co-funded by ICT-PSP
The European Network on
• Statistics for Digitisation,
• Digital Preservation and
• Online Access to Cultural Heritage
The European Network on
• Statistics for Digitisation,
• Digital Preservation and
• Online Access to Cultural Heritage
ENUMERATE
Europeana Vlaanderen24/01/2013
• algemeen• core survey / thematic survey(s)• data platform (demo)
ENUMERATE is the European Thematic Network on Statistics for Digitisation,
Digital Preservation and Online Access to Digital Cultural Heritage.
ENUMERATE is the successor to the NUMERIC project (May 2007 – May 2009)
which sought to investigate evidence of the progress of Digitisation of Europe’s
Cultural Heritage.
ENUMERATE builds on the evidence and methodological framework established
by NUMERIC, and will draw on the recommendations to ensure continuity and
enhancement of the data it generated.
ENUMERATE general
ENUMERATE Aims
1. The development of a vibrant and sustainable European community of practice,
connecting practitioners in statistical analysis and digital content creation and
preservation and supporting the sharing of knowledge and best practices.
2. The creation, promotion and development of a statistically valid open methodology
for surveying the digitization, use, preservation and associated costs of cultural
heritage materials in Member States.
3. The implementation of a multi-annual programme of coordinated surveys based on
this methodology, including wide-scale harmonized statistical data-gathering and more
in-depth and analytical surveying of digitization activities by European cultural heritage
institutions.
4. The creation and maintenance of an open, sustainable data platform to collate,
analyse and promote the use of the normalized data and intelligence arising from
these surveys.
ENUMERATE Consortium
• Collections Trust, UK;
• Digitaal Erfgoed Nederland (DEN), Netherlands;
• Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Germany;
• Digibis, Spain;
• FARO Vlaams Steunpunt voor Cultureel Erfgoed, Belgium;
• Ministère de Culture et de la Communication, France;
• Oesterreichische Nationalbibliothek, Austria;
• Naradna in Univerzitetna Knjiznica (National and University Library), Slovenia;
• Orszagos Széchényi Konytvar (National Széchényi Library), Hungary;
• The European Library (hosted by the Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Netherlands).
ENUMERATE Surveys
Year 1: CORE SURVEY
A high-level survey aimed at establishing a baseline of statistical information about Digitisation, Digital Preservation, Digitisation Costs and Online Access to Digital Cultural Heritage.
Year 2: THEMATIC SURVEY
A detailed and in-depth survey aimed both at enhancing the quantitative data and supporting it with qualitative information.
Year 3: CORE SURVEY
A reiteration of the initial survey, aimed at improving the quality of the data and providing trend information and analysis to inform policy development.
Core survey (2012)
- Rapport : www.enumerate.eu
- geeft globale resultaten voor Europa
- geen rapport per land voorzien
- wel dataplatform met deelresultaten / land (demo)
- respons België (42) voldoende, maar laag in vgl. met NUMERIC (2008-2009)
- respons Vlaanderen te laag voor representatieve analyse (ca. 20) (NUMERIC: 72)
2. Response to the survey
• Total usable responses: 1951 from 29 countries (of these 300 were not
completed completely, but enough to be included in the results)
• From 1951: 1623 digitised / digitisation activities (83%), 328 none (17%)
• Highest response in Spain (255), problematic respons in Bulgaria (0) and France
(1). Non EU countries (‘Other’) are Liechtenstein and Switzerland
• Number of responding institutions is large enough to calculate reliable data on
the level of institution type
Figure 1: Response per country compared with target
ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012)
24
38
26
15
53
35
15
33
127
150
35
44
15
150
15
0
22
15
15
67
125
27
46
25
15
103
38
0
150
95
42
0
21
111
58
18
89
1
227
58
85
25
127
16
5
71
28
4
140
58
85
39
78
56
255
33
77
49
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switserland
United Kingdom
Target Realisation
Figure 2: Response by institution type (n=1951)
ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012)
409
403
274
249
171
160
97
73
47
38
30
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Special or other type of library
Archives/records office
Other type of museum
Museum of archaeology, history
Museum of art
Higher education library
Museum of science, technology
Museum of anthropology and ethnology
Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute
Institution for Monument Care
National library
3. Results: Digitisation activity
Figure 5: Estimated percentage of heritage collection already digitally reproduced and percentage still to be digitally reproduced (n=1626) - comparison Numeric
ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012)
42%
28%
26%
26%
24%
22%
22%
14%
12%
12%
4%
20%
52%
58%
64%
62%
61%
65%
63%
52%
55%
54%
62%
57%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Museum of art
Museum of archaeology, history
Institution for Monument Care
Museum of anthropology and ethnology
Other type of museum
Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute
Museum of science, technology
Higher education library
Archives/records office
Special or other type of library
National library
Total
Have digitized Intend to digitize
Figure 6: Object types most freq. digitised & intended to be digitised (n=1626)
ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012)
46%
29%
22%
24%
20%
28%
9%
12%
28%
66%
30%
35%
24%
31%
29%
11%
22%
21%
8%
7%
19%
21%
21%
56%
39%
25%
30%
23%
36%
13%
13%
37%
64%
32%
36%
32%
31%
27%
11%
21%
22%
10%
7%
21%
27%
24%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Archival records
Rare books
Other books
Newspapers
Serials
Manuscripts
Sheet music
Microforms/Microfilms
Maps
Photographs
Engravings/Prints
Drawings
Posters
Postcards
Paintings
2D objects
3D works of art
3D man-made objects
Other 3D objects (incl. natural science specimens)
Monuments and sites
Film
Video recordings
Audio (music & other recorded sound)
Have digitized Intend to digitize
Figure 7: Part of the collection catalogued in digital metadata and percentage of the collection currently digitized (n=200)
ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012)
34%
53%
58%
54%
65%
45%
33%
39%
42%
37%
47%
48%
40%
38%
52%
32%
45%
43%
27%
33%
37%
39%
45%
7%
8%
8%
17%
11%
14%
13%
14%
18%
32%
33%
46%
32%
40%
43%
29%
33%
23%
10%
26%
29%
38%
37%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Archival records (meters)
Rare books (volumes)
Other books (volumes)
Newspapers (titles)
Serials (volumes)
Manuscripts (number)
Sheet music (number)
Microforms/Microfilms (number)
Maps (number)
Photographs (number)
Engravings/prints (number)
Drawings (number)
Posters (number)
Postcards (number)
Paintings (number)
2 dimensional objects (number)
3 dimensional art objects (objects)
Other 3 dimensional man-made objects (objects)
Other 3 dimensional non-man-made (objects)
Monuments and sites (number)
Film (hours)
Video recordings (hours)
Audio (hours)
catalogued in digital metadata digitally reproduced
Figure 8: Part of the collection currently digitized, intended to digitize and with no intention to digitize (n=200)
ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012)
40%
36%
58%
37%
52%
29%
53%
31%
11%
4%
8%
13%
26%
16%
19%
38%
34%
18%
7%
8%
8%
17%
11%
14%
13%
14%
18%
32%
33%
46%
32%
40%
43%
29%
33%
23%
10%
26%
29%
38%
37%
52%
56%
34%
46%
37%
58%
34%
55%
76%
67%
56%
50%
61%
47%
53%
45%
51%
59%
52%
40%
53%
56%
56%7%
6%
6%
1%
4%
80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Archival records (meters)
Rare books (volumes)
Other books (volumes)
Newspapers (titles)
Serials (volumes)
Manuscripts (number)
Sheet music (number)
Microforms/Microfilms (number)
Maps (number)
Photographs (number)
Engravings/prints (number)
Drawings (number)
Posters (number)
Postcards (number)
Paintings (number)
2 dimensional objects (number)
3 dimensional art objects (objects)
Other 3 dimensional man-made objects (objects)
Other 3 dimensional non-man-made (objects)
Monuments and sites (number)
Film (hours)
Video recordings (hours)
Audio (hours)
no intent to digitize digitally reproduced still to digitize
Figure 10: Does your organisation have a written digitisation strategy? (n=1557) – comparison Numeric
ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012)
52%
47%
44%
37%
37%
35%
34%
31%
31%
30%
25%
34%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
National library
Museum of art
Museum of anthropology and ethnology
Museum of archaeology, history
Institution for Monument Care
Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute
Museum of science, technology
Special or other type of library
Other type of museum
Archives/records office
Higher education library
Total
4. Results: Digital access
ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012)
100%
70%
77%
87%
94%
94%
82%
86%
80%
89%
85%
20%
34%
35%
37%
27%
25%
24%
22%
39%
47%
51%
36%
0%
19%
35%
23%
18%
6%
6%
22%
13%
20%
11%
16%
84%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Institution for Monument Care
Archives/records office
Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute
Museum of art
Museum of archaeology, history
Museum of science, technology
Museum of anthropology and ethnology
Other type of museum
Special or other type of library
National library
Higher education library
Total
Web statistics Database statistics User studies
Figure 14: How is the use of the digital collection measured? (n=628)
ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012)
Figure 15: Which percentage of the digital collections is accessible through which options? (n=774)
49%
31%
22%
14%
15%
2%
3%
12%
6%
16%
61%
47%
37%
24%
31%
4%
7%
23%
13%
28%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Offline
Institutional website
National aggregator
Thematic aggregator
Europeana
Memory of the World
Wikipedia
Institutional API
3rd party API
Other
currently 2 years from now
6. Results: Digital expenditure
Figure 20: Annual budget for digitisation activities in % of total institutional budget (n=703)
ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012)
2,7%
2,5%
1,5%
1,4%
1,1%
0,9%
0,9%
0,8%
0,6%
0,6%
0,2%
2,8%
3,8%
1,2%
1,3%
1,0%
0,9%
0,9%
0,9%
0,7%
0,6%
0,5%
0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% 4% 4% 5%
Archives/records office
Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute
Special or other type of library
Other type of museum
Museum of anthropology and ethnology
Museum of art
Museum of archaeology, history
Higher education library
National library
Museum of science, technology
Institution for Monument Care
budget2011 budget2012
Figure 22: Staff involved in digitisation activities, in FTE (n=1584)
ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012)
5,2
8,0
3,1
2,0
3,2
3,8
2,1
3,7
13,6
4,8
3,5
1
4
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3,4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Institution for Monument Care
Archives/records office
Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute
Museum of art
Museum of archaeology, history
Museum of science, technology
Museum of anthropology and ethnology
Other type of museum
Special or other type of library
National library
Higher education library
Total
Paid staff Volunteers
ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012)
Table 4: Digitisation paid staff compared to total paid staff (N answered both questions = 948) - comparison Numeric
Total paid staff in FTEDigitisation paid staff in
FTE In %
Museum of anthropology and ethnology 46,7 3,9 8,3%
Other type of museum 30,3 2,3 7,6%
Archives/records office 48,3 3,6 7,4%
National library 190,2 14,0 7,4%
Special or other type of library 66,8 4,0 6,0%
Museum of archaeology, history 44,2 2,2 5,0%
Museum of art 75,3 3,2 4,3%
Museum of science, technology 88,4 3,6 4,1%
Institution for Monument Care 145,6 5,2 3,6%
AV, broadcasting or film institute 610,1 8,1 1,3%
Higher education library 513,9 5,0 1,0%
Total 112,4 3,8 3,3%
Figure 23: From what sources are the digitisation activities funded? (n=1584)
ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012)
90%
91%
79%
88%
81%
82%
80%
90%
85%
92%
91%
87%
0%
3%
14%
3%
3%
7%
0%
4%
2%
8%
9%
4%
20%
31%
41%
45%
50%
42%
44%
34%
41%
48%
49%
40%
0%
7%
3%
5%
4%
9%
9%
2%
4%
12%
9%
5%
5%
10%
7%
4%
5%
9%
4%
5%
5%
8%
13%
7%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Institution for Monument Care
Archives/records office
Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute
Museum of art
Museum of archaeology, history
Museum of science, technology
Museum of anthropology and ethnology
Other type of museum
Special or other type of library
National library
Higher education library
Total
Internal budgets Commercial trading Public grant or subsidy Private investment Public-private partnership
Results Digital Expenditure
• Digitisation costs have several components: in 70% of the cases the costs cover paid
staff. In about 50% equipment en conversion costs are included. Right clearance costs
are only included by 8% of the institutions.
• On average the ‘digitisation team’ is limited to on average about 5.5 FTE (3.5 FTE paid
staff; 2 FTE volunteers). Remarkable is the relative high number of volunteer FTE at
archives and records offices (4 FTE; 3.4 paid staff). In national libraries on average 15
FTE are involved in the digitisation process.
• On average the budget per FTE engaged in digitisation activities is 32.000 euro in 2011
and 39.000 euro in 2012
• On average digitisation activities are funded most often by internal budgets, followed by
public grant or subsidy. Not mentioned very much are commercial trading (4%), private
investment (5%) and public-private partnership (7%).
Relatie ENUMERATE met cijferboek:
-Beperkt set overgenomen in cijferboek 2012
-Verdere integratie na afloop ENUMERATE kan overwogen worden (apart onderdeel digitalisering op basis core survey), mits voldoende geconsolideerde methode (en respons).
- Afhankelijk toekomstig verloop (vervolgproject ENUMERATE ‘plus’?)
Cijferboek cultureel erfgoed
The Thematic Survey is looking at four themes:
- Identification of Growth of Digital Collections (supply);
- Costs of Digital Collections (economics);
-> België
- Usage of Digital Collections (demand);
- Digital Preservation Practices (sustainability).
Thematic Surveys
- 10-15 Belgische instellingen nodig (5-7 VL) die effectief digitale collecties beheren.
- Taal: Engels
- Periode: februari-april
KANDIDATEN?
Please participate in the surveys and andfollow the link below to register to participate: http://dataplatform.enumerate.eu/participate
of via [email protected]
België: thematic Survey costs of digital collections
Website http://www.enumerate.eu/
Registreer je voor de newsletter: http://www.enumerate.eu/en/newsletter/
Volg ENUMERATE op linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/ENUMERATE-4042570
Volg ENUMERATE op Twitter: https://twitter.com/EnumerateEU
Delicious: https://delicious.com/enumeratesources
Meer info
Demo data platform
http://enumeratedataplatform.digibis.com/
Contact
FARO. Vlaams steunpunt voor cultureel erfgoed
Top Related