Academic Excellence Indicator System 2007-08

1

Academic Excellence Indicator System2007-08

Annual Report and Public Hearing

Midland ISDJanuary 13, 2009

2

Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)

• Comprehensive reporting system defined by statute

• Published annually since 1990-91• Gives parents and community a snapshot of

• District/Campus Performance (Section I of AEIS Report)• District/Campus Profile (Section II of AEIS Report)

• Contains all data used to determine District/Campus accountability ratings

• Uses data collected through:• State data reporting system (PEIMS)• Student assessment system

3

AEIS Reports(Overview – Three Sections)

Cover Page

District Performance

District Profile

4

AEIS Reports(Cover Page)

• District 2008 Accountability Rating:• Academically Acceptable

• District PBM Special Education Monitoring Results:• Local Interventions Implemented • Each status is explained in detail in Appendix G to the

2007-08 AEIS Glossary (p. 57)

• District 2008 Gold Performance Acknowledgments: • None applicable at the district level• 52 received at the campuses -- an increase of 6

5

AEIS: 2008 Accountability Standards

Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Included

TestsTAKS

TAKS +

TAKS-Acc

(Group 1)*

TAKS +

TAKS-Acc

(Group 1)

TAKS +

TAKS-Acc

(All Grades/ Subjects)

TAKS +

TAKS-Acc + TAKS-M + TAKS-Alt

Standards AA/Re/Ex AA/Re/Ex AA/Re/Ex AA/Re/Ex AA/Re/Ex

Reading/ELA 65/75/90 70/75/90 70/75**/90 70/80**/90 TBD

Writing 65/75/90 65/75/90 70/75**/90 70/80**/90 TBD

Social Studies 65/75/90 65/75/90 70/75**/90 70/80**/90 TBD

Mathematics 45/75/90 50/75/90 55/75**/90 60/80**/90 TBD

Science 40/75/90 45/75/90 50/75**/90 55/80**/90 TBD

* TAKS-Accommodated (Group 1)• Science (Grades 5, 8, 10, 11); Spanish (5)• Social Studies (Grades 8, 10, 11)• ELA (Grade 11)• Math (Grade 11)

** Recognized Standard• In the 2007 Accountability Manual, the Commissioner proposed that

the Recognized standard increase to 80% in 2009• It will remain at 75% in 2009, but is scheduled to go to 80% in 2010

(subject to review in 2009)

6

AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)

• District performance indicators include:

• TAKS performance – Spring 2008 (p. 1 – 5)

• “Met Standard” by grade, subject, and student group• Divided by English and Spanish Test Takers

• Comparison to 2007 performance

• Comparison to State and Region performance

7


• District performance indicators include:• TAKS performance – Spring 2008 Accountability

Measure: “Met Standard” – Sum of All Grades Tested (3-11 or all grades tested at campus)

• By subject• Reading/ELA, Math, Writing, Science, Social

Studies• By student group

• All Students, African American, Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantaged

8

2008 TAKS Performance Sum of All Grades Tested

2008 Accountability Indicator

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Reading/ ELA Math Writing Science Social Studies All Combined

State Midland

9


• District performance indicators include:

• TAKS Met 2010 Standard – Preview (p. 5)

• 2010 preview at Panel Recommendation• “Met Standard” by grade, subject, and student group

• Additional TAKS (Accommodated) subjects/grades• Reading and Math 3-10• Writing 4, 7

• Comparison to State and Region performance

10

TAKS Met 2009 StandardSum of All Grades Tested

2010 Accountability Indicator Preview

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Reading/ ELA Math Writing Science Social Studies All

State Midland

11

AEIS ReportsCommended Performance

• Achieved Commended Performance (p. 5)• ~90% of the items correct; Scale score of 2400

0

10

20

30

40

50

Reading/ ELA Math Writing Science Social Studies All

State Midland

12


• District performance indicators include:• TAKS/TAKS-Acc/TAKS-M/TAKS-Alt Participation (p.

6)• Sum of all grades by student group

• TAKS Exit-Level Cumulative Pass Rate (p. 6)• Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers (p. 7)• TGI (Texas Growth Index) (p. 7 and p. 33

Glossary)• Student Success Initiative Results (p. 7-9)• English Language Learners Progress Measure (not

shown this year)• Scheduled future accountability indicator

13


• District performance indicators include:• Attendance Rate (p. 9)• Annual Dropout Rate (2006-07) (p. 9)

• Grades 7-8 [Standard Accountability Measure]• Grades 7-12 [Alternative Accountability Measure]• Grades 9-12

• Completion Rate II (p. 10)• Class of 2007 (with GED) [Alternative Accountability

Measure]

• Completion Rate I (p. 10)• Class of 2007 (without GED) [Standard

Accountability Measure]

14





Measure]



15


• Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 7-8) (p. 9)

• Final Decision: Standards by Accountability Year (school year of dropout in parentheses)

2007(2005-06)

2008(2006-07)

2009(2007-08)

Recommended

(To be reviewed in 2009)

2010(2008-09)

2011(2009-10)

2010(2008-09)

Academically Acceptable ≤ 1.0%

≤ 2.0% ≤ 2.0 ≤ 1.8% ≤ 1.6% ≤ 1.4%Recognized ≤ 0.7%

Exemplary ≤ 0.2%

16

2006-07 Annual Dropout Rate (Gr. 7-8)

0.40.7

0.9

0

0.6 0.8 0.8

0

1

2

3

4

5

Midland

State ALL African American Asian Hispanic White Ec. Dis.

17

AEIS Key Issues for 2007-08

• Implementation of NCES definition of dropout impacted the following accountability indicators in 2006-07:

• Grade 7-8 dropout rate [Standard Accountability Measure]• Grade 7-12 dropout rate [Alternative Accountability Measure]• Completion Rate I [Standard Accountability Measure]• Completion Rate II [Alternative Accountability Measure]

• School Leaver Provision for 2007-08 • Dropout rate or completion rate cannot be the cause of a

lowered district/campus rating

18





Measure]



19

2006-07 Annual Dropout Rate (Gr. 7-12)(2008 Alternative Education Accountability

Indicator)

2.7

4.1

6.2

1.9

5.2

2.4

7.7

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Midland


20





Measure]

• Completion Rate I (p. 10)• Class of 2007 (without GED)

[Standard Accountability Measure]

21

2006-07 Annual Dropout Rate (Gr. 9-12)(Report Only)

3.9

5.8

9

2.6

7.9

3.2

7

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Midland


22


• Completion Rate (HS) (p. 10)• Grades 9-12 (2003-04 Freshman Class) • Final Decision: Standards by Accountability Year (freshman year

of cohort in parentheses)

2007(2002-03)

2008(2003-04)

2009(2004-05)

Academically Acceptable 75% 75% 75%

Recognized 85% 85% 85%

Exemplary 95% 95% 95%

23

Completion Rate I(2008 Accountability Indicator) (p.

10)

• Percent of students (longitudinal measure) who first attended 9th grade in 2003-04 who graduated or who are continuing their education 4 years later:

• Graduated with class of 2007 (or earlier)• Re-enrolled in school in fall of 2007

24

Completion Rate IClass of 2007 (Longitudinal)

74.1

58.3

62.4

85.2

56.1

7.9

14.4

12.2

3.5

13

16.1

26.5

24

8.8

29.2

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

All

Afric Amer

Hispanic

White

Eco Dis

Grad Continued HS GED 4-Yr Dropout

State=78%

25

Violent and Criminal Incidents

• Texas statute (TEC 39.053) requires every district to publish an annual report on violent and criminal incidents at campuses in the district• Number• Rate• Type

• No conduct reported punishable as a felony

26

Violent and Criminal Incidents

191

41 34 31

870

13136 26 32

670

0

200

400

600

800

2005-06 2006-07

Drugs Alcohol Assault Tobacco Fighting

27

AEIS ReportsCollege Readiness Indicators

• District performance indicators include:• Advanced Courses/Dual Enrollment (p. 10)• Recommended High School Program

(RHSP)/Distinguished Achievement Program (DAP) Graduates (p. 10)

• AP/IB Results (p. 10)• Texas Success Initiative – Higher Education

Readiness Component (HERC) (p. 10)• SAT/ACT Results (p. 11)• College-Ready Graduates (Class of 2007) (p. 11)

• Scheduled future accountability indicator

28

Additional Indicators:College Readiness Indicators

• 19.3% of high school students completing an Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment –increase by 0.2% over prior year (p.10)

• 73.1% of 2007 graduates completing the RHSP/DAP – an increase by 2.7% from last year (p.10)

• 7.4% of AP students tested on at least one AP exam – increase of 2.4% over prior year examination results (p. 10)

• 38.8% of SAT/ACT scores at or above criterion – increase of 1.6% over prior year

29


• Texas Success Initiative (TSI)• HERC – Higher Education Readiness

Component• Measures Math and ELA proficiency• ≥2200 on both + 3 on writing• Includes TAKS-Accommodated

30

63%

27%

34%30%

49%

90%

79%85%86%

94%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All AfricanAmerican

Hispanic White Econ Disadv

High Ed Readiness Component TAKS Met Standard

Additional Indicators(2008 11th Graders Meeting HERC vs. Passing TAKS:

ELA)

31

56%

37% 39%33%

72%

91%

61%70%

67%

81%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All AfricanAmerican


High Ed Readiness Component TAKS Met Standard

Additional Indicators(2008 11th Graders Meeting HERC vs. Passing TAKS:

Math)

32


• College-Ready Graduates • High school graduates who:

• Met HERC standard on Exit Level ELA/Math; OR

• Scored >=500 on SAT Reading/Math and >=1070 Total; OR

• Scored >= 19 on ACT English/Math and >=23 Composite

33

27%

45%33%

53%

33%

46%49%

69%

45%

56%60%

41%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

State All AfricanAmerican


ELA Math

Additional Indicators2007 College-Ready Graduates ELA & Math

State = 49% ELA

State = 56% Math

34

Additional IndicatorsSAT/ACT Results (p. 11)

• Tested:• All Students:

51.2%• Af. Amer.: 52.2%• Hispanic: 23.6%• White:

64.6%• Eco. Dis.: n/a

• At/Above Criterion• All Students:

38.8%• Af. Amer.: 11.4%• Hispanic: 19.0%• White:

44.3%• Eco. Dis.: n/a

35

Student Enrollment and Academic Performance

(Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board)

• Data collected and reported by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

• Reported for each high school in the district

• Reports on student performance in postsecondary institutions

• Most recent report (2005-06) available at:• http://www.txhighereddata.org/Interactive/HSCollLink.cfm

36

AEIS Reports(Section II - Profile) (p. 1-2)

• Student Information• By grade• Ethnicity• Program areas• Graduates• Retention rates• Class size

37

AEIS Reports(Section II - Profile)

• Staff Information (p. 3-4)• Professional staff• Educational aides/auxiliary staff• Ethnicity and gender• Degrees held• Experience• Average teacher salary• Turnover rate for teachers

• Financial Information (p. 5-6)• Tax information• Revenues• Expenditures

38

Campus Performance Objectives

• Campus Improvement Plans are based on the AEIS (available online on campus webpages)• Performance Objectives are approved by the

Board of Trustees (February Meeting)

• Data from the AEIS gives direction for the development of performance objectives that are low in relation to the accountability standards

39

Accessing the AEIS Report

• Public Hearing• January 13, 2009 – Board Meeting• Campuses schedule their own

meetings• Where the report is available

• TEA website • District website• Campus libraries or offices

Academic Excellence Indicator System 2007-08

Documents

Transcript of Academic Excellence Indicator System 2007-08