The Curriculum at WIS. The WIS Curriculum Creative Inspiring Progressive Differentiated.
Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
Transcript of Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
1/21
COURT OF APPEALS
DECISION
DATED AND FILED August 18, 2015
Diane M. Fe!gen
C"e# $% C$ut $% A&&ea"s
NOTICE
T'is $&ini$n is su()e*t t$ %ut'e e+iting. I%
&u("is'e+, t'e $%%i*ia" esi$n -i"" a&&ea in
t'e ($un+ $"u!e $% t'e O%%i*ia" Re&$ts.
A &at !a %i"e -it' t'e Su&e!e C$ut a
&etiti$n t$ eie- an a+ese +e*isi$n ( t'e
C$ut $% A&&ea"s. See /IS. STAT. 808.10
an+ R ULE 80.2.
A&&ea" N$. 2013AP241 Ci. Ct. N$. 201FO231
STATE OF /ISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
DISTRICT III
TO/N OF TREMPEALEAU,
PLAINTIFF6R ESPONDENT,
7.
/ENDELL P. LEIN,
DEFENDANT6APPELLANT.
APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Trempealeau
County: JOHN A. A!ON" Judge. Affirmed .
#$ %TA&'" J.$ (endell 'lein appeal) a judgment that *a) entered
after the circuit court denied hi) motion) to di)mi)) a citation for operating a
propane cannon" or +)care gun", on hi) farmland in -iolation of an ordinance
$ Thi) appeal i) decided y one judge pur)uant to (/%. %TAT. 0 123.4$536. All reference)
to the (i)con)in %tatute) are to the 37$48$9 -er)ion unle)) other*i)e noted.
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
2/21
No. 37$9AP31$
3
enacted y the To*n of Trempealeau.3 'lein argue) the To*n;) )care gun
ordinance i) in-alid for )e-eral rea)on). (e reject hi) argument) and affirm.
9AC:ROUND
#3 'lein" *ho o*n) and operate) a farm in the To*n of Trempealeau"
u)e) )care gun) on hi) property to deter lac
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
3/21
No. 37$9AP31$
4
the )care gun ordinance y operating a )care gun at an angle of le)) than forty8fi-e
degree) from a neighoring property line. 'lein pled not guilty to the citation and
al)o mo-ed to di)mi))" arguing the ordinance *a) in-alid ecau)e it: 5$6 depri-ed
him of a -e)ted right to u)e )care gun) on hi) propertyB 536 *a) preempted y the
+&ight to arm La*", (/%. %TAT. 0 @34.7@B and 546 *a) enacted *ithout appro-al
y the Trempealeau County Foard.
#9 The To*n )umitted a rief in re)pon)e to 'lein;) motion to
di)mi))" and the partie) entered into a +%tipulation of act), for purpo)e) of the
motion. A) rele-ant here" the partie) )tipulated that:
• The To*n did not apply to the Trempealeau County Foard for appro-al of
the )care gun ordinanceB
• Trempealeau County ha) +county *ide Goning", and" a) a re)ult" +action
y the County Foard *ould e re>uired, for the To*n to enact a Goning
ordinance in connection *ith )care gun)B
• The county oard did not ta
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
4/21
No. 37$9AP31$
9
the ordinance conflicted *ith Trempealeau County;) comprehen)i-e Goning
ordinance.
#? 'lein )umitted an affida-it in )upport of hi) )econd motion todi)mi))" in *hich he a-erred that he ha) een a farmer +all hi) life", and he
currently rai)e) crop) for )ale" a) *ell a) for dairy feed and edding. 'lein
a-erred that lac
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
5/21
No. 37$9AP31$
2
protect corn and crop) from predation y lac
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
6/21
No. 37$9AP31$
?
t*enty8)iD )econd)" and )care gun) on other portion) of 'lein;) property *ere
di)charging approDimately e-ery ninety )econd). Fortle a-erred that 'lein;) )care
gun) can e heard +for a con)iderale di)tance eyond 'lein;) property line.,
He further a-erred the to*n oard recei-ed a petition )igned y o-er )iDty area
re)ident) a)
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
7/21
No. 37$9AP31$
1
peace and tran>uility" )leep" property -alue)" di)tract) dri-er)" and negati-ely
impact) -i)itor) to the *ildlife re)er-e., Fortle )tated he i) a*are +of )e-eral
farmer) *ho operate farm land) )imilarly )ituated to 'lein *ithout the need
for )care gun)", and )ome of tho)e farmer) +)po
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
8/21
No. 37$9AP31$
@
'lein relie) on Des Jardin v. Town of reenfield " 3?3 (i). 94" 9189@" 24 N.(.3d
1@9 5$236" in *hich our )upreme court" >uoting another authority *ith appro-al"
)tated:
+=enerally )pea
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
9/21
No. 37$9AP31$
526 a fiDed" for*ard8loo
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
10/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$7
point) out" the circuit court made a factual finding that 'lein;) u)e of )care gun)
*a) not indi)tingui)hale from hi) agricultural u)e" )tating that the ordinance did
not pre-ent the agricultural u)e of 'lein;) land. Thi) finding i) not clearly
erroneou). See (/%. %TAT. 0 @72.$1536. There *a) e-idence in the record from
*hich the circuit court could rea)onaly conclude )care gun) *ere not integral to
the agricultural u)e of 'lein;) landin particular" Fortle;) a-erment that he i)
a*are of )e-eral farmer) *ho are ale to farm land )imilarly )ituated to 'lein;)
property +*ithout the need for )care gun).,
#$@ /n the )ection of hi) rief8in8chief in *hich he ad-ance) hi) -e)ted
right) argument" 'lein al)o a))ert) that the )care gun ordinance +operate) li
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
11/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$$
percent of the ear) of corn *ere damaged y lacuent )ection) of thi) opinion. Accordingly" *e do
not )eparately addre)) them here.
(e al)o decline to )eparately addre)) an argument ad-anced in a later )ection of 'lein;) rief that the e-idence )ho*) hi) u)e of )care gun) i) not a nui)ance. /n that )ection" 'lein argue)
that" ecau)e he ha) a -e)ted right to u)e )care gun)" the To*n cannot prohiit that practice unle))it con)titute) a nui)ance. Ho*e-er" *e ha-e already determined 'lein doe) not ha-e a -e)ted
right to u)e )care gun) on hi) property. Thu)" e-en a))uming 'lein;) u)e doe) not con)titute a
nui)ance" that fact i) in)ufficient to in-alidate the ordinance. /n)tead" a) *e eDplain in greaterdetail elo*" the ordinance" *hich *a) enacted under the To*n;) nonGoning police po*er" i)
-alid if it ear) any rational and rea)onale relation)hip to a police po*er purpo)e. See infra" ##4284?.
1 Again" interpretation of an ordinance pre)ent) a >ue)tion of la* that *e re-ie*
independently. See "wiefelhofer " 44@ (i). 3d 9@@" #37.
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
12/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$3
comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance" *hich )tate)" in rele-ant part" +=eneral
agricultural practice) )hall e allo*ed in all agricultural di)trict) *ithout i))uance
of a land u)e permit., Trempealeau Cty." (i)." Comprehen)i-e Moning
Ordinance 0 9.745$65a6. /t i) undi)puted that 'lein;) property i) )uject to the
comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance and i) located in an agricultural di)trict.
Although the comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance doe) not define the term +general
agricultural practice)", 'lein argue) hi) u)e of )care gun) indi)putaly fall) *ithin
that term. 'lein al)o argue) 0 9.74;) reference to +general agricultural practice),
demon)trate) an intent to protect agricultural practice) +along *ith the underlying
agricultural u)e., Thu)" 'lein argue) any permit re>uirement for hi) u)e of )care
gun) i) prohiited y the comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance" *hich i) inding on
the To*n.
#3$ Ho*e-er" 'lein;) argument that the To*n;) )care gun ordinance
-iolate) the comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance re)t) on the faulty premi)e that the
permit re>uired y the )care gun ordinance i) a land u)e permit. The
comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance define) a +land u)e permit, a) +a permit" i))ued
y the Moning Admini)trator" )tating that a u)e or a )tructure may e
e)tali)hed" eDpanded or enlarged )uject to any condition) placed on the permit
and the pro-i)ion) of thi) Ordinance., Id." 0 [email protected]. The term +u)e", in turn" i)
defined a) +the purpo)e or acti-ity for *hich a parcel of land" or )tructure5)6
thereon" i) de)igned" arranged" intended" occupied" or maintained., Id.
#33 Applying the)e definition)" the permit re>uired y the )care gun
ordinance i) not a +land u)e permit, ecau)e it doe) not attempt to licen)e a +u)e.,
/n other *ord)" 'lein;) property i) not +de)igned" arranged" intended" occupied" or
maintained, to fire )care gun). See id. &ather" a) eDplained ao-e" firing )care
gun) i) merely one type of agricultural acti-ity 'lein employ) a) part of the
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
13/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$4
o-erall agricultural u)e of hi) land. Accordingly" ecau)e the permit re>uired y
the )care gun ordinance i) not a +land u)e permit", a) the comprehen)i-e Goning
ordinance define) that term" the permit re>uirement in the )care gun ordinance
doe) not -iolate the comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance.
#34 /n addition" *e o)er-e that 0 9.745$65c6 of the comprehen)i-e
Goning ordinance li)t) +arnyard)" feedlot)" and u)e) in-ol-ing agricultural
)tructure), a) eDample) of +general agricultural practice)., Id." 0 9.745$65c6.
The)e eDample) all pertain to location) or )tructure) found on agricultural land and
are different in character from the u)e of )care gun). Thi) further )upport) our
conclu)ion that the permit re>uirement in the )care gun ordinance doe) not conflict
*ith the county;) comprehen)i-e Goning ordinance.
III. /ISCONSIN STAT. 82.08
#39 'lein neDt argue) the )care gun ordinance i) in-alid ecau)e it
conflict) *ith and i) preempted y the +&ight to arm La*", (/%. %TAT. 0 @34.7@.
%ection @34.7@ i) found in (/%. %TAT. ch. @34" *hich deal) *ith nui)ance action).
/t egin) *ith the follo*ing )tatement of legi)lati-e purpo)e:
The legi)lature find) that de-elopment in rural area) andchange) in agricultural technology" practice) and )cale ofoperation ha-e increa)ingly tended to create conflict) et*een agricultural and other u)e) of land. The legi)lature elie-e) that" to the eDtent po))ile con)i)tent *ith good pulic policy" the la* )hould not hamper agricultural production or the u)e of modern agricultural technology.The legi)lature therefore deem) it in the e)t intere)t of the
)tate to e)tali)h limit) on the remedie) a-ailale in tho)econflict) *hich reach the judicial )y)tem. The legi)laturefurther a))ert) it) elief that local unit) of go-ernment"through the eDerci)e of their Goning po*er" can e)t pre-ent)uch conflict) from ari)ing in the future" and the legi)latureurge) local unit) of go-ernment to u)e their Goning po*eraccordingly.
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
14/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$9
%ec. @34.7@5$6. The )tatute then pro-ide) that an +agricultural u)e, or
+agricultural practice,@ may not e found to e a nui)ance if all of the follo*ing
apply: 5$6 the u)e or practice +i) conducted on" or on a pulic right8of8*ay
adjacent to" land that *a) in agricultural u)e *ithout )u)tantial interruption efore
the plaintiff egan the u)e of property that the plaintiff allege) *a) interfered *ith
y the agricultural u)e or agricultural practiceB, and 536 the u)e or practice +doe)
not pre)ent a )u)tantial threat to pulic health or )afety., %ec. @34.7@5465a6. The
)tatute al)o limit) the remedie) a-ailale if an agricultural u)e or practice i) found
to e a nui)ance. See 0 @34.7@54656.
@ The term +agricultural u)e, i) defined a):
5a6 Any of the follo*ing acti-itie) conducted for the purpo)e of
producing an income or li-elihood:
$. Crop or forage production.
3. 'eeping li-e)toc
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
15/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$2
#32 'lein and the To*n agree that (/%. %TAT. 0 @34.7@ protect) oth
agricultural u)e) and practice). They al)o agree that the )tatute )et) forth a
heightened )tandard for determining that an agricultural u)e or practice i) a
nui)ance. Fa)ed on the)e propo)ition)" 'lein argue) the )tatute gi-e) farmer) a
+-e)ted intere)t, in continuing their e)tali)hed agricultural u)e) and practice).
'lein therefore a))ert) that" in order to regulate an e)tali)hed agricultural u)e or
practice" a local go-ernment mu)t fir)t find that the u)e or practice con)titute) a
nui)ance under the higher )tandard )et forth in 0 @34.7@5465a6that i)" that it
pre)ent) a )u)tantial threat to pulic health or )afety. 'lein contend) the To*n
did not" and could not" maue)tion of la* for our independent re-ie*. Do+ino
v. -alworth Ct!." $$@ (i). 3d 9@@" 94" 491 N.(.3d $1 5Ct. App. $@96. (hen interpreting a)tatute" our ojecti-e +i) to determine *hat the )tatute mean) )o that it may e gi-en it) full"
proper" and intended effect., State e rel. /alal v. Circ(it Co(rt for Dane Ct!." 3779 (/ 2@"
#99" 31$ (i). 3d ?44" ?@$ N.(.3d $$7. Our analy)i) egin) *ith the plain language of the)tatute. Id." #92. /f the )tatute;) meaning can e di)cerned from it) plain language" *e need not
re)ort to eDtrin)ic )ource) of interpretation" )uch a) legi)lati-e hi)tory. Id." #9?.
$7 See /alal " 31$ (i). 3d ?44" #9? 5+%tatutory language i) interpreted in the conteDt in*hich it i) u)edB not in i)olation ut a) part of a *holeB in relation to the language of )urrounding
or clo)ely8related )tatute).,6.
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
16/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$?
local go-ernment) from regulating agricultural u)e) and practice) a)ent a finding
that tho)e u)e) or practice) meet the heightened nui)ance )tandard )et forth in the
)tatute.
#31 'lein al)o argue) (/%. %TAT. 0 @34.7@ preempt) the To*n;) )care
gun ordinance.$$ Again" *e di)agree. our factor) guide our determination of
*hether a political )udi-i)ion;) action) are preempted y )tate legi)lation:
5$6 *hether the legi)lature ha) eDpre))ly *ithdra*n the po*er of political )udi-i)ion) to actB or 536 *hether the political )udi-i)ion;) action) logically conflict *ith the)tate legi)lationB or 546 *hether the political )udi-i)ion;)action) defeat the purpo)e of the )tate legi)lationB or596 *hether the political )udi-i)ion;) action) are contraryto the )pirit of the )tate legi)lation.
0da+s v. State Livestoc# Facilities Siting Review Bd." 37$3 (/ @2" #43" 493
(i). 3d 999" @37 N.(.3d 979. None of the)e factor) are met in the in)tant ca)e.
#3@ ir)t" y enacting (/%. %TAT. 0 @34.7@" the legi)lature did not
eDpre))ly *ithdra* the po*er of local go-ernment) to regulate agricultural
practice). Fy it) plain language" 0 @34.7@ clearly and unamiguou)ly applie) only
to nui)ance action). Nothing in the )tatute indicate) that the higher )tandard it )et)
forth for nui)ance litigation applie) to or pre-ent) local regulation of agricultural
acti-ity. 'lein argue) that" ecau)e the legi)lati-e purpo)e )tatement in
0 @34.7@5$6 urge) local go-ernment) to u)e their Goning authority to addre))
conflict) et*een agriculture and other land u)e)" the )tatute prohiit) local
go-ernment) from u)ing their nonGoning police po*er to regulate agricultural
practice). Ho*e-er" that 0 @34.7@5$6 )pecifically mention) Goning doe) not
$$ Thi) pre)ent) a >ue)tion of la* that *e re-ie* independently. See La#e Be(lah
'g+t. Dist. v. $illage of %. Tro!" 37$$ (/ 22" #$$" 442 (i). 3d 3" 1 N.(.3d 1@1.
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
17/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$1
amount to an eDpre)) *ithdra*al of local go-ernment); authority to regulate
agricultural practice) u)ing their nonGoning police po*er.
#3 %econd" the To*n;) )care gun ordinance doe) not logically conflict*ith (/%. %TAT. 0 @34.7@. The ordinance and )tatute operate in completely
different )phere): the ordinance regulate) a particular type of agricultural practice"
pur)uant to the To*n;) police po*er" *hile the )tatute protect) farmer) from
nui)ance action) under certain )pecified condition).
#47 Third" the )care gun ordinance doe) not defeat the purpo)e of (/%.
%TAT. 0 @34.7@" *hich i) to protect farmer) from nui)ance action) )o a) not to
hamper agricultural production. See 0 @34.7@5$6" 546. Again" the )care gun
ordinance merely regulate) farmer); u)e of )care gun). e)pite the ordinance"
farmer) are )till protected from nui)ance action) y the pro-i)ion) )et forth in
0 @34.7@.
#4$ ourth and finally" the To*n;) ordinance i) not incon)i)tent *ith the
)pirit of (/%. %TAT. 0 @34.7@. The )tatute reflect) an intent to protect farmer) from
nui)ance action)" ut it al)o recogniGe) that conflict) et*een agricultural u)e) and
other land u)e) *ill occur" and it urge) local go-ernment) to ta
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
18/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$@
I7. A(itainess
#44 La)tly" 'lein argue) the )care gun ordinance i) in-alid ecau)e it i)
aritrary. Thi) argument fail) for )e-eral rea)on).
#49 ir)t" 'lein doe) not cite any authority de)criing *hat ma
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
19/21
No. 37$9AP31$
$
di)tract) dri-er)" and negati-ely impact) -i)itor) to the *ildlife re)er-e., He al)o
a-erred that he recei-ed multiple complaint) regarding the noi)e cau)ed y 'lein;)
)care gun)" and that the to*n oard recei-ed a petition )igned y o-er )iDty
re)ident) a)
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
20/21
No. 37$9AP31$
37
he re-ie*ed numerou) )tudie) and report) regarding the effecti-ene)) of )care
gun). /n addition" Fortle;) affida-it )ho*) that the To*n recei-ed input from
other area farmer). Fa)ed on thi) information" Fortle a-erred that lac
-
8/20/2019 Town of Trempeleau v. Klein, No. 2014AP2719 (Wis. App. Aug. 18, 2015)
21/21