Global Ocean Salinity products from SMOS The NOC experience

31
www.noc.ac.uk Global Ocean Salinity products from SMOS The NOC experience Christine Gommenginger Chris Banks Meric Srokosz Helen Snaith Contact: [email protected] [email protected]

Transcript of Global Ocean Salinity products from SMOS The NOC experience

www.noc.ac.uk

Global Ocean Salinity products from SMOS The NOC experience

Christine Gommenginger Chris Banks

Meric Srokosz Helen Snaith

Contact: [email protected] [email protected]

www.noc.ac.uk

Use of SMOS products at NOC

• Produce validated Level 3 SMOS sea surface salinity (SSS) products useful for science – 1˚x1˚, monthly in the first instance

• Based on ESA Level 2 SMOS data – Similar analyses and products for Aquarius

• Explore mitigation strategies to reduce artefacts & outliers

• Comparisons with data assimilating ocean model output (FOAM/NEMO) and in situ data (Argo, ship underway, PIRATA, drifters)

www.noc.ac.uk

Model Output: UKMO FOAM/NEMO Forecasting Ocean Assimilation Model based on

Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean

• operational • ¼º resolution daily • Averaged (mean) to 1º and

then monthly • Assimilates Argo data (as

well as SST, SSH and sea ice)

www.noc.ac.uk

Can FOAM/NEMO be used for validation?

Monthly – Nov 2011

www.noc.ac.uk

SMOS L3 Product v.1 • Based on ESA L2 (3_16) OS (Sept 2010) • Ascending and descending separately • 1ºx1º grid, monthly • Atlantic sector only [60ºS,60ºN],[80ºW,10ºE] • In-house QA:

– Keep only SSS>30 and SSS<40 – Keep if Nobs>25 in 1ºx1º cell

• Flags: – Reject <40 km from land – Keep if no issues with retrieval due to galactic noise,

sun- or moon-glint

www.noc.ac.uk

SMOS SSS Sept 2010 (Desc)

32 38

Model 1 Model 2

Model 3 WOA05

Banks et al (In press) TGRS SMOS Special Issue

www.noc.ac.uk

SMOS L3 Product v.2 • Based on ESA L2 (3_17) OS (July 2011) • Ascending and descending separately • 1ºx1º grid, monthly • Global between [60ºS, 60ºN]

www.noc.ac.uk

SSS error distribution in different locations

www.noc.ac.uk

SSS Distribution 1º cell July 2011 July 2011 (A)

Model 1 July 2011 (D)

Model 1

www.noc.ac.uk

Location of SSS with error distribution

www.noc.ac.uk

July 2010 (A) Model 1

SSS1 (A) 1ºx1º cell July 2011

July 2010 (D) Model 1

www.noc.ac.uk

SMOS L3 Product v.3 • based on ESA L2 (3_17) OS (Feb-July 2011) • Ascending and descending separately • 1ºx1º, monthly median • Global between [60ºS, 60ºN] • No flags except

– Reject <40 km from land • In-house QA

– Nobs>25, SSS Error < 1

www.noc.ac.uk

SSS1 (D)

Feb 2011

32 38

Processor error

www.noc.ac.uk

SSS1 (D)

March 2011

32 38

www.noc.ac.uk

SSS1 (D)

April 2011

32 38

www.noc.ac.uk

SSS1 (D)

May 2011

32 38

www.noc.ac.uk

SSS1 (D)

June 2011

32 38

www.noc.ac.uk

SSS1 (D)

July 2011

32 38

www.noc.ac.uk

L3 Temporal variability A vs D

www.noc.ac.uk

L3 Temporal variability A vs D

www.noc.ac.uk

L3 Temporal variability A vs D

www.noc.ac.uk

L3 Temporal variability A vs D

www.noc.ac.uk

L3 Temporal variability A vs D

www.noc.ac.uk

L3 Temporal variability A vs D

www.noc.ac.uk

SMOS L3 Product v.4 • Based on ESA L2 (5_00) OS (Nov 2011) • Ascending and descending separately • 1ºx1º, monthly median • Global between [60ºS, 60ºN] • In-house QA: Nobs>=25, SSS Error < 1 • Flags

– Reject >40 km from land – Keep if no geophysical issues (e.g. outliers, glint) (flag 25) – Keep if no retrieval issues (e.g. poor quality convergence)

(flag 26)

www.noc.ac.uk

Descending Ascending

SMOS L3 SSS1

32 38

Nov 2011

www.noc.ac.uk

Descending Ascending

FOAM/NEMO minus L3 SMOS SSS1

-1 +1 ±0.1

Nov 2011

www.noc.ac.uk

Ascending

FOAM/NEMO cf L3 SMOS SSS1

Nov 2011

www.noc.ac.uk

FOAM/NEMO cf L3 SMOS SSS1

Descending

Nov 2011

www.noc.ac.uk

SMOS User feedback (1) • Not yet looked at latest processor version (V5_50)

– Successive ESA L2 OS products getting better ! • Frequent changes of processor makes analyses and

validation difficult – Need full time series of SMOS L2 OS products obtained

consistently with the same version(s) of the processor(s) – Consistent datasets essential to interpret temporal and

spatial changes of SMOS SSS and diagnose anomalies – Cannot compare more than one to ~ few months as ESA

processor(s) changes often & without warning • For scientific exploitation, we use (and recommend)

the CATDS/Ifremer products !

www.noc.ac.uk

• For non-expert users (like NOC), details about the processing and major changes to the processing are difficult to obtain – e.g. Tb calibration ? Application of OTT ?

• Contact with expert labs and ESA through regular science meetings is absolutely essential !

• Significant effort needed to educate potential users of SMOS data e.g. software to read data ! – Useful URLs we point people to (when asked, frequently)

• www.argans.co.uk/smos/pages/faqs.php • ww.argans.co.uk/smos/pages/history.html • smos.array.ca/web/smos/matlab-tool

SMOS User feedback (2)