EPA Region 5 Records Ctr.
222799
Second Five-Year Review Report
Second Five-Year Review Reportfor
Organic Chemical, Inc. Superfund SiteCity of Grandville
Kent County, Michigan
September 2004
PREPARED BY:
United States Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 5
Chicago, Illinois
Approved by: Date:
. Karl, DirectorSuperfund Division
Second Five-Year Review Report
Second Five-Year Review Reportfor
Organic Chemical, Inc. Superfund SiteCityofGrandville
Kent County, Michigan
September 2004
PREPARED BY:
United States Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 5
Chicago, Illinois
Approved by: Date:
Richard C. Karl, DirectorSuperfund Division
Table of Contents Section Page List of Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II Five-Year Review Summary Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III I. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. Site Chronology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 III. Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Physical Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Land and Resource Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 History of Contamination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Initial Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Basis for Taking Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 IV. Remedial Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Remedy Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Remedy Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 System Operations/Operation and Maintenance (O&M) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 V. Progress Since the Last Five-Year Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 VI. Five-Year Review Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Administrative Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Community Involvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Document Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Site Inspections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Interviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 VII. Technical Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents? 13 Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action objectives (RAOs) used at the time of the remedy still valid? 14 Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question the protectiveness of the remedy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Technical Assessment Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
VIII. Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 IX. Recommendations and Follow-up Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 X. Protectiveness Statement(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 XI. Next Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Tables Table 1 - Chronology of Site Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Table 2 - Actions Taken Since the Last Five-Year Review . . . . . . . . . . 12 Table 3 - Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Table 4 - Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Attachments Attachment 1 - Site Location Map (Figure l) Attachment 2 - Site Plan (Figure 2) Attachment 3 - List of Documents Reviewed Attachment 4 - Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) Attachment 5 - Monitoring Wells Sampled for the Alternate Point of Compliance (APC) Demonstration Report Attachment 6 - Results of the 8 Rounds of Sampling for the APC Demonstration Report
and split sampling performed by MDEQ for Rounds 8 and the first Round of Post Shutdown Groundwater Monitoring
List of Acronyms ARAR Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency ESD Explanation of Significant Difference MCL Maximum Contaminant Level MCLG Maximum Contaminant Level Goal MDEQ Michigan Department of Environmental Quality NCP National Contingency Plan NPL National Priorities List O&M Operation and Maintenance PAH Polyaromatic Hydrocarbon PCS Polychlorinated Biphenyl PPB Parts per Billion PRP Potentially Responsible Party RA Remedial Action RAO Remedial Action Objective RD Remedial Design RI/FS Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study ROD Record of Decision VOC Volatile Organic Compound
Executive Summary
The remedy for the Organic Chemical, Inc. (OCI) Superfund Site (the Site) included excavation and disposal of surrounding soils, and extraction and treatment of groundwater contamination to MCLs. The groundwater system operated from May 1995 until July 1997. At MDEQ's request, the system was shut down at that time when the effluent from the treatment plant, discharging to Roys Creek, failed an aquatic toxicity test. It was never restarted because the remedy in the OU2 ROD allowed for an Alternate Point of Compliance (APC), which authorizes the PRPs to turn off the extraction and treatment system if certain conditions are met, while maintaining the system for future use if necessary. The Site achieved construction completion with the signing of the Preliminary Close Out Report (PCOR) on September 29, 2003. This five-year review is the second five-year review conducted for the Site. The first five-year review for this Site was completed on September 15, 1999. The trigger for this five-year review was the completion of the first five-year review signed September 15, 1999.
The assessment of this five-year review found that the remedy was constructed in accordance with the requirements of the two Record of Decisions (ROD). An Explanation of Significant Difference (ESD) was issued in 2003 to modify the treatment of contaminated soil, allow for an APC, which allows the PRPs to turn off the extraction and treatment system if certain conditions are met, while maintaining the system for future use if necessary, and allows for an APC that differs from the ROD.
The remedy is protective of human health and the environment in the short and long term. Implementation and maintenance of deed restrictions and institutional controls in case of future Site development are expected to lessen the likelihood of human exposure to contaminants. The institutional controls are listed in the Restrictive Covenants in both consent decrees. The signed and registered Restrictive Covenants can be found for the two PRP groups in the APC Demonstration Report and the Administrative Record.
Five-Year Review Summary Form
SITE IDENTIFICATION
Site name (from WasteLAN): Organic Chemical, Inc. Superfund Site
EPA ID (from WasteLAN): MID990858003
Region: 5 State: Ml City/County: Grandville/ Kent
SITE STATUS
NPL status: [X] Final [ ] Deleted [ ] Other ( specify)
Remediation status (choose all that apply): [ ] Under Construction [ ] Operating [X] Complete
Multiple Ous?* [X] YES [ ] NO Construction completion date: 09/29/2003
Has Site been put into reuse? [ ] YES [X] NO
REVIEW STATUS
Lead agency: [X] EPA [ ] State [ ] Tribe [ ] Other Federal Agency
Author name: Thomas G. Williams
Author title: Remedial Project Manager Author affiliation: U.S. EPA, Region 5
Review period:** 11/09 /2003 to 9/15 /2004
Date(s) of Site inspection: 9/18/2003 & January 16, 2004
Type of review: [X] Post-SARA [ ] Pre-SARA [ ] NPL-Removal only [ ] Non-NPL Remedial Action Site [ ] NPL State/Tribe- lead D [ ] Regional Discretion)
Review number: [ ] 1 ( first) [ ] 2 ( second) [ ] 3 ( third) [ ] Other ( specify)
Triggering action [ ] Actual RA On-site Construction at OU # N/A [ ] Actual RA Start at OU# 1 [ ] Construction Completion [X] Previous Five-Year Review Report [ ] Other (specify)
Triggering action date (from WasteLAN): 9 /15 /1999
Due date (five years after triggering action date): 9 /15 /2004 *["OU" refers to operable unit.]
** [Review period should correspond to the actual start and end dates of the Five-Year Review in WasteLAN.]
Five-Year Review Summary Form, cont'd.
Issues:
1) Work with MDEQ to see that the Site is redeveloped. 2) MDEQ has requested that the Contaminants of Concern (COC) list for the APC be
expanded. Due to the recent completion of the soil remedial action and the granting of the APC, there are no other outstanding issues.
Recommendations and Follow-up Actions:
1) Work with potential developers to redevelop the Site. 2) Work with MDEQ to evaluate the expansion of the COC list for the APC.
Protectiveness Statement(s):
The remedy is protective of human health and the environment in the short term and measures are in place to ensure protectiveness in the long-term. There are no current exposure pathways to a future site worker with appropriate institutional controls in place and followed. The remedy appears to be functioning as designed. The removal of soils, to eliminate a source of contamination, has achieved the remedial objective to implement a remedial action to protect human health and the environment.
Long-term Protectiveness:
The other remaining component of the cleanup is the APC for groundwater. Continued groundwater monitoring of the Site to see that the requirements of the APC are complied with will ensure that the remedy is protective for groundwater. If the contaminant concentration in the groundwater exceeds performance standards at or beyond the APC (unless the exceedance is benzene alone), the PRP's will be required to submit a written cause for the exceedance and submit a plan that proposes additional actions to establish compliance. If the plan is to restart the groundwater treatment plant, the PRP's will be directed to repair and upgrade the system. The PRP's are also responsible for making any repairs to the soil cover or slabs to ensure that no direct contact threats exist.
Other Comments: None.
ORGANIC CHEMICAL, INC. SUPERFUND SITE GRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
SECOND FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the five-year review is to determine whether the remedy at a site is protective of human health and the environment. The methods, findings, and conclusions of reviews are documented in Five-Year Review reports. In addition, Five-Year Review reports identify issues found during the review, if any, and identify recommendations to address them.
EPA is preparing this Second Five-Year Review report pursuant to CERCLA §121 and the National Contingency Plan (NCP). CERCLA §121 states:
If the President selects a remedial action that results in any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining at the site, the President shall review such remedial action no less often than each five years after the initiation of such remedial action to assure that human health and the environment are being protected by the remedial action being implemented. In addition, if upon such review it is the judgment of the President that action is appropriate at such site in accordance with section [104] or [106], the President shall take or require such action. The President shall report to the Congress a list of facilities for which such review is required, the results of all such reviews, and any actions taken as a result of such reviews. EPA interpreted this requirement further in the NCP; 40 CFR §300.430 (f)(4)(ii) states: If a remedial action is selected that results in hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, the lead agency shall review such action no less often than every five years after the initiation of the selected remedial action.
EPA, Region 5, conducted the second five-year review of the remedy implemented at
the Organic Chemical, Inc. (OCI) Superfund Site in Grandville, Michigan. This review was conducted by the Remedial Project Manager (RPM) for the entire site from November 2003 through January 2004. This report documents the results of the review.
This is the second five-year review for the OCI Superfund Site. The first five-year review was completed on September 15, 1999. The triggering action for this statutory review is the initiation of the remedial action on February 9, 1994. The five-year review is required due to the fact that hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure.
II. SITE CHRONOLOGY
Table 1 - Chronology of Site Events
EVENT DATE Proposed on NPL December 12, 1982
Listed on NPL September 8, 1983
Refinery & Bulk Oil Storage Operation OCI Operations
1941 - 1968 1968 - 1991
Phase I RI/FS Phase II RI/FS
March 29, 1989 - July 11, 1991 July 2, 1992 - March 1996
ROD OU 1 Unilateral Administrative Order
September 30, 1991 January 2, 1992
RD for Pump & Treat System January 2, 1992 - February 9, 1994
Construction of Pump & Treat System May 1995 - September 1996
Pre-Final Inspection of Pump & Treat System Operation of Pump and Treat System
January 13, 1995 May 1995 - July 1997
OU2 ROD Groundwater Consent Decree
Soil Consent Decree
February 5, 1997 February 7, 2000 February 1, 2001
Alternate Point of Compliance Demonstration February 15, 2000 - TBD
RD for Soil Remediation Soil Remediation
February 16, 2001 - September 26, 2001 September 2001 - TBD
Pre-Final Inspection for Soil Remediation September 18, 2003
Final Inspection of Entire Site January 16, 2004
ESD & PCOR September 29, 2003
First Five-Year Review September 15, 1999
Second Five-Year Review September 15, 2004
Next Five-Year Review Five Years for the signature of this document
III. BACKGROUND Physical Characteristics The OCI property is located at 3291 Chicago Drive, S.W., in the city of Grandville, Kent County, Michigan. The OCI property, approximately 5 acres, is fenced, with several buildings and structures occupying the Site (Attachments 1 and 2). The Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad, which runs southeast of the facility and along the north side of Chicago Drive, has an elevated railbed acting as a barrier to surface drainage. ThEre is no visible surface drainage linking the Site and the Grand River, which is located approximately 0.95 miles north. Two gravel quarries have been identified near the OCI Site. One quarry is located 0.3 miles northwest, and the other quarry is 0.2 miles northeast of the Site. Both quarries are inactive and filled with water. The OCI property is bordered by Tenneco Packaging Inc., on the east, by the Htrans Holdings on the west, and by Developers Inc., on the north. Residential areas are approximately 200 feet southeast of the Site and 1700 feet to the southwest. These properties along with others comprise an industrial park which extends up to I-196, approximately 2000 feet north of the OCI Site. Across I-196 is a wetland area that extends north to the Grand River, and the interstate highway transects the sensitive ecosystem and the industrial park/commercial park. Land and Resource Use The OCI property had several buildings and structures occupying the property. The chemical manufacturing operation, which was housed in two buildings along the western boundary of the property, produced small quantities of specialized industrial chemicals and pharmaceutical intermediates. The solvent recovery operation was housed in several buildings along the southeastern portion of the property. Other structures included a warehouse, several drum and storage tank areas, an office building, a boiler facility and a waste water pretreatment facility. OCI stopped operations in May 1991, because of financial problems and the inability to obtain a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Part B permit. OCI completed RCRA closure of the equipment and tanks in 1992, although never completed a complete closure. Still remaining on-site are several abandoned buildings. Much of the steel tanks and structures have been removed by scavengers. U.S. EPA is working in conjunction with the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and the PRPs to redevelop the Site for future industrial use. There are no natural resource areas associated with the OCI Site which is located in an industrial/commercial park. History of Contamination The Site was previously used for petroleum refining from 1941 to 1945, and transport and storage operations from 1945 to 1966. A succession of petroleum-related industries leased the land prior to its purchase by Spartan Chemicals. Anne R. Herald, owner of the property from approximately 1900 to 1942, issued an oil and gas lease for the entire property to Gerald J. Wagner on December 7, 1937. Mr. Wagner then leased the premises for oil and gas exploration to various third parties. During tenure of these leaseholds, two oil production wells were drilled onsite. One was a dry hole and the other was never completed or maintained. Attempts made to identify the exact locations of these wells by reviewing existing data were unsuccessful. All oil and gas exploration leases were summarily voided by Ms. Herald on February 7, 1941. Other petroleum industry operations including a refinery commenced onsite in the early 1940's. Total Pipeline Corporation, a petroleum transporter, leased an oil and gasoline warehouse and tank facility onsite during this period. Its facilities were then taken over by its parent company, Total Petroleum, Inc., which operated onsite through 1964. Leonard Fuels purchased the Site in 1964 and sold the property to Total Realty in 1966. In 1968, Spartan Chemical Company acquired the Site property for the solvent
reclamation and chemical manufacturing operations of its subsidiary, Organic Chemicals Company (now Organic Chemicals, Inc.). OCI has operated on the Site since 1968 and stopped operation in 1991. In 1979, OCI became the owner of the premises by conveyance of deed from Spartan Chemical Company. Historical aerial photographs, taken from 1960 through 1978, show changes to the physical facilities of the OCI Site. In a 1960 photograph, three large vertical tanks with two sumps for containing spills were present along the northwestern portion of the former refinery. By 1967, these tanks were no longer present. In 1973, the terrain on the western portion of the former refinery was being regraded and leveled. The ground was visibly scarred from earth moving activity. In this same year there was a seepage lagoon on the OCI property which appeared to contain liquid waste. Two new buildings and six additional vertical storage tanks had been added to the facility in 1973. A 1978 aerial photograph indicates that the west portion of the former refinery was abandoned. This area was owned by Haven-Busch, Co., and was being used as an open storage yard for this steel fabrication company. Haven-Busch, Co., has since closed both their corporate office and their steel fabrication plant and has been sold to Padnos Iron and Metal. A chemical fire occurred onsite on October 11, 1976, damaging part of the OCI facilities. The cause of the blaze was reported as being started by a spark from a metal drum dragged across a floor. The spark ignited barrels of solvents stored nearby. According to retired Grandville Fire Chief Osterink, the fire was contained in the building and prevented from spreading to other storage tanks outside. A chemical spill at the Site in November, 1979, was reported to the MDEQ by OCI. On November 3, 1979, 2,200 gallons of lacquer thinner were spilled by an operator onto the ground onsite. Some of the spilled lacquer thinner was recovered and disposed of in the onsite seepage lagoon. The OCI Site was classified, on April 14, 1980, as a potential hazardous waste site by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Site was listed on the National Priority List on September 8, 1983. EPA summarized the problem hi its Potential Hazardous Waste Site log as "known groundwater contamination by organic solvents." Between 1968 and 1980, company records indicate that OCI discharged its process waste and cooling water, which included F001-F005 hazardous wastes into the onsite seepage lagoon. In June 1980, OCI ceased discharge of wastewater to the seepage lagoon. In 1980, the company installed a wastewater pretreatment facility with discharge to the City of Grandville Sanitary Sewer system. The pretreatment facility included two 9,000 gallon sedimentation tanks and a 30,000 gallon aeration basin with pH adjustment. Also, piping that contains hazardous waste remains on-site, although it has not contributed to groundwater contamination, remains intact. Also, drums were discovered on the northeast side of the Site that were remove and additional soil was removed although additional contamination remained at a depth of approximately five feet and the excavation was backfilled with sand: Initial Response In September 1981, seepage lagoon sludges were excavated and transferred to railroad cars. The total removed soil filled approximately seven railroad cars. These sludges were disposed of at Chem-Met Services, Inc., in Wyandotte, Michigan. A Preliminary Assessment (PA) for the Site was completed by EPA in 1983. The PA documented potential groundwater contamination from the solvent-contaminated seepage lagoon. Soils beneath this pond were also found to be contaminated. A potential for drinking water contamination and endangerment of flora and fauna in nearby potential wetlands was indicated in the PA. In September 1986, MDEQ Law Enforcement Division personnel responded to a complaint of alleged illegal disposal of hazardous wastes at the facility. Reportedly, OCI personnel were disposing of sludges and other residues generated from the solvent recovery operations by placing these materials into drums and rolloff containers along with their normal nonhazardous solid waste materials. Analyses taken from solid waste storage units (rolloffs and 55 gallon drums) located at the Site revealed the presence of various
contaminants including methylene chloride, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes and arochlor 1242 polychlorinated bi- phenyls (PCBs). Analyses of soil samples taken from the vicinity of the solid waste storage units revealed the presence of methylene chloride, toluene, xylenes, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloroethene, tetrachloroethene, chloroform, 1,1-dichloroethene, 1,2-dichloroethene, and Aroclor 1242 (PCBs). As a result of this investigation, OCI was cited by EPA on December 3, 1986, to be in violation of RCRA. Among the violations cited were: (1) the unreported generation of hazardous waste from a drum cutting operation; (2) the routine transport of hazardous waste from the Site by unauthorized agents; (3) failure to prepare hazardous waste manifests, and (4) shipment of hazardous waste to unauthorized facilities. Based on these findings, EPA levied fines of $22,500 on OCI. i During August/September 1987, OCI conducted a voluntary investigation in cooperation with MDEQ. Approximately 150 buried drums were discovered and removed from the southwest corner of the OCI warehouse building. Some of these drums contained sludge and liquid residues. Groundwater samples taken at that time from Prein & Newhof's monitoring well, B-11, indicated the presence of 1,1-dichloroethene, 1,1-dichloroethane, cis-l,2-dichloroethene, dibromochJoromethane, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes. Monitoring well B-ll; was located south and slightly west of the warehouse building. The drum burial area was excavated down to approximately 17 feet below grade. Soil samples from the bottom of the excavation indicated methylene chloride (13 ug/kg) and tetrachloroethene (2.7 ug/kg) contamination. OCI stopped operations in May 1991, because of financial problems and the inability to obtain a RCRA Part B permit. OCI performed RCRA closure of the equipment and tanks in 1992, however, a complete RCRA closure of the entire facility was not performed. Basis for Taking Action Contaminants The primary contaminants at the Site are associated with the past operation of the seepage pit by OCI, chemical spills at the Site and past oil related activities. These areas are: the former seepage lagoon, the former lacquer thinner spill Site and petroleum sludge lagoons (Figure 2). These contaminants include elevated levels of chlorinated solvents and benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene (BETX) compounds. Lower concentrations of other volatile and semivolatile organic compounds were also detected. The nature and extent of contamination is presented in the FFS and Phase II RI report and summarized in the following sections. Hazardous substances that have been released at the Site and have performance standards in each media include: Soil Groundwater Benzo(a)anthracene Vinyl Chloride Benzo(a)pyrene 1,2-Dichloroethane Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Bis(2-ethylhexy)phthalate Benzene Beryllium Toluene Lead Ethylenebenzene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene Xylene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Arsenic Dieldrin Barium 2,3,7,8-TCDD(TEF) Total Chromium PCB(Arochlor-1248) Copper Lead Mercury Exposure to soil and groundwater were associated with significant human health risks due to exceedances of EPA's risk management criteria for the reasonable maximum exposure scenarios. The carcinogenic risks were highest for exposure to contaminated groundwater from a possible future ingestion pathway. Soil contaminants posed the greatest
carcinogenic risk to human health through dermal contact and ingestion by future workers, primarily from Arochlor 1248, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and dioxin/furans. Non-carcinogenic risks for future workers was from lead. IV. REMEDIAL ACTIONS Remedy Selection U.S. EPA had organized this project into two operable units (OU). The first OU, OU1, action was an interim action to address contamination in the upper ground-water system (UGS) by stopping the contaminant plume migration. The final OU, OU2, was to remediate the ground water to comply with MCLs, and the soil contamination to be protective in an industrial setting. The OU2 ROD also allowed for an Alternate Point of Compliance (APC). The APC was granted on June 9, 2004, and included the OCI property and the adjacent property to the west, Htrans Holdings. The soil, which was the principal threat at the Site was to be addressed by excavation of approximately 6,000 cubic yards of the contaminated soil and on-site treatment by solidification/stabilization. After addition pre-design sampling, the volume of contaminated soils was now approximately 2,500 cubic yards and the remedy was modified to allow for excavation and off-site disposal. An ESD was issued to account for this modification. The OU1 ROD was signed for the Site on September 30, 1991. The Remedial Action Objectives (RAOs) were developed as a result of data colleted during the Phase I RI/ Focused Feasability Study. This included a single remedial activity to contain and remediate the contaminated groundwater. The selected remedy had the following specific components:
For contaminated groundwater associated with the Site: Construction and operation of a groundwater pump and treat system to contain the contaminant plume. The treated water to be discharged into Roy's Creek was to be in compliance with the substantive requirements of a NPDES permit.
The OU2 ROD was signed for the Site on February 5,1997. The RAO's for the Site, were developed form the Phase I and II RI. The OU2 ROD addressed the contaminated groundwater by treating it to meet MCLs or granting an APC if certain conditions were met. The OU2 ROD also addressed the contaminated soils by excavation and solidification/stabilization. An ESD was signed on September 29, 2003. This ESD documented the temporary shutdown of the groundwater extraction and treatment system to evaluate the need for continued operation of the system. During this shutdown, a study was conducted to evaluate the potential of an APC for the groundwater, as allowed by the ROD. The APC allows the system to be discontinued indefinitely as long as groundwater monitoring demonstrates compliance with the AP, C and other requirements within the ROD. The second modification addresses groundwater performance standards, MCLs, and a provision in the Consent Decree's Statement of Work (SOW). The last modification noted in the BSD was the off-site disposal of the material versus the originally planned on-site treatment and disposal of the hazardous material. Quarterly groundwater sampling started in the summer of 1995 and continued through October 2000 and began again in October 2001 through July 2003. Cleanup goals for the groundwater are MCLs for Contaminants of Concern identified in the Phase II RI/FS throughout the contaminant plume although granting of the APC changed it from throughout the contaminant plume to the OCI property and the adjacent property to the west, Htrans Holdings:
Groundwater Contaminant Cleanup Goal (ppb) Arsenic 50 Barium 2,000 Total Chromium 100 Copper 1,300 Lead 15 Mercury 2 1,2-Dichloroethane 5 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 Vinyl Chloride 2 Benzene 5 Toluene 1,000 Ethylbenzene 700 Xylene 10,000
The selected remedy for the OU2 ROD addressed the principal threat at the Site by excavation and off-site disposal of the contaminated soils. The following table lists the soil contaminant and the cleanup goal for that contaminant.
Soil Contaminant Cleanup Goal (ppb) Benzo(a)anthracene 3,153 Benzo(a)pyrene 2,967 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 3,519 Bis(2-ethylhexy) phthalate 14,488 Beryllium 420 Lead 900,000 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2,350 Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 2,595 Dieldrin 20 2,3,7,8-TCDD(TEF) .085 PCB (Arochlor-1248) 7,739
Restrictive Covenants will be placed on the Site. Restrictive Covenants for the groundwater can be found in Appendix H of the APC Demonstration Report. A Restrictive Covenant for the soils will be filed with the Kent County, Register of Deeds in the near future. The soils Restrictive Covenant has the following major restrictions:
1) A prohibition on all site uses that are not compatible with the industrial site uses;
2) A prohibition on demolition, excavation or the conduct of other intrusive
activities that could affect the integrity of existing building foundations and concrete slabs unless provisions are made to replace these features with an engineered barrier of equal or greater competence;
3) A prohibition on the use of groundwater for any purpose other than approved
environmental sampling and remediation activities; 4) A prohibition that any buildings constructed at the site have the provisions
to prevent the migration of volatile chemical into indoor air; 5) A prohibition on the off-site transport of soils at the site without first
testing those soils for hazardous characteristics and then managing those soils in accordance with all federal and state environmental regulations; and
6) A prohibition on subdividing the site into more than one unit to limit the possibility that workers would have repeated exposures to soils in a particular sub area of the site.
Remedy Implementation The dates that the pump and treat system remedial design was started and completed was January 2, 1992 - February 9, 1994. The groundwater system operated from May 1995 until July 1997. At MDEQ's request, the system was shut down at that time when the effluent from the treatment plant, discharging to Roys Creek, failed an aquatic toxicity test. It was never restarted because the remedy in the OU2 ROD allowed for an APC, which allows the PRPs to turn off the extraction and treatment system if certain conditions are met, while maintaining the system for future use if necessary. The State of Michigan's, Part 201, Environmental Remediation, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended (Part 201), which is an ARAR for the Site, requires a demonstration that the contaminant plume is being reduced by a naturally occurring process and that the contaminants will not exceed the groundwater performance standards at the approved APC. The work plan for this demonstration was approved on December 15, 2000. Monitoring of the well network began in September 2001 and was recently completed in June 2003. The APC Demonstration Report was submitted on September 12, 2003, and was approved on June 9, 2004. Attachment 5 shows the monitoring wells sampled in the APC Demonstration. Attachment 6, shows the results of the 8 rounds of sampling for the organic and inorganic compounds in the APC Demonstration. The only contaminant that exceeds the MCL performance standard at the APC is benzene. The reason that the SOW did not include benzene, if all the other performance standards were met, was because the oil plume that covers much of the 20 acre property contains benzene. Given that there are 12 other contaminants that have MCLs as a performance standard (7 of which are volatiles and three are toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene (TEX) from the BTEX oil designation that includes benzene) and all twelve would have to be below their respective performance standards to achieve compliance, it was considered appropriate to exclude benzene as a contaminant of concern because the oil contamination is not subject to action under CERCLA. The reason that the TEX chemicals were included as a contaminant of concern was that OCI was a solvent recycler and used the TEX chemicals extensively. In addition, the MCL for benzene is at a much lower concentration than the MCLs for the TEX chemicals. The dates for the soil remedial design start and completion are February 16, 2001 - September 26, 2001. The ROD estimated that approximately 6,000 cubic yards of soils would exceed the cleanup levels and need to undergo solidification/stabilization prior to on-site disposal. The ROD also allowed for a small part of this volume to be taken off- site for disposal as solid waste if necessary. During the remedial design, the volume of soils which needed to be removed from the site to meet the established cleanup levels was determined to be approximately 2,500 cubic yards. In addition, sampling and excavation of soils at the site revealed that a significant volume of soils may either contain higher levels of contamination or contain enough waste material that solidification/ stabilization would be difficult or impossible to implement. Since the volume and nature of wastes can change the cost-effectiveness of various disposal options, the PRPs compared the costs of off-site disposal of all soils to the costs of solidification/ stabilization and on-site disposal and identified significant savings for off-site disposal. Therefore the waste was sent offsite. Also, drums that were disposed of on the Site were remediated along with contaminated soil were removed from the Site. The soil RA was started in September 2001 and was completed in September 2003. A Unilateral Administrative Order was issued on January 2, 1992 to the Abitibi PRP Group for design/construct and operation and maintenance of the pump and treat system. Two consent decrees have been entered with regard to this Site. The first was entered on February 7, 2003, with the Abitibi PRP Group (U.S. vs. Abitibi Price Corporation, et al.) and is for the development and implementation of the APC study. The second consent decree was entered on February 1, 2001, with Total Petroleum Inc., and was for the design and implementation of the soil remediation.
No CERCLA removal actions or non-CERCLA removal actions have been performed since the signature of either ROD, although the Abitibi Price PRP Group has offered to remove contaminated sludge and water from the existing pretreatment tank if MDEQ agrees to execute an Administrative Consent Decree that would settle any and all potential liability of the Group under Part 201. System Operations/Operation and Maintenance (O&M) The groundwater system operated from May 1995 until July 1997. Although the APC has been approved, if the contaminant concentration in the groundwater exceeds performance standards at or beyond the APC (unless the exceedance is benzene alone), the PRP's will be required to submit a written cause for the exceedance and submit a plan that proposes additional actions to establish compliance. If the plan is to restart the groundwater treatment plant, the PRP's will be directed to repair the broken pipe that leads from the extraction well to the treatment system (broken by the other PRP that performed the soil remediation) and upgrade the system. The capital cost of constructing the pump and treat system was $398,000. The projected cost of operating the treatment plant without being upgraded is $ 280,000 annually. Ground water monitoring during the operation of the treatment system or with the approved APC is $127,000 annually. Attachment 5 shows the monitoring wells involved in the APC. The soil remediation requires no O&M other than maintenance of the existing concrete slabs. Contamination is present under some of these slabs which is addressed by institutional controls if they are removed as a result of future development. If additional work is required at the Site, including but not limited to replacement or maintenance of the slabs, it will be handled through the Modification Clause in the TPI Petroleum Inc., Consent Decree or by a new Site owner as appropriate. V. PROGRESS SINCE THE LAST FIVE-YEAR REVIEW
Table 2: Actions Taken Since the Last Five-Year Review
Recommendations From Previous Review Party Responsible Action Taken
Grant APC & Obtain Institutional Controls for Groundwater
EPA PRP Complete June 9, 2004
Continue Monitoring APC PRP Ongoing
Complete Soil Remediation In Accordance With OU2 ROD PRP Complete
Obtain Institutional Controls for Soil PRP Ongoing
The first five-year review recommended granting the APC, obtaining enforceable land use restrictions, continued groundwater monitoring, and remediation of the contaminated soil. Groundwater monitoring has consistently occurred over the last two years as part of the APC Demonstration which concluded that natural attenuation is occurring. VI. FIVE-YEAR REVIEW PROCESS Administrative Components Members of the MDEQ were notified of the initiation of the five- year review in December 2003. The OECI Five-Year Review team was led by Tom Williams of EPA, RPM for the OCI Site, and included the MDEQ Project Manager, and Geologist. From December 4, 2003 to January 15, 2004, the RPM established the review schedule. Its components included:
? Community Notification; ? Document Review; ? Site Inspections; ? Five-Year Review Report Development and Review.
Community Involvement Activities to involve the community in the five-year review process were initiated in October 2003 with a notification to the Community Involvement Coordinator (CIC) for the OCI Superfund Site. A notice was published on January 30, 2004 in the local newspaper, the Grand Rapids Press, that a five-year review was to be conducted. Since the notice and press release were issued, no member of the community voiced any interest or opinion concerning the five-year review process. Document Review This five-year review consisted of a review of relevant site documents including, but not limited to, the APC Demonstration Report, and the Soil Remedial Action Report. Site Inspections Site inspections were conducted on September 18, 2003 and January 16, 2004. The purpose of the first inspection was to determine if the Site met the requirements to issue a PCOR, which included the pre-final inspection for the soil remediation. The second inspection, on January 16, 2004, was the final inspection for the soil remediation. Interviews Interviews with individuals beyond the five-year review project team were not conducted. VII. TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents? The review of documents, applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs), risk assumptions, and the results of the Site inspections indicates that the remedy is functioning as intended by the OU2 ROD, as modified by the ESD. The removal of soils eliminated the principal threat at the Site. The other remaining component of the cleanup is the APC for groundwater. Continued groundwater monitoring of the Site to see that the requirements of the APC are complied with will ensure that the remedy is protective for groundwater. If the contaminant concentration in the groundwater exceeds performance standards at or beyond the APC (unless the exceedance is benzene alone), the PRP's will be required to submit a written cause for the exceedance and submit a plan that proposes additional actions to establish compliance. If the plan is to restart the groundwater treatment plant, the PRP's will be directed to repair and upgrade the system. Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action objectives (RAOs) used at the time of the remedy selection still valid? There have been no changes in the physical conditions of the OCI Site that would affect the protectiveness of the remedy. Changes in Standards and To be Considers As the remedial work has been completed, the risk based cleanup for soil in the OU2 ROD have been met. ARARs that still must be met at this time and that have been evaluated include: The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)(40 CFR 141.11-141.16). A list of ARARs is
included in Attachment 3. There have been no changes in these ARARs and no new standards or to be considers (TBCs) affecting the protectiveness of the remedy. Changes in Exposure Pathways, Toxicity, and Other Contaminant Characteristics The exposure assumptions used to develop the Human Health Risk Assessment included exposure to contaminated groundwater for future residents through ingestion, dermal contact, and dermal contact pathways, and exposure to contaminated soils from a possible future worker through surface and subsurface soil contaminants (0-10 feet below groundwater surface) through incidental ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact pathways. There have been no changes in the toxicity factors for the contaminants of concern that were used in the baseline risk assessment. These assumptions are considered to be conservative and reasonable in evaluating risk and developing risk-based cleanup levels. A change in assumptions due to VOCs at the Site requires a restriction against building construction, without regulatory approval, in areas where subsurface VOC contamination is present at concentrations that may pose an indoor air inhalation risk. No other change to these assumptions, or the cleanup levels developed from them is warranted. There has been no change to the standardized risk assessment methodology that could affect the protectiveness of the remedy. The remedy is progressing as expected. Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question the protectiveness of the remedy? No other events have affected the protectiveness of the remedy and there is no other information that calls into question the short-term protectiveness of the remedy. Technical Assessment Summary
According to the data reviewed and the Site inspections, the remedy is functioning as intended by the OU2 ROD, as modified by the ESD. There have been no changes in the physical conditions of the Site that would affect the protectiveness of the remedy. No ARARs for soil were cited in the ROD because the remediation was risk based. There have been no changes in the toxicity factors for the contaminants of concern that were used in the baseline risk assessment, and there have been no changes to the standardized risk assessment methodology that could affect the protectiveness of the remedy. On going monitoring of the APC will ensure that the groundwater remains protective to human health and the environment.
VIII. ISSUES
Table - Issues
Issue Currently Affects Protectiveness
(Y/N)
Affects Future Protectiveness
(Y/N)
Work with MDEQ to see if additional COCs are required for the APC
N Y
Work with MDEQ to see that the Site is redeveloped N N
IX. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS
Table 4 - Recommendations and Follow- Up Actions
Affects Protectiveness?
(Y/N) Issue Recommendations/ Follow-up Actions
Party Responsible
Oversight Agency
Milestone Date
Current Future Work with MDEQ to see if additional COCs are required for the APC
Work with MDEQ on this issue. MDEQ/EPA EPA ASAP N Y
Work with MDEQ to see that the Site is redeveloped.
Work with potential developers to redevelop the Site.
EPA/MDEQ/ PRP MDEQ/EPA ASAP N N
X. Protectiveness Statement The remedy is protective of human health and the environment in the short-term and measures are being put in place to ensure protectiveness in the long-term. There are no current exposure pathways and the remedy appears to be functioning as designed. The removal of soils, to eliminate the source of contamination has achieved the remedial objectives to minimize the migration of contaminants to groundwater and surface water and prevent direct contact with, or ingestion of, contaminants in soils which were remediated. Contamination that remains under concrete slabs will be dealt with through institutional controls. The other remaining component of the cleanup is groundwater containment and restoration by a pump and treat system or by allowing an APC which was granted on June 9, 2004. Continued groundwater monitoring of the Site to see that the requirements of the APC are complied with will ensure that the remedy is protective for groundwater. If the contaminant concentration in the groundwater exceeds performance standards at or beyond the APC (unless the exceedance is benzene alone), the PRP's will be required to submit a written cause for the exceedance and submit a plan that proposes additional actions to establish compliance. If the plan is to restart the groundwater treatment plant, the PRP's will be directed to repair and upgrade the system. If additional work is required at the Site, including but not limited to replacement or maintenance of the slabs, it will be handled through the Modification Clause in the TPI Petroleum Inc., Consent Decree or by a new Site owner as appropriate. XI. Next Review The next five-year review for the OCI Site is required by September 2009, five years from the date of this review.
ATTACHMENTS
00
s^rR
Sr^
il»_l
i i.
L|
n fl
i D
C
<%
•*-—
{_•]
Q
'^-
-
CO
RPO
RAT
ION
O
F (S
MER
IC4
ATTACHMENT 3
List of Documents Reviewed OCI Superfund Site Record of Decision, September 30, 1991 OCI Superfund Site Record of Decision, February 5, 1997 OCI Superfund Site First Five- Year Review, September 15, 1999 OCI Superfund Site Explanation of Significant Differences, September 29, 2003 OCI Superfund Site Preliminary Close-Out Report, September 29, 2003 OCI Superfund Site APC Demonstration Report and Addendum, September 2003 and January 14, 2004 respectively OCI Superfund Site Soil Remedial Action Completion Report, Draft March 15, 2004
ATTACHMENT 4
ARARs Safe Drinking Water Act Michigan's, Part 201, Environmental Remediation, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended Clean Water Act R323.3102-.2189 of the Michigan Water Resources Commission Act, Public Act 245 of 1929, as amended
ATTACHMENT 5
ATTACHMENT 6
TABLE 4.1 Page! of 12
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
APC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITE
GRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
~ " ~1
-
OCJ Performance StandardLocation \ Date
BackgroundMW-17MW-17MW-17MW-17MW-17MW-17MW-17MW-17
MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23
Source AreaMW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1
9/21/0112/T9/OP3/18/026/24/029/30/0212/16/023/31/036/18/03
1 — —
cNC
«Hg/i-
5
<1.0
Car
bon
Dis
iilf
ide
Chl
orob
enze
ne
fJi^/L M?/L
Chl
oroc
lhan
e
W/L
-
1
Chl
orof
ortn
Hg/L
-
1, 1
-Dic
hlor
oeth
ane
Wf/1-
Ifl-
Dic
hlor
oeth
ene
Mi'/f-
|
<50 <1.0 ! <1 0 <1.0 <1.0<1.0 <50<1.0<1.0<1.0
; <1.0(<1.0)
<501.6
<1.0<50 <1.0<50 i <1.0
<50(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)
<1.0 <1-0 <1.0<1.0 , <1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<5.0j. <1.0 | <50 <1.0 ; <1.0
9/24/01 112/17/013/19/026/25/029/30/0212/17/023/31/036/18/03
9/25/019/25/0112/20/013/20/023/20/026/26/026/26/0210/1/0212/18/02
MW-1 ' 12/18/02
—
_
D
D
D
DMW-1 4/1/03MW-1 6/19/03MW-1 t 6/19/03 ID
<1.0 (<1.0)n
<1.0: •i- i;'6. ^rS>
<1.0<1 0
<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<50(<1.0) kl.O ( < 1 . 0 ) j <1.0 (<5.0) <1.0(<1.0)1 '
<so : <i .o <i .o : <i.o<50 : 1.5 <1.0 <1.0<50<50
<1.0 ! <50<1.0(< 1.0)
<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)
.s^aoocflglvJg3&33bo§8fi|j;|j<ijjj$QQ;!j$sSAiSSlSQBBKfr
iMi&cSJIJSQC
Kww
;-2^22o(@i8;' SOO^SZOOS3600(3700),:i.,3400j«:*.-=i1200 (1400),;-1500:(1200)V
<50 (<1.0)<50
<50(<1.0)
<20000
<!:!!<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)
600<20000 | 660
<1.0 <1.0
<1.0•cl.O<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)
1,2-
Dic
hlor
oeth
ane
cis-
1,2-
Dic
hlor
oeth
ene
Hg/L fig/I.
5
<1.0 <1.0•cl.O <1.0<1.0 <1.0<1.0 : <1.0
<1.0<1.0 (<1 .0)
<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0 ' <1.0 <1-0<1.0 | <1.0 <1.0<1.0
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<5.0)<1.0
<1.0 (<5.0)
<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0
<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0 <1.0
<1.0 (<1.0) (<1.0 (<1.0)| <1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)
<400 <400 i <400 1400 <400<400 <400 <400
<10000 ; 510 , <200<2500 210 ! <50
<200 <200<50 <50
1500 <400730 <200 _,66
<2500 210 <50 <50 <50 140< 13000 390<13000 380
<250 <250 <250 ; 720
<50<50
<250<250 ; <250 <250 740 i <250
tran
s-1,
2-D
ichl
oroe
then
e
M,?/L
1,2-
Dic
hlor
opro
panc
liS/L
l
<1.0 <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)
2.2<1.01.7
<i .O<1.0
1.6(1.6)2.2
1.2(1.7)
48000510003400034007300
3600036000
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)
< .0< .0< .0< .0< .0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1 .0 (<1 .0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)
<400 2200<400<200<50<50<250<250
<25000 <500 | <500 \ <500 ' <500 ; 880 <500 50000 <500
24009308217010001000
<500<25000(42) ' 660(620) ,<500(<5.0) ' <500(10) <500'5i> 820(1200) oOO (<1.0), 52000 (58000) <500 (210) l 2000 (2100)<25000(7.0) 740(730)
<25000 710<500(<5.0l ' -.5'. '0il2) ! <500i.54> 1100 (1500; oOO (<1.0) olOOu (79000 -.:5i)0 (190] i 2300(2400) :
<500 <500 <5CO 1500 - 5 0 0 S6000 <500 2500 ;
<10000(1.4) 380(380) <200 (<5.0) <200 (6.3) 740(23) <200 (800;<25000(1.7) <500(330)!<500(<5.0);<500«1.0) <500 (23) 860(690)
.<200(24k<500:(23)a
40000 (40000; ' <200 7SU) , 850 (960)40000(38000) <500(190) 1000(830)
TABLE 4.1
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
Page 2 of 12
TABLE 4.1
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
Page 3 of 12
TABLE 4.1 Page 4 of 12
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
OCl Performance StandardLocation j Date
Source Area^cont.)MW-2MW-2MW-2MW-2MW-2MW-2MW-2MW-2
MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22
D-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-l
Eth
ylbe
nzen
e
Met
hyle
ne C
hlor
ide
H$/L iig/L
Sty
renc
Tft
rach
loro
ethe
ne
11
W/L \ iiS/L i n$/L!
700 ! - - i - 20001 ' i !
9/26/0112/18/013/20/026/25/02lu/1/0212/18/024/1/036/19/03
9/26/0112/18/013/20/023/20/026/25/0210/1/0212/17/024/2/036/19/03
1.1<1.0<1.0
<5.0 : <1.0<5.0<5.0
<1.0 1.5<1.0 i <1.0 i <1.0<1.0 I <1.0 , <1.0
<1.0 ! <5.0 i <1 0 1 <1.0<1.0 <5.0 j <1.0 | <1.0
<1.0(<1.0): <5.0(<5.0)<1.0 i <5.0
! 6.7(6.6)
D
9/25/0112/17/013/20/026/26/0210/1/0212/18/024/1/036/19/036/19/03
<2.0<1.0<1.0
<5.0 (<5.0)
<1.0(<1.0)i <1.0(<1.0)<1.0 <1.0
<1.0(<1 .0) j <1.0(<1.0)1
<1.0<1.0
1,1,
1 -T
rich
loro
e tha
ne
MS/Z-
200
1,1,
2-T
rich
loro
etha
ne
M.?/L
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)<1.0 | <1.0
1.5(1.2)
<10 <2.0 ; <2.0<5.0 <1.0<5.0 i <1.0
<1.0 1 <5.0 i <1.0<1.0 <5.0 <1.0<1.0 <5.0
<1.0(<1.0) <5.0(<5.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0<1.0(<1.0)
<5.0 | <1.0<5.0 (<5.0)
<5.0<5.0<5.0<5.0
<1.0 <5.0<1.0(<1.0)l <5.0(<5.0)
<1.0 i <5.0
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.05.2
6.3<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
<2.0<1.0
<1.0 | <1.0
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
<2.0<1.0<1.0
Tri
chlo
roet
hene
MX/L
5
1.0<1.0<1.0 '<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
m^Hi<1.0<1.0
<1.0 <1.0 i <1.0 <1.0<1.0 <1.0<1.0
3.1(2.6) <1.0(<1.0j1.2
<1.0(<1.0)j <1.0(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0 _,<1.0
<i .o t<i .o)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<i.o ; <i.o
<1.0
<1.0<1.0(<1.0)
<1.0
<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
7.5(<1.0) |<1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
1.5(1.3) <5.0(<5.0) <1.0(<1.0) i <1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)D 1.4 i <5.0 ' <1.0 1 <1.0 i <1.0
<1.0 ; <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.01.6
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
3.3(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.02.6
<1.0<1.0(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0(<1.0;
<1.0
Vin
yl C
hlor
ide
MS/L
"«
2tu
1"Si'V-S/L
2 | 10000
1.2<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
<1.0(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<3.0<3.0<3.0 ,<3.0<3.0
, <3.0 1r" <3.0
16
<6.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0
^^3_0_<3'.0
<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0
TABLE 4.1
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
Page 5 of 12
TABLE 4.1 P a g e 6 o f l 2
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
APC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITE
GRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
OC1 Performance StandardLocation \ Date
Source Area^cont.JD-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2
SentrvMW-4MW^lMW-4MW-4MW^lMW-4MW-4MW^
MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43
9/26/0112/18/013/20/02t,.'?5/026/25/0210/1/0212/17/0212/17/024/2/036/19/03
9/24/0112/20/013/19/026/25/029/30/0212/17/024/1/036/18/03
10/5/0110/5/0112/18/013/19/026/24/029/30/0212/17/024/1/03
MW-43 6/ IS/03
D
D
—
.
Eth
ylbc
nzen
e
Met
hyle
ne C
hlor
ide
Hg/L ng/L
^
Tet
rach
loro
ethc
ne
lig/L . tigfLI
700
1.0 <5.0
-
Tol
uene
1,1,
1-T
rich
loro
ctha
ne
lig/L ngfL
\ 1000j
<1.0 <1.0 1.0<1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<2.0
<5.0 <1.0<5.0 ; <1.0<5.0 i <1.0<10
1.9(2.0) <5.0(<5.0)<2.0
<1.0 (<1.0)1.6 _j <5.0 i <1.0
<1.0<1.0(<1.0)
<5.0 i <1.0<5.0 (<5.0) <1.0(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<2.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<2.0
<1 0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0 <1.0[ <1.0(<1.0) 4.1 (<1.0)
!L<1.0 <5.0 i <1.08.0 | <5.0 ! <1.05.677
<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0<1.0(<1.0)
1
L>$/jjJL7Q()MlHfe200?%
260gj|I200|j|t
<5.0 <1.0<5.0<5.0
<1.0<1.0
<5.0(<5.0) <1.0(<1.0)<5.0 j <1.0
<5.0(<5.0) i <1.0(<1.0)
<130 <25
<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0<1.0
200
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<2.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0
2.3 <1.0<1.0 <1.0 <1.0
<i .o(<i .o) < i .o (< i .o ) <i .b(<i .o)<1.0 i <1.0 i <1.0
<1.0(<1.0) i <1.0(<1.0)
<25 1 390<130 <25 <25 | 300<25 <5.0 1 <5.0 ! 820
<250 i <50 h <50 [$3ftPXX>fcU.i>.130 i <so <io i <io KgsS.l5oa.aM!*i
1,1,
2-T
ricM
oroe
than
e
Hg/L
-
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<2.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)| <1.0(<1.0)
<25<2518
<5015
150 <5.0 <1.0 <1.0 110 22<1. 0(460)
80 1<5.0(<5.0) <1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0) 9.6(10) 7.2(6.8)
0.0 <1.0 i <1.0 3.3 3.7
<25<25<5.0<50<10<1.0
<1.0 «1.0)<1.0
Tri
chlo
roet
hene
tigfL
5
bj^tiMg&dHfii&iIMPHKE-^i^Sl
<1.0<1.0<1.0
mmwm<1.01.5
1.9(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
<25<25<5.0<50<10<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
40(48) <5.0(<5.0) <1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0) 2 .2(2.1) 2.9(3.1) <1.0(<1.0) | <1.0(<1.0)
Vin
yl C
hlor
ide
VS/L
2
d(|$SJi76<&33i$IMHlQ&ifKl!
<1.0<1.0<1.0
pSjjfejfmty 'Jtf) 'MiifiLJ
a»af»;?jMll1.5(1.4)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0) I<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
<25<25<5.0<50<10<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
"a
Xjig/L
10000
<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<6.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0
<3.013
<3.0170
<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0
76005400730
3600440440<3.0170
<1.0(<1.0) 34 !
TABLE 4.1
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
P a g e 7 o f l 2
CRA 4151 (2^)
TABLE 4.1 Page 8 of 12
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
APC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITE
GRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
OCl Performance StandardLocation
Sentry (cant.)MW-44MW-44
Date \
10/5/0112/18/01
MW-44 3/19/02MW^4MW^4MW^14MW-44MW-44
D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3
6/25/029/30/0212/17/02 i4/1/03 i6/18/03 ;
9/26/0112/17/0112/17/013/19/026/26/0210/1/02
D-3 12/17/02D-3 i 4/2/03D-3 I 6/19/03
i
D-4 9/24/01D-4 ^D-4D-4D-4D-4D-4D-4
12/18/013/19/026/25/029/30/0212/17/024/1/036/18/03
L>
tn£
^'UJ
W/Z-
Met
hyle
ne C
hlor
ide
MS/Z-
700 !
iiioooMmum;M14QQ»
1
<J-j
W/Z-
-
Tet
rnch
loro
ethe
nc
cs/Z-
\\
<130 ! <25<50 <10
<130
§(9*30 <5074 (85)
2001JOO {1200;
430
<5.0(<5.0)<50
^ <25
<25<10<25
<10 : <10
<10 <10<1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)
<10<50(<5.0) ! <10(<1.0)
<25 <5.0j§S31310J$ :| <25
1 620mmm
410450
EgyCL^Oli680
jrsa<820).;i
, <1.04.41.5
<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
2.4(<1.0)
<25<5.0<50
<50 <10<25<50
<5.0 (<250)<25
<50(<5.0)
<5.0<5.0<5.0<5.0<5.0
<5.0 (<5.0)<5.0
<5.0(<5.0)
<5.0<10
<1.0(<50)<5.0
<10(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<10<10(<1.0)
<5.0<5.0<5.0<10<5.0<10
Tol
uene
V-X/L
1000
2804102308869
20(22)<10
$fll'00-(1200)*?
<5.0<5.0<5.0<10<5.0
1,1,
1-T
rich
loro
c th
ane
CS/Z-
200
<25<10<25<10<10
<1.0(<1.0)<10
<10(<1.0)
<5.0<5.0<5.0<10<5.0
<io : <io<1.0(<50) • 1.5 (<50)
<5.0<10(<1.0j
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)l <1.0(<1.0)
5.1<1.0(<50)
<5.0<10(3.5) <10(<1.0)
i
1,1,
2-Jr
ichl
oroe
than
e
w?/z.
-
<25<10<25<10<10
<1.0(<1.0)<10
<10 (<1.0)
<5.0<5.0<5.0<10<5.0<10
<1.0(<50)<5.0
<10(<1.0)
<1.0 _[ <1.0 ' <1.015 <1.0
<1.0 | <1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0<1.0
<i.o ! <i.o<1.0 1 <1.0
<1.0(<1.0)|<1.0(<1.0)<1.0 ! <1.0
1.3(<1.0) |<1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)
Tri
chlo
roet
heit
e
WT/Z.
5
<25<10<25<10<10
<1.0(<1.0)<10
<10(2.1)
<5.0<5.0<5.0<10<5.0<10
<1.0(<50)<5.0
<10(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
Vin
yl C
hlor
ide
MS/E-
2
<25<10<25<10<10
<1.0(<1.0)<10m&>mm<5.0<5.0<5.0<10<5.0<10
<1.0(<50)<5.0
g»fKHJ'(3;7)p?
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
a
i1j
5"»>xHS/L
10000
30002600420023002300<3.021003400
9802200]1800260012001600<3.018002100
5954174243
<3.0<3.06.3
TABLE 4.1
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDV1LLE, MJCHJGAN
Page 9 of 12
TABLE 4.1 Page 10 of 12
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
OCI Performance StandardLocation
Sentry (confj
D-6D-6D-6D-6D-6
Date
9/27/0112/19/013/19/02t, '25/0210/1/02
D-6 | 12/17/02D-6 4/2/03D-6 j 6/19/03
BoundaryMW-45MW-45MW-45MW^ISMW-45MW-45MW-45MW-45
MW-46MW-46MW-46MW-46MW-46MW^16MW-46MW-46MW-46
10/4/0112/19/013/19/026/24/029/30/0212/16/024/1/036/18/03
10/4/0112/19/013/18/026/24/029/30/029/30/0212/16/024/1/036/18/03
Eth
ylbe
iize
ne
f-g/L
700
2228 _j4317
tw
~Ec
-CUc
*>,j:5-s
<5.0<5.0<5.0<5.0
fi'/I-
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
24 <5.0 : <1.0
"
v-lft-
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
Tol
uene
HgfL
WOO
1.91.61.1
1,1,
1-T
Hch
loro
e th
ane
P-g/L
200
<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 <1.01.0 <1.0
33(38) ;<5.0(<5.0) <1.0(<1.0)l <1.0(<1.0) 1.4(1.3) <1.0C<1.0)1 12 ,
10(28)
U
<1.06.0
[' 1.41.9
<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0<1.0 (<1 0)
<5.0 ! <1.0<5.0(<5.0)| <1.0(<1.0)
,
<5.0
<1.0 i 13 ; <1.0<1.0(<1.0) <1.0(1.3) <1.0(<1.0)
8.1 <1.0 <1.0 ] 2.5<5.0 <1.0 <1.0<5.0<5.0
<5.0 (<5.0)<5.0
<5.0(<5.0)
6.8 <5.0
<1.0 <1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.04.3 <5.0 <1.0
<1.0 ! <5.0 ; <1.0<1.0 <5.0 <1.0<1.0 ; <5.0 <1.0<1.0 i <5.0 : <1.0
<1.0 (<1.0jj <5.0 (<5.0) i <1.0 (<1.0j<1.0 ; <5.0
<1.0 (<1.0)! <5.0 (<5.0)
<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0 <1.0
<1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1 .0 (<1 .0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1 .0 (<1 .0)<1.0
<1 .0 (<1 .0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
1,1,
2-T
rich
loro
etha
ne
f-gfl-
-
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)
Tri
chlo
roet
hene
M£/L
s
3.74.71.53.31.7
2.7 (2.7)1.6
<1. 0(2.4)
Vin
yl C
hlor
ide
V-g/i-
2
1.3
1.4•• • •s fsISJBwSM'flB^
<1.01.0 (<1.0)
<1.0 T <1.01.1 <1.0
<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
<1 .0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0<1.0(<1.0)
Xyl
ene
(Tot
al)
MX/I-
30000
162357104.4158.2
<3.0
<3.0153.53.3
<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0
248.43.3
<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0
TABLE 4.1
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
Page 11 of 12
1.0(<1.0) 3.8(3.8) j <1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0; |
CRA4151 (2V)
TABLE 4.1
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
Page 12 of 12
Laboratory analysis conducted by Triiiiatnx Laboratories, Inc.( ) - Laboratory ai\aiysis conducted by the Michigan Department
of Envlroiuiienta] Quality EnvLronnienlal Laboratory'NA - Not AnalyzedJ - The analyte was positively identified, the nunxencal value is the
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.D - I^boralor)- duplicate.
TABLE 4.2 Pagel of 12
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS METALSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITE
GRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
1OCl Performance Standard
LocationBackground
MW-17MW-17MW-17
Date
9/21/0112/19/013/18/02
MW-17 6/24/02MW-17MW-17MW-17MW-17
MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23
Source AreaMW-1MW-1
9/30/0212/16/02
Alu
min
um,
Tot
al
MgA-
-
<50
Ant
imon
y,
Tot
al
Ars
enic
, T
otal
fig/L jig/L
-
<2.0<50 <2.0
Bar
ium
, T
ota
l
MS/7-
50 2000
1.91.3
<50 : <2.0 1.6<50 i <2.0 1.2110
<50 (<50)3/31/03 ; <506/18/03 :<50(<50)
9/24/0112/17/013/19/026/25/029/30/0212/17/023/31/036/18/03
9/25/019/25/01
MW-1 12/20/01MW-1 3/20/02MW-1 ; 3/20/02MW-1 6/26/02MW-1MW-1MW-1
6/26/02
10/1/02
<50<50<50
<2.0 1.8<2.0 (<1.0)
<2.0<2.0 (<1.0)
<2.0 |<2.0
Cad
miu
m,
Tot
al
V-S/L
50 <0.2487.26153
1.9(<1.0) I 62(55)1.5 73
8.0(<1.0) 77(64)
<1.08.5
<2.0 <1.0<50 <2.0 <1.0
i 90 : <2.0 <1.0
-._.
D
<50 (<50) j <2.0 (<1.0)j <1.0 (<1.0)<50 <2.0 . <1.0
<50 (<50) <2.0 (<1 0) <1.0 (<1.0)
<20<50
~1 <50
D
D
<50<50
<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0
6817
Cal
cium
, Tot
al
mg/L \
62<0.2 1 62<0.2 79<0.2 79<0.2 ; 67
<0.2(<0.2) i 67(65.4)<0.2 ; 88
Chr
omiu
m,
Tot
al
MS/1-
2
1V-&K-
i200
2.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<0.2(<0.2) ! 78(73) j 71 (<1.0)
<0.2 74<0.2 81
60 <0.2 7565 ^0.2 8172
64(65)56
74 (69)
2.52.54.02.83.1
<50 ' <2.0 j 1.7 J<50 : <2.0 1.798 <2.0
12/18/02 ! <50(<50) i<2 .0(<1.0)MW-1 1 12/18/02MW-1 4/1/03 iMW-1 6/19/03MW-1 ; 6/19/03
3.22.6 (<1.0)
D j <50 (<50) ;<2 0 (<1.0) 2.7(<1.0)<50 <2.0 • 3.4
D130 (<50) <2.0(<1.0), 3.3(3.1)130 (<50) <2.0(<1.0) 3.5(3.0)
<0.2 ! 80<0.2 (<0.2) i 74 (73.8)
<0.2 69<0.2(<0.2) 53(78.1)
38 ; <0.2 544188134149
<0.2<0.2
58110
<0.2 194<0.2 , 195
76 ! <0.2 ' 11879 i <0.2 120
5.3<1.0<i.r<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.01.4
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
2300
5.31.2
<1.01.01.3
1.2(1.2)3.4
6.5(1.4)
1.2<1.0<1.01.3
<1.01.0 (<1.0)
2.11.9(1.4)
<1.0<1.01.1
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
60 <0.2 79 ; <1.0 <1.046(44) ; < 0 . 2 ( < 0 . 2 > 59(69.8; ,<1.0 «1 0) 1.2 <••• 1.0)46(39) !<0.2(<0.2V 59(604! < 1 . 0 i c l O ) J 1 2 ( 1 . 1 . )
Iron
(II)
(F
ield
)
mg/L
-
0.02.50.00.00.00.01.52.5
0.00.00.020202.52.50.0
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0505.0
sS
sHg/L
370<100<100<100<100
<100(41)<100
2320 (26)
160J740
<100<100 1<100
<100 (85)<100
<100(31)
110220
<100<100<100<100<100
250120(190)100 (110)
79 '-O 2 300 -- 10 31 5 I 59047(46 j < 0 2 « 0 2 ; 282(248) <I.O«1.0)| 1 .3 (1 .1 )40(41) < 0 2 i < 0 . 2 ) 229 (251 i <1 0 (<1 .0 ) j 1.6(1.2)
or ; v o u ( S 9 0 >0.0 ; o50 (800)
TABLE 4.2
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS METALSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
Page 2 of 12
Lea
d, T
otal
Mag
nesi
um,
Tot
al
ligfL j mg/L
Man
gane
se (
II)
(fie
ld)
Man
gane
se,
Tot
al
mg/L fj.g/L
! |OCI Performance Standard \ 15
LocationBackground
MW-17r~ MW-17
MW-17MW-17M "-17MW-17MW-17MW-17
MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23M'.V-23MW-23MW-23MW-23
Source AreaMW-1MW-1MW-1 1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1
-Date ! : i
9/21/0112/19/013/18/026/24/029/30/0212/16/023/31/036/18/03
9/24/0112/17/013/19/026/25/029/30/0212/17/023/31/036/18/03
-J
!
<1.0 i 15 0.4<1.0 13 0.214<1.0 17 0.0<1.0 18 0.0<1.0 ! 16 0.0
, i<1.0(<i .0) | 14(14.5)<1.0 20
1.3(<1.0) 19(18.1)
<1.0 18<1.0 . 23<1.0 . 18<1.0 19<1.0 ! 20
<1.0(<1.0): 18(18.1)<1.0 ' 16
<1.0(<1.0) 20(20.2)'
1 19/25/019/25/0112/20/oT3/20/023/20/026/26/026/26/0210/1/0212/18/02 i12/18/02
„
b
ET~
£T
<1.0 22<1.0 25<1.0 ! 63<1.0 ; 95<1.0 ' 90<1.0 i 46<1.0 i 47
0.00.20.0
1
usHg/L
538 14592681621505
613(532)758
784 (580)
0.130.126
0.0i 6.0L o.o
0.00.00.0
133J82137
Pot
assi
um,
Tot
al
mg/L
-
Sele
nium
, T
otal
Hg/L
-
1.95.0 2.25.2 2.12.8 2.03.0
6.7(5.6)8.3
12(7.2)
<104.31.4
858 1.4119 1.3
128(112) 4.4(3.7)110 3.8
21(100) 1.0(5.3)
0.00.0R
0.0
281 : <10300 <10878 ; 6.11510 3.4
0.0 1820 3.70.00.0
<1.0 : 29 00<1.0«1.0): 18(21.3) 0.0<1.0(<1.0) 18(18.3) 0.0
4/1/03 : <1.0 296 006/19/03 <1.0(<1.0) 131(132) 0.06/19/03 ID < 1 . 0 ( < 1 . 0 ) j 114(130) 0.0
805 3.2830 3.2637 : 6.2
393 (454) 7.5 (7.3)
1.92.2(2.1)
2.21.8(1.5)
2.22.21.91.92.0
1.9(1.8)1.7
1.9(1.8)
<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0
<2.0 (<1.0)<2.0U]
<2.0 (<1.0)
<2.0<2.0U]
<2.0<2.0<2.0
<2.0f<1.0)<2.0UJ
Sodi
um,
Tot
al
mg/L
75
C3
(2cN
Hg/L
-
<1057 j 10637877
70 (72)87
94 (96.7)
7872747377
75(80.1)68
<2.0(<1.0) j 30(76.1)
14 <2.014106.96.47.26.9
<2.0134132
<2.0 78<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0
23
<10<10<w
<10 (<10)13
<10(<10)
<10<10<10<10<10
<10 (<10)<10
<10 (<10)
<10<10<10<10
20 <1053 <1049 I <10
11 <2.0 109 <1015(13.8; ' <2.0 (<!.()) 142(126) .-.-10 i<10)
372(358) i 7.3 (6 5) 16(15.4; <2.0 (<1.0) ; 141 (147, <10 (<10)2160 22
2680 (2000) . 8.5 (16)1910(2000; • 8.3(16)
18 , 2.3]10(11.8) , <2.0 (<1.0)1 2 ( 1 1 . 7 ) ' <2.0«1.0)
110 <1075(95.4} i 15(<10)95(99.7) :<10«10)l
TABLE 4.2 Page 3 of 12
SUMMARY OF DETECTED VGS METALS
APC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
_. - • '
OCl Performance StandardLocation Date
Alu
min
um, T
ota
l
M£/L
Ant
imon
y, T
otal
Mg/L
Ars
enic
, T
otal
v-gft-
Bar
ium
, T
otal
V-gft-
Source Area (cant.) \ : i
MW-2 9/26/01 <50MW-2 12/18/01 <50MW-2 | 3/20/02 ! j <50MW-2MW-2MW-2MW-2MW-2
MW-22L MW-22
MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22
D-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-l
' 6 /25/0210/1/0212/18/02
<5086
<2.0
50
5.0<2.0 | 4.8<2.0<2.0<2.0
4.84.0
r 4.8<50 (<50) I <2.0 (<1.0), 5.7 (3.5)
4/1/03 ; <506/19/03 57 (<50)
i
9/26/01 <5012/18/013/20/02
<50<50
3/20/02 ID 1 <506/25/02 ; <5010/1/0212/17/024/2/036/19/03
9/25/0112/17/01
93
<2.0 4.7<2.0(<1.0)! 4.5(3.8)
<2.0 <1.0<2.0 | <1.0<2.0 } <1.0<2.0<2.0<2.0
<50(<50) <2.0(<1.0)<50
60 (<50)r<50<50
3/20/02 i <506/26/0210/1/02 r
12/18/02_L4/1/036/19/03
<;50I 96
<50 (<50)<50
75 (120)6/19/03 ID 64
<2.0<2.0 (<1.0)
I~ <2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0
<2.0 (<1.0)<2.0
<2.0(<1.0)<2.0
<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)
2000
1214131212
15(12)12
" 16(16)
595357554853
59 (52)<1.0 i 83
<1.0(<1.0)[ 56(59)
7.2<1.08.46.97.7
8.3 (6.3)7.4
7.6(7.6)7.6
1767161316
17(14)15
22 (24)21
Cad
miu
m, T
otal
Pgf1-
-
<0.2<0.2
1 <0.2<0.2<0.2
0.4 (<0.2)<0.2
Cal
cium
, To
tal
mg/L
1
|
|
"5
Q
lig/L L ng/L
100 1300
8887808373
JJ5 (84.8)72
<0.2(<0.2) 97(107)
<0.2<0.2<0.2
998184
<1.3U<1.0
•cl.O<1.0
<1.0 <1.0<1.0 1.1
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
1.2<1.3U
1.3(<1.0)<1.0
Iron
(U
) (F
ield
)
mg/L
60
1]
-
2200.0 <)001515204.05.0
1.4(1.0) 0.0
<1.0<1.0
<1.0 1.0<0.2 84 <1.0<0.2 81 <1.0<0.2
<0.2 (<0.2)<0.2
[<0.2(<0.2)
8587 (88.9)
14592 (97.8)
<1.01.1
<1.0 <1.0<.1.0 (<1-0) 1.2 (<1.0)
<1.0
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2
<0.2 (<0.2)<0.2
8469778275
79 (79.2)76
<1.0<1.0
2.2<1.0 (1.1)
<1.01.3
<I .O <3.0
~5TU~<1.0 (<1-0)
<1.Q< 0 . 2 ( < 0 . 2 ) j 117(122) <1.0(<1.0)
<0.2 115 <1.0
<1.0<1.0
150.00.00.00.00.05.02.5NA
402.5301515
1.2(<1.0) 5.02.2
1.3(1.0)
I 110100
<100, 110(90) i
<100160(150)
-, 150
<100140150
<1001 <100
<100 (<20)i <100
<100(<20)
3300<100910
|n 870800
810 (769)5.0 | 74025 1280 (1300)
1.1 25 1260
TABLE 4.2 Page 4 of 12
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS METALSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
r
•3
•a53-J
II
lig/L mg/L
Man
gane
se (
11) (
fiel
d)
Man
gane
se, T
ota
l
mg/L ug/L
OCI Performance Standard 15 " 1 "Location
Source Area (cont.)MW-2MW-2MW-2
Date '
\9/26/01 <1.0 24 | 0.312/18/Olj ; <1.0 24 0.03/20/02
MW-2 6/25/02MW-2 10/1/02MW-2MW-2MW-2
MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22
12/18/024/1/036/19/03
9/26/0112/18/013/20/023/20/02
MW-22 [ 6/25/02MW-22 10/1/02MW-22 ! 12/17/02MW-22MW-22
D-lD-l
4/2/036/19/03
9/25/0112/17/01
D-l 3/20/02D-l I 6/26/02D-lD-lD-lD-lD-l
10/1/02
<1.0 23 0.0<1.0 23 i 0.0<1.0 22 0.0
1.5(<1.0) j 24(23.1) 0.0
—
D-
<1.0 23 0.0<1.0(<1.0) 33(36.5) : 0.0
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
22 0.319 j R2020
0.00.0
<1.0 : 19 0.0<1.0 22 0.0
2.6 (<1.0)i <1.0
<1.0 (2.7)
20(21.2) 0.031 0.0
20 (20.7) ! NA
i
12/18/02 j4/1/036/19/036/19/03 D
<1.0 23 0.1<1.0 17 R<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
21 1 0.022 0.022 0.1
22 (22.2) 0.021 0.0
<1.0(<1.0) 36(37.2) 0.0<1.0 36 0.0
1316141215
12(10)13
19(17)
10588
Nic
kel,
Tot
al
V-gfl-
-
1.2J2.11.81.11.5
4.6 (3.7)3.8
1.9(6.1)
1.2
Pot
assi
um, T
ota
l
mg/L
-
2.22.42.12.01.8
2.2 (2.0)2.1
2.3 (2.2)
2.21.3 1 2.0
82 : 1.7 2.079 1 1.4 1.97584
102 (93)
<L.O l.S
1.14.5(3.9)
223 7.6117(110) ; 2.8(6.3)
87127
<102.2
70 2.67382
85 (74)79
129(140)
1.23.5
4.8(3.7)4.6
1.7(6.7)126 1.7
1.92.0(1.9)
2.42.0(1.9)
2.42.12.02.01.9
2.1 (2.0)2.2
2.4(2.2)2.3
Sel
eniu
m, T
ota
l
Hg/L
<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0
<2.0 (<1.0)<2.0U]
<2.0(<1.0)
<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2-0<2.0
<2.0(<1.0)<2.0U]
<2.0 (<1.0)
<2.0<2.0U]
<2.0<2.0<2.0
<2.0(<1.0)<2.0U]
<2.0 (<1.0)<2.0
Sod
ium
, T
otal
mg/L
7573727465
75(71.9)83
73 (80.3)
717067686770
73 (75.2)81
78 (85.4)
7174717265
71 (73.6)82
75 (80.2)74
"a
Isu"cN
lig/L
-
<10<10<10<10<10
11 (<10)<10
<10(<10)
<10<1014
<10<10<10
<10 (33)<10
<10 (<10)
<10<10<10<10<10
11 (<10)<10
<10 (<10)<10
TABLE 4.2 Page 5 of 12
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS METALSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
OC7 Performance StandardLocation
Source Area (cant.)D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2 j
Date
9/26/0112/18/013/20/026/25/02
Alu
min
um, T
otal
Hg/L
. ...
_ _ _
Ant
imon
y, T
otal
Ars
enic
, T
otal
jig/t ng/L
, - j 50
Bar
ium
, T
ota
l
Cad
miu
m, T
otal
lig.fl. Hg/L
2000i
<50 <2.0
6/25/02 D10/1/0212/17/02
D-2 12/17/02 DD-2 4/2/03D-2 | 6/19/03
1SenfrvMW-4 9/24/01MW-4 12/20/01MW^J _1 3/19/02MW-JMW-4MW^i
r MW-4MW-4
MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43
<50 ^ <2.0<1.0<1.0
<50 <2.0 , <I .O<50<50
<2.0 <1.0<2.0
93 <2.0<1.0<1.0
<50(<50) i<2.0(<1.0) <1.0(< 1.0)<50 <2.0 <1.0<50
68 (<50)<2.0 <1.0
66546649 149
i 59r 64 (55)
6584
<2.0 (<1.0) <1.0 (<1.0) 58(64)
<50 <2.0 19<50 <2 0 13<50 1 <2.0 11
6/25/02 <50 | <2.0 ( 119/30/0212/17/024/1/03
81 <2.0 1 21<50 (<50) j<2.0(<1.0) 22(17)
1 <506/18/03 87(<50)
<2.0 12<2.0(<1.0)| 12(11)
10/5/0110/5/01 ID12/18/01 1
<50 <2.0 ! 4.2<50<50
3/19/02 <506/24/029/30/0212/17/02
<2.0<2.0<2.0
j <50 ^ <2.0
4.23.33.6
1 3.6180 1 <2.0 1 4.7
<50(<50) !<2.0(<1.0)l 4.1 (2.2)MW-43 4/1/03 <50 <2.0 3.9MW-43 6/18/03 : 170(93) (<2.0(<1.0) 3.2(3.1)
2527
" 262423
27 (26)27
31 (26)
2926 125
H 312730
26 (22)
L 24
28 (26)
Cal
cium
, T
otal
mg/L
-
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2
<0.2 K0.2)<0.2<02 1
Chr
omiu
m,
Tot
al
T~
Hg/L fig/LI
200 2300
105 <1.082 <1.6U86858591
100(91.6)96
<1.0
1.1r <].o
1.6, <1.0 1.6
<1.0<1.0
<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0))<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
144 <1.0<0.2(<0.2)j 95(98) <2 .0(<2 .0)
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2
<0.2(<0.2)<0.2
( <0.2(<0.2)
<0.2<02 1<0.2 ~~*
7886
<1.0<1.0
91 <1.089 <1.079 <1.0
88 (88.2) <1.0(<1.0)93 <1.0
98(97.1) <1.0(<1.0)
I 1.62.5
r<i.o(<i.o)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.1
<1.01.5(1.2)
97 <1.0 <1.0102 <1.097 i
<0.2 129<0.2<0.2
|j<0.2_(<0.2)<0.2
<0.2(<0.2)
10677
98(96.1) ,93 1
88 (88.9)
<1.1U<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
1.2<1.0<1.01.96.9
1.4(2.6)2.0
Iron
(11
) (F
ield
)
mg/L
W2.50.00.0
a
co
Hg/L
790<100
,_ <100 |<100
0.0 <1000.0 <1005.05.05.0NA
20253540307.5
' 50 ~l60
^<100 (70"pi<100170 J
<ioo«2or
1166014401780 113301500
1730(1700) I1820
2640 (2400) ]J
30 83030 | 860 |5.035
1020 12250
25 | 78010 5202525
<1.0(<1.0)1 3.4(2.5) 25
1160(1100)830
520 (800)
TABLE 4.2 Page 6 of 12
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS METALS
APC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC SITE
GRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
OCI Performance StandardLocation
Source Area (cont, J
D-2D-2D-2D-2L'-2D-2D-2D-2D-2
Date
9/26/0112/18/013/20/02
a
isT3a%j-J
MS/L
75
<1.0<1.0<1.0
6/25/02 <1.0
a
3|
1S
mg/L
24
Man
gan
ese
(11)
(Fie
ld)
Man
gan
ese,
To
tal
mg/L ligfL
j
"«
is"S•s§
V-S/L I
Po
tass
ium
, T
ota
l
"a
3
E
1to
<Sj
mg/L fig/L
-
0.2519 ; 0.6822 0.0
!75 <1.096 <1.024 : 2.2
2.1 j <2.02.0 <2.02.0
20 i 0.0 61 j <1.0 2.06/25/02 ID <1.0 2010/1/02 i <1.0 94
12/17/0212/17/02 D
<1.0(<1.0)
0.00.0
64 <1.0 1.995 1.3
22 (21.4) i 0.0 114(100)2.0 21 0.0 108
4/2/03 [ <1.0 j 30 j 0.0 254D-2 : 6/19/03 ! <1.0 (<1.0)
Sftitrv
M\\MM\v-4MW-4MW^JMW-4MW-4MW-4MW-4
MW-J3
MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43
20(21.2) NA
i
128 (130)
' j
5.1 (4.7)5.47.7
2.5 (6.9)
9/24/01 1 <1.0 19 0.35 i 355 <1012/20/013/19/02 16/25/02 i9/30/0212/17/024/1/036/18/03
10/5/01
<1.0<1.0<1.0
212222
0.409 5530.00.0
•cl.O 19 0.0j<1.0(<1.0) 21(21) 0.0
<1.0 . 22<1.0(<1.0) 23(24.1)
440497397
454 (423)
^ 4.44.42.15.3
5.6 (4.3)0.1 462 4.90.0 584(510) 1.8(4.9)
[<1.0 29 0.15 121
10/5/01JD ; <1.0 30 0.1512/18/013/19/026/24/029/30/0212/17/024/1/036/18/03
<1.0 i 30 ; 0.182! <1.0 36 0.0
11399112
<1.0 33 ; 0.0 • 59
4.6
5.04.34.65.2
5.3 i 25 0.0 46 6.3<1.0(<1.0) 30(31) 0.0 80(64) 5.2(6.2)
<1.0 28 0.0 60 5.41.6(1.0) '27(27 .8) 0.0 43(53) 6.4(7.9)
2.02.1 (2.0)
2.0
<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0
<2.0(<1.0)<2.0
2.5 j <2.0L>71.9(1.8) |<2.0UJ (<1.0;
1
2.2" 1.8 '
22
1.92.0(1.9)
1.91.9(1.6)
2.22.32.52.82.52.0
2.2(2.1)2.2
2.1 (1.9)
<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0
<2.0(<1.0)<2.0U]
<2.0(<1.0)
<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0
<2.0(<1.0)<2.0UJ
<2.0(<1.0)
Sod
ium
, T
ota
l
mg/L
-
767270676871
76 (74.6)7383
74(78.1)
7870757284
"a
(2o~.cN
Vgfl-
-
<10<10 j<10<10<10<10
<10(<10)12
<W I<10(<10)
<iq<1U<10<10<10
81 (84.9) |<10(<10)82
71 (78.5)
646869686976
66 (67.2)75
72 (74.3)
<10<10 (27)
<10<10<10<10<1014
12(<10)16
<10(11)
TABLE 4.2 Page 7 of 12
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS METALSAFC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
[
1A
lum
inum
, fa
tal
Hg/LI
OCI Performance StandardLocation Date
Sentry leant.) \MW44 10/5/01MW-44MW-44MW-44MW^MMW-44MW-44MW^4
D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3
DADADADADA
12/18/013/19/026/25/029/30/0212/17/024/1/036/18/03
Ant
imon
y, T
otal
«/L
Ars
enic
, Tot
al
f2E
•£a03
lig/L ng/L
I !
- ] SO
9/26/0112/17/0112/17/01 D3/19/02
j
<50 <2.0
2000
Cad
miu
m,
Tot
al
Cal
cium
, T
otal
fig/L mg/L
[
8.8 53 <0.2<50 \ <2.0 : 8.0<50 <2.0 7.5
3838
<50 <2.0 7.5 33<50 ! <2.0 ! 8.3
<50 (<50)<50
59 (<50)
<2.0(<1.0)<2.0
<2.0(<1.0)
<50 \ <2.0
8.9 (6.5)33
35 (33)5.6 35
6.9 (6.7) 41 (28)
1.7 j 18<50 \ <2.0 2.5 22<50 <2.0 ! 1.6 20<50 <2.0 j 1.9 19
6/26/02 ! <5010/1/02 13012/17/024/2/036/19/03
9/24/01 112/18/013/19/026/25/029/30/02
DA 12/17/02D^J 4/1/03D-4 1 6/18/03
<2.0<2.0
<50(<50) j<2.0(<1.0)<50
100 (<50)<2.0
<2.0(<1.0)
1.5 18I 1.7 23
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2
<0.2 f<0.2)<0.2
<0.2 (<0.2)
6555627057
62 (61)83
68 (59.6)
3 105<0.2 113<0.2 105<0.2 119<0.2 109<0.2 110
2 . 2 ( < 1 . 0 ) : 24(21) <0.2(<0.2) ] 137(151)1.9 26
h 2.2(1.9)<0.2 247
21 (22) j <0.2 (<0.2) : 181 (190)\
<50<50<50<5099
<50 (<50)<50
<2.0<2.0<2.0
1.1 ! 36 \ <0.2 91<1.0<1.0
<2.0 1.3<2.0 1.8
<2.0(<1.0) 1.6(<1.0)<2.0 1.9
<50(<50) j<2.0(<1.0) 1.3(1.2)
34 <0.2 932829
, 3740 (35)
3935(34)
<0.2 _L 85<0.2 79<0.2 87
<0.2(<0.2)| 97(101)<0.2
<0.2 (<0.2)106
87 (85.3)
Chr
omiu
m,
Tot
al
MS/L
200
<1.0<1.2U<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
<1.0
*a
1
£
1O
«r/L
2300
<1.0<1.01.0
<1.01.0
1.1 (<1.0)1.3
1.5(1.0)
<1.0<1.0 <1.0<1.0 <1.0<1.0<1.C<1.0
<1.0«1.0)<l.O
<1.0(<1.0)
1.3<1.5U
1.2<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)•cl.O
<1.0(<1.0)
<1.0<1.01.0
<1.0(<1.0)3.2
2.4(1.2)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
1.2(<1.0)2.1
<1.0(1)
2C
c
mg/L
-
NA40352520305020
5.015150.05.010155.025
0.0250.00.00.02.52.5NA
*a
3cc
MS/L
-
70093012009501130
1850(1700)2480
3220(1000)
540150120110100160
<100(5b)270
800 (<20)
1070140
<100<100<100
<100(110)<100
<100(44)
TABLE 4.2 Page 8 of 12
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS METALS
APC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITE
GRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
r
OCI Performance Standard
£
11 -J M
agne
sium
, T
otal
Hg'/L • mg/L
15Location Date j
Sentry (cont.)
MW44 10/5/01MW-44MW44MW44MW44
i MW44MW44MW-44
D-3D-3 -D-3
12/18/013/19/026/25/02
— ; —
Man
gane
se (
II) (
Fie
ld)
mg/L
1
Man
gane
se,
Tot
al
5 I"
lig/L M£/f- i m£/^-
i
! !
<1.0 52<1.0 : 54<1.0 64<1.0 49
9/30/02 <1.0 i 5012/17/024/1/036/18/03
9/26/0112/17/01
<1.0(<1.0)j 51(54)<1.0 _[ 43
<1.0(<1.0)l 51(66)
: <i.o<1.0
12/17/01 DD-3 i 3/19/02D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3
D4D4D4D-lD-4D4D4D-4
6/26/0210/1/0212/17/024/2/03
6/19/03
9/24/01
. _<1.0<1.01.0
<1.0
NA0.1950.00.00.00.00.10.0
127 : 4.0 3.197 . 3.1928995
118(105)
2.73.1 2.7
'" ~
1S
elen
ium
, To
tal
fg/l-
-
<2.0<2.0<2.0
1.6 I 2.7 ; <2.03.9 . 2.4
3.9(3.1) 2.6(2.5)151 4.3 2.7
130 (88)
21242224
1 20_22
<1.0(<1.0): 29(30.4)1.0
1.6 (<1.0)
<1.0
4237 (40)
0.250.2360.236
0.00.00.00.30.00.0
1.0(3.4)
101 i <1.0148 <1.0133 <1.0
2.4 (2.2)
2.14.12.1
108 | 2.0 1.9119137
129 (129)
1.32.3
7.8(6.3)
1.92.0
2.2(2.1)384 ! 12 2.4 J
116(140)
2012/18/01 ! <1.0 | 203/19/026/25/029/30/0212/17/024/1/036/18/03
I <i.o<1.0 (<1.0)
<1.0<1.0(<1.0)
191620
21 (22.5)24
19 (20)
0.10.521
0.00.00.00.00.0NA
479584
2.6(10)
<102.4
2.4(2.2)
<2.0<2.0 (<1.0)
<2.0U]<2.0 (<1.0)
<2.05.6J
<2.0UJ<2.0<2.0<2.0
<2.0 (<1.0)<2.0R
<2.0 (<1.0)i
2.3 I <2.01.8 1 <2.0
490 1.9 1 1.6 | <2.0416 i 1.3505
518 (487)558
1.75.2(4.0)
5.6520(480) , 1.6(4.9)
1.8 <2.02.0 I
1.9(1.9)1.8
1.7(1.7)
<2.0<2.0 (<1.0)
<2.0U]<2.0(<1.0)
Sod
ium
, To
tal
0"cN
mg/L figiL
-
6965676967
71 (75.4)71
66 (70.8)
707369716657
70(71.5)77
65(71)
6867666669
66 (69.7)69
62 (65.5)
<10<10<10<10<10
<10 (<10)<10
<10 (<10)
<10<10<10<10<10<10
<10 (<10)<10
13 (<10)
<10<10<10<10<10
<10 (19)<10
<10 (<10)
TABLE 4.2 Page 9 of 12
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS METALSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
Alu
min
um, T
otal
..J
; W/LOCl Performance Standard
LocationSentry (cont.j
D-6D-6D-6D-6
Datc
9/27/0112/19/013/19/026/25/02
D-6 j 10/1/02D-6 i 12/17/02D-6 4/2/03D-6 ! 6/19/03
!BoundaryMW^5MWA5MW-45MW-45MW-45
10/4/0112/19/013/19/026/24/029/30/02
MW-45 i 12/16/02
..._..
—
MW-45 | 4/1/03MW-45 j 6/18/03 |
MW^t6 10/4/01MW-46 ! 12/19/01MW-46 j 3/18/02MW-46 6/24/02MW^J6 9/30/02MW-J6 j 9/30/02MW^6 12/16/02MW-46 4/1/03MW-16 6/18/03
D
..
Ant
imon
y, T
otal
...
Vg/1-
i
Ars
enic
, T
otal
s2|
'C«ec Cad
miu
m,
Tot
al
Cal
cium
, Tot
al
Hg/L ng/L i iig/L mg/lj : !
50 I 2000 i
120 <2.0 29<50 . <2.0 I 26<50 : <2.0 19
L <50 ; <2.0 2476 : <2.0
<50(<50) <2.0(<1.0)22
16371
<0.2<0.2
100 <0.2
787898
95 ' <0.2 ; 79114
33(27) 112(91)<50 ; <2.0 24
<50 (<50)
250<50<50
<2.0(<10) ; 22(22)!
<2.0 j 13<2.0 : 6.0<2.0 6.2
i 160 <2.0 7.6' 240
230 (305)<50
69 (<50)
240<50<50<508685
<50 (<50)<50
59 (<50)
<2.0<2.0(<1.0)
<2.0<2.0(<1.0)
<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0
<2.0(<1.0)<2.0
<2.0(<1.0)
4.5
8090 C93)
<0.2 82
Chr
omiu
m, T
otal
M,?/I
WO
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<0.2(<0.2)! 89(88.1) ;<1.0 (<1.0)<0.2 92 3.2
<0.2 (<0.2) 1 95 (93), -
55465242
' 415.7(4.1) ; 48(46)
5.8 4215(4.7) ! 36(42)
15 3613 33
8.2 i 318.9 3217 : 3418 i 35
19(15) 36(34)13 33
14(13) 37(33)
<1.0(<1.0)
<0.2 ! 89 <1.0<0.2 ! 82 ; <1.0<0.2 91 <1.0<0.2 81 , 1.1<0.2 77 ; 1.1
<0.2(<0.2): 87(89.5) 1.7(1.4)<0.2 , 81 <1.0
<0.2(<0.2) : 88(87) |<1.0«1.0); j
<0.2<0.2 "<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2
<0.2 (<0.2)<0.2
<0.2 (<0.2)
898193907272
84 (85.3)88
88(84.1)
<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)
<3
is
1ngfi-
1300
1.9<1.01.01.3
<1.01.2(<1.0)
3.71.0(1.0)
1.5<1.0<1.01.72.0
2.4(2.1)1.7
1.7(1.3)
2.4<1.0<1.01.41.0
<1.02.1(1.3)
2.82.9(<1.0)
2^j
£— s
1mg/L
602.51040206040
NA
303020302025652.5
60302530303050600.0
"a
(5
1
M,?/L
-
2180126015601620860
1840 (1800)1280
2030(2100)
1220530114010401660
1260(1300)2340
2140(1300)
276016901600213017101710
1930(1899)1940
2130 (2000)
TABLE 4.2 P a g e l O o f l 2
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS METALSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
-J
"a3E
So
lig/L j mg/L\
Man
gane
se (
II)
(fie
ld)
Man
gane
se,
Tot
al
_I_i
mg/L P-g/L Hgfl-
Pota
ssiu
m,
Tot
al
mg/L
OCI Performance Standard 15 - - - - J_ -Location
Sentn/ (cant.)D-6D-6
Date
9/27/01 1.5 . 20 0.412/19/01
D-6 i 3/19/02D-6 ! 6/25/02D-6D-6D-6D-6
BoundaryMW-45MW-45MW-45MW-45MW-45MW-45MW-45MW-45
MW-46MW-46MW-46MW-46MW-46
10/1/02
<1.0 20 0.264<1.01.7
<1.012/17/02 i !<1.0(<1.0)4/2/036/19/03
10/4/0112/19/013/19/02
<1.03.4 (<1.0)
22 : 0.01820
23 (22.9)23
0.30.00.00.7
24(24.1) ! NA
<1.0 i 20<1.0 19<1.0 1 21
6/24/02 2.2 [ 189/30/0212/16/024/1/036/18/03
10/4/0112/19/013/18/026/24/029/30/02
MW-46 9/30/02 ]DMW-46 12/16/02MW-46MW-46
4/1/036/18/03
2.0 I 174.6 (3.2)
1.0
689 5.2 2.3862- 4.51600 9.61540 8.31500 . 6.4
1230 (1,080DL) 10(9.5)1320
1230(1100):
0.40.697
0.00.00.0
19(19.3) i 0.018 0.0
1.0(<1.0) | 21 (19.9)
<1.0<1 0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0
1.5(<1.0)
201922211717
0 0
627645
115.8 (8.8)
3.4]
Sele
nium
, Tot
al
Hg/L
<2.02.4 2.52.4 ] 2.22.32.3
2.4 (2.4)2.3J
2.2 (2.0)
<2.0<2.0
<2.0 (<1.0)<2.0R
<2.0 (<1.0)
2.1 ] <2.04.4 1.8
588 3.1 2.0557 1.5453
536 (474)663
546 (540)
0.350.589
0.00.00.00.0
19(20.1) ! 0.022 ! 0.1
21 (21.3) 0.0
553506592521477
5.92.12.8
5.3(4.4^ 2.7(2.5)4.2 2.9
1.8(43)
5.33.83.42.56.1
488 i 6.8534 (453) 5.2 (4)
491 4.7528(490) | 1.8(4.4)
<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0
<2.0 (<1.0)<2.0UJ
1.8(2.2) 1 <2.0(<1.0)
2.11.81.81.71.71.7
1.9(1.8)1.8
1.8(1.6)
<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0
<2.0 (<1-0)<2.0U]
<2.0(<1.0)
Sodi
um,
Tot
al
mg/L
-
124113116135102
148 (139)112
117(104)
6565717264
68 (69.6)64
75 (73.7)
736973707374
79(81.6)78
75 (80.6)
"a
cN
Hg/L
-
<10<10<1012
<10<10 (<10)
<10<10 (<10)
<1011131413
20(21)16
<10 (<10)
<10<10<10<10<10<10
<10 (<10)<10 j
<10 (<10)|
TABLE 4.2 Page 11 of 12
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS METALSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, iNC SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
Alu
min
um, T
otal
MS/L
OCI Performance StandardLocation \ Date
Boundary (cont.)MW-47 I 10/4/01MW-47 12/20/01MW-47 3/18/02MW^17 1 6/24/02MW-47 9/30/02MW-47 ! 12/17/02
r
Ant
imon
y, T
otal
Hgfl*
Ars
enic
, Tot
al
Bar
ium
, Tot
al
Cad
miu
m, T
otal
Hg/L ; ng/L i^g/L
50 2000
240 <2.0 14<50<50
46<2.0 9.3 33<2.0 : 11
<50 <2.081 j <2.0
<50 (<50)MW^17 4/1/03 , ; <50MW-47MW-J7
MW^ISMW-48MW-48
4/1/036/18/03
10/5/0112/20/013/19/02
DJ <50
—
MW-48 1 6/25/02MW-48MW-48MW-48MW-48
<2.0(<1.0)<2.0
33
<0.2<0.2<0.2
Cal
cium
, Tot
al
mg/L
Chr
omiu
m,
Tot
al
L __
V-Z/L
WO
89 i <1.08589
5.8 31 <0.2 9511
12(10)7.9
31 <0.232(31)
29<0.2 (<0.2)
<0.2
7587(82.1)
89<2.0 7.7 ! 31 ! <0.2 j 92
r74(<50) "<2.0(<1.0) 15(9) i 37(31)
1 55Q<50
<0.2 (<0.2) 85 (93)
<1.0<i.o— 1<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0);
<2.0 4.1 20 <0.2 110 j 1.9<2.0
<50 <2.0<50
9/30/02 i ; 21012/17/024/1/036/18/03
2.6 8.2 <0.23.3
<2.0 T 2.8<2.0
877.3 <0.2 956 <0.2 89
3.5 8.6 1 <0.2 i 82<50(<50) j<2.0(<1.0) 4.8(3.2) 14 (12) ! <0.2 (<0.2) 105(100)
<5052 (<50)
<2.0 6.6<2.0(<1.0}j 4.1(9)
1616(13)
<0.2 !_ 94<0.2 (<0.2)
a
££
!UgA-
1300
3.3<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)2.82.2
2.7(<1.0)
2.4<1.0 <1.0<1.0<i.b<1.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
93(135) <1.0(<1.0)
<1.0<1.01.7
Iron
(11
) (Fi
eld)
mg/L
-
500.04025352.5404050
302.50.00.00.0
<1.0(<1.0) 2.51.4 _j 5.0
2.2(1.17] 0.0
a
£c"
MX/L
20901280227016601080
1300(1200)11201590
2170(1400)
1800<100<100<100350
160(150)140
450 (<20)
TABLE 4.2 Page 12 of 12
SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS METALS
APC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITE
GRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN
OCl Performance StandardLocation
Boundary (cont.)
MW-47
MW-47MW-47MW-47MW-47MW^i7MW-47
Date\
10/4/0112/20/013/18/02
"3£w<a-j
1 M£/L
d
21VI^
15 M
angan
ese
(II)
(F
ield
)
mg/L mg/Li
25 - i -
i 1.5 22 ; 0.4
6/24/029/30/0212/17/024/1/03
<1.0 20 0.0<1.0<1.0
21 0.026 0.1
<1 0 i 21 ; 0.0
<1.0(<1.0)<1.0
MW-47 j 4/1/03 ID '• <1.0MW-47
MW-48
6/18/03
10/5/01
; 2.1 (<1.0)
20 (20.4) 0.021 0.022 0.0
21 (22.6) 5.0
Man
gan
ese,
To
tal
"G
£<x).*<-ls
lig/L ng/L
562 4.7576 i 4.2485 40668 <1.0532 4.3
Pota
ssiu
m,
To
tal
mg/L
2.21.81.7
Sel
eniu
m,
To
tal
Hgfl-
-
<2.0<2.0<2.0
1.9 <2.01.9
614(544) i 4.9 (4.1) 2.0(1.9)649 4.4 | 1.8598 4.1
565 (590) 1.7(4.3)1
2.7 27 0.4MW-48 1 12/20/01 : <1.0MW-48 3/19/02
I MW48 6/25/02MW48 9/30/02MW-48MW-48MW^i8
12/17/024/1/036/18/03
_|
20 0.264<1.0 22 0.0<1.Q 21 0.0<1.0 I 20 0.0
<1.0(<1.0) 23(23.1) • 0.0<1.0 ; 21 i 0.0
<1.0(<1.0) 20(30.8) j 0.0
315 6.4J214 4.0J207 1.6177209
403 (382)370
1.32.7
1.81.7(1.7)
2.31.91.92.2
<2.0<2.0(<1.0)
<2.0U]<2.0UJ
<2.0(<1.0)
<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0
2.0 | <2.0UJ5.4 (4.4) j 2.5 (2.4) j <2.0 (<1.0)
4.6 2.0 <2.0U]376 (380) 1.3 (6.6) | 2.0 (2.1) | <2.0 (<1.0)
Sod
ium
, T
ota
l
mg/L
7465736473
78(79.1)7981
72 (75.2)
686570
"Q
IsC"c
NMS/L
-
<10<10<10<10<10
<10(<10)<10<10
20«10)
<10<10<10
71 <10 j65
62 (63.2)60
<10<10(<10)
<1047(74.4) <10(<10)
laboratory analysis conducted by Trunatrix I-aboratories, Inc.( ) - laboratory analysis conducted by the Michigan Department
of Environmental Quality Environmental LaboratoryNA - Not AnalyzedI - The analyte was positively identified, the nLUiierical value is the
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.UJ - Tlie analyte was not detected. The associated value is an estimate
and niay be inaccurate or impreciseD - i-aboratory duplicate.DL - Sample analyzed using a dilulion(s).R - Result out of range.
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical
Ground Wate
D1
Conventional Parameter
PHConventional Parameter
Chloride
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Metal
Aluminum (B)
Iron (B)Manganese (B)Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mirex
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)Benzene (I)
DibromochloropropaneD-1
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
Metal
Iron (B)
Manganese (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Result
r
6/19/2003
7.4
ug/L
140,000 D
790,000
ug/L
1201,300
140.2 U.5 U2 U
ug/L
.9 Uug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 Uug/L
5 U5.6
5 U7/27/2004
fiH
7.6
ug/L
170,000 D
ug/L
920
86
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
.9 U
ug/L
.02 U
ReportingLimit
0
1
20
50
20
5
0.2
0.5
2
0.9
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
5
1
5
"~cT
1
205
0.20.5
2
0.9
0.02
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
250,000
MHmsmHHpjffiP
aSBisiliSlglliaii&HgpSffigaFaB^gsSi2
34
2
.098
.4
44"
.02
Criteria
isifsiij
250,000
2
34
Note
-
Industrial andCommercial II,
111,1V DWCriteria
Criteria Note
250,000 1 E
V
E
E
A
A
'
A
M
A
A
Note
:*:
±2 A
A
.098
V
E
98
2 A
A
.4
.4 A
130
.02 M
11
Hiiiiiiiiifii AA
Criteria Note
250,000] E
iMMMfBi EBglgB E
298
" 2 A"
A
.4
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria
760
Note
FF
NANAGX
3.7
.02
200
Criteria
itefeii'Bggji
760
paJBilL'IMJjfeiiHlSHSa
3.7
MX
M
XMX M
M
XX
NANote
\ Fp
NAGX
MX
M
X M
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria Note
760
-
.02
12
. .
Criteria Note
760
mm.-\ - - '
Residential andCommercial 1
GW VIAIC
Criteria Note
NLV
NLV
1 NLV
NLV
56
NLV
NLV
45 S
180 S
180; S
! ID
ID
34,000
5,600
1,200 S
Criteria Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
56^
NLV
: NLV
45 S
180 S
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria Note
NLV
rNLV
NLV
NLV
56^NLV
NLV
45 S"~ " " r
180 S180 S
IDID
190,000
35,0001 ,200 f S
Criteria Note
NLV
NLVNLV
56NLVNLV
45' S
180 S
GroundwaterContact Criteria
ICriteria
64,000,00058,000,000
9,100,00056
1,500,000
13,000
3.3
.342.9510.02
14,000
1 1 ,000390
Criteria
58,000,000
9,100,000
561,500,000
13,000
Note
ID
" AA
AAAASM
Note
ID
3.3 AA
.34 AA
Water Solubility
Criteria Note
NA
I1 '
' NA
NA
NA
56
: NANA
44.7
180
180
510
j ^^^^K^^^^ f \
75,000,000
1 ,750,000
1,23of
Criteria Note
i
NA
NANA
56'NANA
44.7
180
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria Notei
ID
I IDIDID
IDID
ID
IDID
i IDNA
i
6,400,000
68,000
NACriteria i Note
i ID
IDID
IDID
ID
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID' I D
ID
ID
ID
ID
: ID
ID[ ID
i" ID67,000 :
IDCriteria Note
ID
IDID
: IDID
ID
ID
Res andCom I
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
3002,000
860
Criteria
2,000
860
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
4,1005,6002,500
Criteria
5,600
2,500
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 1 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:29 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical
Ground Wate
D-1
Pesticide
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mi rex
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)
Dibromochloropropane
02
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Metal
Manganese (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mirex
Result
r
7/27/2004
ug/L
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
10 U
50 U
50 U
10 U
ug/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
ug/L
2 U
ug/L
5 U
5 U
6/79/2003
fiH
7.3
ug/L
170,000 D
600,000
ug/L
130
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
.9 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ReportingLimit
0.02
0.07
0.02
10
50
50
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
0
1
20
5
0.2
0.5
2
0.9
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
.4
44
.02
150jfrjyjagjBaaEBasiSjB
HSffl&SHilm120
5
2
5
5
2
liillllslllHwmmssiBfflm
BW|HgHjaj | iro!
HJPMmCriteria
HHHBHi
250,000
*jjjffiffi£M£iEMixt.
2
34
2
.098
.4
44
.02
Note
A
M
M
A
Industrial andCommercial II,
111,1V DWCriteria
Criteria
.4
130
.02
470
Note
A
M
M
-HA
M
M
M
M
A
Note
E
E
A
A
J
i - - -A
M
5
2
5
5
2
ia^ ^ ^HglggHsS ffifc!Criteria
SsSrelmlrWTff™
250,000
ffppllpf
2
98
2
A
M
M
M
"M
A
A
Note
E
E
A
A
.4
.4 A
130
.02 ! M
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria
.02
nnmumffafflinHMm
B*
mCriteria
H BLUUMmUHHnKSiPHHMKrawm&gSw
760
tlP
3.7
*.02"
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Note 1 Criteria
xM'pMBj
M
NA
GX
M
ID
ID
NA
NA
ID
ID
«NA
.02
SumtBit maB&Km
Note 1 Criteria
FF
-
G X
M
X
M
XM
X M
M
760
Note
Note
.02
Residential andCommercial 1
GW VIAIC
Criteria
180
440
34,000
1 ,200
Criteria
56
45
Note
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
-•180 S
180 ' S
ID
ID
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
180
3,000
190,000
1,200
Criteria
56
45
Note
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
180 S
180 S
ID
ID
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Criteria
2.9
510
.02
79,000
9,500
200
10,000
2
25
4.6
14,000
390
Criteria
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
13,000
3.3
Note
AA
S
M
AAM
AAM
AAM
AAM
Note
ID
AA
.34 AA
2.9 AA
510 S
.02; M
Water Solubility
Criteria
180
510
3,900,000
200,000
1,850,000
800,000
6,200
75,000,000
1,230
Criteria
56
44.7
180
180
510
- ,- .uoouypp
Note
Note
NA
NA
NA
NA
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
NA
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
~I ID
i 'Dj ID
6,400,000
Criteria
ID
" NA
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
'. IDID
NA
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria
- -
Criteria
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
Note
"
ID
ID
IDr ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
Criteria
860
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
Criteria
2,500
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 2 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:29 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical Result
Ground Water
D2
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (1)Dibromochloropropane
D-2
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
Metal
Manganese (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mirex
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenolPentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trich.lorophenol
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)Dibromochloropropane
D3
6/79/2003
ug/L
5 U
5 U
7/27/2004
pH
7.5
ug/L
170,000 D
ug/L
97
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
.9 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
10 U
50 U
50 U
10 U
ug/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
ug/L
2 U
ug/L
5 U
5 U
7/27/2004
ReportingLimit
5
5
0
1
5
0.2
0.5
2
0.9
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
10
50
50
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
ISSIsiillCriteria
250,000
2
34
2
.098
.4
44
.02
150
IBfiB^ Bi^^^ •H120
5
2
5
5
2
JBaiMiBtfsfeiggl
Note
A
Note
=
E
E
A
A
A
M
M |
A
A
M
M
M
M
A
Criteria
A
Note
Industrial andCommercial II,
111,1V DWCriteria
Criteria
11
niissssiilz!asHslESsJSiCriteria
•BBHBHHiii
250,000
2
98
2
.4
.4
130
.02
420
•470
Note
A
Note
E
E
A
A
! A^M
M
A 1
5 A
2
5
5
2
|ssEjisaakrijaai|Uftg
•lillaBS
11
Criteria
M
M
M
M
A
A
Note
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria
JmiilliipilSsa
Note
X
NA
Criteria ' Note
lIHiii
1
I FF
760
3.7
TJyffiBBffaflMHtiegqflpt
JS&nnHHlflm§iw
.02
SSS-SiilliiJBEiii'SIBeaiiBgBHIaBiaaiaarl
'IlililMBIIiBrr
GX
M
X
M
X M
XM
M
NA
~"GX~M
ID
1 ID
NA
NA
ID
Criteria
ID
X
NA
Note
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria Note
Criteria Note
760
.02
j&pilHSlii
...
Criteria Note
Residential andCommercial 1
GW VIAIC
Criteria
34,0001,200
Criteria
Note
S
Note! ~ ' "I
56
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
45 i SI
180
180 S
ID
ID
i
440
34,000
1,200
Criteria
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
Note
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
190,000
1,200
Criteria
56
45
Note
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
180 S
180 S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
IDNLV
NLV
3,000
190,000
1,200
Criteria
NLV
S
Note
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Criteria
14,000
390
Criteria
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
13,000
3.3
.34
2.9
510
.02
79,000
9,500
200
10,000
2
2
5
5
4.6
14,000
390
Criteria
Note
Note
ID
AA
AA
AA
S
M
AAM
AAM
AAM
AAM
Note
Water Solubility
Criteria
75,000,000
1,230
Criteria
56
44.7
180
180
510
3,900,000
200,000
Note
Note
NA
NA
NA
NA
1 ,850,000 I
800,000
I'Salliifflwtei!ml&SmisGiBBBg)
6,200
75,000,0001,230
Criteria Note
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria Note
6,400,000NA
Criteria Note
1~t ID
| ID
ID
ID
: ID
ID
ID
ID: NAi
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
6,400,000NA
Criteria Note
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria
Criteria
Note
ID
ID
Note
ID
ID
«?:ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID.. .
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
""ID
ID
Criteria
ID
ID
Note
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
Criteria
860
Criteria
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
Criteria
2,500
Criteria
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 3 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:30 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical
Ground ware
03
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
Metal
Manganese (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mi rex
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
Dibenzofuran
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Naphthalene
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)
Benzene (I)Dibromochloropropane
Ethylbenzene (I)
Naphthalene
n-Propylbenzene (I)
Result
r
7/27/2004
EH
7.1
ug/L
160,000 D
ug/L
52
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
3.2 U
ug/L
.02 U
.03 UK
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
10 U
51 U
51 U
10 U
ug/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
ug/L
5.1 U
2 U
17 2
ug/L
5 U
10
5 U
350
110 X
140
ReportingLimit
0
1
5
0.2
0.5
2
3.2
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.07
0.02
10
51
51
10
2
2
2
2
2
5.1
2
1
5
1
5
50
5
1
Residentialand
Commercial IDW Criteria
Criteria
250,000
i$ji$$ji$i$igM^
2
34
2
.098
.88
Note
E
E
A
A
.41 Ai44
.02 | M
150
120
M
A
i
5 A
2
5
5
2
520
520llfjpfigQ
M
M
M
M
ID
A
A
AE
Industrial andCommercial II,
III, IV DWCriteria
Criteria
250,000
2
98
2
.4
3.6
Note
E
E
A
A
.4^
130
.02 M"
420
470
5
2
5
5
2
1,500
11
•3 j$®^%$3ffi
M
A
A
M
M
M
M
ID
A
A
A
E
1,500
230
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria Note
Hjiigilj
FF. .___^_ _
760 GX
3.7 X
M
X M
^^^^| ID
.02 M
~_««J
__™J^NA
^^^B^^^^ G XiSPlwSsPI<ll?l!ftlffl
ID
ID
NA
NA
ID
M
ID
X
200' X
NA
ID
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria
760
.02
i H^^Pf ^ l ^
Note
-
"
12
Residential andCommercial 1
GW VIAIC
Criteria
56
45
180
180
440
31,000
34,000
5,600
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
NLV
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
S
1 ,200 S
110,000
31,000 S
ID
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
56
45
180
180
3,000
31 ,000
190,000
35,000
1,200
170,000
31,000
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
NLV
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
S
S
S
S
ID
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Criteria
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
13,000
3.3
.34
120
2.9
510
.02
79,000
9,500
200
10,000
2
2
5
5
4.6
31,000
14,000
11,000
390
170,000
31,000
15,000
Note
ID
~AA
AA
AA
S
M
AAM
AAM
AAM
AAM
ID
S
S
S
Water Solubility
Criteria
56
44.7
180
240
180
510
3,900,000
200,000
1 ,850,000
800,000
^^ l fela) ^ SHS^
10,000
6,200
31,000
75,000,000
1,750,000
1,230
169,000
31,000
Note
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria
6,400,000
68,000
43,000
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
NA
NA
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria Note
ID
i
1
.. ..
31,000
67,000
170,000
31,000
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
S
ID
ID
S
S
ID
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
860
700
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
2,500
700
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 4 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:30 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical
Ground Watt
D3
Volatile
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (|)
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (I)
0-3
onventional Parameter-Cvanii
Cyanide (P,R)
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
ChlorideTOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Metal
Manganese (B)Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)Mirex
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)Benzene (I)
Dibromochloropropane
Ethylbenzene (I)Naphthalene
n-Propylbenzene (I)
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (I)Vinyl chloride
Xylenes (I)
0-4
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
Result
>r
7/27/2004
ufl/L
69051
6/1 9/2003
ug/L
6 H
fiH
6.8
ug/L
160,000 D
990,000
ug/L
140
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
1.4 U
Ufl/L
.02 U
.02 U5
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
5 U
12
5 U
820
110 X
140
900
3.7 J
180
7/26/2004
Eh
7.4
ug/L
140,000 D
ReportingLimit
50
1
0.005
0
1
20
5
0.2
0.5
2
1.4
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
51
5
50
5
1
501
100
0
1
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
72
Criteria
200
250,000
mm
2
34
2
.098
.4
44
.02
| JCTiKjm BafflSe* BjfflBJsS rffiiJalc
ImPiHinS lili
520
280
Criteria
250,000
Note
E
E
Note
A
E
E
A
A
A
M
A
A
E
E
A
E
Note
E
Industrial andCommercial II,
111,1V DWCriteria
Criteria
72
Criteria
200
250,000
2
98
2
.4
.4
130
.02
11
1,500
Note
E
E
Note
A
E
El~
A
A
A
M
A
;230J
A
280 1 E
Criteria
250,000
Note
I
E
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria
Criteria
760
3.7
.02
200
jKHKBfeBKB^S&iiB|wBBB| ^Hy
15IHH1S1I38SIjffiBpggMfrjigjjjiffi
Criteria
Note
Note
FF
GX
M
X
M
XM
~XM
M
X
X
NA
ID
Note
FF
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria
Criteria
760
.02
12
Criteria
Note
Note
-
r •--Note
Residential andCommercial I
GW VIAIC
Criteria
56,000
61,000
Criteria
56
45
180~180
Note
S
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
sS
ID
' ID
34,0005,600
1,200
110,000
31 ,000
56,000
r • •
S
S
ID
S
1,100
190,000
CriteriaS
Note
NLV
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
56,000
61,000
Criteria
56
45
180
180
Note
S
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
sID
ID
190,00035,000
1,200
170,00031,000
56,000
13,000
190,000
Criteria
S
ssID
S
S
Note
NLV
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Criteria
56,00061,000
Criteria
57,000
""
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
13,000
3.3
.34
2.9
510
.02
14,000
11,000
390
170,000
31,000
Note
S
S
Note
ID
AA
AA
AA
S
M
S
S
1 5,000 j
56,000
1000
190,000
Criteria
S
S
Note
ID
Water Solubility
Criteria
55,890
61,150
Criteria
56
44.7
180
180
510
75,000,000
1,750,000
1,230
169,000
31,000
55,890
2,760,000
186,000
Criteria
Note
Note
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Note
NA
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria Note
56,000 ! S
ID
Criteria Note
ID
; ID
j ID
ID
ID- -I —
ID
ID
ID
i ID
NA
6,400,00068,000
NA
43,000
; NA
ID
56,000 S
33,000
70,000
Criteria Note
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria
Criteria
Note
ID
ID
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
67,000
170,00031,000
190,000
Criteria
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
S
S
ID
ID
ID
S
Note
ID
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
1000
1000
Criteria
860
w<& ii$?w$
1000
10,000
Criteria
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
2,900
2,900
Criteria
2,500
2*£f !'.££'• 'lUvl TfttSim. - v»W
2,900
10,000
Criteria
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 5 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:31 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical
Ground ware
D-4
Metal
Manganese (B)Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mirex
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
DibenzofuranHexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)
Dibromochloropropane
D-6
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
Metal
Iron (B)
Manganese (B)Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Result
r
7/26/2004
ug/L
380
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
1.4 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
10 U
51 U
51 U
10 U
ug/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
ug/L
5.1 U
2 U
ug/L
5 U
5 U
7/27/2004
Ed
7.8
ug/L
160,000 D
ug/L
1,400
620
.2 U
.5 U
ReportingLimit
5
0.2
0.5
2
1.4
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
10
51
51
10
2
2
2
2
2
5.1
2
5
5
0
1
20
5
0.2
0.5
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
2
34
2
^Sffiss
.098
.4
44
.02
150
jjjjjMii,
120
52
5
5
2
,
§i s$i$$l$£{fafffl£
Criteria
250,000
Note
E
A
A
A
M
M
A
A
M
M
M
M
ID
A
A
Note
1 •
' E
2
34
E
E
Industrial andCommercial II,
111,1V DWCriteria
Criteria
2
98
2
.4
.4
130
.02
.420
jMiEfiBBaBgH
470
5
2
5
5
2_
11
Criteria
250,000
Note
E
A
A
A
M
M
A
A
M
M
M
M
ID
A
A
Note
_
E
E
2
98
E
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria
760
*P||{|jjBpi8ii
3.7
^^ raKl jgiflfrTnjmMfflEQMififfi
.02
iaiBS^SM^ ESE
B
SjggK& JSHHIIE^B3SaaBHBBKI8BMfU*yiaiiigflHflsaHSBiia
SBMSfiBi'SjwSSHmK.
Criteria
Note"
GX
M
*M
XM
XM
M
NA
GX
M
ID
ID
NA
NA
ID
M
ID
X
NA
Note
FF
: NA760 G X
M
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria
760
.02
iffi&H&HHBiiiS
Criteria
!il!!!iOipQO
760
Note
Note
Residential andCommercial I
GW VIAIC
Criteria
56
45
180
180
440
34,000
1,200
Criteria
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
56 !
NLV
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
56
45-
180
180
3,000
190,000
1 ,200
Criteria
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV56
NLV
GroundwaterContact Criteria
iCriteria
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
13,000
3.3
.34
2.9
510
.02
79,000
9,500
200
10,000
2
25
5
4.6
14,000
390
Criteria
Note
AA
AA
AA
S
M
AAM
AAM
AAM
AAM
ID
Note
ID
58,000,000
9,100,000'
56
1,500,000
Water Solubility
Criteria
56
Note
NA
NA
NA
44.7 i
180
180
510
3,900,000
200,000
1 ,850,000
800,000
SlilSlliljSffi
10,000
6,200
75,000,000
1,230
Criteria Note
NA
NA
NA
56
NA
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria
- - - - -
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
6,400,000
Criteria
NA
Note
• •
ID
ID
ID
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria Note
ID
| ID
i ID
ID
I
| ID
! IDID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
: ID
; ID
Criteria Note
j
: ID
ID
ID
ID
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
860
Criteria
2,000
860
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
2,500
Criteria
5,600
2,500
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 6 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:32 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land UsesResidential
andCommercial IDW Criteria
Industrial andCommercial II,
111,1V DWCriteria
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
SourceReportingLimit
Ground Water
Criteria ! Note
f\ -r T \s
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzofg, h, i )perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Dibromochloropropane
Ethylbenzene (I)
onventional Parameter-Cvani<
Conventional Parameter
Conventional Parameter
130,000680000TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Residential andCommercial I
GW VIAIC
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Water Solubility Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Res andCom I
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria Note
NLV
Criteria
45 45
180
180
ssID
I To[
[ NLV
[ NLV
! NLV
i NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
180
180
Note
NLV
S
Criteria
13,000
3.3
NLV
NLV
ID
440
""734,000
"^ 5,600
1,200
110,000
Criteria
3,000
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
.34
2.9
5 O
79,000
9,500
200
10,000
4.6
S
Note
NLV
190,000;
35,000
1,200 [ S
170,000 j S
Criteria ! Note
1 NLV
Note Criteria [ Note
NA
Criteria
AA 44.7
Note
ID
ID
Criteria
AA
AA
180
180
510
M
3,900,000
200,000
1,850,000
800,000
Note
ID
ID
Criteria Criteria
AAM
AAM
AAM
ID 10,000
6,200
14,000
11,000
390170,000
Criteria
57,000
Note
75,000,000
1,750,000
1^230
169^000
Criteria
ID
ID
IDNA"
JD
lbID
ID
ID
ib~ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
j J?-J
i |D
ii IDT "ID"i IDT "76""i
iID
r IDi ID
i ID
Note
NA
6,400,000
68,000
I IMA43,000 i
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
67,000 i
T ID
170,000! S
Criteria Note
ID
700 700
Criteria Criteria
NLV NLV ID NA ID ID
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 7 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:32 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical
Ground Wate
0-6
Metal
Iron (B)
Manganese (B)Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mi rex
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (1)
Benzene (1)
Dibromochloropropane
Ethylbenzene (1)
MW-1
onventional Parameter-Cyanic
Cyanide (P,R)
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSSulfate
Metal
Iron (B)
Manganese (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Result
r
6/19/2003
lig/L
2,100
1,100 D
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
.9 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
5 U
51
5 U
28
6/1 9/2003
ug/L
16
fib
7
ug/L
61,000 D
1,800,000
740,000 D
ug/L
890
2,000 D
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
.9 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
ReportingLimit
20
5
0.2
0.5
2
0.9
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
5
1
5
1
0.005
0
1
20
2
20
5
0.2
0.5
2
0.9
0.02
0.02
0.07
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
2
34
2
.098
.4
44
.02
Illllll
j|P||j||||[
74
Criteria
200
250,000
Note
EE"
A
A
A
M
" A
A
Note
A
E
E
*/is|plpK<
2
34
2
ttfete.098
.4
44
E
E
A
A
A
Industrial andCommercial II,
111,1V DWCriteria
Criteria
mfflBwiiMtmS®!
2
98
2
.4
.4
130
.02
11
*affii|jj|j||jj||gg||g
74
Criteria
200
BBBiSa
250,000
2
98
2
lillBlPP
.4
.4
130
Note
E
h
A
A
A
M
A
A
E
Note
-E
E
E
E
I A""
A
A
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria
3.7
|||i|j|Bj|l§|||lraaw^^ ig^p
mmMjramnrMTJmTmMUSisai
.02
200
Criteria
imtiB™™
Note
NA
GX
M
X
M
XM
xJ
M
X
X
NA
Note
FF
I
WKSGHlmf
3.7
;_^
*•"«, i'%01i 'igS'ffiRftvihjt ^gjitsyi
' * <?' ,03
NA
NA
GX
M
X
M
X M
X M
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria
taSJWt&li&ttMMBmftft
Note
I
j
]I
IgjSiSiOiiMtmK iilgiffg^SSS
.02
HBgUHBgiBgwffiflBmBilOa^aarniMmafiaaaalSigiai
Criteria
-••
Note
!!
Residential andCommercial I
GW VIAIC
Criteria
56
45
180
180
34,000
5,600
1,200
110,000
Criteria
56
45
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
180 S
180 S
ID
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria Note
NLV
! NLV
56
NLV
NLV
45 S
180 S
180 S
ID1 ID
190,000
35,000
1 ,200 S
170,000 S
Criteria Note
iNLV
ii
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
56
NLV
NLV
45 S
180 S
180 S
ID
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Criteria
58,000,000
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
Note
13,000 [
3.3
.34
2.9
510
.02
14,0001 1 ,000
390
170,000
Criteria
57,000
58,000,000
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
13,000
3.3
AA
AA
AA
S
M
S
Note
ID
ID
AA
.34; AA
2.9 AA
510 S
Water Solubility
Criteria
56
44.7
180
180
510
75,000,000
1,750,000
1,230
169,000
Criteria
56
44.7
Note
NA
NA
NA
NA
- -
Note
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
180
180 '
510
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
6,400,00068,000
43,000
Criteria
ID
ID
ID
NA
NA
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria Note
I IDI ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
; ID
ID
67,000
ID
170,000 S
Criteria Note
ID
| ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
700
Criteria
2,000'fl«if?!$!lg
Ind andCom M III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
5,600
2,500
700
Criteria
5,600
2,500
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 8 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:33 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land UsesResidential andCommercial
GW VIAIC
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Residentialand
Commercial IDW Criteria
Industrial andCommercial II,
111,1V DWCriteria
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)CriteriaReporting
Limit
Ground Water
34,000
5,600
210,000
1,200
9,600
1,000,000
"93,00085,000
16,000
"110,000
220,000
530,000
15,000
56,000
H
Chlorobenzene (I)
Dibromochloropropane1,2-Dichloroethane (I)
1,1 -Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 280
"960
J380
Teo19,000
6,900
150
1,600870
7/27/2004
1,2-Dichloropropane (I)
Ethylbenzene (I)
Methylene chloride
Trichloroethylene
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (I)
190,000 S
Criteria NoteCriteria Note Criteria Note Criteria Note
Conventional Parameter
Manganese (B)Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-metnylpnenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitropnenol
Pentachlorophenol
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Water Solubility Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Res andCom I
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
S
S
Criteria : Note
190,000
35,000
470,000"
1,20059,000
2,300,000
210,000
200,000
36,000
170,000
1,400,000
530,000
97,000
56,000
13,000
190,000
Criteria
ID
Criteria i Note Criteria
S
Note
.02
14,000
11,000
86,000
39019,000
2,400,000
200,000220,000
16,000
170,000
220,000
530,000
22,000
56,000
Mi190,000
Criteria
M
Note Criteria Note
NA
Criteria Note Criteria Criteria
S
Note
75,000,000
1,750,000
472,0001,230
8,520,0005,060,000
3,500,000
6,300,000
2,800,000169,000
17,000,000
526,000
1,100,000
55,890
2,760,000
186,000
Criteria Note
6,400,000
68,000
160,000
2,500,000
380,000
530,000230,000
550,000
43,000
61,000j
56,000
33,000
70,000
Criteria
56
i NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
58,000,0009,100,000
561,500,000
13,000
45 3.3 AA
56
44.7!
NA
NA
NA
NA~
180, S
]" NLV
180 S
' ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
.34| AA
120
2.9 AA
510 S
.02 : ~M
79,000
9,500
200
180
240
180
510
3,900,000
200,000
1,850,000
NA
ID
ID
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
ID
ID
ID
67,000
ID
ID
ID
"IcT
ID
ID
ID
S
S
ID
ID
1,100,000 i SI ID"| ID
190,0001 S
Criteria ' Note
2,800,000
170,000 700 700
1000
10,000
2,900
"10,000
Criteria Criteria
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
5,600
2,500
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 9 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:33 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical
Ground Watt
MW-1
Semivolatile-Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)
Benzene (I)
Dibromochloropropane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane (I)
Ethylbenzene (I)
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (I)
Vinyl chloride
MW-1 7
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
Metal
Manganese (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mi rex
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Result
r
7/27/2004
ug/L
10 U
ug/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
ug/L
2 U
ug/L
5 U
30
5 U
12
35
39
67
7/26/2004
fiH
7.7
ug/L
140,000 D
ug/L
530
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
.9 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
10 U
50 U
50 U
ReportingLimit
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
1
5
0.2
0.5
2
0.9
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
10
50
50
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
120
5
2
5
5
2
JMJ88J8ijrJ!Swii!5B?ifl
74
63
Criteria
BBB
250,000
2
34
2
Note
A
M
M
M
M
A
A
A
A
E
E
A
Note
E
A
A
.098
.4
44
.02
150^"^^•^Syr- jArt
A
M
M
A
Industrial andCommercial II,
III, IV DWCriteria
Criteria
470
5
2
5
5
Note
A
M
M
M
2\ M
•SHsU
11
y|o|p %3fflp5Si!BM(ffjfjj|f]H&tWSSKaSKSBtoaBRSi
74
63
•i IflilH WsSffffJBlSnaPi
Criteria
250,000
ii lfiiEiillH2
98
2
.4
.4
130
.02
420
*$jjfc 3
A
A
A
A
E
^Note
E
E
A
A
A
M
M
A
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria
200
290SiiijpiSISiiiSjJiiiii
'mjjjjfflj$iSilii£fflffi^|mT^JagffjWSiSHEBHraSwRESi••BMHMSBSliilHHJpapJJjMftBMmMKii
Criteria
760
3.7
.02
J? - t7'£
2-8
Note
M
ID
ID
NA
NA
ID
ID
X
X
NA
X
Note
FF
G X
M
X
M
X M
X M
M
NA
G X
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria Note
Criteria
760
.02
Note
"
Residential andCommercial 1
GW VIAIC
Criteria Note
| NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
I
440 :
34,000
5,600
1 ,200 S
16,000
noVooo4
56,000 S
1,100.
Criteria Note
NLV
NLV
56NLV
NLV
45 j S
180 S
180 S
ID
ID
NLV
"'' NLV; NLV
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
3,000
190,000
35,000
1 ,200
36,000
170,000
56,000
13,000
Criteria
56
45
180
180
Note
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Criteria
10,000
2
2
5
5
4.6
14,000
1 1 ,000
390
16,000
170,000
56,000
1000
Criteria
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
13,000
3.3
.34
2.9
510
.02
Note
AAM
AAM
AAM
AAM
S
S
Note
ID
AA
AA
AA
S
M
79,000
9,500
200
Water Solubility
Criteria
800,000
ffl£st8fflctQffliwJeti&**ffMf
Note
6,200
75,000,000
1,750,000
1,230
i
2,800,000]
169,000
55,890
2,760,000
Criteria
56
44.7
180
180
510
Note
NA
NA
NA
NA
3,900,000
200,000 :
1,850,000
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
6,400,000
68,000 ;
NA
550,000 :
43,000
56,000 ; S
33,000
Criteria Note
i••" r| IDI
ID
ID
ID
' I D
ID
ID
ID
NA
ID
ID
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
i ID
67,000
ID
ID
ID
ID
2,800,000 S
170,000 S
Criteria
ID
ID
Note
ID
...ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
700
1000
Criteria
860
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
700
2,900
Criteria
2,500
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 10 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:34 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical Result
Ground Water
MW-17
Semivolatile-Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)
Dibromochloropropane
MW-2
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Metal
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mirex
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)
Benzene (I)
Dibromochloropropane
MW-22
Conventional Parameter
PH
7/26/2004
ug/L
10 U
ug/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
ug/L
2 U
ug/L
5 U
5 U
6/1 9/2003
EM
7.5
ug/L
150,000 D
750,000
ug/L
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
.9 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
5 U
5.8
5 U
6/1 9/2003
pH
7.3
ReportingLimit
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
0
1
20
0.2
0^5
2
0.9
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
5
1
5
0
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
120
5
2
5
5
2
Criteria
250,000
2
34
2
.098
.4
44
.02
Criteria
HKPfiSW
Note
- -A
M
M
MM
A
A
Note
E
A
A
A
M
A
A
Note
Industrial andCommercial II,
III, IV DWCriteria
Criteria
470
5
2
5
5
2
11
Criteria
Note
A
M
M
M
M
A
L
A
Note
250,000
2
982
BrlitfSlffliflBBi'ilJF
.4
.4
130
.02
11
3£a8l&tlMi£S£j£EJB8ga|B|ME|aM
Criteria
E
A
A
A
M
A"
A
Note
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria Note
M
I ID
t ID
NA
i NA
ID
ID
X
NA
Criteria Note
FF
jjBpKiiM
3.7 X
M
isrtnii XMX M
.02 M
|Pi8aBgBBSijSEai'3 A
200; X
NA
Criteria Note
GSI Criteria forSurface Water
used as DWSource
Criteria Note
Criteria
ij£ag tiTOIJga@jift
.02
Note
12
Criteria
" "
Note
Residential andCommercial 1
GW VIAIC
Criteria
— -
440
34,000
1,200
Criteria
56
45
180
180
Note
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
34,000 i
5,600
1,200
Criteria
S
Note
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
- - --
• •
3,000
190,000
1 ,200
Criteria
56
45
180
180
190,000
35,000
1,200
Criteria
Note
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
S
Note
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Criteria
10,000
2
2
5
5
4.6
14,000
390
Criteria
56
1,500,000
13,000
3.3
.34
2.9
510
.02
Note
AAM
AAM
AAM
AAM
Note
ID
AA
AA
AA
S
M
14,000
11,000
390
Criteria Note
Water Solubility
Criteria
800,000
Wi3ft"1
P ii
6,200
75,000,000
1,230
Criteria
56
44.7
Note
Note
NA
NA
NA
180T
180,
510,
175,000,000
1 ,750:000"
1 ,230 ;
Criteria Note
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
I ID
6,400,000
Criteria
ID
NA
Note
... i _ .
6,400,000
68,000
Criteria
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
NA
Note
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
Criteria
ID
Note
ID
ID
67,000
Criteria
ID-
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
Note
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
Criteria
Criteria
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
Criteria
Criteria
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 11 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:34 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical Result
Ground Water
MW-22
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Metal
Manganese (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mirex
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (1)
Dibromochloropropane
MW-22
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
Metal
Manganese (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mirex
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
6/19/2003
ug/L
180,000 D
610,000
ug/L
110
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
.9 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
5 U
5 U
7/27/2004
EH
7.5
ug/L
170,000 D
yg/L
90
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
.9 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
10 U
50 U
ReportingLimit
1
20
5
0.2
0.5
2
0.9
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
5
5
0
1
5
0.2
0.5
2
0.9
0.02
0.020.07
0.02
10
50
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
250,000MvumMmsSsffiSB
2
34
2
.098
.4
44
.02
mUSfiiiKiiiHnMMNMMMBM
jjiisjiimS oHI BHKKtBs
Criteria
250,000
2
34
2
.098
.4
44
.02
150
^ 20
Note
E
E~
A
A
A
M
;Note
E
E
-
A
A
A
M
M
Industrial andCommercial II,
III.IV DWCriteria
Criteria
250,000
f«»^»^ S«
2
98
2
.4
.4
130
.02
Criteria
250,000
2
98
2
Note
E
. E
A
A
A
M
A
Note
E
E
A
A
.4
.4 A
130
.02
420£.!;}& 20
M
: M
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria Note
FF
II
3.7
.02
Criteria
760
3.7
SiIfefefi
3J$< sgif u§j§ii%g&S)!i£
.02
GX
M
X
M
X M
X M
M
X
NA
Note
FF
G X
M
X
M
X M
X M
M
NA
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria
760
.02
Criteria
BgMBIBitHMOLiBB
760
^^^ l ll ^ftjfet j
Note
Note
- -
.02
Residential andCommercial I
GW VIAIC
Criteria Note
NLV
NLV
56 I
[NLV
45
180
NLV
S
h s180 S
ID
34,000
1,200
Criteria
56
45
180
180
ID
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
56
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
45 S
180
180
•
190,000
1 ,200
Criteria
56
45
180
180
S
S
ID
ID
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Criteria
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
13,000
3.3
.34
Note
ID
AA
AA
2.9 AA
510 S
.02 M
14,000
390
Criteria
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
13,000
3.3
.34
2.9
510
.02
79,000
9,500
Note
ID
AA
AA
AA
S
M
Water Solubility
Criteria
56
44.7
180
180
510
Note
NA
.
NA
NA
NA
75,000,000
1,230
Criteria Note
56
44.7
180
180
510
3,900,000
200,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
6,400,000
NA
Criteria Note
i
ID
• • • " " ' I " ID-
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
ID
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria
••
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
: IDI ID
• - • • • - -r ' ~
Criteria
ID
ID
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
Res andComl
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
860
Criteria
860
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
2,500
Criteria
2,500
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 12 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:35 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical Result
Ground Water
MW-22
Semivolatile-Phenol
Pentachlorophenol
2 ,4 ,6-Trichlorophenol
SemivolatHe-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g,h ,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)
Dibromochloropropane
Tetrachloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
MW-4
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
Metal
Iron (B)
Manganese (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mi rex
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
7/27/2004
uq/L
50 U
10 U
uq/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
uq/L
2 U
uq/L
5 U
5 U
8.5
6.1
7/26/2004
pH
7.2
uq/L
150,000 D
uq/L
1,900
450
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
uq/L
.9 U
uq/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ufl/L
10 U
51 U
51 U
10 U
ReportingLimit
50
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
1
1
0
1
20
5
0.2
0.5
2
0.9
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
10
51
51
10
Residentialand
Commercial IDW Criteria
Criteria
120
5
2
5
Note
A
A
M
M
5 M
2 M
AA
A
250,000
[%]Bafcaajjjffl&iffiijjj55Sj
2
34
2
.098
.4
44
.02
150
•JXJ£|! SS flfe^Sti;
120
Note
-
E
E
E
A
A
A
M
M
A
Industrial andCommercial II,
III, IV DWCriteria
Criteria
470
5
2
5
5
2
11
Criteria
250,000
2
98
Note
A
A
M
M
M
M
A
A
A
A
Note
E
" E
2 [ A
.4
.4
130
.02
420
A
\
M
M
A
470
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria
^^^K^ .
45
15
Criteria
Note
GX
M.
ID
ID
NA
NA
ID
ID
X
NA
X
Note
760
9wumStiSiaK$Wim^^^^^^ .3.7
jaKiaiBiHiiiira
jjgS&lBBJIHpJSBilii
.02
FF
NA
GX
" M
X
M
XM
XM
M
NA
G X
M
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria Note
11
Criteria
760
.02
Note
-
-
Residential andCommercial 1
GW VIAIC
Criteria Note
440
34,000"
1 ,200
25,000
1,100
Criteria
56
45
180
180
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
3,000
190,000
1,200
170,000
13,000
Criteria
56
45
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
Q
180 i S
180 S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV: NLV
' NLV
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Criteria
200
10,000
2
2
Note
AAM
AAM
5 AAM
5
4.6
14,000
390
12,000
1000
AAM
Criteria Note
58,000,000
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
13.000
3.3
.34
2.9
510
.02
ID
AA
AA
AA
S
M
79,000
9,500 "
200
10,000
Water Solubility
Criteria
1,850,000
800,000
sffBS!^M-«
«h
6,200
75,000,000
1,230
200,000
2,760,000
Criteria
56
44.7
180
180
510
Note
.
Note
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.900,000
200,000 :
1,850,000
800,000 '
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
I ID
6,400,000
33,000
Criteria
NA
ID
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
ID
ID
ID
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria : Note
200,000
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
S
ID
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
: ID
ID
ID
Res andCom I
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
Criteria
2,000
860
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
Criteria
5,600
2,500
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 13 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:35 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical
Ground Watt
MW-4
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
Dibenzofuran
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)
Benzene (I)
Dibromochloropropane
Ethylbenzene (I)
MW41
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Sulfate
Metal
Iron (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,2)
Silver (B)
Strontium (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mirex
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Result
r
7/26/2004
ug/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
ug/L
5.1 U
2 U
ug/L
5 U
22
5 U
28
7/27/2004
fiH
7.3
ug/L
450,000 D
ug/L
2,700
.2 U
.5 U
4,900 D
2 U
ug/L
.9 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
10 U
50 U
50 U
10 U
ug/L
2 U
ReportingLimit
2
2
2
2
2
5.1
2
5
1
5
1
0
2
20
0.2
0.5
5
2
0.9
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
10
50
50
10
2
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
5
2
5
5
2
||||BB|H|IliiJIiliSigiiBfcUlSgMa
74
Criteria
•mjBjmHJMMBrtillBaili
2
34
MBSI*3* «8sS3»»ip&E'
2
.098
.4
44
.02
Note
A
M
M
M
M
ID
A
Industrial andCommercial II,
111,1V DWCriteria
Criteria
5
2
5
5
2
11A
A
Note
" E
-g-
A
A
A
M
150
120
M
A
5 A
^sws^^mmS^^^^B
74
Criteria
~2
98
13,000
2
.4
.4
130
Note
A
M
M
M
M
ID
A
A
A
E
Note
E
E
A
A
A
.02 M
420
470
M
A
5 A
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria
200
ffit3^i*iHtfy'SfSffl*SiavvSllllllillllrrfagtai&igaEl&i:
Criteria
BBJIBs BBBBBffiSiB!
3.7
Note
ID
ID
NA
NA
ID
M
ID
X
X
NA
Note
NA
NA
M
X
MI
^ ^ ^ ^
.02
X M
XM
M
NA
GX
M
ID
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria Note
i
HRHBBli
rrtMm
Criteria
m
fe
Note
.02
' 1.8Q
Residential andCommercial 1
GW VIAIC
Criteria
440
Note
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
T34,000
5,600
1,200
110,000
Criteria
56
45
180
180
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
3,000
190,000
35,000
1,200
170,000
Criteria
56
45
180
180
Note
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
S
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
GroundwaterContact Criteria
iCriteria
2
2
5
5
- - •
4.6
14,000
1 1 ,000
390
170,000
Criteria
58,000,000
56
1,500,000
120,000,000
13,000
3.3
.34
2.9
510
.02
79,000
9,500
200
10,000
Note
AAM
AAM
AAM
AAM
ID
S
Note
- -
ID
AA
AA
AA
S
M
2 AAM
Water Solubility
Criteria
10,000
6,200
75,000,000
1,750,000
1,230
169,000
Note
Criteria Note[
56
44.7
180
180
510
3,900,000
200,000
1,850,000
800,000
' • « 162
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
6,400,000
68,000
NA
43,000 1
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria
"
67,000
170,000
Criteria
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
S
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
700
Criteria
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
700
Criteria
5,600
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page Hot 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:36 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical
Ground Wate
MW41
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)
Dibromochloropropane
MW-41
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Sulfate
Metal
Iron (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Strontium (B)
Thallium (B)
PCS
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mirex
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)
Dibromochloropropane
MW-43
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
Result
>r
7/27/2004
ug/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
ug/L
2 U
ug[L
5 U
5 U
6/19/2003
pH
7.3
ug/L
1,100,000
450,000 D
ug/L
2,000
.2 U
.5 U
4,900 D
2 U
ug/L
.9 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
5 U
5 U
7/26/2004
fit!
7.5
ug/L
140,000 D
ReportingLimit
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
0
20
2
20
0.2
0.5
5
2
0.9
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
5
5
0
1
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
2
5
5
2
1^ \
Criteria
mm
34
2
ip8iiS|iiqpj
.098
.4
44
.02
Criteria
mjisiiailJiii
250,000
Note
M
M
M
M~
A
A
Note
E
E
A
A
A
M_.
"A~
Note
,
Industrial andCommercial II,
111,1V DWCriteria
Criteria
2
5
5
2
Criteria
isisssirifisi'"
2
98
13,000
2
P ^MPiii!:aaaBs!esB£§E3saga
.4
.4
130
.02
11iHffhKtojMiflKjfiaafiHHjM| BICK|yWy|
Criteria
Note
M
M
M
M
A
A
Note
E
E
A
A
A
M
A
Note
jssg8HS||SiMBjjiH
250,000 : E
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria
IgjililljSmlfflSsliffli
Criteria
Note
ID
NA
NA
ID
ID
^NA
Note
INA
BJ:M
W$$ji$$j&Mjfj
T&SSS&i&JiJ&sBm,
%ss s&u&&iBjillBBaBBPPliiaBSBfflSiBai
.02
Criteria
—
XM
XM
M
>NA
Note
FF
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria Note
Criteria
[as iEajH ffiajI'Jismiiii&iiiiSMI SSiSamPq s m
.02
Criteria
3; p ^ ^ || ^
Note
Note
Residential andCommercial 1
GW VIAIC
Criteria Note
ID
NLV
NLV
NLVI
440|
34,000
1 ,200 S
Criteria Note
I
NLV
NLV
56
NLV
NLV
NLV
45 S
180 S
180 S
ID
ID
34,000
1 ,200 S
Criteria Note
; NLV
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
3,000
190,000
1 ,200
Criteria
56
45
180
180
190,000
1,200
Criteria
Note
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
S
Note
NLV
GroundwaterContact Criteria
ICriteria
2
5
5
4.6
14,000
390
Criteria
58,000,000
56
1 ,500,000
120,000,000
13,000
3.3
.34
2.9
510
.02
Note
AAM
AAM
AAM
Note
ID
AA
AA
AA
S
M
_i14,000
390
Criteria Note
ID
Water Solubility
Criteria
^
H™SB
6,200
75,000,000
1,230
Criteria
Note
Note
NA
56
44.7
180
180
510lljflif llliflJ!«tt&
75,000,000
1,230
Criteria
NA
NA
NA
NA
•• •
-Note
NA
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria
6,400,000
Criteria
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
Note
ID
ID
|
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
6,400,000
NA
Criteria Note
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
" "T'D
^ ID
ID
ID
ID
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
' I DID
'•. ID
ID
ID
Criteria Note
ID
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
Criteria
2,000
Criteria
Ind andCom II Ml IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
Criteria
5,600
Criteria
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 15 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:36 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical Result
Ground Water
MW-43
Metal
Iron (B)
Manganese (B)Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
AldrinHeptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mirex
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)Benzene (I)
Chlorobenzene (I)
DibromochloropropaneEthylbenzene (I)
Xylenes (I)
MW-44
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
7/26/2004
ug/L
830
66
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
1.4 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
10 U
50 U
50 U
10 U
ug/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
ug/L
2 U
ug/L
5 U
6.8
150
5 U
49
56
7/26/2004
fit!
7.6ug/L
140,000 D
ReportingLimit
- - - - - -
205
0.20.5
2
1.4
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
10
50
50
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
1
1
5
1
3
0
1
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
HHlSflissi
2
34
2
.098
.4
44
.02
150
UllllllhfasMpfiSSiP
120
5
2
5
5
2
74
280
Criteria
ix A?
250,000
Note
EE
A
A
A
M
M
A
A
M
M
M
M
A
A
A
A
E
E
Note
E
Industrial andCommercial II,
111,1V DWCriteria
Criteria Note- . .i
298
2
E
E
A
A
.4
.4130.02
420
470
52552
11
A
M
M
A
A
M
M
M
M
A
A
A
A
74 E280
Criteria
E
Note
fwM ' 8-5
250,000 E
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria
760
a jiHBiHtf|w|wjirBs ^mMlRamHlBiBmIlHBHBral
Note
NA
GX
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria
760
M 1
sSKSftBSK?iHlilmlm1.02
X M
X M
M"
••m200
IPmCriteria
!?§!¥*$!,
NA
G X
M
ID
ID
NA
NA
ID
ID
X
X
NA
Note
FF
Note
.02
!K»laPiBIIB!{BBiSigl%i>
sBSBPIfw12
Criteria
. ^SfSPP
Note
Residential andCommercial 1
GW VIAIC
Criteria
56
45
180
180
440
34,000
5,600
210,000
1,200
110,000
190,000
Criteria
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
S-
S
Note
NLV
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
56
45
180
180
3,000
190,000
35,000
470,000
1,200
170,000
190,000
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
S
Criteria Note
NLV
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Criteria
58,000,000
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
13,000
Note
3.3 AA
.34 AA
2.9 | AA
510,
.02
79,000
9,500
200
10,000
2
2
5
5
4.6
14,000
1 1 ,000
86,000
390
170,000
190,000
Criteria
S
M
AAM
AAM
AAM
AAM
S
S
Note
ID
Water Solubility
Criteria Note
NA
NA
56
NA
NA
i
44.7 '
180
180:
510
3,900,000
200,000
1,850,000
800,000
B6,200
I
75,000,000
1,750,000
472,000
1,230169,000 '
186,000
Criteria Note
NA
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria Note
IDID
IDID
ID
IDIDIDNA
i IDIDID
6,400,000
68,000
160,000
43,000
70,000
Criteria
ID
IDIDIDIDID
ID
NA
Note
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID" """
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
67,000
170,000
190,000
Criteria
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
S
S
Note
ID
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
2,000
860
70010,000
Criteria
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
5,600
2,500
70010,000
Criteria
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 16 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:37 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical
Ground Wate
MW-44
Metal
Iron (B)
Manganese (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mi rex
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)
Benzene (I)
Chlorobenzene (I)
Dibromochloropropane
Ethylbenzene (I)
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (I)
Xylenes (I)
MW-45
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
Result
r
7/26/2004
ug/L
860
100
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
2.3 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
10 U
50 U
50 U7
10 U
ug/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
ug/L
2 U
ug/L
5 U
69
140
5 U
180
150
190
7/27/2004
B»
7.4
ug/L
140,000 D
ReportingLimit
20
5
0.2
0.5
2
2.3
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
10
50
50
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
1
1
5
1
1
3
0
1
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
2
34
2
.098
.4
44
.02
150
120
5
2
5
5
2
zBBSiBSx&SR&sfiffg
«p$j! BCTffiipF '
280
Criteria
250,000
Note
E
E
A
A
A
M"
M
A
A
M
M
M
M
A
A
A
A
E
E "
E
Note
E
Industrial andCommercial II,
III, IV DWCriteria
Criteria
rnHHwajj
98
2
.4
.4
130
.02
420
470
5
2
5
5
2
280
Note
E
E
A
A
A
M
M
A
A
M
M
M
M
A
A
A
A
E
E
Criteria Note
250,000 E
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria
760
3.7
•H
HIijpipipiWim§28Sm&5iijSl aRra
AM
IB.02
fflfflliiMfflilfJSgJSs
1HffSsSs
200ggjEEaiai»aaa»«
fl|p ftisjsgii
mHIPit
Criteria
Note
NA
GX
M
X
M
XM
XM
M
NA
GX
M
ID
ID
NA
NA
ID
ID-
X
X
NA
Note
FF
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria
760
.02
Note
i
Criteria Note
•• - -T- -
Residential andCommercial I
GW VIAIC
Criteria Note
NLV
NLV
56 iNLV
NLV
45 i S
I
180! S
180 ! S
; ID
i ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
1 NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV1
440
34,000
5,600
210,000
1 ,200 S
110,000
56,000 S
190,000 S
Criteria Note
NLV
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
56
45
180
180
3,000
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
190,000
35,000
470,000 S
1 ,200 ! S
170,000
56,000
190,000
Criteria
S
S
S
Note
NLV
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Criteria
58,000,000
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
13,000
3.3
.34
2.9
510
.02' ' "- "
79,000
9,500
200
10,000
2
2
5
5
4.6
14,000
11,000
86,000
390
170,000
56,000
190,000
Note
AA
AA
AA
S
M
AAM
AAM
AAM
AAM
S
S
S
Criteria Note
ID
Water Solubility
Criteria
56
44.7
Note
NA
NA
NA
NA
180
180
510
3,900,000
200,000
1,850,000
800,000
3SiillllIll§!
| ^ ^ ^ ^ g|gjS
|Sgsjl»api||JBfeajfe3gB|jj!c
6,200
75,000,000
1,750,000
472,000
1,230
169,000
55,890
186,000
Criteria
_
Note
NA
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria
6,400,000
68,000
160,000
43,000
56,000
70,000
Criteria
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
S
Note
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria
..
- -
67,000
170,000
190,000
Criteria
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
' S
ID
S
Note
ID
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
2,000
860
700
1000
10,000
Criteria
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
5,600
2,500
700
2,900
10,000
Criteria
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 17 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:38 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical
Ground Wate
MW-45
Metal
Aluminum (B)
Iron (B)
Manganese (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mi rex
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)
Dibromochloropropane
MW-46
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
Metal
Iron (B)
Manganese (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Result
r
7/27/2004
ug/L
200
810
520
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
.9 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
10 U
50 U
50 U
10 U
ug/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
ug/L
2 U
ug/L
5 U
5 U
7/27/2004
Ed
7.3
ug/L
140,000 D
ug/L
1,600
630
.2 U
ReportingLimit
50
20
5
0.2
0.5
2
0.9
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
10
50
50
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
0
1
20
5
0.2
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
•
2
34
2
.098
.4
44
.02
150
120
5
2
5
: • :
5
2
HP
Note
V
E
E
A
A
M
M
A
A
M
M
M
M
A
A
Criteria Note
iIf
250,000
IfepB
?«sT«J
E
E
E
Industrial andCommercial II,
III.IV DWCriteria
Criteria Note
V
2
98
2
.4
.4
130
.02
420
470
5
2
5
5
2
Criteria
E
E
A
A
:»-M
M
A
A
M
M
M
M
A
. . _
Note
250,000 : E
, 4 300
^ * _^. J
2
E
E
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria Note
760
MJ||j||ffllaiP|Sf
3.7
NA
NA
G X
M
X
.02
ByjiiiiiiiiHMSessmliMmjmS'VKKSiHtflyfMKKafSv
M
XM
XM
M
NA
G X
M
ID
ID
NA
NA
ID
iID
X
NA
Criteria Note
FF
NA
760 GX
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria
760
.02
JJli||]!| Jj>g|$6»'
Criteria
WliSm&i-*.
Note
Note
760
Residential andCommercial 1
GW VIAIC
Criteria Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
56
NLV
NLV
45 S
180 S
180 S
\ ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
440
34,000 P
1 ,200 S
Criteria Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
56
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
56
45
180
180
"
3,000
190,000
1,200
Criteria
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV_. . . ._
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
56
GroundwaterContact Criteria
iCriteria
64,000,000
58,000,000
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
13,000
3.3
.34
510- - -
.02
79,000
9,500
200
10,000
2
2
5
5
4.6
14,000
390
Criteria
Note
AA
AA
AA
S
M
AAM
AAM
AAM
AAM
Note
ID
58,000,000
9,100,000
56
Water Solubility
Criteria
56
44.7
180
180
510
3,900,000
200,000
1,850,000
800,000
pjjjjfeS
IPPia•
|ffiJrjj J|Pm!jJKm|j
PiHBSBaisi
6,200
75,000,000
1,230
Criteria
Note
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Note
NA
NA
NA
56
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID: NA
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
]
ID
6,400,000
NA
Criteria Note
: ID
ID
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
'. ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID\1
ID
ID
ID
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
300
2,000
860
Criteria
2,000
860
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
4,100
5,600
2,500
- -
-— -
Criteria
5,600
2,500
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 18 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:38 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical Result
Ground Water
MW-46
Metal
Silver (B)Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
AldrinHeptachlorEndosulfan (J)
Mirex
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g, h , i )perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)Benzene (I)
Chlorobenzene (I)
DibromochloropropaneXylenes (I)
MW-47
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
Metal
Iron (B)
Manganese (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
7/27/2004
tTg/L
.5 U
2 U
ug/L
1.4 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
10 U
50 U
50 U
10 U
ug/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
ug/L
2 U
ug/L
5 U
3382
5 U
44
7/27/2004
fiH
7.4
ug/L
140,000 D
ug/L
2,300
570
.2 U
.5 U
ReportingLimit
0.5
2
1.4
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
10
50
50
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
11
5
3
0
1
20
5
0.2
0.5
Residentialand
Commercial IDW Criteria
Criteria
34
2
.098
.4
44
.02
150
120
5
2
5
5
2
mjfjMijmffiim^mfG
100
280
Criteria
250,000
2
34
Note
A
A
A
M
M
A
A
M
M
M
M
A
A
A
A
E
Note
E
b
[ h
Industrial andCommercial II,
III, IV DWCriteria
Criteria
98l
2
.4
.4
130
.02
420
Note
A
A
A
M
M
A
470 I
5
2
5
5
2
11
100
28o"
Criteria
250,000
A
M
M
M
M
A
A
A
A
E
Note
" E "
H E
2
98:
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria
3i7
mH1
.0
«
12
' •mMi
200
Criteria
Note
M
X
M
XM
XM
M
NA
GX
M
ID
ID
NA
NA
ID
ID
X
X
NA
Note
FF
NA
760 GX
ffWm. M
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria
Tffiaf
Note
.02
Mim:8.
!••
m1
Criteria
_
Note
760"~
Residential andCommercial 1
GW VIAIC
Criteria
45
180
180
440
34,000
5,600210,000
1,200
190,000
Criteria
56
Note
NLV
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
SS
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria Note
NLV
NLV
45 S
180 S
180 S
h°| ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
1 NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
3,000
190,000
35,000470,000 S
1,200 S
190,000 S
Criteria Note
i
NLV
NLV
NLV
56
NLV
GroundwaterContact Criteria
I
Criteria
1,500,000
13,000
- -
3.3J
.34
2.9
510
.02
79,000
9,500
200
10,000
2
Note
AA
AA
AA
S
M
AAM
2[AAM5
5
4.6
14,000
1 1 ,000
86,000
390
190,000Criteria
58,000,000
9,100,000
56
1,500,000
AAM
AAM
S
Note_ .
ID
Water Solubility
Criteria
44.7
180
180
510
Note
NA
NA
3,900,000
200,000
1,850,000
800,000
6,200
75,000,0001 750,000
472,000
1,230
186,000
Criteria Note
NA
56
NA
NA
NA
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
L NA
ID
J ID
6,400,00068,000
160,000
70,000
Criteria
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
; IDID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
67,000
190,000
Criteria
ID
ID
ID
S
Note
i
ID
ID
ID
ID
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
10,000
Criteria
-, .. ,2,000860
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
10,000
Criteria
5,600
2,500
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 19 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:39 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical Result
Ground Water
MW-47
Metal
Thallium (B)
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)
Mi rex
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether (I)
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)
Benzene (I)
Dibromochloropropane
MW-48
Conventional Parameter
PH
Conventional Parameter
Chloride
Metal
Manganese (B)
Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)
Silver (B)
Thallium (B)
7/27/2004
gg/L
2 U
ufl/L
.9 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
10 U
50 U
50 U
10 U
ug/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
ug/L
2.4
2 U
ug/L
5 U
15
5 U7/26/2004
EH
7.3
ug/L
170,000 D
ug/L
190
.2 U
.5 U
2 U
ReportingLimit
2
0.9
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
10
50
50
10
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
5
1
5
0
1
5
0.2
0.5
2
Residentialand
Commercial IDW Criteria
Criteria
2
iHKIBiSSSt
.098
.4
44
.02
Note
A
A
A
M
150
120
5
2
5
5
2
mmmiiigiHBmHSKBSiSI
ajgaygJjJB [8iljij9iS5|
Criteria
M
A
A
M
M
M
"
*
A
^A~
Note
250,000 E
2
34
E
2 A
Industrial andCommercial II,
111,1V DWCriteria
Criteria Note
2 A
SSlSifii&islM
.4
.4
130
.02
470
52
5
5
2
8.3HOfflPffll]aJBEBiiBiiJBilSsai
11Sisiil*§t*llSiS5ffla^KPffl^Ia
Criteria
A
A
M
M
A
A
M
M
M
M
f A
A
A
Note
250,000^ E
f' *llte^ fi
2
98
2
E
A
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria Note
3.7 X
M
XMX M
.02J M
l NA
G X
M
IDIDNANAID
15 XID
j ^ ip^ l x200| X
NA
Criteria Note
: FF
760 GX
Siiiwf ?rf=: ^3.7 X
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria
IBiillSJiiiBilBBgaaila
Note
"
.02
Criteria Note
760
[
WT'.W
Residential andCommercial 1
GW VIAIC
Criteria
45
180
180
" •
38,000
440
34,000
5,600
1,200
Criteria
56
Note
NLV
S
S
SID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
Note
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
45
180
180
210,000
3,000
190,000
35,000
1,200
Criteria
Note
NLV
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
._. . ..NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
S
Note
NLV
NLV
56'
NLV
NLV
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Criteria
13,000
3.3
.34
2.9
510
.02
79,000
9,500
200
10,000
2
2
5
5
5,700
4.6
14,000
1 1 ,000
390
Criteria
Note
AA
AA
AA
S
M
AAM
AAM
AAM
AAM
Note
ID
9,100,000
56 r
1,500,000
13,000
Water Solubility
Criteria Note
I| NA]
44.7 1 "
180
180
510
3,900,000
200,000
1,850,000
800,000
*f ml$iflSliffiffili!5if?l'lilf
17,200,000
6,200
75,000,000
1,750,000
1,230
Criteria
56
Note
-
NA
NA
NA
NA
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID"'"" " TID
17,000,000 S
6,400,000
68,000
Criteria
ID
NA
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria Note
ID
ID
: ID
; ID; IDi ID
1 ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
,.
17,000,000 S
r 'D
ID
67,000
ID
Criteria Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
Criteria
860
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
Criteria
2,500
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 20 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:39 PM
OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data
Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses
Chemical
Ground Watt
MW-48
PCS
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC
Pesticide
Aldrin
Heptachlor
Endosulfan (J)Mirex
Semivolatile-Phenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Pentachloraphenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Semivolatile-PNA
Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)
Semivolatile
Dibenzofuran
Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)
Volatile
Acrylonitrile (I)Benzene (I)
Result
T
7/26/2004
ug/L
2.3 U
ug/L
.02 U
.02 U
.07 U
.02 U
ug/L
10 U
51 U
51 U
10 U
ug/L
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
ug/L
5.1 U
2 U
ug/L
5 U
9.5
ReportingLimit
2.3
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.02
10
.. 51_51
10
2
2
2
2
2
5.1
2
51
5
Residentialand
Commercial 1DW Criteria
Criteria
.098
.4
44
.02
150
120
5
2
5
5
2
Note
A
A
M
M
A
A
M
M
M
M
ID
A
A
Industrial andCommercial II,
III, IV DWCriteria
Criteria
.4
.4
130
.02
420
470
5
2
5
5
2
11
Note
A
A~
GroundwaterSurface
Interface (GSI)Criteria
Criteria Note
M
umiBi XMIIHiNffiili
M
M
A
A
M
M
M
M
ID
A
A
A
.02] M
NA
™
ID
ID
NA
NA
ID
ID
x
200 X
I NA
GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW
Source
Criteria
.02
12
Note
Residential andCommercial 1
GW VIAIC
Criteria
45""
180
180
440
34,000
5,600,2(J(J
Note
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
S
Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC
Criteria
45
180
180
3,000
190,000
35,000
Note
S
S
S
ID
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
NLV
NLV
NLV
ID
GroundwaterContact Criteria
Criteria
3.3
.34
2.9
510
.02
79,000
9,500
200
10,000
2
2
5
5
4.6
14,000
1 1 ,000
Note
AA
AA
AA
S
M
AAM
AAM
AAM
AAM
ID
Water Solubility
Criteria
44.7
180
180
510
3,900,000
200,000
1,850,000800,000
10,0006,200
75,000,000
1,750,000
Note
Flammability andExplosivity
Screening Level
Criteria
- --
Note
ID
ID
ID
ID
NA
ID
ID
ID
ID
JID
ID
ID
ID
Mb
6,400,000
68,000
IDID
Acute InhalationScreening Level
Criteria Note
ID
IDID
"" IDID
ID
ID
ID
ID
r IDID
IDID
• ID
; IDID
ID
67,000
Res andCom 1
DrinkingWater
Aesthetic
Criteria
Ind andCom II III IV
DrinkingWater
Aesthetics
Criteria
Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 21 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:40 PM
Top Related