Activity-Based Costing and Management Management Accounting: The Cornerstone for Business Decisions...
-
Upload
lyric-showell -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Activity-Based Costing and Management Management Accounting: The Cornerstone for Business Decisions...
Activity-Based Costing and Management
Management Accounting: The Cornerstone for
Business Decisions
Copyright ©2006 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
Learning Objectives
1. Explain why functional-based costing approaches may produce distorted costs.
2. Explain how an activity-based costing system works for product costing.
3. Describe activity-based customer and supplier costing.
Learning Objectives
4. Explain how activity-based management can be used for cost reduction.
5. (Appendix) Explain the basics of quality cost management.
6. (Appendix) Explain the basics of environmental cost management.
List Limitations of Functional Cost
Accounting System◙ Distorts costs in multiproduct
situations◙ Does not assign non-unit related
overhead costs appropriately◙ Companies in intensely competitive
industries adopt business practices and strategies to achieve competitive excellence which are not supported by old cost accounting systems
◙ Doesn’t support product diversity
Product Costing Data for PowerPoint Cornerstones
Activity Usage Measures
Deluxe Regular Total
Units produced 30 300 330
Prime costs $ 2,400 $ 24,000 $ 26,400
DLH 60 240 300
MH 30 120 150
Setup Hrs 9 3 12
Number of moves 18 12 30
How to calculate consumption ratios.7-1
Consumption Ratios
Overhead Activity Deluxe Regular Activity Driver
Setting up equip.
0.75
0.25 Setup Hrs
Moving goods
0.60
0.40 # of moves
Machining
0.20
0.80 MH
Assembly
0.20
0.80 DLH
Setup Hours for Deluxe 9 / 12 = .75; Regular 3 / 12 = .25
How to calculate activity rates.
Activity Activity Cost Driver Quantity
Setup equip. $3,600 Setup hrs 12Moving goods 2,400 # of moves 30Machining 4,500 MH 50Assembly 1,500 DLH 100
REQUIRED: Calculate activity rates.
7-2
Calculation: The rates are obtained by dividing the activity cost by the total cost driver quantity
Setup rate $3,600 / 12 setup hrs = $300 per setup hour
Mtls handling rate $2,400 / 30 moves = $80 per move
Machining rate $1,500 / 150 MH = $10 per machine hour
Assembly rate $1,500 / 300 DLH = $5.00 per direct labor hour
How to calculate activity rates.7-2
Illustrate Activity-Based Costing
How to calculate activity-based unit
costs.Activity
Deluxe Regular Rate
Units prod. year 30 300
Prime costs $2,400 $24,000
Setup hours 9 3 $300.00
# of moves 18 12 80.00
Machine hours 30 120 30.00
DLH 60 240 5.00
7-3
REQUIRED: Calculate the unit cost for deluxe & regular models.
Calculation: Deluxe RegularPrime Costs $2,400 $24,000Overhead Costs:Setups $300 x 9; $300 x 3 2,700 900Moving Materials
$80 x 18; $ 80 x 12 1,440 960Machining $30 x 30; $30 x 120 900 3,600Assembly $5 x 60; $5 x 240 300 1,200Total manufacturing costs $7,740
$30,660Units produced 30 300
Unit cost (Total costs / Units) $ 258 $102.20
How to calculate activity-based unit
costs.7-3
Illustrate Two Stage Assignment
How to assign resource costs using direct tracing
& resource drivers.Assume each employee is paid $45,000 ($270,000 total cost for 6 employees). The work distribution is the same as exhibit 7-4.REQUIRED: Assign the cost of labor to each of the activities of the credit department.Calculation: The amount of labor cost assigned to each activity is below. The percentage is from Exhibit 7-5.Processing transaction $108,000 (0.4 x $270,000)Preparing statements $ 81,000 (0.3 x $270,000)Answering questions $ 81,000 (0.3 x $270,000)
7-4
How to calculate activity-based
customer costs.Milan company produces precision
parts for 11 major buyers. Of the 11 customers one accounts for 50% of the sales, with the remaining 10 accounting for the remaining sales. The 10 smaller companies purchase approximately equal quantities of parts. Orders placed by the smaller companies are about the same size. Data pertaining to Milan’s customer activity is on the next slide.
7-5
How to calculate activity-based customer costs
7-5Large
Customers Ten Smaller
Customers
Units purchased 1,000,000
1,000,000
Orders placed 4 400
Number of sales calls 20 420
Manufact. costs 6,000,000 6,000,000
Alloc. order filling costs 404,000 404,000
Alloc. sales force costs 220,000 220,000
Currently customer driven costs are assigned based on units sold, a unit level driver.
REQUIRED: Assign cost using ABCCalculation: The appropriate drivers are orders
placed and number of sales calls. The activity rates are:
$808,000 / 404 = $2,000 per order$440,000 / 440 = $1,000 per callUsing the information, the customer-driven costs can
be assigned to each group of customers as follows:Large Ten Smaller
Order filling costs:($2,000 x 4), ($2,000 x 400) $ 8,000 $ 800,000
Sales force costs:($1,000 x 20), (1,000 x 420) $20,000 $ 420,000
How to calculate activity-based
customer costs.7-5
How to calculate activity-based supplier
costs.Assume that a purchasing manager uses
two suppliers, Murray, Inc. and Plata Assoc., as the source of two machine parts: Part A1 and Part B2. Consider two activities repairing products (under warranty) and expediting products. Repairing products occurs because of parts failure (bought from suppliers). Expediting products occurs because suppliers are late in delivering needed parts. Activity cost information and other data needed for supplier costing follows:
7-6
How to calculate activity-based supplier
costs.1. Activity costs caused by suppliers (e.g. failed
parts or late delivery)Activity CostsRepairing products $400,000Expediting products $100,000
2. Supplier Data
7-6
Murray Inc. Plata Assoc.
A1 B2 A1 B2
Purchase price $ 20 $ 52 $ 20 $ 52
Units purchased 40,000 20,000 5,000 5,000
Failed units 800 190 5 5
Late shipments 30 20 - -
REQUIRED: Determine the cost of each supplier using ABC.
Calculation: Using the previous data, the activity rates for assigning costs to suppliers are computed as follows:
Repair rate = $400,000 / 1,000* = $400 per failed part*(800 + 190 + 5 + 5)
Expediting rate = $200,000 / 50* = $2,000 per late delivery *(30 + 20)
Using the above rates and the activity data, the total purchasing cost per unit for each component is computed:
How to calculate activity-based supplier
costs.7-6
How to calculate activity-based supplier
costs.7-6
Murray Inc. Plata Assoc.
A1 B2 A1 B2
Purchase price
$20 x 40,000 $ 800,000
$52 x 20,000 $1,040,000
$24 x 5,000 $120,000
$56 x 5,000 $280,000
Repairing prod.
$400 x 800 320,000
$400 x 380 152,000
$400 x 5 2,000
$400 x 5 2,000
Expediting prod.
$2,000 x 30 60,000
$2,000 x 20 - 40,000
-
-
Total costs $1,180,000 $1,232,000 $122,000 $282,000
Units 40,000 20,000 5,000 5,000
Total unit cost $ 29.50 $ 61.60 $ 24.40 $ 56.40
7-6
How to calculate activity-based supplier
costs.
Illustrate the Process-Value Analysis
Driver Analysis
ActivitiesPerformance
Analysis
WHY? HOW WELL?
WHAT?
Match Definitions
Activity Inputs
Value-added Activities
Activity Outputs
Identifying those factors that are the root causes of activity costs
Identifying, describing & evaluating the activities an organization performs
Resources consumed by the activity in producing an output
Activity Analysis
Driver Analysis
Activities necessary to stay in business
The result or product of an activity
Define Non-Value Added Activities
◙ All activities other than those absolutely essential to remain in business
Provide some examples◙ Scheduling◙ Moving◙ Waiting◙ Storing◙ Inspecting
How to assess non-value added costs.
Consider the following two activities: (1) Performing warranty work, cost $240,000. The warranty cost of the most efficient competitor is $20,000. (2) Purchasing components, cost $300,000 (15,000 purchase orders). A benchmarking study reveals that the most efficient level would use 5,000 purchase orders and entail a cost of $110,000.
REQUIRED: Determine the non-value added cost of each activity.
7-7
Calculation: Determine the value content of each activity. Is it value added? Performing warranty work is non-value added. If done correctly the first time it is not needed. Therefore, the cost of the activity is $240,000. The cost of the competitors is also non-value added but is irrelevant.
Purchasing is necessary so materials are available for production and thus is value-added. However, it is not performed as efficiently as possible as shown in the benchmarking study. The non-value added cost is $190,000 ($300,000 - $110,000).
How to assess non-value added costs.7-7