Post on 13-Dec-2015
L. Linssen, CLIC physics and detector monthly meeting, May 14th 2012
1
General news, future LC organisation, update on CDR Vol3…
Lucie Linssen
L. Linssen, CLIC physics and detector monthly meeting, May 14th 2012
CLIC CDR, published/printed
2
Physics and Detectors => publishedhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1202.5940ANL-HEP-TR-12-01CERN-2012-003DESY 12-008KEK Report 2011-7
Printed copies were sent out at beginning of April.
In some cases, copies took >1 month in the mail.
Please let us know in case your copy did not arrive.
L. Linssen, CLIC physics and detector monthly meeting, May 14th 2012
3
Organisational matters
Post-2012Linear Collider organisation
under ICFA,in preparation
• At KILC12 it was announced: search committee converged on one candidate for LC director• Candidate still needs to be approved by ICFA• Possible announcement of LC director + 3 associate directors at ICHEP, July, Melbourne
L. Linssen, CLIC physics and detector monthly meeting, May 14th 2012
4
Possible future LC organisation
Currently, discussions are ongoingwithin WWS-OC and within the groups/collaborations about a model for the future physics&detector box.
Some level of convergence.... about having stronger bottom-up approach than current ILC RD model
L. Linssen, CLIC physics and detector monthly meeting, May 14th 2012
5
ILD SiD CALICE
LC-TPC FCAL
R&D
R&D
R&D
group(ILC)
group(ILC)
“collab”(CLIC)
hostlab
“collab”(LC)
“collab”(LC)
“collab”(LC)
R&D
groups involved in“world-wide LC detector work”
CLICp&d
R&DR&D
L. Linssen, CLIC physics and detector monthly meeting, May 14th 2012
6
ILD SiDCLICp&d
CALICE
LC-TPC FCAL
R&D
R&D
R&D
group(ILC)
group(ILC)
“collab”(CLIC)
hostlab
“collab”(LC)
“collab”(LC)
“collab”(LC)
R&D
possible future LC organisation(this is nothing more than current discussion basis…)
R&D
steering
review
‘director’coordinator/facilitator
bottom-up coordinating body representatives from blocks below
R&D
L. Linssen, CLIC physics and detector monthly meeting, May 14th 2012
7
• More bottom-up and self-organising than the current ILC RD structure
• Build upon current strong groups (ILD, SiD, CLIC p&d, CALICE, LC-TPC, FCAL..)
• More clear visibility/involvement of participating institutes
• Rotation of responsibility roles
• Try to limit the number of “steering groups”
• Try to limit the number of “review” bodies, and ensure that the review bodies are real “expert bodies” ?
Questions:
• Role of WWS ?
• Which parts of the structure needs to be fully global ?
• Which parts of the new structure need “regional representation” ?
More remarks about the future LC organisation
L. Linssen, CLIC physics and detector monthly meeting, May 14th 2012
8
CLIC Detector Institute Board (IB)
ChairpersonOne person from each institute
CLIC Detector Executive TeamLucie LinssenMark Thomson, James Wells, Konrad Elsener
Steering Board
Executive teamRepresentative ILDRepresentative SiDWorking group convenersChairperson of IB
working groups
CLIC Steering Committee
(CSC)acc. + det.
✓“ad interim”
next step to beimplemented
✔exists
already
requires draftingMoA
+ participants(will take ~1 year)
CLICp&d
R&D
“CLIC physics and detector study”
L. Linssen, CLIC physics and detector monthly meeting, May 14th 2012
9
These are all CERN-funded projects (e.g. CERN contribution to LHC experiments, accelerator operation, etc, etc)
CERN-LCD
project
this project stands for: “funding to work on LC detectors: ILC/CLIC concepts and R&D”
project leader is Lucie(nominated by CERN DG)
2 explanatory slides, serving just to give background info…
L. Linssen, CLIC physics and detector monthly meeting, May 14th 2012
10
ILD SiDCLICp&d
CALICE
LC-TPC FCAL
R&D
R&D
R&D
group(ILC)
group(ILC)
“collab”(CLIC)
hostlab
“collab”(LC)
“collab”(LC)
“collab”(LC)
R&D
CERN LCD project participation
CERN-LCD
projectR&D
CERN-LCD
project
R&D
• Accelerator:• Philippe Lebrun, Daniel Schulte, Steinar Stapnes, Nobu Toge
• Physics/detector:• Frank Simon, Harry Weerts, James Wells, LL• Angela Lucaci Timoce
• Timescale:• Due date for a full draft: June 20th• Submit Volume 3 at end July• Submit a 15-page condensed version as CLIC input to European Strategy process
• A few more meetings were held recently and editing has started• Lots of discussions about energy staging implementation options for the machine
CLIC CDR volume 3
CLIC CDR volume 3, status• Foreword (1p) and/or Introduction (1p, nothing yet)
• Physics overview (5-7 pages, James Wells)• Detailed outline was set up ✪• Writing has started
• The CLIC machine technology (6-8 pages, Daniel Schulte)• Detailed outline was set up
• Detector technologies (5 pages, Angela, Frank, Harry, Lucie)• First draft of the full text exists (extracted from Vol2)
• Implementation of the project (8-12 pages, Philippe Lebrun)• Convergence on the scope/options✪
• Strategy, objectives and work-plan for post CDR phase (8-12 pages, Steinar and Lucie)• Detailed outline was set up✪
• Physics potential (5-7 pages, Frank)• Detailed outline was set up✪• Good progress with new benchmark studies✪ => writing will start soon
L. Linssen, CLIC physics and detector monthly meeting, May 14th 2012
13
L. Linssen, CLIC physics and detector monthly meeting, May 14th 2012
14
Lucie Linssen, FCAL meeting, Zeuthen, May 8th 2012
15
Physics/detector objectives: 2012-2016
Implementation study and technical demonstration phasePhysics studies, following up on 7-8 TeV and 14 TeV LHC results
Exploration of SM physics (incl. Higgs, top) and reach for new physicsAdaptation of strategy for CLIC energy staging and luminosity levels
Detector optimisationGeneral detector optimisation + simulation studies in close relation with detector R&D
R&D: Implementation examples demonstrating the required functionalityVertex detector
Demonstration module that meets the requirementsMain tracker
Demonstration modules, including manageable occupancies in the event reconstructionCalorimeters
Demonstration modules, technological prototypes + addressing control of cost Electronics
Demonstrators, in particular in view of power pulsingMagnet systems
Demonstrators of conductor technology, safety systems and moveable service linesEngineering and detector integration
Engineering design and detector integration harmonized with hardware R&D demonstrators Challenging detector technologies, considered feasible in a 5-year R&D program
Most of the work in
common with ILC
L. Linssen, CLIC physics and detector monthly meeting, May 14th 2012
16
Ongoing benchmark studies, staged energyNew benchmark studies (ongoing) with staged energies(In addition to studies already reported in the CDR)
Stage 1: Ecm = 500 GeV machine (+350 GeV running)Lint = 500 fb-1
Higgs mass measurement (500 GeV, 350 GeV)t-tbar threshold scan (350 GeV)
Stage 2: Ecm = 1.4 TeVLint = 1.5 ab-1 triple Higgs couplingSUSY studies with “Model 3”
sleptons (inc. stau), gauginos
Stage 3: Ecm = 3 TeVLint = 2 ab-1
triple Higgs coupling
L. Linssen, CLIC physics and detector monthly meeting, May 14th 2012
17