ACTION RESEARCH...ACTION RESEARCH “Action research is characterized as research that is done by...

32
ACTION RESEARCH Trudy Thorson & Kendra Beliveau ED 800 November 19 th , 2012

Transcript of ACTION RESEARCH...ACTION RESEARCH “Action research is characterized as research that is done by...

ACTION RESEARCH

Trudy Thorson & Kendra Beliveau

ED 800

November 19th, 2012

ACTION RESEARCH

“Action research is characterized as research that

is done by teachers for themselves”

(Mertler, 2009).

Teachers examine their own

classrooms, instructional strategies, assessment

procedures, and interactions with student learners

in order to improve their quality and effectiveness.

WHAT ACTION RESEARCH IS AND IS NOT

What it is… What it is not…

• A process that improves

education through change

• Problem-solving

• Collaborative • Doing research on or about

people

• Cyclical • Linear

• Practical and relevant • Conclusive

• Within context of teacher’s

environment

• Generalizing to larger

populations

• How we can do things better • Why we do certain things

• Explores, discovers and seeks

to find creative solutions

• The implementation of

predetermined answers

• A way to improve instructional

practice by observing, revising,

and reflecting

• A fad

VIDEO: ACTION RESEARCH MADE SIMPLE

Action Research Made Simple

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg83f72_6Gw

Key Characteristics

Addresses Real Life Problems

Constructs Knowledge

Promotes Change

Collaborative / Participatory

A BRIEF HISTORY OF ACTION RESEARCH

FERRANCE (2000)

Kurt Lewin, a social psychologist and educator, first

formulated the idea of performing research in a “natural”

setting in the 1940s.

No distinction between the research study and the

problem to be solved.

Proposed that research should be cyclical rather than

linear.

Stephen Corey was among the first to use action

research in education and he stated the following:

We are convinced that the disposition to study…the

consequences of our teaching is more likely to change

and improve our practices than is reading about what

someone else has discovered of his teaching (Corey,

1953, p. 70).

MODELS AND TYPES OF

ACTION RESEARCH

MODELS OF ACTION RESEARCH

Many models exist but all share the same basic

principles which are:

A central problem or topic

Observation or monitoring takes place

Collection and synthesis of data

Some type of action is taken

Next stage of action research (varies)

ACTION RESEARCH INTERACTING SPIRAL

ERNEST STRINGER (2007)

LEWIN’S ACTION RESEARCH SPIRAL

(MERTLER, 2009)

CALHOUN’S ACTION RESEARCH CYCLE

(MERTLER, 2009)

BACHMAN’S ACTION RESEARCH CYCLE

MERTLER (2009)

RIEL’S ACTION RESEARCH MODEL

(MERTLER, 2009)

PIGGOT-IRVINE’S ACTION RESEARCH MODEL

MERTLER (2009)

TYPES OF ACTION RESEARCH (FERRANCE, 2000)

STEPS IN ACTION RESEARCH

STEPS IN ACTION RESEARCH

(FERRANCE, 2000)

STEPS IN ACTION RESEARCH

FERRANCE (2000)

Identify a problem area

Meaningful, attainable and within teacher’s influence

Higher order question that is specific and concise

Collection and organization of data

Portfolios, interviews, photos, diaries, field notes, videos, journals, case studies, checklists, surveys

Appropriate, easy to collect, and readily available

Triangulate data (i.e. use three or more sources)

Organize to identify themes; can be arranged by gender, classroom, school, grade level, age, etc.

Interpretation of data

Analyze and identify major themes

Quantitative or qualitative

STEPS IN ACTION RESEARCH

Action based on data

Use the data collected complemented by current

research to develop a plan of action

Alter only one variable

Document and collect data during action phase

Reflection

Evaluate the results

Was the intervention successful? Can the positive

results be directly attributed to the variable addressed?

If unsuccessful, what could be done in subsequent

attempts to elicit more favorable results?

UNDERSTANDING OUR LEARNERS AND DEVELOPING

REFLECTIVE PRACTICE: CONDUCTING ACTION RESEARCH

WITH ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

SOWA (2009)

The study outlined action research projects of six

graduate student teachers in an ESL Methods Course.

Three projects are described in the paper and we will

outline one of these to show how it reflects the steps of

action research.

Identify the Problem

Students were not able to make “connections between

the sound symbol relationships necessary for word

decoding in reading and spelling” (Sowa, 2009, p.

1029).

UNDERSTANDING OUR LEARNERS AND DEVELOPING

REFLECTIVE PRACTICE: CONDUCTING ACTION RESEARCH

WITH ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

SOWA (2009)

Gather Data

Reading assessment: Pre- and Post-Tests

Work Samples

Interpret Data

A reading pre-test was used as a baseline

Student samples showed beginning writing and spelling

strategies

UNDERSTANDING OUR LEARNERS AND DEVELOPING

REFLECTIVE PRACTICE: CONDUCTING ACTION RESEARCH

WITH ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

SOWA (2009)

Act on Evidence

Re-teach phonemic awareness to try to improve ELLs

reading, writing and spelling skills.

Taught phonics in context

Worked on spelling strategies including letter-sound

relationships and letter-sound combinations

Evaluate Results

Work samples indicated an improvement in spelling and

reading but only a slight growth in reading.

The reading post-test showed improvement amongst

students to decode words and recognize miscues.

ACTION RESEARCH: USING WORDLES FOR

TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGE WRITING

BARALT, PENNESTRI, & SELVANDIN (2011)

Used Mackey and Gass’s (2005) explanation of action research as framework for study.

A very comprehensive research report which includes three sections:

1. Explanation of data visualization as a learning tool (creates a rationale for the research study)

2. The action research report conducted by the authors using Wordle

3. The outcome of the project and suggestions for how educators can use word clouds in foreign language classrooms

Context: 18 students in an intermediate-level Spanish FL class at a private research university who met for 50 minutes three times a week. Four compositions were to be written during the semester and students were expected to be able to: present information formally with an introduction, provide supporting paragraphs and a conclusion; use accurate grammar; and use instructors’ feedback in their writing. The expectations were clearly communicated to the students.

ACTION RESEARCH: USING WORDLES FOR

TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGE WRITING

BARALT, PENNESTRI, & SELVANDIN (2011)

Identify the Problem

Two main issues in students’ writing:

1. Continuous repetition of errors

2. Reliance on high frequency words without attempting

to use new vocabulary in writing

Data Collection

Word frequency counts from students’ compositions and

a whole-class-based word cloud.

Teaching reflection about the class discussion

Instructor asked students about their perceptions of the

use of Wordle in the writing process

This procedure was used for all four compositions.

ACTION RESEARCH: USING WORDLES FOR

TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGE WRITING

BARALT, PENNESTRI, & SELVANDIN (2011)

Act on Evidence

Wordles helped to show students’ progress

Students used more vocabulary in their compositions

Facilitated class discussions about the writing process

Evaluate Results

Both the students and instructor agreed that using

Wordles created excitement about writing.

Effective, novel, and enjoyable.

Students incorporated more varied vocabulary, used

grammar more accurately, and had more content in their

writing.

Workshop days became more student-centered

ACTION RESEARCH: USING WORDLES FOR

TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGE WRITING

BARALT, PENNESTRI, & SELVANDIN (2011)

Limitations

Lack of generalizability

Findings of action research are typically only

relevant to the specific classroom being

investigated, its students and its own unique

characteristics

It may yield different results in other classrooms,

contexts or languages.

As with any technology, teachers must ensure that

the software works with their computer systems;

Wordle requires a Java-enabled web browser

WRITING THE ACTION RESEARCH

REPORT

WRITING ACTION RESEARCH REPORTS

Reports vary depending on the variables, context, and action involved but most include:

Introduction Area of focus

Defining the variables

Research questions

Review of related literature

Description of the Intervention or Innovation

Data Collection and Considerations

Data Analysis and Interpretation

Conclusions

Reflection and Action Plan (Mertler, 2009)

Examples of Action Research Reports written for professional development presentations

DISADVANTAGES OF ACTION

RESEARCH

Lack of Time

• Action Research is demanding of space and time, both of which are stretched to their limits.

Validity

• Inevitable research bias

Results are not Generalizable

• Although a researcher’s findings may be tested by

another teacher in their own classroom

Range of Models and Process

• Action Research is a messy process and the constraints of the models may “trap teachers”

TIME TO REFLECT!

After viewing our presentation on action research,

what nags you about your teaching practices that

you’d like to change?

At your table groups, use the questions on the next

slide to come up with a possible research

question(s) that you could test in you own

classroom.

Examples include but are not limited to: teaching

method, identifying a problem, examining an area

of interest, classroom environment, classroom

management, evaluation, etc.

ACTIVITY:

WRITE ACTION RESEARCH QUESTIONS

PINE (2009)

I would like to improve by __________________.

I am perplexed by _____________________.

I am really curious about ____________________.

Something I really think would make a difference is

_______________________.

Something I would really like to change is

____________________.

What happens to student learning in my classroom

when I ___________________?

How can I implement ______________________?

How can I improve _______________________?

REFERENCES

Baralt, M., Pennestri, S., & Selvandin, M. (2011). Using Wordles to Teach Foreign Language Writing. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 12-22.

Ferrance, E. (2000). Action Research. Providence, RI, USA. Retrieved November 14, 2012 from http://www.lab.brown.edu/pubs/themes_ed/act_research.pdf

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). 7.5.2 Action Research. In Second Language Research: Methodology and Design (pp. 216-220). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Mertler, C. (2009). Action Research. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Pine, G. (2009). Teacher Action Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Sowa, P. A. (2009). Understanding our learners and developing reflective practice: Conducting action research with English Language Learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1026-1032.

Stringer, E. T. (2007). Action Research (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Waters-Adams, S. (2006). Action Research in EducationRetrieved November 14, 2012 fromhttp://www.edu.plymouth.ac.uk/resined/actionresearch/arhome.htm