루멘스 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
-
date post
07-Apr-2018 -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of 루멘스 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 1/37
At the trough
Upgrading to Overweight – utilization is the keyWe are upgrading the LED sector to Overweight from Neutral as we
expect LED industry utilization, the key profit driver, to improve from
roughly 50% in 4Q10 to 90% in 4Q11. We expect QoQ demand growth, i.e.the numerator, to exceed QoQ supply growth, i.e. the denominator,
throughout 2011 considering 1) recent capex cut announcements and 2)
our now higher LED penetration assumptions.
Utilization hikes will mitigate ASP cuts from 2Q11Our analysis suggests that a 1%pt change in both utilization and ASP
impacts operating profit margins by roughly 1%pt at current utilization
levels at Korean LED makers (30%). As we expect about a 10%pt
utilization hike in 1Q, due to channel inventories, we believe it will be
difficult for LED makers to turn to profit. In 2Q11, however, we expect
utilization to improve by roughly 20%pt, mitigating ASP declines.
Why we are now more aggressive on LED penetrationWe are revising up our 2011 LED TV panel shipment estimates by 14% to
122.4mn (up 236% YoY) as we believe TV makers will get more
aggressive in LED adoptions. Due to, 1) declining TV ASPs, 2) lower YoY
panel shipment growth and 3) reduced impact of the CRT to LCD shift, we
believe TV makers will focus more on LED adoption to improve the product
mix. CCFLs selling at a discount price have been the key reason behind
weak LED demand, in our view, thus the CCFL phase out by set makers
could be the greatest catalyst for LED. We believe consumers will also be
more receptive due to the narrower price gap (60% in 4Q10 to 30% in
4Q11).
At the trough – a good time to enter LED stocksWe believe the hard landing seen in 4Q10 is a blessing for the LED
industry. Thanks to capex cuts and lower ASPs, we believe the earnings of
key LED names have bottomed in 4Q10 and show a strong recovery from
2Q11. We believe the combined operating profit of LED companies will
recover from W29bn in losses in 4Q10 to W116bn in profits in 4Q11. We
note that component company valuations typically move with quarterly
earnings leveraging the upside.
Top picks – SEMCO, LumensWe are raising our price target for SEMCO to W164,000, from W134,000,
and upgrading Lumens to BUY while raising our price target to W15,000
from W10,000. We do think LG Innotek will also be a beneficiary and raise
our price target to W148,000, but we maintain our relatively cautiousstance as we believe the risk associated with LG Electronics is not
resolved.
Sector Report / Electronic Components
LED
January 31, 2011
Overweight (Upgrade)
Company Rating TP (KRW)
SEMCO BUY (-) 164,000 (▲)
LG Inotek Hold (-) 148,000 (▲)
Lumens BUY (▲) 15,000 (▲)
Seoul Semicon. BUY (-) 56,000 (-)
Contents
I. Upgrading to Overweight ..................................................... 1
1. 4Q10 hard landing, a blessing for the industry
2. Revising up LED penetration assumptions3. Utilization, the key earning driver, has bottomed
in 4Q10
II. Utilization hikes will mitigate ASP cuts from 2Q11......4
1. Utilization to mitigate ASP declines from 2Q11
2. LED margins have bottomed in 4Q10
III. We forecast 54% LED penetration in 2011.........6
1. Set makers to aggressively shift to LED
2. Ranging the penetration
3. CCFL phase out could accelerate LED growth
IV. At the trough .............................................................................. 13
V. Top picks – SEMCO, Lumens ....................................... 15
Company ............................................................................................... 17
YS Chang82-2-3276-4589
Youngwoo Chung82-2-3276-6186
youngwoo.chung @truefriend.com
Daniel Lee82-2-3276-6279
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 2/37
Electronic Components
1
I. Upgrading to Overweight, utilization is the key
We are upgrading the LED sector to Overweight from Neutral as we expect LEDindustry utilization, the key profit driver, to improve from roughly 50% in 4Q10 to
90% in 4Q11. We expect QoQ demand growth, i.e. the numerator, to exceed QoQ
supply growth, i.e. the denominator, throughout 2011 considering 1) recent capex
cut announcements and 2) our now higher LED penetration assumptions.
1. 4Q10 hard landing, a blessing for the industry
As seen in <Table 1>, SEMCO and LG Innotek (Innotek) both reported very
disappointing 4Q10 results, with LED earnings widely missing our estimates due to
lower-than-expected utilizations amid weak demand.
<Table 1> LED earnings disappoint (W bn)
4Q10E 4Q10P Difference
SEMCO
Revenue 349 211 -40%
Operating profit 43 -14.8 NM
OP margin 12.3% -7%
LG Innotek
Revenue 258 211 -18%
Operating profit -7.8 -42.2 NM
OP margin -3.0% -20%
Source: Company data, Korea Investment & SecuritiesNote: LED business only.
We do, however, believe the hard landing seen in 4Q10 is a blessing for the LED industry.
Due to low utilization, companies are scaling down their 2011 capex materially
compared to 2010 as seen in <Figure 1>. We believe the 2011 capex for three key
Korean LED companies, i.e. SEMCO, Innotek and Seoul Semiconductor (Seoul
Semi), will decline 63.7% YoY to W666bn, assuming SEMCO cuts capex by 30%
YoY. While SEMCO did not disclose FY11 capex numbers, we note that
management hinted at no capacity additions in 1H11.
As a result, we now expect 2011 LED capacity (for TV-use LEDs) to grow 124.9%
YoY compared to our previous 170.5% YoY growth estimate.
Upgrading to Overweight
Hard landing, a blessing
for the industry
Scaling down Capex
Figure 1. Material YoY capex cut expected in 2011
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2010 2011F
(W bn)
Source: Company data, Korea Investment & Securities
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 3/37
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 4/37
Electronic Components
3
As we expect demand (shipment) growth to exceed supply (capacity) growth, we
expect LED industry utilizations have bottomed in 4Q10 at roughly 50%, and will
improve to approximately 90% utilization in 4Q11.
We now finally believe that the LED industry is bottoming out.
Figure 3. Component industry key driver is volume shipments – the MLCC example
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
1 Q 9 1
1 Q 9 2
1 Q 9 3
1 Q 9 4
1 Q 9 5
1 Q 9 6
1 Q 9 7
1 Q 9 8
1 Q 9 9
1 Q 0 0
1 Q 0 1
1 Q 0 2
1 Q 0 3
1 Q 0 4
1 Q 0 5
1 Q 0 6
1 Q 0 7
1 Q 0 8
1 Q 0 9
1 Q 1 0
Shipment QoQ
ASP QoQ
Rev enue QoQ
Source: Company data, Korea Investment & Securities
Figure 4. MLCC operating profit margins vs. utilization
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1Q05 1Q06 1Q07 1Q08 1Q09
-75%
-55%
-35%
-15%
5%
25%
Util ization(LHS) OP margin(RHS)
Source: Company data, Korea Investment & Securities
LED is now bottoming out
Figure 5. LED industry utilizations
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10F 1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F
Source: Company data, Korea Investment & Securities
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 5/37
Electronic Components
4
II. Utilization hikes will mitigate ASP cuts
from 2Q11
Considering 1) LED TV inventories, 2) weak profitability at panel makers and 3) the
lower bargaining power at LED chipmakers, we think LED prices will continue to
fall, especially in 1H11. However, we believe utilization hikes can mitigate ASP cuts
no later than 2Q11. As a result we expect LED makers to post strong earnings
recovery from that point.
1. Utilization to mitigate ASP declines from 2Q11
Our analysis suggests that a 1%pt change in both utilization and ASP impacts
operating profit margins by roughly 1%pt at current utilization levels of Korean LED
makers (30%). Innotek also mentioned that they see 50% utilization as a
breakeven point if ASPs are flat. Considering that 1) Innotek LED margins were at
-20% and 2) utilizations were around 30% in 4Q10, we believe this supports our
analysis.
We have summarized our QoQ LED ASP assumptions and utilization of Korean
companies in Figure 6. As we expect only a 10%pt utilization hike in 1Q11, due to
channel inventories, we believe it will be difficult for LED makers to turn to profit.
However, from 2Q11 to 4Q11 we expect industry utilization to improve, rapidly
mitigating ASP declines.
Utilization hikes will
mitigate ASP cuts
1%pt utilization change =
1% ASP change
Figure 6. Utilization and ASP assumptions (Korea)
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F
Utilization change ASP cut
Source: Company data, Korea Investment & Securities
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 6/37
Electronic Components
5
2. LED margins have bottomed in 4Q10
Considering utilizations, we believe the LED margins of key Korean LED
chipmakers have bottomed in 4Q10 as seen in <Table 3>. We have a morepositive outlook for companies in the Samsung food chain due to 1) relative cost
competitiveness and 2) bottom up findings from our channel checks.
<Table 3> Quarterly earnings forecast (LED only) (W bn)
1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10F 1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F
Samsung LED
Sales 330 431 346 211 233 307 415 473
Operating profit 53 126 62 -15 -9 15 58 57
Margin 16.0% 29.3% 18.0% -7.0% -4.0% 5.0% 14.0% 12.0%
LG Innotek
Sales 155 285 254 211 197 252 340 355
OP 4 26 8 -42 -36 -20 14 11
Margin (%) 2.5% 9.0% 3.1% -20.0% -18.0% -8.0% 4.0% 3.0%
Seoul Semi
Sales 124 215 277 222 245 291 366 354
OP 13 29 43 23 30 39 51 39
Margin (%) 10.4% 13.5% 15.5% 10.3% 12.2% 13.4% 13.9% 11.0%
Lumens
Sales 51 66 73 60 73 101 123 106
OP 4 7 6 5 6 10 13 10
Margin (%) 8.1% 11.1% 8.5% 8.6% 8.6% 9.5% 10.3% 9.3%
Total sales 660 997 950 705 749 951 1244 1287
Total OP 74 188 119 -29 -9 44 135 116
Margin 11.2% 18.9% 12.6% -4.1% -1.1% 4.6% 10.9% 9.0%
Source: Company data, Korea Investment & Securities
We believe Samsung is becoming very aggressive in LED transition. According to
Lumens, they are seeing almost full utilizations in 1Q10 (70% in 4Q10). And BLU
names mentioned that almost 80% of total 40”+ models are now being produced
using LEDs.
LED margins have already
bottomed
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 7/37
Electronic Components
6
III. We forecast 54% LED penetration in 2011
We are revising up our 2011 LED TV panel shipment estimates by 14% to122.4mn (up 236% YoY) or 54% LED penetration on a panel basis. We believe TV
makers will become much more aggressive in LED adoptions during 2011. Due to,
1) declining TV ASPs, 2) reduced YoY panel shipment growth and 3) the lower
impact from the CRT to LCD mix shift.
We believe CCFLs selling at a discount price have been the key reason behind
weak LED demand, thus the CCFL phase out by set makers could be the greatest
demand driver for LED. We think consumers will also be much more receptive due
to the narrower price gap (60% in 4Q10 to 30% in 4Q11).
1. Set makers to aggressively shift to LED
We think one key reason why companies shift their product mix is to protect their
top line. And considering the industry conditions in 2011, we believe set makers
will aggressively adopt LED TVs.
As seen in Figure 7, blended TV ASPs, including CRT and PDP, peaked out in
2008. Due to the higher LCD portion out of total revenues (85.2% in 2010), we
believe the impact from the CRT to TFT-LCD transition is fading out.
To make matters worse, we expect LCD TV shipment growth to also slow
considering the weaker panel shipment growth outlook. We expect YoY LCD panel
shipment growth to slow at 18.3% in 2011 compared to the 36.8% seen in 2010.
54% LED penetrationexpected
Why set makers will shift
to LED
1. TV ASPs trending down
Figure 7. TV ASP vs. LCD TV revenue share
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%TV price LCD TV revenue portion
(USD)
Source: DisplaySearch, Korea Investment & Securities
2. TV shipment growth to
slow
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 8/37
Electronic Components
7
As seen in Figure 8, when LCD panel shipment growth slowed, LCD TV ASPs fell
less, suggesting that TV makers focused on improving their product mix. And
considering the shipment growth outlook, we believe 2011 will be another year in
which TV makers will struggle to defend their ASPs.
Our discussions with panel / set makers indicate that retailers were burdened morethan usual during 4Q10 price promotions. We believe this also indicates that TV
makers are feeling ASP pressure at current TV price points.
Thus, considering much lower LED TV prices, we believe TV set makers will
attempt to phase out CCFL TVs, replacing them with LED TVs.
Figure 8. YoY panel shipment growth
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010P 2011F
Source: DisplaySearch, Korea Investment & Securities
Product mix shift has
happened before
Figure 9. TFT-LCD YoY shipment growth vs. YoY TV price declines
Source: Korea Investment & Securities
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010P 2011F
-60%
-40%
-20%
0% YoY shipment growth (LHS)
30"-40" YoY change (RHS)
40"-50" YoY change (RHS)
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 9/37
Electronic Components
8
2. Ranging the penetration
We attempted to range the LED penetration for 2011 in order to reach a realistic
penetration level. That said, we calculated the max / min quarterly LED penetrationfor 2011 and assumed that the actual LED penetration would fall somewhere
between the two.
1) Minimum penetration
We believe LED penetration will at least reach a level where TV makers can
maintain their revenues. And thus, we feel that it should be considered as a
minimum penetration range.
<Table 4> shows the ASP level required for TV makers to maintain their top line for
mainstream 30”-40”, 40”-50” LCD TVs. We note that LCD TV revenues for these
two sizes represent roughly 65% of total TV revenues.
<Table 4> LCD TV ASP required to maintain 2010 revenues
1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F Remarks
TV revenue (USD mn) 25,705 27,820 28,417 35,242 Assuming no YoY growth
30"-40" LCD revenue portion 30.00% 28.00% 28.00% 28.00% Roughly 31% in 2010
40"-50" LCD revenue portion 35.00% 35.00% 34.00% 35.00% Roughly 35% in 2010
30"-40" LCD revenue 8,157 8,899 9,640 10,382
40"-50" LCD revenue 8,960 9,774 10,589 11,403
30”-40" LCD TV shipments 19,652 21,523 24,331 28,074 10% YoY growth
40"-50" LCD TV shipments 12,904 14,132 15,976 18,434 20% YoY growth
30”-40" LCD TV blended ASP 415 413 396 370
40"-50" LCD TV blended ASP 694 692 663 619
Source: Korea Investment & Securities
And <Table 5-8> show our ASP assumptions for 30”-40” and 40”-50” CCFL and
LED TVs
<Table 5> 30”-40” CCFL TV ASP assumptions <Table 6> 40”-50” CCFL TV ASP assumptions
(USD) 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q (USD) 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
2004 4,373 3,985 3,353 2,932 2004 9,322 8,658 6,904 6,748
2005 2,670 2,146 1,908 1,617 2005 5,889 5,132 3,731 3,294
2006 1,580 1,452 1,273 984 2006 3,128 2,661 2,257 1,789
2007 914 844 791 730 2007 1,706 1,595 1,487 1,305
2008 748 749 706 598 2008 1,312 1,265 1,201 1,044
2009 560 545 501 435 2009 1,000 997 898 753
2010 434 428 403 363 2010 718 680 657 618
2011F 356 349 331 305 2011F 593 570 541 498
QoQ QoQ
2004 -8.90% -15.90% -12.50% 2004 -7.10% -20.30% -2.20%
2005 -8.90% -19.60% -11.10% -15.30% 2005 -12.70% -12.80% -27.30% -11.70%
2006 -2.30% -8.10% -12.40% -22.70% 2006 -5.00% -14.90% -15.20% -20.80%
2007 -7.10% -7.60% -6.30% -7.70% 2007 -4.60% -6.50% -6.80% -12.30%
2008 2.50% 0.10% -5.70% -15.20% 2008 0.60% -3.60% -5.00% -13.10%
2009 -6.50% -2.60% -8.00% -13.20% 2009 -4.20% -0.30% -9.90% -16.10%
2010 -0.30% -1.50% -5.90% -9.90% 2010 -4.60% -5.30% -3.50% -5.90%
2011F -2.00% -2.00% -5.00% -8.00% 2011F -4.00% -4.00% -5.00% -8.00%
Source: DisplaySearch, Korea Investment & Securities
Ranging the penetration
Minimum penetration
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 10/37
Electronic Components
9
<Table 7> 30”-40” LED TV ASP assumptions <Table 8> 40”-50” LED TV ASP assumptions
(USD) 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q (USD) 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
2009 1,048 2009 1,491
2010 901 782 626 585 2010 1,322 1,189 1,080 987
2011F 538 495 445 401 2011F 908 835 752 676
QoQ QoQ
2009 2009
2010 -14.00% -13.20% -20.00% -6.60% 2010 -11.30% -10.00% -9.20% -8.60%
2011F -8.00% -8.00% -10.00% -10.00% 2011F -8.00% -8.00% -10.00% -10.00%
Source: DisplaySearch, Korea Investment & Securities
Under our ASP assumptions, <Table 9> is the LED penetration level required for
TV set makers to maintain their revenues.
<Table 9> Minimum LED penetration assumptions (Unit: %)
1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F
30"-40" 32.8 44.0 57.0 68.0
40"-50" 32.0 46.0 58.0 68.0
Source: Korea Investment & Securities
2) Maximum penetration
Maximum penetration assumes, what level of penetration LED TVs should have
reached at current price levels compared to that of CCFL TVs.
Historically, a price and penetration level of 30”-40” and 40”-50” CCFL TVs
reached a certain level of penetration at similar price points as seen in Figure 10.
What makes this approach more interesting is that the above phenomenon
happened during the times indicated in <Table 10>.
<Table 10> CCFL price vs. penetration
5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
When
30"-40" LCD 4Q05-1Q06 2Q06-3Q06 1Q07-2Q07 3Q07-4Q07 3Q08-4Q08 1Q09-2Q09
40"-50" LCD t 4Q06-1Q07 4Q07-1Q08 1Q09-3Q09
ASP (USD)
30"-40" LCD 1,762 1,323 879 740 655 552
40"-50" LCD 1,749 1,309 961
Source: DisplaySearch, Korea Investment Securities
Maximum penetration
Figure 10. LCD TV penetration vs. price
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
30"~40" 40"~50"
(USD)
Source: DisplaySearch, Korea Investment Securities
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 11/37
Electronic Components
10
Thus, from this aspect, we compared our LED TV price assumptions with historical
CCFL TV prices and indentified the CCFL TV penetration rate. We believe this will
be the maximum level of LED penetration. <Table 11> shows our maximum
penetration assumptions.
<Table 11> Maximum LED penetration assumptions (%)
1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F
30"-40" 87.2 90.1 93.0 95.9
40"-50" 70.8 75.3 79.7 88.6
Source: Korea Investment & Securities
3) Our penetration assumptions
Figure 11 and 12 show the LED penetration range for 30”-40” and 40”-50” LED TV
and our assumptions.
We assumed 30”-40” penetration will be around the minimum range while 40”-50”
will be in the middle of the range. The reason we have been more aggressive on
40”-50” penetration is because it is a higher end segment and consumers tend to
be less price sensitive.
Actually in 2010, when comparing LED penetration and historical CCFL
penetration and current LED TV pricing, the penetration gap between 40”-50” LED
and CCFL TVs was much narrower compared to that of 30”-40” as seen in Figure13 and 14.
Penetration assumptions
Figure 11. 30”-40” LED penetration range andpenetration
Figure 12. 40”-50” LED penetration range andpenetration
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F
Min Max Penetration
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F
Min Max Penetration
Source: Korea Investment & Securities Source: Korea Investment & Securities
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 12/37
Electronic Components
11
We have applied our TV penetration rate into our panel assumptions as seen in
<Table 12>. To note, our 1Q11 panel penetration is lower than our TV penetration
assumptions as we believe TV makers will continue to reduce LED TV inventories
carried over from 4Q10.
<Table12> LED panel / TV penetration assumptions
1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F
30"-40"
Set 33% 45% 58% 70%
Panel 28% 45% 58% 70%
40"-50"
Set 51% 61% 70% 80%
Panel 46% 61% 70% 80%
Source: Korea Investment & Securities
3. CCFL phase out could accelerate LED growth
As seen above in Figure 13 and 14, LED penetration is much weaker compared to
that of CCFL at similar price points. We believe the discrepancy comes from the
degree of differentiation. CCFL LCD offered a very distinctive form factor
compared to CRT while the differences between CCFL LCD and LED LCD TVs are
not as significant. Thus the strategic need of TV set makers to shift from CCFL to
LED, removing the cheap comparable from consumers, could be one of the keycatalyst for LED shipment growth, in our view.
We believe consumers will also be more receptive to LED TVs due to the narrower
price gap between CCFL and LED (60% in 4Q10 to 30% in 4Q11).
Figure 13. 30”-40” LED vs. CCFL penetration at LEDprices
Figure 14. 40”-50” LED vs. CCFL penetration at LEDprices
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10
LED CCFL
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10
LED CCFL
Source: Korea Investment & Securities Source: Korea Investment & Securities
CCFL phase out could
accelerate LED growth
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 13/37
Electronic Components
12
Figure 15. 30”-40” LED and CCFL price gap Figure 16. 40”-50” LED and CCFL price gap
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
CCFL LED Premium
(USD)
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
CCFL LED Pr emium
(USD)
Source: Korea Investment & Securities Source: Korea Investment & Securities
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 14/37
Electronic Components
13
IV. At the trough – a good time to enter LED
stocks
We believe the hard landing seen in 4Q10 will prove to be a blessing for the LED
industry. Thanks to capex cuts and lower ASPs, we expect the earnings of key
LED names have bottomed in 4Q10 and show a strong recovery from 2Q11. We
forecast the combined operating profit of LED companies will snap back from an
operating loss of W29bn in 4Q10 to an operating profit of W116bn in 4Q11.
<Table 13> Quarterly earnings forecast (LED only) (W bn)
1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10F 1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F
Samsung LED
Sales 330 431 346 211 233 307 415 473
Operating profit 53 126 62 -15 -9 15 58 57
Margin 16.0% 29.3% 18.0% -7.0% -4.0% 5.0% 14.0% 12.0%
LG Innotek
Sales 155 285 254 211 197 252 340 355
OP 4 26 8 -42 -36 -20 14 11
Margin (%) 2.5% 9.0% 3.1% -20.0% -18.0% -8.0% 4.0% 3.0%
Seoul Semi
Sales 124 215 277 222 245 291 366 354
OP 13 29 43 23 30 39 51 39
Margin (%) 10.4% 13.5% 15.5% 10.3% 12.2% 13.4% 13.9% 11.0%
Lumens
Sales 51 66 73 60 73 101 123 106
OP 4 7 6 5 6 10 13 10
Margin (%) 8.1% 11.1% 8.5% 8.6% 8.6% 9.5% 10.3% 9.3%
Total sales 660 997 950 705 749 951 1244 1287
Total OP 74 188 119 -29 -9 44 135 116
Margin 11.2% 18.9% 12.6% -4.1% -1.1% 4.6% 10.9% 9.0%
Source: Korea Investment & Securities
Typically the share prices of component companies tend to move with quarterly
earnings, as seen in Figure 17 and 18.
At the trough
Share moves with earnings
Figure 17. Quarterly OP vs. SEMCO’s share price Figure 18. Quarterly OP vs. Innotek’s share price
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
2 0 0 4 - 0 1 - 0 2
2 0 0 4 - 0 7 - 0 2
2 0 0 5 - 0 1 - 0 2
2 0 0 5 - 0 7 - 0 2
2 0 0 6 - 0 1 - 0 2
2 0 0 6 - 0 7 - 0 2
2 0 0 7 - 0 1 - 0 2
2 0 0 7 - 0 7 - 0 2
2 0 0 8 - 0 1 - 0 2
2 0 0 8 - 0 7 - 0 2
2 0 0 9 - 0 1 - 0 2
2 0 0 9 - 0 7 - 0 2
2 0 1 0 - 0 1 - 0 2
2 0 1 0 - 0 7 - 0 2
(50.0)
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0SEMCO SEMCO OP
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
2 0 0 8 - 0 7 - 2 5
2 0 0 8 - 0 9 - 2 5
2 0 0 8 - 1 1 - 2 5
2 0 0 9 - 0 1 - 2 5
2 0 0 9 - 0 3 - 2 5
2 0 0 9 - 0 5 - 2 5
2 0 0 9 - 0 7 - 2 5
2 0 0 9 - 0 9 - 2 5
2 0 0 9 - 1 1 - 2 5
2 0 1 0 - 0 1 - 2 5
2 0 1 0 - 0 3 - 2 5
2 0 1 0 - 0 5 - 2 5
2 0 1 0 - 0 7 - 2 5
2 0 1 0 - 0 9 - 2 5
2 0 1 0 - 1 1 - 2 5
(40.0)
(20.0)
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0LGI LGI OP
Source: SEMCO, Korea Investment & Securities Source: LG Innotek, Korea Investment & Securities
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 15/37
Electronic Components
14
And we note that component company valuations also move with quarterly
earnings leveraging the upside.
Valuations also move with
earnings
Figure 19. SEMCO’s OP vs. P/B
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5OP(LHS) P/B(RHS)
(W bn)
Source: SEMCO, Korea Investment & Securities
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 16/37
Electronic Components
15
VII. Top picks – SEMCO, Lumens
We like companies with 1) better cost structures and 2) stronger earningsmomentum. From this context, we recommend investors to focus on companies in
the Samsung food chain, i.e. SEMCO and Lumens.
We also like Seoul Semiconductor, but we think quarterly earnings momentum is
weaker than the two above due to higher earnings base in 4Q10.
While we do think LG Innotek will be a beneficiary of LED turn around, we believe
it’s more of a trade considering that, 1) LED will turn to profit only in 3Q11, and 2)
LGE related risks are not resolved.
<Table 14> Quarterly earnings forecast (W bn)
1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10F 1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11FSEMCO
Sales 1,623.5 1,906.3 1,845.5 1,593.7 1,607.8 1,834.2 2,172.7 2,133.3
Operating profit 119.1 311.1 263.8 83.8 93.5 185.3 252.4 195.8
Margin 7.3% 16.3% 14.3% 5.3% 5.8% 10.1% 11.6% 9.2%
OP growth (QoQ) 161% -15% -68% 12% 98% 36% -22%
LG Innotek
Sales 774.9 1,028.7 1,164.0 1,135.9 1,056.0 1,195.3 1,397.9 1,332.4
OP 42.4 86.9 63.2 (36.0) (8.4) 21.8 63.8 51.8
Margin (%) 5.5% 8.4% 5.4% -3.2% -0.8% 1.8% 4.6% 3.9%
OP growth (QoQ) 105% -27% -157% -77% -361% 192% -19%
Seoul Semi
Sales 124.5 215.3 277.0 222.3 245.3 291.0 366.0 353.8
OP 13.3 29.1 42.8 24.5 30.4 42.0 58.1 50.4
Margin (%) 10.7% 13.5% 15.5% 11.0% 12.4% 14.4% 15.9% 14.2%
OP growth (QoQ) 118% 47% -43% 24% 38% 38% -13%
Lumens
Sales 50.5 65.9 72.8 60.3 72.8 101.1 123.4 105.7
OP 4.1 7.3 6.2 5.2 6.3 9.6 12.7 9.8
Margin (%) 8.1% 11.1% 8.5% 8.6% 8.6% 9.5% 10.3% 9.3%
OP growth (QoQ) 79% -16% -16% 21% 53% 33% -23%
Total Sales 2,573.4 3,216.2 3,359.3 3,012.2 2,981.9 3,421.7 4,059.9 3,925.3
Total OP 178.9 434.4 376.0 77.5 121.7 258.8 387.0 307.8
Margin (%) 7.0% 13.5% 11.2% 2.6% 4.1% 7.6% 9.5% 7.8%
OP growth (QoQ) 143% -13% -79% 57% 113% 50% -20%
Source: Company data, Korea Investment & Securities
<Table 15> Peer Valuation
Market cap P/E EV/EBITDA P/B ROE (%)Net debt
(USD mn)Net debt to
equity
Company Rating (USD mn) FY10F FY11F FY10F FY11F FY10F FY11F FY10F FY11F FY10F FY11F FY10F FY11F
Korea
SEMCO BUY 8,676 16.7 19.3 7.4 8.6 16.7 19.3 17.9 13.7 918 748 30% 21%
LG Innotek Hold 2,518 13.0 25.2 9.5 7.5 1.7 1.6 16.7 6.7 1,295 1,403 97% 98%Seoul Semi BUY 2,168 25.6 17.3 14.3 8.8 4.1 3.5 17.9 22.3 -76 -31 -15% -5%
Lumens BUY 316 29.1 11.4 10.1 7.4 3.0 2.5 11.3 24.6 37 37 37% 29%
Daeduck Elec. BUY 352 7.7 7.1 4.7 3.7 1.2 1.0 16.5 15.3 -81 -85 -27% -25%
Daeduck GDS NR 162 7.1 5.2 2.2 1.3 0.6 0.6 8.6 10.7 -100 -125 -35% -40%
Japan
Murata NR 16,865 19.6 16.6 8.1 7.7 1.5 1.5 7.9 8.6 -1,921 -2,095 -18% -19%
Taiyo Yuden NR 1,849 15.0 11.9 4.1 3.8 1.0 0.9 7.0 7.8 84 -2 5% 0%
TDK NR 8,781 13.4 11.7 5.0 4.7 1.2 1.1 9.0 9.7 549 154 7% 2%
Toyoda Gosei NR 3,057 12.2 10.7 3.1 2.9 1.0 1.0 8.8 9.2 -278 -377 -9% -12%
Stanley Elec. NR 3,393 11.6 10.5 4.2 3.9 1.2 1.1 10.4 10.5 -822 -976 -29% -32%US
Cree NR 5,726 25.4 21.7 13.3 11.0 2.4 2.2 9.6 10.6 -1,061 -1,190 -48% -49%Taiwan
Yageo NR 1,148 8.4 7.6 5.3 5.1 1.1 1.0 12.8 12.7 38 -62 NA NA
Lite-On Tech. NR 3,174 10.3 9.5 10.6 9.0 1.3 1.3 13.9 14.3 -364 -321 -18% -15%
Everlight Elec. NR 1,258 14.0 13.3 10.0 9.1 2.5 2.2 18.4 18.8 40 61 NA NA
Epistar NR 3,107 15.4 14.3 10.0 8.7 2.2 2.0 15.0 14.2 -366 -312 -24% -19%
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, Korea Investment & Securities* Note: Japanese makers FY end is March. Cree FY end is June
Top picks – SEMCO,
Lumens
Maintain Hold on LG
Innotek
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 17/37
This page is left blank intentionally
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 18/37
SEMCO (009150) ................................................................................................................................................................................... 18
LG Innotek (011070) ......................................................................................................................................................................... 21
Lumens (038060) .................................................................................................................................................................................. 24
Seoul Semiconductor (046890) ..................................................................................................................................... 29
Company
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 19/37
Electronic Components
18
SEMCO (009150) BUY (Maintain), TP: W164,000 (Up)
Bottoming out
Weaker-than-expected 4Q10, but we are turning more optimistic
SEMCO reported disappointing 4Q10 results with operating profit missing our
estimate by 59%. The key culprit was LEDs. We believe SEMCO’s LED operating
profit margin came in at –7% compared to our 12% estimate due to low utilization.
However, despite disappointing earnings, we are now turning more bullish on the
LED industry and SEMCO.
Cost competitiveness will lead to faster earnings recovery
We believe the LED industry is bottoming out as capex cuts and strong demand
will lead to utilization hikes. And given SEMCO’s cost competitiveness in LED, we
think SEMCO’s turnaround will arrive faster than Innotek’s. We now see SEMCO
posting LED profits by 2Q11, followed by a strong turnaround in 2H11
Multiple engines to mitigate the LED downside
We expect SEMCO to post an operating loss in LEDs during 1Q11 as utilization
hikes (12% pts) will not be sufficient to fully mitigate the anticipated 15% QoQ ASP
cut. We note, however, that more than half (52%) of SEMCO’s non-LED operating
profits are generated from non-captive customers, and we expect them to post
healthy results during 2011. Thus, we believe earnings contribution from other
divisions can minimize the negative impact from LEDs.
Revising down earnings
We are revising down our 2011 revenue and operating profit estimates by 10% and
16%, respectively. Again, LED is the key culprit, as it represents 64.1% and 81.1%
out of today’s revenue and operating profit cut. We have revised down our 2011
LED shipment estimates by 4.7%, reflecting 1) the greater number of LED TV
shipments but 2) lower LED area/panel due to the two-bar transition. We have
lowered our ASP assumptions by 22.6%, now assuming a 44% YoY ASP cut.
Revising up price target – valuation to expand when earnings recover
We are raising our price target by 22% to W164,000 based on 3.0x FY11 P/B (from
2.5x). Historically, SEMCO’s valuation moved in line with operating profit,
suggesting that the current 2.7x FY11 P/B can serve as a bottom as we expect
earnings to recover from 1Q10. We note, SEMCO peaked at 3.1x P/B in 2009 with
11.6% ROE and 3.7x P/B in 2010 with 16.8% ROE. Our target price is based on
3.0x P/B with 12.4% ROE in 2011. We are basically applying peak multiples for
SEMCO as we believe earnings have bottomed in 4Q11 and will show a strong
turnaround, especially in 2H11.
January 28, 2011 / W130,500 / Mkt cap: USD8,685mn, KRW9,710bn
Yr to Sales OP EBT NP EPS % chg. EBITDA P/E EV/EBITDA P/B ROE
Dec (W bn) (W bn) (W bn) (W bn) (won) (YoY) (W bn) (x) (x) (x) (%)
2008A 4,284 137 84 48 631 (56.8) 478 52.7 7.0 1.2 2.4
2009A 5,551 465 432 278 3,697 485.5 842 29.1 10.6 2.9 11.6
2010F 6,969 778 831 555 7,417 100.6 1,458 16.7 7.4 2.6 16.82011F 7,740 727 674 503 6,726 (9.3) 1,279 19.4 8.7 2.4 12.4
2012F 8,312 766 724 544 7,269 8.1 1,359 18.0 8.0 2.1 11.8
YS Chang
822-3276-4589
Daniel Lee
822-3276-6279
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 20/37
Electronic Components
19
<Table 16> Earnings revision (W bn)
1Q11F 2011F
Previous Revised Change (%) Previous Revised Change (%)
Total revenue 1,802 1,608 -11% 8,629 7,740 -10%
Non-LED 1,425 1,375 -4% 6,608 6,312 -4%
ACI total revenue 373 368 -2% 1,730 1,663 -4%
LCR total revenue 425 417 -2% 1,982 1,871 -6%
OMS total without LED 213 176 -18% 984 865 -12%
CDS total revenue 414 414 0% 1,913 1,913 0%
LED 377 233 -38% 2,022 1,428 -29%
Operating profit 152 93 -38% 870 727 -16%
Non-LED 121 103 -15% 633 606 -4%
LED 30 -9 -131% 236 121 -49%
Operating profit margin 8.4% 5.8% 10.1% 9.4%
Non-LED 8.5% 7.5% 9.6% 9.6%
LED 8.0% -4.0% 11.7% 8.5%
EBT 159 80 -50% 901 674 -25%
Tax 35 14 -59% 201 122 -39%
Net profit 124 66 -47% 700 552 -21%
Minority interest 12 -4 -131% 95 48 -49%
Net profit ex minority 112 69 -38% 605 503 -17%
Source: SEMCO, Korea Investment & Securities
<Table 17> Quarterly earnings forecast (W bn)
(W bn) 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10P 2010F 1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F 2011F 2012F
Total 1,623 1,906 1,846 1,593 6,969 1,608 1,834 2,173 2,133 7,740 8,312
Non-LED 1,294 1,475 1,499 1,383 5,651 1,375 1,527 1,758 1,661 6,312 6,770
ACI total revenue 335 366 380 362 1,443 368 404 454 445 1,663 1,844
LCR total revenue 357 433 448 398 1,637 417 469 529 456 1,871 1,941OMS total without LED 208 237 228 182 855 176 218 245 226 865 882
CDS total revenue 393 439 443 441 1,716 414 436 530 533 1,913 2,104
LED 330 431 346 211 1,318 233 307 415 473 1,428 1,542
Operating profit 119 311.1 263.8 84 778 93 185 252 196 727 766
Non-LED 66 185 202 99 551 103 170 194 139 606 643
LED 53 126 62 -15 227 -9 15 58 57 121 123
Operating profit margin 7.3% 16.3% 14.3% 5.3% 11.2% 5.8% 10.1% 11.6% 9.2% 9.4% 9.2%
Non-LED 5.1% 12.5% 13.4% 7.1% 9.8% 7.5% 11.1% 11.1% 8.4% 9.6% 9.5%
LED 16.0% 29.3% 18.0% -7.0% 17.2% -4.0% 5.0% 14.0% 12.0% 8.5% 8.0%
EBT 196 303 247 85 831 80 172 239 182 674 724
Tax 44 72 48 -13 150 14 31 43 33 122 131
Net profit 152 231 199 98 680 66 141 196 150 552 593
Minority interest 29 50 40 6 125 -4 6 23 23 48 49Net profit ex minority 123 180 159 92 555 69 135 173 127 503 544
Source: SEMCO, Korea Investment & Securities
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 21/37
Electronic Components
20
Balance Sheet
Fiscal year ending Dec. (W bn) 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
Current assets 1,334 2,393 2,423 2,699 2,970
Cash & cash equivalent 330 1,084 677 763 892
Accounts receivable 374 646 811 900 967
Inventory 487 485 716 795 854
Fixed assets 2,503 3,170 4,435 4,675 4,907
Investments 522 966 1,238 1,362 1,498
Tangible assets 1,821 2,088 3,096 3,212 3,307
Intangible assets 13 23 87 87 87
Total assets 3,837 5,563 6,836 7,374 7,877
Current liabilities 1,168 1,968 2,158 2,164 2,224
Accounts payable 176 322 789 897 966
Short-term borrowing 531 640 1,101 1,000 1,000
Current portion of LT debt 150 430 0 0 0
Long-term debt 665 800 875 875 744
Debentures 0 299 0 0 0
Long-term borrowings 500 309 608 608 487
Total liabilit ies 1,833 2,768 3,033 3,039 2,968
Paid-in capital 388 388 388 388 388
Capital surplus 1,077 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132
Capital adjustments (5) (10) 440 440 440
Retained earnings 356 615 1,111 1,595 2,119
Shareholders' equity 2,004 2,795 3,416 3,949 4,522
Income Statement
Fiscal year ending Dec. (W bn) 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
Sales 4,284 5,551 6,969 7,740 8,312
Gross profit 731 1,176 1,754 1,811 1,930
SG&A expense 594 711 976 1,084 1,164
Operating profit 137 465 778 727 766
Non-op. profit 278 255 313 212 208
Interest income 11 17 21 22 25
FX gains 215 161 147 131 124
Equity gains 1 8 0 0 0
Non-op. expense 331 288 260 265 250
Interest expense 56 67 68 72 67
FX losses 223 164 180 193 183
Equity losses 3 1 0 0 0
Earnings before tax 84 432 831 674 724
Income taxes 30 113 150 122 131
Profit from discontinued 0 0 0 0 0
Net profit 48 278 555 503 544
EBITDA 478 842 1,458 1,279 1,359
Key Financial Data
Fiscal year ending Dec. 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
per share data (won)
EPS 631 3,697 7,417 6,726 7,269
BPS 26,832 37,413 47,884 54,740 62,132
DPS 250 750 750 750 750
SPS 55,743 72,080 90,090 99,951 107,587
Growth (%)
Sales growth 21.8 29.5 25.6 11.1 7.4
OP growth (18.6) 239.5 67.3 (6.5) 5.4
NP growth (57.4) 479.7 99.2 (9.3) 8.1
EPS growth (56.8) 485.5 100.6 (9.3) 8.1
EBITDA growth (1.4) 76.3 73.1 (12.3) 6.3
Profitability (%)
OP margin 3.2 8.4 11.2 9.4 9.2
NP margin 1.1 5.0 8.0 6.5 6.5
EBITDA margin 11.2 15.2 20.9 16.5 16.4
ROA 1.4 6.8 11.0 7.8 7.8
ROE 2.4 11.6 16.8 12.4 11.8
Dividend yield 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6
Stability
Net debt (W bn) 829 572 1,010 823 572
Int. coverage (x) 2.4 7.0 11.4 10.0 11.5
D/E ratio (%) 58.9 60.0 50.0 40.7 32.9
Valuation (x)
PER 52.7 29.1 16.7 19.4 18.0
PBR 1.2 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.1
PSR 0.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2
EV/EBITDA 7.0 10.6 7.4 8.7 8.0
Cash Flow
Fiscal year ending Dec. (W bn) 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
C/F from operating 437 648 823 982 1,073
Net profits 48 278 555 503 544
Depreciation 336 371 680 552 593
Amortization 5 6 0 0 0
Net incr. in W/C (109) (143) (538) (122) (114)
Others 157 136 125 48 49
C/F from investing (404) (721) (197) 288 335
Capex (423) (757) 839 1,012 1,172
Decr. in fixed assets 37 48 0 0 0
Net incr. in current assets (1) 5 0 0 0
Incr. in investment (8) 4 (750) (600) (700)
Others (10) (21) (286) (124) (136)
C/F from financing 26 684 (968) (789) (922)
Incr. in equity 1 38 0 0 0
Incr. in debts 70 521 0 0 0
Dividends (49) (24) (999) (688) (800)
Others 5 149 32 (101) (122)
Increase in cash 82 1,296 (587) 242 244
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 22/37
Electronic Components
21
LG Innotek (011070) Hold (Maintain), TP: W148,000 (Up)
An LGE proxy
4Q10 weaker than expected
Innotek reported disappointing 4Q10 results, posting a W360bn operating loss.
The key culprit was LEDs. We believe Innotek’s LED operating profit margins
came in at –20% compared to our -3% estimates due to low utilization. Recent
developments do suggest that the LED sector is bottoming out; however, we
maintain our cautious stance on Innotek.
LED to turn profitable only in 3Q11
We do think Innotek’s LED margins will improve after bottoming out in 4Q10-1Q11.However, we expect the company to reach the breakeven point only in 3Q10
considering 1) weaker cost structure and 2) low base, i.e. -20% operating profit
margin in 4Q10. As a result, we are somewhat concerned that LED will post losses
for the full year.
And exposure to LG Electronics is another risk
We continue to believe that high exposure to captive customers, i.e. LG
Electronics (LGE) and LG Display, is another key risk factor for Innotek in 2011.
For example, PCB, which represented 16.3% of total Innotek revenues in 2010, is
dependent on LGE’s handsets. Thus, as long as LGE continues to post lackluster
results, which we believe as likely, Innotek’s earnings and share price will remain
suppressed, in our view.
Revising down earnings
We are revising down our 2011 revenue and operating profit estimates by 1.5%
and 45.6%, respectively. We have revised up our Mobile (SnO) revenue estimates
by 20.3% thanks to stronger-than-expected camera module sales to overseas
customers. However, we have slashed revenue estimates for LED and PCB by
11.7% and 13.0%, respectively. As for operating profit, we now assume LED to be
in operating losses from a full-year perspective.
Maintain Hold
As we believe that the LED industry is bottoming out and expectations are building
on LGE’s recovery, we do think Innotek’s share price can show a short-term
bounce. But we still maintain our cautious stance on the stock as LGE related
concerns have yet to be resolved, in our view. We raised our price target to
W148,000 based on 1.9x FY10 P/B, We have applied a 10% discount to the mid
cycle 2.0x P/B multiple due to lower ROE aspects this year (6.5%) compared to
the previous mid cycle (8.1%).
January 28, 2011 / W138,500 / Mkt cap: USD2,511mn, KRW2,808bn
Yr to Sales OP EBT NP EPS % chg. EBITDA P/E EV/EBITDA P/B ROE
Dec (W bn) (W bn) (W bn) (W bn) (won) (YoY) (W bn) (x) (x) (x) (%)
2008A 1,922 76 52 52 4,906 NM 179 7.4 2.9 0.8 NM
2009A 2,971 114 66 57 3,759 (23.4) 274 25.5 8.6 1.6 8.1
2010F 4,103 157 109 196 10,278 173.4 432 13.0 9.5 1.7 16.6
2011F 4,982 129 115 102 5,086 (50.5) 551 27.2 7.9 1.8 6.52012F 5,567 286 277 249 12,396 143.7 749 11.2 5.5 1.5 14.7
YS Chang
822-3276-4589
Daniel Lee
822-3276-6279 [email protected]
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 23/37
Electronic Components
22
<Table 18> Earnings revision (W bn)
1Q11F 2011F
Previous Revised Change (%) Previous Revised Change (%)
Revenue 1,080 1,056 -2.2% 5,056 4,982 -1.5%
Non-LED 844 879 4.1% 3,784 3,918 3.6%
D/N (Display & Network) 252 250 -1.0% 1,106 1,110 0.4%
PCB 163 142 -13.0% 736 640 -13.0%
S/D (Semiconductor & Display) 109 109 0.0% 508 511 0.6%
Mobile 244 296 21.3% 1,057 1,271 20.3%
Motor / Automobile 76 82 8.5% 377 386 2.4%
LED 256 197 -22.9% 1,352 1,143 -15.4%
Operating profit 35 (8) -124.0% 237 129 -45.6%
Non-LED 45 27 -39.8% 212 160 -24.4%
LED (10) (36) 247.1% 25 (31) -226.2%
Operating profit margin 3.2% -0.8% 4.7% 2.6%
Non-LED 5.3% 3.1% 5.6% 4.1%
LED -4.0% -18.0% 1.8% -2.7%
EBT 20 (12) -158.8% 179 115 -35.9%
Tax 4 0 -100.0% 36 13 -64.6%
Net profit 16 (12) -173.4% 144 102 -28.7%
Source: LG Innotek, Korea Investment & Securities
<Table 19> Quarterly earnings forecast (W bn)
1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10P 2010P 1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F 2011F 2012F
Revenue 775 1,029 1,164 1,136 4,103 1,056 1,195 1,398 1,332 4,982 5,567
Adjustment factor (20) (24) (26) (19) (89) (20) (20) (20) (20) (80) (80)
Non-LED 640 768 936 944 3,287 879 964 1,078 998 3,918 4,275
D/N (Display & Network) 236 277 308 309 1,130 250 282 303 275 1,110 1,110
PCB 169 184 179 150 682 142 154 180 165 640 640S/D (Semiconductor & Display) 118 132 125 115 491 109 126 134 143 511 552
Mobile 55 106 253 300 713 296 310 347 317 1,271 1,408
Motor / Automobile 63 69 62 78 271 82 92 114 98 386 565
LED 155 285 254 211 905 197 252 340 355 1,143 1,372
Operating profit 42 87 63 (36) 157 (8) 22 64 52 129 286
Non-LED 39 52 55 18 163 27 42 50 41 160 245
LED 4 26 8 (42) (5) (36) (20) 14 11 (31) 41
Operating profit margin 5.5% 8.4% 5.4% -3.2% 3.8% -0.8% 1.8% 4.6% 3.9% 2.6% 5.1%
Non-LED 6.0% 6.8% 5.9% 1.9% 5.0% 3.1% 4.4% 4.7% 4.1% 4.1% 5.7%
LED 2.5% 9.0% 3.1% -20.0% -0.5% -18.0% -8.0% 4.0% 3.0% -2.7% 3.0%
EBT 41 63 60 (55) 109 (12) 18 60 49 115 277
Tax (0) 25 (7) (35) (18) 0 2 6 5 13 28
Net profit 42 38 67 (20) 126 (12) 16 54 44 102 249Minority interest (0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Net profit ex minority 47 101 67 (20) 196 (12) 16 54 44 102 249
Source: LG Innotek, Korea Investment & Securities
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 24/37
Electronic Components
23
Balance Sheet
Fiscal year ending Dec. (W bn) 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
Current assets 596 1,263 1,489 1,914 2,206
Cash & cash equivalent 162 305 224 379 519
Accounts receivable 224 634 782 949 1,052
Inventory 137 246 365 450 488
Fixed assets 488 1,541 2,637 2,918 2,977
Investments 7 15 16 20 22
Tangible assets 415 1,394 2,338 2,627 2,666
Intangible assets 32 49 121 121 121
Total assets 1,084 2,804 4,125 4,831 5,183
Current liabilities 482 1,345 1,214 1,784 1,879
Accounts payable 167 409 460 587 656
Short-term borrowing 183 308 126 400 350
Current portion of LT debt 1 162 142 142 142
Long-term debt 114 584 1,442 1,476 1,482
Debentures 0 321 859 859 859
Long-term borrowings 85 203 562 562 562
Total liabilit ies 596 1,929 2,656 3,259 3,361
Paid-in capital 60 86 101 101 101
Capital surplus 175 505 846 846 846
Capital adjustments 0 (0) (0) (0) (0)
Retained earnings 207 260 533 635 885
Shareholders' equity 510 875 1,470 1,572 1,821
Income Statement
Fiscal year ending Dec. (W bn) 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
Sales 1,922 2,971 4,103 4,982 5,567
Gross profit 221 368 515 577 787
SG&A expense 144 254 362 448 501
Operating profit 76 114 157 129 286
Non-op. profit 169 119 35 64 68
Interest income 4 8 7 10 14
FX gains 158 101 20 30 30
Equity gains 0 0 0 0 0
Non-op. expense 193 167 83 79 77
Interest expense 12 26 68 79 77
FX losses 163 100 15 16 16
Equity losses 0 0 0 0 0
Earnings before tax 52 66 109 115 277
Income taxes (0) 15 (18) 13 28
Profit from discontinued 0 0 0 0 0
Net profit 52 57 196 102 249
EBITDA 179 274 432 551 749
Key Financial Data
Fiscal year ending Dec. 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
per share data (won)
EPS 4,906 3,759 10,278 5,086 12,396
BPS 48,389 59,467 77,091 78,119 90,515
DPS 350 350 350 350 350
SPS 189,431 203,610 215,233 247,544 276,611
Growth (%)
Sales growth NM 54.6 38.1 21.4 11.7
OP growth NM 49.3 37.7 (17.5) 121.4
NP growth NM 9.7 245.2 (47.8) 143.7
EPS growth NM (23.4) 173.4 (50.5) 143.7
EBITDA growth NM 53.0 57.4 27.7 35.8
Profitability (%)
OP margin 4.0 3.8 3.8 2.6 5.1
NP margin 2.7 1.9 4.8 2.1 4.5
EBITDA margin 9.3 9.2 10.5 11.1 13.5
ROA NM 2.6 3.6 2.3 5.0
ROE NM 8.1 16.6 6.5 14.7
Dividend yield 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3
Stability
Net debt (W bn) 79 675 1,425 1,543 1,353
Int. coverage (x) 6.1 4.4 2.3 1.6 3.7
D/E ratio (%) 52.7 113.6 114.9 124.8 105.0
Valuation (x)
PER 7.4 25.5 13.0 27.2 11.2
PBR 0.8 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.5
PSR 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5
EV/EBITDA 2.9 8.6 9.5 7.9 5.5
Cash Flow
Fiscal year ending Dec. (W bn) 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
C/F from operating 105 132 (102) 579 659
Net profits 52 57 196 102 249
Depreciation 100 161 275 422 463
Amortization 4 0 0 0 0
Net incr. in W/C (78) (136) (223) 26 (63)
Others 28 51 (350) 28 9
C/F from investing (145) (290) (1,040) (707) (480)
Capex (113) (314) (1,423) (700) (500)
Decr. in fixed assets 6 0 0 0 0
Net incr. in current assets (27) 0 0 0 0
Incr. in investment (5) 0 0 0 0
Others (6) 24 383 (7) 20
C/F from financing 179 235 1,060 284 (40)
Incr. in equity 136 0 355 0 0
Incr. in debts 46 239 694 274 (50)
Dividends (3) 4 0 0 0
Others 0 (9) 10 10 10
Increase in cash 149 142 (81) 156 140
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 25/37
Electronic Components
24
Lumens (038060) BUY (Upgrade), TP: W15,000 (Up)
Accumulate on early positive signal
Upgrade to BUY on positive LED TV outlook
We upgrade Lumens to BUY and raise our 12-month target price to W15,000 (from
W10,000) based on the mid-cycle multiple of 4.5x 2011F PBR (from previous 9.5x
EV/EBITDA which is a trough multiple). Our rationale for the shift in valuation
methodology: 1) uniformity in comparison with main LED peers (SEMCO, LGI and
SSC), 2) positive earnings growth outlook from 1Q11, 3) pure LED play that is
most favorable to LED TV up-cycle. Our W15,000 target price implies 2011F
multiples of 19.6x PER, 12.1x EV/EBITDA and 25% ROE.
We prefer pure plays during TV up-cycle
With weaker-than-normal seasonal demand and ASP cuts in 4Q10 now behind us,
we expect TV market to show a gradual recovery from 1Q11 on the following
reasons: 1) return of inventory restocking demand in 2Q11 (according to our
display sector analyst in “LG Display 4Q10 review: Time to buy on reduced
inventory ”), 2) LED penetration in LCD TV sets may accelerate faster than
expected as panel makers seek to improve their product mix to sustain profitability.
As a pure TV play (we expect TV LED to account for 85% of 2011F revenue), we
believe Lumens is best positioned among major LED names to benefit the most
from Samsung’s aggressive LED TV strategy. Factoring in weaker 2H10 earnings
and positive 2011 outlook, we adjust 2010F and 2011F EPS by -32% and +5%,
respectively.
4Q10 earnings could be weaker, but we are passing the bottom
We expect Lumens to report 4Q10 sales of W60.3bn and operating profit of
W5.2bn, down 17% and 16% QoQ respectively, mainly due to 1) weaker-than-
expected set demand and 2) ASP cuts from LCD price decline. Despite weaker
revenue however, our operating margin forecast of 8.6% appears solid compared
to SEMCO and LG Innotek’s LED profitability in 4Q10. Our channel checks also
indicate that the company’s utilization is running at near full capacity since
recovering in early-mid 4Q10, leading us to believe that we are now passing the
earnings bottom and headed towards recovery phase in 1H11. We expect
Samsung, Lumens’ largest customer, to target aggressive LED TV shipments for
2011. We believe Lumens’ plan to add new capacity (60mn unit per month) on its
existing lines (220mn units per month) by end-1Q11 confirms Samsung’s
aggressiveness. Also, the company remains comfortable with its target of 20%+
market share within Samsung, despite mounting competition from other LED
suppliers. Factoring in the aforementioned points, we revise up our 2011F revenue
and operating profit forecast by 7% and 22%, respectively versus our previous
forecast.
January 27, 2011 / W8,760 / Mkt cap: USD316mn, KRW339bn
Yr to Sales OP EBT NP EPS % chg. EBITDA P/E EV/EBITDA P/B ROE
Dec (W bn) (W bn) (W bn) (W bn) (won) (YoY) (W bn) (x) (x) (x) (%)
2008A 75 3 (3) (2) (67) (120.9) 8 NM 9.5 2.3 (9.3)
2009A 133 6 4 5 160 NM 15 55.8 25.9 4.3 9.4
2010F 250 23 16 11 281 75.9 36 29.1 10.1 3.0 11.32011F 403 38 39 31 767 172.5 53 11.4 7.4 2.5 24.6
2012F 461 45 47 37 924 20.5 63 9.5 5.9 2.0 23.4
Youngwoo Chung
822-3276-6186 [email protected]
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 26/37
Electronic Components
25
Lumens is our most preferred LED pure playWe believe Lumens is on track for a solid earnings recovery in 1Q11. Lumensshares have underperformed both Korean LED sector and Kospi for the past sixmonths. Hence, we recommend investors to accumulate shares on an earlypositive signal (e.g. full utilization).
<Table 20> Earnings revisions (W bn)
New Old Change
4Q10F 2010F 2011F 4Q10F 2010F 2011F 4Q10F 2010F 2011F
Sales 60.3 249.6 403.0 80.0 269.5 378.2 -25% -7% 7%
LCD 52.5 210.2 343.4 68.9 226.7 312.6 -24% -7% 10%
Lighting 3.9 15.0 29.0 3.9 15.0 29.0 0% 0% 0%
Mobile 3.0 21.1 25.0 6.2 24.8 25.0 -52% -15% 0%
Auto 1.0 2.0 5.5 1.0 2.0 11.5 0% 0% -52%
Operating profit 5.2 22.8 38.4 6.8 24.8 31.5 -24% -8% 22%
Operating margin 8.6% 9.1% 9.5% 8.5% 9.2% 8.3%
EBT 2.4 15.6 39.4 7.0 22.0 36.7 -66% -29% 8%Net profit 1.9 11.2 30.8 5.5 16.5 28.6 -66% -32% 8%
Source: Korea Investment & Securities
<Table 21> Quarterly earnings forecasts (W bn)
2009 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10F 2010F 1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F 2011F
Sales 133.0 50.5 65.9 72.8 60.3 249.6 72.8 101.1 123.4 105.7 403.0
TV BLU 84.3 38.0 54.6 60.7 51.6 204.9 61.9 85.4 101.4 86.7 335.3
Notebook BLU 1.6 2.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 5.3 1.0 1.8 2.8 2.5 8.1
General lighting 13.0 2.1 4.2 4.9 3.9 15.0 4.4 6.3 9.5 8.9 29.0
Handset 32.0 7.1 6.0 5.0 3.0 21.1 4.5 6.3 7.6 6.6 25.0
Others 2.1 0.7 0.3 1.3 1.0 3.2 1.0 1.5 2.0 1.0 5.5
OP 5.7 4.1 7.3 6.2 5.2 22.8 6.3 9.6 12.7 9.8 38.4
OP margin 4.3% 8.1% 11.1% 8.5% 8.6% 9.1% 8.6% 9.5% 10.3% 9.3% 9.5%
EBT 4.5 3.4 5.2 4.6 2.4 15.6 6.3 9.8 13.2 10.1 39.4
Pretax margin 3.4% 6.8% 7.9% 6.3% 4.0% 6.3% 8.7% 9.7% 10.7% 9.5% 9.8%
Net profit 5.2 2.7 3.3 3.2 1.9 11.2 4.9 7.7 10.3 7.9 30.8
Net margin 3.9% 5.4% 5.1% 4.5% 3.1% 4.5% 6.8% 7.6% 8.3% 7.4% 7.6%
Source: Company data, Korea Investment & Securities
[Figure 20] Worldwide LCD TV shipments & LED penetration
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10F 4Q10F 1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F
('000)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%Global LED TV
Global LCD TV (non-LED display)
LED penetration (RHS)
Source: Display Search, Korea Investment & Securities
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 27/37
Electronic Components
26
[Figure 21] Samsung LCD TV shipments & LED penetration forecast
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10F 4Q10F 1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F
('000)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%LED TV
LCD TV (non-LED display )
LED penetration (RHS)
Source: Display Search, Korea Investment & Securities
[Figure 22] Lumens 2011F revenue breakdown by application
LCD
86%
Auto
1%
Others
0%Mobile
6%Lighting
7%
Source: Korea Investment & Securities
[Figure 23] Korea LED share price performance vs. KOSPI
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
J u l - 1 0
A u g - 1 0
A u g - 1 0
S e p - 1 0
S e p - 1 0
O c t - 1 0
O c t - 1 0
O c t - 1 0
N o v - 1 0
N o v - 1 0
D e c - 1 0
D e c - 1 0
J a n - 1 1
J a n - 1 1
SEMCO LGI SSC Lumens KOSPI
Source: Datastream
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 28/37
Electronic Components
27
[Figure 24] Lumens share price vs. quarterly operating profit
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
D e c - 0 6
M a r - 0 7
J u n - 0 7
S e p - 0 7
D e c - 0 7
M a r - 0 8
J u n - 0 8
S e p - 0 8
D e c - 0 8
M a r - 0 9
J u n - 0 9
S e p - 0 9
D e c - 0 9
M a r - 1 0
J u n - 1 0
S e p - 1 0
D e c - 1 0
M a r - 1 1
J u n - 1 1
(KRW)
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12(W bn)
Adj. share priceQuarterly operating profit
Source: Lumens, Datastream, Korea Investment & Securities
[Figure 25] Lumens PB vs. share price
2.0x
3.0x
4.0x
5.0x
6.0x
7.0x
D e c - 0 8
F e b - 0 9
A p r - 0 9
J u n - 0 9
A u g - 0 9
O c t - 0 9
D e c - 0 9
F e b - 1 0
A p r - 1 0
J u n - 1 0
A u g - 1 0
O c t - 1 0
D e c - 1 0
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000P/B
Share price (RHS)
Source: Lumens, Datastream, Korea Investment & Securities
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 29/37
Electronic Components
28
Balance Sheet
Fiscal year ending Dec. (W bn) 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
Current assets 33 99 150 229 283
Cash & cash equivalent 6 12 20 20 43
Accounts receivable 10 37 50 81 92
Inventory 11 34 60 97 111
Fixed assets 28 83 86 86 86
Investments 3 24 28 28 29
Tangible assets 13 51 52 52 53
Intangible assets 8 5 7 5 4
Total assets 62 182 236 315 368
Current liabilities 27 64 88 136 152
Accounts payable 8 38 50 89 101
Short-term borrowing 16 17 22 22 22
Current portion of LT debt 0 1 1 1 1
Long-term debt 12 31 38 38 38
Debentures 10 10 10 10 10
Long-term borrowings 1 20 28 28 28
Total liabilit ies 39 94 126 174 190
Paid-in capital 15 20 20 20 20
Capital surplus 22 65 69 69 69
Capital adjustments (19) (7) 0 0 0
Retained earnings 5 10 21 52 89
Shareholders' equity 23 88 110 141 178
Income Statement
Fiscal year ending Dec. (W bn) 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
Sales 75 133 250 403 461
Gross profit 13 20 48 84 98
SG&A expense 10 14 25 46 53
Operating profit 3 6 23 38 45
Non-op. profit 5 7 13 13 14
Interest income 0 0 1 1 1
FX gains 3 4 7 7 7
Equity gains 0 0 1 0 1
Non-op. expense 10 8 20 12 12
Interest expense 1 2 3 4 4
FX losses 8 4 8 8 8
Equity losses 0 0 5 0 0
Earnings before tax (3) 4 16 39 47
Income taxes (1) (1) 4 9 9
Profit from discontinued 0 0 0 0 0
Net profit (2) 5 11 31 37
EBITDA 8 15 36 53 63
Key Financial Data
Fiscal year ending Dec. 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
per share data (won)
EPS (67) 160 281 767 924
BPS 1,138 2,090 2,754 3,486 4,410
DPS 0 0 0 0 0
SPS 2,870 4,092 6,255 10,032 11,465
Growth (%)
Sales growth 507.3 77.4 87.6 61.5 14.3
OP growth 8.4 86.6 297.8 68.6 16.1
NP growth (168.2) NM 115.4 174.7 21.2
EPS growth (120.9) NM 75.9 172.5 20.5
EBITDA growth 140.2 86.5 143.8 46.5 17.9
Profitability (%)
OP margin 4.1 4.3 9.1 9.5 9.7
NP margin (2.5) 3.9 4.5 7.6 8.1
EBITDA margin 10.7 11.2 14.6 13.2 13.7
ROA (4.4) 4.3 5.4 11.2 10.9
ROE (9.3) 9.4 11.3 24.6 23.4
Dividend yield 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Stability
Net debt (W bn) 18 31 40 41 17
Int. coverage (x) 2.6 2.6 7.0 10.6 12.3
D/E ratio (%) 121.1 54.5 55.3 43.2 34.1
Valuation (x)
PER NM 55.8 29.1 11.4 9.5
PBR 2.3 4.3 3.0 2.5 2.0
PSR 0.9 2.2 1.3 0.9 0.8
EV/EBITDA 9.5 25.9 10.1 7.4 5.9
Cash Flow
Fiscal year ending Dec. (W bn) 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
C/F from operating (6) (9) (1) 18 44
Net profits (2) 5 11 31 37
Depreciation 3 7 12 15 18
Amortization 2 2 1 0 0
Net incr. in W/C (13) (26) (27) (29) (13)
Others 4 3 1 1 1
C/F from investing (4) (63) (17) (16) (20)
Capex (7) (46) (13) (16) (19)
Decr. in fixed assets 0 2 0 0 0
Net incr. in current assets 5 (1) 0 0 0
Incr. in investment (2) (20) (4) (0) (1)
Others 0 3 (0) 0 (0)
C/F from financing 8 79 23 (2) (0)
Incr. in equity 0 48 4 0 0
Incr. in debts 8 22 13 0 0
Dividends 0 0 0 0 0
Others (0) 9 6 (2) (0)
Increase in cash (2) 6 4 (0) 24
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 30/37
Electronic Components
29
Seoul Semiconductor (046890) BUY (Maintain), TP: W56,000 (Maintain)
The best all-around LED play
Diversification a key to sustaining profitability
We prefer Seoul Semiconductor (Seoul Semi) as the most stable pure play in the
Korea LED universe. We believe Seoul Semi’s 1) diversified customer base, 2)
diversified product mix, and 3) ongoing improvement of vertical integration may
help sustain long-term cost leadership and profitability. In 2011 we expect another
solid year for Seoul Semi on 1) LED TV market recovery from 2H10 weakness, 2)
stable general lighting revenue growth, and 3) strong mobile (e.g. smart-phone,
media tablet) demand, which could have a positive impact on the existing handset
and notebook LED business.
Earnings headed toward sequential recovery
We expect 1Q11 earnings to rebound QoQ with sales of W245.3bn (up 10% QoQ)
and operating profit of W30.4bn (up 24% QoQ). We believe the earnings recovery
will be driven by 1) higher utilization from new TV model launches, 2) solid revenue
growth from non-TV products (e.g. mobile and lighting LEDs), and 3) the adoption
of IFRS accounting, which may reduce Seoul Opto’s depreciation costs and
improve profitability. For 2011, we forecast sales of W1.3trn and operating profit of
W180.8bn, on the back of 1) aggressive LED adoption by TV panel makers, and 2)
solid general lighting revenue growth. We believe general lighting may provide
further revenue upside if the company secures meaningful orders from new captive
customers (POSCO LED and Hyundai LED).
Remain long-term positive on Seoul Semi
We remain long-term positive on Seoul Semi for following reasons: 1) diversified
product mix, 2) diversified customer base, and 3) improving vertical integration. We
maintain BUY and our 12-month target price of W56,000 applying a mid cycle
multiple of 4.8x 2011F PBR.
January 27, 2011 / W41,450 / Mkt cap: USD2,169mn, KRW2,251bn
Yr to Sales OP EBT NP EPS % chg. EBITDA P/E EV/EBITDA P/B ROE
Dec (W bn) (W bn) (W bn) (W bn) (won) (YoY) (W bn) (x) (x) (x) (%)
2008A 284 (11) (15) (13) (246) (169.1) 4 NM 114.6 3.0 (7.2)
2009A 453 44 33 28 547 NM 64 84.8 39.4 6.1 9.1
2010F 839 110 113 92 1,586 190.0 160 25.6 14.3 4.1 17.9
2011F 1,256 181 179 147 2,402 51.4 270 17.3 8.8 3.5 22.3
2012F 1,501 226 225 170 2,922 21.7 335 14.2 6.8 2.9 22.6
Youngwoo Chung
822-3276-6186 [email protected]
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 31/37
Electronic Components
30
<Table 22> Quarterly earnings forecast
(W bn) 2009 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 2010 1Q11F 2Q11F 3Q11F 4Q11F 2011F
Sales 453.4 124.5 215.3 277.0 222.3 839.0 245.3 291.0 366.0 353.8 1,256.1
Handset 159.4 30.0 30.4 38.3 40.0 138.6 33.4 34.7 35.9 39.6 143.6
Lighting & others 173.8 46.5 62.3 80.5 64.2 253.5 83.4 104.0 132.0 99.2 418.6
Notebook PC 116.4 29.0 38.6 32.2 31.3 131.1 32.0 32.6 37.7 35.1 137.4
TV 3.9 19.0 84.0 126.0 86.8 315.8 96.5 119.8 160.3 179.9 556.5
OP 44.0 13.3 29.1 42.8 24.5 109.7 30.4 42.0 58.1 50.4 180.8
Handset 5.7 0.9 1.9 2.7 2.0 7.5 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.4 8.6
Lighting & others 26.0 7.6 10.5 14.5 11.0 43.6 14.9 20.8 27.7 19.3 82.6
Notebook 12.9 3.5 4.6 4.2 2.8 15.1 2.9 3.6 4.1 3.5 14.1
TV 0.2 1.3 12.0 18.9 8.7 41.0 10.6 15.6 24.1 25.2 75.4
OP margin 9.7% 10.7% 13.5% 15.5% 11.0% 13.1% 12.4% 14.4% 15.9% 14.2% 14.4%
EBT 33.1 15.2 39.4 42.2 16.4 113.2 29.9 41.6 57.6 49.9 179.0
EBT margin 7.3% 12.2% 18.3% 15.2% 7.4% 13.5% 12.2% 14.3% 15.7% 14.1% 14.2%
Net profit 28.2 12.5 32.1 34.0 13.4 92.0 24.5 34.1 47.2 40.9 146.8
Net margin 6.2% 10.0% 14.9% 12.3% 6.0% 11.0% 10.0% 11.7% 12.9% 11.6% 11.7%
Source: Seoul Semiconductor, Korea Investment & Securities
[Figure 26] Korea LED operating margin comparison
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
1Q09 2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10
SEMCO (LED) LGI (LED)
Seoul Semi (consolidated) Lumens
Source: Korea Investment & Securities
[Figure 27] 2011F operating profit breakdown by application
Handset
5%
General lighting
36%
Automobile
8%NB/MNT
8%
TV
41%
Others
2%
Source: Korea Investment & Securities
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 32/37
Electronic Components
31
[Figure 28] Share price vs. quarterly operating profit
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
D e c - 0 5
A p r - 0 6
A u g - 0 6
D e c - 0 6
A p r - 0 7
A u g - 0 7
D e c - 0 7
A p r - 0 8
A u g - 0 8
D e c - 0 8
A p r - 0 9
A u g - 0 9
D e c - 0 9
A p r - 1 0
A u g - 1 0
D e c - 1 0
A p r - 1 1
(KRW)
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50(W bn)Adj. share price
Quarterly operating profit (RHS)
Source: Company data, Datastream, Korea Investment & Securities
[Figure 29] PBR trend
1x
2x3x
4x
5x
6x
7x
8x
9x
10x
11x
12x
13x
14x
J a n - 0 2
J u n - 0 2
N o v - 0 2
A p r - 0 3
S e p - 0 3
F e b - 0 4
J u l - 0 4
D e c - 0 4
M a y - 0 5
O c t - 0 5
M a r - 0 6
A u g - 0 6
J a n - 0 7
J u n - 0 7
N o v - 0 7
A p r - 0 8
S e p - 0 8
J a n - 0 9
J u l - 0 9
N o v - 0 9
A p r - 1 0
S e p - 1 0
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000P/B
Share price (RHS)
Source: Company data, Datastream, Korea Investment & Securities
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 33/37
Electronic Components
32
Balance Sheet
Fiscal year ending Dec. (W bn) 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
Current assets 171 340 506 615 804
Cash & cash equivalent 9 27 174 125 218
Accounts receivable 55 93 167 251 300
Inventory 35 49 103 151 180
Fixed assets 70 188 280 343 325
Investments 7 93 120 120 120
Tangible assets 43 74 150 213 193
Intangible assets 16 19 7 7 7
Total assets 241 528 786 958 1,128
Current liabilities 75 69 112 170 203
Accounts payable 27 42 48 75 90
Short-term borrowing 22 0 1 1 1
Current portion of LT debt 1 0 0 0 0
Long-term debt 1 1 102 104 104
Debentures 0 0 0 0 0
Long-term borrowings 0 0 100 100 100
Total liabilit ies 76 70 214 273 307
Paid-in capital 25 29 29 29 29
Capital surplus 78 339 366 366 366
Capital adjustments (1) 0 0 0 0
Retained earnings 61 90 176 288 425
Shareholders' equity 165 458 572 685 822
Income Statement
Fiscal year ending Dec. (W bn) 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
Sales 284 453 839 1,256 1,501
Gross profit 61 102 196 323 397
SG&A expense 72 58 87 142 171
Operating profit (11) 44 110 181 226
Non-op. profit 22 17 27 24 25
Interest income 3 3 9 5 6
FX gains 18 11 11 12 12
Equity gains 0 0 (1) 0 0
Non-op. expense 26 28 23 26 26
Interest expense 1 2 3 5 5
FX losses 12 17 17 18 18
Equity losses 10 7 0 0 0
Earnings before tax (15) 33 113 179 225
Income taxes (3) 5 21 32 41
Profit from discontinued 0 0 0 0 0
Net profit (13) 28 92 147 170
EBITDA 4 64 160 270 335
Key Financial Data
Fiscal year ending Dec. 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
per share data (won)
EPS (246) 547 1,586 2,402 2,922
BPS 2,931 7,598 9,816 11,747 14,090
DPS 0 93 480 584 623
SPS 5,586 8,780 14,393 21,544 25,740
Growth (%)
Sales growth 13.6 59.6 85.0 49.7 19.5
OP growth (144.8) NM 149.6 64.8 25.1
NP growth (170.7) NM 225.8 52.2 21.7
EPS growth (169.1) NM 190.0 51.4 21.7
EBITDA growth (90.8) 1,660.2 152.5 68.4 24.2
Profitability (%)
OP margin (4.0) 9.7 13.1 14.4 15.1
NP margin (4.4) 6.2 11.0 11.1 11.4
EBITDA margin 1.3 14.0 19.1 21.5 22.4
ROA (5.4) 7.3 14.0 16.1 16.3
ROE (7.2) 9.1 17.9 22.3 22.6
Dividend yield 0.0 0.2 1.2 1.4 1.5
Stability
Net debt (W bn) (38) (176) (83) (35) (128)
Int. coverage (x) (11.9) 20.5 42.8 35.7 44.8
D/E ratio (%) 13.7 0.0 17.7 14.7 12.3
Valuation (x)
PER NM 84.8 25.6 17.3 14.2
PBR 3.0 6.1 4.1 3.5 2.9
PSR 1.6 5.3 2.8 1.9 1.6
EV/EBITDA 114.6 39.4 14.3 8.8 6.8
Cash Flow
Fiscal year ending Dec. (W bn) 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F
C/F from operating 10 19 26 131 222
Net profits (13) 28 92 140 170
Depreciation 13 17 51 89 109
Amortization 2 3 0 0 0
Net incr. in W/C (12) (39) (123) (104) (64)
Others 19 10 6 6 6
C/F from investing (28) (239) (284) (128) (90)
Capex (17) (51) (270) (152) (90)
Decr. in fixed assets 0 0 0 0 0
Net incr. in current assets (24) (103) 0 0 0
Incr. in investment 13 (79) (28) 0 0
Others 0 (7) 14 24 0
C/F from financing 10 238 281 (29) (39)
Incr. in equity 0 261 27 0 0
Incr. in debts 14 (23) 101 (0) 0
Dividends (4) 0 (5) (28) (34)
Others 0 0 158 (0) (5)
Increase in cash (8) 18 23 (26) 93
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 34/37
Electronic Components
33
Changes to recommendation and price target Company (Code) Date Recommendation Price target Company (Code) Date Recommendation Price target
Samsung Electro-
Mechanics (009150)
01-28-09 BUY W42,000 11-06-09 Hold W110,000
02-17-09 BUY W52,000 07-20-10 Hold W196,000
09-25-09 NM W0 07-27-10 Hold W164,000
11-06-09 BUY W119,000 10-14-10 Hold W144,000
02-22-10 BUY W126,000 01-28-11 Hold W148,000
04-09-10 BUY W154,000 Lumens (038060) 07-20-10 Hold W14,600
07-20-10 BUY W187,000 10-14-10 Hold W10,000
07-23-10 BUY W175,000 01-28-11 BUY W15,000
10-14-10 BUY W134,000SeoulSemiconductor (046890)
07-20-10 BUY W58,300
01-28-11 BUY W164,000 07-30-10 BUY W53,000
LG Innotek (011070) 02-06-09 BUY W63,000 01-28-11 BUY W56,000
09-25-09 NM W0
Samsung Electro-Mechanics(009150) LG Innotek(011070)
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100 ,000
120 ,000
140 ,000
160 ,000
180 ,000
200 ,000
Jan -09 M ay-09 Sep -09 Jan -10 M ay-10 Sep -10 Jan -11
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
Jan -09 M ay-09 Sep -09 Jan -10 M ay-10 Sep -10
Lumens(038060) Seoul Semiconductor(046890)
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
Jan -09 M ay-09 Sep -09 Jan -10 M ay-10 Sep -10
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
Jan -09 M ay-09 Sep -09 Jan -10 M ay-10 Sep -10
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 35/37
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 36/37
■ Guide to Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd. stock ratings based on absolute 12-month forward share price performance
BUY: Expected to give a return of +15% or more
Hold: Expected to give a return between -15% and +15%
Underweight: Expected to give a return of -15% or less
■ Guide to Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd. sector ratings for the next 12 months
Overweight: Recommend increasing the sector’s weighting in the portfolio compared to its respective weighting in the Kospi (Kosdaq) based on market
capitalization.
Neutral: Recommend maintaining the sector’s weighting in the portfolio in line with its respective weighting in the Kospi (Kosdaq) based on market capitalization. Underweight: Recommend reducing the sector’s weighting in the portfolio compared to its respective weighting in the Kospi (Kosdaq) based on market
capitalization.
■ Analyst Certification
I/We, as the research analyst/analysts who prepared this report, do hereby certify that the views expressed in this research report accurately reflect my/our personal
views about the subject securities and issuers discussed in this report. I/We do hereby also certify that no part of my/our compensation was, is, or will be directly or
indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views contained in this research report.
■ Important Disclosures
As of the end of the month immediately preceding the date of publication of the research report or the public appearance (or the end of the second most recent
month if the publication date is less than 10 calendar days after the end of the most recent month), Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd., or its affiliates does
not own 1% or more of any class of common equity securities of the companies mentioned in this report.
There is no actual, material conflict of interest of the research analyst or Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd., or its affiliates known at the time of publication of
the research report or at the time of the public appearance.
Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd., or its affiliates has not managed or co-managed a public offering of securities for the companies mentioned in this report
in the past 12 months;
Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd., or its affiliates has not received compensation for investment banking services from the companies mentioned in this
report in the past 12 months; Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd., or its affiliates does not expect to receive or intends to seek compensation for investment
banking services from the companies mentioned in this report in the next 3 months.
Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd., or its affiliates was not making a market in securities of the companies mentioned in this report at the time that the research
report was published.
Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd. does not own over 1% of Samsung Electro-Mechanics, LG Innotek, Lumens, Seoul Semiconductor shares as of January
28, 2011.
Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd. has not provided this report to various third parties.
Neither the analysts covering these companies nor their associates own any shares of as of January 28, 2011.
Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd. has issued ELW with underlying stocks of Samsung Electro-Mechanics, LG Innotek, Seoul Semiconductor and is the
liquidity provider.
Prepared by: YS Chang, Heonyoung Lee
This report was written by Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd. to help its clients invest in securities. This material is copyrighted and may not be copied, redistributed,forwarded or altered in any way without the consent of Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd. This report has been prepared by Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd.
and is provided for information purposes only. Under no circumstances is it to be used or considered as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy. We make no
representation as to its accuracy or completeness and it should not be relied upon as such. The company accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential
loss arising from any use of this report or its contents. The final investment decision is based on the client’s judgment, and this report cannot be used as evidence in any
legal dispute related to investment decisions.
8/6/2019 20110131 _jung_LED Upgrade Report\
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/-20110131-jungled-upgrade-report 37/37
HEAD OFFICE
WON-JAE RHEE, Executive Managing Director ([email protected] +822 3276 5660)
PAUL CHUNG, Sales Trading ([email protected] +822 3276 5843)
27-1 Yoido-dong, Youngdeungpo-ku, Seoul 150-745, Korea
Toll free: US 1 866 258 2552 HK 800 964 464 SG 800 8211 320
Fax: 822 3276 5681~3
Telex: K22966
NEW YORK
DONG KIM, Managing Director ([email protected] +1 212 314 0681)
ELAINE LIM, Head of Sales ([email protected] +1 212 314 0686)
JU KIM, Sales ([email protected] +1 212 314 0683)
Korea Investment & Securities America, Inc.
1350 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 1110
New York, NY 10019
Fax: 1 201 592 1409
HONG KONG
STEVE KIM, Managing Director ([email protected] +852 2530 8900)
SANGME LEE, Managing Director, Head of Asia Sales ([email protected] +852 2530 8910)
DAN SONG, Sales ([email protected], +852-2530-8900)
JUN HWAN KIM, Sales ([email protected], +852-2530-8912)
Korea Investment & Securities Asia, Ltd.
Room Suite 2110 Jardine House
1 Connaught Place, Central, Hong Kong
Fax: 852-2530-1516
SINGAPORE
SUNG NAMGOONG, Managing Director ([email protected] +65 6501 5601)
TERRY SHIN, Sales ([email protected] +65 6501 5602)
Korea Investment & Securities Singapore Pte Ltd
1 Raffles Place, #43-04, OUB Center
048616 Singapore
Fax: 65 6501 5617
LONDON
JJ MOON, Managing Director ([email protected] +44 207 065 2765)
BRANDON JUNE, Sales ([email protected] +44 207 065 2767)
MINGOO KANG, Sales ([email protected], +44 207 065 2760)Korea Investment & Securities Europe, Ltd.
2nd Floor, 35 Moorgate
London EC2R 6AR
Fax: 44-207-236-4811
Telex: 8812237
This report has been prepared by Korea Investment & Securities Co., Ltd. and is provided for information purposes only. Under no circumstances is it to be used or
considered as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy. While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information contained herein is not untrue
or misleading at the time of publication, we make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and it should not be relied upon as such. This report is provided
solely for the information of professional investors who are expected to make their own investment decisions without undue reliance on this report and the company
accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or its contents. This report is not intended for the use of private