Egypt Revolution-basic Case Study

8/3/2019 Egypt Revolution-basic Case Study

1/14

Hosni Mubarak committed horrendous crimes, but we have to ask, who benefits from his

overthrow? It is not the Egyptian people. In every contrived crisis, there are certain

characters with just the ''right'' connections (went to Western controlled schools,received honors from suspicious organizations, work for NGOs and foundations with

suspicious seed money, connected to intelligence, work for mega-corporations) who are at

the center.

The Daily Telegraphreported that it obtained a secret document outlining the systemic

preparation and support for the protesters by the US. [1] and [2]

[1]- Egypt protests: secret US document discloses support for protesters-

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/8289698/Egypt

-protests-secret-US-document-discloses-support-for-protesters.html

[2]- Busted: America behind uprising in Egypt- http://www.terminalx.org/2011/02/busted-

america-behind-uprising-in-egypt.html#axzz1EHH020ne

So, what happened in Egypt that led to the overthrow and who are the puppets involved?

THE PUPPETS

Mohamed ElBaradei he is elite pedigree is already


2/14

well known. The turmoil in Egypt is another contrived, Illuminati backed "color"

revolution designed to install puppets more subservient to their London-based masters.

Over the last decade, we have seen such "revolutions" in Serbia, Georgia, Ukraine,

Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia and recent failed attempts in Burma, Iran and Thailand.

"Human rights" and "democracy" is always the pretext for these Illuminati gambits, dating

back to the French and Russian Revolutions. They take advantage of genuine grievances to

hoodwink the public and gain power.

This time there was no color scheme tip-off but the unanimous support by the Illuminati-

controlled mass media was enough. You wouldn't hear about it otherwise. (For example, did

you know that real nationalists took over the government of Hungary?)

The confirmation is the man they are touting to replace Hosni Mubarak.

Globalist widget, Mohammed El Baradei is a trustee of the "International Crisis Group" an

"independent" non-profit group run by bankers to incite revolutions and profit from them.

His fellow trustee is none other than the ubiquitous Rothschild front man, George Soros.

El Baradei, who recently resigned as Director of the International Atomic Energy Agency,

is being groomed by the Illuminati to replace Mubarak. (He and his agency won the 2005

Nobel Prize.) In April, he gave a speech at Harvard saying he was "looking for a job" and

wanted to be "an agent of change and advocate for democracy" in Egypt. This is code for

local boss in the NWO banker tyranny. (Barack Obama has taught us about "change.")

In February, El Baradei was part of a new non-party political movement called the

"National Association for Change" which included a leader of the banned Masonic Muslim

Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood is a proxy for Britain's MI-6 masquerading as


3/14

Muslim fundamentalists. In November they were roundly defeated in elections, so this

"revolution" seems to be their answer. Mubarak wisely jailed their leaders.

On Thursday, El Baradei returned to Egypt to lead the demonstrations. Friday he and hissupporters were subjected to water canons and batons. Today, he announced: "We are

seeking a change of regime. President Mubarak should step down. We should head towards

a democratic state through a new government and free democratic elections...The whole

world should realize that the Egyptians are not going home until their demands are

realized...We are talking about taking down the Pharaonic dictatorship."

Egypt has accused the US of helping to engineer this revolt by training "activists."

Is it going too far to say that removing Mubarak would be a victory for Israel in its

expansion from the Nile to the Euphrates? Their surrogates are already in Baghdad.

This article is not intended to garner sympathy for the Mubarak regime but merely to

point out that this turmoil is about the Illuminati tightening their grip on Egypt. Imagine a

Mafia gang that has been raking off a share of profits for decades. One day it decides to

increase its take by eliminating the middle man. At the same time, it can create turmoil

which always provides new opportunities.

One thing is for sure: Our "leaders" care little about human rights and democracy. The

Illuminati agenda ultimately is to degrade, disinherit and and enslave us mentally and

spiritually, if not physically. The Egyptian turmoil is another step in this direction.

Wael Ghonim:

Wael Ghonim, left, is being proclaimed the hero of the revolution

by the Western media. An Egyptian who is the Head of Marketing for Google Middle East


4/14

and North Africa, he received his MBA from the American University in Cairo. According

to the BBC, ''the Egyptian-born Google marketing executive first played a role in

organizing the opposition through Facebook, only to disappear into police custody for 12

days.''

''Mr. Ghonim has thanked Google for its support, explaining that he tricked the

corporation into allowing him to return to Egypt from Dubai last month, citing a "personal

problem."

Even though this explanation is laughable at best, Ghonim ironically confirms himself the

nature of the movement, when he stated, "They were 100% convinced that foreigners are

behind us, that someone manipulates and finances us. But if I was a traitor I would have

stayed in my villa with my swimming pool in the Emirates. We are not traitors."

Ghonim went on CNN Wolf Blitzer's show and thanked Facebook for their contribution in

the overthrow. "Egypt's Facebook Revolution: Wael Ghonim Thanks The Social Network."

Mohamed Hussein Tantawi:

Field Marshal Mohamed Hussein Tantawi was one of Mubarak's

closest allies. Tantawi is the head of the army, deputy Prime Minister and Minister of

Defense. He was in contact with the US during the Egyptian crisis, most likely taking

orders from them or acting as a ''negotiator'' between Mubarak and the US. It has been

reported that Tantawi had been speaking with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and


5/14

Admiral Mullen. ''It was his [Gates] fifth phone conversation with the Egyptian defense

minister since the situation in Egypt began, according

''The Gates and Mullen phone calls are emblematic of the sustained but quiet engagement

with their military counterparts that the Pentagon has been undertaking throughout thecrisis. That effort has been especially important in recent days, as the military's role has

increased and its allegiances have come under closer scrutiny. Tantawi is now the military

dictator in charge of Egypt through the ''Supreme Council of the Armed Forces''.

Subsequently, the Constitution has been completely annihilated.

Omar Suleiman:

Omar Suleiman is Egypt's top spy chief. He is known as a

''torturer'' and a ''CIA-man''. This was quite evident during the crisis, as Suleimanheaded the negotiation talk table on TV between the ''opposition'' and Mubarak, and it

was he who made the final announcement of Mubarak's ouster.

The CIA's man in Cairoexplains, "Suleiman has long been favored by the US government

for his ardent anti-Islamism, his willingness to talk and act tough on Iran - and he has long

been the CIA's main man in Cairo...Omar Suleiman is not the man to bring democracy to

the country. His hands are too dirty, and any 'stability' he might be imagined to bring to

the country and the region comes at way too high a price. Hopefully, the Egyptians who are

thronging the streets and demanding a new era of freedom will make his removal from

power part of their demands, too." People have wondered why Mubarak was ousted even

though he was a loyal servant to the Illuminati. The answer is he wasn't 100%. The US was


6/14

not in complete control of Mubarak, and this became evident when Mubarak by his refusal

to provide troops for Iraq/Afghanistan. Webster Tarpley has also reported that he

refused to back an Arab coalition against Iran. Apparently he was getting too friendly with

Russia and China. Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Russian Foreign Minister SergeyLavrov held important talks over common regional and international interests, according

to Egyptian Minister of Foreign Affairs Ahmed Abul Gheit.

Among the most important issues discussed, Abul Gheit told reporters, was the Israeli-

Palestinian conflict. Mubarak and Lavrov stressed the importance of reconciliation between

Palestinian factions and the urgent need to lift the Israeli siege on the Gaza Strip.

Mubarak welcomed a proposal to hold a ministerial meeting in Moscow for parties involvedin the peace process.

Answering a question about the prospects for peace in the absence of a serious Israeli

commitment to negotiations, Lavrov said that hope still exists, and assured that his

country will continue to do its best to achieve a solution. Lavrov said Egypt and Russia have

the same position vis-a-vis the peace process, stressing that both countries take

international resolutions as the starting point for their policies.

Lavrov affirmed the importance of re-activating the 2005 agreement on movement over

the Rafah crossing and also stressed the need to take unified steps to eliminate the siege

and stop weapons smuggling across the Egypt-Gaza border.

On the other hand, Egypts foreign minister said that implementing the 2005 agreement

will require the presence of the Palestinian Authority at the crossings, which makes a

reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah all the more necessary.

Abul Gheit plans to attend a meeting Paris on Thursday which will include foreign ministers

of Norway, France, and Spain, in addition to the Quartet envoy, Tony Blair, and the

European Unions foreign affairs representative, Cathrine Ashton.


7/14

The Illuminati does not differentiate between friends and foes, based on past

contributions. It demands constant obedience to an agenda which has little to do with

democracy or the welfare of the Egyptian people.

The Obama administration was caught by surprise when President Hosni Mubarak spoke

to the Egyptian people and initially declined to step down as leader of the country.

Following the speech, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm.

Mike Mullen quickly phoned their counterparts in the Egyptian military.

Today, the military assumed control of the Egyptian government and Vice President Omar

Suleiman announced in a recorded statement that Mubarak had stepped down from the

presidency. "Secretary Gates spoke with [Defense Minister] Field Marshal Mohamed

Hussein Tantawi again last night," Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell confirmed toThe Cable. "It was his fifth phone conversation with the Egyptian defense minister since

the situation in Egypt began."


8/14

Captain John Kirby, spokesman for the Joint Chiefs, confirmed to The Cablethat Mullen

called Egyptian Army Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Sami Anan following the Mubarak speech.

Mullen and Anan have spoken four times since Jan. 25, and the last call before Thursday

night was on Saturday, Feb. 5, Kirby said. Both Morrell and Kirby declined to give detailson the substance of the calls. Press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters on Friday

morning that President Barack Obama did not call Mubarak after the speech. The last

reported call between Vice President Joseph Biden and Suleiman was Feb. 8, when Biden

pressed Suleiman to expand his dialogue with opposition groups. The Gates and Mullen

phone calls are emblematic of the sustained but quiet engagement with their military

counterparts that the Pentagon has been undertaking throughout the crisis. That effort

has been especially important in recent days, as the military's role has increased and its

allegiances have come under closer scrutiny.

The Pentagon even sent out a quiet request to scores of U.S. military officers last week,

asking them to contact any Egyptian military members they might know through past

associations at American military colleges, the Washington Postreported. The officers

weren't told to deliver any specific messages. The outreach has been rather about

collecting information from the Egyptian military and making sure that the military-to-

military relationship remained intact, a Pentagon official said, adding that similar outreach

has occurred between the Pentagon and its interlocutors in other countries, including

Israel. The White House and the State Department have disagreed on how much pressure

to place on Mubarak and Suleiman. The Pentagon has sided mostly with State, arguing for

more support of existing Egyptian institutions of power, especially the military. Some

observers see the Pentagon as inclined to favor supporting the Egyptian military due its

own interests and natural institutional biases.

"The Pentagon is simply so used to letting the Egyptian military have what they want," said

one former U.S. official who dealt with the Pentagon on Egypt. "The Pentagon has wanted

to keep their involvement at a strictly military-to-military level. So they are reluctant to


9/14

be part of diplomacy at the top level, but insistent in being engaged in their own diplomacy

for their own interest."

Regardless, the direct intervention of top Pentagon and U.S. military officials at key times

throughout the crisis may have influenced the Egyptian military's behavior at key

junctures, such as when the Egyptian military was implicated in the crackdown of

journalists and human rights activists last weekend. Pentagon officials believe their

outreach contributed to the relative restraint of the Egyptian Army. It's unclear whether

Gates and Mullen's telephone diplomacy last night actually influenced the events that

unfolded only hours later. But the Pentagon's relationships with the Egyptian military are

now among the most crucial avenues of communication and influence for U.S. policy towardEgypt going forward. On January 29, Omar Suleiman, Egypts top spy chief, was anointed

vice president by tottering dictator, Hosni Mubarak. By appointing Suleiman, part of a

shake-up of the cabinet in an attempt to appease the masses of protesters and retain his

own grip on the presidency, Mubarak has once again shown his knack for devilish

shrewdness. Suleiman has long been favored by the US government for his ardent anti-

Islamism, his willingness to talk and act tough on Iran - and he has long been the CIAs

main man in Cairo.

Mubarak knew that Suleiman would command an instant lobby of supporters at Langley and

among 'Iran nexters' in Washington - not to mention among other authoritarian

mukhabarat-dependent regimes in the region. Suleiman is a favorite of Israel too; he held

the Israel dossier and directed Egypts efforts to crush Hamas by demolishing the tunnels

that have functioned as a smuggling conduit for both weapons and foodstuffs into Gaza.

According to a Wiki Leak(ed) US diplomatic cable, titled 'Presidential Succession in

Egypt', dated May 14, 2007:

"Egyptian intelligence chief and Mubarak consigliere, in past years Soliman was often cited

as likely to be named to the long-vacant vice-presidential post. In the past two years,


10/14

Soliman has stepped out of the shadows, and allowed himself to be photographed, and his

meetings with foreign leaders reported. Many of our contacts believe that Soliman,

because of his military background, would at least have to figure in any succession

scenario."

From 1993 until Saturday, Suleiman was chief of Egypts General Intelligence Service. He

remained largely in the shadows until 2001, when he started taking over powerful dossiers

in the foreign ministry; he has since become a public figure, as the Wiki Leak document

attests. In 2009, he was touted by the London Telegraph and Foreign Policy as the most

powerful spook in the region, topping even the head of Mossad.

In the mid-1990s, Suleiman worked closely with the Clinton administration in devising and

implementing its rendition program; back then, rendition involved kidnapping suspected

terrorists and transferring them to a third country for trial. In The Dark Side, Jane

Mayer describes how the rendition program began:

"Each rendition was authorized at the very top levels of both governments [the US and

Egypt] ... The long-serving chief of the Egyptian central intelligence agency, Omar

Suleiman, negotiated directly with top [CIA] officials. [Former US Ambassador to Egypt

Edward] Walker described the Egyptian counterpart, Suleiman, as 'very bright, very

realistic', adding that he was cognizant that there was a downside to 'some of the

negative things that the Egyptians engaged in, of torture and so on. But he was not

squeamish, by the way'. "Technically, US law required the CIA to seek 'assurances' from

Egypt that rendered suspects wouldn't face torture. But under Suleiman's reign at the

EGIS, such assurances were considered close to worthless. As Michael Scheuer, a formerCIA officer [head of the al-Qaeda desk], who helped set up the practice of rendition,

later testified, even if such 'assurances' were written in indelible ink, 'they weren't worth

a bucket of warm spit'."


11/14

Under the Bush administration, in the context of "the global war on terror", US renditions

became "extraordinary", meaning the objective of kidnapping and extra-legal transfer was

no longer to bring a suspect to trial - but rather for interrogation to seek actionable

intelligence. The extraordinary rendition program landed some people in CIA black sites -and others were turned over for torture-by-proxy to other regimes. Egypt figured large

as a torture destination of choice, as did Suleiman as Egypts torturer-in-chief. At least

one person extraordinarily rendered by the CIA to Egypt Egyptian-born Australian

citizen Mamdouh Habib was reportedly tortured by Suleiman himself.

Suleiman the torturer

In October 2001, Habib was seized from a bus by Pakistani security forces. While

detained in Pakistan, at the behest of American agents, he was suspended from a hook and

electrocuted repeatedly. He was then turned over to the CIA, and in the process of

transporting him to Egypt he endured the usual treatment: his clothes were cut off, a

suppository was stuffed in his anus, he was put into a diaper - and 'wrapped up like a spring

roll'.

Frustrated that Habib was not providing useful information or confessing to involvement in

terrorism, Suleiman ordered a guard to murder a shackled prisoner in front of Habib,

which he did with a vicious karate kick. In April 2002, after five months in Egypt, Habib

was rendered to American custody at Bagram prison in Afghanistan - and then transported

to Guantanamo. On January 11, 2005, the day before he was scheduled to be charged, Dana

Priest of the Washington Post published an expos about Habib torture. The US

government immediately announced that he would not be charged and would be repatriatedto Australia.

A far more infamous torture case, in which Suleiman also is directly implicated, is that of

Ibn al-Sheikh al-Libi. Unlike Habib, who was innocent of any ties to terror or militancy, al-

Libi was allegedly a trainer at al-Khaldan camp in Afghanistan. He was captured by the


12/14

Pakistanis while fleeing across the border in November 2001. He was sent to Bagram, and

questioned by the FBI. But the CIA wanted to take over, which they did, and he was

transported to a black site on the USS Bataan in the Arabian Sea, then extraordinarily

rendered to Egypt. Under torture there, al-Libi "confessed" knowledge about an al-QaedaSaddam connection, claiming that two al-Qaeda operatives had received training in Iraq

for use in chemical and biological weapons. In early 2003, this was exactly the kind of

information that the Bush administration was seeking to justify attacking Iraq and to

persuade reluctant allies to go along. Indeed, al-Libis "confession" was one the central

pieces of "evidence" presented at the United Nations by then-Secretary of State Colin

Powell to make the case for war.

As it turns out, that confession was a lie tortured out of him by Egyptians. Here is how

former CIA chief George Tenet describes the whole al-Libi situation in his 2007 memoir,

At the Center of The Storm:

"We believed that al-Libi was withholding critical threat information at the time, so we

transferred him to a third country for further debriefing. Allegations were made that we

did so knowing that he would be tortured, but this is false. The country in question [Egypt]understood and agreed that they would hold al-Libi for a limited period. In the course of

questioning while he was in US custody in Afghanistan, al-Libi made initial references to

possible al-Qaida training in Iraq. He offered up information that a militant known as Abu

Abdullah had told him that at least three times between 1997 and 2000; the now-

deceased al-Qaida leader Mohammad Atef had sent Abu Abdullah to Iraq to seek training

in poisons and mustard gas.

"Another senior al-Qaida detainee told us that Mohammad Atef was interested in

expanding al-Qaidas ties to Iraq, which, in our eyes, added credibility to the reporting.

Then, shortly after the Iraq war got under way, al-Libi recanted his story. Now, suddenly,

he was saying that there was no such cooperative training. Inside the CIA, there was sharp


13/14

division on his recantation. It led us to recall his reporting, and here is where the mystery

begins.

"Al-Libi's story will no doubt be that he decided to fabricate in order to get better

treatment and avoid harsh punishment. He clearly lied. We just don't know when. Did he lie

when he first said that al-Qaida members received training in Iraq - or did he lie when he

said they did not? In my mind, either case might still be true. Perhaps, early on, he was

under pressure, assumed his interrogators already knew the story, and sang away. After

time passed and it became clear that he would not be harmed, he might have changed his

story to cloud the minds of his captors. Al-Qaida operatives are trained to do just that. A

recantation would restore his stature as someone who had successfully confounded theenemy. The fact is, we don't know which story is true, and since we don't know, we can

assume nothing. (pp. 353-354)"

Al-Libi was eventually sent off, quietly, to Libya - though he reportedly made a few other

stops along the way - where he was imprisoned. The use of al-Libis statement in the build-

up to the Iraq war made him a huge American liability once it became clear that the

purported al-QaedaSaddam connection was a tortured lie. His whereabouts were, in fact,a secret for years, until April 2009 when Human Rights Watch researchers investigating

the treatment of Libyan prisoners encountered him in the courtyard of a prison. Two

weeks later, on May 10, al-Libi was dead, and the Gaddafi regime claimed it was a suicide.

According to Evan Kohlmann, who enjoys favored status among US officials as an 'al-

Qaeda expert', citing a classified source: 'Al-Libis death coincided with the first visit by

Egypts spymaster Omar Suleiman to Tripoli?

Kohlmann surmises and opines that, after al-Libi recounted his story about an al-Qaeda

Saddam-WMD connection, "The Egyptians were embarrassed by this admission - and the

Bush government found itself in hot water internationally. Then, in May 2009, Omar


14/14

Suleiman saw an opportunity to get even with al-Libi and travelled to Tripoli. By the time

Omar Suleimans plane left Tripoli, Ibn al-Sheikh al-Libi had committed 'suicide'."

As people in Egypt and around the world speculate about the fate of the Mubarak regime,

one thing should be very clear: Omar Suleiman is not the man to bring democracy to the

country. His hands are too dirty, and any 'stability' he might be imagined to bring to the

country and the region comes at way too high a price. Hopefully, the Egyptians who are

thronging the streets and demanding a new era of freedom will make his removal from

power part of their demands, too.

CONCLUSION:

People have wondered why Mubarak was ousted even though he was a loyal servant to the

Illuminati. The answer is he wasn't 100%. The US was not in complete control of Mubarak, and

this became evident when Mubarak by his refusal to provide troops for Iraq/Afghanistan.

Webster Tarpley has also reported that he refused to back an Arab coalition against Iran.

Apparently he was getting too friendly with Russia and China.

The Illuminati does not differentiate between friends and foes, based on past contributions. It

demands constant obedience to an agenda which has little to do with democracy or the welfare of

the Egyptian people.

Egypt Revolution-basic Case Study

Documents

Transcript of Egypt Revolution-basic Case Study