Àǯ½ ² ÁÈɳ ° Dz¯ · 2014-03-30 · .¦ ²³£ ±ª ¦ ´ ² ¨³ § «²® §£²°...
224
Àǯ½ ²ÁÈɳ ° Dz¯
Transcript of Àǯ½ ² ÁÈɳ ° Dz¯ · 2014-03-30 · .¦ ²³£ ±ª ¦ ´ ² ¨³ § «²® §£²°...
.
. ,
, :
,
ISSN 1565-3250
601820 '
www.bankisrael.org.il
©
" ' " ,2014 31
, 54 ,2013
.2010- "
,3.3%- 2013
, .
.2012- .
. , ,
.
; ,
. ,
, . ,
.
,
, .
. ,
. ,
. ,1.8%- 2013-
. ,
, :
. ,
. – .
, .
. , ,
2008 ,2012- , 6%-
. . 60%-
,
, .
. .
, ,
.
.
, , ,
.1% ,
"
. -
, .
,
2009
, .
.
,
,2014- .
- . – – ,
– 3.1 .
.
,
. ,
.
- – , ,
, - , .
.
, .
, ,
.
,
.
:
, - , .
, ,
.
'
2 ........................................................................ .1
5 .......................................................................... .2
12 ................................................................................. .3
14 ............................................................................... .4
18 ................................ – .5
24 ................................. .6
: '
32 ...................................................... .1
36 ................................................................. .2
43 ............................................................................ .3
47 .......................................... - .4
:1-'
50 .............................. - :
:2-'
54 ..........................................................
'
58 ............................................................................ .1
70 ............................................................................................. .2
75 ........................................... .3
79 ...... - – :1-'
'
84 ............................................... .1
86 ............................... .2
88 .......................................................................... .3
96 ...................................................... .4
102 ........................................................ .5
: '
.1
108 ....................................................................... ?
112 ...................... .2
118 .... ? .3
'
124 ........................................ - .1
129 ................................................... .2
131 ............................................................................. .3
134 ................................................................................. .4
138 ............................................................................ .5
140 ...................................................................................... .6
142 ........ " " :1-'
:2-'
145 .................................... -
147 ............... :3-'
:4-'
150 ........................................................................... ?
'
:' -'
155 ........................................................................................... .1
158 ................................................................................................. .2
164 .................................................................................. .3
166 ............................................................................................. .4
:' -'
169 ........................................................ .1
174 .................................................................... .2
:' -'
183 ......... 2007 .1
.2
188 ..........................................
191 ............................................................... .3
.4
192 ................................................................ ,
'
196 ................................................................................. - .1
204 ............................................................ .2
208 ............................................... :1-'
211 ................... - :2-'
'
4 ............................................... 2013 2009 , 1-'
( ) : 2-'
24 .....................................................................
30 ..................2013 2003 , - : 3-'
: '
32 ......................................2013 1995 , 1-'
34 ......................................2013 1995 , 2-'
36 ....................................2013 1995 , 3-'
37 ........................................ 2013 1995 , 4-'
, : 5-'
40 .................................................................................... 2013 1995
43 .....................................2013 1995 , 6-'
46 .............................. 2013 1995 , , 7-'
48 ................................2013 1995 , 8-'
'
1-'
60 .................................................................. 2013 2009 ,
73 ...........................2013 2009 , 2-'
76 .......................................... 2013 2009 , 3-'
78 ...................................... 2013 2009 , 4-'
82 ................................. 1-' -'
'
, 1-'
87 ....................................................................................2013 2003
2-'
89 .............................................2013 ,( )
( ) 3-'
94 .......................................................... 2013 2008 ,
4-'
102 ................................................2013 2010 , , "
: '
108 ................ 2012 1996 , 1-'
, 2-'
114 ...............................................................
115 ................... ,baseline hazards ratio 3-'
121 .................. 2011 , , 4-'
'
, 1-'
125 ....................................................................................2013 2007
2-'
128 .................................................... 2011- 1995- OECD-
, , 3-'
129 ....................................................................................2013 2007
130 ....................2013 4-'
, 5-'
132 ....................................................................................2013 2007
140 ................................. 2013 2009 , 6-'
'
:' -'
155 .......................................... 2013 2001 , : 1-' -'
- 2-' -'
157 ...........................................................................................
: , , 3-' -'
159 .......................................................................................
164 ..............................................2013 2009 , " 4-' -'
( ) 5-' -'
166 ..................................................................................
:' -'
169 ........... ( ) 1-' -'
,( ) 2-' -'
170 ......................2012- 2001 ,
, 3-' -'
172 ............................................................................. 2012- 2001
172 ......2012- 2001 ,( ) 4-' -'
173 ..........................................................2012 , 5-' -'
" 6-' -'
177 ...........................................................2011 2007 ,
, " 7-' -'
179 ........................................................... 2006 ,OECD-
:' -'
, 1-' -'
186 ...................2013 1981 , :
2-' -'
: ,
191 .................................................................. OECD-
'
- 1-'
205 ................... 2010 ,OECD- 29 ,
1
'
• ,3.3%- 2013
.
.
. ; , ;
• . ,
. , ,
• , ,1.8%-
.
.
• ,6%- ,
.50%- 2012- 2008
,2013-
.
• , ,
.
.1%- 1.75%-
.
• .2012 0.7%- , 3.2%-
. , 1%-
,
.
• ,
. ,
.
• "
.
.
, , ,
.
• ( ) :
, ,
, ( )- ,
.
2
2013 ,
.1
,3.3%- 2013
, ." "
,
, . "
.
.( ) ,
.
, , ,OECD-
, " 2011- , .
.
,
,
, .
, .
, . ,
,
.
, ;
.(1-' ) "
2011 .2008
–
. 2013- 2012- – 1
2010- .2011
, ,2011-
. ,
;
, .
. " ,
, – –
. , ,
, ,
.
, ,
.
. " " 1
1-' . .2011
2013 ,3.3%- ." "
, , .
, , . 0.25 , .
3
:'
– 0.25
1% –
,
,
.
, "
2009-
, "
.
,
, :
.
,
.
,
"
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
,
,2014—2013 , .
.
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
'-1 :
-12 ,2007 2013
: .
-5.0
-2.5
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
'-2 ,
,1999 2013
: -.
.
,
.
,
.
4
2013 ,
,2012-
,( ) .
,
, .
.
1-' 2013 2009 ,
20092010201120122013
( ) 7.57.67.87.98.1
( , " ) 809 866 924 993 1,053
( , " ) 1081141191261311( , ) 63.572.380.784.885.71( , ) 58.669.182.985.283.1
( ) 7.97.23.30.87.2
( ) 5.33.62.73.93.2
( ) 75.371.569.768.267.4
( ) 3,054 3,159 3,252 3,359 3,450
( , , ) -2.60.70.40.50.8
( , ) 10- " 5.44.95.14.64.0
( , ) 10- " 2.92.22.42.01.6
( , ) 1.25.74.63.43.3
( , ) 2.25.03.83.23.7
( , ) 9.58.47.16.96.2
( , , ) -9.211.76.25.10.0
( , ) 3.92.72.21.61.8
( , ) 0.81.62.92.31.4
( , ) -0.4-0.70.3-0.1-0.5
( , ) 1.8-5.1-1.04.5-6.4
( ) 3.93.73.63.93.62100 " 88.814.9-20.17.215.1
( , ) -10.612.86.12.72.9
. 1
. – 2
. - , :
6
2013 ,
. - ,
– – ,
.(' ) -
"
" .
.
. "
,( ) 15%-
15%- ,
" .
) ,
.(' -'
, 2.4%
. , ,
. ,
, ,( ) 8%-
. ,
. "
.
,
,
" " –
." "
.( .2 )
,
. .
, ,
; ,
.
. ,
: ," "
, ,
.
,
.( )
, .
. ,
,
.
, .
, .
7
:'
, ,
,
.
,
, .
2011- 2004 . ,
20%—15%-
( ) ,
.(' )
.
. ,1.8%-
,
, .
. "
, , "
.
, , .
.4 25%-
, .
,
.
, .
. , .
, ,2011
. ,2013 ,2012 .2012
.
, .
, .
, .
,2013- , .5
. 2011-
;2013- 2012 2011
,
, .
.
2013 . 4
.
, , 5
. . ,
,1.8%-
.
,
.
.2012
8
2013 ,
, 2011
, :
.(' )
.2008
,
. ,
,
, 2013- .( )
;
.
,2013
.2013 2012 .
2012- 2008 ,6%-
.2013 .50%-
. ,
,
.(3-' )
" ,
" .6
,
.
–
–
,
.
,
. 6
.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
'-3
" 1
1998 2013
4-3.5 ) (
-15-10 ) ,4 (
1 .
: .
.
.6%-
9
:'
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
" -10 5
40
60
80
100
120
140
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
1
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
2
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
3
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
4
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
" -10 5
'-4 ,2008 2013
1 . , - ,MSCI - " 100, " - s&p-500.: Bloomberg .
2 -12 . -IFS . :IFS database .3 : – ; ," –Bloomberg ; – )
-2011 PPP ( : , ,' , , , .4 . :IFS database .5 :Bloomberg . : , , , , ,
.
"
) (
10
2013 ,
, " 2013 .7 "
)
. 2013 .( "
.
)
, .(' -'
,
, , .
. ,
.
,
.
, , . "
, ,
. ,
, ,
CDS- ,
, . "
, , "
.
, ,
.
.
" , ,
. ,2013
" " 10- "
" .
.
2012 , - ,
, . ,2013
.
, " – "
, :8
, "
25% ,2013 7
: ..
. 2012 " 8
" .
11
:'
. " 9
, " "
- .
.
,( ) ,
, . ,
. "
, " 2013
;
,
" . "
– .
"
. –
; 2%- 2013- -
, -
– .10
. -
( )
) 2008- ,
,11 : ( )- ,(5
. ;
. " ,
,
. ,
, ,
" " ( ) :(' )
( ) ; , "
( ) ;
, -
.FED- ,Federal Reserve- 9
, 10
" , " .(' )
. , 11
, , 2012 :
.(15%) ,25%-
.
2013
" .
-
2%- 2013-.
.
12
2013 ,
.
, ,
– – .
,
.(' )
.3
,
2013 . ,
,
, 2013 .
. "
, ,
, 2013-
.
. , " ,
,
.2012- .
. ,
. ,
10- , . "
, , " ;
.7%- 4% 2013
: ,
,10.9%-
.
.
2015 :
. (ECB- )
,
.
– 0.25% – ECB- , .
.
, 6.7% 2013- , "
.
. "
, , –
. –
.
.
.
2013 ,. "
13
:'
2-
.2008
.40%—20%-
– –
, . , "
, ,
, . "
. ,
, ,
,
2008—2007- .
,
2000- .
2013
.(' -' )
2030405060708090
100110120
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
) , (
"
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2 ) , (
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
) , (
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
) , , (
'-5 1 ,2003 2013
1 -IMF World Economic Outlook _ _ , -OECD ) -2008
(PPP : , , , , , , , , , , .2 -. .
: _ ; - _ IMF World Economic Outlook 2013, IFS Database, -OECD Database.
.
14
2013 ,
.4
–
; ;
. ; ;
.
. ,
.
.
- .
,
– ;
. –
:
. .
,1%- 1.75%-
. "
.
, 2013
.
, , ,
.
. ,
. ,
,
,
. ,
,
, 2013- .(' -' )
, .
,2008 , .
,2009 ;
2011 .0.5%
3.25%- ; ,
, ,2011 .2011
. ,
.1% , 2013- 2012
. ,
–
.
.
.
15
:'
, 2.3 2013 . 10-
. 0.8
– –
- ,
- . "
.
,
" " .
.
" "
" " – , .
" – 2018-
.12
, . , - ,
,
, .
, , .
. , "
; 2.8- 2013- , 12
. 2.1
- "
.
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
. -10 ,2007 2013
-10
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5 . ,2007 2013
-10 -3
70
80
90
100
110
120
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
. )(,
2007 2013
"
"
" )(
"
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
. -12
)"(
'-6
: .
16
2013 ,
. .
, ,
,2012 .
,
, ,
. .
.
.
0.7%- , 3.2%-
.13 1%- , 0.6%- .2012-
, . "
.
, .
,2014- 2013
2014 ,
.
, ,
.
,
/ .
, ,
. ,
, ,
, ,
.
, , -
,2013
, .2014
, "
.
,( - ) :
.
.2014
" . " " 13
( ) " .
17
:'
-
- .2014—2013
,
.
,OECD
.
, ,OECD
, ,
, .
. – , , –
– ,
.OECD –
, 25%- ,
– 2013 .60%- OECD-
– , " , ,
.(' )
. ( )
,14 2.5%-
.4%-
. ,
,
.
" "
. " " .2009
." "
, .
" " .
" " " " ,
.
.
, ,
,
.
.
,
) 50 , 14
2015 ,( ) .(67% 2014- 2013 ,
.
,OECD
.
, ,
.
)
(
.
.
18
2013 ,
– , , – .
, "
.
.
, , "
, , .
,( ) "
,( ) ,( )
,( )
.( " )
,
, –
, .
.
,
. .
,
,
, .
.
,
– . ,
, ,
, –
,2012- .
. ,2013 ,
– .5
, (1995- )
.
(defined benefits)
,15(defined contributions)
. , 15
.
19
:'
.
.16
:1995 .
, ( )
:1999- .
, .
,
, .
.17
2003- ,
, ,
. .
–
–
, .18
.19
.( )
,
, ,
.
– . ,
.OECD- –
, ,20
, OECD .
. , ;
" ,(2010) ' ' , : 16
,(2001) ' , ; , ,8 ," : ,( ) ' , - ," " ,"2003 : " ,(2008) ' ' , ; ,1998—1985 ,"2004—2002 " ,(2003) ' , ; , ,5
.108—84 ' ,71
: 2008 17
. .
. 18
3% ) 5% 19
,5% , , ,( .
, . 20
.
,
,
,
.
20
2013 ,
7-'
.21 ,OECD
,2004
.
,( )
)
.(" " ,
,
.22
.
. ,
62 – ,24 23
. – 67-
90%- ,
, " 1,500- 2013- ( ) .
, ,
.
10 2%-
. 35 50% ,
90%- ,( )
. 21
. . 70 ,70—45 , . .70 15- : ( ) Mark . ,
.Keese, "A Method for Calculating the Average Effective Age of Retirement", OECD . 22
.
. 23
. ,
,68 .70 24
.70-
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
'-7
-OECD)( ,1972 12012
OECD - OECD -
1 '21. - 2011.
:OECD " .
90%- 90%- , .
21
:'
,
.35% 2012
100%
.25 85%- ,
:
.
1985
15.5%
.
, 4%—3%
/
)
.(8-'
.
2006- .
,
.
2009 , 2006
.
,2006-
.
:
.
,
.2627%- ( ) 50%- 2040 .
,
, .
,OECD
.
.
, . 5% .
, .
, 57%
, .
10%- .
. 25
—2009 : " ,(2012) ' ' , ' ,' , 26
. ,"2059
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
'-8
, ,
1975 2013
) (
) (
: , .
.
.
.
22
2013 ,
,
.
.
,
.
.
20-
,
.(9-' )
, .
/
)
.(
.
( )
,
2-' .
,27
,
,
,
.28
35-
,4%
.80%-
. 27
35 ; 80% : 28
, , ; ; ; ; ; 7,500- , ) 2% ;( , "
. ;6%-
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29
'-9 1 :
,2012
1 : , ,
, . , , . -100% .
: 2012.
23
:'
.
,
.
25%-
) 4% 3%
, .(
.
; ,
. ,
.
.29
,
.
, . , "
. 29
2-' 1 ( ) :
,
217.5%319.5%
" 7,500
( )
" 15,000
( )
" 7,500
( )
" 15,000
( )
25
246384941
354465750
4635568604 570627568
35
255495953
367617267
4837789854 59692105100
40
260556560
375708177
49591103994 5114110124120
. 28 ; 1
. 2
. 3
. , 5 4
. :
,
.
24
2013 ,
, , , .
.
, 30% , "
" ,
" . ( )
,
. , ,
; "
.
, ( )
. ,
– .30
. - –
.
; : ,
. , ;31
6%-
, .60-
. ,
, ,
35 . –
,(70% )
. .32
.
.6
,
, .
– .
. 30
.
, , . , 31
.
, 32
, . 2% – – , .
.
. .
25
:'
. , /
. ,
,
. .
, "
.
) ,
, , , .(
.
,
.
:
• –
. , , ,
• –
.
.
• / " –
. , ,
:
, .
,33
, .34
, ,
, .
, , 33
- / , , . , , , , . ,
: .
Gray (1976), “Wage Indexation, A Macroeconomic Approach", Journal of Monetary Economics
Fischer (1977), “Wage Indexation and Macro-Economic Stability", Journal of Monetary Economics
: 34
Bonomo and Garcia (1994) “Indexation, Staggering and Disin ation", Journal of Development
Economics
26
2013 ,
.35 ,
. , ,
,
. –
, ,
.36 -
,2%
. ,
. :
,
, :
, ;
, ,37
;
, 2002 ,
2007 ;
. 2008 ,
,
:
' ,2003
, .
, , , " )
" , 25% ( " ,
.38 15% –
– ,
25% " .
, 15% - " ,
, , .
, ,
, .
"
.
Ball (1988) "Is Equilibrium Indexation Ef cient?", Quarterly Journal of Economics : 35
" , , 36
: . -
Price (1997) "The Rationale and Design of In ation – Indexed Bonds" IMF Working Paper
. 2006- 2005- 37
, 2011 38
.4% – 2%
.
27
:'
, :
; , "
, " ,
, , .
,
.
– –
. .
) ( ) 15-
, ,(
, .
, , "
,
.
, . , ,
.39
,
.
;
, .
. ,
– –
, , ,
.40
.
.
; ,2010-
: .
. ,
– –
,
39
, ..
: 40
, .
.
.
:
.
28
2013 ,
2013 .
,2.5%- .
, 1.5%- ( )
, .(1.7%)
,
. 0.2%
, ,
; ,3%
, ,
. , ,
.41
. ,
:
• ,
(32%)
, 2% , .(65%)
.
,
-
.
.42 ,
• , , , –
, ,( )
/ .
.
. , 2%
2%- – (2012 2002) 10- 41
. ,
.136 ' , 42
.
29
:'
3-'
2013
2003
, 1-
:
2007-2003 2012-2008
2013
"
OE
CD
"
OE
CD
"
OE
CD
4.8
2.92.2
2.83.9
0.8-0.3
0.63.3
1.7-0.4
1.2
2.91.9
1.62.0
2.00.0
-0.6-0.1
1.40.8
--
,
)
(
20.744.0
29.929.9
30.649.0
35.435.4
36.252.8
--
1.8
0.90.6
0.61.8
0.80.3
0.71.9
0.7-
- ,
64-25 75.1
79.0-
75.377.3
78.3-
76.278.8
--
-
11.5
5.28.6
6.57.9
8.39.7
7.76.2
7.512.0
8.0
(
)
0.82.9
2.22.5
3.22.1
2.12.2
1.51.5
1.4-
2(
) 33.3
10.238.3
23.932.1
12.641.6
26.429.4
--
-
(
)
19.122.6
21.3-
19.318.8
19.6-
19.719.4
17.9-
(
)
21.717.8
21.9-
21.315.4
20.2-
22.216.7
20.4-
(
)
2.6-5.2
0.5-1.2
2.0-3.2
0.5-0.7
2.5-2.5
2.6-0.2
3
44.936.2
47.139.2
41.542.6
40.949.8
40.338.7
49.541.7
34.125.8
38.134.7
30.424.2
37.934.0
30.3-
..-
3(
)
87.0
63.176.0
75.871.5
90.892.1
95.867.4
104.1106.4
110.3
.OE
CD
Eco
no
mic O
utlo
ok
-
,
O
EC
D-
1
.
–
2
.
-
3
.
OE
CD
,-
:
31
'
:
• (3.3%)
,1.4%-
." "
• , ,
.
• ,
. .
•
. , "
• 2008
. 14%- 2007 20%- ,OECD-
• ,
.
• ,
.
.
•
,
.
•
, ,
.OECD-
• ,
. " 2%-
– 4.5% –
.
32
2013 ,
.1
.
– 3.3% –
." "
; .2.5%-
, ,
.
,
, " .
: , ,
, "
.
, "
:
. ,
,
.1 .
.(' )
, ,
, " 1
.
1-'
( ) 2013 1995
-1995
200820092010201120122013
4.01.25.74.63.43.3
OECD- 2.6-3.63.02.01.51.0
1.8-0.53.72.71.51.4
OECD- 1.9-4.22.41.40.90.3
8.5-10.213.36.64.1-1.2
4.22.25.03.83.23.7
( ) 10.79.58.47.16.96.2
1.1-2.60.70.40.50.8
( ) -0.13.83.11.30.32.4
10.81.8-5.1-1.04.5-6.4.2008-1999 1
. OECD- , :
.3.3% – ,2.5%- .
33
: :'
: .
,( )
.
,1.5%
,(1.8%) - 2011- 2010
.OECD-
. 14%- 2007 20%- ,
, : .
,
.
1-' .
,
. 2-' .
. " 2%- ( " )
. , - "
.
2.9%)
,(2-' ;2012- 3.2%
– 25%- – .
30%- – " .
, –
(" ")
) (tapering)
– ,2013 .(2014
. –
, ,
.2008
.
; 2008 ,
2008 ,
.
15%- ,
.(1-' )
" – ,
. –
,
.
, " "
,
.OECD-
,
.
,
.
.
34
2013 ,
. " " ,
,
– .
. –
, ," "
. " ,
,
–
.
,
. , " "
.
. -
,
,(5-' )
. ,
0.6-
, - 0.3-
2-'
( ) 2013 1995
-1995
200820092010201120122013
2.6-3.63.02.01.511.0
6.0-12.111.74.71.021.5
"
3.0-2.82.51.82.81.9
2.1-4.42.01.6-0.71-0.7
5.63.17.56.24.924.5
8.8-8.314.78.85.525.0
6.7-10.612.86.12.722.9. 2013 1
. 2013 2
. OECD- ,(IMF) - :
" "" . . .
, - .
35
: :'
,( ) .2
. -
, , "
. " ,
. .3" "
,
.4
, .
, ,
: " " , .
,
.5
" ,(2013) ' , 2
" ,(2014) ' , .87 ' ,". , ,"2012—2000
, " 3
http://www.boi.org.il/he/ : .2018 , NewsAndPublications/PressReleases/Pages/13052013m.aspx
. – ' 4
– " ,(2013) ' ' , 5
.87 ' ," -
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
) (
) (
'-
'
"
'-1 2013-2012 2007-2006
1 -OECD : -
1 , . : -OECD .
,
.
36
2013 ,
.2
" .
" ,
2-' .
,2013 2010-
.
.(4-' )
.
. "
,
. 4-' ,
. 2011—2009- ,
–
.
,
.
3-'
( ) 2013 1995
-1995
200820092010201120122013
4.01.25.74.63.43.3
5.6-11.912.18.95.2-2.7
3.30.65.55.73.72.9
: 4.22.25.03.83.23.7
( ) 1.9-4.69.216.23.20.8
( ) -0.3-0.4-0.3-0.40.30.6
2.14.62.72.32.83.1
8.5-10.213.36.64.1-1.2. :
, " . .
37
: :'
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
'-2 : ) (
) ( ,2006 2013
: .
4-'
( ) 2013 1995
(2012)
-1995
2008200920102011201220131 4.11.25.74.63.43.3
16.21.93.52.43.53.12.4
71.54.50.76.44.63.53.5
14.94.0-5.614.9-0.48.80.7
9.44.6-0.47.44.42.72.1
22.95.70.61.35.17.23.4
5.5-0.12.411.111.04.83.02 13.65.67.24.82.48.6
1.83.616.0-9.84.37.40.5
0.84.625.232.6-5.7-46.555.7 , 3-' - 1-' 1
..2013 2009- 2008-1995- 2
. :
38
2013 ,
.
)
2013 (
.1.2%-
, ,
) "
.( , .1
,
,
2004
.( 3-' )
,2012—2010-
–
.( 3-' )
,2010
.( 3-' ) 2009- 2007
2013-
,
:
,
,
,
.
3-'
.
– – .
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
70
90
110
130
150
170
190
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
. , 2000 2013
)2000=1(
)2000=100(
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
75
100
125
150
175
200
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
. ,2000 2012
OECD
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
0
50
100
150
200
250
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
. , 2000 2012
'-3
1,2 2000 2013
1 -OECD ", .
2 . , , , ) (
, . - -10% - .
: WTO) ( .
39
: :'
2009—2007 ,(2006) ,
– . "
–
.
, :
.
-
. 0.2%- 1% , :
.6
. ,
3.0% ,6.1%)
, ,(
, . "
" ,
, .7
– .8
– ,
,
– , ,
. –
.
" ,
.(12-' ) ,
,
, .2011
, ,
.
. ,
" ,(2005) ' , ,2008 3-' 6
. , ,"
) 25%- ( ) " 7
, , ,( , , .( 30%—25% 10%) 60%—50%- ( )
.(2013 )
, 3%- 2011—2005- 8
.8% (2005—1999)
.
.
,
.
, "
,
.
,
.
41
: :'
– ( )
.
.
,
4-' .10
(2) 11 (1)
.12
.
3.1% , ,
1.8%- ( ) 2005- 1996 .2006
, ;
, DSGE- 10
Argov, E., A. Barnea, A. Binyamini, E. Borenstein, D. Elkayam and I. Rozenshtrom (2012) MOISE: A
DSGE Model for the Israeli Economy, Bank of Israel, Research Department Discussion Paper No.2012.06.
" ,' , 11
. ," - :
12
;(2007—2006) ,2011—2010 ,2012 ; ,2009—2008 . , , ,
.
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
0 20 40 60 80 100
)(
'-4 2007-2006 2013-2012
1 , 2006 )(
,
,
,
1 -2007-2006.
: .
.
.2006
42
2013 ,
. 3.1%- .
. ,
. ,0.8%-
. ,(5-' )
.5.2%-
. 5-'
– -
–
.(2013- 1%- 2011- 16%- )
,
.
;" "
.
1.5- 2013
, . ,
, ,
.
–
–
, , .
,
. ;" "
, ,
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
'-5 : ) (
) (, 2007 2013
: .
, -
. , .
43
: :'
.
.
, , ,
, ,
.
,
)
.(
. – –
;
. , ;
.3
.
,
,
.
6-' 2
( ) 2013 1995
-1995
200820092010201120122013
4.01.25.74.63.43.3
: 4.50.76.44.73.43.5
1.93.52.43.53.12.4
5.44.23.03.75.25.2
2.72.02.41.83.22.0
2.82.02.62.03.01.9
0.8-1.93.52.0-0.21.21( ) 4.83.22.83.75.53.5
1( ) 4.8-2.34.25.92.51.21 0.0-5.41.32.1-2.8-2.3
( ) 65.560.861.662.961.159.7
0.1-1.7-0.7-0.1-0.6-1.2.2013-2009- 2008-1995- , 1
. – , 2
. :
44
2013 ,
– , , – -
. ,
2013- ,
,4%
: .
. ,
,
.
,
. ,
, ,
.13
.2003—2001 ,
2013 (6-' )
,1%- . ,2012
.14 - ,
. ,
, ,
. –
.136 ' , 13
. 14
. - ,
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
'-6 ,2008 2013
: .
. –
.
45
: :'
,(4%- )
) ,
. ,(6-'
.15NAIRU-
.
.
,
,
.
,
.
. " "
, :
" " ,
– , ;
. , –
, ,
– :
, – 16
.
. ,
.
.17
.
9- (' )
. " ,(5-' )
, ,non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment 15
, - " , ' ' , (. ) .2013.04 , , ,2011—1992
, 16
. , 2012- .
.2012.09 , , ," " , ' ' , 17
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
03/1
992
09/1
993
03/1
995
09/1
996
03/1
998
09/1
999
03/2
001
09/2
002
03/2
004
09/2
005
03/2
007
09/2
008
03/2
010
09/2
011
03/2
013
'-7
-NAIRU,1992 2013
NAIRU
: . -NAIRU )2013(. 15.
,
.
" "
.
.
46
2013 ,
"
, .
,
.
,
.2 , .
,
.2
.
)
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
'-8 1 ,2006 2013, )2006=100(
1 , , . 18 .
: .
, , .
, , .
7-' ,
( ) 2013 1995
-1995
200820092010201120122013
19.521.320.921.121.021.9
:-0.5-2.7-1.4-0.6-1.6-0.9
19.923.922.321.722.622.8
19.817.417.919.820.619.5
:13.412.912.714.10.30.1
5.45.15.56.014.213.3
1.0-0.6-0.4-0.26.26.0
-0.43.83.11.30.32.4
:-2.42.81.7-0.50.21.2
-3.1-2.5-2.2-1.7-3.1-1.9
5.13.53.53.43.33.11 0.110.4-4.4-6.76.51.3
1 20.81.8-5.1-1.04.5-6.4. 1
.2008-1999 2
. :
47
: :'
, (8-' ,18
,
." " –
- .4
.
, 2011
, ,(6-' )
.(9-' , )
.2007 ,
, 2008
, .
"
, ;
,
, , .
.
. , "
, , – - 18
- – .
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
12/1
999
07/2
000
02/2
001
09/2
001
04/2
002
11/2
002
06/2
003
01/2
004
08/2
004
03/2
005
10/2
005
05/2
006
12/2
006
07/2
007
02/2
008
09/2
008
04/2
009
11/2
009
06/2
010
01/2
011
08/2
011
03/2
012
10/2
012
05/2
013
) (
'-9 ) ( , ,
4 ,2000 2013
: .
.
48
2013 ,
.
, (8-' )
, .
. -
(64-25) ;
,
.
8-'
( ) 2013 1995
-1995
200820092010201120122013
(15+) 2.31.81.71.81.61.8
( ) 59.862.162.662.663.663.8
2.72.02.41.83.22.0
( ) 54.056.657.658.259.259.8
( ) 10.79.58.47.16.96.2
(64-25) 2.91.12.11.61.11.3
( ,64-25)76.777.177.578.678.8
( ,64-25) 70.771.872.874.074.5
( ,64-25) 8.37.26.15.95.5
2.90.73.32.83.12.9
:3.00.43.11.92.62.2
2.61.33.64.94.04.3
2.92.22.72.62.62.3
:2.82.02.62.03.01.9
3.32.83.04.71.13.4
0.11.5-0.6-0.2-0.5-0.6
:-0.11.6-0.50.10.4-0.2
0.71.5-0.6-0.2-2.8-0.8
4.70.73.43.82.22.6
1.1-2.60.70.40.50.8
. :
, ; .
49
: :'
: .
,
.
.(8-' 10-' )
.
;
.
( )
:
,
.19(11-' )
:
,
.
,
,
) , .(12-' )
. (13-'
, . .
. 19
, 11-' .8-' , , .
.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
I/20
05
I/20
06
I/20
07
I/20
08
I/20
09
I/20
10
I/20
11
I/20
12
I/20
13
) (
) (
1 _ ;
_ . : .
5.1
'-10 1
, )64-25( , 2005 2013
74.8
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
03/2
005
11/2
005
07/2
006
03/2
007
11/2
007
07/2
008
03/2
009
11/2
009
07/2
010
03/2
011
11/2
011
07/2
012
03/2
013
'-11
, ,2005 2013 )2005=100(
: .
.
.
.
50
2013 ,
:
.
, . ,
.' .
8,100
8,200
8,300
8,400
8,500
8,600
8,700
8,800
8,900
9,000
03/2
005
11/2
005
07/2
006
03/2
007
11/2
007
07/2
008
03/2
009
11/2
009
07/2
010
03/2
011
11/2
011
07/2
012
03/2
013
11/2
013
'-12
,2005 2013
: .
" , 2010
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
06/2
006
12/2
006
06/2
007
12/2
007
06/2
008
12/2
008
06/2
009
12/2
009
06/2
010
12/2
010
06/2
011
12/2
011
06/2
012
12/2
012
06/2
013
12/2
013
" -
-
- " -
'-13 , ,
, , 2006 2013
)2006=100(
: .
: :1-' -
– –
14%- 2011- , 2012 1-' .
.24%- ,OECD-
. 1 .
,OECD-
.
, , 30%- 50% 2 ,1
; , 40%-
Brand Gilad, Israel's Growth Paradox: Declining Productivity and Returns to Human Capital, The Milken Institute Fellows 1
.Program, 2014
OECD- , 2
,OECD- . . .
51
: :'
) 3 .
. , .(
. , .
: ,2
, , .
. 3
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
1 -OECD
, 2007
,
-
"
: -,OECD .
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
2 -OECD
, 2007
,
-
"
: -,OECD .
52
2013 ,
, , , , ,
.
. ,
–
, .
– , :( )
. .
OECD- . 1
, , ,
. OECD- .4
. ,
,
:OECD- 5 .
. " 4
, , , . - " 5
. ,
1 ,OECD- ,**
2011
*
OECD-
OECD-
OECD-
-44.312.88.92.11.51.80.7
( 20%) -39.019.115.42.66.31.23.1
(20%-50%) -28.314.913.73.06.22.73.5
( 50%) 3.535.823.817.411.916.25.4
-31.59.613.13.55.13.13.3
-23.315.415.92.35.40.70.6
-43.7------
-5.352.545.317.319.32.90.9
" 34.033.43.78.22.12.3
, 0.066.555.635.945.633.017.7
16.918.21.75.50.20.8
-29.039.229.622.417.120.36.8
35.916.118.47.116.22.6. - *
.OECD- **. :
53
: :'
– ,
, .6OECD- –
.
, .
.
.
. 7
,8 2011- 1995 ,3
.9 ,
. ,
. ,
.
; ,
, ,
.10
,
.
,
.
, .
,
,
.
,11 ,
.
,
. ,
, . , 6
, ) , .( ,
. , - 7
– 8
. , –
2011- 2004 , 9
. 2010 .
. OECD- 10
, 11
.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
3
1995 2013) 1995=100(
,
54
2013 ,
:2-'
2013
, .(System of National Accounts 2008) -
.1 7%- " ,2012—2006
,
. ,
. , ( " )
. "
-
, " ,
, .2 ,
" , "
.
"
,( ) .
, .
(" ") , "
.
.3 , 2%-
, " , "
. - "
, , " -
4.5% " : ,OECD-
,(80%) , .2%- OECD-
. - ,(1 ) "
. " , " 15%-
, " ) " :
,(
,OECD- .
.(2 ) -
, - 1
) ,(2011 ) . : .( - , (4.5%) ,( 15% )
.(3.5%)
" 1% .Romer (1990), Helpman (1992), Griliches (1998) : 2
, " ,0.3%—0.1%- (TFP) .Nadari (1993), Guellec and Potterie (2001) .
,( 1.5%- ) : " 3
.( 2%- ) " ,( 1.6%- )
55
: :'
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
"
2 " , _
,2011
"
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
-
OE
CD
"
' '
1 " , _ ,2010
" "
56
2013 ,
" , 4.5%- "
" ." "
) "
" , .( "
. - ,
, ; , " ,
" .4 , "
,( " ) OECD-
"
.
:
.4 ' , : , ,(2013)
Coe, D. T. and E. Helpman (1995), "International R&D Spillovers", European Economic Review,
Vol 39.
Romer, P.M. (1990), "Endogenous Technical Change", Journal of Political Economy, Vol 98.
Griliches, Z. (1988), "Productivity Puzzles and R&D: Another Non-explanation", Journal of
Economic Perspectives, Vol 2.
Guellec, D. and B. P., Potterie (2001), "R&D and Productivity Growth: Panel Data Analysis of 16
OECD Countries", OECD Economic Studies, No. 33.
Nadiri, I. (1993), "Innovations and technological spillovers", NBER Working Paper Series No. 4423.
) . , 4
) ,( 270 , " 320 2012 , .(2012 8.9 , " 28
. ,
57
'
• .1.8%- 2013-
. ,(3%—1%)
:
. –
,
.
• ,
, .
, 1%- 1.75%
. ;2011
, .
.
• 2012- , " 2013
. ,
"
.
. ;7%-
•
2013 ,
.2014 ; , "
, – –
.
58
2013 ,
.1
.
,
.2011 –
.
.
, – –
2013 .
. ,
" .
2013 . ,
,Federal Reserve- ) – –
, 2014 (FED-
" .
. ,
, "
.OECD- , .
;3%—1%)
;(1-'
,2013 1 .
, . 2012-
.
) 1%- 1.75%- ,
– – ;(2-' 1-' -'
. ,
,2012
. " 2013
, "
"
– , .
. –
,
, -
.
. , 1
" .
59
:'
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
'-1 -12 , ,
2008 2013) (
-12
10
: .
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
'-2 1 " ,
2008 2013) (
"
1 . : .
60
2013 ,
1-' 2013 2009 ,
2013
20092010201120122013IIIIIIIV
( ) .
.11-31-31-31-31-31-31-31-31-31 .23.92.72.21.61.80.15.22.00.0
2 .31.92.32.01.13 .41.82.92.72.31.82.61.81.41.5
3 .52.32.52.52.32.32.32.32.32.3
3 .61.82.72.82.31.81.91.91.91.73( ) .
.10.81.62.92.31.41.81.51.21.04 " .2-0.4-0.70.4-0.1-0.5-0.8-0.4-0.2-0.6
5 " .35.44.95.14.64.04.23.94.13.9
5 " .42.92.22.42.01.61.61.51.81.66( ) .
.13.5-7.13.60.6-7.8-3.7-1.9-1.7-0.8
.2-2.1-4.94.70.1-7.2-2.2-1.7-1.9-1.6
.36.3-13.94.2-0.3-3.1-3.4-0.1-0.60.96( ) .
(M1) .152.14.61.68.715.33.62.87.20.8
( , ) .
.19.58.47.16.96.36.66.76.05.87 " .21.25.74.63.43.32.24.71.82.7
8 .377.874.472.471.672.6
. . , 1
. .(2010 1 ) 2
. 3
. ,0 4
. ,0 5
. 6
. 7
. 8
. , :
62
2013 ,
( ) ;
," " ( )- ;(' )
, .
. ,
.(' )
.(' ) 2013
,4 3
2011 , .
, – (' ) 2004 –
.
(3)
,
, 2008- .
.
, ,2013-
– .
, , –
credit) ,(quantitative easing)
.5 " (easing
. ,
,
2013 .
. ,
– 2013- 0.8%- 2012- 2.7%- – 12% –
(ECB- ) , .2%-
0.25%
.(3-' ) 6
"
, FED- " .
. , (tapering)
, " " ( , )
,
, .((1). .1 )
. , FED-
.65 24 – 3
. , 4
, " : " 5
.2013
http://www.ecb.europa.eu/ ,2013 ECB- 6
press/pressconf/2013/html/is131107.en.html
, , .
.
, .
63
:'
,77%- , – 18-
.2014 FED- –
, FED-
, – –
FED- .(81.1% ) 2%
6.5%-
.92%-
2013
– ,2013 ,
. –
. ,
, ,
. :
,10 . ;
. 7
FED- . , ,PCE- 8
.2% ,
– (forward guidance) 9
FED- . , FED- .
. ,
. , , 10
. , :
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
'-3 ," ,
2008 2013) (
*
-ECB
-FED
* :" ) 0.49( , ) 0.32( , ) 0.13( , ) 0.06.(
: , )-ECB ( )-FED.(
,
.
taper-) (ing
;.2014
64
2013 ,
. ,
,
.
.
. ,
" (4)
;117.2%- – ,6.7%- 2013
– , " .(4-' )
"
, –
.
( )
, . (basic account)
.(5-' ) 12
2013- .
.
. ( )
2011- , ,
. " "
.2012 2013 11
.net FDI, foreign direct investment 12
82
86
90
94
98
102
106
110
2.80
3.30
3.80
4.30
4.80
5.30
5.80
,2.1.2008=100
'-4
,2008 2013) (
- ) (
- ) (
) (
: .
. .
65
:'
,
. 2012-
: , CDS- ,
- , –
104 ( ) 2012 138 –
.( ) 2013
, ,
, (3-' ) ,13
, .
2011- , ,
.14 "
,
– –
,(overvalue)
, 2012- , "
.
2.92 2013 .
, ,ECB- 13
.
.' ,2011 14
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
-9
-6
-3
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
,2.1.2007=100
'-5 :
,1999 2013) ,4 (
) (
: .
66
2013 ,
, .15
, , 0.25- – – 2013
.
,
.
.
,
.17 16
,
,2008 ,2008 – "
– 2009
, .18
.19 0.7-
.
, ,
. ,
. .
– – ( )
, -
, , , .
.
. ,
. 60- ," "
" ,
. ,
2013 .
, 2.1-
– 2014- . "
,2018 . 3.5-
. , 15
Kamil, H., (2008): "Is Central Bank Intervention Effective Under Inflation Targeting Regimes? 16
The Case of Colombia", International Monetary Fund, IMF Working Paper WP/08/88.
Adler, G., Tovar, C. (2011) "Foreign Exchange Intervention: A Shield Against Appreciation Winds?" 17
International Monetary Fund, IMF Working Paper WP/11/165.
Disyatat, P., Galati, G., (2007) "The Effectiveness of Foreign Exchange Intervention in Emerging Market Countries: Evidence from the Czech Koruna" Journal of International Money and Finance 26(3), pp.92-123.
,86 ,"? " :(2013) . , 18
.45—7 ' , "
Flug, K., Shpitzer, A. (2013): "Rethinking Exchange Rate Policy in a Small Open Economy: the 19
Israeli Experience During the Great Recession", BIS Papers NO 73, 189-204.
, " .
67
:'
. (sovereign wealth fund)
" , ," "
. ,
(5)
: 2011 , 2013—2012
,8%- ( ) 20
75%- – 21 .(' -' ) 2012- 8.7%
,3.2%- – 20%-
.22
.
.
.
23 ,
. ,2011
, ,2013
, , .
,
.
,
– .
–
, .
.
( ) - –
– 2012—2010
, , .(' -' )
,
.
,
, , 5
.
.
. " " " 20
. " " 21
.' ,2012 22
23
.2% .
2013—2012 , 2011
.
.
.
68
2013 ,
.
(1)
,
. , ,2008
, (6-' )
, .
2013 .
,
.
, "
. "
, , ,
. –
,
.(' -' )
, ,
,
. ,
( ) : 24
,
( ) ; ,
,
( )- ;
"
.
– –
.
" 10-
, .(6-' )
FED-
,
treasury) " 10-
, (inflation-indexed security
, .0.4%- -0.2%-
" ,
. ,0.5%
– – " :(2014) , . ,. , 24
. ," ?
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
'-6 "
) (-10 ) /"(, ,
2013 2013
" " -10
" -10
"
: .
69
:'
, 0.7%-
.2014 FED-
, 1.9%- 1.4%- , 10-
. - ,1.5%-
.(' -' )
;
- ; " ;
.
(2)
(9-' ) 2012
, .25(Taylor rule)
.27 26 ,
, 28
.29
,
.30
,2008 ,
,
.
,
. ,
,
, "
,
Taylor, J. B., 1993. "Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice." Carnegie-Rochester Conference 25
Series on Public Policy 39, pp. 195-214.
. 26
.2-' ,2011 . . " Hodrick-Prescott
. 10 5- , " 27
, . . ,
. , – 28
Svensson, L.E.O. (2003): "What Is Wrong with Taylor Rules? Using Judgment in Mon- : 29
etary Policy through Targeting Rules." Journal of Economic Literature 41: 426-477.
, , 30
.
.
,
, "
,
;
.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
'-7
, 2003 2013
: .
70
2013 ,
, 31 " .7-'
. , " ( )
" ,
, ,
.
. 7-'
"
. " :
, – " –
.
.2
.
– 1.8%- 2013-
.(8-' ;3%—1%) 2003
,
,2012
.
,
, "
, .
,32
,
,2013 2012
.331.3%- 2013
, ,
; ,( )
" Livingston Survey- 31
. - ..2013 2003
, 32
. , . 97%- ,
. ,
,. , : , , 33
,2012 .169—125 ,84 ," " ,2010. ,'
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
'-8 -12 –
, 2008 2013
-
,
: .
,( ) , , . , .
71
:'
.(9-' )
. 0.7 2.9%-
.34
. 0.4 3.9%-
2012- .
– , –
.(-2' ) ,
) –
2011- – (" "
.
. ," "
.(5) ' ,( ) 1 , 34
1.8
11.8
3.3
2.9
3.9
-2.5
-1.8
2.2
0.8
-2.0
4.5
-5 0 5 10 15
'-9 ,2013
)(
1.8
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.4
-0.1
-0.1
0.3
0.0
-0.4
0.2
-2 -1 0 1 2 3
'-9 ,2013
) (
: .
72
2013 ,
. 0.5 3.3%-
, 2013
. (10-' )
,
. " ,
, , "
1-' )
.( "
.
6.2%-
2012- . , , –
,
. , 4—3
, 5.4% ,4.5%-
.
– 7.1% – 6.4%- ,
.
.
.
, ,
, ,
.
.
. 2013-
.
–
, , .2011
.35 ,
. , ,
.36(' ) 2012
–
. 35
. ,
,' ) 2012 36
.( .2
, . .
73
:'
2-'
2013 2009 ,
,
1
, , 2
( ,
,
)
20093.9
8.41.1
5.65.2
-1.2-4.4
1.42.5
6.54.5
13.03.6
3.42010
2.716.0
2.04.9
-1.2-2.8
4.51.5
0.62.0
3.2-0.4
3.12.5
20112.2
-8.12.3
1.59.3
-0.42.1
-0.32.6
1.71.3
9.21.6
2.12012
6.1-1.7
4.03.3
7.4-1.4
0.4-2.9
2.5-0.4
5.46.5
0.80.9
20138.1
11.83.3
9.29.3
-2.5-1.8
2.20.8
-2.04.5
1.61.6
1.3
( ,
)
2013-0.2
5.70.2
-0.10.5
0.0-8.1
0.0-0.4
-0.40.1
-0.2-0.3
-0.40.1
0.01.1
1.1-0.4
0.20.5
-5.9-0.1
0.50.2
0.02.1
-0.4-0.5
0.2
0.2-2.9
-0.40.8
-0.2-0.4
-1.00.9
-0.20.5
-0.40.8
0.20.4
0.2
0.43.1
1.00.9
0.4-0.4
3.8-0.2
-0.1-0.9
0.1-2.8
0.60.5
-0.3
0.1-0.2
-0.20.3
0.90.1
0.10.5
0.3-1.1
3.2-1.2
0.30.3
0.0
0.80.4
0.80.3
1.5-0.5
5.90.3
0.51.0
0.93.4
0.60.6
0.8
0.33.3
0.41.0
0.3-0.5
-8.00.6
0.30.3
0.2-0.5
0.40.4
0.2
0.2-2.3
0.20.7
0.1-0.2
-3.70.9
0.50.3
-0.21.2
0.10.1
0.1
0.0-0.3
0.5-0.1
0.1-0.6
-0.80.0
0.20.1
-0.31.8
-0.3-0.1
0.2
0.35.9
0.40.1
0.10.8
6.40.3
-0.1-1.4
0.6-2.9
0.60.2
0.1
-0.4-3.5
-0.7-0.3
0.0-0.7
2.3-0.6
-0.1-0.5
0.1-0.7
-0.3-0.2
-0.1
0.11.5
0.1-0.3
0.0-0.6
9.1-0.5
-0.5-0.1
0.10.7
0.00.2
0.2.
,
1
(.2010
1
) .
2
.
:
74
2013 ,
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
10
30
50
70
90
110
130
150
170
190
'-10 ,
,2008 2013
) 2008=100(
) 2008=100(
) (
:Bloomberg .
– 37
.(' )
,
.
, ,(commodities)
.
,
:( ) ,
2013
. ,
,
, ,2011
2010
.(10-' )
,20%-
, ,
.
. ,
. ,2011- , ,1.6%
:
, , "
, ;
, .38
1% ;0.35- 0.1
– ,0.35%- 0.1%
.39 , " ,
– 37
. – NAIRU- ,NAIRU – Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment)
Yakhin, Y., Presman, N., : (. 2013. "A Flow-Accounting Model of the Labor Market: An Application to Israel." Bank of Israel,
Elkayam, E., Ilek, A. (2013): "Estimat- : Research Department, Discussion Paper. Forthcoming. ing the NAIRU using Both the Phillips and the Beveridge Curves", Bank of Israel, Research Depart-
ment, Discussion Paper No. 2013.10.
, 38
, . ; "
.
: 39
Argov, E., Barnea, A., Binyamini, A., Borenstein, E., Elkayam, D., Rozenshtrom, I., 2012. "A DSGE
Model for Analysis of the Israeli Economy (MOISE)." Bank of Israel, Research Department, Discus-sion Paper No. 2012.06.
, . .
75
:'
,
.
,
,2012
.(2-' -' )
.
,
.40 40%- ,
,(11-' )
2013- ;412005
,3.1%-
– – .
, " .
, .
.
.3
.
, –
.
,
.
/ . /
. ,
, " M1
.(3-' ) 52%- ,2009
" . , - 40
.1989 ,89.11 ' , , , ," " . , , . ," :
.' , , ,
. 41
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
'-11
,1999 2013
) , (
-
-
: .
76
2013 ,
1998- , M1
,422013
M1 "
.
2009-
. "
2009 -
, "
.
,M1 , – M2- M1
.(12-' ) -
,
,
, "
, -
.43
( ) . 42
– M1- " , – . . " ,
.
.2012 ' 43
0.15
0.18
0.21
0.24
0.27
0.30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
M1/M2
"
'-12 ,2008 2013
) (
) ( M1/M2
: .
M1 , ,M1- M2- 2008 .
3-' 2013 2009 ,
( , , )
121+2=34563+4+5+6=7
"1M1 3 3 " 3 "
4 "2M2200919.919.675.352.1-4.41.840.213.620106.37.63.24.64.016.2-4.53.6201112.311.5-3.41.614.525.44.510.520129.213.45.98.77.98.57.98.220136.53.922.515.3-1.30.316.56.62013
I8.010.818.015.22.31.519.67.8II4.97.314.211.50.34.214.65.6
III5.95.818.113.4-2.67.515.95.2
IV6.53.922.515.3-1.30.316.56.6. " =M1 1
. + " + M1=M2 2
. 3
. - 4
. :
77
:'
) ,2012 2010 :2009-
, , ;M2- M1 ,(2009
.2009 ,M2- M1
-0.85 2014- 2000
.M2- M1
, 2013-
.(3-' ) (15.2%)
.
,
.44 "
, , .
.
" " , , ,
.
,
, . " ,45
.( )
" 2011 2008- .2008
" 2009- ;(4-' )
, .
.
2010 , 2011- 2009
2013 2011 . "
2013 .
2.92 , , "
, 2.1 .
. ,
, "
, , . ( " )
, ,(4-' ) "
. " 6-
, , " 44
.
. 45
, "
,
, .
,
, " .
78
2013 ,
4-' 2013 2009 ,
( " )
2013
20092010201120122013IIIIIIIV
.1-14.201.42-2.14-9.13-10.45-12.01-10.52-0.5712.65
:-14.950.60-2.61-9.67-10.45-12.01-10.52-0.5712.651 .278.2243.0615.90-0.2319.190.109.014.975.11
:77.4143.7516.170.0019.040.008.994.955.10
(1+2) .364.0244.4813.76-9.368.74-11.91-1.514.4017.76
.4-58.85-32.96-7.5010.05-2.4117.050.95-6.22-14.20
:0.42-0.420000000
"4.96-47.2716.658.15-6.35-3.49-2.54-0.630.32
000000000
"-63.1913.13-27.63-1.002.0020.003.00-6.00-15.0020.421.252.892.301.220.400.340.260.22
" 18.0000000000
-2.0100000000
.55.1411.516.080.756.445.34-0.87-1.533.50 . , ( ) " ( ) , , 1
. , ,
. " 2
. :
79
:'
- – :1-'
, ,
.
, –
. –
( )
,
. ,
,( " )
,
.12011 1999
,
;(1 ) 9—6
, .2
.3.5% ,
.3 ,10%-
:
, , ;
4- – ;
, –
.
.
,
, 10- .
5- – ;5%
," – " ,(2013) . . 1
. , ,2013.07 . ,
Alvarez et. al. (2006), "Sticky prices in the Euro area: A summary of new micro-evidence", 2
.Journal of the European Economic Association 4(2-3) (ECB- ) ,In ation Persistence Network- . Klenow and Malin (2011), "Microeconomic Evidence on Price Setting", in Handbook
.of Monetary Economics, Vol. 3A, Friedman, B. M. and M. Woodford (eds.). North-Holland , "
. "
3
. , , " , ,( )
.
80
2013 ,
0.02.04.06.08.0
10.012.014.016.0
13
57
911
1315
1719
2123
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
13
57
911
1315
1719
2123
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
13
57
911
1315
1719
2123
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
13
57
911
1315
1719
2123
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
13
57
911
1315
1719
2123
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
13
57
911
1315
1719
2123
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
13
57
911
1315
1719
2123
,
0 5 10 15 20 25
13
57
911
1315
1719
2123
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
13
57
911
1315
1719
2123
1:
1
. -
; -
5%
1
81
:'
.2.5% –
,
.
,9/2005 ,03/2004) 4 : " 6
.(7/2009- 6/2002) (1/2010- 7/2006
. ( )- ( )
,(" ")
.
" , "
.
, 2
) " .30%- 15%
, (
" . "
" , 0.25-
. 0.12-
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
2000
m1
2000
m5
2000
m9
2001
m1
2001
m5
2001
m9
2002
m1
2002
m5
2002
m9
2003
m1
2003
m5
2003
m9
2004
m1
2004
m5
2004
m9
2005
m1
2005
m5
2005
m9
2006
m1
2006
m5
2006
m9
2007
m1
2007
m5
2007
m9
2008
m1
2008
m5
2008
m9
2009
m1
2009
m5
2009
m9
2010
m1
2010
m5
2010
m9
2011
m1
2011
m5
2 : ) (1
1 , , ".
82
2013 ,
1-' -'
( )
11- 3060
11--0.252.75024
12- 2.75051
12--0.252.5015
12- 2.5060
12- 2.5060
12- 2.5060
12- 2.5051
12--0.252.25015
12- 2.25060
12- 2.25060
12- 2.25060112--0.252024
12- 2060
13--0.251.75015
13- 1.75060
13- 1.75051
13- - 1.75060213--0.251.5006
13--0.251.25015
13- 1.25060313- 1.25050
13- 1.25050
13--0.251023
13- 1050
13- 1050. 1
" . , 2
. , ,2014 . 2014 2013 3
. . :
83
'
• , 2013
,
.
• ,
. "
,
.
• ,3%- 2013- ( )
– –
.
• "
.
, ,
.
• ,
,
.
•
, 2013-
.
• , 2013
.
• , "
.
. , , ,
• 11.8 –
, . - " –
,
.
84
2013 ,
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135)31.12.2012=100(
'-1 , 1 ,2013
Tel Aviv 100 Nikkei 225 Euro Stoxx 50 S&P 500
1 .: .
.1 . 2013
) ,
, , .('
, ,
.(' )
,
(tapering)
" ' -' ) "
, ,(
, .
,
,1 " , .
. , "
, " FED-
–
2013- , .(1-' ) 2013
,
. "
2013-
, . ,
. ,
.FED- ,Federal Reserve- 1
,2013 .
85
:'
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
'-2 " -10 ,
1 ,2007 2013
1 MSCI. , , MSCI -2013 .
: .
. "
,2013- "
. 20- 10- "
,2013- , ,
.(2-' ) ,
.
2013- , CDS- :
,2009 36-
, .2012-
CDS- .
: ( ) 2013-
) 2014—2013-
. , - ( )- ,('
" , , "
.
,
.
86
2013 ,
.2 . " 209- 2013-
. , ,
(1-' )
.
. 2007 ,
, " ( )
( ) ,
( )- , , "
: , "
. "
,2013-
) 20%- 2013- " .
, , .(
. ; "
10%- – ,
" , " –
.
.(3-' )
,
, ,
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
'-3
,2003 2013
) (
) (
54
)(
)(
3939
61
40
60
38
62
37
63
40
60
41
59
41
59
42
58
44
56
46
61
: .
,2013- " .
, .
87
:'
1-'
2013
2003
,
1
"
2
"
"
4
5"
6
3"
"
20031,313.1
233.140.6
14.311.4
1.92.3
3.615.1
3.73.2
2.01.9
20041,420.9
240.137.9
14.210.2
2.42.7
4.516.8
3.73.6
2.71.4
20051,648.1
263.034.6
12.78.7
4.03.6
4.118.8
3.94.3
3.41.9
20061,831.7
272.332.5
11.07.5
5.03.9
4.621.5
3.94.1
3.82.2
20072,046.9
284.830.9
10.26.6
7.43.9
3.323.9
4.13.6
3.82.4
20081,877.8
245.637.2
13.911.2
6.92.9
3.511.7
3.93.1
3.02.7
20092,299.9
284.231.7
12.69.4
8.72.6
2.718.8
3.23.1
4.62.5
20102,556.1
295.130.1
12.08.7
9.32.2
2.721.4
2.33.2
5.52.5
20112,526.1
273.434.0
12.19.6
9.42.2
3.015.5
1.83.8
5.92.7
20122,722.6
274.133.6
13.19.4
9.41.9
2.615.0
1.13.9
6.73.1
20132,961.4
281.332.0
13.09.4
9.01.6
2.616.8
0.83.8
7.73.1
.
,
,
1
.
"
2
.
3
.Warran
t
4
."
,
"
5
."
72
2008
.
2008
6
.
:
88
2013 ,
, . 2
.
,
; ,
,
.3
,35%- . 2013-
– 31%- ( ) . " 230-
, .2003
" . " ,4 "
" ,
. " –
( ) : 2013-
,
, , ,
. ,
, .
. " 50- 6%-
. " ( ) . " 26- , ,
: "
.
, ) .2013-
. " 89- ,50%- ( 20%-
, "
.
32- 2013
5.5%- ) 3%- – ( 8%- ) 5%- , "
. – 2011- (
.3 , ,
–
. .(2-' )
, – – ,
. , , 2
" , . . , 3
.2010 , ,8 ," -
, " " 4
, . " . " " , "
.30%- 2013-
,2013- " ,. "
. 2013- 5%-.
89
:'
2-' )
" ,2013 ,(
36938879837
10538615506
265265
"26466
7150381538
744758
"74218292
"32156188
10112
10112
014598243
01264130
"197291
"02222
23427
23427
90154244
"90154244
4107797111900. :
.5
.
. .'
.
,
, , .
: .
2013 –
. 70%- , " 410
; ,(Modigliani, 1949) 5
, . , ,
.
90
2013 ,
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
'-4 ,
1 _ -12 , ,
2009 2013
1 2013 -70% .
: .
.
,2011
,6
(4-' )
2013-
.(' -' )
,2011
, 2013
,
.2013
,
,
,7
.
, , 2013 ,2012
.(4-' )
, .
, , ,8
2008 :
120- ( ) 2013
; " 53- ( ) , "
.9 " 17-
, ,
. ,
; ,
,
.10 ,
.2012- 7.9%- 2008- 3.3%-
.' ,2011 6
. 2013- ' -' 7
. 8
, " 53 " 120 9
– " 36 – " 53 . , .
, : 10
.
2013 . .
, .
.
91
:'
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
"
'-5 ) - ( :
,2000 2013 , 2013
) (
: .
; , , ,
, ,
2013- 15%- .11
.2012- ,
.
,2012 , " 137- 2013
) 12 " 134-
,( - ) .('
.
,(5-' )
– 2013- 100%- 2010—2009- 120%-
. .
.
,
.
.2011 3-' 11
, , . ,2010 12
. ,
,
.
92
2013 ,
2013-
.2011 ,
, ,2010-
2008
, .
.
,
2013 , , .(' )
,
, , .
.
–
:
,
, .13
, , "
, .
:
,9%- 2013
, .
, ,
.
/ , .
,
,
.14
13
– , . "
: 14
Myers, S. and Majluf, N. (1984), "Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms have Information the Investors do not have", NBER Working Paper Series, No. 1936.
,"Jensen, M. (1986), "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers
The American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, 323-329.
Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976), "Theory of the firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs andOwnership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, 305-360.
2013 .
2013- , , .
93
:'
.1
16 - 15
.
,
, .
– -
, . ,4.3%- 5.3%
- ,
. ,
-
63% , " 89.5-
.2013
.2013 51%- , " 72-
– -
–
.
.2
, :(3-' )
. " ,
( - )
2%- 2013
( " ) ;2012
,3.5%
;(8-' )
4.2%- ( " ) "
; ,
" ,
,2.3%- ,
)
, .(7-'
,31%-
.2013 2012 15
, . 16
, , : , , . ," " ,(2012) . . ,.
. ,2012.03
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2010 2011 2012 2013
"
'-6 " )
, (, -,
2010 2013
-
) (
: .
.
2013
, ;
.
94
2013 ,
3-'
) ( ) 2013 2008 ,( , "
2008200920102011201220131 415390412408404388
" :433342
1571401351491531512 :121518263545
571530546557557540
126130129148150145
:93103104126131126
5454543 "417282778390
743735762786795779
520509536561572561
"166177185185185186
"574941403832
272265264259263259
" 220209204226220203
-250262294301312317 . " " , 1
. / 2
. 3
. :
,2012- 2011-
.(3-' )
) - " 2010
2013 , ,2012- .(6-'
.(3-' ) " , - "
"
- .
"
,(6-' )
" .
. "
. 2013
, 108 2009 .
" 13%- , " 38- ( )
,17 2013 .2013
. "
. 17
2013 " , - , " .
95
:'
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
'-7 "
) ( " , 1 ,2007 2013
"
1 -2012 " """" , .
: .
"
. " ;
13- :BBB "
;(7-' ) . 6-
,
.
, " , "
.
, "
2013- .18( ) - "
, "
. "
, "
. "
,
. ,
,
. "
," " ,(2013) . , 18
.www.tase.co.il
2013 "
,
"
. "
"
, ,
. "
96
2013 ,
.3
. " 6.2- " 2013
.2013—2008 ( " 3.5- ) 2012-
4 .2013 " 10- – (2007—1993) 2008
. 38 – 5%- – (IPO)
" ,
70%- .
" .(2013—2011)
, . 2013- ;
2013-
;
. -
" , " , "
.
,2013-
: ;19
.2019.6 2013 100 "
, ;
- . ,21 "
100 "
MSCI Emerging)
. ,(Markets
.4
.
, / -
, 19
" – – " " .
; , 20
, , (EV/EBIT) ,21.66 2013 - . . ,. , . ,2012.03 , (2012) " " , .
.
" 21
. ( ) . .
4 2013 38 , . .
" 70%- .
.
97
:'
, .
. , ,
,22( )
,( ) "
, ,( )
20 ) ( 16 )
.( ) ,(301
.
,
(monitoring) (moral hazard)
,
. .
, ,
,
(systemic risk)
. , ,
,
.
, ,
1-' )
. .(2012
, , :
. , , 36-
,
,
.
.
,
.2013 ,23
,
– .2010
. " –
,
, .25 " , 100 "
, ,
,
. "
.2012 ' 22
.2012 1-' 23
;
.
2013
.
98
2013 ,
, ,
.
. 2013-
:
; ;
;
.
– .
, –
, .
( ) :
,
.
, .2008 1983
, ' , ,
( ) . ,
2013 ;
, . " 3.5-
,
.
" ,
, " 1.6- 1 – 2013-
2013- " .2012- –
" .2012- , " 0.7-
,2008 24
" 25 , . " "
,2008
" .2008 , ,
, – 2013
: 2012- 2011 –
.(' ,2012 ) 35%-
bid/- ) 24
.(ask. 25
" 2013- .
99
:'
.
.1
) – 2% – 2013
( ) ,(
,42%- .79.5% ,
(28%) – 73%- –
.(44%)
2012 ; ,
,2015 9%-
16%- 2009 , .2017 10%-
, .
,9%- 2013
;
.
388 3.7%- 2013- 26
, 8-' . "
2013- .
2013- . ,
.1%- ,
,
.2009 2013
,
. 2013 , .
,
.
.
,27 2013
. 2012- 3%-
2011-
,
, " , , .
.
.28
, . 6%- 2012—2010 :
( ) ,( ) 26
.
.2013 , , : 27
80%- ,OECD- 28
.(Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2014: An OECD Scoreboard, January 2014)
. 2013-
.
,
,
.
100
2013 ,
2012
. ,
, " 2- 2013
. 1%-
.2
. 2008- , 2013
, " 2013-
.
"
, ,
.
,29
2013- , .
, " "
– . -
.2013- –
, "
.
, 20% 29
.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
12/0
6
03/0
7
06/0
7
09/0
7
12/0
7
03/0
8
06/0
8
09/0
8
12/0
8
03/0
9
06/0
9
09/0
9
12/0
9
03/1
0
06/1
0
09/1
0
12/1
0
03/1
1
06/1
1
09/1
1
12/1
1
03/1
2
06/1
2
09/1
2
12/1
2
03/1
3
06/1
3
09/1
3
'-81 , -
, ,2007 2013
) (
) (
1 , .
.
: .
2013 , 2008- . , " , .
101
:'
1%
17%
22%
10%4%
6%
13%
2%
15%
6%4%
'-9 ,
30/09/2013
" :
" :"
,
: .
.
10.5%- , " 1.2 2013
. " 44%- .2012
– 2009 – 5%- 2013- "
, " "
, ,
5%- .
. ,
,
. ,
. ,
,
. ,
:
- ,
,
.
2013
.( )
,
.
,
, .
. "
,
.
.
102
2013 ,
4-' , , "
2013 2010
( , )
2013
2010201120122013IIIIIIIV
.118,1717,1392,32112,2124,9175,595-4442,145
5,51010,7669,48111,8033,5114,7821,9851,525
" 8,985-5,658-3,5131,6271,739384-1,5121,017
3,6772,031-3,648-1,219-334429-917-397
" .217,7788,8168,59419,2715,3665,1168807,909
" 8,6565,3292,3524,9334171,1052,2741,137
" 9,3693,1208,77811,0054,0431,5842,9672,411
" -217354-2,2403,7771,0602,549-4,2604,428
-3012-296-444-153-123-101-67
(1-2) .3393-1,677-6,273-7,059-450479-1,324-5,764
.411,9124,534-1804,3571,7541,1303781,095
(3-4) .5-11,520-6,211-6,094-11,416-2,204-651-1,702-6,859
. :
, ,
.( , : )
.5 , 2013
2013 .(' )
, . "
, - "
" ,
. ,
.(4-' ) "
. 2013- , , "
" 2013-
11 2013 ;
5 . " 6.5- , "
4.4- . , "
, " , "
" " 2013-
,2013 .
" 2013- .
103
:'
.(' )
,2013 "
"
) 30 . "
, " .('
.
3- 2013- "
. 20.8% ,
2006 ,2003
" .
.
; – – , "
, " ( )
, . " ( ) , "
, " 2012- 2011
,2010- 2009- , "
, , . "
. "
, , 2013
, 11.8- :
( - ) 2012 .2006
OECD- , " 3.9%
; 2013 .1.2%
– 41%- ( 6.2) 59%-
. 64% . 2013
, 2.4-
" 2013- . -
2011 , "
)
.(2012
, .
, ,
.
) " 59% 30
.(
2013- "
,
.
2013- .
105
'
:
•
.
•
,
.
.
•
,
.
•
.
,
.
.
106
2013 ,
,
.
, , .1
.2
, 3
.
,
.
, ,
. ,
. :
,
,
, .4
.5
;
.
- –
–
65%- ) .
. 6(2012 24%- 1992
:
, ,2008—2004
.
)
– ," " ,
. ' 1
(structural unemployment) 2
, .
(frictional unemployment) 3
, . .
.
, 4
, .Beveridge .
. ,flexicurity- 5
. , , , -
. ;
' ,136 ' 6
.53—45
.
107
: :'
,( 7
.( )
.9,8
,
.
–
.
,
) 2008–1995 .10
OECD- ;0.86 (
.110.91- 0.38 – – 0.66 –
,
.
,
.(1 ) .
. ,
,
. (2 ) .
, ,
,( , , )
;
(3 ) .
, , .
)
.(2012 '
,
." " " " 7
, , Beveridge 8
: " , ' ' , ) 2011—2004- . , ,Discussion Paper No. 2013.05 ,( ) "
. 9
, Beveridge , .(Hartz reforms) 2005—2003 ,( , , ) ( ) Krebs, T. and M. Scheffel (2013), "Macroeco- : )
.(nomic Evaluation of Labor Market Reform in Germany", IMF Working Paper WP/13/42 , , " . , ,
.
; 10
.
,132 ' ," " : 11
.33–26 ' , ,2011
108
2013 ,
.
. –
.1?
-
.
, , :
. ,
,
.
,( , )
,
12 , " : ,
. .
, ,
. ,
.13 ,1-'
,
.
. Bhagwati (1998)- Bhagwati and Dehejia (1994)
, , , ,
, .
,
. 12
. 13
.
1-' 2012 1996 , 1
(1993 )
:
(241-240 ) 0.747
(245 ) 0.912
(34-31 ) 0.333
:
(16-14 ) , 0.029
(19-17 ) , 0.094
. 1
. :
109
: :'
, , .14
" " . ,
("kaleidoscopic comparative advantage")
.
.
, 40%- :16,15
, .
. ,
, :2009—2008 .
. ,
,
,
. ,
, :
, ,
. ,
,
.172011—1996
,
,
.(1-' )
;
.(1-' )
. ,
," " ," " ," " –
. - – ' " " ," ' "
- , 11-
.(Barba Navaretti et al., 2003)
,
.
,2013 ," " , 14
. ,
, (2) , (1) 15
; , (4)- , (3).
, , - 16
, , .
.Hodrick-Prescott filter- , , 17
,
.
110
2013 ,
,
, .19 18
, .(' 2-' )
:2009—2008 ,
.(' 2-' )
( ) ,
.
,
. ,
, ,
. , 18
, / 19
. .2011—1996 .
.64—25
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
.
-30.0
-20.0
-10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
.
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
.
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
.
'-1 1
1 , . : .
, .
111
: :'
.20 ,
;
2.6- ,
.
(fixed effects) ,
.
,
14—0 , , , , ,
.21 , , ,
, ,
,
. ,
, ,
50%- 70%-
, .
. 50%-
, , 20
, 4.2% 2013- 16 . .7.4% 12—11
,2009- 2008 , 21
.
91.0
92.0
93.0
94.0
95.0
96.0
97.0
98.0
99.0
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
.
- -
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
.
- -
'-2 / ,
, 64-25 ,1996 2011 )(
: .
112
2013 ,
:
Bhagwati, J. (1998), "Trade and Wages: a Malign Relationship?" in S. Collins (ed.), Imports, Exports, and the American Worker, Washington, DC: BrookingsInstitution Press.
Bhagwati, J. and V. Dehejia (1994), "Free Trade and Wages of the Unskilled – isMarx Striking Again?" in Bhagwati, J. and M. Kosters (eds.), Trade and Wages:Leveling Wages Down?, Washington, DC: AEI Press.
Barba Navaretti, G., D. Checchi and A. Turrini (2003), "Adjusting Labor Demand:Multinational versus National Firms", Journal of the European EconomicAssociation, 1 (2-3): 708-719.
.2
, ,2009—2008
22(vacancy yield)
, .( " " – ,duration of vacancy)
.
. ,
– , ,
. 23
, -
,
.
,(matching function) ,Beveridge
.
)
.( ,
Beveridge ,
. -
, 2011- 2004 Beveridge
- .(3-' )
,
.
,( )
. –
22
. Ht ⁄ Vt-1 ,
. 26- 23
, .
113
: :'
.
.
– 24
2004
,2008
252013 2010
) –
.(2009 2008
4-' .(2-' ) 13.3%-
-
– –
.26
27 ,
8.1%-
.
)
.(
.19.2%-
)
,
(
.
,
. 24
. 25
.1- , 26
, , ,( ) . .(time-aggregation bias) ,
.(instantaneous hiring) ,
vacancies ,flow = vacanciest - 0.9vacanciest-1 + 0.9hirest - ,flow , 27
. 10%- . hires-
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 13.0 15.0
'-3 Beveridge ,2004 2013
2004/I
2013/IV
- 2013-2012, .
: , .
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13
'-4
, 1999 2013 ) (
, , -
) (
) (
: .
114
2013 ,
.28
. (survival function)
.
, , ,(fixed effects)
– - .
.
. ,
– 5-'
.
,
,
,
. 5-
.
,2013—2012
– (censored duration) 28
.(completed duration)
2-' 1 ,
2008/III-2004/III2009/IV-2008/IV
2013/III-2010/I
0.841.010.9613.3%
,
3.192.242.93-8.1%
,
4.093.103.30-19.2%
: ; 1
. , . :
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 21
'-5
,
,2010 ) ( 2013 ) (
,2004 ) ( 2008 ) (
: .
,
115
: :'
;
– . (baseline hazards)
,29 –
.
,5.6%- , , ,
, ,
. 3-' .
,1-
.
, ,
, .
,
, .' ,
.
, , ,
.
,
.
.
( ) 0.3% 29
. –
3-' ,baseline hazards ratio
(2011 ) hazards ratio
- **1.26
0.92
**1.13
1.04
, **1.15
0.83
**1.23
**1.25
"0.89
, , 0.91
, , 1.02
, **1.056
.5% **. :
116
2013 ,
, ,
, . , ,
," "
. ,
. ,
:
,
,
.30
,10—1
.10 8
,
, .
hazards ratio
.baseline
(10 8)
.6
.
;
31
.(6-' )
.
,
,
: 30
www.economy.gov.il/NR/exeres/84E57160-2E37-4B20-A13F-668EC51831CB
. , , , 10 , 31
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13
'-6
, , 1999 2013 ) (
: .
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
'-7 -26 :
, 64-25 ,1996 2011
: .
117
: :'
,(8-' 7-' )
: . Beveridge
,
2009- )
.33,32 Beveridge – (
. ,
,
.
.2011—1996
,
.34
9-' . ,
.
.Hobijn, B. and A. Sahin (2013)- Kroft, K. et. al. (2013) 32
Beveridge 33
. – , – . . " ,
.(Bonthuis et. al., 2012;Hobijn, B. and A. Sahin, 2013)
A(d)- d ,A(d) = exp(a0 + a1ln(d)) 34
, .d , .(negative time dependence)
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
'-8 1 , 64-25 ,
1996 2011
-26 15 26 -15
,
1 . : .
118
2013 ,
,
.
,
,
.
,
.
,
,
.(6-' )
.(RMSE)
,
.Beveridge
Bonthuis, B., V. Jarvis and J. Vanhala (2012), "What's Going on Behind the Euro
Area Beveridge Curve(s)?", European Central Bank Worker Paper Series No. 1586.
Hobijn, B. and A. Sahin (2013), "Beveridge Curve Shifts across Countries since the
Great Recession", Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco working paper.
Kroft, K., F. Lange, M.J. Notowidigdo and L.F Katz (2013), "Long-Term
Unemployment and the Great Recession: The Role of Composition, Duration
Dependence, and non-Employment", working paper.
? .3
.
,( )
.
, , , :
, . ,
) . ,
- " ,'
(."
25.0
27.0
29.0
31.0
33.0
35.0
37.0
39.0
41.0
96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
-9
, ,1996 2011
) (
: .
. .
119
: :'
– 35 "
– 2020 2005
, , : .
,( , ) - ,
.
.35 " ,
, "
( " ) ,
- , , ,
. ,
,(3161 ' ) 2018
.
.
,
. "
. ,
, ," . . "
." " ,
, ," "
. ,
,
, ,
. ,
:
, ,
. ,
. ( - )
,
.
; ,
.
/
.
, , , : 5 .
.35 ; ,
, 44
, ) .36Herfindahl ,
. ,(1- ,
35
. .
. i xi ,H=∑i xi 2 : 36
120
2013 ,
,2011- 1996 ,
)
.(10-'
,
,
.
– 15
, ,
–
.
,
,
,
.
,
,4-' .
. , , , ,
, .
, , ,
.
,( )
. ,
,
. , ,
" "
.(economic geography)
" -
.(manufacturing belt) " " ,
. " "
:
, . ,
. ,
,
, .
(circular causation, Myrdal (1957)) " " .
:(positive feedback, Arthur (1990)) " "
. ,
.(Krugman, 1993) ,
0.035
0.036
0.037
0.038
0.039
0.040
0.041
'-10 Herfindahl ,
,2011 1996
2011 1996
: .
121
: :'
, .
.
, .
, ,
, . – ,
(informational spillovers) , .
.
, .
, . ,
,
. ,
, " .
. ,
,
)
4-' 2011 , ,
( )
7.37.738.442.24.4
, 10.114.131.939.34.6
4.933.630.219.411.9
1.332.238.19.618.7
5.726.938.223.95.3
13.226.319.324.616.5
16.329.127.119.77.8
9.915.115.353.56.2
10.99.618.158.82.7
11.423.228.729.47.4
10.818.814.252.24.0
8.215.915.954.35.8
8.416.029.237.98.5
12.714.021.942.88.6
7.115.232.838.86.1
"11.026.324.925.112.7
. :
122
2013 ,
.(
.
,
.
, – –
.
.
- .
. , ,
, , ,
.
, .
(networking) ,
.
.35 " , ,
Arthur, W.B. (1990), "Positive Feedbacks in the Economy". Scientific American,262: 92-99.Krugman, P. (1993), "On the Number and Location of Cities". European EconomicReview, 37: 293-298. Myrdal, G. (1957), Economic Theory and Under-Developed Regions. London:Duckworth.
– – , .
123
'
• 3.2%- 2013
. 1%- 2013 .
.2013
•
, , .
. 5%- 2013
,2014- 2013-
,
. 3%-
• , 2013-
. ,
• " - .97.8% 2013-
. ,"
• –
" " –
. • -
.
• 2004
.
. ,2003-1992
• ,
, - .
, .
. ,
124
2013 ,
- .1
, 0.7%- 2013
4.65% , .(1-' )
,2013 2012- .2014-2013 ,1
,
2014- ,2013- ,
, , .2014-2013-
.2012
.2% – 3.9% 2012-
, ,2012
1.5%- 2013- ,2013 ,
,2013 ( ) 2012- .3%-
,2012- . 2013
. 2013
, , ,
.
.
.
– ,( " 12- ) 2014
,2014- 2013-
18 )
4.65%- 2013 .( "
. 2013- " 6.5
3%-
. ,2014
,
.
,2013 . -
,2014-
, 2015 .2014-
.
, .
.
" 10- 2015- .
.2013- 4.65% , " 45.6 2013- 1
. 4.33% ,2013 , "
0.7%- 2013 , . .
, . .
, .
125
:'
1-' 2013 2007 ,
( " )
2007 2000200820092010201120122013
42.338.638.635.736.735.436.2
1.31.00.80.70.70.70.7
34.431.929.730.530.729.530.3
12.111.511.411.811.711.211.8
3.93.93.73.93.93.63.4
13.011.29.59.69.89.610.1
5.55.35.15.25.35.15.1
3.02.22.01.71.91.81.713.63.56.12.83.43.43.5
45.340.741.040.139.439.239.4
41.837.237.537.036.336.135.9
17.616.917.017.117.217.117.2
5.85.25.14.94.84.54.5
1.71.21.01.01.01.11.0
0.80.70.80.70.70.70.8
10.99.710.19.99.99.99.7
5.03.43.53.32.82.82.72 1.51.92.01.71.51.61.8
2.01.61.51.51.61.51.6
32.830.831.430.930.830.831.1
3.02.15.33.62.73.93.23 - 3.33.66.74.63.84.84.0
2.51.74.63.42.63.62.84 1.63.24.73.93.84.93.7
5 - 2.64.25.54.84.95.94.67,6( ) 76.565.367.064.964.163.062.6
6( ) 86.872.975.371.569.768.267.4
" , , , 1
. " ". " 2
.( - ) - 3
. " - . ,2% 4
,( - ) - 5
.2% . 6
. 7
. :
126
2013 ,
-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.08.0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
1
40.0
42.0
44.0
46.0
48.0
50.0
52.0
54.0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
1
50.0
55.0
60.0
65.0
70.0
75.0
80.0
85.0
90.0
95.0
100.0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
)(
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
1
35.3
30.4
34.7
28.0
29.0
30.0
31.0
32.0
33.0
34.0
35.0
36.0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
4
-OECD
32.431.0
39.7
44.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
3
'-1 -OECD2 , ,2000 2013
1 - .2 -OECD .3 -OECD -2012 -2013.4 -OECD -2013.
: OECD, ,OECD Revenue Statistics 2013.
35.3
1.5
-0.5
4.0
86.6
4.6
0.1
4.6
2.8
81.2
1.7
62.4
45.2
42.2
67.4
45.6
40.3
127
:'
, ,
. ,
.2 – –
.
, .
. ,
.
: -
;
;
; ;
, .
, .
,
.3
-
7%- 2012- 2013 "
.46%–4%- – ,
.5
,(1-' ) 6OECD , ,
.
, . OECD-
, - ,
. OECD
.
,7 4.3% 2011- OECD ,(1-' )
, 8 . -
. 2-' 2
Alessina, Alberto et. al. "The political economy of fiscal adjustments." Brookings Papers on Economic 3
Activity (1998):197-266
. 2-' 4
, , " SNA 2008 OECD 5
.
. 6
. ' , OECD
. OECD ,2011 7
: - 8
. ( ) . , -
.
. -
" 2013-
. ,
. OECD
. OECD
128
2013 ,
.2011- 2.2% – OECD-
. -
.OECD-
,2011- 1995- ,OECD- 2-'
.
) OECD- ,OECD
.9OECD- 2/3- ,(2-'
.OECD-
, –
.10 ,
. OECD
OECD-
.11( 0.1%) ,
.OECD Education at a Glance 9
, - – 10
.2013 2012 ,
. 37 11
2-' OECD-
12011- 1995-
( )
:
2(15-0)
:
2(65+)
2
( )( )
19951995
OECD- 5.95.72.011.717.81.351.629.121.750.7
5.47.48.512.810.61.750.348.515.664.2
3OECD-13/192/19 1/198/19 19/193/1912/191/1918/191/19
20112011
OECD- 6.95.71.412.618.20.748.825.524.850.2
5.27.06.212.110.90.442.145.516.361.8
3OECD-17/192/19 1/1912/1919/1917/1917/191/1918/191/19
OECD- 1.00.0-0.50.90.4-0.6-2.8-3.73.2-0.5
-0.2-0.4-2.3-0.70.3-1.3-8.2-3.00.7-2.4
.OECD- 1
.(64-15) ( / ) 2
, , , , , , , , , , , , ' , , ) OECD- 19 3
.2011- 1995 ( , , , ,.OECD- :
,OECD .
129
:'
.2 .(1-' ) 3.2% 0.7%- 12
3.1%- 2013- ( ) .
. 3.9% ,
" 5.7- ,(3-' ) 13 4.3% ,2013
.(4-' ) 6.7-
" . , 2013-
0.7%- 2013 , ( )
1% .14( " 7)
.2013 0.3%- 2009–2004
.
, " , , 12
,2001 ,3-' (.9-' -' ) . .
.2013- 4.65% , " 45.6 2013- 13
. 4.33% ,2013 , "
, 14
.2013 ,
3-' 2013 2007 , ,
( " )
2007200820092010201120122013
2.91.66.05.53.02.04.31 ( ) 0.11.94.93.53.13.93.1
( ) -1.30.53.52.42.02.92.21 31.128.425.325.825.824.825.6
26.724.222.122.723.022.123.0
, , , 0.90.90.70.60.40.40.5
2.02.01.61.41.51.41.3
" 1.41.31.01.20.90.90.81 31.130.430.229.328.928.728.7
, :
5.75.25.14.94.84.74.62( ) 7.77.57.17.06.56.26.2
17.817.718.017.317.617.818.0
. 1
. 2
" ,1-' 3
. ,
. 2013 31 , , – :
2013-
.2013
.2013- 0.3%-
130
2013 ,
,
.
2013
, 1%- (1-' ) 16 .15
. / 15
" " 16
, .2%- , . . , " " . . , .2% , " ;
. , , .
4-' 2013
( )
2012-
2013
( , , " )
(-) -39.0-45.7-33.212.4
: -33.5-43.8-27.916.0
" : -5.5-1.8-5.4-3.6
246.6263.4269.15.7
: 236.7252.9258.45.51 217.6236.0241.65.7
14.014.614.2-0.42 4.14.14.90.8
8.98.78.4-0.31285.6309.0302.3-6.7
3 : 270.2296.7289.8-6.93 " : 15.412.312.60.3
4 62.062.165.02.9
, 46.949.348.0-1.4
172.4190.6187.9-2.7
4.47.51.9-5.5
. 1
. , , 2
. . " " 3.5 : 2013- 3
. 4
. 2013 , :
131
:'
,17 .2011
. ,
" " " – -
. – -
- , 5.0%–3.5% ,
, ,
18 .
.
.19
,
.
. , ,
,
, ,
20(2014) , , .
10-
. 10–6-
.3
2012- ,6.4%-
0.2%- ) .(5-' )
, .2009 ,(
, .
, , .
. , ,
–
.( ) 2012 1/12 ,
, 17
, ,"2012—2000 " , ' : ) .(.2014 ,2014.01 ,
, 1.8% ,1973 18
. , . 0.3%- 2013 , . .1997 ;1% , ' .
.
Peter Heller, Understanding Fiscal Space, IMF, 2005 . 19
(sustainability) " Ghosh, , Jun I. Kim, and Mahvash S. Qureshi. Fiscal space. International Monetary Fund,." " Research Department, 2010
." ( )
" 20
. , ," –
2013-
.
2013- ,
.
132
2013 ,
,2013- " 46.5 , " 59 2012-
9.0- 2013
. 1/12 ,2012- , "
. , ,
, - 2013
.212008 , 2%- ,2014-2013
2013 .22
, " 52.0- 51.0 ,52.5 2015–2013 , - 21
7.7% ,2015- 5.5%- 2013- 6.2%- . .(3-' ) 2007-
.2011 ,' ,8-' 22
5-' 2013 2007 ,
2007200820092010201120122013
3.14.16.64.94.67.06.4
: 3.2-16.77.62.1-9.26.43.3
3.16.66.55.25.97.16.6
: 2.45.96.55.96.16.95.7
3.26.68.16.26.77.26.1
3.06.14.66.85.76.95.6
4.67.45.86.65.76.36.0
5.07.56.37.57.07.35.9
( ) 3.25.64.45.55.15.43.9
3.56.84.28.37.47.76.7
7.58.59.67.26.76.85.1
3.86.73.13.43.22.65.2
2.72.54.83.33.43.94.1
2.65.510.75.16.76.94.4
( ) 0.83.68.83.24.85.02.4
9.710.6-0.24.313.52.714.4
: 16.716.70.25.1-0.316.069.4
11.916.811.9-7.5-4.516.018.1
( ) 0.54.63.32.73.51.71.5
0.01.64.30.11.14.22.5
-0.23.21.53.43.13.52.3
" 6.86.45.87.06.77.56.0
. :
2013 - 1/12 .2012 .
133
:'
- .23 5%- ,
2014- 7%- 2013- 2014- ,
, .
. - ,2014
- -
.
-
. , ,
,
, , .
. -
.
2013- .
. ,
,2007
.2016 ,
)
(
. 2-'
2000 70%-
.242031- 80%-
, 2-' ,
.25
.
,97.8% 2013-
.2012–2006 99%
" 6.7-
(4-' )
59.5 , " 61.3 2013 23
" 3.27 . " 1.8 ,( ) 0.3- 2.79 , . , 2.5 , – 5.900 + 64.967 . ,
. " 61.312 = 7.055 – 2.500
. 31% 2013 32.4% 2000 24
, , : 25
.
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
'-2
,2000 2013)(
: .
2013 -
. 2013
2014 .
-
.
OECD , .
.
70%- 2000
.2013- 80%-
.
134
2013 ,
.2013 –
,98.6% " " .
.
1.9 , " 7.5- ," " -
, - . "
, - .
7.5- 2011- " 5.7- ,2011- 60%- 2012- 37%
.2013-
.4 ( )
. 9.6% , " 320.8- 2013
11% , " 241.6- ,
.(4-' ) 26 " 5.7-
.4.8%- -
.
27 " 11.7 2013-
, : " 4.6- .
, " 42,000- " 14,000 1%-
. 3-' 26
, , , , 27
.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
'-2 ,
2000 2013
*
* , , .: .
2013 .97.8% -." "
11%- .
2013- , . " 11.7
135
:'
2% 28
7.0 .(2012- ) " 811,560
,18%- " : "
. , , ,(1-' )
– - 2013-
." " "
. , " 3 -
" , . -
. , -
" - "
) " (" " ) FDI-
.( ' ) .(WAZE
. " - "
" "
, .
. ,
" 2012- . " "
."
(6%- , 70%–40%)
, .
" 4.4 ,2013
" 3 ( 122 " 60)
; , .2013
.
.2014 2013
, 2014-
.
.2016 ,
, 2013 ,
. . ,2014-
, , " ) 2013–1999
.(
.(3-' ) , ,
,
,
,4-' , .
.
, " 168,001- " 173,160- 28
. " 240,001- " 261,361-
2013-
. -
. "
.
" "
4.4- 2013- 1.4 , "
" .
. -
2013- ,
.
.
.
136
2013 ,
, . ,
,(2013 ) " 5,000- " 2,500- ,
.
. , " 5,000-
2013-1999 5-'
. ( )
" 3,700 ,2011- .
" 5,300 ,2.4%- ( 20%)
" 50,000 16,000 , 10%- ( 63%)
. 20%–15%- ( 12%)
, " 3,700
.
(. ' - ).29
/ ,+55 18 , , 29
.
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
'-3 ,1999 2016
"
)( )(
: .
. ,2.4%- " 50,000 16,000–15%- . 20%
137
:'
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 42,500 70,000
'-4 2013
2013-1999
1999 2000 2001 2002
2003 2004 2005 2006
2007 2008 2009 2010
2011 2012 2013 ) (
) (
: .
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
02,
000
4,00
06,
000
8,00
010
,000
12,0
0014
,000
16,0
0018
,000
20,0
0022
,000
24,0
0026
,000
28,0
0030
,000
32,0
0034
,000
36,0
0038
,000
40,0
0042
,000
44,0
0046
,000
48,0
0050
,000
52,0
0054
,000
56,0
0058
,000
60,0
0062
,000
64,0
0066
,000
68,0
0070
,000
0102030405060708090100110120
'-5 1999 -2013 ,
, 1
-2011 ) 2013( 1999 -2013
1999 -2013 ,
"
1 2013 , , .
-2011 ) 2013 ,(
5%
, 50%
-11% )
(
138
2013 ,
.5
.
. 2013
– ,
.
.30 50
.
.2004
, ,
, .31 –
. , - ,2004
–
. – -
– .
;
, – .
: .
- , , ,
- .
. ,
.
2013 ,2014-2013 ,
.2014
, .
. /
.
. ,
,
, , .32 ,
fiscal volatility) -
- .330.15%- (shock
.2.57 =50/67.5+ (2013– 2011 ) 1.83 : 2015 , 30
. 2014- 2013
Kopits, George, and Steven A. Symansky. Fiscal policy rules. Vol. 162. International monetary fund, 31
1998. J. Alm (1988). Uncertain Tax Policies, Individual Behavior, and Welfare. American Economic 32
Review, 78(1), 237-245. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde et al. Fiscal volatility shocks and economic activity. No. w17317. 33
National Bureau of Economic Research, 2011.
2013 . .
.2004 -
, , .
139
:'
, , - .
.
,
, ,
; ,
;
,3 ; ,
; 1984
; 17 ,
, ,
, . , ,
. , ,
.
. 2013
2015 ,
, .( 6-' ) "
.2015- 2017- 2016
2017–2015
36.5
37.0
37.5
38.0
38.5
39.0
39.5
40.0
40.5
41.0
41.5
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
'-6
, 2013 2020
-
-
: .
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
'-6
, ,2013 2020
-
-
: .
2015
, " 10-
.2017—2016
140
2013 ,
,34 ,
.( 6-' )
,
" 18- 2013 .
.
.6 .67.4% , 0.8- 2013 ( )
,2012–2010
, . ( )
, .(6-' ) 2013 - ,
,2003
,2012 0.4%- ( ) .(5-' )
,
. , 0.7%-
: 34
.2013 , ,
6-' 2013 2009 ,
( )
20092010201120122013
72.975.371.569.768.2
( ) -4.0-5.0-4.5-4.9-3.8
5.21.31.33.73.3
( ) :4.93.53.13.93.21 " -0.7-0.7-0.6-0.4-0.4
-0.3-0.5-0.8-0.1-0.12 1.4-1.0-0.40.30.7
3 1.40.90.70.50.5
" 0.0-0.60.7-0.2-0.6
-0.5-0.2-0.2-0.3-0.340.2-0.30.1-0.30.1
75.371.569.768.267.4
. 1
. 2
. 3
. 4
. :
( ) , 0.7- 2013.67.4%
141
:'
,
,
, -
,
.
( ) ,OECD
– 2013- 3.7%- –
.35(1.9%)
,
, "
.
, " 38.8- 2013-
.2012-
10.5- 2013
.(7-' ) 2011–2004 , "
-
, 30%-
.
. ,2012-
, ,
.
, , , ,36
.37
." - " 35
15- ,1995 ," " 36
.2.2% , ,2013- , 15- .4.8%
, ,2013 37
- . 5%- , " 1.3- 15- - 2013- 2012 .
, . .
-10,000
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
"
'-7 –
,
,
. -
,2013
.
142
2013 ,
" " :1-'
, ,
, .1
.
, ,
.( ) ,
. ,
, ,
.
,
- 2009 :
, )
,
" " (
.2
,
,
.3 15
,90% 75%—72%-
.4
– –
.83%- 30%
" "
,
.5
. , , 1
.
," , , , ,' ' - " 2
2001- .2008 .
. , 3
– 2012- 1/10- – 130- 4
http://taxes.gov.il/About/ : . , 2/3- . Reforms/Documents/MisuiYarok2009/polutionMisuiyarok010813.xls
. ,"2008- " , " 5
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
15-12 11-7 6-2
1 " "
) ( , ,
2008 2012
: , .
143
:'
,
– (2 ) –
." "
) 62000
: ,(2
2008- 2000 -
;
2008- -
,
.
" "
,
,
.
2008-
. ,
, 2012- 2000
.72008
, , 2013
, , .8
. ,
." "
, " "
.
.
, ,
. 2008 ,(1 ) 6
.2012 74% –
. , 7
, , , .
. , -
," , " , . . ,. , 8
. , : . ,2012 ,2013 , ," : " ,.
.
1,550
1,570
1,590
1,610
1,630
1,650
1,670
1,690
1,710
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
8090
100110120130140150160
2 95 ,
,2000=100 ) ( ; ," ) (,
2000—2013
: .
"
144
2013 ,
7.2%)
.(2012
.9 ,
)
(3
,2009
, .
4- ,8
,2013
" " , )
.6- (
.
" "
,
, ,
;
)
. (" "
–
2013 , .
, ,
, .10
,
.11
" 9
/http://ozar.mof.gov.il/hachnasot :/http://goingreen.org.il/home 10
.OECD Economic Surveys, Israel. December 2013, pp. 49-52 : 11
: ( ) , , .
.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
6-2 11-7 15-12
3 3.5
) ( ,
: , .
-
2013
145
:'
:2-' 1 -
2000 .
12- 2012- : 40%-
.(1 ) . ,263
– ,
, , .(2 )
. ,
,2( " )
) " 15- 2010—2008
2102 ; 2%- – (2012
. " – " 6.1-
, -
.
, ( )
( ) ;3 "
) " " ,
, ( ) ;4( "
( ) ;
, ( ) ;
.
(" ")
,
.5
.2009—2005 ,6 -
," - " ,( ) ' ,' ,' , 1
. , ,
. , :2012 " ,(2012) 2
. , - " 3
, , . , .( )
. - 570- 4
.1996/7 5
, . , 6
.( ) ' ,' -'
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
1
" ,2000 2012
" ) (
" ) (
: .
146
2013 ,
. , , ,
(panel) –
. –
1% ) 0.92 ,
.7 – ( 0.92%
;15%-
.821%- ;32%-
.
.
" .14%-
, ,
.
–
(" ") –
Elvik, R., Hoye, A., Vaa, T. and Sorensen, M. (2009) The Handbook of Road Safety, Emerald Group 7
Publishing Limited, Second Edition, UK.. ,
. , , 8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
2 " , -OECD,
2011 -2000
2000 2011
49.5 36.7 26.7
* 2010 , 2011.:OECD (2013), Road Safety Annual Report 2013, International Road Traffic and Accident,
Database (IRTAD) .
147
:'
:3-' .
. , ,
: 2012–1992
,
. , ;
4.8%- . 1 1
) . 1.2% – ( )
: (
– 2003 .1.8%-
. ( 0.2%- ) ,2003 – 1%-
. ( )
. ( ) 1
2009- 2003 ,2002 . , .
. ( )
.
/ ( )
, ,
. , .
, , ) -
. .9(fixed effect
. .10 ,
- ,
. – –
,
.
. , ,
,
.
. 9
,(" " ) .
, , . ,(2000) ' , 10
.
148
2013 ,
,2012–1992
2
.
- :
. – 3
. ( )
- , "
, .
" . ,
. ( ) -
, "
.
( ) " - " ,4
.
, 2
, , . , . ( )
, WEO- 3
WEO- . , .
, ) , 4
.( ,
5.7
5.9
5.4
3.7
5.8
4.4 5.
9
-0.9
-7.9
3.6
9.4
3.3
10.0
2.4
-0.9
-0.4
-6.1
-6.1
3.4
13.7
-3.0
-7.5
0.3
6.0
-10
-5
0
5
10
1519
92
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2002
Q3
2003
2003
Q3
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2009
Q3
2010
2011
2012
) (
) (
1 : , ,1992 2012
: ," .
149
:'
. 2004
.
) 2003–1992 ,
2012–2004 ,( 5.7%-
,2004- , . .5
, ,
, .
,
.
,
, ,
, .
, , . " " ,
,
1% .
. , ,( 0.43- )
, ,
.( )
,
, .
.
,
6 .
.
, ,
. 2.1% ,
,
.
, 5
, .( )
Pina, Alvaro and Venes, Nuno (2011), "The political economy of EDP scal forecasts: : 6
An empirical assessment", European Journal of Political Economy 27 (2011), 534-546
150
2013 ,
:4-' ?
.
, . , , -
) . -
(
.1 ,
, .
.
– , , , " – OECD .2OECD
.
– .
– ,
.
, , .3 ,
, .
/ ,4
.
, .
. , ,
– –
. ,
,
.(101 )
: .
;
;
;
– .
, 1
, , . " 640,000- .126
Tax Administration in OECD and Selected: OECD - 2
Non-OECD Countries: Comparative Information Series, OECD, 2011, Using Third Party Information Reports to Assist Taxpayers Meet their Return Filing Obligations – Country Experiences with the Use of Pre-populated Tax Returns, Forum on Tax Administration Taxpayer Services Sub-group, OECD, 2006, Tax Administration in OECD
Countries: Comparative Information Series, OECD, 2004. , – 3
. 4
151
:'
;
.
,
, , .
.5 14-
,
, .
,(pre-filled tax return)
.
, , )
.(
. ,
OECD 13-
.(1 )
, , , )
(
, , ) .
.6 , (.
,
(. , , ) .
( , , , " ) OECD
.
: . ,
,
, .
, .(126 )
.7
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/toder.pdf 5
. . 6
, . 7
.
168
5
5
18
1OECD :
152
2013 ,
( , , )
. "
- ; -
,
.( " )
;
. ,
,
. - –
,
," " .8
. :
.
.
,(101 )
.
.( )
OECD -
OECD 32- - .9
( 18) –
- – ( 14)
.( 18% ) 19%- –
,
.
; " "
, , .
. – ,
, " "
.
: OECD 8
Understanding and In uencing Taxpayers’ Compliance Behavior, Forum on Tax Administration: SMECompliance Subgroup, OECD, 2010
F. Schneider and A. Buehn (2011), “Shadow Economies in Highly - 9
Developed OECD Countries: What are the Driving Forces?", IZA DP No. 6891.
153
'
• – 2008 . ,8.1%-
.82%- –
• ,2.9%-
.
.
. ,39%-
•
, .
.
, ,
.
• .
.
• , 43 , 44-
. 42-
. ,
• ,
2011—2010- .
. , – ,
• 5%-
.2035 10%-
• ( )
.
,( )
, ,
.
154
2013 ,
• – –
.
, , ,
. ,
•
) ,
, .(
.
•
,
.
• , 2007 1997-
.
• 2007
, , ,
.
. / " "
"
. ( " )
155
:'
:' -'
.1
)
, .(
) ,
. , .(
,
1-' -' 2013 2001 , :
2013-
1
2006-20012013-2007 2009 2010 201120122013
( )
( ) 8049.51.91.81.81.81.91.81.82(2004 ) 8713.6-0.30.1-2.60.70.40.50.9
(2010 , " ) 120.00.82.2-0.53.72.71.51.4
( , ) 6.512.17.99.58.47.16.96.5
(2010 , " ) 97.9-1.66.53.19.810.05.61.9
( ) : 57.1-1.57.08.113.011.65.4-0.3
( ) 18.6-5.53.5-1.57.95.0-3.16.9
( ) 19.12.93.9-4.64.89.914.43.7
( , ) 91.6-4.75.13.711.317.46.42.5
( , ) 44.3-6.25.16.415.115.5-8.33.4
( , ) 42.0-5.54.57.41.92.99.511.8
( , ) 16.4-4.82.8-23.836.035.46.9-2.2
( , )21.438.30.62.6
(2010 , " ) 47.0-1.25.72.411.111.04.82.1
( ) 3247.5-4.04.3-1.57.90.4-1.410.9
---2.56.212.615.37.61.58.2
---0.62.411.52.93.12.61.9
--2.50.3-3.3-0.10.61.70.6
,
( ) --5.43.03.02.42.92.62.3
--5.92.40.81.62.92.41.4
. , 1
. 2002- , 2002 2
. 3
. , , :
156
2013 ,
.1
2
:( )
. ,
, ,
,
,
. ,
.( )
,
)
,(
, , .
,(1-' -' )
–
,
.
,
.2-' -' ,
-' -' )
2012 ,(1
,
.
2-' -'
2010—2008- ,
,
,
,
. ,
2013—2011- ,
.(" ") ' ,' ,2012 1
( ) " " 2
. , . .
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
110,000
120,000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
'-'-1 ,
, ,2002 2013
)" , (
)" , (
) " , (
: ) ", "( , .
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
'-'-2 ,
2002 2013
,
: )" ( .
, . 2011 .
157
:'
2-' -' -
( ) - .
(1/11/2012 : ) 2012
(75%) ,70%- (LTV) .(50%) ,
2013
.
45% 35% .1
75% ;60%- 45% 50% ;( )
100% 2010 .75%- 60%
, " 800 ,60%-
(.1/1/2013 : ) . 25%
) 0.35% .2
.(0.22%
: .3
.20% 10%
(1/9/2013 : ) 2013
100% 40% .50%- .1 .
. .2
. 5 ,2011
.( ) 30- .3
.
.8%- 7%- " 4- – .1
.2014 ( ) – .2
. 18
158
2013 ,
2011 . ,
50%-
,(5-' -' ) 2010—2008
. , ,
,
.(2-' -' )
.2
.
. ,( )
,
.3 ,
, ( )
. .
. ,4 (93%)
82% . , .
,
13.5% , , , .(3-' -' )
. 60%-
,
.5 (18%)
. -
( " ) ,
:( ) ,
,( ) ,( )
/ .( ) ( )
,( )
. ,
.6 11 , 13-
, – 38 " – 3
. , . ,
; , 4
.( " )
, , 5
. .
.(" ") ' ,' ,2012- 2011 6
, .
159
:'
( " ) 60 – 2010
,8( " ) 2011 – 72020—2011
.
, " 65- 2012 ,( )
.9 " 79
" .( " 25) 2011—2007
.
) . , "
(.
56%) (3-' -' ) ,
, , ( "
: ;
, .
,
, . /
. –
. .15.7.2010 2019 7
3.8.2011- ,2013 " 8
.(" ") ' ,' ,2011 .11.8.2013-
. 7.5 9
3-' -' : , ,1
""
, .1
93.087.269.179.148.890.099.2
7.012.830.920.9 51.2 10.0 0.8
, .2
10021.34.76.20.86.560.5210017.312.325.217.312.915.0
2 10014.613.425.522.111.013.43 .3
0.40.30.91.57.60.70.1
0.10.10.30.42.80.20.0
2013 2002 .4
10023.118.124.58.49.116.8
. , 1
. 2
. 3
. , " , :
,
.
.
160
2013 ,
,
.
. "
( ) 15.2- , " 30.2-
.10 ,2011—2010 24.4-
.(3-' -' ) 2011—2010-
, ,
.
, "
. " " .
4-' -' .
. ,
. ,
;
.
:
.( ) ,
, 2013 "
.11
. " 4,500 10
39%) : , 11
;(29%) ;(34%) ;(.(18%) ;(20%) - ;(25%)
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
'-'-3 , ,
2000 2013
2000-2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
: .
"
,2011—2010 .
.
161
:'
-
.12
-
,
,
, ,
.
42.8- , " 44.3- –
2011- – 2012-
2010 .( " 47- )
, " 40-
.13
,
. " 14.5-
42 , .
.(1-' -' ) ,2011- 34- 38- ,
,
. ,
– –
) ,(5-' -' )
, , .(1-' -'
.
, .
.
. ,
. ,2014 ,
.14( )
, ,
Carolina, Osorio-Buitron and Stephanie Denis (2013), "The Housing Market in Israel", Interna- : 12
tional Monetary Fund (IMF) (December)
. . 13
, , , : , " 14
. , , , ,
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
'-'-4 :
, , ) (,
2001 2013
)"(
)"(
: .
"
2010 " 40-
,
. .
,
,
.
162
2013 ,
. . -
,
.
.( )
: "
( ) : .15 " 2015
" ( ) . "
– , –
( ) . " 70 - " ( ) .
.16 4 "
. - 25% 2013
– :
– ,
.
.17
, : –
. 10 " 150- ,
.2020—2011 " 60,000-
: - - –
, ,
( 80%) , " 200 , " 15
.' ,2011 .
. 90- 60- (" ") " " , 16
; " 10,000 – ; " 21,000 – : 17
. " 7,500 – ; " 6,400 –
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
'-'-5 , ,
2000 2013
" ) (
: .
163
:'
. ,
– – .
.
:
,
.18 . -
30%- 20%- (1 :
(3 ;38 " (2 ;(" ")
( )
,( ) (4 ;
, ,
(5 ; , ,
( " 200 )
. (5 ;
.
(1)
. 247.3- ,10.7%-
2012- . 162.8- ,
. 46.1- , 9.8- .19
5,000 ,80%-
, 38- , .
; 8,000-
. ,
, : "
, .20" "
.
" (2)
. " 9- ,
, " :
, 21.(4-' -' )
, " 6
, " , - , , , , , 18
.
2011 . 2012 " 19
, , , : " . SNA 1993- , .ISICrev. IV- , ;SNA 2008-
.
,2013 4.1%- 2012—2011 10%- 20
. ,2009-
. " – 4-' 21
,
,
,
,
.
164
2013 ,
;
, "
.( " )
20- – ,
2010- . ; "
2011-
,( )
.
) ,(2-' -' )
,(
. , .
.3
– 92-
,2007- 2004 60- ;
.(1-' -' )
. ,
62% :
4-' -' ( " ) 2013 2009 , "
20092010201120121201320102011201212013
(' 3+' 2) .122.410.22.09.1
(' 3+' 2) : 5.43.0-2.03.0
.2
.101.7106.2112111.9107.94.55.8-0.1-3.3
(1) : 43.542.945.550.751.7-0.52.65.22.3
" (2) 58.263.266.561.356.25.03.3-5.2-5.62 .165.8187.2200.2204.1203.321.513.03.92.8
(1) : 94.6112123.6134.9137.117.411.611.26.0
" (2) 71.175.276.669.266.24.01.4-7.4-3.2
.3
" : .5.96.19.614.2
: .7.01.60.42.2
( ) .12.010.511.910.1
.0.9-2.8-1.96.3
166.8195.1214.7237251.728.319.622.319.6
.2012 2013- . 2013 1
. - 2
. , , :
, , . , .
165
:'
.2009—2008- 53% ,
( " ) ,
.
, 2.1%- ,
.3.4%-
;
.(1-' -' )
.1999 ,
- 6-' -'
, .2010 1995
(5.2%) . ( ) ( )
. ,1995 ,
. , ,
( , )
.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
)4(
)2(
)3(
_
)4(
)2(
'
)3(
)2( )1(
)2(
)2(
'-'-6 "1 , - ,1995 2012
1 , . 2012-2008) .1 ( 2008 ;)2 ( 2009 ;)3 ( 2011 ;)4 (
2012 . 2013" ._ " : , , .
: -OECD .
,
- .
166
2013 ,
.4
. ,
,(4%) 2011-
.(5-' -' ) 8.3%
, .(1-' -' ) ,
.
; ,82%-
;(5-' -' ) ,58%-
, .
7-' -' .
.
; 2008
.
, ; 2009
. – ,
.22
,
. – –
, - ,( " )
2009 " ,(2011) ' ' , , , 22
.85 ,"?2010-
5-' -' ( ) ( )
( )
200810.66.58.712.1810.23.3
200919.915.4165.61.62.10
201014.111.111.94.92.12.93.9
201141.82.65.12.93.73.8
20128.76.97.43.31.62.13.3
20138.16.16.52.91.01.31.4
2013-200881.657.865.638.518.324.216.6
. :
, ,2008- , ,82%-.
2009 . , .
167
:'
. -
-
, -
,8-' -' ;
, . -
– .
–
,
, , , ,
.
,
)
.( '
,
,
,
.
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
2000
2000
M11
2001
M09
2002
M07
2003
M05
2004
M03
2005
M01
2005
M11
2006
M09
2007
M07
2008
M05
2009
M03
2010
M01
2010
M11
2011
M09
2012
M07
2013
M05
'-'-7
,2000 2013
)" (
: .
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
-02
-02 -
02-
03-
04-
04-
05-
06-
06-
07-
07-
08-
09-
09 -10
-10
-11
-11
-12
-13
-13
'-'-8
- ) 2002=100(
:" .
-
,
–
–
.
,
.
, .
168
2013 ,
:' -'
: ,
(1)
(2) ;
.
5%- (1)
, .2035 10%-
,
( , )
, – .
: –
, .( )
. – , ,
(2)
, .
,
.
. , , ,
,
, .
. ,
( )
. "
" , ,
, . " ,
) , "
.(' ,
, , . -
, .
169
:'
.1
,
,1 ( ) . -
.
. " ,
15%- , ,
.20%- 30%- " ; 24%-
, "
.
, .
2035 ,(1-' -' )
.10%- ,
.
.
– – ,2
, .3
.6%- – , 20% 2035- , 1
) - 2
.( -
. 3
1-' -' ( )
( )
2000201212035
323225
123
135
221
1510
302421
( ) 122
132
234
( , ) 121113
161413
0.330.250.23 (2012 ) 1
. ( " ) ,1
. :
.
,
.
170
2013 ,
:
; , , ' ,
(2-' -' ) . ,
.(4 )
, -
. ,
,
, ,( 20%- )
.( )
, . 4
.
2-' -' ,( )
2012- 2001 ,
( )
20012012
""
431760362561
3374030939
"76246634
44952411557
4524843143
"89118416
521668642084
3113214316
"83177723
421153591675
4714724125
"88128317
441256421961
3774434439
"81197624
382361183250
271239341650
"65355248. :
171
:'
. 5
,0.14% 2001-
2.7- ,(0.25%)
6 . 5%- ,
60% ; ,
: .
,( ) 2007-
.777%-
, , , , ,
.
,
0.13%) .8
. (2012
,
, .
0.01 ,
.
.
, :
, .
. ,
,
, 9 (3-' -' ) . ,
, , ,
.( )
– 10 ,
) .
11 .4-' -' (
20% 30% 2012 –
; . ,
. 4%- , 1% , ,
( ) . 5
.
. , 6
.
; 7
.
, " j 8
.2012- 90 .
. 9
. 10
." " 11
,
.
,
.
,
.
172
2013 ,
( )
, ,
,
( ) ,
.12
12
.
3-' -' 2012- 2001 ,
( )
20012012
""
11445585563
4054528937
"51493664
243761175067
3353825833
"57424258
342660274370
3554023730
"69315050
1412061282957
31839271643
"72285545 ,3-' -' , , 1
. ,
. :
4-' -' 2012- 2001 ,( )
( )
20012012
,1573412744
121110817172115
912141312131216
1115191211161014
( ) 3443475331364440
20127111711910. :
173
:'
,13%- ;( )
.20%-
2012 2005- .
, 280 ,13
.( " )
:14
.15 2012- ,10%-
75%- "
. 800- , , ;
1%- , 150- 2012-
(5-' -' ) .16
,
.
, . ( )
.8%
, ,
. ( )
, ) ,
.1.2 ,90%- 13
,1.5 .2.5
. 2 14
. 20%- , 70%- 15
) 0.05%- 16
.(2%- " ,0.08%
5-' -' 2012 ,
( )
31215
8574
22333514
23242820
44362947. :
.
.
174
2013 ,
. (
: , .
– .( )
. – ,
.2
, 17
, "
, .18 "
, . ,
, ,
.19
–
. – 20
,
. ,
" ,
. ,21
,
, "
, . "
. ,
2013 .
) ( ) -
. 11- ( ,
:
, " 17
, ,( ,40%- 54%) . – –
,6% 2011- 2008 " - 18
.2012
) ( ) " 19
, ,( , .(30% 25% 10%) .(2013 ) 60% 50%- ( )
8% , 3%- 2011 2005 20
.(2005 1999)
-2010 ) " , 21
10% 5% .30%- , ,34%- ,39%- (1999-1998 2011. , ,
– , – .
, ,.
175
:'
) ,
" .22 (
. - "
, -
"
.
.
) ;
59) .( ,19- 9
.( 38) " (
, 30-
,OECD
: .
16- 50 OECD
;(13%) (66%) " ;
– , , ,15-
. ,
–
, , –
, .
" ,
, ,( " ," ")
)
24 , .23(
" :
, "
.(65 ' ) " ,
, .
,( " )
, ,
26 .25
, "
.
, ,
. The global innovation index, Cornell University ,INSID and WIPO 22
. 6% ( ICT- ) 23
," : " (2006) ' ' 24
.
.2007 , 25
. " " 26
,
, ,
,
" .
,
,
.
176
2013 ,
.27 – –
.
. – ,
( ,23% 20%) OECD-
. ,(22%) OECD
,
.
:
, - ,
,
, ;
, ,28
–
.
,
,
. ,
. ,
,(60%- ) "
" - . " ,
. 36 (2010 ) 29
.( 0.08%) , 0.17%-
,30 "
. "
" ,(65%) "
10%- ( ) ;31
. " , "
(0.3%) "
, , 1.0%–0.6%)
, , , .(
; , "
.
. , 27
,(51 ) 28
. ,(39) (51) ,(90)
,2011 OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013 29
2010 , .2010 . 0.14%
.OECD (2010–2011) 1.4% ,3.5% " 30
0.5%- - 2% , 8.5% " OECD- 31
.(2006 )
, .
10%- " , 25%.
177
:'
. "
, , ,
, ,( " )
,
.32
, " (2007 , )
" ,"
" .
" ,
- , " :
, .
.(2006 ) " ,
, , "
, , 1-' ' 32
.2007
6-' -' , "
2011 2007
( )
"
" 1
1
"
3
"484331
3.486350.7
3.179361
2.62912300.3
2.582460.8
2.375340.9
1.974310.7
1.984460.6
1.573220.5
1.579370.5
1.460200.7
1.252--
0.775290.2
'0.567440.3
0.585520.2. , , , , , 1
.2011-2010 2
. 3
. ,OECD- :
(2007)
" ,
,"
" .
178
2013 ,
. , - , "
– " , ,
. , " , -
, ,
. ,
" ,
.
,
" .
.
- 21% , 3% – -
" . " –
. "
" : "
( ) ,
. "
( - ) :( - )
- ) , 99
, .(
.
. , "
"
– - , "
- " ,
, " " .
, , .33
. "
,
,
.
,
45% .34
, ,( " )
2012 - .35
. ,(2011) 33
.2012 5,918- 2000 2,553- ( ) 34
.2012 3,000- 2000 680- : .
30% ,600- 35
.
" . " , ".
,-
. .
179
:'
,36
.
, ,
: .
, .
; 37 "
.( 6% )
, - ,
, . , "
(' , )
, .
,
.(2013 , ,2,600- 2,000)
."2012 - , " 36
, , , .
2,784 2013 , " 37
,( " ) 1,600 : 750 . 420- , 850
.
7-' -' : "
2006 ,OECD-
OECD-
OECD-
1.51.62.5
, 0.20.30
, 0.40.50.9
, , 1.731.4
3.65.31.5
,0.60.90.9
- 0.40.50.6
21.96.2
1.61.91.7
,7.67.912.4
3.55.38.2.OECD- :
180
2013 ,
.
, " (60%- )
, (23%) .
.
. ,
,
.
,
.
:
, 333) " 6- 1996
.(
.(2012 2007 " 354)
, 5% ,
. ,
( ) .(2012) " 4.2- ,
2006 .38
( 15%)
( ) , .( 30%)
:
, .39 0.46 ,0.24
;
, :
,
. ,
,40 ,
, .
)
.(
; –
.
.(2006 ) 40% ,43% 38
2%- ,40%- 2012 " "
, 2006 1995 39
.2006 0.24- 1995 0.35-
, - - 9 40
(1977 ) " " .
.1997 " - " Drori, I. S. Ellis, & Z. Shapira (2012). The evolution of a new industry: A genealogical approach.
Stanford University Press. , " "
.
, , .
, ) .(
181
:'
. ,
,
.41
( ) ,
)
.(
,
.
:
,( )
,( )
, .
.( )
,( )
,
.
:
,
, .
.
: 41
5% ,(2007 1995) 15% .
, ,
.
182
2013 ,
:' -'
.
,1
, , . " "
, ,
.
.
( ) .
. .
,
, ;
, ,
, . ( )
. ,
, ,
.
1997- . –
, 2007
.
, , ,
. ,
. / " "
) "
, ( "
. "
– .2007
, – , , "
.
.
.
." " 1
, .
, .
, .
183
:'
2007 .1
–
. 2 ;
.
,( )
.
. ,
, .
,
,3
. ,
.
.( ) –
, .
, ,4 ,
.
1992-
2007
.2%-
, ,
1995- . ,
2005
,
,
.(1-' -' ) 5%-
,
2000
,
. 2007
.
,(2-' -' ) ,
.(4-' -' ,3-' -' )
. ,33%- 32%- 2
. , 3
, 4
.( – )
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
'-'-1 ,
-12 , , -G4
-IMF) ( ,1992 2012
-G4
:Bloomberg-IMF.
.
.
184
2013 ,
,
.
,
,
.
,
.
,
.
, 1-' -' 7-' -' 5-' -'
.5
, 2007 5
.(2007 2000 )
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
'-'-2 ,
, -G4 ¹
) ( ,1998 2012
-G4
¹ , , , ,, , , , ,' .
:Bloomberg .
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
'-'-3 " - -10 ,
, -G4 ¹
) ,2001 2013(
G4
¹ , , , , , , , ,- , '.
:Bloomberg -IMF.
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
'-'-4 ¹ "
-10 , , -G4 ²
) ,2001 2013(
G4
¹ -G4 ,
" .² , , , , ,
, , ,- , ' . :Bloomberg -IMF.
185
:'
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
'-'-5
-IMF ,
) ( ,1981 2012
- - -
:- IMF.
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
'-'-6 ,
-IMF ,
) ( ,1981 2012
:- IMF.
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
'-'-8
) ,
2000 2013(
)4.097 =31/07/1999(
, "
: Bloomberg -IMF.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
'-'-7 ,
, ) ,1991 2013 ,2000=100 (
MSCI
MSCI
" 100
.: Bloomberg .
186
2013 ,
, , .
,2001 . ,2000 .
6 " ,
,
.7 .2005
, -
2007
, , , ,
) – .8
(
.9
. 6
Dong and Robert (2013):"Transmitting global liquidity to East Asia", BIS working paper No 431. : 7
John Taylor (2013):"International monetary policy coordination", BIS working paper 437
Hofman and Bogdanova (2012):"Taylor rules and monetary policy: a global "great deviation"?, : 8
, 90- 80- .BIS Quarterly Review, September 2012 .
. .
Caruana (2012): "International monetary policy interactions" ,Speech to the CEMLA_SEACEN con- 9
ference, Uruguay.
1-' -' ,1
2013 1981 , :
1999 19810.30-0.090.07
2013 20000.820.820.95
1999 1981-0.080.140.40
2013 20000.570.720.74
1999 19920.030.460.40
2013 20000.900.930.90. 1
.IFS- " :
187
:'
–
. –
,
.
. ,
,
.
. .
"
.10
-
2005 2001
,
2003 ;
.2007
.(9-' -' )
,2005
,
– 11
–
.2007 ,
2007 , , .
. , ,
, ,
.
,
.12
, 2005 2001
, ,2001 .
. ,2007 " 10
, , .2013
.(FED- ) Federal Reserve- 11
.Hofman and Bogdanova (2012)- Taylor (2013) 12
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
'-'-9 ,
-G4 ) ,100=2000(
-G4
: .OECD
-
2005- 2001
.
2001 2005- ,
.
188
2013 ,
. 2
,
,
, .
, ,2002
.
, 2003 .2003- 2002
2004 .
– – 2007- 2006 , .2005
. ,
,
2013 2008 . 2007
.14 ,13
.2 15
– 2013- 2007 –
( )
. ,0-
,( )
" . ,
: ,16"
.17( )
( )
.18" "
( ) ,
.( )
.2012 ' 13
.0- 14
. 15
. ( ) , , , ,
. , , ,
.2013 16
, – .1 : 17
, " – .2 , .4 ,(" ") " .3 , " , , – (forward guidance) " " , . ( ) , ;
. .
" " 18
. –
) ( .0- .
, ) .(
189
:'
,
. .
,
. ,
– –
: .
( ) .19
, ,
, , .
, .
,20 ,
, " .
.21
, – ,
) –
. ,(
, ,
.22
. , .23 "
, , ,
" ,
.
:
. ,
, . " "
,
)
.(24 –
,
,(8-' -' )
. 19
. 20
, , . ,
. " , " 21
, " . .
, 22
.
. , , , , , , 23
, Taylor (2013) 24
. - GPM6-
.
.
, ,
.
.
. "
, .
190
2013 ,
. " .
" .
. ,
.25
,(" " ) ,2008
,
2008 4.25% :
" – .2009 0.5%
, ,2009 .26
;2011 3.25% ,
.272011- ,2010
, 2013- 2012 ,
.2013 1%
, 2007
2008 , .
) , ,2009
, (9-' -'
.
,
-
– , .28
.
,
.
, , –
2005- 2001 . –
( ) .
.2007
( )- ( ) , ( ) 2-' -' .
2007
OECD ,
, , .
.
, ,
.
.2011 2009 25
. " 18 ,(2009 ) 26
.2010- 2009 27
.( ) ' 28
" .
2008 4.25%- .2009 0.5%-
191
:'
. ,
–
– , ,
.
, , ( )
) .
1999) , , , (
. ,(2007
. ,
–
1999 –
. 2013
.3
, ,
– , .
, , –
)
, .(
2-' -' , ¹
OECD- ² :
2007.4-2013.21999.4-2007.41999.4-2013.22007.4-2009.4
49.919.125.9-20.3-9.8-11.719.4-3.00
26.87.418.010.84.95.640.5-2.75
21.75.615.3-2.16.4-7.919.2-3.75
15.74.011.365.710.550.091.8-3.50
13.1-1.314.7-16.6-2.7-14.3-5.7-3.75
12.00.711.267.4-2.671.887.5-3.50
8.61.27.3-------------3.75
5.9-1.97.956.7-1.859.666.0-3.75
1.715.0-11.679.13.073.882.1-4.00
0.84.0-3.181.04.573.282.5-3.00. . . 1
. 2
.OECD- " :
.
2013- 1999
.
192
2013 ,
, " .
.
,
. , ,
-
- , .
. ,
. ,
. , ,
,
.
, ,
- .
.
– – .
.2015 " ,
.4 ,
,2014 , .
) ,2015-
; " (tapering) (
.29 ,
.
.
2013 ,
.2013
" 10- " , .
.
, – , "
. ,
.
.
.(' )
)
,(
.
, 10- " FED- 2013 29
.2014
, , , .
.
193
:'
. – –
,
. ,
,
( )
, , -
, , , ,
" )
. , ,(
, ,
, .
, . ,
, ( ) 2003
, 67.5%- , 2013- .
,
,OECD- .2014
, " .( )
.
,
.
,
. ; "
, , ,
,( ) ,
. .
"
.
. " " ,
.
, ,
, .
.30
.
.
, .
- ,
, , .31
. ,
, . 30
. ,
.( ) ' 31
-
.
.
195
'
• ( )
,25% .
.60%- OECD-
.OECD-
•
.
. ,
.
•
:
.
•
. - -
•
, .OECD-
. - ,
• "
.
•
. ,
; ,
. ,
• . - 2011- 1998
. -
196
2013 ,
- .1
- .
,OECD- 2010- 1 -
;2( 1-' )
, .( 1-' )
,OECD-
-
.( 2-' - 2-' )
;60%- OECD- ,25%-
.OECD- 35% ,25% -
. 1
.
. - 2010- 2
0.4700.501
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
'
-
OE
CD
-
"
'
'-1 ' ,
-,OECD 2010
: -.OECD
197
:'
28.0 28.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
'
-
'
"
OE
CD
-
'-1 ,
-,OECD 2010
: -.OECD
0.314
0.376
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
'
OE
CD
-
"
'
'-2 ' ) ( ,
-,OECD 2010
: -.OECD
198
2013 ,
- " " .
2003-
, .
,
; -
.3
.( 3-' - 3-' ) -
2006 -
( ) –
. ,
. - . -
. 2011- 2003
( )
( ) , . 25%-
, . 0.7- – 21%-
:
,2011 10%- 2003 5%- ,
12%- .44%- 34%-
.(8%- – ,15%- )
.2012 1-' 3
11.4
20.9
0
5
10
15
20
25'
-
OE
CD
-
"'
'-2 )
( , -OECD , 2010
: -.OECD
2003- .
- . - .
2011- 2003 .
.OECD-
199
:'
.
. ,21%-
2013- ,
, ,
. -
, .
.
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
'-3 - ,2000 2011
- ) (
: .
'
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
39
41
43
45
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
'-3 ,
2000 2011
) (
: .
2013-
,
, -
.
201
:'
,
- " -
.
. - -
,
.10
)
; ,( 12-
.11 ,
- .
, ,
: 5-' . -
. 12 -
. ,OECD-
Friedmann Y. and R. Frish (2010), "The Effect of the Liquidity Constraint on the Accessibility of 10
Higher Education in Israel", Israel Economic Review Vol. 8.
.109 , , ," - " ,(2012) . , 11
- - 12
. -
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2725
21
17
10
16 17
2124
21
1114
17
22
36
'-4 ,2011
12 12 -15 15
: 2011.
.
,
,
. -
202
2013 ,
: .
, 3%-
5-' .( 3-' 5-' )
,13 -
.OECD-
, -
.
, .
, -
, .
,
, ." "
- .
, -
;
13
. , -
'
"
-OECD
y = -0.0425x2 + 4.5095x - 77.258R² = 0.6417
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
-
)(
'-5 -
, 2010
: -OECD.
203
:'
, ,
.14 ,
,OECD-
–
. 17% OECD- , 11%-
) OECD- - ,
, .15(6-' ) OECD- ,( 1- 1-'
.16OECD- ( )
,
. -
, - , -
.17 OECD-
IMF Staff Discussion Note (2014): "Redistribution, Inequality and Growth" 14
4.2% 2009 . 15
.OECD- 6.7% ,
. 2-' 16
. , 17
. - – – , ,OECD-
.
10.9
17.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
'
-
OE
CD
'-6 ,
-OECD 12011 ,OECD
1, ", - . ,
-1.5, 2.4, 4 -2.4 , .
: -OECD.
, 11%-
OECD- . 17%
204
2013 ,
.2
- : .
. -
. -
.(1-' ) OECD-
,
.(7-' ) OECD-
)
.OECD- , .(
2012- - , '
– 18OECD- – 10%-
.(OECD- 22% 16%)
( ) 1
(3)- , - (2) , - (1) ,
. -
. OECD- 18
0.60
0.98
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
'
OECD-
'-7 ,
-,OECD2010
.OECD- :
, .OECD-
.OECD-
205
:'
–
, . - –
, . -
, ,
. -
,OECD-
, , .
.
.( ,1-' )
(14 ) - .
, -
, - .
. -
- . , -
.
- .
( , ) 60%-
( ) " ,19
, .
, ;
" .(8-' ) .
. 19
1-' -
2010 ,OECD- 29 ,
'
'
-
(1)0.16-0.590.76
(2)
0.030.37-0.39
(2)- (1) (3)-0.39
.2010 OECD :
– –
. -
"
, ,
. -
206
2013 ,
.20 -
2003-
. 4.7- , 0.9-
, -
. -
, -
. , , , 20
.
7%
10%
14%
22%
46%
3% 6%
11%
22%58%
13%
17%
19%22%
29%
"
7%9%
11%
15%
23%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
23%
17%
13%11%
8%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
"
30%
25% 25%26%
31%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
'-8 "
: 2012.
- , . -
207
:'
1 )
(3 ) (2-
,
,2- 1 ,
,
– .21
/
.
:(9-' )
1%- .1
.
1%- .2
. "
.3
. , "
(1 )
, :
.
,
,
. , ,
, ,2
- ,
0.9%- " .
. ; ,0.4%-
. , "
" ,( ) ,3
, " - ,( )
.
,
. - "
21
.("2014 " 10 )
3%
1%
1%
1%
0%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
'-9 ) (
, " , -)1 ( ,)2 (
" ,-)3 ( "
"
-1.5%
-0.3% -0.4%0.0%
0.6%
-1.65%
-1.15%
-0.65%
-0.15%
0.35%
0.85%
1.35%
"
: 2012.
208
2013 ,
:1-'
,
,2011 .
," " ;
. ,
70%- . ,
20%- , " 2,250-
.
, 40%-
, 60%- , .
.1
)
.2 - - ,(
.
:
, , –
– ( ) ;
;
.( )
.3
,
, .
; 40%-
.35%
. 1
70%- ,63%-
. .
– –
.
. ,1-
30-
10%- – ,53% 83% –
3-' 2013 5 1
.2006
, - 0.025- - ' 2
.
. 3
209
:'
, .
.1997
-
50% : .(1 )
20%- , . -
( ) .
,
, , .
.
28% , 70%- ,
.
. , , ,
. .4
, – , –
1997 .
. : ,
.( )
4
.
18
3330
19
0
7
17
31
44
2
38
32
20
10
1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1 )( 2 3 4 5 )(
1 ,
-
: 2011.
210
2013 ,
1
20111997
63 70 58 73
3.3 3.9 3.0 3.6
0.8 1.2 0.8 1.1
( ) 70 28 84 39
3 24 0 12
100 100 99 100
65 85 17 48
58 87 17 87
12 42 12 48
23 42 11 27
26 62
53 75
30 70 41 68
: 33
55 84 11 39
39 78 1 5
: 41
.2011- 1997 , :
211
:'
- :2-'
, , ,
(' ) .1
.
. -
-
, .
-
.2 - -
:
,
. -
. -
) 1
, , ,
- ,(
- .2011- 1998
. ( )
-
.3 - -
,2003- , .
,
.
,4
- .
;2011- ,2010
,2.15 . 1
.2013 ,
.Milanovic, 2005; Theil, 1989; Akita, 2000; Braun, 1988 2
, , , , , : 3
. , . .2004 , 2012- . 15%- .
.2011
, 2012 . 2005 4
, 2009 . . 11 .2016—2012
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
1 -
- 1 ,2011 1998
)(
- ) (
- ) (
- ) (
1( - . -
- , )
(, 6 ) (.
: , .
212
2013 ,
- .5
. 2006-
2
, 6—5- .( )
, . 0.6- – , 2- –
, . 8- –
–
. –
, 2011- 3
: .1998-
. ,
:
, ,
.
, ,
.(2 )
- 1994- 1990 (2000) Akita : 5
- (2005) Milanovic .( 0.029) 3- - . 5—3 – – 2000- 1990 ,
. 1.3- 2010- 1998
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
)" , 2012(1
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
)(
2 ,
1998 2011
1 2000 -2001.
: , .
213
:'
. - 2011- 1998 4
, -
- , - , .
, .
. -
.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1998 2011 1998 2011 1998 2011 1998 2011 1998 2011
3 , 2011
11998
1 . : , .
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
4 - , ,
1998 ,2004 -2011
1998 2004 2011
: , .
214
2013 ,
—1997 : - " , - ,
.(2012 ) ,"2010
Akita, T. (2000). Decomposing regional income inequality using two-stage nested Theil
decomposition method . International University of Japan.
Braun, D. (1988). "Multiple measurements of US income inequality". The Review of
Economics and Statistics, 398-405.
Haughton, J., & Khandker, S. R. (2009). Handbook on poverty and inequality. World Bank.
Milanovic, B. (2005). "Half a World: Regional inequality in five great federations". Journal
of the Asia Pacific Economy, 10(4), 408-445.
Theil, H., & Sorooshian, C. (1979). "Components of the change in regional inequality".
Economics Letters, 4(2), 191-193.
Theil, H. (1989). "The development of international inequality 1960–1985". Journal of
Econometrics, 42(1), 145-155.
