KCI Terminal Development Program Process Update CITY...

KCI Terminal Development Program Process Update

CITY COUNCIL SESSION

PRESENTATION | December 10, 2015PRESENTATION | December 10, 2015

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

2

Existing Kansas City International (KCI) Airport

Current Terminal Complex Facilities


Existing KCI Terminal Facilities

3

Facility Year Built Age

TerminalsA, B, & C

1972Refurbish2004

STRUCTURE

43 YearsINTERIOR

11 Years

Parking Garage A

1987 28 Years Old

Parking Garage B

1989 26 Years Old

Parking Garage C

1997 18 Years Old

Apron 1995 to 2000

15 to 20 Years Old

Underground Utilities

1972 43 to 48 Years Old

B

Closed


Apprehension to Move to KCI in 1972

4 BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Source: K.C.I. Special, The Kansas City Star, Sunday, October 15, 1972

“The first impression may be of a modern-day Stonehenge…

The words “lean-to” and “outhouse” were applied to Municipal and some wag will call K.C.I. “a three ring circus.” Likely, however, the words will be expletives…

There’ll be stories, too:“I parked at gate five and my return flight came in at gate 21 (or terminal B or C)…”

Security Paradigm Shift | Nov. 12, 1972


U.S. Airport Terminal Designs

6

Since DFW was opened in 1974, no other U.S. peer airport has replicated KCI’s configuration

Kansas City Int’l Austin-Bergstrom Int’l Dallas Love Field

Indianapolis Int’l John Wayne-Orange County Lambert-St Louis Int’l Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int’l

Nashville Int’l Norman Y. Mineta San Jose Int’l Pittsburgh Int’l Port Columbus Int’l

Raleigh-Durham Int’l Sacramento Int’l San Antonio Int’l Southwest Florida Int’l

General Mitchell Int’l (Milwaukee)

Metropolitan Oakland Int’l

Portland Int’l

William P Hobby (Houston)

Detroit Metropolitan


Taxpayers Do Not Pay Airport Costs!


City tax revenues do NOT, and will NOT, pay for airport operations or capital projects

Airport Finance is a Closed SystemUnder Federal Law KCI Improvements are Funded by Airlines & Travelers

Airport Fees & Charges Stay at KCI

• Federal law prohibits spending airport fees for other city purposes

Airport Revenue Bonds

• Bonds are secured based only on airport fees & charges, passenger facility charges & federal grants — not with city or state taxes

• Each of the three major rating agencies have taken positive rating actions on KCI within the last three years


“The rating also incorporates the potential for the large‐scale airport redevelopment plan.”‐ Moody's revises to positive the outlook on Kansas City Airport Enterprise, Moody’s Investor Service, 20 Jun 2015

9

Airport Terminal Timeline


Exhibit “K” & Project Goals

10

AdvancedPlanning

Airport Terminal Advisory

Group

Public Input

Council Resolution:

Exhibit KUse & Lease Negotiations

Improving KCI

Customer Convenience Affordability

Construct-ability

Technology

Right-Sized

Flexibility

Efficiency

The Airlines say doing nothing is not an option Customer convenience and affordability are top City and Airline priorities

Requires Airport and Airline collaboration in evaluating airport and airline data

Evaluates alternatives for Major Renovations & New Terminal Developments

Recommendation of a Preferred Terminal Development by May 1, 2016


40

2030 34 33

32

63

35

105

144

176

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

INDIndianapolis

DALDallas Love

Field

MSYNew

Orleans

SMFSacramento

SJCSan Jose

AUSAustin

STLSt. Louis

KCIKansas

City/2025

DENDenver

(53 millionpax)

DFWDallas FortWorth (64million pax)

ORDChicago

(70 millionpax)

Gates KCI Peer Airports – 7 to 13 million pax

Airport Terminal Gate Comparison


Existing* RequirementsGates 29 35Ticketing/Check‐in 20,879 32,000Security Checkpoint 29,951 18,640

FUNCTION

Post-Security Space Undersized

by Nearly One-Half

Pre-Security Space Nearly 3x Amount Needed

p gPost‐Security Departure Corridor 0 95,540Post‐Security Restrooms 4,949 11,200Airline Club 0 2,500International Arrivals 21,001 31,460Concessions 60,097 70,660Pre‐Security Circulation, Restrooms, and Seating 156,283 58,200Bag Claim 17,745 45,710Baggage Makeup 72,761 82,080Airline Operations/ATO/BSO 96,591 56,720Non Public Spaces 91,955 49,450Terminal Functions (HVAC, MEP) 101,357 117,200

Total Area 773,850 752,960

Bag Claim Space is 1/3 of Required

Space

Non Public Space Oversized by

Nearly 2x Amount Needed

Existing Space/Terminal Requirements

12

*36 Existing Gates, 29 leased


Terminal Functions (HVAC, MEP) 101,357 117,200

Total Area 773,850 752,960(Square Feet)

Curb Bag Claim Gate Arrive

13

Local passengers are familiar with configuration and timing to process

Arrival Process Arrival Process

Curb Check-in Gate Depart

What’s good about the existing Terminals

Departure Process Departure Process


14

Short walking distances


“MCI has to be the easiest airport ever. Easy drop off right in front of check in which is right next to the gates. Every couple gates has it's

own security.”

Almost as easy as a private airport.Cheri A- Yelp


TYPE OF PARKING

Valet Parking Short Term Curb Service

Terminal Garages B & C Short Term

Circle Parking E1 ‐ E4

Short/Long Term Surface

Economy Lots B and C Long Term

Park Air Express & The Parking Spot

Off‐airport Long Term

Variety of Parking Options at Various Price Points

15


Garage BGarage C

Circle E2 Parking

Circle E1 Parking

Circle E3 Parking

Circle E4 Parking

To Economy Lots B, C, and

Off Airport Parking


Valet Parking

“Meeter/Greeter” Advantages Seats to sit and wait Non-secure concessions available Ample pre-secure restrooms

16



“KCI is old school in the fact that your loved ones can wait in the

unsecured area, but close to your gate - so they can greet you when

you arrive.”

Tim K.- Yelp

Valet Parking

17

Terminal B

Terminal C

Security Screening Checkpoint Individual checkpoints at multiple

locations• Congestion localized to individual

checkpoints• Processing time is convenient

at non-peak periods

Security Checkpoint


“This is the fastest security of any airport! They are friendly and check-in is right at your gate! Amazing! This makes

air travel super easy!”

Kim S.- Yelp


Departure Lounge

18

Security Screening Checkpoints Insufficient capacity at

certain locations TSA Pre✓ cannot be

offered at all checkpoints

What’s not good about the existing Terminals


“Dear @KCIAirportplease get it together.

Lots of grumpy Monday morning travelers. Such a

terrible experience.”Amy Konrath –

Twitter, 4:06 AM - 8

Sep 2015

Scattered checkpoint locations complicate security control and staffing

No equipment backup if screening devices fail

Passenger delays at checkpoint can result in missed flights

19

Security Screening Building Geometry - 72-foot concourse width Precludes normal orientation of security lanes from curb to gate Cannot easily accommodate current TSA lane requirements or new

screening layouts (60’ x 150’) Any renovations must follow the current TSA guidelines Inadequate space for passenger queuing Insufficient lanes for TSA Pre✓ at several locations



Departure Lounge Geometry Small departure lounges cannot be expanded Outdated layout does not allow for group

seating Crowded conditions limit loading and

unloading processes Combining separate departure lounges

requires narrow backside corridor

20



“Yes this airport may be easy to getin and out of but if you suffer from claustrophobia or don't like a lot of people crammed into one area -AVOID AVOID AVOID MCI.”

Anastasia U.-Yelp

Departure Lounge & Circulation Area

21

Departure Lounge Size/Amenities Insufficient seating and power outlets Restrooms are too few and too small Peer terminals offer sit-down restaurants, bars,

airline clubs, retail accessible to everyone Lack of departure lounge workstations


“@KCIAirport inexplicably has a single men’s RR stall for 8

gates. Designers must have been Barbarians.”

CW_Humphreys - Twitter


22

Curbside Passenger congestion and confusion for

pickup/drop-off Competition for curbside space among

shuttles, buses, vans, limos, taxis, and private vehicles

Parking often unavailable at Terminal B Limited shelter for commercial curb



“Once again all parking lots near Terminal B are full. Remind me again how

convenient #kci supposedly is??”

Jennifer Peters – via Twitter

Baggage Screening Baggage screening is a 2-step process for

more than 50% of KCI’s passengers Potential for lost baggage No backup if individual system goes down

23



“You've got baggage issues, @KCIAirport” John Bryan -- Twitter 8:22 PM - 19 Dec 2014.

“We've got nothing against Kansas City.It would be a lovely place to visit if they ever replace that toy airport

with a real one.”

Sports Illustrated July 20, 2015

MICHAEL ROSENBERGSenior Writer, Sports Illustrated

Concrete Columns

24

Structural Constraints Concrete walls limit

potential for interior expansion or accommodating other uses

Large columns restrict expansion potential

“We had a lousy crystal ball, . . . We couldn’t read the future.”

Kivett and Myers(Architects of Existing Terminals)



“Kansas City, I love your teams, BBQ & people. But your airport

looks like it was designed by a 87 year old, color-blind prison guard.”

9:29 AM - 25 Sep 2015

Rainn Wilson Tweet (Actor from television comedy The Office)

25

Aging Infrastructure – underground utilities, apron, & terminal roadways Increases potential for critical failure of

mechanical systems (electric, plumbing, fueling, HVAC)

Increases need for ongoing maintenance that translates into higher operating costs

Energy efficiency upgrades are limited

“I don't think people appreciate

the fact that it's falling apart

(underneath).”

Dan CranshawATAG member in

ATAG presentation, lawyer, and frequent

traveler

“At more than 40 years old, the underground

distribution network providing chilled water

to and from each of MCI's three terminals had a long history of

line breaks that caused costly disruptions toairport operations.”

Robert NordstromJournalist for

AirportImprovement.com



26

Building Restriction Line

Peak time delays due to aircraft push back from gates into taxiways at Terminals A, B, & C• This condition cannot be changed when using existing terminals• Aircraft push back from gates into a single taxilane between terminals

Distance between terminal and taxiways limits expansion potential

Taxiway Conflict AreaPushback Conflict Area


Terminal B

TerminalC

TerminalA


Closed

Terminal B

Terminal C

27

Bus Operations Multiple stops

• Buses often fill before last stop, forcing passengers to wait for another bus

• Affects curbside congestion and wayfinding• Higher operating costs due to complexity of multi-stop routes

No Taxi Stand Passengers must call and wait for taxis

Bus Stop



6.1

5.6

5.9

5.2

6.1

5.6

5.9

6

6.2

7.5

4.7

5.3

5.6

5.8

6.1

6.3

6

6.2

6.3

6.7

3.8

4.6

4.9

5.6

4.8

5.1

5.4

5.8

6.1

4.4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

New York LaGuardia (LGA)

Los Angeles International (LAX)

Newark Liberty International (EWR)

Miami International (MIA)

Ft. Lauderdale - Hollywood (FLL)

Washington Dulles (IAD)

New York John F. Kennedy (JFK)

Chicago O'Hare (ORD)

Philadelphia International (PHL)

Kansas City International (MCI)

Average score*Security Restrooms Shopping

28

Top 10 Least Pleasant Airports by Frequent Travelers in North America as of September 2014

Source: Bloomberg Businessweek.Note: United States; Canada; September to November 2014; 3,000+; travelers who have taken at least one round-trip in the past year..



Facts, Industry Data + Public Input

AdvancedPlanning

Airport Terminal Advisory Group

Public Input

Council Resolution: Exhibit K

Use & Lease Negotiations

Airport Terminal Advisory Group Briefings and Town Hall Meetings.Image Source: Austin Alonzo Reporter- Kansas City Business Journal.


Deputy DirectorCommercial Development

Deputy DirectorEngineering

Program Director

AAACChairpersonor Designee

Kansas CityInternational Airport Director of Aviation

TERMINAL PLANNING TEAML&B

LANDSIDEHNTB

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

AIRSIDEL&B

Airport & AirlineAffairs Committee

(AAAC)

City of Kansas City Mayor/City Council

Deputy DirectorFinance

UTILITIES & CUPSKDesignHNTB

MEPFPRoss & Baruzzini

PGAL/WA

Bag Handling Systems VTC

CONCESSIONSAirProjects Inc.

FUELINGHNTB

DEICINGL&BHNTB

LeadershipCommittee

Terminal PlanningTeam

MAJOR RENOVATION

PGALWA

TERMINAL PROGRAMMING

L&B

NEW TERMINALPGAL

COST ESTIMATINGConnico

Airline Technical Rep

AvAirPros

KCAD AdvisorLeighFisher

Exhibit K Organizational Structure/Experts


Two-Track Terminal Evaluation Process

Design team instructed to improve and blend best elements of preferred concepts 5 DIFFERENT CONCEPTS Refine/improve prior

concepts Identify level of finishes

and building systems2Charrette Major Renovation

MR2 Concepts

New TerminalNT

3 Concepts

Initial Screening Design team started with 27 concepts

Design team instructed to further refine/improve and develop comparative cost estimates4 DIFFERENT CONCEPTS

Continue refining and improving concepts

High level comparative cost estimating

3Charrette Major Renovation

MR2 Concepts

New TerminalNT

2 Concepts

32

12 DIFFERENT CONCEPTS Site Plans Floor plans Space requirements Terminal section diagrams Construction phasing

1Charrette

Major Renovation MR

5 Concepts

New TerminalNT

7 Concepts


NT BNT B

Proposed Conceptual Site Plans

MR AMR A

MR BMR B

NT ANT A


Major Renovation | MRMajor Renovation | MR New Terminal | NTNew Terminal | NT

LEGENDRenovated SpaceNew Terminal Garage


Reuses existing Terminal A & B concourses

Builds a new, two level central processor at both Terminals A & B

Provides separate arrivals and departures roadways, curbs and parking garages for each terminal

Added square footage increases cost


Major Renovation | “MR A” COST: $1.191 Billion(2015 dollars)


Major Renovation A - $1.191 Billion (2015 dollars)

35

$1.191 Billion in 2015 dollars GOALS PROS CONS

Customer Convenience

Short walking distances to origin and destination gates

No ability to incorporate moving walkways in curved concourses

Affordability Most expensivealternative

Constructability

Very difficult to construct during on‐going operations and requires multiple airline moves

Technology New system technologies

Some technologies will be more costly to install within existing structure

Right‐SizedTerminal significantly exceeds necessary square footage

FlexibilitySome flexibility to expand into endconcourse gates

Limited expansion capabilities beyond end gates would result in need to activate 3rd terminal

EfficiencyImproved but split check‐in and security screening

Aircraft pushback conflicts with Taxiway D and cul‐de‐sac are not fixable. Difficult baggage tug and cart operations

Departures

Arrivals




Major Renovation | “MR B”

Reuses existing Terminal A & B concourses

Builds a new, two level central processor between Concourses A & B

Provides separate arrivals and departures roadways and curbs

Builds a new central parking garage and reuses portions of existing A & B Garages

COST: $1.046 Billion (2015 dollars)


Major Renovation B - $1.046 Billion (2015 dollars)


GOALS PROS CONS


Possesses passenger convenience improvements over existing

Long walking distances to farthest gates with no ability to incorporate moving walkways

AffordabilityMore expensive than both NTs but less expensive than MR A

ConstructabilityDifficult to phase with on‐going operations at Terminal B

Technology New system technologies

Some technologies will be more costly to install within existing structure

Right‐SizedTerminal significantly exceeds necessary square footage

FlexibilitySome flexibility to expand to the west on the center concourse

Limited flexibility to expand beyond the center concourse due to reusing existing terminals

EfficiencyImproved consolidated check‐in and security screening

Aircraft pushback conflicts with Taxiway D not fixable. Difficult baggage tug and cart operations

$1.046 Billion in 2015 dollars

Departures

Arrivals



New Terminal | “NT A”

Builds a new centralized terminal at the Terminal A site

Provides separate arrivals and departures roadways and curbs

Builds a new central parking garage

Reuses B garage

COST: $964 Million (2015 dollars)

LEGEND

New Terminal Garage

New Terminal A - $964 Million (2015 dollars)


GOALS PROS CONS


Possesses all passenger convenience features

Affordability Least expensive alternative

ConstructabilityPhases more easily and quickly than either MR or NT B alternatives

Technology All new system technologies

Right‐Sized New terminal exactly meets requirements

Flexibility

Able to incrementally expand to south on two concourses, reuses B Garage

Efficiency

Efficient consolidated check‐in, security screening, baggage operations

A few gates have single taxilane access on the northern concourse

$964 Million in 2015 dollars

Departures Arrivals



New Terminal | “NT B”

Builds a new centralized terminal at the Terminal A site

Provides separate arrivals and departures curbs

Builds a new central parking garage

Reuses B garage

COST: $972 Million (2015 dollars)

LEGEND

New Terminal Garage

New Terminal B - $972 Million (2015 dollars)

41

GOALS PROS CONS


Possesses all passenger convenience features

Affordability Less expensive than MRs Slightly more expensive than NT A

Constructability Phases more easily than either MR

Requires an additional phasing step than NT A

Technology All new system technologies

Right‐Sized New terminal exactly meets requirements

Flexibility

Able to incrementally expand to south on one concourse, reuses B Garage

Less expansion flexibility than NT A

Efficiency

Efficient consolidated check‐in, security screening, spilt baggage operations

A few gates have single taxilane access and a blind corner on the northern concourse


$972 Million in 2015 dollars

Departures

Arrivals

Major Renovation New TerminalFacilities MR A MR B NT A NT BTerminal $803,176,000 $730,913,000 $593,255,000 $579,427,000

Parking & Roads $264,232,000 $196,779,000 $217,321,000 $218,021,000

Aprons & Taxiways $81,062,000 $76,233,000 $104,772,000 $126,666,000

Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing $30,913,000 $30,483,000 $27,695,000 $27,695,000

Aircraft Fueling System $10,294,000 $10,393,000 $18,885,000 $18,885,000

Deicing System $1,565,000 $1,608,000 $1,619,000 $1,634,000

Total Cost $1.191 B $1.046 B $964 M $972 M

Conceptual Cost Estimates


Note: Values in 2015 dollars.

GOALS MAJOR RENOVATION (MR) NEW TERMINAL (NT)


Better than today’s terminals but less than NT More passenger conveniences for all passengers

Affordability Higher capital and operating cost than NT Lower capital and operating cost than MR

Construct‐ability

More difficult and longer time to construct than NTs with far more passenger disruptions during construction

Isolated site allows easier and shorter construction time than MR with less passenger disruptions

Technology Some limitations on ability to include all new technologies

All new technologies for all functions

Right‐SizedRequires more space than required due to its inefficient configuration and duplication of functions

Avoids duplicate central processors, bag systems, concessions, moving walkways, parking garages

FlexibilityExisting concrete structure and circular configuration limits the flexibility of functional uses and expansion options

New structure and layout provides better flexibility of spatial uses and more expansion potential

EfficiencyLess operationally efficient than NT due to airside, terminal, and landside operational constraints

More efficient airside, terminal and landside operations than MR

MR and NT Alternatives Evaluation


MR Oversized by 21% NT Right-Sized

To Provide Future Expansion Capability: MR Oversized by 43% NT Oversized by 8%

RequirementsMajor

RenovationNew

TerminalGates 35 35 35Ticketing/Check‐in 32,000 49,344 34,901Security Checkpoint 18,640 21,693 18,654Departure Lounges 81,600 92,859 82,395Public Space/Departure Corridor 164,940 211,518 170,048Airline Club 2,500 4,163 2,546International Arrivals 31,460 40,003 34,106Concessions 70,660 73,245 68,633Bag Claim 45,710 50,641 45,401Baggage Makeup 82,080 127,494 79,882Airline Operations/ATO/BSO 56,720 66,814 52,961Non Public Spaces 49,450 49,766 44,818Terminal Functions 117,200 120,038 117,663

Total Area in Use (Square Feet) 752,960 907,578 752,008Unassigned Space 143,165 21,542Unbuilt Tug Drive Through 29,056 24,889Undeveloped Space 12,929

Total Gross Area (Square Feet) 752,960 1,079,799 811,368

FUNCTION

Facility Requirements: MR / NT


Airline Recommendations:

45

Airlines and KCAD concluded that Major Renovation (MR) alternatives presented significant shortfalls: Limited options to meet the goal of improved customer convenience

Higher capital cost

Higher ongoing operating and life cycle cost

Substandard operational performance

More difficult phasing and lengthy construction

The Airline-Airport Affairs Committee unanimously proposed tabling further study of MR options

The Airline-Airport Affairs Committee will continue to review and refine New Terminal (NT) options


Next Steps: Exhibit “K” Process

46

Refine New Terminal

OptionsRecommendations

to City Council

• Design & Layout• Cost Estimations• Airline Agreement

• Terms of New Business Arrangement with Airlines


QUESTION & ANSWER


KCI Terminal Development Program Process Update CITY...

Documents

Transcript of KCI Terminal Development Program Process Update CITY...