SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity status 4 February 2013 ARGANS.
Www.argans.co.uk SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity 13-14 September 2010 ARGANS & L2OS...
-
Upload
dandre-gomm -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Www.argans.co.uk SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity 13-14 September 2010 ARGANS & L2OS...
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Level 2 Ocean Salinity
13-14 September 2010
ARGANS & L2OS ESL
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
• Wind speed retrieval in Model 1 without retrieving wind direction;• Dual from Full versus Full from Full ;• EAFFOV versus AFFOV versus small xi-eta;• Increasing threshold for valid number of measurements;• Appendix;
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Model_1 retrieving WSn instead of UN10 and VN10
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Model_1 retrieving WSn instead of UN10 and VN10
• Contents
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Model_1 retrieving WSn instead of UN10 and VN10
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Model_1 retrieving WSn instead of UN10 and VN10
• Contents
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Model_1 retrieving WSn instead of UN10 and VN10
• Contents
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Model_1 retrieving WSn instead of UN10 and VN10
• Better rate of successful retrievals for the modification of Roughness Model 1 not retrieving wind direction;
• Much better convergence for the model with fixed wind direction;• Model 1 with fixed wind direction slightly better correlates with Model 2;• Retrieved Wind Speed for Model 1 with variable wind direction closer to
ECMWF initial data;• Recommend using Model 1 with fixed wind direction
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Dual from Full versus Full from Full
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Dual from Full versus Full from Full
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Dual from Full versus Full from Full
• Contents
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Dual from Full versus Full from Full
• More successful retrievals for Full-from-Full (FF): 74% instead of 69 %;• Better convergence for FF; there are more points failed to reach
convergence for DF;• Better chi2 results for FF;• TEC retrieval for FF has lower cross-track bias;
• Recommend using Full Pol from Full Pol rather than Dual Pol from Full Pol;
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
EAFFOV vs AFFOV vs small xi-eta
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
EAFFOV vs AFFOV vs small xi-eta
• Contents
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
EAFFOV vs AFFOV vs small xi-eta
#GP: 64790, 40733, 34467
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
EAFFOV vs AFFOV vs small xi-eta
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
EAFFOV vs AFFOV vs small xi-eta
• Contents
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
EAFFOV vs AFFOV vs small xi-eta
• Reducing field of view decreases edge effects but does not eliminate them completely;
• Changing field of view does not affect significantly grid point distribution against chi2;
• Reducing field of view improves chi2 values, in particularly near the edges, but the edge effect is still well seen;
• Recommend not using AFFOV or xieta reduced instead of EAFFOV;
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Increasing threshold for valid number of measurements
Extended AFFOVThreshold: 16(“min”); 30 (“low”); 50; 75
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Increasing threshold for valid number of measurements
Extended AFFOVThreshold: 16(“min”); 30 (“low”); 50; 75
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Increasing threshold for valid number of measurements
AFFOVThreshold: 16(“min”); 30 (“low”); 50; 75
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Increasing threshold for valid number of measurements
• Increasing threshold Tg_num_meas_valid sharply improves quality of results: edge effects and East-West bias are practically eliminated with a proper threshold;
• Increasing Tg_num_meas_valid reduces amount of available gridpoints, especially after the threshold exceeds 80-100; compromise value of the threshold should be selected, about 50-60;
• Effect of increasing Tg_num_meas_valid is much stronger than redaction of the field of view, from the point of reducing biases and edge effects; if we have to use FOV reduction, it could be more efficiently used in combination with increased Tg_num_meas_valid;
• Recommend increasing Tg_num_meas_valid initially to 50;
www.argans.co.uk
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity
Appendix
All pictures in this presentation are apparently affected/contaminated by sun that is illustrated on this slide; some results look more affected than the others – in most cases this is defined only by the colour scale used;