IN RE: 2002 JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPORTIONMENT€¦ · IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO....

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. SCO2-194

IN RE: 2002 JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPORTIONMENT __________________________________________________________________

APPENDIX TO BRIEF OF THE FLORIDA SENATE

__________________________________________________________________

JAMES A. SCOTT Tripp Scott, P.A. P.O. Box 14245 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33302 Phone: (954) 525-7500 Fax: (954) 761-8475

BARRY RICHARD Greenberg Traurig, P.A. P.O. Drawer 1838 Tallahassee, FL 32302 Phone: (850) 222-6891 Fax: (850) 681-0207

APPENDIX TO BRIEF OF THE FLORIDA SENATE

A. Newly Created Senatorial Districts

1. Maps........................................................................................................... 1

2. Statistics

a. Census and Election Statistics by District ....................................... 8

b. District by County Statistics .......................................................... 48

B. Existing Districts (Benchmark)

1. Maps......................................................................................................... 53

2. Statistics

a. Census and Election Statistics by District .................................... 60

b. District by County Statistics ........................................................ 100

C. Affidavit by John Guthrie ........................................................................... 105

1. Attachment 1: Technical Discussion of Racial and Ethnic Categories Used in FREDS 2000........................................................... 116

2. Attachment 2: Population Detail for Newly Created Senatorial Districts .................................................................................................. 120

3. Attachment 3: Population Detail for Existing Senatorial Districts........ 125

4. Attachment 4: Socioeconomic Characteristics of Newly Created Senatorial Districts................................................................................. 130

5. Attachment 5: Silhouettes of Selected Florida Municipalities .............. 133

D. Affidavit by Kathleen Mears....................................................................... 140

E. District Descriptions, March 15, 2002, Senate Floor Proceedings............. 155

F. Excerpts from Brief for the State [of Florida] Appellees in United States Supreme Court (Lawyer v. Department of Justice, et al., No. 95-2024) ...................................................................................................... 165

N

Senate Plan: S17S0036Sponsor: Sen. Laurent, John F.Total number of districts: 40Range of population (total deviation from target): 118 persons (0.0%)All geography assigned: TrueAll districts contiguous: TrueProcessed: 3/15/2002

0 50 100 150 Miles

MONROE

POLK

LEE

LEVY

BAY

COLLIER

LAKE

MARION

MIAMI-DADE

PALM BEACH

VOLUSIA

BREVARD

OSCEOLA

DIXIE

TAYLOR

WALTON

GULF

HENDRY

DUVAL

PASCO

LEON

BROWARD

GLADES

CLAY

ORANGE

CITRUS

JACKSON

FRANKLIN

ALACHUA

OKALOOSA

LIBERTY

PUTNAM

SANTA ROSA

NASSAU

HIGHLANDS

MARTIN

MANATEE

BAKER

ESCAMBIA

ST. JOHNS

HILLSBOROUGH

DESOTO

MADISON

HARDEE

COLUMBIAWAKULLA

ST. LUCIE

SUMTER

CHARLOTTE

SARASOTA

OKEECHOBEE

SUWANNEE

PINELLAS

FLAGLER

CALHOUN

HOLMES

JEFFERSONGADSDEN

HERNANDO

HAMILTON

LAFAYETTE

WASHINGTON

INDIAN RIVER

UNION

SEMINOLE

GILCHRIST

BRADFORD3

6

2

39

7

17

14

45

26

8

1

27

21

15

28

20

249

37

23

11

10

12

34

25

181613

35

22

30

19

40

31

38

32

29

33

36

Newly Created Senatorial Districts, 2002House Joint Resolution 1987

Plan S17S0036 by Sen. Laurent

Committee on Reapportionment404 South Monroe Street, 103 S.O.B.

Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100Voice: 850/487-5855 Fax: 850/487-6458

www.leg.state.fl.us/senateredistrictingSenator Daniel Webster, Chairman

The Florida Senate

1

BAY

GULF

LEON

JACKSON

FRANKLIN

LIBERTY

WAKULLA

CALHOUN

GADSDENWASHINGTON

HOLMES

Tallahassee

Panama City

Tyndall AFB

Quincy

Marianna

Eastpoint

Lynn Haven

Sneads

Callaway

Vernon

Woodville

Wewahitchka

Esto

Chipley

Midway

Carrabelle

Bonifay

Graceville

Greenwood

Malone

Chattahoochee

Springfield

Jacob City

Port St. Joe

Gretna

Blountstown

Altha

Havana

Cedar Grove

Apalachicola

St. Marks

AlfordGrand Ridge

Pretty Bayou

Cottondale

Wausau

Sopchoppy

Mexico Beach

Greensboro

Campbellton

Hiland Park

Bascom

6

2

4

3

WALTONOKALOOSASANTA ROSA

ESCAMBIA

BAY

HOLMES

Pensacola

Pace

Gulf Breeze

Brent

Ensley

GonzalezFerry Pass

Crestview

Bellview

Freeport

Destin

Niceville

Valparaiso

Molino

Wright

Westville

Warrington

Milton

Ebro

De Funiak Springs

Paxton

Bagdad

Myrtle Grove

JayCentury

Panama City Beach

Fort Walton Beach

Ponce de Leon

Miramar Beach

Eglin AFB

Laurel Hill

Laguna Beach

2

4

N

0 10 20 30 Miles




The Florida Senate

Newly Created Senatorial Districts (Plan S17S0036)

2

Spring Hill

Newberry

Hernando

Lecanto

Alachua

Gainesville

Pine Ridge

Shady Hills

Perry

Yankeetown

Sugarmill Woods

Citrus Springs

Land O' Lakes

High Springs

Homosassa Springs

Lake City

Manattee Road

East Bronson

Citrus Hills

Hudson

Odessa

Live Oak

Andrews

Homosassa

Inverness

Holiday

Dunnellon

Trinity

Williston

Inglis

Floral City

Elfers

Williston Highlands

Crystal River

Brooksville

Chiefland

Wesley Chapel

Bayonet Point

Bell

North Weeki Wachee

Archer

Lee

Trenton

Madison

New Port Richey

Hernando Beach

Five Points

Jasmine Estates

East Williston

Fort White

Cedar Key

Cross City

Mayo

Fanning Springs

La Crosse

White Springs

Greenville

Otter Creek

Branford

Masaryktown

Weeki Wachee

Worthington Springs

Horseshoe Beach

Pine Island

Lake Lindsey

LEVY

DIXIE

TAYLOR

CITRUS

PASCO

COLUMBIA

SUWANNEE

ALACHUA

MADISON

LAFAYETTE

HERNANDO

JEFFERSON

GILCHRIST

MARION

BAKER

UNION

HAMILTON

BRA3

14

11

6

12

15

100 10 20 30 Miles

N





The Florida Senate

3

Tampa

Cape Coral

St. Petersburg

North Port

Lehigh Acres

Lakeland

Lutz

Sanibel

Keystone

Alva

Fort Myers

Clearwater

Brandon

Dunedin

Estero

East Lake

North Fort Myers

Sarasota

Largo

Bonita Springs

Poinciana

Gandy

Iona

Plant City

Ruskin

Palm Harbor

Naples

Winter Haven

Port Charlotte

Bradenton

Bartow

Fish Hawk

Buckingham

Punta Gorda

Placid Lakes

Town 'n' Country

Sebring

Venice

St. Pete Beach

Captiva

Thonotosassa

Gibsonton

Rotonda

Marco Island

Pinellas Park

Lake Wales

Tarpon Springs

St. James City

Westchase

Gateway

Feather Sound

Cheval

Citrus Park

Bokeelia

Laurel

Riverview

Olga

Wimauma

Osprey

Villas

Oldsmar

Auburndale

Cortez

Fruitville

Valrico

Haines City

Immokalee

Lake Magdalene

Englewood

Lake Alfred

Medulla

Greater Sun Center

Mango

Port La Belle

Longboat Key

Ellenton

Dundee

Cleveland

Avon Park

Arcadia

Palmetto

South Venice

Gulfport

Lely Resort

Fort MeadeApollo Beach

Dover

Southeast Arcadia

Orangetree

McGregor

Kathleen

Bee Ridge

Egypt Lake-Leto

Punta Rassa

MulberryBelleair

Wauchula

Tierra Verde

Treasure Island

Vamo

Fort Myers Beach

Siesta Key

Golden Gate

San Carlos Park

Seminole

Tice

Pelican Bay

WaverlyWahneta

South Bradenton

Lake Hamilton

North Sarasota

Plantation

Lake Placid

Frostproof

Pine Island Center

Pebble Creek

Vineyards

Madeira Beach

Sylvan Shores

Manasota Key

Suncoast Estates

Davenport

Whitfield

Harbour Heights

Warm Mineral Springs

Holmes Beach

Babson Park

Zolfo Springs

Naples Park

Bowling Green

Burnt Store Marina

Highland City

Ridgecrest

Polk City

Highland Park

Everglades

LEE

POLK

COLLIER

MANATEE

HIGHLANDS

HILLSBOROUGH

DESOTO

HARDEE

HENDRY

CHARLOTTE

SARASOTA

GLADES

PINELLAS

OSCEOLA

17

21

39

23

27

37

10

15

18

26

1613

1211

N

0 10 20 30 Miles





The Florida Senate

4

Jacksonville

Ocala

Deltona

Palm Coast

Mims

Gainesville

Daytona Beach

Yulee

Orlando

Hernando

Lecanto

Alachua

Sanford

Apopka

De Bary

Pine Ridge

Titusville

Leesburg

Floral City

Port Orange

Oviedo

Yalaha

Lakeside

Ormond Beach

De Land

Bithlo

Fruit Cove

Eustis

Geneva

Middleburg

New Smyrna Beach

Ocoee

Citrus Springs

Sugarmill Woods

Ponce Inlet

Oak Hill

Pierson

Jacksonville Beach

Palm Valley

Starke

Palatka

Winter Springs

Clermont

Lake Mary

Atlantic Beach

Samsula-Spruce Creek

Inverness

Citrus Hills

Tavares

St. Augustine

Pine Hills

Edgewater

Hilliard

Winter Park

Dunnellon

Lady Lake

Nassau Village-Ratliff

Williston

MaitlandCasselberry

Fernandina Beach

Bunnell

Interlachen

Mount Dora

Wekiwa Springs

Winter Garden

Orange City

Lockhart

Wildwood

Paisley

Green Cove Springs

Neptune Beach

Holly Hill

Astor

Orange Park

Forest City

Zellwood

Brooksville

Lake Helen

Umatilla

Sawgrass

Archer

Minneola

Heathrow

Ferndale

South Daytona

Mascotte

Hawthorne

Macclenny

Flagler Beach

LisbonFruitland Park

Groveland

Asbury Lake

High Point

Astatula

Silver Lake

Union Park

Waldo

Baldwin

Bushnell

Pomona Park

Chuluota

Lake Panasoffkee

Silver Springs Shores

East Williston

Lake Mack-Forest Hills

Orlovista

Inverness Highlands South

Butler Beach

Lawtey

Belleview

Welaka

TangerineMount Plymouth Midway

Pittman

St. Augustine Shores

Webster

Center Hill

Crescent City

Pine Lakes

Lake Butler

De Leon Springs

Callahan

Reddick

La Crosse

Newberry

Villano Beach

Hampton

Micanopy

Keystone Heights

Penney Farms

Crescent Beach

St. Augustine Beach

Ormond-By-The-Sea

Hastings

McIntosh

Raiford

Brooker

Altoona

Marineland

Beverly Beach

Nobleton

Okahumpka

Worthington Springs

Lake Lindsey

MARION

LAKE

VOLUSIA

DUVAL

CLAY

PUTNAM

NASSAU

BAKER

ST. JOHNS

ALACHUA

FLAGLER

SUMTER

CITRUS

ORANGE

UNION

SEMINOLE

LEVY

BRADFORD

BREVARDHERNANDO

7

5

14

8

1

3

20

924

1522

1911

N

0 10 20 30 Miles





The Florida Senate

5

POLK

BREVARD

OSCEOLA

GLADES

PALM BEACH

ORANGE

HIGHLANDS

MARTIN

HENDRY

ST. LUCIEOKEECHOBEE

INDIAN RIVER

AKE

LEE

VOLUSIA

HARDEE

DESOTO

RLOTTE

Orlando

Palm Bay

Lehigh Acres

Port St. Lucie

Mims

Alva

Poinciana

Merritt Island

Jupiter

Melbourne

West Palm Beach

Sanford

Apopka

Titusville

Wellington

Bay Lake

Oviedo

Palm Beach Gardens

Wedgefield

Hutchinson Island South

Citrus Ridge

Fort Pierce

Lake Butter

Bithlo

Palm City

Geneva

Malabar

Ocoee

Cocoa

Micco

Sebastian

Placid Lakes

Kissimmee

Sebring

Stuart

St. Cloud

Lake Wales

Rockledge

Eustis

Cocoa Beach

Vero Beach

Gifford

Winter Springs

Celebration

Florida Ridge

Lake Mary

Palm Beach

North Beach

Pine Hills

Sharpes

Olga

Haines City

Winter Park

Meadow Woods

Riviera BeachPort La Belle

Maitland

White City

Pahokee

Casselberry

De Bary

Winter Garden

Jensen Beach

Vero Beach South

Mount Dora

Wekiwa Springs

Dundee

Fellsmere

Royal Palm Beach

Lake Worth

Indiantown

Avon Park

Lockhart

Winter Beach

Belle Isle

West Melbourne

Clewiston

Hobe Sound

Forest City

Belle Glade

Conway

Lakewood Park

Zellwood

Boynton BeachLantana

Indian River Shores

Christmas

South Bay

Loughman

Roseland

Heathrow

Okeechobee

Doctor Phillips

Port Salerno

Taylor Creek

Ferndale

Port St. John

Williamsburg

Waverly

Azalea Park

Jupiter Island

Lake Hamilton

Buena Ventura Lakes

Fort Pierce North

Fort Pierce South

Taft

Oak Hill

Tequesta

Chuluota

Lake Placid

Frostproof

Satellite Beach

Orlovista

Campbell

Sylvan Shores

Lake Hart

Tangerine

South Patrick Shores

Midway

Juno Beach

Cypress Quarters

Davenport

Cape Canaveral

Deltona

Canal Point

Harlem

Palm Springs

Babson Park

Indialantic

Lake Harbor

St. Lucie

Buckhead Ridge

Moore Haven

Highland Park

SEMINOLE

17

26

28

27

249

39

7

15

20

25

22

19

30

29

21

N

0 10 20 30 Miles




The Florida SenateNewly Created Senatorial Districts (Plan S17S0036)

6

Miami

Davie

Islandia

Miramar

Weston

Coral Gables

Hollywood

Wellington

Hialeah

Boca Raton

Sunrise

Doral

Plantation

Pembroke Pines

Kendall

Fort Lauderdale

Coral Springs

West Palm Beach

Miami Beach

Tamarac

Pompano Beach

Homestead

Parkland

Delray Beach

Margate

Cutler

Boynton Beach

Deerfield Beach

Tamiami

Pinecrest

Coconut Creek

North Miami

Princeton

Carol City

Palm Beach

Lauderhill

Ojus

Cooper City

Kendale Lakes

Medley

Royal Palm Beach

Lake Worth

Sunset

Oakland Park

The Hammocks

Miami Lakes

Belle Glade

Norland

Opa-locka

Greenacres

Hallandale

Goulds

Dania Beach

Aventura

Cutler Ridge

Lantana

South Bay

Golden GladesCountry Club

Westchester

Westview

Fountainbleau

Three Lakes

Country Estates

Boca Del Mar

Leisure City

West Little River

Kendall West

Florida City

Glenvar Heights

Miami Shores

Richmond West

Homestead Base

Gladeview

Sunshine Ranches

North Lauderdale

Manalapan

Andover

Miami Springs

Rolling Oaks

Golf

Atlantis

Golden Lakes

East Perrine

South Miami

Kings Point

Ocean Ridge

Hialeah Gardens

Lighthouse Point

Harlem

Wilton Manors

Palm Springs

Surfside

Hamptons at Boca Raton

Lake Harbor

Key Biscayne

Hillsboro Beach

Boca Pointe

Sunny Isles Beach

Westgate-Belvedere Homes

Highland BeachWhisper Walk

Gulf Stream

Melrose ParkBroadview Park

Mission Bay

Villages of Oriole

Lauderdale-by-the-Sea

Lake Clarke Shores

North Bay Village

Utopia

Dunes Road

Terra Mar

Lakeside Green

West Ken-Lark

Fisher Island

Belle Glade Camp

Palm Aire

Edgewater

Godfrey Road

Gun Club Estates

Briny Breezes

MIAMI-DADE

BROWARD

PALM BEACHHENDRY

COLLIER

MONROE

39

34

27

25

35

30

40

31

38

32

29

33

36

28

0 5 10 15 20 Miles

N




The Florida Senate


7

Total District Population 399,563 General Election 2000 Deviation 4 0.0% President of the United States

Bush, George W. & Dick Cheney (REP) 46,125 38.6%Total Population (2000 Census) 399,563 100.0% Gore, Al & Joe Lieberman (DEM) 71,504 59.8% Single-Race Non-Hispanic White 171,915 43.0% Nader, Ralph & Winona LaDuke (GRE) 1,013 0.8% Non-Hispanic Black (including multirace) 201,097 50.3% All Other Candidates 866 0.7% Hispanic Black (including multirace) 2,056 0.5% United States Senator Hispanic (excluding Hisp Black) 11,571 2.9% McCollum, Bill (REP) 44,394 36.7% Non-Hispanic Other (none of the above) 12,924 3.2% Nelson, Bill (DEM) 76,590 63.3% Male 190,956 47.8% Treasurer and Ins. Comm. Female 208,607 52.2% Gallagher, Tom (REP) 56,852 46.2% Age 17 and younger 109,278 27.3% Cosgrove, John (DEM) 66,117 53.8% Age 18 to 64 243,770 61.0% Commissioner of Education Age 65 and older 46,515 11.6% Crist, Charlie (REP) 46,399 39.8%

Sheldon, George H. (DEM) 70,049 60.2%Voting Age Population (2000 Census) 290,285 100.0% Democratic Primary 2000 Single-Race Non-Hispanic White 137,582 47.4% Commissioner of Education Non-Hispanic Black (including multirace) 133,909 46.1% Bush III, James (DEM) 10,566 32.8% Hispanic Black (including multirace) 1,231 0.4% Sheldon, George H. (DEM) 21,654 67.2% Hispanic (excluding Hisp Black) 8,135 2.8% General Election 1998 Non-Hispanic Other (none of the above) 9,428 3.2% United States Senator

Crist, Charlie (REP) 22,708 26.5%Population Change (2000-1990) 20,609 5.4% Graham, Bob (DEM) 63,130 73.5%

Governor and Lieutenant GovernorTotal Population (1990 Census) 378,954 100.0% Bush, Jeb & Frank Brogan (REP) 36,790 41.6% Non-Hispanic White 195,746 51.7% MacKay, Buddy & Rick Dantzler (DEM) 51,741 58.4% Non-Hispanic Black 169,586 44.8% Secretary of State Hispanic Black 1,291 0.3% Harris, Katherine (REP) 34,223 39.8% Hispanic (excluding Hisp Black) 6,727 1.8% Gievers, Karen (DEM) 51,711 60.2% Non-Hispanic Other 5,604 1.5% Attorney General

Bludworth, David H."Dave" (REP) 26,166 30.3%Voting Age Population (1990 Census) 278,266 100.0% Butterworth, Bob (DEM) 60,207 69.7% Non-Hispanic White 155,281 55.8% Comptroller Non-Hispanic Black 113,257 40.7% Milligan, Bob (REP) 36,230 42.9% Hispanic Black 821 0.3% Daughtrey, Newall Jerome (DEM) 48,267 57.1% Hispanic (excluding Hisp Black) 4,871 1.8% Treasurer and Ins. Comm. Non-Hispanic Other 4,036 1.5% Ireland, Tim (REP) 26,578 30.6%

Nelson, Bill (DEM) 60,298 69.4%Registered Voters 2000 210,881 100.0% Commissioner of Education Republicans 47,409 22.5% Gallagher, Tom (REP) 37,251 42.8% Democrats 137,610 65.3% Wallace, Peter Rudy (DEM) 49,737 57.2% Independents/Other Parties 25,862 12.3% Commissioner of Agriculture

Faircloth, Rich (REP) 24,085 27.9%Registered Voters 1998 208,799 100.0% Crawford, Bob (DEM) 62,137 72.1% Republicans 47,077 22.5% General Election 1996 Democrats 139,549 66.8% President of the United States Independents/Other Parties 22,171 10.6% Dole, Bob and Jack Kemp (REP) 40,057 33.0%

Clinton, Bill and Al Gore (DEM) 75,049 61.9%Registered Voters 1996 204,349 100.0% Perot, Ross and Pat Choate (REF) 6,197 5.1% Republicans 46,124 22.6% General Election 1994 Democrats 139,386 68.2% United States Senator Independents/Other Parties 18,839 9.2% Mack, Connie (REP) 51,554 58.5%

Rodham, Hugh E. (DEM) 36,587 41.5%Registered Voters 2000 210,881 100.0% Governor and Lieutenant Governor White 100,811 47.8% Bush, Jeb and Tom Feeney (REP) 38,858 41.9% Black 97,898 46.4% Chiles, Lawton and Buddy MacKay (DEM) 53,834 58.1% Hispanic 2,748 1.3% Secretary of State Other 9,425 4.5% Mortham, Sandy Barringer (REP) 35,665 42.0% Male 90,675 43.0% Saunders, Ron (DEM) 49,280 58.0% Female 119,228 56.5% Attorney General Gender Not Specified 978 0.5% Ferro, Henry (REP) 28,353 32.0% Age 18 to 29 44,505 21.1% Butterworth, Bob (DEM) 60,162 68.0% Age 30 to 44 66,338 31.5% Comptroller Age 45 to 54 38,368 18.2% Milligan, Bob (REP) 32,115 36.8% Age 55 to 64 24,742 11.7% Lewis, Gerald (DEM) 55,176 63.2% Age 65 and Older 36,890 17.5% Treasurer and Ins. Comm. Age Not Specified 38 0.0% Ireland, Tim (REP) 32,408 37.3% Votes Cast for President of the U.S. 119,506 56.7% Nelson, Bill (DEM) 54,518 62.7%

Commissioner of EducationRegistered Republicans 2000 47,409 100.0% Brogan, Frank T. (REP) 38,160 43.0% White 40,812 86.1% Jamerson, Doug (DEM) 50,646 57.0% Black 3,811 8.0% Commissioner of Agriculture Hispanic 754 1.6% Smith, Jim (REP) 37,106 42.0% Other 1,763 3.7% Crawford, Bob (DEM) 51,192 58.0%

Democratic Primary 1994Registered Democrats 2000 137,610 100.0% Commissioner of Education White 45,322 32.9% Griffin, John (DEM) 16,000 55.2% Black 87,103 63.3% Jamerson, Doug (DEM) 12,986 44.8% Hispanic 1,208 0.9% General Election 1992 Other 4,280 3.1% President of the United States (1992)

Bush, George and Dan Quayle (REP) 45,327 35.8%Registered Ind/Other 2000 25,862 100.0% Clinton, Bill and Al Gore (DEM) 66,639 52.6% White 14,675 56.7% Perot, Ross and James Stockdale (IND) 14,817 11.7% Black 6,984 27.0% United States Senator (1992) Hispanic 785 3.0% Grant, Bill (REP) 28,767 26.0% Other 3,381 13.1% Graham, Bob (DEM) 82,005 74.0%

Newly Created Senatorial District 1 (Plan S17S0036)

8

Total District Population 399,543 General Election 2000 Deviation -16 0.0% President of the United States

Bush, George W. & Dick Cheney (REP) 103,852 65.3%Total Population (2000 Census) 399,543 100.0% Gore, Al & Joe Lieberman (DEM) 51,347 32.3% Single-Race Non-Hispanic White 307,896 77.1% Nader, Ralph & Winona LaDuke (GRE) 2,028 1.3% Non-Hispanic Black (including multirace) 66,795 16.7% All Other Candidates 1,817 1.1% Hispanic Black (including multirace) 755 0.2% United States Senator Hispanic (excluding Hisp Black) 8,351 2.1% McCollum, Bill (REP) 92,034 60.3% Non-Hispanic Other (none of the above) 15,746 3.9% Nelson, Bill (DEM) 60,712 39.7% Male 198,362 49.6% Treasurer and Ins. Comm. Female 201,181 50.4% Gallagher, Tom (REP) 107,380 70.1% Age 17 and younger 100,479 25.1% Cosgrove, John (DEM) 45,899 29.9% Age 18 to 64 248,137 62.1% Commissioner of Education Age 65 and older 50,927 12.7% Crist, Charlie (REP) 92,876 62.9%

Sheldon, George H. (DEM) 54,735 37.1%Voting Age Population (2000 Census) 299,064 100.0% Democratic Primary 2000 Single-Race Non-Hispanic White 236,280 79.0% Commissioner of Education Non-Hispanic Black (including multirace) 45,149 15.1% Bush III, James (DEM) 13,936 36.9% Hispanic Black (including multirace) 456 0.2% Sheldon, George H. (DEM) 23,799 63.1% Hispanic (excluding Hisp Black) 5,775 1.9% General Election 1998 Non-Hispanic Other (none of the above) 11,404 3.8% United States Senator


Governor and Lieutenant GovernorTotal Population (1990 Census) 333,019 100.0% Bush, Jeb & Frank Brogan (REP) 69,317 67.8% Non-Hispanic White 265,128 79.6% MacKay, Buddy & Rick Dantzler (DEM) 32,962 32.2% Non-Hispanic Black 55,067 16.5% Secretary of State Hispanic Black 317 0.1% Harris, Katherine (REP) 60,774 60.7% Hispanic (excluding Hisp Black) 5,063 1.5% Gievers, Karen (DEM) 39,328 39.3% Non-Hispanic Other 7,444 2.2% Attorney General







Democratic Primary 1994Registered Democrats 2000 119,173 100.0% Commissioner of Education White 89,830 75.4% Griffin, John (DEM) 17,958 55.8% Black 25,995 21.8% Jamerson, Doug (DEM) 14,252 44.2% Hispanic 417 0.3% General Election 1992 Other 2,949 2.5% President of the United States (1992)



9











Commissioner of EducationRegistered Republicans 2000 81,201 100.0% Brogan, Frank T. (REP) 60,059 52.5% White 77,493 95.4% Jamerson, Doug (DEM) 54,233 47.5% Black 954 1.2% Commissioner of Agriculture Hispanic 778 1.0% Smith, Jim (REP) 54,373 46.9% Other 1,953 2.4% Crawford, Bob (DEM) 61,618 53.1%




10















11











Commissioner of EducationRegistered Republicans 2000 113,752 100.0% Brogan, Frank T. (REP) 71,731 71.0% White 107,465 94.5% Jamerson, Doug (DEM) 29,280 29.0% Black 1,128 1.0% Commissioner of Agriculture Hispanic 1,383 1.2% Smith, Jim (REP) 66,977 65.6% Other 3,888 3.4% Crawford, Bob (DEM) 35,150 34.4%




12


Bush, George W. & Dick Cheney (REP) 67,025 43.0%Total Population (2000 Census) 399,586 100.0% Gore, Al & Joe Lieberman (DEM) 85,172 54.6% Single-Race Non-Hispanic White 251,059 62.8% Nader, Ralph & Winona LaDuke (GRE) 2,409 1.5% Non-Hispanic Black (including multirace) 125,368 31.4% All Other Candidates 1,333 0.9% Hispanic Black (including multirace) 1,461 0.4% United States Senator Hispanic (excluding Hisp Black) 12,489 3.1% McCollum, Bill (REP) 57,893 38.6% Non-Hispanic Other (none of the above) 9,209 2.3% Nelson, Bill (DEM) 92,147 61.4% Male 199,288 49.9% Treasurer and Ins. Comm. Female 200,298 50.1% Gallagher, Tom (REP) 78,527 51.7% Age 17 and younger 90,575 22.7% Cosgrove, John (DEM) 73,356 48.3% Age 18 to 64 266,686 66.7% Commissioner of Education Age 65 and older 42,325 10.6% Crist, Charlie (REP) 61,026 42.0%








Rodham, Hugh E. (DEM) 39,936 35.3%Registered Voters 2000 234,060 100.0% Governor and Lieutenant Governor White 161,163 68.9% Bush, Jeb and Tom Feeney (REP) 45,368 39.2% Black 61,801 26.4% Chiles, Lawton and Buddy MacKay (DEM) 70,430 60.8% Hispanic 2,380 1.0% Secretary of State Other 8,715 3.7% Mortham, Sandy Barringer (REP) 37,371 33.7% Male 103,558 44.2% Saunders, Ron (DEM) 73,423 66.3% Female 129,185 55.2% Attorney General Gender Not Specified 1,317 0.6% Ferro, Henry (REP) 27,337 24.8% Age 18 to 29 58,888 25.2% Butterworth, Bob (DEM) 83,074 75.2% Age 30 to 44 66,562 28.4% Comptroller Age 45 to 54 44,409 19.0% Milligan, Bob (REP) 33,512 29.9% Age 55 to 64 28,892 12.3% Lewis, Gerald (DEM) 78,448 70.1% Age 65 and Older 35,298 15.1% Treasurer and Ins. Comm. Age Not Specified 11 0.0% Ireland, Tim (REP) 36,162 32.7% Votes Cast for President of the U.S. 155,942 66.6% Nelson, Bill (DEM) 74,588 67.3%





13













Bush, George and Dan Quayle (REP) 61,231 40.6%Registered Ind/Other 2000 39,151 100.0% Clinton, Bill and Al Gore (DEM) 57,528 38.1% White 34,775 88.8% Perot, Ross and James Stockdale (IND) 32,204 21.3% Black 823 2.1% United States Senator (1992) Hispanic 844 2.2% Grant, Bill (REP) 51,036 34.5% Other 2,708 6.9% Graham, Bob (DEM) 96,837 65.5%


14













Bush, George and Dan Quayle (REP) 64,718 52.0%Registered Ind/Other 2000 43,309 100.0% Clinton, Bill and Al Gore (DEM) 37,738 30.3% White 36,442 84.1% Perot, Ross and James Stockdale (IND) 21,953 17.6% Black 1,747 4.0% United States Senator (1992) Hispanic 1,175 2.7% Grant, Bill (REP) 49,094 42.6% Other 3,969 9.2% Graham, Bob (DEM) 66,098 57.4%


15











Commissioner of EducationRegistered Republicans 2000 90,252 100.0% Brogan, Frank T. (REP) 51,858 62.4% White 81,138 89.9% Jamerson, Doug (DEM) 31,253 37.6% Black 772 0.9% Commissioner of Agriculture Hispanic 4,170 4.6% Smith, Jim (REP) 45,862 54.7% Other 4,163 4.6% Crawford, Bob (DEM) 37,938 45.3%




16















17













Bush, George and Dan Quayle (REP) 66,344 37.2%Registered Ind/Other 2000 56,813 100.0% Clinton, Bill and Al Gore (DEM) 67,554 37.9% White 52,348 92.1% Perot, Ross and James Stockdale (IND) 44,299 24.9% Black 436 0.8% United States Senator (1992) Hispanic 1,131 2.0% Grant, Bill (REP) 63,112 38.0% Other 2,906 5.1% Graham, Bob (DEM) 102,785 62.0%


18















19















20















21















22















23















24






Bludworth, David H."Dave" (REP) 15,163 21.3%Voting Age Population (1990 Census) 284,408 100.0% Butterworth, Bob (DEM) 56,087 78.7% Non-Hispanic White 153,640 54.0% Comptroller Non-Hispanic Black 90,063 31.7% Milligan, Bob (REP) 25,167 36.4% Hispanic Black 1,901 0.7% Daughtrey, Newall Jerome (DEM) 44,016 63.6% Hispanic (excluding Hisp Black) 35,140 12.4% Treasurer and Ins. Comm. Non-Hispanic Other 3,664 1.3% Ireland, Tim (REP) 18,866 26.4%









25















26















27















28















29















30















31















32















33















34















35


Bush, George W. & Dick Cheney (REP) 14,540 14.6%Total Population (2000 Census) 399,534 100.0% Gore, Al & Joe Lieberman (DEM) 83,125 83.7% Single-Race Non-Hispanic White 94,493 23.7% Nader, Ralph & Winona LaDuke (GRE) 919 0.9% Non-Hispanic Black (including multirace) 252,546 63.2% All Other Candidates 705 0.7% Hispanic Black (including multirace) 3,844 1.0% United States Senator Hispanic (excluding Hisp Black) 40,676 10.2% McCollum, Bill (REP) 15,112 15.6% Non-Hispanic Other (none of the above) 7,975 2.0% Nelson, Bill (DEM) 81,903 84.4% Male 197,262 49.4% Treasurer and Ins. Comm. Female 202,272 50.6% Gallagher, Tom (REP) 22,989 23.7% Age 17 and younger 114,502 28.7% Cosgrove, John (DEM) 74,201 76.3% Age 18 to 64 241,165 60.4% Commissioner of Education Age 65 and older 43,867 11.0% Crist, Charlie (REP) 17,949 19.6%













36















37















38















39











Commissioner of EducationRegistered Republicans 2000 22,484 100.0% Brogan, Frank T. (REP) 12,206 20.2% White 5,804 25.8% Jamerson, Doug (DEM) 48,221 79.8% Black 3,456 15.4% Commissioner of Agriculture Hispanic 12,213 54.3% Smith, Jim (REP) 13,402 22.4% Other 955 4.2% Crawford, Bob (DEM) 46,373 77.6%




40















41















42















43















44















45















46















47

District by County Statistics for Newly Created Senatorial DistrictsPercentages of District Populations/Voters by County and of County Populations/Voters by District (Census and Elections of 2000)

District 1 399,563 290,285 210,881 47,409 137,610 Duval 329,671 82.5% 42.3% 238,093 82.0% 41.5% 174,281 82.6% 41.1% 39,571 83.5% 26.0% 114,024 82.9% 53.9%Flagler 6,380 1.6% 12.8% 4,699 1.6% 11.5% 3,353 1.6% 10.0% 1,036 2.2% 7.5% 1,818 1.3% 13.5%Putnam 13,332 3.3% 18.9% 9,868 3.4% 18.6% 7,183 3.4% 17.8% 1,339 2.8% 12.9% 5,236 3.8% 20.5%St. Johns 17,209 4.3% 14.0% 12,514 4.3% 13.2% 10,815 5.1% 12.1% 3,267 6.9% 7.4% 5,931 4.3% 19.8%Volusia 32,971 8.3% 7.4% 25,111 8.7% 7.1% 15,249 7.2% 5.8% 2,196 4.6% 2.2% 10,601 7.7% 9.3%District 2 399,543 299,064 239,263 92,090 119,173 Bay 13,715 3.4% 9.3% 9,878 3.3% 8.8% 6,552 2.7% 7.1% 2,123 2.3% 6.2% 3,398 2.9% 7.7%Escambia 193,859 48.5% 65.8% 146,594 49.0% 65.1% 109,907 45.9% 64.1% 40,588 44.1% 58.1% 55,730 46.8% 71.1%Holmes 18,564 4.6% 100.0% 14,279 4.8% 100.0% 10,318 4.3% 100.0% 1,292 1.4% 100.0% 8,606 7.2% 100.0%Okaloosa 49,877 12.5% 29.3% 36,204 12.1% 28.2% 33,484 14.0% 30.1% 17,887 19.4% 28.8% 10,259 8.6% 33.1%Santa Rosa 71,691 17.9% 60.9% 52,432 17.5% 60.6% 45,315 18.9% 58.3% 22,192 24.1% 54.8% 18,209 15.3% 67.7%Walton 30,864 7.7% 76.0% 23,609 7.9% 74.2% 19,304 8.1% 68.5% 5,252 5.7% 52.9% 12,279 10.3% 82.7%Washington 20,973 5.2% 100.0% 16,068 5.4% 100.0% 14,383 6.0% 100.0% 2,756 3.0% 100.0% 10,692 9.0% 100.0%District 3 399,512 316,022 254,485 81,201 140,734 Baker 22,259 5.6% 100.0% 16,141 5.1% 100.0% 12,354 4.9% 100.0% 1,685 2.1% 100.0% 10,263 7.3% 100.0%Citrus 108,444 27.1% 91.8% 89,552 28.3% 91.6% 74,554 29.3% 91.6% 30,548 37.6% 92.2% 30,733 21.8% 91.2%Columbia 16,438 4.1% 29.1% 12,052 3.8% 28.6% 9,311 3.7% 29.9% 1,963 2.4% 23.9% 6,558 4.7% 33.1%Dixie 13,827 3.5% 100.0% 10,772 3.4% 100.0% 10,460 4.1% 100.0% 1,088 1.3% 100.0% 8,959 6.4% 100.0%Hamilton 13,327 3.3% 100.0% 10,190 3.2% 100.0% 7,103 2.8% 100.0% 719 0.9% 100.0% 6,112 4.3% 100.0%Jefferson 4,008 1.0% 31.1% 3,080 1.0% 30.9% 2,617 1.0% 32.1% 381 0.5% 30.9% 2,053 1.5% 31.8%Lafayette 7,022 1.8% 100.0% 5,499 1.7% 100.0% 4,034 1.6% 100.0% 319 0.4% 100.0% 3,608 2.6% 100.0%Leon 36,611 9.2% 15.3% 29,123 9.2% 15.5% 24,302 9.5% 16.7% 6,583 8.1% 16.6% 14,932 10.6% 17.3%Levy 12,305 3.1% 35.7% 9,595 3.0% 36.5% 7,206 2.8% 38.6% 1,783 2.2% 39.8% 4,762 3.4% 37.8%Madison 1,891 0.5% 10.1% 1,454 0.5% 10.4% 1,110 0.4% 10.7% 178 0.2% 13.8% 892 0.6% 10.2%Marion 109,280 27.4% 42.2% 87,564 27.7% 43.0% 68,611 27.0% 46.5% 29,807 36.7% 47.3% 27,167 19.3% 44.1%Suwannee 34,844 8.7% 100.0% 26,475 8.4% 100.0% 20,519 8.1% 100.0% 4,459 5.5% 100.0% 14,585 10.4% 100.0%Taylor 19,256 4.8% 100.0% 14,525 4.6% 100.0% 12,304 4.8% 100.0% 1,688 2.1% 100.0% 10,110 7.2% 100.0%District 4 399,586 306,852 260,972 127,526 91,487 Bay 122,625 30.7% 82.7% 93,907 30.6% 83.4% 80,254 30.8% 86.5% 30,946 24.3% 90.2% 36,819 40.2% 83.3%Escambia 100,551 25.2% 34.2% 78,545 25.6% 34.9% 61,493 23.6% 35.9% 29,323 23.0% 41.9% 22,706 24.8% 28.9%Okaloosa 120,621 30.2% 70.7% 92,161 30.0% 71.8% 77,903 29.9% 69.9% 44,272 34.7% 71.2% 20,691 22.6% 66.9%Santa Rosa 46,052 11.5% 39.1% 34,042 11.1% 39.4% 32,463 12.4% 41.7% 18,313 14.4% 45.2% 8,702 9.5% 32.3%Walton 9,737 2.4% 24.0% 8,197 2.7% 25.8% 8,859 3.4% 31.5% 4,672 3.7% 47.1% 2,569 2.8% 17.3%District 5 399,573 292,315 233,528 113,752 86,524 Clay 110,772 27.7% 78.7% 79,550 27.2% 78.4% 68,954 29.5% 79.4% 39,441 34.7% 80.9% 18,745 21.7% 75.7%Duval 229,198 57.4% 29.4% 170,294 58.3% 29.7% 129,802 55.6% 30.6% 58,355 51.3% 38.4% 53,315 61.6% 25.2%Nassau 38,429 9.6% 66.6% 27,785 9.5% 64.3% 19,987 8.6% 58.6% 7,518 6.6% 54.0% 10,409 12.0% 64.1%St. Johns 21,174 5.3% 17.2% 14,686 5.0% 15.5% 14,785 6.3% 16.6% 8,438 7.4% 19.0% 4,055 4.7% 13.6%District 6 399,586 309,011 234,060 48,879 162,459

Total Reg Voters

% of District

% of County

% of District

% of County

Republican Reg Voters

% of District

% of County

Democrat Reg Voters

Senate Plan S17S0036 Total

Population% of

District% of

CountyVoting Age Population

% of District

% of County

48


Total Reg Voters

% of District

% of County

% of District

% of County


% of District

% of County

Democrat Reg Voters


Population% of

District% of


% of District

% of County

Bay 11,877 3.0% 8.0% 8,790 2.8% 7.8% 5,986 2.6% 6.5% 1,233 2.5% 3.6% 3,999 2.5% 9.0%Calhoun 13,017 3.3% 100.0% 9,996 3.2% 100.0% 7,234 3.1% 100.0% 614 1.3% 100.0% 6,359 3.9% 100.0%Franklin 9,829 2.5% 100.0% 7,840 2.5% 100.0% 7,578 3.2% 100.0% 1,039 2.1% 100.0% 6,127 3.8% 100.0%Gadsden 45,087 11.3% 100.0% 33,168 10.7% 100.0% 26,229 11.2% 100.0% 2,636 5.4% 100.0% 22,311 13.7% 100.0%Gulf 14,560 3.6% 100.0% 11,665 3.8% 100.0% 9,914 4.2% 100.0% 1,623 3.3% 100.0% 7,806 4.8% 100.0%Jackson 46,755 11.7% 100.0% 36,306 11.7% 100.0% 23,979 10.2% 100.0% 3,919 8.0% 100.0% 18,951 11.7% 100.0%Jefferson 8,894 2.2% 68.9% 6,892 2.2% 69.1% 5,541 2.4% 67.9% 853 1.7% 69.1% 4,394 2.7% 68.2%Leon 202,841 50.8% 84.7% 159,322 51.6% 84.5% 121,198 51.8% 83.3% 33,123 67.8% 83.4% 71,208 43.8% 82.7%Liberty 7,021 1.8% 100.0% 5,490 1.8% 100.0% 3,753 1.6% 100.0% 166 0.3% 100.0% 3,512 2.2% 100.0%Madison 16,842 4.2% 89.9% 12,543 4.1% 89.6% 9,272 4.0% 89.3% 1,113 2.3% 86.2% 7,843 4.8% 89.8%Wakulla 22,863 5.7% 100.0% 16,999 5.5% 100.0% 13,376 5.7% 100.0% 2,560 5.2% 100.0% 9,949 6.1% 100.0%District 7 399,552 317,415 236,829 95,030 102,646 Clay 30,042 7.5% 21.3% 21,879 6.9% 21.6% 17,905 7.6% 20.6% 9,332 9.8% 19.1% 6,023 5.9% 24.3%Marion 80,430 20.1% 31.1% 61,931 19.5% 30.4% 44,239 18.7% 30.0% 20,016 21.1% 31.8% 18,161 17.7% 29.5%Putnam 40,319 10.1% 57.3% 30,646 9.7% 57.7% 23,480 9.9% 58.3% 6,249 6.6% 60.0% 14,769 14.4% 57.9%Volusia 248,761 62.3% 56.1% 202,959 63.9% 57.4% 151,205 63.8% 58.0% 59,433 62.5% 59.7% 63,693 62.1% 56.1%District 8 399,568 310,802 246,725 114,094 89,321 Duval 220,010 55.1% 28.2% 165,501 53.2% 28.8% 119,846 48.6% 28.3% 54,071 47.4% 35.6% 44,404 49.7% 21.0%Flagler 43,452 10.9% 87.2% 36,208 11.6% 88.5% 30,113 12.2% 90.0% 12,722 11.2% 92.5% 11,621 13.0% 86.5%Nassau 19,234 4.8% 33.4% 15,439 5.0% 35.7% 14,106 5.7% 41.4% 6,399 5.6% 46.0% 5,822 6.5% 35.9%St. Johns 84,752 21.2% 68.8% 67,536 21.7% 71.3% 63,533 25.8% 71.3% 32,696 28.7% 73.6% 19,934 22.3% 66.6%Volusia 32,120 8.0% 7.2% 26,118 8.4% 7.4% 19,127 7.8% 7.3% 8,206 7.2% 8.2% 7,540 8.4% 6.6%District 9 399,552 300,098 195,472 90,252 66,700 Orange 339,181 84.9% 37.8% 255,503 85.1% 38.1% 164,228 84.0% 40.7% 75,446 83.6% 46.9% 57,096 85.6% 34.6%Osceola 31,442 7.9% 18.2% 23,333 7.8% 18.5% 13,857 7.1% 15.1% 4,794 5.3% 14.7% 5,219 7.8% 13.6%Seminole 28,929 7.2% 7.9% 21,262 7.1% 7.8% 17,387 8.9% 9.1% 10,012 11.1% 10.9% 4,385 6.6% 7.0%District 10 399,547 297,572 207,551 83,893 83,764 Hillsborough 322,374 80.7% 32.3% 237,154 79.7% 31.8% 164,670 79.3% 33.2% 69,100 82.4% 38.0% 63,225 75.5% 28.7%Pasco 49,643 12.4% 14.4% 41,226 13.9% 15.0% 29,314 14.1% 13.2% 11,782 14.0% 13.1% 11,845 14.1% 13.3%Polk 27,530 6.9% 5.7% 19,192 6.4% 5.2% 13,567 6.5% 5.1% 3,011 3.6% 2.9% 8,694 10.4% 7.1%District 11 399,543 326,209 280,057 122,269 100,975 Citrus 9,641 2.4% 8.2% 8,203 2.5% 8.4% 6,826 2.4% 8.4% 2,597 2.1% 7.8% 2,983 3.0% 8.8%Hernando 59,342 14.9% 45.4% 49,480 15.2% 46.6% 45,577 16.3% 47.7% 20,377 16.7% 50.0% 17,219 17.1% 45.2%Pasco 183,430 45.9% 53.2% 151,105 46.3% 54.9% 124,066 44.3% 55.9% 50,576 41.4% 56.1% 49,919 49.4% 56.2%Pinellas 147,130 36.8% 16.0% 117,421 36.0% 15.8% 103,588 37.0% 18.0% 48,719 39.8% 20.1% 30,854 30.6% 14.4%District 12 399,594 300,646 220,649 87,856 88,417 Hillsborough 287,902 72.0% 28.8% 217,726 72.4% 29.2% 152,219 69.0% 30.6% 59,998 68.3% 33.0% 61,298 69.3% 27.8%Pasco 111,692 28.0% 32.4% 82,920 27.6% 30.1% 68,430 31.0% 30.9% 27,858 31.7% 30.9% 27,119 30.7% 30.5%District 13 399,563 332,772 258,133 115,388 90,410 Pinellas 399,563 100.0% 43.4% 332,772 100.0% 44.7% 258,133 100.0% 44.9% 115,388 100.0% 47.7% 90,410 100.0% 42.2%

49


Total Reg Voters

% of District

% of County

% of District

% of County


% of District

% of County

Democrat Reg Voters


Population% of

District% of


% of District

% of County

District 14 399,571 312,423 213,996 58,949 122,908 Alachua 217,955 54.5% 100.0% 174,017 55.7% 100.0% 120,978 56.5% 100.0% 34,337 58.2% 100.0% 64,210 52.2% 100.0%Bradford 26,088 6.5% 100.0% 20,363 6.5% 100.0% 14,311 6.7% 100.0% 3,011 5.1% 100.0% 10,075 8.2% 100.0%Columbia 40,075 10.0% 70.9% 30,124 9.6% 71.4% 21,811 10.2% 70.1% 6,257 10.6% 76.1% 13,272 10.8% 66.9%Gilchrist 14,437 3.6% 100.0% 10,908 3.5% 100.0% 6,879 3.2% 100.0% 1,396 2.4% 100.0% 4,967 4.0% 100.0%Levy 22,145 5.5% 64.3% 16,724 5.4% 63.5% 11,463 5.4% 61.4% 2,702 4.6% 60.2% 7,825 6.4% 62.2%Marion 48,657 12.2% 18.8% 37,177 11.9% 18.3% 22,212 10.4% 15.0% 7,638 13.0% 12.1% 11,389 9.3% 18.5%Putnam 16,772 4.2% 23.8% 12,605 4.0% 23.7% 9,603 4.5% 23.8% 2,832 4.8% 27.2% 5,481 4.5% 21.5%Union 13,442 3.4% 100.0% 10,505 3.4% 100.0% 6,739 3.1% 100.0% 776 1.3% 100.0% 5,689 4.6% 100.0%District 15 399,559 305,225 228,184 88,983 99,265 Hernando 71,460 17.9% 54.6% 56,596 18.5% 53.4% 50,050 21.9% 52.3% 20,415 22.9% 50.0% 20,891 21.0% 54.8%Lake 8,795 2.2% 4.2% 6,539 2.1% 3.9% 4,351 1.9% 3.3% 1,865 2.1% 2.9% 1,393 1.4% 3.0%Osceola 58,496 14.6% 33.9% 42,792 14.0% 33.9% 32,825 14.4% 35.8% 12,185 13.7% 37.4% 13,731 13.8% 35.7%Polk 240,842 60.3% 49.8% 183,839 60.2% 50.3% 131,135 57.5% 49.2% 51,420 57.8% 49.4% 57,670 58.1% 46.8%Sumter 19,966 5.0% 37.4% 15,459 5.1% 34.5% 9,823 4.3% 31.1% 3,098 3.5% 25.8% 5,580 5.6% 37.2%District 16 399,549 318,022 236,884 98,455 90,604 Hillsborough 129,800 32.5% 13.0% 102,645 32.3% 13.8% 77,583 32.8% 15.6% 32,347 32.9% 17.8% 31,251 34.5% 14.2%Pinellas 269,749 67.5% 29.3% 215,377 67.7% 29.0% 159,301 67.2% 27.7% 66,108 67.1% 27.3% 59,353 65.5% 27.7%District 17 399,577 306,584 217,006 83,441 107,003 Desoto 29,068 7.3% 90.2% 22,344 7.3% 89.7% 13,884 6.4% 86.4% 3,023 3.6% 78.7% 9,319 8.7% 90.1%Glades 6,431 1.6% 60.8% 5,132 1.7% 62.3% 3,677 1.7% 62.5% 703 0.8% 54.0% 2,694 2.5% 65.9%Hardee 26,938 6.7% 100.0% 19,503 6.4% 100.0% 7,570 3.5% 100.0% 1,595 1.9% 100.0% 5,531 5.2% 100.0%Highlands 87,366 21.9% 100.0% 70,622 23.0% 100.0% 52,964 24.4% 100.0% 23,619 28.3% 100.0% 22,365 20.9% 100.0%Okeechobee 28,923 7.2% 80.5% 21,646 7.1% 80.6% 13,790 6.4% 79.0% 3,558 4.3% 76.7% 9,068 8.5% 80.5%Polk 215,552 53.9% 44.5% 162,688 53.1% 44.5% 121,915 56.2% 45.7% 49,631 59.5% 47.7% 56,779 53.1% 46.1%St. Lucie 5,299 1.3% 2.7% 4,649 1.5% 3.1% 3,206 1.5% 2.7% 1,312 1.6% 2.9% 1,247 1.2% 2.6%District 18 399,553 291,551 170,492 35,702 106,375 Hillsborough 258,872 64.8% 25.9% 188,285 64.6% 25.2% 102,244 60.0% 20.6% 20,463 57.3% 11.2% 64,417 60.6% 29.3%Manatee 35,641 8.9% 13.5% 24,887 8.5% 11.9% 14,235 8.3% 8.3% 3,581 10.0% 4.5% 8,335 7.8% 14.2%Pinellas 105,040 26.3% 11.4% 78,379 26.9% 10.5% 54,013 31.7% 9.4% 11,658 32.7% 4.8% 33,623 31.6% 15.7%District 19 399,553 288,115 160,800 44,463 84,133 Orange 352,501 88.2% 39.3% 254,398 88.3% 38.0% 136,348 84.8% 33.8% 37,454 84.2% 23.3% 72,450 86.1% 43.9%Osceola 47,052 11.8% 27.3% 33,717 11.7% 26.7% 24,452 15.2% 26.7% 7,009 15.8% 21.5% 11,683 13.9% 30.4%District 20 399,578 317,936 244,958 111,238 93,728 Lake 201,733 50.5% 95.8% 161,270 50.7% 96.1% 126,473 51.6% 96.7% 62,365 56.1% 97.1% 45,190 48.2% 97.0%Marion 20,549 5.1% 7.9% 16,819 5.3% 8.3% 12,615 5.1% 8.5% 5,500 4.9% 8.7% 4,839 5.2% 7.9%Seminole 14,426 3.6% 4.0% 11,238 3.5% 4.1% 8,858 3.6% 4.6% 4,763 4.3% 5.2% 2,626 2.8% 4.2%Sumter 33,379 8.4% 62.6% 29,316 9.2% 65.5% 21,719 8.9% 68.9% 8,904 8.0% 74.2% 9,439 10.1% 62.8%Volusia 129,491 32.4% 29.2% 99,293 31.2% 28.1% 75,293 30.7% 28.9% 29,706 26.7% 29.8% 31,634 33.8% 27.9%District 21 399,556 323,162 261,678 127,676 85,806

50


Total Reg Voters

% of District

% of County

% of District

% of County


% of District

% of County

Democrat Reg Voters


Population% of

District% of


% of District

% of County

Charlotte 25,728 6.4% 18.2% 21,417 6.6% 17.9% 16,627 6.4% 16.9% 7,890 6.2% 16.8% 5,876 6.8% 17.7%Desoto 3,141 0.8% 9.8% 2,555 0.8% 10.3% 2,178 0.8% 13.6% 816 0.6% 21.3% 1,022 1.2% 9.9%Lee 100,432 25.1% 22.8% 81,398 25.2% 23.0% 59,827 22.9% 23.7% 28,345 22.2% 22.9% 19,954 23.3% 25.0%Manatee 225,770 56.5% 85.5% 181,983 56.3% 86.9% 153,996 58.8% 90.3% 75,414 59.1% 94.0% 49,916 58.2% 84.8%Sarasota 44,485 11.1% 13.6% 35,809 11.1% 13.1% 29,050 11.1% 13.1% 15,211 11.9% 13.2% 9,038 10.5% 13.3%District 22 399,568 306,270 206,772 97,119 71,321 Orange 118,515 29.7% 13.2% 94,864 31.0% 14.2% 64,264 31.1% 15.9% 30,938 31.9% 19.2% 22,253 31.2% 13.5%Seminole 281,053 70.3% 77.0% 211,406 69.0% 77.6% 142,508 68.9% 74.8% 66,181 68.1% 72.2% 49,068 68.8% 78.0%District 23 399,561 337,510 276,653 140,166 86,766 Charlotte 115,498 28.9% 81.6% 97,704 28.9% 81.8% 81,519 29.5% 82.9% 39,097 27.9% 83.0% 27,344 31.5% 82.1%Manatee 2,591 0.6% 1.0% 2,485 0.7% 1.2% 2,347 0.8% 1.4% 1,270 0.9% 1.6% 636 0.7% 1.1%Sarasota 281,472 70.4% 86.4% 237,321 70.3% 86.9% 192,787 69.7% 86.9% 99,799 71.2% 86.8% 58,786 67.8% 86.7%District 24 399,554 305,287 217,272 98,280 82,339 Brevard 272,619 68.2% 57.2% 211,364 69.2% 56.9% 156,394 72.0% 55.4% 70,572 71.8% 54.0% 62,398 75.8% 58.0%Orange 86,147 21.6% 9.6% 65,239 21.4% 9.7% 39,075 18.0% 9.7% 17,004 17.3% 10.6% 13,074 15.9% 7.9%Seminole 40,788 10.2% 11.2% 28,684 9.4% 10.5% 21,803 10.0% 11.4% 10,704 10.9% 11.7% 6,867 8.3% 10.9%District 25 399,580 335,981 264,548 121,942 88,462 Broward 163,581 40.9% 10.1% 139,414 41.5% 11.2% 107,817 40.8% 12.1% 49,693 40.8% 18.6% 36,699 41.5% 8.0%Palm Beach 235,999 59.1% 20.9% 196,567 58.5% 22.1% 156,731 59.2% 24.0% 72,249 59.2% 31.4% 51,763 58.5% 17.6%District 26 399,517 310,382 236,045 107,327 90,174 Brevard 203,611 51.0% 42.8% 160,167 51.6% 43.1% 126,060 53.4% 44.6% 60,203 56.1% 46.0% 45,131 50.0% 42.0%Indian River 99,030 24.8% 87.7% 78,882 25.4% 86.4% 59,413 25.2% 84.0% 29,754 27.7% 78.6% 20,271 22.5% 92.5%Osceola 35,503 8.9% 20.6% 26,437 8.5% 20.9% 20,558 8.7% 22.4% 8,622 8.0% 26.4% 7,856 8.7% 20.4%St. Lucie 61,373 15.4% 31.8% 44,896 14.5% 30.1% 30,014 12.7% 25.5% 8,748 8.2% 19.1% 16,916 18.8% 34.7%District 27 399,568 315,868 219,625 86,686 88,917 Charlotte 401 0.1% 0.3% 320 0.1% 0.3% 228 0.1% 0.2% 109 0.1% 0.2% 68 0.1% 0.2%Glades 4,145 1.0% 39.2% 3,107 1.0% 37.7% 2,204 1.0% 37.5% 600 0.7% 46.0% 1,392 1.6% 34.1%Hendry - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0%Lee 160,198 40.1% 36.3% 130,664 41.4% 36.9% 92,158 42.0% 36.5% 47,674 55.0% 38.5% 26,301 29.6% 33.0%Palm Beach 234,824 58.8% 20.8% 181,777 57.5% 20.4% 125,035 56.9% 19.2% 38,303 44.2% 16.6% 61,156 68.8% 20.8%District 28 399,573 314,238 262,431 126,888 83,306 Indian River 13,917 3.5% 12.3% 12,371 3.9% 13.6% 11,281 4.3% 16.0% 8,096 6.4% 21.4% 1,655 2.0% 7.5%Martin 126,731 31.7% 100.0% 103,108 32.8% 100.0% 86,499 33.0% 100.0% 48,042 37.9% 100.0% 23,238 27.9% 100.0%Okeechobee 6,987 1.7% 19.5% 5,213 1.7% 19.4% 3,657 1.4% 21.0% 1,080 0.9% 23.3% 2,201 2.6% 19.5%Palm Beach 125,915 31.5% 11.1% 93,979 29.9% 10.6% 76,328 29.1% 11.7% 34,044 26.8% 14.8% 25,657 30.8% 8.7%St. Lucie 126,023 31.5% 65.4% 99,567 31.7% 66.8% 84,666 32.3% 71.8% 35,626 28.1% 78.0% 30,555 36.7% 62.7%District 29 399,534 285,032 173,881 28,655 119,365 Broward 240,205 60.1% 14.8% 170,733 59.9% 13.8% 106,173 61.1% 12.0% 15,446 53.9% 5.8% 76,002 63.7% 16.6%Palm Beach 159,329 39.9% 14.1% 114,299 40.1% 12.8% 67,708 38.9% 10.4% 13,209 46.1% 5.7% 43,363 36.3% 14.8%District 30 399,553 330,694 246,089 79,053 119,221

51


Total Reg Voters

% of District

% of County

% of District

% of County


% of District

% of County

Democrat Reg Voters


Population% of

District% of


% of District

% of County

Broward 53,213 13.3% 3.3% 45,117 13.6% 3.6% 29,145 11.8% 3.3% 8,142 10.3% 3.1% 15,105 12.7% 3.3%Palm Beach 346,340 86.7% 30.6% 285,577 86.4% 32.1% 216,944 88.2% 33.2% 70,911 89.7% 30.8% 104,116 87.3% 35.5%District 31 399,544 313,113 222,717 66,930 115,567 Broward 399,544 100.0% 24.6% 313,113 100.0% 25.2% 222,717 100.0% 25.1% 66,930 100.0% 25.1% 115,567 100.0% 25.3%District 32 399,576 306,359 227,682 66,267 114,576 Broward 399,576 100.0% 24.6% 306,359 100.0% 24.7% 227,682 100.0% 25.7% 66,267 100.0% 24.9% 114,576 100.0% 25.1%District 33 399,552 279,282 155,587 22,484 112,456 Miami-Dade 399,552 100.0% 17.7% 279,282 100.0% 16.5% 155,587 100.0% 17.5% 22,484 100.0% 6.7% 112,456 100.0% 28.6%District 34 399,596 286,547 196,514 66,620 91,380 Broward 292,943 73.3% 18.0% 211,114 73.7% 17.0% 159,376 81.1% 18.0% 51,756 77.7% 19.4% 78,136 85.5% 17.1%Miami-Dade 106,653 26.7% 4.7% 75,433 26.3% 4.5% 37,138 18.9% 4.2% 14,864 22.3% 4.4% 13,244 14.5% 3.4%District 35 399,563 321,191 171,145 46,405 91,140 Broward 73,956 18.5% 4.6% 54,239 16.9% 4.4% 34,615 20.2% 3.9% 8,260 17.8% 3.1% 20,813 22.8% 4.6%Miami-Dade 325,607 81.5% 14.4% 266,952 83.1% 15.8% 136,530 79.8% 15.4% 38,145 82.2% 11.4% 70,327 77.2% 17.9%District 36 399,575 313,582 163,401 82,343 52,968 Miami-Dade 399,575 100.0% 17.7% 313,582 100.0% 18.5% 163,401 100.0% 18.4% 82,343 100.0% 24.5% 52,968 100.0% 13.5%District 37 399,552 322,420 218,057 116,338 60,106 Collier 219,294 54.9% 87.2% 179,982 55.8% 89.3% 117,400 53.8% 95.3% 68,482 58.9% 97.4% 26,685 44.4% 91.2%Lee 180,258 45.1% 40.9% 142,438 44.2% 40.2% 100,657 46.2% 39.8% 47,856 41.1% 38.6% 33,421 55.6% 41.9%District 38 399,540 303,116 170,270 85,622 50,718 Miami-Dade 399,540 100.0% 17.7% 303,116 100.0% 17.9% 170,270 100.0% 19.2% 85,622 100.0% 25.5% 50,718 100.0% 12.9%District 39 399,606 282,433 170,928 43,717 98,730 Broward - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0%Collier 32,083 8.0% 12.8% 21,454 7.6% 10.7% 5,761 3.4% 4.7% 1,861 4.3% 2.6% 2,568 2.6% 8.8%Hendry 36,210 9.1% 100.0% 25,336 9.0% 100.0% 16,268 9.5% 100.0% 4,474 10.2% 100.0% 10,258 10.4% 100.0%Miami-Dade 222,947 55.8% 9.9% 151,132 53.5% 8.9% 90,668 53.0% 10.2% 17,073 39.1% 5.1% 59,476 60.2% 15.1%Monroe 79,589 19.9% 100.0% 65,984 23.4% 100.0% 48,460 28.4% 100.0% 18,934 43.3% 100.0% 18,946 19.2% 100.0%Palm Beach 28,777 7.2% 2.5% 18,527 6.6% 2.1% 9,771 5.7% 1.5% 1,375 3.1% 0.6% 7,482 7.6% 2.5%District 40 399,488 304,652 133,822 75,433 33,589 Miami-Dade 399,488 100.0% 17.7% 304,652 100.0% 18.0% 133,822 100.0% 15.1% 75,433 100.0% 22.5% 33,589 100.0% 8.6%

52

N

Senate Plan: PUBS0000Sponsor: State of Florida, 1996Total number of districts: 40Range of population (total deviation from target): 187,795 persons (47.0%)All geography assigned: TrueAll districts contiguous: True (1990 Census geography)Processed: 1/23/2002

0 50 100 150 Miles

MONROE

POLK

LEE

LEVY

BAY

COLLIER

LAKE

MARION

MIAMI-DADE

PALM BEACH

VOLUSIA

BREVARD

OSCEOLA

DIXIE

TAYLOR

WALTON

GULF

HENDRY

DUVAL

PASCO

LEON

BROWARD

GLADES

CLAY

ORANGE

CITRUS

JACKSON

FRANKLIN

ALACHUA

OKALOOSA

LIBERTY

PUTNAM

SANTA ROSA

NASSAU

HIGHLANDS

MARTIN

MANATEE

BAKER

ESCAMBIA

ST. JOHNS

HILLSBOROUGH

DESOTO

MADISON

HARDEE

COLUMBIAWAKULLA

ST. LUCIE

SUMTER

CHARLOTTE

SARASOTA

OKEECHOBEE

SUWANNEE

PINELLAS

FLAGLER

CALHOUN

HOLMES

JEFFERSONGADSDEN

HERNANDO

HAMILTON

LAFAYETTE

WASHINGTON

INDIAN RIVER

UNION

SEMINOLE

GILCHRIST

BRADFORD4

3

1

5

29

40

8

7

26

35

18

17

11

10

6

2

24

15

39

25

12

27

16

23

1913

9

21

22

28

20

31

38

32

14

33

37

30

36

34

Existing Senatorial Districts, 1996-2002Plan PUBS0000 (formerly Plan 386)




The Florida Senate

53

BAY

GULF

LEON

JACKSON

FRANKLIN

LIBERTY

WAKULLA

CALHOUN

GADSDENWASHINGTON

HOLMES

Tallahassee

Panama City

Tyndall AFB

Quincy

Marianna

Eastpoint

Lynn Haven

Sneads

Callaway

Vernon

Woodville

Wewahitchka

Esto

Chipley

Midway

Carrabelle

Bonifay

Graceville

Greenwood

Malone

Chattahoochee

Springfield

Jacob City

Port St. Joe

Gretna

Blountstown

Altha

Havana

Cedar Grove

Apalachicola

St. Marks

AlfordGrand Ridge

Pretty Bayou

Cottondale

Wausau

Sopchoppy

Mexico Beach

Greensboro

Campbellton

Hiland Park

Bascom

3

1

7

4

WALTONOKALOOSASANTA ROSA

ESCAMBIA

BAY

HOLMES

Pensacola

Pace

Gulf Breeze

Brent

Ensley

GonzalezFerry Pass

Crestview

Bellview

Freeport

Destin

Niceville

Valparaiso

Molino

Wright

Westville

Warrington

Milton

Ebro

De Funiak Springs

Paxton

Bagdad

Myrtle Grove

JayCentury

Panama City Beach

Fort Walton Beach

Ponce de Leon

Miramar Beach

Eglin AFB

Laurel Hill

Laguna Beach

1

7

N

0 10 20 30 Miles




The Florida Senate

Existing Senatorial Districts, 1996-2002

54

Spring Hill

Newberry

Hernando

Lecanto

Alachua

Gainesville

Pine Ridge

Shady Hills

Perry

Yankeetown

Sugarmill Woods

Citrus Springs

Land O' Lakes

High Springs

Homosassa Springs

Lake City

Manattee Road

East Bronson

Citrus Hills

Hudson

Odessa

Live Oak

Andrews

Homosassa

Inverness

Holiday

Dunnellon

Trinity

Williston

Inglis

Floral City

Elfers

Williston Highlands

Crystal River

Brooksville

Chiefland

Wesley Chapel

Bayonet Point

Bell

North Weeki Wachee

Archer

Lee

Trenton

Madison

New Port Richey

Hernando Beach

Five Points

Jasmine Estates

East Williston

Fort White

Cedar Key

Cross City

Mayo

Fanning Springs

La Crosse

White Springs

Greenville

Otter Creek

Branford

Masaryktown

Weeki Wachee

Worthington Springs

Horseshoe Beach

Pine Island

Lake Lindsey

LEVY

DIXIE

TAYLOR

CITRUS

PASCO

COLUMBIA

SUWANNEE

ALACHUA

MADISON

LAFAYETTE

HERNANDO

JEFFERSON

GILCHRIST

MARION

BAKER

UNION

HAMILTON

BRA

4

5

10

3

11

1913

2

0 10 20 30 Miles

N





The Florida Senate

55

Tampa

Cape Coral

St. Petersburg

North Port

Lehigh Acres

Lakeland

Lutz

Sanibel

Keystone

Alva

Fort Myers

Clearwater

Brandon

Dunedin

Estero

East Lake

North Fort Myers

Sarasota

Largo

Bonita Springs

Poinciana

Gandy

Iona

Plant City

Ruskin

Palm Harbor

Naples

Winter Haven

Port Charlotte

Bradenton

Bartow

Fish Hawk

Buckingham

Punta Gorda

Placid Lakes

Town 'n' Country

Sebring

Venice

St. Pete Beach

Captiva

Thonotosassa

Gibsonton

Rotonda

Marco Island

Pinellas Park

Lake Wales

Tarpon Springs

St. James City

Westchase

Gateway

Feather Sound

Cheval

Citrus Park

Bokeelia

Laurel

Riverview

Olga

Wimauma

Osprey

Villas

Oldsmar

Auburndale

Cortez

Fruitville

Valrico

Haines City

Immokalee

Lake Magdalene

Englewood

Lake Alfred

Medulla

Greater Sun Center

Mango

Port La Belle

Longboat Key

Ellenton

Dundee

Cleveland

Avon Park

Arcadia

Palmetto

South Venice

Gulfport

Lely Resort

Fort MeadeApollo Beach

Dover

Southeast Arcadia

Orangetree

McGregor

Kathleen

Bee Ridge

Egypt Lake-Leto

Punta Rassa

MulberryBelleair

Wauchula

Tierra Verde

Treasure Island

Vamo

Fort Myers Beach

Siesta Key

Golden Gate

San Carlos Park

Seminole

Tice

Pelican Bay

WaverlyWahneta

South Bradenton

Lake Hamilton

North Sarasota

Plantation

Lake Placid

Frostproof

Pine Island Center

Pebble Creek

Vineyards

Madeira Beach

Sylvan Shores

Manasota Key

Suncoast Estates

Davenport

Whitfield

Harbour Heights

Warm Mineral Springs

Holmes Beach

Babson Park

Zolfo Springs

Naples Park

Bowling Green

Burnt Store Marina

Highland City

Ridgecrest

Polk City

Highland Park

Everglades

LEE

POLK

COLLIER

MANATEE

HIGHLANDS

HILLSBOROUGH

DESOTO

HARDEE

HENDRY

CHARLOTTE

SARASOTA

GLADES

PINELLAS

OSCEOLA

26

29

17

35

24

25

23

18

21

10

22

13

20

19

N

0 10 20 30 Miles





The Florida Senate

56

Jacksonville

Ocala

Deltona

Palm Coast

Mims

Gainesville

Daytona Beach

Yulee

Orlando

Hernando

Lecanto

Alachua

Sanford

Apopka

De Bary

Pine Ridge

Titusville

Leesburg

Floral City

Port Orange

Oviedo

Yalaha

Lakeside

Ormond Beach

De Land

Bithlo

Fruit Cove

Eustis

Geneva

Middleburg

New Smyrna Beach

Ocoee

Citrus Springs

Sugarmill Woods

Ponce Inlet

Oak Hill

Pierson

Jacksonville Beach

Palm Valley

Starke

Palatka

Winter Springs

Clermont

Lake Mary

Atlantic Beach

Samsula-Spruce Creek

Inverness

Citrus Hills

Tavares

St. Augustine

Pine Hills

Edgewater

Hilliard

Winter Park

Dunnellon

Lady Lake

Nassau Village-Ratliff

Williston

MaitlandCasselberry

Fernandina Beach

Bunnell

Interlachen

Mount Dora

Wekiwa Springs

Winter Garden

Orange City

Lockhart

Wildwood

Paisley

Green Cove Springs

Neptune Beach

Holly Hill

Astor

Orange Park

Forest City

Zellwood

Brooksville

Lake Helen

Umatilla

Sawgrass

Archer

Minneola

Heathrow

Ferndale

South Daytona

Mascotte

Hawthorne

Macclenny

Flagler Beach

LisbonFruitland Park

Groveland

Asbury Lake

High Point

Astatula

Silver Lake

Union Park

Waldo

Baldwin

Bushnell

Pomona Park

Chuluota

Lake Panasoffkee

Silver Springs Shores

East Williston

Lake Mack-Forest Hills

Orlovista

Inverness Highlands South

Butler Beach

Lawtey

Belleview

Welaka

TangerineMount Plymouth Midway

Pittman

St. Augustine Shores

Webster

Center Hill

Crescent City

Pine Lakes

Lake Butler

De Leon Springs

Callahan

Reddick

La Crosse

Newberry

Villano Beach

Hampton

Micanopy

Keystone Heights

Penney Farms

Crescent Beach

St. Augustine Beach

Ormond-By-The-Sea

Hastings

McIntosh

Raiford

Brooker

Altoona

Marineland

Beverly Beach

Nobleton

Okahumpka

Worthington Springs

Lake Lindsey

MARION

LAKE

VOLUSIA

DUVAL

CLAY

PUTNAM

NASSAU

BAKER

ST. JOHNS

ALACHUA

FLAGLER

SUMTER

CITRUS

ORANGE

UNION

SEMINOLE

LEVY

BRADFORD

BREVARDHERNANDO

5

8

4

11

6

2

16

109

12

18

14

N

0 10 20 30 Miles





The Florida Senate

57

POLK

BREVARD

OSCEOLA

GLADES

PALM BEACH

ORANGE

HIGHLANDS

MARTIN

HENDRY

ST. LUCIEOKEECHOBEE

INDIAN RIVER

AKE

LEE

VOLUSIA

HARDEE

DESOTO

RLOTTE

Orlando

Palm Bay

Lehigh Acres

Port St. Lucie

Mims

Alva

Poinciana

Merritt Island

Jupiter

Melbourne

West Palm Beach

Sanford

Apopka

Titusville

Wellington

Bay Lake

Oviedo

Palm Beach Gardens

Wedgefield

Hutchinson Island South

Citrus Ridge

Fort Pierce

Lake Butter

Bithlo

Palm City

Geneva

Malabar

Ocoee

Cocoa

Micco

Sebastian

Placid Lakes

Kissimmee

Sebring

Stuart

St. Cloud

Lake Wales

Rockledge

Eustis

Cocoa Beach

Vero Beach

Gifford

Winter Springs

Celebration

Florida Ridge

Lake Mary

Palm Beach

North Beach

Pine Hills

Sharpes

Olga

Haines City

Winter Park

Meadow Woods

Riviera BeachPort La Belle

Maitland

White City

Pahokee

Casselberry

De Bary

Winter Garden

Jensen Beach

Vero Beach South

Mount Dora

Wekiwa Springs

Dundee

Fellsmere

Royal Palm Beach

Lake Worth

Indiantown

Avon Park

Lockhart

Winter Beach

Belle Isle

West Melbourne

Clewiston

Hobe Sound

Forest City

Belle Glade

Conway

Lakewood Park

Zellwood

Boynton BeachLantana

Indian River Shores

Christmas

South Bay

Loughman

Roseland

Heathrow

Okeechobee

Doctor Phillips

Port Salerno

Taylor Creek

Ferndale

Port St. John

Williamsburg

Waverly

Azalea Park

Jupiter Island

Lake Hamilton

Buena Ventura Lakes

Fort Pierce North

Fort Pierce South

Taft

Oak Hill

Tequesta

Chuluota

Lake Placid

Frostproof

Satellite Beach

Orlovista

Campbell

Sylvan Shores

Lake Hart

Tangerine

South Patrick Shores

Midway

Juno Beach

Cypress Quarters

Davenport

Cape Canaveral

Deltona

Canal Point

Harlem

Palm Springs

Babson Park

Indialantic

Lake Harbor

St. Lucie

Buckhead Ridge

Moore Haven

Highland Park

SEMINOLE

18

35

17

29

15

26

12

27

911

16

14

10

28

30

3125

N

0 10 20 30 Miles




The Florida SenateExisting Senatorial Districts, 1996-2002

58

Miami

Davie

Islandia

Miramar

Weston

Coral Gables

Hollywood

Wellington

Hialeah

Boca Raton

Sunrise

Doral

Plantation

Pembroke Pines

Kendall

Fort Lauderdale

Coral Springs

West Palm Beach

Miami Beach

Tamarac

Pompano Beach

Homestead

Parkland

Delray Beach

Margate

Cutler

Boynton Beach

Deerfield Beach

Tamiami

Pinecrest

Coconut Creek

North Miami

Princeton

Carol City

Palm Beach

Lauderhill

Ojus

Cooper City

Kendale Lakes

Medley

Royal Palm Beach

Lake Worth

Sunset

Oakland Park

The Hammocks

Miami Lakes

Belle Glade

Norland

Opa-locka

Greenacres

Hallandale

Goulds

Dania Beach

Aventura

Cutler Ridge

Lantana

South Bay

Golden GladesCountry Club

Westchester

Westview

Fountainbleau

Three Lakes

Country Estates

Boca Del Mar

Leisure City

West Little River

Kendall West

Florida City

Glenvar Heights

Miami Shores

Richmond West

Homestead Base

Gladeview

Sunshine Ranches

North Lauderdale

Manalapan

Andover

Miami Springs

Rolling Oaks

Golf

Atlantis

Golden Lakes

East Perrine

South Miami

Kings Point

Ocean Ridge

Hialeah Gardens

Lighthouse Point

Harlem

Wilton Manors

Palm Springs

Surfside

Hamptons at Boca Raton

Lake Harbor

Key Biscayne

Hillsboro Beach

Boca Pointe

Sunny Isles Beach

Westgate-Belvedere Homes

Highland BeachWhisper Walk

Gulf Stream

Melrose ParkBroadview Park

Mission Bay

Villages of Oriole

Lauderdale-by-the-Sea

Lake Clarke Shores

North Bay Village

Utopia

Dunes Road

Terra Mar

Lakeside Green

West Ken-Lark

Fisher Island

Belle Glade Camp

Palm Aire

Edgewater

Godfrey Road

Gun Club Estates

Briny Breezes

MIAMI-DADE

BROWARD

PALM BEACHHENDRY

COLLIER

MONROE

29

39

40

35

28

31

38

32

33

37

36

34

30

27

0 5 10 15 20 Miles

N




The Florida Senate


59

Total District Population 376,141 General Election 2000 Deviation -23,418 -5.9% President of the United States













Existing Senatorial District 1 (Plan PUBS0000)

60















61















62

Total District Population 408,359 General Election 2000 Deviation 8,800 2.2% President of the United States














63















64















65















66















67















68















69















70















71















72















73















74


Bush, George W. & Dick Cheney (REP) 70,161 43.8%Total Population (2000 Census) 383,877 100.0% Gore, Al & Joe Lieberman (DEM) 86,588 54.0% Single-Race Non-Hispanic White 316,470 82.4% Nader, Ralph & Winona LaDuke (GRE) 2,609 1.6% Non-Hispanic Black (including multirace) 37,390 9.7% All Other Candidates 961 0.6% Hispanic Black (including multirace) 985 0.3% United States Senator Hispanic (excluding Hisp Black) 21,230 5.5% McCollum, Bill (REP) 65,100 42.5% Non-Hispanic Other (none of the above) 7,802 2.0% Nelson, Bill (DEM) 88,031 57.5% Male 184,095 48.0% Treasurer and Ins. Comm. Female 199,782 52.0% Gallagher, Tom (REP) 85,015 55.0% Age 17 and younger 77,705 20.2% Cosgrove, John (DEM) 69,683 45.0% Age 18 to 64 218,883 57.0% Commissioner of Education Age 65 and older 87,289 22.7% Crist, Charlie (REP) 78,432 52.4%













75















76















77















78















79















80















81















82















83















84


Bush, George W. & Dick Cheney (REP) 91,615 53.8%Total Population (2000 Census) 408,170 100.0% Gore, Al & Joe Lieberman (DEM) 73,922 43.4% Single-Race Non-Hispanic White 329,813 80.8% Nader, Ralph & Winona LaDuke (GRE) 3,810 2.2% Non-Hispanic Black (including multirace) 27,829 6.8% All Other Candidates 968 0.6% Hispanic Black (including multirace) 993 0.2% United States Senator Hispanic (excluding Hisp Black) 42,458 10.4% McCollum, Bill (REP) 85,658 52.7% Non-Hispanic Other (none of the above) 7,077 1.7% Nelson, Bill (DEM) 76,869 47.3% Male 200,591 49.1% Treasurer and Ins. Comm. Female 207,579 50.9% Gallagher, Tom (REP) 101,014 61.8% Age 17 and younger 81,701 20.0% Cosgrove, John (DEM) 62,493 38.2% Age 18 to 64 223,590 54.8% Commissioner of Education Age 65 and older 102,879 25.2% Crist, Charlie (REP) 96,349 61.6%













85















86















87















88















89















90















91















92















93















94















95















96















97















98















99

District by County Statistics for Existing Senatorial DistrictsPercentages of District Populations/Voters by County and of County Populations/Voters by District (Census and Elections of 2000)

District 1 376,141 280,515 226,004 83,513 116,470 Bay 24,922 6.6% 16.8% 18,151 6.5% 16.1% 14,213 6.3% 15.3% 3,931 4.7% 11.5% 8,506 7.3% 19.2%Escambia 178,942 47.6% 60.8% 134,730 48.0% 59.8% 100,340 44.4% 58.5% 36,019 43.1% 51.5% 52,038 44.7% 66.3%Holmes 18,564 4.9% 100.0% 14,279 5.1% 100.0% 10,318 4.6% 100.0% 1,292 1.5% 100.0% 8,606 7.4% 100.0%Okaloosa 43,447 11.6% 25.5% 31,456 11.2% 24.5% 29,222 12.9% 26.2% 15,121 18.1% 24.3% 9,391 8.1% 30.3%Santa Rosa 58,429 15.5% 49.6% 42,222 15.1% 48.8% 38,224 16.9% 49.1% 19,142 22.9% 47.3% 14,958 12.8% 55.6%Walton 30,864 8.2% 76.0% 23,609 8.4% 74.2% 19,304 8.5% 68.5% 5,252 6.3% 52.9% 12,279 10.5% 82.7%Washington 20,973 5.6% 100.0% 16,068 5.7% 100.0% 14,383 6.4% 100.0% 2,756 3.3% 100.0% 10,692 9.2% 100.0%District 2 330,621 237,595 177,839 36,990 120,779 Alachua 21,585 6.5% 9.9% 15,414 6.5% 8.9% 9,822 5.5% 8.1% 1,494 4.0% 4.4% 7,120 5.9% 11.1%Clay 3,266 1.0% 2.3% 2,495 1.1% 2.5% 1,825 1.0% 2.1% 810 2.2% 1.7% 765 0.6% 3.1%Duval 281,191 85.0% 36.1% 201,891 85.0% 35.2% 151,519 85.2% 35.7% 30,730 83.1% 20.2% 104,073 86.2% 49.2%Putnam 8,562 2.6% 12.2% 6,143 2.6% 11.6% 4,412 2.5% 11.0% 863 2.3% 8.3% 3,128 2.6% 12.3%St. Johns 16,017 4.8% 13.0% 11,652 4.9% 12.3% 10,261 5.8% 11.5% 3,093 8.4% 7.0% 5,693 4.7% 19.0%District 3 394,045 302,882 228,071 50,596 154,447 Bay 41,082 10.4% 27.7% 30,650 10.1% 27.2% 24,885 10.9% 26.8% 9,567 18.9% 27.9% 11,713 7.6% 26.5%Calhoun 13,017 3.3% 100.0% 9,996 3.3% 100.0% 7,234 3.2% 100.0% 614 1.2% 100.0% 6,359 4.1% 100.0%Franklin 9,829 2.5% 100.0% 7,840 2.6% 100.0% 7,578 3.3% 100.0% 1,039 2.1% 100.0% 6,127 4.0% 100.0%Gadsden 45,087 11.4% 100.0% 33,168 11.0% 100.0% 26,229 11.5% 100.0% 2,636 5.2% 100.0% 22,311 14.4% 100.0%Gulf 14,560 3.7% 100.0% 11,665 3.9% 100.0% 9,914 4.3% 100.0% 1,623 3.2% 100.0% 7,806 5.1% 100.0%Jackson 46,755 11.9% 100.0% 36,306 12.0% 100.0% 23,979 10.5% 100.0% 3,919 7.7% 100.0% 18,951 12.3% 100.0%Jefferson 4,342 1.1% 33.7% 3,323 1.1% 33.3% 2,926 1.3% 35.9% 442 0.9% 35.8% 2,334 1.5% 36.2%Leon 176,217 44.7% 73.6% 137,575 45.4% 73.0% 101,303 44.4% 69.6% 27,278 53.9% 68.7% 59,453 38.5% 69.0%Liberty 7,021 1.8% 100.0% 5,490 1.8% 100.0% 3,753 1.6% 100.0% 166 0.3% 100.0% 3,512 2.3% 100.0%Madison 13,272 3.4% 70.8% 9,870 3.3% 70.5% 6,894 3.0% 66.4% 752 1.5% 58.2% 5,932 3.8% 67.9%Wakulla 22,863 5.8% 100.0% 16,999 5.6% 100.0% 13,376 5.9% 100.0% 2,560 5.1% 100.0% 9,949 6.4% 100.0%District 4 408,359 318,947 252,333 72,624 151,781 Alachua 16,715 4.1% 7.7% 12,353 3.9% 7.1% 9,494 3.8% 7.8% 2,615 3.6% 7.6% 5,570 3.7% 8.7%Baker 22,259 5.5% 100.0% 16,141 5.1% 100.0% 12,354 4.9% 100.0% 1,685 2.3% 100.0% 10,263 6.8% 100.0%Bradford 13,579 3.3% 52.1% 10,877 3.4% 53.4% 6,203 2.5% 43.3% 1,058 1.5% 35.1% 4,696 3.1% 46.6%Citrus 55,834 13.7% 47.3% 45,749 14.3% 46.8% 37,770 15.0% 46.4% 15,619 21.5% 47.1% 14,857 9.8% 44.1%Columbia 16,440 4.0% 29.1% 12,054 3.8% 28.6% 9,313 3.7% 29.9% 1,963 2.7% 23.9% 6,559 4.3% 33.1%Dixie 13,827 3.4% 100.0% 10,772 3.4% 100.0% 10,460 4.1% 100.0% 1,088 1.5% 100.0% 8,959 5.9% 100.0%Gilchrist 14,437 3.5% 100.0% 10,908 3.4% 100.0% 6,879 2.7% 100.0% 1,396 1.9% 100.0% 4,967 3.3% 100.0%Hamilton 13,327 3.3% 100.0% 10,190 3.2% 100.0% 7,103 2.8% 100.0% 719 1.0% 100.0% 6,112 4.0% 100.0%Jefferson 8,560 2.1% 66.3% 6,649 2.1% 66.7% 5,232 2.1% 64.1% 792 1.1% 64.2% 4,113 2.7% 63.8%Lafayette 7,022 1.7% 100.0% 5,499 1.7% 100.0% 4,034 1.6% 100.0% 319 0.4% 100.0% 3,608 2.4% 100.0%Leon 63,235 15.5% 26.4% 50,870 15.9% 27.0% 44,197 17.5% 30.4% 12,428 17.1% 31.3% 26,687 17.6% 31.0%Levy 11,570 2.8% 33.6% 9,375 2.9% 35.6% 7,059 2.8% 37.8% 1,988 2.7% 44.3% 4,300 2.8% 34.2%Madison 5,461 1.3% 29.2% 4,127 1.3% 29.5% 3,488 1.4% 33.6% 539 0.7% 41.8% 2,803 1.8% 32.1%

Total Reg Voters

% of District

% of County

% of District

% of County


% of District

% of County

Democrat Reg Voters

Senate Plan PUBS0000 Total

Population% of

District% of


% of District

% of County

100


Total Reg Voters

% of District

% of County

% of District

% of County


% of District

% of County

Democrat Reg Voters


Population% of

District% of


% of District

% of County

Marion 43,381 10.6% 16.8% 35,941 11.3% 17.7% 27,507 10.9% 18.6% 12,128 16.7% 19.3% 10,636 7.0% 17.3%Nassau 57,663 14.1% 100.0% 43,224 13.6% 100.0% 34,093 13.5% 100.0% 13,917 19.2% 100.0% 16,231 10.7% 100.0%Suwannee 20,117 4.9% 57.7% 15,260 4.8% 57.6% 11,847 4.7% 57.7% 2,381 3.3% 53.4% 8,729 5.8% 59.8%Taylor 19,256 4.7% 100.0% 14,525 4.6% 100.0% 12,304 4.9% 100.0% 1,688 2.3% 100.0% 10,110 6.7% 100.0%Union 5,676 1.4% 42.2% 4,433 1.4% 42.2% 2,996 1.2% 44.5% 301 0.4% 38.8% 2,581 1.7% 45.4%District 5 398,083 311,477 222,413 67,459 122,088 Alachua 179,655 45.1% 82.4% 146,250 47.0% 84.0% 101,662 45.7% 84.0% 30,228 44.8% 88.0% 51,519 42.2% 80.2%Bradford 12,509 3.1% 47.9% 9,486 3.0% 46.6% 8,108 3.6% 56.7% 1,953 2.9% 64.9% 5,379 4.4% 53.4%Clay 26,194 6.6% 18.6% 19,275 6.2% 19.0% 16,233 7.3% 18.7% 8,740 13.0% 17.9% 5,220 4.3% 21.1%Columbia 40,073 10.1% 70.9% 30,122 9.7% 71.4% 21,809 9.8% 70.1% 6,257 9.3% 76.1% 13,271 10.9% 66.9%Levy 22,880 5.7% 66.4% 16,944 5.4% 64.4% 11,610 5.2% 62.2% 2,497 3.7% 55.7% 8,287 6.8% 65.8%Marion 32,418 8.1% 12.5% 25,137 8.1% 12.4% 14,722 6.6% 10.0% 5,674 8.4% 9.0% 7,090 5.8% 11.5%Putnam 61,861 15.5% 87.8% 46,976 15.1% 88.4% 35,854 16.1% 89.0% 9,557 14.2% 91.7% 22,358 18.3% 87.7%Suwannee 14,727 3.7% 42.3% 11,215 3.6% 42.4% 8,672 3.9% 42.3% 2,078 3.1% 46.6% 5,856 4.8% 40.2%Union 7,766 2.0% 57.8% 6,072 1.9% 57.8% 3,743 1.7% 55.5% 475 0.7% 61.2% 3,108 2.5% 54.6%District 6 398,541 290,962 228,494 110,817 84,408 Clay 111,354 27.9% 79.1% 79,659 27.4% 78.5% 68,801 30.1% 79.2% 39,222 35.4% 80.4% 18,783 22.3% 75.8%Duval 268,997 67.5% 34.5% 198,893 68.4% 34.7% 146,972 64.3% 34.7% 64,157 57.9% 42.2% 62,329 73.8% 29.4%St. Johns 18,190 4.6% 14.8% 12,410 4.3% 13.1% 12,721 5.6% 14.3% 7,438 6.7% 16.8% 3,296 3.9% 11.0%District 7 393,783 303,541 255,331 127,770 86,476 Bay 82,213 20.9% 55.5% 63,774 21.0% 56.7% 53,693 21.0% 57.9% 20,805 16.3% 60.7% 23,997 27.7% 54.3%Escambia 115,468 29.3% 39.2% 90,409 29.8% 40.2% 71,060 27.8% 41.5% 33,892 26.5% 48.5% 26,398 30.5% 33.7%Okaloosa 127,051 32.3% 74.5% 96,909 31.9% 75.5% 82,165 32.2% 73.8% 47,038 36.8% 75.7% 21,559 24.9% 69.7%Santa Rosa 59,314 15.1% 50.4% 44,252 14.6% 51.2% 39,554 15.5% 50.9% 21,363 16.7% 52.7% 11,953 13.8% 44.4%Walton 9,737 2.5% 24.0% 8,197 2.7% 25.8% 8,859 3.5% 31.5% 4,672 3.7% 47.1% 2,569 3.0% 17.3%District 8 455,567 354,516 272,343 125,490 98,916 Duval 228,691 50.2% 29.4% 173,104 48.8% 30.2% 125,438 46.1% 29.6% 57,110 45.5% 37.6% 45,341 45.8% 21.4%Flagler 49,832 10.9% 100.0% 40,907 11.5% 100.0% 33,466 12.3% 100.0% 13,758 11.0% 100.0% 13,439 13.6% 100.0%Marion 45,891 10.1% 17.7% 35,430 10.0% 17.4% 25,876 9.5% 17.5% 11,336 9.0% 18.0% 10,822 10.9% 17.6%St. Johns 88,928 19.5% 72.2% 70,674 19.9% 74.6% 66,151 24.3% 74.2% 33,870 27.0% 76.3% 20,931 21.2% 70.0%Volusia 42,225 9.3% 9.5% 34,401 9.7% 9.7% 21,412 7.9% 8.2% 9,416 7.5% 9.5% 8,383 8.5% 7.4%District 9 384,615 295,209 189,661 84,885 67,085 Orange 218,229 56.7% 24.3% 169,603 57.5% 25.3% 105,720 55.7% 26.2% 45,602 53.7% 28.4% 39,072 58.2% 23.7%Seminole 166,386 43.3% 45.6% 125,606 42.5% 46.1% 83,941 44.3% 44.1% 39,283 46.3% 42.9% 28,013 41.8% 44.5%District 10 433,186 341,232 266,921 108,771 111,221 Hernando 130,802 30.2% 100.0% 106,076 31.1% 100.0% 95,627 35.8% 100.0% 40,792 37.5% 100.0% 38,110 34.3% 100.0%Pasco 140,979 32.5% 40.9% 108,430 31.8% 39.4% 83,843 31.4% 37.8% 33,630 30.9% 37.3% 33,730 30.3% 37.9%Polk 125,075 28.9% 25.8% 97,134 28.5% 26.6% 70,002 26.2% 26.3% 28,755 26.4% 27.6% 29,639 26.6% 24.1%Sumter 36,330 8.4% 68.1% 29,592 8.7% 66.1% 17,449 6.5% 55.3% 5,594 5.1% 46.6% 9,742 8.8% 64.9%District 11 452,573 361,445 283,530 130,781 107,673

101


Total Reg Voters

% of District

% of County

% of District

% of County


% of District

% of County

Democrat Reg Voters


Population% of

District% of


% of District

% of County

Citrus 62,251 13.8% 52.7% 52,006 14.4% 53.2% 43,610 15.4% 53.6% 17,526 13.4% 52.9% 18,859 17.5% 55.9%Lake 210,528 46.5% 100.0% 167,809 46.4% 100.0% 130,824 46.1% 100.0% 64,230 49.1% 100.0% 46,583 43.3% 100.0%Marion 137,226 30.3% 53.0% 106,983 29.6% 52.6% 79,573 28.1% 53.9% 33,823 25.9% 53.7% 33,007 30.7% 53.6%Seminole 25,553 5.6% 7.0% 19,464 5.4% 7.1% 15,430 5.4% 8.1% 8,794 6.7% 9.6% 3,947 3.7% 6.3%Sumter 17,015 3.8% 31.9% 15,183 4.2% 33.9% 14,093 5.0% 44.7% 6,408 4.9% 53.4% 5,277 4.9% 35.1%District 12 488,360 361,134 244,445 114,114 80,825 Orange 313,958 64.3% 35.0% 231,925 64.2% 34.6% 150,979 61.8% 37.4% 68,532 60.1% 42.6% 51,431 63.6% 31.2%Osceola 11,589 2.4% 6.7% 8,663 2.4% 6.9% 6,333 2.6% 6.9% 2,484 2.2% 7.6% 2,105 2.6% 5.5%Seminole 145,572 29.8% 39.9% 107,638 29.8% 39.5% 77,490 31.7% 40.7% 39,347 34.5% 42.9% 23,377 28.9% 37.1%Volusia 17,241 3.5% 3.9% 12,908 3.6% 3.7% 9,643 3.9% 3.7% 3,751 3.3% 3.8% 3,912 4.8% 3.4%District 13 409,472 313,333 229,512 92,515 91,764 Hillsborough 329,473 80.5% 33.0% 248,602 79.3% 33.3% 174,154 75.9% 35.1% 69,692 75.3% 38.3% 69,443 75.7% 31.5%Pasco 79,999 19.5% 23.2% 64,731 20.7% 23.5% 55,358 24.1% 25.0% 22,823 24.7% 25.3% 22,321 24.3% 25.1%District 14 391,842 288,358 160,912 50,943 81,980 Orange 364,157 92.9% 40.6% 268,476 93.1% 40.1% 147,217 91.5% 36.4% 46,708 91.7% 29.0% 74,370 90.7% 45.1%Seminole 27,685 7.1% 7.6% 19,882 6.9% 7.3% 13,695 8.5% 7.2% 4,235 8.3% 4.6% 7,610 9.3% 12.1%District 15 396,315 305,791 223,950 97,087 90,194 Brevard 228,186 57.6% 47.9% 177,597 58.1% 47.8% 131,126 58.6% 46.4% 58,152 59.9% 44.5% 51,030 56.6% 47.5%Indian River 92,712 23.4% 82.1% 72,948 23.9% 79.9% 54,639 24.4% 77.3% 27,055 27.9% 71.5% 18,934 21.0% 86.4%St. Lucie 75,417 19.0% 39.1% 55,246 18.1% 37.1% 38,185 17.1% 32.4% 11,880 12.2% 26.0% 20,230 22.4% 41.5%District 16 383,877 306,172 229,818 86,374 101,173 Volusia 383,877 100.0% 86.6% 306,172 100.0% 86.6% 229,818 100.0% 88.1% 86,374 100.0% 86.8% 101,173 100.0% 89.2%District 17 369,565 280,669 199,659 76,085 95,868 Highlands 52,915 14.3% 60.6% 42,536 15.2% 60.2% 31,125 15.6% 58.8% 13,442 17.7% 56.9% 13,567 14.2% 60.7%Okeechobee 17,498 4.7% 48.7% 12,515 4.5% 46.6% 6,709 3.4% 38.5% 1,593 2.1% 34.3% 4,486 4.7% 39.8%Polk 299,152 80.9% 61.8% 225,618 80.4% 61.7% 161,825 81.1% 60.7% 61,050 80.2% 58.7% 77,815 81.2% 63.2%District 18 408,948 311,550 236,686 102,749 92,884 Brevard 248,044 60.7% 52.1% 193,934 62.2% 52.2% 151,328 63.9% 53.6% 72,623 70.7% 55.5% 56,499 60.8% 52.5%Osceola 160,904 39.3% 93.3% 117,616 37.8% 93.1% 85,358 36.1% 93.1% 30,126 29.3% 92.4% 36,385 39.2% 94.5%District 19 382,168 308,780 253,927 111,479 87,727 Pasco 123,787 32.4% 35.9% 102,090 33.1% 37.1% 82,608 32.5% 37.2% 33,763 30.3% 37.4% 32,832 37.4% 36.9%Pinellas 258,381 67.6% 28.0% 206,690 66.9% 27.8% 171,319 67.5% 29.8% 77,716 69.7% 32.1% 54,895 62.6% 25.6%District 20 337,342 270,438 200,084 78,994 81,613 Hillsborough 82,263 24.4% 8.2% 65,578 24.2% 8.8% 48,482 24.2% 9.8% 18,948 24.0% 10.4% 21,199 26.0% 9.6%Pinellas 255,079 75.6% 27.7% 204,860 75.8% 27.5% 151,602 75.8% 26.4% 60,046 76.0% 24.8% 60,414 74.0% 28.2%District 21 336,447 242,260 144,056 28,848 92,550 Hillsborough 234,676 69.8% 23.5% 169,768 70.1% 22.8% 96,029 66.7% 19.3% 19,542 67.7% 10.7% 60,614 65.5% 27.5%Manatee 38,124 11.3% 14.4% 27,426 11.3% 13.1% 16,676 11.6% 9.8% 4,873 16.9% 6.1% 8,962 9.7% 15.2%Pinellas 63,647 18.9% 6.9% 45,066 18.6% 6.1% 31,351 21.8% 5.5% 4,433 15.4% 1.8% 22,974 24.8% 10.7%District 22 344,375 287,333 220,764 99,678 75,957

102


Total Reg Voters

% of District

% of County

% of District

% of County


% of District

% of County

Democrat Reg Voters


Population% of

District% of


% of District

% of County

Pinellas 344,375 100.0% 37.4% 287,333 100.0% 38.6% 220,764 100.0% 38.4% 99,678 100.0% 41.2% 75,957 100.0% 35.5%District 23 412,233 304,829 212,839 87,983 84,622 Hillsborough 352,536 85.5% 35.3% 261,862 85.9% 35.1% 178,049 83.7% 35.8% 73,726 83.8% 40.5% 68,934 81.5% 31.3%Polk 59,697 14.5% 12.3% 42,967 14.1% 11.7% 34,790 16.3% 13.0% 14,257 16.2% 13.7% 15,688 18.5% 12.7%District 24 395,470 336,130 276,058 140,946 85,389 Charlotte 120,972 30.6% 85.4% 101,981 30.3% 85.4% 85,856 31.1% 87.3% 41,386 29.4% 87.9% 28,625 33.5% 86.0%Lee 37,235 9.4% 8.4% 33,071 9.8% 9.3% 24,657 8.9% 9.8% 12,170 8.6% 9.8% 7,866 9.2% 9.9%Sarasota 237,263 60.0% 72.8% 201,078 59.8% 73.6% 165,545 60.0% 74.6% 87,390 62.0% 76.0% 48,898 57.3% 72.1%District 25 496,016 406,891 282,404 154,220 72,858 Collier 219,192 44.2% 87.2% 179,694 44.2% 89.2% 115,836 41.0% 94.1% 67,668 43.9% 96.2% 26,325 36.1% 90.0%Lee 276,824 55.8% 62.8% 227,197 55.8% 64.1% 166,568 59.0% 65.9% 86,552 56.1% 69.9% 46,533 63.9% 58.4%District 26 408,170 326,469 255,665 118,623 93,521 Desoto 32,209 7.9% 100.0% 24,899 7.6% 100.0% 16,062 6.3% 100.0% 3,839 3.2% 100.0% 10,341 11.1% 100.0%Hardee 26,938 6.6% 100.0% 19,503 6.0% 100.0% 7,570 3.0% 100.0% 1,595 1.3% 100.0% 5,531 5.9% 100.0%Highlands 34,451 8.4% 39.4% 28,086 8.6% 39.8% 21,839 8.5% 41.2% 10,177 8.6% 43.1% 8,798 9.4% 39.3%Manatee 225,878 55.3% 85.6% 181,929 55.7% 86.9% 153,902 60.2% 90.2% 75,392 63.6% 93.9% 49,925 53.4% 84.8%Sarasota 88,694 21.7% 27.2% 72,052 22.1% 26.4% 56,292 22.0% 25.4% 27,620 23.3% 24.0% 18,926 20.2% 27.9%District 27 419,360 340,860 289,255 143,334 88,543 Indian River 20,235 4.8% 17.9% 18,305 5.4% 20.1% 16,055 5.6% 22.7% 10,795 7.5% 28.5% 2,992 3.4% 13.6%Martin 123,477 29.4% 97.4% 100,399 29.5% 97.4% 85,523 29.6% 98.9% 47,667 33.3% 99.2% 22,787 25.7% 98.1%Palm Beach 158,370 37.8% 14.0% 128,290 37.6% 14.4% 107,976 37.3% 16.5% 51,066 35.6% 22.2% 34,276 38.7% 11.7%St. Lucie 117,278 28.0% 60.9% 93,866 27.5% 62.9% 79,701 27.6% 67.6% 33,806 23.6% 74.0% 28,488 32.2% 58.5%District 28 462,569 376,216 278,807 87,644 135,902 Broward 26,063 5.6% 1.6% 23,084 6.1% 1.9% 15,421 5.5% 1.7% 3,592 4.1% 1.3% 9,177 6.8% 2.0%Palm Beach 436,506 94.4% 38.6% 353,132 93.9% 39.6% 263,386 94.5% 40.4% 84,052 95.9% 36.5% 126,725 93.2% 43.2%District 29 405,881 307,874 201,898 60,157 105,123 Broward 289,805 71.4% 17.9% 228,612 74.3% 18.4% 155,492 77.0% 17.5% 44,530 74.0% 16.7% 81,688 77.7% 17.9%Collier 32,185 7.9% 12.8% 21,742 7.1% 10.8% 7,325 3.6% 5.9% 2,675 4.4% 3.8% 2,928 2.8% 10.0%Hendry 36,210 8.9% 100.0% 25,336 8.2% 100.0% 16,268 8.1% 100.0% 4,474 7.4% 100.0% 10,258 9.8% 100.0%Palm Beach 47,681 11.7% 4.2% 32,184 10.5% 3.6% 22,813 11.3% 3.5% 8,478 14.1% 3.7% 10,249 9.7% 3.5%District 30 357,240 253,296 157,695 28,318 106,331 Broward 183,956 51.5% 11.3% 125,397 49.5% 10.1% 76,282 48.4% 8.6% 7,446 26.3% 2.8% 59,859 56.3% 13.1%Palm Beach 173,284 48.5% 15.3% 127,899 50.5% 14.4% 81,413 51.6% 12.5% 20,872 73.7% 9.1% 46,472 43.7% 15.8%District 31 348,819 291,485 220,805 94,694 82,227 Broward 260,666 74.7% 16.1% 216,223 74.2% 17.4% 162,238 73.5% 18.3% 67,040 70.8% 25.2% 63,551 77.3% 13.9%Palm Beach 88,153 25.3% 7.8% 75,262 25.8% 8.4% 58,567 26.5% 9.0% 27,654 29.2% 12.0% 18,676 22.7% 6.4%District 32 518,416 375,349 261,453 83,335 131,293 Broward 423,928 81.8% 26.1% 306,621 81.7% 24.7% 225,762 86.3% 25.4% 72,397 86.9% 27.2% 112,676 85.8% 24.7%Miami-Dade 94,488 18.2% 4.2% 68,728 18.3% 4.1% 35,691 13.7% 4.0% 10,938 13.1% 3.3% 18,617 14.2% 4.7%District 33 438,600 340,152 252,330 71,489 129,947

103


Total Reg Voters

% of District

% of County

% of District

% of County


% of District

% of County

Democrat Reg Voters


Population% of

District% of


% of District

% of County

Broward 438,600 100.0% 27.0% 340,152 100.0% 27.4% 252,330 100.0% 28.4% 71,489 100.0% 26.8% 129,947 100.0% 28.4%District 34 335,035 265,054 145,358 75,443 44,768 Miami-Dade 335,035 100.0% 14.9% 265,054 100.0% 15.6% 145,358 100.0% 16.4% 75,443 100.0% 22.5% 44,768 100.0% 11.4%District 35 406,916 310,943 209,891 73,552 98,399 Charlotte 20,655 5.1% 14.6% 17,460 5.6% 14.6% 12,518 6.0% 12.7% 5,709 7.8% 12.1% 4,663 4.7% 14.0%Glades 10,576 2.6% 100.0% 8,239 2.6% 100.0% 5,881 2.8% 100.0% 1,303 1.8% 100.0% 4,086 4.2% 100.0%Lee 126,829 31.2% 28.8% 94,232 30.3% 26.6% 61,417 29.3% 24.3% 25,153 34.2% 20.3% 25,277 25.7% 31.7%Martin 3,254 0.8% 2.6% 2,709 0.9% 2.6% 976 0.5% 1.1% 375 0.5% 0.8% 451 0.5% 1.9%Okeechobee 18,412 4.5% 51.3% 14,344 4.6% 53.4% 10,738 5.1% 61.5% 3,045 4.1% 65.7% 6,783 6.9% 60.2%Palm Beach 227,190 55.8% 20.1% 173,959 55.9% 19.5% 118,361 56.4% 18.1% 37,967 51.6% 16.5% 57,139 58.1% 19.5%District 36 335,295 236,828 133,706 23,709 93,217 Miami-Dade 335,295 100.0% 14.9% 236,828 100.0% 14.0% 133,706 100.0% 15.1% 23,709 100.0% 7.1% 93,217 100.0% 23.7%District 37 393,806 299,543 165,516 83,650 48,698 Miami-Dade 393,806 100.0% 17.5% 299,543 100.0% 17.7% 165,516 100.0% 18.7% 83,650 100.0% 24.9% 48,698 100.0% 12.4%District 38 367,043 295,832 147,952 38,438 79,236 Miami-Dade 367,043 100.0% 16.3% 295,832 100.0% 17.5% 147,952 100.0% 16.7% 38,438 100.0% 11.4% 79,236 100.0% 20.2%District 39 473,593 354,089 160,126 84,611 43,701 Miami-Dade 473,593 100.0% 21.0% 354,089 100.0% 20.9% 160,126 100.0% 18.0% 84,611 100.0% 25.2% 43,701 100.0% 11.1%District 40 333,691 240,059 147,526 38,108 83,487 Miami-Dade 254,102 76.1% 11.3% 174,075 72.5% 10.3% 99,066 67.2% 11.2% 19,174 50.3% 5.7% 64,541 77.3% 16.4%Monroe 79,589 23.9% 100.0% 65,984 27.5% 100.0% 48,460 32.8% 100.0% 18,934 49.7% 100.0% 18,946 22.7% 100.0%

104

105


CASE NO. SCO2-194

IN RE: 2002 JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPORTIONMENT

AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GUTHRIE

1. My name is John Guthrie. I lived in Largo, Florida from 1956 through 1972. I

received a B.A. from Davidson College in 1976 and an M.A in political science from the University of Florida in 1977. I pursued doctoral studies in political science at the University of Rochester from 1977 through 1980, but did not earn a degree. I have been employed in Tallahassee by the State of Florida since June of 1980. Between August of 1989 and November of 1992, I was staff director for Senate Reapportionment. Through the remainder of the decade, I was staff director for various Senate committees, while also assisting with reapportionment litigation that involved the Senate and preparing for redistricting after the 2000 Census. Since January of 2001, I have been employed as staff director, system operations and training, for the Senate Committee on Reapportionment.

2. I have personal knowledge of the facts set out below.

3. I participated in the invention, design, and development of FREDS 2000, the Florida Legislature’s Redistricting System software. I managed the Senate Redistricting web site (http://www.leg.state.fl.us/senateredistricting). I supervised production of maps, statistics, and legal descriptions for all senate and congressional plans considered by the Senate. I am familiar with the district configurations and demographics of the existing and newly created senatorial districts.

4. The newly created senatorial districts are numbered consecutively and all territory is assigned. The senatorial districts described in House Joint Resolution 1987 (Plan S17S0036) are numbered consecutively from 1 to 40. Districts are described using Census blocks, block groups, tracts, and counties from the Redistricting Census 2000 TIGER/Line® Files [machine-readable data files prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C., 2000]. There are 362,499 Census blocks in Florida. These blocks are nested within 9,112 block groups, which in turn are nested within 3,154 tracts and 67 counties. An assignment file records which census geography is assigned to which district. Each census block in Florida is assigned to a district numbered 1 to 40 in Plan S17S0036. No territory is assigned to more than one district. The legal descriptions of senatorial districts in House Joint Resolution 1987 were generated directly from Plan S17S0036 using an algorithm that converts the FREDS 2000 assignment file to text describing the counties, tracts, block groups, or blocks assigned to each district.

106

5. The newly created senatorial districts are composed of contiguous territory. District geography is constructed using geographic information derived from the Redistricting Census 2000 TIGER/Line® Files [machine-readable data files prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C., 2000]. The Dry Tortugas is separate from the rest of the state in the Census geography. Therefore, the district containing the Dry Tortugas will have a minimum of 2 separate pieces, or “rings.”1

A district shape is the union of all territory assigned to the district, including waters. Each of the districts in Plan S17S0036 has one ring, except District 39, which contains the Dry Tortugas and has two rings. Therefore, all senatorial districts in Plan S17S0036 are contiguous.

6. The newly created senatorial districts have equal population. The total population of the State of Florida, based on the 2000 Census, is 15,982,378. The target population for each district in a 40-district senatorial plan is 399,559 persons (15,982,378 divided by 40). In Plan S17S0036, Senate District 39, with 399,606 persons, is the most populous. District 40, with 399,488 persons, is the least populous. The total deviation for Plan S17S0036 is 118 persons, or 0.03%.

By way of comparison, the total deviation for senate districts in Senate Joint Resolution 2-G (enacted by the legislature in 1992), based on the 1990 Census, was 2,808 persons, or 0.87%. The total deviation for senate districts in the Humphrey-Reaves plan ordered into effect by the Florida Supreme Court in 1992 (In re Constitutionality of Senate Joint Resolution 2G, Special Apportionment Session 1992, 601 So.2d 543, Fla. 1992), based on the 1990 Census, was 2,797 persons, or 0.86%. The total deviation for Senate districts in the settlement plan ordered into effect by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in 1996 (Scott, et al. v. United States Department of Justice, et al., 920 F.Supp. 1248), based on the 1990 Census, was 5,404 persons, or 1.67%. These districts were in effect for elections between 1996 and present. Based on the 2000 Census, the total deviation of the existing senatorial districts is 187,795, or 47.0%). District 2, with 330,621 persons, is the least populous. District 32, with 518,416 persons, is the most populous.

Census population counts for districts are derived from the Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File – Florida [machine readable data files prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau, 2001]. The population of one block in Franklin County and one block in Gulf County were updated to reflect official corrections issued by the U.S. Census Bureau. In the P.L. 94-171 data for Florida, 1,228 persons residing in Gulf County were incorrectly attributed to a block in Franklin County.

7. The newly created senatorial districts preserve the cores of existing districts. On average, 71.5% of the population of a newly created district overlaps a single

1 A ring is a series of four or more connected points that form a closed, non-self-intersecting loop.

A ring starts and ends at the same point, and it does not otherwise cross or touch itself. Examples of shapes that have 2 rings are: (1) a pair of disconnected polygons, (2) a doughnut, or (3) a figure eight. See, ESRI Shapefile Technical Description, An ESRI White Paper-July 1998 [Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, CA, 1998], p. 8.

107

senatorial district in the current plan. For example, 97.2 percent of the population in newly created district 32 comes from existing district 33. All but two of the newly created districts get 50 percent or more of their total population from a single existing district. Overall, based on the 2000 Census, 11,135,243 Floridians will be in a senatorial district with a majority of the constituents in their existing district.

8. The newly created senatorial districts respect the political balance of existing districts. Republicans make up a majority of registered voters in 6 existing senatorial districts and a plurality in 19.2 Democrats make up a majority of registered voters in 14 existing senatorial districts and a plurality in 21. Among the newly created senatorial districts, Republicans make up a majority of registered voters in 5 and a plurality in 20. Democrats make up a majority of registered voters in 12 and a plurality in 20. Half of the newly created senatorial districts have more Republicans than Democrats, and half have more Democrats than Republicans.

In terms of ballots cast in the 2000 Presidential election, the Republican candidate, George W. Bush, received more votes than the Democratic candidate, Al Gore, in 24 of the 40 existing senatorial districts. Al Gore received more votes in 16. Among the newly created senatorial districts, George W. Bush would have received more votes in 23 districts, and Al Gore would have received more votes in 17.

9. The newly created senatorial districts preserve opportunities for racial minorities. I prepared the attached Technical Discussion of Racial and Ethnic Categories Used in FREDS 2000 that describes in detail the allocation of Census population categories (see Attachment 1). Based on the 1990 Census, three existing senatorial districts have black voting age populations greater than 50% (districts 2, 30, and 36). Four more have black populations greater than 25% (districts 3, 14, 21, and 40). During the 1990s, the relative numbers of African Americans in each of the seven districts increased. For example, the black voting age population of District 2 increased from 44.9% to 50.9%. Also during the 1990s, all seven districts grew slower than the 23.5% population growth rate of the state as a whole. Based on the 2000 Census, they range 5,514 to 68,938 people (1.4% to 20.9%) short of the target population for senatorial districts. African American incumbents have represented 5 of the 7 districts from 1992 until present (districts 2, 21, 30, 36, and 40) and one of the districts from 2000 until present (district 3). A white incumbent has represented district 14 from 1992 until present.

Three newly created senatorial districts have black populations greater than 50%, based on the 2000 Census (districts 1, 29, and 30, which include many of the same areas as existing districts 2, 30 and 36, respectively). Four more newly created

2 Precinct level voter registration counts (broken down by party, gender, age and race/ethnicity of

the voter) and election results from 1992 to 2000 were collected from supervisors of elections and from the central voter file maintained by the Division of Elections. Some registration counts and statewide election results were disaggregated to block level so district estimates could be calculated instantly, and considered when modeling or evaluating proposed districts.

108

districts have black populations greater than 25% (districts 6, 18, 19, and 39, which include many of the same areas as existing districts 3, 21, 14, and 40, respectively).

Districts Exceeding 25% African American Population

1992 District

Total Population

1990

Total Population

2000

Population deviation

2000

2002 District

Total Population

2000


2000

30 57.9% 64.2% -11.8% 29 64.2% 0.0% 36 57.6% 60.3% -19.2% 33 63.2% 0.0% 2 49.1% 55.2% -20.9% 1 50.8% 0.0% 21 42.1% 47.2% -18.8% 18 43.4% 0.0% 40 38.6% 38.3% -19.7% 39 36.7% 0.0% 14 31.3% 37.9% -2.0% 19 33.9% 0.0% 3 28.4% 29.9% -1.4% 6 31.7% 0.0%

Districts Exceeding 25% African American Voting Age Population

1992 District

Voting Age Population

1990


2000


2000

2002 District


2000


2000

30 51.5% 58.7% -11.8% 29 58.3% 0.0% 36 52.5% 56.3% -19.2% 33 59.7% 0.0% 2 44.9% 50.9% -20.9% 1 46.6% 0.0% 21 36.9% 42.2% -18.8% 18 38.4% 0.0% 40 34.4% 34.6% -19.7% 39 33.1% 0.0% 14 26.9% 33.4% -2.0% 19 30.3% 0.0% 3 25.9% 28.2% -1.4% 6 29.9% 0.0%

For the most part, the central elements of the seven existing districts were left in place. To reach the target population, districts were expanded into adjacent territories that have similar socioeconomic and political characteristics. In all five cases where blacks make up more than 50% of registered Democrats in the existing district (districts 2, 21, 30, 36, and 40), they will continue to hold the majority in the newly created districts (districts 1, 18, 29, 33, and 39).

Newly created district 19 in the Orlando area includes 58.2% of the population of existing district 14. It loses the existing district’s extension into Seminole County and gains areas in southern Orange County and northwestern Osceola County with growing numbers of families who work in service and hospitality industries. The combined black and Hispanic voting age population in the new district 19 is 54.2%.

Based on the 1990 Census, three existing senatorial districts have Hispanic populations greater than 50% (districts 34, 37, and 39). Five more have Hispanic populations greater than 25% (districts 32, 36, 38, and 40). During the 1990s, the relative number of Hispanics in each of the eight districts increased. Two of the eight

109

districts grew faster than the state average, and six grew slower. Based on the 2000 Census, they range from 65,868 people below the target population for senatorial districts to 118,857 over. Hispanic incumbents have represented all three majority Hispanic districts from 1992 until present. Existing districts 36 and 40, in addition to having Hispanic voting age population percentages in excess of 30%, also include substantial numbers of African Americans. African American incumbents have represented both those districts since 1992. White incumbents have represented districts 32 and 38 since 1992.

Districts Exceeding 25% Hispanic Population

1992 District

Total Population

1990

Total Population

2000


2000

2002 District

Total Population

2000


2000

39 74.6% 79.8% 15.6% 40 83.7% 0.0% 34 65.0% 69.6% -19.3% 36 71.7% 0.0% 37 63.3% 72.6% -1.5% 38 71.5% 0.0% 38 31.2% 36.8% -8.9% 35 35.9% 0.0% 32 20.1% 31.3% 22.9% 34 35.3% 0.0% 40 23.4% 32.1% -19.7% 39 32.8% 0.0% 36 30.3% 33.6% -19.2% 33 29.1% 0.0% 14 7.9% 14.5% -2.0% 19 26.5% 0.0% 21 13.7% 19.0% -18.8% 18 18.9% 0.0%

* Note: Newly created district 18 (existing district 21) has less than 25% Hispanic population. It is included here because the combined African American and Hispanic population is 61%.

Districts Exceeding 25% Hispanic Voting Age Population

1992 District


1990


2000


2000

2002 District


2000


2000

39 76.1% 82.7% 15.6% 40 86.3% 0.0% 34 66.3% 72.0% -19.3% 36 74.3% 0.0% 37 64.3% 75.0% -1.5% 38 73.9% 0.0% 38 29.9% 37.7% -8.9% 35 36.3% 0.0% 32 19.7% 31.2% 22.9% 34 35.2% 0.0% 40 22.9% 31.7% -19.7% 39 31.7% 0.0% 36 33.1% 36.9% -19.2% 33 31.3% 0.0% 14 7.4% 13.7% -2.0% 19 25.2% 0.0% 21 13.9% 18.4% -18.8% 18 18.2% 0.0%

* Note: Newly created district 18 (existing district 21) has less than 25% Hispanic voting age population. It is included here because the combined African American and Hispanic voting age population is 55.7%.

110

The newly created Hispanic majority senatorial districts are similar to the existing ones. Ninety-two percent of the people in existing district 34 are in newly created district 36, 95.2% of the people in existing district 37 are in newly created district 38, and 73.1% of the people in existing district 39 are in newly created district 40. The newly created districts have Hispanic voting age population percentages of 74.3%, 73.9%, and 86.3%, respectively.

Existing minority districts in Section 5 counties


District County Total

Population Black Hispanic Black or Hispanic

21 Hillsborough* 234,676 37.3% 22.5% 58.5% 21 Manatee 38,124 30.5% 19.2% 49.2% 21 Pinellas 63,647 68.0% 2.6% 70.0% 21 Total 336,447 42.2% 18.4% 59.6% 40 Miami-Dade 254,102 46.0% 38.2% 81.9% 40 Monroe* 79,589 4.5% 14.3% 18.5% 40 Total 333,691 34.6% 31.7% 64.5%

* Note: Five Florida counties are subject to federal jurisdiction pursuant to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended: Hillsborough, Hardee, Hendry, Collier, and Monroe. Two of those counties are included in existing minority senatorial districts

Newly created minority districts in Section 5 counties


District County Total

Population Black Hispanic Black or Hispanic

18 Hillsborough* 258,872 35.7% 24.1% 58.5% 18 Manatee 35,641 36.4% 21.8% 57.5% 18 Pinellas 105,040 45.6% 3.1% 48.2% 18 Total 399,553 38.4% 18.2% 55.7% 39 Broward - N/A N/A N/A 39 Collier* 32,083 17.0% 63.1% 79.5% 39 Hendry* 36,210 14.1% 36.8% 50.7% 39 Miami-Dade 222,947 46.7% 35.4% 80.4% 39 Monroe* 79,589 4.5% 14.3% 18.5% 39 Palm Beach 28,777 68.2% 20.4% 87.7% 39 Total 399,606 33.1% 33.7% 63.7%

* Note: Five Florida counties are subject to federal jurisdiction pursuant to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended: Hillsborough, Hardee, Hendry, Collier, and Monroe. Four of those counties are included in newly created minority senatorial districts.

111

Five Florida counties are subject to federal jurisdiction pursuant to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended: Hillsborough, Hardee, Hendry, Collier, and Monroe.

The population of Hillsborough County, based on the 2000 Census, is 998,948 persons. Presently, there are seven senatorial districts in the Tampa Bay area. Six have substantial non-Hispanic white majorities and, without exception, have elected white incumbents (districts 13, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 26). One existing district (district 21) has voting age population percentages, based on the 2000 Census, of: 38.0% non-Hispanic white, 41.2% non-Hispanic black, 1.0% Hispanic black, 17.3% other Hispanics, and 2.4% all other persons. This district (and a similar district that was in effect in 1992), without exception, has elected African American incumbents. It now is 63,112 persons short of the target population for a senatorial district, based on the 2000 Census.

Newly created district 18 includes 91% of the population in existing district 21. Areas removed from the existing district were more Republican, while the district is mostly Democratic. Areas added to the district fit the socioeconomic and partisan patterns of the district as a whole. Because substantial new population was required and areas adjacent to the existing district did not have the same concentrations of minorities, the minority voting age population percentages in newly created district 18, based on the 2000 Census, are: 41.5% non-Hispanic white, 37.4% non-Hispanic black, 1.0% Hispanic black, 17.2% other Hispanics, and 2.8% all other persons. The combined voting age population percentage of blacks and Hispanics is 55.7%.3

Another jurisdiction subject to Section 5 is Hardee County. It has 26,938 people, based on the 2000 Census. The voting age population of Hardee County is 9.3% black, 30.1% Hispanic, and 39.0% black or Hispanic combined. The entire county is within existing senatorial district 26, but because of the county’s rural character and sparse population, it makes up only 6.6% of the district’s total population. Coastal Manatee and Sarasota Counties make up 77% of the existing district population (55.3% and 21.7%, respectively). The minority voting age population of existing district 26 is 5.8% black, 8.8% Hispanic, and 14.4% black or Hispanic combined. Newly created district 17 puts all of Hardee County together with parts of Polk, DeSoto, Highlands, Glades, Okeechobee, and interior St. Lucie counties. Hardee County remains a small share of the overall population of the newly created district (6.7%), but fits better with the rural community of interest. The minority voting age population of newly created district 17 is 11.0% black, 11.6% Hispanic, and 22.3% combined black or Hispanic combined.

Three south Florida counties, Hendry, Collier, and Monroe, are covered under Section 5. Presently, the three contiguous counties are split among three senatorial

3 Persons who identified themselves as “Black or African American” in the 2000 Census (either

alone or in combination with other races) and also identified themselves as “Hispanic” are allocated alternatively as African American or Hispanic. Therefore, the “Black or Hispanic” category generally has smaller numbers than the sum of “Black” plus “Hispanic” (see Attachment 1).

112

districts. Existing senatorial district 40 includes all of Monroe County and part of Miami-Dade County. Its voting age population is 34.6% black, 31.7% Hispanic, and 64.5% black or Hispanic combined. An African American incumbent has represented this district since 1992. All of Hendry County and the rural portions of Collier County are in existing senatorial district 29. These rural areas do not match the political clout of urban southeastern Broward County, however, which dominates with 71.4% of the district’s population. Since 1992, white incumbents have represented district 29. The voting age population of the existing district is 15.7% black, 20.7% Hispanic, and 35.8% black or Hispanic combined. The coastal portion of Collier County is in existing district 25, which has only small numbers of minorities.

Newly created district 39 combines Monroe County, all of Hendry County except an unpopulated corner adjacent to Lake Okechobee, rural portions of Collier and Palm Beach Counties, unpopulated conservation areas in Broward County, and portions of Miami-Dade County that overlap existing district 40. The three contiguous south Florida Section 5 counties are kept together in a single senatorial district.

Eighty-three percent of the population from existing district 40 is in newly created district 39. As was the case in the Tampa Bay area, the existing minority district falls more than 60,000 people below the target population. The new district needed to add territory to reach the target population. The voting age population of newly created district 39 is 33.1% black, 31.7% Hispanic, and 63.7% black or Hispanic combined.

Newly created district 39 includes more counties than either existing district 40 or existing district 29, but the distances from the population center to the extremities of the newly created district are similar to the distances for those two districts.4 In fact, the distance from the population center of existing district 40 to the most distant point is 175 miles, which is 4 miles longer than the distance from the population center to the furthest point in newly created district 39.

If the Keys are excluded, the most distant spot from the population center of the new district 39 is in northwest Hendry County near Labelle. That distance is 94 miles, which is 5 miles further than the distance from the same extreme point to the population center of existing district 29.

In terms of driving time, it is approximately 20 miles (30 minutes) from downtown Miami to Interstate 575 in Fort Lauderdale. The commute time from there to LaBelle is approximately 115 miles (2½ hours) regardless of whether the trip starts in south Broward County or in Miami.5

4 For this analysis, population center is calculated as a point representing the mean latitude and

mean longitude of all “block points” in a particular district, weighted for total population. A “Block point” is a single point inside the boundary of a Census block. Once the population center is determined, linear distances are calculated from it to each Census block in a district to determine the most distant point.

5 Driving information calculated as the “quickest” route using default settings in Microsoft® Streets and Trips 2002.

113

10. The Legislature’s redistricting software can be used to access socioeconomic information. Knowing something about the socioeconomic characteristics of neighborhoods is useful for understanding communities of interest. Socioeconomic data from the long form of the 2000 Census, however, will not be available until later this year. The 1990 data are the most recent available. The data are referred to as “Select Census SF3 Factors (1990).” Paired with local knowledge of current conditions, they can contribute to our understanding of socioeconomic communities of interest, particularly because the characteristics of neighborhoods generally are stable.

FREDS 2000 includes map themes for 29 socioeconomic factors. The themes can be used, in conjunction with local knowledge, to model or evaluate districts based on factors like per capita income, the percentage of families having incomes below the poverty level, the unemployment rate, the percentage of college graduates, housing costs, family size and type, among others. Also, after a plan is completed, proposed districts can be compared in terms of the socioeconomic factors (see Attachment 4).

11. Keeping counties intact is not a traditional redistricting principle in Florida. In 1992 and again in 2002, many counties were split, giving them the advantage of being represented by more than one Senator. In the existing plan, there are only 24 instances where counties are wholly contained in a single senatorial district. The remaining 43 counties are split among two or more districts. With the newly created districts, there are 23 instances where counties are wholly contained in a single district. This does not count Hardee County, where all of the population, but not all of the territory, are in a single district.

12. Making districts that are geometrically compact is not a traditional redistricting principle in Florida. In 1992 and again in 2002, the Legislature did not include geometric compactness as a formal standard for redistricting. Quantitative measures of geometric compactness relate poorly to communities of interest that have emerged parallel to the Florida coast. This state’s coastline is the longest in the continental United States, and it has been a dominant influence on patterns of development.

Neither the existing districts nor the newly created districts compare favorably to perfectly compact circles. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that in terms of perimeter ratio, a common measure of geometric compactness, the newly created districts score as more compact than the existing districts.6 If the districts in both plans are ordered from the least compact to the most compact, the newly created districts measure as more compact than the existing districts in first nine (i.e., least compact) positions. Continuing through the order, the newly created districts score as more compact in 11 of first 12 positions and in 27 of 40 overall.

6 The perimeter ratio is calculated as the area of the district divided by the area of a circle that has

a circumference equal to the length of the perimeter of the district. Values approaching 0 indicate less compact districts. Values approaching 1 indicate more compact districts. A perfectly circular district would have a perimeter ratio of 1. The longer the perimeter of a district, relative to its area, the lower the score.

114

Another common measure of geometric compactness is dispersion ratio.7 If the districts in both plans are ordered from least to most compact based on this measure, the newly created districts score as more compact in the first two positions and in 8 of the first 12.

Though mathematicians favor these ratios for evaluating relative compactness, a more direct method is simply to measure the sum of district perimeters (i.e., measure the border of each district and sum the 40 measurements to a total for the plan). The sum of perimeters for the 40 newly created districts is 12,066 miles, which is 7.7% less than the 13,076-mile sum for the 40 existing districts.

13. Keeping municipalities intact is not a traditional redistricting principle in Florida. The shapes of municipalities are further evidence that geometric compactness is not the standard for geopolitical boundaries in this state. In fact, each of the following municipalities has a lower perimeter ratio score than the least compact newly created district: Apopka, Auburndale, Belle Glade, Cedar Grove, Clearwater, Crestview, De Land, Eustis, Fort Pierce, Fruitland Park, Islamorada, Village of Islands, Largo, Leesburg, Marathon, New Port Richey, Newberry, Ocoee, Orlando, Palatka, Pinellas Park, Sanford, Seminole, St. Cloud, Tallahassee, Tavares, Winter Garden, Winter Haven (see Attachment 5 for silhouettes of these municipalities).

Adhering to lines like these would not produce geometrically compact districts. Furthermore, municipal boundaries in many parts of the state change frequently due to annexation. Between the Census of 1990 and that of 2000, the number of incorporated places in Florida increased from 386 to 403.

Keeping municipalities intact was not a standard for redistricting in Florida either in 1992 or in 2002. The number of municipalities split among two or more existing districts (using the 1996 settlement plan as the benchmark) increased during the decade from 115 to 126. The newly created districts split 120 municipalities — 6 fewer than the benchmark, based on the 2000 Census.

14. FREDS 2000 and the Senate Redistricting Internet site gave citizens unprecedented access to redistricting information. The Florida Legislature designed and produced FREDS 2000 expressly to make redistricting technology available to all. It includes more than 2 gigabytes of Census and elections data in an easy to use application for modeling and evaluating districts. The complete package is available for $20 per license. Those who do not have their own personal computers can find the program at libraries and other locations. The same day the program was provided to legislators and staff, the legislature shipped copies to 508 public libraries and branches in Florida. Additional copies went to university libraries and depositories, state

7 The dispersion ratio is calculated as the area of the district divided by the area of a

circumscribing circle. The circumscribing circle is the smallest circle that wholly contains the entire district shape. As with the perimeter ratio, values range between 0 and 1. A perfectly circular district would have a dispersion ratio of 1. While the perimeter ratio is sensitive to turns that lengthen the outer boundary of a district, the dispersion ratio is sensitive to the overall length of a district relative to its girth.

115

universities and community colleges, private colleges and universities, supervisors of elections, county administrators, and county commission chairs. A tutorial and comprehensive help system are integrated with the application to assist users with mastering the software. The Help System contains a complete list of functions, themes, and buttons that are included in FREDS and instructions on how to use them.

The Senate Redistricting website (http://www.leg.state.fl.us/senateredistricting) provides instant public access to the redistricting process via the Internet. Citizens can view transcripts of public hearings, committee meetings, or floor debate, and can access maps or statistics of existing districts or proposed plans. Senators or members of the public can submit redistricting plans or comments directly to the committee. They also can easily access public correspondence sent to the committee. The website has a link to FREDS 2000 Help, with frequently asked questions and instructions on how to contact technicians for individual help. It also has links for downloading the latest enhancements to FREDS 2000 and the ArcView® shapefiles and Microsoft Access® databases included in the program.

The foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

___________________________________ John Guthrie Date: April 15, 2002

STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF LEON

Sworn to and subscribed before me, the undersigned Notary Public, this 15th day of April, 2002, by John Guthrie, who is personally known to me and who did take an oath.

___________________________________ Notary Public

116

Attachment 1: Technical Discussion of Racial and Ethnic Categories

Used in FREDS 2000

The Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) include, for the first time, counts of persons who identified themselves as members of more than one racial category. There are six categories:

• White,

• Black or African American,

• American Indian and Alaska Native,

• Asian,

• Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, and

• Some other race.

Individuals may identify themselves using any combination of categories, provided that at least one category is selected. This yields 63 possible combinations (26-1). Other Census questions ask individuals whether they are Hispanic and when they were born. Census P.L. 94-171 block, block group, tract, and county data are tabulated to account for all possible combinations of race (63), plus Hispanic origin (doubling the number of categories to 126), and voting age population (again doubling the number of categories to 252). Most categories get very few responses.

It would be unwieldy to keep track of all 252 categories when modeling, evaluating, or reporting the demographic characteristics of proposed districts. On March 9, 2000, the federal Office of Management and Budget issued OMB Bulletin No. 00-02. It suggests strategies for aggregating and allocating data in the 63 racial categories. The bulletin specifically rejects methods that would require “fractional or double counting of individuals, or arbitrary allocation of responses to one minority group versus another.” For civil rights monitoring and enforcement, the bulletin provides:

• The five single race categories (excluding “other”) are not allocated.

• Categories combining one minority race and white are allocated to the minority race.

• Categories combining two or more minority races are allocated to the race against which discrimination is alleged, or, if the complaint requires separate assessments, the combined categories are allocated alternately to each of the minority groups.

Subsequently, the Department of Justice published its “Guidance Concerning Redistricting and Retrogression Under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C.

117

1973c,” Federal Register, Vol. 66, No. 12, January 18, 2001. Pursuant to the OMB Bulletin, the Department of Justice will allocate categories combining one minority race and white to the minority race. Furthermore, the department will examine categories combining two or more minorities, “and if it appears that any one of these categories has significant numbers of responses, . . . those responses will be allocated alternatively to each of the component single-race categories for analysis.” Likewise, “[I]f there are significant numbers of responses which report Hispanics and one or more of minority races . . . those responses will be allocated alternatively to the Hispanic category and the minority race category.

Florida’s population, based on the 2000 Census, is 65.4% single-race non-Hispanic white, 14.2% single-race non-Hispanic black, 1.6% single-race non-Hispanic Asian, and 12.6% Hispanic. The numbers of persons who identified themselves as members of more than one race was 376,315 statewide (2.4% of the total population). This amount is mostly attributable to Hispanics who identified themselves as “white and some other race” (98,468 persons), and persons not of Hispanic origin who identified themselves as black in combination with white (30,404 persons) or in combination with other minorities (80,550 persons). Individual county data reveal that the Asian population is not geographically concentrated. The greatest concentration of Asians is in Broward County, where 40,466 persons (2.5%) identified themselves as Asian alone or Asian in combination with white.

Population of Florida, 2000 Census

Category Total Population Voting Age Population

Non-Hispanic White alone 10,458,509 65.4% 8,439,743 68.4% Black or African American alone 2,264,268 14.2% 1,511,373 12.3% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 42,358 0.3% 31,885 0.3% Asian alone 261,693 1.6% 201,038 1.6% Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 6,887 0.0% 5,172 0.0% Some other race alone 28,994 0.2% 16,156 0.1% Black and White 30,404 0.2% 8,192 0.1% American Indian and White 40,367 0.3% 31,187 0.3% Asian and White 34,214 0.2% 19,034 0.2% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White 2,773 0.0% 1,762 0.0% Some other race and White 33,005 0.2% 24,738 0.2% American Indian and Black 6,586 0.0% 4,696 0.0% Other combinations including Black 73,964 0.5% 49,787 0.4% Other combinations not including Black 15,641 0.1% 11,099 0.1% Hispanic White alone 2,006,520 12.6% 1,521,241 12.3% Black or African American alone 71,237 0.4% 49,555 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 11,183 0.1% 7,679 0.1% Asian alone 4,563 0.0% 3,156 0.0% Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 1,738 0.0% 1,173 0.0%

118

Category Total Population Voting Age Population

Some other race alone 448,113 2.8% 302,921 2.5% Black and White 8,025 0.1% 4,624 0.0% American Indian and White 3,573 0.0% 2,196 0.0% Asian and White 2,854 0.0% 1,467 0.0% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White 616 0.0% 401 0.0% Some other race and White 98,468 0.6% 69,683 0.6% American Indian and Black 596 0.0% 340 0.0% Other combinations including Black 16,650 0.1% 10,042 0.1% Other combinations not including Black 8,579 0.1% 5,698 0.0% Total 15,982,378 12,336,038

The numbers and distribution of population in Florida suggest an allocation method that gives special consideration to both black and Hispanic minorities. Persons who identify themselves as Hispanic should be counted as Hispanic, regardless of their racial identification. Persons who identify themselves as black, either alone or in combination with other choices, should be counted as black. Persons who identify themselves as both Hispanic and black should be allocated alternately to the Hispanic category and the black category, just as prescribed in the OMB Bulletin and Department of Justice guidance.

The 252 population categories in the Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) are reduced to 10 in FREDS 2000 (population and voting age population for the following):

• “Single-Race Non-Hispanic White” includes persons who identified themselves as white alone and not Hispanic.

• “Non-Hispanic Black” includes persons who identified themselves as black, either alone or in combination with other races, and not Hispanic.

• “Hispanic Black” includes persons who identified themselves as black, either alone or in combination with other races, and Hispanic.

• “Hispanic Excluding Black” includes persons who identified themselves as Hispanic, excluding persons who identified themselves as black, either alone or in combination with other races.

• “Non-Hispanic Other” includes persons who are not white alone, not black (either alone or in combination with other races), and not Hispanic.

These five categories sum to the total population (or voting age population) for the block, block group, tract, county, state, or district. Fractional or double counting of persons is avoided, as is any arbitrary allocation of responses to one minority group versus another.

As is done with the numbers and percentages reported in the affidavit, Hispanic blacks can be allocated alternatively as Hispanics or blacks to determine the total

119

number of persons in an area or district who identify themselves as belonging to either minority. Because Hispanic blacks are added to both categories, the number of persons categorized as “Black or Hispanic” (i.e., “Non-Hispanic Black” plus “Hispanic Black” plus “Hispanic Excluding Black”) likely will be less than the number of persons categorized as “Black” (i.e., “Non-Hispanic Black” plus “Hispanic Black”) plus the number categorized as “Hispanic” (i.e., “Hispanic Excluding Black” plus “Hispanic Black”).

Attachments 2 and 3 will be helpful to those interested in detailed population breakdowns for newly created and existing senatorial districts. The reports include 2000 Census counts and percentages for all of the categories suggested by the OMB aggregation guidance (Part I of the OMB Bulletin), plus more based on the allocation guidance in Part II of the OMB Bulletin and the Department of Justice guidance. The 63 Census categories are aggregated to 14. These are reported, together with the total, for total population, non-Hispanic population, and Hispanic population, total voting age population, non-Hispanic voting age population, and Hispanic voting age population. There are a total of 90 population categories in the report.

Attachment 2: Population Detail for Newly Created Senatorial DistrictsSenate Plan S17S0036Census detail based on OMB guidance District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 8Total Population (2000 Census) 399,563 100.0% 399,543 100.0% 399,512 100.0% 399,586 100.0% 399,573 100.0% 399,586 100.0% 399,552 100.0% 399,568 100.0% White alone 178,667 44.7% 313,104 78.4% 338,211 84.7% 337,171 84.4% 343,121 85.9% 259,013 64.8% 361,950 90.6% 343,084 85.9% Black or African American alone 200,133 50.1% 65,667 16.4% 46,497 11.6% 35,481 8.9% 34,264 8.6% 124,784 31.2% 21,918 5.5% 32,800 8.2% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 1,131 0.3% 4,202 1.1% 1,668 0.4% 2,780 0.7% 1,518 0.4% 1,696 0.4% 1,504 0.4% 1,336 0.3% Asian alone 7,616 1.9% 5,431 1.4% 3,390 0.8% 9,532 2.4% 8,781 2.2% 4,489 1.1% 3,183 0.8% 10,449 2.6% Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 214 0.1% 350 0.1% 116 0.0% 460 0.1% 267 0.1% 152 0.0% 154 0.0% 211 0.1% Some other race alone 4,515 1.1% 2,627 0.7% 4,388 1.1% 4,396 1.1% 4,602 1.2% 3,947 1.0% 5,879 1.5% 4,703 1.2% Black and White 1,213 0.3% 952 0.2% 737 0.2% 1,303 0.3% 854 0.2% 881 0.2% 667 0.2% 984 0.2% American Indian and White 895 0.2% 3,283 0.8% 1,734 0.4% 2,471 0.6% 1,454 0.4% 1,501 0.4% 1,586 0.4% 1,274 0.3% Asian and White 905 0.2% 1,465 0.4% 496 0.1% 2,415 0.6% 1,610 0.4% 615 0.2% 559 0.1% 1,484 0.4% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White 77 0.0% 168 0.0% 76 0.0% 167 0.0% 130 0.0% 59 0.0% 88 0.0% 98 0.0% Some other race and White 1,918 0.5% 846 0.2% 1,104 0.3% 1,258 0.3% 1,372 0.3% 936 0.2% 1,200 0.3% 1,469 0.4% American Indian and Black 432 0.1% 287 0.1% 179 0.0% 204 0.1% 161 0.0% 293 0.1% 121 0.0% 128 0.0% Other combinations including Black 1,375 0.3% 644 0.2% 602 0.2% 1,016 0.3% 863 0.2% 871 0.2% 410 0.1% 867 0.2% Other combinations not including Black 472 0.1% 517 0.1% 314 0.1% 932 0.2% 576 0.1% 349 0.1% 333 0.1% 681 0.2%Non-Hispanic Population 385,936 96.6% 390,437 97.7% 381,539 95.5% 385,521 96.5% 384,244 96.2% 385,636 96.5% 380,586 95.3% 382,237 95.7% White alone 171,915 43.0% 307,896 77.1% 326,532 81.7% 329,148 82.4% 333,903 83.6% 251,059 62.8% 350,189 87.6% 332,064 83.1% Black or African American alone 198,463 49.7% 65,131 16.3% 45,776 11.5% 34,958 8.7% 33,682 8.4% 123,597 30.9% 21,549 5.4% 32,158 8.0% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 1,043 0.3% 4,013 1.0% 1,497 0.4% 2,555 0.6% 1,399 0.4% 1,555 0.4% 1,359 0.3% 1,190 0.3% Asian alone 7,531 1.9% 5,344 1.3% 3,343 0.8% 9,416 2.4% 8,646 2.2% 4,407 1.1% 3,123 0.8% 10,322 2.6% Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 178 0.0% 328 0.1% 96 0.0% 431 0.1% 239 0.1% 141 0.0% 134 0.0% 202 0.1% Some other race alone 692 0.2% 503 0.1% 268 0.1% 701 0.2% 619 0.2% 397 0.1% 314 0.1% 587 0.1% Black and White 1,137 0.3% 897 0.2% 671 0.2% 1,221 0.3% 789 0.2% 840 0.2% 617 0.2% 870 0.2% American Indian and White 844 0.2% 3,171 0.8% 1,680 0.4% 2,346 0.6% 1,387 0.3% 1,450 0.4% 1,513 0.4% 1,194 0.3% Asian and White 861 0.2% 1,419 0.4% 455 0.1% 2,299 0.6% 1,519 0.4% 578 0.1% 544 0.1% 1,422 0.4% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White 68 0.0% 155 0.0% 69 0.0% 158 0.0% 105 0.0% 58 0.0% 77 0.0% 88 0.0% Some other race and White 1,347 0.3% 402 0.1% 342 0.1% 629 0.2% 749 0.2% 381 0.1% 503 0.1% 796 0.2% American Indian and Black 411 0.1% 274 0.1% 157 0.0% 189 0.0% 151 0.0% 284 0.1% 114 0.0% 119 0.0% Other combinations including Black 1,086 0.3% 493 0.1% 450 0.1% 797 0.2% 630 0.2% 647 0.2% 293 0.1% 681 0.2% Other combinations not including Black 360 0.1% 411 0.1% 203 0.1% 673 0.2% 426 0.1% 242 0.1% 257 0.1% 544 0.1%Hispanic Population 13,627 3.4% 9,106 2.3% 17,973 4.5% 14,065 3.5% 15,329 3.8% 13,950 3.5% 18,966 4.7% 17,331 4.3% White alone 6,752 1.7% 5,208 1.3% 11,679 2.9% 8,023 2.0% 9,218 2.3% 7,954 2.0% 11,761 2.9% 11,020 2.8% Black or African American alone 1,670 0.4% 536 0.1% 721 0.2% 523 0.1% 582 0.1% 1,187 0.3% 369 0.1% 642 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 88 0.0% 189 0.0% 171 0.0% 225 0.1% 119 0.0% 141 0.0% 145 0.0% 146 0.0% Asian alone 85 0.0% 87 0.0% 47 0.0% 116 0.0% 135 0.0% 82 0.0% 60 0.0% 127 0.0% Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 36 0.0% 22 0.0% 20 0.0% 29 0.0% 28 0.0% 11 0.0% 20 0.0% 9 0.0% Some other race alone 3,823 1.0% 2,124 0.5% 4,120 1.0% 3,695 0.9% 3,983 1.0% 3,550 0.9% 5,565 1.4% 4,116 1.0% Black and White 76 0.0% 55 0.0% 66 0.0% 82 0.0% 65 0.0% 41 0.0% 50 0.0% 114 0.0% American Indian and White 51 0.0% 112 0.0% 54 0.0% 125 0.0% 67 0.0% 51 0.0% 73 0.0% 80 0.0% Asian and White 44 0.0% 46 0.0% 41 0.0% 116 0.0% 91 0.0% 37 0.0% 15 0.0% 62 0.0% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White 9 0.0% 13 0.0% 7 0.0% 9 0.0% 25 0.0% 1 0.0% 11 0.0% 10 0.0% Some other race and White 571 0.1% 444 0.1% 762 0.2% 629 0.2% 623 0.2% 555 0.1% 697 0.2% 673 0.2% American Indian and Black 21 0.0% 13 0.0% 22 0.0% 15 0.0% 10 0.0% 9 0.0% 7 0.0% 9 0.0% Other combinations including Black 289 0.1% 151 0.0% 152 0.0% 219 0.1% 233 0.1% 224 0.1% 117 0.0% 186 0.0% Other combinations not including Black 112 0.0% 106 0.0% 111 0.0% 259 0.1% 150 0.0% 107 0.0% 76 0.0% 137 0.0%Total Voting Age Population 290,285 100.0% 299,064 100.0% 316,022 100.0% 306,852 100.0% 292,315 100.0% 309,011 100.0% 317,415 100.0% 310,802 100.0% White alone 142,480 49.1% 239,937 80.2% 272,961 86.4% 264,831 86.3% 255,475 87.4% 206,107 66.7% 292,447 92.1% 272,064 87.5% Black or African American alone 133,718 46.1% 44,893 15.0% 32,923 10.4% 23,585 7.7% 22,050 7.5% 91,430 29.6% 14,646 4.6% 22,317 7.2% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 887 0.3% 3,118 1.0% 1,258 0.4% 2,156 0.7% 1,143 0.4% 1,308 0.4% 1,175 0.4% 1,038 0.3% Asian alone 5,828 2.0% 4,248 1.4% 2,609 0.8% 7,606 2.5% 6,651 2.3% 3,598 1.2% 2,484 0.8% 8,025 2.6% Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 154 0.1% 269 0.1% 93 0.0% 346 0.1% 190 0.1% 123 0.0% 113 0.0% 148 0.0% Some other race alone 2,902 1.0% 1,740 0.6% 2,857 0.9% 3,085 1.0% 2,940 1.0% 2,808 0.9% 3,489 1.1% 3,185 1.0% Black and White 296 0.1% 192 0.1% 180 0.1% 264 0.1% 175 0.1% 264 0.1% 157 0.0% 247 0.1% American Indian and White 714 0.2% 2,457 0.8% 1,298 0.4% 1,855 0.6% 1,088 0.4% 1,153 0.4% 1,202 0.4% 982 0.3% Asian and White 462 0.2% 686 0.2% 285 0.1% 1,084 0.4% 750 0.3% 376 0.1% 311 0.1% 701 0.2% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White 45 0.0% 99 0.0% 47 0.0% 89 0.0% 66 0.0% 43 0.0% 46 0.0% 64 0.0% Some other race and White 1,348 0.5% 557 0.2% 760 0.2% 799 0.3% 872 0.3% 706 0.2% 808 0.3% 1,012 0.3% American Indian and Black 317 0.1% 210 0.1% 127 0.0% 155 0.1% 105 0.0% 221 0.1% 79 0.0% 96 0.0% Other combinations including Black 809 0.3% 310 0.1% 383 0.1% 448 0.1% 423 0.1% 613 0.2% 235 0.1% 477 0.2% Other combinations not including Black 325 0.1% 348 0.1% 241 0.1% 549 0.2% 387 0.1% 261 0.1% 223 0.1% 446 0.1%Non-Hispanic Voting Age Population 280,919 96.8% 292,833 97.9% 303,338 96.0% 296,979 96.8% 282,215 96.5% 298,358 96.6% 304,716 96.0% 298,691 96.1% White alone 137,582 47.4% 236,280 79.0% 264,404 83.7% 259,032 84.4% 249,174 85.2% 199,861 64.7% 284,056 89.5% 264,153 85.0% Black or African American alone 132,684 45.7% 44,546 14.9% 32,450 10.3% 23,248 7.6% 21,724 7.4% 90,520 29.3% 14,420 4.5% 21,904 7.0% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 815 0.3% 2,997 1.0% 1,142 0.4% 1,989 0.6% 1,057 0.4% 1,206 0.4% 1,067 0.3% 932 0.3% Asian alone 5,774 2.0% 4,185 1.4% 2,573 0.8% 7,519 2.5% 6,572 2.2% 3,531 1.1% 2,447 0.8% 7,943 2.6% Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 127 0.0% 252 0.1% 79 0.0% 324 0.1% 172 0.1% 112 0.0% 100 0.0% 141 0.0% Some other race alone 302 0.1% 236 0.1% 145 0.0% 320 0.1% 275 0.1% 193 0.1% 141 0.0% 288 0.1% Black and White 261 0.1% 169 0.1% 145 0.0% 234 0.1% 146 0.0% 245 0.1% 138 0.0% 201 0.1% American Indian and White 676 0.2% 2,387 0.8% 1,265 0.4% 1,775 0.6% 1,056 0.4% 1,126 0.4% 1,165 0.4% 929 0.3% Asian and White 443 0.2% 674 0.2% 271 0.1% 1,051 0.3% 715 0.2% 353 0.1% 304 0.1% 678 0.2% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White 40 0.0% 92 0.0% 43 0.0% 84 0.0% 53 0.0% 43 0.0% 42 0.0% 58 0.0% Some other race and White 994 0.3% 304 0.1% 269 0.1% 482 0.2% 541 0.2% 300 0.1% 394 0.1% 595 0.2% American Indian and Black 309 0.1% 203 0.1% 111 0.0% 146 0.0% 102 0.0% 215 0.1% 78 0.0% 90 0.0% Other combinations including Black 655 0.2% 231 0.1% 293 0.1% 363 0.1% 329 0.1% 476 0.2% 184 0.1% 400 0.1% Other combinations not including Black 257 0.1% 277 0.1% 148 0.0% 412 0.1% 299 0.1% 177 0.1% 180 0.1% 379 0.1%Hispanic Voting Age Population 9,366 3.2% 6,231 2.1% 12,684 4.0% 9,873 3.2% 10,100 3.5% 10,653 3.4% 12,699 4.0% 12,111 3.9% White alone 4,898 1.7% 3,657 1.2% 8,557 2.7% 5,799 1.9% 6,301 2.2% 6,246 2.0% 8,391 2.6% 7,911 2.5% Black or African American alone 1,034 0.4% 347 0.1% 473 0.1% 337 0.1% 326 0.1% 910 0.3% 226 0.1% 413 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 72 0.0% 121 0.0% 116 0.0% 167 0.1% 86 0.0% 102 0.0% 108 0.0% 106 0.0% Asian alone 54 0.0% 63 0.0% 36 0.0% 87 0.0% 79 0.0% 67 0.0% 37 0.0% 82 0.0% Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 27 0.0% 17 0.0% 14 0.0% 22 0.0% 18 0.0% 11 0.0% 13 0.0% 7 0.0% Some other race alone 2,600 0.9% 1,504 0.5% 2,712 0.9% 2,765 0.9% 2,665 0.9% 2,615 0.8% 3,348 1.1% 2,897 0.9% Black and White 35 0.0% 23 0.0% 35 0.0% 30 0.0% 29 0.0% 19 0.0% 19 0.0% 46 0.0% American Indian and White 38 0.0% 70 0.0% 33 0.0% 80 0.0% 32 0.0% 27 0.0% 37 0.0% 53 0.0% Asian and White 19 0.0% 12 0.0% 14 0.0% 33 0.0% 35 0.0% 23 0.0% 7 0.0% 23 0.0% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White 5 0.0% 7 0.0% 4 0.0% 5 0.0% 13 0.0% - 0.0% 4 0.0% 6 0.0% Some other race and White 354 0.1% 253 0.1% 491 0.2% 317 0.1% 331 0.1% 406 0.1% 414 0.1% 417 0.1% American Indian and Black 8 0.0% 7 0.0% 16 0.0% 9 0.0% 3 0.0% 6 0.0% 1 0.0% 6 0.0% Other combinations including Black 154 0.1% 79 0.0% 90 0.0% 85 0.0% 94 0.0% 137 0.0% 51 0.0% 77 0.0% Other combinations not including Black 68 0.0% 71 0.0% 93 0.0% 137 0.0% 88 0.0% 84 0.0% 43 0.0% 67 0.0%

120

Attachment 2: Population Detail for Newly Created Senatorial DistrictsSenate Plan S17S0036Census detail based on OMB guidanceTotal Population (2000 Census) White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some other race alone Black and White American Indian and White Asian and White Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White Some other race and White American Indian and Black Other combinations including Black Other combinations not including BlackNon-Hispanic Population White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some other race alone Black and White American Indian and White Asian and White Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White Some other race and White American Indian and Black Other combinations including Black Other combinations not including BlackHispanic Population White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some other race alone Black and White American Indian and White Asian and White Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White Some other race and White American Indian and Black Other combinations including Black Other combinations not including BlackTotal Voting Age Population White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some other race alone Black and White American Indian and White Asian and White Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White Some other race and White American Indian and Black Other combinations including Black Other combinations not including BlackNon-Hispanic Voting Age Population White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some other race alone Black and White American Indian and White Asian and White Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White Some other race and White American Indian and Black Other combinations including Black Other combinations not including BlackHispanic Voting Age Population White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some other race alone Black and White American Indian and White Asian and White Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White Some other race and White American Indian and Black Other combinations including Black Other combinations not including Black

District 9 District 10 District 11 District 12 District 13 District 14 District 15 District 16399,552 100.0% 399,547 100.0% 399,543 100.0% 399,594 100.0% 399,563 100.0% 399,571 100.0% 399,559 100.0% 399,549 100.0%320,263 80.2% 331,958 83.1% 380,890 95.3% 337,625 84.5% 365,632 91.5% 301,194 75.4% 339,417 84.9% 352,155 88.1%

30,607 7.7% 34,936 8.7% 5,485 1.4% 25,363 6.3% 16,638 4.2% 75,966 19.0% 33,828 8.5% 16,853 4.2%1,327 0.3% 1,727 0.4% 1,042 0.3% 1,451 0.4% 1,175 0.3% 1,496 0.4% 1,650 0.4% 1,219 0.3%

15,298 3.8% 4,644 1.2% 4,206 1.1% 11,312 2.8% 5,862 1.5% 8,432 2.1% 3,351 0.8% 13,431 3.4%392 0.1% 223 0.1% 119 0.0% 256 0.1% 238 0.1% 125 0.0% 192 0.0% 246 0.1%

20,163 5.0% 18,646 4.7% 2,994 0.7% 14,314 3.6% 4,531 1.1% 5,320 1.3% 13,798 3.5% 7,268 1.8%1,161 0.3% 824 0.2% 543 0.1% 1,013 0.3% 806 0.2% 1,175 0.3% 956 0.2% 1,017 0.3%1,025 0.3% 1,456 0.4% 1,289 0.3% 1,218 0.3% 1,262 0.3% 1,705 0.4% 1,499 0.4% 1,381 0.3%1,493 0.4% 940 0.2% 765 0.2% 1,374 0.3% 760 0.2% 944 0.2% 650 0.2% 1,522 0.4%

120 0.0% 76 0.0% 79 0.0% 80 0.0% 70 0.0% 76 0.0% 71 0.0% 99 0.0%4,639 1.2% 2,476 0.6% 1,417 0.4% 3,484 0.9% 1,646 0.4% 1,516 0.4% 2,390 0.6% 2,805 0.7%

100 0.0% 192 0.0% 41 0.0% 161 0.0% 79 0.0% 264 0.1% 89 0.0% 113 0.0%1,713 0.4% 834 0.2% 365 0.1% 1,240 0.3% 465 0.1% 852 0.2% 1,189 0.3% 788 0.2%1,251 0.3% 615 0.2% 308 0.1% 703 0.2% 399 0.1% 506 0.1% 479 0.1% 652 0.2%

333,956 83.6% 349,632 87.5% 383,504 96.0% 337,658 84.5% 381,063 95.4% 379,424 95.0% 356,903 89.3% 364,779 91.3%280,012 70.1% 304,122 76.1% 368,987 92.4% 294,386 73.7% 353,234 88.4% 288,421 72.2% 314,141 78.6% 327,284 81.9%

28,703 7.2% 34,103 8.5% 5,201 1.3% 24,043 6.0% 16,214 4.1% 75,147 18.8% 32,790 8.2% 15,967 4.0%955 0.2% 1,423 0.4% 907 0.2% 1,167 0.3% 957 0.2% 1,315 0.3% 1,313 0.3% 1,024 0.3%

15,149 3.8% 4,539 1.1% 4,153 1.0% 11,150 2.8% 5,798 1.5% 8,326 2.1% 3,278 0.8% 13,286 3.3%330 0.1% 170 0.0% 98 0.0% 222 0.1% 221 0.1% 112 0.0% 134 0.0% 213 0.1%

1,444 0.4% 519 0.1% 353 0.1% 838 0.2% 429 0.1% 513 0.1% 530 0.1% 633 0.2%870 0.2% 707 0.2% 467 0.1% 847 0.2% 719 0.2% 1,090 0.3% 789 0.2% 894 0.2%915 0.2% 1,351 0.3% 1,231 0.3% 1,107 0.3% 1,205 0.3% 1,635 0.4% 1,422 0.4% 1,309 0.3%

1,405 0.4% 879 0.2% 728 0.2% 1,275 0.3% 725 0.2% 908 0.2% 605 0.2% 1,461 0.4%107 0.0% 62 0.0% 76 0.0% 78 0.0% 63 0.0% 70 0.0% 57 0.0% 83 0.0%

1,717 0.4% 602 0.2% 796 0.2% 1,104 0.3% 780 0.2% 657 0.2% 594 0.1% 1,451 0.4%88 0.0% 178 0.0% 36 0.0% 137 0.0% 75 0.0% 242 0.1% 83 0.0% 103 0.0%

1,296 0.3% 598 0.1% 260 0.1% 815 0.2% 345 0.1% 650 0.2% 878 0.2% 570 0.1%965 0.2% 379 0.1% 211 0.1% 489 0.1% 298 0.1% 338 0.1% 289 0.1% 501 0.1%

65,596 16.4% 49,915 12.5% 16,039 4.0% 61,936 15.5% 18,500 4.6% 20,147 5.0% 42,656 10.7% 34,770 8.7%40,251 10.1% 27,836 7.0% 11,903 3.0% 43,239 10.8% 12,398 3.1% 12,773 3.2% 25,276 6.3% 24,871 6.2%

1,904 0.5% 833 0.2% 284 0.1% 1,320 0.3% 424 0.1% 819 0.2% 1,038 0.3% 886 0.2%372 0.1% 304 0.1% 135 0.0% 284 0.1% 218 0.1% 181 0.0% 337 0.1% 195 0.0%149 0.0% 105 0.0% 53 0.0% 162 0.0% 64 0.0% 106 0.0% 73 0.0% 145 0.0%

62 0.0% 53 0.0% 21 0.0% 34 0.0% 17 0.0% 13 0.0% 58 0.0% 33 0.0%18,719 4.7% 18,127 4.5% 2,641 0.7% 13,476 3.4% 4,102 1.0% 4,807 1.2% 13,268 3.3% 6,635 1.7%

291 0.1% 117 0.0% 76 0.0% 166 0.0% 87 0.0% 85 0.0% 167 0.0% 123 0.0%110 0.0% 105 0.0% 58 0.0% 111 0.0% 57 0.0% 70 0.0% 77 0.0% 72 0.0%

88 0.0% 61 0.0% 37 0.0% 99 0.0% 35 0.0% 36 0.0% 45 0.0% 61 0.0%13 0.0% 14 0.0% 3 0.0% 2 0.0% 7 0.0% 6 0.0% 14 0.0% 16 0.0%

2,922 0.7% 1,874 0.5% 621 0.2% 2,380 0.6% 866 0.2% 859 0.2% 1,796 0.4% 1,354 0.3%12 0.0% 14 0.0% 5 0.0% 24 0.0% 4 0.0% 22 0.0% 6 0.0% 10 0.0%

417 0.1% 236 0.1% 105 0.0% 425 0.1% 120 0.0% 202 0.1% 311 0.1% 218 0.1%286 0.1% 236 0.1% 97 0.0% 214 0.1% 101 0.0% 168 0.0% 190 0.0% 151 0.0%

300,098 100.0% 297,572 100.0% 326,209 100.0% 300,646 100.0% 332,772 100.0% 312,423 100.0% 305,225 100.0% 318,022 100.0%245,959 82.0% 255,013 85.7% 313,571 96.1% 258,235 85.9% 309,584 93.0% 242,288 77.6% 265,844 87.1% 285,430 89.8%

20,634 6.9% 22,466 7.5% 3,758 1.2% 17,285 5.7% 10,985 3.3% 53,100 17.0% 22,414 7.3% 11,295 3.6%971 0.3% 1,267 0.4% 793 0.2% 1,059 0.4% 940 0.3% 1,148 0.4% 1,196 0.4% 959 0.3%

11,254 3.8% 3,396 1.1% 3,123 1.0% 8,557 2.8% 4,482 1.3% 7,209 2.3% 2,552 0.8% 10,049 3.2%302 0.1% 161 0.1% 72 0.0% 186 0.1% 186 0.1% 101 0.0% 130 0.0% 163 0.1%

13,642 4.5% 11,060 3.7% 1,892 0.6% 9,516 3.2% 3,135 0.9% 3,873 1.2% 8,655 2.8% 4,939 1.6%398 0.1% 201 0.1% 152 0.0% 308 0.1% 184 0.1% 366 0.1% 251 0.1% 243 0.1%785 0.3% 1,060 0.4% 945 0.3% 932 0.3% 993 0.3% 1,326 0.4% 1,164 0.4% 1,055 0.3%802 0.3% 472 0.2% 408 0.1% 752 0.3% 433 0.1% 643 0.2% 355 0.1% 825 0.3%

79 0.0% 42 0.0% 50 0.0% 52 0.0% 38 0.0% 52 0.0% 51 0.0% 58 0.0%3,219 1.1% 1,480 0.5% 986 0.3% 2,359 0.8% 1,193 0.4% 1,154 0.4% 1,504 0.5% 2,001 0.6%

71 0.0% 122 0.0% 37 0.0% 115 0.0% 62 0.0% 196 0.1% 65 0.0% 78 0.0%1,129 0.4% 474 0.2% 217 0.1% 780 0.3% 274 0.1% 560 0.2% 740 0.2% 472 0.1%

853 0.3% 358 0.1% 205 0.1% 510 0.2% 283 0.1% 407 0.1% 304 0.1% 455 0.1%254,514 84.8% 266,738 89.6% 315,016 96.6% 257,505 85.7% 319,292 95.9% 297,166 95.1% 277,350 90.9% 292,911 92.1%217,351 72.4% 237,267 79.7% 305,011 93.5% 227,453 75.7% 300,315 90.2% 232,393 74.4% 248,857 81.5% 266,976 83.9%

19,354 6.4% 21,961 7.4% 3,581 1.1% 16,432 5.5% 10,700 3.2% 52,539 16.8% 21,738 7.1% 10,763 3.4%726 0.2% 1,061 0.4% 703 0.2% 872 0.3% 776 0.2% 1,019 0.3% 983 0.3% 817 0.3%

11,161 3.7% 3,337 1.1% 3,085 0.9% 8,460 2.8% 4,440 1.3% 7,119 2.3% 2,505 0.8% 9,961 3.1%263 0.1% 124 0.0% 61 0.0% 168 0.1% 169 0.1% 91 0.0% 95 0.0% 139 0.0%939 0.3% 240 0.1% 176 0.1% 448 0.1% 220 0.1% 289 0.1% 256 0.1% 342 0.1%233 0.1% 143 0.0% 125 0.0% 211 0.1% 144 0.0% 314 0.1% 167 0.1% 194 0.1%720 0.2% 1,002 0.3% 913 0.3% 870 0.3% 961 0.3% 1,281 0.4% 1,125 0.4% 1,010 0.3%761 0.3% 452 0.2% 389 0.1% 713 0.2% 413 0.1% 624 0.2% 340 0.1% 799 0.3%

71 0.0% 34 0.0% 49 0.0% 51 0.0% 36 0.0% 48 0.0% 39 0.0% 52 0.0%1,315 0.4% 421 0.1% 590 0.2% 800 0.3% 641 0.2% 539 0.2% 420 0.1% 1,062 0.3%

61 0.0% 115 0.0% 33 0.0% 101 0.0% 58 0.0% 186 0.1% 62 0.0% 71 0.0%883 0.3% 355 0.1% 160 0.0% 550 0.2% 207 0.1% 447 0.1% 570 0.2% 354 0.1%676 0.2% 226 0.1% 140 0.0% 376 0.1% 212 0.1% 277 0.1% 193 0.1% 371 0.1%

45,584 15.2% 30,834 10.4% 11,193 3.4% 43,141 14.3% 13,480 4.1% 15,257 4.9% 27,875 9.1% 25,111 7.9%28,608 9.5% 17,746 6.0% 8,560 2.6% 30,782 10.2% 9,269 2.8% 9,895 3.2% 16,987 5.6% 18,454 5.8%

1,280 0.4% 505 0.2% 177 0.1% 853 0.3% 285 0.1% 561 0.2% 676 0.2% 532 0.2%245 0.1% 206 0.1% 90 0.0% 187 0.1% 164 0.0% 129 0.0% 213 0.1% 142 0.0%

93 0.0% 59 0.0% 38 0.0% 97 0.0% 42 0.0% 90 0.0% 47 0.0% 88 0.0%39 0.0% 37 0.0% 11 0.0% 18 0.0% 17 0.0% 10 0.0% 35 0.0% 24 0.0%

12,703 4.2% 10,820 3.6% 1,716 0.5% 9,068 3.0% 2,915 0.9% 3,584 1.1% 8,399 2.8% 4,597 1.4%165 0.1% 58 0.0% 27 0.0% 97 0.0% 40 0.0% 52 0.0% 84 0.0% 49 0.0%

65 0.0% 58 0.0% 32 0.0% 62 0.0% 32 0.0% 45 0.0% 39 0.0% 45 0.0%41 0.0% 20 0.0% 19 0.0% 39 0.0% 20 0.0% 19 0.0% 15 0.0% 26 0.0%

8 0.0% 8 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 2 0.0% 4 0.0% 12 0.0% 6 0.0%1,904 0.6% 1,059 0.4% 396 0.1% 1,559 0.5% 552 0.2% 615 0.2% 1,084 0.4% 939 0.3%

10 0.0% 7 0.0% 4 0.0% 14 0.0% 4 0.0% 10 0.0% 3 0.0% 7 0.0%246 0.1% 119 0.0% 57 0.0% 230 0.1% 67 0.0% 113 0.0% 170 0.1% 118 0.0%177 0.1% 132 0.0% 65 0.0% 134 0.0% 71 0.0% 130 0.0% 111 0.0% 84 0.0%

121



48,479 12.1% 167,721 42.0% 126,673 31.7% 34,102 8.5% 14,756 3.7% 37,444 9.4% 15,063 3.8% 39,305 9.8%2,508 0.6% 1,621 0.4% 1,554 0.4% 1,326 0.3% 1,138 0.3% 1,157 0.3% 891 0.2% 1,552 0.4%3,902 1.0% 5,398 1.4% 11,448 2.9% 3,204 0.8% 3,532 0.9% 10,616 2.7% 3,091 0.8% 8,274 2.1%

158 0.0% 301 0.1% 371 0.1% 131 0.0% 162 0.0% 231 0.1% 116 0.0% 274 0.1%23,978 6.0% 19,192 4.8% 35,188 8.8% 8,300 2.1% 6,916 1.7% 13,785 3.4% 4,087 1.0% 9,263 2.3%

712 0.2% 1,884 0.5% 1,931 0.5% 686 0.2% 729 0.2% 1,312 0.3% 638 0.2% 1,303 0.3%1,200 0.3% 1,171 0.3% 813 0.2% 1,303 0.3% 1,078 0.3% 1,293 0.3% 980 0.2% 1,474 0.4%

458 0.1% 706 0.2% 1,042 0.3% 496 0.1% 626 0.2% 1,254 0.3% 566 0.1% 1,401 0.4%68 0.0% 77 0.0% 115 0.0% 62 0.0% 57 0.0% 76 0.0% 71 0.0% 100 0.0%

2,321 0.6% 3,937 1.0% 5,915 1.5% 1,702 0.4% 1,402 0.4% 3,040 0.8% 988 0.2% 2,044 0.5%131 0.0% 615 0.2% 406 0.1% 123 0.0% 61 0.0% 164 0.0% 98 0.0% 214 0.1%

1,294 0.3% 3,139 0.8% 6,598 1.7% 677 0.2% 512 0.1% 1,402 0.4% 543 0.1% 1,126 0.3%434 0.1% 770 0.2% 1,235 0.3% 390 0.1% 278 0.1% 743 0.2% 267 0.1% 556 0.1%

344,670 86.3% 324,195 81.1% 293,642 73.5% 370,361 92.7% 374,641 93.8% 350,792 87.8% 383,702 96.0% 366,673 91.8%287,065 71.8% 144,928 36.3% 146,244 36.6% 328,842 82.3% 352,091 88.1% 296,067 74.1% 361,683 90.5% 311,891 78.1%

47,616 11.9% 164,184 41.1% 122,455 30.6% 33,294 8.3% 14,230 3.6% 36,146 9.0% 14,575 3.6% 38,244 9.6%1,664 0.4% 1,173 0.3% 1,031 0.3% 1,133 0.3% 912 0.2% 960 0.2% 785 0.2% 1,314 0.3%3,812 1.0% 5,288 1.3% 11,270 2.8% 3,151 0.8% 3,500 0.9% 10,483 2.6% 3,065 0.8% 8,137 2.0%

108 0.0% 247 0.1% 308 0.1% 110 0.0% 133 0.0% 202 0.1% 86 0.0% 224 0.1%346 0.1% 974 0.2% 1,401 0.4% 312 0.1% 368 0.1% 837 0.2% 379 0.1% 681 0.2%593 0.1% 1,556 0.4% 1,288 0.3% 587 0.1% 645 0.2% 1,024 0.3% 570 0.1% 1,072 0.3%

1,150 0.3% 1,035 0.3% 685 0.2% 1,228 0.3% 1,027 0.3% 1,137 0.3% 926 0.2% 1,408 0.4%437 0.1% 640 0.2% 975 0.2% 459 0.1% 600 0.2% 1,185 0.3% 552 0.1% 1,332 0.3%

59 0.0% 60 0.0% 96 0.0% 57 0.0% 55 0.0% 65 0.0% 63 0.0% 95 0.0%495 0.1% 943 0.2% 1,279 0.3% 383 0.1% 399 0.1% 1,088 0.3% 373 0.1% 887 0.2%121 0.0% 576 0.1% 382 0.1% 113 0.0% 55 0.0% 145 0.0% 91 0.0% 196 0.0%

1,005 0.3% 2,173 0.5% 5,430 1.4% 457 0.1% 427 0.1% 932 0.2% 385 0.1% 805 0.2%199 0.0% 418 0.1% 798 0.2% 235 0.1% 199 0.0% 521 0.1% 169 0.0% 387 0.1%

54,907 13.7% 75,358 18.9% 105,911 26.5% 29,217 7.3% 24,915 6.2% 48,776 12.2% 15,859 4.0% 32,881 8.2%26,869 6.7% 48,093 12.0% 60,020 15.0% 18,234 4.6% 16,218 4.1% 30,984 7.8% 10,479 2.6% 20,777 5.2%

863 0.2% 3,537 0.9% 4,218 1.1% 808 0.2% 526 0.1% 1,298 0.3% 488 0.1% 1,061 0.3%844 0.2% 448 0.1% 523 0.1% 193 0.0% 226 0.1% 197 0.0% 106 0.0% 238 0.1%

90 0.0% 110 0.0% 178 0.0% 53 0.0% 32 0.0% 133 0.0% 26 0.0% 137 0.0%50 0.0% 54 0.0% 63 0.0% 21 0.0% 29 0.0% 29 0.0% 30 0.0% 50 0.0%

23,632 5.9% 18,218 4.6% 33,787 8.5% 7,988 2.0% 6,548 1.6% 12,948 3.2% 3,708 0.9% 8,582 2.1%119 0.0% 328 0.1% 643 0.2% 99 0.0% 84 0.0% 288 0.1% 68 0.0% 231 0.1%

50 0.0% 136 0.0% 128 0.0% 75 0.0% 51 0.0% 156 0.0% 54 0.0% 66 0.0%21 0.0% 66 0.0% 67 0.0% 37 0.0% 26 0.0% 69 0.0% 14 0.0% 69 0.0%

9 0.0% 17 0.0% 19 0.0% 5 0.0% 2 0.0% 11 0.0% 8 0.0% 5 0.0%1,826 0.5% 2,994 0.7% 4,636 1.2% 1,319 0.3% 1,003 0.3% 1,952 0.5% 615 0.2% 1,157 0.3%

10 0.0% 39 0.0% 24 0.0% 10 0.0% 6 0.0% 19 0.0% 7 0.0% 18 0.0%289 0.1% 966 0.2% 1,168 0.3% 220 0.1% 85 0.0% 470 0.1% 158 0.0% 321 0.1%235 0.1% 352 0.1% 437 0.1% 155 0.0% 79 0.0% 222 0.1% 98 0.0% 169 0.0%

306,584 100.0% 291,551 100.0% 288,115 100.0% 317,936 100.0% 323,162 100.0% 306,270 100.0% 337,510 100.0% 305,287 100.0%249,863 81.5% 156,622 53.7% 161,389 56.0% 282,783 88.9% 302,961 93.7% 255,896 83.6% 318,638 94.4% 259,488 85.0%

32,529 10.6% 109,159 37.4% 81,935 28.4% 22,990 7.2% 9,526 2.9% 26,063 8.5% 10,411 3.1% 26,902 8.8%1,764 0.6% 1,202 0.4% 1,123 0.4% 1,008 0.3% 826 0.3% 879 0.3% 705 0.2% 1,194 0.4%2,834 0.9% 4,286 1.5% 8,754 3.0% 2,401 0.8% 2,711 0.8% 8,132 2.7% 2,425 0.7% 6,519 2.1%

111 0.0% 227 0.1% 258 0.1% 98 0.0% 123 0.0% 183 0.1% 89 0.0% 212 0.1%15,387 5.0% 12,421 4.3% 23,114 8.0% 5,251 1.7% 4,276 1.3% 9,335 3.0% 2,682 0.8% 6,098 2.0%

173 0.1% 553 0.2% 723 0.3% 164 0.1% 164 0.1% 426 0.1% 176 0.1% 354 0.1%936 0.3% 935 0.3% 638 0.2% 994 0.3% 822 0.3% 975 0.3% 765 0.2% 1,102 0.4%260 0.1% 433 0.1% 625 0.2% 266 0.1% 320 0.1% 709 0.2% 298 0.1% 703 0.2%

52 0.0% 53 0.0% 78 0.0% 39 0.0% 27 0.0% 43 0.0% 44 0.0% 64 0.0%1,433 0.5% 2,758 0.9% 4,082 1.4% 1,166 0.4% 864 0.3% 2,135 0.7% 693 0.2% 1,427 0.5%

85 0.0% 448 0.2% 267 0.1% 97 0.0% 46 0.0% 127 0.0% 62 0.0% 158 0.1%846 0.3% 1,904 0.7% 4,291 1.5% 409 0.1% 312 0.1% 878 0.3% 339 0.1% 668 0.2%311 0.1% 550 0.2% 838 0.3% 270 0.1% 184 0.1% 489 0.2% 183 0.1% 398 0.1%

271,068 88.4% 238,362 81.8% 215,382 74.8% 297,867 93.7% 306,996 95.0% 271,667 88.7% 326,265 96.7% 282,774 92.6%232,299 75.8% 121,139 41.5% 118,683 41.2% 269,750 84.8% 292,161 90.4% 233,220 76.1% 310,975 92.1% 244,903 80.2%

32,003 10.4% 106,907 36.7% 79,214 27.5% 22,428 7.1% 9,199 2.8% 25,226 8.2% 10,049 3.0% 26,238 8.6%1,164 0.4% 905 0.3% 759 0.3% 890 0.3% 697 0.2% 737 0.2% 634 0.2% 1,033 0.3%2,779 0.9% 4,206 1.4% 8,641 3.0% 2,365 0.7% 2,688 0.8% 8,039 2.6% 2,404 0.7% 6,440 2.1%

84 0.0% 198 0.1% 216 0.1% 85 0.0% 104 0.0% 166 0.1% 66 0.0% 178 0.1%184 0.1% 469 0.2% 898 0.3% 140 0.0% 152 0.0% 500 0.2% 204 0.1% 342 0.1%

96 0.0% 393 0.1% 348 0.1% 110 0.0% 123 0.0% 264 0.1% 148 0.0% 239 0.1%908 0.3% 846 0.3% 552 0.2% 956 0.3% 793 0.2% 882 0.3% 729 0.2% 1,070 0.4%252 0.1% 396 0.1% 595 0.2% 254 0.1% 308 0.1% 675 0.2% 289 0.1% 671 0.2%

44 0.0% 40 0.0% 67 0.0% 36 0.0% 26 0.0% 36 0.0% 38 0.0% 60 0.0%355 0.1% 732 0.3% 964 0.3% 301 0.1% 300 0.1% 846 0.3% 293 0.1% 672 0.2%

80 0.0% 432 0.1% 253 0.1% 92 0.0% 42 0.0% 116 0.0% 59 0.0% 149 0.0%679 0.2% 1,384 0.5% 3,629 1.3% 292 0.1% 270 0.1% 604 0.2% 256 0.1% 493 0.2%141 0.0% 315 0.1% 563 0.2% 168 0.1% 133 0.0% 356 0.1% 121 0.0% 286 0.1%

35,516 11.6% 53,189 18.2% 72,733 25.2% 20,069 6.3% 16,166 5.0% 34,603 11.3% 11,245 3.3% 22,513 7.4%17,564 5.7% 35,483 12.2% 42,706 14.8% 13,033 4.1% 10,800 3.3% 22,676 7.4% 7,663 2.3% 14,585 4.8%

526 0.2% 2,252 0.8% 2,721 0.9% 562 0.2% 327 0.1% 837 0.3% 362 0.1% 664 0.2%600 0.2% 297 0.1% 364 0.1% 118 0.0% 129 0.0% 142 0.0% 71 0.0% 161 0.1%

55 0.0% 80 0.0% 113 0.0% 36 0.0% 23 0.0% 93 0.0% 21 0.0% 79 0.0%27 0.0% 29 0.0% 42 0.0% 13 0.0% 19 0.0% 17 0.0% 23 0.0% 34 0.0%

15,203 5.0% 11,952 4.1% 22,216 7.7% 5,111 1.6% 4,124 1.3% 8,835 2.9% 2,478 0.7% 5,756 1.9%77 0.0% 160 0.1% 375 0.1% 54 0.0% 41 0.0% 162 0.1% 28 0.0% 115 0.0%28 0.0% 89 0.0% 86 0.0% 38 0.0% 29 0.0% 93 0.0% 36 0.0% 32 0.0%

8 0.0% 37 0.0% 30 0.0% 12 0.0% 12 0.0% 34 0.0% 9 0.0% 32 0.0%8 0.0% 13 0.0% 11 0.0% 3 0.0% 1 0.0% 7 0.0% 6 0.0% 4 0.0%

1,078 0.4% 2,026 0.7% 3,118 1.1% 865 0.3% 564 0.2% 1,289 0.4% 400 0.1% 755 0.2%5 0.0% 16 0.0% 14 0.0% 5 0.0% 4 0.0% 11 0.0% 3 0.0% 9 0.0%

167 0.1% 520 0.2% 662 0.2% 117 0.0% 42 0.0% 274 0.1% 83 0.0% 175 0.1%170 0.1% 235 0.1% 275 0.1% 102 0.0% 51 0.0% 133 0.0% 62 0.0% 112 0.0%

122



16,499 4.1% 42,674 10.7% 27,742 6.9% 19,396 4.9% 239,941 60.1% 18,713 4.7% 46,883 11.7% 55,030 13.8%783 0.2% 1,283 0.3% 967 0.2% 926 0.2% 1,167 0.3% 545 0.1% 1,460 0.4% 806 0.2%

5,956 1.5% 4,508 1.1% 5,277 1.3% 3,942 1.0% 3,797 1.0% 6,784 1.7% 9,567 2.4% 10,914 2.7%181 0.0% 217 0.1% 214 0.1% 246 0.1% 325 0.1% 142 0.0% 285 0.1% 222 0.1%

6,127 1.5% 8,635 2.2% 16,342 4.1% 7,640 1.9% 13,088 3.3% 10,306 2.6% 11,980 3.0% 12,527 3.1%568 0.1% 823 0.2% 751 0.2% 668 0.2% 1,185 0.3% 527 0.1% 1,092 0.3% 1,112 0.3%739 0.2% 1,240 0.3% 779 0.2% 902 0.2% 439 0.1% 525 0.1% 662 0.2% 560 0.1%797 0.2% 975 0.2% 794 0.2% 713 0.2% 376 0.1% 739 0.2% 1,128 0.3% 1,021 0.3%

94 0.0% 89 0.0% 96 0.0% 82 0.0% 67 0.0% 58 0.0% 88 0.0% 76 0.0%2,846 0.7% 1,951 0.5% 3,534 0.9% 1,513 0.4% 2,853 0.7% 3,105 0.8% 4,591 1.1% 4,563 1.1%

83 0.0% 147 0.0% 95 0.0% 57 0.0% 445 0.1% 71 0.0% 145 0.0% 125 0.0%1,616 0.4% 1,457 0.4% 2,041 0.5% 867 0.2% 14,819 3.7% 1,672 0.4% 2,888 0.7% 4,406 1.1%

476 0.1% 460 0.1% 607 0.2% 462 0.1% 882 0.2% 564 0.1% 804 0.2% 804 0.2%365,568 91.5% 370,306 92.7% 336,050 84.1% 371,215 92.9% 355,014 88.9% 356,116 89.1% 322,555 80.7% 339,343 84.9%337,199 84.4% 317,006 79.3% 297,881 74.6% 343,697 86.0% 94,493 23.7% 325,075 81.4% 258,298 64.6% 263,789 66.0%

15,808 4.0% 41,762 10.5% 26,483 6.6% 18,741 4.7% 236,924 59.3% 17,925 4.5% 45,027 11.3% 53,409 13.4%555 0.1% 1,092 0.3% 706 0.2% 688 0.2% 654 0.2% 388 0.1% 1,245 0.3% 594 0.1%

5,890 1.5% 4,446 1.1% 5,162 1.3% 3,900 1.0% 3,723 0.9% 6,702 1.7% 9,422 2.4% 10,813 2.7%140 0.0% 162 0.0% 158 0.0% 118 0.0% 223 0.1% 112 0.0% 229 0.1% 195 0.0%852 0.2% 559 0.1% 678 0.2% 491 0.1% 1,273 0.3% 1,091 0.3% 1,244 0.3% 1,836 0.5%495 0.1% 693 0.2% 646 0.2% 556 0.1% 1,034 0.3% 428 0.1% 785 0.2% 931 0.2%686 0.2% 1,178 0.3% 691 0.2% 846 0.2% 372 0.1% 469 0.1% 576 0.1% 494 0.1%742 0.2% 914 0.2% 743 0.2% 679 0.2% 347 0.1% 674 0.2% 981 0.2% 956 0.2%

84 0.0% 83 0.0% 81 0.0% 71 0.0% 42 0.0% 51 0.0% 71 0.0% 57 0.0%1,201 0.3% 662 0.2% 724 0.2% 432 0.1% 900 0.2% 1,239 0.3% 1,484 0.4% 1,583 0.4%

76 0.0% 138 0.0% 81 0.0% 49 0.0% 409 0.1% 66 0.0% 130 0.0% 117 0.0%1,499 0.4% 1,250 0.3% 1,685 0.4% 689 0.2% 14,179 3.5% 1,473 0.4% 2,452 0.6% 3,958 1.0%

341 0.1% 361 0.1% 331 0.1% 258 0.1% 441 0.1% 423 0.1% 611 0.2% 611 0.2%34,012 8.5% 29,211 7.3% 63,518 15.9% 28,358 7.1% 44,520 11.1% 43,437 10.9% 76,989 19.3% 60,233 15.1%25,616 6.4% 18,052 4.5% 42,448 10.6% 18,462 4.6% 25,657 6.4% 30,727 7.7% 59,673 14.9% 43,621 10.9%

691 0.2% 912 0.2% 1,259 0.3% 655 0.2% 3,017 0.8% 788 0.2% 1,856 0.5% 1,621 0.4%228 0.1% 191 0.0% 261 0.1% 238 0.1% 513 0.1% 157 0.0% 215 0.1% 212 0.1%

66 0.0% 62 0.0% 115 0.0% 42 0.0% 74 0.0% 82 0.0% 145 0.0% 101 0.0%41 0.0% 55 0.0% 56 0.0% 128 0.0% 102 0.0% 30 0.0% 56 0.0% 27 0.0%

5,275 1.3% 8,076 2.0% 15,664 3.9% 7,149 1.8% 11,815 3.0% 9,215 2.3% 10,736 2.7% 10,691 2.7%73 0.0% 130 0.0% 105 0.0% 112 0.0% 151 0.0% 99 0.0% 307 0.1% 181 0.0%53 0.0% 62 0.0% 88 0.0% 56 0.0% 67 0.0% 56 0.0% 86 0.0% 66 0.0%55 0.0% 61 0.0% 51 0.0% 34 0.0% 29 0.0% 65 0.0% 147 0.0% 65 0.0%10 0.0% 6 0.0% 15 0.0% 11 0.0% 25 0.0% 7 0.0% 17 0.0% 19 0.0%

1,645 0.4% 1,289 0.3% 2,810 0.7% 1,081 0.3% 1,953 0.5% 1,866 0.5% 3,107 0.8% 2,980 0.7%7 0.0% 9 0.0% 14 0.0% 8 0.0% 36 0.0% 5 0.0% 15 0.0% 8 0.0%

117 0.0% 207 0.1% 356 0.1% 178 0.0% 640 0.2% 199 0.0% 436 0.1% 448 0.1%135 0.0% 99 0.0% 276 0.1% 204 0.1% 441 0.1% 141 0.0% 193 0.0% 193 0.0%

335,981 100.0% 310,382 100.0% 315,868 100.0% 314,238 100.0% 285,032 100.0% 330,694 100.0% 313,113 100.0% 306,359 100.0%309,598 92.1% 268,040 86.4% 277,320 87.8% 289,408 92.1% 102,559 36.0% 300,832 91.0% 256,674 82.0% 244,061 79.7%

11,397 3.4% 27,993 9.0% 17,623 5.6% 13,059 4.2% 155,231 54.5% 12,230 3.7% 31,835 10.2% 36,588 11.9%612 0.2% 908 0.3% 687 0.2% 663 0.2% 799 0.3% 410 0.1% 997 0.3% 551 0.2%

4,762 1.4% 3,537 1.1% 3,947 1.2% 2,880 0.9% 2,949 1.0% 5,111 1.5% 7,320 2.3% 8,116 2.6%149 0.0% 164 0.1% 158 0.1% 174 0.1% 244 0.1% 101 0.0% 220 0.1% 154 0.1%

4,396 1.3% 5,488 1.8% 10,617 3.4% 4,868 1.5% 8,949 3.1% 7,099 2.1% 8,296 2.6% 8,567 2.8%213 0.1% 204 0.1% 219 0.1% 205 0.1% 444 0.2% 201 0.1% 499 0.2% 377 0.1%590 0.2% 923 0.3% 605 0.2% 680 0.2% 356 0.1% 409 0.1% 534 0.2% 403 0.1%474 0.1% 472 0.2% 463 0.1% 360 0.1% 278 0.1% 421 0.1% 664 0.2% 568 0.2%

74 0.0% 52 0.0% 65 0.0% 53 0.0% 50 0.0% 39 0.0% 67 0.0% 50 0.0%2,175 0.6% 1,291 0.4% 2,397 0.8% 1,001 0.3% 2,106 0.7% 2,278 0.7% 3,349 1.1% 3,315 1.1%

59 0.0% 104 0.0% 65 0.0% 44 0.0% 299 0.1% 52 0.0% 90 0.0% 78 0.0%1,111 0.3% 921 0.3% 1,279 0.4% 550 0.2% 10,108 3.5% 1,111 0.3% 1,969 0.6% 2,976 1.0%

371 0.1% 285 0.1% 423 0.1% 293 0.1% 660 0.2% 400 0.1% 599 0.2% 555 0.2%310,090 92.3% 290,656 93.6% 272,366 86.2% 295,165 93.9% 253,487 88.9% 299,428 90.5% 256,052 81.8% 263,246 85.9%289,764 86.2% 255,464 82.3% 247,594 78.4% 276,662 88.0% 83,811 29.4% 278,316 84.2% 211,743 67.6% 212,303 69.3%

10,913 3.2% 27,415 8.8% 16,844 5.3% 12,649 4.0% 153,348 53.8% 11,705 3.5% 30,566 9.8% 35,551 11.6%444 0.1% 785 0.3% 509 0.2% 528 0.2% 469 0.2% 298 0.1% 843 0.3% 415 0.1%

4,712 1.4% 3,502 1.1% 3,880 1.2% 2,852 0.9% 2,897 1.0% 5,059 1.5% 7,221 2.3% 8,042 2.6%118 0.0% 130 0.0% 121 0.0% 98 0.0% 166 0.1% 82 0.0% 175 0.1% 135 0.0%578 0.2% 257 0.1% 336 0.1% 228 0.1% 724 0.3% 718 0.2% 730 0.2% 1,109 0.4%173 0.1% 132 0.0% 164 0.1% 142 0.0% 361 0.1% 139 0.0% 305 0.1% 287 0.1%552 0.2% 890 0.3% 553 0.2% 647 0.2% 310 0.1% 372 0.1% 474 0.2% 365 0.1%442 0.1% 444 0.1% 438 0.1% 344 0.1% 259 0.1% 383 0.1% 578 0.2% 534 0.2%

67 0.0% 49 0.0% 53 0.0% 44 0.0% 30 0.0% 32 0.0% 55 0.0% 37 0.0%962 0.3% 466 0.2% 521 0.2% 321 0.1% 723 0.3% 965 0.3% 1,118 0.4% 1,227 0.4%

57 0.0% 100 0.0% 56 0.0% 40 0.0% 281 0.1% 50 0.0% 84 0.0% 71 0.0%1,037 0.3% 800 0.3% 1,067 0.3% 446 0.1% 9,764 3.4% 1,007 0.3% 1,698 0.5% 2,728 0.9%

271 0.1% 222 0.1% 230 0.1% 164 0.1% 344 0.1% 302 0.1% 462 0.1% 442 0.1%25,891 7.7% 19,726 6.4% 43,502 13.8% 19,073 6.1% 31,545 11.1% 31,266 9.5% 57,061 18.2% 43,113 14.1%19,834 5.9% 12,576 4.1% 29,726 9.4% 12,746 4.1% 18,748 6.6% 22,516 6.8% 44,931 14.3% 31,758 10.4%

484 0.1% 578 0.2% 779 0.2% 410 0.1% 1,883 0.7% 525 0.2% 1,269 0.4% 1,037 0.3%168 0.1% 123 0.0% 178 0.1% 135 0.0% 330 0.1% 112 0.0% 154 0.0% 136 0.0%

50 0.0% 35 0.0% 67 0.0% 28 0.0% 52 0.0% 52 0.0% 99 0.0% 74 0.0%31 0.0% 34 0.0% 37 0.0% 76 0.0% 78 0.0% 19 0.0% 45 0.0% 19 0.0%

3,818 1.1% 5,231 1.7% 10,281 3.3% 4,640 1.5% 8,225 2.9% 6,381 1.9% 7,566 2.4% 7,458 2.4%40 0.0% 72 0.0% 55 0.0% 63 0.0% 83 0.0% 62 0.0% 194 0.1% 90 0.0%38 0.0% 33 0.0% 52 0.0% 33 0.0% 46 0.0% 37 0.0% 60 0.0% 38 0.0%32 0.0% 28 0.0% 25 0.0% 16 0.0% 19 0.0% 38 0.0% 86 0.0% 34 0.0%

7 0.0% 3 0.0% 12 0.0% 9 0.0% 20 0.0% 7 0.0% 12 0.0% 13 0.0%1,213 0.4% 825 0.3% 1,876 0.6% 680 0.2% 1,383 0.5% 1,313 0.4% 2,231 0.7% 2,088 0.7%

2 0.0% 4 0.0% 9 0.0% 4 0.0% 18 0.0% 2 0.0% 6 0.0% 7 0.0%74 0.0% 121 0.0% 212 0.1% 104 0.0% 344 0.1% 104 0.0% 271 0.1% 248 0.1%

100 0.0% 63 0.0% 193 0.1% 129 0.0% 316 0.1% 98 0.0% 137 0.0% 113 0.0%

123


District 33 District 34 District 35 District 36 District 37 District 38 District 39 District 40399,552 100.0% 399,596 100.0% 399,563 100.0% 399,575 100.0% 399,552 100.0% 399,540 100.0% 399,606 100.0% 399,488 100.0%118,545 29.7% 305,765 76.5% 291,391 72.9% 334,661 83.8% 347,374 86.9% 347,412 87.0% 209,714 52.5% 344,533 86.2%239,542 60.0% 51,226 12.8% 69,778 17.5% 25,929 6.5% 28,816 7.2% 14,168 3.5% 139,163 34.8% 15,242 3.8%

995 0.2% 696 0.2% 870 0.2% 792 0.2% 977 0.2% 565 0.1% 1,487 0.4% 553 0.1%3,996 1.0% 12,174 3.0% 8,178 2.0% 4,616 1.2% 2,978 0.7% 7,364 1.8% 3,433 0.9% 3,900 1.0%

164 0.0% 196 0.0% 228 0.1% 120 0.0% 227 0.1% 102 0.0% 203 0.1% 94 0.0%16,084 4.0% 16,160 4.0% 14,949 3.7% 19,681 4.9% 11,857 3.0% 17,360 4.3% 30,683 7.7% 20,888 5.2%

1,213 0.3% 1,219 0.3% 1,222 0.3% 782 0.2% 642 0.2% 726 0.2% 934 0.2% 684 0.2%307 0.1% 423 0.1% 543 0.1% 417 0.1% 755 0.2% 348 0.1% 662 0.2% 294 0.1%410 0.1% 1,357 0.3% 901 0.2% 682 0.2% 536 0.1% 997 0.2% 525 0.1% 571 0.1%

53 0.0% 69 0.0% 88 0.0% 70 0.0% 94 0.0% 52 0.0% 72 0.0% 81 0.0%5,691 1.4% 5,821 1.5% 6,376 1.6% 9,323 2.3% 2,650 0.7% 8,451 2.1% 5,631 1.4% 10,749 2.7%

507 0.1% 105 0.0% 214 0.1% 84 0.0% 88 0.0% 48 0.0% 253 0.1% 59 0.0%11,403 2.9% 3,486 0.9% 3,969 1.0% 1,760 0.4% 2,069 0.5% 1,333 0.3% 6,128 1.5% 1,315 0.3%

642 0.2% 899 0.2% 856 0.2% 658 0.2% 489 0.1% 614 0.2% 718 0.2% 525 0.1%283,328 70.9% 258,511 64.7% 256,263 64.1% 113,200 28.3% 352,710 88.3% 114,023 28.5% 268,536 67.2% 65,194 16.3%

35,199 8.8% 188,624 47.2% 173,576 43.4% 85,650 21.4% 316,050 79.1% 91,259 22.8% 119,609 29.9% 49,000 12.3%230,765 57.8% 48,774 12.2% 65,355 16.4% 19,765 4.9% 27,933 7.0% 11,683 2.9% 135,473 33.9% 10,215 2.6%

525 0.1% 418 0.1% 459 0.1% 283 0.1% 653 0.2% 242 0.1% 1,017 0.3% 195 0.0%3,846 1.0% 11,902 3.0% 7,956 2.0% 4,384 1.1% 2,918 0.7% 7,100 1.8% 3,312 0.8% 3,700 0.9%

138 0.0% 149 0.0% 190 0.0% 72 0.0% 127 0.0% 45 0.0% 126 0.0% 36 0.0%748 0.2% 1,665 0.4% 1,360 0.3% 457 0.1% 480 0.1% 590 0.1% 808 0.2% 224 0.1%685 0.2% 836 0.2% 718 0.2% 252 0.1% 549 0.1% 298 0.1% 603 0.2% 135 0.0%164 0.0% 307 0.1% 415 0.1% 233 0.1% 706 0.2% 192 0.0% 541 0.1% 141 0.0%345 0.1% 1,152 0.3% 758 0.2% 515 0.1% 514 0.1% 778 0.2% 461 0.1% 392 0.1%

21 0.0% 50 0.0% 66 0.0% 17 0.0% 71 0.0% 23 0.0% 50 0.0% 11 0.0%477 0.1% 1,056 0.3% 1,556 0.4% 601 0.2% 555 0.1% 631 0.2% 634 0.2% 573 0.1%478 0.1% 92 0.0% 183 0.0% 61 0.0% 83 0.0% 33 0.0% 230 0.1% 40 0.0%

9,659 2.4% 2,867 0.7% 3,159 0.8% 707 0.2% 1,810 0.5% 833 0.2% 5,296 1.3% 345 0.1%278 0.1% 619 0.2% 512 0.1% 203 0.1% 261 0.1% 316 0.1% 376 0.1% 187 0.0%

116,224 29.1% 141,085 35.3% 143,300 35.9% 286,375 71.7% 46,842 11.7% 285,517 71.5% 131,070 32.8% 334,294 83.7%83,346 20.9% 117,141 29.3% 117,815 29.5% 249,011 62.3% 31,324 7.8% 256,153 64.1% 90,105 22.5% 295,533 74.0%

8,777 2.2% 2,452 0.6% 4,423 1.1% 6,164 1.5% 883 0.2% 2,485 0.6% 3,690 0.9% 5,027 1.3%470 0.1% 278 0.1% 411 0.1% 509 0.1% 324 0.1% 323 0.1% 470 0.1% 358 0.1%150 0.0% 272 0.1% 222 0.1% 232 0.1% 60 0.0% 264 0.1% 121 0.0% 200 0.1%

26 0.0% 47 0.0% 38 0.0% 48 0.0% 100 0.0% 57 0.0% 77 0.0% 58 0.0%15,336 3.8% 14,495 3.6% 13,589 3.4% 19,224 4.8% 11,377 2.8% 16,770 4.2% 29,875 7.5% 20,664 5.2%

528 0.1% 383 0.1% 504 0.1% 530 0.1% 93 0.0% 428 0.1% 331 0.1% 549 0.1%143 0.0% 116 0.0% 128 0.0% 184 0.0% 49 0.0% 156 0.0% 121 0.0% 153 0.0%

65 0.0% 205 0.1% 143 0.0% 167 0.0% 22 0.0% 219 0.1% 64 0.0% 179 0.0%32 0.0% 19 0.0% 22 0.0% 53 0.0% 23 0.0% 29 0.0% 22 0.0% 70 0.0%

5,214 1.3% 4,765 1.2% 4,820 1.2% 8,722 2.2% 2,095 0.5% 7,820 2.0% 4,997 1.3% 10,176 2.5%29 0.0% 13 0.0% 31 0.0% 23 0.0% 5 0.0% 15 0.0% 23 0.0% 19 0.0%

1,744 0.4% 619 0.2% 810 0.2% 1,053 0.3% 259 0.1% 500 0.1% 832 0.2% 970 0.2%364 0.1% 280 0.1% 344 0.1% 455 0.1% 228 0.1% 298 0.1% 342 0.1% 338 0.1%

279,282 100.0% 286,547 100.0% 321,191 100.0% 313,582 100.0% 322,420 100.0% 303,116 100.0% 282,433 100.0% 304,652 100.0%92,383 33.1% 222,630 77.7% 244,653 76.2% 265,253 84.6% 288,887 89.6% 264,858 87.4% 160,253 56.7% 263,709 86.6%

157,678 56.5% 34,956 12.2% 47,558 14.8% 18,970 6.0% 17,853 5.5% 10,372 3.4% 88,931 31.5% 11,640 3.8%627 0.2% 466 0.2% 638 0.2% 577 0.2% 701 0.2% 389 0.1% 1,061 0.4% 361 0.1%

3,094 1.1% 8,710 3.0% 6,613 2.1% 3,684 1.2% 2,351 0.7% 5,730 1.9% 2,695 1.0% 2,962 1.0%105 0.0% 133 0.0% 170 0.1% 89 0.0% 171 0.1% 66 0.0% 139 0.0% 70 0.0%

11,158 4.0% 10,903 3.8% 10,991 3.4% 14,492 4.6% 7,863 2.4% 12,463 4.1% 19,567 6.9% 15,078 4.9%648 0.2% 597 0.2% 645 0.2% 504 0.2% 195 0.1% 440 0.1% 386 0.1% 428 0.1%226 0.1% 289 0.1% 438 0.1% 300 0.1% 536 0.2% 254 0.1% 474 0.2% 190 0.1%288 0.1% 764 0.3% 668 0.2% 445 0.1% 302 0.1% 666 0.2% 310 0.1% 399 0.1%

37 0.0% 44 0.0% 73 0.0% 50 0.0% 53 0.0% 36 0.0% 46 0.0% 53 0.0%4,251 1.5% 4,005 1.4% 5,101 1.6% 7,351 2.3% 1,822 0.6% 6,413 2.1% 3,891 1.4% 8,359 2.7%

306 0.1% 70 0.0% 143 0.0% 56 0.0% 65 0.0% 34 0.0% 181 0.1% 44 0.0%8,011 2.9% 2,416 0.8% 2,851 0.9% 1,337 0.4% 1,273 0.4% 965 0.3% 4,000 1.4% 960 0.3%

470 0.2% 564 0.2% 649 0.2% 474 0.2% 348 0.1% 430 0.1% 499 0.2% 399 0.1%191,750 68.7% 185,778 64.8% 204,456 63.7% 80,724 25.7% 289,870 89.9% 79,219 26.1% 192,905 68.3% 41,748 13.7%

28,179 10.1% 138,180 48.2% 147,201 45.8% 61,019 19.5% 266,648 82.7% 62,580 20.6% 97,179 34.4% 29,805 9.8%151,369 54.2% 33,219 11.6% 44,065 13.7% 13,986 4.5% 17,286 5.4% 8,461 2.8% 86,484 30.6% 7,684 2.5%

306 0.1% 288 0.1% 324 0.1% 190 0.1% 487 0.2% 162 0.1% 744 0.3% 112 0.0%2,971 1.1% 8,531 3.0% 6,443 2.0% 3,493 1.1% 2,308 0.7% 5,519 1.8% 2,621 0.9% 2,813 0.9%

86 0.0% 102 0.0% 144 0.0% 56 0.0% 97 0.0% 32 0.0% 89 0.0% 27 0.0%438 0.2% 941 0.3% 950 0.3% 234 0.1% 244 0.1% 352 0.1% 484 0.2% 134 0.0%331 0.1% 374 0.1% 322 0.1% 114 0.0% 138 0.0% 169 0.1% 192 0.1% 58 0.0%136 0.0% 227 0.1% 339 0.1% 175 0.1% 511 0.2% 145 0.0% 404 0.1% 90 0.0%244 0.1% 679 0.2% 575 0.2% 331 0.1% 287 0.1% 527 0.2% 270 0.1% 279 0.1%

13 0.0% 31 0.0% 58 0.0% 15 0.0% 42 0.0% 15 0.0% 32 0.0% 7 0.0%343 0.1% 688 0.2% 1,274 0.4% 405 0.1% 432 0.1% 382 0.1% 447 0.2% 334 0.1%289 0.1% 64 0.0% 120 0.0% 35 0.0% 63 0.0% 24 0.0% 169 0.1% 29 0.0%

6,832 2.4% 2,055 0.7% 2,250 0.7% 532 0.2% 1,135 0.4% 621 0.2% 3,521 1.2% 230 0.1%213 0.1% 399 0.1% 391 0.1% 139 0.0% 192 0.1% 230 0.1% 269 0.1% 146 0.0%

87,532 31.3% 100,769 35.2% 116,735 36.3% 232,858 74.3% 32,550 10.1% 223,897 73.9% 89,528 31.7% 262,904 86.3%64,204 23.0% 84,450 29.5% 97,452 30.3% 204,234 65.1% 22,239 6.9% 202,278 66.7% 63,074 22.3% 233,904 76.8%

6,309 2.3% 1,737 0.6% 3,493 1.1% 4,984 1.6% 567 0.2% 1,911 0.6% 2,447 0.9% 3,956 1.3%321 0.1% 178 0.1% 314 0.1% 387 0.1% 214 0.1% 227 0.1% 317 0.1% 249 0.1%123 0.0% 179 0.1% 170 0.1% 191 0.1% 43 0.0% 211 0.1% 74 0.0% 149 0.0%

19 0.0% 31 0.0% 26 0.0% 33 0.0% 74 0.0% 34 0.0% 50 0.0% 43 0.0%10,720 3.8% 9,962 3.5% 10,041 3.1% 14,258 4.5% 7,619 2.4% 12,111 4.0% 19,083 6.8% 14,944 4.9%

317 0.1% 223 0.1% 323 0.1% 390 0.1% 57 0.0% 271 0.1% 194 0.1% 370 0.1%90 0.0% 62 0.0% 99 0.0% 125 0.0% 25 0.0% 109 0.0% 70 0.0% 100 0.0%44 0.0% 85 0.0% 93 0.0% 114 0.0% 15 0.0% 139 0.0% 40 0.0% 120 0.0%24 0.0% 13 0.0% 15 0.0% 35 0.0% 11 0.0% 21 0.0% 14 0.0% 46 0.0%

3,908 1.4% 3,317 1.2% 3,827 1.2% 6,946 2.2% 1,390 0.4% 6,031 2.0% 3,444 1.2% 8,025 2.6%17 0.0% 6 0.0% 23 0.0% 21 0.0% 2 0.0% 10 0.0% 12 0.0% 15 0.0%

1,179 0.4% 361 0.1% 601 0.2% 805 0.3% 138 0.0% 344 0.1% 479 0.2% 730 0.2%257 0.1% 165 0.1% 258 0.1% 335 0.1% 156 0.0% 200 0.1% 230 0.1% 253 0.1%

124

Attachment 3: Population Detail for Existing Senatorial DistrictsSenate Plan PUBS0000Census detail based on OMB guidance District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 8Total Population (2000 Census) 376,141 100.0% 330,621 100.0% 394,045 100.0% 408,359 100.0% 398,083 100.0% 398,541 100.0% 393,783 100.0% 455,567 100.0% White alone 287,244 76.4% 136,510 41.3% 262,342 66.6% 336,873 82.5% 322,372 81.0% 335,967 84.3% 333,075 84.6% 381,530 83.7% Black or African American alone 69,467 18.5% 180,025 54.5% 115,868 29.4% 58,722 14.4% 52,331 13.1% 38,383 9.6% 33,925 8.6% 44,467 9.8% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 3,915 1.0% 928 0.3% 1,915 0.5% 1,698 0.4% 1,590 0.4% 1,501 0.4% 2,766 0.7% 1,507 0.3% Asian alone 5,324 1.4% 4,292 1.3% 4,334 1.1% 3,097 0.8% 8,569 2.2% 9,883 2.5% 9,211 2.3% 12,475 2.7% Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 329 0.1% 145 0.0% 162 0.0% 139 0.0% 135 0.0% 292 0.1% 460 0.1% 235 0.1% Some other race alone 2,292 0.6% 3,208 1.0% 3,881 1.0% 2,866 0.7% 6,276 1.6% 4,996 1.3% 4,566 1.2% 6,942 1.5% Black and White 921 0.2% 935 0.3% 867 0.2% 675 0.2% 1,098 0.3% 911 0.2% 1,277 0.3% 1,181 0.3% American Indian and White 2,975 0.8% 719 0.2% 1,598 0.4% 1,884 0.5% 1,719 0.4% 1,409 0.4% 2,543 0.6% 1,429 0.3% Asian and White 1,379 0.4% 614 0.2% 669 0.2% 556 0.1% 958 0.2% 1,686 0.4% 2,364 0.6% 1,644 0.4% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White 154 0.0% 47 0.0% 73 0.0% 69 0.0% 89 0.0% 148 0.0% 163 0.0% 109 0.0% Some other race and White 755 0.2% 1,296 0.4% 901 0.2% 844 0.2% 1,507 0.4% 1,652 0.4% 1,287 0.3% 1,951 0.4% American Indian and Black 280 0.1% 366 0.1% 279 0.1% 148 0.0% 209 0.1% 190 0.0% 206 0.1% 191 0.0% Other combinations including Black 653 0.2% 1,173 0.4% 786 0.2% 487 0.1% 724 0.2% 912 0.2% 1,004 0.3% 1,159 0.3% Other combinations not including Black 453 0.1% 363 0.1% 370 0.1% 301 0.1% 506 0.1% 611 0.2% 936 0.2% 747 0.2%Non-Hispanic Population 367,925 97.8% 320,875 97.1% 380,555 96.6% 395,653 96.9% 377,004 94.7% 382,107 95.9% 379,436 96.4% 431,164 94.6% White alone 282,606 75.1% 131,949 39.9% 254,683 64.6% 328,557 80.5% 309,365 77.7% 326,158 81.8% 324,890 82.5% 366,182 80.4% Black or African American alone 68,939 18.3% 178,556 54.0% 114,741 29.1% 58,102 14.2% 51,709 13.0% 37,765 9.5% 33,398 8.5% 43,604 9.6% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 3,725 1.0% 870 0.3% 1,776 0.5% 1,531 0.4% 1,399 0.4% 1,365 0.3% 2,547 0.6% 1,335 0.3% Asian alone 5,242 1.4% 4,224 1.3% 4,251 1.1% 3,030 0.7% 8,466 2.1% 9,749 2.4% 9,098 2.3% 12,335 2.7% Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 308 0.1% 129 0.0% 151 0.0% 131 0.0% 114 0.0% 257 0.1% 430 0.1% 220 0.0% Some other race alone 416 0.1% 508 0.2% 397 0.1% 238 0.1% 495 0.1% 652 0.2% 750 0.2% 752 0.2% Black and White 866 0.2% 886 0.3% 829 0.2% 636 0.2% 1,013 0.3% 837 0.2% 1,195 0.3% 1,047 0.2% American Indian and White 2,876 0.8% 687 0.2% 1,544 0.4% 1,845 0.5% 1,639 0.4% 1,337 0.3% 2,409 0.6% 1,333 0.3% Asian and White 1,329 0.4% 580 0.2% 628 0.2% 516 0.1% 928 0.2% 1,598 0.4% 2,259 0.6% 1,576 0.3% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White 143 0.0% 44 0.0% 70 0.0% 64 0.0% 83 0.0% 117 0.0% 155 0.0% 100 0.0% Some other race and White 363 0.1% 886 0.3% 354 0.1% 321 0.1% 668 0.2% 991 0.2% 647 0.2% 1,002 0.2% American Indian and Black 263 0.1% 348 0.1% 270 0.1% 138 0.0% 190 0.0% 181 0.0% 195 0.0% 172 0.0% Other combinations including Black 483 0.1% 921 0.3% 598 0.2% 373 0.1% 566 0.1% 657 0.2% 792 0.2% 910 0.2% Other combinations not including Black 366 0.1% 287 0.1% 263 0.1% 171 0.0% 369 0.1% 443 0.1% 671 0.2% 596 0.1%Hispanic Population 8,216 2.2% 9,746 2.9% 13,490 3.4% 12,706 3.1% 21,079 5.3% 16,434 4.1% 14,347 3.6% 24,403 5.4% White alone 4,638 1.2% 4,561 1.4% 7,659 1.9% 8,316 2.0% 13,007 3.3% 9,809 2.5% 8,185 2.1% 15,348 3.4% Black or African American alone 528 0.1% 1,469 0.4% 1,127 0.3% 620 0.2% 622 0.2% 618 0.2% 527 0.1% 863 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 190 0.1% 58 0.0% 139 0.0% 167 0.0% 191 0.0% 136 0.0% 219 0.1% 172 0.0% Asian alone 82 0.0% 68 0.0% 83 0.0% 67 0.0% 103 0.0% 134 0.0% 113 0.0% 140 0.0% Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 21 0.0% 16 0.0% 11 0.0% 8 0.0% 21 0.0% 35 0.0% 30 0.0% 15 0.0% Some other race alone 1,876 0.5% 2,700 0.8% 3,484 0.9% 2,628 0.6% 5,781 1.5% 4,344 1.1% 3,816 1.0% 6,190 1.4% Black and White 55 0.0% 49 0.0% 38 0.0% 39 0.0% 85 0.0% 74 0.0% 82 0.0% 134 0.0% American Indian and White 99 0.0% 32 0.0% 54 0.0% 39 0.0% 80 0.0% 72 0.0% 134 0.0% 96 0.0% Asian and White 50 0.0% 34 0.0% 41 0.0% 40 0.0% 30 0.0% 88 0.0% 105 0.0% 68 0.0% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White 11 0.0% 3 0.0% 3 0.0% 5 0.0% 6 0.0% 31 0.0% 8 0.0% 9 0.0% Some other race and White 392 0.1% 410 0.1% 547 0.1% 523 0.1% 839 0.2% 661 0.2% 640 0.2% 949 0.2% American Indian and Black 17 0.0% 18 0.0% 9 0.0% 10 0.0% 19 0.0% 9 0.0% 11 0.0% 19 0.0% Other combinations including Black 170 0.0% 252 0.1% 188 0.0% 114 0.0% 158 0.0% 255 0.1% 212 0.1% 249 0.1% Other combinations not including Black 87 0.0% 76 0.0% 107 0.0% 130 0.0% 137 0.0% 168 0.0% 265 0.1% 151 0.0%Total Voting Age Population 280,515 100.0% 237,595 100.0% 302,882 100.0% 318,947 100.0% 311,477 100.0% 290,962 100.0% 303,541 100.0% 354,516 100.0% White alone 220,078 78.5% 108,669 45.7% 206,978 68.3% 266,731 83.6% 257,771 82.8% 250,333 86.0% 262,178 86.4% 303,624 85.6% Black or African American alone 47,294 16.9% 119,645 50.4% 84,474 27.9% 43,144 13.5% 36,221 11.6% 24,531 8.4% 22,879 7.5% 30,326 8.6% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 2,885 1.0% 706 0.3% 1,465 0.5% 1,340 0.4% 1,223 0.4% 1,128 0.4% 2,158 0.7% 1,204 0.3% Asian alone 4,116 1.5% 3,226 1.4% 3,505 1.2% 2,424 0.8% 7,283 2.3% 7,452 2.6% 7,374 2.4% 9,656 2.7% Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 249 0.1% 109 0.0% 129 0.0% 102 0.0% 114 0.0% 204 0.1% 350 0.1% 164 0.0% Some other race alone 1,465 0.5% 2,010 0.8% 2,743 0.9% 1,947 0.6% 4,344 1.4% 3,196 1.1% 3,249 1.1% 4,612 1.3% Black and White 177 0.1% 227 0.1% 252 0.1% 180 0.1% 336 0.1% 183 0.1% 267 0.1% 294 0.1% American Indian and White 2,207 0.8% 572 0.2% 1,232 0.4% 1,438 0.5% 1,337 0.4% 1,046 0.4% 1,919 0.6% 1,101 0.3% Asian and White 644 0.2% 311 0.1% 369 0.1% 312 0.1% 640 0.2% 774 0.3% 1,088 0.4% 800 0.2% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White 90 0.0% 34 0.0% 46 0.0% 45 0.0% 54 0.0% 72 0.0% 91 0.0% 72 0.0% Some other race and White 502 0.2% 896 0.4% 657 0.2% 596 0.2% 1,134 0.4% 1,084 0.4% 822 0.3% 1,341 0.4% American Indian and Black 201 0.1% 268 0.1% 216 0.1% 116 0.0% 153 0.0% 122 0.0% 156 0.1% 132 0.0% Other combinations including Black 306 0.1% 683 0.3% 545 0.2% 343 0.1% 476 0.2% 427 0.1% 453 0.1% 681 0.2% Other combinations not including Black 301 0.1% 239 0.1% 271 0.1% 229 0.1% 391 0.1% 410 0.1% 557 0.2% 509 0.1%Non-Hispanic Voting Age Population 274,948 98.0% 231,066 97.3% 292,660 96.6% 309,715 97.1% 295,992 95.0% 280,061 96.3% 293,416 96.7% 337,369 95.2% White alone 216,809 77.3% 105,433 44.4% 201,015 66.4% 260,521 81.7% 247,933 79.6% 243,576 83.7% 256,268 84.4% 292,449 82.5% Black or African American alone 46,960 16.7% 118,753 50.0% 83,613 27.6% 42,715 13.4% 35,790 11.5% 24,181 8.3% 22,531 7.4% 29,761 8.4% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 2,765 1.0% 660 0.3% 1,365 0.5% 1,221 0.4% 1,086 0.3% 1,029 0.4% 1,994 0.7% 1,075 0.3% Asian alone 4,053 1.4% 3,185 1.3% 3,439 1.1% 2,378 0.7% 7,198 2.3% 7,370 2.5% 7,291 2.4% 9,565 2.7% Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 234 0.1% 95 0.0% 118 0.0% 95 0.0% 99 0.0% 184 0.1% 326 0.1% 152 0.0% Some other race alone 177 0.1% 213 0.1% 187 0.1% 123 0.0% 271 0.1% 288 0.1% 367 0.1% 376 0.1% Black and White 160 0.1% 202 0.1% 233 0.1% 159 0.0% 286 0.1% 152 0.1% 231 0.1% 241 0.1% American Indian and White 2,143 0.8% 548 0.2% 1,203 0.4% 1,412 0.4% 1,285 0.4% 1,010 0.3% 1,836 0.6% 1,037 0.3% Asian and White 632 0.2% 296 0.1% 349 0.1% 296 0.1% 621 0.2% 742 0.3% 1,055 0.3% 774 0.2% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White 84 0.0% 31 0.0% 45 0.0% 41 0.0% 50 0.0% 57 0.0% 86 0.0% 67 0.0% Some other race and White 271 0.1% 647 0.3% 272 0.1% 253 0.1% 546 0.2% 715 0.2% 500 0.2% 752 0.2% American Indian and Black 193 0.1% 260 0.1% 210 0.1% 110 0.0% 144 0.0% 119 0.0% 148 0.0% 121 0.0% Other combinations including Black 224 0.1% 547 0.2% 421 0.1% 271 0.1% 386 0.1% 327 0.1% 370 0.1% 573 0.2% Other combinations not including Black 243 0.1% 196 0.1% 190 0.1% 120 0.0% 297 0.1% 311 0.1% 413 0.1% 426 0.1%Hispanic Voting Age Population 5,567 2.0% 6,529 2.7% 10,222 3.4% 9,232 2.9% 15,485 5.0% 10,901 3.7% 10,125 3.3% 17,147 4.8% White alone 3,269 1.2% 3,236 1.4% 5,963 2.0% 6,210 1.9% 9,838 3.2% 6,757 2.3% 5,910 1.9% 11,175 3.2% Black or African American alone 334 0.1% 892 0.4% 861 0.3% 429 0.1% 431 0.1% 350 0.1% 348 0.1% 565 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 120 0.0% 46 0.0% 100 0.0% 119 0.0% 137 0.0% 99 0.0% 164 0.1% 129 0.0% Asian alone 63 0.0% 41 0.0% 66 0.0% 46 0.0% 85 0.0% 82 0.0% 83 0.0% 91 0.0% Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 15 0.0% 14 0.0% 11 0.0% 7 0.0% 15 0.0% 20 0.0% 24 0.0% 12 0.0% Some other race alone 1,288 0.5% 1,797 0.8% 2,556 0.8% 1,824 0.6% 4,073 1.3% 2,908 1.0% 2,882 0.9% 4,236 1.2% Black and White 17 0.0% 25 0.0% 19 0.0% 21 0.0% 50 0.0% 31 0.0% 36 0.0% 53 0.0% American Indian and White 64 0.0% 24 0.0% 29 0.0% 26 0.0% 52 0.0% 36 0.0% 83 0.0% 64 0.0% Asian and White 12 0.0% 15 0.0% 20 0.0% 16 0.0% 19 0.0% 32 0.0% 33 0.0% 26 0.0% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White 6 0.0% 3 0.0% 1 0.0% 4 0.0% 4 0.0% 15 0.0% 5 0.0% 5 0.0% Some other race and White 231 0.1% 249 0.1% 385 0.1% 343 0.1% 588 0.2% 369 0.1% 322 0.1% 589 0.2% American Indian and Black 8 0.0% 8 0.0% 6 0.0% 6 0.0% 9 0.0% 3 0.0% 8 0.0% 11 0.0% Other combinations including Black 82 0.0% 136 0.1% 124 0.0% 72 0.0% 90 0.0% 100 0.0% 83 0.0% 108 0.0% Other combinations not including Black 58 0.0% 43 0.0% 81 0.0% 109 0.0% 94 0.0% 99 0.0% 144 0.0% 83 0.0%

125

Attachment 3: Population Detail for Existing Senatorial DistrictsSenate Plan PUBS0000Census detail based on OMB guidanceTotal Population (2000 Census) White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some other race alone Black and White American Indian and White Asian and White Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White Some other race and White American Indian and Black Other combinations including Black Other combinations not including BlackNon-Hispanic Population White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some other race alone Black and White American Indian and White Asian and White Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White Some other race and White American Indian and Black Other combinations including Black Other combinations not including BlackHispanic Population White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some other race alone Black and White American Indian and White Asian and White Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White Some other race and White American Indian and Black Other combinations including Black Other combinations not including BlackTotal Voting Age Population White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some other race alone Black and White American Indian and White Asian and White Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White Some other race and White American Indian and Black Other combinations including Black Other combinations not including BlackNon-Hispanic Voting Age Population White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some other race alone Black and White American Indian and White Asian and White Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White Some other race and White American Indian and Black Other combinations including Black Other combinations not including BlackHispanic Voting Age Population White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some other race alone Black and White American Indian and White Asian and White Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White Some other race and White American Indian and Black Other combinations including Black Other combinations not including Black


26,674 6.9% 23,861 5.5% 37,520 8.3% 31,090 6.4% 22,647 5.5% 140,211 35.8% 56,397 14.2% 36,802 9.6%1,265 0.3% 1,659 0.4% 1,603 0.4% 1,645 0.3% 1,295 0.3% 1,339 0.3% 1,196 0.3% 1,140 0.3%

11,040 2.9% 3,426 0.8% 4,200 0.9% 16,976 3.5% 11,314 2.8% 10,978 2.8% 5,374 1.4% 3,660 1.0%244 0.1% 132 0.0% 141 0.0% 393 0.1% 248 0.1% 368 0.1% 234 0.1% 145 0.0%

23,671 6.2% 8,172 1.9% 7,126 1.6% 23,318 4.8% 14,696 3.6% 19,114 4.9% 8,446 2.1% 6,117 1.6%1,412 0.4% 720 0.2% 715 0.2% 1,458 0.3% 1,057 0.3% 1,622 0.4% 1,035 0.3% 825 0.2%1,233 0.3% 1,761 0.4% 1,578 0.3% 1,356 0.3% 1,137 0.3% 861 0.2% 1,180 0.3% 1,323 0.3%1,408 0.4% 628 0.1% 594 0.1% 1,760 0.4% 1,350 0.3% 915 0.2% 1,077 0.3% 578 0.2%

89 0.0% 77 0.0% 78 0.0% 140 0.0% 76 0.0% 93 0.0% 83 0.0% 71 0.0%4,504 1.2% 1,739 0.4% 1,533 0.3% 4,944 1.0% 3,763 0.9% 3,847 1.0% 1,967 0.5% 1,398 0.4%

147 0.0% 117 0.0% 160 0.0% 137 0.0% 131 0.0% 403 0.1% 220 0.1% 150 0.0%1,630 0.4% 658 0.2% 622 0.1% 1,866 0.4% 1,330 0.3% 6,111 1.6% 1,681 0.4% 598 0.2%

885 0.2% 444 0.1% 411 0.1% 1,356 0.3% 700 0.2% 974 0.2% 426 0.1% 347 0.1%309,179 80.4% 404,323 93.3% 428,017 94.6% 407,993 83.5% 336,476 82.2% 334,870 85.5% 367,866 92.8% 361,662 94.2%265,189 68.9% 371,506 85.8% 381,075 84.2% 351,145 71.9% 296,678 72.5% 173,324 44.2% 299,591 75.6% 316,470 82.4%

24,704 6.4% 23,253 5.4% 36,879 8.1% 29,030 5.9% 21,045 5.1% 137,262 35.0% 55,368 14.0% 36,112 9.4%951 0.2% 1,457 0.3% 1,385 0.3% 1,233 0.3% 1,009 0.2% 1,004 0.3% 1,006 0.3% 1,041 0.3%

10,864 2.8% 3,358 0.8% 4,154 0.9% 16,770 3.4% 11,126 2.7% 10,850 2.8% 5,303 1.3% 3,598 0.9%200 0.1% 106 0.0% 110 0.0% 347 0.1% 200 0.0% 320 0.1% 177 0.0% 123 0.0%893 0.2% 311 0.1% 359 0.1% 1,363 0.3% 763 0.2% 1,408 0.4% 589 0.1% 387 0.1%974 0.3% 636 0.1% 632 0.1% 1,108 0.2% 849 0.2% 1,240 0.3% 911 0.2% 736 0.2%

1,077 0.3% 1,677 0.4% 1,502 0.3% 1,238 0.3% 1,032 0.3% 763 0.2% 1,122 0.3% 1,244 0.3%1,317 0.3% 586 0.1% 559 0.1% 1,664 0.3% 1,245 0.3% 863 0.2% 1,028 0.3% 549 0.1%

74 0.0% 67 0.0% 69 0.0% 127 0.0% 74 0.0% 78 0.0% 75 0.0% 62 0.0%1,256 0.3% 508 0.1% 415 0.1% 1,592 0.3% 1,072 0.3% 1,252 0.3% 764 0.2% 531 0.1%

126 0.0% 102 0.0% 147 0.0% 114 0.0% 109 0.0% 389 0.1% 208 0.1% 140 0.0%967 0.3% 467 0.1% 460 0.1% 1,284 0.3% 821 0.2% 5,397 1.4% 1,416 0.4% 402 0.1%587 0.2% 289 0.1% 271 0.1% 978 0.2% 453 0.1% 720 0.2% 308 0.1% 267 0.1%

75,436 19.6% 28,863 6.7% 24,556 5.4% 80,367 16.5% 72,996 17.8% 56,972 14.5% 28,449 7.2% 22,215 5.8%45,224 11.8% 18,286 4.2% 15,217 3.4% 50,776 10.4% 53,050 13.0% 31,682 8.1% 17,408 4.4% 14,253 3.7%

1,970 0.5% 608 0.1% 641 0.1% 2,060 0.4% 1,602 0.4% 2,949 0.8% 1,029 0.3% 690 0.2%314 0.1% 202 0.0% 218 0.0% 412 0.1% 286 0.1% 335 0.1% 190 0.0% 99 0.0%176 0.0% 68 0.0% 46 0.0% 206 0.0% 188 0.0% 128 0.0% 71 0.0% 62 0.0%

44 0.0% 26 0.0% 31 0.0% 46 0.0% 48 0.0% 48 0.0% 57 0.0% 22 0.0%22,778 5.9% 7,861 1.8% 6,767 1.5% 21,955 4.5% 13,933 3.4% 17,706 4.5% 7,857 2.0% 5,730 1.5%

438 0.1% 84 0.0% 83 0.0% 350 0.1% 208 0.1% 382 0.1% 124 0.0% 89 0.0%156 0.0% 84 0.0% 76 0.0% 118 0.0% 105 0.0% 98 0.0% 58 0.0% 79 0.0%

91 0.0% 42 0.0% 35 0.0% 96 0.0% 105 0.0% 52 0.0% 49 0.0% 29 0.0%15 0.0% 10 0.0% 9 0.0% 13 0.0% 2 0.0% 15 0.0% 8 0.0% 9 0.0%

3,248 0.8% 1,231 0.3% 1,118 0.2% 3,352 0.7% 2,691 0.7% 2,595 0.7% 1,203 0.3% 867 0.2%21 0.0% 15 0.0% 13 0.0% 23 0.0% 22 0.0% 14 0.0% 12 0.0% 10 0.0%

663 0.2% 191 0.0% 162 0.0% 582 0.1% 509 0.1% 714 0.2% 265 0.1% 196 0.1%298 0.1% 155 0.0% 140 0.0% 378 0.1% 247 0.1% 254 0.1% 118 0.0% 80 0.0%

295,209 100.0% 341,232 100.0% 361,445 100.0% 361,134 100.0% 313,333 100.0% 288,358 100.0% 305,791 100.0% 306,172 100.0%243,669 82.5% 311,419 91.3% 324,424 89.8% 302,340 83.7% 272,412 86.9% 164,913 57.2% 253,179 82.8% 270,031 88.2%

18,694 6.3% 16,848 4.9% 24,672 6.8% 21,300 5.9% 15,447 4.9% 91,426 31.7% 37,450 12.2% 25,234 8.2%967 0.3% 1,272 0.4% 1,164 0.3% 1,206 0.3% 947 0.3% 979 0.3% 867 0.3% 885 0.3%

8,697 2.9% 2,578 0.8% 3,149 0.9% 12,425 3.4% 8,509 2.7% 8,376 2.9% 4,209 1.4% 2,855 0.9%191 0.1% 102 0.0% 97 0.0% 303 0.1% 181 0.1% 263 0.1% 178 0.1% 119 0.0%

15,702 5.3% 5,229 1.5% 4,447 1.2% 15,609 4.3% 9,828 3.1% 12,884 4.5% 5,395 1.8% 3,810 1.2%507 0.2% 177 0.1% 157 0.0% 465 0.1% 300 0.1% 557 0.2% 244 0.1% 218 0.1%961 0.3% 1,330 0.4% 1,197 0.3% 967 0.3% 883 0.3% 704 0.2% 879 0.3% 1,002 0.3%793 0.3% 348 0.1% 319 0.1% 939 0.3% 729 0.2% 555 0.2% 525 0.2% 315 0.1%

53 0.0% 46 0.0% 47 0.0% 85 0.0% 51 0.0% 66 0.0% 52 0.0% 38 0.0%3,200 1.1% 1,123 0.3% 1,001 0.3% 3,353 0.9% 2,593 0.8% 2,650 0.9% 1,316 0.4% 974 0.3%

114 0.0% 77 0.0% 117 0.0% 96 0.0% 109 0.0% 266 0.1% 163 0.1% 112 0.0%1,037 0.4% 401 0.1% 366 0.1% 1,160 0.3% 846 0.3% 4,027 1.4% 1,061 0.3% 342 0.1%

624 0.2% 282 0.1% 288 0.1% 886 0.2% 498 0.2% 692 0.2% 273 0.1% 237 0.1%242,301 82.1% 321,672 94.3% 344,993 95.4% 305,708 84.7% 261,508 83.5% 248,811 86.3% 286,647 93.7% 291,024 95.1%210,780 71.4% 298,672 87.5% 313,792 86.8% 266,549 73.8% 233,815 74.6% 142,111 49.3% 241,075 78.8% 259,850 84.9%

17,418 5.9% 16,414 4.8% 24,276 6.7% 19,898 5.5% 14,425 4.6% 89,547 31.1% 36,822 12.0% 24,793 8.1%741 0.3% 1,136 0.3% 1,031 0.3% 937 0.3% 756 0.2% 747 0.3% 745 0.2% 817 0.3%

8,578 2.9% 2,534 0.7% 3,114 0.9% 12,305 3.4% 8,399 2.7% 8,292 2.9% 4,168 1.4% 2,815 0.9%164 0.1% 85 0.0% 80 0.0% 276 0.1% 157 0.1% 232 0.1% 140 0.0% 100 0.0%550 0.2% 145 0.0% 166 0.0% 826 0.2% 408 0.1% 934 0.3% 279 0.1% 187 0.1%251 0.1% 140 0.0% 117 0.0% 282 0.1% 192 0.1% 340 0.1% 184 0.1% 169 0.1%857 0.3% 1,291 0.4% 1,161 0.3% 901 0.2% 824 0.3% 641 0.2% 846 0.3% 964 0.3%749 0.3% 327 0.1% 309 0.1% 890 0.2% 687 0.2% 533 0.2% 502 0.2% 305 0.1%

43 0.0% 38 0.0% 43 0.0% 77 0.0% 49 0.0% 59 0.0% 48 0.0% 35 0.0%1,009 0.3% 346 0.1% 322 0.1% 1,170 0.3% 800 0.3% 953 0.3% 567 0.2% 435 0.1%

103 0.0% 69 0.0% 109 0.0% 80 0.0% 96 0.0% 258 0.1% 157 0.1% 111 0.0%631 0.2% 301 0.1% 282 0.1% 849 0.2% 560 0.2% 3,639 1.3% 912 0.3% 248 0.1%427 0.1% 174 0.1% 191 0.1% 668 0.2% 340 0.1% 525 0.2% 202 0.1% 195 0.1%

52,908 17.9% 19,560 5.7% 16,452 4.6% 55,426 15.3% 51,825 16.5% 39,547 13.7% 19,144 6.3% 15,148 4.9%32,889 11.1% 12,747 3.7% 10,632 2.9% 35,791 9.9% 38,597 12.3% 22,802 7.9% 12,104 4.0% 10,181 3.3%

1,276 0.4% 434 0.1% 396 0.1% 1,402 0.4% 1,022 0.3% 1,879 0.7% 628 0.2% 441 0.1%226 0.1% 136 0.0% 133 0.0% 269 0.1% 191 0.1% 232 0.1% 122 0.0% 68 0.0%119 0.0% 44 0.0% 35 0.0% 120 0.0% 110 0.0% 84 0.0% 41 0.0% 40 0.0%

27 0.0% 17 0.0% 17 0.0% 27 0.0% 24 0.0% 31 0.0% 38 0.0% 19 0.0%15,152 5.1% 5,084 1.5% 4,281 1.2% 14,783 4.1% 9,420 3.0% 11,950 4.1% 5,116 1.7% 3,623 1.2%

256 0.1% 37 0.0% 40 0.0% 183 0.1% 108 0.0% 217 0.1% 60 0.0% 49 0.0%104 0.0% 39 0.0% 36 0.0% 66 0.0% 59 0.0% 63 0.0% 33 0.0% 38 0.0%

44 0.0% 21 0.0% 10 0.0% 49 0.0% 42 0.0% 22 0.0% 23 0.0% 10 0.0%10 0.0% 8 0.0% 4 0.0% 8 0.0% 2 0.0% 7 0.0% 4 0.0% 3 0.0%

2,191 0.7% 777 0.2% 679 0.2% 2,183 0.6% 1,793 0.6% 1,697 0.6% 749 0.2% 539 0.2%11 0.0% 8 0.0% 8 0.0% 16 0.0% 13 0.0% 8 0.0% 6 0.0% 1 0.0%

406 0.1% 100 0.0% 84 0.0% 311 0.1% 286 0.1% 388 0.1% 149 0.0% 94 0.0%197 0.1% 108 0.0% 97 0.0% 218 0.1% 158 0.1% 167 0.1% 71 0.0% 42 0.0%

126



56,845 15.4% 28,257 6.9% 13,583 3.6% 16,873 5.0% 154,110 45.8% 13,230 3.8% 36,463 8.8% 8,697 2.2%1,565 0.4% 1,771 0.4% 1,023 0.3% 1,215 0.4% 1,406 0.4% 973 0.3% 1,632 0.4% 854 0.2%3,748 1.0% 6,298 1.5% 5,315 1.4% 11,812 3.5% 3,526 1.0% 5,011 1.5% 6,390 1.6% 2,944 0.7%

176 0.0% 299 0.1% 168 0.0% 250 0.1% 225 0.1% 195 0.1% 249 0.1% 105 0.0%18,969 5.1% 17,047 4.2% 3,538 0.9% 5,005 1.5% 16,869 5.0% 3,928 1.1% 19,181 4.7% 3,254 0.8%

839 0.2% 1,272 0.3% 734 0.2% 918 0.3% 1,521 0.5% 679 0.2% 922 0.2% 511 0.1%1,160 0.3% 1,498 0.4% 1,163 0.3% 1,361 0.4% 951 0.3% 1,080 0.3% 1,348 0.3% 985 0.2%

473 0.1% 1,156 0.3% 814 0.2% 1,385 0.4% 491 0.1% 672 0.2% 1,090 0.3% 568 0.1%65 0.0% 125 0.0% 90 0.0% 86 0.0% 67 0.0% 58 0.0% 62 0.0% 55 0.0%

2,195 0.6% 3,290 0.8% 1,528 0.4% 2,238 0.7% 3,217 1.0% 1,467 0.4% 2,856 0.7% 921 0.2%143 0.0% 150 0.0% 82 0.0% 117 0.0% 546 0.2% 58 0.0% 189 0.0% 37 0.0%

1,501 0.4% 1,452 0.4% 394 0.1% 791 0.2% 2,742 0.8% 384 0.1% 949 0.2% 485 0.1%415 0.1% 743 0.2% 300 0.1% 613 0.2% 602 0.2% 361 0.1% 689 0.2% 241 0.1%

324,883 87.9% 351,545 86.0% 364,997 95.5% 316,391 93.8% 272,622 81.0% 328,531 95.4% 359,205 87.1% 382,051 96.6%259,335 70.2% 310,545 75.9% 341,110 89.3% 280,478 83.1% 110,129 32.7% 305,790 88.8% 309,958 75.2% 366,710 92.7%

55,865 15.1% 26,351 6.4% 13,208 3.5% 16,243 4.8% 151,045 44.9% 12,819 3.7% 35,534 8.6% 8,301 2.1%1,133 0.3% 1,422 0.3% 827 0.2% 1,067 0.3% 982 0.3% 823 0.2% 1,343 0.3% 771 0.2%3,672 1.0% 6,190 1.5% 5,277 1.4% 11,691 3.5% 3,446 1.0% 4,953 1.4% 6,283 1.5% 2,920 0.7%

114 0.0% 220 0.1% 149 0.0% 225 0.1% 179 0.1% 182 0.1% 196 0.0% 78 0.0%420 0.1% 826 0.2% 407 0.1% 603 0.2% 813 0.2% 364 0.1% 655 0.2% 302 0.1%728 0.2% 887 0.2% 642 0.2% 831 0.2% 1,256 0.4% 615 0.2% 799 0.2% 461 0.1%

1,114 0.3% 1,394 0.3% 1,095 0.3% 1,291 0.4% 843 0.3% 1,032 0.3% 1,241 0.3% 948 0.2%445 0.1% 1,064 0.3% 779 0.2% 1,334 0.4% 445 0.1% 635 0.2% 1,032 0.3% 553 0.1%

57 0.0% 115 0.0% 82 0.0% 76 0.0% 48 0.0% 51 0.0% 51 0.0% 50 0.0%485 0.1% 939 0.2% 850 0.2% 1,347 0.4% 698 0.2% 671 0.2% 807 0.2% 376 0.1%134 0.0% 135 0.0% 77 0.0% 109 0.0% 512 0.2% 54 0.0% 175 0.0% 30 0.0%

1,159 0.3% 951 0.2% 286 0.1% 603 0.2% 1,906 0.6% 284 0.1% 704 0.2% 368 0.1%222 0.1% 506 0.1% 208 0.1% 493 0.1% 320 0.1% 258 0.1% 427 0.1% 183 0.0%

44,682 12.1% 57,403 14.0% 17,171 4.5% 20,951 6.2% 63,825 19.0% 15,844 4.6% 53,028 12.9% 13,419 3.4%22,136 6.0% 35,045 8.6% 12,326 3.2% 14,200 4.2% 40,045 11.9% 10,489 3.0% 30,255 7.3% 9,103 2.3%

980 0.3% 1,906 0.5% 375 0.1% 630 0.2% 3,065 0.9% 411 0.1% 929 0.2% 396 0.1%432 0.1% 349 0.1% 196 0.1% 148 0.0% 424 0.1% 150 0.0% 289 0.1% 83 0.0%

76 0.0% 108 0.0% 38 0.0% 121 0.0% 80 0.0% 58 0.0% 107 0.0% 24 0.0%62 0.0% 79 0.0% 19 0.0% 25 0.0% 46 0.0% 13 0.0% 53 0.0% 27 0.0%

18,549 5.0% 16,221 4.0% 3,131 0.8% 4,402 1.3% 16,056 4.8% 3,564 1.0% 18,526 4.5% 2,952 0.7%111 0.0% 385 0.1% 92 0.0% 87 0.0% 265 0.1% 64 0.0% 123 0.0% 50 0.0%

46 0.0% 104 0.0% 68 0.0% 70 0.0% 108 0.0% 48 0.0% 107 0.0% 37 0.0%28 0.0% 92 0.0% 35 0.0% 51 0.0% 46 0.0% 37 0.0% 58 0.0% 15 0.0%

8 0.0% 10 0.0% 8 0.0% 10 0.0% 19 0.0% 7 0.0% 11 0.0% 5 0.0%1,710 0.5% 2,351 0.6% 678 0.2% 891 0.3% 2,519 0.7% 796 0.2% 2,049 0.5% 545 0.1%

9 0.0% 15 0.0% 5 0.0% 8 0.0% 34 0.0% 4 0.0% 14 0.0% 7 0.0%342 0.1% 501 0.1% 108 0.0% 188 0.1% 836 0.2% 100 0.0% 245 0.1% 117 0.0%193 0.1% 237 0.1% 92 0.0% 120 0.0% 282 0.1% 103 0.0% 262 0.1% 58 0.0%

280,669 100.0% 311,550 100.0% 308,780 100.0% 270,438 100.0% 242,260 100.0% 287,333 100.0% 304,829 100.0% 336,130 100.0%223,720 79.7% 269,552 86.5% 289,776 93.8% 241,126 89.2% 121,333 50.1% 267,949 93.3% 258,338 84.7% 322,242 95.9%

36,928 13.2% 18,707 6.0% 8,796 2.8% 11,309 4.2% 99,826 41.2% 8,910 3.1% 23,987 7.9% 6,282 1.9%1,091 0.4% 1,304 0.4% 785 0.3% 953 0.4% 997 0.4% 794 0.3% 1,194 0.4% 685 0.2%2,765 1.0% 4,896 1.6% 3,924 1.3% 8,889 3.3% 2,839 1.2% 3,772 1.3% 4,848 1.6% 2,312 0.7%

124 0.0% 217 0.1% 106 0.0% 172 0.1% 165 0.1% 158 0.1% 171 0.1% 81 0.0%11,868 4.2% 11,000 3.5% 2,318 0.8% 3,381 1.3% 10,809 4.5% 2,725 0.9% 11,536 3.8% 2,154 0.6%

190 0.1% 425 0.1% 192 0.1% 222 0.1% 436 0.2% 151 0.1% 253 0.1% 137 0.0%922 0.3% 1,118 0.4% 848 0.3% 1,037 0.4% 760 0.3% 855 0.3% 991 0.3% 762 0.2%277 0.1% 571 0.2% 422 0.1% 759 0.3% 321 0.1% 378 0.1% 574 0.2% 294 0.1%

53 0.0% 78 0.0% 54 0.0% 52 0.0% 45 0.0% 33 0.0% 39 0.0% 38 0.0%1,380 0.5% 2,247 0.7% 1,070 0.3% 1,591 0.6% 2,238 0.9% 1,067 0.4% 1,764 0.6% 639 0.2%

97 0.0% 105 0.0% 64 0.0% 80 0.0% 396 0.2% 46 0.0% 123 0.0% 26 0.0%964 0.3% 863 0.3% 225 0.1% 439 0.2% 1,661 0.7% 238 0.1% 575 0.2% 310 0.1%290 0.1% 467 0.1% 200 0.1% 428 0.2% 434 0.2% 257 0.1% 436 0.1% 168 0.0%

252,230 89.9% 272,672 87.5% 296,739 96.1% 255,282 94.4% 197,709 81.6% 275,771 96.0% 271,396 89.0% 326,599 97.2%209,327 74.6% 245,161 78.7% 280,883 91.0% 230,528 85.2% 92,100 38.0% 260,092 90.5% 238,613 78.3% 315,602 93.9%

36,327 12.9% 17,465 5.6% 8,572 2.8% 10,922 4.0% 97,888 40.4% 8,632 3.0% 23,415 7.7% 5,972 1.8%831 0.3% 1,064 0.3% 655 0.2% 841 0.3% 723 0.3% 674 0.2% 1,003 0.3% 627 0.2%

2,714 1.0% 4,831 1.6% 3,898 1.3% 8,809 3.3% 2,782 1.1% 3,735 1.3% 4,789 1.6% 2,292 0.7%89 0.0% 165 0.1% 92 0.0% 152 0.1% 141 0.1% 145 0.1% 138 0.0% 61 0.0%

228 0.1% 429 0.1% 187 0.1% 311 0.1% 377 0.2% 202 0.1% 327 0.1% 174 0.1%123 0.0% 204 0.1% 152 0.0% 189 0.1% 313 0.1% 120 0.0% 186 0.1% 118 0.0%901 0.3% 1,066 0.3% 806 0.3% 991 0.4% 686 0.3% 833 0.3% 929 0.3% 736 0.2%266 0.1% 537 0.2% 411 0.1% 735 0.3% 296 0.1% 355 0.1% 552 0.2% 284 0.1%

46 0.0% 69 0.0% 52 0.0% 48 0.0% 31 0.0% 31 0.0% 33 0.0% 34 0.0%355 0.1% 689 0.2% 648 0.2% 980 0.4% 534 0.2% 552 0.2% 564 0.2% 298 0.1%

91 0.0% 97 0.0% 60 0.0% 74 0.0% 382 0.2% 42 0.0% 115 0.0% 21 0.0%772 0.3% 570 0.2% 176 0.1% 339 0.1% 1,215 0.5% 178 0.1% 441 0.1% 248 0.1%160 0.1% 325 0.1% 147 0.0% 363 0.1% 241 0.1% 180 0.1% 291 0.1% 132 0.0%

28,439 10.1% 38,878 12.5% 12,041 3.9% 15,156 5.6% 44,551 18.4% 11,562 4.0% 33,433 11.0% 9,531 2.8%14,393 5.1% 24,391 7.8% 8,893 2.9% 10,598 3.9% 29,233 12.1% 7,857 2.7% 19,725 6.5% 6,640 2.0%

601 0.2% 1,242 0.4% 224 0.1% 387 0.1% 1,938 0.8% 278 0.1% 572 0.2% 310 0.1%260 0.1% 240 0.1% 130 0.0% 112 0.0% 274 0.1% 120 0.0% 191 0.1% 58 0.0%

51 0.0% 65 0.0% 26 0.0% 80 0.0% 57 0.0% 37 0.0% 59 0.0% 20 0.0%35 0.0% 52 0.0% 14 0.0% 20 0.0% 24 0.0% 13 0.0% 33 0.0% 20 0.0%

11,640 4.1% 10,571 3.4% 2,131 0.7% 3,070 1.1% 10,432 4.3% 2,523 0.9% 11,209 3.7% 1,980 0.6%67 0.0% 221 0.1% 40 0.0% 33 0.0% 123 0.1% 31 0.0% 67 0.0% 19 0.0%21 0.0% 52 0.0% 42 0.0% 46 0.0% 74 0.0% 22 0.0% 62 0.0% 26 0.0%11 0.0% 34 0.0% 11 0.0% 24 0.0% 25 0.0% 23 0.0% 22 0.0% 10 0.0%

7 0.0% 9 0.0% 2 0.0% 4 0.0% 14 0.0% 2 0.0% 6 0.0% 4 0.0%1,025 0.4% 1,558 0.5% 422 0.1% 611 0.2% 1,704 0.7% 515 0.2% 1,200 0.4% 341 0.1%

6 0.0% 8 0.0% 4 0.0% 6 0.0% 14 0.0% 4 0.0% 8 0.0% 5 0.0%192 0.1% 293 0.1% 49 0.0% 100 0.0% 446 0.2% 60 0.0% 134 0.0% 62 0.0%130 0.0% 142 0.0% 53 0.0% 65 0.0% 193 0.1% 77 0.0% 145 0.0% 36 0.0%

127



12,938 2.6% 27,211 6.7% 17,357 4.1% 26,935 5.8% 67,697 16.7% 215,577 60.3% 29,706 8.5% 88,320 17.0%1,084 0.2% 1,662 0.4% 907 0.2% 732 0.2% 1,323 0.3% 977 0.3% 804 0.2% 1,510 0.3%3,730 0.8% 3,476 0.9% 4,177 1.0% 8,164 1.8% 6,814 1.7% 3,187 0.9% 5,209 1.5% 14,857 2.9%

235 0.0% 169 0.0% 262 0.1% 206 0.0% 255 0.1% 276 0.1% 199 0.1% 283 0.1%14,262 2.9% 15,557 3.8% 6,809 1.6% 13,039 2.8% 24,565 6.1% 10,890 3.0% 7,451 2.1% 21,401 4.1%

650 0.1% 838 0.2% 626 0.1% 695 0.2% 963 0.2% 924 0.3% 687 0.2% 1,684 0.3%989 0.2% 1,007 0.2% 873 0.2% 623 0.1% 699 0.2% 379 0.1% 652 0.2% 600 0.1%759 0.2% 564 0.1% 648 0.2% 906 0.2% 922 0.2% 306 0.1% 707 0.2% 1,605 0.3%124 0.0% 66 0.0% 85 0.0% 81 0.0% 81 0.0% 55 0.0% 74 0.0% 85 0.0%

3,055 0.6% 1,844 0.5% 1,475 0.4% 3,592 0.8% 5,135 1.3% 2,230 0.6% 3,123 0.9% 7,305 1.4%56 0.0% 130 0.0% 76 0.0% 87 0.0% 134 0.0% 397 0.1% 88 0.0% 208 0.0%

1,596 0.3% 643 0.2% 899 0.2% 2,233 0.5% 4,197 1.0% 12,321 3.4% 3,183 0.9% 4,869 0.9%431 0.1% 338 0.1% 518 0.1% 659 0.1% 777 0.2% 632 0.2% 557 0.2% 1,157 0.2%

441,341 89.0% 364,719 89.4% 391,578 93.4% 407,373 88.1% 315,144 77.6% 319,663 89.5% 310,571 89.0% 356,144 68.7%419,435 84.6% 329,813 80.8% 366,031 87.3% 366,024 79.1% 232,244 57.2% 87,219 24.4% 268,380 76.9% 245,034 47.3%

12,178 2.5% 26,508 6.5% 16,666 4.0% 25,911 5.6% 65,829 16.2% 213,074 59.6% 28,753 8.2% 84,088 16.2%791 0.2% 955 0.2% 637 0.2% 482 0.1% 1,005 0.2% 541 0.2% 560 0.2% 1,163 0.2%

3,664 0.7% 3,419 0.8% 4,121 1.0% 8,098 1.8% 6,673 1.6% 3,129 0.9% 5,134 1.5% 14,557 2.8%149 0.0% 127 0.0% 117 0.0% 163 0.0% 185 0.0% 168 0.0% 178 0.1% 232 0.0%513 0.1% 427 0.1% 432 0.1% 987 0.2% 1,131 0.3% 981 0.3% 993 0.3% 1,946 0.4%538 0.1% 698 0.2% 545 0.1% 575 0.1% 755 0.2% 817 0.2% 563 0.2% 1,061 0.2%927 0.2% 936 0.2% 823 0.2% 549 0.1% 612 0.2% 331 0.1% 590 0.2% 462 0.1%727 0.1% 544 0.1% 623 0.1% 830 0.2% 827 0.2% 279 0.1% 654 0.2% 1,357 0.3%

97 0.0% 60 0.0% 71 0.0% 73 0.0% 72 0.0% 35 0.0% 59 0.0% 61 0.0%652 0.1% 449 0.1% 445 0.1% 1,169 0.3% 1,436 0.4% 603 0.2% 1,241 0.4% 1,378 0.3%

53 0.0% 123 0.0% 67 0.0% 81 0.0% 117 0.0% 368 0.1% 83 0.0% 178 0.0%1,390 0.3% 500 0.1% 747 0.2% 1,968 0.4% 3,773 0.9% 11,799 3.3% 2,958 0.8% 3,804 0.7%

227 0.0% 160 0.0% 253 0.1% 463 0.1% 485 0.1% 319 0.1% 425 0.1% 823 0.2%54,675 11.0% 43,451 10.6% 27,782 6.6% 55,196 11.9% 90,737 22.4% 37,577 10.5% 38,248 11.0% 162,272 31.3%36,672 7.4% 24,852 6.1% 18,617 4.4% 38,593 8.3% 60,075 14.8% 21,870 6.1% 27,999 8.0% 129,498 25.0%

760 0.2% 703 0.2% 691 0.2% 1,024 0.2% 1,868 0.5% 2,503 0.7% 953 0.3% 4,232 0.8%293 0.1% 707 0.2% 270 0.1% 250 0.1% 318 0.1% 436 0.1% 244 0.1% 347 0.1%

66 0.0% 57 0.0% 56 0.0% 66 0.0% 141 0.0% 58 0.0% 75 0.0% 300 0.1%86 0.0% 42 0.0% 145 0.0% 43 0.0% 70 0.0% 108 0.0% 21 0.0% 51 0.0%

13,749 2.8% 15,130 3.7% 6,377 1.5% 12,052 2.6% 23,434 5.8% 9,909 2.8% 6,458 1.9% 19,455 3.8%112 0.0% 140 0.0% 81 0.0% 120 0.0% 208 0.1% 107 0.0% 124 0.0% 623 0.1%

62 0.0% 71 0.0% 50 0.0% 74 0.0% 87 0.0% 48 0.0% 62 0.0% 138 0.0%32 0.0% 20 0.0% 25 0.0% 76 0.0% 95 0.0% 27 0.0% 53 0.0% 248 0.0%27 0.0% 6 0.0% 14 0.0% 8 0.0% 9 0.0% 20 0.0% 15 0.0% 24 0.0%

2,403 0.5% 1,395 0.3% 1,030 0.2% 2,423 0.5% 3,699 0.9% 1,627 0.5% 1,882 0.5% 5,927 1.1%3 0.0% 7 0.0% 9 0.0% 6 0.0% 17 0.0% 29 0.0% 5 0.0% 30 0.0%

206 0.0% 143 0.0% 152 0.0% 265 0.1% 424 0.1% 522 0.1% 225 0.1% 1,065 0.2%204 0.0% 178 0.0% 265 0.1% 196 0.0% 292 0.1% 313 0.1% 132 0.0% 334 0.1%

406,891 100.0% 326,469 100.0% 340,860 100.0% 376,216 100.0% 307,874 100.0% 253,296 100.0% 291,485 100.0% 375,349 100.0%380,369 93.5% 291,116 89.2% 317,725 93.2% 337,554 89.7% 231,741 75.3% 91,415 36.1% 254,818 87.4% 278,051 74.1%

8,346 2.1% 18,063 5.5% 11,406 3.3% 17,345 4.6% 44,831 14.6% 139,606 55.1% 19,917 6.8% 59,344 15.8%805 0.2% 1,242 0.4% 658 0.2% 521 0.1% 927 0.3% 672 0.3% 613 0.2% 973 0.3%

2,912 0.7% 2,664 0.8% 3,124 0.9% 6,097 1.6% 5,272 1.7% 2,419 1.0% 4,214 1.4% 10,745 2.9%174 0.0% 128 0.0% 187 0.1% 153 0.0% 185 0.1% 206 0.1% 168 0.1% 203 0.1%

9,416 2.3% 10,008 3.1% 4,468 1.3% 8,716 2.3% 16,198 5.3% 7,328 2.9% 5,366 1.8% 14,436 3.8%208 0.1% 223 0.1% 180 0.1% 242 0.1% 386 0.1% 335 0.1% 285 0.1% 765 0.2%714 0.2% 802 0.2% 666 0.2% 476 0.1% 539 0.2% 306 0.1% 538 0.2% 452 0.1%444 0.1% 293 0.1% 341 0.1% 511 0.1% 520 0.2% 209 0.1% 445 0.2% 915 0.2%

77 0.0% 33 0.0% 58 0.0% 52 0.0% 61 0.0% 42 0.0% 60 0.0% 56 0.0%2,095 0.5% 1,171 0.4% 1,058 0.3% 2,562 0.7% 3,641 1.2% 1,613 0.6% 2,404 0.8% 5,141 1.4%

38 0.0% 81 0.0% 61 0.0% 59 0.0% 97 0.0% 270 0.1% 55 0.0% 125 0.0%985 0.2% 417 0.1% 572 0.2% 1,471 0.4% 2,902 0.9% 8,413 3.3% 2,167 0.7% 3,379 0.9%308 0.1% 228 0.1% 356 0.1% 457 0.1% 574 0.2% 462 0.2% 435 0.1% 764 0.2%

369,203 90.7% 297,755 91.2% 321,502 94.3% 337,265 89.6% 244,197 79.3% 226,825 89.5% 262,418 90.0% 258,185 68.8%354,624 87.2% 274,445 84.1% 304,457 89.3% 309,751 82.3% 188,479 61.2% 75,510 29.8% 233,078 80.0% 183,306 48.8%

7,846 1.9% 17,610 5.4% 10,962 3.2% 16,692 4.4% 43,588 14.2% 138,038 54.5% 19,273 6.6% 56,357 15.0%607 0.1% 715 0.2% 488 0.1% 355 0.1% 719 0.2% 386 0.2% 449 0.2% 738 0.2%

2,867 0.7% 2,624 0.8% 3,083 0.9% 6,053 1.6% 5,186 1.7% 2,384 0.9% 4,155 1.4% 10,539 2.8%110 0.0% 101 0.0% 97 0.0% 125 0.0% 135 0.0% 128 0.1% 151 0.1% 166 0.0%262 0.1% 182 0.1% 214 0.1% 582 0.2% 650 0.2% 516 0.2% 681 0.2% 1,120 0.3%142 0.0% 146 0.0% 134 0.0% 171 0.0% 255 0.1% 276 0.1% 214 0.1% 432 0.1%680 0.2% 758 0.2% 633 0.2% 429 0.1% 481 0.2% 275 0.1% 495 0.2% 373 0.1%421 0.1% 284 0.1% 330 0.1% 469 0.1% 471 0.2% 191 0.1% 418 0.1% 794 0.2%

61 0.0% 29 0.0% 47 0.0% 44 0.0% 53 0.0% 26 0.0% 48 0.0% 42 0.0%512 0.1% 341 0.1% 346 0.1% 887 0.2% 1,052 0.3% 461 0.2% 1,030 0.4% 956 0.3%

38 0.0% 79 0.0% 58 0.0% 56 0.0% 88 0.0% 254 0.1% 54 0.0% 112 0.0%870 0.2% 332 0.1% 480 0.1% 1,327 0.4% 2,667 0.9% 8,138 3.2% 2,029 0.7% 2,691 0.7%163 0.0% 109 0.0% 173 0.1% 324 0.1% 373 0.1% 242 0.1% 343 0.1% 559 0.1%

37,688 9.3% 28,714 8.8% 19,358 5.7% 38,951 10.4% 63,677 20.7% 26,471 10.5% 29,067 10.0% 117,164 31.2%25,745 6.3% 16,671 5.1% 13,268 3.9% 27,803 7.4% 43,262 14.1% 15,905 6.3% 21,740 7.5% 94,745 25.2%

500 0.1% 453 0.1% 444 0.1% 653 0.2% 1,243 0.4% 1,568 0.6% 644 0.2% 2,987 0.8%198 0.0% 527 0.2% 170 0.0% 166 0.0% 208 0.1% 286 0.1% 164 0.1% 235 0.1%

45 0.0% 40 0.0% 41 0.0% 44 0.0% 86 0.0% 35 0.0% 59 0.0% 206 0.1%64 0.0% 27 0.0% 90 0.0% 28 0.0% 50 0.0% 78 0.0% 17 0.0% 37 0.0%

9,154 2.2% 9,826 3.0% 4,254 1.2% 8,134 2.2% 15,548 5.1% 6,812 2.7% 4,685 1.6% 13,316 3.5%66 0.0% 77 0.0% 46 0.0% 71 0.0% 131 0.0% 59 0.0% 71 0.0% 333 0.1%34 0.0% 44 0.0% 33 0.0% 47 0.0% 58 0.0% 31 0.0% 43 0.0% 79 0.0%23 0.0% 9 0.0% 11 0.0% 42 0.0% 49 0.0% 18 0.0% 27 0.0% 121 0.0%16 0.0% 4 0.0% 11 0.0% 8 0.0% 8 0.0% 16 0.0% 12 0.0% 14 0.0%

1,583 0.4% 830 0.3% 712 0.2% 1,675 0.4% 2,589 0.8% 1,152 0.5% 1,374 0.5% 4,185 1.1%- 0.0% 2 0.0% 3 0.0% 3 0.0% 9 0.0% 16 0.0% 1 0.0% 13 0.0%115 0.0% 85 0.0% 92 0.0% 144 0.0% 235 0.1% 275 0.1% 138 0.0% 688 0.2%145 0.0% 119 0.0% 183 0.1% 133 0.0% 201 0.1% 220 0.1% 92 0.0% 205 0.1%

128



59,287 13.5% 11,252 3.4% 60,507 14.9% 191,875 57.2% 15,633 4.0% 73,386 20.0% 19,367 4.1% 122,009 36.6%841 0.2% 584 0.2% 1,805 0.4% 791 0.2% 520 0.1% 789 0.2% 787 0.2% 1,024 0.3%

11,553 2.6% 4,767 1.4% 4,824 1.2% 2,185 0.7% 7,343 1.9% 7,516 2.0% 6,090 1.3% 3,167 0.9%243 0.1% 116 0.0% 232 0.1% 135 0.0% 83 0.0% 168 0.0% 153 0.0% 141 0.0%

14,051 3.2% 13,839 4.1% 17,162 4.2% 13,240 3.9% 17,446 4.4% 12,673 3.5% 25,503 5.4% 15,741 4.7%1,192 0.3% 532 0.2% 945 0.2% 868 0.3% 726 0.2% 1,062 0.3% 1,028 0.2% 904 0.3%

594 0.1% 345 0.1% 944 0.2% 245 0.1% 320 0.1% 443 0.1% 400 0.1% 576 0.2%1,086 0.2% 679 0.2% 677 0.2% 229 0.1% 1,010 0.3% 831 0.2% 826 0.2% 484 0.1%

79 0.0% 60 0.0% 90 0.0% 44 0.0% 47 0.0% 82 0.0% 99 0.0% 70 0.0%5,099 1.2% 7,003 2.1% 3,290 0.8% 5,144 1.5% 8,506 2.2% 5,923 1.6% 12,500 2.6% 4,649 1.4%

135 0.0% 45 0.0% 153 0.0% 433 0.1% 53 0.0% 234 0.1% 61 0.0% 236 0.1%5,002 1.1% 1,104 0.3% 2,818 0.7% 9,018 2.7% 1,334 0.3% 4,493 1.2% 1,995 0.4% 4,817 1.4%

896 0.2% 483 0.1% 734 0.2% 506 0.2% 654 0.2% 757 0.2% 703 0.1% 624 0.2%373,714 85.2% 102,001 30.4% 347,394 85.4% 222,514 66.4% 107,907 27.4% 232,020 63.2% 95,554 20.2% 226,696 67.9%291,868 66.5% 86,693 25.9% 275,445 67.7% 25,757 7.7% 83,959 21.3% 146,853 40.0% 71,815 15.2% 98,516 29.5%

57,549 13.1% 7,831 2.3% 58,912 14.5% 184,252 55.0% 12,983 3.3% 68,790 18.7% 13,797 2.9% 117,314 35.2%622 0.1% 207 0.1% 1,418 0.3% 409 0.1% 223 0.1% 406 0.1% 307 0.1% 630 0.2%

11,447 2.6% 4,563 1.4% 4,698 1.2% 2,068 0.6% 7,074 1.8% 7,307 2.0% 5,817 1.2% 3,074 0.9%212 0.0% 70 0.0% 163 0.0% 113 0.0% 36 0.0% 136 0.0% 71 0.0% 101 0.0%

2,212 0.5% 405 0.1% 723 0.2% 565 0.2% 594 0.2% 1,096 0.3% 584 0.1% 734 0.2%1,002 0.2% 215 0.1% 803 0.2% 460 0.1% 300 0.1% 599 0.2% 312 0.1% 547 0.2%

524 0.1% 212 0.1% 852 0.2% 114 0.0% 165 0.0% 310 0.1% 222 0.0% 455 0.1%1,013 0.2% 529 0.2% 630 0.2% 189 0.1% 783 0.2% 706 0.2% 599 0.1% 412 0.1%

60 0.0% 18 0.0% 78 0.0% 19 0.0% 18 0.0% 50 0.0% 24 0.0% 46 0.0%1,870 0.4% 520 0.2% 743 0.2% 338 0.1% 587 0.1% 1,471 0.4% 769 0.2% 539 0.2%

123 0.0% 33 0.0% 139 0.0% 405 0.1% 38 0.0% 207 0.1% 40 0.0% 213 0.1%4,526 1.0% 517 0.2% 2,388 0.6% 7,659 2.3% 816 0.2% 3,639 1.0% 908 0.2% 3,797 1.1%

686 0.2% 188 0.1% 402 0.1% 166 0.0% 331 0.1% 450 0.1% 289 0.1% 318 0.1%64,886 14.8% 233,034 69.6% 59,522 14.6% 112,781 33.6% 285,899 72.6% 135,023 36.8% 378,039 79.8% 106,995 32.1%46,674 10.6% 207,533 61.9% 37,290 9.2% 84,825 25.3% 256,172 65.1% 111,833 30.5% 332,266 70.2% 80,733 24.2%

1,738 0.4% 3,421 1.0% 1,595 0.4% 7,623 2.3% 2,650 0.7% 4,596 1.3% 5,570 1.2% 4,695 1.4%219 0.0% 377 0.1% 387 0.1% 382 0.1% 297 0.1% 383 0.1% 480 0.1% 394 0.1%106 0.0% 204 0.1% 126 0.0% 117 0.0% 269 0.1% 209 0.1% 273 0.1% 93 0.0%

31 0.0% 46 0.0% 69 0.0% 22 0.0% 47 0.0% 32 0.0% 82 0.0% 40 0.0%11,839 2.7% 13,434 4.0% 16,439 4.0% 12,675 3.8% 16,852 4.3% 11,577 3.2% 24,919 5.3% 15,007 4.5%

190 0.0% 317 0.1% 142 0.0% 408 0.1% 426 0.1% 463 0.1% 716 0.2% 357 0.1%70 0.0% 133 0.0% 92 0.0% 131 0.0% 155 0.0% 133 0.0% 178 0.0% 121 0.0%73 0.0% 150 0.0% 47 0.0% 40 0.0% 227 0.1% 125 0.0% 227 0.0% 72 0.0%19 0.0% 42 0.0% 12 0.0% 25 0.0% 29 0.0% 32 0.0% 75 0.0% 24 0.0%

3,229 0.7% 6,483 1.9% 2,547 0.6% 4,806 1.4% 7,919 2.0% 4,452 1.2% 11,731 2.5% 4,110 1.2%12 0.0% 12 0.0% 14 0.0% 28 0.0% 15 0.0% 27 0.0% 21 0.0% 23 0.0%

476 0.1% 587 0.2% 430 0.1% 1,359 0.4% 518 0.1% 854 0.2% 1,087 0.2% 1,020 0.3%210 0.0% 295 0.1% 332 0.1% 340 0.1% 323 0.1% 307 0.1% 414 0.1% 306 0.1%

340,152 100.0% 265,054 100.0% 310,943 100.0% 236,828 100.0% 299,543 100.0% 295,832 100.0% 354,089 100.0% 240,059 100.0%272,411 80.1% 234,116 88.3% 250,320 80.5% 87,197 36.8% 259,555 86.7% 219,383 74.2% 303,527 85.7% 138,901 57.9%

39,363 11.6% 8,428 3.2% 38,533 12.4% 126,249 53.3% 11,896 4.0% 49,738 16.8% 14,209 4.0% 79,324 33.0%580 0.2% 424 0.2% 1,233 0.4% 496 0.2% 357 0.1% 569 0.2% 517 0.1% 778 0.3%

8,636 2.5% 3,821 1.4% 3,638 1.2% 1,739 0.7% 5,736 1.9% 6,079 2.1% 4,507 1.3% 2,512 1.0%167 0.0% 87 0.0% 164 0.1% 90 0.0% 58 0.0% 125 0.0% 102 0.0% 99 0.0%

9,670 2.8% 10,304 3.9% 11,030 3.5% 9,282 3.9% 12,587 4.2% 9,557 3.2% 18,168 5.1% 10,282 4.3%414 0.1% 325 0.1% 286 0.1% 528 0.2% 449 0.1% 603 0.2% 632 0.2% 408 0.2%434 0.1% 259 0.1% 705 0.2% 176 0.1% 233 0.1% 351 0.1% 257 0.1% 407 0.2%606 0.2% 442 0.2% 400 0.1% 155 0.1% 690 0.2% 634 0.2% 559 0.2% 280 0.1%

52 0.0% 43 0.0% 51 0.0% 36 0.0% 32 0.0% 62 0.0% 66 0.0% 48 0.0%3,733 1.1% 5,562 2.1% 2,169 0.7% 3,896 1.6% 6,494 2.2% 4,796 1.6% 9,567 2.7% 3,281 1.4%

84 0.0% 34 0.0% 114 0.0% 269 0.1% 34 0.0% 147 0.0% 49 0.0% 164 0.1%3,384 1.0% 858 0.3% 1,775 0.6% 6,356 2.7% 969 0.3% 3,188 1.1% 1,431 0.4% 3,133 1.3%

618 0.2% 351 0.1% 525 0.2% 359 0.2% 453 0.2% 600 0.2% 498 0.1% 442 0.2%293,510 86.3% 74,287 28.0% 270,526 87.0% 149,422 63.1% 75,005 25.0% 184,277 62.3% 61,169 17.3% 164,027 68.3%238,255 70.0% 63,124 23.8% 224,244 72.1% 19,940 8.4% 57,011 19.0% 125,697 42.5% 44,370 12.5% 80,498 33.5%

38,242 11.2% 5,568 2.1% 37,536 12.1% 120,689 51.0% 9,837 3.3% 46,113 15.6% 9,909 2.8% 76,023 31.7%436 0.1% 138 0.1% 990 0.3% 241 0.1% 148 0.0% 272 0.1% 179 0.1% 501 0.2%

8,559 2.5% 3,652 1.4% 3,560 1.1% 1,642 0.7% 5,525 1.8% 5,918 2.0% 4,308 1.2% 2,449 1.0%147 0.0% 55 0.0% 112 0.0% 73 0.0% 27 0.0% 104 0.0% 49 0.0% 72 0.0%

1,392 0.4% 216 0.1% 360 0.1% 350 0.1% 352 0.1% 763 0.3% 336 0.1% 448 0.2%316 0.1% 104 0.0% 214 0.1% 248 0.1% 178 0.1% 291 0.1% 137 0.0% 190 0.1%392 0.1% 169 0.1% 653 0.2% 94 0.0% 125 0.0% 248 0.1% 144 0.0% 331 0.1%569 0.2% 340 0.1% 375 0.1% 128 0.1% 546 0.2% 546 0.2% 412 0.1% 237 0.1%

39 0.0% 16 0.0% 45 0.0% 13 0.0% 11 0.0% 43 0.0% 16 0.0% 32 0.0%1,474 0.4% 356 0.1% 522 0.2% 238 0.1% 365 0.1% 1,197 0.4% 448 0.1% 375 0.2%

76 0.0% 23 0.0% 105 0.0% 251 0.1% 24 0.0% 125 0.0% 33 0.0% 150 0.1%3,121 0.9% 396 0.1% 1,529 0.5% 5,395 2.3% 618 0.2% 2,596 0.9% 633 0.2% 2,485 1.0%

492 0.1% 130 0.0% 281 0.1% 120 0.1% 238 0.1% 364 0.1% 195 0.1% 236 0.1%46,642 13.7% 190,767 72.0% 40,417 13.0% 87,406 36.9% 224,538 75.0% 111,555 37.7% 292,920 82.7% 76,032 31.7%34,156 10.0% 170,992 64.5% 26,076 8.4% 67,257 28.4% 202,544 67.6% 93,686 31.7% 259,157 73.2% 58,403 24.3%

1,121 0.3% 2,860 1.1% 997 0.3% 5,560 2.3% 2,059 0.7% 3,625 1.2% 4,300 1.2% 3,301 1.4%144 0.0% 286 0.1% 243 0.1% 255 0.1% 209 0.1% 297 0.1% 338 0.1% 277 0.1%

77 0.0% 169 0.1% 78 0.0% 97 0.0% 211 0.1% 161 0.1% 199 0.1% 63 0.0%20 0.0% 32 0.0% 52 0.0% 17 0.0% 31 0.0% 21 0.0% 53 0.0% 27 0.0%

8,278 2.4% 10,088 3.8% 10,670 3.4% 8,932 3.8% 12,235 4.1% 8,794 3.0% 17,832 5.0% 9,834 4.1%98 0.0% 221 0.1% 72 0.0% 280 0.1% 271 0.1% 312 0.1% 495 0.1% 218 0.1%42 0.0% 90 0.0% 52 0.0% 82 0.0% 108 0.0% 103 0.0% 113 0.0% 76 0.0%37 0.0% 102 0.0% 25 0.0% 27 0.0% 144 0.0% 88 0.0% 147 0.0% 43 0.0%13 0.0% 27 0.0% 6 0.0% 23 0.0% 21 0.0% 19 0.0% 50 0.0% 16 0.0%

2,259 0.7% 5,206 2.0% 1,647 0.5% 3,658 1.5% 6,129 2.0% 3,599 1.2% 9,119 2.6% 2,906 1.2%8 0.0% 11 0.0% 9 0.0% 18 0.0% 10 0.0% 22 0.0% 16 0.0% 14 0.0%

263 0.1% 462 0.2% 246 0.1% 961 0.4% 351 0.1% 592 0.2% 798 0.2% 648 0.3%126 0.0% 221 0.1% 244 0.1% 239 0.1% 215 0.1% 236 0.1% 303 0.1% 206 0.1%

129

Attachment 4: Socioeconimic Characteristics of Newly Created Senatorial DistrictsSenate Plan S17S0036Select Census SF3 Factors (1990) Dist 1 Dist 2 Dist 3 Dist 4 Dist 5 Dist 6 Dist 7 Dist 8 Dist 9 Dist 10 Dist 11 Dist 12 Dist 13 Dist 14All Persons (SF3) 378,978 333,342 303,347 332,410 321,600 332,272 338,659 286,347 288,154 317,657 327,711 311,336 382,827 323,262 Households 145,148 121,643 120,028 129,249 118,567 121,936 141,462 110,863 109,862 118,502 146,650 120,925 177,227 121,200 Per capita income 10,700 10,600 11,491 14,010 15,744 11,533 13,372 16,355 17,277 12,918 14,190 15,301 17,025 11,259 Average household income 27,414 28,231 28,469 35,401 42,337 30,513 31,445 41,210 44,838 34,158 31,436 39,173 36,106 29,028 Average family income 31,818 31,835 31,916 39,902 46,968 36,462 36,008 46,586 51,123 38,179 36,083 44,752 44,018 34,937 Unemployment rate 4.6% 4.0% 3.2% 3.7% 2.9% 3.5% 3.0% 2.9% 3.2% 3.3% 2.5% 3.3% 2.1% 3.4% Family income below poverty level 16.4% 14.7% 11.1% 8.6% 5.4% 14.6% 7.9% 5.4% 5.2% 8.4% 5.5% 6.7% 4.8% 14.9% Full-time employees 40+ weeks/year 44.0% 42.4% 35.5% 46.9% 53.6% 43.1% 37.5% 48.8% 53.9% 42.8% 30.1% 51.5% 38.3% 39.3% Manageral and professional occupations 19.8% 20.9% 22.9% 28.4% 27.8% 28.6% 23.1% 28.9% 29.7% 21.3% 24.6% 29.7% 26.8% 29.4% High school graduates 68.1% 70.8% 68.6% 82.7% 82.4% 71.7% 74.2% 82.5% 82.1% 70.5% 73.4% 80.7% 79.2% 74.9% College graduates 12.7% 13.0% 12.6% 22.2% 21.1% 22.3% 13.9% 22.6% 25.5% 14.3% 13.2% 23.7% 18.7% 22.6% Children in public schools (K-12) 92.0% 94.5% 94.8% 92.9% 85.5% 92.0% 92.3% 88.9% 90.5% 91.1% 92.6% 86.6% 85.4% 92.8% Children in private schools (K-12) 8.0% 5.5% 5.2% 7.1% 14.5% 8.0% 7.7% 11.1% 9.5% 8.9% 7.4% 13.4% 14.6% 7.2% Houses valued $50,000 or more 48.1% 50.6% 64.9% 76.4% 85.4% 58.1% 79.7% 85.8% 92.4% 79.5% 74.5% 86.7% 88.1% 60.8% Average house value 55,544 58,867 68,408 86,814 95,780 70,427 83,102 103,607 120,874 85,114 85,198 98,037 101,075 68,981 Owner-occupied dwellings 56.4% 71.6% 78.5% 62.8% 72.2% 65.6% 74.6% 66.8% 65.0% 77.1% 80.6% 67.5% 71.5% 63.3% Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ 26.5% 24.7% 28.4% 42.9% 60.1% 40.1% 41.3% 56.5% 66.7% 57.3% 42.3% 64.0% 49.7% 36.6% Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ 21.3% 14.2% 21.7% 25.3% 39.5% 25.4% 33.8% 49.2% 62.3% 29.6% 36.6% 42.8% 41.3% 20.9% Number of persons per dwelling unit 2.53 2.64 2.45 2.51 2.67 2.55 2.34 2.48 2.58 2.62 2.21 2.54 2.10 2.50 Dwellings with no telephone 9.5% 7.7% 7.7% 4.7% 4.4% 7.3% 5.5% 3.9% 4.0% 7.4% 2.9% 4.1% 3.2% 9.0% Households with no vehicle 17.4% 9.5% 7.1% 5.0% 4.9% 11.9% 7.0% 5.0% 4.8% 6.3% 6.0% 4.5% 9.4% 9.0% Vacant housing units 11.6% 11.1% 15.9% 22.2% 6.6% 12.6% 18.5% 14.2% 12.6% 15.6% 17.0% 11.5% 18.5% 13.0% Inside an urbanized area 90.3% 50.1% 11.4% 88.9% 79.6% 43.5% 63.9% 68.6% 86.0% 49.0% 89.5% 76.6% 100.0% 42.8% Married-couple households 44.1% 58.7% 62.0% 60.1% 64.2% 50.0% 58.2% 60.0% 59.2% 64.9% 62.5% 58.4% 51.6% 49.7% Non-family households 33.8% 25.3% 26.4% 27.5% 24.7% 32.8% 30.9% 28.8% 29.3% 23.1% 29.1% 29.7% 38.1% 34.9% Born in Florida 54.8% 47.7% 42.2% 30.2% 41.7% 59.1% 30.3% 31.6% 27.1% 37.7% 13.3% 32.9% 18.1% 51.8% Changed residences within last 5 years 48.6% 49.0% 53.6% 59.1% 55.4% 51.6% 52.6% 62.4% 61.5% 53.3% 54.1% 56.9% 48.1% 56.7% Persons age 65 and older 12.6% 11.6% 21.6% 11.3% 9.2% 10.8% 22.6% 13.1% 10.6% 17.2% 33.7% 10.6% 30.3% 11.3% Average age 34.8 35.0 41.0 35.2 33.5 33.9 42.0 36.2 35.1 37.9 47.9 34.9 46.8 34.2 Black or African-American Persons 171,093 55,769 34,552 26,821 17,944 99,780 15,990 18,685 15,869 25,886 2,851 13,866 12,656 64,813 Households 58,606 18,123 10,687 8,774 5,722 31,510 5,269 5,617 5,143 7,986 1,006 4,883 4,304 19,883 Per capita income 7,439 6,396 6,681 7,575 9,441 6,678 6,822 9,278 9,972 7,701 8,178 11,024 7,400 6,164 Average household income 21,148 18,867 19,882 21,698 28,142 19,599 19,554 26,727 29,789 24,124 23,803 31,205 21,203 18,221 Unemployment rate 6.7% 7.1% 6.3% 6.6% 6.4% 6.2% 7.5% 5.7% 5.4% 6.5% 4.6% 6.2% 7.5% 5.3% Family income below poverty level 28.7% 34.9% 31.0% 29.7% 17.3% 31.7% 31.6% 18.5% 15.0% 26.2% 27.9% 17.3% 30.8% 35.8% High school graduates 59.5% 59.4% 53.4% 71.2% 74.8% 53.9% 56.9% 72.2% 67.3% 58.7% 55.4% 77.1% 56.6% 57.4% College graduates 9.9% 7.4% 8.6% 9.8% 16.1% 11.5% 11.0% 17.1% 16.6% 10.4% 15.8% 25.9% 8.7% 9.1% Owner-occupied dwellings 50.7% 55.7% 62.6% 32.7% 48.9% 56.1% 52.1% 43.4% 47.9% 57.3% 62.1% 49.5% 44.4% 53.4% Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ 19.7% 15.6% 18.1% 34.7% 62.0% 20.4% 24.5% 52.4% 57.0% 32.3% 35.0% 69.6% 24.1% 16.8% Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ 14.4% 9.5% 13.1% 14.0% 29.9% 15.2% 14.2% 37.3% 42.2% 10.7% 15.2% 33.3% 19.2% 8.7% Number of persons per dwelling unit 2.83 2.93 2.94 2.92 2.96 2.89 2.85 2.86 2.98 3.15 2.79 2.75 2.83 2.87 Households with no vehicle 29.7% 27.6% 26.0% 18.8% 14.7% 28.7% 23.6% 13.8% 12.8% 24.9% 20.0% 13.7% 23.1% 28.2% Married-couple households 33.8% 38.6% 40.3% 42.4% 52.3% 33.2% 39.4% 47.6% 43.1% 42.2% 43.4% 43.7% 33.7% 31.3% Non-family households 29.3% 25.8% 26.9% 24.3% 24.6% 30.8% 28.4% 24.9% 27.5% 22.2% 28.0% 28.5% 28.5% 29.7% Persons age 65 and older 9.9% 9.5% 10.9% 4.2% 4.6% 9.5% 9.0% 6.6% 6.1% 8.0% 13.7% 5.9% 7.9% 8.9% Average age 31.3 31.1 31.9 26.2 26.6 30.8 30.4 28.2 29.1 30.3 33.8 28.9 29.6 30.3 Persons Who Are Not Black 207,885 277,573 268,795 305,590 303,656 232,492 322,669 267,662 272,285 291,771 324,860 297,471 370,172 258,449 Households 86,542 103,520 109,341 120,475 112,845 90,425 136,193 105,246 104,719 110,516 145,645 116,042 172,923 101,317 Per capita income 13,383 11,444 12,110 14,575 16,116 13,617 13,696 16,849 17,703 13,381 14,243 15,500 17,354 12,536 Average household income 31,657 29,871 29,309 36,399 43,057 34,316 31,905 41,983 45,577 34,883 31,489 39,508 36,477 31,148 Unemployment rate 3.1% 3.4% 2.8% 3.5% 2.7% 2.5% 2.8% 2.7% 3.1% 3.0% 2.5% 3.1% 2.0% 3.0% Family income below poverty level 7.1% 11.2% 9.2% 7.0% 4.8% 8.4% 6.9% 4.6% 4.7% 7.1% 5.3% 6.2% 4.0% 10.4% High school graduates 73.9% 72.8% 70.1% 83.4% 82.7% 78.0% 74.8% 83.0% 82.8% 71.3% 73.5% 80.9% 79.7% 78.7% College graduates 14.6% 14.0% 12.9% 23.0% 21.3% 26.2% 14.0% 22.9% 25.9% 14.6% 13.2% 23.6% 18.9% 25.6% Owner-occupied dwellings 60.2% 74.3% 80.0% 64.9% 73.4% 69.0% 75.5% 68.0% 65.8% 78.5% 80.7% 68.2% 72.1% 65.3% Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ 30.7% 26.0% 29.3% 43.2% 60.0% 44.1% 41.8% 56.6% 67.1% 59.2% 42.3% 63.8% 50.4% 39.8% Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ 27.0% 15.6% 23.2% 26.8% 40.4% 30.5% 35.2% 50.3% 63.8% 32.4% 36.9% 43.4% 42.3% 24.2% Number of persons per dwelling unit 2.33 2.59 2.40 2.48 2.65 2.44 2.32 2.46 2.56 2.58 2.20 2.53 2.08 2.42 Households with no vehicle 9.0% 6.4% 5.3% 4.1% 4.4% 6.0% 6.4% 4.5% 4.4% 5.0% 5.9% 4.2% 9.1% 5.2% Married-couple households 51.0% 62.3% 64.1% 61.4% 64.8% 55.9% 58.9% 60.7% 60.0% 66.5% 62.6% 59.1% 52.0% 53.3% Non-family households 36.8% 25.3% 26.3% 27.7% 24.7% 33.5% 31.0% 29.0% 29.4% 23.1% 29.1% 29.7% 38.3% 35.9% Persons age 65 and older 14.8% 12.0% 23.0% 12.0% 9.5% 11.4% 23.3% 13.5% 10.9% 18.0% 33.9% 10.8% 31.1% 11.9% Average age 37.6 35.8 42.1 36.0 33.9 35.3 42.6 36.7 35.5 38.6 48.0 35.2 47.4 35.2 Persons Of Hispanic Origin 7,924 5,466 7,020 7,938 8,039 6,451 9,717 8,606 23,019 24,826 7,132 31,492 7,817 9,672 Households 2,738 1,453 2,075 2,415 2,466 1,761 2,348 2,633 7,136 5,737 2,512 10,537 2,665 3,206 Per capita income 9,565 9,431 8,456 9,242 11,629 8,492 8,937 11,849 10,637 7,790 11,571 12,081 12,613 9,171 Average household income 27,021 29,191 25,616 27,290 36,774 27,550 31,741 34,434 33,571 29,401 31,715 36,114 35,235 25,301 Unemployment rate 6.3% 4.2% 2.6% 6.3% 4.5% 4.2% 3.9% 4.6% 4.9% 4.8% 4.7% 3.9% 3.5% 3.9% Family income below poverty level 15.2% 13.6% 18.6% 11.9% 11.9% 24.9% 13.6% 8.4% 14.3% 23.7% 12.4% 11.2% 7.8% 16.2% High school graduates 70.2% 75.0% 62.6% 84.1% 81.7% 70.2% 53.6% 81.8% 67.1% 42.4% 65.5% 71.4% 74.7% 76.3% College graduates 14.9% 17.3% 12.1% 19.7% 20.8% 25.6% 13.6% 23.5% 18.0% 9.5% 13.7% 20.2% 20.4% 32.2% Owner-occupied dwellings 41.1% 58.4% 67.5% 45.7% 59.2% 35.3% 67.8% 61.4% 49.3% 53.5% 69.4% 62.8% 55.0% 43.2% Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ 40.7% 21.4% 19.2% 46.4% 54.2% 56.6% 31.1% 61.6% 58.7% 62.4% 42.4% 60.0% 52.8% 39.8% Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ 28.1% 13.3% 36.5% 20.7% 39.0% 27.0% 31.9% 47.6% 58.2% 20.7% 26.1% 38.5% 48.6% 23.9% Number of persons per dwelling unit 2.70 2.88 2.69 2.78 2.98 2.46 2.83 2.80 3.10 3.74 2.55 2.96 2.56 2.58 Households with no vehicle 15.7% 6.8% 9.6% 5.0% 6.8% 10.4% 8.1% 8.9% 8.4% 5.1% 8.0% 6.6% 10.8% 5.5% Married-couple households 52.4% 64.4% 61.5% 65.9% 67.3% 38.5% 66.3% 68.8% 65.2% 69.6% 62.7% 63.0% 57.2% 44.6% Non-family households 28.8% 20.1% 21.2% 20.8% 18.6% 44.2% 22.3% 18.2% 18.8% 12.8% 22.6% 21.8% 29.4% 41.3% Persons age 65 and older 8.5% 5.6% 11.2% 4.6% 4.2% 1.7% 7.8% 7.9% 5.6% 3.3% 15.5% 7.4% 13.4% 5.1% Average age 31.7 28.6 34.8 28.2 27.7 27.6 30.1 30.8 30.2 26.9 37.2 32.2 34.7 28.7 Persons Not Of Hispanic Origin 371,054 327,876 296,327 324,473 313,561 325,821 328,941 277,741 265,135 292,831 320,579 279,845 375,011 313,590 Households 142,411 120,190 117,953 126,834 116,101 120,175 139,114 108,229 102,726 112,765 144,138 110,388 174,562 117,995 Per capita income 10,724 10,619 11,563 14,127 15,849 11,593 13,503 16,495 17,854 13,353 14,249 15,663 17,117 11,323 Average household income 27,421 28,220 28,519 35,555 42,455 30,556 31,440 41,375 45,620 34,400 31,431 39,465 36,119 29,129 Unemployment rate 4.6% 4.0% 3.2% 3.6% 2.9% 3.5% 3.0% 2.8% 3.1% 3.2% 2.5% 3.2% 2.1% 3.4% Family income below poverty level 16.4% 14.8% 11.0% 8.6% 5.2% 14.5% 7.8% 5.3% 4.5% 7.6% 5.3% 6.2% 4.7% 14.8% High school graduates 68.1% 70.7% 68.7% 82.7% 82.4% 71.7% 74.6% 82.5% 83.2% 72.2% 73.6% 81.7% 79.3% 74.8% College graduates 12.7% 13.0% 12.6% 22.3% 21.1% 22.2% 13.9% 22.6% 26.0% 14.6% 13.2% 24.0% 18.7% 22.4% Owner-occupied dwellings 56.7% 71.8% 78.6% 63.1% 72.5% 66.0% 74.7% 66.9% 66.1% 78.3% 80.8% 67.9% 71.7% 63.9% Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ 26.2% 24.8% 28.6% 42.8% 60.2% 39.9% 41.5% 56.3% 67.2% 57.0% 42.3% 64.4% 49.7% 36.5% Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ 21.1% 14.2% 21.3% 25.4% 39.6% 25.4% 33.8% 49.2% 62.8% 30.6% 36.9% 43.3% 41.1% 20.8% Number of persons per dwelling unit 2.53 2.64 2.44 2.51 2.66 2.56 2.33 2.47 2.55 2.56 2.20 2.50 2.10 2.49 Households with no vehicle 17.4% 9.5% 7.0% 5.0% 4.9% 11.9% 7.0% 4.9% 4.5% 6.4% 5.9% 4.3% 9.4% 9.0% Married-couple households 43.9% 58.7% 62.0% 60.0% 64.1% 50.2% 58.1% 59.8% 58.7% 64.7% 62.5% 58.0% 51.5% 49.8% Non-family households 33.9% 25.4% 26.4% 27.6% 24.8% 32.6% 31.1% 29.1% 30.1% 23.6% 29.2% 30.4% 38.2% 34.7% Persons age 65 and older 12.7% 11.7% 21.9% 11.5% 9.3% 11.0% 23.1% 13.2% 11.0% 18.4% 34.1% 10.9% 30.7% 11.5% Average age 34.8 35.1 41.1 35.4 33.7 34.1 42.4 36.3 35.5 38.8 48.1 35.2 47.0 34.4

130

Attachment 4: Socioeconimic Characteristics of Newly Created Senatorial DistrictsSenate Plan S17S0036Select Census SF3 Factors (1990)All Persons (SF3) Households Per capita income Average household income Average family income Unemployment rate Family income below poverty level Full-time employees 40+ weeks/year Manageral and professional occupations High school graduates College graduates Children in public schools (K-12) Children in private schools (K-12) Houses valued $50,000 or more Average house value Owner-occupied dwellings Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ Number of persons per dwelling unit Dwellings with no telephone Households with no vehicle Vacant housing units Inside an urbanized area Married-couple households Non-family households Born in Florida Changed residences within last 5 years Persons age 65 and older Average ageBlack or African-American Persons Households Per capita income Average household income Unemployment rate Family income below poverty level High school graduates College graduates Owner-occupied dwellings Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ Number of persons per dwelling unit Households with no vehicle Married-couple households Non-family households Persons age 65 and older Average agePersons Who Are Not Black Households Per capita income Average household income Unemployment rate Family income below poverty level High school graduates College graduates Owner-occupied dwellings Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ Number of persons per dwelling unit Households with no vehicle Married-couple households Non-family households Persons age 65 and older Average agePersons Of Hispanic Origin Households Per capita income Average household income Unemployment rate Family income below poverty level High school graduates College graduates Owner-occupied dwellings Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ Number of persons per dwelling unit Households with no vehicle Married-couple households Non-family households Persons age 65 and older Average agePersons Not Of Hispanic Origin Households Per capita income Average household income Unemployment rate Family income below poverty level High school graduates College graduates Owner-occupied dwellings Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ Number of persons per dwelling unit Households with no vehicle Married-couple households Non-family households Persons age 65 and older Average age

Dist 15 Dist 16 Dist 17 Dist 18 Dist 19 Dist 20 Dist 21 Dist 22 Dist 23 Dist 24 Dist 25 Dist 26 Dist 27 Dist 28300,486 357,158 332,998 379,841 317,260 286,177 317,759 335,922 336,894 287,011 349,128 336,930 271,002 285,493 116,377 158,684 128,322 150,629 112,739 117,511 135,557 132,459 154,270 112,062 167,375 134,584 114,016 116,034

11,708 16,622 12,385 9,926 11,349 12,336 14,869 16,773 17,677 13,867 27,275 14,516 15,709 19,697 29,748 37,115 31,540 24,346 30,853 29,729 34,498 42,190 38,295 35,091 56,634 36,039 37,064 48,138 33,360 44,337 35,730 28,229 33,426 33,605 39,224 48,440 44,670 40,098 71,143 40,481 42,119 53,619

3.7% 2.6% 3.6% 4.7% 3.8% 3.1% 2.2% 3.0% 1.9% 3.6% 2.1% 3.6% 2.5% 2.6%8.7% 5.7% 10.4% 18.5% 11.2% 7.9% 5.2% 5.4% 4.9% 7.5% 3.9% 7.0% 5.1% 4.1%

40.2% 48.0% 37.1% 42.4% 52.4% 36.1% 37.6% 51.9% 33.0% 45.3% 41.5% 41.6% 42.2% 40.7%18.3% 29.1% 21.2% 19.0% 19.5% 20.7% 22.9% 31.4% 25.6% 27.3% 33.8% 25.9% 22.7% 27.5%68.5% 79.5% 66.5% 65.0% 73.3% 71.4% 76.8% 84.9% 79.9% 80.0% 84.9% 77.5% 77.3% 81.9%10.8% 21.5% 12.6% 12.3% 13.5% 12.5% 15.4% 27.5% 19.8% 18.3% 28.2% 18.3% 16.5% 21.5%94.5% 84.1% 93.5% 93.0% 92.9% 92.2% 90.9% 89.9% 91.9% 91.0% 73.5% 93.2% 88.0% 87.6%

5.5% 15.9% 6.5% 7.0% 7.1% 7.8% 9.1% 10.1% 8.1% 9.0% 26.5% 6.8% 12.0% 12.4%68.3% 81.2% 62.9% 49.7% 84.4% 71.3% 87.3% 91.8% 88.7% 82.3% 97.7% 85.1% 87.9% 94.6%

70,814 97,890 71,555 55,796 72,694 76,476 99,428 109,076 111,147 85,243 187,001 97,299 99,501 141,438 72.5% 67.2% 74.1% 50.2% 53.6% 78.5% 76.1% 62.6% 76.7% 68.8% 71.1% 70.7% 74.1% 78.9%32.1% 48.2% 32.2% 24.8% 47.7% 33.6% 50.8% 62.6% 45.3% 46.9% 74.1% 46.4% 55.4% 65.7%25.8% 43.2% 17.4% 19.3% 50.9% 27.8% 47.8% 57.9% 55.3% 39.9% 69.1% 44.1% 65.4% 68.3%

2.51 2.20 2.52 2.43 2.68 2.39 2.30 2.50 2.15 2.49 2.06 2.47 2.33 2.43 7.9% 3.9% 8.9% 13.6% 7.6% 5.6% 3.5% 2.8% 2.5% 5.0% 2.0% 5.1% 2.7% 2.4%7.0% 8.6% 7.3% 19.6% 10.2% 7.0% 5.0% 5.8% 6.1% 5.9% 7.4% 6.2% 6.5% 3.6%

15.8% 12.7% 20.0% 15.7% 9.8% 14.6% 21.3% 8.1% 22.2% 10.8% 25.2% 15.2% 22.0% 22.6%50.5% 98.1% 26.7% 98.9% 96.5% 17.9% 77.0% 98.2% 86.9% 84.2% 99.8% 77.7% 69.2% 82.4%62.2% 50.4% 62.5% 39.5% 50.0% 62.5% 61.7% 54.8% 59.2% 58.3% 49.7% 60.3% 59.0% 66.4%25.8% 38.6% 25.4% 39.2% 31.2% 26.8% 29.0% 32.3% 32.0% 29.7% 41.7% 28.0% 30.7% 25.4%35.5% 25.0% 40.6% 46.8% 32.1% 30.1% 22.6% 26.8% 14.7% 29.0% 16.2% 26.9% 21.5% 21.1%55.8% 52.7% 50.4% 53.8% 62.3% 53.8% 56.1% 58.1% 54.6% 59.0% 51.4% 57.0% 59.2% 60.8%19.6% 20.2% 21.9% 14.8% 9.0% 25.7% 27.4% 12.2% 34.4% 14.0% 27.5% 19.3% 24.4% 22.6%

39.5 40.9 40.8 36.0 32.6 43.1 44.4 35.8 48.7 36.6 46.1 39.7 42.1 41.9 22,688 8,913 40,290 141,509 84,248 25,156 9,152 26,296 11,983 28,447 7,206 36,548 9,160 10,490

6,923 2,767 12,105 48,636 25,439 8,543 2,595 8,744 4,121 9,199 2,267 10,945 2,818 2,856 6,537 8,123 6,163 7,205 7,721 6,320 7,558 8,668 7,264 7,915 10,272 6,386 8,621 9,443

20,673 24,705 19,280 20,594 24,408 18,625 25,509 25,764 20,281 23,948 29,825 20,865 27,108 31,582 6.6% 4.7% 8.2% 6.4% 6.0% 7.1% 4.9% 4.8% 4.5% 6.7% 5.1% 9.8% 4.9% 5.6%

24.0% 26.2% 32.3% 31.4% 24.8% 32.2% 24.1% 23.0% 29.0% 26.3% 19.1% 31.0% 20.7% 20.4%50.0% 73.9% 45.1% 57.6% 58.4% 51.8% 57.7% 62.2% 53.9% 61.4% 59.0% 44.7% 65.8% 54.1%

6.5% 12.2% 4.5% 8.7% 9.3% 7.0% 9.5% 14.5% 8.8% 12.2% 15.9% 7.4% 15.0% 8.7%48.0% 29.3% 51.5% 44.0% 43.4% 54.7% 48.6% 49.1% 45.8% 51.3% 29.0% 43.1% 40.7% 55.8%23.4% 44.3% 9.6% 20.9% 38.8% 13.9% 49.3% 39.3% 23.5% 27.4% 76.5% 26.1% 46.3% 50.5%

9.2% 35.1% 5.9% 14.4% 36.4% 7.0% 37.3% 32.7% 23.2% 20.5% 62.4% 19.1% 62.3% 32.6%3.03 2.70 3.09 2.84 3.16 2.89 3.13 2.91 2.76 2.90 2.82 3.24 2.84 3.24

20.5% 18.4% 25.3% 30.2% 21.6% 23.9% 14.7% 21.5% 27.4% 22.1% 11.9% 23.5% 9.8% 15.5%42.1% 38.5% 37.5% 31.5% 38.1% 39.3% 44.0% 38.4% 38.0% 37.5% 37.4% 41.7% 39.9% 48.4%25.5% 30.7% 26.2% 30.2% 25.0% 27.8% 18.7% 29.5% 27.8% 27.8% 34.4% 24.1% 28.4% 18.9%

7.5% 3.8% 9.3% 8.1% 6.2% 11.7% 4.5% 9.6% 13.7% 7.0% 4.3% 7.3% 5.6% 9.1%29.6 27.1 30.7 30.2 28.8 32.4 27.8 31.5 33.4 29.8 29.4 29.4 27.6 31.0

277,798 348,245 292,707 238,332 233,012 261,021 308,607 309,626 324,911 258,564 341,923 300,382 261,842 275,003 109,455 155,917 116,217 101,992 87,300 108,968 132,962 123,715 150,149 102,863 165,108 123,639 111,198 113,178

12,130 16,839 13,241 11,542 12,661 12,916 15,086 17,461 18,061 14,522 27,633 15,506 15,957 20,088 30,322 37,336 32,817 26,135 32,731 30,599 34,673 43,351 38,789 36,088 57,002 37,382 37,316 48,556

3.5% 2.5% 3.0% 3.8% 3.1% 2.8% 2.1% 2.9% 1.8% 3.3% 2.0% 3.0% 2.4% 2.5%7.7% 5.3% 8.1% 10.9% 6.8% 6.0% 4.8% 4.1% 4.2% 5.8% 3.7% 4.8% 4.7% 3.7%

69.6% 79.6% 68.7% 68.4% 77.7% 72.8% 77.2% 86.5% 80.6% 81.6% 85.4% 80.4% 77.6% 82.7%11.1% 21.7% 13.5% 14.0% 14.7% 12.9% 15.5% 28.4% 20.1% 18.8% 28.4% 19.2% 16.5% 21.9%74.0% 67.9% 76.5% 53.1% 56.6% 80.3% 76.6% 63.5% 77.5% 70.3% 71.6% 73.1% 74.8% 79.5%32.6% 48.2% 34.4% 26.8% 50.1% 34.8% 50.9% 63.7% 46.0% 48.4% 74.1% 47.9% 55.6% 66.0%27.8% 43.5% 20.0% 22.0% 56.5% 31.4% 48.2% 60.3% 57.3% 42.7% 69.3% 48.9% 65.6% 70.3%

2.48 2.20 2.46 2.23 2.54 2.35 2.29 2.47 2.13 2.46 2.05 2.40 2.32 2.41 6.2% 8.4% 5.5% 14.6% 6.8% 5.8% 4.8% 4.7% 5.6% 4.5% 7.4% 4.6% 6.4% 3.2%

63.5% 50.6% 65.1% 43.3% 53.5% 64.3% 62.1% 56.0% 59.8% 60.1% 49.9% 62.0% 59.5% 66.8%25.8% 38.7% 25.3% 43.4% 33.0% 26.7% 29.2% 32.5% 32.2% 29.8% 41.8% 28.4% 30.8% 25.6%20.6% 20.6% 23.6% 18.8% 10.0% 27.1% 28.1% 12.4% 35.1% 14.8% 27.9% 20.8% 25.1% 23.1%

40.3 41.3 42.1 39.4 34.0 44.1 44.9 36.2 49.3 37.4 46.4 40.9 42.7 42.3 11,988 20,104 21,023 48,041 39,513 11,110 9,039 23,339 6,898 10,873 16,893 11,876 24,486 10,734

3,193 7,166 5,251 17,791 12,051 3,574 2,421 7,647 2,245 3,346 5,971 3,505 7,327 3,049 7,910 14,478 6,270 8,619 8,181 8,790 8,776 10,789 11,982 9,896 15,929 9,343 9,771 11,471

28,202 39,735 23,889 23,474 26,430 26,906 30,005 32,873 36,535 30,425 42,045 29,760 31,664 38,228 8.3% 3.3% 9.7% 5.2% 5.3% 7.0% 4.2% 5.5% 4.4% 5.1% 3.5% 5.4% 4.4% 4.5%

15.8% 9.3% 34.0% 17.7% 14.3% 18.5% 17.0% 10.5% 15.1% 14.0% 11.0% 11.3% 12.4% 13.5%54.6% 68.4% 33.6% 50.6% 64.7% 60.0% 50.9% 77.8% 65.8% 75.4% 71.4% 61.0% 51.7% 59.3%11.7% 18.9% 6.4% 8.7% 11.0% 11.2% 7.3% 23.0% 14.5% 19.5% 21.9% 15.6% 10.4% 17.3%55.4% 61.6% 50.8% 54.2% 49.0% 63.1% 54.9% 53.1% 61.9% 55.9% 50.7% 53.8% 54.1% 63.7%39.6% 41.3% 23.8% 24.0% 48.6% 30.3% 38.7% 62.1% 40.0% 57.8% 65.5% 43.0% 43.9% 60.3%29.0% 45.0% 10.2% 17.1% 54.1% 24.0% 43.7% 56.4% 43.5% 35.2% 64.4% 29.9% 56.9% 49.0%

3.43 2.65 3.79 2.71 3.23 3.02 3.38 2.98 2.74 2.85 2.61 3.14 3.17 3.35 7.4% 8.3% 10.1% 15.6% 9.9% 7.2% 6.8% 7.0% 4.8% 7.5% 6.2% 9.2% 6.3% 4.5%

68.6% 60.1% 66.0% 53.2% 63.0% 67.7% 67.2% 62.6% 62.3% 61.9% 51.6% 68.5% 65.7% 65.7%19.2% 26.3% 15.9% 28.5% 17.2% 17.3% 15.2% 19.9% 18.9% 27.3% 30.1% 18.8% 15.6% 16.1%

5.9% 11.9% 3.8% 15.4% 6.2% 10.1% 5.3% 7.6% 13.2% 5.9% 9.8% 6.9% 7.8% 5.6%29.2 36.2 26.0 36.7 30.2 32.4 28.3 31.9 35.2 30.5 35.3 30.0 31.8 29.8

288,498 337,054 311,975 331,800 277,746 275,067 308,720 312,583 329,995 276,138 332,236 325,054 246,515 274,759 113,185 151,518 123,070 132,837 100,688 113,937 133,136 124,812 152,025 108,716 161,404 131,080 106,689 112,985

11,866 16,749 12,797 10,115 11,800 12,479 15,048 17,220 17,796 14,023 27,852 14,705 16,299 20,019 29,792 36,991 31,866 24,463 31,382 29,817 34,579 42,760 38,321 35,235 57,173 36,207 37,434 48,406

3.5% 2.5% 3.2% 4.6% 3.6% 3.0% 2.2% 2.9% 1.9% 3.6% 2.0% 3.6% 2.3% 2.5%8.5% 5.5% 9.2% 18.6% 10.8% 7.5% 4.9% 5.0% 4.7% 7.3% 3.6% 6.9% 4.4% 3.9%

68.9% 80.1% 67.9% 67.0% 74.4% 71.7% 77.3% 85.4% 80.1% 80.1% 85.5% 78.0% 79.3% 82.6%10.8% 21.7% 12.9% 12.8% 13.8% 12.5% 15.6% 27.8% 19.9% 18.3% 28.4% 18.3% 17.0% 21.6%73.0% 67.4% 75.1% 49.7% 54.1% 78.9% 76.5% 63.2% 76.9% 69.2% 71.8% 71.1% 75.4% 79.3%31.8% 48.6% 32.5% 24.9% 47.6% 33.7% 51.1% 62.6% 45.4% 46.5% 74.5% 46.5% 56.4% 65.9%25.6% 43.1% 18.0% 19.5% 50.5% 28.0% 47.9% 58.0% 55.5% 40.1% 69.4% 44.7% 66.4% 69.2%

2.49 2.18 2.46 2.39 2.62 2.37 2.28 2.47 2.14 2.48 2.04 2.45 2.28 2.40 7.0% 8.6% 7.2% 20.1% 10.2% 7.0% 5.0% 5.7% 6.1% 5.8% 7.5% 6.1% 6.5% 3.5%

62.0% 49.9% 62.4% 37.6% 48.5% 62.4% 61.6% 54.3% 59.2% 58.2% 49.6% 60.1% 58.5% 66.4%26.0% 39.2% 25.8% 40.6% 32.8% 27.1% 29.2% 33.1% 32.2% 29.7% 42.1% 28.3% 31.8% 25.7%20.2% 20.7% 23.1% 14.7% 9.4% 26.3% 28.1% 12.5% 34.8% 14.3% 28.4% 19.8% 26.1% 23.3%

39.9 41.2 41.7 35.9 33.0 43.5 44.8 36.1 49.0 36.9 46.6 40.0 43.2 42.4

131

Attachment 4: Socioeconimic Characteristics of Newly Created Senatorial DistrictsSenate Plan S17S0036Select Census SF3 Factors (1990)All Persons (SF3) Households Per capita income Average household income Average family income Unemployment rate Family income below poverty level Full-time employees 40+ weeks/year Manageral and professional occupations High school graduates College graduates Children in public schools (K-12) Children in private schools (K-12) Houses valued $50,000 or more Average house value Owner-occupied dwellings Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ Number of persons per dwelling unit Dwellings with no telephone Households with no vehicle Vacant housing units Inside an urbanized area Married-couple households Non-family households Born in Florida Changed residences within last 5 years Persons age 65 and older Average ageBlack or African-American Persons Households Per capita income Average household income Unemployment rate Family income below poverty level High school graduates College graduates Owner-occupied dwellings Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ Number of persons per dwelling unit Households with no vehicle Married-couple households Non-family households Persons age 65 and older Average agePersons Who Are Not Black Households Per capita income Average household income Unemployment rate Family income below poverty level High school graduates College graduates Owner-occupied dwellings Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ Number of persons per dwelling unit Households with no vehicle Married-couple households Non-family households Persons age 65 and older Average agePersons Of Hispanic Origin Households Per capita income Average household income Unemployment rate Family income below poverty level High school graduates College graduates Owner-occupied dwellings Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ Number of persons per dwelling unit Households with no vehicle Married-couple households Non-family households Persons age 65 and older Average agePersons Not Of Hispanic Origin Households Per capita income Average household income Unemployment rate Family income below poverty level High school graduates College graduates Owner-occupied dwellings Owner occupied with mortgage of $700+ Rental units with monthly rent of $500+ Number of persons per dwelling unit Households with no vehicle Married-couple households Non-family households Persons age 65 and older Average age

Dist 29 Dist 30 Dist 31 Dist 32 Dist 33 Dist 34 Dist 35 Dist 36 Dist 37 Dist 38 Dist 39 Dist 40366,582 288,741 318,085 294,476 373,541 204,890 352,708 380,559 282,103 333,179 377,022 294,080 138,508 133,223 134,954 122,730 120,445 78,993 165,028 137,886 118,328 110,511 128,471 95,400

10,953 21,805 17,023 17,498 9,566 17,519 20,542 13,149 19,457 15,000 12,101 11,073 28,414 46,974 39,722 41,718 29,231 45,243 43,600 36,028 45,709 44,897 34,593 33,637 31,535 55,945 47,633 47,520 31,895 50,688 56,735 41,292 52,319 47,930 38,148 35,793

5.3% 2.2% 3.3% 2.9% 6.7% 2.8% 3.8% 4.9% 2.3% 3.8% 5.2% 5.0%17.3% 3.4% 6.5% 4.1% 20.1% 3.7% 11.4% 14.7% 5.9% 7.4% 18.5% 13.4%44.4% 35.5% 44.9% 44.8% 44.1% 50.3% 39.2% 42.3% 39.5% 52.0% 43.2% 47.7%17.0% 30.3% 27.5% 27.3% 18.2% 32.3% 31.7% 23.9% 24.7% 29.5% 20.6% 17.8%63.4% 81.8% 76.1% 82.0% 58.4% 83.9% 73.5% 59.0% 80.1% 77.1% 63.2% 54.9%11.5% 23.0% 18.9% 20.7% 11.2% 23.4% 24.1% 19.2% 21.1% 25.5% 14.4% 11.7%93.0% 82.6% 84.1% 90.0% 92.0% 87.4% 81.5% 84.5% 92.5% 80.8% 93.0% 86.7%

7.0% 17.4% 15.9% 10.0% 8.0% 12.6% 18.5% 15.5% 7.5% 19.2% 7.0% 13.3%79.6% 96.3% 95.3% 96.4% 78.9% 98.7% 94.7% 95.3% 91.6% 98.1% 79.8% 96.1%

72,041 146,757 113,232 119,158 69,895 121,638 167,249 123,187 146,576 111,194 113,449 96,975 52.8% 78.5% 67.4% 70.9% 56.2% 78.9% 51.0% 48.6% 68.6% 67.0% 55.0% 54.1%44.7% 74.9% 67.2% 73.7% 42.8% 82.4% 69.0% 62.1% 58.4% 71.1% 52.1% 60.9%48.1% 81.0% 59.8% 86.7% 37.2% 84.5% 49.6% 38.2% 56.8% 80.7% 33.2% 53.8%

2.59 2.14 2.32 2.38 3.05 2.58 2.11 2.73 2.34 2.99 2.83 3.01 9.4% 1.0% 3.3% 1.2% 7.7% 0.8% 4.8% 4.9% 3.8% 1.3% 13.2% 2.7%

16.1% 7.7% 10.9% 7.0% 17.4% 6.0% 23.6% 18.1% 6.0% 4.4% 17.3% 9.5%14.0% 20.1% 16.7% 14.1% 8.3% 11.4% 19.4% 5.0% 31.1% 6.5% 16.6% 6.0%

100.0% 95.8% 100.0% 99.0% 100.0% 89.7% 100.0% 100.0% 79.9% 98.1% 58.3% 98.9%39.4% 59.3% 50.5% 58.1% 44.1% 63.2% 41.5% 51.3% 60.0% 62.2% 49.3% 61.1%37.7% 33.1% 37.0% 31.7% 27.1% 26.2% 45.8% 29.4% 29.8% 21.1% 29.4% 20.5%36.9% 14.4% 23.5% 16.6% 38.9% 24.5% 18.6% 20.4% 19.2% 24.8% 39.8% 19.5%54.5% 55.9% 53.0% 59.5% 48.6% 61.8% 55.1% 51.2% 60.3% 57.2% 53.5% 57.6%14.9% 33.8% 19.7% 22.5% 9.9% 15.3% 24.9% 17.5% 24.4% 9.4% 10.4% 12.4%

35.8 47.6 40.7 40.8 33.0 37.1 43.8 40.0 43.0 34.5 33.4 37.0 197,494 5,284 25,530 14,898 215,832 12,616 37,732 23,392 21,788 11,521 141,404 9,807

59,139 1,660 8,266 4,456 62,243 4,106 12,770 7,490 6,510 3,872 43,270 2,799 7,525 11,143 8,265 11,284 7,960 14,053 8,116 7,088 6,668 12,511 6,929 9,723

24,610 34,631 24,010 36,221 27,292 43,559 23,562 21,332 20,607 36,309 21,898 30,137 7.8% 6.4% 7.3% 4.6% 8.5% 4.2% 9.0% 9.0% 6.8% 5.4% 8.9% 4.5%

26.4% 15.3% 28.2% 8.1% 24.8% 5.6% 23.1% 32.8% 33.0% 11.7% 33.6% 20.9%50.9% 71.7% 54.2% 73.6% 56.5% 83.8% 60.5% 47.6% 44.2% 77.7% 47.5% 59.4%

7.8% 21.4% 9.8% 19.3% 9.0% 27.5% 12.1% 9.0% 5.6% 25.3% 7.1% 14.9%44.9% 43.8% 34.1% 43.6% 51.5% 65.5% 27.7% 22.8% 36.2% 48.5% 38.8% 28.8%42.7% 76.4% 55.2% 82.9% 41.7% 87.8% 56.4% 50.0% 19.3% 74.1% 34.3% 83.2%42.8% 77.8% 34.5% 83.9% 34.2% 88.6% 35.6% 23.7% 17.9% 76.2% 16.1% 56.3%

3.30 2.88 2.85 3.12 3.41 3.02 2.86 2.96 3.24 2.78 3.20 2.60 19.8% 8.3% 23.5% 7.3% 21.1% 4.9% 25.5% 36.5% 28.1% 6.1% 34.7% 13.8%38.6% 48.4% 33.4% 52.5% 39.5% 52.4% 35.6% 30.2% 35.2% 45.0% 32.4% 37.0%22.9% 27.2% 29.2% 20.6% 21.7% 21.2% 33.4% 31.6% 23.4% 26.0% 27.4% 35.1%

5.6% 2.7% 6.1% 2.6% 5.0% 4.2% 4.9% 7.5% 5.8% 5.0% 7.5% 3.9%28.9 27.9 29.3 27.4 28.7 29.8 29.4 31.2 27.4 31.1 29.9 30.3

169,088 283,457 292,556 279,578 157,709 192,273 314,976 357,167 260,315 321,658 235,618 284,273 79,368 131,563 126,688 118,274 58,202 74,887 152,258 130,396 111,818 106,640 85,201 92,601 14,956 22,004 17,787 17,829 11,764 17,747 22,030 13,546 20,527 15,089 15,206 11,119 31,249 47,130 40,747 41,925 31,305 45,336 45,281 36,872 47,170 45,208 41,040 33,742

3.0% 2.1% 3.0% 2.8% 4.6% 2.7% 3.3% 4.6% 2.1% 3.8% 3.3% 5.0%7.1% 3.2% 4.9% 3.9% 14.2% 3.6% 10.2% 13.7% 4.1% 7.2% 10.5% 13.2%

73.8% 82.0% 77.5% 82.4% 60.5% 83.9% 74.6% 59.7% 82.1% 77.1% 71.0% 54.7%14.6% 23.0% 19.5% 20.7% 13.5% 23.1% 25.2% 19.7% 22.0% 25.5% 17.9% 11.6%58.7% 78.8% 69.5% 71.9% 61.3% 79.6% 53.0% 50.1% 70.5% 67.6% 63.1% 54.8%46.8% 74.9% 67.7% 73.3% 44.2% 82.1% 70.2% 62.4% 60.3% 71.0% 59.8% 60.6%53.3% 81.1% 63.3% 86.9% 41.3% 84.2% 51.4% 39.5% 61.8% 81.0% 47.6% 53.7%

2.06 2.13 2.28 2.35 2.66 2.56 2.04 2.72 2.29 3.00 2.64 3.02 13.4% 7.7% 10.1% 7.0% 13.5% 6.0% 23.4% 17.1% 4.7% 4.4% 8.5% 9.4%40.1% 59.5% 51.6% 58.3% 48.9% 63.7% 41.9% 52.5% 61.5% 62.9% 58.0% 61.8%48.8% 33.2% 37.6% 32.1% 33.0% 26.5% 46.9% 29.3% 30.2% 20.9% 30.4% 20.1%25.6% 34.4% 20.9% 23.6% 16.5% 16.1% 27.3% 18.2% 26.0% 9.5% 12.2% 12.7%

43.9 48.0 41.7 41.5 38.9 37.6 45.5 40.6 44.3 34.6 35.6 37.2 30,037 15,670 31,872 21,424 94,439 37,496 97,538 258,139 16,037 205,130 83,794 232,418

9,178 4,975 10,367 6,629 30,422 11,961 39,971 91,295 4,629 63,842 23,803 74,057 8,802 13,650 11,784 12,217 8,353 14,222 14,235 9,986 8,675 12,663 8,843 9,775

27,762 41,075 35,988 36,684 25,865 44,250 34,749 28,270 28,949 40,575 30,447 30,614 5.6% 3.5% 5.2% 4.6% 6.1% 3.9% 5.6% 5.6% 4.6% 4.3% 5.6% 5.4%

21.6% 9.8% 11.2% 8.8% 21.8% 6.6% 20.5% 17.9% 17.6% 9.3% 24.1% 15.1%49.5% 62.5% 66.5% 74.6% 45.4% 80.4% 62.9% 48.6% 46.2% 70.5% 44.3% 48.6%

7.9% 18.9% 15.3% 18.2% 7.5% 22.4% 20.4% 12.8% 9.1% 20.7% 9.2% 9.4%36.1% 57.9% 54.2% 53.9% 50.8% 69.0% 34.1% 39.6% 43.9% 62.7% 48.9% 50.6%43.8% 68.6% 68.1% 73.5% 39.3% 88.4% 72.4% 53.9% 42.6% 73.4% 50.2% 59.2%52.5% 81.9% 59.0% 89.3% 33.0% 88.3% 36.8% 34.6% 46.9% 81.1% 28.7% 50.8%

3.23 3.04 3.05 3.09 3.20 3.19 2.47 2.90 3.23 3.32 3.45 3.21 12.3% 4.4% 6.8% 4.5% 15.8% 2.2% 26.8% 21.1% 7.2% 4.5% 14.0% 10.3%50.0% 65.5% 59.7% 63.5% 55.6% 70.7% 44.5% 52.7% 59.9% 67.7% 61.9% 64.8%25.1% 18.2% 21.6% 21.5% 21.2% 15.2% 36.3% 25.3% 20.6% 13.9% 19.1% 15.0%

5.7% 6.5% 6.5% 5.2% 11.5% 5.3% 13.8% 18.6% 6.4% 9.8% 6.7% 12.6%29.9 32.4 32.5 30.8 35.6 30.9 37.9 41.2 29.7 34.9 30.0 37.5

336,545 273,072 286,213 273,052 279,102 167,394 255,171 122,420 266,065 128,049 293,228 61,662 129,329 128,248 124,587 116,101 90,023 67,031 125,057 46,591 113,700 46,669 104,667 21,343

11,145 22,273 17,606 17,912 9,977 18,258 22,952 19,820 20,107 18,744 13,032 15,964 28,461 47,203 40,033 42,006 30,368 45,420 46,429 51,230 46,391 50,808 35,536 44,126

5.3% 2.1% 3.0% 2.8% 6.9% 2.5% 3.2% 3.3% 2.2% 3.0% 5.1% 3.3%17.0% 3.1% 6.1% 3.7% 19.4% 3.1% 7.8% 7.3% 5.3% 4.1% 17.0% 4.9%64.5% 82.7% 77.0% 82.5% 63.4% 84.6% 77.1% 83.3% 81.6% 88.1% 68.0% 80.4%11.8% 23.2% 19.2% 20.8% 12.6% 23.6% 25.4% 33.9% 21.7% 33.4% 15.7% 21.3%53.9% 79.2% 68.5% 71.8% 58.0% 80.6% 56.5% 66.3% 69.6% 73.0% 56.3% 66.2%44.7% 75.3% 67.1% 73.7% 43.9% 81.2% 68.2% 73.0% 59.0% 68.2% 52.6% 66.2%47.6% 81.0% 59.9% 86.4% 38.9% 83.5% 55.8% 50.9% 57.5% 80.0% 34.4% 68.8%

2.54 2.10 2.26 2.33 2.99 2.47 1.99 2.39 2.30 2.54 2.68 2.30 16.4% 7.9% 11.3% 7.1% 18.0% 6.6% 22.5% 12.2% 5.9% 4.3% 18.0% 6.6%38.7% 59.1% 49.7% 57.8% 40.2% 61.8% 40.5% 48.4% 60.1% 54.8% 46.5% 48.1%38.6% 33.7% 38.3% 32.3% 29.1% 28.2% 48.9% 37.3% 30.2% 30.9% 31.7% 39.7%15.7% 35.4% 21.2% 23.9% 9.3% 17.6% 29.2% 15.3% 25.5% 8.8% 11.5% 11.8%

36.4 48.5 41.6 41.6 32.1 38.5 46.0 37.3 43.8 33.8 34.4 34.9

132

Attachment 5: Silhouettes of Selected Florida Municipalities

133

Apopka

Auburndale

Belle Glade

Cedar Grove


134

Clearwater

Crestview

De Land

Eustis


135

Fort Pierce

Fruitland Park

Islamorada, Village of Islands

Largo


136

Leesburg

Marathon

New Port Richey

Newberry


137

Ocoee

Orlando

Palatka

Pinellas Park


138

Sanford

Seminole

St. Cloud

Tallahassee


139

Tavares

Winter Garden

Winter Haven

140


CASE NO. SCO2-194

IN RE: 2002 JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPORTIONMENT

AFFIDAVIT OF KATHLEEN MEARS

1. My name is Kathleen Mears. I have served as an employee of the Florida Legislature

since January 1997. I served as the Communications Specialist for the Speaker of the House of Representatives from January 1997 until December 1998. I have been employed as the Legislative Assistant to Senator Daniel Webster since December 1998.

2. I have personal knowledge of the facts set out below.

3. As the Legislative Assistant to Senator Daniel Webster, Chairman of the Senate Reapportionment Committee, I was responsible for coordinating the logistics for the Statewide Public Hearings with the staff of the House of Representatives.

4. The House and Senate Leadership considered many factors, including the three factors below, when deciding the number of public hearings and the locations.

• The hearings were to be statewide. A large map was produced for pinpointing locations of the proposed cities. Leadership started by selecting cities in each of the 5 voting rights counties and then identified other major cities where hearings could be held.

• The leadership agreed upon a number of hearings that would fit into a schedule that was both accommodating to the public and reasonable for the members. Leadership did not want to have too many hearings, fearing that they would not be well attended by Legislators. It was important to have statewide coverage and high participation of the legislators in order to make the public hearings effective.

• Leadership sought to establish a balance of daytime and evening hearings. Some argued for daytime hearings to accommodate citizens that could not travel in the evening. Others favored evening meetings so that individuals could attend without taking time off of work. In many cases, both day and evening meetings were scheduled in the same area.

5. Based on public interest factors, staff began to look for facilities and dates for public hearings. Every attempt was made to avoid religious holidays, weekends, civic holidays, interim committee meeting dates, and legislative conference dates.

141

Locations were selected based on a number of factors. Staff sought facilities that were centrally located and easy for the public to find. It was imperative that the hearing room and building be ADA compliant. In order to keep costs to a minimum, staff looked for facilities where the rental fee was waived or substantially reduced. Staff estimated the potential size of the crowd based on the size of other state-sponsored public hearings. In some cases, strong public interest was expressed prior to the meetings, which required relocating to a larger facility larger location. In several cases, local legislative staff (both Republican and Democrat) assisted the Tallahassee-based staff with the selection of facilities and accommodations.

6. Prior to each public hearing, local media were notified of the time and location. Local legislators were periodically notified by e-mail of the upcoming meetings. A paid advertisement was purchased in the major statewide newspaper in the region. In the paid advertisement, a phone number was provided for individuals needing special accommodations such as a deaf interpreter or foreign language interpreter. Staff was in contact with a Florida-based service that provided deaf interpreters, although those services were not requested or needed. Spanish translators and Creole translators were available at the hearings in South Florida, although those services were neither requested nor required. The Spanish and Creole translators were asked to arrive at the South Florida hearings at least one hour prior to the event in order to assist at the public testimony sign-in table. The translators that served at these events were volunteer legislative staff who worked with Hispanic and Haitian constituents in the legislative districts.

7. In summary, a total of 4,503 members of the public attended the 24 public hearings held throughout Florida. All told, 1082 presentations were made. Attendance by Legislators ranged from 10 to 60, with an overall average of 26 legislators per hearing. At each hearing, information was provided by legal counsel and committee staff on the legal requirements governing the redistricting process, and on the demographic changes that have occurred since 1990 affecting the state and the local area. Additionally, the public was invited to access the redistricting website, to submit maps and correspondence, and to make use of the FREDS redistricting software.

8. I prepared the attached report to document publicity for and attendance at each hearing.

142

The foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

___________________________________ Kathleen Mears Date: April 15, 2002

STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF LEON

Sworn to and subscribed before me, the undersigned Notary Public, this 15th day of April, 2002, by Kathleen Mears, who is personally known to me and who did take an oath.

___________________________________ Notary Public

143

Date: July 12, 2001 City: Tallahassee Location: Room 212, Knott Building Time: 10:00 a.m. – 1:15 a.m. Number of Speakers: 40 The Tallahassee public hearing was held in the House conference room in the Knott

Building (Room 212, Knott Building, Capitol Complex, Tallahassee, Florida 32301).

The Knott Building, which is part of the Capitol Complex, is regularly used for public

meetings, committee meetings, and conferences. Dozens of legislative staff provided

assistance at the hearing including answering questions, providing assistance at

information tables, and directing the public to the hearing room. Large signs were posted

inside and outside of the building to provide information on the location of the hearing

room. The meeting was advertised in the Tallahassee Democrat on July 9, 2001, and a

notice of the meeting was faxed to all local television and radio stations. A total of 219

people attended the public hearing. Forty-three individuals filled out cards to speak and

40 actually testified before the committee. Sixty Legislators were present at this meeting.

At the conclusion of the meeting, the Florida Redistricting Data Software (FREDS) was

made available for sale to the public. Senators who were present at the event were

provided with a notebook of information on the public hearings (dates, locations,

accommodations information), and two copies of the FREDS software.

Date: August 6, 2001 City: Jacksonville Location: WJCT-TV Time: 6:00 p.m. – 8:50 p.m. Number of Speakers: 29 The Jacksonville public hearing was held at the studios of WJCT-TV (100 Festival Park

Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida 32202). The meeting was advertised in the Ocala Star-

Banner on August 6, 2001 and in the Florida Times-Union on August 4, 2001. A notice

of the meeting was also faxed to all local television and radio stations. In addition to the

Tallahassee-based staff, 7 local legislative staff provided assistance for the public

hearing. Several large signs were posted inside and outside of the building to provide

information on the location of the hearing room. A total of 211 individuals attended the

meeting. Forty-one people filled out cards to speak, and 29 actually testified before the

144

committee. Forty-two Legislators attended this meeting. The meeting was taped for

broadcast and subsequently aired on the local public television station.

Date: August 7, 2001 City: Ocala Location: Central Florida Community College, Webber Center Time: 1:30 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. Number of Speakers: 44 The Ocala public hearing was held at the Webber Center on the campus of Central

Florida Community College (3001 SW College Road, Ocala, Florida 34474). The

meeting was advertised in the Ocala Star-Banner on August 6, 2001. A notice of the

meeting was faxed to all local television and radio stations. In addition to the

Tallahassee-based staff, three local legislative staff provided assistance for the public

hearing. The Community College provided both signs and security personnel to direct

members of the public to the Webber Center. A total 203 individuals attended the public

hearing. Forty-four people filled out cards to speak, all of whom testified before the

committee. Twenty-nine Legislators attended this public hearing.

Date: August 20, 2001 City: Orlando Location: Expo Center Time: 6:00 p.m. – 11:05 p.m. Number of Speakers: 76 The Orlando public hearing was held in the Orlando Expo Center (500 W. Livingston

Street, Orlando, Florida 32801). The hearing was advertised in the Seminole Herald on

August 19, 2001 and in the Orlando Sentinel on August 17, 2001. A notice of the

meeting was also faxed to all local television and radio stations. The location of the

meeting was changed from the Orlando City Council Chambers to the Expo center. The

original room was supposed to seat 300, however when an advance team looked at the

site, it was apparent that the room capacity was much smaller than was described. The

Orlando City Council assisted the Legislature by finding a new location and paying for

rental of the facility. Several large signs were posted inside and outside of the building to

provide information on the location of the hearing room. Staff was posted at the Orlando

City Council Chamber to direct any members of the public that did not receive

145

notification of the location change. Additionally, the meeting began 20 minutes late in

order to provide time for those that may have had difficulty in finding the public hearing.

Tallahassee-based staff and 8 local legislative staff provided assistance at the public

hearing. A total of 347 individuals attended the event. One-hundred-sixteen people filled

out cards to speak, 76 actually testified before the committee. Fifty-three Legislators

attended this public hearing.

Date: August 21, 2001 City: Daytona Beach Location: Daytona Beach Community College, The Bergengren Bldg. (110) Time: 10:00 a.m. – 12:45 p.m. Number of Speakers: 43 The Daytona Beach public hearing was held in the Bergengren Building on the Campus

of Daytona Beach Community College (1200 W. International Speedway Blvd). The

hearing was advertised in the Daytona Beach News Journal on August 18, 2001, and

notice of the meeting was faxed to all local television and radio stations. In addition to

the Tallahassee-based staff, 3 local legislative staff members provided assistance at the

hearing. Several large signs were posted inside and outside of the building to provide

information on the location of the hearing room. The Community College also provided

signs and security staff to direct the public to the hearing. A total of 117 members of the

public attended the hearing. Forty-nine people filled out cards to speak, 43 actually

testified before the committee. Thirty-one Legislators attended this meeting.

Date: August 27, 2001 City: Tampa Location: Hillsborough County Commission Chambers Time: 9:30 a.m. – 1:35 p.m. Number of Speakers: 65 The Tampa hearing was held in the Hillsborough County Commission Chambers (601 E.

Kennedy Blvd, 2nd. Floor, Tampa, Florida 33601). The meeting was advertised in the

Tampa Tribune on August 26, 2001, and a notice of the meeting was faxed to all local

television and radio stations. In addition to the Tallahassee-based staff, 6 local legislative

staff members provided assistance at the hearing. Several large signs were posted inside

and outside of the building to provide information on the location of the hearing room. A

146

total of 208 individuals attended the public hearing. Seventy-three people filled out cards

to speak, 65 actually testified before the committee. Thirty-nine Legislators attended this

meeting.

Date: August 27, 2001 City: Clearwater Location: Long Center Sports Complex Time: 5:00 p.m. – 7:05 p.m. Number of Speakers: 39 The Clearwater hearing was held in the Long Center Sports Complex (1501 N. Belcher

Road, Suite 225, Clearwater, Florida 33667). The meeting was advertised in the Tampa

Tribune on August 26, 2001 and a notice of the meeting was faxed to all local television

and radio stations. Several large signs were posted inside and outside of the building to

provide information on the location of the hearing room. In addition to Tallahassee-

based staff, 3 local legislative staff members provided assistance. A total of 169 people

attended the meeting. Forty-six people filled out cards to speak, and 39 actually testified

before the committee. Twenty-nine Legislators attended this meeting. In response to a

request at the Tampa Public Hearing, a FREDS Help Desk was set up one hour prior to

the public hearing to assist members of the public, legislators, and staff with any

technical questions regarding the program. This service continued for the remaining

public hearings.

Date: August 28, 2001 City: Lakeland Location: The Lakeland Center Time: 1:30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. Number of Speakers: 39 The Lakeland hearing was held in the Lakeland Center (Lake Hollingsworth Room, 700

W. Lemon Street, Lakeland, Florida 33815). The meeting was advertised in the Lakeland

Ledger on August 26, 2001, and a notice of the meeting was faxed to all local television

and radio stations. Several large signs were posted inside and outside of the building to


based staff, 4 local legislative staff provided assistance at the hearing. A total of 60

147

individuals attended the meeting. Twenty-three people filled out cards to speak, all of

which testified before the committee. Twenty Legislators attended this meeting.

Date: September 5, 2001 City: Vero Beach Location: Courthouse Executive Center Time: 9:00 a.m. – 11:20 p.m. Number of Speakers: 36 The Vero Beach hearing was held in the Vero Beach Courthouse Executive Center (2145

14th Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida 32950). The meeting was advertised in the Vero

Beach Press Journal and the Palm Beach Post on September 3, 2001, and a notice of the

meeting was faxed to all local television and radio stations. Several large signs were

posted inside and outside of the building to provide information on the location of the

hearing room. In addition to Tallahassee-based staff, 3 local legislative staff provided

assistance at the hearing. A total of 129 individual attended the public hearing. Thirty-six

people filled out cards to speak, and 33 actually testified before the committee. Twenty-

three Legislators attended this meeting.

Date: September 5, 2001 City: West Palm Beach Location: Palm Beach Lakes Community High School Time: 4:00 p.m. – 6:40 p.m. Number of Speakers: 37 The West Palm Beach hearing was held in the Palm Beach Lakes Community High

School (3505 Shiloh Drive, West Palm Beach, Florida 33407). The meeting was

advertised in the Palm Beach Post on September 3, 2001 A notice of the meeting was

faxed to all local television and radio stations. Several large signs were posted inside and

outside of the building to provide information on the location of the hearing room. In

addition to Tallahassee-based staff, 3 local legislative staff provided assistance at the

hearing. A total of 213 individuals attended this meeting. Forty-one people filled out

cards to speak, 37 actually testified before the committee. Twenty-three Legislators

attended this meeting.

148

Date: September 6, 2001 City: South Palm Beach (Delray Beach) Location: South County Civic Center Time: 6:00 p.m. – 9:10 p.m. Number of Speakers: 55 The South Palm Beach hearing was held in the South County Civic Center (16700 Jog

Road, Delray Beach, Florida 33446). The meeting was advertised in the Palm Beach

Post on September 3, 2001. A notice of the meeting was faxed to all local television and

radio stations. Several large signs were posted inside and outside of the building to



individuals attended the meeting. Sixty-seven people filled out cards to speak; 55

actually testified before the committee. Seventeen Legislators attended this meeting.

Date: September 20, 2001 City: Wauchula Location: Hardee County Civic Center Time: 2:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. Number of Speakers: 12 The Wauchula hearing was held in the Hardee County Civic Center (515 Civic Center

Drive, Wauchula, Florida 33873). A notice of the meeting was faxed to all local

television and radio stations. In addition to the Tallahassee-based staff, one local

Legislative staff member provided assistance at the meeting. A total of 40 individuals

attended the public hearing. Thirteen people filled out cards to speak; twelve actually

testified before the committee. Sixteen Legislators attended this meeting.

Date: September 21, 2001 City: Sarasota Location: New College, Sudakoff Center Time: 9:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. Number of Speakers: 27 The Sarasota hearing was held in the Sudakoff Center on the Campus of New College

(5700 N. Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, Florida 34243). The meeting was advertised in the

Sarasota Herald Tribune on September 20, 2001, and a notice of the meeting was faxed to

all local television and radio stations. Several large signs were posted inside and outside

149

of the building to provide information on the location of the hearing room. In addition to

Tallahassee-based staff, 4 local legislative staff provided assistance at the hearing. A total

of 188 individuals attended the public hearing. Twenty-nine people filled out cards to

speak; 27 actually testified before the committee. Twenty Legislators attended this

meeting.

Date: September 24, 2001 City: La Belle Location: La Belle Civic Center Time: 10:00 a.m. Number of Speakers: 18 The La Belle hearing was held in the La Belle Civic Center (481 Highway 80 West, La

Belle, Florida 33935.) A notice of the meeting was faxed to all local television and radio

stations. In addition to the Tallahassee-based staff, one local legislative staff member

provided assistance at the event. A total of 98 individuals attended the public hearing.

Eighteen people filled out cards to speak, all of whom testified to the committee. Sixteen

Legislators attended this meeting.

Date: September 24, 2001 City: Naples Location: Naples High School Auditorium Time: 6:00 p.m. – 8:45 p.m. Number of Speakers: 44 The Naples hearing was held in the Naples High School Auditorium (1100 Golden Eagle

Circle, Naples, Florida 34103). The meeting was advertised in the Naples Daily News on

September 23, 2001, and a notice of the meeting was faxed to all local television and

radio stations. Several large signs were posted inside and outside of the building to



individuals attended the public hearing. Fifty-three people filled out cards to speak; 44

actually testified before the committee. Twenty-two Legislators attended the meeting.

150

Date: September 25, 2001 City: Ft. Myers Location: WGCU-TV Time: 1:00 p.m. Number of Speakers: 63 The Ft. Myers hearing was held in the studios of WGCU-TV (10501 FGCU Blvd., The

Broadcast Building, Production Studio, Ft. Myers, Florida). The meeting was advertised

in the Ft. Myers News Press on September 22, 2001, and a notice of the meeting was

faxed to all local television and radio stations. Signs and security personnel were

provided by the station to help the public find the hearing room. In addition to the

Tallahassee-based staff, three local legislative staff provided assistance. A total of 307

individuals attended this hearing. Seventy-six people filled out cards to speak; 63 actually

testified before the committee. The meeting was shown live on the local Public

Television Station. A taped broadcasted was also aired on a later date.

Date: October 1, 2001 City: South Broward (Pembroke Pines) Location: Broward Community College, South Campus Auditorium Time: 9:00 a.m. Number of Speakers: 54 The South Broward hearing was held in South Campus Auditorium of Broward

Community College. The meeting was advertised in the Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel on

September 28, 2001, and a notice of the meeting was faxed to all local television and

radio stations. An opinion editorial, written by Chairman Webster, was sent and actually

appeared on October 1, 2001 to the Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel. In addition to the

Tallahassee-based staff, 5 local legislative staff provided assistance at the event. One of

the staff, Ms. Fatima Perez from Senator Campbell’s Office, was available to provide

Spanish translation if necessary. Ms. Perez arrived early in the event that she was needed

to assist at the public testimony sign-in table. A total of 187 individuals attended the

meeting. Seventy-four people filled out cards to speak; 54 actually testified to the

committee. Twenty-six Legislators attended this hearing.

151

Date: October 1, 2001 City: Ft. Lauderdale (Davie) Location: Broward Community College, Central Campus Time: 5:00 p.m. Number of Speakers: 107 The Ft. Lauderdale hearing was held in Bailey Hall on the Central Campus of Broward

Community College (3501 S.W. Davie Road Davie, Florida 33314.) The meeting was

advertised in the Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel on September 28, 2001, and a notice of the

meeting was faxed to all local television and radio stations. An opinion editorial, written

by Chairman Webster, was sent to the Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel and appeared in the

paper on October 2, 2001. Large signs were placed inside and outside of the building to

provide directions to the hearing. The Community College also provided security

personnel to help direct the public to the hearing. In addition to the Tallahassee-based

staff, 6 local legislative staff assisted at this event. Two staff members, Fatima Perez

from Sen. Campbell’s office and Danielle Blake from Sen. Garcia’s office, were at the

meeting and designated as Spanish interpreters. Ms. Perez arrived early to assist at the

public testimony sign-in table. A total of 198 people attended this meeting. One-hundred-

seven people filled out cards to speak; 71 actually testified to the committee. Thirty-three

Legislators attended this hearing.

Date: October 2, 2001 City: Opa Locka Location: Miami Central High School Time: 4:00 p.m. Number of Speakers: 114 The Opa Locka hearing was held in Miami Central High School Auditorium (1781 N.W.

95th Street, Miami, Florida 33127). The meeting was advertised in the Miami Herald,

and a Spanish version of the ad ran in the Nuevo Herald on September 29, 2001. A

notice of the meeting was faxed to all local television and radio stations. An opinion

editorial, written by Chairman Webster, was sent to the Miami Herald and was published

on October 2, 2001. Two staff members, Fatima Perez from Sen. Campbell’s office and

Norma Ledesma from Sen. Alex Villalobos’ office, were at the meeting and designated

as Spanish interpreters. Additionally, Shirlee Morreau from Sen. Meek’s office and her

friend Carlene Paul, were designated as Creole interpreters. All of the interpreters were

152

asked to arrive early to provide translation at check-in. One member of the public

approached the check-in table speaking Spanish. A staff member that spoke Spanish was

immediately made available to her. This individual then began speaking English, stating

that she was just making sure that interpreters were available. Three members of the

public inquired as to whether or a Creole interpreter was present at the hearing. Ms.

Shirlee Morreau spoke at length with the group. During discussions Shirlee assured the

group that every effort was made by Senator Meek’s office to solicit input from the

Haitian community through translated press notifications to the major Haitian newspaper,

a town meeting attended by Senator Meek, and by Senator Meek’s office notifying

leaders in the Haitian Community. A total of 696 people attended the hearing. One-

hundred-fourteen filled out cards to speak, and 82 actually testified before the committee.

Twenty-two Legislators attended this meeting.

Date: October 3, 2001 City: Miami Location: Florida International University Time: 3:00 p.m. Number of Speakers: 56 The Miami hearing was held in Graham Center on the Campus of Florida International

University (11200 S.W. 8th Street, Miami, Florida 33199.) The meeting was advertised

in the Miami Herald and a Spanish version of the ad ran in the Nuevo Herald on

September 29, 2001. A notice of the meeting was faxed to all local television and radio

stations. An opinion editorial, written by Chairman Webster, was sent to the Miami

Herald and ran on October 2, 2001. The University prohibited us from putting signs up,

however they provided security personnel to direct the public to the hearing room. In

addition to the Tallahassee-based staff, 4 local legislative staff assisted at the hearing.

Two staff members, Norma Ledesma from Sen. Villalobos’ office and Lucy Luciano

from Sen. Jones’ office, were at the meeting and designated as Spanish interpreters. Ms.

Luciano sat at the public testimony sign-up table on hour prior to the event, and remained

there for most of the hearing. No language translations services were requested nor were

they needed. A total of 148 individuals attended the public hearing. Fifty-six people filled

out cards to speak, 48 actually testified before the committee. Twenty-one Legislators

attended this meeting.

153

Date: October 3, 2001 City: Key Largo Location: Key Largo Public Library Time: 10:00 a.m. Number of Speakers: 16 The Key Largo hearing was held in the Key Largo Public Library (Mile Marker 101,

Building 485, Key Largo, Florida 33037). The meeting was advertised in the Key West

Citizen on October 1, 2001, and a notice of the meeting was faxed to all local television

and radio stations. Large signs were posted outside of the building to help direct the

public to the meeting. Tallahassee staff provided assistance at this meeting. A total of 22

individuals attended this meeting. Sixteen people filled out cards to speak, all of which

testified before the committee. Ten Legislators attended this hearing.

Date: October 15, 2001 City: Pensacola Location: WSRE-TV Time: 6:00 p.m. Number of Speakers: 6 The Pensacola hearing was held in the studios of WSRE-TV (1000 College Blvd.,

Pensacola, Florida 32504). The meeting was advertised in the Pensacola News Journal

on October 12, 2001, and a notice of the meeting was faxed to all local television and

radio stations. The Chairman of the Committee, Senator Daniel Webster, submitted an

opinion editorial to the Pensacola News Journal. Large signs were posted inside and

outside of the building to help direct the public to the meeting room. In addition to the

Tallahassee-based staff, two local legislative staff provided assistance. A total of 48

individuals attended the meeting. Seven people filled out cards to speak; 6 individuals

actually testified before the committee. Fifteen Legislators attended this meeting. The

public hearing was taped for broadcast and subsequently aired on the local Public

Television station.

154

Date: October 16, 2001 City: Panama City Location: Florida State University Time: 11:00 a.m. Number of Speakers: 19 The Pensacola hearing was held in the campus auditorium of Florida State University

(4750 Collegiate Drive, Panama City, Florida 32405). The meeting was advertised in the

Pensacola News Journal on October 12, 2001, and a notice of the meeting was faxed to

all local television and radio stations. The Chairman of the Committee, Senator Daniel

Webster, submitted an opinion editorial to the Pensacola News Journal. Florida State

University provided signs to help direct the public to the meeting room. In addition to

the Tallahassee-based staff, four local legislative staff provided assistance. A total of 93

individuals attended the hearing. Nineteen people filled out cards to speak; 16 actually

testified before the committee. Seventeen Legislators attended this meeting.

Date: October 16, 2001 City: Gainesville Location: University of Florida Harn Museum Time: 6:00 p.m. Number of Speakers: 43 The Gainesville hearing was held in the University of Florida Harn Museum (SW 34th

Street and Hull Road, Gainesville, FL 32611-2700). The meeting was advertised in the

Gainesville Sun and on October 12, 2001, and a notice of the meeting was faxed to all

local television and radio stations. The Chairman of the Committee, Senator Daniel

Webster, submitted an opinion editorial in the Gainesville Sun which appeared on

October 15, 2001. In addition to Tallahassee-based staff, three local legislative staff

provided assistance at the meeting. The University provided signs and security personnel

to help direct the public to the event. A total of 82 individuals attended the hearing.

Forty-three people filled out cards to speak; 39 actually testified before the committee.

Eleven Legislators attended the hearing.

1

2

3

4

5

6 2002 LEGISLATIVE SESSION

7 EXCERPT OF SENATE PROCEEDINGS

8 REGARDING REAPPORTIONMENT

9

10 MARCH 15, 2002

11 9:00 a.m.

12 SENATE CHAMBER, THE CAPITOL

13 TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

14

15

16

17 REPORTED BY:

18 MONA L. WHIDDON

19 COURT REPORTER

20 Division of Administrative Hearings

21 DeSoto Building

22 1230 Apalachee Parkway

23 Tallahassee, Florida

24

25

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS (850) 488-9675

155

2 (Pages 2 to 5)

Page 2

1 SENATE MEMBERS2 PRESIDENT JOHN M. McKAY

SENATOR GINNY BROWN-WAITE, PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE3 SENATOR CHARLIE BRONSON

SENATOR LOCKE BURT4 SENATOR WALTER G. CAMPBELL, JR.

SENATOR LISA CARLTON5 SENATOR CHARLIE CLARY

SENATOR LEE CONSTANTINE6 SENATOR ANNA P. COWIN

SENATOR VICTOR D. CRIST7 SENATOR M. MANDY DAWSON

SENATOR ALEX DIAZ de la PORTILLA8 SENATOR BUDDY DYER

SENATOR HOWARD E. FUTCH9 SENATOR RUDY GARCIA

SENATOR STEVEN A. GELLER10 SENATOR BETTY S. HOLZENDORF

SENATOR JIM HORNE11 SENATOR DARYL L. JONES

SENATOR JAMES E. KING, JR., MAJORITY LEADER12 SENATOR RON KLEIN

SENATOR JACK LATVALA13 SENATOR JOHN F. LAURENT

SENATOR ALFRED LAWSON, JR.14 SENATOR TOM LEE, RULES CHAIRMAN

SENATOR KENDRICK B. MEEK15 SENATOR LESLEY MILLER, JR.

SENATOR RICHARD MITCHELL16 SENATOR DURELL PEADEN, JR.

SENATOR BILL POSEY17 SENATOR KEN PRUITT

SENATOR TOM ROSSIN, DEMOCRATIC LEADER18 SENATOR DEBBY P. SANDERSON

SENATOR BURT L. SAUNDERS19 SENATOR JIM SEBESTA

SENATOR RONALD A. SILVER20 SENATOR ROD SMITH

SENATOR DONALD C. SULLIVAN, M.D.21 SENATOR J. ALEX VILLALOBOS

SENATOR DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ22 SENATOR DANIEL WEBSTER

SENATOR STEPHEN R. WISE23

FAYE W. BLANTON, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE2425


Page 3

1 RPOCEEDINGS2 MR. PRESIDENT: Senators, this is the3 beginning of the first reapportionment bill. The4 first apportionment bill, the one on legislative5 apportionment. I have asked the Senator from the6 17th to approach the well, speak from the well, so7 that you can direct all your questions to him with8 regard to this issue, much as we do in an9 appropriations bill.

10 You are recognized, Senator, to explain the11 bill.12 SENATOR LAURENT: Thank you, Mr. President.13 Let me give some general comments on just some14 technical issues. The 36 by 36 redistricting maps15 are in the bill drafting bubble and will be put on16 easels when we take up the Senate resolution. We17 should have one map for the current districts, one18 map for the plan passed out of the committee, and19 one map for each amendment.20 The computer hookup for showing the maps on21 the overhead chamber screen via FREDS, the viewer22 has been tested and is ready to go. We plan to23 provide 8 by 11 maps to back up statistics to all24 members on the final agreed-to plan, just like the25 information they received in committees and


Page 4

1 received in the amendment packet that was passed2 out this morning. And drafting that amendment to3 the House resolution, the actual statutory4 language that is to be bar coded will most likely5 be done before the maps.6 So, from an operational standpoint, the7 printing of the maps will be determined, the time8 in which we will be ready to go back on the floor9 with the Laurent amendment to the House resolution

10 that will reflect all agreed-to floor action.11 We began last July in Tallahassee with a12 hearing at which many organizations proposed13 standards that should guide our redistricting14 process. Those of us who attended the subsequent15 hearings in all different parts of the state16 learned that there's no single, comprehensive set17 of standards that can or should apply statewide.18 The interests, needs, and concerns of19 Florida's communities are just too diverse for20 that. Each hearing told a slightly different21 story, each area had its own goals and its own22 ideas for achieving them. Our job is not to try23 to fit everyone into districts drawn to serve24 theoretically predetermined criteria. Our job is25 to fit districts to the particular often widely


Page 5

1 differing needs of as many of our communities as2 it's possible to do.3 This is our representative task. It is a4 task that calls on all of our accumulated5 experience, our local knowledge, and our6 understanding of community concerns. It is a task7 that we, the elect representatives of all8 Florideans, are uniquely capable of performing.9 It's true there are some overriding legal

10 requirements that we must obey. We are all11 thoroughly aware of the Equal Protection12 requirements of population equality, minority13 representation, non-retrogression, as well as the14 requirements of the Florida Constitution.15 We know that our work must stand up in court16 and withstand scrutiny by the United States17 Department of Justice in its preclearance process.18 In addition to these legal requirements, the19 people of Florida have also established a strict20 expectation of our performance. They expect21 fairness from us. I believe our constituents22 understand very well the difficulty of meeting23 every expectation with the new districts. They24 understand that not all interests can be25 satisfied, but they demand that we, that in this


156

3 (Pages 6 to 9)

Page 6

1 process, they view this process as a public trust2 not for cheap partisan advantage.3 I know that many of us were gratified in the4 course of the hearings by a number of our5 constituents who came forward and spoke of their6 hope to continue our representation in office. It7 was encouraging to learn that a primary public8 concern is the preservation of incumbency. But9 there's another, perhaps, more important point

10 here, those comments about keeping local11 representatives were also linked to please -- to12 avoid gerrymandering.13 Our constituents remember very well the14 unseemly bitterness of the 1992 redistricting15 process. They will not tolerate running16 incumbents against one another or using the17 redistricting process for personal political18 advantage. Although most have grown used to their19 strangely-shaped districts, many remember the20 confusion and stress caused to voters when those21 districts were first used. They want no22 repetition of that type of gerrymandering.23 The bill that I bring before you fully meets24 all the legal and constitutional requirements. It25 also fully meets the public expectation of


Page 7

1 fairness. Incumbents are not thrown into2 districts and run against one another. Counties3 are not arbitrarily divided, cities and4 communities are not fragmented simply to meet5 political goals.6 But the plan does much more than avoid7 gerrymandering, it also meets as many as possible8 of the concerns of our state's widely different9 communities. That task, as many of you know from

10 a personal experience, has not been easy. Often11 the testimony that we had from one community was12 in conflict with testimony from another. And even13 within the same community we also found ourselves14 dealing with dramatically different points of15 view.16 In general, the three most widely shared17 concerns of most communities was preservation of18 incumbents, maintaining the status quo of district19 lines, protecting communities of interest. The20 difficulty of satisfying these and other concerns21 was particularly troubled by the dramatically22 uneven pace of the growth in the state.23 Flagler County grew by 73.6 percent, and24 Sumter County by 68.9 percent, but Pinellas and25 Putnam Counties both grew by only 8.2 percent and


Page 8

1 Monroe by only by 2 percent. Like it or not,2 therefore, district lines must change to reflect3 the new population numbers, and sometimes, the4 changes must be dramatic because the growth has5 been rapid in one area and very limited in6 another.7 Wherever a change in the lines of one8 district forces changes in the lines of9 neighboring districts, then as lines change in

10 response to population pressures, the task of11 protecting incumbents or insuring communities of12 interest becomes more complicated.13 We are proud of the districts we have drawn,14 they are in full compliance with the law, and15 constitute the best available solutions to16 problems and difficulties cited in public17 testimony. They represent the most effective18 adjustments among the competing goals that we have19 heard about at the hearings and they reflect the20 informed judgment and intimate local knowledge of21 the members of the Florida Senate.22 I would like to take a few minutes and go23 through each district in detail. The proposed24 Senate District 1, the district anchored in25 Jacksonville is one of the few districts that


Page 9

1 underwent dramatic change at the request of the2 incumbent in accordance with the testimony at the3 public hearings.4 The district normally included -- formerly5 included population centers in Jacksonville and6 Gainesville. At public hearings in Gainesville7 strong sentiment was expressed for unifying8 Alachua County in a single district and providing9 an opportunity for local Gainesville

10 representation.11 The incumbent, the Senator from the 2nd, also12 strongly advocated for pulling the district out of13 Gainesville in Alachua County and reorienting the14 district in a north/south configuration reflected15 in my amendment. In the words of the incumbent at16 the March 12th committee hearing: The new17 configuration unites communities of interest that18 were not present in the Jacksonville, Gainesville19 district.20 If you would look at -- this is a quote, "If21 you would look at the district as it is drawn, you22 go from Duval County to St. Johns County down to23 Flagler to Volusia Counties. They all have a24 tourist attraction because of their beaches, they25 all have higher education institutions that can


157

4 (Pages 10 to 13)

Page 10

1 relate in the fact that those communities are2 growing communities and they are African-American3 populations, if you are trying to do a majority4 minority district to have some similarities. And,5 so we tried to find communities that had a common6 interest," close quote.7 Public testimony from Daytona Beach supports8 linkage with Jacksonville because of communities9 of interest reflected in current Congressional

10 District 5, which covers the same area. The11 north/south configuration also makes the district12 more compact.13 The city of Jacksonville is too big to be14 contained in one district, it must be divided.15 The division reflected in proposed Senate District16 1 is similar to the existing district. The St.17 Augustine and Palatka extensions are also similar18 to the existing district. The district has a zero19 percent popUlation deviation and is a majority20 minority district. African-Americans constitute21 the largest minority group at 50.3 of the total22 population.23 Proposed Senate District 2, although the24 current district, Senate District 1, needed to25 gain approximately 24,000 people, we were able to


Page 11

1 retain the footprint and core of the current2 district in the proposed District 2 with some3 minor shifting of the lines. The proposed4 district has a zero percent population deviation.5 Proposed District 3, the current district,6 Senate District 4, needs to lose approximately7 8800 people. The current district represents 188 counties with no one county constituting a9 majority of the district. The proposed district

10 would cover all or part of 13 counties.11 Five counties that are totally within the12 current district would also remain whole in the13 proposed district. Gilchrist and Nassau Counties14 have been removed from the proposed district,15 however, the district still remains its core. It16 is a predominantly agricultural district with17 strong ties to the nature coast.18 While the current district splits 1119 counties, the proposed district splits only seven.20 The changes proposed reflect public testimony21 received in Jacksonville asking that Nassau County22 not be included in a Panhandle district. The23 proposed district recognizes the unique24 differences that exist between the coastal areas25 of Citrus County and the interior Citrus County.


Page 12

1 By removing the coastal Citrus County and2 moving the district inward, we were able to3 accommodate public testimony received in Ocala4 requesting that communities of Citrus Springs,5 Citrus Hill, Sugar Mill Woods be made whole. The6 district has a zero percent population deviation.7 Senate District 4, this is a coastal district8 contiguous to proposed Senate District 2. These9 two districts have been historically linked. The

10 current district, Senate District 7, needed to11 lose some population. Again, we were able to make12 the changes necessary to correct the population,13 the population underage, with a very minor14 adjustment to the core of the district.15 The public testimony we received in both16 Pensacola and Panama City indicated that the17 constituency of those two districts was relatively18 happy with the status quo. The proposed district19 has a zero percent population deviation.20 The current core district, Senate District 6,21 a slightly under-the-target population. The22 proposed district places all of Nassau County,23 except the coastal areas, into a district with24 Duval, Clay and St. Johns Counties with the25 addition of Nassau County -- with the addition of


Page 13

1 Nassau County, Duval County was reduced somewhat.2 The proposed district still maintains current3 communities of interest while incorporating public4 testimony and public correspondence, urging the5 placement of Nassau County in a district with6 Duval and Clay. The proposed district is also7 more compact. The proposed district has a zero8 percent population deviation.9 Current district, Senate District 3, this is

10 a proposed Senate District 6, this is the current11 Senate District 3. It is just under the target12 population by approximately 5500 people. The13 proposed district retains the footprint of the14 current district. We were able to work with the15 incumbent to address some concerns he had with the16 area of Panama City that shared a commonality of17 interest with that part of Bay currently18 represented by District 3, but is not currently19 represented by the Senator from the 3rd.20 The concern echoed public testimony received21 in Tallahassee requesting that the district extend22 further into Panama City. The proposed district23 has a cleaner division between the northern and24 southern parts of Jefferson and Madison Counties.25 The proposed district has a zero percent


158

5 (Pages 14 to 17)

Page 14

1 population deviation.2 The proposed District 7 with the changes made3 to current Senate Districts 4, 5 and 6, it4 necessarily followed that changes would need to be5 made to current Senate District 16, which is6 proposed Senate District 7 under this amendment.7 District 16 is currently underpopulated and8 needs to gain approximately 15 to 16,000 people to9 meet the one person, one vote requirement. In

10 designing this district we also had to factor in11 current Senate District 2, a minority majority12 district. The proposed district includes parts of13 Clay, Marion, Putnam and Volusia Counties with14 Volusia County making up 62.3 percent of the15 district. The proposed district has a zero16 percent population deviation.17 Proposed Senate District 8. The district18 maintains and strengthens its coastal ties and19 communities of interest. The current district,20 also Senate District 8, needs to lose21 approximately 56,000 people. The proposed22 district is pulled out of Marion County and the23 interior of Flagler County. These changes then24 allow the district to move north along the coast25 to take in the coastal communities of Nassau


Page 15

1 County.2 As a result, the proposed district is also3 more compact. The proposed district is consistent4 with public testimony from both the Jacksonville5 and the Ocala public hearings with residents of6 Nassau County requesting a tie to Duval County and7 residents of Marion County requesting that the8 district not come all the way inland to their9 county.

10 The proposed district has a zero percent11 population deviation. Proposed Senate District 9,12 the current district, Senate District 12, needs to13 lose some population, approximately 89,000 people.14 The current district represents four counties:15 Orange, Osceola, Seminole, Volusia. The proposed16 district is taken out of Volusia County and the17 population in Seminole County is greatly reduced.18 The proposed district is still an Orlando-based19 seat but it's more compact.20 Some of the changes made to the district are21 the result of significant changes made to proposed22 South District 19. The proposed district has a23 zero percent population deviation.24 Proposed Senate District 10. The current25 district, Senate District 23, needs to lose


Page 16

1 approximately 13,000 people. The current2 district's primary core is in Hillsborough County3 with a small portion of Polk County. The proposed4 district retains the core of the current district5 but reduces Hillsborough and Polk communities6 while adding communities of interest north of the7 current district in Pasco County. But the8 proposed district has a zero percent population9 deviation.

10 Proposed Senate District 11. This district11 encompasses much of what is currently in Senate12 District 19. Although it does form a more13 extensive coastal district, Senate District 1914 needs to gain population of approximately 17,00015 people. District 19 represents Pasco and Pinellas16 Counties with Pinellas comprising 67.6 percent of17 the entire district.18 The proposed District 11 adds the coastal19 communities of Citrus and Hernando Counties. This20 shift northward provides Pasco County with a21 majority of the district at 53.2 percent. This22 district recognizes the unique characteristics and23 demands of the southern nature coast. The24 proposed district also incorporates public25 testimony detailing the strong ties between Pasco


Page 17

1 and Hernando Counties. The proposed district has2 a zero percent population deviation.3 Proposed Senate District 12. The current4 district, Senate District 13, needs to lose5 approximately 10,000 people. The current district6 represents Hillsborough and Pasco Counties. The7 proposed district shifts north to take a -- much8 of Pasco County where the population is not as9 dense.

10 Public testimony from the Tampa hearings11 describe a community of interest that exists12 between the communities of Lutz and Hillsborough13 County and Land O'Lakes and Pasco County. The14 proposed district recognizes those communities of15 interest as well as St. Leo and Dade City. The16 proposed district has a zero percent population17 deviation.18 Proposed Senate District 13, this is a19 coastal district recognizing Pinellas County. The20 current district, Senate District 22, needs to21 gain population, approximately 55,000 people.22 Adjustments were made to equalize the population,23 but the core of the district remains the same.24 The proposed district has a zero percent25 population deviation.


159

6 (Pages 18 to 21)

Page 18

1 Proposed Senate District 14. The current2 district, Senate District 5, is very close to the3 target population. Nine counties are included in4 the current district with Alachua County5 representing 45 percent of the district. The6 proposed district includes eight counties with7 Alachua County representing 54.5 percent of the8 district.9 While the core of the district is retained,

10 the proposed district places all of Alachua County11 in one district, thereby assuring Alachua County a12 resident Senator. The proposed district is far13 more compact. The proposed district has a zero14 percent population deviation.15 Proposed Senate District 15. The proposed16 district incorporates much of the current District17 10 while also creating a strong agricultural18 district, which provides representation for key19 environmental concerns such as the Green Swamp, a20 region of critical concern. And current District21 10 represents Hernando, Pasco, Polk and Sumter22 Counties.23 The proposed district would represent24 Hernando, Lake, Osceola, Polk and Sumter Counties.25 The proposed district has a zero percent


Page 19

1 population deviation.2 Proposed Senate District 16. The current3 district, Senate District 20, needs to gain4 population, approximately 62,000 people. The5 district represents Hillsborough County and6 Pinellas County. While the proposed district7 still maintains the core of the current district8 in Pinellas County, similarly situated communities9 from Hillsborough have been added to equalize the

10 population.11 The overall footprint of the current district12 remains in place. The proposed district has a13 zero percent population deviation.14 Proposed Senate District 17. Currently,15 Senate District 17 represents Highlands,16 Okeechobee and Polk Counties. The district needs17 to pick up approximately 30,000 people. In18 response to the need to add population, and a good19 amount of public testimony asking for a strong,20 heartland, agricultural Senate district, District21 17 as proposed would represent Desoto, Glades,22 Hardee, Highlands, Okeechobee, Polk and St. Lucie.23 Many of these communities have expressed a desire24 to be part of an interior district, with few or no25 ties to coastal communities.


Page 20

1 Hardee County is a Section 5 Voting Rights2 county; therefore, it's important to avoid3 retrogression. The district maintains the4 benchmarks for both the Hispanic and black5 populations in Hardee County.6 Currently, Hardee County is linked to the7 coastal community in Manatee County with vastly8 different socioeconomic and cultural9 characteristics, the proposed district recognizes

10 the commonalities that exist between Hardee,11 Desoto, Highlands and Okeechobee Counties that was12 talked about frequently during the public13 testimony in Wachulla. The proposed district has14 a zero percent population deviation.15 Proposed District 18. The predecessor to16 this district was drawn from the Florida Supreme17 Court and precleared by the United States18 Department of Justice. Subsequently, the district19 was modified to its current configuration by a20 Federal court order and upheld by the United21 States Supreme Court. It's located partially in22 Hillsborough County, a county covered by Section 523 of the Federal Voting Rights Act.24 Section 5 requires that the voting strength25 of minority residents in covered counties not be


Page 21

1 diminished through redistricting. The current2 district in this area, Senate District 21, needs3 to gain about 63,000 persons. Territory was added4 to this district and traded with surrounding5 districts to balance population to preserve6 minority voting strength to the extent possible.7 Thus, the new district is a total majority8 minority group. The single largest minority group9 is African-Americans at 42 percent of the

10 population, followed by Hispanic persons at about11 18 percent of the population. The district, which12 has elected an African-American Democrat, Les13 Miller, remains strongly Democratic in14 registration.15 Although there was some conflicting testimony16 at public hearings in Tampa, much of the testimony17 supports the current configuration of this18 district and the other districts in Hillsborough19 County.20 Such testimony noted that the coastal areas21 of Hillsborough and Manatee have common interests,22 that southwest Hillsborough has very little in23 common with northwest Hillsborough, that Plant24 City has strong ties to Polk County, that Lutz,25 Land O'Lakes and Pasco County share common


160

7 (Pages 22 to 25)

Page 22

1 interests, and that St. Petersburg benefits from2 being divided between districts and that Sun City3 Center should be kept whole. The district has a4 zero percent population deviation.5 Proposed Senate District 19. The existing6 district in this area, Senate District 14, needs7 to gain about 7,700 people. The new district,8 Senate District 19, is based in part on the main9 body of the existing district in the northern

10 Orlando portion of Orange County.11 Existing Senate District 14 includes narrow12 tentacles that extended from the district's core13 across an adjacent county to get the pockets of14 minority population. The new district replaces15 those narrow tentacles with a compact area of16 Orlando previously located in an adjacent17 district.18 This is now entirely an Orlando area19 district. The district links areas of like voters20 and observes the growing minority influence in the21 Orlando area by creating a 63 percent total22 minority district that is 51 percent Democratic in23 registration.24 The public testimony we heard in Orlando25 advocating the need for recognizing the growing


Page 23

1 Hispanic population in central Florida that2 performs more Democrat, the proposed district has3 a zero percent population deviation.4 Proposed Senate District 20. The current5 district, Senate District 11, needs to lose6 approximately 53,000 people. The proposed7 district retains the core of the district, Lake8 County and the villages.9 The proposed district is pulled out of Citrus

10 County altogether. It also removes a good deal of11 Marion County with the exception of the area12 contiguous to the villages of Lake and Sumter13 Counties.14 The proposed district does not extend into15 the interior of Volusia County which is consistent16 with testimony from the Daytona Beach public17 hearing where a request was made to bring the18 communities of Deland, Lake Helen and Cassadaga19 together in one district. The proposed district20 has a zero percent population deviation.21 Proposed Senate District 21. The current22 district, Senate District 26, needs to lose 860023 people. The current district represents Desoto,24 Hardee, Highlands, Manatee and Sarasota Counties.25 The proposed district represents Charlotte,


Page 24

1 Desoto, Lee, Manatee and Sarasota Counties.2 The current district is pulled out of Hardee3 and Highlands Counties entirely and out of most of4 Desoto County. The core of the district in5 Manatee County remains intact. The proposed6 district picks up communities of interest in7 Charlotte and Lee Counties.8 Many of the changes made to the interior of9 the current district were made to expand and

10 strengthen the heartland, agricultural district.11 The proposed district has a zero percent12 population deviation.13 Proposed Senate District 22. The current14 district, Senate District 9, needs to gain some15 population, approximately 15,000 people. The16 current district represents Orange and Seminole17 Counties. In shifting the district north we were18 able to gain population to make the district more19 compact while still maintaining established20 communities of interest. The proposed district21 has a zero percent population deviation.22 Proposed Senate District 23. The core of the23 current district, Senate District 24, remains24 intact. It's primarily a Sarasota County-based25 seat. The current district represents Charlotte,


Page 25

1 Lee, Sarasota Counties. The proposed district2 represents Charlotte, Manatee and Sarasota3 Counties.4 The current district is pulled out of Lee5 County and takes in coastal communities of6 interest. In Manatee County, the proposed7 district is more compact. The proposed district8 has a zero percent population deviation.9 Senate District 24. The current Senate

10 District 15 needs to gain slightly in population11 of approximately 3200 people. Currently, the12 district represents Brevard, Indian River and St.13 Lucie Counties. The proposed district represents14 Brevard, Orange and Seminole Counties.15 Brevard County remains the majority county in16 the proposed district; the changes made to the17 district add some compactness. The proposed18 district has a zero percent population deviation.19 Proposed Senate District 25. The current20 district, Senate District 31, needs to gain21 population, approximately 51,000 people. Both the22 current and the proposed districts encompass23 largely coastal areas in Broward and Palm Beach.24 Under the proposed district, the seat would25 shift population advantage from Broward to Palm


161

8 (Pages 26 to 29)

Page 26

1 Beach. The configuration of this district is2 driven to a large extent by the population shifts3 of Senate District 30, which is a majority4 minority seat. The proposed district has a zero5 percent population deviation.6 Proposed District 26. Current Senate7 District 18 needs to lose approximately 9,0008 people. The current district represents Brevard9 and Osceola Counties. The proposed district

10 represents Brevard, Indian River, Osceola and St.11 Lucie Counties. The district's Brevard population12 was reduced significantly to accommodate changes13 that needed to be made to proposed District 24,14 which is current District 15. With the proposed15 changes, both districts are more compact. The16 proposed district has a zero percent population17 deviation.18 Senate District 27. The current district,19 Senate District 35, needs to lose approximately20 7400 people. Currently, the district represents21 parts of Charlotte, Lee, Martin, Okeechobee and22 Palm Beach Counties, and all of Glades County.23 Palm Beach County comprises 55.8 percent of24 the district in population. The proposed district25 moves Martin and Okeechobee Counties and adds


Page 27

1 Hendry County, although the area incorporated has2 zero population.3 Palm Beach County comprises 58.8 percent of4 the proposed district population. The proposed5 district has a zero percent population deviation.6 Proposed Senate District 28. The current7 district, Senate District 27, needs to lose8 population, approximately 20,000 people. The9 district encompasses parts of Indian River,

10 Martin, Palm Beach and St. Lucie Counties.11 The proposed district brings all of Martin12 County into the district and reduces the number of13 Palm Beach County coastal communities that bring14 the population into target range. The core of the15 district remains intact. The proposed district16 has a zero percent population deviation.17 Proposed Senate District 29. The current18 district, Senate District 30, in this area needs19 to gain about 42,000 people to satisfy one person,20 one vote. The new district gathers the population21 while remaining faithful to the footprint of the22 current district in the area. The district23 includes cities in central and south Palm Beach24 County, they move south into Broward County where25 it ends in Ft. Lauderdale.


Page 28

1 The district is a majority black district at2 63 percent. The significant percentage of the3 speakers at the public hearings in Ft. Lauderdale4 supported maintaining the current district with as5 little change as probable. The proposed district6 has a zero percent population deviation.7 Proposed Senate District 30. The current8 district, Senate District 28, needs to lose9 population, approximately 63,000 people. The

10 current district represents Broward and Palm Beach11 Counties, although Palm Beach comprises12 94.4 percent of the district's population.13 The proposed districts retain significant14 amounts of the core of the district, the extent15 possible given the population overage. Under the16 proposed district, Palm Beach comprises17 86.7 percent of the district's population. The18 proposed district has a zero percent population19 deviation.20 Proposed Senate District 31. The current21 district, Senate District 29, needs to lose22 population, approximately 6300 people. The23 district -- the current district represents parts24 of Charlotte, Collier and Hendry Counties. The25 proposed district is entirely within Broward


Page 29

1 County. The proposed district is more compact.2 The proposed district has a zero percent3 population deviation.4 Senate District 32. The current district,5 Senate District 33, needs to lose approximately6 39,000 people. The district is wholly within7 Broward County. The proposed district retains the8 core of the current district where it shifts for9 population consideration. The proposed district

10 has a zero percent population deviation.11 Proposed Senate District 33. The current12 district, Senate District 36, needs to gain13 population, approximately 65,000 people. The14 district is contained wholly within Dade County.15 Under both the current and proposed16 districts, it is an African-American majority17 minority seat. The proposed district retains the18 core of the current district while adding19 communities that have common interests with the20 current district. The proposed district has a21 zero percent population deviation.22 Proposed district, Senate District 34. The23 current district, Senate District 32, needs to24 lose a significant amount of population,25 approximately 119,000 people. The current


162

9 (Pages 30 to 33)

Page 30

1 district represents Broward and Miami-Dade with2 Broward County comprising 81.8 percent of the3 district's total population.4 The proposed district also represents Broward5 and Miami-Dade, although the configuration of the6 district is changed with the reduction of7 population. The proposed district does retain a8 large number of communities of interest9 represented in the current district while

10 incorporating some underpopulated areas of11 Miami-Dade. The proposed district has a zero12 percent population deviation.13 Proposed District 36. The current district,14 Senate District 38, needs to gain population,15 approximately 33,000 people. The current district16 represents only Dade County. To gain population,17 the proposed district moves north into Broward18 County, although Dade still comprises a majority19 of the district's population.20 The district is primarily a coastal seat and21 the core of the district is retained. The22 proposed district has a zero percent population23 deviation.24 Proposed Senate District 36. This is a Dade25 County district. The current Senate district in


Page 31

1 this area, Senate District 34, needed to gain2 64,000 people. Population of the district is3 diverse economically and culturally. Lower4 income, older age bracket neighborhoods where5 Spanish is the primary, and often only, language6 is the core of the district. While rebuilding the7 district to meet equal population requirements,8 the core community of lower and lower to middle9 class income persons was retained in matching

10 communities on its northern border were added.11 To further increase the community's12 homogeneity of the district, similar areas in13 Coral Gables were excluded. The district contains14 most of the city of Miami. Of the Dade County15 districts, this one has the oldest population with16 31 percent over the age of 65.17 The district is primarily urban and18 incorporated with the unique features of many19 neighborhoods and multigenerational homes.20 Proposed Senate District 36 is a Hispanic majority21 district. The proposed district has a zero22 percent population deviation.23 Proposed Senate District 37. The current24 district, Senate District 25, needs to lose a25 significant amount of population, 96,457 people.


Page 32

1 Both the current and proposed districts represent2 Lee and Collier Counties. In order to reduce3 population, the inland areas of the current4 district are reduced, making primarily the5 district primarily a coastal district.6 We are able to include Ft. Myers in a Lee7 County district, which was something that was8 brought to light during the Ft. Myers' public9 hearing. Although changes had to be made to

10 accommodate the population overage, the core of11 the district remains largely intact. The proposed12 district has a zero percent population deviation.13 Proposed Senate District 38 is also a Dade14 County district. Its predecessor district,15 District 37, needed to gain only 5700 people;16 therefore, the shape of the new district is very17 similar to the current district. This is a very18 stable residential community that's primarily19 suburban in character. There are no incorporated20 cities within its boundaries and it depends on its21 county commissioners and legislators for local22 services.23 Much of the district is relatively new24 development and it has a younger population than25 some of its neighboring districts, but an


Page 33

1 important feature of the district is its senior2 centers and historical family ties.3 The population is solidly middle class.4 There's also a -- this is also a Hispanic majority5 district. The proposed district has a zero6 percent population deviation.7 Proposed District 39, the new district,8 includes the existing districts, Senate District9 40, needs to gain about 66,000 persons. The new

10 district includes Collier and Hendry Counties.11 These two counties are joined with Monroe County,12 as they share the rural community characteristics,13 the Everglades National Park and Wildlife14 Management areas and Big Cypress National15 Preserve, just to name a few.16 There was also considerable public testimony17 opposing the current linkage of Hendry County and18 inland Collier County with the populated portions19 of Broward County. Collier, Hendry and Monroe are20 protected by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act;21 therefore, it is important to avoid retrogression.22 The district maintains the benchmarks for23 both the Hispanic and black populations in Monroe24 County and enhances the voting strength of25 minorities in Collier and Hendry Counties. It


163

10 (Pages 34 to 37)

Page 34

1 maintains the 1990s linkage of Collier, Hendry and2 Broward and agricultural Palm Beach Counties and3 joins these areas with the Everglades' portions of4 Dade County.5 This district is linked by an interstate6 freeway. The district has an open seat and past7 performance indicates that minority voters will8 have a fair opportunity to elect a candidate of9 their choice. The proposed district has a zero

10 percent population deviation.11 Proposed Senate District 40. This district12 was developed primarily by reducing the13 populations of current Senate District 39 which14 had about 74,000 too many people. This occurred15 primarily in the southern part of the district16 which contained agricultural areas that were17 dissimilar to the more urbanized north of the18 district. This change made the district much more19 compact and homogeneous.20 The new district includes incorporated21 cities, unincorporated territory and industrial22 areas. The new district unites the cities of23 Miami Lakes and Hialeah which were divided between24 the existing districts.25 There are many high poverty areas. A large


Page 35

1 portion of the population is new immigrants whose2 needs are different from the other established3 communities in the counties. People live and work4 in the community and neighborhoods are5 characterized by extended family relationships.6 Because of the high level of family participation7 and local schools, the district has some of the8 finest schools in the state.9 The district also has unique environmental

10 concerns because of its geographic features. The11 district is also home of the historic Hialeah race12 track. New Senate District 40 is a majority13 Hispanic district. The proposed district has a14 zero percent population deviation.15 Mr. President, that is a brief explanation of16 the plan.17 MR. PRESIDENT: Thank you, Senator. Are18 there questions for the Senator from the 17th19 before we go to the amendatory process? Seeing20 none -- Senator, we -- Senator Laurent, we need an21 order in which you would like to take up the22 amendments.23 If you could quote it by bar codes. Senator24 for the 2nd, for which purpose do you rise?25 SENATOR HOLZENDORF: A question, Mr.


Page 36

1 President, of the sponsor.2 MR. PRESIDENT: You are recognized and he3 yields.4 SENATOR HOLZENDORF: Senator Laurent, I was5 having difficulty following because you were6 changing numbers. On Senate District 30, what did7 that number become?8 SENATOR LAURENT: Current District 30 becomes9 Senate District 29.

10 SENATOR HOLZENDORF: Thank you.11 MR. PRESIDENT: Further questions? Seeing12 none, Senator, what amendment would you like to13 take up first, which amendment first?14 SENATOR LAURENT: Amendment number 24.15 MR. PRESIDENT: Please read amendment number16 24.17 SENATOR LAURENT: It is S17S0024, it is Tab 118 in the packet.19 MR. PRESIDENT: There is a little clerical20 difficulty, Senator, so we are going to21 temporarily pass the May substitute for Senate22 Joint Resolution 580. And let's go back -- are we23 ready?24 THE SECRETARY: Yes.25 MR. PRESIDENT: Once again, read the joint


Page 37

1 resolution, please, the May substitute for Senate2 joint resolution because I temporarily passed it.3 Please read it, the joint resolution.4 THE READING CLERK: Committee substitute for5 Senate Joint Resolution 580, a bill to be6 entitled, A map relating to reapportionment.7 MR. PRESIDENT: All right. Now, Senator, do8 you have the -- we have the correct amendment9 before us?

10 SENATOR LAURENT: Yes.11 MR. PRESIDENT: Read the first amendment.12 THE READING CLERK: Bar code number 751138 by13 Senator Laurent. Delete everything after the14 resolving clause and insert lengthy amendment.15 MR. PRESIDENT: Senator from the 17th is16 recognized to explain the amendment.17 SENATOR LAURENT: Senate District 24 is18 basically the amendment that we passed out of19 committee. There were a number of changes. We20 made a change in the Panhandle between Senator21 Clary, Senator Peaden, this area in the Panhandle.22 There were some changes to the Senator's23 district from Senate District 1 and Senate24 District 7 and the changes only affected their25 districts. There was a change on the space port


164

No.952024 -

INTHE

OCTOBER TERM. 1996

C. MARTIN LAWYER, III,

V. Appellant,

THE UNITEDSTATESDEPARTMENTOFJUSTICE, etal., Appellees.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

BRIEF FOR THE STATE APPELLEES

PETER ANTONACCI Deputy Attorney General GEORGE L. WAAS Assistant Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050 (904) 488-1573 Counsel for the State of Florida

B. ELAINE NEW Office of General Counsel Florida House of Representatives Tallahassee, Florida 32399- 1300 (904) 488-763 1 Counsel for the Florida House

BEN H. HILL, III Hill, Ward & Henderson 101 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 3700 Tampa, Florida 33602-5 1.56 (813) 221-3900 Counsel for the Florida Senate

RICHARD G. TARANTO (Counsel of Record) Fat-r & Taranto 2445 M Street, N.W., Suite 225 Washington, D.C. 20037-1435 (202) 775-0184 Counsel for the State Appellees

DONALD L. BELL DAVID TEPPER Office of General Counsel Florida Department of State Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 (904) 488-3684 Counsel for the Secretary of State

STEPHEN N. ZACK Zack, Sparber, Kosnitzky, P.A. 100 S.E. Second Street, Suite 2800 Miami, Florida 33131-2144 (305) 539-8400 Counsel for the Florida Senate

[Additional Counsel Listed on Inside Cover]

165

10

relied on the same points about crossing county lines and county-wide racial statistics. See J.S. App. 21a-25a.

2. The parties proposing Plan 386 filed a number of affidavits, with maps and statistics and other information, explaining and supporting the proposal as not in fact having subordinated neutral districting principles to race. J.A. 23- 154. The main submission was a declaration by John Guthrie, the state Senate’s redistricting expert who, with the aid of computers, drafted the proposed district. J.A. 25-125. His evidence documented what the consenting parties had done in order to resolve the allegation that Plan 330 allowed race to subordinate other state districting principles:

l The new plan was designed to make District 21 substantially more compact, by deleting the extremities of the existing district. J.A. 25. In terms of compactness (which has been rejected as a Florida districting principle), the new District 21 is in line with a host of other Florida legislative districts that have no substantial minority population. J.A. 25-26, 60-75. Cf: J.A. 57, 77 (appellant’s proposed district).

l The plan was designed to meet the one-person, one-vote principle of the Fourteenth Amendment. J.A. 28.

l The plan complied with the contiguity requirement of the Florida Constitution, which allows the crossing of bodies of water - a practice that is common in Florida’s legislative districts. J,A. 28, 81-83. Indeed, in the immediate vicinity, House District 55 similarly crosses Tampa Bay. See J.A. 59.

. The plan was designed to minimize the disruption of existing constituencies, by that time based on Plan 330, under which two elections had taken place. It ensured that any changes made in even-numbered districts, which had elections in 1994 and would have their next elections in

166

11

1998, would be small enough so as not to require special off-cycle elections in 1996. See J.A. 25, 28-29.

l The plan’s new District 21 maintained a consistent profile of urban residents in the Tampa Bay area, whose socioeconomic characteristics are among the most disadvantaged in the State, even controlling for race. J.A. 30-3 1, 49-5 1.*

. The plan reflected the political imperative of preserving the existing partisan balance between Republicans and Demo- crats, so that the plan would be acceptable both to the Republican-controlled Senate and the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives. J.A. 3 1.

. The plan reduced the black voting-age population of District 2 1 to 36.2%, ensuring “meaningful participation in the electoral process” of all citizens. J.A. 31; see J.A. at 26, 28-29.9

l The plan’s District 21, in crossing county lines (it covers portions of three counties), is in keeping with common practice - and the deliberate policy view of many Senators - in Florida. J.A. 32-33 & n.7,45-48.r’ Appellant’s own

8 A separate filing in support of Plan 386, by the Florida NAACP, attached a declaration of Leon Russell, who noted that, although years before he had “expressed some reservations” about the cohesiveness of minorities in the Tampa Bay area, he no longer had such reservations, in light of the experience of Senator Hargrett’s representation of cross-bay populations since 1992. R. 181 at 2.

9 At the November 2 status conference, counsel for the consenting plaintiffs stated that, while they continued to assert that Plan 330 was unconstitutional, the new plan was valid and that “[w]e believe it is permitted to consider race, and that’s one of the things that we have done.” 1 l/2/95 Tr. 20.

lo Many Senators believe that a county receives better representation when more than one legislator has constituents in the county. J.A. 32 n.7. A total of 31 of Florida’s 40 Senate districts cross county lines. J.A. 33.

167

IN RE: 2002 JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPORTIONMENT€¦ · IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO....

Documents

Transcript of IN RE: 2002 JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPORTIONMENT€¦ · IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO....