Greening of the Arctic: An IPY initiative - · PDF fileGreening of the Arctic: An IPY...

1
Greening of the Arctic: An IPY initiative D.A. Walker 1 , H.E. Epstein 2 , G.J. Jia 2 , U. Bhatt 1 , V.E, Romanovsky 1 , J.C. Comiso 3 , J.O. Kaplan 4 , C. Markon 5 , M.O. Leibman 6 , N. Moskalenko 6 , B.C. Forbes 7 , G.P. Kofinas 1 , C.T. Tarnocai 8 , C.L. Ping 1 , H.A. Maier 1 , M. Nolan 1 , P. Prokein 1 , T. Heinrichs 1 , J. Grimes 1 , M.K. Raynolds 1 , C. Munger 1 , B. Sharpton 1 , A. Balsar 1 1 University of Alaska Fairbanks, [email protected]; 2 University of Virginia, Charlottesville; 3 NASA-Goddard; 4 European Commission Joint Research Center, Bern; 5 Alaska Geographic Science Office, Anchorage; 6 Earth Cryosphere Laboratory, Moscow; 7 Arctic Centre, Rovaniemi, 8 Agri. and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Abstract: One of the key goals of IPY will be to document the rapid and dramatic changes to terrestrial vegetation that are expected to occur across the circumpolar Arctic as a result of climate change. Changes in the biomass of terrestrial ecosystems will likely affect the permafrost, active layer, carbon reserves, trace-gas fluxes, hydrological systems, biodiversity, wildlife populations and the habitability of the Arctic. Changes in green biomass can be expected across the entire bioclimate gradient from treeline to the coldest parts of the Arctic. The Greening of the Arctic (GOA) initiative consists of a group of scientists who are part of three major components that will examine the spatial and temporal trends of greening in the Arctic, how these trends are affecting the indigenous people of the Arctic, and develop a web- based Arctic Geobotanical Atlas to help communicate the results of the study to students, scientists, government agencies, and the general public. Poster presented at ICARP II meeting, Copenhagen, Denmark, 10-12 Nov 2005 P Component I: Sea Ice – Land-surface- temperature – Greening relationships. This component will examine in detail the 24-year record of greenness across the entire circumpolar Arctic as measured by the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) using satellite imagery (AVHRR and MODIS). The study will examine historical trends in NDVI and document areas of major increases or decreases in the NDVI and link these trends to changes in sea-ice distribution, land-surface- temperatures (LSTs), snow-cover, bioclimate subzones, vegetation type, glacial history, and other variables in a circumpolar GIS database that is part of the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map (CAVM). Modeling studies will use the past trends in NDVI to predict future distribution of arctic vegetation using the BIOME4 model. Transient dynamics of the vegetation will be examined using the ArcVeg model. This component is already funded as an ARCSS Synthesis project. Component II: Arctic transects in North America and Eurasia. This component will examine NDVI-ecosystem relationships along transects through all 5 arctic bioclimate subzones. The North American Arctic Transect (NAAT) has been established as part of a NSF-funded Biocomplexity in the Environment (BE) project. The Russian part of the study is linked to the Circumpolar Arctic Rangifer Monitoring and Assessment (CARMA) project, and will examine the linkages between greening trends, the range and forage for the reindeers of the Nenets people, and the regional sea-ice conditions. The Russian component has been proposed to the NASA/USDA Land Cover Land-Use Change initiative. An additional proposal to the SEARCH program will address logistics for establishing camps, helicopter support, and field studies along the North America Arctic Transect during the IPY 2007-2008 time period, and developing protocols and field manual for biomass collection, and data management that can be used at other sites across the Arctic. Component III: Arctic Geobotanical Atlas. An outreach/education component of the project will develop a web-based Arctic Geobotanical Atlas (AGA) that will use a variety of tools to help students, educators, scientists, land managers, and the public understand issues related to the greening of the Arctic. Users will be able to download and use online GIS data from the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map and other maps at several sites along the GOA transects, in combination with other remote-sensing products. This component is funded by an NSF grant. Educational application of the AGA in the classroom will be proposed at a later date. Linkage of the project to the University of the Arctic and Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) will also occur in relationship to the human dimensions aspects of the project. Fig. 2. The Arctic tundra biome. Note the close proximity of all parts of the biome to perennially or seasonally frozen seawaters. 61% of the tundra is within 50 km of sea ice, 80% is within 100 km, and 100% is within 350 km. This strong linkage between the Arctic Ocean and the tundra makes the biome particularly sensitive to changes to the summer sea-ice distribution. The southern boundary of the biome is tree line. (Walker et al. 2005). Fig. 4. Land surface temperatures will be derived from AVHRR satellite data. These data show the circumpolar annual temperature anomalies in the Arctic from 1981 to 2003, based on AVHRR thermal infrared data. Blue areas show areas of cooling and red areas have warmed. (Adapted from Comiso 2004), Fig. 1. The climate–sea-ice–terrain–vegetation system. Topics and linkages highlighted in green are the main foci of Component I of the GOA initiative. Terrain Climate Sea Ice Structure Composition NDVI Biomass Vegetation Nutrient and Water availability Spatial heterogeneity Elevation Continentality Effects on circulation patterns Temperature Atmospheric circulation Albedo Summer cooling Effects on circulation patterns Albedo Trace-gas effects Temperature LST SWI Precipitation Snow Rainfall Distribution Longevity Soil Bedrock chemistry Topography 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Peak NDVI Subzone C Subzone D Subzone E Region 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 Summer Warmth Index ( 0 C) Barrow (Subzone C) Prudhoe (Subzone D) Umiat (Subzone E) 2000-01 1984 1985-86 1991-92 1989-90 1998-99 a b Fig. 5 The GOA project will also examine the temporal NDVI patterns for the whole Arctic. These data from northern AK show the trend in temperatures (lower diagram) and maximum (peak) summer NDVI (upper diagram) for the three bioclimate subzones in northern AK. The shaded area in (b) highlights the period of SWI covered by the NDVI data in (a). The arrows show years of corresponding increases (red) and decreases (blue) in NDVI and SWI. Regional NDVI increased by 17% between 1980 and 2000. From Jia et al. (2003). Fig. 3. Maximum NDVI of the Arctic. The GOA project will examine the spatial patterns of NDVI with respect to land-surface temperature, elevations, presence and type of permafrost, soil type, vegetation type, glacial history, and bioclimate subzones. From Walker et al. (2003). Fig. 6. The North American Arctic Transect. The transects will traverse all five Arctic bioclimate subzones and examine the spatial and temporal patterns of NDVI in relationship to sea-ice, land- surface temperatures and a host of terrain variables (CAVM Team 2003). Fig. 7. Nenets woman drives her sled across an eroding road in the gas field at Bovonenkova on the Yamal Peninsula. Component II will focus on how changes in greening and land-use patterns are affecting traditional herding by the indigenous people of the Yamal region, which has undergone extensive transformation of vegetation cover in the past 20 years (Forbes 1999). Fig. 8. The Eurasian Arctic Transect. Black dots are proposed study locations in each of the bioclimate subzones along the Yamal Peninsula and Novaya Zemlya. Part of an ARCSS and Circum-Arctic GIS Network Circum-Arctic GIS Network (UNESCO/Grid-Arendal) US Arctic GIS Network Other US Arctic GIS Nodes AGDC Northern Alaska GIS Network ARSC Toolik GIS Facility WERC Users: Researchers Educators University students High school students Government agencies General public Other National Arctic GIS networks ARCSS VECO ACDD JOSS Arctic Geobotanical Atlas (5) (2) (1) (1) (3) AGC GINA Other North Slope nodes Other UAF nodes (4) Figure 11. The GIS database behind the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map would be the top level in the hierarchy of databases. Nine other themes are in the circumpolar database at 1: 7.5 million scale. Figure 10. Hierarchy of map scales in the AGA. Maps in the atlas could be accessed by map scale, theme, region, or year. Figure 9. The AGA would be linked to a variety of networks through the worldwide web. The information in the AGA would be accessible with a variety of visualization tools including the Swathviewer, ArcIMS, Chameleon, and EarthSLOT. The red box shows the Northern Alaska network. The red numbered nodes are part of the support team developing the AGA (AGC, Alaska Geobotany Center; GINA, Geographic Information Network of Alaska; ARSC, Alaska Regional Supercomputer Center; WERC, Water and Environmental Research Center). Literature cited: CAVM Team. 2003. Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map (Scale 1:7,500,000). in. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) Map No. 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, AK. Comiso, J. C. 2003. Warming trends in the Arctic from clear sky satellite observations. Journal of Climate 16:3498-3510. Forbes, B. C. 1999. Reindeer herding and petroleum development on Poluostrov Yamal: sustainable or mutually incompatible uses? Polar Record 35:317-322. Jia, G. J., H. E. Epstein, and D. A. Walker. 2003. Greening of arctic Alaska, 1981-2001. Geophysical Research Letters 30. Walker, D. A., H. E. Epstein, J. G. Jia, A. Balser, C. Copass, E. J. Edwards, W. A. Gould, J. Hollingsworth, J. Knudson, H. A. Maier, A. Moody, and M. K. Raynolds. 2003. Phytomass, LAI, and NDVI in northern Alaska: relationships to summer warmth, soil pH, plant functional types, and extrapolation to the circumpolar Arctic. Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres 108:8169. Walker, D. A., M. K. Raynolds, F. J. A. Daniels, E. Einarsson, A. Elvebakk, W. A. Gould, A. E. Katenin, S. S. Kholod, C. J. Markon, E. S. Melnikov, N. G. Moskalenko, S. S. Talbot, B. A. Yurtsev, and CAVM Team. 2005. The Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map. Journal of Vegetation Science 16:267-282 + appendices. Dalton Highway (7 locations) Isachsen Green Cabin Mould Bay Inuvik A B C D E Arctic Bioclimate Subzones Transect Study Sites

Transcript of Greening of the Arctic: An IPY initiative - · PDF fileGreening of the Arctic: An IPY...

Page 1: Greening of the Arctic: An IPY initiative - · PDF fileGreening of the Arctic: An IPY initiative D.A. 2Walker1, ... A nou tr ea c h/d i mp f ... maps at several sites along the GOA

Greening of the Arctic: An IPY initiativeD.A. Walker1, H.E. Epstein2, G.J. Jia2, U. Bhatt1, V.E, Romanovsky1, J.C. Comiso3, J.O. Kaplan4, C. Markon5, M.O. Leibman6, N. Moskalenko6, B.C.Forbes7, G.P. Kofinas1, C.T. Tarnocai8, C.L. Ping1, H.A. Maier1, M. Nolan1, P. Prokein1, T. Heinrichs1, J. Grimes1, M.K. Raynolds1, C. Munger1, B.

Sharpton1, A. Balsar1

1University of Alaska Fairbanks, [email protected]; 2University of Virginia, Charlottesville; 3NASA-Goddard; 4European Commission Joint Research Center, Bern; 5Alaska Geographic Science Office,

Anchorage; 6Earth Cryosphere Laboratory, Moscow; 7Arctic Centre, Rovaniemi, 8Agri. and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa

Abstract: One of the key goals of IPY will beto document the rapid and dramatic changes

to terrestrial vegetation that are expected tooccur across the circumpolar Arctic as a

result of climate change. Changes in the

biomass of terrestrial ecosystems will likelyaffect the permafrost, active layer, carbon

reserves, trace-gas fluxes, hydrologicalsystems, biodiversity, wildlife populations and

the habitability of the Arctic. Changes ingreen biomass can be expected across the

entire bioclimate gradient from treeline to thecoldest parts of the Arctic. The Greening of

the Arctic (GOA) initiative consists of a groupof scientists who are part of three major

components that will examine the spatial andtemporal trends of greening in the Arctic, how

these trends are affecting the indigenouspeople of the Arctic, and develop a web-

based Arctic Geobotanical Atlas to help

communicate the results of the study tostudents, scientists, government agencies,

and the general public.

Poster presented at ICARP II meeting, Copenhagen,Denmark, 10-12 Nov 2005

P

Component I: Sea Ice – Land-surface-temperature – Greening relationships. This

component will examine in detail the 24-year record

of greenness across the entire circumpolar Arctic as

measured by the normalized difference vegetation

index (NDVI) using satellite imagery (AVHRR and

MODIS). The study will examine historical trends in

NDVI and document areas of major increases or

decreases in the NDVI and link these trends to

changes in sea-ice distribution, land-surface-

temperatures (LSTs), snow-cover, bioclimate

subzones, vegetation type, glacial history, and other

variables in a circumpolar GIS database that is part

of the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map (CAVM).

Modeling studies will use the past trends in NDVI to

predict future distribution of arctic vegetation using

the BIOME4 model. Transient dynamics of the

vegetation will be examined using the ArcVeg model.

This component is already funded as an ARCSS

Synthesis project.

Component II: Arctic transects in North

America and Eurasia. This component will

examine NDVI-ecosystem relationships along

transects through all 5 arctic bioclimate subzones.

The North American Arctic Transect (NAAT) has

been established as part of a NSF-funded

Biocomplexity in the Environment (BE) project. The

Russian part of the study is linked to the

Circumpolar Arctic Rangifer Monitoring and

Assessment (CARMA) project, and will examine the

linkages between greening trends, the range and

forage for the reindeers of the Nenets people, and

the regional sea-ice conditions. The Russian

component has been proposed to the NASA/USDA

Land Cover Land-Use Change initiative. An

additional proposal to the SEARCH program will

address logistics for establishing camps, helicopter

support, and field studies along the North America

Arctic Transect during the IPY 2007-2008 time

period, and developing protocols and field manual

for biomass collection, and data management that

can be used at other sites across the Arctic.

Component III: Arctic GeobotanicalAtlas. An outreach/education component of the

project will develop a web-based Arctic

Geobotanical Atlas (AGA) that will use a variety of

tools to help students, educators, scientists, land

managers, and the public understand issues

related to the greening of the Arctic. Users will be

able to download and use online GIS data from

the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map and other

maps at several sites along the GOA transects, in

combination with other remote-sensing products.

This component is funded by an NSF grant.

Educational application of the AGA in the

classroom will be proposed at a later date.

Linkage of the project to the University of the

Arctic and Integrative Graduate Education and

Research Traineeship (IGERT) will also occur in

relationship to the human dimensions aspects of

the project.

Fig. 2. The Arctic tundra biome. Note

the close proximity of all parts of the

biome to perennially or seasonally

frozen seawaters. 61% of the tundra is

within 50 km of sea ice, 80% is within

100 km, and 100% is within 350 km.

This strong linkage between the Arctic

Ocean and the tundra makes the biome

particularly sensitive to changes to the

summer sea-ice distribution. The

southern boundary of the biome is tree

line. (Walker et al. 2005).

Fig. 4. Land surface temperatures will be

derived from AVHRR satellite data.

These data show the circumpolar annual

temperature anomalies in the Arctic

from 1981 to 2003, based on AVHRR

thermal infrared data. Blue areas show

areas of cooling and red areas have

warmed. (Adapted from Comiso 2004),

Fig. 1. The climate–sea-ice–terrain–vegetation system.

Topics and linkages highlighted in green are the main foci

of Component I of the GOA initiative.

Terrain

Climate

Sea IceStructure

Composition NDVI Biomass

VegetationNutrient and

Wateravailability

Spatialheterogeneity

ElevationContinentality

Effects on circulationpatterns

Temperature

AtmosphericcirculationAlbedo

Summercooling

Effects oncirculation

patterns

Albedo

Trace-gaseffects

Temperature

LST

SWIPrecipitation

Snow Rainfall

DistributionLongevity

SoilBedrock

chemistryTopography

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

19

81

1982

1983

1984

198

5

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

199

2

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Pea

k N

DV

I

Subzone C Subzone DSubzone E Region

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Su

mm

er W

arm

th I

nd

ex (

0C

)

Barrow (Subzone C)Prudhoe (Subzone D)Umiat (Subzone E)

2000-011984 1985-86

1991-921989-90 1998-99

a

b

Fig. 5 The GOA project will also examine the

temporal NDVI patterns for the whole Arctic.

These data from northern AK show the trend

in temperatures (lower diagram) and

maximum (peak) summer NDVI (upper

diagram) for the three bioclimate subzones in

northern AK. The shaded area in (b)

highlights the period of SWI covered by the

NDVI data in (a). The arrows show years of

corresponding increases (red) and decreases

(blue) in NDVI and SWI. Regional NDVI

increased by 17% between 1980 and 2000.

From Jia et al. (2003).

Fig. 3. Maximum NDVI of the Arctic.

The GOA project will examine the

spatial patterns of NDVI with respect to

land-surface temperature, elevations,

presence and type of permafrost, soil

type, vegetation type, glacial history,

and bioclimate subzones. From Walker

et al. (2003).

Fig. 6. The North American Arctic Transect. The

transects will traverse all five Arctic bioclimate

subzones and examine the spatial and temporal

patterns of NDVI in relationship to sea-ice, land-

surface temperatures and a host of terrain variables

(CAVM Team 2003).

Fig. 7. Nenets woman drives her sled across an eroding road in the gas field at

Bovonenkova on the Yamal Peninsula. Component II will focus on how changes in

greening and land-use patterns are affecting traditional herding by the indigenous

people of the Yamal region, which has undergone extensive transformation of

vegetation cover in the past 20 years (Forbes 1999).

Fig. 8. The Eurasian Arctic Transect. Black dots are proposed study locations in

each of the bioclimate subzones along the Yamal Peninsula and Novaya Zemlya.

Part of an ARCSS and Circum-Arctic GIS NetworkCircum-Arctic GIS Network

(UNESCO/Grid-Arendal)

US Arctic GIS NetworkOther US

Arctic GIS

NodesAGDC

Northern Alaska GIS Network

ARSC

Toolik GIS

FacilityWERC

Users:

Researchers

Educators

University

students

High school

students

Government

agencies

General public

Other

National

Arctic GIS

networks

ARCSSVECO

ACDD JOSS

Arctic

Geobotanical

Atlas

(5)

(2)

(1)

(1)

(3)

AGC

GINA Other North

Slope nodes

Other UAF

nodes

(4)

Figure 11. The GIS database behind the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation

Map would be the top level in the hierarchy of databases. Nine other

themes are in the circumpolar database at 1: 7.5 million scale.

Figure 10. Hierarchy of map scales in the AGA. Maps in the atlas could

be accessed by map scale, theme, region, or year.

Figure 9. The AGA would be linked to a variety of networks through the

worldwide web. The information in the AGA would be accessible with a variety of

visualization tools including the Swathviewer, ArcIMS, Chameleon, and

EarthSLOT. The red box shows the Northern Alaska network. The red numbered

nodes are part of the support team developing the AGA (AGC, Alaska Geobotany

Center; GINA, Geographic Information Network of Alaska; ARSC, Alaska

Regional Supercomputer Center; WERC, Water and Environmental Research

Center).

Literature cited:CAVM Team. 2003. Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map (Scale

1:7,500,000). in. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF)Map No. 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, AK.

Comiso, J. C. 2003. Warming trends in the Arctic from clear skysatellite observations. Journal of Climate 16:3498-3510.

Forbes, B. C. 1999. Reindeer herding and petroleum developmenton Poluostrov Yamal: sustainable or mutually incompatible uses?Polar Record 35:317-322.

Jia, G. J., H. E. Epstein, and D. A. Walker. 2003. Greening of arcticAlaska, 1981-2001. Geophysical Research Letters 30.

Walker, D. A., H. E. Epstein, J. G. Jia, A. Balser, C. Copass, E. J.Edwards, W. A. Gould, J. Hollingsworth, J. Knudson, H. A. Maier,A. Moody, and M. K. Raynolds. 2003. Phytomass, LAI, and NDVIin northern Alaska: relationships to summer warmth, soil pH,plant functional types, and extrapolation to the circumpolarArctic. Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres108:8169.

Walker, D. A., M. K. Raynolds, F. J. A. Daniels, E. Einarsson, A.Elvebakk, W. A. Gould, A. E. Katenin, S. S. Kholod, C. J. Markon,E. S. Melnikov, N. G. Moskalenko, S. S. Talbot, B. A. Yurtsev, andCAVM Team. 2005. The Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map.Journal of Vegetation Science 16:267-282 + appendices.

Dalton Highway (7

locations)

Isachsen

Green Cabin

Mould Bay

Inuvik

A

BC

D

E

ArcticBioclimateSubzones

TransectStudy Sites