1
Sizing Pipes for Efficiency
Learning Outcomes
Upon completion of this training one should be able to:
• Compare pipe sizing methods
• Understand the impact of pipe sizing on the system performance
• Apply ASHRAE Standard 90.1 to pipe sizing
• Understand how VV/VS pumping influences pipe sizing
• Utilize life cycle cost economics to justify the use of Magna3 in both new and renovated systems
2
Overview
• Pipe Sizing Considerations• Pipe Sizing Methods• Work Through a Pipe Sizing Example• Discuss Pump & System Energy Costs as They
Relate to Pipe Sizing
3
4
Importance
Pipe size selection impacts:• Pump head• Hydronic system performance • Energy consumption
5
Sizing Considerations
Pipe size depends on: •Material• First cost• Pump energy costs
• Internal pipe erosion• Noise• Budget
6
Pipe Material
•Material selection influences pipe size• Nominal pipe size may be the same but different inside diameter (free area) • Influencing the friction loss and velocity
7
Copper has the more restrictive ID
Nominal 2” Copper ID=1.985”Nominal 2” Steel ID=2.067”
8
Typical Procedure
Size pipe based on: • Constant Friction Rate• Velocity
• Use rule of thumb or common values
9
Constant Friction Rate
• Range: 1’/100’ - 4’/100’ • 2.5’/100’ used on average (ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009
Chpt 22)
• 4’/100’ when > 2” pipe diameter
10
Velocity
• Define a maximum (Common: 4 fps ≤ 2”, 8 fps > 2”)• Limited primarily for noise & erosion • Higher values acceptable when air is removed from system
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 Chapter 22
11
Velocity - Material Impact
Maximum velocity per Copper Tube Handbook* • Chilled Water 8 fps• Hot Water (<140ºF) 5 fps• Hot water (>140ºF) 3 fps
≤ ½” diameter pipe, lower velocities should be used due to craftsmanship and abrupt changes in flow direction
Higher velocities acceptable in chilled water because the air is more easily removed than in hot water.*Copper Development Association
12
Commercial Steel Pipe (schedule 40)
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 Chapter 22 Figure 4
13
Commercial Steel Pipe (schedule 40)
2.5’/100’ hd loss
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 Chapter 22 Figure 4
14
Commercial Steel Pipe (schedule 40)
2.5’/100’ hd loss
4’/100’ hd loss
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 Chapter 22 Figure 4
15
Commercial Steel Pipe (schedule 40)
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 chapter 22 Figure 4
4 fps
2.5’/100’ hd loss
4’/100’ hd loss
16
Commercial Steel Pipe (schedule 40)
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 chapter 22 Figure 4
4 fps
2.5’/100’ hd loss
4’/100’ hd loss
17
Schedule 40 Steel Pipe Sizing Chart
18
Copper Tubing (Types K, L, M)
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 chapter 22 Figure 5
4 fps
2.5’/100’ hd loss
4’/100’ hd loss
19
Copper Type L Pipe Sizing Chart
20
Material Comparison
Steel
Copper
21
Noise
• Noise velocity limits are difficult to pin point as it is dependent on many variables:• Insulation• Number of turns, fittings, valves• Air quantity• Partial flow
• Typically not a significant concern as long as entrained air has been eliminated from a closed loop system.
22
Erosion
• Velocities < 10 fps – erosion is not significant as long as there is no cavitation
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 Chapter 22
23
Aging
• Build up and increased roughness occurs in pipe over time • Narrow the pipe free area increasing head• Often ignored • Unpredictable• Research data is not available • A greater concern for open systems
24
EXAMPLE
25
Example
• 4 Story Office Building• Located in Houston, Texas• HVAC system: Fan Coil Units with Chilled Water coils
26
Basement
2
1
3
4
Mechanical Room
5
6
Zoning
27
Main Floor
5
1 2
4
3
6
7
8
9 10 11
12 13
Zoning
28
2nd/3rd Floor
1
2
4
5
3
7
8
6
9
10 11
Zoning
29
23.7 GPM 2”, 2”
3RD
2ND
MAIN
BASE
22.3 GPM 2”, 2”
46 GPM 2½”, 2½”
24.3 GPM 2”, 2”
10.7 GPM 1¼”, 1¼”
70.3 GPM 3”, 3”
81 GPM 3”, 3”
Steel Schedule 402.5’/100’
Copper2.5’/100’
Riser
30
Basement
0-1(0.9)
0-2(2.2)
0-3(2.2)
0-4(1.7)
0-5(1.7)
0-6(1.1)
co
½”, ½”
¾”, 1”
1”, 1”
1¼”, 1¼”
1¼”, 1¼”
3”, 3”
MECH ROOM(0.8)
3”, 3”
Fan Coil Unit
Steel Schedule 402.5’/100’
Copper2.5’/100’
Example
31
Main Floor
1-5(1.9)
1-1(1.5)
1-2(0.95)
1-3(0.8)
1-7(2.0)
1-9(2.0)
1-8(1.9)
1-4(1.6)
1-10(1.0)
1-11 (1.4)
1-12 (3.7)
1-13 (4.9)
co
1”, 1” 1¼”, 1¼”
1¼”, 1¼”
1 ¼”, 1 ½”
1½”, 1½”
2”, 2”
Fan Coil Unit
Steel Schedule 402.5’/100’
Copper2.5’/100’
Example
32
2nd Floorco
2-1(1.6)
2-2(2.1)
2-5(3.0)
2-3(1.2)
2-7(1.5)
2-6(1.3)
2-8(3.0)
2-9 (2.6)
2-11(2.2)2-10
(1.9)
1”, 1”
1¼”, 1¼”
2”, 2”
1¼”, 1½”
1¼”, 1¼”
1½”, 2”
2-4(2.0)
Fan Coil Unit
Steel Schedule 402.5’/100’
Copper2.5’/100’
Example
33
3rd Floor
3-1(2.2)
3-2(2.2)
3-5(3.0)
3-3(1.3)
3-7(1.6)
3-4(2.1)
3-6(1.4)
3-8(3.1)
3-9 (2.8)
3-11 (2.2)3-10
(1.9)
1”, 1”
1¼”, 1½”
2”, 2”
1½”, 1½”
2”, 1½”
Fan Coil Unit
Steel Schedule 402.5’/100’
Copper2.5’/100’
Example
34
Steel Schedule 402.5’/100’4’/100’4fps(≤2”); 8fps(>2”)
23.7 GPM 2”, 2”, 1½”
3RD
2ND
MAIN
BASE
22.3 GPM 2”, 1½”, 1 ½”
46 GPM 2½”, 2½”, 2½”
24.3 GPM 2”, 2”, 1 ½”
10.7 GPM 1¼”, 1¼”, 1”
70.3 GPM 3”, 2½”, 2½”
81 GPM 3”, 3”, 2½”
Riser
35
Basement
0-1(0.9)
0-2(2.2)
0-3(2.2)
0-4(1.7)
0-5(1.7)
0-6(1.1)
co
½” ½” ½”
¾”, ¾”, ¾”
1” 1” ¾”
1 ¼”, 1”, 1”
1¼”, 1¼”, 1”
2½”2½” 2½”
MECH ROOM(0.8)
3” 3”
2½”
Steel Schedule 402.5’/100’4’/100’4fps(≤2”); 8fps(>2”)
Example
36
Main Floor
1-5(1.9)
1-1(1.5)
1-2(0.95)
1-3(0.8)
1-7(2.0)
1-9(2.0)
1-8(1.9)
1-4(1.6)
1-10(1.0)
1-11 (1.4)
1-12 (3.7)
1-13 (4.9)
co
1”¾”½”
1¼”1”1”
1¼”1”1”
1¼”, 1¼”, 1¼”
1½”, 1¼”, 1¼”
2”2”1½”
Steel Schedule 402.5’/100’4’/100’4fps(≤2”); 8fps(>2”)
Example
37
2nd Floorco
2-1(1.6)
2-2(2.1)
2-5(3.0)
2-3(1.2)
2-7(1.5)
2-6(1.3)
2-8(3.0)
2-9 (2.6)
2-11(2.2)2-10
(1.9)
1”, ¾”, ½”
1¼”, 1¼”, 1”
2”, 1½”, 1½”
1¼”, 1¼”, 1”
1¼”, 1¼”, 1¼”
1½”, 1½”, 1½”
2-4(2.0)
Steel Schedule 402.5’/100’4’/100’4fps(≤2”); 8fps(>2”)
Example
38
3rd Floor
3-1(2.2)
3-2(2.2)
3-5(3.0)
3-3(1.3)
3-7(1.6)
3-4(2.1)
3-6(1.4)
3-8(3.1)
3-9 (2.8)
3-11(2.2)3-10
(1.9)
1”, 1”, 1” 1¼”, 1¼”, 1”
2”, 2”, 1½”
1½”1¼”1¼”
2”, 1½”, 1½”
Steel Schedule 402.5’/100’4’/100’4fps(≤2”); 8fps(>2”)
Example
39
Pump Energy Costs
• Pressure drop (head)• Hours of operation• Annual flow profile• Pump control: constant vs variable pump flow• Energy rates• Efficiency of the pump
40
Pressure Drop
• Energy must exerted to overcome resistance seen by the critical circuit• Poor hydronic system design and pipe lay out influences energy consumed• Items that impose resistance:• Valves• Coils• Fittings• Pipe ASHRAE Tables
Manufacturer Literature
41
Pipe Resistance
• Based on pipe size, flow, and material, length Example: 3” Schedule 40 pipe with 80 GPM, 50’ long
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 Chapter 22 Figure 4
1.5
’/100’
1.5’ of Head/100’ of pipe length
50’ of pipe X1.5’/100’ = 0.75’ Hd
42
Fitting Resistance
• Based on pipe size and velocity
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 Chapter 22
43
Pipe Resistance
• Based on pipe size, flow, and material, length Example: 3” Schedule 40 pipe with 81 GPM
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 Chapter 22 Figure 4
Velocity = 3.3 fps
3.3 fps
44
Fitting Resistance
• Based on pipe size and velocity
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 Chapter 2290⁰ ElbowResistance = 8.1’ of straight pipe
45
Fitting Resistance
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 Chapter 22
46
Fitting Resistance
• Based on pipe size and velocityExample: 3.5 FPS, 3” Steel pipe
45⁰ ElbowMultiply by the 0.7 correction valueResistance = 8.1’ x 0.75.7’ of straight pipe
47
Pressure Drop Calculation
• The calculation is cumbersome and time consuming• Often simplified• Sized pipe using 2.5’/100’, apply this value to the total pipe length of critical circuit• Much of the pipe likely to operate at less than 2.5’/100’ at full load as in example • More common to multiply value by a factor such as 1.5
• Result: Over estimated head
48
Prescriptive Path requirements Section 6.5.4.5 – Hydronic Systems and Control
ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010
49
Hours of Operation
50
Example: Schedule 40 pipe with 81 GPM
→ 3” pipe using traditional sizing methods
ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010
51
Example: Schedule 40 pipe with 81 GPM→Constant Speed = 3”; →VV/VS = 2 ½”
ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010
52
• Should a 2 ½” pipe be used for a VV/VS system?• Remember that 90.1 concentrates on energy only!• Does not account for noise or erosion
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 chapter 22 Figure 4
4.5
’/100’
5.2 fps
ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010
53
• Should a 2 ½” pipe be used for a VV/VS system?• Remember that 90.1 concentrates on energy only!• Does not account for noise or erosion
ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 chapter 22 Figure 4
1.7
5’/
100’
3.5 fps
ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010
54
Pipe Size
3” pipe• 1.75’/100’ head loss• 3.5 fps
For lowest head loss the 3” pipe is preferable3” pipe is more expensive than 2 ½”REMEMBER:System will operate at peak (81 GPM) only 19 hrs/yr
2 ½” pipe• 4.5’/100’ head loss• 5.2 fps
55
56
Pipe Size
3” pipe• 1.75’/100’ head loss• 3.5 fps
For lowest head loss the 3” pipe is preferable
REMEMBER:• System will operate at peak (81 GPM) only 19 hrs/yr• Head loss & velocity for 2 ½” pipe will be much less most of the time • Closed loop system will have little issues with noise and erosion since air is eliminated
2 ½” pipe• 4.5’/100’ head loss• 5.2 fps
57
Decreased Pipe Size Justification2 ½” pipe is potentially justifiable:• Decrease first cost• Little to no sacrifice in system life/performance• Inconsistent with pipe sizing using the constant friction rate method• Designer must consider LLC and system operation
58
Software for Economic Analysis
• Free from Energy Design Resources: Pipe Optimization Tool
• http://www.energydesignresources.com/resources/software-tools/cool-tools/cooltools-pipe-size-optimization-tool.aspx
59
Economic Analysis
• Using this software and its defaults, an economic analysis was performed for a constant and variable volume system
Variable VolumeGPM = 81Total Head = 36Smaller Pipe Size, VFD1st Cost = $35,678LCC = $39,470
Constant VolumeGPM = 81Total Head = 34Larger Pipe Size1st Cost = $32,234LCC = $44,040
Note: generic pump performance curves utilized for this analysis (58% Eff)
Actual savings in energy by a Magna3 pump will exceed these values (74% Eff)
60
• Concern with limitation on pipe sizing by ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010 on retrofits:• Pipes exist and there is a need for increased capacity• These limitations can restrict the design
• Change to VV/VS pumping allows for increased GPM • Increased capacity without increasing GPM• Change the water ∆T GPM=BTUh/(500∆T)
Retrofit
61
Other Free Resources
• Chilled Water design Guide http://www.energydesignresources.com/resources/publications/design-guidelines/design-guidelines-cooltools-chilled-water-plant.aspxOptimizing
• Energy Calculator for Horizontal Piping http://www.wbdg.org/design/midg_design_echp.php
• Temperature Drop Calculator for Hydronic Piping http://www.wbdg.org/design/midg_design_tdchp.php
Top Related