Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

25
Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002

Transcript of Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Page 1: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Footpoint behavior

Hugh Hudson

UCB

Galileo science meetingNobeyama, July 12, 2002

Page 2: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

What can footpoints teach us?

• How do we understand the symbiosis of energy release and particle acceleration?

• What is the nature of the geometrical evolution of the corona in the impulsive phase of a flare (or the acceleration phase of CME)?

• Recall work of Sakao (Yoyogi conference); Saita (unfinished thesis); Asai (ongoing)

Page 3: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Coronal structure and conjugacy

Fletcher et al., 2001Cargill & Priest, 1995?

http://isass1.solar.isas.ac.jp/~hudson/cartoons

Page 4: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

B. Somov, 2002

Page 5: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Coronal separatrix structure

• The separatrix surfaces deform during an energy-release event

• The flare ribbons in the chromosphere should map into these separatrices

• Ribbon brightening not only reveals the energy, but also describes the coronal restructuring

Page 6: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

The coronal magnetic field, assuming low beta, plays two roles simultaneously:

1) The field defines the source of energy via B2/8

2) The field defines the geometry of the energy release

Comment

Page 7: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Warren & WarshallApJ 560, L87, 2001

Asai et al., Y10 proceedings,2002

Page 8: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Footpoint behavior for Aug. 25, 2001

(Metcalf et al. AGU poster)

Page 9: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Metcalf made a potential-field extrapolation and foundthat the separatrix structurecorrelated in interesting wayswith the in-plane motions,but not with the out-of-plane(perpendicular to B) motions.

Footpoints and separatrices

Page 10: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Particle acceleration and energy release

• Neupert effect (Neupert, 1968; Hudson, 1972)

• Soft-hard-soft spectral pattern (Parks & Winckler, 1971; Benz, 1975)

Page 11: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

RHESSI 20-25 keV (purple)

GOES 1-8 A(green)

Neuperteffect

Examples of the Neupert effect

Page 12: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Lessons from the Neupert effect

• The energy release that fills coronal loops with hot plasma has a direct relationship with particle acceleration

• To a first approximation, this relationship is independent of the scale or intensity of the energy release

Page 13: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Soft-hard-soft pattern

Page 14: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

F. Farnik, 2001

Another SHS example

Page 15: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

A

RH

ES

SI M

-clas

s flare

Page 16: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Broad-band spectral variation

Page 17: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Spectral soft-hard-soft effect

Page 18: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Lessons from soft-hard-soft

• Non-thermal time scales are usually not determined by trapping

• The spectral evolution at high energies is an intrinsic property of the acceleration mechanism

• Understanding hard X-ray spectral morphology will be a major RHESSI goal

Page 19: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

HX/EUV overlay for Bastille flare ribbons

Fletcher & Hudson, 2001

Page 20: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Ribbon evolution and photospheric B

Fletcher & Hudson, 2001

Page 21: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Magnetic flux swept out in ribbon motions

Fletcher & Hudson, 2001

Page 22: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Swept-out fluxes

Fletcher & Hudson, 2001

Page 23: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Lessons from ribbons

• Ribbon shapes don’t reflect photospheric field

• Ribbon motions and swept-out field don’t match preconceptions

• In the Bastille 2000 flare, the hard X-ray footpoint brightnesses don’t match the expectation from mirroring

Page 24: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Conclusions

• The footpoint sources (hard X-ray or other) can teach us a lot about coronal restructuring (flares and CMEs)

• The lessons learned thus far don’t agree particularly well with expectations from simple models

Page 25: Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.

Final remark

• The Neupert effect and the soft-hard-soft spectral pattern are dominant, but not universal

• The exceptions are probably well worth studying