Post on 07-Aug-2018
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
1/21
COURT OF APPEALS
DECISION
DATED AND FILED August 18, 2015
Diane M. Fe!gen
C"e# $% C$ut $% A&&ea"s
NOTICE
T'is $&ini$n is su()e*t t$ %ut'e e+iting. I%
&u("is'e+, t'e $%%i*ia" esi$n -i"" a&&ea in
t'e ($un+ $"u!e $% t'e O%%i*ia" Re&$ts.
A &at !a %i"e -it' t'e Su&e!e C$ut a
&etiti$n t$ eie- an a+ese +e*isi$n ( t'e
C$ut $% A&&ea"s. See /IS. STAT. 808.10
an+ R ULE 80.2.
A&&ea" N$. 2013AP241 Ci. Ct. N$. 201FO231
STATE OF /ISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
DISTRICT III
TO/N OF TREMPEALEAU,
PLAINTIFF6R ESPONDENT,
7.
/ENDELL P. LEIN,
DEFENDANT6APPELLANT.
APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Trempealeau
County: JOHN A. A!ON" Judge. Affirmed .
#$ %TA&'" J.$ (endell 'lein appeal) a judgment that *a) entered
after the circuit court denied hi) motion) to di)mi)) a citation for operating a
propane cannon" or +)care gun", on hi) farmland in -iolation of an ordinance
$ Thi) appeal i) decided y one judge pur)uant to (/%. %TAT. 0 123.4$536. All reference)
to the (i)con)in %tatute) are to the 37$48$9 -er)ion unle)) other*i)e noted.
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
2/21
No. 37$9AP31$
3
enacted y the To*n of Trempealeau.3 'lein argue) the To*n;) )care gun
ordinance i) in-alid for )e-eral rea)on). (e reject hi) argument) and affirm.
9AC:ROUND
#3 'lein" *ho o*n) and operate) a farm in the To*n of Trempealeau"
u)e) )care gun) on hi) property to deter lac
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
3/21
No. 37$9AP31$
4
the )care gun ordinance y operating a )care gun at an angle of le)) than forty8fi-e
degree) from a neighoring property line. 'lein pled not guilty to the citation and
al)o mo-ed to di)mi))" arguing the ordinance *a) in-alid ecau)e it: 5$6 depri-ed
him of a -e)ted right to u)e )care gun) on hi) propertyB 536 *a) preempted y the
+&ight to arm La*", (/%. %TAT. 0 @34.7@B and 546 *a) enacted *ithout appro-al
y the Trempealeau County Foard.
#9 The To*n )umitted a rief in re)pon)e to 'lein;) motion to
di)mi))" and the partie) entered into a +%tipulation of act), for purpo)e) of the
motion. A) rele-ant here" the partie) )tipulated that:
• The To*n did not apply to the Trempealeau County Foard for appro-al of
the )care gun ordinanceB
• Trempealeau County ha) +county *ide Goning", and" a) a re)ult" +action
y the County Foard *ould e re>uired, for the To*n to enact a Goning
ordinance in connection *ith )care gun)B
• The county oard did not ta
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
4/21
No. 37$9AP31$
9
the ordinance conflicted *ith Trempealeau County;) comprehen)i-e Goning
ordinance.
#? 'lein )umitted an affida-it in )upport of hi) )econd motion todi)mi))" in *hich he a-erred that he ha) een a farmer +all hi) life", and he
currently rai)e) crop) for )ale" a) *ell a) for dairy feed and edding. 'lein
a-erred that lac
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
5/21
No. 37$9AP31$
2
protect corn and crop) from predation y lac
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
6/21
No. 37$9AP31$
?
t*enty8)iD )econd)" and )care gun) on other portion) of 'lein;) property *ere
di)charging approDimately e-ery ninety )econd). Fortle a-erred that 'lein;) )care
gun) can e heard +for a con)iderale di)tance eyond 'lein;) property line.,
He further a-erred the to*n oard recei-ed a petition )igned y o-er )iDty area
re)ident) a)
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
7/21
No. 37$9AP31$
1
peace and tran>uility" )leep" property -alue)" di)tract) dri-er)" and negati-ely
impact) -i)itor) to the *ildlife re)er-e., Fortle )tated he i) a*are +of )e-eral
farmer) *ho operate farm land) )imilarly )ituated to 'lein *ithout the need
for )care gun)", and )ome of tho)e farmer) +)po
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
8/21
No. 37$9AP31$
@
'lein relie) on Des Jardin v. Town of reenfield " 3?3 (i). 94" 9189@" 24 N.(.3d
1@9 5$236" in *hich our )upreme court" >uoting another authority *ith appro-al"
)tated:
+=enerally )pea
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
9/21
No. 37$9AP31$
526 a fiDed" for*ard8loo
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
10/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$7
point) out" the circuit court made a factual finding that 'lein;) u)e of )care gun)
*a) not indi)tingui)hale from hi) agricultural u)e" )tating that the ordinance did
not pre-ent the agricultural u)e of 'lein;) land. Thi) finding i) not clearly
erroneou). See (/%. %TAT. 0 @72.$1536. There *a) e-idence in the record from
*hich the circuit court could rea)onaly conclude )care gun) *ere not integral to
the agricultural u)e of 'lein;) landin particular" Fortle;) a-erment that he i)
a*are of )e-eral farmer) *ho are ale to farm land )imilarly )ituated to 'lein;)
property +*ithout the need for )care gun).,
#$@ /n the )ection of hi) rief8in8chief in *hich he ad-ance) hi) -e)ted
right) argument" 'lein al)o a))ert) that the )care gun ordinance +operate) li
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
11/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$$
percent of the ear) of corn *ere damaged y lacuent )ection) of thi) opinion. Accordingly" *e do
not )eparately addre)) them here.
(e al)o decline to )eparately addre)) an argument ad-anced in a later )ection of 'lein;) rief that the e-idence )ho*) hi) u)e of )care gun) i) not a nui)ance. /n that )ection" 'lein argue)
that" ecau)e he ha) a -e)ted right to u)e )care gun)" the To*n cannot prohiit that practice unle))it con)titute) a nui)ance. Ho*e-er" *e ha-e already determined 'lein doe) not ha-e a -e)ted
right to u)e )care gun) on hi) property. Thu)" e-en a))uming 'lein;) u)e doe) not con)titute a
nui)ance" that fact i) in)ufficient to in-alidate the ordinance. /n)tead" a) *e eDplain in greaterdetail elo*" the ordinance" *hich *a) enacted under the To*n;) nonGoning police po*er" i)
-alid if it ear) any rational and rea)onale relation)hip to a police po*er purpo)e. See infra" ##4284?.
1 Again" interpretation of an ordinance pre)ent) a >ue)tion of la* that *e re-ie*
independently. See "wiefelhofer " 44@ (i). 3d 9@@" #37.
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
12/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$3
comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance" *hich )tate)" in rele-ant part" +=eneral
agricultural practice) )hall e allo*ed in all agricultural di)trict) *ithout i))uance
of a land u)e permit., Trempealeau Cty." (i)." Comprehen)i-e Moning
Ordinance 0 9.745$65a6. /t i) undi)puted that 'lein;) property i) )uject to the
comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance and i) located in an agricultural di)trict.
Although the comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance doe) not define the term +general
agricultural practice)", 'lein argue) hi) u)e of )care gun) indi)putaly fall) *ithin
that term. 'lein al)o argue) 0 9.74;) reference to +general agricultural practice),
demon)trate) an intent to protect agricultural practice) +along *ith the underlying
agricultural u)e., Thu)" 'lein argue) any permit re>uirement for hi) u)e of )care
gun) i) prohiited y the comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance" *hich i) inding on
the To*n.
#3$ Ho*e-er" 'lein;) argument that the To*n;) )care gun ordinance
-iolate) the comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance re)t) on the faulty premi)e that the
permit re>uired y the )care gun ordinance i) a land u)e permit. The
comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance define) a +land u)e permit, a) +a permit" i))ued
y the Moning Admini)trator" )tating that a u)e or a )tructure may e
e)tali)hed" eDpanded or enlarged )uject to any condition) placed on the permit
and the pro-i)ion) of thi) Ordinance., Id." 0 $@.73. The term +u)e", in turn" i)
defined a) +the purpo)e or acti-ity for *hich a parcel of land" or )tructure5)6
thereon" i) de)igned" arranged" intended" occupied" or maintained., Id.
#33 Applying the)e definition)" the permit re>uired y the )care gun
ordinance i) not a +land u)e permit, ecau)e it doe) not attempt to licen)e a +u)e.,
/n other *ord)" 'lein;) property i) not +de)igned" arranged" intended" occupied" or
maintained, to fire )care gun). See id. &ather" a) eDplained ao-e" firing )care
gun) i) merely one type of agricultural acti-ity 'lein employ) a) part of the
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
13/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$4
o-erall agricultural u)e of hi) land. Accordingly" ecau)e the permit re>uired y
the )care gun ordinance i) not a +land u)e permit", a) the comprehen)i-e Goning
ordinance define) that term" the permit re>uirement in the )care gun ordinance
doe) not -iolate the comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance.
#34 /n addition" *e o)er-e that 0 9.745$65c6 of the comprehen)i-e
Goning ordinance li)t) +arnyard)" feedlot)" and u)e) in-ol-ing agricultural
)tructure), a) eDample) of +general agricultural practice)., Id." 0 9.745$65c6.
The)e eDample) all pertain to location) or )tructure) found on agricultural land and
are different in character from the u)e of )care gun). Thi) further )upport) our
conclu)ion that the permit re>uirement in the )care gun ordinance doe) not conflict
*ith the county;) comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance.
III. /ISCONSIN STAT. 82.08
#39 'lein neDt argue) the )care gun ordinance i) in-alid ecau)e it
conflict) *ith and i) preempted y the +&ight to arm La*", (/%. %TAT. 0 @34.7@.
%ection @34.7@ i) found in (/%. %TAT. ch. @34" *hich deal) *ith nui)ance action).
/t egin) *ith the follo*ing )tatement of legi)lati-e purpo)e:
The legi)lature find) that de-elopment in rural area) andchange) in agricultural technology" practice) and )cale ofoperation ha-e increa)ingly tended to create conflict) et*een agricultural and other u)e) of land. The legi)lature elie-e) that" to the eDtent po))ile con)i)tent *ith good pulic policy" the la* )hould not hamper agricultural production or the u)e of modern agricultural technology.The legi)lature therefore deem) it in the e)t intere)t of the
)tate to e)tali)h limit) on the remedie) a-ailale in tho)econflict) *hich reach the judicial )y)tem. The legi)laturefurther a))ert) it) elief that local unit) of go-ernment"through the eDerci)e of their Goning po*er" can e)t pre-ent)uch conflict) from ari)ing in the future" and the legi)latureurge) local unit) of go-ernment to u)e their Goning po*eraccordingly.
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
14/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$9
%ec. @34.7@5$6. The )tatute then pro-ide) that an +agricultural u)e, or
+agricultural practice,@ may not e found to e a nui)ance if all of the follo*ing
apply: 5$6 the u)e or practice +i) conducted on" or on a pulic right8of8*ay
adjacent to" land that *a) in agricultural u)e *ithout )u)tantial interruption efore
the plaintiff egan the u)e of property that the plaintiff allege) *a) interfered *ith
y the agricultural u)e or agricultural practiceB, and 536 the u)e or practice +doe)
not pre)ent a )u)tantial threat to pulic health or )afety., %ec. @34.7@5465a6. The
)tatute al)o limit) the remedie) a-ailale if an agricultural u)e or practice i) found
to e a nui)ance. See 0 @34.7@54656.
@ The term +agricultural u)e, i) defined a):
5a6 Any of the follo*ing acti-itie) conducted for the purpo)e of
producing an income or li-elihood:
$. Crop or forage production.
3. 'eeping li-e)toc
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
15/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$2
#32 'lein and the To*n agree that (/%. %TAT. 0 @34.7@ protect) oth
agricultural u)e) and practice). They al)o agree that the )tatute )et) forth a
heightened )tandard for determining that an agricultural u)e or practice i) a
nui)ance. Fa)ed on the)e propo)ition)" 'lein argue) the )tatute gi-e) farmer) a
+-e)ted intere)t, in continuing their e)tali)hed agricultural u)e) and practice).
'lein therefore a))ert) that" in order to regulate an e)tali)hed agricultural u)e or
practice" a local go-ernment mu)t fir)t find that the u)e or practice con)titute) a
nui)ance under the higher )tandard )et forth in 0 @34.7@5465a6that i)" that it
pre)ent) a )u)tantial threat to pulic health or )afety. 'lein contend) the To*n
did not" and could not" maue)tion of la* for our independent re-ie*. Do+ino
v. -alworth Ct!." $$@ (i). 3d 9@@" 94" 491 N.(.3d $1 5Ct. App. $@96. (hen interpreting a)tatute" our ojecti-e +i) to determine *hat the )tatute mean) )o that it may e gi-en it) full"
proper" and intended effect., State e rel. /alal v. Circ(it Co(rt for Dane Ct!." 3779 (/ 2@"
#99" 31$ (i). 3d ?44" ?@$ N.(.3d $$7. Our analy)i) egin) *ith the plain language of the)tatute. Id." #92. /f the )tatute;) meaning can e di)cerned from it) plain language" *e need not
re)ort to eDtrin)ic )ource) of interpretation" )uch a) legi)lati-e hi)tory. Id." #9?.
$7 See /alal " 31$ (i). 3d ?44" #9? 5+%tatutory language i) interpreted in the conteDt in*hich it i) u)edB not in i)olation ut a) part of a *holeB in relation to the language of )urrounding
or clo)ely8related )tatute).,6.
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
16/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$?
local go-ernment) from regulating agricultural u)e) and practice) a)ent a finding
that tho)e u)e) or practice) meet the heightened nui)ance )tandard )et forth in the
)tatute.
#31 'lein al)o argue) (/%. %TAT. 0 @34.7@ preempt) the To*n;) )care
gun ordinance.$$ Again" *e di)agree. our factor) guide our determination of
*hether a political )udi-i)ion;) action) are preempted y )tate legi)lation:
5$6 *hether the legi)lature ha) eDpre))ly *ithdra*n the po*er of political )udi-i)ion) to actB or 536 *hether the political )udi-i)ion;) action) logically conflict *ith the)tate legi)lationB or 546 *hether the political )udi-i)ion;)action) defeat the purpo)e of the )tate legi)lationB or596 *hether the political )udi-i)ion;) action) are contraryto the )pirit of the )tate legi)lation.
0da+s v. State Livestoc# Facilities Siting Review Bd." 37$3 (/ @2" #43" 493
(i). 3d 999" @37 N.(.3d 979. None of the)e factor) are met in the in)tant ca)e.
#3@ ir)t" y enacting (/%. %TAT. 0 @34.7@" the legi)lature did not
eDpre))ly *ithdra* the po*er of local go-ernment) to regulate agricultural
practice). Fy it) plain language" 0 @34.7@ clearly and unamiguou)ly applie) only
to nui)ance action). Nothing in the )tatute indicate) that the higher )tandard it )et)
forth for nui)ance litigation applie) to or pre-ent) local regulation of agricultural
acti-ity. 'lein argue) that" ecau)e the legi)lati-e purpo)e )tatement in
0 @34.7@5$6 urge) local go-ernment) to u)e their Goning authority to addre))
conflict) et*een agriculture and other land u)e)" the )tatute prohiit) local
go-ernment) from u)ing their nonGoning police po*er to regulate agricultural
practice). Ho*e-er" that 0 @34.7@5$6 )pecifically mention) Goning doe) not
$$ Thi) pre)ent) a >ue)tion of la* that *e re-ie* independently. See La#e Be(lah
'g+t. Dist. v. $illage of %. Tro!" 37$$ (/ 22" #$$" 442 (i). 3d 3" 1 N.(.3d 1@1.
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
17/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$1
amount to an eDpre)) *ithdra*al of local go-ernment); authority to regulate
agricultural practice) u)ing their nonGoning police po*er.
#3 %econd" the To*n;) )care gun ordinance doe) not logically conflict*ith (/%. %TAT. 0 @34.7@. The ordinance and )tatute operate in completely
different )phere): the ordinance regulate) a particular type of agricultural practice"
pur)uant to the To*n;) police po*er" *hile the )tatute protect) farmer) from
nui)ance action) under certain )pecified condition).
#47 Third" the )care gun ordinance doe) not defeat the purpo)e of (/%.
%TAT. 0 @34.7@" *hich i) to protect farmer) from nui)ance action) )o a) not to
hamper agricultural production. See 0 @34.7@5$6" 546. Again" the )care gun
ordinance merely regulate) farmer); u)e of )care gun). e)pite the ordinance"
farmer) are )till protected from nui)ance action) y the pro-i)ion) )et forth in
0 @34.7@.
#4$ ourth and finally" the To*n;) ordinance i) not incon)i)tent *ith the
)pirit of (/%. %TAT. 0 @34.7@. The )tatute reflect) an intent to protect farmer) from
nui)ance action)" ut it al)o recogniGe) that conflict) et*een agricultural u)e) and
other land u)e) *ill occur" and it urge) local go-ernment) to ta
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
18/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$@
I7. A(itainess
#44 La)tly" 'lein argue) the )care gun ordinance i) in-alid ecau)e it i)
aritrary. Thi) argument fail) for )e-eral rea)on).
#49 ir)t" 'lein doe) not cite any authority de)criing *hat ma
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
19/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$
di)tract) dri-er)" and negati-ely impact) -i)itor) to the *ildlife re)er-e., He al)o
a-erred that he recei-ed multiple complaint) regarding the noi)e cau)ed y 'lein;)
)care gun)" and that the to*n oard recei-ed a petition )igned y o-er )iDty
re)ident) a)
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
20/21
No. 37$9AP31$
37
he re-ie*ed numerou) )tudie) and report) regarding the effecti-ene)) of )care
gun). /n addition" Fortle;) affida-it )ho*) that the To*n recei-ed input from
other area farmer). Fa)ed on thi) information" Fortle a-erred that lac
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
21/21