Assessment Task Information · Web viewHSC PDHPE (Stage 6) Unit: Improving Performance Task Title:...
Transcript of Assessment Task Information · Web viewHSC PDHPE (Stage 6) Unit: Improving Performance Task Title:...
Andrew Sondaar17643362
HPE Extension Assessment Task 2
Assessment Task Information
Faculty: PDHPE
Course: HSC PDHPE (Stage 6)
Unit: Improving Performance
Task Title: Multimodal Presentation
Task marks: 20
Weighting: 20% Task No: 3 of 4
Date issues: Term 2, Week 2 Date for submission: Term 2, Week 6
Context
Contextual statement:
The class is comprised of 24 students of mixed capabilities ranging from students
classified as Gifted and talented Students (GATS) to students with behavioural disorders
such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). All students have access to computers and
internet at home and while at school have access to individual laptops and internet
services.
Task Rationale
Contextual statement:
During this unit of work students investigate approaches to the physiological preparation
and skill development of athletes. Students will experience and analyse a variety of
training methods and look at the application of these methods to improving performance.
The effects of planning on performance and ethical considerations relating to improving
athletes’ performance are also examined.
Description of Activity:
You have been appointed the role of Exercise Scientist for a professional athlete in a sport of your choice.
You are to research and present a multimodal presentation examining the factors that must be considered in
developing a training program for the athlete. Your multimodal presentation should be able to be used in an
initial consultation with the athlete and their coach as a guide to forming an effective training program to
achieve their performance goals.
Task instructions:
Your multimodal presentation must address the following components:
Andrew Sondaar17643362
a. Outline and compare (400 words) two types of training used in the sport.
b. Analyse (300 words) the potential dangers of weight training and recommend preventative measures.
c. Construct (300 words) a report that evaluates the use of performance-enhancing drugs from a
physiological and ethical perspective.
Your multimodal presentation should be clear and logically presented using headings. Careful,
accurate and appropriate use of sources is required to access higher Band levels.
GLOSSARY:
● Outline: Sketch in general terms; indicate the main features of
● Compare: Show how things are similar or different
● Evaluate: Make a judgement based on criteria; determine the value of
● Analyse: Identify components and the relationship between them; draw out and relate implications
● Construct: Make; build; put together items or arguments
Outcomes to be assessed
Outcome Description
H7 Explains the relationship between physiology and movement potential.
H8Explains how a variety of training approaches and other interventions
enhance performance and safety in physical activity.
H9 Explains how movement skill is acquired and appraised.
H10 Designs and implements training plans to improve performance.
H16Devises methods of gathering, interpreting and communicating information
about health and physical activity concepts.
H17Selects appropriate options and formulates strategies based on a critical
analysis of the factors that affect performance and safe participation.
Criteria for assessing learning
Marking criteria
Mark Range Criteria
17-20 ▪ Precise outline of the two types of training used using relevant examples
Andrew Sondaar17643362
▪ Extensive comparison of the two types of training used
▪ Extensive analysis of the potential dangers of weight training and
preventative measures
▪ Detailed and accurate evaluation of the use of performance-enhancing drugs
from a physiological and ethical perspective
▪ Careful, accurate and appropriate extensive use of resources
13-16
▪ Thorough outline of the two types of training used using relevant examples
▪ Thorough comparison of the two types of training used
▪ Thorough analysis of the potential dangers of weight training and
preventative measures
▪ Detailed evaluation of the use of performance-enhancing drugs from a
physiological and ethical perspective
▪ Careful, accurate and appropriate use of resources
9-12
▪ Sound outline of the two types of training used using relevant examples
▪ Sound comparison of the two types of training used
▪ Sound analysis of the potential dangers of weight training and preventative
measures
▪ Sound and accurate evaluation of the use of performance-enhancing drugs
from a physiological and ethical perspective
▪ Appropriate extensive use of resources
5-8 ▪ Basic outline of the two types of training used using relevant examples
▪ Basic comparison of the two types of training used
▪ Basic analysis of the potential dangers of weight training and preventative
measures
▪ Basic and accurate evaluation of the use of performance-enhancing drugs
Andrew Sondaar17643362
from a physiological and ethical perspective
▪ Basic or incomplete use of resources
1-4 • Elementary treatment of content or incomplete or unreferenced
0 • No attempt made or submitted
Scaffold
Andrew Sondaar17643362
Part 2
Related Resources
Question 1 - PDHPE HSC Textbook
- Australian Institute of Sport (AIS): https://www.ausport.gov.au/ais/
performance_support/strength_and_conditioning/resources
-PDHPE.net: https://www.pdhpe.net/improving-performance/how-do-
athletes-train-for-improved-performance/
-ClickView Video: https://www.clickview.com.au/curriculum-libraries/video-
details/?id=3714172&cat=3708539&library=secondary
Question 2 - PDHPE HSC Textbook
-ClickView Video: https://www.clickview.com.au/curriculum-libraries/video-
details/?id=3714125&cat=6012042&library=tertiary
Question 3 - PDHPE HSC Textbook
- Website: Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA)
- Website: World Anti-Doping Authority (WADA)
- Journal Article: Fraleigh, W. P. (1984). Performance-enhancing drugs in
sport: The ethical issue. Journal of the Philosophy of
Sport, 11(1), 23-28.
-Book: Waddington, I., & Smith, A. (2013). Sport, health and drugs: A critical
sociological perspective. Routledge.
-Book: Mottram, D. R. (2010). Drugs in sport. Routledge.
Andrew Sondaar17643362
Andrew Sondaar17643362
Graded Rubric for Marking CriteriaCriteria Mark Score1 2 3 4 5 6
Question 1
Elementary treatment of content or incomplete or unreferenced
Basic outline of the two types of training used using relevant examplesBasic comparison of the two types of training used
Sound outline of the two types of training used using relevant examplesSound comparison of the two types of training used
Thorough outline of the two types of training used using relevant examplesThorough comparison of the two types of training used
Precise outline of the two types of training used using relevant examplesDetailed comparison of the two types of training used
Accurate and extensive outline of the two types of training used using relevant examplesExtensive comparison of the two types of training used /6
Question 2
Elementary treatment of content or incomplete or unreferenced
Basic analysis of the potential dangers of weight training and preventative measures
Sound analysis of the potential dangers of weight training and preventative measures
Thorough analysis of the potential dangers of weight training and preventative measures
Extensive analysis of the potential dangers of weight training and preventative measures
/5
Question 3
Elementary treatment of content or incomplete or unreferenced
Basic and accurate evaluation of the use of performance-enhancing drugs from a physiological and ethical perspective
Sound and accurate evaluation of the use of performance-enhancing drugs from a physiological and ethical perspective
Detailed evaluation of the use of performance-enhancing drugs from a physiological and ethical perspective
Detailed and accurate evaluation of the use of performance-enhancing drugs from a physiological and ethical perspective
/5Resources
and presentation
Basic or incomplete use of resources
Appropriate extensive use of resources
Careful, accurate and appropriate use of resources
Careful, accurate and appropriate extensive use of resources /4
Total Mark: /20
Feedback: . .
Andrew Sondaar17643362
. .
Assessment ScheduleTerm 4 2017
Week1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Assessment #1 Due
Unit Core 1
Term 1 2018
Week1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Assessment #2 Due
Unit Core 2
Term 2 2018
Week1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Assessment #3 Due
Unit Option 1 Option 2
Term 3 2018
Week1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Assessment #4 Due
Unit Option 2 Revision and lead up to HSC
Assessment # Due Weighting Description1 Term 4, Week 8 25% Assessment Task on Core 1
Andrew Sondaar17643362
2 Term 1, Week 8 25% Assessment Task on Core 23 Term 2, Week 6 20% Assessment Task on Option 14 Term 3, Week 2 30% Formal Examination on all content
Andrew Sondaar17643362
Sample Completed Task
Part 3
Andrew Sondaar17643362
Feedback is considered to be one of the most effective tools that can assist learners
in developing further knowledge and understanding. Hattie and Timperley (2007) make the
suggestion that the simplest way to improve the educational and learning environment for
students is to provide them with incremental measures of feedback. This is reinforced by
the idea that the main purpose of feedback is to support and enhance student learning
(Walker and Gobby, 2017). This justification will look at how feedback can be given back to
students with a completed assessment task while considering the concepts revolving how
and why these forms of feedback are effective for those students.
Feedback is essentially the way in which teachers and educators can communicate to
students in relation to assessment tasks and learning activities in order to provide the
opportunity for the students to improve in future learning and assessment experiences.
Feedback provides a means of supporting student learning in order to allow them to clarify
how their levels of knowledge and understanding and skills such as critical thinking,
research, analysis and communicating are being assessed (NSW Education Standards
Authority, 2018).
There are a number of way in which feedback can be provided to students following
the completion of an assessment task. However, the form in which this feedback is given
can rely specifically on the nature of the assessment task that was given. The nature of the
assessment task as well as the learning context can impact the type of feedback that should
be handed back to the student.
Feedback can come in a couple formats; formal and informal. On top of this,
feedback can be presented in a number of mediums, including oral and written. An example
of these factors affecting the way in which feedback is presented could be the comparison
between assessing a physical movement during a sporting activity; feedback can be
provided informally through teaching points or team discussion, as well as in a formal
manner where the teacher is assessing students with a scoring sheet based on actions
during an activity. This example also displays the mediums that were previously mentioned;
oral feedback through informal means and written feedback through the formal method.
Other forms of feedback can include:
Peer assessments
Checklists
Andrew Sondaar17643362
Questioning
Digital annotations
Self-reflection
("Effective feedback", 2018).
When the opportunity for providing feedback to learners arises, there are a number
of principles that ensure that the feedback is being effectively communicated to the
individual. Effective feedback allows students and learners to identify their strengths as well
as areas that require development in order to plan the next steps in improving their
learning. This development is fostered through feedback that is specific and related to the
learning of the assessment task while being given to the individual in a timely manner. The
feedback must also be constructive, encompassing a strength based approach, to provide
meaningful evidence of students learning ("Effective feedback", 2018).
The quality of the feedback being provided is also essential to ensure that the
learner can understand the reasoning behind the mark received. The feedback should
specifically relate to the marking criteria provided in the assessment. Furthermore, Hattie
and Timperley (2007) discuss that quality feedback is characterised by having a focus on the
task and not the student, being clear, understandable and concise, encouraging the learner
to think about their work, being given to the learner in a timely manner and addressing the
needs of the learner.
The concept of feedback can be broken down into three aspects for students to use
to improve their understanding for future learning. Fisher and Frey (2009) discuss that ‘feed
up’. ‘feedback’ and ‘feed forward’ can achieve varying outcomes in relation to
improvement. Feed up is defined as placing a focus on learners to identify and set their
learning goals from the information, feed forward is used to inform learners about how they
can meet their learning objectives and goals and finally feedback lies in between these two
notions where the information that a learner receives in direct response to a completed
assessment and relates to how the learner is progressing with their learning and goals
(Fisher and Frey, 2009).
Andrew Sondaar17643362
`In conclusion, a teacher that is supplying effective feedback that is of high quality should
endeavour to use these strategies to provide the greatest benefit to their students in
relation to their ongoing improvement of learning. These concepts related to feedback are
able to be used to assist students of all capabilities. Feedback is an essential tool that
teachers should aim to improve their expertise in implementing as there can be a direct
impact on the student’s ability to understand how to best demonstrate their levels of
understanding and knowledge that is required of them in future assessment activities.
Andrew Sondaar17643362
Resources
Effective feedback. (2018). Retrieved from http://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/
portal/nesa/k-10/understanding-the-curriculum/assessment/effective-feedback
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2009). Feed up, back, forward. Educational Leadership, 67(3), 20-25.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational
research, 77(1), 81-112.
NSW Education Standards Authority. (2018). Using feedback to support student learning.
[online] Available at: http://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/11-
12/Understanding-the-curriculum/assessment/assessment-in-practice/feedback
[Accessed 8 May 2018].