Using atmospheric radiocarbon ( 14 CO 2 ) to constrain North American fossil and biogenic CO 2...

Post on 18-Jan-2018

224 views 0 download

description

Biases in FF will manifest themselves as biases in NEE in inversions, when using only CO 2 1.So, with a limited set of 14 C observations, we’ll soon focus on relaxing the assumption of FF_error = 0. 2.Eventually, with more 14 C observations, we’ll move towards direct emissions verification. 3.Here, I’ll describe our data and our modeling framework (and some examples of constraints of NEE and fossil fluxes).

Transcript of Using atmospheric radiocarbon ( 14 CO 2 ) to constrain North American fossil and biogenic CO 2...

Using atmospheric radiocarbon (14CO2) to constrain North American fossil and biogenic

CO2 fluxes

John B. MillerScott Lehman, Arlyn Andrews, Colm Sweeney, Pieter

Tans, Chad Wolak, Jocelyn Turnbull, Marc Fischer, Brian LaFranchi, Tom Guilderson, John Southon

Fossil Fuel are the biggest annual global and N. American fluxes…

1. …but, at many time scales NEE is bigger, which makes FF hard to identify (see Yoichi Shiga poster)

2. Inventories are good; why check them?

a. They have spatio-temporal biases at the state/monthly and smaller scales.

b. Generally, for up to date inversions, we need to extrapolate inventories.

Global

USA

Biases in FF will manifest themselves as biases in NEE in inversions, when using only CO2

1. So, with a limited set of 14C observations, we’ll soon focus on relaxing the assumption of FF_error = 0.

2. Eventually, with more 14C observations, we’ll move towards direct emissions verification.

3. Here, I’ll describe our data and our modeling framework (and some examples of constraints of NEE and fossil fluxes).

14C is a theoretically robust tracer for fossil fuel fluxes. Total 14C looks just like fossil CO2.

Catm*datm/dt = (fos-atm)Ffos +

disFsurf_gross+ isoFnuc+ isoFcosmo

dCatm/dt = Ffos + Fnet_surf + Ffire

14Cff = -1000 per mil (i.e. zero 14C)Scaling: -2.7 per mil 14C = 1 ppm CO2-fossil

14C Cff

Results of simulated 14CO2 inversions show Fossil Fuel emissions can be retrieved with low uncertainty

5000 measurements per year over the US (currently ~ 750) Monthly, state-sized fluxes at ~ 10% uncertainty.

NRC Recommendation of large increase in 14CO2 measurements to verify reductions

Current network of sites samples a large fraction of N. American fossil fuel emissions.

Dense enough to relax assumption of perfectly known fossil fuel emissions.(without sacrificing precision in NEE)

US PBL data show expected depletions of 14C(… AND enhancements of other anthropogenic

gases: see Steve Montzka’s poster)

NWR Downwind PBL

~ 2-3 samples/week

10 ppm Cff

CO2 PBL enhancements (or depletions) can be partitioned into NEE and Fossil fractions.

Fossil Fuel masks Bio signal

Cbio large even in winter (~60% of total winter-time enhancement) despite urban/industrial observational footprint

CO2-only methods (tower, satellite, etc.) can not assume enhancements are due just to Cff

(see Miller et al, JGR-D 2012)

US East Coast 300 m asl

PBL enhancement

How well can we model our observations?(using TM5 with full 14CO2 and CO2 budget)

TM5

Land(CASA model)

Ocean(GLODAP/WOCE)

Fossil(CDIAC/CT)

Cosmogenic(50/50 Strat/trop)

Nuclear Power(Graven)

The global trend and background for N. America are modeled very well.

Bias = 0.8 per milStdev = 2.3 per mil

…And depletions relative to the trend fairly well.

R2= 0.50

1:1

At polluted tower sites, seasonally varying depletion is captured.

NWR • Seasonal cycles probably driven by wind direction co-varying with flux

• (not PBL height or flux seasonality)

Downwind of mid-Atlantic East Coast, there are significant differences in vertical gradients

CMA(Original fossil fuel emissions)

CMA(Vulcan fossil fuel emissions)

Vulcan’s emissions match data better because of lower urban emissions.

Standard CT-FF Vulcan FFVulcan minus CT

CMA(Vulcan fossil fuel emissions)

But, Vulcan may still have too much FF fuel emission near the coast in urban areas.

Summary

1. 14CO2 can partition NEE and FF fluxes – AND CO2 ≠ Cff

2. Increasingly dense set of 14CO2 observations that will allow us to soon relax the assumption of fixed FF in inversions.

3. A reliable modeling framework.4. Some ability already to distinguish fossil fuel

patterns.

Detection Sensitivity allows for < 1ppm recently added Fossil Fuel CO2

NWT3 by measurement order:

manual = 43.25 ± 1.60 Crex = 43.26 ± 1.65

Sigma-Cff = sqrt(2) * 1.8 per mil / 2.7 per mil/ppm = 0.9 ppm

Determination of background is always important!

use of 14C + CO2 in CT to improve NEE

Fff prior (given 0 uncertainty) NEE posterior retrieval

deviation Fff prior from actuals will lead directly to bias in retrieved Fbio (NEE) from inversion of Cobs

dCobs/dt = Fff + Fbio + Ffire

Fff is large w.r.t net annual Fbio, and.. extrapolation of Fff inventories will not capture Fff anomalies associated with sustained heat and cold waves

CT 2000-10