Green Wireless Communication - IEEEewh.ieee.org/r10/calcutta/comsoc/lecture_ETCOMS13.pdf · A....

26
02 February, 2013 Jadavpur, Kolkata Aniruddha Chandra Electronics & Communication Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur. [email protected] Green Wireless Communication Green Wireless Communication

Transcript of Green Wireless Communication - IEEEewh.ieee.org/r10/calcutta/comsoc/lecture_ETCOMS13.pdf · A....

02 February, 2013Jadavpur, Kolkata

Aniruddha Chandra

Electronics & Communication Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur.

[email protected]

Green Wireless Communication Green Wireless Communication

2/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013

Green Communication =

Energy Efficient Communication

A new timely idea

3/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013OutlineOutline

Energy Efficiency – Why?

Energy Efficiency – How?

Case Study

4/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013OutlineOutline

Energy Efficiency – Why?

Energy Efficiency – How?

Case Study

5/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013Energy EfficiencyEnergy Efficiency

Why?

Traditional perspective:

- Reduced Tx power → reduced reliability.

- To maintain QoS, Tx rate should be reduced.

Ecological perspective:

- Reduce greenhouse gas emission.

Economical perspective:

- Reduce OPEX cost.

6/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013Energy EfficiencyEnergy Efficiency

Traditional Perspective

Value BW most:

- Ever increasing subscriber base.

- Strict spectrum regulations.

- R&D focus on BW efficient radio access techniques.

- These complex techniques demand more processing power.

A typical MIMO-OFDM Tx Rx ckt

7/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013Energy EfficiencyEnergy Efficiency

Traditional Perspective

What about energy?

- Battery powered mobile terminals → limited energy.

- Limited energy → limited reliable data rate.

BER vs. SNR curves (M = 16) BW efficiency vs. power efficiency

8/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013Energy EfficiencyEnergy Efficiency

Ecological Perspective

2007 statistics on environmental impact:

- A cellular network ~ Energy for 1,70,000 homes.

- 3% of the energy consumption.

- 2% of CO2 emission.

- The figures are going to triple by 2020.

Objects in Mirror are Close than

they Appear

9/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013Energy EfficiencyEnergy Efficiency

Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emission

Operation of radio access network:

- RF transmission.

- Fossil fuel powered BS.

- Charging of devices.

Device/ equipment production.

Backbone network operation.

A. Fehske et al. “The global footprint of mobile communications: the ecological and economic perspective,” IEEE Commun. Magz., 49 (8), 55-62, 2011.

10/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013Energy EfficiencyEnergy Efficiency

Economical Perspective

Decreasing revenue:

- Vodafone annual ARPU decreased from € 30 (2000) to € 16 (2009).

Increasing fuel cost:

- Diesel cost has doubled since 2008.

11/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013

Energy Consumption

Cost components:

Energy components:

- Feeder network.

- RF conversion.

- Climate control (e.g., air conditioning).

Energy EfficiencyEnergy Efficiency

Energy components for BS

12/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013Energy EfficiencyEnergy Efficiency

Energy Cost Calculation

Revenue generated:

- No. of subscribers per cell site ~ 800.

- ARPU ~ 3$ / month.

- Monthly revenue ~ 800 x 3$ = 2400 $.

Cost for energy:

- Energy cost ~ 0.20 $/ kWh.

- Power requirement per BS ~ 1.7 kW.

- Cost per month ~ 30 (days) x 24 (hours) x 1.7 x 0.20 $ = 244 $.

10% of total revenue (even before tax, interest, depreciation)!

BSSubscriber

Subscriber

Cell site

Power plant

13/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013OutlineOutline

Energy Efficiency – Why?

Energy Efficiency – How?

Case Study

14/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013

Energy Savings in Base Stations

Improvements in PA:

- Linear PAs → 90% wastage.

- DPD, Doherty, GaN based PA.

Power saving mode:

- Sleep mode, discontinuous Tx/ Rx.

Optimization:

- BS placement, cell size.

Energy Efficient MethodsEnergy Efficient Methods

V. Mancuso et al. “Reducing costs and pollution in cellular networks,” IEEE Commun. Magz., 49 (8), 55-62, 2011.

Z. Hasan et al. “Green cellular networks: a survey, some research issues and challenges,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., 13 (4), 524-40, 2011.

15/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013

Energy Savings in Base Stations

Renewable energy:

- Sustainable bio-fuel.

- Solar energy.

- Wind energy.

New BS architecture:

- Short, low power RF cable between Amp. & Ant.

- Feeder less site.

Reduce no. of BS?C. Lubritto et al. “Energy and environmental aspects of mobile communication systems,”Energy, 36 (2), 1109-14, 2011.

Solar powered BS (Italy)

Energy Efficient MethodsEnergy Efficient Methods

16/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013

New Communication Strategies

MIMO / beamforming:

- Diversity.

- More sectors per cell site.

Cognitive radio:

- Find unused spectrum, BW traded off for power.

Use a third node:

- Reduce effective transmission distance.

Energy Efficient MethodsEnergy Efficient Methods

17/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013OutlineOutline

Energy Efficiency – Why?

Energy Efficiency – How?

Case Study

18/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013

Save Energy by Introducing Relays

Basic idea:

- Transmit power,

- Realized over two hops,

Consider circuit energy:

- Energy consumed by Tx and Rx circuit at source, destination, and relay.

Overall energy saving:

- Depends on relay placement.

Case StudyCase Study

nT

nT CdPdP =⇒∝

212211 ;, dddCdPCdP nT

nT +===

( ) TTTnnn PPPdddd ≤+⇒+≤+ 212121

19/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013Relay PlacementRelay Placement

Collinear Model

Relay DestinationSource

Direct Path(Reference level)

Relayed Path

42.2 m (Optimum location)

20/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013Relay PlacementRelay Placement

Non-linear Model

21/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013Relay PlacementRelay Placement

Non-linear Model

Floor plan of 1st floor of ECE department, National Institute of Technology

My Cabin!

22/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013Relay PlacementRelay Placement

Non-linear Model

Energy saving contours superimposed on Floor plan

B. Ghosh et al. “Placing the ‘third’ node: An energy efficiency perspective,” Proc. IEEE CODEC, Kolkata, Dec. 2012.

23/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013

Open Problems

Relay - To use or not to use:

- Always cooperate, or use relay only when the direct link fails?

Relay selection:

- If there are many relay nodes, how many and which ones to select?

Other issues:

- Multiple antennas at relay, distributed STC etc.

Relay PlacementRelay Placement

24/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013SummarySummary

Value energy.

Various means to reduce energy consumption.

Use of wireless relays is one of them.

A single collinear relay may save upto 40% energy.

For non-linear setup, an energy efficient region may be found to place the relay.

Many open problems, we need you!

25/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013Read More About ItRead More About It

Green Communication1. G. Y. Li et al., “Energy efficient wireless communications: Tutorial, survey,

and open issues,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Magz., 18 (6), 28-35, 2011.

Modelling Energy Consumption

1. S. Cui et al., “Energy-efficiency of MIMO and cooperative MIMO techniques in sensor networks,” IEEE JSAC, 22 (6), 1089-98, 2004.

2. G. G. de Oliveira Brante et al., “Energy efficiency analysis of some cooperative and non-cooperative transmission schemes in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE TCOM, 59 (10), 2671-77, 2011.

26/26A. Chandra - Green wireless communication

ETCOMS 2013

Thank You!

[email protected]