Hazardous Building Materials Assessment Report · pointing mortar in exterior stone or brick work...

Pinchin West Ltd. 200-13775 Commerce Parkway, Richmond, BC V6V 2A2

Tel: 604-244-8101 www.pinchinwest.com

Hazardous Building Materials Assessment Report

Malaspina Manor 149 West 20th Street

North Vancouver, BC

Prepared for: Colliers International

15th Floor, 200 Granville Street Vancouver, BC. V6C 2R6

Attention: Cristina Toader Senior Property Manager

May 20, 2014

Pinchin West Project: 12661K-04

Copyright © by Pinchin West Ltd.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

© 2014 Pinchin West Ltd. Page i

Colliers International (Client) retained Pinchin West Ltd. (PWL) to conduct a hazardous building material assessment of Malaspina Manor located at 149 West 20th Street, North Vancouver, BC. The assessment was performed on April 30, 2014.

The objective of the assessment was to identify specified hazardous building materials, evaluate their current condition and potential exposure risk to building occupants and develop corrective action plans as required. The findings from this assessment should only be used for the purpose of building management and routine maintenance. The results of this assessment are not intended to be used for construction, renovation, demolition or project tendering purposes.

Summary of Findings

The following is a summary of significant findings. Refer to the body of the report for specific findings and testing results.

Asbestos: Asbestos-containing materials (ACM) were confirmed to be present as follows:

Drywall joint compound throughout building in good condition.

Texture finish throughout the building in good condition.

Vinyl floor tiles in the Basement Hallway (Location 6) in good condition.

Lead: Lead was confirmed present in select paints/surface coatings and is present in emergency light batteries and lead flashing on rooftop drainage pipes, and pipe fittings.

Silica: Crystalline silica is present in concrete, mortar, brick, masonry, ceramics where present in the building.

Mercury: Mercury vapour is present in lamp bulbs and fluorescent light tubes throughout the building. Mercury liquid is present in thermostats throughout the building.

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs): PCBs are presumed to be present in lighting ballasts.

Halocarbons: Halocarbons were not observed during the assessment.

Mould: Mould-impacted items were not observed during the assessment.

Summary of Recommendations

Please refer to Section 5.0 of this report for detailed recommendations on the hazardous materials identified.

This Executive Summary is subject to the same standard limitations as contained in the report and must be read in conjunction with the entire report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

© 2014 Pinchin West Ltd. Page ii

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE ............................................................................. 1 1.1 Scope of Assessment ................................................................................. 1 1.2 Limitations on Scope ................................................................................... 1

2.0 GENERAL METHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 2

3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .......................................................................... 2 3.1 Building Description .................................................................................... 2

4.0 FINDINGS ............................................................................................................. 3 4.1 Asbestos ..................................................................................................... 3 4.2 Lead ............................................................................................................ 5 4.3 Silica ........................................................................................................... 5 4.4 Mercury ....................................................................................................... 6 4.5 Polychlorinated Biphenyls ........................................................................... 6 4.6 Halocarbons ................................................................................................ 6 4.7 Mould .......................................................................................................... 6

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................... 7 5.1 General ....................................................................................................... 7 5.2 Building Demolition or Renovation .............................................................. 7 5.3 Remedial Recommendations ...................................................................... 7

6.0 STANDARD LIMITATIONS ................................................................................... 8

7.0 CLOSURE ............................................................................................................. 9

8.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................... 10

APPENDICES

Appendix I Specific Methods and Criteria

Appendix II Locations Summary

Appendix III Hazardous Materials Summary

Appendix IV Hazardous Materials Findings by Location

Appendix V-A Asbestos Laboratory Certificates

Appendix V-B Lead Laboratory Certificates

Appendix VI Photographs

Appendix VII Drawings

Hazardous Building Materials Assessment Final Report 149 West 20th Street, North Vancouver, BC May 20, 2014 Colliers International Pinchin West Project: 12661K-04

© 2014 Pinchin West Ltd. Page 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE

Colliers International (Client) retained Pinchin West Ltd. (PWL) to conduct a hazardous building material assessment of Malaspina Manor located at 149 West 20th Street, North Vancouver, BC.

The assessment was performed by Nadia Slakov, Technologist and Sandra Fahim, Technologist on April 30, 2014. The assessors were accompanied for the first portion of the assessment by Ron Cameron, Building Manager for Colliers International.

The objective of the assessment was to identify specified hazardous building materials, evaluate their current condition and potential exposure risk to building occupants and to recommend corrective action plans as required.

1.1 Scope of Assessment

The assessment was performed to establish the location and type of hazardous building materials incorporated in the structure(s) and its finishes.

For the purpose of the assessment, and this report, hazardous building materials are defined as those containing the following:

Asbestos;

Lead;

Silica;

Mercury;

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs);

Halocarbons; or

Mould.

The assessed area consisted of all interior parts of the building. This assessment did not include demolition of building materials or equipment to view concealed conditions behind solid walls, enclosures shafts and chases.

1.2 Limitations on Scope

The findings from this assessment should only be used for the purpose of building management and routine maintenance. The results of this assessment are not intended to be used for construction, renovation, demolition or project tendering purposes.

This assessment excluded the following:

Owner or occupant articles (e.g. stored items, furniture, appliances, etc.);

Underground materials or equipment (e.g. vessels, drums, underground storage tanks, pipes, etc.);

Building envelope, structural components or items where sampling may cause consequential damage to the property (e.g. fire doors, exterior wall cavities, roofing materials, caulking and putties);



Inaccessible items or materials (e.g. exterior soffits, material concealed behind structure, materials above solid ceilings, material below flooring, items inside ductwork, adhesives);

Energized systems (e.g. internal boiler components, elevators, mechanical or electrical components);

Controlled products (e.g. stored chemicals, operational or process-related substances);

Other components (e.g. settled dust, mastic, coatings, etc.; and

Inaccessible areas or locked rooms.

2.0 GENERAL METHODOLOGY

A representative assessment was conducted in the building to identify the hazardous materials listed in the scope of work and included all common areas of the building and a minimum of 10% of the suites on each floor.

Representative samples were collected and/or visual observation of the hazardous materials was conducted. A risk assessment was conducted to develop corrective action or ongoing management strategies.

A unique location number was assigned to each room or homogenous area to identify each part or location of the building.

Specific methods and criteria used in this assessment are further detailed in Appendix I.

3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION

3.1 Building Description

The building was originally constructed in 1971 and is 3 storeys above grade with 1 level below grade. The use of the building is residential apartments. The total area is approximately 36,000 ft2.

A summary of the site building, including a basic description of the building systems is provided below:

Item/System Details

Structure Concrete, wood

Exterior Cladding Brick, stucco

HVAC Boiler and hot water, electric baseboards

Roof Built-up roofing

Flooring Vinyl tile, carpet



Item/System Details

Interior Walls Drywall

Ceilings Drywall

4.0 FINDINGS

The following sections present the results of the hazardous materials assessment and include a discussion of significant findings for each material.

Information collected during the assessment has been presented in this report as follows:

Assigned location numbers, location descriptions, and inaccessible areas are listed in Appendix II;

A summary of the hazardous materials inspection and testing results, including specific material descriptions and locations is provided in Appendix III;

Room-by-room details of material locations, assessment, sample results, quantities, etc., are presented in Appendix IV;

Copies of the laboratory analytical reports are provided in Appendix V;

Photographs referenced in the sections below are provided in Appendix VI; and

Drawings, indicating location numbers, sample locations are provided in Appendix VII.

4.1 Asbestos

4.1.1 Suspect ACM Not Present

The following materials are typically suspected to contain asbestos but were not observed in the building and are not discussed in the report findings:

Spray-applied fireproofing or thermal insulation;

Acoustic ceiling tiles;

Plaster;

Vinyl sheet flooring; and

Firestopping.

4.1.2 Texture Finishes (Acoustic/Decorative)

Asbestos-containing texture finish is present on the drywall walls and ceilings throughout the building. Texture finish is friable, is in good condition and is painted. Refer to Photo No. 1 in Appendix VI.



4.1.3 Pipe Insulation

Non-asbestos fibreglass insulation is present on pipes throughout the assessed area.

4.1.4 Duct Insulation

All ducts are un-insulated.

4.1.5 Mechanical Equipment Insulation

All mechanical equipment is either un-insulated or insulated with non-asbestos fibreglass.

4.1.6 Acoustic Ceiling Tiles

Asbestos-containing acoustic ceiling tiles were not found.

4.1.7 Vermiculite

Concrete block walls and/or solid ceilings were not demolished to determine if vermiculite is present. Loose fill vermiculite is not present in accessible areas.

4.1.8 Drywall Joint Compound

Drywall (gypsum board) and drywall joint compound is present as a wall and ceiling finish throughout the building. Based on test results, assume all drywall joint compounds to be asbestos-containing unless further sampling proves otherwise. Drywall joint compound is non-friable and is in good condition.

4.1.9 Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic

A total of three distinct types of vinyl floor tiles are present in the assessed area. One distinct type of vinyl floor tile, (12”x12” grey with grey stripes) present in Location 6 was determined to be asbestos-containing. Refer to Appendix I for locations, sizes and colours. The vinyl floor tiles are non-friable and are in good condition. Refer to Photo No. 2 in Appendix VI.

4.1.10 Presumed Asbestos Materials

A number of materials which might contain asbestos were not sampled during our assessment due to limitations in scope and methodology. Where present, these materials must be presumed to be an asbestos material and are best sampled immediately prior to disturbance. Materials presumed to contain asbestos include:

roofing, felts and tar

concrete floor levelling compound

elevator and lift brakes

electrical components or wiring within control centers, breakers, motors or lights, insulation on wiring

insulation under metal clad boilers and vessels



vermiculite in concrete block wall cavities

adhesives and duct mastics

caulking

paints and coatings

soffit and fascia boards at elevated heights

mechanical packing, ropes and gaskets

fire resistant doors or metal clad finishes

exterior cladding

4.2 Lead

4.2.1 Paints and Surface Coatings

Lead-containing paints were found in various areas. Refer to the Appendices for complete testing results. All lead-based paints were found to be in good condition.

4.2.2 Lead Products and Applications

Lead-containing batteries are present in emergency lighting units found throughout the building.

4.2.3 Presumed Lead Materials

Lead may be present in a number of materials which were not sampled as part of our assessment. The following materials, where found, should be considered lead-containing:

caulking in bell and spigot fittings on cast iron pipes

electrical components, including wiring connectors, fibre optic cable sheathing, grounding conductors, and solder

pointing mortar in exterior stone or brick work

glazing on ceramic tiles

4.3 Silica

Crystalline silica is a presumed component of the following building materials where present in the building:

poured or pre-cast concrete

masonry

refractory ceramic materials in high temperature mechanical equipment

ceramic tiles, grout and plaster

concrete block, brickwork, and associated mortar compounds



4.4 Mercury

4.4.1 Lamp Bulbs

Mercury vapour is present in all fluorescent lamps found throughout the building.

4.4.2 Mercury-Containing Devices

Mercury is present as a liquid in thermostats found throughout the building.

4.5 Polychlorinated Biphenyls

4.5.1 Lighting Ballasts

The building has not been comprehensively re-lamped with new energy efficient light ballasts and lamps, and as such, a percentage of light ballasts will be pre-1980 and contain PCBs.

4.5.2 Transformers

Transformers were not found during the assessment.

4.5.3 Presumed PCB Materials

A number of items which might contain PCBs were not sampled during our assessment. Materials presumed to contain PCBs include:

oil impregnated cables

voltage regulators

4.6 Halocarbons

Equipment containing halocarbons was not found during the assessment.

4.7 Mould

Suspect visible mould growth was not found during the assessment.



5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 General

The following general recommendations are made at this time:

1. All asbestos-containing materials are required to be identified with labels or signs or if not practicable, other effective means. “Other effective means” can be a floor plan showing locations of ACMs.

2. When PCB ballasts are removed from service they must be packaged and incinerated in accordance with applicable regulations. All PCB must be eliminated from use and sent for destruction on or before December 31, 2025.

5.2 Building Demolition or Renovation

As this report is not intended for building renovation or demolition purposes; a detailed destructive assessment is recommended prior to these activities. A destructive assessment typically involves; sampling of materials presumed to be hazardous that were not sampled (i.e. roofing, window caulking, mastics), destructive testing and investigation (i.e. coring of block walls, removal of building components).

5.3 Remedial Recommendations

No remedial action is recommended.



6.0 STANDARD LIMITATIONS

The work performed by Pinchin West Ltd. (PWL) was conducted in accordance with generally accepted engineering or scientific practices current in this geographical area at the time the work was performed. No warranty is either expressed or implied by furnishing written reports or findings. The Client acknowledges that subsurface and concealed conditions may vary from those encountered or inspected. PWL can only comment on the environmental conditions observed on the date(s) the assessment is performed. The work is limited to those materials or areas of concern identified by the Client or outlined in our proposal. Other areas of concern may exist but were not investigated within the scope of this assignment.

PWL makes no other representations whatsoever, including those concerning the legal significance of its findings, or as to other legal matters touched on in this report, including, but not limited to, ownership of any property, or the application of any law to the facts set forth herein. With respect to regulatory compliance issue, regulatory statutes are subject to interpretation and these interpretations may change over time. PWL accepts no responsibility for consequential financial effects on transactions or property values, or requirements for follow-up actions and costs.

The liability of PWL, or its staff, will be limited to the lesser of the fees paid or actual damages incurred by the Client. PWL will not be responsible for any consequential or indirect damages. PWL is only liable for damages resulting from negligence of PWL. All claims by the Client shall be deemed relinquished if not made within two years after last date of services provided.

Information provided by PWL is intended for Client use only. PWL will not provide results or information to any party unless disclosure by PWL is required by law. Any use by a third party of reports or documents authored by PWL or any reliance by a third party on or decisions made by a third party based on the findings described in said documents, is the sole responsibility of such third parties. PWL accepts no responsibility for damages suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions conducted. No other warranties are implied or expressed.



7.0 CLOSURE

If you have any questions, please contact Vanessa McNeil at 604-238-2941.

Authored by:

Pinchin West Ltd.

Reviewed by:

Pinchin West Ltd.

Per:

Per:

Nadia Slakov, B.Env.D., Dipl. T Technologist [email protected]

Vanessa McNeil, B.A., LEED AP Senior Project Manager [email protected]



8.0 REFERENCES

The following legislation and documents were referenced in completing the assessment and this report:

1. Occupational Health and Safety Regulation (B.C. Reg. 296/97, as amended), under WorkSafe BC.

2. Safe Work Practices for Handling Asbestos, WorkSafe BC, 2006 Edition.

3. Hazardous Waste Regulation, BC Ministry of Environment; including amendments up to B.C. Reg. 261/2006, September 21, 2006.

4. Ozone Depleting Substances and Other Halocarbons Regulation, B.C. Reg. 220/2006, Environmental Management Act.

5. PCB Regulations, SOR/2008-273, Canadian Environmental Protection Act.

6. Lead-Containing Paint and Coatings, Preventing Exposure in the Construction Industry, WorkSafe BC, June 2011.

7. Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations SOR/2008-34, Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act.

8. Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 745 Lead; Identification of Dangerous Levels of Lead; Final Rule, Environmental Protection Agency, January 5, 2001.

9. Mould Guidelines for the Canadian Construction Industry, Standard Construction Document CCA 82 – 2004, Canadian Construction Association.

APPENDIX I

SPECIFIC METHODS AND CRITERIA

Specific Methods and Criteria Appendix I


1.1 Asbestos

An inspection for the presence of friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials (ACM) was conducted. A friable material is a material that when dry can be crumbled, pulverized or powdered by hand pressure.

A separate set of samples was collected of each type of homogenous material suspected to contain asbestos. A homogenous material is defined by the US EPA1 as material that is uniform in texture and appearance, was installed at one time, and is unlikely to consist of more than one type or formulation of material.

Samples were collected at a rate that was in compliance with the requirements of local regulations and guidelines.

The homogeneous materials were determined by visual examination, available information on the phases of the construction and prior renovations.

The sampling strategy was also based on known ban dates and phase out dates of the use of asbestos; sampling of certain building materials was not conducted after specific construction dates. In addition, to be conservative, several years past these dates have been added to account for some uncertainty in the exact start / finish date of construction and associated usage of ACM.

In some cases, manufactured products such as asbestos cement pipe were visually identified without sample confirmation.

Drywall joint compound was sampled at exterior walls, columns or other locations to determine the presence of asbestos in the original drywall joint compound. Delineation of asbestos-containing drywall joint compound from non-asbestos drywall joint compound was not conducted.

Bulk samples were submitted to a NVLAP2 accredited laboratory for analysis. The analysis was performed in accordance with Test Method EPA/600/R-93/116: Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials, July 1993.

The asbestos analysis was completed using a stop positive approach. Only one result of greater than the regulated criteria is required to determine that a material is asbestos-containing, but all samples must be analyzed to conclusively determine that a material is non-asbestos. The laboratory stopped analyzing samples from a homogeneous material once greater than the regulated criteria was detected in any of the samples of that material. All samples of a homogeneous material were analyzed if no asbestos was detected. In some cases, all sampled were analyzed in the sample set regardless of result.

An asbestos-containing material is defined as 0.5% or any amount if vermiculite.

1 Environmental Protection Agency 2 National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program



Asbestos materials were evaluated in order to make recommendations regarding remedial work. For each ACM identified, a risk assessment was performed which included; condition, friability, air movement or if located in an air plenum and accessibility. Remedial action was then determined from the risk assessment and/or if mandated by regulatory requirements.

PWL used an action matrix based on an evaluation of the accessibility and condition of ACM to make recommendations for compliance with current regulations and industry best practice. Refer to the assessment methodology at the end of this section.

1.2 Lead

Each distinctive paint finish likely to be disturbed by the planned renovation and present in more than very limited application was sampled for lead content. Paint samples were collected and submitted to a laboratory for analysis.

Analysis for lead in paints or surface coatings is performed in accordance with EPA Method No. 3050B/Method No. 7420; flame atomic absorption at an accredited laboratory.

For this report, all paints containing lead at a concentration of 0.009% or greater have been discussed. Paint and surface coatings were evaluated for condition.

Lead building products (e.g. batteries, lead sheeting, flashing) were identified by visual observation only.

1.3 Silica

Building materials suspected of containing crystalline silica (e.g. concrete, cement, tile, brick, masonry, mortar) were identified by knowledge of current and historic applications and visual inspection only. Sampling of these materials for laboratory analysis of crystalline silica content was not performed.

1.4 Mercury

Building materials/products/equipment (e.g. thermostats, barometers, pressure gauges, light tubes), suspected to contain mercury were identified by visually inspection only. Dismantling of equipment suspected of containing mercury was not performed. Sampling of these materials for laboratory analysis of mercury content was not performed.

Spills or damaged equipment was recorded where observed.

1.5 Polychlorinated Biphenyls

Light ballast and wet transformers suspected to contain PCB were determined based on the age of the building, a review of maintenance records and examination of labels on equipment, where present and accessible. The information was compared to known ban dates of PCBs and Environment Canada publications.

Dry transformers are presumed to be free of dielectric fluids and hence non-PCB. Spills or leakage of suspect PCB-containing fluids was recorded where observed or identified in historical documents.



Fluids (mineral oil, hydraulic or Askeral) in transformers or other equipment were not sampled for PCB content.

1.6 Halocarbons

Air conditioning units, chillers and fire suppression systems (fixed and portable) suspected of containing halocarbons or other ODS were determined by visual inspection of manufactures labels and maintenance records only.

1.7 Visible Mould

Mould was identified if visibly present in a significant quantity on exposed building surfaces. If any mould growth is concealed within wall cavities it was not addressed in this assessment.



2.0 Asbestos Risk Assessment

For each ACM identified, a risk assessment was performed which included; condition, friability (those materials that can easily be crumbled or powdered with hand pressure) air movement or if located in an air plenum and accessibility. Remedial action was then determined from the risk assessment and/or if mandated by regulatory requirements. PWL used the following action matrix based on an evaluation of the accessibility and condition of ACM to make recommendations for compliance with current regulations and industry best practice.

Action Matrix (Friable)

Access Condition

Debris GOOD FAIR POOR

A 5 5 3 1

B 7 6 3 1

C (Visible) 7 6 3 2

C (Not Visible) 7 7 4 2

D 7 7 7 7

Any access with air movement

5 5 3 1

Action Matrix (Non-Friable)

Access Condition

Debris GOOD FAIR POOR

A 7 7 3 1

B 7 7 3 1

C (Visible) 7 7 4 2

C (Not Visible) 7 7 4 2

D 7 7 7 7

Air movement in access A, B, C

7 7 3 1

Air movement in access D 7 7 7 7



Definitions of Actions

Action Explanation

1 Clean-Up of ACM Debris – High Priority Restrict access that is likely to cause a disturbance of the ACM Debris and clean up ACM Debris immediately.

2 Clean-Up of ACM Debris – Medium Priority Restrict access that is likely to cause a disturbance of the ACM Debris and clean up ACM Debris.

3 ACM Removal – High Priority Remove ACM as soon as possible. Until it is removed, restrict access to the material so it is not disturbed.

4 ACM Removal – Medium Priority Remove ACM. Until it is removed, restrict access to the material so it is not disturbed.

5 ACM Control – Low Priority Proactively remove, enclose or encapsulate ACM in conjunction with other building activities.

6 ACM Repair Repair ACM.

7 Asbestos Management Program with Routine Surveillance Implement an Asbestos Management Program, including routine surveillance of ACM. Reassess materials regularly (typically once per year).



Definitions of Condition

ACM Material GOOD FAIR POOR

Friable Surfacing Materials (spray applied fireproofing, sprayed thermal insulation, texture finishes)

Surface of material shows no significant signs of damage, deterioration or delamination. Good condition includes unencapsulated or unpainted fireproofing or texture finishes, where no delamination or damage is observed, or encapsulated fireproofing or texture finishes where the encapsulant or paint has been applied after the damage or fallout occurred.

N/A A sprayed material that shows signs of significant damage or is significantly delaminating or deteriorating. This may be limited to surface delamination or some portion of the substrate may be exposed. Presence of debris.

Friable Manufactured Products (ceiling tiles)

No significant damage or deterioration. Condition is at or near to the condition when it was installed. Still serving its intended use as a building material or finish.

Showing signs of some cracking or breakage, but is not deteriorating (e.g. broken but in place ceiling tile, etc.). The material is still serving its intended use as a building material or finish but may require repair for mainly cosmetic purposes.

Significant deterioration or breaking apart of the material. Material has deteriorated to the point it is not serving its intended use as building material or finish. Is not repairable and requires at least localized removal and replacement. Presence of debris.



ACM Material GOOD FAIR POOR

Friable Thermal System Insulation (mechanical insulation on vessels, boilers, breeching, ducts, pipes, fan units, equipment etc.)

Insulation is completely covered in jacketing and exhibits no evidence of damage or deterioration. No insulation is exposed. Includes conditions where the jacketing has minor damage (i.e. scuffs or stains), but the jacketing is not penetrated.

Minor penetrating damage to jacketed insulation (cuts, tears, nicks, deterioration or delamination) or undamaged insulation that had never been jacketed. Insulation is exposed but not showing surface disintegration. The extent of missing insulation ranges from minor to none. Damage can be repaired.

Original insulation jacket is missing, damaged, deteriorated or delaminated. Insulation is exposed and significant areas have been dislodged. Damage cannot be readily repaired. Includes components where insulation may have been removed incompletely. Presence of debris.

Non-friable materials (i.e. drywall and manufactured products such as cement products)

No significant damage or deterioration. Condition is at or near to the condition when it was installed. Still serving its intended use as a building material or finish.

Showing signs of some cracking or damage but has not deteriorated. The material is still serving its intended use as a building material or finish and does not require repair or removal from an asbestos hazard perspective.

Significant deterioration or breaking apart of the material to the point at which it cannot be repaired and it will require at least local removal. Material has deteriorated to the point it is not serving its intended use as building material or finish. Material may have deteriorated to a point where traffic or disturbance may cause it to become friable.



Definitions of Accessibility

Access Explanation

A

Common areas of the building within reach of all building users (approximately 9’ from floor or standard ceiling height). Includes other areas where occupant activities may result in disturbance of material that is not normally within reach from floor level, but may be disturbed by common activities (e.g. gymnasiums, workshops, warehouses)

B

Areas of the building accessed primarily by Maintenance, Caretaking, Janitorial Staff and within reach without use of a ladder. Includes areas within reach in Boiler Rooms, Electrical Rooms, Janitors Closets, Elevator Rooms, Mechanical Rooms, etc. Includes materials within reach from fixed ladders or catwalks, mezzanines, and accessible pipe chases.

C visible

Areas of the building above 9’ where use of a ladder or scaffold is required to reach the ACM. Only includes ACM that are visible to view without the removal or opening of other building components such as ceiling tiles or service access panels.

C not visible

Areas of the building above 9’ where use of a ladder or scaffold is required to reach the ACM. Includes ACM that are not visible to view and require the removal of a building component, such as ceilings tiles or access panels to view and access. Includes rarely entered crawl spaces, attic spaces, etc. Observations will be limited to the extent visible from the access points.

D

Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls or equipment etc. where demolition of the ceiling, wall or equipment etc. is required to reach the ACM. Material inaccessible due to height or location or is only reached under unusual situations. Evaluation of condition and extent of ACM is limited.

Definition of Air Erosion, Air Plenum or Air Movement

The ACM is in a return air plenum or in a direct airstream or there is evidence of air erosion (i.e. ducts for heating or air conditioning blowing directly on ACM).

APPENDIX II

LOCATIONS SUMMARY

LOCATIONS LIST

1-877-322-4744 www.pinchinwest.com

Victoria * Kelowna * Nakusp * Calgary * Edmonton * Red Deer * Regina * Saskatoon Website: www.pinchinwest.com * 1-877-322-4744 Page 1 of 1.

Project #: 12200H-04 Site: 1420-1440 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC

Building Name: Unity Auto/ Jarvis Electric Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date:

2014-04-16 Location No. Name or Description Size (ft2) Floor No. Notes

1 Office Foyer 200 1

2 Washroom 50 1

3 Workshop Floor 2500 1 4 Storage Mezzanine 500 2 50% covered pigeon feces 5 Storage Under Stairs 20 1 old switch

6 Mezzanine Above Office 500 2

7 Exterior

8 Jarvis Electric Main Floor Storage 1000 1

9 Jarvis Electric Office 250 1

10 Jarvis Electric Basement 600 -1

11 Jarvis Mezzanine 300 2

12 Jarvis Mezzanine Offices 450 2

13 Roof 5000

APPENDIX III

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SUMMARY

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SUMMARY


Victoria * Kelowna * Nakusp * Calgary * Edmonton * Red Deer * Regina * Saskatoon Website: www.pinchinwest.com * 1-877-322-4744 Page 1 of 1.

Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SUMMARY - ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS (ACM)

Sample No. System Material/Notes Friable Location(s) Substance Amount Unit Positive

S0001 WALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No 1,2,3,4,6,7,11,13,14,15,16,17 Chrysotile 3 % Yes S0002 WALL TEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT) Yes 4,6,11,13,14,15,16,17 Chrysotile 3 % Yes

S0003 FLOOR VINYL FLOOR TILES, 12X12 GREY W GREY ST No 6 Chrysotile 5 % Yes

S0004 FLOOR VINYL FLOOR TILES, 12X12 TAN W BROWN TR No 7 None Detected No

Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SUMMARY - LEAD BASED PAINT (LBP)

Sample No. System Description Location(s) Substance Amount Unit Positive

L0001 WALL WHITE 1,2,3,4,6,13,14,15,16,17 Lead <0.003 % No L0002 WALL GREY 6,13,14,15,16,17 Lead 0.019 % Yes L0003 WALL WHITE EXT 12 Lead 0.004 % No

Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SUMMARY - LEAD (PB) PRODUCTS

Component Total Quantity (Estimated)

Location(s)

BATTERIES IN EMER. LIGHTS 10 13,14,15,16,17,6

Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SUMMARY - MERCURY (HG)

Component Total Quantity (Estimated)

Location(s)

THERMOSTAT 2 2,3

FLUORESCENT LIGHT TUBE 10 12

APPENDIX IV

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS FINDINGS BY LOCATION

ALL DATA REPORT


2014-05-09 Victoria * Kelowna * Nakusp * Calgary * Edmonton * Red Deer * Regina * Saskatoon Website: www.pinchinwest.com * 1-877-322-4744 Page 1 of 16.

Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 1 Location Name: Suite 101 Floor: 1 Room #: Square ft: 700

ASBESTOS

System Component Material Friable Item Covering Access Visible Air Plenum

Good Fair Poor Unit Sample Asbestos Type Amount Asbestos

FLOOR ALL CARPET No ~ No FLOOR ALL PLASTIC LAMINATE No ~ No

CEILING ACOUSTIC TILE TEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT) Yes ALL C Y Y 700 SF ~ No CEILING ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No ALL C Y N 700 (7) SF V0001 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes

WALL ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No ALL A Y N 1200 (7) SF S0001a CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes STRUCTURE ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ALL ~ No

DUCT NO ACCESS THROUGH CEILING No ~ No

PIPE NO ACCESS THROUGH CEILING No ALL ~ No

MECHANICAL ALL NOT INSULATED No ~ No


ASBESTOS





WALL ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No ALL A Y N 1200 (7) SF S0001b CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes STRUCTURE ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ALL ~ No




ALL DATA REPORT




ASBESTOS





WALL ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No ALL A Y N 1200 (7) SF S0001c CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes STRUCTURE ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ALL ~ No




Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 4 Location Name: storage under stairs Floor: 1 Room #: Square ft: 30

ASBESTOS



FLOOR ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No CEILING ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No ALL C Y N 100 (7) SF V0001 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes CEILING ALL TEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT) Yes ALL C Y Y 100 (5) SF V0002 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes

WALL ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No ALL A Y N 100 (7) SF S0001d CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes WALL ALL TEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT) Yes ALL B Y Y 100 (5) SF S0002a CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes

STRUCTURE ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ALL ~ No




ALL DATA REPORT



Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 5 Location Name: Boiler room Floor: Basement (1) Room #: Square ft: 250

ASBESTOS



FLOOR ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No CEILING ALL WOOD No ~ No

WALL ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No WALL ALL MASONRY No ~ No

STRUCTURE ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No DUCT ALL NOT INSULATED No ~ No PIPE ALL FIBREGLASS No ALL CANVAS B Y N 100 LF ~ No PIPE ALL NOT INSULATED No ALL B Y N 100 LF ~ No

MECHANICAL BOILER NOT INSULATED No B Y N ~ No

Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 6 Location Name: Basement Hallway Floor: Basement (1) Room #: Square ft: 150

ASBESTOS



FLOOR ALL VINYL FLOOR TILES, 12X12 GREY W GREY ST No A Y N 150 (7) SF S0003 CHRYSOTILE 5% Yes

CEILING ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No A Y N 150 (7) SF V0001 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes CEILING ALL TEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT) Yes A Y N 150 (5) SF V0002 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes

WALL ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No A Y N 400 (7) SF V0001 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes WALL ALL TEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT) Yes A Y N 400 (5) SF S0002B CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes

STRUCTURE ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No DUCT NOT FOUND No ~ No

PIPE NO ACCESS THROUGH CEILING No ~ No

MECHANICAL NOT FOUND No ~ No

ALL DATA REPORT



Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 7 Location Name: Laundry Room Floor: Basement (1) Room #: Square ft: 200

ASBESTOS



FLOOR ALL VINYL FLOOR TILES, 12X12 TAN W BROWN TR No A Y N 200 SF S0004 NON-ASBESTOS No

CEILING ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No A N N 200 (7) SF V0001 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes WALL ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No A Y N 600 (7) SF S0001E CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes

STRUCTURE ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No DUCT NOT FOUND No ~ No



Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 8 Location Name: Storage Floor: Basement (1) Room #: Square ft: 300

ASBESTOS



FLOOR ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No CEILING ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No

WALL ALL MASONRY No ~ No STRUCTURE ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No

DUCT NOT FOUND No ~ No PIPE ALL FIBREGLASS No INSULATION PAPER ~ No


ALL DATA REPORT



Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 9 Location Name: Electrical Room Floor: Basement (1) Room #: Square ft: 100

ASBESTOS



FLOOR ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No CEILING ALL DRYWALL NO COMPOUND No ALL ~ No


DUCT NOT FOUND No ~ No PIPE ALL NOT INSULATED No ~ No


Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 10 Location Name: Elevator room Floor: Basement (1) Room #: Square ft: 75

ASBESTOS



FLOOR ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No CEILING ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ALL ~ No


DUCT NOT FOUND No ~ No PIPE ALL NOT INSULATED No ~ No

MECHANICAL MOTOR GENERATOR No ~ No

ALL DATA REPORT



Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 11 Location Name: Closet Floor: Basement (1) Room #: Square ft: 25

ASBESTOS



FLOOR ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No CEILING NOT FOUND No ~ No

WALL ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No ALL A Y N 75 (7) SF V0001 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes WALL ALL TEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT) Yes ALL A Y N 75 (5) SF V0002 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes

STRUCTURE ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No DUCT NOT FOUND No ~ No PIPE NOT FOUND No ~ No


Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 12 Location Name: Parkade Floor: Basement (1) Room #: Square ft: 2000

ASBESTOS



FLOOR ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No CEILING ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No

WALL ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No STRUCTURE ALL CONCRETE (POURED) No ~ No

DUCT ALL NOT INSULATED No ~ No PIPE ALL FIBREGLASS No INSULATION ~ No PIPE DRAIN NOT INSULATED No ~ No


ALL DATA REPORT



Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 13 Location Name: First floor hallway Floor: 1 Room #: Square ft: 350

ASBESTOS



FLOOR ALL CARPET No A Y N 150 SF ~ No FLOOR ALL CERAMIC TILES No ~ No

CEILING ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No A Y N 350 (7) SF V0001 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes CEILING ALL TEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT) Yes A Y N 350 (5) SF V0002 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes

WALL ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No A Y N 600 (7) SF V0001 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes WALL ALL TEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT) Yes A Y N 600 (5) SF V0002 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes

STRUCTURE ALL WOOD No ~ No




Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 14 Location Name: Second Floor Hallway Floor: 2 Room #: Square ft: 250

ASBESTOS



FLOOR ALL CARPET No A Y N SF ~ No CEILING ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No A Y N 250 (7) SF V0001 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes CEILING ALL TEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT) Yes A Y N 250 (5) SF V0002 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes

WALL ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No A Y N 600 (7) SF V0001 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes WALL ALL TEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT) Yes A Y N 600 (5) SF V0002 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes





ALL DATA REPORT



Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 15 Location Name: Third Floor Hallway Floor: 3 Room #: Square ft: 250

ASBESTOS




WALL ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No A Y N 600 (7) SF V0001 CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes WALL ALL TEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT) Yes A Y N 600 (5) SF S0002e CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes





Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 16 Location Name: West stairwell Floor: All Room #: Square ft: 400

ASBESTOS




WALL ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No A Y N 600 (7) SF S0001f CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes WALL ALL TEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT) Yes A Y N 600 (5) SF S0002c CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes

STRUCTURE ALL WOOD No ~ No DUCT NOT FOUND No ~ No PIPE NOT FOUND No ~ No


ALL DATA REPORT



Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 17 Location Name: East Stairwell Floor: All Room #: Square ft: 400

ASBESTOS




WALL ALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND No A Y N 600 (7) SF S0001g CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes WALL ALL TEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT) Yes A Y N 600 (5) SF S0002d CHRYSOTILE 3% Yes

STRUCTURE ALL WOOD No ~ No DUCT NOT FOUND No ~ No PIPE NOT FOUND No ~ No


ALL DATA REPORT




LEAD PAINT

System Item Good Poor Unit Sample Sample Description Result Description Amount Lead WALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND 1400 SF L0001 white <0.003% No


LEAD PAINT

System Item Good Poor Unit Sample Sample Description Result Description Amount Lead WALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND 1400 SF V0001 white <0.003% No


LEAD PAINT


Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 4 Location Name: storage under stairs Floor: 1 Room #: Square ft: 30

LEAD PAINT



LEAD PAINT

System Item Good Poor Unit Sample Sample Description Result Description Amount Lead WALL METAL 100 SF L0002 grey 0.019% Yes WALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND 400 SF V0001 white <0.003% No

ALL DATA REPORT




LEAD PAINT

System Item Good Poor Unit Sample Sample Description Result Description Amount Lead WALL CONCRETE (POURED) 4000 SF L0003 white ext 0.004% No

Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 13 Location Name: First floor hallway Floor: All Room #: Square ft: 350

LEAD PAINT

System Item Good Poor Unit Sample Sample Description Result Description Amount Lead WALL WOOD 200 SF V0002 grey 0.019% Yes WALL DRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND 650 SF V0001 white <0.003% No


LEAD PAINT


ALL DATA REPORT




LEAD PAINT



LEAD PAINT



LEAD PAINT


ALL DATA REPORT




Pb Products

Component Quantity Unit

BATTERIES IN EMER. LIGHTS 1 EA

Project #: 12661K-04 Site: 149 20th ave, North Vancouver, BC Building Name: Malaspina Manor Surveyor: Nadia Slakov Survey Date: 2014-04-30 Location #: 13 Location Name: First floor hallway Floor: 1 Room #: Square ft: 350

Pb Products




Pb Products




Pb Products




Pb Products



ALL DATA REPORT




Pb Products



ALL DATA REPORT




MERCURY


THERMOSTAT 1 EA


MERCURY


THERMOSTAT 1 EA


MERCURY


FLUORESCENT LIGHT TUBE 10 EA

ALL DATA REPORT



Legend:

Sample number Units Other

S#### Sample collected. SF Square feet SVM Suspect Visible Mould

V#### Material is visually identified to be identical to S#### LF Linear feet

V0000 Known non asbestos material. EA Each

V9000 Material is visually identified to contain asbestos. % Percentage

V9500 Material is presumed to contain asbestos. Access Condition

A Accessible to all building occupants Good No visible damage or deterioration

B Accessible to maintenance and operations staff without a ladder Fair Minor, repairable damage, cracking or deterioration.

C Accessible to maintenance and operations staff with a ladder. Also rarely entered, locked areas. Poor Irreparable damage or deterioration with exposed and

missing material.

D Not normally accessible or without demolition Action (1) Clean up of ACM Debris (2) Precautions for Access Which may Disturb ACM Debris (3) ACM removal

(4) Precautions for Work Which may Disturb ACM in Poor Condition (5) Proactive ACM removal (Minimum repair required for fair

condition) (6) ACM repair

(7) Management program and surveillance

APPENDIX V-A

ASBESTOS LABORATORY CERTIFICATES

1407851Lab Order ID:

Malaspina Manor 12661K-04 149 20th Ave

Project:

5/1/2014Date Received:

5/6/2014Date Reported:

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab NotesAsbestos Fibrous

ComponentsNon-Fibrous Components

Attributes

Treatment

By Polarized Light MicroscopyEPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020

Vanessa McNeilNadia SlakovSandra Fahim

Attn:

1407851_PLMAnalysis ID:

Customer: Pinchin West Ltd.Suite 200, 13775 Commerce ParkwayRichmond BC V6V 2V4

3% ChrysotileS0001ADRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND,wall,Loc:1

TanNon FibrousHomogeneous

Crushed1407851PLM_1

Other97%

Not AnalyzedS0001BDRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND,wall,Loc:2

1407851PLM_2

Not AnalyzedS0001CDRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND,wall,Loc:3

1407851PLM_3

Not AnalyzedS0001DDRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND,wall,Loc:4

1407851PLM_4

Not AnalyzedS0001EDRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND,wall,Loc:7

1407851PLM_5

Not AnalyzedS0001FDRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND,wall,Loc:16

1407851PLM_6

Not AnalyzedS0001GDRYWALL AND JOINT COMPOUND,wall,Loc:17

1407851PLM_7

3% ChrysotileS0002ATEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT),wall,Loc:4

WhiteNon FibrousHeterogeneous

Crushed1407851PLM_8

Other97%

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 1.0%.

Page 1 of 2

Approved SignatoryAnalyst

Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

Dorlos Ammerman (15)

plm_3.3.009

1407851Lab Order ID:

Malaspina Manor 12661K-04 149 20th Ave

Project:

5/1/2014Date Received:

5/6/2014Date Reported:

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab NotesAsbestos Fibrous

ComponentsNon-Fibrous Components

Attributes

Treatment

By Polarized Light MicroscopyEPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020

Vanessa McNeilNadia SlakovSandra Fahim

Attn:

1407851_PLMAnalysis ID:

Customer: Pinchin West Ltd.Suite 200, 13775 Commerce ParkwayRichmond BC V6V 2V4

Not AnalyzedS0002BTEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT),wall,Loc:6

1407851PLM_9

Not AnalyzedS0002CTEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT),wall,Loc:16

1407851PLM_10

Not AnalyzedS0002DTEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT),wall,Loc:17

1407851PLM_11

Not AnalyzedS0002ETEXTURE FINISH ( TEXTURE COAT),wall,Loc:15

1407851PLM_12

5% ChrysotileS0003 - A

VINYL FLOOR TILES,12x12 grey w grey stripes,Loc:6

tile

GrayNon FibrousHeterogeneous

Dissolved1407851PLM_13

Other95%

None DetectedS0003 - B

VINYL FLOOR TILES,12x12 grey w grey stripes,Loc:6

mastic

BlackNon FibrousHeterogeneous


Cellulose Other2% 98%

None DetectedS0004VINYL FLOOR TILES,12x12 tan w brown triangles,Loc:7

self stick tile

Tan, BrownNon FibrousHeterogeneous


Other100%

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 1.0%.

Page 2 of 2

Approved SignatoryAnalyst


Dorlos Ammerman (15)

plm_3.3.009

APPENDIX V-B

LEAD LABORATORY CERTIFICATES

Pinchin West Ltd.Suite 200, 13775 Commerce ParkwayRichmond BC V6V 2V4

Customer:

Analysis ID: 1407841_PBP

Attn: Vanessa McNeilNadia SlakovSandra Fahim

Date Reported: 5/7/2014

Date Received: 5/1/2014

Project: Malaspina Manor 12661K-04 149 20thAve

Lab Order ID: 1407841

Lab Notes

Description

Lab Sample ID

Sample ID

Analysis for Lead Concentrationin Paint Chips

by Flame Atomic Absorption SpectroscopyEPA SW-846 3rd Ed. Method No. 3050B/Method No. 7420

Analytical Sensitivity

(% by weight)(g)

Mass Concentration

(% by weight)

1407841PBP_1

Wall, drywall and joint compound, white, loc 1L00010.001%0.1150 < 0.003%

1407841PBP_2

Door, metal, grey, loc 6L00020.004%0.0139 0.019%

1407841PBP_3

Wall concrete (poured), white ext, loc 12L00030.001%0.1207 0.004%

The quality control samples run with the samples in this report have passed all AIHA required specifications unless otherwise noted. This report relates only to the samplestested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by AIHA or any

other agency of the U.S. government. (R.L. = 0.01 wt.%)

Kristin Cooke (3)


Analyst Laboratory Director

Page 1 of 1pbRpt_3.4.02/pbCalc_3.4.0

1

APPENDIX VI

PHOTOGRAPHS

Photographs Appendix VI


Photo 1 – Asbestos-containing texture coat in good condition on drywall walls and ceiling throughout the building.

Photo 2 – Asbestos-containing vinyl floor tiles in good condition in the Basement Hallway (Location 6).

Photographs Appendix VI


Photo 3 – Leaded grey paint on metal doors and frames throughout building.

Photo 4 – Mercury thermostats throughout building.

APPENDIX VII

DRAWINGS

Hazardous Building Materials Assessment Report · pointing mortar in exterior stone or brick work...

Documents

Transcript of Hazardous Building Materials Assessment Report · pointing mortar in exterior stone or brick work...