Existentialism2

Existentialism / Nihilism

Presentation Outline

•I. What is Existentialism?•II. A Brief History of Existentialism

▫A. An Overview of Major Philosophers ▫B. Existentialism’s connection with

Nihilism•III. Connections to John Gardner’s

Grendel

I. What is Existentialism?

Introductory Question:

•What do you know with absolute certainty?

(Perhaps the key question with which to begin any philosophical investigation)

“I am….”

Existentialism starts at the same point as Descartes’ philosophy – with your existence as the original certainty. You might not know anything else, but you at least know you exist (in some way) because you are thinking. As Descartes stated it:

“I think, therefore, I am.”

Important Announcement:

Descartes was NOT an existentialist.

Despite a common starting point, the two take radically different philosophical

directions.Descartes starts here and runs to many additional conclusions – Existentialism

basically stays here.

Existentialism is the philosophy that holds your existence as your pre-eminent truth and reality.

Existentialism in Three Main Themes:

(1) We are Free(1) We are Free

This is not referring to political freedom; rather that there are no

psychological or metaphysical forces that determine the person you become or the actions you take. You are free

to be the person that you choose. Rather than a blessing, this is a

tremendous responsibility you must learn to accept.

(2) Our Existence is Absurd(2) Our Existence is Absurd

This means that we can give no logical sense or purpose to life – There is none to be found.

(3) Truth is Subjective(3) Truth is Subjective

This means that what is true for one person might not be

true for another.

Then what?

Okay, thanks to Descartes, we know we exist.

To understand what Existentialism says about existence, think of the types of things a person might believe influences or controls their existence….

Such as….•An Interactive God•Fate•Astrology•Murphy’s Law (& other laws)•Grandmother’s axioms•Human nature•Pre-destination•Freud’s sub-consious mind

Then, imagine the universe without any of these!

That’s the Existential view of reality!

Existentialism says there is nothing that explains, guides or gives purpose to our

existence.

In short – you EXIST (have “BEING”) in total FREEDOM surrounded by

NOTHINGNESS.

Sartre gives his treatment on this view in his philosophical work:

“Being and Nothingness”

Sartre on existentialism:

Man can will nothing unless he has first understood that he must count no one but himself; that he is alone, abandoned on earth in the midst of his infinite responsibilities, without help, with no other aim than the one he sets himself, with no other destiny than the one he forges for himself on this earth. (Being and Nothingness, 1943)

II. A Brief History of Existentialism

BACKGROUND•Concepts of existentialism are found

throughout the history of literature and philosophy.

•Its most recent development came from the French writer/philosopher Jean Paul Sartre.

•Popular during the radicalism of the 1960s and 1970s

•“Modern” existentialism began with….

Existential Thinkers

SorenKierkegaar

d

KIERKEGAARD

In the early 1800’s, philosophy was dominated by the work of idealists like Hegel, whose thought postulated grand

theories that explained how thought, societies and nations changed and

evolved over time.

i.e. Hegel’s Thesis + Antithesis = Synthesis

KIERKEGAARD

This may have been great for explaining the inception of a nation, ideology or economic system, but it reduces the individual to a mere faceless cog in the workings of the universe.

“Hey! Look at me!”

KIERKEGAARD

Then along comes

Soren Kierkegaard1813-1854

Danish – LutheranHis written works were inspired by his difficulties

with himself, his girlfriend, and his father.(Dad was guilt-ridden, doddering and overbearing)


OBJECTIVE TRUTHComes from Externals

(Things Beyond Us)

SUBJECTIVE TRUTHComes from Within Us

KIERKEGAARDKierkegaard’s writings are the beginning of modern

existentialism.

For him, the individual’s existence is where it all starts.

Kierkegaard believed people in the 19th Century to be in despair over being human. People didn’t want to exist outside of the crowd. He argued that a person who ‘follows the crowd’ does not choose his or her own identity and therefore could not live life passionately as an individual. This amounted to not existing.

KIERKEGAARD

The problem for the individual is (in Kierkegaard’s view) that God has physically hidden himself from us.

There is an “infinite abyss” between us and God. Therefore, we must struggle to make decisions in “absolute isolation” from God.

KIERKEGAARD

BUT HOW?

Objective reason is of no value – when God deals with us as individuals, His

commands are often irrational and unique to the individual.

Kierkegaard refers to such episodes as the

“Teleological Suspension of the Ethical”

Instances where individuals are commanded by God to act irrationally and/or in ways outside the ethical norm – for a specific purpose.

His Most Famous Example:

God’s command to Abraham to sacrifice his

son Isaac.

Other examples of the Teleological Suspension of the Ethical:

- Jesus- Paul

KIERKEGAARD

Since God’s commands are often irrational and unique to the individual,

TRUTH IS SUBJECTIVE&

FAITH (RELIGIOUS TRUTH) IS IRRATIONAL

(not based on reason & logic)

““IRRATIONAL”:IRRATIONAL”:

1. By the norms of the time

2. Not based on logic and reason


While some would argue that God only occasionally commands some to act

outside the norm, Kierkegaard holds that this is the way all religious experience

operates.

KIERKEGAARD“Then how am I supposed to

know what to do?”

If Kierkegaard is right, we must make decisions without any means of justifying our choices.

This creates ANGUISH and ANXIETY in us.

KIERKEGAARD

In wake of this, Kierkegaard says:

“I must find the truth that is true from me…. the idea for which I can live or die.”

KIERKEGAARD

BUT HOW?

Since objective reason is not a guide in making decisions, we cannot

know before hand which choices will be right –

therefore, we must act by taking a blind “leap of

faith.”

KIERKEGAARD

In the aftermath of our leap of faith, we must then consider the outcome. This is referred to by the phrase:

“Act and Reflect”

KIERKEGAARD

Kierkegaard also challenges us to:

“…. live life forward, understand life backwards”


FrederickNietzsche

(1844-1900)

NIETZSCHE

Throughout history, Western thought was centered around philosophy and religion, from whose tenants meaning, morality and purpose for life was given.

NIETZSCHE

Nietzsche predicted that gradually, belief in religion and philosophy would diminish, moving civilization towards a day where

people would have no “belief” in anything. Nietzsche called this “belief in nothing”

NIHILISMNIHILISM

NIETZSCHE

Nietzsche predicted that the emergence of science would in large part drive

humanity’s march toward nihilism.

(The Scientific Revolution had already began about one hundred years prior to

Nietzsche.)


It was about at this time that DARWIN and his THEORY OF EVOLUTION emerged.

NIETZSCHE

Nietzsche proclaimed the dawning of this era of nihilism and atheism with his

famous statement:

“God is Dead.”

NIETZSCHE

Man is Free(without God – really free)

This will further unleash the individual’sWILL TO POWER

that drives the ascent of civilization.This would free the strong-willed to lord

over the weak-minded.

NIETZSCHE

In this environment, there would bethose with a

MASTER MENTALITYand those with a

SLAVE MENTALITY.

NIETZSCHE

“God is Dead”

In the nihilism that would dominate the thought of the next century (the 1900s),

he prophesized grand scale war, totalitarianism, genocide, and….

NIETZSCHE

The rise of the SUPERMAN, the free and emboldened leader who acts “beyond

(without regard to the concept of) good and evil.”

In other words, a champion of untruth, injustice, and having all things his way.


NIETZSCHETHOUGHT THE (EARLY) MUSIC OFWAGNEREXPRESSED THE SPIRIT OFTHE SUPERMAN.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V92OBNsQgxU

NIETZSCHE’S VIEW OF MAN

For Nietzsche,

“Man is the rope between the ape and

the Superman.”

NIETZSCHE’S VIEW OF WOMEN

June Cleaver portrays the perfect Nietzschean woman.

“The role of the woman is to take care of the warrior.”

NIETZSCHE

Was Nietzsche an analytical philosopher (as Camus thought)?

Or was Nietzsche an advocate (as the Nazi’s

thought)?


•In the late 1800’s – early 1900’s, psychology was dominated by the work of the behaviorists (like Pavlov) and Freud.

•Both saw humans as the product of conditioning childhood experiences, our subconscious mind, etc.

“Hey! Look at me!”

THEN CAME….

EDMUND HUSSERL

1859-1938

EDMUND HUSSERL

•Philosopher – Influenced Psychology•Sartre studied under Husserl.•His “phenomenology” advocated

SUBJECTIVE TRUTH – Things are what they are to the individual.

•“Stick to the first person.”


Martin Heidegger

1889-1976

HEIDEGGER

•Voluminous German Philosopher•Influenced Sartre – developed concept of

Being.•Later found existentialism too focused on

the self rather than the individual as a part of all existence.

•Association with early Nazi party diminished his influence.


Jean PaulSartre

1905-1980

SARTRE

•French•Most noted

Existentialist philosopher

•Failed his first Baccalaureate

SARTRE

HOW DID WE COME TO BE?

To Sartre, the human condition is a paradox. Thanks to Descartes, we know

we exist, but for Sartre, there is no explanation of how or why.

(Sartre is an atheist.)

SARTRE

WHAT ARE WE SUPPOSED TO BE?

Since we do not know how we came to exist, there is no way of knowing a

purpose for our existence.

SARTRE

“Existence Precedes Essence”

Therefore, according to Sartre, we have an existence, but no essence (a “nature” or purpose for which we were designed).

SARTRE

No thing (or “nothingness”) surrounds our being to give it purpose.

We exist (have “being”) in “freedom” because our existence is surrounded by

“nothingness.”

SARTRE

Sartre is not happy about our freedom.He actually says we are

“condemned to be free.”

(trapped in an existence for which we have no way of making any sense of our

purpose)

SARTRE

“NAUSEA”occurs when we struggle to find purpose or

reason in our existence in NOTHINGNESS.

SARTRE

Man’s Attempt to Become God

“Nausea” leads us to an attempt to create a purpose for our existence.

Sartre says to attempt to create the purpose for one’s existence is to attempt

to be God.

SARTRE


Furthermore, we can only fail, because there are no logical answers to the

questions:“How did we come to be?”

and “What are we to be?”

SARTRE

“OTHERS”Another way we try to create a purpose for

our existence is through relations with other people. However, this also doesn’t

work and creates further frustration leading to Sartre’s axiom:

“Hell is other people.”


Before concluding that Sartre has given you an epiphany about your family’s

dynamics, remember that his father died when he was young, his step-father was

stern and cold, and that his relations with both his mother and the woman in his life

were troubled.

SARTRE


The hopelessness of this quest lead to Sartre’s statement:

“Man is a futile Passion”

SARTRE


He didn’t mean that we strive to be the master of the universe, rather that we seek to create a purpose for our life.

Sartre equates this with attempting to “be God.”

SARTRE

How should we then live?One might conclude that Sartre’s POV

places little significance on the actions of humans. On the contrary, with our total freedom comes total responsibility (even

in situations involving duress and oppression).

“There are no innocent victims in war.”

SARTRE

We must act in“Good Faith” rather than “Bad Faith.”

We act in “good faith” when we act in a way that acknowledges our freedom.


Just as he was becoming famous, Sartre proclaimed himself a Marxist. Respect for him was diminished as he was viewed as

too tolerant of the Soviet style of communism. He committed much of his

later writing efforts to attempts at reconciling philosophical contradictions

between Marxism and existentialism.

Existentialist Thinkiers

ALBERTCAMUS

CAMUS

•The most popular existentialist writer

•More optimistic than Sartre

•Died in a car accident in 1951

CAMUS

**Is he an existentialist?**Held that life is absurd but can still have

meaning.That it cannot be made rational is what

makes it wonderful.Camus begins with the issue of facing the

inevitability of death (Camus is an atheist).

CAMUS• Camus believed that when we confront

the absurdity of existence and realise the world is completely random and meaningless we experience a deep ‘nihilism’.

• However, far from contemplating suicide in the face of such absurdity we must conquer our fate.

• We need to become the ‘absurd hero’ like Sisyphus.

• Sisyphus conquers his absurd situation and lives life with a love and passion for which the God’s condemned him.

• He determines his meaning and gives life value in a world without either.

• ‘One must remember Sisyphus ‘happy’!

CAMUS

We must accept that we will one day die – and then

chase meaning in life.

The Myth of SisyphusThe champion of a just but lost cause is Camus’ hero.


FranzKafka(1883-1924)

KAFKA

Writer whose disturbing, symbolic fiction prefigured the oppression and despair of

the late 20th century.The term Kafkaesque has, in fact, come to

by applied commonly to grotesque, anxiety-producing social conditions or their treatment in literature. (Encarta)

Remember the Cockroach!

Summary

The Main Themes in the Existentialist thought of Sartre, Camus, Kierkegaard and Heidegger.

Big Ideas

We search for the meaning of our existence and the meaning of our death and suffering. Reality is a lived experience.We need to confront alienation and anxiety and the absurdity of life with courage. We should live a moral life because even though I determine my own essence, I share a common human condition. Nothing defines you but you.

Existence precedes essence

Traditional philosophy suggests essence precedes existence. We imagine a hammer and then make one. From a religious perspective God had an idea of human beings and then created them (essence then existence). Satre turned this up side down. We come into being, we exist and then through life we develop our essence by questioning and living. I become “human” by becoming conscious.

Anxiety and Angst

Despair, Anxiety and Angst (fear and dread) can enhance our understanding of ourselves. Happiness alone will not lead to a deep understanding of existence.

Absurdity

Why am I here and is there purpose to life? Am I simply a small speck in the universe in a world that has no meaning? Kierkegaard asks: I stick my finger into existence, it smells of nothing. Questions everywhere: Where am I? what is this thing called the world? Who is it who has lured me into the thing and now leaves me here? Who am I? How did I come into the world? Why was I not consulted?

Alienation

We all experience a feeling of being separate, lost, confused, out of place, etc. Modernity has only added to this problem. We are alienated by our own creations; science, capitalism, politics, religion, technology, etc. We need to confront alienation with dignity.

Death

Death is a facet of life and we must comprehend it to really understand living. Living life as if death does not exist is irresponsibility. Examples? Heidegger saw death as our most authentic moment i.e. you are most alive as you die

Watch clip – Fight Club (1h 15:50- 1h 20)

The “New Theology”

•1960’s radical theology•An existentialist Christianity•Held that the New Testament narratives

were myth symbolizing the existential anguish found in human existence

•Meaning and reality are not in the hereafter but in the “eternal now” we experience.

The “New Theology” Analysis of Traditional Christianity

Traditional Response• God’s will• Forgiveness of sin• Eternal life

Our Flight• Freedom/Angst• Responsibility• Non-Being (Death)

Existentialism – Post Mortem:

Why Existentialism Faded- The figures and movements it was tied to

(Sartre, 60’s radicalism) died.- Philosophy changes.- People want answers – not “nothingness.”

Existentialism – Post Mortem:

What was lost in the death of Existentialism?

A debate over the role and potential of the individual.

III. Existentialism and John Gardner’s Grendel

(another side of Beowulf)

GRENDEL

As you will see, in addition to being a retelling of the Beowulf legend, Grendel is

also an experiment that involves Existentialism, among other things (like

the poetry of William Blake).

Grendel is an existentialist, to an extent.

Grendel• In Gardner’s novel,

Grendel must choose between nihilistic and idealistic visions, each of which are symbolically represented by other characters.

Grendel• Gardner repeatedly

indicated that Grendel’s vision was inspired by Jean-Paul Sartre’s Being and Nothingness (1943), which Gardner admired for its metaphors and style, but disliked for its ideas.

GrendelSartre’s most famous

metaphor is that of existential man peering into the abyss of nothingness and contemplating the suicide that will free him from his anguish.

To quote Sartre…

“I approach the precipice, and my scrutiny is searching for myself in my very depths. In terms of this moment, I play with my possibilities. My eyes, running over the abyss from top to bottom, imitate the possible fall and realize it symbolically…”

Important Announcement:Gardner neither agreed with or liked either

nihilism or Sartre’s existentialism. Instead of promoting them, he uses them as tools to trace the main ideas of Western civilization.

YOUR JOB:And it is a daunting one…

Is to read Grendel as more than a story; to read it as a philosophical commentary. It is from that POV that we will ultimately attempt to discuss it.

Read for symbolism, allusions, and philosophical meaning…

In Conclusion,

REMEMBER:

It might hurt a bit at first, but you must have fun with philosophy, orphilosophywill have fun with you!

Existentialism2

Documents

Transcript of Existentialism2