Jared Diamond and the Geography of...

30
Jared Diamond and the Geography of Development Diamond isn’t seeking to explain a narrow window of change like the Industrial Revolution He sees differences in development evolving over long periods of time. The differences have their roots in the geography and ecology of where societies began. The (proximate) factors allowing one culture to become dominant over another are guns, germs and steel. All three of these factors actually have their roots in geographical differences. J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 1 / 30

Transcript of Jared Diamond and the Geography of...

Jared Diamond and the Geography of Development

Diamond isn’t seeking to explain a narrow window ofchange like the Industrial Revolution

He sees differences in development evolving over longperiods of time.

The differences have their roots in the geography andecology of where societies began.

The (proximate) factors allowing one culture to becomedominant over another are guns, germs and steel.

All three of these factors actually have their roots ingeographical differences.

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 1 / 30

The Settlement of Polynesia as a Natural Experiment

Around 1200 BC, people from near New Guinea reachthe Polynesian Islands and start to colonize every littleisland.

By 500 AD, most islands are colonized.

Why does this provide a natural experiment?

Everyone descended from the same group but theenvironments of the islands varied tremendously.

We can see what effect environment had on theevolution of societies.

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 2 / 30

The Polynesian Islands

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 3 / 30

The Maori vs The Moriori

The Maori

The Maori lived in the northern part of New Zealand.

Northern New Zealand was the warmer part of NewZealand.

Largest land area in the Polynesian islands.

Land and climate could support Polynesian agriculture.

Population of the Maori exceeded 100,000.

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 4 / 30

New Zealand

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 5 / 30

New Zealand

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 6 / 30

The Maori vs The Moriori

The Moriori

The Moriori came from the Maori and were possiblyMaori farmers.

They settled the Chatham Islands.

The Chathams had a cold climate.

Tropical crops could not grow.

The Moriori were hunter-gatherers, hunting seals,shellfish, nesting seabirds and fish.

Catching these animals could be done by hand or club.

The Chathams had a total population of around 2,000.

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 7 / 30

The Chatham Islands

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 8 / 30

The Chatham Islands

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 9 / 30

The Maori vs The Moriori

So what happened between the Maori and Moriori?

The two societies lost contact for several hundred years.

Eventually, the Maori find out about the Moriori.

In 1835, the Maori show up and enslaved or killed justabout all of the Moriori.

Diamond’s question is how did two societies that camefrom the same society just a few hundred years earlierbecome so different?

The answer lies in geography.

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 10 / 30

What can we learn from Polynesia?

Polynesian islands differed in climate, geological type,marine resources, area, terrain fragmentation, andisolation.

All of these environmental factors shaped Polynesiansocieties and economies.

Different possibilities for food production led todifferences in population size and density.

These differences in population size and density led todifferences in political structures, technology, andinteraction with other societies.

All of these differences led to very different paths ofdevelopment for the different Polynesian societies.

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 11 / 30

Generalizing from the Polynesian Natural Experiment

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 12 / 30

Generalizing from the Polynesian Natural Experiment

East/West Axis

Ultimate Factors Axis

Ease of species Many suitable 

Factors

Many domesticated 

spreadingwild species

yplant and animal species

Food surpluses, food storage

Large, dense, sedentary stratified societies

Proximate

stratified societies

Technology

Proximate Factors Horses Guns, steel 

swordsOcean‐

going ships

Political organization, 

writing

Epidemic diseases

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 13 / 30

Parts of Diamond’s Argument We Will Cover

The importance of developing agriculture

The importance of domesticated animals

The diffusion of plants and animals

The importance of germs

The development of technology

Social structure and geography

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 14 / 30

The Domestication of Plants

Farming is critical to development in Diamond’s story.

So who starts farming and how?

Factors leading people to switch from hunting andgathering to farming:

decline in availability of wild foodsincrease in range of domesticable wild plantsimprovements in food technologypopulation pressure

So places with more domesticable plants and animals,more population pressure and more exposure toagricultural practices and technologies of others willimprove food production faster than others

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 15 / 30

The Domestication of Plants

Wheat and barley are domesticated in the fertile crescentaround 8,000 BC. They were edible, gave high yields, couldbe easily and quickly grown and could be stored.

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 16 / 30

The Domestication of Plants

Fruit and nut trees are domesticated around 4,000 BC. Theytook a long time to yield food and therefore could only begrown by societies already committed to settled village life.An advantage was that they could be grown from cuttings.

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 17 / 30

The Domestication of Plants

A later stage of plant domestication involved fruit trees thatrequired grafting rather than using seed or cuttings.Examples include apples, pears, plums and cherries.

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 18 / 30

The Domestication of Plants

At the same time as these difficult fruit trees other wildplants became domesticated after appearing as weeds. Thesecrops include rye, oats, turnips, beets, leeks and lettuce.

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 19 / 30

Who Domesticated Plants?

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 20 / 30

Why doesn’t this match up with the most developedeconomies?

If food production is the key to building a dominantsociety, why aren’t African and South Americancountries the economic superpowers?

It is because it’s not so much where domesticated cropsstarted, but how specific crops could spread.

Fertile Crescent crops were better nutritionally andgeography favored the spread of Fertile Crescent crops.

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 21 / 30

The Spread of Domesticated Plants

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 22 / 30

The Spread of Domesticated Plants

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 23 / 30

The Domestication of Animals

Domesticated animal Location of wild ancestorSheep West and Central AsiaGoat West AsiaCow Eurasia and North AfricaPig Eurasia and North Africa

Horse Russia

The Major Five

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 24 / 30

The Domestication of Animals

Domesticated animal Location of wild ancestorArabian camel ArabiaBactrian camel Central Asia

Llama and alpaca AndesDonkey North Africa (maybe Southwest Asia)Reindeer Eurasia

Water buffalo Southeast AsiaYak Himalayas

Bali cattle Southeast AsiaMithan India

The Minor Nine

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 25 / 30

The Domestication of Animals

EurasiaSub-Saharan

Africa The Americas AustraliaCandidates 72 51 24 1

Domesticated species 13 0 1 0

Percentage of candidates

domesticated 18% 0% 4% 0%Candidate is defined as a species of terrestrial, herbivorous or omnivorous, wild mammal weighing over 100 pounds.

Mammalian Candidates for Domestication

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 26 / 30

Why were domesticated animals a big advantage?

Animals can be eaten for their meat

Animals can provide milk products

In the days before synthetic fertilizer, animals providethe fertilizer

Animals provide land transportation (which remainsimportant all the way up to the era of railroads)

Animal power can be used for plowing

Animals offer a big military advantage both throughbeing assault vehicles and carriers of disease

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 27 / 30

Disease

Human disease Animal with closely related pathogenMeasles cattle

Tuberculosis cattleSmallpox cattle

Flu pigs and ducksPertussis pigs and dogs

Falciparum malaria birds

Diseases and Domesticated Animals

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 28 / 30

Technology and Geography

Continent 1990 PopulationAreas (square

miles)Population

DensityEurasia and North Africa 4,120,000,000 24,200,000 170 Eurasia 4,000,000,000 21,500,000 186 North Africa 120,000,000 2,700,000 44North America and South America 736,000,000 16,400,000 45Sub-Saharan Africa 535,000,000 9,100,000 59Australia 18,000,000 3,000,000 6

Human Populations of the Continents

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 29 / 30

Geography, Food Production, and the Structure of Society

Diamond sees intensified food production and societalcomplexity as promoting each other

Complex, centralized societies are uniquely capable of:

organizing public workslong-distance tradeorganizing activities of specialized workers

Intensified food production leads to:

seasonally pulsed inputs of laborfood surpluses that allow for economic specializationand social stratificationsedentary living and the ability to accumulatepossessions and commit to projects with longer timehorizons

J. Parman (UC-Davis) World Economic History, Spring 2011 May 13, 2011 30 / 30