Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc. · 2020. 4. 30. · 290 Broadway, 20th Floor Buffalo, NY 14203-2999 ....
Transcript of Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc. · 2020. 4. 30. · 290 Broadway, 20th Floor Buffalo, NY 14203-2999 ....
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.A subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum
Joe Branch 7601 Old Channel Trail Project Manager Montague, MI 49437 Direct Dial (231) 670-6809
April 30, 2020 Reference No. 001069 Ms. Jaclyn Kondrk Mr. Brian P. Sadowski USEPA NYSDEC Region II, Site Investigation & Compliance Branch 270 Michigan Avenue 290 Broadway, 20th Floor Buffalo, NY 14203-2999 New York, NY 10007-1866
Dear Ms. Kondrk and Mr. Sadowski:
Re: Quarterly Operations Report - First Quarter 2020 Hyde Park Remedial Program Bedrock and Overburden Monitoring Programs NYSDEC Site No. 932021
In accordance with the July 2006 "Performance Monitoring Plan" (PMP), the following is the Quarterly Operations Report for the Hyde Park Remedial Program for the period January 1, 2020 through March 31, 2020. A total of 11.04 million gallons of aqueous phase liquid (APL) were collected, treated, and discharged in compliance with the Site's City of Niagara Falls Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) Significant Industrial Users (SIU) Wastewater Discharge Permit #49. Two drums (approximately 988 pounds) of non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) and twelve drums (approximately 2,646 pounds) of personal protective equipment (PPE) were shipped for disposal this quarter. The potentiometric contours are consistent with previous interpretations. Flow Zones 6, 7, and 9 have dewatered areas between the landfill and the gorge face. The current data continue to support the interpretation of effective hydraulic containment and inward gradients.
The performance monitoring data are presented as follows:
• Figures 1-9: Showing the potentiometric surface for the bedrock flow zones and overburden
• Figure 10: Showing continuously recorded water levels at flow zone 9 piezometer PMW-1M-09
• Table 1: Water level elevation summary
• Tables 2 and 3: Daily and weekly treatment system effluent monitoring data
• Attachment A: Purge well performance graphs indicating daily level and flow information
Due to a barometric transducer malfunction, the water elevations presented for the flow zone 9 piezometer PMW-1M-09 for this quarterly reporting period have not been compensated for barometric pressure. Compensating the water elevations removes the pressure exerted on the water level transducer by the overlying atmosphere, leaving only the pressure exerted on the transducer by the overlying water column. This results in “real” water elevations that are lower relative to the uncompensated elevations. As the uncompensated water elevations are already below the water elevation of 526 feet above mean sea level (ft. AMSL) required to be maintained in flow zone FZ-09 between the landfill and the APL purge wells, the compensated water elevations would also be below that target elevation. As such, the FZ-09 outcrop along the New York Power Authority (NYPA) access road remained unsaturated during the quarterly reporting period. The small number of water
April 30, 2020 Reference No. 001069
- 2 -
elevations that were compensated with the barometric data from the barometric transducer early in the quarter before the transducer malfunction were approximately 515.5 ft. AMSL. In addition, the quarterly groundwater elevation in piezometer PMW-1M-09 measured manually on March 3, 2020 was 517.25 feet above mean sea level (AMSL), confirming that the FZ-09 outcrop along the NYPA access road was unsaturated. The barometric transducer will be replaced in April 2020.
The pumping wells were operational and functioning as designed during the first quarter 2020. The pumps are operated to maintain a water level between a typical range of 2.5 feet above (pump on) and 2.5 feet below (pump off) a specific setpoint in accordance with the setpoint range defined in the Operation & Maintenance Manual. The following minor operational and setpoint issues were investigated or resolved during the first quarter of 2020:
• The water level in PW-2UR exceeded setpoint range from January 1 through January 7 due to pump maintenance. The water level returned to within setpoint range on January 8.
• The water level in PW-6UR exceeded setpoint range from January 1 through January 14 due to rain and snow melt. The water level returned to within setpoint range on January 15.
• The water level in PW-3M exceeded setpoint range on January 11 due to leak detection switch trip and on March 2 due to rain and snow melt. The water level returned to within setpoint range on January 12 and March 3, respectively.
• The water level in APW-1 exceeded setpoint range due to rain and snow melt from January 11 through January 12, January 24 through January 30, February 17 through February 20, and March 2 through March 6. The water level returned to within setpoint range on January 13, January 31, February 21, and March 7, respectively.
• The water level in APW-1 exceeded setpoint range on March 29 due to a pump fault. The pump was reset and the water level returned to within setpoint range on March 30.
• The water levels in the following wells exceeded setpoint range due to a heat trace failure:
− PW-1L, PW-8U, PW-10U, and APW-2 on January 29. The water levels in these wells returned to within setpoint range on January 30.
− PW-1U, PW-2UR, PW-2L, PW-3L, PW-5U, PW-6MR, PW-6UR, and PW-7U from January 29 through January 30. The water levels in these wells returned to within setpoint range on January 31.
• The water level in PW-4U exceeded setpoint range on the following dates:
− January 29 through January 31 and February 1, February 10, and February 15 due to an electrical fault. The pump was reset and the water level returned to within setpoint range on February 2, February 11 and February 15, respectively.
− March 1 and March 2 due to rain and snow melt. The water level returned to within setpoint range on March 3.
− March 11 and March 13 through March 14 due to communication faults. The pump was reset and the water level returned to within setpoint range on March 12 and March 15, respectively.
− March 19 for cleaning and maintenance of the water level transducer. The water level returned to within setpoint range on March 20.
April 30, 2020 Reference No. 001069
- 3 -
• The water levels in the following wells exceeded setpoint range due to effluent tank process controlmaintenance:
− PW-4U from February 22 (due to an electrical fault) and February 23 through February 25. Thewater level returned to within setpoint range on February 26.
− PW-1L from February 23 through February 26. The water level returned to within setpoint range onFebruary 27.
− PW-1U, PW-2UR, PW-2L, PW-3L, PW-5UR, PW-6UR, PW-6MR, PW-8U, and PW-10U fromFebruary 23 through February 25. The water levels returned to within setpoint range onFebruary 26.
− PW-2M and PW-3M from February 24 through February 26. The water levels returned to withinsetpoint range on February 27.
− APW-2 from February 23 through February 24. The water level returned to within setpoint range onFebruary 25.
− APW-1 from February 23 through February 24 and February 26 through February 27. The waterlevel returned to within setpoint range on February 25 and February 28, respectively.
• The water level in PW-7U exceeded setpoint range from March 12 through March 20 and from March 22through March 23 due to a communication issue with the pump. The water levels returned to within setpointrange on March 21 and March 24, respectively. Select communication equipment associated with PW-7Uwill be replaced in the second quarter of 2020.
• The water level in PW-9U exceeded set point range from January 16 to March 25 due to water leveltransducer issues. The transducer was removed and reset on March 25. The water level decreased;however, the transducer could not be placed to a depth where set point could be achieved. Cleaning of thiswell will occur in the second quarter such that the transducer can be reset to the required depth.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (231) 670-6809 or by email at [email protected].
Very truly yours,
GLENN SPRINGS HOLDINGS, INC.
Joe Branch Project Manager 231-670-6809 Cell
JB/eew/5 Encl.
cc: G. May, NYSDECJ. Robinson, NYSDOH D. Hoyt, GHDJ. Pentilchuk, GHD M. Popek, GHD
G1U-01
G6-01
H2U-01
H5-01
I1-01
PW-6UR
606.98
605.50
614.73
595.79
602.98
~595
figure 1FZ-01 Potentiometric Surface March 2020
1st Quarter ReportHyde Park Landfill Site
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.Niagara Falls, New York
Dewatered area offlow zone
Piezometer usedin contouring
Piezometer consideredunreliable - data notused in contouring
Purge Well - data notused in contouring
Tilde at a piezometerindicates that the flowzone is dewatered. At apurge well, the pumpingwater level is below theflow zone, but the flowzone is not necessarilydewatered. Valueshown is the flow zoneelevation.
~ 525
Legend
2003 Delineationof NAPL Limits
Potentiometric Contour(ft AMSL)
Flow Zone Subcrop
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.
0 200 400 600
PW-5UR
PW-6UR
PW-4U
F2U-02
F4U-02
G1-02
G6-02
H2U-02
H5-02
I1-02
J2U-02
J5U-02
J6-02
~577
~574
~577
577.01
588.04
594.63
593.07
595.98
595.67
592.57
600.49
600.74
603.11
figure 2FZ-02 Potentiometric Surface March 2020
1st Quarter ReportHyde Park Landfill Site
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.Niagara Falls, New York
Dewatered area offlow zone
Piezometer usedin contouring
Piezometer consideredunreliable - data notused in contouring
Purge Well - data notused in contouring
Tilde at a piezometerindicates that the flowzone is dewatered. At apurge well, the pumpingwater level is below theflow zone, but the flowzone is not necessarilydewatered. Valueshown is the flow zoneelevation.
~ 525
Legend
2003 Delineationof NAPL Limits
Potentiometric Contour(ft AMSL)
Flow Zone Subcrop
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.
0 200 400 600
PW-2UR
PW-10U
PW-5UR
PW-6UR
PW-4U
AFW-2U-04
D1U-04D2U-04
E6-04
F2U-04
F4U-04
F6-04
G1U-04
G6-04
H5-04
I1-04
J2U-04
J5U-04
J6-04
~570
~572
~563
~560
571.90
578.88
584.46582.97
566.96
579.91
587.73
570.75
594.71
593.43
595.62
586.86
596.93
589.21
583.54
figure 3FZ-04 Potentiometric Surface March 2020
1st Quarter ReportHyde Park Landfill Site
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.Niagara Falls, New York
Dewatered area offlow zone
Piezometer usedin contouring
Piezometer consideredunreliable - data notused in contouring
Purge Well - data notused in contouring
Tilde at a piezometerindicates that the flowzone is dewatered. At apurge well, the pumpingwater level is below theflow zone, but the flowzone is not necessarilydewatered. Valueshown is the flow zoneelevation.
~ 525
Legend
2003 Delineationof NAPL Limits
Potentiometric Contour(ft AMSL)
Flow Zone Subcrop
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.
0 200 400 600
PW-10U
PW-1U
PW-2UR
PW-3M
PW-4UPW-5UR
PW-6UR
AFW-2U-05
AGW-1U-05
D1U-05D2U-05
E6-05
F2U-05
F4U-05
F6-05
G6-05
H2M-05
H5-05
I1-05
J2U-05
J5U-05
J6-05
PMW-1U-05
565.10
~564
~562
520.90
~572
560.30
559.30
578.88
589.40
582.99582.76
567.36
580.18
587.59
570.65
593.23
595.47
594.28
552.81
581.91
582.04
583.12
580.72
figure 4FZ-05 Potentiometric Surface March 2020
1st Quarter ReportHyde Park Landfill Site
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.Niagara Falls, New York
Dewatered area offlow zone
Piezometer usedin contouring
Piezometer consideredunreliable - data notused in contouring
Purge Well - data notused in contouring
Tilde at a piezometerindicates that the flowzone is dewatered. At apurge well, the pumpingwater level is below theflow zone, but the flowzone is not necessarilydewatered. Valueshown is the flow zoneelevation.
~ 525
Legend
2003 Delineationof NAPL Limits
Potentiometric Contour(ft AMSL)
Flow Zone Subcrop
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.
0 200 400 600
PW-10U
PW-1U
PW-2M
PW-3M PW-4M
PW-6UMR
PW-7U
PW-8U PW-9U
ABP-7-06
AFW-1U-06
AFW-2U-06
AGW-1U-06
B2U-06
C3-06
D1U-06
D2U-06
E6-06F2M-06
F4M-06
F6-06
G1M-06
G6-06
H2M-06
H5-06
I1-06
J2M-06
J5M-06
J6-06
PMW-1U-06
565.10
549.00
~543
~539
~537
~534
~548 ~547
549.50 ~548
~554
558.08
545.34
554.55
555.12
~551
549.53550.75
575.03
552.40
551.33
574.91
575.06
577.50
585.21
590.24
546.24
552.97
549.09
554.75
549.23
figure 5FZ-06 Potentiometric Surface March 2020
1st Quarter ReportHyde Park Landfill Site
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.Niagara Falls, New York
Dewatered area offlow zone
Piezometer usedin contouring
Piezometer consideredunreliable - data notused in contouring
Purge Well - data notused in contouring
Tilde at a piezometerindicates that the flowzone is dewatered. At apurge well, the pumpingwater level is below theflow zone, but the flowzone is not necessarilydewatered. Valueshown is the flow zoneelevation.
~ 525
Legend
2003 Delineationof NAPL Limits
Potentiometric Contour(ft AMSL)
Flow Zone Subcrop
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.
0 200 400 600
PW-8M
APW-1
PW-2M
PW-3M
PW-4M
PW-6UMR
PW-8M
ABP-1-07 547.02
ABP-7-07
AFW-1M-07
AFW-2M-07
AGW-1M-07
B2M-07
C3-07
D1M-07D2M-07
E6-07
F2M-07
F4M-07
F6-07
G1M-07
G6-07
H5-07
I1-07
J5M-07
J6-07
PMW-1M-07
~536
~523
520.90
524.20
~514
~527
534.95
~534
~528
546.75
~531
546.51
532.07524.10
554.82
517.78
529.14
567.49
585.79
585.16
555.26
543.06
545.66
545.22
529.63
figure 6FZ-07 Potentiometric Surface March 2020
1st Quarter ReportHyde Park Landfill Site
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.Niagara Falls, New York
Dewatered area offlow zone
Piezometer usedin contouring
Piezometer consideredunreliable - data notused in contouring
Purge Well - data notused in contouring
Tilde at a piezometerindicates that the flowzone is dewatered. At apurge well, the pumpingwater level is below theflow zone, but the flowzone is not necessarilydewatered. Valueshown is the flow zoneelevation.
~ 525
Legend
2003 Delineationof NAPL Limits
Potentiometric Contour(ft AMSL)
Flow Zone Subcrop
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.
0 200 400 600
APW-1
APW-2
PW-1L
PW-2M
PW-3M
PW-4M
PW-6UMR
PW-8M
ABP-1-09 534.76
ABP-7-09
AFW-1M-09
AFW-2M-09
AGW-1M-09
B2M-09
C3-09
D1M-09D2M-09
E6-09
F2M-09
F4M-09
F6-09
G1M-09
G6-09
H2M-09
H5-09
I1-09
J2M-09
J5M-09
J6-09
PMW-1M-09
528.50
~526
~519
~514
520.90
524.20
~506
519.70
534.75
526.40
521.11
546.56
obstructed @59.88 ft BTOC
543.76
517.21517.09
553.69
516.83
516.85
570.94
581.94
586.36
553.32
543.98
563.10
545.26
545.53
566.02
517.25
figure 7FZ-09 Potentiometric Surface March 2020
1st Quarter ReportHyde Park Landfill Site
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.Niagara Falls, New York
Dewatered area offlow zone
Piezometer usedin contouring
Piezometer consideredunreliable - data notused in contouring
Purge Well - data notused in contouring
Tilde at a piezometerindicates that the flowzone is dewatered. At apurge well, the pumpingwater level is below theflow zone, but the flowzone is not necessarilydewatered. Valueshown is the flow zoneelevation.
~ 525
Legend
2003 Delineationof NAPL Limits
Potentiometric Contour(ft AMSL)
Flow Zone Subcrop
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.
0 200 400 600
585
APW-1
APW-2
PW-1L
PW-2L
PW-3L
AFW-1L-11
AFW-2L-11
AGW-1L-11
B2L-11
D1L-11D2L-11
E6-11
F2L-11
F4L-11
F6-11
G1L-11
G6-11
H2L-11
H5-11
I1-11
J5L-11
J6-11
PMW-1L-11
528.50
512.10
497.70
495.00
499.40
514.14
497.14
584.64
500.87
504.00523.76
535.10
554.25
572.14
530.21
593.16
594.75
559.90
542.09
545.23
556.27
587.26
514.28
figure 8FZ-11 Potentiometric Surface March 2020
1st Quarter ReportHyde Park Landfill Site
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.Niagara Falls, New York
Dewatered area offlow zone
Piezometer usedin contouring
Piezometer consideredunreliable - data notused in contouring
Purge Well - data notused in contouring
Tilde at a piezometerindicates that the flowzone is dewatered. At apurge well, the pumpingwater level is below theflow zone, but the flowzone is not necessarilydewatered. Valueshown is the flow zoneelevation.
~ 525
Legend
2003 Delineationof NAPL Limits
Potentiometric Contour(ft AMSL)
Flow Zone Subcrop
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.
0 200 400 600
CMW-11OB
CMW-12OB
CMW-1OB
CMW-2OB
CMW-3OB
CMW-4OB
CMW-5OB
CMW-6OB
CMW-7OB
CMW-8OB
CMW-9OB
OMW-1
OMW-10R
OMW-11ROMW-12R
OMW-13R
OMW-14ROMW-15
OMW-16R
OMW-2
OMW-3OMW-4R
OMW-5R
OMW-6
OMW-7 OMW-8R2
OMW-9WW-D
WW-C
571.35
591.03
571.79
590.97
576.63
Well Surcharged
580.73
WellSurcharged
606.74
Dry
569.44
601.19
590.25
593.42
593.21
591.85
595.84
603.29
603.93
603.60
594.58
590.35
589.27
586.06
586.88 588.48
590.12
sp.580
sp.583
Niagara Falls, New York
figure 9Overburden Potentiometric Surface March 2020
1st Quarter ReportHyde Park Landfill Site
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.
Well usedin contouring
Well consideredunreliable - data notused in contouring
Indicates the well isdry.
Dry
Legend
Existing BarrierCollection System
Potentiometric Contour(ft AMSL)
Overburden BarrierCollection System
0ft. 200ft. 400ft. 600ft.
Note: Data values may overlap.If illegible, refer to tabulateddata in the report.
Niagara River
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.
OBCWS Wet Wellspumped for recovery.Posted levels indicatethe pumping setpoints.Setpoint levels wereused for contouring.
figure 10
PMW-1M-09 1st Quarter 2020 - Hourly Water Level Elevation1st Quarter Report
Hyde Park Landfill SiteGlenn Springs Holdings, Inc.
Riser
Top of Casing = 597.80 ft AMSL
500
505
510
515
520
525
530
535
540
545
550
555
560
565
570
575
580
585
590
595
600
Ele
vati
on
(F
t. A
MS
L) Reference Elevation = 526 ft AMSL
Screened Interval
Uncompensated Water Level Elevation
FZ-9
Screen and Sandpack
Table 1
Water Level Elevation SummaryFirst Quarter - 2020
Hyde Park RRT Program
Page 1 of 5
Well Reference Elevation Depth to Water Water Level Elevation(ft AMSL) (ft) (ft AMSL)
Overburden
CMW-2OB 590.79 -0.18 590.97CMW-3OB 582.13 5.50 576.63CMW-4OB 574.28 Surcharged 574.28CMW-5OB 583.43 2.70 580.73CMW-6OB 571.89 Surcharged 571.89CMW-7OB 611.00 4.26 606.74CMW-8OB 616.11 Dry -CMW-9OB 571.76 2.32 569.44CMW-1OB 576.80 5.01 571.79CMW-11OB 572.85 1.50 571.35CMW-12OB 594.74 3.71 591.03MH20 605.87 4.66 601.21MH21 599.77 6.06 593.71MH22 593.37 6.62 586.75MH23 587.05 7.84 579.21MH24 582.57 1.36 581.21MH25 583.82 0.99 582.83MH26 584.48 2.54 581.94MH27 586.12 5.73 580.39MH28 585.23 5.68 579.55MH29 604.58 NM -MH30 599.49 7.58 591.91MH31 590.10 8.61 581.49MH32 592.01 9.59 582.42MH33 592.51 8.64 583.87MH34 598.34 7.10 591.24MH35 605.69 6.55 599.14MH35A 605.69 7.14 598.55OMW-1 605.28 4.09 601.19OMW-2 605.99 2.39 603.60OMW-3 598.63 4.05 594.58OMW-4R 601.17 10.82 590.35OMW-5R 591.31 2.04 589.27OMW-6 587.62 1.56 586.06OMW-7 592.74 5.86 586.88OMW-8R2 594.67 6.19 588.48OMW-9 595.27 5.15 590.12OMW-10R 595.13 4.88 590.25OMW-11R 597.52 4.10 593.42OMW-12R 596.71 3.50 593.21OMW-13R 601.50 9.65 591.85OMW-14R 599.64 3.80 595.84OMW-15 607.48 4.19 603.29OMW-16R 607.62 3.69 603.93SC-2 625.61 22.64 602.97SC-3 638.72 40.58 598.14SC-4 639.35 39.22 600.13SC-5 634.07 Obstructed -SC-6 631.15 17.51 613.64
001069Kondrk-Sadowski-5-Tbls.xlsx
Table 1
Water Level Elevation SummaryFirst Quarter - 2020
Hyde Park RRT Program
Page 2 of 5
Well Reference Elevation Depth to Water Water Level Elevation(ft AMSL) (ft) (ft AMSL)
Shallow Bedrock
CMW-1SH 576.11 10.56 565.55CMW-2SH 590.51 16.17 574.34CMW-3SH 581.91 25.99 555.92CMW-4SH 574.16 16.52 557.64CMW-5SH 583.36 Surcharged 583.36CMW-6SH 572.05 9.27 562.78CMW-7SH 610.58 10.23 600.35CMW-8SH 615.95 3.45 612.50CMW-9SH 571.96 11.02 560.94CMW-11SH 573.21 7.48 565.73CMW-12SH 597.02 21.64 575.38
Flow Zone 1
G1U-01 617.08 10.10 606.98G6-01 609.24 3.74 605.50H2U-01 620.92 6.19 614.73H5-01 617.61 21.82 595.79I1-01 625.58 22.60 602.98
Flow Zone 2
F2U-02 599.89 22.88 577.01F4U-02 602.32 14.28 588.04G1-02 616.86 22.23 594.63G6-02 608.65 15.58 593.07H2U-02 620.88 24.90 595.98H5-02 617.47 21.80 595.67I1-02 625.47 32.90 592.57J2U-02 609.66 9.17 600.49J5U-02 606.21 5.47 600.74J6-02 609.23 6.12 603.11
Flow Zone 4
AFW-2U-04 593.48 14.60 578.88D1U-04 593.77 9.31 584.46D2U-04 590.65 7.68 582.97E6-04 578.23 11.27 566.96F2U-04 599.76 19.85 579.91F4U-04 602.19 14.46 587.73F6-04 588.06 17.31 570.75G1U-04 616.96 22.25 594.71G6-04 609.15 15.72 593.43H5-04 617.40 21.78 595.62I1-04 625.30 38.44 586.86J2U-04 609.42 12.49 596.93J5U-04 606.05 16.84 589.21J6-04 609.12 25.58 583.54
001069Kondrk-Sadowski-5-Tbls.xlsx
Table 1
Water Level Elevation SummaryFirst Quarter - 2020
Hyde Park RRT Program
Page 3 of 5
Well Reference Elevation Depth to Water Water Level Elevation(ft AMSL) (ft) (ft AMSL)
Flow Zone 5
AFW-2U-05 593.33 14.45 578.88AGW-1U-05 591.80 2.40 589.40D1U-05 593.51 10.52 582.99D2U-05 590.56 7.80 582.76E6-05 578.04 10.68 567.36F2U-05 599.64 19.46 580.18F4U-05 602.06 14.47 587.59F6-05 587.85 17.20 570.65G6-05 609.13 15.90 593.23H2M-05 621.59 26.12 595.47H5-05 617.31 23.03 594.28I1-05 625.25 72.44 552.81J2U-05 609.30 27.39 581.91J5U-05 605.87 23.83 582.04J6-05 609.02 25.90 583.12PMW-1U-05 598.00 17.28 580.72
Flow Zone 6
ABP-7-06 575.78 Dry -AFW-1U-06 571.83 13.75 558.08AFW-2U-06 593.22 47.88 545.34AGW-1U-06 591.66 37.11 554.55B2U-06 589.29 34.17 555.12C3-06 585.78 37.19 548.59D1U-06 593.25 43.72 549.53D2U-06 590.38 39.63 550.75E6-06 577.99 2.96 575.03F2M-06 599.06 46.66 552.40F4M-06 602.05 50.72 551.33F6-06 587.84 12.93 574.91G1M-06 616.75 41.69 575.06G6-06 609.09 31.59 577.50H2M-06 621.42 36.21 585.21H5-06 617.17 26.93 590.24I1-06 625.15 78.91 546.24J2M-06 608.94 55.97 552.97J5M-06 606.22 57.13 549.09J6-06 608.93 54.18 554.75PMW-1U-06 597.92 48.69 549.23
001069Kondrk-Sadowski-5-Tbls.xlsx
Table 1
Water Level Elevation SummaryFirst Quarter - 2020
Hyde Park RRT Program
Page 4 of 5
Well Reference Elevation Depth to Water Water Level Elevation(ft AMSL) (ft) (ft AMSL)
Flow Zone 7
ABP-1-07 575.20 28.18 547.02ABP-7-07 575.73 40.78 534.95AFW-1M-07 571.41 38.78 532.63AFW-2M-07 593.44 66.73 526.71AGW-1M-07 592.91 46.16 546.75B2M-07 589.52 Dry -C3-07 585.62 39.11 546.51D1M-07 594.15 62.08 532.07D2M-07 590.77 66.67 524.10E6-07 577.91 23.09 554.82F2M-07 598.91 81.13 517.78F4M-07 601.91 72.77 529.14F6-07 587.68 20.19 567.49G1M-07 616.68 30.89 585.79G6-07 609.06 23.90 585.16H5-07 617.05 61.79 555.26I1-07 625.14 82.08 543.06J5M-07 606.07 60.41 545.66J6-07 608.85 63.63 545.22PMW-1M-07 598.50 68.87 529.63
Flow Zone 9
ABP-1-09 575.19 40.43 534.76ABP-7-09 575.67 40.92 534.75AFW-1M-09 571.12 44.72 526.40AFW-2M-09 593.32 72.21 521.11AGW-1M-09 592.75 46.19 546.56B2M-09 589.34 Obstructed -C3-09 585.00 41.24 543.76D1M-09 594.02 76.81 517.21D2M-09 590.66 73.57 517.09E6-09 577.82 24.13 553.69F2M-09 598.71 81.88 516.83F4M-09 601.79 84.94 516.85F6-09 587.53 16.59 570.94G1M-09 616.58 34.64 581.94G6-09 608.98 22.62 586.36H2M-09 621.32 68.00 553.32H5-09 616.93 72.95 543.98I1-09 624.91 61.81 563.10J2M-09 608.77 63.51 545.26J5M-09 605.82 60.29 545.53J6-09 608.76 42.74 566.02PMW-1M-09 598.34 81.09 517.25
001069Kondrk-Sadowski-5-Tbls.xlsx
Table 1
Water Level Elevation SummaryFirst Quarter - 2020
Hyde Park RRT Program
Page 5 of 5
Well Reference Elevation Depth to Water Water Level Elevation(ft AMSL) (ft) (ft AMSL)
Flow Zone 11
AFW-1L-11 572.10 57.96 514.14AFW-2L-11 593.43 96.29 497.14AGW-1L-11 592.71 8.07 584.64B2L-11 589.65 88.78 500.87D1L-11 593.80 89.80 504.00D2L-11 590.21 66.45 523.76E6-11 577.72 42.62 535.10F2L-11 598.94 44.69 554.25F4L-11 602.22 30.08 572.14F6-11 587.40 57.19 530.21G1L-11 616.84 23.68 593.16G6-11 608.89 14.14 594.75H2L-11 620.73 60.83 559.90H5-11 616.81 74.72 542.09I1-11 624.75 79.52 545.23J5L-11 607.20 50.93 556.27J6-11 608.68 21.42 587.26PMW-1L-11 598.84 84.56 514.28
Purge Wells
APW-1 564.98 36.48 528.50APW-2 569.89 57.79 512.10PW-1L 593.16 95.46 497.70PW-1U 593.50 44.50 549.00PW-2L 597.29 102.29 495.00PW-2M 596.61 85.21 511.40PW-2UR 594.75 35.85 558.90PW-3L 599.05 99.65 499.40PW-3M 597.79 76.89 520.90PW-4M 606.93 82.73 524.20PW-4U 604.85 32.95 571.90PW-5UR 601.31 41.01 560.30PW-6UMR 609.31 106.11 503.20PW-6UR 608.47 49.17 559.30PW-7U 592.47 52.17 540.30PW-8M 592.67 72.97 519.70PW-8U 589.27 39.77 549.50PW-9U 587.47 40.37 547.10PW-10U 593.54 28.44 565.10
Notes:
"-" - Not applicableft AMSL - Feet above mean sea levelNM - Not measured due to overlying ice and snowDry - No water present at the time of measurement
001069Kondrk-Sadowski-5-Tbls.xlsx
Table 2
Leachate Treatment System Daily Effluent Monitoring DataFirst Quarter - 2020
Hyde Park RRT Program
Page 1 of 3
EffluentDate pH Flow
(su) (gal)
01/01/20 7.1 257,00001/02/20 7.2 166,00001/03/20 7.2 51,00001/04/2001/05/2001/06/20 7.8 262,00001/07/20 7.8 319,00001/08/20 7.1 103,00001/09/20 7.1 171,00001/10/2001/11/2001/12/20 7.0 335,00001/13/20 7.0 291,00001/14/2001/15/20 7.0 299,00001/16/2001/17/20 7.1 263,00001/18/2001/19/2001/20/20 7.0 316,00001/21/20 7.0 192,00001/22/20 7.1 73,00001/23/20 7.0 68,00001/24/2001/25/2001/26/20 7.0 199,00001/27/20 7.0 340,00001/28/20 7.0 280,00001/29/20 7.0 20,00001/30/20 7.0 125,00001/31/20 7.1 75,00002/01/2002/02/2002/03/20 7.0 317,00002/04/20 6.9 323,00002/05/20 6.9 88,00002/06/20 7.5 202,000
001069Kondrk-Sadowski-5-Tbls.xlsx
Table 2
Leachate Treatment System Daily Effluent Monitoring DataFirst Quarter - 2020
Hyde Park RRT Program
Page 2 of 3
EffluentDate pH Flow
(su) (gal)
02/07/20 6.9 32,00002/08/2002/09/2002/10/20 7.5 228,00002/11/20 7.4 275,00002/12/20 6.9 24,00002/13/20 7.0 178,00002/14/20 7.1 41,00002/15/2002/16/2002/17/20 7.0 282,00002/18/20 7.0 83,00002/19/20 7.1 59,00002/20/20 7.5 82,00002/21/2002/22/2002/23/2002/24/2002/25/20 7.5 55,00002/26/20 7.3 37,00002/27/20 7.3 293,00002/28/20 7.2 290,00002/29/2003/01/2003/02/20 7.2 43,00003/03/20 7.2 249,00003/04/20 7.2 278,00003/05/20 7.2 246,00003/06/20 7.1 68,00003/07/2003/08/2003/09/20 7.0 203,00003/10/20 7.1 404,00003/11/20 7.3 219,00003/12/20 7.3 30,00003/13/20 7.2 220,00003/14/20
001069Kondrk-Sadowski-5-Tbls.xlsx
Table 2
Leachate Treatment System Daily Effluent Monitoring DataFirst Quarter - 2020
Hyde Park RRT Program
Page 3 of 3
EffluentDate pH Flow
(su) (gal)
03/15/2003/16/20 7.3 238,00003/17/20 7.2 255,00003/18/20 7.1 58,00003/19/20 7.0 261,00003/20/2003/21/2003/22/2003/23/20 7.1 216,00003/24/20 7.0 275,00003/25/2003/26/20 7.1 134,00003/27/20 7.1 56,00003/28/2003/29/2003/30/20 7.2 201,00003/31/20 7.1 296,000
Total 11,044,000
Notes:
su - Standard Unitgal - Gallons
001069Kondrk-Sadowski-5-Tbls.xlsx
Table 3
Analytical Results SummaryWeekly Sampling - Leachate Treatment System
First Quarter - 2020Hyde Park RRT Program
Page 1 of 2
EffluentParameter Units 01/02/2020 01/08/2020 01/15/2020 01/22/2020 01/29/2020 02/05/2020
Volatiles1,1,1-Trichloroethane µg/L 0.28 J 0.48 J 0.40 J 0.52 J 0.73 J 1.11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane µg/L 0.61 J 1.1 0.71 J 1.6 3.5 5.21,1,2-Trichloroethane µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.41 J 0.49 J1,1-Dichloroethane µg/L 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.7 2.8 2.91,1-Dichloroethene µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1,2-Dichlorobenzene µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1,2-Dichloroethane µg/L 1.8 2.3 1.8 2.7 2.7 3.91,2-Dichloropropane µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.43 J 0.54 J1,3-Dichlorobenzene µg/L 1.0 U 0.24 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1,4-Dichlorobenzene µg/L 1.0 U 0.55 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U2-Chlorotoluene µg/L 1.0 U 0.79 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U3-Chlorotoluene µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U4-Chlorotoluene µg/L 1.0 U 0.25 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UBenzene µg/L 0.37 J 0.86 J 0.44 J 1.0 3.0 4.6Bromodichloromethane µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UBromoform µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UBromomethane (Methyl bromide) µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UCarbon disulfide µg/L 29 4.1 15 33 22 21Carbon tetrachloride µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UChlorobenzene µg/L 1.0 U 0.38 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UChloroethane µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UChloroform (Trichloromethane) µg/L 1.3 1.8 1.4 1.6 3.3 4.8Chloromethane (Methyl chloride) µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene µg/L 0.27 J 0.66 J 0.29 J 0.49 J 0.68 J 0.85 Jcis-1,3-Dichloropropene µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UDichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12) µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UEthylbenzene µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Um&p-Xylenes µg/L 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 Um-Monochlorobenzotrifluoride µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UMethylene chloride µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.38 J 1.0 Uo-Monochlorobenzotrifluoride µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Uo-Xylene µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Up-Monochlorobenzotrifluoride µg/L 1.0 U 0.45 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UStyrene µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UTetrachloroethene µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UToluene µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UTrichloroethene µg/L 1.0 U 0.21 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UTrichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11) µg/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UVinyl acetate µg/L 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 UVinyl chloride µg/L 140 120 130 150 170 140Xylenes (total) µg/L 3.0 U 3.0 U 3.0 U 3.0 U 3.0 U 3.0 U
General ChemistryPhenolics (total) mg/L 0.0011 J 0.0045 J 0.0037 J 0.0027 J 0.0050 0.0188
Notes:
J - Estimated concentrationU - Not detected at the associated reporting limitmg/L - Milligrams per literµg/L - Micrograms per liter
001069Kondrk-Sadowski-5-Tbls.xlsx
Table 3
Analytical Results SummaryWeekly Sampling - Leachate Treatment System
First Quarter - 2020Hyde Park RRT Program
Page 2 of 2
EffluentParameter Units
Volatiles1,1,1-Trichloroethane µg/L1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane µg/L1,1,2-Trichloroethane µg/L1,1-Dichloroethane µg/L1,1-Dichloroethene µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene µg/L1,2-Dichloroethane µg/L1,2-Dichloropropane µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene µg/L2-Chlorotoluene µg/L3-Chlorotoluene µg/L4-Chlorotoluene µg/LBenzene µg/LBromodichloromethane µg/LBromoform µg/LBromomethane (Methyl bromide) µg/LCarbon disulfide µg/LCarbon tetrachloride µg/LChlorobenzene µg/LChloroethane µg/LChloroform (Trichloromethane) µg/LChloromethane (Methyl chloride) µg/Lcis-1,2-Dichloroethene µg/Lcis-1,3-Dichloropropene µg/LDichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12) µg/LEthylbenzene µg/Lm&p-Xylenes µg/Lm-Monochlorobenzotrifluoride µg/LMethylene chloride µg/Lo-Monochlorobenzotrifluoride µg/Lo-Xylene µg/Lp-Monochlorobenzotrifluoride µg/LStyrene µg/LTetrachloroethene µg/LToluene µg/Ltrans-1,2-Dichloroethene µg/Ltrans-1,3-Dichloropropene µg/LTrichloroethene µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11) µg/LVinyl acetate µg/LVinyl chloride µg/LXylenes (total) µg/L
General ChemistryPhenolics (total) mg/L
Notes:
J - Estimated concentrationU - Not detected at the associated reporting limitmg/L - Milligrams per literµg/L - Micrograms per liter
02/12/2020 02/19/2020 02/28/2020 03/04/2020 03/10/2020 03/17/2020 03/25/2020
0.93 J 0.76 J 0.57 J 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.24.7 3.1 2.6 6.2 9.0 7.0 12
0.50 J 0.34 J 0.33 J 0.56 J 0.85 J 0.63 J 0.81 J3.3 J 3.4 J 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.41.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U4.2 3.9 3.2 4.1 5.1 5.0 6.3
0.69 J 0.51 J 0.50 J 0.59 J 0.65 J 0.67 J 0.83 J1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.79 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.41 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U4.7 2.7 2.1 6.6 11 9.8 16
1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U
40 28 35 14 19 20 351.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.98 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U4.5 3.4 3.5 6.5 6.7 3.7 5.4
1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.89 J 1.0 U 1.0 U0.83 J 0.74 J 0.61 J 1.2 1.5 1.6 2.01.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.21 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 0.59 J 2.0 U 0.21 J 2.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.48 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.43 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.58 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.66 J 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.25 J 0.23 J 1.0 U 0.28 J1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U160 140 160 130 130 140 150
3.0 U 3.0 U 3.0 U 1.0 J 3.0 U 3.0 U 3.0 U
0.0157 0.0146 0.0143 0.0399 0.0374 0.0234 0.0434
001069Kondrk-Sadowski-5-Tbls.xlsx
GHD | 001069Kondrk-Sadowski-5
Attachment A
First Quarter 2020 Pumping Well Performance Graphs
ATTACHMENT A
FIRST QUARTER 2020 - PUMPING WELL PERFORMANCE GRAPHS
HYDE PARK
Page 1 of 10
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
490
500
510
520
530
540
550
560
570
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well APW-1
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.8
500
505
510
515
520
525
530
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well APW-2
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
ATTACHMENT A
FIRST QUARTER 2020 - PUMPING WELL PERFORMANCE GRAPHS
HYDE PARK
Page 2 of 10
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
490
495
500
505
510
515
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-1L
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
530535540545550555560565570575
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-1U
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
ATTACHMENT A
FIRST QUARTER 2020 - PUMPING WELL PERFORMANCE GRAPHS
HYDE PARK
Page 3 of 10
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
490
495
500
505
510
515
520
525
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-2L
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
505
510
515
520
525
530
535
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-2M
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
ATTACHMENT A
FIRST QUARTER 2020 - PUMPING WELL PERFORMANCE GRAPHS
HYDE PARK
Page 4 of 10
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
550
560
570
580
590
600
610
620
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-2UR
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
495
500
505
510
515
520
525
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-3L
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
ATTACHMENT A
FIRST QUARTER 2020 - PUMPING WELL PERFORMANCE GRAPHS
HYDE PARK
Page 5 of 10
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
515
520
525
530
535
540
545
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-3M
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
510
515
520
525
530
535
540
545
550
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-4M
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
ATTACHMENT A
FIRST QUARTER 2020 - PUMPING WELL PERFORMANCE GRAPHS
HYDE PARK
Page 6 of 10
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
560
565
570
575
580
585
590
595
600
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-4U
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
555
565
575
585
595
605
615
625
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-5UR
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
ATTACHMENT A
FIRST QUARTER 2020 - PUMPING WELL PERFORMANCE GRAPHS
HYDE PARK
Page 7 of 10
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
545
555
565
575
585
595
605
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-6UR
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
500505510515520525530535540545550
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-6MR
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
ATTACHMENT A
FIRST QUARTER 2020 - PUMPING WELL PERFORMANCE GRAPHS
HYDE PARK
Page 8 of 10
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
530
540
550
560
570
580
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-7U
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
515
520
525
530
535
540
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-8M
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
ATTACHMENT A
FIRST QUARTER 2020 - PUMPING WELL PERFORMANCE GRAPHS
HYDE PARK
Page 9 of 10
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
540
545
550
555
560
565
570
575
580
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-8U
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
535
540
545
550
555
560
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-9U
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)
ATTACHMENT A
FIRST QUARTER 2020 - PUMPING WELL PERFORMANCE GRAPHS
HYDE PARK
Page 10 of 10
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
550555560565570575580585590595
Flow
(GPM
)
Gro
undw
ater
Ele
vatio
n (ft
AM
SL)
Well PW-10U
Elevation (ft AMSL) Setpoint Upper/Lower Bounds (ft AMSL) Flow (GPM)