Post on 05-Aug-2020
Coal Export Terminal Rail Flyover Modification Threatened Species Assessment
00453138.DOCX\4 June, 2012
ATTACHMENT A
DATABASE RESULTS
Coal Export Terminal Rail Flyover Modification Threatened Species Assessment
00453138.DOCX\4 June, 2012 A-1
Table A1 Threatened Flora and Fauna Species from Kooragang Island
Scientific Name Common Name
Conservation Status1
Species Records
Potential Habitat in the Modification Area OEH
BioNet/ Atlas of
NSW Wildlife2
Australian Museum3
Birds Australia4
Ecological Assessment for
PWCS T4 Project5 TSC Act
EPBC Act
FLORA
SCROPHULARIACEAE
Euphrasia arguta - CE CE - - No likely potential habitat.
ZANNICHELLIACEAE
Zannichellia palustris - E - - - Potential habitat is present in freshwater wetlands and saltmarsh.
FAUNA
Amphibians
HYLIDAE
Litoria aurea Green and Golden Bell Frog
E V - - Habitat is present in freshwater wetlands and saltmarsh.
Birds
ANSERANATIDAE
Anseranas semipalmata Magpie Goose V - - Habitat is present in freshwater wetlands and surrounding areas of permanent water (e.g. Deep Pond).
ANATIDAE
Stictonetta naevosa Freckled Duck V - - No likely potential habitat.
Oxyura australis Blue-billed Duck V - - - No likely potential habitat.
PROCELLARIIDAE
Pterodroma solandri Providence Petrel V - - - - No likely potential habitat.
CICONIIDAE
Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus Black-necked Stork
E - - Limited. Habitat is present in freshwater wetlands and surrounding areas of permanent water. Limited foraging habitat on saltmarsh.
Coal Export Terminal Rail Flyover Modification Threatened Species Assessment
00453138.DOCX\4 June, 2012 A-2
Table A1 (Continued) Threatened Flora and Fauna Species from Kooragang Island
Scientific Name Common Name Conservation
Status1
Species Records
Potential Habitat in the Modification Area OEH
BioNet/ Atlas of
NSW Wildlife2
Australian Museum3
Birds Australia4
Ecological Assessment for
PWCS T4 Project5
ARDEIDAE
Botaurus poiciloptilus Australasian Bittern
E E - Limited. Habitat is present in freshwater wetlands and surrounding areas of permanent water.
Ixobrychus flavicollis Black Bittern V - - - Limited. Habitat is present in freshwater wetlands and surrounding areas of permanent water.
ACCIPITRIDAE
Pandion cristatus Eastern Osprey V -- - No likely potential habitat.
Lophoictinia isura Square-tailed Kite
V - - - - No likely potential habitat.
Circus assimilis Spotted Harrier V - - No likely potential habitat.
Hieraaetus morphnoides Little Eagle V - - No likely potential habitat.
TURNICIDAE
Turnix maculosus Red-backed Button-quail
V - - - - No likely potential habitat.
BURHINIDAE
Burhinus grallarius Bush Stone-curlew
E - - - - No likely potential habitat.
HAEMATOPODIDAE
Haematopus longirostris Pied Oystercatcher
E - - - - No likely potential habitat.
Haematopus fuliginosus Sooty Oystercatcher
V - - - No likely potential habitat.
Coal Export Terminal Rail Flyover Modification Threatened Species Assessment
00453138.DOCX\4 June, 2012 A-3
Table A1 (Continued) Threatened Flora and Fauna Species from Kooragang Island
Scientific Name Common Name Conservation
Status1
Species Records
Potential Habitat in the Modification Area OEH
BioNet/ Atlas of
NSW Wildlife2
Australian Museum3
Birds Australia4
Ecological Assessment for
PWCS T4 Project5
CHARADRIIDAE
Charadrius mongolus Lesser Sand-plover
V - - Limited foraging habitat.
Charadrius leschenaultii Greater Sand Plover
V - - - Limited foraging habitat.
JACANIDAE
Irediparra gallinacea Comb-crested Jacana
V - Limited. Habitat is present in freshwater wetlands.
ROSTRATULIDAE
Rostratula australis Australian Painted Snipe
E V - - Limited foraging habitat.
SCOLOPACIDAE
Limosa limosa Black-tailed Godwit
V - Limited foraging habitat.
Xenus cinereus Terek Sandpiper V - Limited potential habitat in saltmarsh.
Calidris tenuirostris Great Knot V - - Limited foraging habitat in freshwater wetlands and saltmarsh.
Calidris ferruginea Curlew Sandpiper
E - Limited foraging habitat.
Limicola falcinellus Broad-billed Sandpiper
V - - Habitat present in saltmarsh.
LARIDAE
Sternula albifrons Little Tern E - - No likely potential habitat.
Coal Export Terminal Rail Flyover Modification Threatened Species Assessment
00453138.DOCX\4 June, 2012 A-4
Table A1 (Continued) Threatened Flora and Fauna Species from Kooragang Island
Scientific Name Common Name Conservation
Status1
Species Records
Potential Habitat in the Modification Area OEH
BioNet/ Atlas of
NSW Wildlife2
Australian Museum3
Birds Australia4
Ecological Assessment for
PWCS T4 Project5
PSITTACIDAE
Calyptorhynchus lathami Glossy Black-Cockatoo
V - - - - No likely potential habitat.
STRIGIDAE
Ninox strenua Powerful Owl V - - - Limited foraging habitat.
TYTONIDAE
Tyto novaehollandiae Masked Owl V - - - - Limited foraging habitat.
Tyto longimembris Eastern Grass Owl
V - - - - Limited foraging habitat.
MELIPHAGIDAE
Epthianura albifrons White-fronted Chat
V - No likely potential habitat.
ESTRILDIDAE
Stagonopleura guttata Diamond Firetail V - - - No likely potential habitat.
Mammals
PTEROPODIDAE
Pteropus poliocephalus Grey-headed Flying-fox
V V - - Limited habitat in mangrove habitat.
EMBALLONURIDAE
Saccolaimus flaviventris Yellow-bellied Sheathtail-bat
V - - - - Limited foraging habitat.
MOLOSSIDAE
Mormopterus norfolkensis Eastern Freetail-bat
V - - - Limited foraging habitat.
Coal Export Terminal Rail Flyover Modification Threatened Species Assessment
00453138.DOCX\4 June, 2012 A-5
Table A1 (Continued) Threatened Flora and Fauna Species from Kooragang Island
Scientific Name Common Name Conservation
Status1
Species Records
Potential Habitat in the Modification Area OEH
BioNet/ Atlas of
NSW Wildlife2
Australian Museum3
Birds Australia4
Ecological Assessment for
PWCS T4 Project5
VESPERTILIONIDAE
Falsistrellus tasmaniensis Eastern False Pipistrelle
V - - - Limited foraging habitat.
Miniopterus australis Little Bentwing-bat
V - - - Limited foraging habitat.
Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis
Eastern Bentwing-bat
V - - - Limited foraging habitat.
Myotis macropus Southern Myotis V - - - Limited foraging habitat.
Scoteanax rueppellii Greater Broad-nosed Bat
V - - - - Limited foraging habitat.
1 Conservation status under NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995 and Commonwealth Environment Protection an Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999 (current as at 25 May 2012).
V – Vulnerable; E – Endangered, CE – Critically Endangered. 2 Office of Environment and Heritage (2012) BioNet/Atlas of NSW Wildlife Records for the Search Area: N: -32.82, S: -32.92, W: 151.68, E: 151.78. Date Received: 25 May 2012. 3 Australian Museum (2012) Database Records for the Search Area: -32.9563, 151.6151; -32.7760, 151.6179; -32.7782, 151.8314; -32.9585, 151.8290. Date Received: 30 May 2012. 4 Birds Australia (2012) Database Records for the Search Area: -32.9563, 151.6151; -32.7760, 151.6179; -32.7782, 151.8314; -32.9585, 151.8290. Date Received: 24 May 2012. 5 Umwelt (Australia) Pty Ltd (2012) Ecological Assessment for Port Waratah Coal Services (PWCS) Proposed Terminal 4 (T4) Project, Port of Newcastle NSW.
Coal Export Terminal Rail Flyover Modification Threatened Species Assessment
00453138.DOCX
ATTACHMENT B
BIRD MONITORING RESULTS
Coal Export Terminal Rail Flyover Modification Threatened Species Assessment
00453138.DOCX B-1
Table B-1 Bird Species Recorded at Deep Pond
Scientific Name Common Name Conservation Status under the TSC Act1
Monitoring Programs
16/01/2010 to 16/12/2010 1/01/2009 to 19/12/2009 19/01/2008 to 10/01/2009
PHASIANIDAE
Coturnix ypsilophora Brown Quail - - -
ANSERANATIDAE
Anseranas semipalmata Magpie Goose V -
ANATIDAE
Cygnus atratus Black Swan -
Malacorhynchus membranaceus Pink-eared Duck - -
Anas superciliosa Pacific Black Duck -
Anas rhynchotis Australasian Shoveler -
Anas gracilis Grey Teal -
Anas castanea Chestnut Teal -
Aythya australis Hardhead -
Biziura lobata Musk Duck -
PODICIPEDIDAE
Tachybaptus novaehollandiae Australasian Grebe -
Poliocephalus poliocephalus Hoary-headed Grebe -
THRESKIORNITHIDAE
Threskiornis molucca Australian White Ibis -
Platalea regia Royal Spoonbill -
ARDEIDAE
Bubulcus ibis Cattle Egret - - -
Ardea alba Great Egret -
Ardea intermedia Intermediate Egret -
Egretta novaehollandiae White-faced Heron -
Egretta garzetta Little Egret -
PELECANIDAE
Pelecanus conspicillatus Australian Pelican -
Coal Export Terminal Rail Flyover Modification Threatened Species Assessment
00453138.DOCX\4 June, 2012 B-2
Table B-1 (Continued) Bird Species Recorded at Deep Pond
Scientific Name Common Name Conservation Status under the TSC Act1
Monitoring Programs
16/01/2010 to 16/12/2010 1/01/2009 to 19/12/2009 19/01/2008 to 10/01/2009
PHALACROCORACIDAE
Microcarbo melanoleucos Little Pied Cormorant -
Phalacrocorax sulcirostris Little Black Cormorant -
Phalacrocorax varius Pied Cormorant - - -
Phalacrocorax carbo Great Cormorant -
ANHINGIDAE
Anhinga novaehollandiae Australasian Darter -
FALCONIDAE
Falco cenchroides Australian Kestrel - -
Falco longipennis Australian Hobby - -
Falco berigora Brown Falcon - - -
ACCIPITRIDAE
Elanus axillaris Black-shouldered Kite - -
Haliastur sphenurus Whistling Kite -
Haliaeetus leucogaster White-bellied Sea-Eagle -
Circus approximans Swamp Harrier -
Circus assimilis Spotted Harrier V -
Accipter fasciatus Brown Goshawk - -
Accipiter cirrocephalus Collared Sparrowhawk - - -
RALLIDAE
Gallirallus philippensis Buff-banded Rail - -
Lewinia pectoralis Lewin’s Rail - - -
Porzana pusilla Baillon’s Crake - - -
Porzana fluminea Australian Crake - - -
Porphyrio porphyrio Purple Swamphen -
Gallinula tenebrosa Dusky Moorhen -
Fulica atra Eurasian Coot - -
Coal Export Terminal Rail Flyover Modification Threatened Species Assessment
00453138.DOCX\4 June, 2012 B-3
Table B-1 (Continued) Bird Species Recorded at Deep Pond
Scientific Name Common Name Conservation Status under the TSC Act1
Monitoring Programs
16/01/2010 to 16/12/2010 1/01/2009 to 19/12/2009 19/01/2008 to 10/01/2009
RECURVIROSTRIDAE
Himantopus himantopus Black-winged Stilt -
Recurvirostra novaehollandiae Red-necked Avocet - -
CHARADRIIDAE
Vanellus miles Masked Lapwing -
Erythrogonys cinctus Red-kneed Dotterel - - -
Charadrius ruficapillus Red-capped Plover - - -
Charadrius bicinctus Double-banded Plover - - -
Elseyornis melanops Black-fronted Dotterel -
SCOLOPACIDAE
Limosa limosa Black-tailed Godwit V - -
Limosa lapponica Bar-tailed Godwit - - -
Tringa stagnatilis Marsh Sandpiper - -
Tringa nebularia Common Greenshank - - -
Caladris ruficollis Red-necked Stint - - -
Calidris acuminata Sharp-tailed Sandpiper - -
LARIDAE
Chroicocephalus novaehollandiae Silver Gull -
Sterna nilotica Gull-billed Tern - - -
Hydroprogne caspia Caspian Tern - -
Chlidonias hybridus Whiskered Tern - - -
CUCULIDAE
Chrysococcyx basalis Horsfield's Bronze-Cuckoo - - -
MALURIDAE
Malurus cyaneus Superb Fairy-wren - - -
MELIPHAGIDAE
Epthianura albifrons White-fronted Chat V -
Coal Export Terminal Rail Flyover Modification Threatened Species Assessment
00453138.DOCX\4 June, 2012 B-4
Table B-1 (Continued) Bird Species Recorded at Deep Pond
Scientific Name Common Name Conservation Status under the TSC Act1
Monitoring Programs
16/01/2010 to 16/12/2010 1/01/2009 to 19/12/2009 19/01/2008 to 10/01/2009
PHALACROCORACIDAE
CORVIDAE
Corvus coronoides Australian Raven - - -
HIRUNDINIDAE
Hirundo neoxena Welcome Swallow - - -
SYLVIIDAE
Acrocephalus stentoreus Australian Reed-Warbler -
Megalurus timoriensis Tawny Grassbird -
Megalurus gramineus Little Grassbird -
Cisticola exilis Golden-headed Cisticola -
MOTACILLIDAE
Anthus australis Australasian Pipit - -
ESTRILDIDAE
Lonchura castaneothorax Chestnut-breasted Mannikin - -
FRINGILLIDAE
Carduelis carduelis* European Goldfinch* - - - 1 Conservation status under NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995 and Commonwealth Environment Protection an Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999 (current as at 25 May 2012).
V – Vulnerable; E – Endangered, CE – Critically Endangered.
Notes:
- Nomenclature consistent with CSIRO (2006) CSIRO List of Australian Vertebrates A Reference with Conservation Status.
* Introduced species.
Coal Export Terminal Rail Flyover Modification Threatened Species Assessment
00453138.DOCX\4 June, 2012
ATTACHMENT C
PEER REVIEW LETTER FROM DR ARTHUR WHITE
(a suitably qualified ecologist approved by the Director-General)
1
1 June 2012 Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group C/- Resource Strategies Pty Ltd P.O. Box 1842 Milton QLD 4064 Attention: Mr Phil Reid
NCIG COAL EXPORT TERMINAL RAIL FLYOVER MODIFICATION THREATENED SPECIES ASSESSMENT REVIEW
Dear Mr Reid, As requested, I have reviewed the threatened species assessment that has been prepared as part of the Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group (NCIG) Coal Export Terminal Rail Flyover Modification Environmental Assessment (EA). I have and continue to be personally involved with ongoing works and activities for projects on Kooragang Island in my role as qualified ecologist approved by the Director-General, in accordance with Condition 2.19 of Project Approval (06_0009). I consider the assessment to be adequate and concur with the findings and proposed mitigation and compensatory measures. I agree that the biodiversity values in the region are likely to be maintained considering: • the small scale of land disturbance required the Rail Flyover Modification (2.6 hectares
[ha]);
• the proportion of proposed land disturbance which is already disturbed (42 percent [%] or 1.1 ha);
• the additional Endangered Ecological Communities (EECs) proposed to be removed for the Rail Flyover Modification are only small incremental disturbances (<3%) additional to the area of EECs already approved for clearance;
Mail Address: 69 Bestic St. Rockdale NSW 2216 A.C.N. 065 241 732 e-mail: 1arthur@tpg.com.au A.B.N. 32 065 241 732
2
• the Rail Flyover Modification area is a linear disturbance located adjacent to the existing rail (infrastructure would therefore be streamlined);
• the works would not significantly impact any threatened species, populations, or ecological communities, or their habitats, listed under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995;
• the works would be undertaken in accordance with a number of approved environmental management plans, including controls for weeds, animal pests, lighting, etc.
• NCIG would establish additional compensatory habitat for the Green and Golden Bell Frog in accordance with the existing NCIG Compensatory Habitat and Ecological Monitoring Program; and
• NCIG would undertake the works in accordance with the modified conditions of approval.
Further, I am of the opinion that the Rail Flyover Modification is unlikely to have a significant effect on any threatened species or their habitats. Yours faithfully
Dr Arthur White
NCIG CET - Rail Flyover Modification Environmental Assessment
00451026.doc Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group
APPENDIX E
CONSTRUCTION FILL TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT [GTA Consultants, 2012]
20yea r s1989-20
09
Our Ref: 12S1311000
27 April 2012
Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group C/- Resource Strategies Pty Ltd PO Box 1842 MILTON QLD 4064
Attention: Mr Phil Reid
Dear Phil,
RE: NEWCASTLE COAL INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP
RAIL FLYOVER MODIFICATION CONSTRUCTION FILL TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT
As requested by the Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group (NCIG), GTA Consultants has undertaken an assessment of the potential road network implications associated with the transport of clean fill by road to the Newcastle Coal Export Terminal (CET) site on Kooragang Island in Newcastle, New South Wales.
NCIG is proposing to construct a rail flyover for the NCIG Northern Rail Spur (the “Rail Flyover Modification”). This will require approximately 360,000 tonnes (t) of clean fill material, to be transported to the CET site from nearby quarries. The purpose of this road transport assessment is to consider the implications of road haulage of fill to the CET site with regard to the approved traffic and transport management measures for construction activities.
The proposed works associated with the construction of the rail flyover will follow on from the Stage 2AA construction activities on the CET site which are nearing completion, as well as the Stage 2F construction activities which will be completed prior to the commencement of the rail flyover construction.
As will be described further in this assessment, the proposed rail flyover construction works will generate significantly less heavy vehicle movements to and from the site compared with the current Stage 2AA works.
Notwithstanding the above, the road transport assessment presented in this report has been undertaken to consider updated information relating to existing background (i.e. non CET site) traffic flows on the surrounding road network.
The findings of the road transport assessment for the transport of fill during the construction of the rail flyover are provided in this report.
GTA
Le
tte
r 201
2
Appendix E 2
1. Background
Project Approval (06_0009) for the NCIG CET was granted by the Minister for Planning on 13 April 2007. The Environment Assessment (EA) for the CET included a Road Transport Assessment1 which considered the traffic implications of both construction and operation of the proposal.
In accordance with Condition 2.47, Schedule 2 of Project Approval (06_009) a Construction Traffic Management Protocol2 (CTMP) report was prepared for the NCIG CET, and has subsequently been updated for Stage 2F construction activities3.
The Stage 2F CTMP establishes the protocols for managing traffic during construction activities and includes:
• Details of anticipated construction traffic generation
• Site access intersection treatments
• Road improvements.
The CTMP will be updated where necessary to describe the management of rail flyover construction traffic movements.
It is noted that at the time of the CET project approval, it was anticipated that fill for the CET could be required from a different source than from the dredging and remediation of the south arm of the Hunter River which was to be the subject of a separate development approval.
These filling arrangements were reflected in Condition 2.47, Schedule 2 of Project Approval (06_0009) which reads:
“Unless otherwise agreed by the Director General, the Proponent shall only source clean materials for use in fill/preloading activities from the development the subject of development consent DA-134-3-2003-I (dredging and remediation of the South Arm of the Hunter River). Where the Proponent seeks the agreement of the Director-General to use fill/pre-load materials from a different source, the Director-General may require submission of additional information to demonstrate how the impacts from heavy vehicle movements will be adequately and appropriately mitigated and managed.”
The Director-General of the Department of Planning (now the Department of Planning and Infrastructure) has approved NCIG to transport fill material from external sources to the CET for Stage 2AA works, in accordance with Condition 2.47 of the Project Approval.
As with the Stage 2AA requirements, NCIG is proposing to source fill for the rail flyover works from external sources. This road transport assessment has been prepared to demonstrate how the impacts from heavy vehicle movements will be adequately and appropriately mitigated and managed and thereby address the requirements of Condition 2.47.
The Stage 2F CTMP for the CET will be updated where necessary to reflect the changes to construction vehicle movements associated with the rail flyover construction traffic movements.
1 Newcastle Coal Export Terminal Road Transport Assessment (May 2006) prepared by Masson Wilson Twiney Pty Ltd 2 Newcastle Coal Export Terminal Construction Traffic Management Protocol (June 2007) prepared by Connell Hatch 3 Newcastle Coal Export Terminal Construction Traffic Management Protocol (March 2012) prepared by NCIG
Appendix E 3
2. Overview of Proposed Rail Flyover Works
The Rail Flyover Modification includes the following components:
• grade separation of the inbound track for the NCIG Northern Rail Spur (also referred as the ‘high capacity optional inlet rail spur and rail sidings’);
• minor realignment of the inbound (western) track of the Kooragang Island Main Line; and
• minor realignment of the outbound (eastern) track of the Kooragang Island Main Line.
The location of these works is shown in Attachment A.
As described above, approximately 360,000t of fill material is required for the construction of the rail flyover and associated rail alignments.
Proposed Sources of Fill
The construction works will involve the transport of fill material to the construction site from quarries in the Lochinvar area, namely:
• Quarry Products Newcastle
• Gosforth Quarries
• Brandy Hill Quarry.
The location of the sources of fill and the associate transport routes to and from the CET are shown in Attachment B. These are the same quarries that fill material for Stage 2AA is currently sourced from.
The relevant EPLs for each quarry permits the following extraction rates:
• Brandy Hill Quarry: up to 2,000,000t of material per annum
• Gosforth Quarries: up to 100,000t of material per annum
• Quarry Products Newcastle: up to 2,000,000t of material per annum.
Truck Volume Generation
Fill will be transported to the construction site over a period of approximately 18 months.
The estimated volume of trucks to be generated by the importation of fill over the 18 month period is shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Estimated Fill Quantity and Truck Volumes
Period Number of Truck Deliveries (per day) Fleet
6 months (July to December 2012) 32 8 trucks, 4 deliveries each
6 months (January to June 2013) 48 12 trucks, 4 deliveries each
6 months (July to December 2013) 32 8 trucks, 4 deliveries each
Notes: Estimated number of truck movements based on 28t/ truck
It is proposed that fill will be imported to site between 7:00 am and 6:00 pm Monday to Friday and between 7.00am and 1.00pm on Saturdays. Fill will not be transported to the CET on Sundays or public holidays.
Appendix E 4
Proposed Transport Routes
As shown in Attachment B the proposed transport route for fill would be via the New England Highway, Pacific Highway, Industrial Drive, Tourle Street Bridge and Cormorant Road.
Access to the NCIG CET site will be via the prescribed transport route as presented in CET Road Transport Assessment4 report of the NCIG Environmental Assessment (EA).
Under the approved route trucks will access the rail flyover construction site using the existing access point immediately to the north of the Tourle Street Bridge (Delta Access Road). This would be via left turn northbound movements only. Trucks will leave the site by left turn onto Cormorant Road from Delta Access Road and performing a U-turn at the roundabout to return to the New England Highway.
The primary entry to the rail flyover construction site will be via Delta Access Road, however during exceptional circumstances, when access via Delta Access Road is restricted, trucks may enter and leave the site (left turn in, left turn out) via Pacific National Road. This potential route would be expected to only carry a small percentage of the overall traffic volume for the project.
Cumulative CET Site Traffic Generation
During the rail flyover construction works all other works will be completed and Stage 2F of the CET will be operating with a capacity of 66 Mtpa. No other significant construction works would be underway during the rail flyover works.
The EA Road Transport Assessment assessed a number of traffic generation scenarios.
Relevantly, Scenario 2 included:
• background traffic with growth to 2007
• traffic from approved developments
• CET construction traffic for Stage 1.
Scenario 2 has been updated to include the following additional traffic generation sources:
• Updated background local road network traffic survey data (October 2011)
• Operational traffic for CET Stage 2F
• Fill traffic for the rail flyover construction.
The estimated daily flows for traffic generated by the CET during the rail flyover fill works is summarised in Table 2. These updated site generated traffic flows have been used in the intersection operation assessment presented in this report (see Section 3).
Table 2: CET Stage 2F Daily Traffic Generation During Rail Flyover Fill Works
Activity Truck Movements (veh/day) Car Movements (veh/day)
Stage 2F Operation 1 10 80
Rail Flyover Fill Works (peak fill period)
96 0
Total 106 80
Notes: Sourced from EA Road Transport Assessment (2007)
4 Newcastle Coal Export Terminal Road Transport Assessment (May 2006) prepared by Masson Wilson Twiney Pty Ltd
Appendix E 5
The generation of approximately 106 truck movements per day by the CET will be a significant reduction of existing (Stage 2AA) filling works which are about to be completed.
Table 3 provides a summary of the estimated reduction in truck movements during the proposed rail flyover construction works.
Table 3: Comparison of CET Stage 2F and Stage 2AA Truck Movements During Fill Works
Activity Stage 2AA Construction Truck Movements
(veh/ day)
Stage 2F Operation with Rail Flyover Construction Truck
Movements (veh/day)
Operation 1 10 10
Fill Works (peak fill period) 240 96
Total 250 106
Notes: 1 Sourced from EA Road Transport Assessment (2007)
Table 3 indicates that truck movements to and from the CET will be reduced by nearly 60% compared with the peak filling period that occurred satisfactorily during Stage 2AA.
Construction of the proposed Port Waratah Coal Services T4 expansion is not anticipated to be underway when the rail flyover would be constructed. As such, potential cumulative impacts from the construction of T4 have not been considered in this assessment.
The recent (2011) background traffic data will include the Stage 2AA construction and operational traffic sources and the fill material being transported for Stage 2AA. These sources will not be contributing to traffic volumes during the construction of the rail flyover.
Therefore the assessment of the Rail Flyover presented in this report has considered the following:
• The 2011 background data minus the predicted Stage 2AA construction and operation movements and the Stage 2AA fill transport movements (Stage 2AA construction, operation and fill transport will be complete).
• The predicted Stage 2F operation traffic (Stage 2F construction will be complete).
• The predicted rail flyover fill transport movements.
3. Assessment of Road Network Impacts
Regional Road Network Implications
As fill material will be sourced from existing approved and operational quarries, it is considered that there will be no net change to traffic flows on the regional road network as this material has approval to be transported on the regional road network whether or not the rail flyover is being constructed.
Each of the quarries from which material will be sourced has an operation EPL which prescribes the amount of material that can be extracted and transported from the quarry per annum and associated transport conditions. It is understood that the proposed transport of fill to the CET would be consistent with the conditions of the relevant EPLs for each quarry.
Local Site Access Implications
Based on the above, it is considered that the road transport implications of the rail flyover filling works will be limited to the local access arrangements on Kooragang Island.
Appendix E 6
It is noted that the measures prescribed in the CTMP would be applied to rail flyover works as they were to the previous construction activities.
The intersection operation analysis undertaken as part of the EA Road Transport Assessment has been reassessed using the estimated traffic flows to be generated by the rail flyover construction activities as described above (as a worst-case scenario) and recent surveyed traffic flows (October 2011) of the existing network operation as presented in the T4 Project, Port Waratah Coal Services Limited Environmental Impact Assessment, Traffic Assessment prepared by EMGA Mitchell McLennan (February 2012).
It is noted that the surveys of existing base traffic flows undertaken as part of the T4 Project assessment included traffic generation associated with Stage 2AA filing works. As such the base traffic conditions will see a reduction in traffic flows on completion of Stage 2AA works.
The intersections that have been reassessed are:
• Cormorant Road / Teal Street (Roundabout)
• Cormorant Road / Egret Street (Priority)
• Cormorant Road / Wharf Road (Priority)
• Cormorant Road / Pacific National Access Road (Priority).
The results of the analysis are presented in Table 4.
The results presented in Table 4 indicate that each of the local site access route intersections would operate with the same or improved operating conditions during the filling works for the rail flyover compared with existing (2011) conditions.
The reduction of traffic generation by the NCIG site associated with the ceasing of Stage 2AA construction works and ceasing of Stage 2F construction works (at the commencement of Rail Flyover construction works would generally improve existing traffic conditions on the local road network as represented in the T4 Project Assessment.
Therefore it is considered that the measures prescribed in the CTMP are appropriate for application to the rail flyover works and would satisfactorily mitigate / manage the potential traffic implications during these works.
4. Conclusions
The findings of this assessment have concluded that the additional traffic movements associated with the transport of fill to the CET during construction of the rail flyover can be adequately and appropriately mitigated and managed in accordance with the CTMP.
Appendix E 7
If you have any queries regarding the above or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Yours sincerely
GTA CONSULTANTS
Jason Rudd Associate Director
Table 4 – Intersection Operation – Existing (2011) and During Rail Flyover Filling Works
Intersection Control Operational Performance
2011 Traffic Conditions With CET Stage 2F Operations + Rail Flyover Works
Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour
Level of Service Level of Service Average Delay Worst
Affected Movement (seconds)
Level of Service
Average Delay Worst
Affected Movement (seconds)
Level of Service
Cormorant Road / Teal Street
Roundabout B B 25 B 19 B
Cormorant Road/ Egret Street
Priority (Egret Left in Left
out)
E F 69 E 1. 96 F 1.
Cormorant Road/ Wharf Access
Priority F F 31 C 39 C
Cormorant Road/ Pacific National
Access Road
Priority C F 25 B 84 F 2.
Cormorant Road / Tourle Street / Delta Access
Road
Priority (Delta Access Left in
/ Left Out)
D F 29 D 96 F 3.
Notes:
[1] 1. This LoS applies to right turn from Cormorant Road to Egret St. 95th percentile queues do not exceed turn lane capacity during AM or PM peaks.
[2] 2.This LoS applies to right turn from Cormorant Road to Pacific National Access Road. 95th percentile queues do not exceed turn lane capacity during AM or PM peaks.
[3] 3.This LoS applies to left turn from the Delta Access Road to Cormorant Road. 95th percentile queues do not exceed turn lane capacity during AM or PM peaks.
Appendix E
Attachment A
LOCATION OF PROPOSED RAIL FLYOVER WORKS
HunterRiver
(South Arm)
Hunter River (North Arm)
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\\
/
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ \
\
\
\
\
\\
\
\
\
\
\
//
//
//
//
/ / /
/
\ \
\
\\
\
\
/
/
/
/
\
\
/
L.P.L.P.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
///
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
///
// //
//
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
X-ING
X-ING
KOOR
AGAN
G
384
000
E
6 362 000 N
382
000
E
380
000
E
6 360 000 N6 360 000 N
384
000
E
382
000
E
380
000
E
6 362 000 N
Delta
A
ccess
Ro
ad
Tourl
e
Stree
t
Cormorant
Road
Corm
orant
Road
Egret
Str
eet
Egret
Str
eet
Heron
Roa
d
Cormorant RoadRoad
Industrial DrivePacific Highway
Pacific Highway
Raven Street
Raven Street
Teal
Teal
Street
Street
SandpiperSandpiperCloseClose
Teal Street
Teal Street
Curlew Street
Curlew Street
Pacifi
c Na
tiona
l Ac
cess
Road
Tourle StreetBridge
ISLAN
D
MAINLIN
E
MAYF IELD
Water Tanks andPump Stations
Energy AustraliaProposed Substation Site
Coal Storage Area
MAYF IELDWEST
MAYF IELDNORTH
WAR ABROOK
TrainUnloadingStations
PORT WARATAH COAL SERV ICESKOORAGANG COAL TERMINAL
(A t Fu l l Deve lo pmen t )
Wharf Facilitiesand ShiploadersWharf Facilitiesand Shiploaders
Rail Spurs andRail Sidings
BHP Closure Area
KOORAGANG WETLANDREHABILITATION PROJECT
ASH ISLAND
Combined Stacker/Reclaimer
Administration, Workshopsand Carpark
Primary and SecondarySettling Ponds
Conveyors OverCormorant RoadConveyors OverCormorant Road
Rail Loops
RailOverpass
K10
K9
K8
K7
K6
K5
K4
ConveyorOverpass
Existing CormorantRoad RoundaboutExisting CormorantRoad Roundabout
U-turn LoopU-turn Loop
Steel River
OneSteel
High Capacity OptionalInlet Rail Spur andRail Sidings
Site WaterPond
Road LevelCrossing
Blue CircleSouthern Cement
Blue CircleSouthern Cement
Delta EMD Australia Landfill
PWCS FinesDisposal Area
OriginEnergyOriginEnergy
Berth Pockets
Realignment ofInbound Rail LineRealignment ofInbound Rail Line
Realignment ofOutbound Rail LineRealignment ofOutbound Rail Line
HUNTER WETLANDS NATIONAL PARK
(KOORAGANG NATURE RESERVE)
KO O RAG AN G I SLAN DFlyover (GradeSeparation) StructureFlyover (GradeSeparation) Structure
Nature Reserve
Mangrove Area
SEPP 14 Wetlands Area
LEGEND
Site Access Point
Rail Infrastructure Corridor (Approved)
Conveyors
Transfer Points
Shipping Berth
Coal Stockpiles
Metres
8000 400
K9
ATTACHMENT A
Approved Project and RailFlyover Modification -General Arrangement
Source: Patterson Britton (2007), NCIG (2006); Connell Hatch (2006);LPI NSW (2001a, 2001b, 2001c, 2002)
NCIG-07-02 RFM CFTR_001B
R A I L F L Y O V E R M O D I F I C A T I O N
Appendix E
Attachment B
PROPOSED TRANSPORT ROUTES