Joe Frisch LCLS FAC [email protected] Oct. 30, 2007 1 Linac/BC2 Commissioning (Dec. 2007...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
0
Transcript of Joe Frisch LCLS FAC [email protected] Oct. 30, 2007 1 Linac/BC2 Commissioning (Dec. 2007...
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 20071
Linac/BC2 CommissioningLinac/BC2 Commissioning(Dec. 2007 through Sep., 2008)(Dec. 2007 through Sep., 2008)
J. Frisch, J. Frisch, et al.et al.LCLS FAC MeetingLCLS FAC Meeting
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 2007
LCLSLCLShttp://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/lcls/internals/commissioning/index.htmlhttp://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/lcls/internals/commissioning/index.html
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 20072
LCLSLCLS Accelerator Schematic Accelerator Schematic
SLAC linac tunnelSLAC linac tunnel research yardresearch yard
Linac-0Linac-0L L =6 m=6 m
Linac-1Linac-1L L 9 m9 m
rf rf 25°25°
Linac-2Linac-2L L 330 m330 mrf rf 41°41°
Linac-3Linac-3L L 550 m550 mrf rf 0° 0°
BC1BC1L L 6 m6 m
RR5656 39 mm39 mm
BC2BC2L L 22 m22 m
RR5656 25 mm25 mm DL2 DL2 L L =275 m=275 mRR56 56 0 0
DL1DL1L L 12 m12 mRR56 56 0 0
undulatorundulatorL L =130 m=130 m
6 MeV6 MeVz z 0.83 mm 0.83 mm 0.05 %0.05 %
135 MeV135 MeVz z 0.83 mm 0.83 mm 0.10 %0.10 %
250 MeV250 MeVz z 0.19 mm 0.19 mm 1.6 %1.6 %
4.30 GeV4.30 GeVz z 0.022 mm 0.022 mm 0.71 %0.71 %
13.6 GeV13.6 GeVz z 0.022 mm 0.022 mm 0.01 %0.01 %
Linac-Linac-XXL L =0.6 m=0.6 mrfrf= =
21-1b,c,d
...existinglinac
L0-a,b
rfrfgungun
21-3b24-6dX
25-1a30-8c
Injector CommissioningInjector Commissioning Commission in Jan. 2008Commission in Jan. 2008
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 20073
BC2/Linac BC2/Linac Commissioning GoalsCommissioning Goals
This is the tricky one
No problems expected
Expect we can run at 1nC
No specific problems expected – but lots to do
No problems expected
No known issues, but there could be surprises
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 20074
OTR screens (3)OTR screens (3)
Dipole magnets (4)Dipole magnets (4)
S-band RF acc. sectionsS-band RF acc. sections
LCLSLCLS BC2-Area Layout BC2-Area Layout
4.3 GeV4.3 GeV(not to scale)(not to scale)
BC2BC2
OTR21OTR21
OTR22OTR22(25-3d)(25-3d)
OTR_TCAVOTR_TCAV(25-9)(25-9)
BXKIKBXKIK
Kicker magnet (1)Kicker magnet (1)
TCAV3TCAV3(25-2d)(25-2d)
4 wire-scanners “de-scoped”4 wire-scanners “de-scoped”
Transverse RF deflector (1)Transverse RF deflector (1)
4 wire-scanners in sec-284 wire-scanners in sec-28(300 m downstream)(300 m downstream)
Can measure Can measure xx,,yy here, here,
with BC2 OFFwith BC2 OFF
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 20075
Linac/BC2 Commissioning ScopeLinac/BC2 Commissioning ScopeNew 4-dipole chicane in 24-7 – 24-8New 4-dipole chicane in 24-7 – 24-8Adjacent matching quads and new opticsAdjacent matching quads and new optics3 new OTR screens, 1 collimator, 1 BPM, and 2 3 new OTR screens, 1 collimator, 1 BPM, and 2 moved wire-scanners in sec-28 (4 wires in sec-24 moved wire-scanners in sec-28 (4 wires in sec-24 are “are “de-scoped”de-scoped”))Transverse RF deflector at 25-2d + Transverse RF deflector at 25-2d + xx-kicker 25-3d-kicker 25-3dTwo new coherent radiation-based bunch length Two new coherent radiation-based bunch length monitorsmonitorsEnergy and bunch length feedback loop and new Energy and bunch length feedback loop and new SS sub-boosters in 24-1,2,3 + 24-8 (TCAV3)SS sub-boosters in 24-1,2,3 + 24-8 (TCAV3)No new linac BPM electronics in 2008 (or ’09?)No new linac BPM electronics in 2008 (or ’09?)
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 20076
Manpower and SchedulingManpower and SchedulingTen months of commissioning BC2/Linac (Dec - Sep)Ten months of commissioning BC2/Linac (Dec - Sep)More help with commissioning shifts (H.-D. Nuhn, F.-J. More help with commissioning shifts (H.-D. Nuhn, F.-J. Decker, Z. Huang, Y. Ding, D. Ratner)Decker, Z. Huang, Y. Ding, D. Ratner)Did 3 shifts per week for 5 months in 2007 - exhaustingDid 3 shifts per week for 5 months in 2007 - exhaustingNo weekend shifts (ops only) after 1No weekend shifts (ops only) after 1stst month of startup month of startupOperators now somewhat experienced on injectorOperators now somewhat experienced on injectorNeed two physicists/shift for 10 shifts/week (after 1Need two physicists/shift for 10 shifts/week (after 1stst month)month)Need to cover 20 man-shifts/week - have at least 14 Need to cover 20 man-shifts/week - have at least 14 physicists – requires a total of physicists – requires a total of 1.5 shifts/week/man1.5 shifts/week/man (after 1 (after 1stst month)month)Shutdown LCLS for 2 weeks in March? (new gun probes + Shutdown LCLS for 2 weeks in March? (new gun probes + fix GTL)fix GTL)
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 20077
Last Run’s Typical Shift ScheduleLast Run’s Typical Shift Schedule
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 20078
ScheduleSchedule
JJ AA SS OO NN DD JJ FF MM AA MM JJ JJ AA SS OO NN DD JJ FF MM AA MM JJ JJ
linac/BC2 linac/BC2 Install Install
Linac/BC2 Linac/BC2 CommissioninCommissionin
g g
LTU/Und/Dump LTU/Und/Dump FEE/NEH Install FEE/NEH Install
20072007 20082008
LTU/Und/FEE LTU/Und/FEE Commissioning Commissioning
AA SS OONN DD
20092009PPS
PPS
Controls Controls checkout & re-checkout & re-
commission commission injectorinjector
Re-Re-commission commission
Inj/BC2 to SL2Inj/BC2 to SL2
X-Ray tunnel/FEH X-Ray tunnel/FEH Install Install
FEL FEL Commissioning Commissioning
……InjectorInjectorCommissioninCommissioning g
NowNow
PPS
PPS
1st Spont. Light1st Spont. Light1st FEL1st FEL
LightLight 1st Users1st Users
downtime
commissioningtime
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 20079
BC2 Commissioning ParametersBC2 Commissioning Parameters
ParameterParameter ValueValue CommentsComments
RF rateRF rate 30 Hz30 Hz May test 120HzMay test 120Hz
Beam rateBeam rate ≤≤30 Hz30 Hz 10 Hz 10 Hz eebeam as baseline – short term 30-Hz beam as baseline – short term 30-Hz tests (beyond 30 Hz is unnecessary)tests (beyond 30 Hz is unnecessary)
Drive-laser rateDrive-laser rate 30 Hz30 Hz Possible 120-Hz late in the run?Possible 120-Hz late in the run?
Bunch chargeBunch charge 250 pC250 pC Start at this low charge but later up to 1-nCStart at this low charge but later up to 1-nC
Drive-laser pulse lengthDrive-laser pulse length ~6 ps fwhm~6 ps fwhm Optimum not clear yetOptimum not clear yet
Final beam energyFinal beam energy 13.6 GeV13.6 GeV 13.6 GeV typically with tests down to 4.3 GeV13.6 GeV typically with tests down to 4.3 GeV
May 12, 2007May 12, 2007
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200710
BC2 LayoutBC2 Layout
Tw
o ne
w O
TR
scr
eens
+ L
OLA
& k
icke
rT
wo
new
OT
R s
cree
ns +
LO
LA &
kic
ker
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200711
BC2 LayoutBC2 Layout
BP
MB
PM
Co
llim
ato
rC
olli
ma
tor
OT
R
OT
R
scre
en
scre
en
23-m long chicane23-m long chicaneTranslates horizontally up to 52 cmTranslates horizontally up to 52 cm
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200712
New construction in BC2 (sector 24/25)New construction in BC2 (sector 24/25)
Oct. 11, 2007Oct. 11, 2007
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200713
New construction in BC2 (sector 24/25)New construction in BC2 (sector 24/25)
Oct 26
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200714
New Pre-Beam Tunnel Check ListNew Pre-Beam Tunnel Check List
17 pages17 pages
etc.etc.etc.etc.
Component bar codesComponent bar codes
Polarity conventionsPolarity conventions
Installation orientationInstallation orientation
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200715
Magnet Power Supply ModificationsMagnet Power Supply ModificationsOnly QUAD’s 24201-24501 (4 of original 8) remain on sector-24 bulk Only QUAD’s 24201-24501 (4 of original 8) remain on sector-24 bulk supply (keep 0-20 A boost for each)supply (keep 0-20 A boost for each)Q24601 gets its own supplyQ24601 gets its own supplyDoubled-up Q24701A/B gets its own supplyDoubled-up Q24701A/B gets its own supplyQ24801 quad goes away forever (boost supply is free)Q24801 quad goes away forever (boost supply is free)Doubled-up Q24901A/B gets its own supplyDoubled-up Q24901A/B gets its own supplyNew QM21 & QM22 (46-cm FFTB quads) each get own supplyNew QM21 & QM22 (46-cm FFTB quads) each get own supplyTwo new MCOR6 tweaker quads (Two new MCOR6 tweaker quads (-correction) as in BC1-correction) as in BC1No new correctors here, but all of sectors 20-30 get new MCOR6 No new correctors here, but all of sectors 20-30 get new MCOR6 corrector supplies to replace old SCOR6 suppliescorrector supplies to replace old SCOR6 suppliesControl divided between EPICS and SLCControl divided between EPICS and SLC
Have software to communicate between systems, but adds complexity.Have software to communicate between systems, but adds complexity.Still details to work out for LEM, etc .Still details to work out for LEM, etc .
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200716
BC2 Dipole Field Quality OKBC2 Dipole Field Quality OK
No quad field andNo quad field andsextupole is just below tolerancesextupole is just below tolerance
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200717
Diagnostics IssuesDiagnostics Issues
Can’t tune on something you can’t measureEngineering issues with the wire scanners
Vibration limits us to slow scan speedsCan be fixed – but no sure solution in hand
Physics issues with the OTR screens
Coherent effects distort imageMay be able to fix with short wavelength filter, but not known.
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200718
Wire ScannersWire ScannersMeasured beam size Vs. Motor Steps / second Range is 40-140 microns
With slow scanning, size was reproducible to 5 microns.
May be able to fix problem by adding a gear reducer to wires scanner (cheap), but not tested yet.
For now, limited to slow scans 1 minute / scan, 10 minutes for emittance measurement.
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200719
Even “ideal” wire scanner only gives integrated Even “ideal” wire scanner only gives integrated profilesprofiles
Pathological beam shape that wouldNot be apparent on wires
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200720
Coherent Effects in OTRsCoherent Effects in OTRs
OTR12 sum signal as QB is varied. BC1 off, L1X, L1S on crest. Y beam sizeVaries with observed intensityNot clear if effect will be worse after BC2.
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200721
OTRs - PlansOTRs - Plans
Installing diffraction gratings in front of OTR camerasHope to find that coherence is only in long wavelength signalsIf signal is incoherent below ~400nm can easily add filters to cameras
Installing UV (200nm) and IR (2.5um) detectors on OTRsIR detectors to understand coherence (not seen yet at DESY / FLASH or Spring-8 / SCCS)UV detectors to look for coherence at hard UVIf no coherence at 200nm, can use UV cameras (but $$)
Can not show from beam parameters that we don’t have coherence as short at 100nm – beyond the range of conventional cameras.In future “Laser Heater” will probably fix this problem – but would like to be able to diagnose beam without heater.
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200722
Diagnostics – BPMsDiagnostics – BPMs
Existing linac BPMs have 30 – 100 micron resolution depending on beam charge (300pc – 1nC).Readout is through SLC – EPICS communication – slow ~5 seconds.Will need good linac orbit tuning algorithms.
Work underway.
Need initial accuracy ~1mm. OKThen tune on emittance – should work but slow.May wish to tune at high charge (~1nC)
Increase effect of wakefieldsBetter BPM resolution
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200723
Diagnostics – where are we?Diagnostics – where are we?
Wire scanners work but:For now, just slow scans – hope for a mechanical fix soonFirst wires located in S28, 300 meters downstream of BC2
OTRsSo far can not be used for quantitative measurementsSome plans that may fix the problem, but not clear a solution exists Discussed at 3-way collaboration meeting at Spring-8 this month. Work underway at other labs.
BPMsUsing old LINAC BPMs. Should be OK, but readout slowNext year (?) replace with epics BPMs.
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200724
Emittance Preservation and MeasurementEmittance Preservation and Measurement
Measure emittance after L2:In BC2 (with compressor straight) using OTR
If we do not have coherent effects – otherwise:
Wire scanner in Sector 28 (300M downstream)Orbit Tuning
Minimize orbit on Linac BPMSThen Tune orbit on emittance
In OTR21, or in S28 wiresMight be slow to converge
Then optimize BC2 emittanceThis is probably our most serious technical challenge.
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200725
Bunch Length measurementBunch Length measurement
In much better shape than transverse measurementsTCAV in S24 will let us resolve bunch length.
Old cavity in new installation.No problems anticipated.
Cross check with direct compression measurement using phase cavities
Demonstrated in injector
On line mm-wave bunch length monitors similar to injector monitors
Shorter mm wavelengths, but should work
Unique beam conditions – can always have surprises!
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200726
Other IssuesOther Issues
LINAC controls split between EPICS and SLC systems.
We have tools in place to make this work, but could be slow to get going
Limited LINAC tunnel access – B-factory running.Limited time to make changes or repairs
Systems designed for “Production”, not R+D. Compact, reliable, and high performance, but difficult ot modify.
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200727
Additional Run PlansAdditional Run Plans
Improve performance of injectorBetter BC1 magnet field qualityX-band cavity moved to reduce steeringTry programmable phase ramp in L0A to reduce bunch length / improve emittance
New RF system for phase stabilization over ~1km beamlineNew temperature stabilized transmission linesNeed to compare with beam timing and MDL. Complexities due to path length changes in bunch compressors.
Commission new beam feedbacksEnergy and bunch length throughout machine
Energy at 3 points, bunch length at 2, beam time. Transverse feedbacks throughout machine
Optimize orbit on emittance, then stabilize
Joe FrischJoe Frisch
LCLSLCLS FAC FAC [email protected]@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Oct. 30, 2007Oct. 30, 200728
SummarySummary
Linac/BC2 Linac/BC2 ee commissioning starts in early Dec. ’07 commissioning starts in early Dec. ’07Large amount of commissioning time available Large amount of commissioning time available (fewer shifts/week & no weekends after 1(fewer shifts/week & no weekends after 1stst month?) month?)Main ’07 goal is to Main ’07 goal is to verifyverify full functionalityfull functionality of of linac/BC2 beamline, plus diagnostics and controlslinac/BC2 beamline, plus diagnostics and controlsOptimizing performance may take longerOptimizing performance may take longerWill need some linac access in first 1-2 monthsWill need some linac access in first 1-2 months