Doudenum Histopathological diagnosis of gluten sensitive entropathy.
-
Upload
adam-manning -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Doudenum Histopathological diagnosis of gluten sensitive entropathy.
Doudenum
Histopathological
diagnosis of
gluten sensitive
entropathy
Although Biopsy
Examination is gold
standard, A pathologist
doesn't make the
diagnosis,
• only can say ….
Abnormalities
are consistent with CD
Even in centers with a
high interest in CD, 12%
of Biopsy specimens are
not suitable
So the diagnosis is impossible
•Steps for better evaluation:Steps for better
evaluation:
* 4 to 5 biopsies
open cup
diameter
(4-6mm)
* Fallowing sites:
• Duodenojejunal flexure at the
level of ligamentum treitz and/or
• Distal transverse portion of
duodenvm (D3)
• Descending duodenum distal to
the papilla of vater (D2)
• Descending duodenum proximal
to the papilla of vater (D1)
• Duodenal bulb (B)
* Orient the sample
adequately on a
small piece of paper
•Embeding the specinens
on edge in paraffin wax,
for serial transverse (3-4
µm) sections and H&E
staining
Identification of four villi
in a row considered as
adequate.
Mucosal lesions: Mucosal lesions: (modified marsh classification)(modified marsh classification)
Type O: the preinfiltrative lesion (normal) Minimal mucosal changes not detectable with
conventional light microscopyType I: the infiltrative lesion (IEL, at least 40/100
entrocytes & at the top) *** In iran (upper limit of normal IEL 37/100 in HE,
39/100 in IHC)
Type II: hyperplastic (crypt elongation, budding, mitoses)
Type III (a,b,c): destructive lesion classic CD lesion(a) mild atrophy (V/c ≤ 2:1)(b) moderate atrophy (V/c ≤ 1:1)(c) sever atrophy
Type IV: flat mucosa
Immunohistochemical studies isnot part of
routine analysis,
• IHC can help in appreciating
the extent and distribution
of lymphocytic exocytosis &
CD markers
Immunostainging of Immunostainging of
IELsIELs● TCR γδ+
● 70% CD 8+
● 10% CD 4+
● 20% CD 3+
● Variable CD 103+
Histologic response to gluten free diet● varies from patient to patient● IEL and mitoses as little as one week● beginning return of villi height at least 3 months ● after 1 to 2 years on a strict diet v/c ratio may be near normal ● reappearance of histologic changes after re-exposure varies from 2 hours to 6 days.
INTESTINAL BIOPSIES
SUB-TOTAL VILLOUS
ATROPHYNORMAL MUCOSA
TGA positive TGA positiveTGA negative TGA negative
AEApositive
AEAnegative
AEApositive
AEAnegative
AEApositive
AEAnegative
AEApositive
AEAnegative
Probabilities of Biopsy and Antibodies Situations
•* Approximately 25% of patients
with CS who have also had
colonic Biopsy
lymphocytic colitis
•* 15% of patients with
lymphocytic colitis who have had
duodenal
biopsy CS
Differential
diagnosis (Abnormal
histologic patterns)
1.Entities usually associated with a diffuse severe villus abnormality and crypt hyperplasia
A. Celiac sprue
B. Refractory or unclassified sprue
C. Other protein allergies
D. Lymphocytic enterocolitis
II. Entities usually associated with a variable villus abnormality and crypt hypoplasia
A. Kwashiorkor, malnutritionB. Megaloblastic anemiaC. Radiation and
chemotherapeutic effectD. Microvillus inclusion disease
III. Entities usually associated with a nonspecific variable villus abnormality, usually not flat
A. Changes associated with dermatitis herpetiformis
B. Partially treated or clinically latent celiac sprue
C. Infection
D. Stasis
E. Tropical sprue
F. Zollinger-Ellison syndrome
G. Mastocytosis
H. Nonspecific duodenitis
I. Autoimmune enteropathy
J. Torkelson syndrome
IV. Entities associated with variable villus abnormalities
illustrating specific diagnostic changes
A. Common variable immunodeficiency
B. Whipple’s disease
C. Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex infection
D. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis
E. Intestinal lymphoma
F. Parasitic infestation
G. Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia
H. Lymphangiectasia
I. Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma
Potential pitfals:Potential pitfals:● Tangenitally cut sections
● Superficial biopsies inthout muscularis mucosa
● Villi adjacent to lymphoid follicles
* Any evidence of brunner’s glands, gastric metaplasia, duodernitis
Sample should be disregarded and repeated
more distally.