Post on 06-Jan-2016
description
.... 12/09
. .
() . ..
2010
, (Arthur Schopenhauer) .
. .
. : (Argumentum ad hominem), (Argumentum ad Ignorantiam), (Argumentum ad verecundiam), (Argumentum ad populum), (Argumentum ad baculum), (Ignoratio Elenchi), (Accident), (Converse Accident), (Fallacy of Equivocation), (Amphiboly), (Composition), (Division).
( ) . .
, .
, , (strategic narrative narrative leadership) .., .
ii
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -iii- "" -1- "" -5- "" -12- "" -20- ""- -- -24- -v-
iii
,
.
.
,
.
, ,
/
.
1,
:
) (proof)
(.. )
) (
)1
,
1 , . , , 2002.
iv
,
) (stratagem),
,
.
.
, ,
2,
,
. ,
.
,
( )
.
2 Rahim, A., 'A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict', Academy of Management Journal', 1983, Vol.26, N.2, .368-376.
1
, ,
,
.
,
,
, , .
, ,
(),
, ,
.
, .
3 ,
,
, (
). a priori
, ,
.
, a posteriori,
3 Schopenhauer Arthur, . , Printa, 2008. Saunders Bailey, he Art of Controversy and other posthumous papers by Arthur Schopenhauer, Swan Sonnenschein & CO. Lim., , 1896. .
2
.
-,
.
,
.
,
.
, ,
4.
.
. ,
.
. ,
,
. ,
,
.
,
4 , - . . , . 2008. . 130 .
3
.
,
,
.
, ,
,
, .
, , ,
, ,
, , .
,
5.
,
,
(
), .
-.
(Contra negantem principia non est disputandum)6.
-
. : ) ad rem ( res-), ,
) ad hominem ex concessis
5 . , , 2002.
4
. : ) , -
) , , .
,
,
, , ,
.
.
.
.
,
. 13
, ,
112 6 (
).
6 David H. Fischer Historian Fallacies New York: Harper & Row, 1979.
5
( )
.
,
.
.7
.
.
modus ponens modus
tollens8, .
(
)
9.
(Argumentum ad hominem):
, 7 Baggini, Julian & Fosl, Peter S. : (. ), , 2005..
8 , . . ... 2009
9 Irving Copi Carl Cohen . Introduction to logic, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall 1998.
6
(ad hominem)10,
.
.
ad hominem
. ( ex concessis)
,
,
.
(Argumentum ad Ignorantiam):
,
.
(
) ,
.
. ,
, ,
.
10 ( -ad hominem). (ex concessis) ( , , ) .
7
(Argumentum ad verecundiam):
,
,
.
.
,
.
(Argumentum ad populum):
.
,
,
. ,
, . Bertrand Russell
, . ,
,
.11
(Argumentum ad baculum):
,
.
(ad baculum )
.
416 ..
11 Bertrand Russell Marriage and Morals New York: Liveright, 1929.
8
: , ,
.
,
( ) (
), ,
.
(Ignoratio Elenchi):
.
.
,
,
.
(Petitio Principii):
.
(.. ),
, , .
,
.
. David Hume ,
9
.
(Accident):
. ..
.
secundum quid ( ),
,
,
.
(Converse
accident):
.
, .
.
(Argumentum non causa pro causa):
.
,
, ,
.
post hoc ergo proper hoc ,
, .
(Fallacy of Equivocation):
10
.
12,
. .
,
.
,
.
,
,
.
,
, .
; .
.
. ,
,
.
,
13.
(Amphiboly):
, ,
. ,
,
,
, .
12 : . . . 13 Richard Robinson, An atheists Values Oxford University Press, , 1964, . 121
11
(accent), 14,
,
, ..
.
.
(Composition):
, ..
.
.
, , ,
(Division): T ,
,
,
.. , ,
.
14 Copi I. M. & Cohen C, Introduction to logic, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall 1998.
12
( )
(
).
.
) ( 4)
, ,
.
) ( 7) (
- ),
,
. ,
.
) ( 8) ,
(
).
.
13
) ( 10)
,
,
.
) ( 12)
. ,
,
, .
:
,
, .
) ( 13-14-15)
,
,
- -
.
( )
. ,
(
)
. ,
14
.
.
) ( 18-23)
,
, ,
(mutatio
controversiae). ,
. ,
.
.
) ( 19)
, ,
,
.
,
, ,
,
. ,
,
(status controversiae)
) ( 22) ,
.
,
,
.
15
) ( 25)
,
,
.
(exemplum in contrarium, instantia).
: ) )
)
.
) ( 28)
. argumentum ad auditores
, :
.
) ( 32)
, .
,
, , ...
) ( 35)
.
. ,
-
, -
16
.
(argumentum ab utili).
) ( 36)
,
.
.
15.
) ( 38)
.
. argumentum ad personam
argumentum ad hominem : ad hominem
, ad personam
,
.
,
.
:
, .
.
15 O Victor Goldsmith Vicar of Wakefild.
17
:
, , .
,
.
(Slippery Slope):
,
.
,
.
.
.
. ,
,
,
,
. ,
.
..
, .
,
.
,
, .
.
18
(
). ,
,
.
,
.
. ,
,
.
,
,
.
16,
.
,
.
( ) .
, ,
.
,
.
16 P=>Q
19
,
.
.
(soundness) :
(sound) , , (, , ).
(valid) , , :
(1) ,
.
(2)
.
(3)
.
, (invalid) 17.
17 , . . ... 2009
20
, .
.
.
. ,
(expanding pie)18.
, ,
, ,
19. Francois de Callieres,
18 ,
, 19.
18 ( ) . 19 Franois de Callires, The Practice of Diplomacy, translation of "De la manire de ngocier avec les souverains," London: Constable & Co, 1919. . 43
21
.
, ,
, 20.
,
.
, - ,
-
.
.
, ,
/.
.
.
,
.
, .
, , , , .
, . 20 Umberto Eco, Daniele Del Giudice, Gianfranco Ravasi, , , 2006.
22
, , .
, .
, ,
,
.
.
,
.
,
. ,
70.
2000
.
,
.
,
,
.
.
(strategic narrative narrative
leadership).
23
,
.
David Boje
.
, ()
.
21.
.
Ohio Jeffrey D. Ford
,
22.
,
.
21 Boje, D. Leadership is theatre! 4 2008 http://business.nmsu.edu/~dboje/388/leadership_theatre_book.html 2005 . 12 22 Ford, J. (1999). Organizational change as shifting conversations. Journal of Change Management, 12, (6), 480-500 http://www.hsdinstitute.org/learn-more/library/articles.html
24
,
( 9)23.
, . (symbolic or formal logic)
.
.
-
- (
). ,
.
.. .
23 Umberto Eco, Daniele Del Giudice, Gianfranco Ravasi, , , 2006 .17.
25
,
..,
.
,
(De inventione 1,1)24
24 Umberto Eco, Daniele Del Giudice, Gianfranco Ravasi, , , 2006 .17.
v
-
1. , . . ... 2009.
2. , . , , 2002.
3. , . , , 2004.
4. Baggini, Julian & Fosl, Peter S. : . . , , 2005.
5. Copi I. M. & Cohen C, Introduction to logic, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall 1998.
6. Eco Umberto, Daniele Del Giudice, Gianfranco Ravasi, . , , 2006.
7. , - . . , . 2008.
8. ., ., ., - , 2007.
9. Saunders Bailey, he Art of Controversy and other posthumous papers by Arthur Schopenhauer, Swan Sonnenschein & CO. Lim., , 1896.
10. Schopenhauer Arthur, . , Printa, 2008.
11. Boje, D. Leadership is theatre! 4 2008 http://business.nmsu.edu/~dboje/388/leadership_theatre_book.html (2005)
12. Ford, J. (1999). Organizational change as shifting conversations. Journal of Change Management, 12, (6), 480-500 http://www.hsdinstitute.org/learn-more/library/articles.html