JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

19
JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language Introduction

Transcript of JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

Page 1: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language

Introduction

Page 2: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

1. Basic concepts & methodologies in historical linguistics

2. The overview of the history of the Japanese language

1. Sound changes 2. Syntactic changes3. Vocabulary changes4. Development of writing systems

3. The formation of modern Japanese and ongoing changes

Page 3: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

Historical studies of languages What is historical linguistics about? What’s the advantage of studying the history

of a particular language (or languages in general)?

Linguistic/Cognitive Interests Historical Interests Cultural Interests

Page 4: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

1. Linguistic/Cognitive Interests(Campbell 1999:2)“[H]uman cognition and the human capacity for language learning are central research interests in linguistics, and historical linguistics contributes significantly to this goal.”

“As we determine more accurately what can change and what cannot change in a language, and what the permitted versus impossible ways are in which languages can change, we contribute significantly to the understanding of universal grammar,language typology and human cognition in general – fundamental to understanding our very humanity.”

Page 5: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

Permitted (common) vs. Impossible (unlikely) ways of language changesExample #1: Directionality of sound change

Unidirectional It is common for the [k] sound (velar stop) to change

into [h] (glottal fricative), but not vice versa. It is common for the [ʧ] ([č]; alveolar affricate) sound

to change into [ʃ] (alveolar fricative), but not vice versa. (deaffrication)e.g. chief vs. chef

→ perceptual reason?, “ease of articulation”?

Page 7: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

voicing of a consonant between two vowels caput (Latin) > cabo (Spanish) ‘head’

“It is easy to voice stops between vowels, since vowels are inherently voiced.” (Campbell 1999:130)

Page 9: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

Bidirectional diphthongization

mouse: /mūs/ > /maʊs/ monophthongization

tire: /taɪɝ/ > /tɑ(ɝ)/ (in some dialects) autre: /aut/ > /ot/ (French) auru- (Latin) > or (French)

Page 10: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

Example #2: Directionality of semantic change/extension

‘see’ > ‘know, understand’ senses of touch/taste > emotions/propensitie

s(e.g. feeling, bitter, sweet, sour)

Page 11: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

body-part > spatial location > temporal location (e.g. in front of, ahead of, behind)

ability > obligation/permission > necessity/probability (e.g. can, may, must)

→ understanding of abstract concepts in terms of concrete concepts and their metaphorical extensions

Page 12: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

Historical/Anthropological Interests “Historical linguistic findings have been utilize

d to solve historical problems of concern to society which extend far beyond linguistics” (Campbell 1999:1)

Page 13: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

Example #1: “What was our ancestors’ life like?”

Many languages spoken in the area covering Europe and the Indian Subcontinent (which include English, Iranian, Hindi) are linguistically proven to be “relatives” (i.e. descendants of a single language).

Their ancestor language, called the Proto-Indo-European, left no written record, but it was reconstructed by the hand of linguists (using the comparative method).

Page 14: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

The reconstructed Proto-Indo-European vocabulary had words corresponding to: *h2erh3trom ‘plough’, *seh- ‘sow’, *peis- ‘thresh’, … *sū- ‘pig’, *h2egwno- ‘lamb’, *wakeh2- ‘cow’, …as well as ‘honey’, ‘purchase’, ‘penalty’, ‘wheel’, ‘axe’, ‘fort’, ‘beech’, etc. …

Such information, along with material evidence (relics), helps us infer whatthe society and culture of the ancient people were like.

Page 15: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

Example #2: “Where did our ancestors come from?”

linguistic migration theory (the center of gravity model)

Assumption: when a language family splits up, it is more likely for the various daughter languages to stay close to where they started out and it is less likely for them to move very far or very frequently.

Page 16: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

A

B

C

EF

G

D

Page 18: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

Example #3: “What is/was the relation between people A, people B, and people C?”

genealogical relation (in the linguistic sense) language contact (borrowing)

Page 19: JPN494/598: History of the Japanese Language - Introduction

Cultural Interests

Knowledge of an ancient language (or an older phase of a language) help us understand/appreciate old writings (historical records, literary works, etc.)