table 2 _4 -14.

3. Base map modified from USGSt

I: 250.000 series (topoqraphic).Aurora, Jllinois (Nt< 16 -7) J 1958,and Peorio) Illinois (NK 16-10).1958 (limited revision 1968).

, Major municipal or industrialpumping center

•REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

REV. 0 – APRIL 1984

SYSTEM SERIES GROUP OR FORMATION

HYDROGEOLOGIC UNIT

DESCRIPTION HYDROGEOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS

Richland Loess

Glacial Drift Aquitard

Silty clay or clayey silt ______________________ Silty clay or clayey silt with interspersed sand and gravel, some thin sand and gravel pockets

Ground water occurs predominantly in thin sand and gravel pockets within the glacial drift. Yields are quite variable and typically low, suitable only for domestic and farm purposes. Wells or cisterns that intersect the more permeable zones may exhibit high, short-term yields. The glacial drift aquitard locally overlies the buried bedrock valley aquifers.

Wedron Formation

QU

AR

TE

RN

AR

Y

Pleistocene

Buried Bedrock Valley Aquifers

Sand and gravel, some silt

The buried bedrock valley aquifers consist of sand and gravel deposited in channels cut into the underlying Pennsylvanian strata. Ground water occurs under water table conditions. Where the glaciofluvial deposits are clean and well-sorted, yields of 100 gpm or more can be sustained.

Missourian Modesto Formation Carbondale Formation

Desmoinesian Spoon Formation

PE

NN

SY

LV

AN

IAN

Atokan Abott Formation

Pennsylvanian Aquitard

Principally shale, with some interbedded under-clay, sandstone, lime-stone, and coal

Ground water occurs primarily in thin sandstone beds and occasionally in joints in thin limestone beds. Ground water occurs under leaky artesian conditions. The high proportion of shales make the Pennsylvanian strata generally unfavorable as aquifers. Yields are low and are suitable only for domestic and farm purposes.

Galena Group Platteville Group

Galena- Platteville dolomites

Dolomite and limestone, locally cherty, sandy at base, shale partings

Champlainian

Ancell Group

Glenwood- St. Peter sandstone

Sandstone, shale at top, little dolomite, locally cherty at base

OR

DO

VIC

IAN

Canadian Prairie du Chien Group

Eminence Formation Potosi Dolomite Franconia Formation

Prairie du Chien, Eminence, Potosi, and Franconia dolomites

Sandy dolomite, dolomitic sandstone, cherty at top, inter-bedded shale in lower part

Ironton Sandstone Galesville Sandstone

Ironton- Galesville sandstone

Cam

bria

n-O

rdov

icia

n A

quif

er

Sandstone, upper part dolomite

Ground water occurs under leaky artesian conditions in the sandstones and in joints in the dolomites. Yields are variable and depend upon which units are open to the well. In terms of the total yield of a well penetrating the entire thickness of the Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer, the Glenwood-St. Peter sandstone supplies about 15 percent, the Prairie du Chien, Eminence, Potosi, and Franconia dolomites collectively supply about 35 percent, and the Ironton-Galesville sandstone supplies about 50 percent.

Eau Claire Aquitard (upper and middle beds)

Shales, dolomites, and shaly dolomitic sandstone

Insignificant amounts of ground water may occur in joints. These beds act as a confining layer between the Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer and the Mt. Simon Aquifer.

Eau Claire Formation

CA

MB

RIA

N

Croixan

Mt. Simon Sandstone

Mt. Simon Aquifer Sandstone

Ground water occurs under leaky artesian conditions. Ground water in this aquifer is too highly mineralized for most purposes. Adequate supplies for municipal and industrial use are more easily obtained from shallower aquifers.

LA SALLE COUNTY STATION NOTE UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS

REPORT 1. Modified from Willman et al., 1975; Hoover and

Schicht, 1967, p. 4; and Csallany, 1966, p. 4 FIGURE 2.4-17

SITE STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS AND THEIR HYDROGEOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS

5 0 5 10••1::11-11::1*'-=====::1.__iii'Scole in Miles

ContDur interval is 50 feet.

Ground water within the area of diversion flowstoward pumping centers aloug the Illinois River.

Elevation of Illinois River at Marseilles Damis 483.25 feet MSL.

2.

3. Datum is mean sea level.

5.

4.

NOTESJ. Modified from Hoover and Schichf,1967,p.l6, Figure 24.

LEGEND__ 450 _ Potentiometric surface contour,

Cambrian - Ordovician Aquifer, Fall, 1963.

_ ______.. Boundary of area of diversion due toground water withdrawals.

T38N

T39N

T37N

1 T32N

I T36N

I R 5EI R4EI R2E I R3EI R IEI RH E

I ~

LA SALLE /Sit~\ !i/~ /

I \K500

1 '---I R2W T --R-'-W- I -R-'-E- -I R 2 E r-R-3-E-"&--- I R 5 E

I RfOEI R9E---..r--

I RaE

BUREAU450 -_---r""I

T21N I

I R8E

T22N I

Tt8N

TI7N

Tl6N

T20N J

TI9N

T'5N


FIGURE 2.4-18

POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF THECAMBRJAN-ORDOVICIAN AQUIFER, FALL 1963

REV~ 0 - APRIL 1984

5 0 5 10• •• ,J

Scate in Miles

~

Datum is mean sea level.

Elevation of Illinois River at Marseilles DamIs 483.25 feet MSL.

Contour Intervol Is 5Of••t.

Ground water east of the ground water

divide flows to the 80St - southeast toward(or98 cones of depressIon developed In thegreater metropolifan region around Ch!cogo;west of the divide J ground water flows to thesouth,and locally to the north, toward pumping

centers located along the Illinois River.

Modified from Sosman et 01. f 1973)p.21, Figure 10.

",.-- -- Ground water divide

Potentiometric surface contour J-650-Cambrian - Ordovician Aquifer ,October,J971

LEGEND

~NOTES

T36N

T38N

T37N

T39N

T31N

R7E I

R6E I R7E

R4E

2.

T35N3.

4.T34N

5.

T33NMORRt~

o \ ~'400 J 0

"450 T32N

Site

\\\'\\

--650

__J_-6'0o

Tt8N

I R8 E IRE I R ICE I RilE I R I E I R 2 E I R3 E I R4 E I R 5 E

T22N ILEE - - ~vr-"J_ - - --

T21N

Tj5N

T16N

Tl7N

Tl9N

T20N I


FIGURE 2.4-19

POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF THECAMBRIAN-OROOVICIAN AQUIFER, OCTOBER 1971

REV. 0 - APRIL !IN

'. i H ',11

LEGEND.' Domestic water well

:-beep well installed for La SalleCounty Station

• CoteQory ( 5 tructure

o Coolin~ toke.-- ... - Property line

NOTES

I. Domestic wen dato are presented inTo bl e 2.4 - t 5 according to well num-bars.

2. Base maps modified from USGS15 minute series (topographic) t

Odell Quadrangle, Illinois, 1958, and

USGS 7.5- minute series (topographic),

Marseilles Quodran9te, tllinois, 1970.

3. Data for the water wells installed for

La SoUe County Station are presented

tn Tobte 2.4- II •

4. Contour interval is 10 feet.

1000 0 1000 2000.-. ' 1

Scale in Fetf

LA SALLE COUNTY STATfONJPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.4-20

DOMESTIC WELL INVENTORY, INCLUDINGLSCS WATER WELLS

R,EV ~ 0 .- AJ?l~,IIJ

•, ,

'I

--~

c ,'._

....:-.....~

\.1

«.\~;'" <;....

40-12

F, ~~'~c_

l ... - ~

~)

~~ -~

"tS--·;6'0

\ "

...... '~--"':::"'<'-

//' t.'_:~_~~_~:_:~~~;-"'-;

,

"~""

"\

• i'~Z!-O-OlH.[:

n1"1 /._, ,

-;//

NOTES ?O{X) 0--=-~~-=-

Scolo In ...,

2000

•.. Ptezometer instolled May 28, 1970

thr_ October 30, 1973.

• Observation weB, instoUed DecemberJ 1974.

----Property line

~ Category I Structure

CooII09 Ioke

l. Dates of piezometer installation andfrequency of measurement are gil/enin Table 2.4 - 16.

2. Dotes of water level measurement oreshown in TabJe 2.4-17 .

3. Water level fluctuations in se lectedpiezometers are shown in Figure 2.4-22'}addft ianel unplatted pj ezometer dataare pr e s en ted in Table 2.4 - 18,

4 - W0 t er Ieve Iffuc tua t10nsin, theobservation wells are shown InFigure 2.4-23~

~), Contour interva I is 10 feet.


FIGURE 2~4-21

LOCATIONS OF PIEZOMETERS ANDOBSERVATION WELLS

REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

670

674

658

662

682

688

694

666

690

706

678

698

D.C......" 10!J .I9.u25

MARCHFEBRUARY.JANUARY

2!Q) 682 t-i--oo+'"--+-~~~"""""~--+---"+--'~~--+-~~~~""""""~""""""~~-"'~""""""'~'

j~2 678 ..........+--t+--~~~~---~'-.....Q)

Eo~ 674 ....,...~.-.+-"'-i~~~~I----+-~-+....,-;....+-~~.............~~..;-.~~----+-"-+----..-..+-" ...........CD....oa..

;:+686---..

4.0

3.0mtmffiEimtffiEm& 2.0

1.0

0.0OCTca~R

.s 4.0 Et- ~4frJf:!1J=IrP:i:+ ~'+-o>:~........t·'h--t~:-:-+c~~t~:~'''';~~~4',tt~.1~,L1::'t ..tt+,·q·-,r.t.H.t.+#~+i' +r+i..,....~!--t"'<-t:~+t....H-.::::'~::H:3.0 ~:..;..~ =1',,,' ...t,H'-<-;"~""'" '''';'''''1."'-''_.. ~"'';_'" ~.~~~~..l~~ . .j..++-.. -++.........

~ ~;.:t" +t... 1""++~·~·b+H'-'-;"i.,~-!,,·~ t""-r~-r1..,·~~~~···~··t"H"+""+H+2.0 ' H"" .,' ..-0 k--+-,·'H ;...'~~.4-.l-t+~+h--~·f+'''1·'~·''·-~-t·f-o.+~'''+I;+·'·-i1"'~''·H·+T''':'

~++-""'''''J~'M·h~,.. ,...t··,-",~~~ .• +-,-+~-+2 :_'~+"'~-j.+'t--t'rM~r;r ..t+1:;;;t~+t:+t.: ..1·4tr-"~-i·"""'·'·"·'rl'-+-·'~~+,->-j.t..+..--:t+l1,+...+~·~~.. ;"'._..tt-l..''';:~'J-~',+t~:~+~~'4'~~:.~~":,: ..c:1.':t..~:.t.

1.0 '~T H- -,..·:ttJ......" :~: +~ "w. ~·~-+-+t#·J-H-l~+~--~+t-H·~·+·H-ttt.!Utt::Wm:t~mtt; rl- f.t:" . ;...1- H~:H.7~t:tt~1 !-ttl ~ 4 r+-:+r ,d. i-'H..,"~'+~'-"""'f.-'+o0 1+++-4+H+++:"7 ...-t~~·-i+r;'++h ...+~+!-'+t H-r f.-i.+·H·++-'--tt·m....t+r1 +H ~ ~--HJ.!-h-·'~t"+H"""!4'~·~~-->-i!

· S to 15 20 2& 8 10 1e 20 2S ~ to t& 20 25JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH

NOTES 1970

installation J surface elevations, tested intervals J andmeasurements are given in Table 2.4- 16.

Potentiometric revels are inferred

Locations

between dates of measurement.


FIGURE 2.4-22DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONS

OF WATER LEVELS IN PIEZOMETERS(SHEET 1 of 4)

within theAll piezometers are insto liedglacial drift aquitard .

5.

offrequency

Figure 2.4- 21.inore shownof piezometers

oflevel

Dateswater

I.

3.

2.•4. Precipitation data were recorded at the Marseilles Lock,4fo21' N

88°451

W Long ..Lat. , REV. 0 APRIL 1984

£ 4.0 J::4++8'~1+'!!++-trL!'1':r·,~fT·_::=t- r:.IT--~t!1,.~r;':.-,-!!.··t:!=-stnt.:r·~·'!':tmrP+tmr~h4~ ++- .-,...~~~~.~ 1'-,·--H·'·r-·'+;"" ~·"'r-~t'~··,·,...f··,..",.,H-~···+'''~''~-~+~~-4-+i·+'

• ~ ..........~ ~"" ' •."'7 ,.... f.J....+~,..-o .. ~>o~+·;"".-..,+I··~

to itS 20 215FEBRUARY

NOTES 1971

706

702

690

686

682

678

670

666

658

H,.t+t!'+'h'_+~"'H'+rlt+++t+H-i1H-ttH'"4.0rtTtt1~tt;ttttiittmt:t:¢t113.0~~~~~~,~+HtJ; 2.0

1.0_ ..........................IoooW.oII-..~ 0.0

2. Dotes of installation, surface elevations, tested intervals, and frequency ofwater level measurements.' are given in Table 2.4- 16.

L Locations of piezometers are shown in

3. Potentiometric levels are inferred

4.. Precipitation data were recorded88°45' W Long.

Figure 2.4- 21.

between dates of measurement.

at the Marseilles Lock,41°21 1 N Lat.,

5. All piezometers are installed within theglacial drift aquitard.




REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

DECEM.EIt10 18 20 28 706

702

698

694

690

686

682, .

678

674

670

666

662

658

3. Potentiometric levels ore inferred between dates of measurement.

4. Precipitation dato were recorded at the Marseilles lOCk , 4f o 2f' N Lot.,88°45' W Long ..

2. Dotes of installation, surface elevations, tested intervals, and frequencywater level measurements ore given in Table 2.4- 16.

NOTES

L Locations of piezometers are shown in Figure 2.4-21.

of

5.

1970

AI f piezometers are installedglaciol drIft oquitard.

within the




REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

..-......J 690 ......~..;.+olI---~~~~"""""-~~~~~~~""""-";'''''--+-~~

'to-+ 686

~~ 682 ..........~--+----t---...;....,.~~+-:--+---t._+---+-- ..............~~4-~-+~ ..............O+--..............---....---~-+4l-l

o~i:

liE.Q...c:CD....oQ..

706

686

682

678

674

670

666

662

658

of installation, surface elevations, tested intervals, andlevel measurements are given in Tobie 2.4-16.

between dotes of measurement.3. Potentiometric leveh are inferred

3.02.01.00.0

~ te 15 20 2!5JANUARY

NOTES

J. Locations

2. Dateswater

of piezometers are shown jn Figure 2.4-2 r.

frequency of

JUl.(

1971

5. All piezometers ore installed wIthin the

glacial drift aquitard.

4.0

3.02.0Lv0.0




4. Precipitation dato were recorded at the Marseilles Lock, 41°21 ' N Lat.,880 45 J W Long.

REVe 0 APRIL 1984

720

710

-J 700en:E.po."to- 690+J!2<J.) 680>Q)......J

.S:2 6702l-.......(1)

E0..... 660c:<I,)+-0C-

It 650

640

630

620

c.Q"0......."0..oell\-.a...

FEBPUARY ,l,PRIL DEC.......1S ao.e

ITl2F£gffiBN1~~__9 740

720

710

700

690

680

660

630

620

. ; ;- -'.- "j'-'" -"'~- ~?, i+y~'~ .H" -~---H-"----' ~ ..~ ... ,--;".,-, ;--I'-'--'--f'-i"+'-+~+ 'f -H-t 4.03.0

2.0

1.00.0

NOTES

I. Locations of observation weJls are shown in Figure 2.4-21.

2. Surface elevations of the observation wells are given inTable 2.4 -17.

3. Observation weJls were installed during December 1 1974.The average depth is 25 ft.; granular backfill was placedaround the lower 8 ft. of each obser/offon well. All ob-servation wells are installed in the glacial drift oquitordi

1975

4. Dates of woter JIve' rneosuremenfs are shownin Table 2.4-17; potentiometric Jevels are in-ferred between dof.1 of mealuremen t,

5. Precipitation doto wlr. recorded at the MarseillesLock, 41°2'-N., 88°4e'W.


FIGURE 2.4-23DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONSOF WATER LEVELS IN OBSERVATION WELLS

(SHEET 1 of 4)REV~ 0 ~ APRIL 1984

.5c:o:.;::~0..()Q)a:

4.0 ~~~tm':1mtt:ttttTt:tr::rtrt'i'!:ttrt::'~tt!1'!1~::r.ttt11".tt!!ttttr:tr:tr::t:rr~t:'Ttt!

3.0 J,+~~~~~~..-4+-h-:.

2.0 ..,..'1~~+t#~~~~irl~~~~.

1.0 ~~i+"-r.~~.~++~~~W

O.0 "'-""";'i5~-''''''O''''''''1'''''~~Z'''''''O''''''''''''~-'

JANUARY

NOTES

740

730

7?O

710

700

620

:,c>T?~~",,"r;~'~~>'i~';-?;r'Tfrr:rrm+rJ~G:~rrr;'''r~='t::~ttfT7::r:rr~r:rr:T:::1TTI:'T!7T:-p"~:'ITr::"Y~':-~rTrrrrr-'-:r~~i~:rr:mtrrITr;r:Tr;nJJrn-rrc~rTnTt,nrr::Trn:Trrn:r~~+r!Pt!'t1t1mnn:ttttm!l,4.03.0

2.01.00.0

1975

I.. Locations of observation wefts are shown in Figure 2 .. 4-21.

2. Surface elevations of the observation wells are given inTable 2 ..4-17.

3. Observation wells were installed during December t 1974.The average depth is 25 ft .. ; granular backfill was placedaround the lower 8 ft. of each observation well. AI t ob-servation wells are installed in the glacial drift aquitard.

4.. Dates of V«1ter !eveI measurements ore shownin Tobie 2.4 -17; potentiometric leve Is are in-fe rred between dotes of meo su rement .

5.. Precipitation data were recorded ot the MarseillesLock ,41°21 r N., 88045 t W..



(SHEET 2 of 4) IREV. 0 - APRIL 1984

680

690

710

650

620

740

630

660

640

670

730

720

700

DECEM.atS 10 111 .0 ••

710

~ to HS 20MARCH

4.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0

4.0 ~!T!!:f'!'1+P~+++t:1+tP1t!T!+tmtt"J:rrt'4+NT1~+mHrnH+!',... rn1".:+ymb"+...m-,-rp~..-.m~,,#· ;::mHTm:rp:p+n+++rrr+++1l

3~0 ~~ri-l<_~--"i'-"'-'~-t1~ ~ri-H-t-H-t·'l---'-·H-+i'C.......,.·t . "'~1":"f--" t:--+°--th-Y-H-h.,.·~+.l-...~-.r. ~+·'..-t""f-++f+H-H+H··'-~~·~'J"~ "T;"1:~t0";"'H"'·· .C"+-t-t-J ·~+,,··:-,-"·t j++t--f·

t-1-'1I- .......-+-t"'..!-'..·->."i-;~"---t·_-:.,.·,t·rl~_·~·--t·~r---_·t!···".· .. ····f·, •.... -'''~''-

H-+-;++-;ri'.t-'-.-+--+..;..t-~.,.'t--i·+;r~ ""~,'-t- i:+.,.++-T+~.".-r'"'+--i-'';''''~+'i-, ;"'i+"'"f'l\"'" ':-t- .. +"+·--H--·H .... i·++t~++,H-~-·tT·r>-~·4",+t·t"t~<T1-·rc~i:---.."-··rt '.TH.-r"tH 't-kiH '-+-1---" ~ ~--' 'H·++~-·H~.. ,"-·-H·..;...'-+f+'..,.f.., >'-H-·H+-;-t+(."··~+..L.+rH..,,·~~t ~-1"··

.5

NOTES

L Locations of observation wells are shown in Figure 2.4-21.

2. Surface elevations of the observation wells are given inTobIe 2.4 -17.

3. Observation wells were installed during December, 1974.The average depth is 25 ft.; granular backfiU was placedaround the lower 8 ft. of each observation well. All ob-servation welfs are installed in the glacial dr j ft aquitard.

5.

1975

Dates of water level measurements ore shownin Table 2.4 -17; potentiomefric levels are in-ferred between dates of measuremen t.

Precipitation data were recorded ot the MarseillesLock, 410 21

I

N., 88°45·W.



(SHEET 3 of 4)REV. 0 - APRIL 1984

:J 700U):E..-'+-

+ 690

.2~

+-Q)

E.S!.-c:Q)....o0...

JANUARYe '0 ns 20 2:5

FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL J () L .~. AUGiJ )'., . ..,. ~ t() l~

.~1j~:T"'T-"~-

~~ ~-~t··~1 ;I ~ :

."- t ~:

<:.!P'T£MB£f.I. OCTOBER Deep...10 U. ao •• 740

730

720

710

700

690

680

670

660

650

640

630

.sc.Q4-

~.9-()<Vl.-e..

NOTESL Locations of observation wells ore shown in Figure 2 .4-21.

2. Surface elevations of the observation welts ore given in"T'obte 2.4-17.

3. Observation wells were installed during December, 1974.The averoQe depth is 25 ft.; granular backfill was placedaround the lowe r 8 f 1. of each observation we J I. A" ob-servation wells ore instof led in the glaciol drift aquitard ..

1975

4. Dotes of water level measurements ore shownin Tobie 2 ..4-17; potentiometric levels are in-ferred between dates of measurement.

5. Water level meolur.ments in weB no. f8 ofterJuly 21,1975, may be affected by a broken cap.

6. Pr~cipitation data were recorded at the Marseif lesL(,~kJ 41 0 21

1

N. t 88°45' W.

........,..,.",...,..,..."..~~4.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0



(SHEET 4 of 4)REV~ 0 - APRIL 1984

LaSalle UNITS 1 AND 2 UFSAR, REVISION 22 AND FIRE … · 2016. 9. 16. · lasalle units 1 and 2...

Documents

Transcript of LaSalle UNITS 1 AND 2 UFSAR, REVISION 22 AND FIRE … · 2016. 9. 16. · lasalle units 1 and 2...