Importance of ip peering

20
Importance of IP Peering Yoshiki Ishida Japan Internet Exchange, Co., Ltd.

Transcript of Importance of ip peering

Importance  of  IP  Peering

Yoshiki  Ishida  Japan  Internet  Exchange,  Co.,  Ltd.

Agenda

Ø Fundamentals  of  IX  and  peering  ü IX  ü Peering  

Ø The  Current  Status  of  IX  and  Peering  ü Change  of  the  Internet  ü IX  and  Peering  

1

Fundamentals  of  IX  and  peering

2

What  is  IX? Ø  DefiniGon  of  IX  Point  

(by  euro-­‐ix)  A  physical  network  infrastructure  operated  by  a  single  enGty  with  the  purpose  to  facilitate  the  exchange  of  Internet  traffic  between  Autonomous  Systems.  The  number  of  Autonomous    Systems  connected  should  at  least  be  three  and  there  must  be  a  clear  and  open  policy  for  others  to  join.    

Ø  IX  is  a  system  composed  by  Layer  2  switches.  

 

Ø  Every  parGes’  routers  are  connected  to  the  switches.

AS

AS

AS

AS

3

A  Typical  Structure  of  the  Internet  in  a  Textbook

ISP ISP ISP ISP ISP

IX IX

ISP

ISP

ISP ISP

Global  Tier-­‐1  

NaGonal  Backbone  Provider

Local  Access  Provider

Customer  (Consumer/OrganizaGon)

ISP

ISP

ISP ISP

4

-­‐Transit-­‐  “Transit”  has  an  upstream    and  a  downstream,  then  the  traffic  from/to  the  la\er  and  its  customers  are  carried  by  the  former  to/from  the  rest  of  the  Internet  with  payment  from  the  downstream.    

-­‐Peering-­‐  Traffic  between  two  parGes  and  their  customers  are  exchanged  by  using  “peering.”  Useless  traffic  to  the  upstream  decreases  by  exchanging  traffic  with  peering,  and  their  transit  cost  can  be  reduced.   5  

Transit  and  Peering  

IX

The  Internet  

ISP-B

user   user   user   user  user  user   user   user  

ISP-D ISP-C

ISP-A

Peering Ø  Types  of  Peering  

ü  LocaGon  •  Pubic  Peer  •  Private  Peer  

ü  Payment  •  Free  Peer  •  Paid  Peer  

Ø  Peering  Agreement  ü  Bi-­‐lateral  Peering  Agreement  

•  An  one-­‐to-­‐one  agreement  between  two  parGes  about  peering.  ü MulG-­‐lateral  Peering  Agreement(MLPA)  

•  MulG-­‐lateral  peering  is  peering  negoGated  and  established  between  potenGally  many  parGes.  

•  A  MulG-­‐Lateral  Peering  Agreement  is  signed  at  exchange  points  that  support  mulG-­‐lateral  peering.

6

IX  and  Peering

Ø Role  of  IX  Providers  for  peering  ü IX  provides  a  point  for  peering  and  exchanging  traffic.  ü IX  providers  make  arrangements  for  communicaGons  on  peering  between  customers.  

ü IX  providers  supply  addiGonal  funcGon  for  peering,  e.g.  Route  Server,  Route  Monitor,  and  Traffic  Viewer.  

ü Some  IX  providers  support  a  private  peering  between  their  customers,  for  example  by  providing  cabling  services.  

ü IX  is  the  place  for  coordinaGon  and  cooperaGon  between  various  parGes  of  the  Internet.  

7

The  Current  Status  of  IX  and  Peering

8

The  Current  Structure  of  the  Internet

ISP ISP ISP

ISP

Global  Tier-­‐1  NaGonal  Backbone  

Local  Access  Provider Mobile

IX IX

ISP

ISP

ISP ISP

ISP

Customer  (Consumer/OrganizaGon)

Hyper  Giants

9

The  Current  Structure  of  the  Internet

ISP ISP ISP

ISP

Global  Tier-­‐1  NaGonal  Backbone  

Local  Access  Provider Mobile

IX IX

ISP

ISP

ISP ISP

ISP

Customer  (Consumer/OrganizaGon)

Hyper  Giants

Contents

Eyeball

Traffic

10

Contents  and  Eyeball  JPIX  Case Ø The  traffic  share  of  top  10  customers  of  JPIX  

with  140  parGes.

11  

IX Switch

Contents Side

OUT 50.6%

Eyeball Side

IN 40.3%

OUT 14.0%

IN 7.7%

Merits  of  using  IX  

Ø Exchanging  Traffic  at  IX  Points  ü High  Bandwidth  ü Low  Latency  ü Cost  Efficiency  ü Direct  RelaGonship  

Ø Peering  with  Internet  Infrastructure  such  as  root  servers  

12  

ISP ISP

Internet

Peering

IX

DNS  root  server

The  Importance  of  IX

Ø  The  importance  of  IX  is  equal  to  the  importance  of  peering  and  exchanging  traffic  locally.  

Ø  Related  AcGviGes  ü WCIT/ITR  

•  31E  3.7  Member  States  should  create  an  enabling  environment  for  the  implementaGon  of  regional  telecommunicaGon  traffic  exchange  points,  with  a  view  to  improving  quality,  increasing  the  connecGvity  and  resilience  of  networks,  fostering  compeGGon  and  reducing  the  costs  of  internaGonal  telecommunicaGon  interconnecGons.    

ü  OECD  Paper  •  Internet  Traffic  Exchange  Market  Developments  and  Policy  Challenges,  OECD  

Digital  Economy  Papers  No.  207  h\p://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k918gpt130q-­‐en  

ü  ISOC  IXP  Toolkit  •  “The  Internet  Society  was  awarded  a  grant  to  extend  its  Internet  exchange  

point  (IXP)  acGviGes  in  emerging  markets  and  developing  countries.”  h\p://www.ixptoolkit.org/  

13

Ecosystem  for  Peering Ø  AddiGonal  fee  for  peering  are  mainly  port  charges  for  IX  providers.    Ø  Peering  are  lower  in  cost  than  transit.  Ø  Payment  for  peering  

ü  Eyeball  side  •  Local  access  providers  pay  for  construcGon  of  consumer  network.  •  Without  contents,    nobody  uses  access  network.  

ü  Contents  side  •  Contents  distributers  pay  for  the  contents  and  network  for  delivering.  •  Without  users,  no  content  delivered.  

Ø  Free  peering  is  an  advantage  for  all  the  parGes.  ü  The  majority  of  content-­‐to-­‐end-­‐user  flows  should  be  free.  ü  For  all  the  parGes,  peering  is  good  tool  for  promoGon  to  their  

customers.

14

IX  and  Regulators

Ø Regulators  should  take  neutral  stance  to  peering  if  domesGc  compeGGve  environment  for  their  IP  network  have  been  developed,  ü To  support  growth  and  evoluGon  of  the  Internet  industry.  

Ø Regulators  may  support  coordinaGon  and  cooperaGon  among  parGes.  

Ø Regulators  may  support  IX  and  intervene  peering  only  if  their  IP  network  is  under  developing  and  compeGGve  environment  is  poor.      

15

IX  Status  Global

Ø  105  Countries  415  IXPs  ü  IX  is  now  increasing  day  by  day.  

Ø  Tier  of  IX  ü  Global  IX  ü  Regional  IX    ü  NaGonal  IX  ü  Local  IX  

Ø  Types  of  IX  ü  A  not-­‐for-­‐profit  independent  

organizaGon,  ü  A  consorGum  of  ISPs,  ü  A  commercial  company,  ü  An  Academic  and  research  project  ü  A  government  agency,  ü  An  informal  associaGon  of  

networks  

Ø  IX  Community  ü  Euro-­‐IX  

•  First  and  Largest  IX  Community.  •  Formed  in  2001  

ü  APIX  ü  LACIX  ü  AFRIX  ü  IX-­‐F  

Ø  Development  of  NaGonal  IX  Points  ü  Some  countries  develop  IX  Points  

by  themselves.  ü  Some  Global  IX  Providers  foster  IX  

Points  in  underdeveloped  regions.  ü  Bo\om  –up  approach  tend  to  be  a  

shortcut  to  success.  

16

IX  Status  Asia-­‐Pacific  Region

Ø  APIX“Asia-­‐Pacific  Internet  Exchange”  ü  An  associaGon  of  Internet  Exchange  

Providers  in  Asia-­‐-­‐-­‐Pacific  region.  ü  just  like  Euro-­‐IX  in  Europe  

Ø  ObjecGves  ü  To  share  informaGon  about  technical,  

operaGonal,  and  business  issues  and  soluGons  regarding  Internet  Exchange.  

Ø  APIX  was  established  in  2010  under  the  support  of  APNIC  

Ø  APNIC’s  support  for  APIX  ü  Engineering  assistance  for  organizaGons  

needed.  ü  APNIC  is  in  a  good  posiGon  to  

encourage  on  facilitate  to  share  knowledge  and  experience  among  IX  points  in  the  region.    

Ø  Members:  16  IXPs  from  12  economies  ü  BDIX(BD)  ü  HKIX(HK)  ü  BBIX,  DIX-­‐IE,  JPIX,  JPNAP(JP)  ü  KINX(KR)  ü  IIX(ID)  ü  NIXI(IN)  ü  MyIX(MY)  ü  NP-­‐IX(NP)  ü  NZIX(NZ)  ü  SGIX,SOX(SG)  ü  VNIX(VN)  ü  Equinix(US,  HK,  JP,  AU)  

Ø  Contact:  ü  sc(at)apix.asia  

17

IX  Status  Japan

Ø Commercial  IX  Providers:  3  ü JPIX  ü JPNAP(Internet  MulGfeed)  

ü BBIX  Ø Academic-­‐based  IX  Providers:  1  ü DIX-­‐IE(WIDE  Project)  

Ø Global  IX  Providers:  1  ü Equinix  

Ø Traffic  at  IX  in  Japan  ü 20%  to  EsGmated  Total  Traffic  in  Japan  are  exchanged  at  IX  points  according  to  the  report  from  MIC.  

ü Traffic  between  huge  telecom  carriers  are  exchanged  by  using  private  peers.

18

Thank  you!

Yoshiki  Ishida  Ishida(at)jpix.ad.jp