Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training -...

31
T hi lT ii Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space DOE Challenge Home Bill Zoeller, RA Steven Winter Associates T echnical T raining

Transcript of Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training -...

Page 1: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

T h i l T i i

1 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space

DOE Challenge Home Bill Zoeller RA Steven Winter Associates

Technical Training

Congratulations

By designing constructing and verifying DOE Challenge Homes yyou are

bull in a select group Only the top one percent of builders in the country meets the extraordinary energy efficiency comfort health safety durability and quality levels associated with the DOE Challenge Home

bull providing unprecedented value Your customers receive immediate energy savings of 40-50 easy to adapt to net-zero performance with a small renewable energy system

bull differentiated from the competition About 12 in 13 homes sales nationwide are lsquousedrsquo homes In addition the majority of new homes are constructed to minimum code Based on a foundation of comprehensive home performance including ENERGY STAR Qualified Home v3 and the latest proven innovations from DOE Building America DOE Challenge Home provides a path to constructing net-zero energy ready that none of your competition has

2 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Training Purpose

For a home to qualify with DOE Challenge Home ducts must be located within the homersquos thermal and air barrier boundary

DOE Challenge Home recognizes several alternate compliance approaches including locating ducts within insulated unvented attics use of plenum truss systems and encapsulating ducts with spray foam and burying them in insulation Done right these alternative approaches can be cost-effective to build and provide highly efficient distribution systems - - but getting them right means understanding the detailsthe details

This training will cover several possible approaches to locating ducts within the homersquos air and thermal barriers and then dig into design considerations and details for the spray foam encapsulation apppproach

Trainees including builders raters and contractors will learn 1 DOE Challenge Home requirements for duct system location 22 Strategies for locating ducts within conditioned space in new residential construction Strategies for locating ducts within conditioned space in new residential construction 3 Key design and installation details for encapsulating ducts within spray foam and then burying

them with attic insulation

3 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Design Options for LocatingDesign Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space

Bill Zoeller RA Steven Winter Associates Inc Steven Winter Associates Inc

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mandatoryy Reqquirements

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

10Mandatoryy Reqquirements

Up to 10rsquo of total duct length is permitted to be outside of the homersquos thermal and air barrier boundary

Ducts are located in an unvented attic Ducts are located in an unvented attic regardless of whether regardless of whether this space is conditioned with a supply register

Ducts are located in a vented attic with all of the followingg characteristics minimum R‐8 duct insulation with an additional minimum 15rdquo of closed‐cell spray foam insulation encapsulating the ducts total duct leakage le 3insulation encapsulating the ducts total duct leakage le 3 CFM25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area and ductwork buried under at least 2rdquo of blown‐in insulation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

10

Mandatoryy Reqquirements

Jump ducts which do not directly deliver conditioned air from the HVAC unit may be located in attics if all joints i lincludi ding boot‐tto‐drywall ll are ff ll ully aiir seall ded withith mastiticb t d

Ducts are located within an unvented crawl space

Ducts are located in a basement which is within the Ducts are located in a basement which is within the homersquos thermal boundary

Ductless HVAC system is used

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Current Opptions

Ductwork thermal losses can range from 10‐45

Multiple Interior duct options exist but may options exist but may be impractical expensive not work well in all climates or increase envelope loads

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Unvented Attic

HVAC design flexibility Usually more expensive

Mi i l d i i t MMay increase encllosure loads Minimal design integrati tion i l d

IRC Sections R8064 Unvented Attic Assemblies d R316 FOAM PLASTIC t l th bliand R316 FOAM PLASTIC control these assemblies

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Low cost in

Ducts in Dropppped Soffit

R i hi h l l f Requires high‐level of Longer ldquothrowsrdquo may be architectural integration required based on plan

Low‐cost in simple plans simple plans

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ver cost effective wall re isters increase

Floor Truss Integgrated Ducts

Off i l i t ll ti Offers simple installation C d i t fl i t hi h Conducive to floor registers which and design flexibility donrsquot work well for cooling

Very cost‐effective y High wall registers increase High g performance cost and complexity

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Modified Truss

Works well in narrow plans Sealing the air‐barrier is critical Moderate costcost ‐increase design integration required Moderate increase design integration required

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

What Are Buried Ducts

Low cost high‐performance duct strategy

Very high R‐values Very high R values

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BuriedEncapsulated Duct CategoriesCategories

Buried Ducts

Buried and Encapsulated Ducts

Encapsulated Ducts

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 2: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Congratulations

By designing constructing and verifying DOE Challenge Homes yyou are

bull in a select group Only the top one percent of builders in the country meets the extraordinary energy efficiency comfort health safety durability and quality levels associated with the DOE Challenge Home

bull providing unprecedented value Your customers receive immediate energy savings of 40-50 easy to adapt to net-zero performance with a small renewable energy system

bull differentiated from the competition About 12 in 13 homes sales nationwide are lsquousedrsquo homes In addition the majority of new homes are constructed to minimum code Based on a foundation of comprehensive home performance including ENERGY STAR Qualified Home v3 and the latest proven innovations from DOE Building America DOE Challenge Home provides a path to constructing net-zero energy ready that none of your competition has

2 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Training Purpose

For a home to qualify with DOE Challenge Home ducts must be located within the homersquos thermal and air barrier boundary

DOE Challenge Home recognizes several alternate compliance approaches including locating ducts within insulated unvented attics use of plenum truss systems and encapsulating ducts with spray foam and burying them in insulation Done right these alternative approaches can be cost-effective to build and provide highly efficient distribution systems - - but getting them right means understanding the detailsthe details

This training will cover several possible approaches to locating ducts within the homersquos air and thermal barriers and then dig into design considerations and details for the spray foam encapsulation apppproach

Trainees including builders raters and contractors will learn 1 DOE Challenge Home requirements for duct system location 22 Strategies for locating ducts within conditioned space in new residential construction Strategies for locating ducts within conditioned space in new residential construction 3 Key design and installation details for encapsulating ducts within spray foam and then burying

them with attic insulation

3 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Design Options for LocatingDesign Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space

Bill Zoeller RA Steven Winter Associates Inc Steven Winter Associates Inc

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mandatoryy Reqquirements

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

10Mandatoryy Reqquirements

Up to 10rsquo of total duct length is permitted to be outside of the homersquos thermal and air barrier boundary

Ducts are located in an unvented attic Ducts are located in an unvented attic regardless of whether regardless of whether this space is conditioned with a supply register

Ducts are located in a vented attic with all of the followingg characteristics minimum R‐8 duct insulation with an additional minimum 15rdquo of closed‐cell spray foam insulation encapsulating the ducts total duct leakage le 3insulation encapsulating the ducts total duct leakage le 3 CFM25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area and ductwork buried under at least 2rdquo of blown‐in insulation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

10

Mandatoryy Reqquirements

Jump ducts which do not directly deliver conditioned air from the HVAC unit may be located in attics if all joints i lincludi ding boot‐tto‐drywall ll are ff ll ully aiir seall ded withith mastiticb t d

Ducts are located within an unvented crawl space

Ducts are located in a basement which is within the Ducts are located in a basement which is within the homersquos thermal boundary

Ductless HVAC system is used

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Current Opptions

Ductwork thermal losses can range from 10‐45

Multiple Interior duct options exist but may options exist but may be impractical expensive not work well in all climates or increase envelope loads

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Unvented Attic

HVAC design flexibility Usually more expensive

Mi i l d i i t MMay increase encllosure loads Minimal design integrati tion i l d

IRC Sections R8064 Unvented Attic Assemblies d R316 FOAM PLASTIC t l th bliand R316 FOAM PLASTIC control these assemblies

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Low cost in

Ducts in Dropppped Soffit

R i hi h l l f Requires high‐level of Longer ldquothrowsrdquo may be architectural integration required based on plan

Low‐cost in simple plans simple plans

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ver cost effective wall re isters increase

Floor Truss Integgrated Ducts

Off i l i t ll ti Offers simple installation C d i t fl i t hi h Conducive to floor registers which and design flexibility donrsquot work well for cooling

Very cost‐effective y High wall registers increase High g performance cost and complexity

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Modified Truss

Works well in narrow plans Sealing the air‐barrier is critical Moderate costcost ‐increase design integration required Moderate increase design integration required

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

What Are Buried Ducts

Low cost high‐performance duct strategy

Very high R‐values Very high R values

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BuriedEncapsulated Duct CategoriesCategories

Buried Ducts

Buried and Encapsulated Ducts

Encapsulated Ducts

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 3: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Training Purpose

For a home to qualify with DOE Challenge Home ducts must be located within the homersquos thermal and air barrier boundary

DOE Challenge Home recognizes several alternate compliance approaches including locating ducts within insulated unvented attics use of plenum truss systems and encapsulating ducts with spray foam and burying them in insulation Done right these alternative approaches can be cost-effective to build and provide highly efficient distribution systems - - but getting them right means understanding the detailsthe details

This training will cover several possible approaches to locating ducts within the homersquos air and thermal barriers and then dig into design considerations and details for the spray foam encapsulation apppproach

Trainees including builders raters and contractors will learn 1 DOE Challenge Home requirements for duct system location 22 Strategies for locating ducts within conditioned space in new residential construction Strategies for locating ducts within conditioned space in new residential construction 3 Key design and installation details for encapsulating ducts within spray foam and then burying

them with attic insulation

3 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Design Options for LocatingDesign Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space

Bill Zoeller RA Steven Winter Associates Inc Steven Winter Associates Inc

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mandatoryy Reqquirements

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

10Mandatoryy Reqquirements

Up to 10rsquo of total duct length is permitted to be outside of the homersquos thermal and air barrier boundary

Ducts are located in an unvented attic Ducts are located in an unvented attic regardless of whether regardless of whether this space is conditioned with a supply register

Ducts are located in a vented attic with all of the followingg characteristics minimum R‐8 duct insulation with an additional minimum 15rdquo of closed‐cell spray foam insulation encapsulating the ducts total duct leakage le 3insulation encapsulating the ducts total duct leakage le 3 CFM25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area and ductwork buried under at least 2rdquo of blown‐in insulation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

10

Mandatoryy Reqquirements

Jump ducts which do not directly deliver conditioned air from the HVAC unit may be located in attics if all joints i lincludi ding boot‐tto‐drywall ll are ff ll ully aiir seall ded withith mastiticb t d

Ducts are located within an unvented crawl space

Ducts are located in a basement which is within the Ducts are located in a basement which is within the homersquos thermal boundary

Ductless HVAC system is used

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Current Opptions

Ductwork thermal losses can range from 10‐45

Multiple Interior duct options exist but may options exist but may be impractical expensive not work well in all climates or increase envelope loads

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Unvented Attic

HVAC design flexibility Usually more expensive

Mi i l d i i t MMay increase encllosure loads Minimal design integrati tion i l d

IRC Sections R8064 Unvented Attic Assemblies d R316 FOAM PLASTIC t l th bliand R316 FOAM PLASTIC control these assemblies

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Low cost in

Ducts in Dropppped Soffit

R i hi h l l f Requires high‐level of Longer ldquothrowsrdquo may be architectural integration required based on plan

Low‐cost in simple plans simple plans

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ver cost effective wall re isters increase

Floor Truss Integgrated Ducts

Off i l i t ll ti Offers simple installation C d i t fl i t hi h Conducive to floor registers which and design flexibility donrsquot work well for cooling

Very cost‐effective y High wall registers increase High g performance cost and complexity

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Modified Truss

Works well in narrow plans Sealing the air‐barrier is critical Moderate costcost ‐increase design integration required Moderate increase design integration required

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

What Are Buried Ducts

Low cost high‐performance duct strategy

Very high R‐values Very high R values

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BuriedEncapsulated Duct CategoriesCategories

Buried Ducts

Buried and Encapsulated Ducts

Encapsulated Ducts

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 4: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Design Options for LocatingDesign Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space

Bill Zoeller RA Steven Winter Associates Inc Steven Winter Associates Inc

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mandatoryy Reqquirements

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

10Mandatoryy Reqquirements

Up to 10rsquo of total duct length is permitted to be outside of the homersquos thermal and air barrier boundary

Ducts are located in an unvented attic Ducts are located in an unvented attic regardless of whether regardless of whether this space is conditioned with a supply register

Ducts are located in a vented attic with all of the followingg characteristics minimum R‐8 duct insulation with an additional minimum 15rdquo of closed‐cell spray foam insulation encapsulating the ducts total duct leakage le 3insulation encapsulating the ducts total duct leakage le 3 CFM25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area and ductwork buried under at least 2rdquo of blown‐in insulation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

10

Mandatoryy Reqquirements

Jump ducts which do not directly deliver conditioned air from the HVAC unit may be located in attics if all joints i lincludi ding boot‐tto‐drywall ll are ff ll ully aiir seall ded withith mastiticb t d

Ducts are located within an unvented crawl space

Ducts are located in a basement which is within the Ducts are located in a basement which is within the homersquos thermal boundary

Ductless HVAC system is used

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Current Opptions

Ductwork thermal losses can range from 10‐45

Multiple Interior duct options exist but may options exist but may be impractical expensive not work well in all climates or increase envelope loads

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Unvented Attic

HVAC design flexibility Usually more expensive

Mi i l d i i t MMay increase encllosure loads Minimal design integrati tion i l d

IRC Sections R8064 Unvented Attic Assemblies d R316 FOAM PLASTIC t l th bliand R316 FOAM PLASTIC control these assemblies

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Low cost in

Ducts in Dropppped Soffit

R i hi h l l f Requires high‐level of Longer ldquothrowsrdquo may be architectural integration required based on plan

Low‐cost in simple plans simple plans

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ver cost effective wall re isters increase

Floor Truss Integgrated Ducts

Off i l i t ll ti Offers simple installation C d i t fl i t hi h Conducive to floor registers which and design flexibility donrsquot work well for cooling

Very cost‐effective y High wall registers increase High g performance cost and complexity

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Modified Truss

Works well in narrow plans Sealing the air‐barrier is critical Moderate costcost ‐increase design integration required Moderate increase design integration required

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

What Are Buried Ducts

Low cost high‐performance duct strategy

Very high R‐values Very high R values

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BuriedEncapsulated Duct CategoriesCategories

Buried Ducts

Buried and Encapsulated Ducts

Encapsulated Ducts

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 5: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Mandatoryy Reqquirements

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

10Mandatoryy Reqquirements

Up to 10rsquo of total duct length is permitted to be outside of the homersquos thermal and air barrier boundary

Ducts are located in an unvented attic Ducts are located in an unvented attic regardless of whether regardless of whether this space is conditioned with a supply register

Ducts are located in a vented attic with all of the followingg characteristics minimum R‐8 duct insulation with an additional minimum 15rdquo of closed‐cell spray foam insulation encapsulating the ducts total duct leakage le 3insulation encapsulating the ducts total duct leakage le 3 CFM25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area and ductwork buried under at least 2rdquo of blown‐in insulation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

10

Mandatoryy Reqquirements

Jump ducts which do not directly deliver conditioned air from the HVAC unit may be located in attics if all joints i lincludi ding boot‐tto‐drywall ll are ff ll ully aiir seall ded withith mastiticb t d

Ducts are located within an unvented crawl space

Ducts are located in a basement which is within the Ducts are located in a basement which is within the homersquos thermal boundary

Ductless HVAC system is used

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Current Opptions

Ductwork thermal losses can range from 10‐45

Multiple Interior duct options exist but may options exist but may be impractical expensive not work well in all climates or increase envelope loads

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Unvented Attic

HVAC design flexibility Usually more expensive

Mi i l d i i t MMay increase encllosure loads Minimal design integrati tion i l d

IRC Sections R8064 Unvented Attic Assemblies d R316 FOAM PLASTIC t l th bliand R316 FOAM PLASTIC control these assemblies

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Low cost in

Ducts in Dropppped Soffit

R i hi h l l f Requires high‐level of Longer ldquothrowsrdquo may be architectural integration required based on plan

Low‐cost in simple plans simple plans

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ver cost effective wall re isters increase

Floor Truss Integgrated Ducts

Off i l i t ll ti Offers simple installation C d i t fl i t hi h Conducive to floor registers which and design flexibility donrsquot work well for cooling

Very cost‐effective y High wall registers increase High g performance cost and complexity

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Modified Truss

Works well in narrow plans Sealing the air‐barrier is critical Moderate costcost ‐increase design integration required Moderate increase design integration required

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

What Are Buried Ducts

Low cost high‐performance duct strategy

Very high R‐values Very high R values

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BuriedEncapsulated Duct CategoriesCategories

Buried Ducts

Buried and Encapsulated Ducts

Encapsulated Ducts

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 6: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

10Mandatoryy Reqquirements

Up to 10rsquo of total duct length is permitted to be outside of the homersquos thermal and air barrier boundary

Ducts are located in an unvented attic Ducts are located in an unvented attic regardless of whether regardless of whether this space is conditioned with a supply register

Ducts are located in a vented attic with all of the followingg characteristics minimum R‐8 duct insulation with an additional minimum 15rdquo of closed‐cell spray foam insulation encapsulating the ducts total duct leakage le 3insulation encapsulating the ducts total duct leakage le 3 CFM25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area and ductwork buried under at least 2rdquo of blown‐in insulation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

10

Mandatoryy Reqquirements

Jump ducts which do not directly deliver conditioned air from the HVAC unit may be located in attics if all joints i lincludi ding boot‐tto‐drywall ll are ff ll ully aiir seall ded withith mastiticb t d

Ducts are located within an unvented crawl space

Ducts are located in a basement which is within the Ducts are located in a basement which is within the homersquos thermal boundary

Ductless HVAC system is used

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Current Opptions

Ductwork thermal losses can range from 10‐45

Multiple Interior duct options exist but may options exist but may be impractical expensive not work well in all climates or increase envelope loads

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Unvented Attic

HVAC design flexibility Usually more expensive

Mi i l d i i t MMay increase encllosure loads Minimal design integrati tion i l d

IRC Sections R8064 Unvented Attic Assemblies d R316 FOAM PLASTIC t l th bliand R316 FOAM PLASTIC control these assemblies

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Low cost in

Ducts in Dropppped Soffit

R i hi h l l f Requires high‐level of Longer ldquothrowsrdquo may be architectural integration required based on plan

Low‐cost in simple plans simple plans

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ver cost effective wall re isters increase

Floor Truss Integgrated Ducts

Off i l i t ll ti Offers simple installation C d i t fl i t hi h Conducive to floor registers which and design flexibility donrsquot work well for cooling

Very cost‐effective y High wall registers increase High g performance cost and complexity

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Modified Truss

Works well in narrow plans Sealing the air‐barrier is critical Moderate costcost ‐increase design integration required Moderate increase design integration required

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

What Are Buried Ducts

Low cost high‐performance duct strategy

Very high R‐values Very high R values

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BuriedEncapsulated Duct CategoriesCategories

Buried Ducts

Buried and Encapsulated Ducts

Encapsulated Ducts

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 7: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

10

Mandatoryy Reqquirements

Jump ducts which do not directly deliver conditioned air from the HVAC unit may be located in attics if all joints i lincludi ding boot‐tto‐drywall ll are ff ll ully aiir seall ded withith mastiticb t d

Ducts are located within an unvented crawl space

Ducts are located in a basement which is within the Ducts are located in a basement which is within the homersquos thermal boundary

Ductless HVAC system is used

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Current Opptions

Ductwork thermal losses can range from 10‐45

Multiple Interior duct options exist but may options exist but may be impractical expensive not work well in all climates or increase envelope loads

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Unvented Attic

HVAC design flexibility Usually more expensive

Mi i l d i i t MMay increase encllosure loads Minimal design integrati tion i l d

IRC Sections R8064 Unvented Attic Assemblies d R316 FOAM PLASTIC t l th bliand R316 FOAM PLASTIC control these assemblies

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Low cost in

Ducts in Dropppped Soffit

R i hi h l l f Requires high‐level of Longer ldquothrowsrdquo may be architectural integration required based on plan

Low‐cost in simple plans simple plans

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ver cost effective wall re isters increase

Floor Truss Integgrated Ducts

Off i l i t ll ti Offers simple installation C d i t fl i t hi h Conducive to floor registers which and design flexibility donrsquot work well for cooling

Very cost‐effective y High wall registers increase High g performance cost and complexity

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Modified Truss

Works well in narrow plans Sealing the air‐barrier is critical Moderate costcost ‐increase design integration required Moderate increase design integration required

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

What Are Buried Ducts

Low cost high‐performance duct strategy

Very high R‐values Very high R values

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BuriedEncapsulated Duct CategoriesCategories

Buried Ducts

Buried and Encapsulated Ducts

Encapsulated Ducts

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 8: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Current Opptions

Ductwork thermal losses can range from 10‐45

Multiple Interior duct options exist but may options exist but may be impractical expensive not work well in all climates or increase envelope loads

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Unvented Attic

HVAC design flexibility Usually more expensive

Mi i l d i i t MMay increase encllosure loads Minimal design integrati tion i l d

IRC Sections R8064 Unvented Attic Assemblies d R316 FOAM PLASTIC t l th bliand R316 FOAM PLASTIC control these assemblies

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Low cost in

Ducts in Dropppped Soffit

R i hi h l l f Requires high‐level of Longer ldquothrowsrdquo may be architectural integration required based on plan

Low‐cost in simple plans simple plans

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ver cost effective wall re isters increase

Floor Truss Integgrated Ducts

Off i l i t ll ti Offers simple installation C d i t fl i t hi h Conducive to floor registers which and design flexibility donrsquot work well for cooling

Very cost‐effective y High wall registers increase High g performance cost and complexity

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Modified Truss

Works well in narrow plans Sealing the air‐barrier is critical Moderate costcost ‐increase design integration required Moderate increase design integration required

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

What Are Buried Ducts

Low cost high‐performance duct strategy

Very high R‐values Very high R values

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BuriedEncapsulated Duct CategoriesCategories

Buried Ducts

Buried and Encapsulated Ducts

Encapsulated Ducts

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 9: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Ducts in Unvented Attic

HVAC design flexibility Usually more expensive

Mi i l d i i t MMay increase encllosure loads Minimal design integrati tion i l d

IRC Sections R8064 Unvented Attic Assemblies d R316 FOAM PLASTIC t l th bliand R316 FOAM PLASTIC control these assemblies

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Low cost in

Ducts in Dropppped Soffit

R i hi h l l f Requires high‐level of Longer ldquothrowsrdquo may be architectural integration required based on plan

Low‐cost in simple plans simple plans

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ver cost effective wall re isters increase

Floor Truss Integgrated Ducts

Off i l i t ll ti Offers simple installation C d i t fl i t hi h Conducive to floor registers which and design flexibility donrsquot work well for cooling

Very cost‐effective y High wall registers increase High g performance cost and complexity

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Modified Truss

Works well in narrow plans Sealing the air‐barrier is critical Moderate costcost ‐increase design integration required Moderate increase design integration required

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

What Are Buried Ducts

Low cost high‐performance duct strategy

Very high R‐values Very high R values

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BuriedEncapsulated Duct CategoriesCategories

Buried Ducts

Buried and Encapsulated Ducts

Encapsulated Ducts

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 10: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Low cost in

Ducts in Dropppped Soffit

R i hi h l l f Requires high‐level of Longer ldquothrowsrdquo may be architectural integration required based on plan

Low‐cost in simple plans simple plans

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ver cost effective wall re isters increase

Floor Truss Integgrated Ducts

Off i l i t ll ti Offers simple installation C d i t fl i t hi h Conducive to floor registers which and design flexibility donrsquot work well for cooling

Very cost‐effective y High wall registers increase High g performance cost and complexity

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Modified Truss

Works well in narrow plans Sealing the air‐barrier is critical Moderate costcost ‐increase design integration required Moderate increase design integration required

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

What Are Buried Ducts

Low cost high‐performance duct strategy

Very high R‐values Very high R values

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BuriedEncapsulated Duct CategoriesCategories

Buried Ducts

Buried and Encapsulated Ducts

Encapsulated Ducts

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 11: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Ver cost effective wall re isters increase

Floor Truss Integgrated Ducts

Off i l i t ll ti Offers simple installation C d i t fl i t hi h Conducive to floor registers which and design flexibility donrsquot work well for cooling

Very cost‐effective y High wall registers increase High g performance cost and complexity

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Ducts in Modified Truss

Works well in narrow plans Sealing the air‐barrier is critical Moderate costcost ‐increase design integration required Moderate increase design integration required

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

What Are Buried Ducts

Low cost high‐performance duct strategy

Very high R‐values Very high R values

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BuriedEncapsulated Duct CategoriesCategories

Buried Ducts

Buried and Encapsulated Ducts

Encapsulated Ducts

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 12: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Ducts in Modified Truss

Works well in narrow plans Sealing the air‐barrier is critical Moderate costcost ‐increase design integration required Moderate increase design integration required

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

What Are Buried Ducts

Low cost high‐performance duct strategy

Very high R‐values Very high R values

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BuriedEncapsulated Duct CategoriesCategories

Buried Ducts

Buried and Encapsulated Ducts

Encapsulated Ducts

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 13: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

What Are Buried Ducts

Low cost high‐performance duct strategy

Very high R‐values Very high R values

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BuriedEncapsulated Duct CategoriesCategories

Buried Ducts

Buried and Encapsulated Ducts

Encapsulated Ducts

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 14: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

BuriedEncapsulated Duct CategoriesCategories

Buried Ducts

Buried and Encapsulated Ducts

Encapsulated Ducts

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 15: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Buried Duct Classification

Buried Duct Schematic (Dry Climate Only)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 16: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Buried Duct Classification

Buried amp Encapsulated Duct Schematic (All Climates)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 17: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Effective R‐values

RR‐value metrics value metrics

Nominal ndash listed values for duct insulation

Effective ndash heat lossgain from duct to attic Effective heat lossgain from duct to attic

Buried duct effective R‐values calculated using FEA

H t fl it d th h h d t d l t d d f ll b i d 8 i di t d tHeat flux magnitude through a hung duct and an encapsulated and fully‐buried 8‐in diameter duct

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 18: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Effective R‐values

R 4 2 R 6 R 8 Duct Configuration R‐42 Ducts

R‐6 Ducts

R‐8 Ducts

Traditional hung ducts 46 59 72

Hung ducts encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF 113 120 127

Partially‐buried 81 102 123

Fully‐buried 120 141 162

Deeply‐buried 207 221 235

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and partially‐buried 184 197 210

Encapsulated in 15rdquo of ccSPF and fully‐buried 226 238 250

Encapsulated in 1 5rdquo of ccSPF and deeply buried 29 6 30 3 31 1 Encapsulated in 15 of ccSPF and deeply‐buried 296 303 311

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 19: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Condensation PotentialTe

mpee

ratu

re (deg

F))

140 100 Attic Temperature

110

120

130

70

80

90Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp

90

100

50

60 ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH

60

70

80

20

30

40

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM40

50

60

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM 0

10

20

400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM400 AM 700 AM 1000 AM 100 PM 400 PM 700 PM 1000 PM 100 AM 400 AM

Rel

ativ

e H

umid

ity (

)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 20: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Performance Compparison

Roof slope 412 612 812 1012

Benchmark1 00 00 00 00

Improved benchmark12 92 92 92 92

Partially-buried (R-33) 104 104 104 105 Fully-buried (R-42)

137 133 127 122 119 119 120 120 12 9 13 0 13 0 13 0

116 117 117 117 Deeply-buried (R-51) 132 134 134 134

Unvented1

Encapsulated1

P i ll b i d amp l d (R 3 )Partially-buried amp encapsulated (R-37) 129 130 130 130 Fully-buried amp encapsulated (R-46) 142 143 144 144

Deeply-buried amp encapsulated (R-54) 153 155 155 156 Interior ducts1 154 155 155 155

11 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 21: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

BEDs Impplementation

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 22: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Install Low‐Profile Compact Duct Design

Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 23: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Mastic seal ducts and test

Test total duct leakage to assure performance levels are met (total leakage lt 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 24: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied prior to ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 25: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Apppp yly 15rdquo minimum ccSPF

ccSPF applied after ceiling gypsum board

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 26: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Install Loose‐fill insulation

Insulation must be ASTM classified as ldquomineral‐fiberrdquo and must cover the ccSPF by a minimum of 15rdquo (cellulose doesnrsquot qualify)

SSome ffoams are exempt from thithis requirement ( t (more in a moment))t f i

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 27: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Code Comppliance

2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation 2009 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M16013) in attics (Section R31653) meet several requirements

Flame spread index less than 25

Smoke‐developed index less than 450

NNo atti ttic sttorage or occupancy

Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (15rdquo mineral fiber) Or meets R316 6 (no ignition barrier required) Or meets R3166 (no ignition barrier required)

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 28: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Builder Resources

Code related considerations Code‐related considerations IRC Sections R8071 M16013 R31653 R3166

DOE Challenge HomeDOE Challenge Home

Title 24 of California Code of Regulations

Technical ReferencesTechnical References Multiple research reports since 2000

Upcoming BA Technical ReportUpcoming BA Technical Report Upcoming BA Measure Guideline

www buildingamerica gov wwwbuildingamericagov

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved 28

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 29: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Contact Info

Steven Winter Associates IncSteven Winter Associates Inc 61 Washington StNorwalk CT 06854 203‐857‐0200

Bill Zoeller wzoellerswintercomwzoellerswintercom

copy 2012 Steven Winter Associates Inc All rights reserved

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 30: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Upcoming Events

1 Join DOE Challenge Home

ndash b ildi hwwwbuildingsenergygovchall llenge

2 Release of Updated Rating Software ndash NOV 2012

3 DOE Challenge Home Awards program

4 DOE Challengge Home traininggs

ndash Additional Technical Trainings

ndash Multiple RESNET Conference SessionsMultiple RESNET Conference Sessions

ndash Net-Zero Ready Home Trainings with Partners (various markets)

30 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov

Page 31: Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space...DOE Challenge Home Technical Training - Ducts in Conditioned Space Subject A publication of the U.S. Department of Energy

Thank YouThank You Q estions Questions

For More InformationFor More Information wwwbuildingsenergygovchallenge

e-mail Contact doechallengehomenewportpartnersllccom

31 | INNOVATION amp INTEGRATION Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market BuildingsEnergygov