FABEC 10.30 h Presentation WAC v06 - World ATM Congress Presentations/FABEC 10... · 0 FABEC...

0

FABEC OperationsFrom a project-driven approach to continuous

operational improvements

Andreas PötzschChairman FABEC Operations and

DFS Director En-route and Approach.

Madrid, 07 March 2017

1

FABEC at a glance

Andreas Pötzsch, CM FABEC Operations and DFS Director En-route and Approach, Madrid 07.03.2017

§ 6 states

§ 7 ANSP’s

§ 5 Military partners

§ 14 ACC’s

§ Traffic:

~ 5.7 Mio Flights/ Year

more than 50 % of European air traffic

§ Airspace: 1,7 Mio km²

§ Service at 240 Airports

2

ACC‘s and UAC‘s

14 Centres with different organisational structures


UACs ACCs

3

FABEC Focus until 2014 / 2015

§ Establish FABEC governance and structure on ANSP and States side

§ Establish complex processes to steer common work

§ Concentrate on large scale airspace design projects, involving numerous stakeholders from both civil and military ANSP’s


4

FABEC Airspace Design Projects

5

FABEC Focus until 2014 / 2015

§ Establish FABEC governance and structure on ANSP and States side

§ Establish complex processes to steer common work

§ Concentrate on large scale airspace design projects, involving numerous stakeholders from both civil and military ANSP’s

§ Distinguish between local / national projects and FABEC projects


6

FABEC projects until 2014 / 2015

§ AMRUFRA cross border airspace redesign R

R

R

R

R

tbd


§ Night Network / City Pairs

§ FAAP: ASM / FUA improved civil military coordination

§ FRA: FABEC Free route project – ongoing

§ XMAN: Extended Arrival Management – ongoing

§ CBA Land / CW: cross border airspace redesign – on hold

§ IP SE: cross border airspace redesign – on hold

§ FOCS: cross border airspace redesign – under discussion

7

2016-2019Changing the focus

Realism and Performance

Combining realistic initiatives to an overarching planning based on performance needs and customer requirements.


8

FABEC Lessons Learned

§ Common processes and firm operational steering is needed

§ Alignment of Local/National and FAB strategies is required when building the FAB project portfolio

§ Large scale airspace redesign is not the answer anymore to fast changing traffic patterns and regulatory framework (e.g. PCP IR)

§ Stepwise approaches instead of big bang implementations

§ Ensure active involvement of all stakeholders

§ Ensure firm commitment of all partners

§ Address daily OPS requirements and stay in close contact with ACC’s


9

FABEC New OPS orientations (1)

§ Pursue performance driven approach (safety, capacity, environment, cost efficiency)


10

Holistic approach to FABEC performance


11



§ Subsidiarity principle (ACC-level, national level, FABEC-level)


12

ACC‘s and UAC‘s

14 Centres with different organisational structures


UACs ACCs

13




§ Adjustment of the FABEC OPS governance


14

FABEC SC OPS Working Organisation


15

FABEC New OPS orientations (1)§ Pursue performance driven approach (safety, capacity, environment, cost efficiency)



§ Widening FABEC Ops scope (include local and bilateral initiatives)

§ Close to daily operations (“2nd pillar initiatives”, establishment of a Head of ACC group at FABEC level)


16

FABEC: Weather induced delay


MET Alliance conducts FABEC study about the impact of adverse weather conditions on ATM

16 January 2017.-; At the request of the FABEC air navigation service providers, MET Alliance, a consortium of leading European meteorological service providers, is investigating the possible effects of changes in weather behaviour on air traffic management and more generally the impact of adverse weather conditions on ATM.

17


§ Actively address OPS challenges (traffic volatility, capacity gaps etc., establishment of a FABEC OPS Development Group)




§ Widening FABEC Ops scope (include local and bilateral initiatives)

§ Close to daily operations (“2nd pillar initiatives”, establishment of a Head of ACC group at FABEC level)

§ Set goals in dedicated OPS plans



FABEC Operational Planning

19


§ Extended Arrival management (XMAN) and Free Route (FRA) remain backbone of OPS strategy


20

FABEC XMAN Project


Plan 2017London –ACC Brest: mid 2017Munich – UAC Karlsruhe: end 2017 (extension to 220NM)Munich – ACC Vienna: end 2017 (extension to 220NM)Munich – ACC Zurich: end 2017 (extension to 220 NM)Munich – ACC Langen: end 2017Frankfurt – MUAC: mid 2017 Frankfurt – UAC Karlsruhe: mid 2017Frankfurt – ACC Munich: mid 2017Frankfurt – ACC Bremen: end 2017Zurich – UAC Reims: early 2017Zurich – ACC Munich: early 2017Zurich – ACC Langen: early 2017

21

FABEC Free Route Airspace Project

§ Stepwise approach

§ One common Concept of Operations

§ Incorporation of AU

§ Set-up States/ANSP FUA task force

§ Rolling UUP

§ InterFAB initiatives


22


§ XMAN and FRA remain backbone of OPS strategy

§ Include Inter FAB OPS initiatives


23

FABEC InterFAB Initiatives

- SESAR Optimized Descend Profiles- Long-Range DCT’s on SE axis- New DCT’s with Baltic FAB- XMAN adjacent to FABEC- ATM system groups, e.g. iTEC- Free Route extension SW FAB


24


§ Development of a FABEC OPS Performance Roadmap

§ Close cooperation with NM, close to network evolutions

§ Close cooperation with airspace users (Joint OPS/AOG, FABEC Customer Satisfaction Survey, etc.)

§ Involvement of social partners

§ Development of FABEC positions towards external stakeholders

§ XMAN and FRA remain backbone of OPS strategy

§ Include Inter FAB OPS initiatives


25

From FAB‘s to European Network – Joint efforts or blaming culture in European aviation?

Who is to be blamed for what?

§ European ATM operational performance: not as efficient as US§ EC: Regulatory framework not adapted to the network requirements § FAB’s: not delivering expected performance§ ANSP’s: capacity gaps and high unit rates§ Airlines: not using the shortest routes§ CFSP’s: technically not up-to-date to support efficient flight planning§ NM: not delivering network performance§ Military airspace users: blocking large parts of European airspace§ Airports: not prepared for special situations (e.g. winter operation)§ Unions (ANSP and Airline): frequent strikes causing major disruptions § ???: Heavy thunderstorm season 2016


26

The European Network – Joint Way Forward

Instead of blaming each other….

FAB’s, AO’s, Airports, NM, CFSP’s, EC focusing on today’s biggest challenges:

§ Traffic volatility

§ Improving daily operational processes

§ Improved data exchange to enhance traffic predictability and improve flight efficiency

§ Improved regulatory framework

§ Availability of resources


Thank you for your attention!

Questions and Answers

FABEC 10.30 h Presentation WAC v06 - World ATM Congress Presentations/FABEC 10... · 0 FABEC...

Documents

Transcript of FABEC 10.30 h Presentation WAC v06 - World ATM Congress Presentations/FABEC 10... · 0 FABEC...