The European Network on Statistics for Digitisation ... · Archives/records office Other type of...

co-funded by ICT-PSP

The European Network on

• Statistics for Digitisation,

• Digital Preservation and

• Online Access to Cultural Heritage

The European Network on

• Statistics for Digitisation,

• Digital Preservation and

• Online Access to Cultural Heritage

ENUMERATE

Europeana Vlaanderen24/01/2013

• algemeen• core survey / thematic survey(s)• data platform (demo)

ENUMERATE is the European Thematic Network on Statistics for Digitisation,

Digital Preservation and Online Access to Digital Cultural Heritage.

ENUMERATE is the successor to the NUMERIC project (May 2007 – May 2009)

which sought to investigate evidence of the progress of Digitisation of Europe’s

Cultural Heritage.

ENUMERATE builds on the evidence and methodological framework established

by NUMERIC, and will draw on the recommendations to ensure continuity and

enhancement of the data it generated.

ENUMERATE general

ENUMERATE Aims

1. The development of a vibrant and sustainable European community of practice,

connecting practitioners in statistical analysis and digital content creation and

preservation and supporting the sharing of knowledge and best practices.

2. The creation, promotion and development of a statistically valid open methodology

for surveying the digitization, use, preservation and associated costs of cultural

heritage materials in Member States.

3. The implementation of a multi-annual programme of coordinated surveys based on

this methodology, including wide-scale harmonized statistical data-gathering and more

in-depth and analytical surveying of digitization activities by European cultural heritage

institutions.

4. The creation and maintenance of an open, sustainable data platform to collate,

analyse and promote the use of the normalized data and intelligence arising from

these surveys.

ENUMERATE Consortium

• Collections Trust, UK;

• Digitaal Erfgoed Nederland (DEN), Netherlands;

• Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Germany;

• Digibis, Spain;

• FARO Vlaams Steunpunt voor Cultureel Erfgoed, Belgium;

• Ministère de Culture et de la Communication, France;

• Oesterreichische Nationalbibliothek, Austria;

• Naradna in Univerzitetna Knjiznica (National and University Library), Slovenia;

• Orszagos Széchényi Konytvar (National Széchényi Library), Hungary;

• The European Library (hosted by the Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Netherlands).

ENUMERATE Surveys

Year 1: CORE SURVEY

A high-level survey aimed at establishing a baseline of statistical information about Digitisation, Digital Preservation, Digitisation Costs and Online Access to Digital Cultural Heritage.

Year 2: THEMATIC SURVEY

A detailed and in-depth survey aimed both at enhancing the quantitative data and supporting it with qualitative information.

Year 3: CORE SURVEY

A reiteration of the initial survey, aimed at improving the quality of the data and providing trend information and analysis to inform policy development.

Core survey (2012)

- Rapport : www.enumerate.eu

- geeft globale resultaten voor Europa

- geen rapport per land voorzien

- wel dataplatform met deelresultaten / land (demo)

- respons België (42) voldoende, maar laag in vgl. met NUMERIC (2008-2009)

- respons Vlaanderen te laag voor representatieve analyse (ca. 20) (NUMERIC: 72)

2. Response to the survey

• Total usable responses: 1951 from 29 countries (of these 300 were not

completed completely, but enough to be included in the results)

• From 1951: 1623 digitised / digitisation activities (83%), 328 none (17%)

• Highest response in Spain (255), problematic respons in Bulgaria (0) and France

(1). Non EU countries (‘Other’) are Liechtenstein and Switzerland

• Number of responding institutions is large enough to calculate reliable data on

the level of institution type

Figure 1: Response per country compared with target

ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012)

24

38

26

15

53

35

15

33

127

150

35

44

15

150

15

0

22

15

15

67

125

27

46

25

15

103

38

0

150

95

42

0

21

111

58

18

89

1

227

58

85

25

127

16

5

71

28

4

140

58

85

39

78

56

255

33

77

49

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Austria

Belgium

Bulgaria

Cyprus

Czech Republic

Denmark

Estonia

Finland

France

Germany

Greece

Hungary

Ireland

Italy

Latvia

Liechtenstein

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Malta

Netherlands

Poland

Portugal

Romania

Slovakia

Slovenia

Spain

Sweden

Switserland

United Kingdom

Target Realisation

Figure 2: Response by institution type (n=1951)


409

403

274

249

171

160

97

73

47

38

30

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

Special or other type of library

Archives/records office

Other type of museum

Museum of archaeology, history

Museum of art

Higher education library

Museum of science, technology

Museum of anthropology and ethnology

Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute

Institution for Monument Care

National library

3. Results: Digitisation activity

Figure 5: Estimated percentage of heritage collection already digitally reproduced and percentage still to be digitally reproduced (n=1626) - comparison Numeric


42%

28%

26%

26%

24%

22%

22%

14%

12%

12%

4%

20%

52%

58%

64%

62%

61%

65%

63%

52%

55%

54%

62%

57%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Museum of art










National library

Total

Have digitized Intend to digitize

Figure 6: Object types most freq. digitised & intended to be digitised (n=1626)


46%

29%

22%

24%

20%

28%

9%

12%

28%

66%

30%

35%

24%

31%

29%

11%

22%

21%

8%

7%

19%

21%

21%

56%

39%

25%

30%

23%

36%

13%

13%

37%

64%

32%

36%

32%

31%

27%

11%

21%

22%

10%

7%

21%

27%

24%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Archival records

Rare books

Other books

Newspapers

Serials

Manuscripts

Sheet music

Microforms/Microfilms

Maps

Photographs

Engravings/Prints

Drawings

Posters

Postcards

Paintings

2D objects

3D works of art

3D man-made objects

Other 3D objects (incl. natural science specimens)

Monuments and sites

Film

Video recordings

Audio (music & other recorded sound)

Have digitized Intend to digitize

Figure 7: Part of the collection catalogued in digital metadata and percentage of the collection currently digitized (n=200)


34%

53%

58%

54%

65%

45%

33%

39%

42%

37%

47%

48%

40%

38%

52%

32%

45%

43%

27%

33%

37%

39%

45%

7%

8%

8%

17%

11%

14%

13%

14%

18%

32%

33%

46%

32%

40%

43%

29%

33%

23%

10%

26%

29%

38%

37%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Archival records (meters)

Rare books (volumes)

Other books (volumes)

Newspapers (titles)

Serials (volumes)

Manuscripts (number)

Sheet music (number)

Microforms/Microfilms (number)

Maps (number)

Photographs (number)

Engravings/prints (number)

Drawings (number)

Posters (number)

Postcards (number)

Paintings (number)

2 dimensional objects (number)

3 dimensional art objects (objects)

Other 3 dimensional man-made objects (objects)

Other 3 dimensional non-man-made (objects)

Monuments and sites (number)

Film (hours)

Video recordings (hours)

Audio (hours)

catalogued in digital metadata digitally reproduced

Figure 8: Part of the collection currently digitized, intended to digitize and with no intention to digitize (n=200)


40%

36%

58%

37%

52%

29%

53%

31%

11%

4%

8%

13%

26%

16%

19%

38%

34%

18%

7%

8%

8%

17%

11%

14%

13%

14%

18%

32%

33%

46%

32%

40%

43%

29%

33%

23%

10%

26%

29%

38%

37%

52%

56%

34%

46%

37%

58%

34%

55%

76%

67%

56%

50%

61%

47%

53%

45%

51%

59%

52%

40%

53%

56%

56%7%

6%

6%

1%

4%

80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Archival records (meters)

Rare books (volumes)

Other books (volumes)

Newspapers (titles)

Serials (volumes)

Manuscripts (number)

Sheet music (number)

Microforms/Microfilms (number)

Maps (number)

Photographs (number)

Engravings/prints (number)

Drawings (number)

Posters (number)

Postcards (number)

Paintings (number)

2 dimensional objects (number)

3 dimensional art objects (objects)

Other 3 dimensional man-made objects (objects)

Other 3 dimensional non-man-made (objects)

Monuments and sites (number)

Film (hours)

Video recordings (hours)

Audio (hours)

no intent to digitize digitally reproduced still to digitize

Figure 10: Does your organisation have a written digitisation strategy? (n=1557) – comparison Numeric


52%

47%

44%

37%

37%

35%

34%

31%

31%

30%

25%

34%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

National library

Museum of art










Total

4. Results: Digital access


100%

70%

77%

87%

94%

94%

82%

86%

80%

89%

85%

20%

34%

35%

37%

27%

25%

24%

22%

39%

47%

51%

36%

0%

19%

35%

23%

18%

6%

6%

22%

13%

20%

11%

16%

84%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%




Museum of art






National library


Total

Web statistics Database statistics User studies

Figure 14: How is the use of the digital collection measured? (n=628)


Figure 15: Which percentage of the digital collections is accessible through which options? (n=774)

49%

31%

22%

14%

15%

2%

3%

12%

6%

16%

61%

47%

37%

24%

31%

4%

7%

23%

13%

28%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Offline

Institutional website

National aggregator

Thematic aggregator

Europeana

Memory of the World

Wikipedia

Institutional API

3rd party API

Other

currently 2 years from now

6. Results: Digital expenditure

Figure 20: Annual budget for digitisation activities in % of total institutional budget (n=703)


2,7%

2,5%

1,5%

1,4%

1,1%

0,9%

0,9%

0,8%

0,6%

0,6%

0,2%

2,8%

3,8%

1,2%

1,3%

1,0%

0,9%

0,9%

0,9%

0,7%

0,6%

0,5%

0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% 4% 4% 5%






Museum of art



National library



budget2011 budget2012

Figure 22: Staff involved in digitisation activities, in FTE (n=1584)


5,2

8,0

3,1

2,0

3,2

3,8

2,1

3,7

13,6

4,8

3,5

1

4

0

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

3,4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16




Museum of art






National library


Total

Paid staff Volunteers


Table 4: Digitisation paid staff compared to total paid staff (N answered both questions = 948) - comparison Numeric

Total paid staff in FTEDigitisation paid staff in

FTE In %

Museum of anthropology and ethnology 46,7 3,9 8,3%

Other type of museum 30,3 2,3 7,6%

Archives/records office 48,3 3,6 7,4%

National library 190,2 14,0 7,4%

Special or other type of library 66,8 4,0 6,0%

Museum of archaeology, history 44,2 2,2 5,0%

Museum of art 75,3 3,2 4,3%

Museum of science, technology 88,4 3,6 4,1%

Institution for Monument Care 145,6 5,2 3,6%

AV, broadcasting or film institute 610,1 8,1 1,3%

Higher education library 513,9 5,0 1,0%

Total 112,4 3,8 3,3%

Figure 23: From what sources are the digitisation activities funded? (n=1584)


90%

91%

79%

88%

81%

82%

80%

90%

85%

92%

91%

87%

0%

3%

14%

3%

3%

7%

0%

4%

2%

8%

9%

4%

20%

31%

41%

45%

50%

42%

44%

34%

41%

48%

49%

40%

0%

7%

3%

5%

4%

9%

9%

2%

4%

12%

9%

5%

5%

10%

7%

4%

5%

9%

4%

5%

5%

8%

13%

7%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%




Museum of art






National library


Total

Internal budgets Commercial trading Public grant or subsidy Private investment Public-private partnership

Results Digital Expenditure

• Digitisation costs have several components: in 70% of the cases the costs cover paid

staff. In about 50% equipment en conversion costs are included. Right clearance costs

are only included by 8% of the institutions.

• On average the ‘digitisation team’ is limited to on average about 5.5 FTE (3.5 FTE paid

staff; 2 FTE volunteers). Remarkable is the relative high number of volunteer FTE at

archives and records offices (4 FTE; 3.4 paid staff). In national libraries on average 15

FTE are involved in the digitisation process.

• On average the budget per FTE engaged in digitisation activities is 32.000 euro in 2011

and 39.000 euro in 2012

• On average digitisation activities are funded most often by internal budgets, followed by

public grant or subsidy. Not mentioned very much are commercial trading (4%), private

investment (5%) and public-private partnership (7%).

Relatie ENUMERATE met cijferboek:

-Beperkt set overgenomen in cijferboek 2012

-Verdere integratie na afloop ENUMERATE kan overwogen worden (apart onderdeel digitalisering op basis core survey), mits voldoende geconsolideerde methode (en respons).

- Afhankelijk toekomstig verloop (vervolgproject ENUMERATE ‘plus’?)

Cijferboek cultureel erfgoed

The Thematic Survey is looking at four themes:

- Identification of Growth of Digital Collections (supply);

- Costs of Digital Collections (economics);

-> België

- Usage of Digital Collections (demand);

- Digital Preservation Practices (sustainability).

Thematic Surveys

- 10-15 Belgische instellingen nodig (5-7 VL) die effectief digitale collecties beheren.

- Taal: Engels

- Periode: februari-april

KANDIDATEN?

Please participate in the surveys and andfollow the link below to register to participate: http://dataplatform.enumerate.eu/participate

of via [email protected]

België: thematic Survey costs of digital collections

http://dataplatform.enumerate.eu/participate

mailto:[email protected]

Website http://www.enumerate.eu/

Registreer je voor de newsletter: http://www.enumerate.eu/en/newsletter/

Volg ENUMERATE op linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/ENUMERATE-4042570

Volg ENUMERATE op Twitter: https://twitter.com/EnumerateEU

Delicious: https://delicious.com/enumeratesources

Meer info

http://www.enumerate.eu/

http://www.enumerate.eu/en/newsletter/

http://www.linkedin.com/groups/ENUMERATE-4042570



https://twitter.com/EnumerateEU

https://delicious.com/enumeratesources

Demo data platform

http://enumeratedataplatform.digibis.com/

Contact

FARO. Vlaams steunpunt voor cultureel erfgoed

[email protected]




The European Network on Statistics for Digitisation ... · Archives/records office Other type of...

Documents

Transcript of The European Network on Statistics for Digitisation ... · Archives/records office Other type of...