CANAPPLYING!NEW!BUSINESSMODELSFUELTHEGROWTH!OF …w2l.dk › file › 552161 ›...
Transcript of CANAPPLYING!NEW!BUSINESSMODELSFUELTHEGROWTH!OF …w2l.dk › file › 552161 ›...
CAN APPLYING NEW BUSINESS MODELS FUEL THE GROWTH OF DANISH SMALL AND MEDIUM-‐SIZED COMPANIES IN THE FASHION INDUSTRY?
Kathrine Weicker
Student number: 2521568
December 2013
Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of
MSc in International Business
London South Bank University, Faculty of Business, Computing and Information
Management
Kathrine Weicker Page 2 of 147
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 5
1. TITLE ................................................................................................................................ 7
2. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 7
2.1 Focus of this report ................................................................................................................................... 10
3. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE .......................................................................................... 12
3.1 General environment ................................................................................................................................ 13
3.2 Situation analysis; SWOT .......................................................................................................................... 13
3.3 Business model development ................................................................................................................... 15
3.4 Value chain ............................................................................................................................................... 18
3.5 Consultancy work; insider knowledge and understanding of the fashion industry .................................... 20
4. RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................ 21
4.1 Main research question ............................................................................................................................ 22
4.2 Partial research questions ......................................................................................................................... 22
4.3 Research objectives .................................................................................................................................. 23
5. RESEARCH PLAN ............................................................................................................. 24
5.1 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................ 24
5.2 Research approach and perspective .......................................................................................................... 25
5.3 Research design ........................................................................................................................................ 27
5.4 Data collection .......................................................................................................................................... 30
5.4.1 Primary research ................................................................................................................................... 31
5.4.2 Secondary research ................................................................................................................................ 34
5.5 Limitations of focus .................................................................................................................................. 35
5.6 Validity, reliability and generalisability ..................................................................................................... 37
6. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................................. 38
Kathrine Weicker Page 3 of 147
7. THE FASHION INDUSTRY ................................................................................................ 40
7.1 The European fashion industry ................................................................................................................. 40
7.2 The Danish fashion industry ...................................................................................................................... 41 7.2.1 Industry performance ............................................................................................................................... 41 7.2.2 Industry structure ...................................................................................................................................... 43 7.2.3 Segments in the Danish fashion industry .................................................................................................. 44
8. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE SMES IN THE DANISH FASHION INDUSTRY ......... 45
8.1 Strengths .................................................................................................................................................. 46 8.1.1 An increase in attention ............................................................................................................................ 46 8.1.2 Outsourcing ............................................................................................................................................... 47 8.1.3 Creativity ................................................................................................................................................... 47 8.1.4 Price ........................................................................................................................................................... 47 8.1.5 Multi-‐channel operations .......................................................................................................................... 47
8.2 Weaknesses .............................................................................................................................................. 48 8.2.1 Funding gap ............................................................................................................................................... 48 8.2.2 Lack of business mind-‐set and company size ............................................................................................ 49 8.2.3 Relationship with manufacturers .............................................................................................................. 49 8.2.4 Vertical integration .................................................................................................................................... 49 8.2.5 Dependence on third party suppliers and manufacturers ........................................................................ 49
8.3 Opportunities ........................................................................................................................................... 50 8.3.1 International expansion ............................................................................................................................ 50 8.3.2 Growing importance of online sales .......................................................................................................... 51 8.3.3 Focus on sustainability .............................................................................................................................. 51
8.4 Threats ..................................................................................................................................................... 52 8.4.1 Excessive exposure to the European consumer ........................................................................................ 52 8.4.2 Fast changing fashion trends and product innovation .............................................................................. 52 8.4.3 Intense competition .................................................................................................................................. 52 8.4.4 International recognition .......................................................................................................................... 53
9. GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................... 53
9.1 Growth and development possibilities ...................................................................................................... 53
9.2 Barriers to growth and development ........................................................................................................ 56 9.2.1 Investor relationships ................................................................................................................................ 56 9.2.2 Manufacturer relationships ....................................................................................................................... 57 9.2.3 Retailer relationships ................................................................................................................................ 57 9.2.4 Intermediary relationships ........................................................................................................................ 58
10. THE FASHION INDUSTRY AND BUSINESS MODEL DEVELOPMENT .................................. 60
10.1 What is business model development? ................................................................................................... 60
10.2 The business model in Danish fashion companies ................................................................................... 65
10.3 Innovation in SMEs in the Danish fashion industry .................................................................................. 67
Kathrine Weicker Page 4 of 147
11. PRIMARY RESEARCH OF THE FASHION INDUSTRY VALUE CHAIN ................................... 71
11.1 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) ...................................................................................................... 74 11.1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 74 11.1.2 The Development of CSR in the Danish fashion industry ........................................................................ 78 11.1.3 CSR today in the Danish fashion industry ................................................................................................ 81
11.2 Production .............................................................................................................................................. 84 11.2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 84 11.2.2 The outsourcing of Danish fashion production ....................................................................................... 86 11.2.3 The outsourcing of production today ...................................................................................................... 88 11.2.4 Sourcing of producers ............................................................................................................................. 91 11.2.5 Fashion production in Serbia ................................................................................................................... 93
11.3 Online sales ............................................................................................................................................ 95 11.3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 95 11.3.2 The Development of online sales in the Danish fashion industry ........................................................... 97 11.3.3 Online sales today in the Danish fashion industry ................................................................................ 100
12. RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. 105
12.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 105
12.2 Customer-‐driven business model development .................................................................................... 108
12.3 Offer-‐driven business model development ........................................................................................... 110
12.4 Resource-‐driven business model development ..................................................................................... 111
12.5 Finance-‐driven business model development ....................................................................................... 114
13. CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................. 115
REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... 120
APPENDICES .................................................................................................................... 128
Appendix A – List of Conferences, Seminars and Master Classes ................................................................... 128
Appendix B – List of Programmes and Projects ............................................................................................. 130
Appendix C – CSR: Interview/ 14th August 2013/ Pia Odgaard/ Dansk Fashion & Textil ................................ 132
Appendix D – Production: Serbian fashion and textile producers/ Spring 2012 ............................................. 135
Appendix E – Production: SWOT analysis from interviews of twelve fashion producers, Serbia, 2012 ........... 137
Appendix F – Production: Interviews/ Nis in Serbia 2nd – 5th April 2012/ Representatives of the fashion and textile manufacturing industry in Serbia ....................................................................................................... 142
Appendix G – Online Sales: Interview/ 10th September 2013/ Rina Hansen/ Head of Digital at Hummel and strategic advisor for fashion companies ....................................................................................................... 145
Kathrine Weicker Page 5 of 147
Executive Summary The Danish fashion industry is one of the most vibrant and creative business sectors in Denmark today, but the economic crisis of recent years has slowed down consumer spending, and made it more difficult to run a successful fashion company. The Danish SMEs in the fashion industry need to adapt to the new situation following the financial crisis, and as a result must adjust the way that they are doing business as well as evaluate the set-‐up of the industry.
The basis and ideas for this report emerged from my interest in business development in creative industries and more specifically how SMEs in the fashion industry can use new business models as a way to grow and develop their businesses. This interest was raised through my consulting work to Danish fashion companies over a number of years, noticing how the focus and creativity was mainly on the development of new products and marketing initiatives and rarely on the overall development of the business. The creativity and innovative skills in the SMEs was not being put to use in the development of new business models.
This report investigates whether applying new business models can fuel the growth of the Danish SMEs in the Danish fashion industry. More precisely, the purpose is to critically identify the strengths and weaknesses of the SMEs in the Danish fashion industry, describe the current state of the industry and determine if strategically re-‐thinking areas in the industry value chain is the way to future growth and development.
This report takes into use the theories and ideas behind business models development and one theory in particular, Alexander Osterwalder’s Business Model Generation. Compared to other industries, little research has been done on the Danish fashion industry, and the focus has been on the more “sexy” aspects of the business, the branding and marketing, of the company. However, in order to create a fully successful and profitable fashion company, the company also has to look at and master other aspects of the business, and in
Kathrine Weicker Page 6 of 147
particular, at other aspects of the value chain. Therefore, this report evaluates new and competitive business models for the Danish fashion industry, and concentrates on how the business models can be applied to three areas of the value chain: Product Development, with the focus on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Production, with the focus on sourcing, and finally Sales, with the focus primarily on online sales.
Also much of the research done on the fashion industry is done in a case-‐study manner, whereas this research is looking at the industry as a whole from the viewpoint of the common situation for SMEs in the industry and not by looking at a few individual fashion companies. The report is from an industry perspective and the research sample consists of the SMEs in the Danish fashion industry, and the logic behind such a selection is that the Danish fashion industry is made up of mainly SMEs, where the challenges and needs are more or less the same across the industry. The industry and business experts that were interviewed were chosen because of their knowledge and expertise and to give the report viewpoints and recommendations from many different angles and perspectives. An action research methodology is applied to this research because it is particularly appropriate for systematically improving organizations in an industry, bringing about practical transformation and advancing knowledge.
Finally, several business models focusing on the customer, the offer, resources and finance business model development were recommended, and the findings lead to the conclusion that by applying new business models, new opportunities for growth and development can be found, and companies can gain a competitive advantage over their competitors.
Kathrine Weicker Page 7 of 147
1. Title
CAN APPLYING NEW BUSINESS MODELS FUEL THE GROWTH OF DANISH SMALL AND MEDIUM-‐SIZED COMPANIES IN THE FASHION INDUSTRY?
“How can Danish Small and Medium-‐sized enterprises in the fashion industry
use new business models as a strategy to grow and develop their businesses?”
I will answer this question in the framework of aspects of the value chain, and I
will focus on three areas: product development, production and sales.
2. Background
In recent years, creative businesses have been growing and they are now
responsible for a higher percentage of the global economy than previously.
Denmark has an excellent starting point from which to generate growth in the
area of creative businesses, but there are also a number of challenges that must
be addressed. The competition is fierce and in order to compete in international
markets, a greater number of creative enterprises must enter a sound growth
process, exploit their potential and increase their size.
Around 85,000 people are employed in the creative industry in Denmark, and
creative businesses account for 6% of the total number of enterprises.
Moreover, they are responsible for just over 7% of Denmark’s total exports and
create value worth DKK 49.1 billion, equivalent to EUR 6.5 billion, annually. The
fashion industry has the highest turnover of any of Denmark’s creative business
Kathrine Weicker Page 8 of 147
areas and increased its turnover from DKK 35 billion to DKK 45 billion from 2001
to 2009 (Regeringen, 2013).
Figure 2.1 Size of Creative Enterprises in Denmark
The creative industries and therefore also the fashion industry has received
much political attention, and just recently, in February 2013, the Danish
Government released a growth plan for creative businesses and design. In the
press release The Minister for Business and Growth Annette Vilhelmsen stated
that “The creative industry has a huge growth potential, but many of the smaller
companies have challenges when it comes to business development…”
(Regeringen, 2013).
The growth plan states that Denmark should be an international growth centre
for creative business, among these the fashion industry, and for that to happen
there is a need to enhance the business competencies of the Small and
Medium-‐sized Enterprises (SMEs).
Creative Business
is 6%
Other Business
es 94%
Creative Enterprises Denmark
Creative Industry, € 6,50
€ 86,36
Export Value Billion Euro
Kathrine Weicker Page 9 of 147
The economic crisis of recent years has slowed down consumer spending, and
made it more difficult to run a successful fashion company. The Danish SMEs in
the fashion industry have to adapt to the new situation following the financial
crisis, and as a result have to adjust the way that they are doing business as well
as evaluate the set-‐up of the industry. It is also important to keep in mind that
the fashion industry is in a constant change. Trends and what is hot and not are
dynamic, and therefore the business models in the industry also have to develop
and adapt.
The focus in this report is on SMEs since the Danish fashion industry is made up
of many SMEs and a few selected large companies. Moreover, small companies
fuel much of the economic growth and they can make a significant contribution
to the economy by simply hiring one or two employees.
Finally, I have been a management consultant for creative businesses, and
mainly for fashion companies, for more than 10 years. I am currently working
for Væksthus, the Regional Business Development Center for Greater
Copenhagen, where we provide consulting for start-‐ups and SMEs with solid
foundations, established potential and clear ambitions to grow. The target
group for Væksthuset Greater Copenhagen is start-‐ups and SMEs, who wish to
enter new markets, develop new products and increase profits.
Through my work at the Væksthus, Greater Copenhagen, www.vhhr.dk I have
been in contact with many hundreds of SMEs in the fashion industry, and have
excellent knowledge of their challenges and growth potential. I help companies
with their business development, prioritising initiatives and organising and
structuring their business, and I have great admiration and a sound
Kathrine Weicker Page 10 of 147
understanding of owners of fashion companies and the industry that they work
in.
2.1 Focus of this report
Many fashion companies focus heavily on the branding and marketing aspects
of the business. I am of course fully aware of the need for all fashion companies
to create their own unique universe and special DNA of the fashion brand to try
to differentiate the brand from their competitors, and I daily help fashion
companies with their value proposition and mission statements. However, I aim
to show through this report that, while branding and the use of the marketing
toolbox are important, they are not the only ways for a fashion company to
excel and be unique. By applying new business models, new opportunities for
growth can be found, and companies can gain a competitive advantage over
their competitors.
Compared to other industries, little research has been done on the Danish
fashion industry, and here the focus is again on the more “sexy” aspects of the
business, the branding and marketing, of the company. However, in order to
create a fully successful and profitable fashion company, you also have to look
at and master other aspects of the business, and in particular, at other aspects
of the value chain. Therefore, this report will evaluate new and competitive
business models for the Danish fashion industry, and concentrate on how the
business models can be applied to three areas of the value chain: Product
Development, with the focus on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR),
Production, with the focus on sourcing, and finally Sales, with the focus on
online sales.
Kathrine Weicker Page 11 of 147
The framework on which this report is built follows the structure of a strategy
process for the Danish fashion industry. See figure 2.2 for a conceptual
framework of the report.
Figure 2.2 Conceptual framework of report is built on the structure of a strategy process,
with the focus on three areas of the value chain
• Chapter 7/ The Fashion Industry External analysis
• Chapter 8/ Strengths and Weaknesses of SMEs in the Danish Fashion Industry Situational Analysis
• Chapter 9/ Growth and Development Goals and Objectives
• Chapter 10/ The Fashion Industry and Business Model Development Strategy Formulation
• Chapter 11/ Primary Research of the Fashion Industry Value Chain
Strategic Choices and Competitive Advantage
• Chapter 12/ Recomendations Implementation
Focus of Report on three areas of Value Chain
Product Development, with the focus on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Production, with the focus on sourcing
Sales, with the focus on online sales
Kathrine Weicker Page 12 of 147
3. Review of the literature
This report makes use of a variety of theoretical contributions related to the
Danish fashion industry: strategy, business model development and value chain
design. The theoretical foundation of the report is built on academic articles,
newspaper articles, books and reports, and these sources strongly contribute to
finding an answer to the research question and making future
recommendations.
The business model of a company must be managed and developed over time,
since managers and people on the inside and customers and competitors on the
outside continue to evolve. Resources must be acquired, activated, and
organised in a way that improves the cost and quality of a company’s offering in
relation to customer preferences and competitors.
It is essential to understand this strategic process – for an individual company
but also for the Danish fashion industry as a whole, if we want to understand
the factors of success and failure. The framework of the literature review is
presented according to where the sources are most relevant to understanding
the strategy process for the Danish fashion industry. The sources have been
described according to Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1 Sources as applied to the strategy process for Danish fashion industry
3.1 General Environment
3.2 Situation Analysis; SWOT
3.3 Business Model
Development
3.4 Value Chain
3.5 Consultancy Work; Insider Knowledge
Kathrine Weicker Page 13 of 147
3.1 General environment
The creative industries and therefore also the fashion industry has received
much political attention and just recently two significant and powerful strategy
plans for the industry have been launched (Regeringen, 2013) (European
Commission, 2012). The relevance and importance of the industry to the
economy was highlighted and as a basis and launch pad for this report it is
important to point out, that at the European level as well as specifically for
Denmark, one of the main points in the plan for achieving growth and
development for the industry is a focus on business model development.
This mentioned political attention and relevance for the economy has made the
literature on the current situation of the industry, and the facing challenges and
needs of creative industries in Denmark, plentiful and up-‐to-‐date. As examples
of reports used in the analysis of the environment are reports by Center for
Cultural and Experience Economy (CKO, 2011) (CKO, 2011/12) (CKO 2012),
together with several reports specifically on the Danish fashion industry from
the trade organizations (Dansk Fashion & Textile, 2013) and also consulting
firms (Deloitte, 2013). The downside to the added attention is that the fashion
industry has been mentioned in numerous articles, books and magazines, but
unfortunately in many cases the focus is not always on the business aspects and
at an academic level, but more on the hype and glamour of the industry, and is
often of a more emotional nature.
3.2 Situation analysis; SWOT
Much of the research done on the Danish fashion industry is case-‐based
focusing on one or more companies in the industry, and the SWOT analysis is
Kathrine Weicker Page 14 of 147
typically on the individual companies. The SWOT analysis is used here to identify
the internal resources and capabilities, together with the downfalls and
vulnerabilities, of the fashion industry as a whole. Instead of using it to compare
the companies of the Danish fashion industry to one another, in order to find
similarities and differences, resulting in formulating the future strategy of the
individual companies, the analysis in this report will provide a broad
characteristic of the companies in the industry as a whole.
The SWOT analysis, meaning the analysis of „key‟ or „critical‟ success factors,
belongs to the highest ranked set of techniques of strategic analysis used by
companies in empirical surveys (Glaister and Falshaw, 1999). Generally a SWOT
analysis is a list of statements or factors with descriptions of the present and
future trend of both the internal and external environment; the expressions of
individual factors are general and brief which describes subjective views, and
the analysis can determine a perfect foundation for successful strategy
formulation. The SWOT is pervasive, in large part, due to its simplicity, and for
this report it is a particularly good choice of methodology since the use has
proven developmental, and it is a results-‐oriented strategic planning tool, which
is well in line with the philosophy and thought behind this report.
However, the SWOT analysis has weakness in the measurement and evaluation
steps, as planning processes are often complicated and difficult by numerous
criteria and interdependencies. It may be that utilization of SWOT is insufficient
to assess the appropriateness of decision alternatives based on these factors.
Therefore, the SWOT analysis alone cannot comprehensively assess the strategic
decision-‐making process.
Kathrine Weicker Page 15 of 147
3.3 Business model development
The business model concept can contribute to the analysis of the business logic
of a company, and a business model outlines the essential details of a
company’s value proposition to its stakeholders. The business model clarifies
the system the company uses to create and deliver this value to them. Even
though a certain amount of effort has been devoted to the subject of business
models over the past twenty years, there is often a lack of a more precise and
shared understanding of what a business model is. One explanation why the
theory on business models is rather clouded is that a business model consists of
many different elements and can take many shapes and sizes. Within business
research, the concept is used sparsely, even if strategy research covers many if
not all of the theoretical components that are included in the business model
concept (Hedman and Kalling, 2003). In this report I examine many different
approaches to defining a business model in search of a common ground within
the subject (Chatterjee, 2013) (Lindgren, 2012) (Chesbrough, 2006) (Zott, 2005),
and in order to close in further on a commonly accepted definition, I have
reviewed the findings of a large study of many different business model types
(Osterwalder et al, 2005).
The business model literature provides the reader with the corner stones and
cement of which a business is constructed, and though business model
literature has its merits, little has been written on how to practically apply the
literature available. It also lacks the focus on the business model further
evolution and innovations. This report will attempt to provide a practical case in
point of how to put business model theory to use to illustrate potential future
trends and business model innovations in the fashion industry.
Kathrine Weicker Page 16 of 147
This report takes into use the theories and ideas behind business models
development and one theory in particular, Alexander Osterwalder’s Business
Model Generation (Osterwalder, 2010). Osterwalder focuses on the subject of
value creation, that is, it depicts the ways in which a company’s business model
creates value in its particular business, a subject that was neglected by previous
business model studies. This particular model was chosen because of its focus
on visual business design and expression together with practical approach, as I
have learned that creative people are visual people. People with different
cognitive approaches, belief systems and values, want concise, practical and
implementable solutions and recommendations. By using conceptualization to
capture business models, they can process graphical information through the
visual system, and this can substantially increases the degree to which
complexity can be handled successfully (Osterwalder et al, 2005).
Business model innovation has been considered a key determinant in business
growth in the fashion industry (Regeringen, 2013), and by understanding the
business model concept, assessing lessons from previous ventures, and taking
an in-‐depth look at the selected industry, one can make judgments about the
future trends and potential business model innovations. Therefore by focusing
on one particular industry, here the Danish fashion industry, more resources can
be devoted to exploring the industry specific business models and, as a result,
lead to more accurate analyses and more relevant findings and
recommendations.
One of the shortcomings in business model literature is that the different
authors rarely build on each other. Consequently, business model research as a
whole advances more slowly than it could and often stays at a superficial level.
Moreover, there is a valid scepticism as to what extent a company’s success can
Kathrine Weicker Page 17 of 147
be predetermined or even explained using the business model theory. Certainly,
business models are frameworks, and as such a simplified abstraction of reality.
That is, far from all factors that determine a company’s success or failure can be
depicted by means of business model studies (Berzina and Bommel, 2009).
Michael Porter has discussed the implications of business model theory, and
criticized both its functionality as its originality. Responding to the business
model literature, Porter finds it unclear, superficial and not theoretically
grounded, and has stated that having a business model is an exceedingly low bar
to set for building a company, and “a far cry” from creating economic value. His
conception of a business model, as found in the literature, is “a loose concept of
how a company does business and generates value”. According to Porter (2001),
a business model can be defined as an abstract representation of some aspects
of a company’s strategy.
Taking Porter’s criticism into account that there are limitations to insight when
solely analysing a company’s business model, this report takes the view that the
business model can provide a source of business success factors when additional
aspects, such as the business environment and the industry are considered. By
clarifying an industry’s business model and comparing it with other business
models across industries, the possibility to restructure business processes, or
identify business possibilities that had previously gone unnoticed, is created.
Finally, it is also important to point out that the focus of much of the research
done is on larger companies, multinational corporations, and one of the aims of
this report is to downsize the focus so that it fits the world of SMEs. The
research in other reports often takes theories from industries such as the airline
or automobile industry, and forces these methodologies to conform to the
Kathrine Weicker Page 18 of 147
Danish fashion industry. Although the research done is both interesting and
thought provoking, I want with this report to have a more practical focus, a
more hands-‐on approach, and provide the companies in the industry with a
sense of common ground, which is easy to relate to their everyday work. This
practical hands-‐on focus comes with insider knowledge and understanding.
3.4 Value chain
In linking other strategic tools and methodologies to the internal and external
analysis, an attempt is made to overcome the drawbacks and limitations of the
SWOT analysis, and in this report Michael Porter’s value chain is used to analyse
and assess whether the Danish fashion industry’s resources and capabilities are
utilised in the best possible way, taking the analysis to the next step of the
strategic management process. Therefore, in order to propose
recommendations for the future strategy for the SMEs in the industry, the value
chain analysis will provide the broad characteristic elements of the companies in
the industry, and therefore fits very well with the scope of this report,
establishing the uniqueness and the competitive advantage of the industry.
The value chain is divided into two types of activities; primary activities and
support activities. Primary activities are involved in the physical creation of the
products, sales, logistics as well as post-‐sale assistance. The value chain, which
focuses on the activities and functions of the company, highlights the underlying
factors that drive cost and differentiation advantages. Thorough control and
grouping of activities enable firms to utilise cost and differentiation potentials
through the reaping of scale advantages or the creation of innovative forums
(Porter, 2001). Previous research concludes that for the Danish fashion industry
Kathrine Weicker Page 19 of 147
operations, outbound logistics and marketing and sales are the most important
activities. Service is less important, because product and inbound logistics are
primarily a matter for the manufacturers (Kure, 2011). And although this was
true and to some extent still is the case, this report takes a revised look at the
supply chain and brings the value adding activities up-‐to-‐date.
The value chain is highly applicable to all manufacturing companies, such as the
Danish fashion companies. Since the entire manufacturing process is generally
outsourced, together with the fact that in most cases the whole production and
further distribution is inflexible due to the fact that the collections are made to
order, the operations activity provides an enormous challenge. Despite the fact
that this activity is of utmost importance, some research does not actually
consider it a part of the Danish fashion companies, since the production is
outsourced (Kure, 2011). I do not share this point of view, and the many years I
have spent consulting to the fashion industry have only confirmed that it is
indeed an integral part of the industry, an area where the company can gain a
significant competitive advantage. Indeed, one of the reasons why production
was chosen as one of the main focus points with regards to the value chain
perspective, is that I want to shed some light on production as a potential
strength. A further related reason is that SMEs tend to focus mainly on the
design aspect of the continuous product launches, and little thought is given to
the actually manufacturing, especially in the beginning of the life cycle of a
company
The theories on business model innovation and also value chain strategies
specific for the creative industries and the fashion industry is examined, and
since much of the research done on the Danish fashion industry is on the
marketing and branding perspective, this report focuses on other parts of the
Kathrine Weicker Page 20 of 147
industry’s value chain, and uses research projects and programmes like
(Negarandeh, 2008) (Tran, 2010) (Hvass, 2012) as a point of departure.
Given the challenges and complexities in the fashion industry, a theoretical
perspective has been adopted to suggest improvements, and consideration is
given to the appropriateness of current strategies to cope with growth and
development and business models (Jensen and Poulsen, 2012).
3.5 Consultancy work; insider knowledge and understanding of the
fashion industry
I have a thorough understanding of the mechanisms driving the industry, and
have over the years gained a valuable foundation for writing this report.
Presentations and discussions from seminars, together with conferences,
workshops and master classes that I have attended, arranged by different
organizations, such as Dansk Fashion & Textile and Danish Fashion Institute are
used to support the interviews, along with scientific reports about the Danish
fashion industry and the theories used in the analyses. This data makes the
empirical research more nuanced because my experience provides more details
to the picture, making the findings more reliable. This data also represents
knowledge I have gathered through interaction with the Danish fashion industry
over many years. However, the knowledge is considered as supporting
documentation of my findings, since it is not the main source for arguments of
the report, but rather arguments that confirm what is written.
Examples of relevant seminars, conferences, workshops and master classes that
I have attended are listed in appendix A.
Kathrine Weicker Page 21 of 147
I have also been involved, in project management and steering committees, on
several projects for the fashion industry and a description of some of the
projects are listed in appendix B.
I have also attended a focus group with companies in the creative industries,
focusing on their challenges and needs for further growth and development,
organised by Center for Cultural and Experience Economy (CKO) and Epinion, in
December 2011.
Finally, I am on an industry expert group working with Copenhagen Business
School (CBS) on a project to look at previous initiatives regarding
entrepreneurship, innovation and growth for the Danish fashion industry, and
from the knowledge and experience gained, the group aims to develop new
initiatives that can support the industry in its further development. The involved
professors at CBS are Lise Skov, Associate Professor of Creative Industries, and
Fabian Faurholt Csaba, Department of Intercultural Communication and
Management.
4. Research Questions and Objectives
The Danish fashion industry is under tremendous pressure as international
competition is fierce. Information and communication technologies are making
customers very knowledgeable and savvy, and the world economy is still
struggling to recover after the eruption of the financial crisis in 2008.
As a way of responding to emerging and changing customer needs and pressing
environmental concerns, business model innovation and development can
Kathrine Weicker Page 22 of 147
systematically invent, design and implement powerful new game-‐changing
methods, new competitive business models.
4.1 Main research question
The main research question is therefore:
How can Danish Small and Medium-‐sized enterprises in the fashion industry use
new business models as a strategy to grow and develop their businesses?
4.2 Partial research questions
Answering the main question involves answering these partial research
questions:
1. What is the current state of the Danish fashion industry in terms of growth
and development?
2. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the SMEs in the Danish fashion
industry (that influence the ability of the industry to grow and develop)?
3. What is business model development?
4. What factors in the value chain can assist Danish SMEs in the fashion industry
in their quest for growth and development?
5. What recommendations can be made to Danish fashion SMEs regarding new
methods and ideas to run their businesses successfully and profitably?
Kathrine Weicker Page 23 of 147
4.3 Research objectives
This again involves these specific research objectives:
1. To consider the factors that influence the growth and development situation
in the Danish fashion industry
This involves the objective of growth and development for the SMEs in the
Danish fashion industry by looking at the current situation and status of the
industry.
2. To critically identify the strengths and weaknesses of the SMEs in the Danish
fashion industry
This is done in the form of a strategic analysis, defining the factors that will have
an impact on the objective of the fashion industry.
3. To selectively appraise the overall aspects of business model development
This involves looking at the nature of business model development and how it is
adapted in the Danish fashion industry today.
4. To determine if strategically re-‐thinking factors like Product Development,
Production and Sales are a way to future growth and development for SMEs in
the Danish fashion industry
This involves looking at business model development and the value chain as it
provides the opportunity to change the way of doing business by re-‐considering
and re-‐establishing the position in the value chain and translating this into
business model development in the Danish fashion industry.
Kathrine Weicker Page 24 of 147
5. To decide on new possible business models for the SMEs in the Danish
fashion industry
Various recommendations are made to future business models for the Danish
fashion industry.
5. Research Plan
The phases of the research plan will be addressed as follows:
-‐ Methodology
-‐ Research approach and perspective
-‐ Research design
-‐ Data collection
-‐ Limitations of focus
In addition, I will discuss how the research plan meets the needs of validity,
reliability and generalizability. Also a sampling strategy is discussed, including
sample numbers, and how the data will be analysed and presented.
5.1 Methodology
The basis and ideas for this report emerged from the interest on business
development in creative industries and more specifically how Danish SMEs in
the fashion industry can use new business models as a strategy to grow and
develop their businesses. This interest was raised by consulting to creative
companies and in particular to Danish fashion companies over a number of
years, noticing how the focus and creativity was mainly on the development of
new products and marketing initiatives and not so much on the overall
Kathrine Weicker Page 25 of 147
development of the business. In a conservative manner, the creativity and
innovative skills in the SMEs was not put to use in the development of new
business models.
The focus of the research and report is, therefore, on the fashion industry and
the opportunities to the industry in terms of business model development. The
report will be based on desk research as well as field research and will
furthermore be influenced by skills obtained not only during my studies but also
understandings and perspectives acquired throughout the more than ten years I
have been a consultant for companies in the fashion industry.
The following is an introduction to the methodological basis of this report, and
will comprise of research approach and perspective, research design, data
collection, limitations and finally validity, reliability and generalizability.
5.2 Research approach and perspective
This section will explain the approach and perspective taken in order to get the
best understanding of the research field in question, and also it gives an
understanding of the thoughts behind it and the development of knowledge
throughout the process.
The interpretivist philosophy believes that people seek understanding of the
world in which they live and work, and that way develop subjective meanings of
their experiences. These meanings are varied and multiple, leading the
researcher to look for the complexity of views rather than narrowing meanings
into a few categories or ideas. The researcher relies on the participants’ views of
the situation being studied, and recognizes that their own backgrounds shape
Kathrine Weicker Page 26 of 147
their interpretation. The bottom line is that the researcher’s intent is to
interpret the meanings others have about the world (Saunders et al, 2009).
Research is rarely conducted in only one manner and a more pragmatic view is
therefore needed. The research approach used in this report is mainly based on
the interpretivist approach since it is believed to be most optimal for the
problem area of research in question. This point of approach has the effect that
the findings in this paper are based on the author’s view of reality, meaning that
if another researcher were to analyse the same field the outcome would be
different. Therefore my interpretation and recommendations are not to be
looked upon as neutral due to the fact that they are influenced by my socially
constructed reality.
It shall at this point be emphasized that the intention of this report is not to
make a scientifically proven, universally usable theory, but rather suggest a
number of new directions and recommendations on the basis of action
research. The approach of theory-‐building rather than theory-‐testing have been
chosen because the field of interest has not before been thoroughly
investigated, and current theory within strategic fashion management literature
could prove insufficient when explaining how Danish SMEs in the fashion
industry can use new business models as a strategy to grow and develop their
businesses.
Much of the research done on the fashion industry is done in a case-‐study
manner, whereas this research is looking at the industry as a whole from the
viewpoint of the common situation for SMEs in the industry and not by looking
at a few individual fashion companies.
Kathrine Weicker Page 27 of 147
An inductive research approach is taken, meaning that empirically based
findings are analysed and from that data analysis, new directions and
recommendations are presented (Saunders et al, 2009). The new directions are
based on the findings from the action research and if a proper research method
has been followed they will be relatively valid. Still, the method requires a
certain degree of interpretation of the findings and though the directions might
be empirically based, the inductive approach will not enable me to prove them.
The deductive process of testing and proving the theory is out of the reach of
this report, but others will be able to test the findings and the suggested
directions (Saunders et al, 2009).
5.3 Research design
The sources for data are multiple, both primary and secondary, such as
interviews, observations, industry documentation and articles. Since this study is
a qualitative one the evidence is found in words (e.g. interview transcripts) or
text and not in numbers or statistics as it would be in a quantitative one. The
report is from an industry perspective and the research sample consists of the
SMEs in the Danish fashion industry, and the logic behind such selection is that
the Danish fashion industry is made up of mainly SMEs and also the challenges
and needs are more or less the same across the industry. The industry and
business experts that were interviewed were chosen because of their
knowledge and expertise and to give the report viewpoints and
recommendations from many different angels and perspectives. The fashion
and textile producers interviewed in Nis, Serbia was chosen because the region
is known for its long and proud manufacturing history, and they have ties to
Kathrine Weicker Page 28 of 147
Denmark in the sense that they have produced fashion to larger Danish fashion
companies.
The action research approach is a useful method to investigate, when business
life and academics are co-‐interested in advancing knowledge about a specific
area or topic. The interest is twofold because traditional research became more
and more irrelevant in the eyes of practitioners of the business world, while an
increased desire arose amongst social scientists to conduct greater social
relevant research (Small, 1995). Small states that action researchers wish to
produce research that can address practical concerns at the same time as
contributing to the development of scientific knowledge. The collaboration
between practitioners and researchers is essential to the outcome of the
analysis in that; “While the action researcher brings to the research process
theoretical knowledge [...], the participant collaborators bring practical
knowledge and experience about the situations that are being studied” (Small,
1995).
So, action research is a participatory approach and indicates the researcher to
take an active part in the research topic and therefore to be involved with
his/her specific case(s), as opposed to observe and analyse a static situation of
previous actions (Sauders et al, 2009).
An action research methodology is applied to this research because it is
particularly appropriate for systematically improving organizations in an
industry, bringing about practical transformation and advancing knowledge. In
this case action research explains that I as a researcher has taken part in the
process and sought to improve and change processes, and not only been an
external observer of situations.
Kathrine Weicker Page 29 of 147
Action research is a future oriented approach that acknowledges the possibility
of data and even research scope to evolve and change over time. The action
undertaken from my perspective is therefore many years of consulting to
fashion companies and diagnosing the specific challenge of lack of new business
models for SMEs. Action is taken in the form of informing decision makers and
small fashion business owners of the necessity of and need for innovative
business development.
Research is about generating knowledge, and action research creates
knowledge based on analysis conducted within specific and often practical
contexts. The purpose of action research is to learn through action that then
leads on to some sort of development. However, the practical and action
aspects of the research method can be perceived as having a lower level of
quality, compared to other research methods. The issues of concern are for
example the partial objectivity, the drawing on own knowledge, the role
blurring, and the fact that there can never be one right way of doing action
research.
It is critical to ensure that the research in this report is sound. The extent to
which it reaches a standard of quality is directly related to the usefulness of the
research findings and recommendations for its intended audience, the Danish
fashion industry. One way the issues of quality can be addressed is in the
knowledge generation efforts and the degree of actionability will depend on my
experience with the process, perspective and credibility.
The research, which is based on theoretical inference as well as practical
studies, can be characterized as “explorative”, as the objective of part of the
research is to discover and understand a matter, which is unknown. In this case,
Kathrine Weicker Page 30 of 147
the issue that is being investigated is development of new business models as a
strategy to grow and develop companies in the case of SMEs in the Danish
fashion industry. In order to analyse an industry, it is imperative to have
knowledge about the current situation and status of the industry. Therefore, a
descriptive section covering the industry profile and situation is provided. The
research purpose of this report is both explorative and descriptive (Saunders et
al, 2009).
Finally, to improve, grow and develop SMEs in the Danish fashion industry,
research into business development is needed, and one outcome of this action
research and final report is likely to be relevant and immediately useful in
understanding and developing the Danish fashion industry. Another outcome is
that the research becomes both an input into and a stimulus for consultants, but
also for fashion business owners reflection and reflection is a necessary
component of personal and professional development. Conducting action
research, then, is of course one key way for me to develop myself as a
management consultant.
5.4 Data collection
The following section has the purpose of presenting the reports data collection
during the research process. The data used for this research consist of both
primary and secondary data, and the two approaches supplement each other
well and give a deeper insight to the field of study. Due to the inductive logic
and the aim of giving new directions and recommendations based on the
findings, it was important to have an open mind, which could allow a degree of
original thinking and insight into new angles to the subject. This would enable
Kathrine Weicker Page 31 of 147
me to conduct research without prejudices and to change direction within and
between the interviews and observations.
5.4.1 Primary research
Although the business model literature has sought to explain what constitutes a
good business venture, little has been written on how to practically apply the
literature available, and the available literature also lacks the focus on the
business model as regards to evolution and innovation. For this reason, the aim
of this report is to provide a practical example of how to put business model
theory to use in the Danish fashion industry, and the primary research has a
special focus on exploring the intricacies of taking the often complicated
structure of a fashion business apart and stipulating success factors within a
business model.
The primary data have been collected through interviews with people working
within business development from different perspectives, and also with experts
of the Danish fashion industry. These data will be used in the industry profile as
well as the analysis. The interviews followed the three areas of the value chain:
Product Development, with the focus on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR),
Production, with the focus on sourcing, and finally Sales, with the focus
primarily on online sales. The focal points are not only selected to give the
research focus and structure, they were also chosen since they represent
important value adding activities, and they are areas that have up until now
mainly been giving the large fashion companies a competitive advantage. The
research done here takes a different view, in that the areas can be, and should
be, exploited by fashion companies of all sizes. The question is just how.
Kathrine Weicker Page 32 of 147
Therefore the interviews were conducted with different participants in order to
get the best possible grasp of the specific knowledge the interviewees have. By
giving insight into what has been the practice of the industry in the past and
what is carried out currently, the interviewees give insight into future ways of
adding value, and new ways of doing business.
Covering the Product development perspective, an interview with CSR Director
Odgaard at Dansk Fashion and Textile was carried out. See appendix C for the
questionnaire. Dansk Fashion and Textile is the trade association for Danish
textile and clothing companies, and represent 340 of the largest and strongest
players in the Danish fashion and textile industries, and Pia Odgaard is a highly
experienced and respected CSR expert and has since 1975 worked in and with
the fashion industry. Another reason why Pia Odgaard was selected is her
thorough and up-‐to-‐date knowledge of international developments in
manufacturing in general.
With regards to the focus area Production five interviews were carried out
already in 2009 using a questionnaire that was e-‐mailed to the chosen
respondents. The questions were closed-‐ended and it was carried out to get an
idea of the relevance, quality and commitment of the participants, and was the
foundation for organizing a specific research trip. Following this, twelve face-‐to-‐
face interviews were conducted during a visit to Nis in Serbia in 2012, and
information on why and how the Danish fashion industry should outsource the
production to Serbia was gained. The respondents are representatives of the
fashion and textile manufacturing industry in Serbia, and possible bias was
eliminated since they are of different sizes; they target different segments of
the fashion market, e.g. women and menswear, and embody different fashion
styles, e.g. European and Balkan styles. See appendix D for a list of the Serbian
Kathrine Weicker Page 33 of 147
producers and appendix E for a SWOT analysis of the garment industry in Serbia.
The interviews were on average lasting for approximately ninety minutes, and
were all carried out using an interpreter. Some of the interviews were audio
recorded and on site observations during site visit were documented by
photographs and diary notes. See appendix F for the questionnaire.
Finally the perspective of Sales was covered with an interview with Rina Hansen,
PhD Fellow at Copenhagen Business School, http://rinahansen.com See
appendix G for the questionnaire. Rina Hansen is an e-‐business expert and has
more than ten years experience in specifically researching and working within
online fashion business. Rina Hansen is currently working at the Danish sports
and fashion brand Hummel as the global Head of Online and Multichannel,
where she is responsible for setting up an online division, creating a global
brand site and launching ecommerce. Rina Hansen does not only understand
the situation in the larger fashion companies when it comes to ecommerce, but
was mainly selected for this report because of her current and all-‐round
understanding of the issues facing the SMEs in the fashion industry.
The interview type was guided and semi structured, as such they followed an
outlined of topics, issues and themes but the responses given by the
participants were open ended, so that despite the pre-‐planned questions as
conversation initiation the conversation can flow into many pertinent directions
(Sauders et al, 2009). The major advantage of such a format was that the
material gathered was systematic but allowed the interview to have a
conversational and informal tone.
As a supplement to the more formal interviews conducted, and a relevant
element of this report, I have been in numerous discussions regarding new
Kathrine Weicker Page 34 of 147
business models and the three focus areas in this report, with many different
people. The participants in these discussions have been owners of fashion
companies, industry experts, PhD students, trade organization representatives,
consultants and business experts. Taking the role of the devil’s advocate I have
been challenging a new line of thinking and points of view, gathering important
and valuable information on the way.
5.4.2 Secondary research
Secondary data was collected from varied sources such as business databases,
and consist of articles, reports and books on the topics of the Danish fashion
industry, business model innovation, SMEs, growth and development etc., and
have been used when making the theoretical foundation as well as the
description of the industry.
The business side of the Danish fashion industry has to a large extent not been
researched and the amount of information available is modest. Therefore the
empirical field has been somewhat of a challenge and in order to get a further
and deeper understanding of the research topic, in the form of interviews and
informal talks and discussions, has been needed. Also the validity of the
research is assessed in reference to the research and not to exclusively to follow
abstract academic criteria. Rather the criteria in qualitative research are
whether the findings are grounded in empirical material (Sauders et al, 2009).
This is done in this report in the form of using a combination of strategic
management research and theories as well as knowledge and understandings
that have been gained during years of work experience in consulting. Therefore
findings and conclusions from the different sources of data collection will be
Kathrine Weicker Page 35 of 147
compared, and the process is that when combined, recommendations of new
business models will be presented.
Therefore the focus has been to form recommendations and give an
understanding that is more consultant-‐based approach, doing applied research.
This has been done with the purpose of reaching a result that can be not only
useful for SMEs in the fashion industry, but also tangible and be understood by
the industry.
Action research has been used as a way to examine purposes and practices in
the fashion industry. You could argue that one way of conducting action
research in this research process has been to engage in participant observation,
which may be seen as a systematic attempt to discover the knowledge of a
group of fashion company owners and has been used to organize the fashion
industry’s challenges and needs. By immersing myself in the subject being
studied, over a long period of time, I presume to have gained understanding,
perhaps more deeply than could be obtained by using for example only
questionnaire items.
5.5 Limitations of focus
Due to the fact that the Danish fashion industry mainly consists of small and
medium sized companies, the report focuses on this segment, and therefore the
report will not elaborate on business development of fashion companies in
general, that is, in large and small companies. The recommendations are
therefore not applicable to the entire fashion industry.
The Danish apparel and textile industry includes many forms of manufacturers,
Kathrine Weicker Page 36 of 147
which include everything from work and industrial apparel to home textiles. The
scope of this project is to look at how new business models can fuel growth in
the Danish fashion industry, and come up with some recommendations, and the
focus of this report will be on the Danish fashion industry, referring to
companies, which design, manage production, market and sell clothing products
(Tran, 2008).
I have chosen to narrow down the scope and limit this report to only one part of
the creative industry; the fashion industry, and although the fashion industry is
embraced all over the world, the main interest in this report is in the national
market and not the international fashion market. This is done to provide a more
narrow investigation into the practices and developments and therefore, does
not consider a global perspective, with the exception of sources of production.
This report has taken use of the theories and ideas behind business models
development and in particular, Alexander Osterwalder’s Business Model
Generation. This particular model was chosen because of its focus on visual
business design and expression together with practical approach, since creative
people are usually visual people with a visual viewpoint, wanting concise,
practical and implementable solutions and recommendations. The new business
models have been considered from the aspect of Michael Porter’s value chain,
but only parts of the value chain have been covered, meaning that areas like
procurement and distribution are not taken into account when
recommendations are made.
Kathrine Weicker Page 37 of 147
5.6 Validity, reliability and generalisability
As the research is undertaken with an interpretivist philosophy of science, using
strategic management research methods and building on qualitative data, the
reliability, defined as the extent to which an experiment, test or measuring
procedure yields the same results on repeated trials, of the data in a statistical
sense is estimated to be low. It is unlikely that other researchers would come to
the same conclusions as I even if they could gain access to the exact same
material as I have used. This is again attributed to the interpretivist philosophy
of science, which predicates that interpretations are highly subjective in nature
(Saunders et al, 2009).
Since action research does not aim to increase knowledge, issues of research
reliability and validity can generally be downplayed in action research while
practicality and immediate usefulness become more important. Action
researchers are not required to validate research designs, rely on statistics, or
use concepts like triangulation and replicability. While these points are to some
extent true, conducting useful action research still requires serious devotion of
time and effort, and a lot of thoughtful consideration.
As such, reliability and generalisability are not really issues in action research.
Action research aims to generate findings that are useful within a specific
context rather than findings applicable across many different situations.
Similarly, the basis for judging validity in action research is different from that
used in research in general. In general research, validity is measured by the
extent to which the research actually investigates what it is supposed to
investigate, and because of this, research design and data analysis procedures
are important. On the other hand and in this case, the validity with action
Kathrine Weicker Page 38 of 147
research can be measured by the extent to which the research produces
findings, which are useful in developing the Danish fashion industry and the
consultant/ company relations. This shift in perceptions concerning the nature
and purposes of research means that action research, which may not be
publishable when judged by the criteria of research in general, is publishable as
action research (Saunders et al, 2009).
Since research on the different industries comprising the creative industry have
shown that the challenges and needs of the industry are more or less the same
across the line, one could argue that in some ways some generalisability can be
claimed for the findings of the action research in this report (CKO, 2011) (CKO,
2011/12).
Even though business model literature has its merits, little has been written on
how to practically apply the literature available. Therefore the aim of this report
is to give practical example of how to put business model theory to use in the
Danish fashion industry. Having gained valuable knowledge and a good
understanding of the past and looking for future insights, the SMEs in the
fashion industry were chosen to illustrate potential future trends and business
model innovations. Despite the fact that the focus is on the companies in the
fashion industry, the basic principles and lessons could also apply to other
creative industries.
6. Ethical Considerations
One of the disadvantages of significant pre-‐gained knowledge of SMEs and the
Danish fashion industry is that it can be a prevention from exploring issues that
would enrich the research, since assumptions and preconceptions can be carried
Kathrine Weicker Page 39 of 147
around. Familiarity is also a problem in the sense that simple and basic aspects
can be taken for granted and issues can be missed since the basic questions will
not be asked. All in all an awareness of the threats to the quality of data by
being too close to the research setting has to be taken into account (Saunders et
al, 2009).
For action research in this report the participants are professional managers and
staff in companies and other organisations, with interactions taking place within
the context of their business and industry. Therefore, the focus for research
interaction is the normal working environment and context. It is important that
the collaborating organisation and participants are made aware of the research
goals and activities, and how these might impact on the engagement. For
example, the issue of confidentiality should normally need to be addressed, and
how it impacts on the research outputs and recommendations should be
considered. Furthermore the research method used has ensured that the
participants could withdraw from the answering process at any time. As an
experienced consultant who has not only performed countless interviews and
assessments of needs, and has always worked within the guidelines of strict
privacy and confidentiality, I have made sure that the participants have not felt
rushed or stressed when answering the questions, and they have all been
treated with the utmost respect, gratitude and sensitivity.
It is also important to be addressing the potential conflicts of interest, and the
role switching and contamination from going from a role as a management
consultant to a researcher (Morton, 1999).
Also the relationship between the researcher and the collaborating
organisations and participants can give rise to ethical dilemmas relating to
Kathrine Weicker Page 40 of 147
participant selection since the researcher might focus the research on an
already established network, and as a result limiting the possible angles and
recommendation. There could also be conflicting and different needs between
the researcher and the participant, and this could be leading to a situation
where the working relationship could be harmed.
7. The Fashion Industry
7.1 The European fashion industry
The European fashion industry is a significant part of the economy. It forms
complex and strongly interlinked value chains, from design and manufacturing
to distribution and retail. The fashion industry creates a variety of clothes and
accessories, but it also creates jobs, supporting almost 850.000 companies, the
vast majority of which are SMEs, and 5 million jobs, not to mention another 3
million jobs in the supply chain. In 2011, the overall size of the textile and
clothing industry in the EU represented a turnover of EUR 179 billion and
investments of around EUR 5 billion. The industry is an important part of the
European manufacturing industry. It plays a crucial role on the economy and
social well being in numerous regions of the EU, and accounts for 3% of total
manufacturing value added in Europe. EU external trade was more dynamic
than the previous year with EUR 39 billion of textile and clothing products
exported and EUR 93 billion imported from Third markets (Commission staff
working document, 2012) (EURATEX, 2011).
In the current globalised world, it is becoming a challenge, if not impossible, for
Europe to compete with the emerging economies on price alone. An
increasingly knowledge-‐ and innovation-‐based industry, based on higher value
Kathrine Weicker Page 41 of 147
added products, processes and services, can however ensure that Europe’s
position, as global leader, remains intact. A number of actors in the EU fashion
industries are already on the right road, finding niches in mature markets,
developing new brands and business models, investing in creativity and
innovation, all of which makes the difference to increasingly demanding
consumers worldwide. However this transformation is not complete and new
market opportunities for the fashion industries need to be explored
(Commission staff working document, 2012).
7.2 The Danish fashion industry
The Danish fashion industry is one of the most vibrant and creative business
sectors in Denmark today. The industry has evolved since the 1950s: cycling
from strong production in the 1950s, creative design emergence during the 60s,
to commercial orientation during the 80s and 90s, and finally the re-‐emergence
of creative designers during the 2000s. The Danish fashion industry is much
more than designer fashion, encompassing, as it does, a complex web of
materials, textile production, clothing design, manufacturing, wholesaling,
marketing and retailing of a broad set of fashion products. The Danish fashion
industry that is the focus of this report refers to companies, which design,
manage production, market, and sell clothing products (Tran, 2008).
7.2.1 Industry performance For the Danish fashion industry, 2012 was characterized by continued restraint
in domestic consumption and large fluctuations in exports. The industry had a
turnover of DKK 38.6 billion, of which exports amounted to DKK 22.7 billion. In
2012 industry revenue fell by a modest 3.7%, which reflects a decrease in both
Kathrine Weicker Page 42 of 147
exports and sales in Denmark. This decrease should be seen in light of the surge
in exports the previous year, where the fashion industry saw a record turnover.
The industry employs across a wide spectrum of roles, and counts today 9,600
people, and if one compares this to pre-‐crisis levels, there has been an increase
in turnover of DKK 2.5 billion, while employment has fallen by approximately
1,800 persons. The fashion industry has therefore made great efforts to reduce
costs and adapt to a new economic world order (Dansk Fashion & Textile, 2013).
The neighbouring export markets continue to push sales of Danish fashion in a
positive direction. The Scandinavian countries especially continue to purchase
Danish fashion in an increasing manner, and exports to Sweden and Norway
rose by 8.7% and 7.3% respectively, which contributes to keeping up the
industry's total sales. Exports to Germany remained, on the other hand, at the
same level as in 2011, while sales for Southern Europe, France and the Benelux
countries saw export figures move in a negative direction. Not surprisingly, the
most serious problem was seen in Spain and Italy, where exports have fallen by
as much as 30%. Despite the difficult economic circumstances, a large number
of the companies in the industry are performing well. Firstly, the industry is
good at exporting and finding new customers and secondly, the companies have
been good at adjusting costs. At the same time, there is generally a strong focus
on Danish fashion from abroad, which further benefits the industry (Deloitte,
2013) (Dansk Fashion & Textile, 2013).
Even in the midst of a global financial crisis, there is an overall confidence in
future success and growth in the business, and generally, there is room for
optimism in the Danish fashion industry. The industry is experiencing an
Kathrine Weicker Page 43 of 147
increasing number of high growth companies, and within the industry, the most
profitable quarter of companies are doing very well, with large growth rates in
revenue and an impressive profit. Last but not least, the Danish consumers have
more money to spend, and, if the world economy permits, domestic
consumption and thus revenue will slowly turn around in 2013. However, the
overall profitability of the industry remains low. With a limited economic growth
rate in the domestic and neighbouring markets, a number of the industry's
companies face an uncertain future in fashion. This is especially true for the
smaller companies, if the economy does not follow the projected positive signs
(Bang, 2013) (Dansk Fashion & Textile, 2013).
7.2.2 Industry structure The dynamics of the fashion industry are of an international nature as the
outsourcing strategy has meant that the production process is no longer
restricted to Denmark but rather involves a range of countries. A new industrial
structure has evolved and a strong interrelatedness has been developed. The
motivation behind outsourcing has mainly been a minimization of production
costs and this has affected the competitive conditions of the industry.
Consequently many companies have expanded their horizons and have begun
seeking new markets. The outsourcing strategy of the fashion industry has
refined the roles of the actors in the value chain. The activities and functions of
the industry have been redistributed in response to the changes in the
competitive conditions for the industry (Maskell, 2005) (Nordisk Ministerråd,
2012).
Kathrine Weicker Page 44 of 147
The Danish fashion industry consists of approximately 650 fashion companies,
and is a fragmented industry dominated by small and medium sized companies,
about 90% of the Danish fashion companies have less than 50 employees. The
Danish fashion industry is characterised by a proliferation of SMEs that are very
fragile in their early stage, and figures shown that only half of the companies
survive after 4 years and after 5 years it drops to a mere 20% survival rate (Tran,
2008) (Dansk Fashion & Textile, 2013).
7.2.3 Segments in the Danish fashion industry When characterising the Danish fashion industry, it is important to make the
distinction between the brands that strive to define tomorrow’s design, the
companies that are innovation-‐driven, and those that build their businesses
upon established trends, the companies that are trend-‐driven. The trend-‐driven
companies first and foremost are tradesmen and the foundation of the
companies is on sound business principles. Trend forecasting and finding
inspirations in international design are important tools in defining their looks
and designs, and the innovation on the business side is done in the use of PR
and marketing techniques, supply chain management and so forth. Copenhagen
is the fashion capital of the innovation-‐driven fashion companies. These brands
are located in creative environments, always striving to develop their image and
their brand value amongst trend-‐spotters and the right endorsers. The
innovation-‐driven companies first and foremost consider themselves to be
designers with a focus on producing innovative interpretations of times and
trends with a strong individual profile and style. These trends underpin the
wider fashion industry, as well as adding value to many lifestyle and consumer
Kathrine Weicker Page 45 of 147
products that increasingly look to the innovation-‐driven companies for
inspiration and content.
Segments
There is no doubt that the trend-‐driven companies, with their business flair and
flexibility in management practice, by far make the best results in growth and
turnover and thereby represent the work and strategies behind the successful
export figures. Still, it is argued that impressive export figures of Danish fashion
would not be possible for the major players if it were not for the smaller
innovation-‐driven businesses. The innovative designer pool is to a great extent
the faces and names causing the great national and international hype and
visibility of Danish fashion through fashion shows, events and editorials. In
addition, the trend-‐driven businesses get their inspiration from trends brought
forward by the innovation-‐driven companies, Danish as well as international,
and often also profit from the design staff hatched and shaped in the creative
segment (Barbry, 2009).
8. Strengths and Weaknesses of the SMEs in the Danish Fashion
Industry
Whilst the interview process and networking activities are useful in highlighting
some of the less quantifiable benefits of the Danish fashion industry, it is also a
possibility to question stakeholders about the future outlook for the industry.
The preceding analysis is focusing on the current state of the Danish fashion
industry, and is drawn upon stakeholder response, and past studies together
with other salient points gleaned from daily contact and networking with the
industry.
Kathrine Weicker Page 46 of 147
SWOT analysis provides a simple but robust framework to assess current
industry trends and gain insight into key future risks that are likely to shape
market outcomes. Strengths and weaknesses refer to internal factors, which are
likely to affect the Danish fashion industry’s response to external threats and
opportunities.
Figure 8.1 SWOT MODEL
8.1 Strengths
8.1.1 An increase in attention There is a sense of quiet optimism in the Danish fashion industry, as the
companies are getting used to and adapting to the new situation in the
Kathrine Weicker Page 47 of 147
aftermath of the financial crisis. Positive development has placed the industry
on the international fashion scene, and especially the export possibilities have
meant that the industry has also been gaining political attention.
8.1.2 Outsourcing The industry has been very successful in outsourcing great parts of the
production, and is geared towards further outsourcing. This has meant an added
focus and strengthening on the design area.
8.1.3 Creativity A strength of the Danish fashion industry is the creativity of fashion designers,
with many products characterised by an edgy individual style, known for its
functionality and easy to wear for everyday life, which helps to differentiate
Danish design internationally.
8.1.4 Price Consumer spending has been depressed due to the economic downturn and
there has been an increase in the price sensitive customer base. Danish fashion
is known for its high qualitative and design content that can be purchased at a
reasonable price, and with presence in the value segment facilitate an increase
in the potential customer base.
8.1.5 Multi-‐channel operations The Danish fashion companies sell their merchandise through retail stores and
different digital channels. Through the e-‐commerce operations, the industry has
been able to increase its scope immensely and reach out to customers
worldwide. The digital strategy gives the industry the opportunities to maintain
a high level of interaction with customers and will enable the companies to drive
revenue growth as these channels are gaining in popularity. The e-‐commerce
Kathrine Weicker Page 48 of 147
market is growing at a fast pace and the trend is expected to continue, and
Internet retail has several counter recessionary characteristics like low
operational costs which can be passed on to the customers. Additionally,
customers might prefer online shopping, as it is convenient and easy. Focus on
the multiple channels coupled with positive trends in the digital markets will
drive top-‐line growth. As stated by Rina Hansen, “fashion companies need to
make sure to have the proper exposure both geographically, in the number of
eyeballs but also multi-‐channel wise so as many channels as possible are used.
Multi-‐channel customers buy for up to six times as much as customers who only
shop in one channel” (Interview, Hansen, 2013).
8.2 Weaknesses
8.2.1 Funding gap Cash flow is a major problem for the SMEs in the fashion industry and they are
facing barriers in obtaining funding. The funding gap for the SMEs stems initially
from their high level of intangible assets, since the value of a fashion company’s
products is concentrated in the design and brand, and in the “head” of the
designer. Protection of design is difficult, if not impossible and consequently,
investors face a particularly high level of risk. Furthermore fashion companies
may demonstrate a limited ability to translate innovative designs into
sustainable businesses, and a lack of formal organisational and managerial
competence deters potential investors.
Kathrine Weicker Page 49 of 147
8.2.2 Lack of business mind-‐set and company size Needless to say it is paramount that Danish fashion companies understand and
gain skills on the technical and design aspects of the business, but is also
important that they understand the reality of running a business. Unfortunately
the majority of fashion companies lack a sense of leadership, management and
international competencies. Fashion is also about business and the industry
needs improved fashion business education, and to attract more internationally
minded, credible skilled, experienced and higher educated commercial people.
The industry consists of many small companies that are run without the critical
mass needed to ensure operation, and the way of work is unstructured and
uncontrolled, not focusing on the commercial aspects, of optimizing the entire
value chain, and growing and developing the business.
8.2.3 Relationship with manufacturers The fashion companies generally view the relationship with manufacturing as
problematic and tense. Manufacturers and designers are critical of each other:
there is a mismatch in expectations; lack of understanding of each other’s
business operations, workflow, and financial restrictions.
8.2.4 Vertical integration Very few SMEs in the Danish fashion industry have vertically integrated design,
production, merchandising and retail functions. This means that the companies
find it difficult to quickly respond to changing fashion trends, reduce risk of
excess inventory, and produce distinctive quality products.
8.2.5 Dependence on third party suppliers and manufacturers
Kathrine Weicker Page 50 of 147
The SMEs do not own any manufacturing facilities and depend on contractors
and third parties for procuring their products. Furthermore, the companies do
not in most cases have any long-‐term contracts with any manufacturer or
supplier; it procures products and raw materials through individual purchase
orders. Though this strategy offers flexibility in some ways, it increases
operational risks for the fashion companies. Primarily, this creates two kinds of
challenges for the companies: timely delivery of goods and quality control. Since
there is no long-‐term contract, the suppliers may not prioritize orders in times
of shortage or resource crunch. As a result, the SMEs consignments may get
delayed or cancelled, which will almost certainly result in loss of revenue or
profitability or both. Moreover, the SMEs do not have complete control over the
quality of its products, as the company is dependent on external manufacturers.
Wherever this leads to poor quality products this could result in loss of revenue
and could lead to loss of customer confidence and repeat sales. Therefore, the
industry’s dependence on third party manufacturers and suppliers could impact
its revenue, profitability and customer retention.
8.3 Opportunities
8.3.1 International expansion The Danish fashion industry has a good understanding of the importance of
expanding its presence in the international market. There are plenty of
possibilities in countries far away from Denmark and where the growth in the
markets where the industry is normally exporting is expected to grow with 0,8
per cent towards 2016, then the expectations of growth rates in the BRIC
countries and other upcoming markets are at a level of 5-‐6 per cent. Given much
Kathrine Weicker Page 51 of 147
stronger growth prospects in emerging markets relative to more developed
countries, it is likely that sales growth will be increasingly export-‐led. (Deloitte,
2013)
8.3.2 Growing importance of online sales Online retailing has become increasingly important as a source of growth across
most industries, including fashion, and companies in the industry are aiming at
tapping the online channel to expand quickly into several countries across the
world, and since the main markets in the developed economies in Europe, and
also in the US, face low growth in retail markets, the emerging countries with
positive demographics will provide several growth opportunities for Danish
companies. The growth experienced in online channel in several countries will
further catalyze the industry's international expansion plans, and forays into
international markets will enable the industry to diversify the revenue stream
and also reduce excessive dependency on Denmark and Northern Europe.
8.3.3 Focus on sustainability Covering issues such as environmental externalities, ethical standards,
upholding of social norms and compliance with the law, the increased focus on
Corporate Social Responsibility goes hand in hand with Danish mentality, how
the Danes see themselves and how they are perceived from the outside. Such
issues that come under the umbrella term of CSR which, fundamentally,
concerns the extent to which public interest is built into corporate decision-‐
making, and according to Pia Odgaard, “by buying Danish fashion, the customer
should ideally at the same time buy into a set of values in line with good morale
and a democratic way of life” (Interview, Odgaard, 2013).
Kathrine Weicker Page 52 of 147
8.4 Threats
8.4.1 Excessive exposure to the European consumer The SMEs derive a large portion of their revenues from the Danish market
together with selected European countries. The industry’s revenues are highly
correlated to the discretionary spending patterns of the European consumer.
Europe is experiencing high levels of unemployment and low consumer
confidence, which is having a negative impact on the consumer spending and in,
turn the retail environment. Another key disadvantage is that the Danish fashion
industry competes in the market with companies who have global presence and
enjoy the advantages of scale. Although the Danish fashion industry has been
focusing on international expansion, it still suffers competitive disadvantage
compared to peers who have established operations in some of the fast growing
economies.
8.4.2 Fast changing fashion trends and product innovation For the Danish fashion industry it is important for companies to come up with
new designs in line with the changing fashion trends, and the life cycle of a
trend which lasted few years a decade ago, has come down to few months at
present. Product innovation by adding more collections each year is a significant
trend and market opportunity. However, activities for each of the fashion
calendar’s two seasons are already extremely compacted for the SMEs, since
the usually operate with small teams and they do not have the brand presence,
infrastructure or cash flow to expand into more collections on their own.
8.4.3 Intense competition The fashion industry is characterized by a high degree of competition. The
Kathrine Weicker Page 53 of 147
Danish fashion industry competes with numerous designers and manufacturers
in domestic and foreign markets. Many of these competitors are significantly
larger and have substantially greater resources than the Danish fashion
company. In addition, the industry has to keep track of changing consumer
demands in order to be competitive within the market. A failure to change
according to trends could adversely affect retail and consumer acceptance of
the products and cause loss of sales.
8.4.4 International recognition The Danish fashion industry has not gained international recognition, and even
though several brands are established internationally, the foothold is not
considerable on the international fashion arena. A global fashion brand closely
linked with Denmark will create a greater knowledge and clarity regarding brand
identity and positioning of Danish fashion, and this will have a spill-‐over effect of
positive associations to other fashion brands.
9. Growth and Development
9.1 Growth and development possibilities
Deciding to grow a fashion company is the beginning of a complex strategic
planning process. One of the most important decisions is where to look for
growth: in familiar areas that offer quick returns, or in aspects that represent a
departure and may take time to cultivate. When credit tightened and revenue
declined during the recession, companies in the Danish fashion industry worked
to extract value from efficiency and austerity. In many cases, those sources of
value have been wrung dry, and now fashion companies are once again turning
Kathrine Weicker Page 54 of 147
to growth. A new focused view of growth can help fashion companies set better
growth targets, identify new opportunities, balance investments and risk and
carry strategies into action with a clear eye toward expectations.
To be realistic and workable, a growth objective and target should emerge from
the interplay between internal and external factors and expectations.
Externalities may include the fashion industry’s overall momentum, investor
expectations, the state of the economy, the intensity of competition and wild
cards such as regulation, innovation or disruption. From within, a fashion
company should take into account its state of lifecycle maturity, its culture and
talent, the resources available, its risk tolerance and its own innovation
capabilities. These inputs create the context that helps determine whether a
fashion company can produce superior performance to create additional value
by surpassing investors’ growth expectations.
A comprehensive view looks at growth possibilities and options along a
continuum: In building the business of today, fashion companies will typically
turn to key areas of focus such as customer retention, pricing optimization and
improvements to existing offerings. When crafting a growth strategy and
creating new business models, it is useful to understand the different levels and
degrees of development, and figure 9.1 depicts the degree of newness in
the growth options.
Kathrine Weicker Page 55 of 147
Figure 9.1 Primary Growth Levers (Deloitte, 2011)
Moving along the scale toward choices that carry higher uncertainty and lie
farther from existing operations, fashion companies will likely start building the
business of tomorrow by designing new offerings, intruding into new markets
and geographies and creating entirely new business models therefore changing
the basis for competition.
A prerequisite for growth in the Danish fashion industry is a high productivity;
total value of output in a given time frame, strengthening the companies’
competitiveness compared to foreign fashion companies. Growth has especially
been favourable in parts of the fashion and clothing industry, where
productivity also is higher than generally in Danish companies (Regeringen,
2013).
Kathrine Weicker Page 56 of 147
9.2 Barriers to growth and development
The fashion industry is an important driving force in growth, innovation, and job
creation in Denmark. However, much more could be done to develop the
potentials of the fashion companies and, at the same time, enhance their global
position and competitiveness. The Danish fashion industry has evolved to a
stage where focus is upon design and management of the logistics of an
increasingly outsourced production, and this has facilitated a strong export
focus far beyond what should be expected from a fashion field in a relatively
small country. However, this evolution has also raised challenges and the future
value creation of the industry is paramount. The challenge is to build on the
success of the Danish fashion industry so far in order to achieve even more, and
investigating the key business relationships that are critical to the industry’s
success, gives a good understanding of the operations and provide evidence of
the barriers and challenges affecting the industry (Tran, 2008).
9.2.1 Investor relationships The Danish fashion industry comprises many SMEs that generate significant
media attention, but whose growth is impeded by lack of finance. The nature of
fashion design makes it harder to access finance: The assets of fashion
companies are intangible with copyright difficult to protect on new designs;
returns are uncertain; and product innovation does not easily translate into
formal business structures. Also a lack of formal organisational and managerial
competence deters potential investors, and even though cash flow is a major
problem for most fashion companies it can take designers years to recognise
that they need investment if they want their company to grow and develop.
When investments are done in the Danish fashion industry it is made by three
Kathrine Weicker Page 57 of 147
groupings; emotional investors, such as friends and family investors, strategic
investors, such as business angels or venture capitalists, and finally debt finance,
with banks and invoice factoring schemes (Regeringen, 2013).
9.2.2 Manufacturer relationships The Danish fashion industry has moved toward creative activities focusing less
on the production side, and one strategy has been to outsource production of
the work intensive processes in order to keep down production costs. The
relationship between designers and manufacturers is often international, in fact
many Danish fashion companies outsource completely with nothing but design
and a few administrative and managerial tasks remaining in Denmark. It is a
highly global industry, even for SMEs, and most fashion companies manufacture
in more than one country, and some of the fashion companies are even making
clothes in three or more countries. Moreover, these relationships tend to be the
most problematic of all the industry’s business relationships. Outsourcing also
entails less control with the conditions of production. CSR, therefore is a
somewhat new important trend in the Danish fashion industry. Companies
define codes of conduct for their entire production processes and put great
effort into ensuring labour rights at the work places that deliver to their
companies. More and more Danish brands market their designs as fair trade and
eco-‐friendly products (Barbry, 2009).
9.2.3 Retailer relationships The fashion companies covered by this report are predominantly wholesale
businesses that generate revenues largely through domestic and international
sales to key boutiques and stores. The Danish fashion industry was a late
Kathrine Weicker Page 58 of 147
adopter of new technologies including ecommerce, but today another new
route to market is online sales. Online retail is an area of growth, with many
companies leading innovation in this area, establishing and developing a loyal
global market. This should also be seen in the light that there are fewer
independent stockists in Europe so the fashion companies need to access new
emerging markets globally.
The fashion companies’ relationships with retailers are often easier. Stores often
want to be seen discovering and supporting emerging designers: as the brand
grows, these relationships become more professional. But, there are still
challenges and barriers inhibiting growth, like the fact that the companies often
hold back on their early sales expansion, in the hope of being picked up by one
of the top stores, which will enhance their credibility, resulting in lack of critical
mass. Also retailers increasingly want novelty from fashion companies,
expecting up to five collections a year compared with two annually in the past.
Limited finance and production management skills inhibit the SMEs from taking
advantage of this trend. This is not to mention that key buyers may not buy
from an emerging fashion company for fear of non-‐delivery or poor
manufacturing quality. Finally, outsourcing has also made it inexpensive to
produce clothes, for all segments. Therefore, the competition might increasingly
be moved to the retail industry, and more and more companies open own shops
exclusively for their own brands (Maskell, 2005).
9.2.4 Intermediary relationships The growth of the Danish fashion industry has created a clear spill-‐over effect
Kathrine Weicker Page 59 of 147
pushing and pulling growth dynamics in other experience fields including
advertising, styling, modelling, photographing, media and event organizing. The
industry has a dynamic network of intermediaries, people who help to influence
retailers and consumers in favour of particular designers and companies, and
intermediaries such as PR agents, licensing agents, sales agents and distributors
are integral to most fashion companies, particularly in communicating the brand
to final customers and securing access to the retailers. The three important
types of intermediary for fashion company growth are: aesthetic service
providers stylists, models and photographers. Stylists are particularly important
for managing editorial work and exposure, developing portfolios, advertising
and gaining access to retailers, sales agents, providing companies with sales
expertise as well as access to specific regional markets, PR agents and the press,
communicating the company’s brand to the trade and consumer. All these
influencers are important storytellers, playing a key and independent role in
building fashion brands and acting as brokers to help retail relationships (Tran,
2008).
The research and the years of consulting to the industry have shown that
different relationships present particular challenges for the Danish fashion
industry and that these challenges need to be addressed to strengthen the
industry’s growth and development potential. In giving insight into how
relationships within the value chain can be managed and improved, an
enhanced understanding of the industry and its barriers to growth will be the
result. This again will identify opportunities for intervention that could reduce or
eliminate barriers to growth, support the growth of fashion companies, and
contribute to creativity and expansion.
Kathrine Weicker Page 60 of 147
10. The fashion Industry and Business Model Development
10.1 What is business model development?
The popularity of the term "business model" is a relatively young phenomenon,
and rose to prominence only towards the end of the 1990s. Driving factors
include the emerging knowledge economy, the growth of the Internet and e-‐
commerce together with the outsourcing and offshoring of many business
activities. A business model describes how a company creates, delivers and
captures value. More precisely, a business model articulates the content,
structure and governance of the activity system that delivers a value proposition
to the customer and enables economic value creation for all activity system
exchange partners. Therefore whenever a fashion company is established, it
either explicitly, or implicitly, employs a particular business model that describes
the design or architecture of the value creation, delivery, and capture
mechanisms it employs. The essence of a business model is in defining the
manner by which the company delivers value to customers, entices customers
to pay for value, and converts those payments to profit (Teece, 2010)
(Osterwalder, 2010).
Short-‐term competitive advantage is created by exploiting existing business
models. However, in the long term, all markets mature, competition intensifies
and turbulence increases. Consequently, new sources of growth must be
explored, and fresh answers to enduring success must be found. The answer
used to be ‘innovate or die’, but research shows that pouring more money into
pure product innovation does not lead to improved performance. Companies
need to dig deeper. To succeed in innovation and to seize new opportunities,
the scope of innovation must be expanded to encompass the full business
Kathrine Weicker Page 61 of 147
model, and new processes must be mastered. In essences business model
development is about transforming key elements of a company or inventing
completely new ways of doing business (Hejlesen, 2012).
Deciding on what a business model consists of and what elements and
parameters that are being used is difficult as the demands of a business model
vary depending on many factors, such as the market it needs to function in, the
level of competition, the structure of the organization and the funds available.
In general many internal as well as external environmental factors are involved.
A company’s business model can be examined in different ways and many
different tools have been developed to analyse business model concepts. The
business model canvas gives any fashion company a simple, intuitive and visual
tool to describe and think through the different elements of its business models
in order to systematically challenge the way it does business and thereby be
able to create new strategic alternatives. The canvas tool consists of nine basic
building blocks covering four main areas of a business: product, customer
interface, infrastructure management, and financial viability. See Table 10.1
Kathrine Weicker Page 62 of 147
Pillar Business Model Building Block
Description
Product Value Proposition Gives an overall view of a company's bundle of products and services.
Customer Interface Target Customer Describes the segments of customers a company wants to offer value to.
Distribution Channel Describes the various means of the company to get in touch with its customers.
Relationship Explains the kind of links a company establishes between itself and its different customer segments.
Infrastructure Management
Value Configuration Describes the arrangement of activities and resources.
Core Competency Outlines the competencies necessary to execute the company's business model.
Partner Network Portrays the network of cooperative agreements with other companies necessary to efficiently offer and commercialize value.
Financial Aspects Cost Structure Sums up the monetary consequences of the means employed in the business model.
Revenue Model Describes the way a company makes money through a variety of revenue flows.
Table 10.1 Nine Business Model Building Blocks (Osterwalder et al, 2005)
The main role of the business model is to find and design a promising business
concept, and the business model canvas has a great strength as a visual planning
tool since it focuses attention on how all the elements of the system fit into a
working whole. The tool visualizes and allows designing and realizing the
business structure and systems that constitute the operational and physical
form the company will take. The business model as a system shows how the
pieces of a business concept fit together, and companies can look at other
companies’ business models to be inspired to do similar changes to their own
model or to design a completely new business model. Business models often
change gradually and do not necessarily imply fundamental revisiting of value
Kathrine Weicker Page 63 of 147
propositions, but of course the changes could also focus on improving
production processes or reconfiguring organizational structures. Business model
development is basically about improving the building blocks of the business
model (Osterwalder et al, 2005) (Bisgaard et al, 2012).
It is important to understand that a company’s business model is no substitute
for its strategy. The strategy covers overarching aspirations and positioning in
the industry and provides a framework for consistently making money in a
changing business environment. If the business model guides day-‐to-‐day
execution, the strategy should communicate how the change in the business
model is intended to take advantage of shifting markets and new opportunities.
Another difference between the terms is that strategy includes execution and
implementation, while the business model is more about how a business works
as a system (Osterwalder et al, 2005). The business model can be identical for
several fashion companies, but they will need a strategy to differentiate
themselves in terms of customers, markets, products and services as well as
value creation. Therefore you could say that the business model describes the
blueprint of how a company does business, and it is the translation of strategic
issues, such as strategic positioning and strategic goals into a conceptual model
that explicitly states how the business functions. The business model serves as a
building plan that allows designing and realizing the business structure and
systems that constitute the company’s operational and physical form (Magretta,
2002) (Osterwalder et al, 2005).
The business model as a source of value can help explain why some companies
outperform others, and its rationale for value creation and appropriation
Kathrine Weicker Page 64 of 147
differs from that of a company’s product market strategy. The concepts are
complements, however, rather than substitutes, and companies will get
significant effects on company performance when business models interact with
product market strategy (Zott and Amit, 2008). Strategy analysis is therefore an
essential step in designing a competitively sustainable business model. Unless
the business model survives the filters which strategy analysis imposes, it is
unlikely to be viable, as many business model features are easily imitated
(Teece, 2010).
A business model can take many shapes and sizes and can include many
different variables depending on what it is used for. The outlook of the business
model is highly dependent on the environment it is supposed to function in,
therefore making it hard to reach a general consensus about what a business
model should encompass. Different elements are in play such as strategy,
management and planning and organizational structure, but the only element
that there is a general agreement on is that a business model is about value
creation on all levels of the value chain. In many ways it builds upon Porter’s
concepts of the value chain, value systems, and strategic positioning.
A successful business model depends on the situation: where it offers unique
value, is hard to imitate, and is grounded in reality. Examples of the most
successful business models are the ones that create new markets, innovate
activity in existing markets, introduce an entire new layer in the value chain or
focus on few steps of the value chain and outsource others. Openness towards
trends, ideas and technology from the outside also has effects on performance,
just as the willingness to let internal resources engage outside of the company.
Kathrine Weicker Page 65 of 147
Furthermore it is also important to foster a dynamic attitude entailing a
constant experimentation with the company’s business model to ensure that
fundamental improvements are initiated whenever competition comes too
close (Hansen, 2013).
10.2 The business model in Danish fashion companies
The SMEs in the Danish fashion industry more or less follow a business model
that is focused on creativity, design, outsourced manufacturing and sales via
own stores or multi-‐brand retailers, directly or through distributors or agents.
Based on these features, they have been developing a successful branding
strategy focusing on Nordic flair, functionality and the value for money principle.
Based on art, symbolic value, culture and creativity, the business model of
Danish fashion companies is underpinned by somewhat continuous innovation,
a relentless focus on quality, highly skilled employees and strong export abroad,
which convey a certain status to the customers.
The SMEs in the Danish fashion industry are mainly design-‐led companies and
they typically offer two collections a year: spring/ summer and autumn/ winter.
The design process usually takes place a year and a half ahead of the real
season; samples are ready for fashion shows and selling a year ahead of the real
arrival of the products in order for stores to reach their customers. The
companies have a limited variety in terms of styles, for the scarcity and
uniqueness, but have high quality products. The element of design is supported
by an increasingly strong marketing orientation, and products and brand are the
key assets. The design identity and quality of products are the core
competencies for competitive advantage and differentiation strategy for these
Kathrine Weicker Page 66 of 147
companies. The value creation is done via high margins on the small volume
(Tran, 2008).
The fashion companies are furthermore focusing on managing costs by
organizing their sourcing, production, and distribution as efficiently as possible.
As a result, they may need as long as 12 to 18 months to design, produce, and
deliver a new line of clothing. That means they have to make big bets on future
customer preferences and demand, and bearing this risk has consequences for
the bottom line through inventory write-‐downs, if the clothes do not sell, or for
the top line through stock-‐outs, if people want more than the company made
(Tran, 2008) (Girotra, 2011).
In today’s highly competitive business environment many Danish fashion
companies choose to send out non-‐core operations to a supplier or
manufacturer to be able to focus only on core operations. Fashion companies
that choose to outsource are hoping to reduce the company’s costs by
specializing and making the company’s labour and resources more efficient. On
the other hand, other fashion companies constantly try to gain control over as
many sections as possible by analyzing its value chain, ultimately becoming a
vertically integrated retailer when every step of the value chain is controlled.
Companies that obtain control over the total production process by in-‐house
production can achieve shorter lead-‐times. The SMEs use a backward vertical
integration strategy not so much in direct ownership, but more in terms of a
tight quality control for ensuring quality (Tran, 2008).
Danish fashion companies are largely wholesale operations, enhanced and
Kathrine Weicker Page 67 of 147
underpinned by a wide-‐reaching supply chain and intermediary community. If
the fashion company sells to multi-‐brand retailers, the company usually follows
a selected distribution policy, that is the shops carrying the products need to
meet specific criteria regarding the store image, the prestige of the other brands
it sells, its geographic location together with the expected sales volume. These
criteria are set in order to maintain the brand image and make sure the
products are available to the target customers. The retailers used by the SMEs
are for the most part boutiques, department stores and concept stores.
Communication costs are high because of the importance of the brand image.
One way of communicating consists of having a strong presence at fashion
shows, which must to be outstanding and impressive, in order to attract
attention, have positive reviews and obtain editorial coverage in magazines and
newspapers. Advertising and PR is another important vehicle to communicate
brand identity and make it attractive to the public (Hansen, 2013).
10.3 Innovation in SMEs in the Danish fashion industry
Innovation is crucial to the future growth of the creative industry. Global
competition is increasingly focused on higher value activities, and the Danish
fashion industry must continue to innovate if it is to further develop its position
in the world of fashion.
Creating a successful company in any industry is a challenge, but the unique
characteristics and mindset of the fashion industry makes it particularly difficult.
There is no question about the fact that in the world of fashion, innovation is
derived from spotting the trend before anyone else and from sophisticated
Kathrine Weicker Page 68 of 147
exploitation of creative skills to create unique products. But unfortunately in
many Danish SMEs there is an unhealthy focus on product development and
many companies believe that creativity and innovation can only be explored
when designing new fashion products and not in business development in
general.
The Danish fashion companies have in the past been in charge and to some
extent spoilt, as they were able to push products to a trusted and emotionally
dedicated customer. Since there was no Internet, a company had full control
over the branding process and led in knowhow. Today many things have
changed, and excellence means more than just weathering a crisis. Relations
along the fashion industry value chain are continually adapting, relations
between raw material suppliers, producers, designers and retailers are
constantly being re-‐aligned in response to demand trends. Also customer
expectations influence changes in the industry and lines between brands and
retailers are becoming blurred; new e-‐channels and consumer pressure are
influencing relationships along the value chain. Selective distribution is today as
important as ever, and companies have to make choices between so-‐called “fast
fashion" and "slow fashion", depending on the time to market.
Looking at the Danish fashion industry today there are different distinctive types
of businesses, such as a Creative partnership, two creative people; Solo,
individual designer focused on growth; Designer and business partner, one
creative and one business partner; and Partnership with investor, designer in
partnership with a formal investor. The companies typically adopt these
business categories at different stages of their growth, and as the fashion
Kathrine Weicker Page 69 of 147
company develops and grows, it needs improved management skills, capital,
production capabilities and far-‐reaching distribution channels.
Each of these types of business has its own unique characteristics, but common
for most of them is that is that they are highly internationalized. Unfortunately it
is also common to have, together with a focus on product innovation, a fixed
view on market innovation and development, that more is better. Instead of
transforming a company’s core business model or designing new business
models to capture growth from new segments or markets, companies are
pushing the products to as many countries as possible, spreading themselves
thin and not gaining a solid foothold in each new market that they are entering.
A fashion company´s business model, the value proposition that it offers
customers and the operating model it creates to deliver that value at a profit, is
key to creating value in any economic environment. In times of instability, when
the potential for competitive disruption is high, business model innovation is
especially important. Business model innovation can provide Danish fashion
companies with a way to break out of intense competition, establish
competitive barriers around new markets, or create new growth opportunities
where none existed before (Lindgardt et al, 2009).
There is a widespread tendency of copying in the fashion world, and it is a
notoriously known fact that designers take inspiration from other designers and
it is really the nature of the business. Innovation in fashion is basically just
change. There is some innovation with fabrics, but most innovation in fashion is
about the design of clothes, and it changes over time but it is not conducive to
some kind of strategic goal. Figuring out how to capture value from innovation is
Kathrine Weicker Page 70 of 147
a key element of business model design, and business model innovations share
some unique characteristics that make the benefits from them more
sustainable.
Innovation is often in the company's processes that may not even be directly
visible to competitors; so while a new product design, a new fashion collection,
is launched with much fanfare, business model innovations remain relatively
hidden. Also copying a business model innovation from the competition is much
harder than imitating the competitor's product design. This is because the
business model innovations are often embedded in the fashion company’s DNA,
they define its core operating logic and for the competition to change and adapt
its business model is much harder. Therefore every new product development
effort should be coupled with the development of a business model which
defines its “go to market” and “capturing value” strategies (Girotra, 2012)
(Teece, 2010).
Given the high complexity of the fashion industry and its dynamic environment,
the existent business model governing the majority of SMEs in the Danish
fashion industry is no longer useful and sustainable to stimulate value creation.
A shift in business development and innovation strategy is what is required
given the particular set of environmental conditions, where a high focus on both
technology and market is needed.
Kathrine Weicker Page 71 of 147
11. Primary Research of the Fashion Industry Value Chain A value chain shows all the stages involved in adding value to a product and the
links between these stages. The stronger the chain, the more value will be
added in the process of production. This chain is the key to gaining competitive
advantage. The fashion industry involves a complex value chain, and there is a
set of processes which develop between actually picking of fibre in a cotton field
and being able to go into a local store and buy a fashion item which is liked,
which fits, is the right colour and has the right fashion appeal. It is the quality
which goes into the value chain that determines its effectiveness. To be
successful, the value chain needs to be driven by the market meaning it must
result in providing those benefits which customers demand and value.
The value chain shows the resources of the company and a company’s resources
are valuable if they lower costs or raise the price of a product. For Danish
fashion companies it is important to have an effective value chain configuration
(design, sourcing, manufacturing, storing and retailing) based on resources such
as design skills, supplier relations, sourcing networks, and sound business
practice. The same resource-‐base and value chain can produce different
products and therefore have a scope of different offerings, but at some point
during the growth and development of a fashion company, new activities are
needed and potentially also new resources, therefore forcing the development
of business models. See Figure 11.1
Kathrine Weicker Page 72 of 147
Figure 11.1 Six Components of a Business Model (Lindgardt et al, 2009)
The fashion industry is the quintessential example of a buyer-‐driven value chain.
Unlike producer-‐driven chains, where profits come from scale, volume and
technological advances, in the buyer-‐driven fashion industry value chain, profits
come from combinations of design, branding, and marketing of the products
that allow the retailers, designers and marketers to act as strategic brokers in
linking overseas factories and traders with product niches in their main
consumer markets (Fernandez-‐Stark et al, 2011).
Creating a new business model is a lot like writing a new story. At some level, all
new stories are variations on old ones and similarly, all new business models are
variations on the generic value chain underlying all companies (Magretta, 2002).
A"Business"Model"Typically"Consists"of"Six"Components"
Value&Proposi-on&Target&Segments&
Product&or&Service&Offering&
Revenue&Model&
Value&Proposi-on&
Value&Proposi-on&Value&Chain& Cost&Model& Organiza-on&
Opera-ng&Model&
Business"Model"
Kathrine Weicker Page 73 of 147
In that respect, interviews were carried out to gain insight into the strengths,
challenges and opportunities faced by the Danish fashion companies and to
identify ways to promote their sustainable growth and competitiveness.
Therefore the analysis looks at the past, the present and the future, with
regards to the development in the chosen areas in the value chain, in the Danish
fashion industry and then the recommendations takes a future perspective,
looking at new relations in the fashion value chain and promoting business
model development.
The fashion industry’s value chain is comprised of upstream, midstream and
downstream activities. Upstream activities include design and product
development. At midstream, the manufacturing processes such as cutting and
sewing are performed. Finally, sales, marketing, branding and distribution are
referred to as downstream activities (Jensen and Poulsen, 2012). The analysis
covers the following activities: Product Development, with the focus on
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Production, with the focus on sourcing,
and finally Sales, with the focus primarily on online sales. The focal points are
not only selected to give the research focus and structure, they were also
chosen since they represent important value adding activities, and they are
areas that have up until now mainly been giving the large fashion companies a
competitive advantage. The research done here takes a different view is that the
areas can be, and should be, exploited by fashion companies of all sizes. The
question is just how.
Kathrine Weicker Page 74 of 147
11.1 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
11.1.1 Introduction The fashion industry has a major impact on the environment, on supply chains,
on production, on manual labour and essentially on the consumer. It is regarded
as one of the most polluting industries, and the growing of cotton, bleaching
and colouring of fibres as well as the production of the finished garments are
associated with a very high energy consumption and large amounts of
wastewater and other forms of waste, imposing a considerable load on both the
local and the global environments. Serious health and safety issues also afflict
the entire supply chain in connection with the handling of chemicals, dust, noise
and monotonous, repetitive work. The fashion industry is one of the most
labour intensive industries, and with production based in countries with low
wages and no employee rights or opportunities for negotiation it becomes a
challenge to create decent and responsible working conditions. The social,
environmental and economic impacts along the clothing supply chain are listed
in Figure 11.2 (The Danish Ministry of Business and Growth, 2013)
(http://www.danishresponsibility.dk).
Kathrine Weicker Page 75 of 147
Figure 11.2 Social and Environmental impacts along the clothing supply chain (Forum for the
Future, 2010)
CSR is defined as “a concept whereby companies integrate social and
environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with
their stakeholders on a voluntary basis” and is about managing change at
company level in a socially responsible manner, seeking to set the trade-‐offs
between the requirements and the needs of the various stakeholders into a
balance, which is acceptable to all parties (European Commission, 2001).
CSR is in many Danish fashion companies playing an integral role in shaping the
mission or driving force of the company. Emerging markets for greener products
on the one hand, and the rise of sustainability and green growth agendas in the
companies on the other, are increasingly leading fashion companies to integrate
non-‐financial metrics into their decision-‐making processes, to revisit the
concepts of value and profitability that drive their business models, and to
Kathrine Weicker Page 76 of 147
reconsider the balance between the dual objectives of short-‐term profitability
and long-‐term sustainability (Interview, Odgaard, 2013).
CSR activity occurs both through external factors, such as legitimacy and
reputation, and through internal factors, such as implementation and learning,
and covers issues such as environmental externalities, ethical standards,
upholding of social norms and compliance with the law. See Figure 11.3 below
for the different environmental, social and governance aspects. For the fashion
industry this for example means a focus on: consumer engagement and
behaviour change, transparency disclosures, improved environmental
performance based on life-‐cycle thinking, sustainable sourcing of primary
materials, and restrictions on harmful substances. See figure 11.4 for
sustainability as a strategic business imperative (European Commission, 2012).
Kathrine Weicker Page 77 of 147
Figure 11.3 (Koehler, 2013)
Kathrine Weicker Page 78 of 147
Figure 11.4 Sustainability as a strategic business imperative (Deloitte, 2013)
11.1.2 The Development of CSR in the Danish fashion industry Growth in the Danish fashion industry has for some time been centered on
continuously creating new brands, new product ranges and new products to
drive sales and growth. Season cycles have shortened, and some brands have
Kathrine Weicker Page 79 of 147
been branching out from the traditional two main seasons to shifting to
presenting new styles on a more regular basis. Customers have been responsive,
and the development has been coined “fast fashion” signifying a production and
consumption pattern according to which products are produced, consumed and
discarded – literally – fast. The business model is one in which efficiency in
sourcing and production in terms of costs and time to market is of essence to
drive and meet consumer demand for new styles at the right price (Deloitte,
2013) (Interview, Odgaard, 2013).
The search for lower production costs has led Danish fashion companies to
outsource production to less-‐developed countries. Due to such off shoring of
production and extended supply chains, business operations of international
fashion companies have become increasingly complex. These global supply
chains are causing significant challenges for Danish fashion companies to trace
the origins of raw materials and exercise control over environmental and social
impacts that arise at various life-‐cycle stages. At the same time companies are
often held responsible for environmental and social problems caused not
directly by themselves but also indirectly by their suppliers. The development of
outsourcing the production has entailed less control with the conditions of
production for Danish fashion companies and since this overall responsibility
can be damaging for the company in terms of social awareness, reputation and
popularity, Danish fashion companies have been turning to Corporate Social
Responsibility, CSR, to help create conditions favourable to sustainable growth,
responsible business behaviour and durable employment generation.
Kathrine Weicker Page 80 of 147
According to Pia Odgaard at Dansk Fashion & Textil the fashion companies are
still struggling and the financial crisis is still roaming and taking its toll. This has
resulted in a changed and more reluctant focus on the CSR aspects of the
business. On the plus side she believes, that the industry has already
demonstrated an impressive capacity to adapt and create space for change. Pia
Odgaard says “In reality CSR in Danish fashion companies started with a good
business sense. The companies understood the importance of the employees
and valued them highly. This then led to satisfied employees that again led to
good suppliers that in return led to satisfied customers”.
Following the first wave of adopting CSR principles companies for example
adopted Codes of Conduct, a set of rules/guidelines concerning CSR for their
business operations, many based on the principles set out in the UN Global
Compact, to end relationships with suppliers who exploited workers, and set out
to improve labour standards. Pia Odgaard continues, “companies defined Codes
of Conduct for their entire production processes and put great effort into
ensuring labour rights at the work places that delivered to their businesses,
unfortunately in many cases the codes of conduct were placed in a binder on
the shelf, but with further considerations and responsibilities they have been
dusted off and the companies again want to implement them. Responsible
business conduct is important for Danish fashion companies to help them create
and keep consumer trust and overall confidence in the industry”.
The increased focus on sustainability goes hand in hand with the Danish
mentality, how we see ourselves and how we are perceived from the outside. By
buying Danish fashion, the customer should ideally at the same time buy into a
Kathrine Weicker Page 81 of 147
set of values in line with good morale, equality and a democratic way of life. In
terms of development it was also pointed out that a growing number of
companies see CSR as a way of distinguishing themselves from their competitors
and gaining a competitive advantage. These Danish fashion companies have
made CSR a main part of their company DNA and have made a very conscious
strategic choice marketing their designs as fair trade and eco-‐friendly products.
The question today is rather how to develop new products and services in a
responsible and strategic way, a way that has to consider and meet the
increasing demands of various stakeholders with profound expertise and
knowledge (Interview, Odgaard, 2013).
11.1.3 CSR today in the Danish fashion industry Today Danish fashion companies are among the world leaders when it comes to
improving the work environment and introducing environmental management,
resource economy and cleaner technologies. The companies are increasingly
recognising that the greening of their own business or value chain by improving
resource productivity may increase both their short-‐term and long-‐term
competitiveness and create new markets. Some companies innovate their
business models and improve their resource productivity by substituting to
alternative and sustainable inputs, reusing or recycling resources, selling
sustainable products and services, while others implement cradle-‐to-‐cradle
elements in their business model or apply functions that may change
consumption patterns and practices throughout their entire value chain, like
offering their product as a service function while continuing to have ownership
of the products. In a broad sense this could all be characterised as greening of
Kathrine Weicker Page 82 of 147
the companies’ business models (Norden Nordic Innovation, 2012) (Interview,
Odgaard, 2013).
There is no doubt that the industry in general has come a long way, but as Pia
Odgaard points out “the Danish fashion companies are at very different stages
of CSR development and implementation, some are at the very beginning of
looking into the area and other companies are very far in the process”. CSR
issues need to be incorporated into the fashion company’s strategic way of
thinking, a clear strategy is vital to generate profit from sustainability since it
defines how a given innovation will add business value, otherwise the company
will not benefit fully from its CSR performance. Accordingly, there is no generic
way of conducting CSR. It has to be incorporated and adapted to the specific
nature of the company. Pia Odgaard continues “to have a place and purpose in
the market one of the company’s focus areas has to be on CSR. Actually it has to
be an integral part of running a successful and sustainable business”.
A sustainable supply chain within the fashion industry is demanding and can be
complex for many SMEs as it requires knowledge and skills throughout the
entire value chain and demands various resources such as time, financing and
staff management. In the development and production phases, companies lack
knowledge of what substances are contained in the materials they use,
alternative materials to use and how to use new materials when developing and
designing new products. Some customers are willing to buy more sustainable
products and services, but there is still a large group of customer that do not
have enough knowledge about what sustainability is and who are too
conservative to change their buying habits where price is the main purchasing
Kathrine Weicker Page 83 of 147
incentive. Another great barrier is the large costs of new machinery and new
materials or changes that must be implemented in new product development
and design. Furthermore, recycling and reusing materials require infrastructure
systems, which also are costly to develop and implement (Interview, Odgaard,
2013) (Norden Nordic Innovation, 2012).
Today different types of green business model innovation approaches has been
implemented in Danish fashion companies, and the supply chain sustainability
strategies that most companies focus on are based on the first generation
approaches looking to control suppliers and very few companies have so far
focused their CSR innovation on both their input side, pre-‐production and
production, and on their output side, use and after-‐use/ reuse. Analysis to
understand how the fashion industry manages the challenges of sustainability
has been carried out and showed that there are opportunities for the industry
to deepen and broaden management of sustainability to increase value, reduce
lead times, costs of raw materials, wastes and transport while increasing
customer engagement and loyalty. Management of sustainability in the fashion
industry is mainly focused on overall commitments to sustainability and less so
on acting on the commitment and showing the results. Bottom line is that there
is a wide gap between today’s reality and the industry’s opportunity to leverage
sustainability (Deloitte, 2013).
One of the most important drivers for companies to initiate CSR is increased
consumer awareness towards sustainability. Pia Odgaard says, “Customers are
demanding that fashion companies become more responsible about their
practices, and key words are transparency and traceability that are concepts
Kathrine Weicker Page 84 of 147
anchored in building consumer trust”. Transparency and traceability is the
disclosure of information relating to material sources, manufacturers and other
suppliers in order for all stakeholders, including the customer, to have a
complete and accurate picture of the ethical and environmental impact of a
product. It is not an easy journey for many SMEs as the business model most
fashion companies is built on is to have a sophisticated marketing strategy and
to manufacture in less-‐ developed countries, where they can make more profit.
This is a fundamental issue we still need to address. There is no doubt that
customer expectations have been rising, that customers are concerned with the
social issues or issues related to product quality and safety, but according to Pia
Odgaard since consumer behaviour plays a major part in the sustainability of
fashion Danish customers could demand more and request higher standards,
therefore driving the development of CSR even further, setting and even beating
world standards.
Today the fashion industry is at a crossroads. It is locked in a competition for
market shares to improve profitability amidst downturn in the global economy
and consumer uncertainty. All the while the industry is facing sustainability
challenges in the supply chain led by high price volatility as well as resource and
factor availability. The road that the industry takes today will significantly impact
the industry’s future growth path (Deloitte, 2013).
11.2 Production
11.2.1 Introduction The least glamorous, but possibly the most important aspect of bringing a
fashion product to market is production and manufacturing. Production
Kathrine Weicker Page 85 of 147
describes the process by which concepts are made into a saleable physical
product, and in most cases, this means going from a small set of samples or
prototypes to commercial quantities of the item or style, often across multiple
sizes, colours and patterns.
Danish fashion companies have moved towards creative activities focusing less
on the production side, and the outsourcing of the production is often
substantiated by the fact that the fashion companies are focusing on the value
adding activities in the value chain. As intangible aspects of the value chain
(such as marketing, brand development, and design) have become more
important for the profitability and power of fashion companies, tangible aspects
(production and manufacturing) have increasingly become “commodities.” See
figure 11.5 for the curve of value added stages in the fashion value chain.
Figure 11.5 Curve of value added stages in the fashion value chain (Fernandez-‐Stark et al,
2011)
Kathrine Weicker Page 86 of 147
On the other hand though, outsourcing of production has been shown to be a
progressive process, and more and more steps in the value chain have become
externalized. While this may enhance the share of value captured by fashion
companies in the short-‐term companies lose their industrial experience and
expertise. This eventually undermines their competitive advantage. Many I have
spoken to have the opinion that the value added in the value chain cannot be
segregated into activities, and this has to be looked upon as a whole. Pia
Odgaard from Dansk Fashion and Textile believe that innovation happens where
the production happens. She believes that when the designers are not sitting
close to the production, no innovation happens with regard to the design and
sourcing, since the companies do not get the benefit of insight into the latest
methods and technologies. ”Bottom line is that if Danish fashion companies are
loosing innovation on the product development side, what is there left. Since we
have already outsourced production, innovation was what we were going to
survive on” states Pia Odgaard. In my experience it is impossible to separate
production from the overall success of a fashion company, as great concepts can
be designed, developed and sold, but a fashion company will ultimately live or
die based on what is produced and delivered to the end customer (Interview,
Odgaard, 2013).
11.2.2 The outsourcing of Danish fashion production The Danish fashion industry holds a unique status being among the first
industries to outsource the greater part of their business activities. Production
was moved abroad, as early as the 1950’s and almost all of the production was
outsourced by the 1990’s, due to cost advantages offered by lower-‐wage
Kathrine Weicker Page 87 of 147
countries. The competition on the international market had changed and the
consequences of globalisation were being felt by the Danish fashion industry.
The production of fashion was moved to low labour costs countries and in order
to survive the competition the Danish fashion companies had to follow. Low
costs and price was now the new competitive parameter and the Danish
companies could only compete by moving from the high intensive salary driven
Danish market to markets where the manufacturing costs where much lower.
The production was first outsourced to Poland and the Baltic countries, but as
the economy of these countries grew during the 1990’s so did the wage level.
Production was therefore moved to Turkey, India and China, countries which
had the wage levels necessary to keep costs down and thereby enhance the
price competitiveness of the Danish fashion companies (Maskell, 2005).
The viewpoint that I have observed from different sources is that this
development has had several positive consequences, and that the outsourcing
of the production has meant that the Danish fashion companies have had do
innovate and reinvent themselves and the business environment that they
operated in. The outsourcing strategy has had a major impact on the structure
of the fashion industry, and the role of production companies changed as they
moved away from traditional production activities towards creative activities
such as design, marketing and sales. The changes in the industry lead to new
types of fashion companies, and these new fashion companies integrated the
design aspect with business and production expertise, becoming knowledge
companies based on an entirely different set of skills and knowledge. The
outsourcing of the production has resulted in the introduction of new business
models, and the Danish fashion companies have had to learn to adjust to the
Kathrine Weicker Page 88 of 147
international fashion scene and the market conditions focusing on other parts of
the value chain like product development, design, logistic, marketing, branding
and sales (Negarandeh, 2008).
On the other hand, I have come across a different perspective. The fashion
industry is characterised by an extreme combination of short product life cycles,
short time to market, and a high rate of new product development, really like no
other industry, in a densely populated market. In order to make a profit, fashion
companies have to focus on both increasing sales and cutting expenses. The
development of outsourcing in the Danish fashion industry and earlier times’
focus on the importance of low wages and material costs has according to some
observers of the fashion industry unfortunately made the companies very one-‐
sided in their view misleading fashion companies into focusing on less efficient
cost-‐saving initiatives. The interviewed producers that worked with Danish
fashion companies all stated that this has resulted in a weakened, and not a
strengthened position, since the fashion companies have missed growth and
development opportunities due to their tunnel vision. Instead, producers and
observers alike would like to see a significant shift in business strategy and
mindset where there is a continued focus on cost reduction, but combined with
a new emphasis on growth (Interview, Serbian fashion producers, 2012).
11.2.3 The outsourcing of production today Today, the Danish fashion industry is at the front with regards to outsourcing,
and most fashion companies outsource the production completely and have
shifted their focus away from production towards high value adding and
Kathrine Weicker Page 89 of 147
knowledge intensive activities, such as design and branding. Information and
communications technologies have made it easier for SMEs to coordinate with
their suppliers, and the fashion companies have successfully created value by
positioning themselves strategically in new, global production networks and as a
result, Danish fashion companies have a very high shareholder value creation,
indicating high competitiveness and considerable potential (Barbry, 2009).
Outsourcing today may benefit fashion companies in a variety of ways, and the
reasons for outsourcing that I often hear are; to save money, speed to market,
proximity to market, to get better products, to enter new markets, to focus on
their key competences. Fashion companies rarely consider if they should be
outsourcing but rather where to next. That said, many good practices are
relevant across industries and in my experience the fashion industry could
benefit from learning how to analyze and compare their existing and potential
market of suppliers.
Moreover many fashion companies still develop their products in a traditional
way, through CMT (Cut-‐Make-‐Trim, meaning that the producer does not supply
any of the fabric or components, and only carries out production with the
materials supplied) collaborations rather than testing opportunities in
collaborating with FOB (Freight-‐On-‐Board, meaning that the producer
manufacture according to customer specifications and design, and in many
cases use raw materials specified by the fashion company) suppliers, as a more
recent approach. This approach keeps key competences on design and
marketing in-‐house but outsource most of the traditional production
development processes to the supplier. The outsourcing and loss of competence
Kathrine Weicker Page 90 of 147
within production has led to competitive disadvantages, and some of the
companies that I meet are specifically not using a FOB or the so-‐called full
package business model, a full-‐package producers is a supplier that carries out
all steps involved in the production of a finished fashion item, since the fashion
company then will become increasingly dependent on suppliers who are taking
care of sourcing, coordination, quality control, code of conduct, and distribution.
The roles and relationships among fashion companies, producers, and
intermediaries have become increasingly blurry today, and the following trends
are closely tied to strategies and long-‐term objectives of the different
companies in the value chain. One trend is that fashion brand owners have
become specialty retailers, meaning that producers and fashion companies are
increasingly opening their own stores. In addition, fashion brands with existing
retail operations are likely to focus more on their own stores rather than
meeting the needs of their external customers. Another trend today is that the
full-‐package producers become intermediaries meaning that rather than
produce, they establish a network of global suppliers. Also the intermediaries/
agents have expanded their roles to include an array of services to companies,
including design, product development, and quality control in addition to
providing a network of suppliers and logistics. Benefits of using a third-‐party
sourcing agent include scale of operations, buying power, flexibility, and ability
to spread risk among suppliers. We have also seen an increase in private-‐label
brands, both in the volume and diversity of retailer private labels. Today,
retailers are expanding the range of private-‐label products offered and
developing higher-‐margin private-‐label goods. Finally fashion companies are
creating exclusive product lines with mass merchant retailers meaning that
Kathrine Weicker Page 91 of 147
retailers are striking agreements with fashion companies to develop and
distribute brands that are sold exclusively through the one retailer’s stores
instead of the traditional fashion company model in which products are sold via
multiple retail stores (Fernandez-‐Stark et al, 2011) (Jensen and Poulsen, 2012).
11.2.4 Sourcing of producers The fashion companies I have been in contact with over the years are finding
sources of production to be the most challenging element to get right, and
industry observers believe that the SMEs have a disadvantage since they are
smaller with fewer assets and less experience in/on the field. I have found that
the Danish fashion companies typically lack an overview of skilled and reliable
producers, and will frequently shift producer until they come across someone
who meets their expectations as to quality, flexibility in for example the
minimum amounts of products, styles, that needs to ordered, and in-‐time
delivery, communication skills, and service. Many of the producers stated that
the fashion companies are shifting between producers, since the companies are
lacking knowledge of production and also have unrealistic expectations with
regards to professional relationships (Interview, Serbian fashion producers,
2012).
Since finding quality suppliers is a complicated and cumbersome element of
running a fashion company, it is seen as a large competitive advantage when it is
done successfully, and as a result, many companies in the Danish fashion
industry tend to be secretive and protective of their production sources. For this
very reason the exact level of outsourcing in Danish fashion is not known.
Kathrine Weicker Page 92 of 147
When the production partner has been found the order of the SMEs, in small
and unpredictable quantities, may tend to get pushed to the back of the order
queue, because of lack of bargaining power of the fashion companies, meaning
that their deliveries may be later than large fashion companies, which can
negatively impact sell-‐through rates and retailer relationships. The SMEs are
therefore finding it difficult to negotiate and demand the need for changing
details, scaling up or down, re-‐ordering, or other distribution and payment
terms. The producers interviewed commented that the fashion companies are
not always communicating effectively, are often poorly organised and are
unrealistic in terms of their expectation to price, quantities and also turnaround
times (Interview, Serbian fashion producers, 2012). The limited order capacity
prevents the fashion companies from the ability to react to the market, and
places high pressure on right design forecasting, an event that happens a year
ahead of the real season. In contrast, companies with large orders can enjoy
very flexible production conditions, matching with the fluctuating market
demand, that is, scaling up and down the production, replenishing bestsellers,
or producing express collections with a very short time to market. Unfortunately
in most cases the producer’s skill and proficiency is only really made clear once
production has started, and this can end in high costs for both the fashion
company and the producer. Choosing the right producer allows the set up of a
supply system that is able to swiftly respond to changing market condition,
adapting to dynamic demands and innovation over time (Tran, 2008).
Kathrine Weicker Page 93 of 147
11.2.5 Fashion production in Serbia I have observed that, recently, some fashion companies have started to see the
benefits of producing closer to home, both in terms of reducing carbon
emissions through less travel, greater production flexibility and positive brand
association. Whilst there are challenges around price and capacity, the close
nature of the production facilities enable easier management of production.
Therefore after years dominated by the relocation of production activities to
low-‐cost countries, the fashion landscape may now be changing again. New
opportunities for European-‐based companies are arising as a consequence of
rising production and logistics costs in the emerging economies, their increasing
focus on domestic markets, as well as the steadily increasing pace of fashion,
which requires strict control of production and fast supply to the European
market (Bang, 2013).
Some of the possible European-‐based companies are based in Nis in the
southern part of Serbia. I visited the area, known for its long and proud
manufacturing history, in the Spring of last year, where I conducted interviews
with twelve different fashion producers. The producers there have ties to
Denmark in the sense that they have produced fashion to larger Danish fashion
companies. I prepared for the trip by already in 2009 to conduct five interviews
using a questionnaire that was e-‐mailed to the chosen respondents, and it was
carried out to get an idea of the relevance, quality and commitment of the
participants. I also spoke to local business organisations that are working with
and for the industry, and also an experienced Danish Sourcer, with around 20
years experience in sourcing and production from SMEs, and who is now
Kathrine Weicker Page 94 of 147
working at one of the largest fashion companies in Denmark.
Visits to the different producers were useful in identifying a number of common
issues and aspects. Many of the companies are run by highly skilled
practitioners, who have a solid foundation and knowledge of the garment
making industry. Through the series of factory visits I made observations
regarding the facilities, workspace and machinery in the manufacturing unit,
working conditions, range of services and capacity, quality and standard of work
and I asked about mindset and ambitions, operations and efficiency,
professionalism and business savvy, product awareness, knowledge of market
position, skills and accreditation schemes, health and safety, certification
systems and code of conducts. A SWOT analysis of my findings, together with
facts on the garment industry in Serbia, is in appendix E.
The choice of geographic location will have a heavy impact on the results, and
therefore fashion companies should carefully evaluate which countries to
consider for outsourcing. Some countries will have tradition for specific types of
production with a sub-‐industry to support these activities. Vast differences
apply between countries in taxes, political climates, and jurisdictions, and this
may be vital to the economic success of an outsourcing decision. Proximity may
benefit time to market and customer service offerings. Making a comparative
analysis of the producers and countries subject to consideration is of utmost
importance.
When it comes to the outsourced production, the fashion companies are alerted
to where the best opportunities are in form of the cost. The supplier selection is
a process which demands the SMEs to identify the key criteria for success,
Kathrine Weicker Page 95 of 147
qualitative as well as quantitative, in order to construct a competitive
advantage. In my experience though few fashion companies know the actual
costs of their activities and the financial impact of their sourcing decisions. Many
companies focus primarily on direct production costs, instead of minimizing
their true burden, indirect costs. I believe that in order to stay competitive,
companies should know their costs so that they may reduce them, and focus on
quality, delivery, and price of their products.
The conventional perception that I hear time and time again is that low
production costs are equal to the least expensive outsourcing. The research trip
to Serbia though highlighted the fact that fashion companies can improve their
profitability by unveiling the true costs of the company’s production related
activities, looking at macro costs (education, infrastructure, government, human
rights, politics of trade), indirect costs (days of credit, communication skills,
quality assurance, order minimums, delivery, reliability) as well as of course
direct costs (business model like CMT, materials, time to market) when making a
comparison between different producers and countries (Interview, Serbian
fashion producers, 2012).
11.3 Online sales
11.3.1 Introduction The fashion industry has always been very competitive, but recent innovations
and technological developments have made the battle even more intense by
adding a digital dimension to the competition. The growth of the Internet, has
raised anew, and in a transparent way, fundamental questions about how
Kathrine Weicker Page 96 of 147
fashion companies deliver value to the customer, and the Internet has caused
many “bricks and mortar” companies to rethink their distribution strategies if
not their whole business models. Luckily, the unique characteristics of virtual
markets; removal of geographical and physical constraints, reversal of
information flows from customers to supplier, and other novel information
bundling and channeling, make the possibilities for business model innovation
appear almost endless.
Globally, retailing is witnessing highly significant shifts, and the growth of the
Internet has powered upheavals in the retail landscape that are revolutionary in
scope, and unprecedented in nature. The emergence of online sales has
radically changed the business landscape, and new fashion companies are
capturing new opportunities in the electronic marketplace through innovative
business models and established companies are racing to transform and adapt
their old business models to the new environment. As a result, retailing practice
is increasingly encompassing a broader range of activities as retailers expand the
boundaries of their target markets and develop new ways for interacting with
customers and channel partners. Online sales continue to outpace overall retail
spending growth, and in 2011, Danish e-‐commerce sales totalled DKK 46 billion,
up 15% from 2010. Of this DKK 4 billion was spent on buying fashion online,
which translates into roughly a fifth of the total sales of fashion in Denmark. In
2012 total e-‐commerce sales was up 19% at DKK 54.7 billion (Sorescu et al,
2011) (FDIH, 2012).
Kathrine Weicker Page 97 of 147
11.3.2 The Development of online sales in the Danish fashion industry Online retailing is a relatively new and important direct sales route to reach the
customer, and it has been developing at a breathtaking pace. It has been
emerging as a new growth driver for the entire fashion industry, disrupting
traditional distribution models, and leading to the emergence of new players in
the industry. For years though, e-‐commerce suffered from capital inefficiencies
and complexities that pushed Danish fashion companies as well as investors
away. The unrealised, over-‐hyped expectations for online sales, at a time when
the market, technology and infrastructure were less evolved, and the
subsequent burns left many companies with bad experiences and no desire to
repeat the costly investment.
Even after the technology was in place and the mentioned difficulties and
threats were rectified, the Danish fashion industry was slow to catch the online
wave and according to Rina Hansen, Head of Digital at Hummel and strategic
advisor for fashion companies, it was very much due to the fear of the negative
attitude towards online stores by the retailers. The Danish fashion companies
were reluctant to launch their own webshops, and despite the growing trend of
online shopping, and the possibilities of reaching a larger segment than if they
limited themselves to only having physical stores, only but a few of the Danish
fashion companies had their own webshops, supplying the full collection.
Despite the many advantages of operating their own webshop, many companies
remained reluctant to do so. The advantages included, not least, a higher
contribution margin per unit, due to the fact that online retailers could cut out
Kathrine Weicker Page 98 of 147
the intermediary. Online retailers do not have the costly infrastructure that
comes with operating hundreds of physical stores along with employing an army
of salespeople. In addition, fashion companies could have direct contact with
the customer: make suggestions of how to use collections, give information
about the manufacturing process and the qualities of the fabrics, capture
valuable information about shopping habits and preferences, and the possibility
for customers to interact directly with the brand. Although this direct contact
with the customer would improve customer loyalty to the brands, and the larger
margins would give better results, companies remain unconvinced about
launching their own webshops.
So it was not only because of time and resource constraints of launching a
webshop, nor the concerns regarding payment insecurity from the customers,
or the fact that many fashion companies could not afford to invest in such a
project. Rather it was that the fact that retailers’ opinion about the fashion
companies own webshops was affecting their behaviour, since they expressed a
concern about the practice, called "showrooming", as customer behaviour
became more and more accustomed to using the in-‐store experience as a point
of research and brand experience, only to then purchase online. The retailers
also feared a cut in sales, because they assumed that the customers would turn
to the fashion companies’ own webshops. Rina says “Fashion companies were
almost afraid of the retailers, and it was scaring the companies from going
online, as they felt that they needed excessive amounts of documentation and
argumentation in place”. The fashion industry was dependent on the retailers
that controlled the access to the customers and a webshop strategy with direct
communication to the customers would make the industry less dependent on
Kathrine Weicker Page 99 of 147
retailers and secure the necessary feedback from the market, changing the
current push strategy to a pull strategy.
The retail industry was waking up to the fact that digital initiatives were no
longer at the periphery of business but was core to driving growth and engaging
customers. The retailers widely assumed that the Internet was cannibalistic, that
it would replace all conventional ways of doing business and overturn all
traditional advantages, and fashion companies worried about cannibalizing their
existing sales channels. According to Rina Hansen the risk of channel conflict
appears to have been overstated. states that “The research that has been done
after the companies have started their online sales using a business-‐to-‐
consumer business model has shown that, looking at the statistics on the actual
sales, the companies cannot see that any cannibalization is taking place”. She
continues, “Actually in the areas where the companies have wholesalers there is
an increase in sales. The higher density in the physical stores the higher sales,
and when new channels are opened, sales are increasing in all channels, also in
the physical shops”. According to Rina the reason for this is that customers are
more educated when they are entered the stores when there is an online
presence (Amit and Zott, 2000).
Many Danish fashion companies had concerns and were struggling to rethink
their traditional sales and marketing strategy to include the digital channels and
the online dimension to make their company fit for the future. Another reason
for their hesitation was due to the dilemma of involving the public and at the
same time maintaining exclusivity and brand control. They feared that
implementing interactive categories on their websites, where customers and
Kathrine Weicker Page 100 of 147
fans could interact, allowing their unfiltered feedback or customize products
could jeopardize and even make them loose control of their brand (Interview,
Hansen, 2013).
11.3.3 Online sales today in the Danish fashion industry Today the tides have turned in e-‐commerce. It has matured, and the fashion
industry is now competing strongly in the digital markets and promising new
business models, built around new ways of buying, selling and engaging with
fashion goods, are emerging. For one, customers are now acclimated to the
concept of online retail and major innovations and infrastructural advances have
also fundamentally improved the economics of e-‐commerce. The growing
importance of the digital environment and online sales has been creating many
new opportunities for the Danish fashion industry, and the companies have
moved from a focus on branding to a focus of sales. It has enabled fashion
companies, in particular SMEs, to reach new markets and offer consumers more
and better targeted choices and competitive prices. Moreover, a strong online
presence has helped to create a modern and dynamic image of the industry as a
whole.
Many actually believe that the retail industry is in the midst of a customer
revolution, and that the collision of the virtual and physical worlds is
fundamentally changing consumers’ purchasing behaviours. The customer
experience is changing as consumers are becoming more and more connected,
with the key drivers being the rapid adoption of mobile devices and digital
media. Customers expect to be able to shop anytime, anywhere, and are also
Kathrine Weicker Page 101 of 147
becoming more demanding. In fact, 60% of consumers in Denmark search
product information online before they make a purchase.
The advent of the Internet has further increased the efficiency of the shopping
experience by reducing customers’ search costs and by allowing them to
purchase products that were previously not geographically accessible. In
Denmark for example the online shopping in international webshops have risen
from DKK 9 billion in 2011 to DKK 12.5 billion in 2012, an increase of almost
40%. Fashion is the second most bought product category after movies, music
and books and the Internet has not only enabled selling in multiple channels
(e.g., online vs. stores), but also selling across channels, making it a more
stimulating and satisfying experience, by allowing customers to purchase online
and pick up at a store, or to access the retailer’s larger online assortment while
shopping in store where they can take advantage of customer support.
Customers are seeking an integrated, seamless and relevant shopping
experience across all channels, and expect retailers to deliver this experience. In
fact, in Denmark 42% have more trust to an online store if it also has a physical
shop and 52% of consumers expect to be able to exchange a product purchased
online in a physical shop. Fashion is actually the most returned product category
with a return rate of 62% (FDIH, 2012) (Sorescu et al, 2011).
The technological developments have also facilitated the prevalence of
customer co-‐creation, where customers participate in the design and creation of
their own fashion items, with high added value. Customer co-‐creation has been
embraced by SME’s, and according to Rina Hansen, this user-‐driven innovation
has become one of the driving forces in the fashion industry. She states “we
Kathrine Weicker Page 102 of 147
have been very focused and concentrated on getting brand control on the digital
channels, and have controlled the content in the different channels, where the
brand had to create the content and set the way, but now that the framework
has been set, and we know how to interact with the customers we therefore
now dare to let the customers in and engage in co-‐creation of products and co-‐
creating the actually brand”.
In recent years, the sales landscape has changed dramatically, and no longer are
fashion companies limited to wholesale and bricks-‐and-‐mortar retail channels.
Today, brands sell across multiple channels, including online retailers and the
fashion companies own webshops, moving from single, independent channels to
both physical and digital multi-‐channel retailing. The blurring line between the
physical and online world reflects a shift in consumer expectations, says Rina
Hansen. "We are in an omni-‐channel world," she points out. "Today you have to
be present in all channels to be successful, since the brand and the company has
to be where the customers are, depending upon their mood or lifestyles
demands”. Finding multiple points to connect with customers builds loyalty and
heightens the brand value and in an omni-‐channel world, the physical store may
become a marketing expense, a tool for generating buzz or a way to provide
service.
According to Rina Hansen, branding and presentation tend in some ways to take
precedence over product orientation in the fashion industry, and many times
there is a lack of awareness as to why a particular fashion item is an excellent
product for every day living, aligned with the customers interests and emotional
involvement and therefore fulfilling the customers expectations. There is not
Kathrine Weicker Page 103 of 147
enough direct communication with the final customer, since she regards the
Danish fashion industry to be based on a wholesale business model, meaning a
more business-‐to-‐business business model. There is much to improve when it
comes to offering customers a structured and intuitive shopping experience
which leads the customers to uniquely bond to the fashion company, and Rina
continues ”the strength is that it builds character, adds personality and a story
behind the company and the brand, it makes it easier for the customers to buy
it, since you are guided and you understand the brand. You get inspired and this
triggers the shopping gene”.
All this will develop the brand profile of the fashion company, as it will allow the
company to define its brand and the meaning that this brand carries in the
minds of the customers. Importantly, Rina Hansen points out “that there has to
be a good balance between high tech and high touch, and not only for the brand
but also for the customer. There has to be a feeling that you are connected
24/7, but just as well as there is high tech, there also has to be high touch so
that the customer can feel the company, and get the antidote to all the
technology. It is important to keep in mind that customers are still living in the
physical world”.
Social commerce is another critical part of the customer experience and the rise
of social media channels like Facebook, Twitter and blogs have also enabled
Danish fashion companies to acquire customers and accelerate growth far more
efficiently. People want to connect and be social, a since there is a need for
social interaction, and two-‐way communication communities based on lifestyles
and common interests are becoming more common. For fashion companies
Kathrine Weicker Page 104 of 147
social media channels like Facebook and Twitter are great social platforms to
connect with their followers. As users willingly express their opinions and
experiences, these sites become valuable tools to distinguish customer’s wants
and needs, making them a potential source of real time customer information,
knowledge and feedback, a never-‐ending focus group. Capturing the knowledge
of customers and using it, as feedback to direct the operations is one way to add
value. I often hear from fashion companies that allowing customers to tap into
the knowledge of other customers is the fastest path to solving customer
problems and creating customer loyalty (Opera Capital Partners, 2013).
On a more negative note it is impossible for fashion companies to control the
conversations which take place about their brand in the social media channels,
but according to RIna Hansen, they must become a part of the conversation and
engage with customers directly. She states, “in general, the fashion industry is
not so good at listening to the needs of the customers, but this of course has to
change and should change. One reason for this is the added transparency in the
social media environment, where there are no secrets anymore. If a customer
receives bad customer service then it will spread via Facebook so you have to
listen to the customers, whether you like it or not” (Interview, Hansen, 2013).
Kathrine Weicker Page 105 of 147
12. Recommendations
12.1 Introduction
Danish fashion companies should be seeking and considering improvements to
their business models, particularly improvements that are difficult to imitate
and that add value for customers. Changing the fashion company’s business
model literally involves changing the paradigm by which it goes to market, and
the elements of a business model must be designed with reference to each
other, and geared to both the business/customer environment and to the
direction of technological development in the fashion industry. There are many
reasons why fashion companies should prepare for the future, some of them
being; the impact of globalization, the adoption of new technologies, the
growing awareness of CSR and the diversification of channels, such as growing
effective use of the internet. Globalization is having a huge impact on how
customers shop and how the industry meets their needs. Technology is also
moving at a pace never seen before. Customer awareness of CSR is increasing,
so that companies can no longer ignore its impact. Finally, diversification of
channels, including the Internet, is redrawing the industry landscape. All these
forces, among others, have the potential to significantly alter the fashion
industry’s value chain in the future.
In this report, it has been argued that business model development is highly
relevant in the current environment of the Danish fashion industry. Several of
the possible areas of focus on in the value chain have been analysed, and in our
recommendations we will look at how fashion companies can develop a
competitive capability in business model innovation. The following
Kathrine Weicker Page 106 of 147
recommendations are intended to be possible, understandable and actionable,
with a clear reference to the nature of the fashion industry. They are not
designed to dictate what are the best and most innovative business models, but
to demonstrate the different ways in which the Danish fashion industry can
accomplish business model innovation. The recommendations follow the
building blocks of Alexander Osterwalder’s Business Model Generation, and are
meant to provide the SMEs with insight and challenge the fashion companies’
ideas, inspire them with new opportunities and help them plan for the future.
How a company goes about developing a new business model will depend on its
role in the industry and the circumstances; however, in general a few activities
are particularly important when striving for business model innovation. The
fashion company has to focus on uncovering opportunities, diagnose the current
model to understand its limitations, and assess the company’s current context,
the needs of its customers, and the models of its competitors. The company
should take an honest look at what is working, what is not working and what
might constitute a better value proposition. Properly implementing the new
business model is crucial, rolling out and scaling up the idea, and finally, building
the platform and skills to sustain a business model innovation advantage on a
continuous basis.
With reference to Osterwalder’s Nine Business Model Building Blocks, I will
present recommendations in all four pillars of the business, making
recommendations using six of the business model building blocks (See Table
12.1 below): Customer-‐driven development, focusing on the internet, multi-‐
channel sales, and engaging the customer; Offer-‐driven development, describing
Kathrine Weicker Page 107 of 147
how CSR should be integrated into the company’s value proposition; Resource-‐
driven development, highlighting how companies should pool resources and
build on suppliers knowledge by networking with both producers and other
fashion companies; and finally Finance-‐driven development, where companies
should manage costs by taking into account direct and indirect costs of
production.
Pillar Business Model Building Block
Recommendation
Product (Section 12.3)
Value Proposition Integrate CSR in company’s DNA, engaging consumers to change their consumption patterns -‐ use sustainability as a driving force for innovation
Customer Interface (Section 12.2)
Target Customer Describes the segments of customers a company wants to offer value to.
Distribution Channel Use Internet and multi-‐channel retail, Brick-‐and-‐click strategy
Relationship Strengthen customer relationships, focusing on co-‐creation, involvement and social innovation -‐ empowering customers
Infrastructure Management (Section 12.4)
Value Configuration Create a common platform -‐ share services, information and network, such as supply chain partners
Core Competency Outlines the competencies necessary to execute the company's business model.
Partner Network Expand cooperative agreements with producers and other fashion companies to efficiently offer and commercialize value, and capture production knowledge
Financial Aspects (Section 12.5)
Cost Structure Manage costs by taking into account direct and indirect costs of outsourcing production
Revenue Model Describes the way a company makes money through a variety of revenue flows.
Table 12.1 Recommendations Using Nine Business Model Building Blocks (Osterwalder et al,
2005)
Kathrine Weicker Page 108 of 147
12.2 Customer-‐driven business model development
Engaging customers, whether to adopt more sustainable behaviours or just
purchase more fashion products, will no longer be about just marketing and
communicating to customers, but will also be about connecting and socializing
with the customers. The Internet and technologies like mobile devices have truly
revolutionized the fashion industry, and with e-‐commerce, fashion companies
can sell and market directly to customers. Customers want to shop through all
the different channels, and since the risk of channel conflict and fear of
cannibalization appears to have been overstated, I recommend a business
model that involves multi-‐channel retailing. Danish fashion should be looking at
innovative ways to drive customers into stores and innovative ways of
improving the in-‐store experience through online. Fashion companies need to
be present everywhere the customers go, across different channels, and ensure
they have a positive experience at every point.
There has been an increase in online sales and recent advances in technology
are helping customers to fully embrace e-‐commerce and contributing to the
steady growth of the market. Most fashion products though are still purchased
from traditional stores and there are still barriers to overcome for the
companies like the inability to physically interact with the products. With that in
mind I therefore recommend a business model that combines both offline and
online part of business, a brick-‐and-‐click business model. This is a business
model that offers multiple and integrated points of shopping access, different
channels for different purposes. Interestingly enough introducing Internet
applications in one activity often places greater demands on physical activities
elsewhere in the value chain. Direct ordering, for example, makes warehousing
Kathrine Weicker Page 109 of 147
and shipping more important. Some of the advantages of this model include for
example strengthening brand name recognition, giving customers a physical
location to return or buy fashion products right away without having to pay
shipping costs, lowering promotional costs through cross-‐marketing and cross-‐
merchandising opportunities, and also expanding customer base. Besides, there
are always customers who enjoy the social interaction shopping provides and
who are still afraid to purchase online because of security issues, and finally
many customers prefer to try on the fashion products before buying.
Customers today have the power of information as their fingertips, enabling
them to make comparisons, access information and purchases anytime and
anywhere. Social media technologies and tools such as Facebook, Twitter, and
blogs, have provided customers with a huge platform for not just
communicating information with one another but for interacting and socializing.
In addition to multichannel retailing, companies should strengthen their
relationship with the customer. Due to the growth in Internet connectivity,
customers scrutinize products, services and companies, and fashion companies
have to be authentic. Customers will expect and demand transparency in the
sourcing and production of fashion products, in the quality and also in company
policies and procedures. Fashion companies will need to take a much more
active role in shaping the conversation with customers, and as an example
customers will expect to have input into the development of new fashion
products, especially with fashion companies to which they feel loyal. It is all
about listening, servicing and collaborating more than just pure selling. I
therefore recommend a business model that is focusing on co-‐creation,
involvement and social innovation. Danish SMEs have to expand their focus
Kathrine Weicker Page 110 of 147
from selling products to engaging and empowering customers, with the ultimate
goal of creating a rewarding customer experience. Social business models will
change the fashion industry and the behaviour of customers have and will be
changing immensely as they will not settle for a standardized product, but will
prefer to participate and take part in the design and in the very creation of the
product. Bottom line is that business models based on customer relationships
are needed.
12.3 Offer-‐driven business model development
There is no doubt that customers are becoming more active participants in the
creation of a more sustainable economy and increasingly aware of the broad
sustainability challenge facing the world. However, there are still some major
barriers to overcome with consumers. The reason for this is that while
consumers might want to buy sustainable products and live more sustainably,
the feel powerless to make a difference. Moreover, defining sustainable fashion
can be difficult for the average consumer and encompasses numerous aspects,
and most consumers are sceptical or confused about claims made by the fashion
companies regarding environmentally friendly products. As a consequence
consumers adoption of more sustainable lifestyles is so far rather limited, and it
is therefore highly likely, that sustainable consumption over the next years will
not be primarily driven by consumers themselves. Rather, I will recommend a
business model where the SMEs in the Danish fashion industry take the lead in
engaging consumers to change their consumption patterns and innovating to
meet future demands.
Kathrine Weicker Page 111 of 147
This will require a fundamental shift in the way that many fashion companies
think and operate, it will be part of the company’s value proposition, in that the
fashion companies will need to use sustainability as a driving force for
innovation in developing new products and services, in sourcing and production
and also in communicating with customers. It will not be enough to react to
customers needs and demands, leading fashion companies will look to engage
customers sooner rather than later to help accelerate a shift toward more
sustainable behaviours.
Many believe that there is a lack of information about impact and a difficulty in
finding sustainable products, and this is a very serious gap in the value chain
that needs to be closed in order to ensure that the products as well as the
fashion company ́s good intentions reach the consumer. Fashion companies can
for example document transparency and traceability, exposing sensitive and the
not always entirely flattering inner-‐workings of their production, in product
labelling and communication, which will help shape new norms and value sets,
positively influencing customer choice and usage. The companies should focus
on the business-‐to-‐consumer sales situation, and take charge of the situation
where the product and its storytelling change hands. This is to ensure a high
level of awareness about sustainability issues concerning the product and
related services.
12.4 Resource-‐driven business model development
Despite the importance of the relationship between the fashion company and
the producer, producers are often seen as a necessary evil by the fashion
Kathrine Weicker Page 112 of 147
companies, and are rarely seen as partners. Fashion companies generally view
manufacturing relationships as problematic and tense, and producers and
fashion companies are critical of each other: there is a mismatch in
expectations, lack of understanding of each other’s business operations,
workflow, and financial restrictions. Moreover, many fashion companies’
production timings are currently polarised within the two-‐season model,
compounding pressures within both the company and producers’ operations,
the production window is extremely condensed, and capacity is stretched to the
limit. Many fashion companies have complex supply chains spanning continents
and involving numerous suppliers and producers. This makes it more critical
than ever to invest in supplier relations and work collaboratively to promote
partnerships and that way solve sustainability challenges, improve efficiency,
information flow and value added processes, reduce costs, and promote
innovation. For these reasons I recommend a partnership business model where
the fashion companies are taking responsibility over the dynamics in the supply
chain, enabling the companies to gain better production knowledge. In addition,
many fashion companies are struggling with sourcing a producer with the
needed skills and reliability, and this challenge lends itself to creating long term
business partnerships that will benefit all parties involved, and will be a driver of
value.
Turning the vision of further development of the fashion companies into reality
will require that the industry focus on skills and experiences as opportunities for
growth and improved performance. Often though, a single company does not
have all the competencies needed to create new and more viable solutions,
therefore they need partners with complementary competencies. Many of the
Kathrine Weicker Page 113 of 147
challenges of the industry, like the issues of sustainable fashion, need collective
action to be overcome, and it is difficult for individual companies in the industry
to address them alone. Fashion companies need to have the ability to balance
operations with development of their company, and a broad and diverse
foundation of knowledge simply makes it easier to be both innovative and goal-‐
oriented. Individual companies cannot afford to wait for others to act. With this
in mind, I recommend that the industry embrace new alliances, and I therefore
see an opportunity for a different partnership and network business model.
Building the new value chain vision, either upstream or downstream, starts with
information sharing within and between fashion companies. Critical company
cultural and behavioural changes will include organisational development,
improved trust, and new ways at looking at the assumed competitors.
Companies should create a common platform and should be prepared to share
services, information and network, such as supply chain partners, between
partners in the platform, and work collectively to transform its businesses.
This will pose an opportunity for companies to lead the way with regards to
using complementary skills, creating awareness, understanding and trust by
sharing best practises on business cases, not to mention create the space for
others to act, and subsequently creating a stronger Danish fashion industry all
together. The companies must realize that there is a shared dependency
between the SMEs, to survive in the competitive globalized world of fashion,
and that this business model will result in an improved collaboration to better
serve the customer everywhere. The ownership of the common platform would
have to be decided and there are several options available to the participating
companies, more importantly though is that this is an opportunity for
Kathrine Weicker Page 114 of 147
pioneering companies to step up and lead the industry with new business
models, products and services that will thrive in the future.
12.5 Finance-‐driven business model development
All companies must manage their costs in a sensible manner, and for fashion
companies operating in a highly competitive market cost control is essential to
stay competitive. Even so, SMEs rarely have procedures for cost analyses since
this is not the primary interest of the designer who typically runs the business.
Fashion products have a lifecycle, which requires a continuous update of the
product range to maintain a relevant value proposition to the market and a
profitable operation for the company. The condition of doing so wisely and
professionally implies that fashion companies can map their cost and profit
landscape of individual products, product portfolio, as well as value interchange
in the product range. With that in mind, I recommend a cost management
business model with a focus on the cost structure of the fashion company,
supporting the outsourcing decisions. The reason for this is that fashion
companies can improve their profitability by including cost analysis, in
comparative studies between producers worldwide. Too many companies focus
only on direct costs when they make decisions about where to produce their
products, instead the cost analysis of macro cost, indirect cost as well as direct
cost should influence fashion companies in sourcing decisions. The benefit to
the fashion companies will be gaining information about all costs incurred to
operate the business model, and learning how to analyze and compare their
existing and potential market of suppliers.
Kathrine Weicker Page 115 of 147
13. Conclusion As stated in the focus of this report, many fashion companies focus heavily on
the branding and marketing aspects of the business. Even though it is indeed of
the utmost importance for all fashion companies to create their own unique
universe and special DNA of the fashion brand to try to differentiate the brand
from their competitors, the aim of this report is to show that, while branding
and the use of the marketing toolbox are important, they are not the only ways
for a fashion company to excel and be unique.
What is the current state of the Danish fashion industry in terms of growth and
development? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the SMEs in the
Danish fashion industry? What is business model development? What factors in
the value chain can assist Danish SMEs in the fashion industry in their quest for
growth and development? These are the research questions this work has tried
to answer. The objective of the report is to analyse how Danish SMEs in the
fashion industry can use new business models as a strategy to grow and develop
their businesses, and to give some well-‐founded recommendations to Danish
fashion SMEs regarding new possible business models, new methods and ideas.
The methodology used in pursuing this objective consists, first of all, in a review
of the existing literature about the fashion industry, growth and development
possibilities and barriers, business model development and value chain design.
This step was considered useful to understand and define the area of research.
The literature review highlighted one fundamental model and theory about
business model development that was considered more relevant for the
purpose of the report: Alexander Osterwalder’s Business Model Generation.
Kathrine Weicker Page 116 of 147
Secondly, the primary data was collected through interviews with people
working within business development from different perspectives, and also with
experts of the Danish fashion industry. In total fourteen semi structured
interviews were held and the data was used in the industry profile as well as the
analysis. By giving insight into what has been the practice of the industry in the
past and what is carried out currently, the interviewees gave insight into future
ways of adding value, and new ways of doing business. The interviews followed
the three areas of the value chain: Product Development, with the focus on
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Production, with the focus on sourcing,
and finally Sales, with the focus primarily on online sales. The focal points were
not only selected to give the research focus and structure; they were also
chosen since they represent important value adding activities, and are areas
that have up until now mainly been giving the large fashion companies a
competitive advantage. The research done here takes the point of view that
fashion companies of all sizes can capture value in all the selected areas. The
question was just how. Finally, several analyses were performed: an analysis of
the information gained through the interviews and from my many years
consulting for the industry, a description of the Danish fashion industry, a SWOT
analysis of the industry, a review of the growth and development possibilities
and barriers, the implementation of Osterwaldere’s model and a look at the
industry value chain. These analyses formed the basis for the suggestions and
recommendations for new business models for the future.
It was recognised when appraising the Danish fashion industry that the
foundations for business model development were present, and there are
Kathrine Weicker Page 117 of 147
significant growth opportunities. The industry has several strengths, such as the
fact that there is a sense of quiet optimism in industry, as the companies are
getting used to and adapting to the new situation in the aftermath of the
financial crisis, making the timing right, and also the fact that the industry has
been very successful in outsourcing great parts of the production, and is geared
towards further outsourcing. These areas offer opportunities that can be further
developed so that the industry can realise its full potential. Furthermore the
growth experienced in online sales can further catalyze the industry's
international expansion and growth plans. Finally, the increased focus on
Corporate Social Responsibility goes hand in hand with the Danish mentality,
how the Danes see themselves and how they are perceived from the outside,
giving Danish fashion companies a large competitive advantage.
It has been argued that business model development is highly relevant in the
current environment of the Danish fashion industry, and there are many ways
by which fashion companies can create, deliver and capture value through their
business models. Firstly, since the risk of channel conflict and fear of
cannibalization appears to have been overstated, one recommendation is a
business model that involves multi-‐channel retailing. Fashion companies need to
be present everywhere the customers go, across different channels, and ensure
they have a positive experience at every point. A business model is
recommended that combine both offline and online part of business, a brick-‐
and-‐click business model. This is a business model that offers multiple and
integrated points of shopping access, different channels for different purposes.
Another recommendation is a business model that is focusing on co-‐creation,
involvement and social innovation. Danish SMEs have to expand their focus
Kathrine Weicker Page 118 of 147
from selling products to engaging and empowering customers, with the ultimate
goal of creating a rewarding customer experience. Since consumers’ adoption of
more sustainable lifestyles is so far rather limited, a recommendation was also
made to adopt a business model where the SMEs in the Danish fashion industry
take the lead in engaging consumers to change their consumption patterns and
to help innovate to meet future demands.
The next recommendation on how Danish SMEs in the fashion industry can use
new business models as a strategy to grow and develop their businesses is a
partnership business model where the fashion companies take responsibility
over the dynamics in the supply chain, enabling the companies to gain better
production knowledge. It has also emerged that the industry should embrace
new alliances, and therefore it is recommended that they create a different
partnership and network business model, building the new value chain vision,
either upstream or downstream, where the companies should create a common
platform and should be prepared to share services, information and network,
such as supply chain partners, between partners in the platform, and work
collectively to transform its businesses. The final recommendation is a cost
management business model with a focus on the cost structure of the fashion
company, supporting the outsourcing decisions. The reason for this is that
fashion companies can improve their profitability by including cost analysis, in
comparative studies between producers worldwide.
In conclusion, applying new business models can fuel the growth of small and
medium sized companies in the Danish fashion industry. While branding and the
use of the marketing toolbox are as important as ever, SMEs in the fashion
Kathrine Weicker Page 119 of 147
industry can create longstanding competitive advantage throughout their value
chain. This report has presented a structured view of the industry and the
supply chain, and proposed realistic and actionable recommendations for SMEs
to implement to realize their growth potential.
Kathrine Weicker Page 120 of 147
References Amit, R., Zott, C. (2000) Value drivers of E-‐commerce business models, The
Wharton School and INSEAD, 2000/06/ENT/SM
Berzina, L. and Van Bommel, P. (2009) Behind the Internet Business Models: An
E-‐health Industry Case, Master Thesis, Copenhagen Business School
Bang, B. (2013) Den trykkede stemning er væk i den danske modebranche,
Børsen, 17th April 2013, p. 16
Bang, B. (2013) Tid og penge styrer modeproduktionen, Børsen, 30th August
2013, p. 7
Barbry, M. G. (2009) Danish fashion, An Overview, Rostra Kommunikation,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, The Trade Council, Customers Relations
Bisgaard, T., Henriksen, K., Bjerre, M. (2012) Green Business Model Innovation
Conceptualisation, Next Practice and Policy, Nordic Innovation Publication,
2012:12 Nordic Innovation, Oslo 2012
Center for Cultural and Experience Economy (CKO) (2011) Behovsanalyse del I:
De kreative erhverv i Danmark, (Analysis of needs part I: Creative Industries in
Denmark 2011)
Kathrine Weicker Page 121 of 147
Center for Cultural and Experience Economy (CKO) (2011/12) Behovsanalyse del
II: De kreative erhverv i Danmark, (Analysis of needs part II: Creative Industries
in Denmark 2011/12)
Center for Cultural and Experience Economy (CKO) (2012) Business Development
in Creative Industries, Creative Competitive Advantages
Chatterjee, S. (2013) 10. Simple Rules for Designing Business Models, California
Management Review; Vol. 55 Issue 2, p97-‐124, 28p
Chesbrough, H. (2006) Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New
Innovation Landscape, Harvard Business School Press
Commission staff working document, policy options for the competitiveness of
the European fashion industries – “Where manufacturing meets
creativity”(2012) Brussels, 5.10.2012 SWD (2012) 284 final/2
The Danish Ministry of Business and Growth, 2013,
http://www.danishresponsibility.dk
Dansk Fashion & Textile (2013) Brancheanalyse, Copenhagen
Dansk Fashion & Textile (2013) Press release, Status on the development in the
Danish fashion industry, 23rd January, Copenhagen
Deloitte (2013) Modeanalysen, Copenhagen
Kathrine Weicker Page 122 of 147
Deloitte (2013) Fashioning sustainability, Redesigning the fashion business
Deloitte (2011) The Duality of Growth, Growing the business of today and the
business of tomorrow
Denmark, The municipality of Copenhagen, FORA (2011) Det kreative
København
Denmark, Regeringen, Danmark i arbejde (2013) Vækstplan for kreative
erhverv*design, Copenhagen
EURATEX, The European Apparel and Textile Confederation (2011) Leaflet: The
EU-‐27 Textile and Clothing Industry in the year 2011
European Commission (2001) Green Paper on promoting a European framework
for corporate social responsibility, 18th July 2001
European Commission, The European Economic and Social Committee and the
Committee of the Regions (2012) Promoting cultural and creative sectors for
growth and jobs in the EU Communication from the Commission to the European
Parliament, the Council, Brussels
European Commission, staff working document, policy options for the
competitiveness of the European fashion industries (2012) Where
manufacturing meets creativity (2012) Brussels, 5.10.2012 SWD (2012) 284
final/2)
Kathrine Weicker Page 123 of 147
FDIH (2012) Dansk e-‐handelsanalyse, Forbrugerstatisk, Årsrapport
Fernandez-‐Stark, K., Frederick, S., Gereffi, G. (2011) The Apparel Global Value
Chain: Economic Upgrading and Workforce Development, Center on
Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness, Duke University, November 2011
Forum for the Future, Fashion futures 2025, (2010) Global scenarios for a
sustainable fashion industry, Levis Strauss & Co., February
Girotra, K., Netessine, S. (2011) How to build risk into your business model,
Smart companies design their innovations around managing risk, Harvard
Business Review, How to build risk into your business model, Smart companies
design their innovations around managing risk, May
Girotra, K., Netessine, S. (2012) Business Model Innovation is the Gift that Keeps
on Giving, Harvard Business Review blog network, December 5, 2012
Glaister, K.W. and Falshaw, R.J., (1999) Strategic planning: Still going strong?,
Long Range Planning, Vol. 32 (1), 107–116.
Hedman, J. and Kalling, T. (2003) The business model concept: theoretical
underpinnings and empirical illustrations, European Journal of Information
Systems 12, 49–59; doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000446
Kathrine Weicker Page 124 of 147
Hejlesen, M. (2012) Create growth through innovative business models,
Understanding the why, what and how of business model innovation,
Implement Consulting Group, Viewpoints on Change, Strategy & Growth, ISSN:
1904-‐6758 – NR. 4 / 2012)
Hvass, K. K. (2012) Business Model Innovation for Post-‐retail Sustainability of
fashion, PhD project, Copenhagen Business School
Jensen, K. and Taudal Poulsen (2012) Fibres of history – The transformation of
the Danish fashion industry and the emergence of global value chains, 1970-‐-‐-‐
2010, University of Southern Denmark and Copenhagen Business School
Koehler, D. A., Hespenheide, E. J. (2013) Finding the value in environmental,
social, and governance performance, Deloitte Review, Issue 12, 2013,
Kure, L., (2011) The Danish fashion industry on the North-‐German market,
Master Thesis, Copenhagen Business School
Lindgren, P. (2012) Business Model Innovation Leadership: How Do SME’s
Strategically Lead Business Model Innovation?, Department of Mechanical and
Manufacturing Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Lindgardt, Z., Reeves, M., Stalk, G., Deimler, M. S. (2009) Business Model
Innovation, When the Game Gets Tough, Change the Game, Boston Consulting
Group
Kathrine Weicker Page 125 of 147
Magretta, J. (2002) Why Business Models Matter, Harvard business review,
80(5), 86-‐92.
Maskell, P. (2005) A mapping of Danish Fashion Industry, Creative Industries
Research, Imagine.. Copenhagen Business School
Mistra Future Fashion (2011 and is on going) CBS Centre for Corporate Social
Responsibility, project on CSR in the Nordic fashion industry, Copenhagen
Morton, A. (1999) Ethics in action research, Systematic Practice and Action
Research, 12(2), pp. 219-‐222.
Negarandeh, R. (2008) Realizing the growth potential of small Danish fashion
companies, Master Thesis, Copenhagen Business School
Norden Nordic Innovation (2012) Nordic Innovation Report, 2012:12, Green
business model innovation, Conceptualisation, Next practice and Policy, October
2012
Nordisk Ministerråd af Danmarks Statistik (2012) Kreative erhverv i Norden,
Kreanord, Nordic creative economy, December 2012
Opera Capital Partners (2013) E-‐commerce reframing the global fashion
industry, April 2013
Osterwalder, A. (2010) Business Model Generation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Kathrine Weicker Page 126 of 147
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y. and Tucci, C. L. (2005) Clarifying business models:
origins, present, and future of the concept, Communications of AIS, Volume 15,
Article
Porter, M. E. (2001) Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review, (2), 63–
78.
Saunders M., Lewis P. and Thornhill, A. (2009) Research methods for business
students, 5th edition, Prentice Hall
Small, S. A. (1995) Action-‐Oriented Research: Models and Methods, Journal of
Marriage and the Family, 57(4) 1995: p. 941-‐955. Wiley-‐Blackwell
Sorescu, A., Frambach, R. T., Singh, J., Rangaswamy, A., Bridges, C. (2011)
Innovations in Retail Business Models, Research Paper No. 2012-‐28, Journal of
Retailing 87S (1, 2011) S3–S16
Teece, D. J. (2010) Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation, Long
Range Planning 43, 172-‐194, Elsevier)
Tran, Y. (2008) Fashion in the Danish experience economy – challenges for
growth, 1. edition, Imagine
Tran, Y. (2010) Organizing Innovation in Turbulent Fashion Markets, PhD project,
Copenhagen Business School
Kathrine Weicker Page 127 of 147
Wiinstedt Tschering, R. and Boxenbaum, E. (2012) What do the creative
industries need? – Barriers and possibilities for growth in the creative industries
in Denmark, Center for Cultural and Experience Economy (CKO)
Zott, C. (2005) Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial
Firms, Associate Professor of Entrepreneurship at INSEAD, France
Zott, C., Amit, R. (2008) The fit between product market strategy and business
model: implications for firm performance, Strategic Management Journal Strat.
Mgmt. J., 29: 1–26
Kathrine Weicker Page 128 of 147
Appendices
Appendix A – List of Conferences, Seminars and Master Classes
1. Masterclass: Joe Pine, Growth through Experiences, at Dare2Mansion, Copenhagen, Denmark, 22nd November 2013
2. Workshop: Design your Business Model, The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, School of Design, Copenhagen, Denmark 20th/21st June 2013
3. Serbia Fashion and Textile Cluster FACTS Day, Embassy of the Republic of Serbia, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3rd June 2013 Mistra Future Fashion Symposium: Sustainability & Producer’s Responsibility in Textiles, Mistra Future Fashion, Malmø University, Sweden, 29th May 2013
4. Conference: E-‐commerce in the Fashion Industry, Danish E-‐commerce Association (FDIH), Århus, Denmark, 11th April 2013
5. Conference: Cross-‐Border e-‐commerce, Danish E-‐commerce Association (FDIH), Copenhagen, Denmark, 27th February 2013
6. Summit: Copenhagen Fashion Summit, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3rd May 2012 (The world's largest and most important conference on sustainability and CSR in the fashion industry)
7. Conference: Creative Encounters Open Day: creative disillusions?, Danish Centre for Design Research, DKDS and The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, School of Design, Copenhagen, Denmark, 8th May 2012
8. Conference: Alexander Osterwalder, Innonet Lifestyle -‐ Interior and Clothing, Herning, Denmark, 11th September 2012
9. Workshop: Pit Stop Business Development, Innonet Lifestyle -‐ Interior and Clothing, Copenhagen, Denmark, 8th November 2012
10. Conference: Creative Business Cup, hosted by Center for Cultural and Experience Economy (CKO), Copenhagen, Denmark, 12th and 13th November 2012
Kathrine Weicker Page 129 of 147
11. Conference: Retail-‐ and etailconference, Danish Fashion Institute, Dansk Fashion & Textile, Copenhagen, Denmark, 11th November 2011
12. Master class: Alexander Osterwalder, at Væksthus, Greater Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3rd November 2010
13. Conference: Creative Encounters: New European Fashion Centres, Dreams of Small Nations in a Polycentric Fashion System, Copenhagen Business School, 20th January 2010
Kathrine Weicker Page 130 of 147
Appendix B – List of Programmes and Projects
1. “Fashion Accelerator”
Fashion Accelerator was a development program aimed at SMEs in the Danish
fashion industry that had growth potential and high ambitions, but lacked
knowledge about certain business processes. The purpose of the project was to
boost the growth of the participating companies and prepare them for
international markets, and offered a program that provided the participating
companies with knowledge, counselling and network activities, consisting of
master classes, workshops and individual mentoring through which the
companies’ development process accelerated. As part of the project I attended
a fashion management programme at European School of Economics in Milan,
11th – 15th October 2010 .The project involved 37 companies and lasted for
three years from 2009 to 2011.
http://www.fashionaccelerator.dk
2. “Fashion Zone”
In helping to put the Danish fashion industry on the map through the
introduction of fashion as the first Danish “experience zone”, the purpose of the
fashion zone was to promote Denmark as a global center for fashion, following
in the footprints of major fashion metropolises such as New York, London, Paris
and Milan. The fashion zone was made to ensure that the Danish fashion
industry continued to develop a solid network and a common platform, which
would strengthen the growth of the fashion business. The project involved the
entire Danish fashion industry and lasted from 2008 to 2011.
Kathrine Weicker Page 131 of 147
3. “Vækst i Kompetence Klynger” (Growth in Competence Clusters)
This project and educational programme was an introduction to cluster theory
and development. The extensive programme included working with a well-‐
tested cluster methodology, facilitating network and processes, cluster
scenarios and strategies together with branding a cluster. The programme
involved many different industry, among them the fashion industry, and lasted
from 2009 to 2010.
Kathrine Weicker Page 132 of 147
Appendix C – CSR: Interview/ 14th August 2013/ Pia Odgaard/ Dansk
Fashion & Textil
CSR is covering issues such as environmental externalities, ethical standards,
upholding of social norms and compliance with the law.
Aim of the interview
… By giving insight into what has been the practice of the industry in the past
and what is carried out currently, the interviewees give insight into future ways
of adding value, and new ways of doing business.
1. PAST
1. What kinds of questions are the fashion companies asking about CSR?
2. What are the SMEs asking about?
3. According to you how has CSR developed over time?
4. (Outsourcing of production = CSR = codes of conduct)
5. (New) focus areas?
6. What are the minimum requirements? Code of Conduct?
7. What do you see as the strengths and weaknesses of the SMEs in the
Danish fashion industry?
Kathrine Weicker Page 133 of 147
2. PRESENT
1. What is the current state of the Danish fashion industry?
2. Do you believe that the Danish SMEs can gain further growth and
development by focusing more on CSR?
3. Is a different focus needed?
4. How can the SMEs create an overview of the (most important) aspects of
CSR?
5. What tools can they use?
6. Are there any areas that offer quick returns?
7. Are the companies ready to strategically re-‐thinking factors like the
Product Development (CSR)?
8. Does public interest matter today? In what way?
9. What are the costs of CSR?
10. What are other cons to the company of CSR?
11. What are the pros to the company of CSR?
3. FUTURE
1. Is it realistic that the Danish fashion industry uses CSR as a competitive
advantage? Danish Design? Danish mentality? Values?, Good morale and
a democratic way of life?
2. What recommendations can be made to Danish fashion SMEs regarding
new methods and idea to run their businesses successfully and profitably?
3. Any new directions?
Kathrine Weicker Page 134 of 147
4. What is your view of international developments in manufacturing in
general? New supplier countries? The time issue? Expenses? Quality?
Transport?
Kathrine Weicker Page 135 of 147
Appendix D – Production: Serbian fashion and textile producers/
Spring 2012
Hajdi Baby – http://www.hajdi.rs/ Balextra – http://nistextil.com/company-‐4.htm?language=2 Novitet Zitkovac – http://www.novitet.rs/ Izvor – http://www.izvor.co.rs/nama.html Fashion Studio – http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pronto-‐studio/120086034673558 FKF – http://nistextil.com/company-‐13.htm?language=2 Pletex –http://www.ledib.org/index.php?section=companies&subsection=show_companies_details&company_
Sara Stil – http://nistextil.com/company-‐30.htm?language=2
Kathrine Weicker Page 136 of 147
Gruppo Fiorentino – http://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/industrial-‐textiles-‐news/newsdetails.aspx?news_id=90417 Cameleon – http://www.cameleon.rs/#/home Free Fashion – http://www.freefashion.rs/#/eng/srb David Konfekcija – http://konfekcijadavid.wsc.rs/
Kathrine Weicker Page 137 of 147
Appendix E – Production: SWOT analysis from interviews of twelve
fashion producers, Serbia, 2012
Facts about the Serbian garment industry
Employing 20.216 people
1.230 companies
Average gross salary: 275 Euro
Top 5 export destination: Italy, Germany, Russian federation, Bosnia,
Herzegovina, and Montenegro
Serbia, having no primary textile industry, import 90% of raw materials and
trimmings from: Italy, China, Turkey, Germany, Bangladesh
11 companies are still state owned and classified as large companies
15% of Serbian SMEs produce their own brand, established locally and export
Joint venture readiness
20% of the SMEs offer collection for the local market
65% SMEs produce CMT and OEM
Serbia has free trade agreements with the EU, Central Europe, Russia and CEFTA
making it a logistic hotspot
Good infrastructure
(Serbian Chamber of Commerce)
Kathrine Weicker Page 138 of 147
SWOT analysis of findings from interviews and visits to twelve fashion
producers in Serbia:
Strengths:
• The companies are not producing at full capacity
• No or low minimum orders
• The Serbian companies have a competitive advantage when selling to
stores in the Balkan states since they know the language, culture, fashion
sense and so forth
• Many of the companies have strong ties to the large Russian market, a
large growth market and a BRIC country. The access to emerging markets
is made easier because of the removing of technical barriers to trade
• The companies follow regulations and have good working conditions
• A very welcoming atmosphere and positive attitude at all the producers
that I visited
• Professional companies that really want to cooperate, and they showed
great flexibility
• Highly qualified labour with competitive wage rates
• Due to a good geographical position, close to Denmark, the logistical
issues are eased. It also offers Danish fashion companies an advantage in
that it is possible to visit the factory and check on production regularly.
This can be useful for picking up on any problems early on in the
production process, when they will be easier to rectify
Kathrine Weicker Page 139 of 147
Weaknesses:
• Many of the companies are not represented online, and they do not have
their own website. It seems like many of the companies are generally not
devoting time to marketing, due to lack of time, low levels of IT skills and
a lack of available finance. This makes it difficult for Danish fashion
companies to find the producers, except through referrals
• The language skills in the companies are poor when it comes to the
English language. The mindset of the companies is not very international
and ready for the tough international competition
• The price of the products seems too high despite the fact that the labour
wages are low. As a comparison the labour wages are at the same level as
wages in China, but the quoted price of the finished product is much
higher in Serbia
• Marketing and branding campaigns seemed like new grounds to many of
the manufactures visited
• Many Danish fashion companies want the producers to take care of the
sourcing of materials
Kathrine Weicker Page 140 of 147
Opportunities:
• Serbia is not yet a member of the European Union, but EU leaders have
agreed to open accession talks with Serbia in early 2014
• Many Danish fashion companies want to move production out of for
example China and India and closer to home, to Europe. Proximity to
market means fast reaction to changing trends
• For many Danish fashion companies Serbia is not known for its textile and
clothing industry, therefore it is an untapped market
• Some of the companies were fully aware of the benefits of technological
and non-‐technological innovation
• Existing industrial base, fashion and textile clusters
• Vertical cooperation, supply chain, manufacturing, retail, despite
globalisation all parts of value chain still present
• The producers are aware of Corporate Social Responsibility, sustainable
production and consumption and also health and safety aspects
Threats:
• The textile and clothing industry in Nis/ Serbia is characterized by a large
number of very small to medium size companies. The national industry is
up against a worldwide textile and clothing industry that is focusing on
fundamental competitive assets, an international textile and clothing
industry that is focusing on innovation and creativity, research &
technological development, education and skills preservation,
implementation of sustainable business processes, supply chain
cooperation, adoption of advanced information and communication
technology
Kathrine Weicker Page 141 of 147
• Economic slowdown in Europe and the companies have to survive in a
difficult economic climate
• The production of fashion is almost always labour intensive, due to the
difficulty of automating processes such as the sewing of garments.
Switching costs for Danish fashion brands are not very high: they include
the risk that choosing a low-‐cost supplier involves a more extended
supply chain that may not be able to cope with sudden changes in
demand in a market susceptible to changes in fashion. The Serbian
producers are further weakened by their lack of diversity
• Social awareness and public responsibilities in Denmark have increased
putting a considerable pressure on the competitiveness of the companies
in the fashion industry. Textile and clothing companies in Serbia has to be
willing to contribute actively to the global challenge of ensuring a more
sustainable and efficient industrial environment. This though is an
economic burden to the small and medium sized companies in Nis.
Kathrine Weicker Page 142 of 147
Appendix F – Production: Interviews/ Nis in Serbia 2nd – 5th April 2012/
Representatives of the fashion and textile manufacturing industry in Serbia
Production describes the process by which concepts are made into a
saleable physical product. In most cases, this means going from a small
set of samples or prototypes to commercial quantities of the item or style,
often across multiple sizes, colours and patterns. It is impossible to
separate production from the overall success of a brand, as great
concepts can be designed, developed and sold, but a fashion business will
ultimately live or die based on what is produced and delivered to the
customer.
Aim of the interview
… By giving insight into what has been the practice of the industry in the
past and what is carried out currently, the interviewees give insight into
future ways of adding value, and new ways of doing business.
1. Customer base
• What other customers does the company service?
• Can we get any references?
• What type of customers does the company serve (SMEs, larger
companies)?
2. Order size
• What minimums does the company have on the whole order?
Kathrine Weicker Page 143 of 147
• What minimums does the company have on each colour?
• What can we expect with regards to prices? (high, medium or low)
3. Production
• Is the company able to do FOB production?
• What machines is the company using?
• What is the company’s capacity per month/ per year?
• What is the number of lines?
• Is the company at all times open and accessible for announced and
unannounced audits for monitoring and evaluation?
• Is the company certified by the equivalent of BSCI in the Far East?
• What other certifications does the company have?
4. Code of Conduct
• Does the company support and respect the protection of
internationally proclaimed human rights?
• How does the company stand with regards to labour standards?
• Does the company have workers living on site? – If yes what
conditions are they living under?
• What is the company’s policy on working overtime?
• Is the company using environmentally friendly technologies? And
overall how does the company stand with regards to environmental
issues?
Kathrine Weicker Page 144 of 147
• Is the company working against corruption in all its forms, including
extortion and bribery?
• If animals are used in the production (for example in the production
of fur and wool) – how are such animals treated?
• Is the company working and seeking to be involved in local or global
charity working to the improvement of better social and living
conditions?
5. Your company
• Does anybody in the company speak English?
• How long has the company been in business?
• Where can I learn more about the company?
Kathrine Weicker Page 145 of 147
Appendix G – Online Sales: Interview/ 10th September 2013/ Rina
Hansen/ Head of Digital at Hummel and strategic advisor for fashion
companies
Online sales (and marketing) are covering the use of the Internet and
other electronic media to sell and promote products and services. These
marketers use a variety of Web sites, search engines, social media, and e-‐
mail to provide information to potential customers. Online sales (and
marketing) is considered an inexpensive format to reach buyers, so many
companies are using the medium to broaden the reach of traditional
marketing programs.
Aim of the interview
… By giving insight into what has been the practice of the industry in the
past and what is carried out currently, the interviewees give insight into
future ways of adding value, and new ways of doing business.
Kathrine Weicker Page 146 of 147
1. PAST
• What kinds of questions are the fashion companies asking about
online sales?
• What are the SMEs asking about?
• According to you how has online sales developed over time?
• (Branding = online sales = multichannel online sales = higher brand
value)
• (New) focus areas?
• What is the minimum online presence? Just a WWW?, Webshop via
other providers? Own webshop? Social media?
• What do you see as the strengths and weaknesses of the SMEs in
the Danish fashion industry?
2. PRESENT
• What is the current state of the Danish fashion industry?
• And in terms of growth and development?
• Do you believe that the Danish SMEs can gain further growth and
development by focusing more on online sales?
• Is a different focus needed?
• How can the SMEs create an overview of the (most important)
aspects of online sales and digital strategy?
• What tools can they use?
• Are there any areas that offer quick returns?
Kathrine Weicker Page 147 of 147
• Are the companies ready to strategically re-‐thinking factors like the
Sales (online sales)? Away from the traditional fashion business
model?
• Does customer needs matter today? In what way?
• What are the costs of online sales?
• What are other cons to the company of online sales?
• What are the pros to the company of online sales?
3. FUTURE
• What will the future hold for the Danish SMEs with regards to
online sales?
• Is it realistic that the Danish fashion industry uses online sales as a
competitive advantage? Because of technological awareness?
Internet access? Highest use of social networks in Europe?
• What recommendations can be made to Danish fashion SMEs
regarding new methods and idea to run their businesses
successfully and profitably?
• Any new directions?
• What is your view of international developments in sales and
marketing in general?
• Resale/ re-‐commerce?, transparency and traceability/ buying a
mystery is gone?, new technologies?, big data?, new interfaces
between fashion companies and customers?, online fashion shows?