CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio,...

178
v><* ma CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF Mo 2 C AND DIAMOND THIN FILMS DEPOSITED ON Mo FOILS AND TIPS BY ELECTROPHORESIS DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the University of North Texas in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Ambrosio Antonio Rouse, B.S., M.S. Denton, Texas August, 1999

Transcript of CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio,...

Page 1: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

v><*

ma

CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF Mo2C AND

DIAMOND THIN FILMS DEPOSITED ON Mo FOILS AND TIPS BY

ELECTROPHORESIS

DISSERTATION

Presented to the Graduate Council of the

University of North Texas in Partial

Fulfillment of the Requirements

For the Degree of

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

By

Ambrosio Antonio Rouse, B.S., M.S.

Denton, Texas

August, 1999

Page 2: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of

MO2C and diamond thin films deposited on Mo foils and tips by Electrophoresis. Doctor

of Philosophy (Physics), August, 1999,164 pp., 27 tables, 80 illustrations, references, 57

titles.

The thermal stability and the resiliency of molybdenum carbide films deposited at

room temperature by electrophoresis was studied using XPS, UPS, SEM and XRD at

412 °C, 525 °C and 800 °C and as a function of increasing annealing temperature. The

photoelectric work function at each temperature was measured and found to be relatively

constant for 2 hrs, 5 hrs and 4 hrs at the annealing temperatures of 412 °C, 525 °C and

800 °C respectively, and by using various incident photon energies. XRD spectra

confirmed the presence of M0O2, M0O3 and M02C which were all found to be stable.

Field emission Fowler-Nordheim current-voltage characteristics and electron energy

distribution measurements were obtained using films deposited on field emission tips as

part of a single aperture gated diode in a VG ESCALABII from which field emission

thresholds were found that agreed well with measured photoelectric thresholds found by

UPS.

Diamond thin films of 0.25 |im, 3 (j.m and 6 |am average particle sizes were

deposited on Mo foils and tips by electrophoresis and studied by XPS, UPS, SEM and

XRD. A decrease in the FE threshold from 3.8 to 3.4 eV for the room temperature

electrophoresis grown diamond films as the average grain size increases from 0.25 jxm to

6 (a,m was observed. FE thresholds were found to agree with the photoelectric work

Page 3: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

functions determined from UPS measurements done on similarly grown flat samples.

Intrinsic diamond surface states were found at 0.4 eV and 0.9 eV above the valence band

by photoemission. A theoretically predicted extrinsic surface state associated with the

hydrogen termination of the diamond films was found at 1.8 eV above the valence band,

and the negative electron affinity (NEA) of the diamond films was confirmed by UPS.

Page 4: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

v><*

ma

CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF Mo2C AND

DIAMOND THIN FILMS DEPOSITED ON Mo FOILS AND TIPS BY

ELECTROPHORESIS

DISSERTATION

Presented to the Graduate Council of the

University of North Texas in Partial

Fulfillment of the Requirements

For the Degree of

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

By

Ambrosio Antonio Rouse, B.S., M.S.

Denton, Texas

August, 1999

Page 5: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I would like to thank Prof. David E. Golden for his support, guidance, and insight

in completing this dissertation and for giving me the opportunity to be creative and be

part of his research group.

I want to also thank Dr. John B. Bernhard, Edward D. Sosa, and Dr. Ikerionwu A.

Akwani for their encouragement and support in this endeavor.

Page 6: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

LIST OF TABLES v

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS vii

Chapter

1. INTRODUCTION 1

Motivational considerations for this study Properties of Molybdenum Carbide (M02C) Properties of Diamond References

2. THEORY 9

Introduction X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Ultraviolet Electron Spectroscopy (UPS) Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) X- ray Diffraction (XRD) Electrophoresis Field Emission References

3. EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES AND SETUP 23

Introduction Sample preparation and film deposition Scanning Electron Microscopy Ultraviolet Electron Spectroscopy, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Field Emission Energy Distribution X-ray Diffraction References

4. CHARACTERIZATION OF Mo2C FILMS 34

111

Page 7: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

Introduction Experimental Results

Characterization of M02C films as deposited Characterization of M02C films as a function of increasing annealing temperature from 26°C to 900°C Characterization of M02C films as a function of constant annealing temperature of 412 °C Characterization of M02C films as a function of constant annealing temperature of 525 °C Characterization of M02C films as a function of constant annealing temperature of 800 °C

Conclusions References

5. CHARACTERIZATION OF DIAMOND FILMS DEPOSITED BY ELECTROPHORESIS ON Mo AS A FUNCTION OF AVERAGE DIAMOND GRAIN SIZE 105

Introduction Experimental Results Discussion and Conclusions References

6. FIELD EMISSION 138

Introduction Experimental Field Emission results of M02C tips Field Emission results of diamond tips Discussion and Conclusions References

7. CONCLUSIONS 156

8. BIBLIOGRAPHY 161

IV

Page 8: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

LIST OF TABLES

Page

Table 1. Properties of M02C 4

Table 1.2. Properties of various forms of Diamond 6

Table 2.1. UPS Characteristics 12

Table 4.1. Comparison of deposition parameters and core electron binding energies... .42

Table 4.2. Peak Height Ratio Comparisons 42

Table 4.3. Average core electron binding energies in eV of the sample annealed as a function of increasing temperature 56

Table 4.4. Peak height intensity ratios of the sample annealed as function of increasing Temperature 56

Table 4.5. Mo3ds/2/Mo3d3/2 peak height ratios of sample annealed as a function of increasing temperature 57

Table 4.6. Summary of the positions in terms of energy of the different states found in the UPS spectra of the sample annealed at 410 °C for 2 hours. 60

Table 4.7. Average core electron binding energies in eV of the sample annealed at 412°C for 2 hours 70

Table 4.8. Peak height intensity ratios of sample annealed at 412°C for 2 hours 71

Table 4.9. Mo3ds/2/Mo3d3/2 peak height ratio of sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours 71

Table 4.10. Summary in terms of the energy position of the different structures obtained in the UPS spectra of the sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours using 5.06 eV incident photons 73

Table 4.11. Average Core Electron Binding Energies in eV of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours 82

Page 9: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

Table 4.12. Peak Height Ratios of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours 82

Table 4.13. Mo3d5/2/Mo3d 3/2 Peak Height Ratios of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours 83

Table 4.14. Summary of the different states present in the UPS spectra of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours obtained by using 4.49 eV incident photons 85

Table 4.15. Average Core Electron Binding Energies in eV of the Sample annealed at 800 °C 93

Table 4.16. Peak Height Ratios for the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours 93

Table 4.17. Mo3ds/2 / Mo3d3/2 Peak Height Ratio of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours 94

Table 4.18. Summary of the position of the different states seen in the UPS spectra of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours obtained by using 4.49 eV incident photons 97

Table 5.1. Positions of structures measured from the valence band found in the UPS spectra of the diamond films using 4.88 eV incident photons 116

Table 5.2. Position of structures measured from the valence band found in the UPS spectra of the diamond films using 4.0 eV incident photons 118

Table 5.3. Positions of the structures found in the valence band of the diamond films and amplitude of the NEA peak 122

Table 5.4. Results of the calculations of the width of the valence band, W, the position of the Fermi level with respect to the valence band, £,the negative electron affinity^, and the photoemission threshold Eth for the three diamond films 124

Table 5.5. Interplanar distances and 2d angles comparisons between standard values and the results of this study 126

Table 6.1. Position of the states in the FEEDs of the three different average diamond particle grain size 155

VI

Page 10: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Page

Figure 2.1. Basic principles of XPS and UPS 11

Figure 2.2. Schematic of a three lens probe forming column used in SEM 14

Figure 2.3. Basic principles of Powder Diffraction 15

Figure 2.4. Basic Setup for Electrophoresis 17

Figure 2.5. Principles of Field Emission 18

Figure 3.1. Jeol Model JMS-T300 S 26

Figure 3.2. VG Mark II Spectrometer 29

Figure 3.3. Siemens Diffractometer Model D-500 33

Figure 4.1. Sectioned "before" XPS spectra of deposited M02C film 38

Figure 4.2. Valence Band Structure of a non annealed as deposited M02C film obtained with He I (21.2 eV) radiation 43

Figure 4.3. Valence Band Structure of an annealed M02C film obtained with He I (21.2 eV) radiation 43

Figure 4.4. Valence Band structure of the M02C film exposed to air for 8 months 44

Figure 4.5. Valence Band structure of the M02C film exposed to air for 8 months biased with-6 V 44

Figure 4.6. SEM of the as deposited M02C film in which the grain size can be seen and which was obtained with a 10000X magnification 45

Figure 4.7. SEM micrograph of an "as deposited" M02C film obtained with a 1,500X magnification and in which the general morphology of the film is seen 46

Figure 4.8. XRD pattern of Mo substrate 47

Vll

Page 11: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

Figure 4.9. XRD pattern of M02C powder 48

Figure 4.10. XRD pattern of deposited M02C film 49

Figure 4.11. XRD pattern of deposited M02C film showing oxide activity 50

Figure 4.12. Sectioned "before" XPS spectra of the sample to be annealed as a function of increasing temperature 52

Figure 4.13. Sectioned "after" XPS spectra of the sample annealed as a function of increasing temperature 53

Figure 4.14. Evolution of the Mo3d doublet as a function of increasing annealing temperature 54

Figure 4.15. UPS Spectra of M02C film showing the lowest resolved UPS band obtained by using 5.64 eV photons 58

Figure 4.16. Effect of annealing on the UPS spectra of the M02C as a function of increasing annealing temperature 59

Figure 4.17. UPS spectra of the valence band of the sample annealed as a function of increasing temperature obtained with a He I (21.2 eV) 61

Figure 4.18. SEM micrograph of the sample annealed as a function of increasing temperature obtained with a magnification of 1500X 62

Figure 4.19. XRD spectra of the sample annealed as a function of increasing temperature 64

Figure 4.20. XRD spectra of the sample annealed as a function of increasing annealing temperature, showing oxide activity 65

Figure 4.21. Sectioned "before" XPS spectra of a sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours 67

Figure 4.22. Sectioned "after" XPS spectra of sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours 68

Figure 4.23. Mo3d doublet of the sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours 69

Figure 4.24. UPS spectra of sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours obtained using 5.06 eV incident photons 72

Figure 4.25. UPS spectra of the valence band structure of the sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours obtained by using He I (21.1 eV) radiation 74

Vlll

Page 12: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

Figure 4.26. SEM micrograph of the sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours, obtained with a magnification of 1500X 75

Figure 4.27. XRD spectra of sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours 76

Figure 4.28. XRD spectra of the sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours in which oxide activity can be seen 77

Figure 4.29. Sectioned "before" XPS spectra of the sample to be annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours 79

Figure 4.30. Sectioned "after" XPS spectra of sample that was annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours 80

Figure 4.31. XPS spectra showing the evolution of the Mo3d doublet of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours after 1, 3 and 5 hours respectively 81

Figure 4.32. UPS spectra of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours obtained using 4.49 eV incident photons 84

Figure 4.33. UPS spectra of the valence band of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours 86

Figure 4.34. SEM micrograph of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours 87

Figure 4.35. XRD spectra of sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours 88

Figure 4.36. XRD spectra of sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours, in which oxide activity can be seen 89

Figure 4.37. Sectioned "before" XPS spectra of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours 91

Figure 4.38. Sectioned "after" XPS spectra of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours 91

Figure 4.39. XPS spectra showing the evolution of the Mo3d doublet during the 3 hours of annealing 92

Figure 4.40. UPS spectra of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours obtained by using 4.49 eV incident photons 96

Figure 4.41. UPS spectra of the valence band structure of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours obtained using He I (21.2 eV) radiation 98

IX

Page 13: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

Figure 4.42. SEM micrograph of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours 99

Figure 4.43. XRD spectra of the sample annealed at 800 °C for three hours 100

Figure 4.44. XRD spectra of the sample annealed at 800 °C for three hours in which oxide activity is seen 101

Figure 5.1. Average Binding Energy position of the C Is Peak for the three average size diamond grains 110

Figure 5.2. C Is peak of the 0.25 microns diamond sample as a function of X ray tube emission current I l l

Figure 5.3. C Is peak of the 3 microns diamond sample as a function of X ray tube emission current 112

Figure 5.4. C Is peak of the 6 microns diamond sample as a function of X ray tube emission current 113

Figure 5.5. Low energy UPS spectra of the three diamond films obtained using 4.88 eV incident photons 115

Figure 5.6. Low energy UPS spectra of the three diamond films obtained using 4.0 eV incident photons 117

Figure 5.7. High energy UPS spectra of the valence band structure of the 0.25 microns diamond film obtained using He I radiation (21.2 eV) 119

Figure 5.8. High energy UPS spectra of the valence band structure of the 3 microns diamond film obtained using He I radiation (21.2 eV) 120

Figure 5.9. High energy UPS spectra of the valence band structure of the 6 microns diamond film obtained using He I radiation (21.2 eV) 121

Figure 5.10. SEM micrograph of the 0.25 microns size diamond film obtained using a magnification of 1,500X 127

Figure 5.11. SEM micrograph of the 0.25 microns size diamond film obtained using a magnification of 10,000X 128

Figure 5.12. SEM micrograph of the 3 microns size diamond film obtained using a magnification of 1,500X 129

x

Page 14: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

Figure 5.13. SEM micrograph of the 6 microns size diamond film obtained using a magnification of 1,500X 130

Figure 5.14. XRD pattern showing the three diamond films 131

Figure 5.15. Percent of diamond (111) present in the total film as a function of average diamond grain size 132

Figure 5.16. Ratio of the Mo (200) plane to the diamond (111) plane as a function of average diamond grain size 133

Figure 5.17. Ratio of the diamond (111) plane to the diamond (200) plane as a function of average diamond grain size 134

Figure 6.1. SEM micrograph of a bare Mo tip 143

Figure 6.2. SEM micrograph showing a 5 minute M02C deposition by electrophoresis onto a Mo tip 144

Figure 6.3. SEM micrograph showing a 10 minute M02C deposition by electrophoresis onto a Mo tip 145

Figure 6.4. FEED spectra of a non-annealed M02C coated Mo tip 146

Figure 6.5. I-V curve of non-annealed M02C coated Mo tip 147

Figure 6.6. Fowler-Nordheim (FN) plot of non-annealed M02C coated Mo tip 147

Figure 6.7. FEED spectra of an annealed M02C coated Mo tip. 148

Figure 6.8. FEEDs of M02C film showing oxides 149

Figure 6.9. FEED spectra of the 0.25 micron diamond coated Mo tip 151

Figure 6.10. FEED spectra of the 3 microns diamond coated Mo tip 152

Figure 6.11. FEED spectra of 6 microns diamond coated Mo tip 153

Figure 6.12. Fowler-Nordheim plots for the different average particle diamond tips 154

XI

Page 15: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

In this dissertation M02C and diamond films deposited by electrophoresis on flat Mo

foils and tips have been studied to determine their suitability as field emission tips. In

this chapter, the properties of M02C and diamond will be presented. These properties

provide the motivation for this study.

1.1. Motivational consideration for this study

Molybdenum is currently the field emission tip of choice, due to the ease of

deposition using standard microelectronics manufacturing technology together with its

properties such as good thermal, mechanical and electrical properties. However, the

work function of molybdenum Spindt arrays have been shown to increase and the field

emission to decrease significantly when exposed to oxygen [4], The reported work

function of polycrystalline Mo is 4.6 eV [5]. M02C has in many cases similar properties

to those of Mo, such as good thermal and mechanical properties. It has a somewhat

higher reported electrical resistivity than that of Mo. We believe that because its melting

point is very close to the reported melting point of Mo, then, its deposition could be done

similarly to that done in the case of Mo, and hence, very few modifications, if any would

be required to the current standards of microelectronic manufacturing fabs. M02C has a

Page 16: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

reported work function of 3.8 eV [6] which is lower than that of Mo. A low work

function is one of the many sought characteristics of a good field emitter material.

Diamond has many attractive properties that make it an interesting material with

potential as a field emitter. Enhancements in the emission of diamond coated Mo tips

have detected the presence of M02C in the interface between the diamond coating and the

Mo substrate [7]. These enhancements in the emission properties in diamond could be

due to the presence of M02C and hence, studies to find any possible correlation are timely

and needed. There is much interest in the development of vacuum microelectronic

devices based on arrays of field emitter cathodes in flat panel displays made possible by

the deposition pioneered by Spindt [8].

Finally, there is no comprehensive study of deposition of M0.2C films by

electrophoresis in literature. With a room temperature deposition method, we hope to

offer an alternative deposition technique for M02C films and diamond films.

In chapter 2 a theoretical overview of the different techniques used to characterize the

M02C and diamond films deposited on Mo flat surfaces and tips, will be presented. A

discussion of electrophoresis and field emission will be given. In chapter 3 a description

of the setup and experimental techniques will be provided. Chapter 4 will focus on the

characterization of M02C films as a function of annealing at both increasing and constant

temperatures. Chapter 5 gives the results for diamond films as a function of average

diamond particle grain size. Chapter 6 gives the results obtained for M02C and diamond

coated tips with particular emphasis on their field emission energy distribution (FEED)

Page 17: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

3

spectra and their potential as good field emitters. Finally in chapter 7, a summary of the

main conclusions of this study will be given, and then some suggestions for future work.

1.2. Properties of Molybdenum Carbide (M02C)

Carbides are a subset of a larger group of materials that go by the name of

interstitial alloys. An important characteristic of these materials is that they maintain

their metallic character when the compounds are formed between a metal and carbon. It

is believed that if the ratio of the radius of the nonmetal to metal is below a critical value

of 0.59, then the metal structure is dominant and the carbon atoms will occupy interstitial

sites in the lattice. There are a variety of ways to prepare carbides. One of the most

common ways to produce transition metal carbides is from the oxides by reduction with

carbon or hydrocarbon gases. One drawback is that this brings about, in many cases, a

solubility of oxygen in the product that is not easy to remove. Chemical analysis is

sometimes difficult, and the use of X-ray cell dimension measurements gets complicated

due to the fact that there is solid solubility of carbon in the carbides, hence, there is likely

to be also a variation of the unit cell dimensions with carbon content. One common way

to circumvent these problems, which is also more economical, is to prepare the carbides

by direct reaction of the pure metal with high purity carbon. Molybdenum carbide is

basically known in two forms, the metal rich carbide hexagonal close packed M02C, and

the carbon rich MoC, which is a face centered cubic.

Page 18: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

The more stable of the two forms is the M02C, which is said to be almost

stoichiometric at temperatures below 1500 °C and has a limited solid solubility at higher

temperatures while the carbon rich form, MoC is believed to be unstable at normal

pressures [1].

One of the more direct and widely used application of carbides, in general, is as

secondary phases in steels and other high temperature alloys, where the intrinsic

properties of the compounds combine with the mode of precipitation and other phase

changes to give enhanced properties to the metal carbide composite. Added to this is the

extreme hardness and high melting point of most carbides, and in this case, specifically

those of the molybdenum carbide family, which also makes them potentially a very

attractive option when view as hard metals for cutting tools inserts and for other wear

resistant applications. There are mainly two phases of M02C, the QfMo2C phase and the

/3M02C phase. The aMo2C melts congruently while the J8M02C also melts congruently

but is not stable below 1746 K (2685°F) [2]. In Table 1.1 we present a summary of some

of the main properties of M02C.

TABLE 1.1. Properties of M02C

Hardness HV

(50Kg)

Crystal Structure

Melting Point

°C

Theoretical Density,

g/cm

Modulus of

elasticity , 106 Psi

Coefficient of Thermal Expansion

106/°C

Resistivity

1500 Hex 2500 9.18 77.3 7.8 97

Page 19: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

5

1.3. Properties of Diamond

The primary source of diamonds is the core of ancient volcanoes. Natural diamonds

are usually mined either from volcano cores or from the sand of streambeds containing

materials from the cores. Usually after the ores are crushed, its components are separated

by density. The density of diamond is approximately 3.6 kg m"3 which makes it denser

than most of the other materials. Diamond is an insulator, while most of the other

components in the ore are conductive, hence it can also be separated electrostatically.

The last step in separating diamond consists of sorting manually.

When it comes to synthetic diamond, there are mainly two methods to form synthetic

diamond. In the first method, a high temperature, in general greater than 1000°C, together

with a fairly high pressure, usually greater than 10s atm, liquid is used. The second

method uses gases at lower temperatures, in general less than 1000 °C, and a low

pressure, usually less than 1 atm. The theoretical strength of a brittle material is

proportional to its modulus of elasticity. A clear comparative look at where diamond

stands in terms of strength with respect to other metals, is the fact that the modulus of

elasticity of diamond is 5 times that of steel and ten times that of aluminum alloy. The

surface of diamond is known to be extremely non-reactive with air, provided the carbon

bonds at the surface are terminated with one of a variety of elements such as hydrogen,

fluorine, oxygen, or nitrogen. Diamond has three very unique thermal properties, these

are that it has the highest volumetric heat capacity at high temperatures, one of the lowest

heat capacities at lower temperatures, and has the highest room temperature thermal

Page 20: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

conductivity. Some of the properties of different types of diamonds discussed so far are

presented in Table 1.2.

TABLE 1.2. Properties of various forms of Diamond

Natural Diamond

Synthetic Diamond

Thin Film Diamond

Dielectric Constant (298 K, 1 MHz)

5.5 to 5.7 5.7 3.5 to 5.7

Band gap energy, eV at 298 K

5.2 to 5.6

Carrier Mobility, cms2/V *s

Hole 1200 to 1600 Carrier Mobility, cms2/V *s

electron 1800 to 2200

Electron Velocity, cm/s

2.7 x 107

Density, g/cm3 3.51 to 3.52 3.20 to 3.52 1.80 to 3.50

Modulus ol Elasticity, <

r jPa

700 to 1200 800 to 925 536 to 1035

Knoop hardness, GPa

(110) & (111) faces

58 to 88

There exist a wide variety of methods based on chemical vapor deposition (CVD) that

are used in the growth of diamond thin films. The general procedure is to activate

hydrogen gas containing a few percent of methane, ethane, or other hydrocarbon

compounds by either thermal plasma, ion-beam, laser-beams, microwave plasma, etc at

pressures of about 0.01-0.1 bar and temperatures of about 800-1300K. Two problems

that are present in CVD diamond growth methods are the difficulties related to diamond

nucleation and diamond growth. These problems arise because of the short lifetime of

the excited carbon atoms, and the suppression of the formation of non-diamond carbon.

Page 21: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

7

Nevertheless, all the unique properties of diamond have raised great interest in it, as a

material, and in its potential applications in the semiconductor industry. In particular, the

high carrier mobilities seen in Table 1.3, make diamond an excellent semiconductor

material that can be used for high speed, high temperature or high power transistors.

Another property exhibited by diamond, mainly in the form of its (111) plane, is its

negative electron affinity (NEA) [3]. In a strict sense, a surface is said to have NEA if its

vacuum level lies below its conduction band and hence electrons that are at the

conduction band minimum can readily escape the surface into vacuum. The NEA

property of diamond has been found to be stable in the presence of oxygen and water,

and to be very dependent on the atoms chemically bound to the diamond surface. It is

believed that hydrogen and oxygen are necessary to maintain the NEA surface of

diamond. The potential technological applications of the NEA properties of diamond are

seen in areas such as electron multipliers, cold cathodes, electrochemical cells, electrodes

in photochemical cells, field emitters, etc.

References

1. D. Bloor, R. J. Brook, M. C. Flemmings and S. Mahajai, editors, The Encyclopedia of

Advanced Materials, (Elsevier Science Inc., 660 white Plains Road, Tarrytown, New

York 10591-5153, U.S.A, 1994).

2. M. Bauccio, editor, Engineering Materials Reference Book, 2nd Edition. (ASM

International, Materials Park, OH 44073-0002, 1994).

3. F. J. Himpsel, J. A. Knapp, J. A. Van Vechten, and D. E. Eastman, Phys. Rev. Lett.

Page 22: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

8

20, 624 (1979).

4. B. R. Chalamala, R.M. Wallace and B.E. Gnade, J. Vac. Sci. & Tech. 16, 2859

(1998).

5. D. E. Eastman, Phys. Rev. B, 2,1 (1970).

6. V. S. Fomenko, Handbook of Thermionic Properties (Plenum, New York, 1966).

7. W. B. Choi, R. Schlesser, G. Wojak, J. J. Cuomo, Z. Sitar, and J. J. Hren, J. Vac. Sci.

Technol. B 16, 716 (1998).

8. C. A. Spindt, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 3504, (1968).

Page 23: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

CHAPTER 2

THEORY

2.1. Introduction

In this chapter a brief discussion of the theory of XPS, UPS, SEM, XRD, Field

Emission and Electrophoresis will be made.

2.2. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

The analysis of surfaces by XPS consists of irradiating samples with soft X-rays

and then analyzing the energy of the electrons that have been emitted from the surface.

Typically two types of X-ray radiation are used. One consisting of Mg Ko: X-rays

(1253.6 eV) and the other of A1 Kor X-rays (1486.6 eV). These photons can penetrate

solids to about 1-10 jum.[l]. This makes it a very useful tool to study adsorbed species on

surfaces, since it is less destructive than electron impact spectroscopies [2], The X-ray

interact with surface atoms and cause the electrons to be emitted. The kinetic energy of

the photoelectrons is given by

EkE = hv-EBE (2.1)

where EKE is the ejected electron kinetic energy, hv is the X-ray energy, and EBE is the

electron binding energy with respect to the Fermi level. The core energy levels and the

electron valence bands are readily obtained [3]. Figure 2.1 is an example of core gold

electron excitation typical of XPS. Bonding information can also be obtained by XPS.

9

Page 24: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

10

Core level chemical shifts were observed in the XPS spectra and that provided

information about chemical bonding of the atoms being studied [4]. Many other

chemically affected phenomena such as multiplet splitting, shake-up and shake-off

satellite structures and line broadening have been observed [5]. These shifts range up to

not more than 10 eV and peak resolution is limited by the width of the X-ray line. X-ray

monochromatized sources can reduce possible instrumental contribution to approximately

0.3 eV [5].

Auger lines appear in the XPS spectra because after excitation and emission of a

core electron a hole is left in the core shell which can be filled either by radiative

deexcitation, giving rise to the characteristic X-ray spectrum, or by an Auger process. In

summary, XPS studies are useful because: large energetic probing depth makes

observation of core levels possible, although XPS is not very surface sensitive, chemical

shifts on adsorbates provide information on chemisorption bonding, valence states may

be observed and Auger lines and energy loss structures are observed in the XPS spectra.

2.3. Ultraviolet Electron Spectroscopy (UPS)

UPS is used to probe surfaces with energies up to 40.6 eV (He II line). Energies in

the 10 to 41 eV range provide enough probing depth to cover the valence band of most

solids [6]. In the low energy region of the spectra using these energies a large

background of scattered electrons can be found.

Page 25: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

11

b> (vac. UV)

Mtw.',- O eV

Ai—B30eV

FIGURE 2.1. Basic principles of XPS and UPS.

Page 26: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

12

The resolution of UPS is limited by the resolution of the analyzer [2]. The basic

process is one in which a photon of energy hv is absorbed by a valence electron, process

which leads to a photoionization process. The binding energy of the emitted electron can

then be found by a subtraction of the photon's energy from the measured kinetic energy.

Figure 2.1 also shows an example of UPS. In Table 2.1 some of the characteristics of

UPS are given. In summary, some of the main advantages of UPS are that it allows

relatively easy angle resolved studies, has high resolution, basically limited by the

analyzer, has a good surface sensitivity, when lower energies are used, which is achieved

by the surface photoelectric effect. Also, good information about the valence band, when

the higher incident photon energies are used can be obtained with good resolution.

TABLE 2.1. UPS Characteristics.

Incident Particle

Incident Energy

Incident Energy

resolotion

Angle of incidence

Incidence angular

definition

Incident current or flux

Incident beam

diameter or area

Photon Low (4-40eV)

High (10-25 meV)

O 00 i o Not Important

High 0.01-0.1 cm2

2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

There are three basic components to a scanning electron microscope, an electron

column and its electronics, a vacuum system, including the specimen chamber and stage,

Page 27: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

13

and a signal detection and display system. The column consists, in general, of an electron

gun and two, three or four electron lenses. The purpose of the lenses is to de-magnify the

electron beam's diameter. The product of the demagnification is a spot size at the

specimen of 250 A or less. [7]. The image is formed by using scanning coils to raster

over the specimen's surface [8]. Figure 2.2 shows a schematic of a basic three lens

probe-forming column typically used in SEM.

The SEM image is obtained from secondary electrons ejected from the sample. The

secondary electrons are accelerated to several keV before detection by a scintillator and

then converted to an electrical signal by a photomultiplier and displayed on a cathode ray

tube (CRT) [9].

2.5. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

Diffraction of X-rays by crystalline materials can be used to make qualitative

analysis and to study lattice defects [10]. X-ray diffraction studies involve interpreting

the diffraction pattern with respect to the values of the Bragg angle. The Bragg equation

given by:

X = 2dhkisin0 (2.2)

where d is the interplanar spacing and the indices h k and 1 refer to the Miller indices of

the plane, A is the wavelength and 0 the Bragg angle. Diffraction takes place from the

lattice layers that are inclined with respect to the X-ray beam by the same angle. Usually,

one finds in powdered samples, many randomly oriented crystals, as seen in Figure 2.3,

which technically assures that there are crystals with the proper position to permit

Page 28: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

14

Electron lenses

Electron gun

First condenser lens

Spray aperture

Second condenser lens

Final lens

Final aperture

Specimen

FIGURE 2.2. Schematic of a three lenses probe forming column used in SEM.

Page 29: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

15

Incident beam \Di rect beam

FIGURE 2.3. Basic principles of Powder Diffraction.

diffraction to occur from all the lattice planes. There are two types in a diffraction

patterns are to be made. The first is in the position of the diffraction lines, and the second

is in the intensity of the diffraction lines. The absorption of X-rays by the sample can

lead to line splitting and to line broadening. The intensity of the diffraction lines can be

greatly affected by absorption. Part of the X-ray beam is absorbed by the sample while

another part is diffracted from the surface thus, the sample's shape is very important to

absorption corrections. The degree of crystallinity of a sample is determined from the

ratio of the relative intensity of its crystalline part to that of its amorphous part [11]. In

general the amorphous part of a pattern will be prevalent for small diffraction angles

(26 < 45°). Measured diffraction patterns are compared with compilations of standard

Page 30: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

16

diffraction patterns, and since a given diagram corresponds uniquely to a given sample,

identification can be made. Quantitative studies of the concentration of the various

constituents of a compound obtained by calculating the ratio of diffraction line

intensities.

2.6. Electrophoresis

Electrophoresis is defined as the migration of charged particles under the influence

of an electric field [12]. The force on a charged particle in an electric field is given by

the product of the effective charge on the particle Q and the potential gradient E. In the

case of a constant velocity, this force is balanced by the frictional resistance of the

medium. In the case of a free solution, this obeys Stoke's law, hence:

f = 6otv?7 (2.3)

In equation 2.3, r is the radius of the particle moving with velocity v in a medium with

viscocity given by rj. The mobility m of the particle in the electrophoretic medium is

defined as the distance d traveled in time t by the particle under the action of the electric

field, E, such that:

m = d/tE, from where m = v/E (2.4)

The velocity of the charged particle can be rewritten in terms of the current density J and

the specific conductivity k by considering that:

v = Em = mJ/k (2.5)

The net charge on some molecules depends on the pH of their environment, and, the

mobility of these particles might be influenced by the pH.

Page 31: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

17

Electrophoresis produces particle motion that is dependent on the direction of the

field being applied. Field reversal could cause a reversal in travel direction. Also,

Electrophoresis has been observed to occur with particles of various molecular sizes, as

opposed to dielectrophoresis [13] which operates only when there is a divergent and non-

uniform field, electrophoresis operates when there is either divergent or uniform fields.

Electrophoresis can be obtained with very low voltages and requires relatively small

charges per unit volume of the particles.

+

Sample Electrode

Electrode

/ S t i r r i n g bar

FIGURE 2.4. Basic Setup for Electrophoresis

Page 32: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

18

2.7. Field Emission

Field emission is defined as the emission of electrons from the surface of a

condensed phase into another phase, usually a vacuum, under the action of high (0.3-0.6

V/A) electrostatic fields [14]. Tunneling from a conductor into vacuum was first studied

by Fowler and Nordheim in 1928 [15]. They used Schrodinger's quantum and Fermi

Dirac statistics from a one dimensional square well to calculate the tunneling current.

% O e f C4

- eV2x

METAL VACUUM

0 X e X , X t

POSITION X (A)

FIGURE 2.5. Principles of Field Emission

Page 33: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

19

Fowler-Nordheim model of field emission from metals by applying high electric

fields assumes the following facts. First, the temperature of the metal is 0 K. It also

assumes that the free electron approximation applies inside the metal, that the surface is

smooth and planar, and the potential barrier closing the surface in the vacuum region

consists of an image charge potential and a potential due to the applied electric field F0

[16]. In Figure 2.5 we see the potential energy diagram for an electron at a distance x

from the metal surface, when an applied field of strength F is applied at the surface.

From classical electrostatics it is known that an electron at a finite distance from the

plane surface of a perfect conductor will be attracted to it by an image charge. This

attraction in Figure 2.5 is represented by the -e2/2x term. The term -eFx represents the

potential on the electron due to the applied electric field F at the surface of the metal. We

can conclude then that the potential energy field seen by an electron in an electron

emission experiment given our defined parameters can be approximated by:

V(x) = Ef + $ -e2/4x - eFx for x > xc (2.8)

V(x) = 0 fo rx<x c (2.9)

In equation 2.8, $ is the metal's work function and xc= e2/[4(Ef + $)], such that

V(xc) =0, where Ef is the Fermi energy. In Figure 2.5, an illustration of the relative

parameters is shown. Also identified in Figure 2.5 is and effective work function

that arises due to the lowering of the potential barrier in the presence of the field F, and

A3>, the difference between the work function without field and the effective work

function when the field is applied. In practice, the lowering of the work function occurs

at extremely large electric fields and what is usually measured is the work function.

Page 34: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

20

In the Fowler-Nordheim model for cold cathode field emission, the number of

tunneling electrons depend on the supply function N(E)dE, the total number of electrons

whose energy is between E and (E+dE) tunneling to the other side of the potential barrier,

which is given by:

P(E) = N(E)D(E)dE (2.10)

The transmission probability depends only on the component of energy normal to

the surface, and for a free electron gas in the WKB approximation it is given by:

D(Ex) = exp [-2 f (8m/h2)1/2 [V(x) - Ex]1/2dx] (2.11)

If equation (2.11) is substituted into equation (2.10) and the fact that the electrons tunnel

in the narrow range of energy near Ef is considered, then integration of equation (2.10)

gives the tunneling current given by:

Jts 11.55 x 1010[ Fo2/$t2(w)]exp[-0.685(<D3/2/eFo)v(w)] (2.12)

In equation 2.12, t(w) and v(w) are nondimensional, slowly varying functions derived

from elliptic integrals to take into account the image forces during the tunneling process,

while Jt is in A/cm , $ is in eV, and F0 is in V/A.

Experimentally speaking in field emission, the current is usually measured as a

function of the potential difference between the tip and the anode. The relation between

those parameters and Jt and F0 is:

I = Jt A and F0 = V/Kr = J3V (2.13)

Where A is the emitting surface area, K and {3 are geometric factors that are determined

from the geometry of the electron emitter, and finally r is the radius of the tip. If equation

2.13 is taken into account we can re-write equation 2.12 as:

Page 35: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

21

I s 1.55 x 10"6(JS2V2A/$t2(w))exp[-0.685($3/2/JSV)v(w)] (2.14)

with yS in A"1, A in A2, and I in Amps.

Equation 2.14 is usually modeled as Ln(I/V2) = Ln a - b03/2/V where the

parameters a and b are assumed to be constants. The parameters a and b are parameters

that depend primarily on surface area and tip shape respectively.

Equation 2.14 is referred to as the Fowler-Nordheim equation, and the curve

obtained by plotting Ln(I/V2) versus 1/V is called the Fowler-Nordheim plot.

References

1 C. D. Wagner, W. M. Riggs, L. E. Davis, J. F. Moulder, and G. E. Muilenberg, editor,

Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, (Perkin-Elmer Co., 1979).

2. H. Ibach editor, Electron Spectroscopy for Surface Analysis vol. 4. (Springer-Ver lag,

New York, 1977).

3. C. R. Brundle, J. Vac. Sci. Technol B, 11, 212 (1974).

4. K. Siegbahn et al., Nova Acta Roy. Soc. Sci. Upsala, 20 (1967).

5. C. R. Brundle, Surf. Sci. 48,99 (1975).

6. B. Feuerbacher, B. Fitton and R. F Willis, Editors, Photoemission and Electronic

Properties of Surfaces, (John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., New York, 1978).

7. P. R. Thornton, Scanning Electron Microscopy. Applications to materials and

Devices Science. (Chapman and Hall Ltd., 11 New Fetter Lane, London E. C 4,1968).

8. S. J. B. Reed, Electron Microprobe Analysis and Scanning electron Microscopy in

Geology. (Cambridge University Press, 1996).

9. J. I. Goldstein and H. Yakowitz, editors, Practical Scanning Electron Microscopy.

Page 36: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

22

Electron and Ion Microprobe Analysis. (Plenum Press, New York A division of Plenum

Publishing Co. 227 West 17th Street, New York, N. Y. 10011,1976)

10. E. F. Kaelble, Editor. Handbook ofX-Rays For Diffraction, Emission, Absorption

and Microscopy. (McGraw Hill Book Inc., 1967).

11. A. Guinier and D. L. Dexter, X- Ray Studies of Materials, (Interscience Publishers, a

division of John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1963).

12. A. T. Andrews, Electrophoresis, Theory, Techniques, and Biochemical and Clinical

Applications, (Clarendon Press. Oxford, 1986).

13. H. A. Pohl, J. Appl. Phys. 22, 869 (1951).

14. R. Gomer, Field emission and Field Ionization, (Harvard Univ. Press. Cambridge,

MA. 1961).

15. R. H. Fowler and L. Nordheim, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A119,683 (1928).

16. V. T. Binh, N. Garcia, and S. T. Purcell, Electron Field Emission from Atom-

Sources: Fabrication, Properties, and Applications of nanotips. Advances in Imaging and

electron Physics, 95,69 (1996).

Page 37: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

CHAPTER 3

EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES AND APPARATUS

3.1. Introduction

In this chapter a detailed description of the experimental techniques and apparatus

used in this work is presented.

3.2. Sample Preparation and Film Deposition

The samples used for the flat surface studies were molybdenum foil 0.1mm thick,

99.95%(metal basis) and (100x100) mm and 0.02" Mo wire both obtained from

AlfaAesar. The foil was cut into pieces of (10x10) mm before film deposition while the

wire was cut into 1" pieces in order to make tips. The wire was electrochemically etched

in a 2% mol KOH solution and then biasing it at +10 V. After the tips were etched they

were rinsed in distilled water. Molybdenum carbide powder, of hexagonal crystal

structure and 99.5%(metal basis) and with average reported particle size between 3 and 4

microns was obtained from AlfaAesar while 100% virgin synthetic diamond powder of

average sizes of 0.25, 3 and 6 microns respectively were obtained from SMG. The

powder was then mixed to a 10% solution with ethanol for 5 minutes and used to deposit

the molybdenum carbide and diamond films film on the Mo foils and tips via

electrophoresis [1]. A + 240 V bias was applied for 10 minutes to the electrode

sustaining the molybdenum foil or tip to be coated which was being suspended in the

23

Page 38: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

24

aqueous solution. The pH of the solution was monitored during deposition. Five

measurements were made, the first of ethanol, the second of M02C powder in ethanol, the

third pH measurement was of the M02C powder in ethanol when the bias was initially

applied. The fourth pH measurement was taken after 5 minutes of deposition and the

fifth and last reading was taken after 10 minutes of deposition. The pH was found not to

change during the deposition and was found to be equal to 4. The thickness of the

coating could be controlled by controlling deposition time. In order to insure that the

molybdenum carbide and diamond particles were in motion, stirring was done in 30

seconds intervals during the 10 minute film deposition. After deposition, the films were

left to dry at room temperature.

3.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy

In order to study the surface morphology of the samples before and after

annealing, a JEOL model JMS-T300 Scanning Electron Microscope, as seen in Figure

3.1 was used. This microscope consists of four major parts, described as follows: an

electron column, a vacuum pumping system, a sample chamber and an electronic control

and imaging system. The electron column contains an electron gun, which produces

electrons by thermionic emission from a tungsten filament. These electrons are then

accelerated by a voltage in the range of 5-25 keV down the center of the electron column

while focusing is done by magnetic lenses. After the electron beam passes the lenses, its

diameter is reduced to less than 1 micron in size, and then is focused on the films. In

Page 39: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

25

general, the incident electron beam hitting the samples produces a substantial amount of

secondary electrons that are then collected at a positively biased collector coated with

''r

' %^'J '

'"i

I

FIGURE 3.1. Jeol Model JMS-T300 S

Page 40: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

26

scintillator material that generates photons in proportion to the number of electrons.

These photons pass down a photomultiplier detector that produces an electrical signal

proportional to the number of photons. The signal is displayed on the CRT and may be

imaged on a Polaroid instant sheet film.

The M02C and diamond thin film deposited on flat Mo foils, as well on tips made

of this same material, were then placed, with the aid of a double-sided adhesive graphite

tape, on a 1.24" steel wafer, and then were introduced into the chamber, which was then

evacuated through an automated sequence to an ultimate base operating pressure of

7xl0"4 Pa or less by a 100 1/min oil rotary pump and a 420 1/sec oil diffusion pump, with

a water cooled baffle.

After achieving base pressure, an accelerating voltage of 25 keV was applied and

the filament slowly increased to 0.4 A. After this, the brightness and contrast were

adjusted to focus the image on the CRT. The final images were captured on a Polaroid

#52 film and Polaroid #55 film and processed by coating with a film coater before

allowing the pictures to dry at room temperature. For flat surfaces, in general, a

magnification of 1500x was used in capturing the SEM images while a magnification of

10,000x was typically used for tips. SEM micrographs were taken after annealing and

characterization of the samples in order to study morphological changes, if any, after

annealing.

Page 41: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

27

3.4. Ultraviolet Electron Spectroscopy, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

and Field Emission Energy Distribution

A Vacuum Generator Scientific VG ESCALAB Mkll system, seen in Figure 3.2

was the main analysis chamber used for obtaining the Ultraviolet Electron Spectroscopy

(UPS) data, the X-ray Photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data and the Field Emission

Energy Distribution (FEED) data. In acquiring the low energy Ultraviolet Electron

Spectroscopy (UPS) data, an Opti Quip model 770 high pressure Xe UV source and a

Verity Instruments Inc. 0.2 m UV monochromator with a 500 micron slit size and a band

pass energy of 2 nm, were used. The Xe UV source produces a relatively uniform

distribution of photons from 180 nm to 354 nm. A Specs plasma discharge UV source

model 10/35 was also used to obtain higher energy UPS data. While using the high

energy UV source the pressure was maintained at 7x10"7 T in the main chamber with a

current of 70 mA and a voltage of 460 V. The UV plasma discharge source was operated

by a Leybold PS-UVS power supply 10/35 which on start provides an ignition anode

voltage of 12,000 V. The gas inlet valve is gradually open to allow the pressure to

increase to maximum when the discharge is running. The required pressure for

combustion of Helium, the gas we used, is between 650 and 700 V. A warm-up period of

approximately 30 minutes was allowed before data acquisition. The Mo2C and diamond

thin film flat samples used for acquiring the UPS and XPS data were pasted with silver

Page 42: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

28

m rjrajt au ^ |

* ' » » « • #

* • «

FIGURE 3.2. VG Mark II Spectrometer

Page 43: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

29

paste on a 12 mm inner diameter nickel specimen holder, on a six sample carousel. The

field emission tips are inserted into holes in the specimen holders and then fixed in place

by set screws before placing them on the carousel. A wobble stick is used to move the

samples from the preparation chamber into the main analysis chamber. The preparation

chamber is pumped down to a base pressure of 10"6 T, or better, by the combined action

of a Leybold Trivac model D16A rotary pump and a Pfeizer Balzers model PM P01 401

turbomolecular pump. A gate valve separates the preparation chamber from the main

analysis chamber and this allows for the main analysis chamber to be maintained

pressurized while samples are loaded into the preparation chamber. After the preparation

chamber was evacuated to a pressure of 10"7 T, the gate valve was opened and the

samples placed in the main analysis chamber. The analysis chamber is pumped by a 400

1/s Varian model 919-0106 Ion pump to a base pressure of <10"9 T. A sample was used to

place the samples manipulator on a High Precision XYZ Translator model HPT 040.

This translator has a Z travel of 250mm and a total of 20 mm movement, beginning at

2.5mm and ending at 22.5 mm of the micrometer scale for both the X and Y travels. The

translator, together with a Sanyo model VC1910 CCD camera, helped provide precise

positioning of the samples in the main analysis chamber. For the FEED experiments, a

retractable manipulator arm was attached to the main analysis chamber, as seen in Figure

2. A copper free 0.755" diameter and 0.12" thick wafer with a 0.012" size aperture was

adapted to this manipulator and served as a gated anode. In gathering the UPS data to

maximize the photoelectron counts to the detector the Xe UV source was turned on and

Page 44: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

30

the monochromator was set to approximately 550nm, green light. This insured initial

reference point for the alignment of the source and positioning of the sample. Once this

was achieved, the monochromator was set to the desired wavelength, and final

adjustments made. Then the two UV lenses were adjusted to maximize the photoelectron

count rate. The majority of the samples were analyzed with wavelengths of 276 nm, 245

nm and 220 nm, corresponding to incident photon energies of 4.49 eV, 5.06 eV and 5.64

eV respectively. For the FEED data the retractable anode was moved into position over

it, as seen from the CCD camera and the XYZ manipulator was adjusted to maximize the

electron count rate.

The HP VEE program was used with a PC system for data acquisition. Low

energy UPS data was obtained with 10 meV steps and a pass energy of 5 eV. The

number of scans was determined by the signal to noise ratio desired and typically 10. For

high energy UPS data, the energy steps were 10 meV with a 2.5 eV pass energy and

typically 1 scan was needed. For the XPS data, the energy steps were 0.75 eV and the

pass energy to 10 eV, while 3 scans were needed. The X-ray source anode voltage was

set to 13 keV while the emission current was maintained at 32 mA with a filament current

of 4.2 A. For the FEED data, the energy steps were set to 50 meV with pass energy of 10

eV and 20 eV. The bias voltage on the tips was usually -90 V. To obtain Fowler

Nordheim (FN) plot, the anode voltage step was typically 20 V. At each anode voltage a

FEED spectrum was obtained. All spectra were normalized, added and averaged. To

obtain a current-voltage (I-V) curve, the current was measured with a Keithley model 486

Page 45: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

31

picoammeter with a GPIB interface at each voltage. The low energy UPS, XPS and

FEED data were analyzed with Peakfit [2]. After analysis the samples were moved to the

preparation chamber and placed on a heating probe. The resistance heater is controlled

by a low voltage high current power supply. In order to allow for adequate degassing of

the heating mechanism and to insure that the samples attain their required annealing

temperatures, the current was always brought up very slowly to the desired setting before

the samples were set on the heating element for annealing. The typical annealing range

used for all samples was between 400 °C and 800 °C. Annealing and repeated data

acquisition was done in vacuum without exposing the samples to air. The typical

ft 7

pressure under which the samples were annealed was between 10" -10" T.

Fermi level determination of the flat samples was done by photoemission from a

sputtered Mo foil, while for the FEED studies, the Fermi level was determined from a Mo

tip.

3.5. X-Ray Diffraction

In order to characterize the samples by X-ray Diffraction (XRD) a Siemens model

D500 diffractometer shown in Figure 3.3 was used. The Cu Kai radiation (A, =1.5405981

A ) along with a Graphite filter was used. The samples were loaded into the sample

holder of the goniometer and clamped into place. The X-ray tube used 40 keV with a

filament current of 30 mA. The diffractometer was PC interfaced and controlled via

Datascan 3.1 [3]. Typically the scans were performed from 20 = 20° to 20 = 90° in 0.05°

step size intervals using a 1 second dwell time. For the detection of the oxides, in the

Page 46: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

32

case of the M02C samples, additional scans were performed from 20 = 20° to 20 = 40° in

0.05 0 stepsize, but with the dwell time increased to 1.5 seconds. After the scan were

completed the data obtained was processed with Jade 3.1 [4].

FIGURE 3.3. Siemens Diffractometer Model D-500

Page 47: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

33

References

1. A. T. Andrews, Electrophoresis, Theory, Techniques, and Biochemical and Clinical

Applications. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986).

2. Peakfit, SPSS, Inc., 444 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611.

3. XRD Diffractometer Control and Data Acquisition System 3.1, 1995-1997, by

Materials Data Inc., 1224 Concannon Blvd., Livermore, CA 94551-0791.

4. XRD Pattern Processing for the PC, 1991-1997, by Materials Data, Inc. 1224

Concannon Blvd., Livermore, CA 94551-0791.

Page 48: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

CHAPTER 4

CHARACTERIZATION OF Mo2C FILMS

4.1. Introduction

The properties of M02C films deposited by electrophoresis on flat Mo foils were

studied by annealing for one hour at a succession of temperatures from room temperature,

26°C, to 900°C. UPS, SEM, XPS and XRD were done to study the evolution of the

deposited M02C film through phase and/or property changes with different temperatures.

Since the M02C films were oxidized it was important to see how the oxides affect the

characteristics of Mo2C. The UPS, SEM, XPS and XRD results of annealing Mo2C films

at 412 °C, 525 °C and 800 °C for 2, 5 and 3 hour respectively also are presented in this

chapter.

4.2. Experimental

Mo2C films were prepared, as it has been described previously. Low energy UPS

data was obtained to determine photoelectric work functions. The wavelength used were

220 nm, 245 nm and 276 nm, corresponding to photon energies of 5.64 eV , 5.06 eV and

4.49 eV, respectively. High energy UPS data using He I radiation (21.2 eV) was

obtained and used to study the valence band structure of the samples. A before and after

SEM micrograph of the samples was obtained to look for morphological changes of the

samples. The SEM micrographs were obtained with magnification of 1500X Chemical

34

Page 49: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

35

shifts and core electron binding energies were monitored by XPS to identify the oxides.

The X- ray Ka A1 (1486.6 eV) line was used with an anode voltage of 13 keV and an

emission current of 32 mA. The pass energy of the detector for UPS data was typically 5

eV. For the XPS data analysis 3 scans were used. The pass energy for the XPS data was

typically 10 eV. Unless otherwise stated, the binding energies we report throughout this

study were obtain, for the UPS data analysis, by the subtraction of the electron's kinetic

energy from the incident photon's energy. In the case of the XPS data analysis, we

calculated the binding energies by subtracting the electron's kinetic energy from the

characteristic X-ray radiation energy, which in our study was the Ka X-ray A1 line at

1486.6 eV which was corrected to 1481.8 eVto account for the distribution of X-ray

energies.

The XRD 29 angles presented in this study have a possible maximum error of

±0.3°.

Annealing was done in situ in the introduction chamber, as was described

previously. No Ar+sputtering was done to reduce or avoid any removal of molybdenum,

as has been reported [1],

Peak analysis for UPS and XPS was done with gaussian peaks using Peakfit [2].

4.3. Results

4.3.1. Characterization of M02C films as Deposited

A typical XPS spectra of a sample right after Mo2C film deposition is shown in

Figure 4.1. As can be seen, only peaks due to Mo, Carbon and Oxygen are present. An

Page 50: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

36

average of the core electron binding energies of the Mo3ds/2 and the Mo3d3/2 of various

samples, upon deposition yields 232.5 eV and 235.6 eV, respectively. These energies

correspond to the binding energies of Mo+6, which indicates the presence of M0O3. In

Table 4.1, referred as typical, are the results obtained for the core electron binding

energies position of the Mo3ds/2, the C Is and the O Is peaks using the parameters used

for all the samples in this study. They are compared to the results obtained for variations

of these parameters on one other sample and can be seen in the results presented in Table

4.1, within experimental error, no differences are seen.

In Table 4.2 C Is / Mo3ds/2, Ols / Mo3ds/2 and the O Is/ C Is peak height ratio of

various samples after Mo2C film deposition using the parameters referred to as "typical"

in Table 4.2 are shown and compared with the results using the lower bias.

He I radiation (21.2 eV) was also used to obtain the valence band spectra of the

M02C films after deposition. A typical before spectra is shown in Figure 4.2. The

position of the Fermi level was determined by He I photoemission onto a sputter cleaned

Mo foil which was the material used as substrate. Calculation of the valence band

position with respect to the experimentally determined Fermi level showed the valence

band to be 0.8 eV below the Fermi level, (Ef- Evai = 0.8 eV).

A subtraction of the energy position of the maximum kinetic energy edge of the

valence band spectra from 21.2 eV, the He I radiation, gives the band gap of M0O3.

Right after deposition the band gap is estimated to be 4.2 eV. A correction of the

emission from the experimentally determined Fermi level position using the fact that

Page 51: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

37

5f l

C 3 O

35000

25000

U 15000

5000

Mo3d

210 290 370 450 530 610

Binding Energy (eV)

FIGURE 4.1. Sectioned "before" XPS spectra of deposited M02C film.

Page 52: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

38

(Ef- Evai) = 0.8 eV, gives a photoemission threshold of 3.4 eV. This result agrees fairly

well with the reported 3.2 eV value for the optical absorption edge of M0O3 as well as

with the low energy UPS photoelectric thresholds measured in this work. The energy

distance between the low kinetic spike seen in the spectra at -17.6 eV and the nearest

structure to it is approximately 0.6 eV which should represent the difference in their work

functions. The structure at -17 eV is not found in the spectra of Mo (not shown) is likely

due to M02C while the structure at -17.6 eV can be attributed to M0O3. The valence

band spectra of the same sample annealed up to 800°C is shown in Figure 4.3. After

annealing the low kinetic energy spike at approximately -17.6 eV is seen to decrease

considerably, as expected, since it can be attributed to M0O3 which, as was found from

the previous XPS and XRD results and was the case of all other oxides, was removed

considerably with annealing temperature. For the annealed sample (Ef - Evai) = 0.4 eV,

which when the band gap estimate of 4.2 eV for M0O3 is taken into consideration gives a

photoelectric threshold of 3.8 eV. This result agrees well with the reported work function

of M02C, the photoelectric work function calculations of the M02C films presented in this

work and the field emission thresholds of the Mo2C coated microtips, as will be presented

in Chapter 6. A sharp maximum kinetic energy turn on is seen, after annealing, at -1.4

eV below the Fermi level, and energetically at 16.6 eV. If this result is subtracted from

the He I radiation of 21.2 eV, the result is 4.6 eV, which would indicate that the presence

of Mo.

M0O3 is known to exist in, at least, two forms, a transparent form and a blue

form. The blue form has been found to have a defect structure band extending from

Page 53: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

39

approximately 0.5 above the Fermi level, to 1.8 eV below. As prepared by

electrophoresis, we get the blue form after deposition. Figure 4.4 appears to indicate that

a layer of transparent M0O3 is deposited over the M02C film if left exposed to air. This

can be concluded from the absence of the low kinetic energy peak that was found

previously and can be seen in Figure 4.2 of a sample exposed to air for over 8 months. It

is though interesting to observe that the low kinetic energy peak can be made to reappear

in the photoemission spectra if the sample is biased. Figure 4.5 is the spectra obtained for

the same sample shown in Figure 4.4 when biased with -6V.

SEM micrographs were taken of the samples after the M02C film deposition and

an example are presented as Figure 4.6 and 4.7. A 10,000X magnification was used to

observe the average grain size of the M02C particles in the film as seen in Figure 4.3. In

Figure 4.4 a magnification of 1500X was used to see the morphology of the film. The

average grain size was calculated to be between 2-3 microns.

XRD spectra of a Mo foil, used as substrate, and of M02C powder are shown in

Figures 4.5 and 4.6. The spectra of the Mo foil shows the presence of 3 major peaks. As

matched with the powder diffraction file, pdf# 42-1120, the more intense peaks

correspond to the Mo (100) plane at 29 = 40.4°, the Mo (200) plane at 29 = 58.6° and to

the Mo (211) plane at 29 = 73.6°. The peak intensity shows a preferred (200) plane

orientation. The FWHM of all the 3 peaks is 0.3°. Analysis of the XRD pattern of the

M02C powder we used to create the films shown in Figure 4.6 reflects the presence of 11

major peaks whose location match the pdf# 35-0787 for hexagonal Mo2C with cell size

(3.0124 x 4.7352) A. The three major peaks are located at 29 = 34.5°, 29 = 38.1° and

Page 54: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

40

29 = 39.6° and correspond to the M02C (100), the M02C (002) and the M02C (101) planes

respectively. The FWHM of the three major M02C peaks is about 0.3°.

The XRD pattern shown in Figure 4.7 allows comparison of the parameters of the

M02C deposited films, with those of the M02C powder and the Mo foil used as substrate.

After deposition the spectra clearly shows the presence of the same three major M02C

peaks as were found in the M02C powder, in addition to the more intense of the Mo

planes. A good gauge of the good film coverage is the fact that the more intense of the

Mo planes, the Mo (200), drops, after the film deposition from a maximum intensity of

3190 counts to 1269 counts. The FWHM of the three M02C planes present in the XRD

pattern of the powder is seen to drop from an average of 0.3° to 0.2°. A shift toward

lower 26 angles, when we compare the XRD pattern of the as deposited film to that of the

M02C powder, can be explained in terms of stress and strains created on the film during

the deposition and/or to oxygen substitution for carbon, as others have reported [3].

Finally, oxide activity can be reported in the form of the (002), the (200) and the (101)

planes of M0O3 as is shown in Figure 4.8, in agreement with our XPS results which

indicated the dominant presence of this Mo oxide right after film deposition.

Page 55: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

41

TABLE 4.1. Comparison of deposition parameters and core electron binding energies.

Mo3d5/2 Mo3d3/2 C Is O l s

Typical (Bias=-240V + 10 min. deposition)

232.5 eV 235.6 eV 285.4 eV 531.3 eV

Bias=-20V + 10 min. Deposition

232.8 eV 236.0 eV 285.2 eV 531.3 eV

TABLE 4.2. Peak Height Ratio Comparisons.

Typical (Bias=-240V + 10 min. deposition)

Bias=-20V +10 min. Deposition

C ls/Mo3d5/2 0.5 0.4

O Is/ Mo3d5/2 1.4 1.3

O ls/C Is 3.2 3.2

Page 56: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

42

80000

„ 60000 C/j

s 40000 o U 20000

0

-19 -17 -15 -13 -11 -9 -7 -5

Kinetic Energy (eV)

-3 -1

FIGURE 4.2. Valence Band Structure of a non annealed as deposited M02C film obtained with He I (21.2 eV) radiation.

&

S3 S O

U

35000

30000

25000

20000

15000

10000

5000

-19 -17 -15 -13 -11 -9 -7 Kinetic Energy (eV)

-5 -3

FIGURE 4.3. Valence Band Structure of an annealed M02C film obtained with He I (21.2 eV) radiation.

Page 57: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

43

5000

4000

% 3000 P 3 5 2000

1000

0

-19 -17 -15 -13 -11 -9 -7 -5 Kinetic liiergy (eV)

-3

FIGURE 4.4. Valence Band structure of the M02C film exposed to air for 8 months.

8000 7000 6000 5000

| 4000 3000

50

-24 -20 -16 -12 -8 Kinetic Energy (eV)

-4 0

FIGURE 4.5. Valence Band structure of the M02C film exposed to air for 8 months biased with -6V.

Page 58: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

44

FIGURE 4.6. SEM of the as deposited M02C film in which the grain size can be seen and which was obtained with a 10000X magnification.

Page 59: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

45

INmHMM

•P8i!<!!(ll •: • • " v -

FIGURE 4.7. SEM micrograph of an "as deposited" M02C film obtained with a 1,500X magnification and in which the general morphology of the film is seen.

Page 60: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

46

Mo

¥ 0 0 U w P**

"I 1 PS

3000

2000

1000

a w e s

fH FH £J, e

"

5

vv O m-4

l"H e s

• I 1. • . 1 I 1 „ ... .,..1 , | J L - * - , 20 30 40 50 60

2-Theta (Degrees) 70 80 90

FIGURE 4.8. XRD pattern of Mo substrate.

Page 61: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

47

%

M o X Powder

40 50 60 2-Theta (Degrees)

FIGURE 4.9. XRD pattern of M02C powder.

Page 62: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

48

Mo 2 C Deposited

s 0 e

U w

1 4j "8

3000

2000

1000

20 30

s &

o rw "̂o

8 sr 0 ®u S « w

5J SJ, 0

k "

e u 0

k "

s e s

fvl ,'V .. 2I7ieta (Degrees)

70 80 90

FIGURE 4.10. XRD pattern of deposited M02C film.

Page 63: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

49

50

£

e 40

30

20

Mo2C Deposited

22 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 30 31 32 33 34 2-Theta (Degrees)

FIGURE 4.11. XRD pattern of deposited M02C film showing oxide activity.

Page 64: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

50

4.3.2 Characterization of M02C films as a function of increasing annealing

temperature from 26°C to 900°C.

Initial XPS inspection of a typical XPS spectra right after deposition confirms the

presence of the C Is and of the O l s peaks as well as the presence of the Mo3d and the

Mo3p doublets as can be seen in Figure 4.12. The "after" annealing XPS spectra of the

same film is shown in Figure 4.13. After annealing the film shows an increase in the

intensity of the Mo3d and the Mo3p doublets, as well as in the intensity of the C Is peak.

Practically complete removal of the oxygen peak is seen after annealing and an

unidentified structure at approximately 310 eV is seen which can be attributed to sodium.

From a further deconvolution of primarily the Mo3ds/2 and the Mo3d3/2 peaks, as well as

that of the oxygen peak as seen in Figure 4.12, we were able to confirm and monitor the

evolution of different molybdenum oxides, mainly in the form of M0O3 and M0O2. A

summary of the core electron binding energy results for the molybdenum Mo3d doublet,,

the Mo3p doublet, the Carbon Cls and Oxygen Ols for these oxides is given in Table

4.3. The present results are in reasonable agreement with previous measurements of

binding energies for these oxides [4-9]. Figure 4.14 shows the XPS spectra of the

evolution of the Mo3d doublet at three different temperatures. Core electron binding

energies of this doublet were used to identify Mo oxides. The presence of molybdenum

carbide, as well as the presence of what could possibly be MoO was also determined.

One of the difficulties in the exact determination of MoO is the fact that it's molybdenum

peaks overlap with those of M0O3 and of Mo02 [10]. The presence of MoO will be

postulated later based upon UPS results. The results of calculations of C/Mo, O/Mo and

Page 65: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

51

0/C using the carbon C Is peak and the Mo3d5/2 peak height intensity ratios are shown in

Table 4.4. Peak height intensity ratios are directly proportional to the number of

absorbate atoms present over a monolayer [11,12]. Structural changes in different

temperature ranges are seen in the Mo3d doublet peak heights. The results of their ratios

are presented in Table 4.5. In this table, the Mo3d5/2 / Mo3d3/2 peak height intensity

ratios clearly seem to define three regions.

C« +* c s o

U

45000

35000

25000

15000

5000

O l s 1

Mo3p

Mo3d

I—

C Is

215 265 315 365 415

FIGURE 4.12. Secfifflffifrfi sample to be annealed as a furfStion of"ifStfedsIng temperature.

465

f the

515

Page 66: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

52

VI

C 3 O

38000

28000

U 18000

8000 w

Mo3d

190 250 310 370 430 490 550 610

Binding Energy (eV)

FIGURE 4.13. Sectioned "after" XPS spectra of the sample annealed as a function of increasing temperature.

The first, a region with an average ratio of 1.1, the second a region with an average ratio

of 0.7 and a third region with an average ratio of 1.5. The full width at half maximum

(FWHM) of the Mo3d3/2 peak broadens between the first and second region and finally

thins in the third region. These changes are attributed to the different oxidation states and

to oxygen desorption as the annealing temperature was increased.

The greatest CIS/M05/2 peak height ratio change occurred between the annealing

temperatures of 775 °C and 825 °C. These findings, summarized in Table 4.4, also

Page 67: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

53

indicate that from somewhere between 775 °C and 825 °C and thereafter, the

Cls/Mo3d5/2 and the 01s/Mo3ds/2 peak heights decreased to practically their lowest

values and remained relatively constant afterwards. After this point was reached, no

further changes in the FWHM of the Mo3ds/2 peak was observed, even though a steady

decrease in the FWHM of the Mo3d3/2 was still taking place. An explanation of this is

the continual desorption at a lower rate as seen by the fact that the 0 ls/Cls peak height is

still dropping due to the presence of oxygen. The temperature range at which this occurs,

coincides with the approximate temperature reported as that at which M0O3 is believe to

desorb [13,14],

28000

21000

14000 500 C

•725 C

900 C

210 220 230 240

Binding Energy (eV) 250

FIGURE 4.14. Evolution of the Mo3d doublet as a function of increasing annealing temperature.

Some traces of oxygen are still present after a total of 7 hours of one hour incremental

annealing periods ranging from 500 °C to 900 °C, as can be seen in Table 4.4. The

Page 68: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

54

deconvolution of the oxygen peaks after 825 °C (not shown) was complicated due to their

poor definition, but their binding energy locations agree well with reported binding

energies of M0O2 and M0O3. The FWHM of one oxygen state attained a maximum

value of 4.9 eV in the second region, to then a value of 2.2 eV in the third region. These

changes are due to contribution of all the different oxides present. The final core electron

binding energy position for the Mo3ds/2 and Mo3d3/2 in the third region, which contains

little oxide and more M02C film, agrees well with the values given in the literature [5,6].

Various states are found by analysis with peakfit in the carbon peak evolution as the

annealing temperature is increased. There is significant graphite content with an average

binding energy of 284.6 eV even after 7 total hours of annealing up to a maximum

temperature of 900 °C. Removal of graphite deposits has been reported to occur at an

annealing temperature of 1127 °C in UHV [17]. This is a much higher temperature than

our maximum operational temperature of 900 °C. The presence of various carbon

species is also confirmed in the form of observed deconvoluted peaks at 285.8 eV, 289.1

eV, 287.2 eV and 287.0 eV respectively from our initial room temperature deposition, up

to a maximum annealing temperature of 775 °C. This temperature range corresponds to

the first and second regions. These peaks can be attributed to various states of molecular

adsorbed CO on molybdenum, as reported [4,7,12,16]. After 775 °C no peaks in our

spectra can be attributed to adsorbed CO.

The electric field applied during film deposition via electrophoresis [18], certainly

contributed to the deep blue coloration and to the level of initial oxidation, predominantly

in the form of M0O3 which was observed initially in the aqueous solution used in coating.

Page 69: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

55

This observation, together with the fact that we didn't observe any charging, agrees well

with what has been reported [19].

There are reports that both Mo and M02C readily re-oxidize when exposed to air even

for short periods of time [5], however, we detected no further oxidation or re-oxidation

states, as determined by any observed chemical or peak shifts in the XPS spectra [20], in

one sample, initially analyzed and then re-exposed for 21 days to normal STP conditions.

When this sample was re-analyzed, it showed no peak shifts.

TABLE 4.3. Average core electron binding energies in eV of the sample annealed as a function of increasing temperature.

Room Temp.

500 °C 650 °C 725 °C 775 °C 825 °C 875 °C 900°C

Mo3d5/2 232.5 232.0 229.9 229.6 228.8 228.7 228.6 228.6 Mo3d3/2 235.6 235.1 232.8 232.6 232.0 231.9 231.8 231.7 O l s 531.3 531.1 530.7 530.7 530.5 530.5 530.7 531.0 C Is 285.3 284.8 284.8 284.6 284.6 284.6 284.7 284.6 Mo3p3/2 398.9 398.4 396.9 396.7 395.8 395.1 394.8 394.7 Mo3pi/2 416.3 415.7 414.1 414.0 413.2 412.4 412.2 412.0

TABLE 4.4. Peak height intensity ratios of the sample annealed as function of increasing temperature.

26 °C 500°C 650°C 725 °C 775 °C 825°C 875 °C 90°C

C ls/Mo3d5/2 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.2

Ols/Mo3ds2 1.5 1.5 1.9 1.5 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.1

Ols/Cls 3.1 3.7 2.7 2.6 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.3

Page 70: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

56

TABLE 4.5. Mo3d5/2/Mo3d3/2 Peak height ratios of the sample annealed as a function of

26°C 500°C 650°C 725°C 775°C 825°C 875°C 900°C

Mo3dS/2 1.2 1.1 0.6 0.8 0.7 1.4 1.5 1.5

Mo3d3/2

1.2 1.1 0.6 0.8 0.7 1.4 1.5 1.5

To understand the low energy UPS data, consideration must be given to the fact that

the initial values of the photoelectric work function, before annealing, should show the

contribution of the different oxides present. As the film is annealed, the photoelectric

work function should change, reflecting the photoelectric work functions of the different

oxides active in the different temperature ranges as a function of the increasing annealing

temperature. As discussed in our XPS analysis section, traces of oxygen were still

present at the maximum operational temperature of 900 °C.

Figure 4.15 shows the evolution of the lowest resolved band in the UPS spectra

obtained from a sample, as a function of increasing annealing temperature using a 5.64

eV incident photon energy. Using a 3 regions model, this corresponds a photoelectric

work function value of 2.6 eV for the first region which is then followed by a transitional

photoelectric work function value of 2.9 eV. In the second region the calculated

photoelectric work function has a value of 3.3 eV. This is followed by another 2.9 eV

transitional photoelectric work function value, and then finally, in a third region, the

calculated work photoelectric work function value is 2.1 eV. A photoelectric work

function value of 2.6 eV is one of the reported values of the photoelectric work function

of one of the transitions present in the photoelectron spectra of MoO [21] hence, the

Page 71: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

57

possible existence of this oxide can be postulated. The photoelectric work function value

of 2.9 eV cannot be associated directly with any of the more known Mo oxides and could

be just the photoelectric work function value of one of the many less known Mo oxides

that are known to exist between M0O3 and M0O2 [22]. Changes in the work function of

molybdenum as a function of increasing exposure to O2 have been previously seen [23].

In that study they calculated, based on an assumed work function value of 4.6 eV for

molybdenum a change, of 0.3 for 10L and about 0.6 eV for a 100L exposure of

molybdenum to oxygen respectively. Analysis made to the initially heavily oxidized film

indicate a transitional increase of 0.7 eV as the work function changed from 2.6 eV

initially in the first region to a value of 3.3 eV in the second region represents a +23.7%

difference, while the subsequent 1.2 eV drop in the transition from the second to the third

region represents a -44% drop. The UPS spectra shown in Figure 4.16 illustrates the

m 3.0

W 2.5

« 2.0

» 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Temperature (°C)

FIGURE 4.15. UPS Spectra of Mo2C film showing the lowest resolved UPS band obtained by using 5.64 eV photons.

Page 72: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

58

G f i H

0 U

2330

1830

1330

830

330

1.7

500 C

875 C

900 C

2.7 3.7 4.7

BINDING ENERGY (eV)

FIGURE 4.16. Effect of annealing on the UPS spectra of the M02C as a function of increasing annealing temperature.

Page 73: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

59

TABLE 4.6. Summary of the positions in terms of energy of the different states found in the UPS spectra of the sample annealed at 410 °C for 2 hours.

500 °C 875 °C 900 °C

lsl State 2.6 eV 1.9 eV 2.2 eV

2,,d State 2.7 eV 3.0 eV 3.1eV

3rd State 3.5 eV 3.8 eV 3.8 eV

41,1 State 4.0 eV 4.2 eV 4.1 eV

effect that annealing had on the UPS spectra as the temperature was increased and on the

removal of oxides, as a function of increasing temperature. The results of a 4 peaks

deconvolution of the UPS spectra is given in Table 4.6. As it can be expected, the lower

states are less stable due to the changes in the presence of surface oxides that are taking

place at the different temperatures.

It can be inferred from the data obtained that in a 3 regions model there is an

apparent correlation between both the Cls/Mo3d5/2 peak height ratios and the

photoelectric work function. As was previously pointed out beginning at 500 °C, there

are two observed Cls/Mo3d5/2 ratio drops. The first a 0.1 drop corresponding to a -

15.4% change between 650 °C and 725 °C, and the second a 0.5 drop corresponding to a

-83.3% change. These drops, beside signaling a transition point, as explained in our XPS

discussion, also coincide with photoelectric work function changes, as seen in Figure

4.12 which was obtained using 5.64 eV photons. The results also appear to indicate that

Page 74: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

60

a higher Cls/Mo3ds/2 ratio, in general, also represented a higher observed photoelectric

work function.

Figure 4.17 corresponds to the He I radiation (21.2 eV) spectra of a sample

annealed as a function of increasing temperatures from 26 °C to 900 °C. When compared

to the spectra, right after deposition, of a sample not annealed, it is found that the valence

band maximum is shifted slightly toward lower kinetic energies and closer to the

experimentally determined Fermi level. The shift toward the Fermi level can be

attributed to the removal of oxides. The valence band, Evai was found to be 0.6 eV below

the experimentally determined Fermi level, Ef, (Ef -Evai = 0.6 eV).

A SEM micrograph of the sample after it was annealed from 26 °C to 900 °C

incrementally by 1 hour, for a total of 7 hours, is shown in Figure 4.18.

o 1500

•18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 Kinetic Energy (eV)

-2 0

FIGURE 4.17. UPS spectra of the valence band of the sample annealed as a function of increasing temperature obtained with a He I (21.2 eV).

Page 75: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

61

#

FIGURE 4.18. SEM micrograph of the sample annealed as a function of increasing temperature obtained with a magnification of 1500X.

Page 76: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

62

It can be seen that even after the sequence of annealing at the various

temperatures, much of the M02C films is still present, still yet, there are a few areas in

which some M02C depletion is seen.

XRD spectra of the sample annealed at increasing temperature is given in Figure

4.19. The pattern matches that of hexagonal M02C powder diffraction file number, pdf #

35-0787 [24]. When compared to the XRD pattern of the non-annealed M02C film as

deposited presented as Figure 4.8, it can be seen that the preferential orientation of the

M02C (101) plane is maintained even after annealing. Substantial depletion of the oxide

layer can be inferred from the fact that all of the M02C planes, as well as those of the Mo

substrate, increase in intensity after annealing. After deposition of the M02C film, and

before annealing, the most intense M02C plane as seen from the XRD spectra was the

M02C (101) plane and the most intense Mo plane was the Mo (200). Initial ratio of the

M02C (101)/Mo (200) = 2.1, but after annealing, this ratio drops to 1.5, from which we

can conclude that there is partial depletion of the M02C film, which also agrees with the

SEM results. Observed was also a clear shift toward lower 26 angles of the non-annealed

M02C. This shift is characteristic of lattice expansion due to oxygen substitution for

carbon, as it has been reported [3]. With annealing, we see a gradual shift now toward

higher 20 angles in the XRD spectra. This indicates that there was some degree of

strain/stress in the film, right after deposition, which was being relieved by annealing the

sample, as well as that it shows agreement with our XPS results which indicate that most

of the oxides, yet not all, initially on the sample had been removed. In Figure 4.20 an

XRD spectra obtained after annealing of the sample is presented which clearly indicates

Page 77: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

63

that there is still oxides present in the form of the M0O2 (011) and the M0O2 (101) planes

and the M0O3 (211) plane.

£ § e U

•1=1 §

£ a

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

& e

s

<N a fH W U e s

a

9

Increasing Temperature

s- a 2 e ^ f t u« s I

<N O o P. Ft

u w " <n o Q " «?* J"

S B IA A 20 30 40 50 60

2-Theta. (Degrees)

70 80 90

FIGURE 4.19. XRD spectra of the sample annealed as a function of increasing temperature.

Page 78: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

64

Increasing Temperature

t A £

26 27 28 29 30 2-Theta (Degrees)

FIGURE 4.20. XRD spectra of the sample annealed as a function of increasing annealing temperature, showing oxide activity.

Page 79: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

65

4.3.3. Characterization of M02C films as a function of constant annealing

temperature of 412 °C.

The full XPS spectra of this sample (not shown), as it was in the case of all the other

samples after deposition, indicates that there were no contaminants. Only the oxygen

Ols, the carbon C Is and the Mo3d and Mo3p doublets are seen as can be seen in the

sectioned "before" XPS spectra shown in Figure 4.21. As was the case of the other

samples, M0O3 was the dominant oxide present. The temperature at which this sample

was annealed is somewhat below the temperature at which M0O3 begins to desorb, thus

the sample is expected to remain in this state. Figure 4.22 shows a sectioned XPS spectra

obtained after the sample was annealed for 2 hours. No changes are seen in the binding

energies of different components as summarized in Table 4.7. As expected, the average

core binding electron energies for the Mo3d doublet shown in Table 4.7 correspond to

those of Mo+6. This is characteristic of M0O3, which was found to be stable after 2 hours

of annealing at 412 °C seen in Figure 4.23. Another indication of the constant level of

oxidation of the film can be seen in the 01s/Mo3d5/2 peak height ratio which remains

approximately equal to 1.5 from initial deposition until after two hours of annealing of

the film at 412 °C. The results are summarized in Table 4.8. Our results indicate that the

Ols peak, the C Is peaks and the Mo3p doublet. This is consistent with the case of the

samples annealed as a function of increasing temperature. In that case annealing below

525 °C apparently causes a sudden decrease in the Cls/Mo3ds/2peak height ratio in Table

4.7. In agreement with the previously discussed XPS results of the sample analyzed at

increasing temperatures, the Mo3ds/2 /Mo3d3/2 peak height ratio of the samples in the

Page 80: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

66

region in which M0O3 is the dominant oxide is approximately equal to 1.5. In Table 4.9

we present the results of the calculation of this ratio.

35000

30000

25000

| 20000

5 15000

10000

5000

Mo3d

200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600

Binding Energy (eV)

FIGURE 4.21. Sectioned "before" XPS spectra of a sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours.

Page 81: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

67

35000

30000

25000 +•» c s 20000 0 U 15000

10000

5000

O l s I

Mo3d C Is

Mo3p

200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600

Binding Energy (eV)

FIGURE 4.22. Sectioned "after" XPS spectra of sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours.

Page 82: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

68

15000 14000 13000

H 12000

11000

10000

9000 8000 7000

0 u

-•— 0 Hours

— 1 Hour

-*—2 Hours

228 230 232 234 236

BINDING ENERGY (eV)

FIGURE 4.23. Mo3d doublet of the sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours.

Page 83: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

69

TABLE 4.7. Average core electron binding energies in eV of the sample annealed at 412°C for 2 hours.

Room Temp.

1 Hour 2 Hours

Mo3d5/2 232.6 232.0 231.9

Mo3ch/2 235.7 235.2 235.2

O l s 531.4 531.3 530.2

C Is 285.5 284.9 285.0

Mo3p3/2 398.7 398.1 397.9

Mo3pi/2 416.1 415.7 415.3

Page 84: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

70

TABLE 4.8. Peak height intensity ratios of sample annealed at 412°C for 2 hours.

Room Temp.

1 Hour 2 Hours

Cls/Mo3d5/2 0.9 0.4 0.6

01s/Mo3d5/2 1.5 1.4 1.4

Ols/Cls 1.7 3.6 2.4

TABLE 4.9. Mo3ds/2/Mo3d3/2 peak height ratio of sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours.

Room Temp.

1 Hour 2 Hours

Mo3d5/2 / Mo3d3/2

1.5 1.3 1.4

Page 85: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

71

The low energy UPS spectra shown in Figure 4.24 obtained using 5.06 eV

incident photons shows an almost amorphous-like type structure with very poorly defined

peaks. Nevertheless, the results of a 4 peaks deconvolution of the spectra are

summarized and given in Table 4.10. The photoelectric work function of the annealed

sample does show a very small initial change, but remained reasonable constant after

annealing for 2 hours.

Figure 4.25 shows the He I radiation photoemission spectra of a sample annealed

at 412 °C.

on +* S3 S O U

0 Hr.

1.5 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

Binding Energy (eV)

FIGURE 4.24. UPS spectra of sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours obtained using 5.06 eV incident photons.

Page 86: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

72

TABLE 4.10. Summary in terms of the energy position of the different structures obtained in the UPS spectra of the sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours using 5.06 eV incident photons.

0 Hours 1 Hour 2 Hours

1SI State 2.3 eV 2.1 eV 2.1 eV

2nd State 2.7 eV 2.7 eV 2.7 eV

3rd State 3.8 eV 3.3 eV 3.3 eV

4,h State 4.4 eV 4.1 eV 4.1 eV

The energy position of the valence band, (Ef- Eyai = 1.3 eV), is farther away from

the experimentally determined Fermi level position than of the sample discussed in the

previous section given in Table 4.4. This indicates a high degree of oxidation, as do the

calculation of the O ls/Mo3d5/2 and O Is/ C Is peak height ratios shown in Table 4.8

Surface conditioning causes changes in the position of the Fermi level [25]. Another

indication of high oxidation is the much higher number of counts seen in the He I spectra

of the sample annealed at 412 °C compared to the He I spectra of the sample annealed at

a maximum temperature of 900 °C.

An SEM of the sample annealed at a constant temperature of 412 °C for 2 hours is

presented in Figure 4.26 and shows little effect of annealing. This result is expected

Page 87: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

73

since not much oxide removal took place in this phase. This is evident from the results of

the O ls/Mo3d5/2 and O ls/C Is peak height ratios shown in Table 4.8.

The XRD pattern of the sample is shown in Figure 4.27. The 26 angle range is

from 26 = 20° to 26 = 90°. According to the XPS results, M0O3 was the dominant oxide

present. XRD results confirms the presence of M0O3 (100) plane and the Mo02 (200)

plane can be seen in the spectra of the sample as shown in Figure 4.27. Another XRD

spectrum of the same sample is presented in figure 4.28. The scan was made from 26 =

20° to 26 = 40° and the dwell time, normally 1 second, was increased to 1.5 seconds. The

pattern shows oxides, as we previously discussed.

x £3 3 O

V

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

-18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6

Kinetic Energy (eV)

-4 -2 0

FIGURE 4.25. UPS spectra of the valence band structure of the sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours obtained by using He I (21.1 eV) radiation.

Page 88: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

74

FIGURE 4.26. SEM micrograph of the sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours, obtained with a magnification of 1500X.

Page 89: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

75

* i 0 U w

f 1 A

Aitnealead. at 412 C

1500

u D §

J l 50 60

2-Theta (Degrees)

p-H O C4 o o w o w SJ •w1 o u • e s

e s I uA*-Jl.

90

FIGURE 4.27. XRD spectra of sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours.

Page 90: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

76

e U w f Pi 4

Annealed at 412 C

26 27 28 29 30 2-Theta (Degrees)

FIGURE 4.28. XRD spectra of the sample annealed at 412 °C for 2 hours in which oxide activity can be seen.

Page 91: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

77

4.3.4. Characterization of M02C films as a function of a

constant annealing temperature of 525 °C

Figure 4.29 is the "before" XPS spectra of the sample to be annealed at 525 °C for 5

hours, while Figure 4.30 is the "after" annealing XPS spectra of the same sample. These

spectra contain at least 2 different Mo oxides were dominant. From the XPS results of

the sample annealed as a function of increasing temperature, we expect that the XPS of

the M02C film at 525 °C to contain Mo+4, which is characteristic of M0O2. As expected,

and shown in Table 4.11 the core electron binding energies obtained for the Mo3d

doublet, are those of Mo+4. These results agree very well with published results [4-9].

Figure 4.31 shows a practically stationary Mo3d doublet which is an indication of

stability of the oxide at this temperature. Considering that the XPS results have an error

of ± 0.1 eV, the M02C film after annealing for a total of 5 hours at an annealing

temperature of 525 °C is stable. As is the case of all of samples, after room temperature

deposition, M0O3 was dominant. In Table 4.13 we show the C Is/ Mo3d5/2, Ols/

Mo3d5/2 and O Is/ C Is peak height intensity ratios. Table 4.12 shows that the sample

annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours, had a constant, O Is/ Mo3d5/2 peak height ratio that is

considerably higher than the sample annealed at 412° for 2 hours. The ratios, of C Is/

Mo3d5/2 and O Is/ C Is, also remained fairly constant. This is another indication that the

MO2C film remained stable after annealing for 5 hours. The results obtained for the

Mo3d5/2/Mo3d3/2 ratios are presented in Table 4.13. The results also are consistent with

the Mo3d5/2/Mo3d3/2peak height ratio of the sample annealed as a function of increasing

Page 92: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

78

temperature. The value obtained for the ratio Mo3ds/2/Mo3d3/2 peak height was 0.5 and

was essentially constant during the 5 hours of annealing.

30000

25000

| 20000

U 15000

10000

Mo3d

200 250 300 350 400 450

Binding Energy (eV)

500 550 600

FIGURE 4.29. Sectioned "before" XPS spectra of the sample to be annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours.

Page 93: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

79

Cff •+«» S s o u

Mo3d

35000

25000

15000

5000 -t I I r

200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600

Binding Energy (eV)

FIGURE 4.30. Sectioned "after" XPS spectra of sample that was annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours.

Page 94: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

80

15500

13500

11500 — 1 Hour

—— 3 Hours

-*— 5 Hours

221 226 231 236

BINDING ENERGY (eV)

241

FIGURE 4.31. XPS spectra showing the evolution of the Mo3d doublet of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours after 1, 3 and 5 hours respectively.

Page 95: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

81

TABLE 4.11. Average Core Electron Binding Energies in eV of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours.

Room Temp.

1 Hour 2 Hours 3 Hours 4 Hours 5 Hours

Mo3d5/2 232.5 229.8 229.8 229.7 229.7 229.7

Mo3d3/2 235.7 232.8 232.7 232.6 232.6 232.6

O l s 531.0 530.8 530.7 531.0 530.7 530.8

C Is 285.3 284.9 284.9 284.9 284.9 285.0

Mo3p3/2 398.6 397.1 396.8 396.7 396.6 396.8

Mo3pi/2 416.0 414.2 414.2 413.9 414.1 414.1

TABLE 4.12. Peak Height Ratios of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours.

Room Temp.

1 Hour

2 Hours

3 Hours

4 Hours

5 Hours

Cls/Mo3ds/2 0.3 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.0 0.9

Ols/Mo3d52 1.4 2.7 2.5 2.9 2.5 2.4

Ols/Cls 3.9 3.2 3.4 3.4 2.6 2.9

Page 96: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

82

TABLE 4.13. Mo3ds/2 /Mo3d 3/2 Peak Height Ratios of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours.

Room Temp.

1 Hour

2 Hours

3 Hours

4 Hours

5 Hours

Mo3d5/2 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

Mo3d3/2

1.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

It can be seen from the UPS spectra shown in Figure 4.32, obtained using 4.49 eV

incident photons, that after the first hour of annealing some oxides were removed. A

summary of the results of a 4 peaks deconvolution of the spectra is given in Table 4.14.

The photoelectric work function values were stable.

The photoemission spectra obtained with He I radiation (21.2 eV) of the sample

annealed for 5 hours at 525° is given in Figure 4.30. In agreement with what we had

previously discussed, the energy position of the valence band, is seen to move away from

the experimentally determined Fermi level position, as the degree of oxidation of the film

increases. For this sample it is found that (Ef- Evai) = 1.8 eV. This result again

illustrates the fact that the location of the valence band with respect to the location of the

Fermi level, is extrinsic and depend on many parameters.

An SEM taken after the sample had been annealed for the total 5 hours at 525° C

is presented in Figure 4.34. No substantial M02C film depletion is observed. The XRD

spectrum again serves to identify the sample as hexagonal M02C, corresponding to pdf #

Page 97: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

83

35-0787. With the peak cutoff set to 2%, no peaks due to any oxide planes are seen in

the spectra presented as Figure 4.35. In addition to the usual Mo planes seen in the

pattern, a peak due the Mo (110) plane at 26 = 40.9° is seen. This plane was not seen

initially after deposition of the M02C film in the other samples. The ratio of the more

intense M02C plane, the (101) and the more intense Mo plane, the (200), is equal to 0.7.

This again corroborates the depletion of some M02C film. The XRD spectra obtained by

scanning in the region 20 = 20° to 26 = 40° with an increased dwell time, did not provide

a clear pattern, however, we do see some traces of the M0O2 (011) plane as well as the

M0O3 (101) plane. As seen in Figure 4.36 the almost amorphous state of the XRD

pattern obtained has to do with the already mentioned high degree of oxidation of the

film.

1600

+3 1200 e a 0 U 800

400

0

0.4 1.2 2 2.8 3.6

Binding Energy (eV)

4.4

FIGURE 4.32. UPS spectra of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours obtained using 4.49 eV incident photons.

Page 98: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

84

TABLE 4.14. Summary of the different states present in the UPS spectra of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours obtained by using 4.49 eV incident photons.

0 Hours Room Temp.

1 Hour 2 Hours 3 Hours 4 Hours 5 Hours

1st State 1.6 eV 2.1 eV 2.0 eY 2.1 eV 1.2 eV 1.9 eV

2nd State 2.9 eV 3.0 eV 3.1 eY 3.0 eV 2.5 eV 2.9eV

3rd State 3.7 eV 3.7 eV 3.8 eV 3.7 eV 3.6 eV 3.6 eV

4th State 4.1 eV 4.1 eV 4.0 eV 4.1 eV 4.1 eV 4.0 eV

Page 99: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

85

5000

4000

42 3000 a s

£ 2000

1000

0 •18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6

Kinetic Energy (eV)

-4 -2 0

FIGURE 4.33. UPS spectra of the valence band of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours.

Page 100: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

86

FIGURE 4.34. SEM micrograph of the sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours.

Page 101: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

87

¥ i e U w

P! Pi

2200

2000

1800

1600

1400

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0

u e s

fit i n

S1

o

c

Anne lead at 525 C

s

~ s « fj-<—> f-H

u w e E

,1 - 1

H, w u e §

w u

20 30 40 50 60 2-Theta. (Degrees)

70 80 90

FIGURE 4.35. XRD spectra of sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours.

Page 102: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

88

¥

t I ps

Annealed at 525 C

50

40

30

20

10 -

22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 2-Tketa (Degrees)

FIGURE 4.36. XRD spectra of sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours, in which oxide activity can be seen.

Page 103: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

89

4.3.5. Characterization of MO2C films as a function of constant annealing

temperature of 800°C.

Seen in Figure 4.37 and Figure 4.38 are the before annealing and after annealing

sectioned XPS spectra of the M02C film. Initial spectra, typical right after deposition,

shows the presence of the Mo3d and Mo3p doublets as well as the presence of the Carbon

C Is and the Oxygen Ols peaks. The after annealing XPS shows that the oxygen peak is

almost completely removed. Figure 4.39 shows that the Mo3d doublet remains

stationary. The averaged core electron binding energies of the Mo3d doublet, of O Is, of

C 1 s and of the Mo3p doublet are summarized in Table 4.15. We expect that annealing

the sample at this temperature will accelerate removal of most of the oxide layer of the

film. Indeed, from the C ls/Mo3d5/2, O Is/ Mo3d5/2 and O ls/C Is peak height ratios

summarized in Table 4.16, it can be seen that these ratios are at about minimum The

Mo3d5/2/ Mo3d3/2 peak height ratio of the sample being annealed, remained fairly

constant, within experimental error, and also similar to the ratio obtained previously for

the sample annealed as a function of gradual incremental annealing temperatures when

the temperatures were in similar region. A summary of the calculations is given in Table

4.17.

Figure 4.40 is representative of the UPS spectra obtained by using 4.49 eV

incident photons. The results of a 4 peak deconvolution of the spectra is given in Table

4.18. With much of the oxide layer depleted, as seen by small ratios of 01 s/C 1 s and

01s/Mo3d5/2 ratios given in Table 4.16. The photoelectric work function of the films is

seen to be constant.

Page 104: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

90

3 © u

35500

30500

25500

20500 Mo3d 15500

10500

190 270 350 430 510

Binding Energy (eV)

590

FIGURE 4.37. Sectioned "before" XPS spectra of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours.

50000

40000

| 30000

© 20000

10000

0

Mo3d Mo3p

| C Is

200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600

Binding Energy (eV)

FIGURE 4.38. Sectioned "after" XPS spectra of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours.

Page 105: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

91

t/5 H Z

o u

27000

22000

17000

12000

7000

" 1 Hours

° 2 Hours

3 Hours

225 230 235 240

BINDING ENERGY (eV)

FIGURE 4.39. XPS spectra showing the evolution of the Mo3d doublet during the 3 hours of annealing.

Page 106: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

92

TABLE 4.15. Average Core Electron Binding Energies in eV of the Sample annealed at 800 °C.

Room Temp.

1 Hour 2 Hours 3 Hours

Mo3d5/2 232.3 228.7 228.6 228.5

Mo3d3/2 235.2 231.8 231.8 231.7

O l s 531.4 530.8 530.9 530.6

C Is 285.3 284.6 284.4 284.6

Mo3p3/2 398.5 395.1 394.8 394.8

Mo3pi/2 416.1 412.4 412.1 412.4

TABLE 4.16. Peak Height Ratios for the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours.

Room Temp.

1 Hour 2 Hours 3 Hours

C ls/Mo3ds/2 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2

O ls/Mo3d5/2 1.9 0.3 0.1 0.1

O ls/C Is 4.0 1.2 0.7 0.4

Page 107: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

93

TABLE 4.17. Mo3d5/2 / Mo3d3/2 Peak Height Ratio of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours.

Room Temp.

1 Hour 2 Hours 3 Hours

Mo3d5/2 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.5

Mo3d3/2

1.0 1.3 1.5 1.5

Figure 4.40 is representative of the UPS spectra obtained by using 4.49 eV

incident photons. The results of a 4 peaks deconvolution of the spectra is given in Table

Page 108: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

94

4.18. With much of the oxide layer depleted, as seen by small ratios of 01 s/Cl s and

01s/Mo3d5/2 ratios given in Table 4.16. The photoelectric work function of the films is

seen to be constant.

The He I radiation (21.2 eV) photoemission spectra of the sample, taken after

annealing, is shown as Figure 4.41. The signal from this sample is smaller than that from

all the samples, in addition, the average energy position of the valence band maximum

with respect to the position of the Fermi level, is the lowest,(Ef- Evai) = 0.4 eV. This

result follows the trend that indicates that the fewer the oxides, the closer is the valence

band to the experimentally determined Fermi level.

The SEM micrograph shown in Figure 4.42 clearly shows a partial depletion of

the M02C film.

Significant depletion of the M02C film is seen in the XRD pattern of the film.

The ratio of the intensities from the M02C (101) plane to that from the Mo (200) is just

0.3. Some depletion of the M02C film is seen in the higher intensity of the Mo (2 11)

peak over the M02C (101) peak as is seen in Figure 4.43. Annealing at this temperature

removed most of the oxides, but also removed a considerable amount of the M02C film.

Relief of the initial stress/strain imparted to the M02C film during deposition is among

the highest. Only the sample annealed incrementally has closer values to those of the

M02C powder. Finally, in agreement with what the XPS results show, there are still

oxides present. Figure 4.44 shows oxide activity in the XRD pattern of the sample in the

form of the M0O2 (011) plane and the M0O3 (101) plane.

Page 109: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

95

a s o U

0.49 1.49 2.49 3.49 4.49

Binding Energy (eV)

FIGURE 4.40. UPS spectra of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours obtained by using 4.49 eV incident photons.

Page 110: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

96

TABLE 4.18. Summary of the position of the different states seen In the UPS spectra of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours obtained by using 4.49 eV incident photons.

1 Hour 2 Hours 3 Hours

1st State 2.1 eV 2.1 eV 2.2 eV

2nd State 3.1 eV 3.2 eV 3.2 eV

3rd State 3.8 eV 3.9 eV 3.8 eV

4th State 4.2 eV 4.2 eV 4.1 eV

Page 111: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

97

4000

3000 Gfi

§ 2000 o

U 1000

0

-18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6

Kinetic Energy (eV)

-4 -2 0

FIGURE 4.41. UPS spectra of the valence band structure of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours obtained using He I (21.2 eV) radiation.

Page 112: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

98

;k'*

- 4 :; t \5

'**+

'*?"\ >40/' : ^ f —

• * , « t ' , - - '

FIGURE 4.42. SEM micrograph of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours.

Page 113: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

99

Annealed at 800 C

H •g o U

-fe*

8000

7000

do oo

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

0

o & « S o ° ^ o 'W w U U

§ S I. 1

ft

u e s

M W e E

«

e s

JL.

w u

k . 20 30 40 50 60

2-Theta (Degrees) 70 80 90

FIGURE 4.43. XRD spectra of the sample annealed at 800 °C for three hours.

Page 114: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

100

-S3

a w

t I A

Annealed at 800 C

60

22 26 27 28 29 2-Theta (Degrees)

FIGURE 4.44. XRD spectra of the sample annealed at 800°C for three hours in which oxide activity is seen.

Page 115: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

101

4.4. Conclusions

We have used XPS, UPS, SEM and XRD to study films coated with molybdenum

carbide via electrophoresis as a function of increasing annealing temperature and constant

annealing temperatures. As a function of increasing annealing temperature, the thin

samples were found to undergo three phases. The first phase occurred between 500 °C

and 650 °C. XPS results confirmed the presence of M0O3 as the dominant oxide present

right after deposition, yet other oxides such as MoO and M0O2 and M02C are also

present. UPS analysis corroborates the presence of all of these components. As the

temperature is increased, a second region is observed in which M0O2 is the dominant

oxide present. The approximate temperature range for this second phase is from 650 °C

to 775 °C. The photoelectric work function we calculate in this region agrees with that of

the optical absorption edge of M0O3. The third region observed, ranging in temperature

from approximately 775 °C to 900 °C, which was our maximum operational annealing

temperature, is characterized by the dominant presence of M02C. In this third region,

UPS analysis leads to the conclusion that in this range the desorption of M0O2 takes

place. The photoelectric work function changes as the annealing temperature is

increased, but the different oxides in each region are stable.

The sample annealed at 412 °C for two hours remained in an amorphous state with a

fairly constant photoelectric work function. The XPS results also indicate that M0O3 was

the dominant oxide. The sample annealed at 525 °C for 5 hours had the highest levels of

oxidation as seen in the XPS O ls/Cls and 01s/Mo3ds/2 ratios with a constant

photoelectric work function. The XRD spectra for this sample was the least clear. In the

Page 116: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

102

case of the sample annealed at 800 °C for 3 hours, the level of oxidation is among the

lowest as corroborated by the XPS and XRD results. The photoelectric work function of

this sample is stable.

References

1. J. Wang, M. Castonguay, J. Deng, and P. H. McBreen, Surf. Sci. 374,197 (1997).

2. Peakfit, SPSS, Inc., 444 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611.

3. R. Ochoa, X. X. Bi, A. M. Rao, and P. C. Eklund in The Chemistry of transitional

Metal Carbides and Nitrides, edited by S. T. Oyama, (Chapman and Hall, 1996)

4. W.Lisowski, A.H. J. van den Berg, I. J. Hanekamp, and A.van Silfhout, Surf.

Interface Anal. 19, 93 (1992).

5. D. Wang, J. H. Lunsford, and M. P. Rosynek, J. Catal. 169, 347 (1997).

6. F. Solymosi, J. Cserenyi, A.Szoke, T. Bansagi, and A.Oszko, J. Catal. 165,150

(1997).

7. P. Delporte, F.Meunier, C.Pham-Huu, P.Vennegues, M. J. Ledoux, and J. Guille,

Catal. Today, 23,251 (1995).

8. K.S. Kim, W.E. Baitinger, J. W. Amy, and N. Winograd, J. Electron Spectrosc.

Relat. Phenom. 5, 351 (1974).

9. P. A. Spevack, and N. S. Mclntyre, J. Phys. Chem., 96, 9029 (1992)

10. E. Bauer, and H. Poppa, Surf. Sci. 88, 31 (1979).

11. W. A. Brainard, and D. R. Wheeler, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 15, 1800 (1978).

12. C. R. Brundle, Surf. Sci., 48, 99 (1975).

13. E. V. Rutkov, A. Ya. Tontegode, M. M. Usufov, andN. R. Gall, Sov. Phys. Tech.

Page 117: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

103

Phys, 37,1038(1992).

14. C. Zhang, M. A. Van Hove, and G. A. Somoijau, Surf. Sci. 149, 326 (1985).

15. J. Wang, M. Castonguay, P. H. McBreen, S. Ramanathan, and S. T. Oyama in

The Chemistry of transitional Metal Carbides and Nitrides, edited by S. T. Oyama,

(Chapman and Hall, 1996).

16. F. Zaera, E. Kollin, and J. L. Gland, Chem. Phys. Lett., 121,464 (1985).

17. M. Wang, P. Castonguay. H. McBreen, S. Ramanathan, and S. T. Oyama editor in

The Chemistry of transitional Metal Carbides and Nitrides, (Chapman and Hall, 1996).

18. H . A. Pohl, J. Appl. Phys. 22, 869 (1951).

19. J. W. Rabalais, and R. J. Colton, Chem. Phys. Lett., 29, 131 (1974).

20. C. D. Wagner, W. M. Riggs, L. E. Davis, J. F. Moulder, and G. E. Muilenberg, editor,

Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, (Perkin-Elmer Co., 1979).

21. R. F. Gunion, S. J. Dixon-Warren, and W. C. Lineberger, J. Chem. Phys. 104,

1765 (1996).

22. F. Okuyama, Surf. Sci. 43,293 (1974).

23. B. R. Chalamala, R. M. Wallace, and B. E. Gnade, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 16,

2859 (1998).

24. International Centre for Diffraction Data, 12 Campus Blvd., Newtown Square,

PA 19073-3273.

25. T. Sugino and J. Shirafuji, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 154, 371 (1996).

26. R. H. Fowler, and L. W. Nordheim, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 119,173 (1928).

27. V. S. Fomenko in Handbook of Thermionic Properties, edited by G. V.

Page 118: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

104

Samsonov, (Plenum, New York, 1966).

28. D. E. Eastman, Phys. Review B. Solid State. 2,1 (1970).

29. F. Werfel, and E. Minni, Phys. C, Solid State Phys., 16, 6091 (1983).

Page 119: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

CHAPTER 5

CHARACTERIZATION OF DIAMOND FILMS DEPOSITED BY

ELECTROPHORESIS AS A FUNCTION OF AVERAGE

DIAMOND GRAIN SIZE

5.1. Introduction

Diamond is known to have many interesting properties that make it a very

attractive option in many applications. It is also the subject of many current studies being

done in field emission because of its properties. It has a density of 3.51-3.52 g/cm3 [1], a

dielectric constant of 5.7 [2], a thermal conductivity of 1.5xl04 Wrrf'ic'p], and an

electron mobility of 0.2 m2 V"1 s_1[2]. It is inert and non-reactive with oxygen at

temperatures below 1000 °C. There are mainly two methods to form synthetic diamond.

In the first method a high temperature, in general greater than 1000°C, together with a

fairly high pressure, usually greater than 105 atm, liquid catalyst such as iron or nickel are

used. The second method uses a mixture of gases containing carbon, hydrogen and

oxygen such as methane is used in general less than 1000 °C, and a low pressure, usually

less than 1 atm. Color center defects, produced by radiation damage from electrons or

neutrons are many times used to change the color of diamonds [2].

105

Page 120: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

106

The negative electron affinity [NEA] of diamond surfaces has been studied and

has been proposed in models as a possible mechanism which would explain the emission

properties exhibited by diamond. [3].

The NEA properties of diamond films, as it relates to the average diamond

particle size, as well as at its potential field emission properties will be studied in this

chapter. A surface is said to have negative electron affinity (NEA) if its vacuum level

lies below its conduction band and hence electrons that are at the conduction band

minimum can readily escape the surface. Photoemission is a good way to detect the

presence of NEA on surfaces, in that the secondary electrons that are at the conduction

band minimum, and are excited, play a role in the obtained spectra in the form of a low

kinetic energy peak, as has been seen and reported [3-5]. The NEA properties have also

been related to hydrogen terminated diamond (111) surfaces. It has been suggested that

the hydrogen termination cause the observed lowering of the work function which then

causes the surface to exhibit NEA [6]. The threshold energy, Eth, for electron emission

for an intrinsic semiconductor is given by:

Eth = X Egap ( 5 . 1 )

where^ is the electron affinity and Egap represents the semiconductor's band gap. The

position of the Fermi level, in a semiconductor is extrinsic and usually is found to be

dependent on properties such as the bulk doping and surface treatment [3,5,7], and to

stoichiometry and surface states [5,8]. This leads to a modification of equation 1 when

there is heavy doping, since this can cause the Fermi level to be below the valence band

edge and:

Page 121: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

107

Eth ~X + Egap+^ (2)

where £ is an extrinsic parameter represents the energy difference between the position of

the Fermi level and the valence band it can be positive or negative..

5.2. Experimental

Flat samples and tips were made of 99.95% molybdenum foil commercially

obtained. The tips were made of 0.02" thick molybdenum wire and electrochemically

etched in a 2% mol KOH solution using a +10 V bias voltage on the wire and then rinsed

in distilled water. Synthetic undoped commercially obtained diamond powder of 0.25

yum, 3 fim and 6 jim average particle size was mixed in an aqueous solution of 10%

ethanol and used to deposit diamond films on the flat samples, and tips by electrophoresis

[9]. XPS data was obtained with a VG ESCALAB Mark II, operating in the twin A1 Ka

radiation mode (1486.6 eV). An average operating base pressure of 10"9 T was

maintained in the experimental chamber. In acquiring the XPS data, a dwell time of 0.5 s

was used. SEM micrographs were obtained with a JEOL JMS-T300 scanning electron

microscope. Low energy (4.0 e V and 4.88 eV) UPS data was obtained using a Hg UV

source and a monochromator with band pass of 2nm. A Specs plasma discharge UV

source model 10/35 was used to obtain high energy UPS data. The operational pressure

n

was maintained at 7x10" T in the main chamber. A current of 70 mA and a voltage of

460 V was used while in operation. The Fermi level vas determined by photoemission

from a molybdenum sheet used as the substrate upon which deposition of the diamond

film was made. A Siemens D500 diffractrometer with a Cu Kai anode radiation (A, =

Page 122: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

108

1.540562 A) and graphite filter was used to obtain XRD spectra. The typical step size

was 0.05° and the dwell time for scans was set typically to 1 s.

5.3. Results

Figure 5.1 shows the XPS spectra of the C Is for the three average diamond grain

sizes. The binding energy of the diamond C Is peak is 289.1 eV for both the 0.25 pim

and the 1 ixm diamond films, while it is 288.6 eV for jj.m film. Shifts in the C Is position

can be attributed to the presence and formation of CO and CO2. Similar shifts in the C Is

core level for polycrystalline diamond films have been reported and attributed to

exposure to O2 and H2 plasma [7]. From the XPS data, a calculation of the O Is/ C Is

area ratios of the three films found the ratio equal to 0.3. This result indicates that the

level of oxidation is similar in all three films, hence any effects in our results due to the

oxidation of the diamond films would be the same in all cases. A lowering of the work

function of up to 1 eV has been seen in diamond-O-Cs surfaces exposed to a 0 2 plasma

[10]. No molybdenum peaks in the XPS spectra of the 1 /mi, and 6 /im diamond films

were detected signaling good film coverage.

The diamond films were found to be conductive by obtaining a spectra of the Cls

peak at different X-ray tube emission currents. If there is "normal" charging, which can

induce band bending, one would expect a shift in the spectra obtained that approximately

proportional to the emission current. The result of this test obtained by using emission

currents of 5 mA, 20 mA and 32mA and an anode voltage of 11 kev are shown as Figures

5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 for the 0.25 micron, the 1 microns and the 6 microns films respectively.

An average of the total shift exhibited by the films can be estimated to be equal to 0.5 eV.

Page 123: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

109

A second test of the conducting nature of the diamond films is the ability to image and

obtain SEM micrographs of the films.

A photon energy of 4.88 eV was used in acquiring the low energy UPS data. The

spectra obtained for the three average particle diamond films is shown as Figure 5.5. We

c« +*

C 3 O

U

4000

3000

2000

1000

0

279 283 287 291 295

Binding Energy (eV)

0.25 microns

3 microns

6 microns

FIGURE 5.1. Average Binding Energy position of the C Is Peak for the three average size diamond grains.

Page 124: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

110

3 •

C3

•t£ C 4>

275 280 285 290 295 300 Binding Energy (eV)

Emission Current=32mA

Emission Current=5mA

Emission Current=20mA

FIGURE 5.2. C Is peak of the 0.25 microns diamond sample as a function of X ray tube emission current.

Page 125: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

I l l

s 0.8 Emission Current=5mA

Emission Current=20mA

Emission Current=32mA

279 284 289 294 Binding Energy (eV)

FIGURE 5.3. C Is peak of the 3 microns diamond sample as a function of X ray tube emission current.

Page 126: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

112

0.6 V)

S 0.4

Emission Current=5mA

-Emission Current=20mA

•Emission Current=32mA

279 284 289 294 Binding Energy (eV)

FIGURE 5.4. C Is peak of the 6 microns diamond sample as a function of X ray tube emission current.

Page 127: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

113

present the results of a three peak deconvolution of the spectra in Table 5.1. From the

spectra obtained three structures are well defined. The average position of these

structures above the valence band were calculated and are presented in Table 5.1. The

structure at 0.2 eV in kinetic energy, is very close, in binding energy to the value given

for polycrystalline Mo [11]. The structures at 0.4 eV and 0.9 eV, are believed to be

surface states, with the structure of 0.9 eV above the valence band, very close to the

theoretically predicted value of surface states proper of diamond [12].

Also studied, were the photoemission spectra of the films obtained by using 4.0

eV incident photons Figure 5.6. A three peak deconvolution of the spectra found

structures at average energy positions of 0.4 eV, 0.9 eV and at 1.8 eV measured in terms

of energy above the valence band maximum as is summarized in Table 5.2. The

structures located at 0.4 and 0.9 eV respectively above the valence band were also found

in the analysis of the spectra obtained with 4.88 eV incident photons, and can be

attributed to direct transitions and to surface states in the diamond particles. These

structures are believed to represent surface states as was previously discussed. The

structure located at an average position of 1.8 eV above the valence band is believed to

be another theoretically predicted surface state of diamond [12].

Figures 5.7, 5.8 and 5.9, are the valence band spectra obtained for the 0.25 jim, 1

(im, and 6 fim average diamond particle films respectively using He I (21.2 eV) radiation.

In order to obtain the spectra a -6 V bias was applied to the samples. Four structures can

be identified and their positions with respect to the position of the valence band

Page 128: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

114

maximum are presented in Table 5.3. The position of the valence band maximum, VBM,

can be found by VBM = hv - Egap + Bias.

0

6 microns

3 microns

0.25 microns

0.5 1 1.5

Kinetic Energy (eY)

2.5

FIGURE 5.5. Low energy UPS spectra of the three diamond films obtained using 4.88 eV incident photons.

Page 129: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

TABLE 5.1. Positions of structures measured from the valence band found in the UPS spectra of the diamond films using 4.88 eV incident photons.

115

0.25 microns 3 micron 6 microns Average Position

1st State 0.2 eV 0.2 eV 0.1 eV 0.2 eY

2nd State 0.4 eV 0.4 eV 0.3 eV 0.4 eV

3rd State 0.9 eV 1.0 eV 0.7 eV 0.9 eV

Page 130: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

116

s P % u • PM pfi

u 6 g> e s o U 0.25 am

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Kinetic Energy (eV)

4.5

FIGURE 5.6. Low energy UPS spectra of the three diamond films obtained using 4.0 eV incident photons.

Page 131: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

117

TABLE 5.2. Position of structures measured from the valence band found in the UPS spectra of the diamond films using 4.0 eV incident photons.

0.25 microns 3 micron 6 microns Average position

lsl State 0.4 eV 0.3 eV 0.4 eV 0.4 eV

2nd State 0.9 Ev 0.8 Ev 0.8 eV 0.9 eV

3rd State 1.9 eV 1.6 eV 1.8 eV 1.8 eV

Page 132: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

118

where hv = 21.2 eV for He I, the Bias = -6V and the band gap of diamond is 5.5 eV. The

negative electron affinity peak, NEA peak, the low kinetic energy structure seen to the

left of the full spectra, is seen to shift toward lower kinetic energies as a function of

30000

25000

20000

§15000 O ^10000

-24 -22 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 Kinetic Eiiergy (eV)

FIGURE 5.7. High energy UPS spectra of the valence band structure of the 0.25 microns diamond film obtained using He I radiation (21.2 eV).

Page 133: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

119

6C e s © V

12000

10000

2000

-24 -22 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0

Kinetic Energy (eV)

FIGURE 5.8. High energy UPS spectra of the valence band structure of the 3 microns diamond film obtained using He I radiation (21.2 eV).

Page 134: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

120

30000

25000

20000 CM 1 15000 O

u 10000

-24 -22 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0

Kinetic Energy (eV)

FIGURE 5.9. High energy UPS spectra of the valence band structure of the 6 microns diamond film obtained using He I radiation (21.2 eV).

Page 135: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

TABLE 5.3. Positions of the structures found in the valence band of the diamond films and amplitude of the NEA peak.

121

J St State

2nd

State 3 State

NEA Amplitude of the NEA

peak 0.25//m -6.4 eV -11 eV -14.1 eV -18.2 eV 5340 counts

3/im -6.1 eV -10.4 eV -13.9 eV -18.6 eV 6478 counts

6//m -4.3 eV -9 eV -13.2 eV -18.8 eV 8885 counts

Page 136: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

122

increasing average diamond particle size. This shift indicates a lowering of the work

function of the surface. The NEA peak increases in amplitude as the average diamond

particle size increases which we believe is due to both an increase in the surface area and

surface defect concentration with increasing diamond grain size which leads to the

greater NEA of the films. The coloration of the diamond powder used corroborates the

idea that the films have different surface defects concentration in that the coloration of

the powder went from, pale green, for the 0.25 jim powder, to light yellow for the 3 fim

powder, to finally a deeper yellow for the 6 fim diamond particle powder. In Table II we

present the energy position, referenced to the valence band, of the four structures seen in

the He I photoemission spectra of the three diamond films. The greatest shifts between

states, measured as distance between peaks or structures, happen between the NEA peak

and the third state, and between the 1st state and the 2nd state. These shift are

characterized by opposite movements, in that while the NEA peak moves away from the

3 rd State, moving towards a lower kinetic energy, the 1st State shifts away from the 2nd

State, as it moves toward a higher kinetic energy. The degree of shifting in the position

of these two structures, we believe is a measure of the degree of band bending in our

samples.

From the photoemission spectra and considering the NEA of the films, one can

calculate the NEA of the film by:

X = hv- Egap -W (5.3)

where hv = 21.2 eV for He I, to which a bias of 6 V is added, Egap= 5.5 eV for the band

gap of diamond and W is the emission width of the valence band measured from the

Page 137: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

123

onset of the NEA peak, low kinetic energy cutoff, to the valence band maximum, VBM.

In Table 5.4,there is a summary of the results of the calculation of W and^f for the three

films. We found the Fermi level, as measured by photoemission on a molybdenum foil,

to be below the valence band. Finally we calculate the photoemission energy threshold

for the three films by using equation (2) and summarize the results in Table 5.4.

TABLE 5.4. Results of the calculations of the width of the valence band, W, the position of the Fermi level with respect to the valence band, £,the negative electron affinity^, and the photoemission threshold Eth for the three diamond films.

W £ X Eth 0.25 fi m 18.7 eV 1.3 eV -3 eV 3.8 eV

1 fim 19.5 eV 1.6 eV -3.8 eV 3.3 eV 6 fim 19.7 eV 1.7 eV -4 eV 3.2 eV

The morphology of the diamond film was studied by SEM. Figures 5.10, 5.11.

5.12 and 5.13 show micrographs corresponding to the three average diamond particle size

films. A magnification of 1500X was used to obtain the micrographs. The films show a

mixture of randomly oriented diamond crystallites. In the case of the 0.25 microns

diamond film seen in Figure 5.10, large diamond crystallite islands of approximately 12

microns in size are seen. These large diamond crystallites contain smaller particles less

than 1 diameter in size as can be seen in Figure 5.11 which is more consistent with the

average size calculated by XRD of the diamond powder.

Page 138: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

124

XRD patterns of the samples are shown in Figure 5.13. The spectra confirms the

random orientation of the diamond films as seen in Figure 5.9. The 26 angular range for

the spectra is from 26 = 20° to 26 = 90°. The diamond (111) reflection at 26 = 43.8° and

the diamond (220) at 26 s 75.2° are present in all three films. The analysis of the

diffraction pattern obtained matches very well that of a cubic synthetic diamond of

3.56692 A cell size, corresponding to powder diffraction file number 75-0623 [13] as can

be seen in Table 5.4. The Mo (200) and the Mo (211) planes are also seen in the spectra.

The d values in Table 5.5 represent the interplanar distances which are compared with

standard values for these planes. Figure 5.14 illustrates the ratio growth of the diamond

(111) plane to the Mo (200) plane as a function of increasing diamond grain size, while

Figure 5.15 indicates the % of the total film area that is diamond (111). They both

confirm the increase surface area coverage of the diamond film as a function of the

increasing average diamond particle size. In Figure 5.16 the results of the calculation of

the ratio of the area of the diamond (111) to the area of the diamond (200) are given. The

results show the gradual dominance of the diamond (111) plane, also as a function of

increasing average particle size. The (111) plane of diamond has been shown by others

[3] to have NEA and these results clearly show that as the average diamond grain size is

increased the NEA of the film becomes more dominant. A mechanism that could explain

the emission properties of the (111) plane of diamond in this study is based on the NEA

affinity of the same. This mechanism is based on the existence of defect states. A further

discussion of this will follow later.

Page 139: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

125

TABLE 5.5. Interplanar distances and 29 angles comparisons between standard values and the results of this study.

h k 1 d(A) of pdf#75-

0623

d(A) of this

study

% Diff.

26 of pdf#75-

0623

29 of this

study

% Diff.

0.25 microns

1 1 1 2.06 2.07 0.48 43.9° 43.7° 0.46 0.25 microns 2 2 0 1.26 1.26 0 75.3° 75.1° 0.27

3 microns

1 1 1 2.06 2.06 0 43.9.° 43.8° 0.23 3 microns 2 2 0 1.26 1.26 0 75.3° 75.2° 0.13

6 microns

1 1 1 2.06 2.06 0 43.9° 43.8° 0.23 6 microns 2 2 0 1.26 1.26 0 75.3° 75.2° 0.13

Page 140: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

126

H

CS3S

FIGURE 5.10. SEM micrograph of the 0.25 microns size diamond film obtained using a magnification of 1,500X.

Page 141: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

127

m

' f M'W'

FIGURE 5.11. SEM micrograph of the 0.25 microns size diamond film obtained using a magnification of 10,000X.

Page 142: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

128

< s m f e t * 3 w & « * «

i * ;, vfi^» *' --»>%, */&%» * '":L *V> *v. t * 3 sVi# Jrl

/ , ' V*

S X / K - A , . > : , j ? * . %. * £ , fS$*<»<4*'"

%3*r • i f

P . & / A

FIGURE 5.12. SEM micrograph of the 3 microns size diamond film obtained using a magnification of 1,500X.

Page 143: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

129

FIGURE 5.13. SEM micrograph of the 6 microns size diamond film obtained using a magnification of 1,500X.

Page 144: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

130

0 2 5 microns

S3

ei

•a

e i—i

TS & |

a

8 o si-

I—1 ts o

rt D S

, \ ?

3 microns

-20- -30- -40- -50- - 6 0 - -70- - 8 0 - -90-

6 microns

2-Theta (Degrees)

FIGURE 5.14. XRD pattern of the three diamond films.

Page 145: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

131

Average diamond grain size (microns)

FIGURE 5.15. Percent of diamond (111) present in the total film as a function of average diamond grain size.

Page 146: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

132

/""N 8 7

W 6 E

.25 03 .25 e +* A

«4 /—s o o Pd

3

o 2 §

Average diamond grain size (microns)

FIGURE 5.16. Ratio of the Mo (200) plane to the diamond (111) plane as a function of average diamond grain size.

Page 147: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

133

o o M w s C3

s ° P '-C

es 5

5.5

- (X 4.5

0 1

Average diamond grain size (microns)

FIGURE 5.17. Ratio of the diamond (111) plane to the diamond (200) plane as a function of average diamond grain size.

Page 148: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

134

5.4. Discussion and Conclusions

As previously noted, a previous study that shows that a work function decrease of

approximately 1 eV is obtained by O2 plasma exposure of a diamond-O-Cs surface.

Since diamond has a band gap of approximately 5 eV a 1 eV lowering of the work

function represents a work function of approximately 4 eV. In this study we found a

photoelectric work function of 3.9 + 0.1 eV for the 0.25 micron sample in agreement with

this study.

A more "recent" electron-emission mechanism for diamond cathodes has been

proposed [14]. In their model they look at a triple junction-NEA surface-emission

mechanism. A triple junction is the intersection of a semiconductor surface with metal

substrate in vacuum. Their model also deals with dopants and suggests that many of the

reported emission properties of diamond and diamond-like films are the results of surface

emission from triple junctions and not the result of field emission from the bulk of the

diamond into vacuum. The proponents of the "new" model, in order to substantiate their

triple junction model quote previous work [15] which found that the areas between

crystallites are strongly emitting areas, which appears to suggest that grain boundaries

could be a source of the emission enhancements seen in diamond. The films used in this

study show good diamond coverage which tends to contradict the possibility of diamond

emission enhancements due to grain boundaries. The present work suggests that a huge

level of defects in the diamond crystallites themselves is in part the cause of the NEA.

One of the proposed mechanisms says that the NEA is due to near surface defect

states which once excited, can easily be injected into vacuum. This model assumes a

Page 149: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

135

constant source of electrons in the conduction band, or in subbands near the vacuum level

[16]. The XRD results show an increase in the diamond (111) plane, which is believed to

have NEA, as a function of increasing average diamond particle size. Also, to be noticed

is that for this model to work there must be a constant supply of electrons or defects in

the subbands near the vacuum level which could be responsible for the emission

enhancements seen. The idea of emission from subbands near the vacuum level, would

be a more plausible explanation of the results obtained in this study, in fact, they seem to

indicate that the emission seen in this study is due to both the fact that the diamond films

used have a considerable degree of NEA stemming from the increase in the hydrogen

termination of the diamond films as a function of increasing average diamond particle

size, as well as to the degree of impurity and defect concentration, as others have

suggested [5], which leads to band bending and to the lowering of the work function.

In this work, UPS, XPS, XRD and SEM were used to characterized diamond

films of 0.25 jiva, 3 jum and 6 jim respectively, as a function of increasing average

diamond particle size. We calculated a value of 3.9 ± 0.1 eV, 3.5 ±0.1 eV and 3.3 ± 0.1

eV for the photoelectric work function of the 0.25 nm, the 3 jim and the 6 /im diamond

films, respectively. Photoemission using 4.88 and 4.0 eV incident photons, was used to

determine the existence of various diamond surface states that lie above the valence band.

On the other hand photoemission with He I radiation (21.2 eV) was used to confirm the

NEA of the diamond films and to calculate their photoemission threshold. From the

XRD results, it can be conclude that the diamond (111) plane becomes more dominant as

a function of increasing average diamond particle size. This plane is known to exhibit

Page 150: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

136

NEA, which agrees with our photoemission results. A correlation between the average

diamond particle size, the photoelectric work function determined by UPS measurements

and the photoemission energy threshold measured by He I (21.2 eV) radiation was found

that suggest that the work function, and photoemission energy threshold decrease as a

function of increasing average diamond particle size, which as we previously mentioned

is related to an increase in the NEA of the films used due to their likely hydrogen

termination and to a considerable degree of impurities and defects that contribute to band

bending which increase as the average diamond particle grain size increases. Deposition

of the films by electrophoresis was shown to be a novel technique for hydrogen

terminating diamond films in order to reduce their work function by making the diamond

films develop enhanced NEA properties.

References

1. M. Bauccio, editor Engineering Materials Reference Book 2nd Edition.(ASM

International, ASM International, Materials Park, OH 44073-0002,1994).

2. Encyclopedia of Applied Physics, Vol. 5. p. 2. (VCH publishers, Inc. 1993).

3. F. J. Himpsel, J. A. Knapp, J. A. van Vechten, and D. E. Eastman, Phys. Rev. 20,264

(1979).

4. J. van der Weide and R. J. Nemanich, Phys. Rev. B, 49, n.19,13629 (1993).

5. C. Bandis and B. B. Pate, Phys. Rev. B, 52, n.16,12056 (1995).

6. J. van der Weide and R. J. Nemanich, Appl. Phys. Lett., 62,1878 (1993).

7. T. Sugino and J. Shirafuji, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 154, 371 (1996).

8. L. Ley, R. A. Pollak, F. R. McFeely, S. P. Kowalczyk, and D. A. Shirley, Phys.

Page 151: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

137

Rev. B, 9,600 (1974).

9. A. T. Andrews, Electrophoresis, Theory, Techniques, and Biochemical and Clinical Applications. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986).

10. M. W. Geis, J. C. Twichell, J. Macaulay, and K. Okano, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1328 (1995).

11. D. E. Eastman, Phys. Review B. Solid State. 2,1 (1970).

12. N. M Miskovsky, P. H. Cutler, and Z.-H. Huang, J. Vac. Sci. technol. B, 14,

2037 (1996).

13. International Centre for Diffraction Data, 12 Campus Blvd., Newtown Square, PA

19073-3273.

14. W. Geis, N. N. Efremov, K. E. Krohn. J. C. Twichell, T. M. Lyszczarz, R. Kalish, A.

Greer, and M. D. Tabat. Nature, 393,431 (1998).

15. C. Wang, A. Garcia, D. C. Ingram, M. Lake, and M. E. Kordesh. Electron. Lett. 27,

1459(1991).

16. N. S. Xu, Y. Tzeng, and R. V. Latham, Appl. Phys. 26, 1776 (1993).

Page 152: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

CHAPTER 6

FIELD EMISSION

6.1. Introduction

Molybdenum is currently the field emission tip of choice, due to ease of deposition

using standard microelectronics manufacturing technology. However, the work function

of molybdenum Spindt arrays has been shown to increase and the field emission to

decrease significantly when exposed to oxygen [1]. Molybdenum carbide and diamond

are known to be stable and non-reacting with oxygen. Therefore, we have studied the

properties of molybdenum carbide and diamond films deposited by electrophoresis [2] on

flat surfaces and field emission tips as potential candidates for stable field emission tips.

6.2. Experimental

Field emission current-voltage (I-V) characteristics and simultaneous field emission

energy distributions (FEEDs) were obtained for field emission tips using a gated diode

configuration set up in the analysis chamber of the VG system. The I-V data was

analyzed using the Fowler-Nordheim equation

I = aV2 exp(-b <D3/2/V) (6.1)

In Equation 6.1, $ is the work function of the surface and the parameters a and b

depend primarily on emission surface area and tip shape, respectively. Provided a and b

remain constant as the voltage changes, Ln (I/V2) vs 1/V is a straight line with slope -

138

Page 153: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

139

b<t>3/2. From this so-called I-V plot, the product of b<t>3/2 may be obtained and the work

function cannot be separated from the parameter b. However, when a simultaneous

measurement of an I-V plot and a field emission energy distribution (FEED) is made, this

separation may be performed. The FEED data were analyzed with a peakfit program

using exponentially modified Gaussian peaks.

The typical pass energy used in this work for FEEDs was 10 eV. This resolution

gives an energy scale error of about ± 0.2 eV. The UPS data was obtained with a pass

energy of 5 eV which gives an error of about ± 0.1 eV.

Field Emission Energy Distribution (FEED) spectra were obtained by the addition

of a retractable manipulator arm to the main analysis chamber. A copper free 1" diameter

and 0.25" thick wafer with a 0.012" size aperture was adapted to this manipulator and

served as a gated anode. FEED data acquisition was entirely PC controlled by a HP VEE

program. For UPS data analysis typically 10 scans were performed and then the spectra

was added. A Keithley model 486 picoammeter with a GPIB interface was used to

acquire the current readings for the FEED curves. The number of scans and the gated

anode voltages used in obtaining our FEED curves were determined and dependent on

the density of state and on the obtained signal to noise ratio. For the FEED data analysis,

the field emission thresholds were obtained by the subtraction of the kinetic energy of the

peaks in the FEED spectra from the tip bias.

Synthetic undoped diamond powder, also commercially obtained, of 0.25 jim,

3 jim and 6 fj.m average particle size was then mixed in an aqueous solution of 10%

ethanol and then was used to deposit diamond films on tips by electrophoresis.

Page 154: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

140

6.3. Field Emission results of M02C Tips

SEM micrograph of a bare Mo tip, a 5 minute coated Mo tip with M02C solution, and

a 10 minute coated Mo tip with the M02C solution are given as Figures 6.1,6.2 and 6.3.

Figures 6.2 and 6.3 are given as an indicator of the control over deposition parameters

such as deposition thickness and coverage that can be obtained by electrophoresis.

Figure 6.4 shows a FEED spectrum of a non-annealed M02C tip coated at room

temperature via electrophoresis. The spectrum is the result of the sum of 5 scans. The tip

bias was set to -89.99 V, while the gated anode voltage ranged from 1000 V to 1200 V in

50 mV steps. The pass energy for the run was set to 10 eV and the dwell time was 0.7 s.

Basically no programmed preconditioning of the tip was done. From the FEED spectrum

three peaks, each representing the field emission threshold value of a different state or

component, are well defined. Deconvolution of the first peak places it at about 3.9 eV.

The origin of this peak can be attributed to Mo2C, and this result agrees very well with

the value for the work function of Mo2C found in literature [3]. From the deconvolution

of the second peak, a value of 4.8 eV can be obtained, which can be attributed to

polycrystalline molybdenum. This result agrees very well with known reports for the

value of the work function of polycrystalline molybdenum [4], The third peak structure

appears to be located approximately at 5.8 eV. The origin of this fairly high binding

energy peak can be attributed to Mo02 which is reported to have a valence band structure

in this region [5]. Emission from the valence band was found to originate 0.94 eV below

the experimentally determined position of the Fermi level.

Page 155: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

141

The current voltage, I/V curve seen in Figure 6.5 shows relatively steady emission

current ranging from 8.85x10"11 A to 1.59x10"9 A. A Fowler-Nordheim (F-N) plot

obtained simultaneously is illustrated in Figure 6.6.

A FEED spectrum of a tip annealed for 1 hour at an annealing temperature of 800 °C

is presented in Figure 6.7. There is no difference between the FE thresholds of annealed

and non-annealed tips coated at room temperature. The emission from the valence band

was found to originate 0.92 eV below that of the experimentally determined Fermi level,

value which is just 0.02 eV closer to the Fermi level position than that of the non-

annealed M02C tip.

wmmmmmmmmmmmm

mmimam

FIGURE 6.1. SEM micrograph of a bare Mo tip.

Page 156: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

142

FIGURE 6.2. SEM micrograph showing a 5 minute M02C deposition by electrophoresis onto a Mo tip.

Page 157: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

143

FIGURE 6.3. SEM micrograph showing a 10 minute M02C deposition by electrophoresis onto a Mo tip.

Page 158: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

144

1

0.8 a •

£ 0.6 "3 c U) 0.4 50

0.2

0

2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0

Binding Energy (eV)

FIGURE 6.4. FEED spectra of a non-annealed M02C coated Mo tip.

Page 159: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

145

2.00E-09 (ft

| 1.50E-09 <

H 1.00E-09

S 5.00E-10 £

g O.OOE+OO

950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250

ANODE VOLTAGE (Volts)

FIGURE 6.5. I-V curve of non-annealed M02C coated Mo tip.

<

(N

S3 J

-33.5

-34.5

-35.5

-36.5

-37.5

0.000833 0.000883 0.000933 0.000983

1/V ( V - l )

FIGURE 6.6. Fowler-Nordheim (FN) plot of non-annealed M02C coated Mo tip.

Page 160: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

146

*

S3 d FCFL

•PN

cc

2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0

Binding Energy (eV)

FIGURE 6.7. FEED spectra of an annealed M02C coated Mo tip.

Page 161: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

147

M0O3 is known to exist in at least two forms, a transparent form and a blue form.

The blue form, which is developed by either irradiation by UV light or the application of

an electric field, is believed to have a defect band that extends from approximately 0.5 eV

above to 1.8 eV below the Fermi level [6]. Deposition by electrophoresis, as was

discussed previously, and as was done in this study, produced deep blue coloration of the

M02C film, which is indicative of the formation of the blue version of M0O3. This was

then deposited as has been described previously on flat Mo foils and Mo tips.

The Field emission threshold of oxides, in particular, M0O3 can be seen in Figure

6.8. The spectra were obtained with a pass energy of 50 eV and a resolution of 2 eV

which gives a possible error of 0.1 eV. Deconvolution of the structures produces peaks at

1.8,2.1,2.5, 3.9,4.2,4.8, and 7.0 eV respectively. These structures can be attributed to

M0O3, M0O2, M02C and to Mo as it is found in literature and agree with the photoelectric

thresholds determined by UPS of the flat samples discussed in Chapter 4, and with the

oe cs 3 ©

14000 12000 10000

4000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Kinetic Energy (eV)

FIGURE 6.8. FEEDs of Mo2C film showing oxides.

Page 162: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

148

UPS data obtained by using the He I radiation.

6.4. Field Emission results of diamond tips

Averaged FEEDs of coated tips coated with the three different diamond average

particle size are shown as Figures 6.8, 6.9 and 6.10. The tip bias in all three cases was set

to approximately -90 V while the dwell time in obtaining the data was 0.9 s. Two, three

and four scan were used respectively to obtain the spectra of the 0.25 pim, the 3 lira, and

the 6 pim coated tips. The results of the deconvolution of the FEEDs are summarized in

Table 6.1. Two exponentially modified gaussian curves were used to fit the spectra of

the different average particle size diamond films. The results of the deconvolution agree

very well with the photoemission thresholds found by UPS and previously presented in

Table 5.4. It was found that the field emission threshold of the diamond coated tips

decreases as the average diamond particle grain size increases which can be attributed to

the observed increase in the NEA of the diamond films with increasing average diamond

grain size as was previously discussed.

A Fowler-Nordheim [7] plot obtained for the 3 different diamond grain sizes is

shown in Figure 6.11.

Page 163: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

149

S3 08

Tix 0 u

0 1 2 3

Binding Energy (eV)

8

FIGURE 6.9. FEED spectra of the 0.25 microns diamond coated Mo tip.

Page 164: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

150

« 0.6

£ 0.5

£ 0.4

4 5 6

Binding Biergy (eV)

FIGURE 6.10. FEED spectra of the 3 microns diamond coated Mo tip.

Page 165: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

151

3 9t

Xtl S Q

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Binding Energy (eV)

8 9

FIGURE 6.11. FEED spectra of 6 microns diamond coated Mo tip.

Page 166: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

-25.5

< > -26

^ -26.5

-27 <

!« -28

152

• 0.25 microns

o 3 microas

a 6 microns

7.80E-04 8.00B-04 8.20E-04 8.40B04 8.60E-04 8.80E-04

1 / V ( 1 / V )

FIGURE 6.12. Fowler-Nordheim plots for the different average particle diamond tips.

Page 167: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

TABLE 6.1. Position of the states in the FEEDs of the three different average diamond particle grain size.

153

ls l State 2aa State

0.25 microns 3.8 eV 4.7 eV

3 micron 3.5 eV 4.5 eV

6 microns 3.4 eV 4.5 eV

Page 168: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

154

6.5 Discussion and Conclusions

The results obtained from the FEED spectra show that the FE threshold is not

sensitive to annealing. From the FEED spectra the field emission threshold of M02C was

determined as well as the field emission threshold of various Mo oxides. The values

obtained agreed with the values found in the literature. The potential of molybdenum

carbide as a good field emitter material was also confirmed. The M02C current-voltage

curves are smooth and the FE threshold is not affected by the oxygen contaminants.

The FEED results for the diamond coated tip can be explained with a more simple

picture, one in which a clear increase in the NEA of diamond films together with the high

electric fields applied, contribute to an increase in the tunneling probability from the bulk

of the diamond film, as the barrier and lowered vacuum level thin with the increased

field.

From the FEEDs, it can be inferred that the FE threshold and the photoemission

energy threshold decrease as a function of increasing average diamond particle size This

is related to an increase in the NEA of our films and to a high level of impurities and

defects that increase with average diamond particle grain size. It was found that

deposition via electrophoresis is a novel technique for hydrogen terminating diamond

films in order to reduce their work function by making the diamond films develop

enhanced NEA properties has been studied.

Page 169: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

155

References

1. B. R. Chalamala, R.M. Wallace and B.E. Gnade, J. Vac. Sci. & Tech. 16,2859 (1998).

2. A. T. Andrews, Electrophoresis, Theory, Techniques, and Biochemical and Clinical Applications. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986).

3. V. S. Fomenko in Handbook of Thermionic Properties, edited by G. V. Samsonov,

(Plenum, New York, 1966).

4. D. E. Eastman, Phys. Review B. Solid State. 2,1 (1970).

5. F. Werfel, and E. Minni, Phys. C, Solid State Phys., 16, 6091 (1983).

6. W. Rabalais, and R. J. Colton, Chem. Phys. Lett., 29, 131 (1974).

7. R.H. Fowler and L. Nordheim. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 119, 683 (1928).

Page 170: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

CHAPTER 7

CONCLUSIONS

Characterization of M02C and diamond films of three different average grain sizes

deposited by electrophoresis on Mo foils and on Mo tips has been done by XPS, UPS,

SEM and XRD. FEED spectra and Fowler-Nordheim plots for tips coated with Mo2C

and diamond were also obtained and studied in order to assess the potential of these

materials as good field emitters.

XPS characterization of the Mo2C films showed that as the film is annealed as a

function of increasing temperature from deposition at room temperature to 900 °C, the

properties of the film were seen to have three regions. In the first region that ranges from

room temperature to approximately 500 °C, M0O3 is the dominant oxide. In the second

region that ranges from approximately 525 °C to 775 °C, the dominant oxide is Mo02. In

the third region the oxide activity was least and the effect of the Mo2C film was the

greatest ranging from approximately 800 °C to 900 °C, the maximum operational

temperature of this study. In each region, the dominant oxide was found to be stable.

MO2C films were annealed at the constant temperatures of 412 °C, 525 °C and 800

°C for 2 hours, 5 hours and 3 hours respectively in order to test the thermal resiliency of

the films. In each case, and at each annealing temperature, the XPS results indicate that

156

Page 171: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

157

the oxides as well as the M02C film were stable in terms of the oxidation and re-oxidation

shifts which would be seen, if they were present, in core electron binding energy shifts.

XPS was also used in analyzing the diamond films. Initial calculations of the

ratio of the oxygen O Is peak to the diamond C Is peak gave 0.3 indicating a

considerable degree of oxidation of the films. One method to confirm the conducting

nature of the films was to obtain the XPS spectra of the diamond C 1 s peak and to study

its evolution as a function of X-ray source emission current. The films were found to be

conductive.

The photoelectric work function of the M02C films was studied by low energy

UPS. The best suited sample, whose results can be used to learn about the changes in the

photoelectric work function of the M02C films as a function of increasing annealing

temperature was the sample that was annealed as a function of increasing temperature

from room temperature up to approximately 900 °C. Analysis was done with various

incident photon energies and it was found that the photoelectric work function of the

films is stable in each of the three annealing regions. In the case of the sample annealed

as a function of increasing annealing temperature, there is a correlation between the

Cls/Mo3d5/2 ratio and the calculated photoelectric work function. This indicates that the

higher their ratio, the higher the photoelectric work function. The photoelectric work

function calculated for the films studied as a function of constant annealing temperature

also showed stability in terms of the calculated photoelectric work function of the

samples.

Page 172: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

158

Low energy UPS studies were conducted on the diamond samples using 4.88eV

and 4.0 eV incident photon energy. Various diamond surface states predicted

theoretically that can be associated with H substitution in carbon vacancies were found.

This supports the notion of hydrogen termination of the diamond films used in this study.

The hydrogen termination of the diamond (111) plane, and the results of this study

confirm that the diamond samples have NEA.

High Energy UPS data obtained by using He I radiation (21.2 eV) was used to

study the valence band structures of both the Mo2C films and diamond films. It was

found that the valence band, in the case of the Mo2C films, was below the experimentally

determined Fermi level position and that as the samples were annealed to higher

temperatures, and more oxides were remove, emission from the valence band moved

closer to the experimentally determined position of the Fermi level. From the spectra

obtained, estimates of the band gap of Mo03 and its photoelectric thresholds were made.

The photoelectric threshold of Mo2C films were measured. In the case of the diamond

films, the photoemission spectra of the valence band indicated that the Fermi levels were

below the valence band which indicates the presence of defects. The negative electron

affinity (NEA) nature of the diamond films was also confirmed by photoemission in the

form of the characteristic low kinetic energy peak in the photoemission spectra

Photoemission thresholds also were determined for the three diamond films. The results

obtained for the thresholds indicate that the threshold is lowered with increasing average

diamond particle grain size.

Page 173: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

159

SEM characterization was used to mainly study the morphology of he films. In

the case of the M02C films annealed as a function of both constant and increasing

temperatures, was used to determine the temperatures at which there was the greatest film

depletion and to estimate the average particle size of the M02C particles.

In the case of the diamond films, SEM was also used to study the morphology of

the films and to estimate the average particle grain size. The ability to image and obtain

SEM micrographs of the diamond samples also was used to confirm the conductive

nature of the diamond films.

XRD was used to study M02C films in order to determine the crystallographic

orientation and identification of planes as well as to serve as a method for element

identification. Micro stresses and strains developed during deposition were relieved by

annealing. XRD was also used as a second method to determine the concentration level

of different elements in the film. Besides being used to obtain similar information, in the

case of the diamond films, more specifically, XRD was used to show the existence of the

diamond (111) plane that is known to exhibit NEA. The diamond film coverage became

better as the average particle grain size was increased. In addition as the coverage

became better, so did the diamond (111) plane coverage.

FEED spectra of the M02C coated Mo tip was used to determine the field

emission threshold. The FEED spectra of the Mo2C coated tip was found to be 0.9 eV

below the threshold of a bare Mo tip, whose threshold was used to establish the

experimental position of the Fermi level. In terms of binding energy, the threshold of the

M02C coated Mo tip was found to be 3.8 ± 0.1 eV. The value of the field emission

Page 174: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

160

threshold was found to be independent of annealing. Field emission thresholds of various

Mo oxides were also determined from a non-annealed tip.

Field emission thresholds were also determined for the diamond coated Mo tips.

Calculations of these thresholds yielded values of 3.8 eV for the 0.25 micron size

diamond coated Mo tip, 3.5 eV for the 3 micron size diamond coated Mo tip and 3.4 eV

for the 6 micron size diamond coated Mo tip. The results of the field emission thresholds

agree well, within experimental error with the thresholds calculated by photoemission for

the same films.

Considering a broader picture in terms of the expectations and current needs that

industry has for effective field emitters, maybe a future project to undertake, after

characterization of both the M02C films and the diamond films, and their successful

deposition onto Mo tips and initial FEED results, would be to try to determine the

stability and resiliency of the coated tips in gaseous environments, in order to study the

possible degradation of the emission qualities of tips made of these materials.

Page 175: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Andrews, A. T. Electrophoresis, Theory, Techniques, and Biochemical and Clinical Applications. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986).

Bandis, C., and Pate, B. B., Phys. Rev. B, 52, 12056 (1995).

Bauer, E., and Poppa, H., Surf. Sci. 88, 31 (1979).

Bauccio, M., editor, Engineering Materials Reference Book, 2nd Edition. (ASM, International, Materials Park, OH 44073-0002,1994).

Binh, V. T., Garcia, N., and Purcell, S. T., Electron Field Emission from Atom-Sources: Fabrication, Properties, and Applications of nanotips., Advances in Imaging and electron Physics, 95,69 (1996).

Bloor, D., Brook, R. J., Flemmings, M. C., and Mahajai, S., editors, The Encyclopedia of Advanced Materials, (Elsevier Science Inc., 660 white Plains Road, Tarrytown, New York 10591-5153, U.S.A, 1994).

Brainard, W. A., and Wheeler, D. R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 15, 1800 (1978).

Brundle, C. R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 11,212 (1974).

Brundle, C. R., Surf. Sci. 48, pp. 99 (1975).

Chalamala, B. R., Wallace, R. M., and Gnade, B. E., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 16, 2859 (1998).

Choi, W. B., Schlesser, R., Wojak, G., Cuomo, J. J., Sitar, Z., and Hren, J. J., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B 16,716(1998).

Delporte, P., Meunier, F., Pham-Huu, C., Vennegues, P., Ledoux, M. J., and Guille, J., Catal. Today, 23,251 (1995).

Eastman, D. E., Phys. Rev. B, 2,1 (1970).

Encyclopedia of Applied Physics, 5,2 (VCH publishers, Inc. 1993).

161

Page 176: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

162

Feuerbacher, B., Fitton, B., and Willis, R. F., editors, Photoemission and Electronic Properties of Surfaces, (John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., New York, 1978).

Fomenko, V. S., Handbook of Thermionic Properties (Plenum, New York, 1966).

Fowler, R. H., and Nordheim, L. W., Proc. Roy. Soc. A 119,173 (1928).

Geis, W., Efremov, N. N., Krohn, K. E., Twichell, J. C., Lyszczarz, T. M., Kalish, R., Greer, A., and Tabat, M. D., Nature, 393,431 (1998).

Geis, M. W., Twichell, J. C., Macaulay, J., and Okano, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1328 (1995).

Goldstein, J. I., and Yakowitz, H., editors, Practical Scanning Electron Microscopy. Electron and Ion Microprobe Analysis. (Plenum Press, New York A division of Plenum Publishing Co. 227 West 17th Street, New York, N. Y. 10011,1976)

Gomer, R., Field emission and Field Ionization, (Harvard Univ. Press. Cambridge, MA. 1961).

Guinier, A., and Dexter, D. L., X- Ray Studies of Materials, (Interscience Publishers, a division of John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1963).

Gunion, R. F., Dixon-Warren, S. J., and Lineberger, W. C., J. Chem. Phys. 104, 1765 (1996).

Himpsel, F. J., Knapp, J. A., Van Vechten, J. A., and Eastman, D. E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 624 (1979).

Ibach, H., editor, Electron Spectroscopy for Surface Analysis vol. 4. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977).

International Centre for Diffraction Data, 12 Campus Blvd., Newtown Square, PA 19073-3273.

Kaelble, E. F., editor, Handbook of X-Rays For Diffraction, Emission, Absorption and Microscopy. (McGraw Hill Book Inc., 1967).

Kim, K. S., Baitinger, W. E., Amy, J. W., and Winograd, N., J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 5, 351 (1974).

Ley, L., Pollak, R. A., McFeely, F. R., Kowalczyk, S. P., and Shirley, D. A., Phys. Rev. B, 9, 600 (1974).

Page 177: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

163

Lisowski, W., J. van den Berg, A. H. J., Hanekamp, I, J., and Van Silfhout, A., Surf. Interface Anal. 19, 93 (1992).

Miskovsky, N. M., Cutler, P. H., and Huang, Z. H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 14, 2037 (1996).

Ochoa, R., Bi, X. X., Rao, A. M., and Eklund, P. C., in The Chemistry of transitional Metal Carbides and Nitrides, edited by S. T. Oyama, (Chapman and Hall, 1996)

Okuyama, F., Surf. Sci. 43,293 (1974).

Peakfit, SPSS, Inc., 444 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611.

Pohl, H. A., J. Appl. Phys. 22, 869 (1951).

Rabalais, J. W., and Colton, R. J., Chem. Phys. Lett. 29,131 (1974).

Reed, S. J. B., Electron Microprobe Analysis and Scanning Electron Microscopy in Geology. (Cambridge University Press, 1996).

Rutkov, E. V., Tontegode, A. Ya., Usufov, M. M., and Gall, N. R., Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys, 37,1038(1992).

Siegbahn, K., et al., Nova Acta Roy. Soc. Sci. Upsala, 20 (1967).

Solymosi, F., Cserenyi, J., Szoke, A., Bansagi, T., and Oszko, A., J. Catal. 165,150 (1997).

Spevack, P. A., and Mclntyre, N. S., J. Phys. Chem. 96, 9029 (1992)

Spindt, C. A., J. Appl. Phys. 39, 3504, (1968).

Sugino, T., and Shirafuji, J., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 154, 371 (1996).

Thornton, P. R., Scanning Electron Microscopy. Applications to materials and Devices Science. (Chapman and Hall Ltd., 11 New Fetter Lane, London E. C 4, 1968).

Van der Weide, J., and Nemanich, R. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 1878 (1993).

Van der Weide, J., and Nemanich, R. J., Phys. Rev. B, 49, 13629 (1993).

Wagner, C. D., Riggs, W. M., Davis, L. E., Moulder, J. F., and Muilenberg, G. E., editor, Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, (Perkin-Elmer Co., 1979).

Page 178: CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD EMISSION PROPERTIES OF …/67531/metadc...Rouse, Ambrosio Antonio, Characterization and field emission properties of MO2C and diamond thin films deposited

164

Wang, C., Garcia, A., Ingram, D. C., Lake, M., and Kordesh, M. E., Electron. Lett. 27, 1459(1991).

Wang, D., Lunsford, J. H., and Rosynek, M. P., J. Catal. 169, 347 (1997).

Wang, J., Castonguay, M., Deng, J., and McBreen, P. H., Surf. Sci. 374, 197 (1997).

Wang, J., Castonguay, M., McBreen, P. H., Ramanathan, S., and Oyama, S. T., in The Chemistry of transitional Metal Carbides and Nitrides, edited by S. T. Oyama, (Chapman and Hall, 1996).

Werfel, F., and Minni, E., Phys. C, Solid State Phys. 16,6091 (1983).

XRD Diffractometer Control and Data Acquisition System 3.1,1995-1997, by Materials Data Inc., 1224 Concannon Blvd., Livermore, CA 94551-0791.

XRD Pattern Processing for the PC, 1991-1997, by Materials Data, Inc. 1224 Concannon Blvd., Livermore, CA 94551-0791.

Xu, N. S., Tzeng, Y., and Latham, R. V., Appl. Phys. 26, 1776 (1993).

Zaera, F., Kollin, E., and Gland, J. L., Chem. Phys. Lett. 121,464 (1985).

Zhang, C., Van Hove, M. A., and Somorjau, G. A., Surf. Sci. 149, 326 (1985).