2010 Indiana Logistics Summit

Michael B. ClineCommissioner, INDOT

October 26, 2010

3,912 INDOT employees1,702 Highway Technicians594 Managers/Supervisors325 Engineers

INDOT

3,106

805

District

CO

State Highway Fund

Construction Spending

In Millions

$777

$686

$789

$946

$835

$1,379

$1,085

$1,513

$1,160

$911

$-

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13

FY 04 – FY 13

Governor Daniels launched in 2006 $2.6B committed for INDOT projects 75 year lease of Indiana Toll Road

By year-end 2012 Open to traffic or substantially complete

375 centerline miles new construction 1,520 lane-miles 3,650 preservation centerline miles

34% of state’s inventory 800 bridges rehabbed or replaced

15% of state’s inventory

Major Moves

Key Projects I-69 Fort-to-Port (US 24)

Hoosier Heartland (SR 25)

US 31(Hamilton County to South Bend)

I-80/94 Interchange Accelerate 465 (I-465 west side)

Terre Haute Bypass (SR 641)

Madison/Milton Bridge

Major Moves

Major MovesI-69Evansville to IndianapolisSections 1-4

Largest contiguous new terrain road construction project in the country in 2011 and 2012!

Fort-to-Port (US 24) 11 miles Final contract: 10/6/10 = $16M

100% let Open to traffic: 9/29/12 CN Cost: $81M

Major Moves

SR 101 looking south to southwest toward City of Woodburn

Hoosier Heartland (SR 25)

36 miles 41% let

Next letting: 2/11 Mainline, US 421 interchange

Final letting: 7/12 Open to traffic: 12/13 CN Cost: $377M

Major Moves

Carroll County line

US 31 Kokomo 13 miles

55% let

Next letting: 8/11 SR 26 to US 35

Final letting: 7/12 Open to traffic: 12/13 CN Cost: $175M

Major Moves

New SB mainline looking north from CR 100S bridge

US 31 Plymouth to South Bend 20 miles

67% let

Next letting: 2/11 SR 4 extension

& interchange

Final letting: 4/13 Open to traffic: 12/14 CN Cost: $233M

Major Moves

New bridge two miles south of SR 4

US 31 Hamilton County 13 miles Next letting: 1/11

146th Str.

Final letting: 2/17 Open to traffic: 2018 CN Cost: $436M

Major Moves

146th Street

I-80/94 Interchange 100% let Open to traffic: summer, 2011 CN Cost: $187M

Major Moves

Accelerate 465 11 miles 100% let Open to traffic: 12/11 CN Cost: $423M

Major Moves

Washington St.

Terre Haute Bypass SR 641 6 miles Next letting: 10/11 Final letting: 10/12 Open to traffic: 12/14 CN Cost: $146M

Major Moves

Interchange for SR 641 and US 41

Madison Milton Bridge Contract awarded with innovative construction plan

$104M

Open to traffic: 9/15/12

Opened: 12/20/29 Length: 3,180’ Height: 95’ above Ohio River ADT: 10,700 vpd Nearest bridges: Markland Dam (26 miles);

I-65 (JFK) bridge in Louisville (46 miles)

Major Moves

I-74 Honda Interchange modification Construction start date: 4/07 Open to traffic: 7/08 CN Cost: $58M

Major Moves

Super 70 6 miles Construction start date: 3/07 Open to traffic: 11/07 CN Cost: $175M

Major Moves

I-70 over Sherman Avenue west

Freight MobilityBulk of Roadway Freight Movements

11,200 INDOT centerline miles INDOT roads make up 12% of all state roads

Carry 76% of all truck ton miles Make up 71% of truck miles

Indiana 9th in the U.S. for truck ton miles 71B truck ton miles 69B VMT cars and trucks 10B VMT trucks only (15% of Indiana’s total)

234B national VMT trucks

Freight Mobility

Freight Mobility

70%

22%

8%

1%

Truck

Rail

Water

Air

Indiana Freight Ton Miles by Mode (2009)

I-70 Dedicated Truck Lanes (DTL) Feasibility Study 800 mile corridor across four states (MO, IL, IN, OH)

Designated as Corridor of the future by FHWA in 2007 Indiana is lead state Wilbur Smith Associates $2.5 million spent to date

Problem: Safety and congestion Congestion reduction improvement by 60% across corridor Improved safety due to hard separation of cars and trucks:

35% less crashes, 55% less fatalities

Dedicated Truck Lanes

Business case analysis Over 75 year span, DTL will cost $18 billion less than

continuing maintenance and operation of I-70 Expected study completion: May 2011 More info at: www.i70dtl.org

Dedicated Truck Lanes

High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail

High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Amtrak and Norfolk Southern Railroad

$71.4M grant from FRA – must be obligated by 12/31/12 Major bottleneck in the Chicago to Detroit & Cleveland routes

14 Passenger trains and 110+ freight trains PER DAY along 30 mile rail corridor

8 project elements: 18 crossovers & turnouts New signalization & control enhancements 5 miles of new/additional track; 1.5 miles of replacement track

3 Agreements INDOT/FRA; INDOT/Norfolk Southern; INDOT/Amtrak Anticipate execution by December 15, 2010

Construction start: March, 2011 Construction complete: December, 2012

Benefits No passenger train delays caused by freight trains Reduce freight train delays by 24% Reduce at-grade crossing delays for autos by 40% Increase all trains’ average speed by 8% Improve air quality (due to less train delays & idling)

High-speed Intercity Passenger Rail

Challenges Struggling economy slowly recovering Toll Road Lease funding ends in 2012 Federal reauthorization bill uncertain

Extension expires December 31, 2010 Nothing will happen before elections July, 2009 proposal – Oberstar bill (observations)

Greater emphasis on transit and high speed rail Tolls and P3 scrutiny Reduced state spending flexibility

INDOT

Manage the Business Build better, faster, less expensive

Speed capital projects to market Innovative bids P3 funding

Improve customer care Manage operating spending Commitment to preservation and maintenance

Looking Ahead

Thank you.

2010 Indiana Logistics Summit

Steve SchultzExecutive Director

Louisville and Southern Indiana Bridges Authority

October 26, 2010

Overview The Project in Context The Purpose The Process The Promise

Louisville-Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project

The Project in Context

The Project in Context

Future Downtown Bridge Site

(Northbound Lanes for I-65)

Future East End Bridge Site

Kennedy Interchange

(aka Spaghetti Junction)

(8 miles upstream)

A history rooted in logistics.

Where “Hoosiers” came from?

The Clark Memorial Bridge Opened in 1929 A tolled facility

The Project in Context

The Project in Context

Bi-StateCooperation

(1963-Present)

Improve cross river mobility in Louisville, KY and Southern Indiana region

Expand capacity of I-65 river crossing Improve I-65, I-71, I-64 interchange Complete I-265 connection across

Ohio River

The Purpose (Project Objectives)

Key to the objectives are solving over-arching (and long-standing) congestion management and safety issuesCongestion SafetyNational Guard concerns

Growth and economic development

The Purpose (Problems to Solve)

EIS Phase (1998-2003) Bi-State Management Team Consideration of 9 bridge locations in 1 or 2

bridge combinations Extensive public involvement process 5,000 comments receive on Draft EIS

Record of Decision (2003) Largest ROD document for FHWA (59 pages) Commitments and mitigations Continued community input

The Process (Planning & Design)

Project Management Bi-State Management Team

KYTC INDOT FHWA

General Engineering Consultant (CTS) Six Design Teams (one for each section)

Project Cost ($4.1 billion) 2/3 Kentucky, 1/3 Indiana Initial Financial Plan, 2008

The Process (Planning & Design)

Reconfiguring Kennedy Interchange

The Process (Planning & Design)

Reconfiguring Kennedy Interchange

The Process (Planning & Design)

Reconfiguring Kennedy Interchange

The Process (Planning & Design)

Downtown Bridge

The Process (Planning & Design)

Three Tower Cable-Stayed

East End Bridge

The Process (Planning & Design)

Median Tower Cable-Stayed

The Project (when completed)

The key missing ingredient: a long-term funding and delivery solution

Creation of the Louisville and Southern Indiana Bridges Authority Kentucky House Bill 3 (Summer 2009) Indiana Executive Order (December 2009) Organized February 2010; ratified late March 14 members and an executive director Strategic Advisor (KPMG) engaged May 2010

The Promise (Funding & Delivery)

Our Mission: to finance, construct and oversee the Ohio River Bridges Project

Our Vision: Two Bridges, One Project; Two States, One Team

Our Values: Speed Superior value Stakeholder opportunity Safety Sustainability

The Promise (Funding & Delivery)

Our Strategy: Build the Authority into an effective, long-term

project sponsor Execute a financial plan that is fair, sound and

doable Manage risk to realize long-term project

benefits Deliver on all the expected project benefits

The Promise (Strategic Objectives)

#1: Building our foundation . . .

The Promise (Strategic Objectives)

#2 and #3: Executing our plan and managing risk . . . Four Key Common Needs Across All Delivery Models

The Promise (Strategic Objectives)

Funding Federal Decisions

Forecasting

Flexible Project Delivery, Risk Allocation and

Financing Mechanisms

#4: Delivering on our promises . . . Addressing the purpose and need

Increasing cross-river mobility Relieving congestion Enhancing safety

Promoting improved livability Increased travel choices Improved air quality

Creating jobs and economic opportunityDirect impact Indirect impacts

The Promise (Strategic Objectives)

Louisville-Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project:

www.kyinbridges.com

Louisville and Southern Indiana Bridges Authority:

www.bridgesauthority.com

Additional information:

Thank you.