An interpretation of Endoscopic biopsy
-
Upload
ganesh-parajuli -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
2.204 -
download
4
description
Transcript of An interpretation of Endoscopic biopsy
Interpretation of the endoscopic biopsy
GUIDED BY- Brig Vibha Dutta, SMPresented by Maj Ganesh Parajuli
• Introduction
• Technical aspects
• Interpretation
• Pitfalls
• Conclusion
OVERVIEW
• Endoscopy : Examination of internal body cavities using a specialized medical instrument called an endoscope
Introduction
• Fibrooptic endoscopy and biopsy – diagnostic procedure in investigation GI disorder
• The first gastroscope: George Wolf in 1911
• Semiflexible gastroscope: 1930
• Harold designed fibroscope: early 1950
• Newer technologies: chromoendoscopy, capsule endoscopy endoscopic ultrasound
Introduction (contd….)
General features of GI biopsy interpretation
• GI tract: limited repertoire of response to host injuries
• Diagnoses requires correlation with clinical information
• Normal biopsies may be obtained from symptomatic patients
• Inflammatory cells are a normal constituent of lamina propia
Overview comments on the GI tract
epithelium – protective, absorbtive & secretory
lamina propria – thin loose CT
muscularis mucosa – slim double layer of smooth muscle
Mucosa
Submucosa
Muscularis propria
Skeletal muscle at beginning & smooth muscle at the end(inner circular; outer longitudinal layer) from lower esophagus to rectum
Serosa
(viseral peritoneum)
4 layers of tissue surround the lumen of the GIT
The major uses of mucosal biopsy includes:
i. Diagnosis : either specific or in the form of an injury pattern or stage
ii. Determination of the extent or severity of lesions
iii. Monitoring of the clinical course of disease states with particular reference to effects of therapy
iv. Detection of complication
Clinical pathological correlation is essential for diagnosis-
The following clinical data should be provided :1. Age, race and sex of the patient
2. Sign and symptoms, site of biopsy, endoscopic and radiological finding
3. History of taking drugs or alcohol
4. Medical and surgical history
Assessing any biopsy from GI tract
Technical aspects • The grasp biopsy specimens obtained at flexible endoscopy
typically consists only of the mucosa
Regions with thicker mucosa contain only superficial portion
• Suction or aspiration-type biopsy more fruitful when a larger sample or more exact location is required
• Choice of fixative is usually not critical though Bouin’s may interfere with staining of the granules of Paneth cells
• Multiple sections to improve the chance of detecting any focal or subtle changes
• For routine analysis at least 3 levels of biopsy specimen, each with 5 or more sections
• When focal lesion not obtained, additional levels should be require
• Cytologic preparations useful diagnostic adjunct
Ideal Mucosal Biopsy
• At least 3 pieces of full thickness mucosa 3 mm in length • Mucosal fragments well oriented at time of embedding
crypt:villous ratio can accurately evaluated
Abnormal esophagealmucosa
Neoplastic
BenignInfections Others
Squamous papilloma Squamous cell carcinomaAdenocarcinoma
Corrosive - lyeReflux
Viral- Herpes simplex CMVFungal- Candida
Non neoplastic
Abnormal esophageal Mucosal Biopsy
Malignant
Esophagitis The 4 most common types of esophagitis:
1. Pill esophagitis– Spectrum of injury by the ingestion of drugs – Common site anatomical narrowing– Ulcer ,granulation tissue ,polarizable foreign material and
multinucleted gaint cells
2. Infectious:– HSV, CMV (BMT, solid organ transplant)– Candidal (HIV, thrush associated) Yeast and pseudohypae seen in necroinflammatory
background
3. Eosinonophilic esophagitis: frequently seen in childern
Endoscopic finding –stricture , rings corrugation,furrows and granularity
Mucosal edema ,basal cell hyperplasia with eosinophil infiltration of sq mucosa >20 eosinophil per high field
4.Reflux disease
• GERD the costliest GI disorder & the most common physician diagnosis GI disorder in outpatient clinic visit
• GERD caused by reflux of gastric contents into esophagus
Reflux of gastric acid and pepsin
• Reflux of alkaline bile & pancreatic secretion moving from duodenum stomach esophagus recognized as a contributing factor to esophageal injury in GERD
• ‘Reflux esophagitis ‘ an example of ‘itis ‘ lack prominent component of inflammation
• The pathology reflects injury to sq epithelium followed by attempts of the epithelium to regenerate
• Mild features of cellular injury- balloon cells vascular lakes, mild inflammation and scattered eosinophils
REFLUX/GERD
Fairly reproducible criteria established by Fiocca et al as abnormal and associated with clinical reflux –
i. Thickened basal layer(>15%) or 5 to 6 layersii. Increased papillary length (>50%) of the squamous thicknessiii. Intraepithelial eosinophil ,neutrophil (>1to 2 cells /40x field)iv. Intraepithelial mononuclear cells.(>10/40x field)v. Dilated /widened inter cellular spaces(which may appear as
bubbles or ladders.
BARRETT’S ESOPHAGUS
• Defined as intestinal metaplasia of a normally SQUAMOUS esophageal mucosa.
• The presence of GOBLET CELLS in the esophageal mucosa is DIAGNOSTIC.
• SINGLE most common RISK FACTOR for esophageal adenocarcinoma
• 10% of GERD patients get it• “BREACHED” G-E junction
BARRETT’S ESOPHAGUS
Gastritis• No widely accepted classification of gastritis• Updated Sydney System Published in 1997• Attempted to combine topographical, morphological and etiological information • Largely unused bec of inadequate sampling & clinical information ,poor endoscopic &
histologic correlation and ethic and geographic variation of the disease
Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) staging system: Based on extent and severity of atrophic gastritis and provide relevant clinical information
regarding the gastric cancer risk.However, atrophic gastritis is a difficult histopathological diagnosis of which the
interobserver agreement is low.
Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) staging system: -Extent and severity of atrophic gastritis
H pylori associated gastritis
• Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) common bacterium that is present in millions of people worldwide
• found in mucous lining of stomach. It is known to be responsible for 60% to 80% of gastric ulcers and 70% to 90% of duodenal ulcers
• The recognition of an association between this bacterium and peptic ulcer disease by Barry Marshall and John R. Warren, in 1983, and they were awarded the Nobel prize in 2005
• Another varient called H. heilmannii (less than 1% isolates)• Like H pylori it produces antral predominant gastritis ,less sev, than
H. pylori gastritis
• Histologically shows organisms within the surface mucus layer and foveolar epithelium
• Abundant, lymphoplasmacytic , chronic inflammation of lamina propria
• Presence of lymphoid follicles (MALT) almost always indicative of infection
A simplified pathology report of gastritis include the following
parameters:a. Type of mucosa
b. Grade of lymphoplasmacytic infiltration (4 M)
c. Presence or absence of active inflammation with degree of activity(if present)
d. Extent of intestional metaplasia or atrophy(if present)
e. Presence or absence of H pylori microorganism
Normal histology
• Finger-like villi
• C:V ratio (assessed where 4 well-oriented crypts and villi are seen)
• Normal C:V ratio 1:3 or more
• C:V ratio lower in children and elderly
• C:V ratio usually uniform in a biopsy
Evaluation of small intestinal mucosal biopsy
Low power • adequacy of biopsy• crypt villous architecture• degree of inflammation
High power• Specific features in lumen, epithelium and lamina
propria
Indications for biopsy:
• Evaluation for patients with malabsorption• Investigation for patients with iron deficiency anemia,
diarrhoea particularly in whom infections is suspected with AIDS
• Diagnosis of neoplasia• Confirmation of ulceration induced by NSAID or in cases of
bleeding from unknown site.
Benign polypsAdenocarcinomasEndocrineLymphomasGISTsWaldenstrom’s
Abnormal small intestinal mucosa
Specific changes
Epithelial Lamina propria
Infections InfectionsOthers Inflammatory Metabolic Neoplasms
Celiac diseaseTropical sprueBacterial overgrowthCow’s milk allergyChronic renal failureB12, folate, iron, zinc defAutoimmune enteropathyDrugs
ViralParasiticFungal
lBDGranulomatousCollagenousEosinophilicImmunodeficiencyAutoimmune enterop
AmyloidosisStorage disorders
LymphocyticAbetalipoprot.Microvillous incGVHDAIDS enteropathyl
ViralParasiticBacterial
Nonspecific changes
Abnormal Small Intestinal Mucosal Biopsy
Lumen parasites
Spectrum of Nonspecific inflammatory changes in the small intestinal mucosa
Architecture• Crypt hyperplasia• Crypt hyperplasia with villous atrophy • Villous atrophy with crypt hypoplasia (rare)• Branching, broadening and fusion of villi (mild cases)
Epithelium• Epithelial damage: flattening, nuclear irregularity, loss of polarity,
vacuolization, basophilia• Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes• Increased apoptosis• Macrocytosis of epithelial cells
Lamina propria• Chronic inflammation• Acute inflammation
Varying degrees of change
mild
sevmod
Celiac disease
Macroscopic features• On endoscopy the mucosa appear flattened and scalloped if
there is significant villous atrophy
Microscopic features• Microscopic changes most severe in duodenum and decrease
in severity distally• 4 small intestinal biopsies are required for absolute diagnostic
confidence (Pais et el, Gastroint Endosc 2008); • May be patchy• Changes decrease with gluten withdrawal and recur when
gluten is re-introduced
Celiac disease : Spectrum of changesMarsh’s diagnostic criteria
• 0 – preinfiltrative: Dermatitis herpetiformis; no mucosal change
• I More than 40 intraepithelial lymphocytes per 100 epithelial cells – infiltrative
• II. Crypt hyperplasia with increased intraepithelial lymphocytes – infiltrative type 2
• III. Crypt hyperplasia with increased intraepithelial lymphocytes and villous atrophy
• IIIa Mild villous atrophy• IIIb Moderate villous atrophy• IIIc Severe villous atrophy
• IV Crypt hypoplasia with villous atrophy
Tropical sprue
• Chronic malabsorptive syndrome seen in residents and visitors to tropical countries
• Etiology related to chronic infections and bacterial overgrowth
• Entire small intestine from duodenum to terminal ileum may be involved
• Villous atrophy, crypt hyperplasia, inflammation and increased IELs
• Often responds to broad spectrum antibiotics like tetracycline
Cow’s milk protein allergy
• Temporary condition affecting young infants presented with malabsorption & dehydration requiring parenteral nutrition
• Bloody diarrrhoea, vomiting, abdominal pain, weight loss
• Small intestional mucosal changes similar to celiac disease but lesser extent
• Intraepithelial eosinophils & peripheral eosinophil are more noted with cow’s milk
Nutritional deficiences
Vitamin B12, protein, iron and zinc deficiency
Structural abnormalities of intestional mucosa
associated with malsorption
• B12: villous blunting, macrocytosis, decreased mitoses
• Protein deficiency
• Zinc deficiency
AIDS enteropathy
• Individuals infected with HIV with chronic diarrhoea have opportunistic infections or diffuse small intestional mucosal alterations in the absence of pathogens
• Duodenal biopsies may shows crypt hyperplasia and partial villous atrophy, increased intraepithelial lymphocytes and infiltration of the lamina propria by plasma cells and lymphocytes
• Crypts shows evidence of increase apoptotic activity
Specific changes in Small intestinal biopsies
Lumen
Giardia Lamblia
InfectionsGiardiasis
• Most common parasitic infection
• Presence of trophozoites in fecal and duodenal biopsy specimen confirm giardia infection
• Duodenum (more than 80%) followed by jejunum and ileum, rarely the stomach and colon
• The mucosa is normal shows minimal changes in majority of cases with mild villous atrophy, crypt hyperplasia , loss of normal brush border shorting of villous epithelium and increase intraepithelial lymphocytes
• The parasite found in lumen close to the surface of villous epithelium
Specific changes in Small intestinal biopsies
Epithelium
Lymphocytic enteritis
Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes
• Definition: • > 30 or 40/100 villous epithelial
cells • Or more than 5 per 20 villous tip
epithelial cells
• Should be diffuse
• Counting should not be done over a lymphoid follicle
Causes • Infections• H.pylori infection • Tropical sprue• Celiac sprue• Refractory sprue• Protein intolerance• NSAIDs• Bacterial overgrowth• IBD• Lymphocytic enteritis• AIDS, hypogammaglobulinemia• Collagen vascular disease
Acute GVHD
Endoscopic findings• Normal mucosa, erythema, ulcers and sloughing
Histologic features• Single cell apoptosis in crypts• Villous blunting• Loss of crypts
• D/D: CMV infection; chemoradiation-induced damage
Chronic GVHD
Epithelial infections
Viral – nonspecific changes except CMV
Bacterial – Enteropathogenic E.coli may form colonies on the brush border
Parasitic - • Microspora – genera Encephalitozoon, Enterocytozoon• Isospora• Cryptosporidium• Cyclospora
Cryptosporidiosis
• Cryptosporodium parvum protozoan, highly infectious with waterborne ,person to person
• Immunocompetent pts acute ,self limiting diarrhoea while immunocompromised pts including AIDs chronic watery dairrhoea
• Distribution worldwide ,endemic in developing countries, found in >50%of AIDS
Cryptosporidiosis
Microsporidiasis
Widespread obligate intracellular parasite Opportunistic infection in immunosuppressed organ transplant patents
and those with AIDS The infection includes : Enterocytozoon bieneusi & Encephalitozoon intestinalis Histological features : In small bowel both causes a partial villous atrophy ,mild crypt hyperplasia
with short blunt villi and mild increase in lymphocytes ,plasma cells & eosinophil in the lamina propria
Microsporidiosis
Encephalitozoon intestinalis
Entercytozoon bieneusi
Specific changes in Small intestinal biopsies
Lamina propria
Specific changes in the lamina propria
Infections• Parasitic: Isospora• Viral: CMV• Bacterial: TB, MAI, Whipple’s, yersinia• Fungal: Histoplasma, cryptococcus
IBD• Crohn’s
Allergic• Eosinophilic enteritis• Lymphocytic/collagenous enteritis
Immune• Immunodeficiency syndromes
Vascular• Radiation enteritis• Vasculitis• Ischemia• Portal hypertension
Others• Amyloidosis• Lymphoma
CMV
Macroscopic• Patchy erythema, edema, aphthous and deep penetrating ulcers
Microscopic• Usually endothelial cells and other stromal cells deep in the base of ulcers
and other sites; rarely epithelial
• less inflammation in immunocompromised individuals
• Atypical inclusions: smudged nuclei
Other diagnostic tests: immunohistochemistry and PCR
Histoplasmosis
• Macroscopic:• Nodular or ulcerating lesions in ileum
• Microscopic:• Granulomas• Fungal bodies in the cytoplasm of histiocytes; small oval yeast
forms with buds at the pointed ends
Mycobacterium Avium Complex • Commonly affects small intestine (duodenum most frequent) and colon of
immunocompromised individuals (AIDS with CD4 counts <60/mm3
• On endoscopy: coarse granularity, edema, erythema, yellowish streaks or ulcers
• On histology – • immunocompetent individuals show necrotizing (up to 30%, small foci) or
nonnecrotizing granulomatous inflammation; • immunodeficient individuals : diffuse infiltrates of histiocytes with foamy
or granular cytoplasm and minimal other inflammatory cells• Regional lymph nodes enlarged with similar cells
• AFB and PAS positive (fibrillary appearance versus granular appearance of Whipple’s)
• EM: intact bacteria
• Mycobacterium Avium Complex • Ziehl Neelsen
Eosinophilic enteritis
• Often associated with peripheral eosinophilia (75%) and allergic disorders
• Eosinophilia may be confined to the mucosa or involve the muscle coat or serosa
• May present with hemorrhage, chronic diarrhea, abdominal pain, malabsorption, protein losing enteropathy, obstruction or ascites
• D/D: parasitic infections, vaculitis, Crohn’s disease, Gluten sensitivity, lymphomas, inflammatory fibroid polyp, magnesium, vitamin E or selenium deficiency
Eosinophilic Enteritis
(I) IBD
• CROHN DISEASE (granulomatous colitis)
• ULCERATIVE COLITIS
(I) IBD
• COMMON FEATURES– IDIOPATHIC– DEVELOPED COUNTRIES– COLONIC INFLAMMATION– SIMILAR Rx– BOTH have CANCER RISK
(I) IBD DIFFERENCES
• CROHN (CD)– TRANSMURAL, THICK WALL– NOT LIMITED to COLON– GRANULOMAS– FISTULAE COMMON– TERMINAL ILEUM OFTEN– SKIP AREAS– “CRYPT” ABSCESSES NOT COMMON– NO PSEUDOPOLYPS– MALABSORPTION
• ULCERATIVE (UC)– MUCOSAL, THICK MUCOSA– LIMITED to COLON– NO GRANULOMAS– FISTULAE RARE– TERMINAL ILEUM NEVER– NO SKIP AREAS– “CRYPT” ABSCESSES COMMON– PSEUDOPOLYPS– NO MALABSORPTION
Intestinal TB versus Crohn’s diseaseTuberculosis:Granulomas• Caseation• Confluent granulomas• Lymphoid cuff • Granulomas larger than 400 micrometer• 5 or more granulomas in biopsies from one
segment• Granulomas located in the submucosa or
in granulation tissue: often with palisaded histiocytes
• Granulomas in the ileocecal region
• Nonspecific inflammatory changes in the same and adjacent segments to those with granulomatous iflammation
• Disproportionate submucosal inflammation
Crohn’s disease:Granulomas• Small (<200 micrometer) • Discrete• Very few / single • Poorly organised • Commonly located in the mucosa• Granulomas in the rectosigmoid• “microgranulomas”: aggregates of
histiocytes
• Nonspecific inflammation more diffusely distributed and not restricted to the same segments or those adjacent to the sites of granulomatous iflammation
• Crypt-centric inflammation: pericryptal granulomas and focally enhanced colitis
Crohn’s disease
• Segmental, patchy and focal involvement• Distorted crypt villous architecture, Villous atrophy• Significant chronic inflammation• Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, cryptitis, ulceration• Granulomas, microgranulomas
Amyloidosis
• G.I. involvement occurs in 85 to 100% cases of systemic amyloidosis
• Commonly causes ulceration, bleeding; motility disorders, stasis and malabsorption
• Macroscopy: fine granularity, erosions, friability, thickening of folds
Take home message
Interpretation & evaluation of GI biopsy specimen requires clinicopathological correlation
Good orientation of the biopsy specimen essential for accurate histopathological assessment.
A well-oriented biopsy specimen should have at least 4-5 consecutive elongated ,well distended villi from the base of the tip
The evaluation of the villous: crypt ratio, the count and distribution of the intraepithelial lymphocytes(IELs) as well as the evaluation of the enterocytes in the tip is critical
Infections can be accompanied by subtle changes in the architecture and minimal inflammation
References
• Biopsy Interpretation of the Gastro intestional tract mucosa , Elizabeth A. Montigomery & Lysandra voltaggia .2nd Edition
• Mucosal biopsy of the Gastrointestional tract,Whitehead 2nd edition
• Morson and Dowson’s Gastrointestional Pathology,David W Day 4th edition
• Robbins and Cortan Pathologic Basis of Disease 8th edition• Sternberg’s Diagnostic Surgical Pathology, Stancy E.Mills 5th
editon• Wheater’s Functional Histology, Barbara Young , Alan,James
5th edition
• Pathology illustrated, Robin Reid, Foina, Elaime. 7th edition
• S serra, P A Jane. An approach to duodenal biopsies J Clin Pathol2006;
• Harvey Goldman, Donald. Mucosal biopsy of the esophagus ,stomach, and proximal duodenum Human pathology
• Netter’s illustrated Human Pathology, Gerhard, L.M. Buja.1st edition