Contrast in Global Marketing Strategies
-
Upload
laowaicareer-jobs-in-china -
Category
Marketing
-
view
114 -
download
1
Transcript of Contrast in Global Marketing Strategies
visit us at https://blog.laowaicareer.comtweet us @laowaicareer
Contrast in Global Marketing Strategies
Click here to learn more about global marketing
strategies. If you have no idea what this means even more reason to
learn more :-p
Before a new market entry, a company must conduct a thorough cross-cultural analysis to
compare the differences and similarities between different country markets. In as much as there are
several risks involved in expanding the market worldwide, the benefits are also insurmountable and if you fail to provide a product to the world
market, your competitor will.
It’s important to note that some products are more appropriate for global market
expansion than others. However, any business type can benefit if it requires fewer changes in its global marketing strategies to reach consumer markets
anywhere in the world.
To take a business worldwide means that you will be able to find new markets for your
products or services, go into markets with less competition and reach new consumers
overseas. The cross-cultural is quite essential since it provides some insight on the
appropriate international strategy whether it is multi-domestic or global.
Global Marketing Strategy
This strategy makes an assumption that all consumers in all geographical regions
or countries are the same. This strategy is best suited for standardized products such as Coca-cola and copy machine,
where little or no product differentiation is required.
For instance, Coca-Cola can be found just anywhere in the world and can easily be
identified as such. It is imperative to note that in as much as countries have narrowed down their differences thanks to globalization, some small differences still which have a huge influence on
how exactly companies will look at and put plans in effect for global marketing behavior still occur.
Standardization Vs Localization
Since companies have begun to market their products globally, they are faced with
the dilemma of whether to standardize (the same marketing concept in each and
country) or localization (adjusting the marketing strategy to match the specific
dimensions of the local market).
For most companies, they decide on standardization of marketing mix for global
markets for cost or efficiency scores and also because of lack of consistent global
marketing strategy.
Standardization is a more cost-driven concept for marketers since it leads to supplying the same
product/service/template configuration to create economies of scale as well as cost savings. When you create a single strategy for the international
market and standardization of marketing mix elements, then you can gain consistency with
customers and also lower costs.
It’s believed that companies can easily achieve long-lasting success by solely concentrating on
producing a standardized product that is functional, reliable, low-priced and advanced rather than focusing on the specifics of what anybody else thinks they might prefer. This
easily leads to a much better resources allocation, higher profits, higher efficiency and
consistent marketing.
During the implementation of a standardized strategy, companies make an assumption of homogenized consumer requirements. Thus, minimally invest in international marketing
research in relation to changing the marketing mix. The marketing mix is made up of the
company’s efforts in relation to the 4 marketing P’s: Place (distribution), Product, Promotion,
and Price.
Pros• Expected quality level of a specific product to be the same around the
world• Supporting positive consumer perception of a specific product• Positive word-of-mouth can easily result in an increase in the sales
across the globe.• Cost reduction since selling in large quantities of a similar, standardized
product and buying content in bulk reduces the cost per unit.• Results in improved R& D, lowers cost of investment and marketing
operational costs.• Helps companies focus the same marketing mix especially on a single
product, thus aids for quality improvement.
Cons• Different markets would mean different preferences and
fail to recognize that might make the local market not to react, allowing for the competitors to gain the market share if their products are tailored to match domestic market needs, for instance, Walmart’s failure to get into the global market by imposing its values all over the world.
• Largely depends on economic scales (international markets and products) with several countries implementing trade barriers, localization id predestined.
Localization/ Adaptation
This global marketing plan takes into consideration the intrinsic diversity existing in global markets and treats people as ‘cultural beings’ whose behaviors and values are defined by the specific culture they
live in. The adaptation strategy focuses on understanding the local consumer needs and other
location-specific requirements then localizes the marketing mix as well as other business concepts to
satisfy consumer wants and needs.
Some brands have failed to localize their products with their communication offending some individuals
in global markets for instance Pepsi, Colgate and Chevrolet had non-localized messages which were
misinterpreted in several countries. China’s automobile industry also faced global barriers related
to the perceptions that Chinese cars are of poor quality despite the industry growing too fast and
being ready for the global expansion.
If localization is done properly, it can really save you some bucks because the cost of repositioning after offending a number of
consumers can be very high and sometimes the damage is permanent. To localize the
product names into local languages without necessarily compromising brand identity can
be quite a challenge.
Also, the issues of packaging are also differently perceived in a different
culture, for instance, a golf ball company lost potential markets in China and Japan for packaging the balls in fours and in the
two countries number four sounds like death hence considered bad luck.
Even with the challenges, many companies have found a way to
perfectly target the international markets by proactively localizing their
marketing mix and product, for instance, McDonald’s and KFC.
In China, the two companies have always had success stories and
recorded profits in China even with the financial crisis. They have achieved this
by localizing their food retailing strategies and menus.
Another example would be Unilever which saw an opportunity with low-income Indians
who wished to buy the high-end personal care products and detergents but could
never afford them. The company would then develop low-end packaging to ensure that
they could be able to access them.
Pros• Customers keep their landmark and
feel noticed• Respect local specifications and
expectations• Excellent local image.
Cons• Higher cost, it’s quite expensive when
trying to localize a product.• Time-consuming and poor speed of
execution• Difficulty to know what consumers really
want.
Ultimately, it’s all about striking the balance since both global business
concepts have logical, coherent and rational advantages as well as valid
inefficiencies. To this effect, it’s safe to say that marketing for multinationals doesn’t
lie on either of the two but when they coexist especially in the same country.
Click on the link below to read the full blog post! Don’t forget to comment, share, tweet…
https://www.laowaicareer.com/blog/contrast-global-marketing-strategies
/
LaowaiCareer.comblog.LaowaiCareer.com
• Search Jobs• Register as a Job seeker.• Subscribe to our Newsletter, Job offers and Blo
gs• Read our blog