Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

17
Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations Department of Space & Climate Physics Mullard Space Science Laboratory A. P. Walsh 1 , A. N. Fazakerley 1 , I. J Rae 2 , I. R. Mann 2, , K. R. Murphy 2 , M. Volwerk 3 !7 th Cluster Workshop, University of Uppsala, 15 th May 2009 1. Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Surrey, UK 2. Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 3. Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria

description

Department of Space & Climate Physics Mullard Space Science Laboratory. Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations. A. P. Walsh 1 , A. N. Fazakerley 1 , I. J Rae 2 , I. R. Mann 2, , K. R. Murphy 2 , M. Volwerk 3. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

Page 1: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based

Observations

Department of Space & Climate Physics

Mullard Space Science Laboratory

A. P. Walsh1, A. N. Fazakerley1, I. J Rae2, I. R. Mann2,, K. R. Murphy2, M. Volwerk3

!7th Cluster Workshop, University of Uppsala, 15th May 2009

1. Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Surrey, UK

2. Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

3. Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria

Page 2: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

Introduction – 2 Substorm Models

• With this event we probably can’t work out which of these is right.

• Will concentrate on near-Earth features of the substorm, particularly the formation of the Substorm Current Wedge.

Mullard Space Science Laboratory

Sketch : UCLA

Page 3: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

Near-Earth Observational Signatures

Mullard Space Science Laboratory

• Include, in the ionosphere:– Geomagnetic bays (= ionospheric current)– Pi1 & Pi2 pulsations– Auroral emissions

• Include, in the magnetotail:– Dipolarisation of the magnetic field– Formation of Substorm Current Wedge (FACs)– Injection of energetic particles near geosynchronous

orbit

Page 4: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

1 October 2005 Event: auroral imaging from space

Mullard Space Science Laboratory

• IMAGE-FUV data (southern hemisph.)

• Images every 2 mins; time stamp is at the end of the 2 min interval during which image is collected

• Frey list onset at 04:21:20 (Frey & Mende, 2006) 04:19-21

• Site of auroral expansion seems to be a few deg’s east; first brightening at 04:21-23; expansion starts 04:23-2504:21:20 UT

04:23:26 UT 04:25:31 UT 04:27:36 UT

Page 5: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

1 October 2005 Event : ground magnetometers

Mullard Space Science Laboratory

• Canadian magnetometers (northern hemisphere)

• The onset of Pi1/2 pulsations can be timed and localised using a wavelet transform (Milling et al., 2007, Murphy et al., 2009).

• Experience shows that wave power arrives a few minutes before auroral intensification, co-located within 1 or 2 degrees

• Onset of Pi1/2 activity at 04:16UT at GILL (Cf 04:19-21 at IMAGE)

Page 6: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

Mullard Space Science Laboratory

• Experience shows that wave power arrives a few minutes before auroral intensification, co-located within 1 or 2 degrees

• Onset of Pi1/2 activity at 04:16UT at GILL (Cf 04:19-21 at IMAGE)

• A Pi1/2 onset/intensification is seen centred between ISLL & PBQ which starts no later than 04:22:24 (Cf 04:21-23 at IMAGE)

• Locations are consistent with the two separate IMAGE onsets.

1 October 2005 Event : ground magnetometers

Page 7: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

Mullard Space Science Laboratory

• Compare magnetometer time history for GILL and PBQ

• GILL shows a weaker bay (weaker ionospheric current overhead) consistent with main substorm ionospheric current being located east of GILL, nearer PBQ, consistent with IMAGE evidence that the eastward event is associated with stronger activity

GILL

PBQ

1 October 2005 Event : ground magnetometers

Page 8: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

1 October 2005 Event : Near Earth Spacecraft

Mullard Space Science Laboratory

• Blue radial line represents longitude of Churchill Line magnetometers used here.

Page 9: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

Mullard Space Science Laboratory

• GOES12 & Double Star TC-2 are close to magnetically conjugate with the 2nd IMAGE onset, apparently.

• LANL90 & LANL94 bracket the onset region

• LANL spacecraft see evidence of a particle injection initiated near TC-2 /GOES12

GSE XY positions of Near-Earth spacecraft

TC-2 at (6.0, -2.2, 1.0) RE GSE

1 October 2005 Event : Near Earth Spacecraft

Page 10: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

Double Star TC-2 DataMullard Space Science Laboratory

• TC-2 in Northern hemi-sphere, in plasma sheet at time of 2nd IMAGE onset.

• Large deflections in dBY,

pulsations in dBZ and enhanced T|| / T┴ observed around the time of onset.

(i.e. FACs and Pi1/2s)PA0

PA90

PA180

T// /

T

Page 11: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

Double Star TC-2 DataMullard Space Science Laboratory

• TC-2 in Northern hemi-sphere, in plasma sheet at time of 2nd IMAGE onset.

• Large deflections in dBY,

pulsations in dBZ and enhanced T|| / T┴ observed around the time of onset. (i.e. FACs and Pi1/2s)

• Sees dipolarisation and more energetic electron population ~4 mins afterwards.

PA0

PA90

PA180

T// /

T

Page 12: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

TC-2 & GOES12 Data

Mullard Space Science Laboratory

• GOES-12 sees deflections in BY, but in the opposite sense to TC-2. Timing matches IMAGE eastern onset.

• Consistent with the spacecraft begin located either side of the Western FAC of the Substorm Current Wedge, as it formed.

• Pi1/2 pulsations at TC-2 start at same time as dBY deflections. (waiting for higher time resolution GOES data)

• GOES12 observes the dipolarisation before TC-2. What does this say about SCW evolution?

j (SCW)

Earth

IMAGE Eastern Onset

Page 13: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

Double Star TC-2 DataMullard Space Science Laboratory

• Pi1/2 oscillations start at 04:20:20 UT. After GILL, but fits with PBQ.

• A lower energy population of field-aligned electrons are present during Pi1/2 pulsations. These disappear when the dipolarisation starts.

• Earthward flow is seen with dipolarisation, but not as early as Pi2 waves.

• Pulsations have frequencies of ~50 to 100mHz. How are these related to electrons, FAC appearance and IMAGE onset?

PA90

PA180

Par-Perp

PA0

Page 14: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

Conclusions

Mullard Space Science Laboratory

• Ionosphere: Pi1/2 pulsations are detected on the ground at virtually the same time as, and at a location consistent with, the main auroral substorm onset.

• Magnetosphere: Similar pulsations at TC-2 start at the same time as the spacecraft sees evidence of the appearance of FACs which we suggest are part of the Substorm Current Wedge.

• M-I link?: Timing evidence consistent with suggestion that these signatures are connected; spacecraft and ground observations magnetically linked? Can we use the data to investigate the onset of cross-tail current diversion?

• Pi1/2 origin: Possibility that the spacecraft and ground pulsations are a signature of local plasma flow is not supported in this case.

Page 15: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

Future Work

Mullard Space Science Laboratory

• Characterise the TC-2 pulsations properly, compare with candidates for current disruption:– EMIC drift (e.g. Yoon et al., 2009)– Kinetic Ballooning (e.g. Liu et al., 2008)

• What is the role of the electrons?• Put into the wider context of the substorm (Cluster

data – Cluster was not in the central plasmasheet at this events onset time…).

Page 16: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

LANL Energetic ParticlesMullard Space Science Laboratory

Page 17: Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations

LANL Energetic ParticlesMullard Space Science Laboratory

e-

p+

LANL90

LANL94