10th FPDP Report

Table of Contents

S.

#

Learning Innovation Page #

Preamble 3

Introduction: Faculty Professional Development

Program

4

Objectives 4

1. Mechanism of the Program 6

2. Course Content 8

3. Implementation 9

4. Visit / Tour 16

5. Concluding Session of 10th FPDP 17

6. Evaluation of Resource Persons 28

7. Recommendations 29

8. Evaluation of the Program 30

9. Time Table 31

M. Abbas/D/6FDP Report - 1-

10th FPDP Report

Annexure

10. 10th FPDP Participants List 22

11. Microteaching Evaluation Proforma 24

12. Microteaching Result ( Phase I & II) 26

13. Sample Evaluation Report 27

14. Evaluation Results 30

15. Graphic presentation 30

- 2 -

10th FPDP Report

Preamble

The Higher Education Commission has been set up to

facilitate the development of the universities of Pakistan to

be the centers of education, research and development at

internal level. Higher education plays a pivotal role in the

development of both human resource and modern societies

as it enhances social, cultural and economic development,

active citizenship and ethical values. 

By promoting learning and the advancement of knowledge,

the HEC aims to assist in the building of a modern,

progressive and tolerant society that values the dignity of

labour, craftsmanship, the spirit of enquiry, critical and

independent thought, and public duty. Its goal is to mobilise

financial, technical, human and social resources for

enhancing the quality of educational institutions, and for

facilitating the reform process initiated within these

institutions. 

The HEC intends to play its part in spearheading the building

of a knowledge based economy in Pakistan. Key issues are

the quality of education imparted to the graduate and its

relevance to the economy. A well-educated graduate is the

building block of a knowledge based economy, and it is for

- 3 -

10th FPDP Report

this reason that the HEC is focusing on the quality of higher

education.

 

- 4 -

10th FPDP Report

Faculty Professional Development Program

The entry qualification for a university teacher is Master’s

Degree or its equivalence in their subject area, but not in the

area of Pedagogy. The Communication / Teaching Skills are

pre-requisite for effective learning and teaching process,

which is, generally lacking in the new faculty members. As a

result, the communication gaps appeared in their daily

instructions, which ultimately affect the classroom learning.

In order to fulfil the demands, Higher Education Commission

has initiated Faculty Professional Development Programs

focusing both on contents as well as teaching methodology.

ObjectivesThe training programme envisages enabling newly inducted

university teachers to become more effective mediator of

the curriculum and facilitator of student learning through

effective organisation and application of the competencies

necessary for university level teaching such as:

Competency in communication skills, lecturing,

discussion, questioning/ answering, demonstration,

tutorials, seminars, workshop and project works.

Competency in their motives for further studies in

their specific subject areas leading to PhDs.

Competency in assessment and evaluation of student

work, assignments, course work Programme and

process.- 5 -

10th FPDP Report

Competency in academic profession, philosophies of

education with emphasis on the Islamic Philosophy of

education, educational psychology, staff student

relations and students affairs, social demands and

overall socialisation.

Competency in the effective use of audio-visual aids

and instructional media including computers and

other educational technologies.

Nine such Programs so far have been organized by

Department of Learning Innovation in which faculty

members of different Public Universities / Colleges were

trained to conduct the short courses/ workshops and

seminars in their institutions.

The Higher Education Commission has organized nine

programs and the 10th Faculty Professional Development

Program was launched on June 2, 2008, the inaugural of the

Program was conducted by Prof. Dr. Riaz Hussain Qureshi,

(Adviser Quality Assurance and Learning Innovation). This is

a milestone for the Learning Innovation Department for

successfully organizing consecutive Professional

Development Programs to cater the needs of HE Faculty.

29 participants from institution of higher learning all over the

country attended the program (List of participants attached

as Annexure—I).

- 6 -

10th FPDP Report

- 7 -

10th FPDP Report

Methodology and Mechanism of the Program

i) Nominations

For calling nominations for 10th FPDP following steps were

followed:

Suitable nominations of faculty members were

called from different public sector universities.

Resource Persons were identified all around

Pakistan and arrangements for travel, boarding &

lodging were made.

The nominees represented both the genders from

all provinces /areas of Pakistan and each nominated

faculty members was treated on duty during the

duration of the program and on his / her return, will

resume duty.

Once nominations were received, a committee

scrutinized the nominations for appropriate

grouping.

ii) Mechanism Followed

In view of recommendations given by the participants of

ninth batch10th FPDP was refined by adopting the following

mechanism of discipline and conduct. These principles were

formulated to enhance the effectiveness of the course and to

achieve all the set objectives. - 8 -

10th FPDP Report

Any participant exceeding more than 4 day Leave will

stand ineligible for program completion certificate.

Leave request will only be entertained in case of a dire,

unavoidable emergency when put up formally through

proper channel, duly verified by the Head of the

Institution.

Stipend of Rs 9000/- will be given in two stages to the

participants to manage the meal requirements and

room security.

Free and fully furnished accommodation will be

provided on sharing basis. The occupants will not be

allowed to exchange the allotted rooms.

The occupants of the room will share all the facilities

and will also be liable to pay for the damages to the

HEC.

Sessions will start at 08:40 am sharp daily

Participants are required to observe punctuality

during the sessions and no late entrant will be

entertained

Attendance sheet will be taken back at 0855 hours.

- 9 -

10th FPDP Report

Since all participants will be residing in the

premises therefore no late entrant requests will be

entertained.

No amendments in the attendance sheet will be

allowed after its submission.

Weekly attendance, conduct, and academic

performance report will be sent to the Parent

Institution.

Photocopying/Printouts are not allowed without the

permission of FPDP Coordinator.

Each nominee will have to submit assignments/course

work as required during the activities.

All participants will be required to wear their ID cards all

the time within HEC premises for security and

authentication purposes.

iii) Academic Contents of the Program The contents were divided in to three pillars of learning

which were further categorized to individually focus every

aspect:

1. Pedagogical Skills 2. Research Skills

4.Special Affiliated Modules

001 021 031

PDGY002-Teacher’s Role RM022- Research SAM032-Adv QA &

- 10 -

10th FPDP Report

as a Communicator. Methodology. LI Lecture

PDGY003-Designing Learning Interventions

RM022a/b- Research Methodology

SAM032- Digital Library

PDGY004-Communication/Presentation Skills

RM023- Professional & Academic Ethics.

SAM033- Personal & Professional Grooming

PDGY005a/b/c/d- Micro Teaching

RM024- Academic Research Writing Skills.

SAM034- Mock Formal Session

PDGY006- Innovative/Creative Teaching Techniques

SAM035- Student’s Counseling & Mentoring Skills.

PDGY007- Computing Skills

SAM036-GRE/GMAT/NTS.

PDGY008- Teaching & Assessment

PDGY009-Curriculum Planning & Instructional Resource Development Skills.

PDGY010- CLUE

PDGY011-Educational Psychology.

PDGY012-Case Study (Capsim)

IMPLEMENTATION

- 11 -

10th FPDP Report

In accordance with the objectives of FPDP different modules

were implemented with the help of well known national

professors and experts in different disciplines / areas.

The modules were taught on international aspects of

learning i.e. theory with practical aspects. Different activities

were arranged for individuals and groups. The main areas for

faculty development program were as follows:

Modules:

1 Research Skills

2 Pedagogical Skills

3 Special Affiliated Modules

1.Research Skills

As per new policy of Higher Education Commission

Research inquiry has become very important area for the

universities and faculty memebers. In order to cater this

demand Learning Innovation Division has included

Research Skills as a separate module in which 21 sessions

were specially designed in the program

The Research Module was specially designed to cater the

need of faculty coming from different disciplines of

Natural and Social Sciences. Two groups of participant

faculty were made in the category of Natural Sciences and

Social Sciences. 4 eminent Resource Persons were called

- 12 -

10th FPDP Report

in advance to formulate a complete package that broadly

covers the area of Research Skills. It was specially focused

by the Resource Persons to specially add the needful

contents of research according to the category of their

Participant group.

Methodology, Collection of data and data analysis,

Literature Review, Formulating References and

Bibliography were the major contents of the sessions

conducted parallel after one major session on research

and its need by Prof. Dr. Shahid Siddiqui. These six

sessions of introduction on Research were extended by

Prof. Dr. Tariq Rahman from Quid-e- Azam University and

Prof. Dr. Javed Aziz Awan from University of Agriculture,

Faisalabad. The sessions on Academic writing skills were

conducted by Dr. Soahila Javed from National University of

Modern Languages in which participants joined as a whole

group. Dr. Mussaret Anwar Sheikh from Fatima Jinnah

Women University, conducted special session on Research

and Academic Ethics which is significant aspect of any

research course.

2) Pedagogical Skills

The Module of Pedagogical Skills was consisted of following sub-modules. The description of these segments is given below:

Communication and Presentation Skills

- 13 -

10th FPDP Report

6 sessions were conducted on Communication and

Presentation Skills required by any HE faculty. The Resource

Person, Dr. Hamid Rafique Khattak, covered the basic

introduction and modes of effective communication in his

session. He made the sessions interactive and followed a

discussional approach with the participants. He conducted

activities of listening and speaking skills to introduce ideas of

better teaching through effective communication. The

outline of his module is given below:

1. Know the material

2. Practicing presentation

3. Learn learners’ name and use them

4. Establish credibility

5. Anticipate potential problems

6. Check in advance the resources and facilities

7. Prepare an outline and follow that

8. Managing appearance (Personality)

9. Using own words

10. Don’t intimidate other

11. Providing overview of topic

12. Introducing yourself to the group

13. Giving special emphasis to the first five minutes

14. Creating an informal settings

Educational Psychology6 sessions were designed on Educational Psychology

which were conducted by Dr. Mumtaz Fatima Jaffery from - 14 -

10th FPDP Report

COMSAT, Islamabad. The sessions covered the need of a

teacher to cope with psychology of students with respect

to their age and cultural needs. The Resource Person

explained the significance of a teacher’s role in

developing the personality of a student and significance of

the fact that a teacher must know basic counseling

techniques to guide a student and facilitate the process of

learning. She emphasized the importance of Counseling in

the age of adolescent and the role of teacher. She

discussed the main characteristics of adolescence that

include the development of identity and self concept,

confusions, experimentations and emotionality etc. She

also conducted mock sessions of counseling to give a

general idea to the participant in which she also

suggested few techniques of stress relieving.

Curriculum Planning & Development

Dr. RA Farooq conducted 6 sessions on Curriculum

Planning & Development. His sessions focused on the

need of defining Educational Objectives. These sessions

on the Curriculum Planning & Development helped the

participants in realizing the need to made objective

oriented activities. He discussed Curriculum Design and

Syllabus of different Institutions with the participants.

Innovative/Creative Teaching Techniques

- 15 -

10th FPDP Report

6 sessions were conducted on Innovative/ Creative Teaching Techniques

by Prof. AD Maken. The objectives of these sessions were to give

orientation to the ideas of creative aspects of teaching which can enhance

the learning of students. These sessions emphasized the integration of

technology and other resources in teaching activities.

Testing & Assessment

Prof. Dr. Pervaiz Mughal from University of Engineering

and Technology, Lahore conducted 8 sessions on Testing

and Assessment criteria set by Higher Education

Commission. The new Grading Policy was discussed in

detail in which he explained the need to match system of

Evaluation with international standards of learning.

Following aspects of Testing were also discussed and

practiced in the sessions:

1. Feasibility

2. Objectivity

3. Reliability

4. Validity

Computing Skills

Mr. Khurrum Shahzad from National University of Science

and Technology conduced 8 sessions on computing skills

that can facilitate teachers in following areas:

1. Research Process and Data Analysis by using MS

Excel & SPSS

2. Managerial tasks of teaching

3. Result Compilation, - 16 -

10th FPDP Report

4. Attendance Record

5. Advanced Power Point Applications for formal

presentations etc.

Microteaching / Teaching Practice

The Focus of program was on learning which was planned

and practiced through individual reflecting guided

practice, group activities and presentations. The

important aspect of this program was teaching practice.

The participants were exposed to actual classroom

instructions through micro-teaching concepts of learning.

This time Microteaching was divided in three Phases of

learning and practice.

Phase I

In phase I Mr. Zahid Majeed from Allama Iqbal Open

University conducted 8 sessions on basic introduction and

theoretical aspect of teaching and explained the idea of

microteaching as a reflective approach towards analysis of

teaching methodologies and evaluation.

Phase II

In phase II topic were selected by the participants from

their disciplines and mock session of teaching were

conducted. Recording of the session were taken and after

every presentation analysis was conducted by watching

the recorded data. Evaluation proformas were also

developed on which teaching quality of every participant

- 17 -

10th FPDP Report

was evaluated. (Microteaching Evaluation Proforma

Annexure II)

Phase III

After a gap of two weeks the participants were required to

arrange new presentation in the light of evaluation and

discussions that were made in previous sessions. Dr. Iqbal

Shah from Allama Iqbal Open University was called for a

third party evaluation of the final presentations. The

evaluation of the Microteaching was conducted by the

following experts:

1) Dr. Iqbal Shah

2) Mr. Zahid Majeed

3) Mr. Fida Hussain

The difference in the obtained scores of Pre and Post

Microteaching Evaluation were calculated and a complete

report of the performance was sent to the participant and

respective Head of the Intuitions (Result attached in

Annexure III, and a sample Result Card attached as

Annexure IIIB)

Special Lectures

The program had exclusive series of lectures by eminent

resource persons from different disciplines of academia. The

objectives of including these sessions was to expose vide

horizons of knowledge to the participants through which they

can explore better reasons of learning and also have insight - 18 -

10th FPDP Report

about the ongoing affairs of the present world. The Resource

Persons invited for these lectures were:

1. Prof. Dr. Mukhtar Ahmad for Learning from Nature

2. Mr. Zill-e-Abbas for Personal & Professional Grooming

3. Nigar Nazar for Cartoons as medium of Communication

4. Mr. Hammad Ashraf for GRE, GMAT & NTS Preparation and

Orientation

5. Ms Sana for Digital Library and Searching Research Based

Knowledge

- 19 -

10th FPDP Report

VISIT / TOURS

1. Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi.

On 4th July, 2008 the participants visited Fatima Jinnah

Women University, Rawalpindi, in lieu of Educational trip.

This trip was organized to give orientation to the system

and upcoming developmental projects of the University. A

comprehensive presentation was given by the

Management which was appreciated by all the

participants.

2. KHANASPUR VISITOn30 June, 2008 second trip was arranged for recreation

of the participant to Khanspur. The participants were

given luxurious accommodation and meals at HEC Rest

House and enjoyed tracking from Khanaspur to Ayubia

and Nathiya Gali and then came back to Islamabad via

Abbotabad.

Concluding Session

- 20 -

10th FPDP Report

The Closing Ceremony of this Program was held on July

16, 2008 in the Conference Room of C&T Building. The Chief

Guest is Member Operation and Planning, Prof. Dr.

Mukhtar Ahmad. The Ceremony started at 3:00pm with

recitation of Holy Quran by Hafiz abdul Aziz followed by Mr.

Fida Hussain Director LI’s speech in which he stated the

objectives of the program and achievements of introducing

298 Master Trainers in the universities of Pakistan.

A representative participant from the group, Mr. Abdul

Ghani Abro and Ms. Nafees gave comments on the

success of the course in which they showed deep gratitude

to the HEC for bringing people from different regions all

together and making the idea of national harmony a

practical dream. Prof. Dr. Riaz Hussain Qureshi

reiterated in his address the need to be united and through

education and research competing in the Modern world.

Prof. Dr. Mukhtar Ahmad, Chief Guest of the Ceremony,

gave comments on the vision of Higher Education

Commission and emphasized that improved quality of

teaching is a dire need of our Nation to cope with present

circumstances of turmoil and pressures. These programs

provide forum of fruitful discussions and increase the

opportunities of learning and sharing. Certificates were given

to the successful participants after this. Ms. Noor Amna

Malik, Director General LID, delivered vote of thanks. In

- 21 -

10th FPDP Report

order to carry on the spirit of the participants 29 candles

were lit by each participant, in end.

EVALUATION

Pretest

A Pretest was designed to evaluate the previous knowledge

of the Participants before attending this Program. The

contents of the Pretest were developed by the Resource

Persons and a pool of items were generated before the

execution of the Program Random selection of items were

done and a pretest was constituted based on pedagogy and

basic research knowledge.

Post Test

The post test was conducted in the last session to evaluate

the impact of Program on the knowledge and skills of the

participants.

Program Evaluation

1. The entire Course was evaluated at the end on a set

proforma. The evaluation was anonymous. The statistical

details are given (attached as Annexure –IV).

Resource Person Evaluation

- 22 -

10th FPDP Report

2. All resource persons / facilitator were also evaluated by

the participants at the end of their respective sessions

(Detail attached as Annexure –IV).

3. Report of each day proceedings were also prepared and

presented the next day before the start of session. A

general discussion on the previous sessions always has an

impact of warm-up activity.

FINDINGS

1. Microteaching Practice helps to apply the knowledge in

actual classroom instruction. Microteaching also

provides an opportunity to the participants to observe

their performance and evaluate their methodology.

2. The arrangement and management of tour programs

was very good

3. The research module was highly appreciated

4. Participants appreciated devoted efforts of the whole

team

5. Digital Library Session was very informative and it

provided useful effective searching techniques for

research.

6. Daily report presented by all participants was a good

exercise by participants because it helped them in

delivering writing and observation skills.

- 23 -

10th FPDP Report

7. The contents of some Resource Persons were repeating

ideas presented before.

8. Electricity failure was a major trouble in the progression

of sessions. The sessions usually started 20 minutes

late due to load shedding hours in the morning.

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. The duration of the training may be reduced to three

sessions.

2. Proper arrangements should be done to cope with the

time loss during load shedding.

3. Each faculty member of all Public Sector University

should be given the same orientation towards teaching

before joining the profession of teaching at higher

education level.

4. The number of sessions on Computer Skills and Digital

Library should be increased.

5. Medical facility must be available to the participants

during the stay.

6. Saturday should be off but lecture hall and internet

access should be made available during off days.

- 24 -

10th FPDP Report

Annexure -I-

Participants’ ListS# Name Institution1. Ms. Naila Khalid

LecturerDepartment of ChemistryKUST, Kohat

2. Ms. Irum GulLecturer

Department of ZoologyKUST, Kohat

3. Mr. Muhammad Yaqoob, Lecturer

Department of Elect. Engg.Balochistan UET Khuzdar

4. Mr. Zulfiqar AliLecturer

Department of Civil Engg.Balochistan UET Khuzdar

5. Mr. Abdul HafeezLecturer

Deptt. of Poultry SciencesNWFP Agricultural Peshawar

6. Mr. Ijaz AhmadLecturer

D/O Animal Breeding & GeneticsNWFP Agricultural Peshawar

7. Mr. Kashif AliAsstt. Professor

Department of BiologyIslamabad Model College for B, G—10/4 Islamabad

8. Ms. Maria YounusLecturer

Department of PhysicsFGCW, F—7/2, Islamabad

9. Mr. Nauman Rahim Khan, Lecturer

Faculty of PharmacyGomal University, D.I.Khan

10. Mr. Sanaullah KhanLecturer

Department of EconomicsGomal University, D.I.Khan

11. Hafiz Abdul AzizLecturer

D/O Basic Sciences & Related Studies, Mehran UET, Jamsoro

12. Mr. Muhammad Naeem Ahmed, Lecturer

Department of ChemistryAJ&K University Muzaffarabad

13. Ms. Ambreen AnjumLecturer

Department of Applied PsychologyBaghdadul Jadeed CampusIslamia University, Bahawalpur

14. Mr. Muhammad Imran Khan, Lecturer

Department of Math.& Stat.Univ. of Agriculture Faisalabad

15. Mr. Amir ShakeelLecturer

Department of Plant Breeding & Genetics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad

16. Ms. Asma RiazLecturer

College of Statistical & Actual Sciences, University of thePunjab, Lahore

17. Mr. Bilal SaleemLecturer

Institute of Chemical Engg.& TechUniversity of the Punjab, Lahore

18. Mr. Salman AzizLecturer

College of Engg.& Emerging TechUniversity of the Punjab, Lahore

19. Mr. Muhammad Asif MemonAssistant Professor

Department of PhysiologyZiauddin University, 4/B Shara-e-Ghalib, Block 6, Clifton Karachi

20. Ms. Nafees AhmedLecturer

Department of EconomicsUniversity of Malakand, Chakdara Dir

21. Mr. Muhammad IbrahimLecturer

Department of Sociology,University of Malakand, Chakdara Dir

22. Mr. Abdul Ghani Abro Department of Elect. Engg.

- 25 -

10th FPDP Report

Lecturer NED University of Engg.& Tech: Karachi23. Syed Aqeel Haider

LecturerDepartment of Computer & Information System Engg; NED University of Engg.& Tech: Karachi

24. Ms. Saima Khan KhosaLecturer

Department of Statistics B.Z.U. Multan

25. Mr. Farhan Ahmed Faiz, Lecturer

Department of Sociology B.Z.U. Multan

- 26 -

10th FPDP Report

Annexure -II-

Microteaching Evaluation Proforma

Faculty Professional Development ProgramHEC Campus (Evaluation Performa for Micro-Teaching Presentation)

Name of Presenter: ___________________________ M.T Cycle No: __________

Topic: _____________________________________________________________

Day: ________________________ Time: _________________________

Kindly give your rating about each aspect in the form of A, B, C, D, E. Where A=4, B=3, C=Needs Improvement, D=Needs Much Improvement, E=Skill Totally to be Learned.

Fields A B C D E1. Planning

Around the single concept It was sequential Time budget verses content

2. Set Induction Learning readiness or motivation From unknown to known From easy to difficult Rapport Localization

3. Presentation Clear concepts Sequential organization Exemplification Linkages Student’s participation Logical positivism

4. Questioning Float the question over the head

of all the participants. Give time to think Give options for answering

(volunteer) Correct the answer if wrong Be polite

5.Encouraging the students to questions Inquiry approach Controversies

- 27 -

10th FPDP Report

Brain storming Probing Appreciating the question

6. Exemplification7. communication

Pitch of the voice Pauses Speed Non-verbal communication Humor Pronunciation

8. General Relevant methodology Liveliness of the teacher Appropriate summing up Not camera conscious Interaction with the students Using appropriate IT Answering the students questions

Main Plus Points:

1.2.3.

Main Minus Points

1.2.3.

Overall rating in your view

Name of Evaluator: _____________________________________

Status: Participant Organizer Resource person Any other

Signature: ________________

Annexure III

MICROTEACHING PRE & POST TEST- 28 -

10th FPDP Report

10th Faculty Professional Development Program (FPDP)

HEC CampusS# Name Department/Subject Pre-Test & Post Test

Marks out of 60

Marks Obtained in Pre Test out of 30

Marks Obtained in Post Test out of 30

Difference +/-

1 Abdul Ghani Abro Electrical Engineering 13 17.5 +4.52 Ambreen Anjum Applied Psychology 12.5 20.5 +83 Ambreen Masood Social Work 13 19 +64 Amir Shakeel Plant Breeding and Genetics 7.5 19 +11.54 Asim Farhan Media 10 18 +86 Faiza Mohtashim Architect 20 18 -27 Ghulam Mujtaba

ShaikhInformation Technology 12.5 17.5 +5

8 Hafiz Abdul Aziz Basic Sciences and Related Studies

9.5 20 +10.5

9 Irum Gul Zoology 17 19 +210 Kashif Ali Biology 13 17.5 +4.511 Lubna Ahmed Soomro Psychology 11.5 16.5 +512 Maria Younas Physics 12.5 20 +7.513 Memuna Ghafoor Botany 17 22.5 +5.514 Misbah Manzoor Botany 11.5 16.5 +515 Muhammad Asif

Memon Physiology 21.5 16 -5.5

16 Muhammad Ibrahim Sociology 11 14.5 +3.517 Muhammad Imran

KhanMath & Stat. 10.5 17 +6.5

18 Muhammad Yaqoob Electrical Engineer 14 15 +119 Nafees Ahmed Economics 11.5 20.5 +920 Naila Khalid Chemistry 15 22.5 +7.521 Nauman Rahim Khan Pharmacy 13.5 13.5 0022 Niaz Hussain Ghumro Business Administration 09 18.5 +9.523 Saima Khan Khosa Statistics 10 17 +724 Salman Aziz Engineering and Emerging

Technology 11.5 15 +3.5

25 Sanaullah Khan Economics 05 19.5 +14.526 Sarfraz Khan Sociology 11 15.5 +4.527 Shumaila Yousaf Mathematics 8.5 21 +12.528 Syed Aqeel Haider Computer and Information System

Engineering 15.5 18 +2.5

29 Zulifqar Ali Civil Engineering 8.5 10.5 +2

Annexure IIIB

- 29 -

10th Faculty Professional Development Program

Learning Innovation DivisionHigher Education Commission,

10th FPDP Report

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONNote: This result of the Participant is based on evaluation of Microteaching Sessions. The difference in the obtained marks of Pre and Post tests are indicating the improvement in performance.

PARTICIPANT DETAILS

First Name

Surname

Designation

Discipline

Institution

FPDP Program Attended Attendance Record

RESULTS

PRETEST TOTAL MARKS OBTAINED MARKS

POSTTEST TOTAL MARKS OBTAINED MARKS

DIFFERENCE

DIRECTOR GENERAL COMMENTS

SIGNATURES

Annexure IV

10 th Faculty Professional Development

Program

- 30 -

ASIM

FARHAN

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

MEDIA

NATIONAL COLLEGE OF ARTS, LAHORE

June 2-July 16, 2006

30 13

30 17.5

+4.5

95%

10th FPDP Report

HEC IslamabadJune 2 – July 16, 2008

Resource Persons’ Evaluation/Feedback

SCALE: 1 – 5

Poor Average Good

1 3 5

S.# Name of Resource Person Average

1. Mr. Hammad Ashraf 4.8

2. Dr. Tariq Rahman 4.6

3. Dr. Hamid Rafiq Khattak 4.4

4. Dr. Shahid Siddiqui 4.4

5. Ms. Noreen Mirza 4.4

6. Dr. Javed Aziz Awan 4.3

7. Mr. Khurram Shahzad 4.3

8. Mr. Zill-e-Abbas 4.3

9. Dr. Sohaila Javed 4.2

10. Mr. Zahid Majeed 4.2

11. Mr. Fazal-e-Muqeem 4.1

12. Dr. Mumtaz Fatima Jafari 3.9

13. Dr. Pervez Mughal 3.5

14. Prof. A. D. Maken 3.5

15. Dr. R.A. Farooq 3.2

Annexure V

- 31 -

10th FPDP Report

10th Faculty Professional Development ProgramHEC IslamabadJune 2 — July 16, 2008

Program Feedback/Evaluation

SCALE: 1 – 5

Poor Below Avg. Average Good Excellent

1 2 3 4 5

Overall Program Feedback/EvaluationParameters Scale

1 – 51. Course Content 3.6

2. Teaching Strategies & Learning Environment 3.7

3. Learning Resources/AV aids 4

4. Quality of Delivery 3.6

5. Overall Organization 3.5

6. Course Coordinator 3.7

Summary 3.7

Overall Average on a scale 1 – 5: 3.7

Annexure VI

- 32 -

10th FPDP Report

Graphical Presentation of the Program Evaluation

- 33 -

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Cou

rse

Con

tent

Tea

chin

g S

trat

egie

s &

Lear

ning

Env

ironm

ent

Lear

ning

Res

ourc

es/A

Vai

ds

Qua

lity

of D

eliv

ery

Ove

rall

Org

aniz

atio

n

Cou

rse

Coo

rdin

ator