Post on 24-Jun-2015
description
The Issue of (Good) Water Governance in the
Americas
World Water ForumMarseille – March 15, 2012
Karin KemperSector Manager, Environment and Water ResourcesLatin America and the Caribbean RegionThe World Bank
Presentation OutlineA few Thoughts about Water Governance, Good Water Governance and IWRM
The experience with attempts at Good Governance - A Global Study
What do the Study Results Mean for Good Governance globally and in the Americas?
Conclusions
A few Thoughts about
Water Governance, Good Water
Governance, and Integrated Water
Resources Management
UNDP and Global Water Partnership define water governance as a “range of political, social, economic and administrative systems that are in place to develop and manage water resources and the delivery of water services, at different levels of society”.
What is Water Governance ?
So What is Good Water Governance?
• Combined Commitment of government and various groups on civil society, particularly at local/ community levels, together with the private sector.
• Ethical Issues - Transparency, Equity & Fairness are fundamental requirements
• Responsibility & Accountability - Each institution must know & take responsibility for what it does.
• Inclusiveness, participation, predictability & responsiveness - Decision-making & implementation must be inclusive & communicative with governments, civil society, & the private sector each having clear roles to play with shared responsibilities on the basis of public-private partnerships.
• Coherence - Policies & actions must be coherent, requiring political leadership and responsibility on the part of institutions at different levels to ensure a consistent approach within a complex system.
So what’s the difference between (Good) Water
Governance and Integrated Water Resources
Management?Governance provides the context within which Integrated Water Resources Management can be applied (according to GWP)
IWRM encompasses the Subsidiary Principle
The principle of Managing Water Resources at the Lowest Appropriate Levels, i.e. decentralization of decision making powers
=> certainly an ambition of Good Governance in IWRM
What Has Been the Experience with Attempts at Good Governance (or the Subsidiary Principle of IWRM)? -
Results from a Global Study
Global Study on the Principle of Managing Water Resources at the Lowest Appropriate Levels
(RBM Decentralization)
When and why does it (not) work in practice?
What can we learn from experiences around the world to advise countries facing reform needs?
*World Bank with University of Indiana and support from INBO and LANBO
Defining RBM Decentralization
increase in transparency in decision making, and increase in stakeholder involvement in decision makingMeasuring decentralization by taking into account:
The existing institutional framework
The process
The political economy and
The results
Three Main Study Elements
1. Extensive literature review of decentralization experiences
2. A global survey and analysis of 83 river basin organizations
3. In depth comparative case study analysis of 8 basins
12
Distribution of responses and data collection efforts by
continentsContinent Questionnaires
sent Responses Eliminated Retained in the data
set Africa & Middle East 18 14 2 12 (66)a Latin America 118 37 2 35 (30) North America 5 5 0 5 (100) East Asia-Pacific 7 7 3 4 (57) Europe 49 40 13 27 (26) Total 197 103 20 83 (42)
In parentheses are percent of retained questionnaires of those that responded
13
Location of the 8 In-Depth Case Studies
Organizational Features of River Basin Organizations Studied
Organizational features ranged from State corporation (Indonesia) to non-governmental organization (Canada)Management problems included scarcity and drought, floods, pollution, inter-sectoral conflict, mega-city urbanization, and erosion–usually combinedRBO responsibilities ranged from planning and consultation only, to infrastructure O&M responsibilities, collecting water charges, water quality monitoring to licensing of water uses and water allocation
15
CONCLUSIONS FROM THE ECONOMETRIC/SURVEY
AND CASE STUDY ANALYSES
16
Study ResultsHigh wealth or other endowments helpful but not essential to successDifficult water resource problems often stimulate, rather than deter, development of basin organizations and stakeholder participationPresence of water user organizations positively associated with reform successAdequate revenues, and financial autonomy to use revenues within the basin, contribute to successConsistency of central government support is vitalReforms often take a long time.
What do the Study Results Mean for Good Governance globally and in the Americas?
18
Institutional arrangements
Decentralization/Management at the Lowest Appropriate Level is not a panacea – it has to be done right don’t just copy approaches but look for the right features that fit a certain country or basin
-> recent discussion about scale – what IS the lowest appropriate level?
Champions are really important, but they don’t last forever…. Early institutionalization is key!
19
Political EconomyPolitical economy is important: vested interests to keep things as they are existed in all cases
Basins with complex problems and highly political issues may encounter difficult decentralization processes
Good Governance is a moving target….. Example Australia, Ceará/Brazil
Crises may help to push reform, but persistent recurring problems such as scarcity or flooding are also good incentives
Finances!
Predictable budget and budget decision making is important for stakeholders to remain interested in decentralization
Governments have little to lose with decentralization: determined, strong government support, including financial, will remain important
Conclusion
There is a clear case for ‘Good Governance’ to achieve better results
We need to look at scale
Consistent financing is a key issue
WRM is dynamic, and so is its Governance
-> urbanization in LAC, climate change, food crisis and increasing energy demand are important drivers for change
22