2g Meerut Report

8/2/2019 2g Meerut Report

1/65

All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006, #####

Meerut 2G Benchmark Report

February 2012


2/65


Executive Summary Meerut

Demographics of MeerutMeerut is a metropolitan city in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. It is an ancient city located 70 km (43 mi) northeast of the national capital New Delhi,and 453 km (281 mi) northwest of the state capital, Lucknow. It is the second largest city in the National Capital Region of India (the largest being Delhi),the 16th largest metropolitan area and 17th largest city in India. It ranked 292 in 2006 and 242 in 2010 in the list of largest cities and urban areas in theworld and is the second fastest developing city in Uttar Pradesh (after Noida).It has the 2nd largest army cantonment in the country. The city is one of the largest producers of sports goods, and the largest producer of musicalinstruments in India.

Meerut Details

Population 3,447,405

Area 272 km

Population Density 1342 /km

MeerutOperators

TechBand of

Operation(MHz)

No. of 2GCells*

Subscribers (UPWest Circle)

Airtel GSM 1800 471 6620368

Vodafone GSM 900 306 9413864

Docomo GSM 1800 361 8528526

Idea GSM 900 339 9829965

RCOM CDMA EVDO 850 - 467950

TATA CDMA EVDO 850 - 8528526

*No of Cells is an indicative no the cells encountered during the drive

Subscriber figures are for UP West Circle taken from the latest COAI report.

*TATA & Reliance Subs includes GSM + CDMA.


3/65


Section 1

Benchmarking Equipment and setup

Data Collection Details

Voice Testing Algorithm

Data Testing Algorithm

Strategic Location Testing

Benchmarking KPIs: Score Evolution

Voice & Data KPI weightages

Benchmarking Methodology


4/65


Benchmarking Equipment and Setup

The XCAL MO is a drive test data collection and analysis system for mobile networks. XCAL tool is a systemthat collects radio performance and QoS Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) of wireless networks.

It is built upon a modular platform for Quality of Service (QoS) wireless network drive testing, RFOptimization and Competitive network benchmarking.The systems uses specially configured commercial phones attached to controlling device in isolationchambers to perform various test such as voice call, data calls, video calls etc. The equipment is flexible inconfiguration supporting a maximum of 20 handset devices on the same testing platform.


5/65


Data Collection Details

A benchmarking activity, was carried out in Meerut for

across the city. The details of the activity are:

Measurement Period : 15th Jan 2012 to 11th Feb2012

Measurement time during the day : 8 AM to 9 PM

Measurement days during the week : Monday to Saturday

The drive route was created to cover the dense population

area , key commercial area, key residential area. The

city was divided into 5 clusters/areas.

CL -1 Ishwar Nagar, Kanjar Mohalla,

CL-2 Prem Puri , sharda Puri Ph1

CL-3 Beripura, Muftiyan , Islamabad

CL-4 Garh Raod, Tejgarhi, Prabhat Nagar

CL- 5 Sharma Nagar, Jawahar Nagar.

1

2

3

4

5


6/65


Voice Testing Algorithm

Test Details Specifications

No of Operators tested2G Network (Airtel, Docomo, Idea,

Vodafone, Reliance CDMA, Tata CDMA)

Voice Test Algorithm

Call Duration 3 mins (180 Secs)

Idle time in between calls 10 Secs

Continuous call for 3 minute duration with 10 seconds of

Idle time. Speech samples (DL and UL) are sent and

received which provide the MOS score for voice quality.

This was repeated for the entire duration of collection


7/65


Data Testing Algorithm

Test Details Specifications

No of Operators testedGSM Network (Airtel, Docomo, Idea, Vodafone)

EVDO Network (Reliance, Tata)

Data Test Algorithm

Attach and PDP Activation Before every test

Ping 3 times - 32 bytes on www.google.co.in

FTP Download 10 MB (for EvDo), 500KB (for GSM) from server

FTP Upload 1 MB ( for EvDo), 100KB (for GSM) to Server

HTTP 8 different websites.

Email send 100 KB Email to SMTP server

Email Receive 100 KB Email from POP3 server

After every application test, we have 5 sec Idle time before the next Application is tested.

No HTTP Websites1 google.com

2 facebook.com

3 nimbuzz.com

4 airtel.in

5 vuclip.com

6 youtube.com

7 admob.com

8 nokia.com


8/65


Strategic Location Testing

Strategic Locations Specifications

No of Operators testedGSM Network (Airtel, Docomo, Idea, Vodafone)

EVDO Network (Reliance, Tata)

Data Test Algorithm

WAP Test 8 different WAP sites

FTP Download 10 MB (for EvDo), 1MB (for GSM) from Server

Email send 100 KB Email to SMTP server

Email Receive 100 KB Email from POP3 server

SMS SMS send to same number (160 char)

MMS MMS send to same number 15 Kb

WAP sites

wap.google.comm.facebook.com

m.samsungmobile.com

wapin.com

m.vuclip.com

m.youtube.com

m.admob.com

m.sonyericsson.com

Apart from the above tests during the drive, at 5 strategic locations across the city, additional stationary tests were

carried out. These locations are important locations of the city.

1. Abu Lane

2. Begam Pul

3. Roadways Bus Stand

4. Sadar Bazar

5. Shastri Nagar


9/65


Each KPI is then measured on a scale of0 to 200 on the basis of performance.

Value of the Particular KPI is not reported default score is 100.

The Score is then weighted with the respective weightages to arrive at an overall Voiceor a Data Score.

Benchmarking KPIs: Score Evolution

9

T

op

Top 20% percentile draws the borderline to the global to 20% performers

50% operators are above medianvalue and 50% of operator are belowthis value

Here you find individual operators

Maximum value shows the best result in thiscase best performing operator call setup

time(2.62 S)

Low 20% percentile shows that 20%of all operators are on this level orlower.

Minimum Values shows poor

performing network in this category .

Here the lowest performing operator

having call setup time(5.00 s)

1

2

3

2.62s

5.00s

3.8s


10/65


Voice & Data KPI weightages

5 KPIs are used to arrive at the Voice Quality Score and 19 KPIs are used to arrive at the Data Quality Score.

Following are the details of weightings assigned to different KPIs. These are used for arriving at the final ranking of the

operator.

*Coverage Calculation:Coverage = A%*10+B%*8+C%*6+D%*1

10


11/65


12/65


Voice Quality Score

12CST= Call Setup Time CSSR= Call Setup Success Rate CCR= Call Completion Rate MOS= Mean Opinion Score 12

Best Operator Airtel

Retainability,AccessibilityVoice quality andcoverage

94

128

53

1

2

3

4

5

172

6

VCQI

\

3.8

4.7

3.2

1

2 3

5

4

10.0

6

CST

97%

99%

92%

1

2

3

4

5

100%

6

CSSR

97%

99%

92%

1

2

3

4 5

100%

6

CCSR

3.6

3.8

3.4

1

2

3

4

5

4.01

6

MOS

74%

92%

61%

1 2 3 4

5

100%

6

Coverage

Operator VCQI CST CSSR CCSR MOS Coverage

1 Airtel 140.29 4.58 98.25% 98.21% 3.89 90.81%

2 Docomo 34.32 5.00 93.51% 94.26% 3.21 90.62%

3 Vodafone 84.62 4.97 96.73% 96.24% 3.59 90.56%

4 Idea 107.79 4.74 96.06% 97.80% 3.71 90.09%

5 RCOM 94.69 2.62 97.60% 97.86% 3.28 84.44%

6 Tata 56.85 2.68 93.91% 95.76% 3.27 74.89%


13/65


Data Quality Score

Best Operator Overall Vodafone among GSM Operators

96

117

66

1

2

3

4

183

65

DCQI

100

146

55

1 2 3 4

200

5 6

GPRS

100

153

57

1 2

3

4

5

197

6

PDP

94

129

41

1

2

3

4

5

200

6

FTP DL

91

130

40

1

2

34

5

196

6

FTP UL

99

133

41

1

2

3

4

5

200

6

HTTP

95

136

52

12

3

4

5

199

6

Email

100

124

44

1

2

3

4

5

200

6

Ping

Operator DCQI HTTP FTP DL FTP UP SMS MMS Email PRS ATT PDP PING

1 Airtel 94 89 55 67 199 188 63 120 0 117

2 Docomo 57 32 0 41 200 149 59 120 0 64

3 Vodafone 125 104 98 135 199 184 157 120 76 124

4 Idea 102 84 134 138 200 89 77 120 51 28

5 RCOM 111 119 47 176 100 100 142 100 100 179

6 Tata 114 135 56 94 100 100 143 100 100 182


14/65


Section 3

Voice Performance Analysis

Coverage Distribution

Call Setup Time

Call Setup Success Rate Call Setup Failure Analysis

Call Completion Success Rate Call Completion Failure Analysis

Accessibility V/s Retainability: Market Comparison

Voice Quality: MOS Airtel MOS Performance

Airtel RxQual

Voice Codec Distribution

Handover Analysis

Detailed Voice Analysis


15/65


Call Setup Time:

Airtel Is no. 3 with Call Setup time of 4.58s

Call Setup Success Rate:

Airtel No. 1 call setup success Rate 98.25%

Call Completion Success Rate:

Airtel is no. 1 for CCSR 98.21%

Voice Quality:Airtel Ranked No. 1 for speech quality for with MOS 3.89

Ranking for Voice KPIs

Voice Performance Analysis

Parameter Best Value Operator

Call Setup Time 2.62 RCOM

Accessibility 98.25% Airtel

Retainability 98.21% Airtel

MOS 3.89 Airtel

Coverage 90.81% Airtel

Best Operator Airtel

15

Operator CST Accessibility Retainability Voice Quality Coverage

1 Airtel 3 1 1 1 1

2 Docomo 6 6 6 6 2

3 Vodafone 5 3 4 3 3

4 Idea 4 4 3 2 45 RCOM 1 2 2 4 5

6 Tata 2 5 5 5 6


16/65


Coverage DistributionCoverage was measured with the help of a digital scanner for all the networks.

All the GSM operators have

an almost equal coverage.

Out of these Airtel is best

Airtel Distribution

Coverage RSSI

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

0 TO 6565 TO 7575 TO 8585 TO 95 95 TO105

Tata CDMA

Reliance CDMA

IdeaVodafone

Docomo

Airtel

Operator

% of

samples

> -

85dBm

Coverag

e Rate

using

formula

Rank

Airtel 2G 89.53% 90.81% 1

Tata

Docomo

2G

89.67% 90.62% 2

Vodafone

2G89.69% 90.56% 3

Idea 2G 85% 90.09% 4

RCOM

CDMA86.61% 84.44% 5

TATA

CDMA83.38% 74.89% 6

Range Samples Percentage

=-65 29749 69.35%

=-75 8961 20.89%

=-85 2812 6.56%

=-95 1314 3.06%

=-105 62 0.14%


17/65


18/65


-10

0

10

20

30

40

5060

70

80

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Airtel Docomo VodafoneIdea Reliance CDMA Tata CDMA

Airtel have least call setup timeamongst all GSM operators.

Call Setup Time (CST)

Call Set up Time (PDF)

3.9 4.7 4.1 4.08 1.54 1.1

14.73

17.53

13.55

22.93

27.57

16.13

4.58 5.00 4.97 4.742.62 2.68

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Airtel Docomo Vodafone Idea RelianceCDMA

Tata CDMA

MIN

MAX

Avg.

CST Avg.


19/65


Call Setup Success Rate is a measure of subscriber experience associated with the access to network

resource. It consists of congestion of network or unavailability of network resources.

Call Setup Success Rate

Airtel has the best accessibility amongst all

Operators with value of 98.25%Operator Call Attempts

Blocked

CallsCSSR

Blocked

Rate

Airtel 2G 479 9 98.25% 1.75%

Docomo 2G 487 37 93.51% 6.49%

Vodafone 2G 496 17 96.73% 3.27%

Idea 2G 418 20 96.06% 3.94%

Reliance CDMA 442 11 97.60% 2.40%

Tata CDMA 447 26 93.91% 6.09%

Call Setup Success Rate Airtel 2G Docomo 2G Vodafone 2G Idea 2G

Reliance

CDMA Tata CDMA

Total Calls Attempts 479 487 496 418 442 447

Blocked Call Reasons (Radio Cause) 9 37 17 20 11 26

SDCCH Drop

SDCCH blocking

CM Setup Phase Failure 6 28 14 17 9 22

SDCCH Drop, High RxQual

Temporary failure

High RxQual 2 2 3 1 2

Poor Coverage 1 1 1 2

Failed after TCH Assignment/progress

Total 9 37 17 20 11 26

CSSR 98.25% 93.51% 96.73% 96.06% 97.60% 93.91%


20/65


Call Completion Success Rate is a measure of subscriber experience associated with the continued use of network

resources that have been granted. It consists of radio link drops or abnormal network-initiated releases.

Call Completion Success Rate

Airtel has best retainability.

Call Completion Success Rate Airtel 2G Docomo 2G Vodafone 2G Idea 2G Reliance CDMA Tata CDMA

Total Calls Established 470 450 479 398 431 421

Dropped Call Reasons 9 23 18 9 10 16

High RxQual

5 18 17 5 7 12

Missing Handover, High RxQual 1 2 2 2 2

Resource Unavailable

High RxQual, FER 3 3 1 2 1 2

Total 9 23 18 9 10 16

CCSR 98.21% 94.26% 96.24% 97.80% 97.86% 95.76%

Operator EstablishedDropped

CallsCCSR

Dropped

Rate

Airtel 2G 470 9 98.21% 1.79%

Docomo 2G 450 23 94.26% 5.74%

Vodafone 2G 479 18 96.24% 3.76%

Idea 2G 398 9 97.80% 2.20%

Reliance CDMA 431 10 97.86% 2.14%

Tata CDMA 421 16 95.76% 4.24%


21/65


Call Failed & Drop Plot

DROPPED CALLSFAILEDCALLS


22/65


Accessibility V/s Retainability: Market Comparison

98.

25%

93.

51%

96.

73%

96.

06%

97.

60%

93.

91%

9

37

17

20

11

26

0

5

10

1520

25

30

35

40

91%

92%

93%

94%95%

96%

97%

98%

99%

Airtel Docomo Vodafone Idea Reliance Tata

CCSR NO OF CALL BLOCKS

98.

21%

94.

26%

96.

24%

97.

80%

97.

86%

95.

76%

9

23

18

910

16

0

5

10

15

20

25

92%

93%

94%

95%

96%

97%

98%

99%

Airtel Docomo Vodafone Idea Reliance Tata

CCR NO OF CALL DROPSCSSR

CSSR CCR


23/65


24/65


Plot DL MOS

MOS Legend Samples Percentage

3.8 < x < 5 29655 24.85%

2.8 < x < 3.8 79418 66.56%

2.2 < x < 2.8 0 0.00%

0 < x < 2.2 10244 8.59%


25/65


Plot RxQualSub

Rx Qual Legend Samples Percentage

7


26/65


27/65


Handover Performance

AIRTEL DOCOMO VODAFONE IDEA RELIANCE CDMA TATA CDMA

HO ATTEMPTS 1396 1375 1257 1168 675 467

HO SUCCESS 1375 726 1146 1076 645 449HO FAILURE 22 649 111 92 30 18

HO SUCCESS RATE 98.50% 52.80% 91.17% 92.12% 95.56% 96.15%

Avg. HO TIME 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.16 0.17

2G HANDOVERS


28/65


Section 3

Data Performance Analysis

FTP Performance FTP Application Throughput Analysis

HTTP Browsing Analysis HTTP Performance (Airtel)

FTP DL/UL and HTTP Failures

Email Performance

GPRS Attach and PDP performance

Data Access Technology Distribution EDGE - GPRS Codecs

GPRS Timeslot Allocation

Ping Response: Latency Performance

KPI Overview Table

Detailed Data Analysis


29/65

All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006, #####Ranking for Data KPIs

Airtel FTP UL performance ranked 4, FTP DL

Performance rank 3

Airtel Ranked 4th for FTP UL throughput, no 5 for

FTP DL throughput

Airtel is at 4th for email sent and 5th retrieve

performance

Ranked 4th for HTTP performance

PDP context performance Airtel ranked 5th

Airtel, Docomo, Vodafone and Idea has comparableGPRS Attach performance

Airtel, Docomo, Vodafone and Idea have same rank

for SMS performance while Vodafone has best MMS

delivery time while Docomo is best for SMS delivery

time

Data Performance Analysis

29

Test Ping (10%)

Operator FTP UP

Success(

60%)

FTP UP

Through

put(40%)

FTP DL

Success(

60%)

FTP DL

through

Put (40%)

HTTP

Success(

60%)

HTTP

downloa

d

time(40%)

Email

sent

Success(

60%)

Email

sent

time(40%)

Email

retrive

Success(

60%)

Email

Retrive

time(40%)

Ping RTT

1 Airtel 4 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 5 6 4

2 Docomo 6 6 4 6 6 6 4 4 6 5 5

3 Vodafone 3 3 2 3 3 3 1 3 1 3 3

4 Idea 1 5 1 4 5 4 4 6 4 4 6

5 RCOM 2 1 4 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 2

6 Tata 5 2 4 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 1

Email Retrive(5%)FTP UP (5%) FTP DL (20%) HTTP (30%) Email Se nt (5%)

Test

Operator GPRS

AttachSuccess

Rate

GPRS

attachdelay(40

%

PDP

contextsuccess(6

0%)

PDP

contextdelay(40

%)

1 Airtel 1 3 5 4

2 Docomo 1 3 5 4

3 Vodafone 1 3 1 3

4 Idea 1 3 4 4

5 RCOM 5 1 2 1

6 Tata 5 1 2 1

GPRS Attached(5%) PDP Attached(5%)

Test

Operator SMSsuccess

(60%)

SMSdelivery

time(40%)

MMSsuccess

(60%)

MMSdelivery

time

(40%)

1 Airtel 1 4 1 2

2 Docomo 1 1 3 3

3 Vodafone 1 3 2 1

4 Idea 1 2 6 4

5 RCOM 5 5 4 5

6 Tata 5 5 4 5

SMS(5%) MMS(5%)


30/65


FTP Statistics

File transfer is becoming increasingly and

legitimately popular as a method of transferring

media files (movies and music).

The FTP test is used to test the FTP service

availability and to measure the application

throughput for file download or file upload. The

test is successful when the desired operation

(uploading or downloading) has succeeded.

Airtel has an average throughput as compared to

other GSM providers.

FTP SUCCESS RATE

FTP THROUGHPUT

FTP UL Throughput

73.26%

49.70%

87.32%

94.93%

0.00%

32.69%

78.68%

72.82%

93.31%

94.64%

94.48%

76.36%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Airtel Docomo Vodafone Idea Reliance

CDMA

Tata CDMA

FTP DL SUCCESS RATE FTP UL SUCCESS RATE

457.6

232.0

97.8

113.4

35.8

69.1

553.6

566.3

70.0

99.8

64.3

72.4

0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 500.00 600.00

Tata CDMA

Reliance

CDMA

Idea

Vodafone

Docomo

Airtel

FTP UL SUCCESS RATE FTP DL SUCCESS RATE

FTP DL Throughput


31/65


32/65


33/65


FTP DL/UL and HTTP Failures

The Plots show the Failure events

encountered during FTP

Download, FTP upload and HTTP

Browsing for Airtel .


34/65


10.2

6.3

28.7

20.4

23.3

28.3

6.7

8.7

29.3

18.2

31.7

36.4

0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00

Tata CDMA

Reliance CDMA

Idea 2G

Vodafone 2G

Docomo 2G

Airtel 2G

Email Retrieve time Email Send time

83.2%

68.3%

98.1%

85.7%

92.0%

92.8%

83.2%

68.3%

98.1%

85.7%

92.8%

92.8%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%


CDMA

Tata CDMA

Email Send success rate Email Receive success rate

Email Send / Retrieve

A 100KB email was sent and downloaded viathe POP and SMTP protocols. This is a close

simulation of Users accessing pull mail from

their work IDs using their handphones.

Airtel has average email send success rate.

Airtel has highest email send delay ascompared to other operators.

EMAIL SEND / RECEIVE RATE

EMAIL SEND/RECEIVE TIME


35/65


GPRS Attach and PDP Context

35

Airtel has poor average GPRS attach Delay amongst all operators.

PDP performance is also poor for Airtel.

92%

89%

99%

98%

8.15

3.713.25

5.16

0

1

2

3

4

5

67

8

9

84%

86%

88%

90%

92%

94%

96%

98%

100%

Airtel Docomo Vodafone Idea

PDP Context Activation rate PDP Time

1

00%

1

00%

1

00%

1

00%

18.78

22.55

19.82

9.55

0

5

10

15

20

25

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%


GPRS Attach Success rate Attach Time

GPRS STATISTICS PDP STATISTICS


36/65


0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00


CS4

CS3

CS2

CS1

EDGE GPRS Codecs

GPRS Downlink

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00


CS4

CS3

CS2

CS1

GPRS Uplink

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.0050.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00


MCS9

MCS8

MCS7

MCS6

MCS5

MCS4

MCS3

MCS2

MCS1

EDGE Downlink

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.0050.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00


MCS9

MCS8

MCS7

MCS6

MCS5

MCS4

MCS3

MCS2

MCS1

EDGE Uplink


37/65


Timeslot Allocation

TS Downlink TS Uplink

Airtel has got average TS allocation.


38/65


A Latency Test was Conducted with www.google.co.in with 32bytes of data to figure out the round trip time. A

Ping Response signifies the average delay it takes to access a particular service.

Airtel has an average ping delay in all GSM Service Providers.

The ping delay response is however not a comprehensive representation of the service access time since it is

dependent on factors beyond the GGSN such as the number of hops to the destination and the pipe available

The delay in the RTT can point to:

UL/DL TBF allocation algorithm

Different Implementation of QoS on the Gn/Gi and giving priority to other traffic than the tunnelled ICMP

Ping Response: Latency Performance

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Airtel 2G Docomo 2G Vodafone

2G

Idea 2G Reliance

CDMA

Tata CDMA

>1000 800-1000 600-800

400-600 200-400 0-200

Ping RTT (msec)

370

573

348

714

164

153

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Airtel Docomo Vodafone Idea RelianceCDMA Tata CDMA

Ping RTT

Airtel Docomo Vodafone Idea Reliance CDMA Tata CDMA


39/65


40/65


KPI Overview Table

The attached KPI table gives an overview about the most important performance figures collected

during this Benchmarking campaign.


41/65


Section 4

City Vs Cluster Standings

Cluster wise Summary Voice

Cluster wise Snapshot Voice

Cluster wise Summary Data

Cluster wise Snapshot Data

Cluster Analysis Cluster 1

Cluster 2

Cluster 3

Cluster 4

Cluster 5

Clusterwise Analysis


42/65

Cit Cl t V i Q lit S


43/65


City vs Cluster Voice Quality Score

43CST= Call Setup Time CSSR= Call Setup Success Rate CCR= Call Completion Rate MOS= Mean Opinion Score 43

3.8

4.7

3.2

0 1 2 43

10.0

5

CST

97%

99%

92%

0

1

2

3

4

100%

5

CSSR

97%

99%

92%

0

1

2

3

4

100%

5

CCSR

74%

92%

61%

0

1 2

3

4

100%

5

Coverage

Meerut 2G VCQI CST CSSR CCR MOS

(Avg ofDL/UL)

Coverage

0 Overall 140 4.58 98.25% 98.21% 3.89 90.81%

1 Cl1 122 4.64 97.14% 97.06% 3.87 93.22%

2 Cl2 178 4.66 100.00% 100.00% 4.20 92.96%

3 Cl3 118 4.53 97.10% 97.01% 3.80 99.27%

4 Cl4 138 4.56 98.36% 98.33% 3.84 95.23%

5 Cl5 130 4.52 98.67% 98.65% 3.755 73.35%

94

128

53

0

2

3

4

179

5

1

VCQI

3.6

3.8

3.4

0 1

2

3 4

4.20

5

MOS


44/65


City vs Cluster Data Quality Score

44

96

117

66

0

1

2

3 4

183

5

DCQI

100

146

55

0 1 2 3

200

4 5

GPRS

100

153

57

0

1

2

3

4

197

5

PDP

94

129

41

0

1 23

4

200

5

FTP DL

91

130

40

0

1

2

34

196

5

FTP UL

99

133

41

0

1

2

3

4

200

5

HTTP

95

136

52

0

1

2

3

4

199

5

Email

100

124

44

0

1

2

3

4

200

5

PING

Meerut 2G DCQI GPRS PDP

Context

FTP DL FTP UL HTTP Email Ping

RTT

0 Overall 94 120 0 55 67 89 63 117

1 Cl1 111 120 120 71 75 110 35 152

2 Cl2 89 120 0 73 98 48 55 140

3 Cl3 96 120 14 75 57 92 84 65

4 Cl4 98 120 0 43 51 101 111 102

5 Cl5 100 120 0 66 49 85 100 134


45/65


Clusterwise Summary Voice

1

2

3

4

5

VoiceIndex

C1 C2 C3 C4 C5

Airtel 1 1 1 1 1

Docomo 2 6 6 6 4

Vodafone 3 4 3 3 5

Idea 6 3 2 2 3

RCOM 4 2 4 4 2

TATA 5 5 5 5 6


46/65


0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Cluster1 Cluster2 Cluster3 Cluster4 Cluster5

Airtel Docomo VodafoneIdea Reliance CDMA Tata CDMA

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Cluster1 Cluster2 Cluster3 Cluster4 Cluster5

Airtel Docomo Vodafone Idea Reliance CDMA Tata CDMA

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 4 Cluster 5

Airtel Docomo Vodafone Idea Reliance Tata CDMA

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%70%

80%

90%

100%



Clusterwise Snapshot Voice

CALL SETUP SUCCESS RATECALL COMPLETION RATE

VOICE QUALITY (MOS) CALL SETUP TIME


47/65


Clusterwise Summary Data

1

2

3

4

5

Data Index C1 C2 C3 C4 C5

Airtel 4 5 5 5 3

Docomo 6 6 6 6 6

Vodafone 1 1 1 1 1

Idea 3 4 4 3 5

RCOM 5 3 3 4 2

TATA 2 2 2 2 4


48/65


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%



0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70



0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%



0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900



Clusterwise Snapshot: Data

48

HTTP DOWNLOAD TIME HTP SUCCESS RATE

FTP DL ACCESSIBILITY FTP DL THROUGHPUT


49/65


Average

Cluster 1

Best Operator (GSM)Voice: Airtel

Data: VodafoneGood Excellent

MOS

Poor

CSSR

CCRCST

Coverage

Focus Area: Coverage and FTP Success

Rate

1

FTP DL and UL both are poor incomparison with other operators.

79.03%

82%

97%

96.30%

0% 3

8%

81%

100%

88.89%

100%

92.31%

81.82%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


CDMA

Tata CDMA

FTP DL

Success

Rate

FTP UL

Success

Rate

FTP SUCCESS RATE


50/65


Cluster 2

Good Excellent

Average Poor

CSSR

CCR

CST

Focus Area: FTP DL Success Rate

Average HTTP browsing success rate

FTP DL Success Rate is Poor.

Coverage

MOS

2


Data: Vodafone

79%

54%

90%

94%

0%

33%

72.04

36.84

137.96

105.16

214.5

374.73

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0%

10%

20%

30%40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


CDMA

Tata CDMA

FTP DL Success Rate FTP DL Throughput

FTP DL SUCCESS RATE


51/65


Average


Data: Vodafone

Cluster 3

Good Excellent

MOS

Poor

CSSR

CCRCST

Coverage

Focus Area: FTP UL Success Rate

Low FTP Upload success rate

3

77%

8

8%

94%

100%

95%

100%

73.98 84.83110.11

70.11

511.33

873.1

0

100

200

300400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

0%

10%

20%

30%40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


CDMA

Tata CDMA

FTP UL Success Rate FTP UL Throughput

FTP UL SUCCESS RATE & THROUGHPUT


52/65



Data: Vodafone

Cluster 4

Good Excellent

Average Poor

CSSR

CCR

CST

Coverage

4

Focus Area: FTP Success Rate (DL/UL)

Poor FTP UL and DL Success rate.

MOS

4

74%

0%

84.62%

100.00%

0%

25%

75.00%

0%

96.15%

100.00%

96.77%

100.00%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


CDMA

Tata CDMA

FTP

DL

Succe

ss

Rate

FTPUL

Succe

ss

Rate

FTP SUCCESS RATE


53/65


Low FTP DL success rate Weak Coverage

Cluster 5

Good Excellent

MOS

Average Poor

CSSR

CCR

CST

Focus Area: Coverage and FTP Success

Rate

Coverage

5


Data: Vodafone

79%

70%

75%

89

%

0%

0.00%

75%

86%

92%

86%

93%

0.00%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


CDMA

Tata CDMA

FTP DL

Succes

s Rate

FTP UL

Succes

s Rate

FTP DL SUCCESS RATE


54/65


55/65


Strategic Location: Overview

Locations Latitude LongitudeAbu Lane 28.996955 77.700448

Roadways Bus Stand 28.988847 77.701049

Begampul 28.998006 77.706027

Shastri Nagar 28.953555 77.732892

Sadar Bazar 28.990762 77.696893


56/65


57/65


Location 1: Abu lane

Test Airtel 2G DOCOMO 2G VODAFONE 2G IDEA 2G Reliance EvDo TATA EVDO

FTP DL Access 5 5 5 5 0 5

FTP DL Success 5 0 2 5 0 1

FTP DL Access ibi l i ty 100.00% 0.00% 40.00% 100.00% 0.00% 20.00%

FTP DL Mean Data rate(Kbps) 46.9 13.21 144.21 98.3 0 1030.48

Emai l Send Access 5 5 5 5 5 5

Emai l Send Success % 100.00% 80.00% 100.00% 100.00% 80.00% 70.00%

Emai l Send Delay 41.44 21.17 14.03 92.92 38.38 3.32

Emai l Retrieve Access 5 5 5 5 5 5

Emai l Retrieve Success % 100.00% 80.00% 100.00% 100.00% 80.00% 70.00%

Emai l Retrieve Delay 28.85 35.21 11.75 10.6 21.37 1.86

SMS send Access 10 10 10 10 - -

SMS e2e Success % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% - -

SMS send Delay (sec) 6.7 8.4 7.3 6.2 - -

Delivery Time (sec) 7.2 10.22 10.21 9.3 - -

MMS send Access 5 5 5 5 - -

MMS e2e Success % 80.00% 10.00% 10.00% 30.00% - -

MMS send Delay 15.78 23.89 18.23 11.23 - -

ABU LANE


58/65


Location 2: Roadways Bus Stand




FTP DL Accessibility 100.00% 20.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0 40

FTP DL Mean Data rate(Kbps) 92.84 18.12 133.34 91.74 0 149.28

Email Send Access 5 5 5 5 5 5

Email Send Success % 100.00% 80.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 40

Email Send Delay 14.82 16.35 34.44 42.65 82.37 11.13

Email Retrieve Access 5 5 5 5 5 5

Email Retrieve Success % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 40

Email Retrieve Delay 9.23 80.37 13.47 43.1 72.47 4.41


SMS e2e Success % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% - -


Delivery Time (sec) 9.98 10.1 11 9.34 - -


MMS e2e Success % 80.00% 0.00% 20.00% 100.00% - -

MMS send Delay 15.24 0 19.21 12.78 - -

ROADWAYS BUS STAND


59/65


60/65


Location 4: Shastri Nagar




FTP DL Accessibility 100.00% 20.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100% 80%

FTP DL Mean Data rate(Kbps) 107.28 0 125.67 76.34 198.54 156.77


Email Send Success % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100%

Email Send Delay 16.72 16.56 13.89 19.31 18.23 11.49Email Retrieve Access 5 5 5 5 5 5

Email Retrieve Success % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100%



SMS e2e Success % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% - -


Delivery Time (sec) 3.67 18.88 11.22 7.23 - -


MMS e2e Success % 100.00% 0.00% 20.00% 0.00% - -

MMS send Delay 18.97 0 16.23 0 - -

SHASTRI NAGAR


61/65


Location 5: Sadar Bazar




FTP DL Accessibility 100.00% 60.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100% 100%

FTP DL Mean Data rate(Kbps) 99.03 92.76 78.61 89.09 166.23 196.56


Email Send Success % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100%

Email Send Delay 12.74 19.85 17.45 11.12 16.8 12.53

Email Retrieve Access 5 5 5 5 5 5

Email Retrieve Success % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100%



SMS e2e Success % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% - -

SMS send Delay (sec) 6.3 6.22 8.59 9.2 - -Delivery Time (sec) 5.43 9.69 10.41 5.19 - -


MMS e2e Success % 60.00% 0.00% 0.00% 40.00% - -

MMS send Delay 16.99 0 0 21.48 - -

SADAR BAZAR


62/65


Section 6

Summary

SWOT Analysis for Airtel

Key findings


63/65


SWOT Analysis for Airtel

Lowest ping latency as compared to competitorindicating lowest delay to access data network

Poor Email success rate as compared to otheroperators

HTTP browsing success rate is poor as www.zedge.net, www.nokia.com and www.cricinfo.com site was themost failed sites.

Low FTP DL success rate Ping delay Lowest call drop rate

STRENGHTS

Voice Quality Accessibility Retainability

By improving HTTP statistics for few of the sitesoverall data score can be improved

THREATS

Both Vodafone & Idea can take the lead byimproving little coverage & quality and enjoy thefacilities of MNP

OPPORTUNITIES

Coverage improvement Download Throughput

WEAKNESS

Coverage FTP DL Throughput


64/65


Key Findings

Voice:

Speech Quality: Airtel is leading as per SpeechQuality amongst all other operators.

Data:

GPRS utilization is high on Airtel compared to

EDGE with other operators leading to lower

FTP download throughput.

Key Suggestions:

Resource allocation (TS) need to be verified for

optimum DATA usage.

Coverage & Quality need to be looked upon in

main city center (Cluster 5).


65/65

2g Meerut Report

Documents

Transcript of 2g Meerut Report