Second Five-Year Review Report Organic Chemical, Inc. Superfund … · 2017. 5. 12. · Table 1 -...

EPA Region 5 Records Ctr.

222799

Second Five-Year Review Report

Second Five-Year Review Reportfor

Organic Chemical, Inc. Superfund SiteCity of Grandville

Kent County, Michigan

September 2004

PREPARED BY:

United States Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 5

Chicago, Illinois

Approved by: Date:

. Karl, DirectorSuperfund Division

Second Five-Year Review Report

Second Five-Year Review Reportfor

Organic Chemical, Inc. Superfund SiteCityofGrandville

Kent County, Michigan

September 2004

PREPARED BY:

United States Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 5

Chicago, Illinois

Approved by: Date:

Richard C. Karl, DirectorSuperfund Division

Table of Contents Section Page List of Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II Five-Year Review Summary Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III I. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. Site Chronology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 III. Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Physical Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Land and Resource Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 History of Contamination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Initial Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Basis for Taking Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 IV. Remedial Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Remedy Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Remedy Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 System Operations/Operation and Maintenance (O&M) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 V. Progress Since the Last Five-Year Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 VI. Five-Year Review Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Administrative Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Community Involvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Document Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Site Inspections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Interviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 VII. Technical Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents? 13 Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action objectives (RAOs) used at the time of the remedy still valid? 14 Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question the protectiveness of the remedy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Technical Assessment Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

VIII. Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 IX. Recommendations and Follow-up Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 X. Protectiveness Statement(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 XI. Next Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Tables Table 1 - Chronology of Site Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Table 2 - Actions Taken Since the Last Five-Year Review . . . . . . . . . . 12 Table 3 - Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Table 4 - Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

Attachments Attachment 1 - Site Location Map (Figure l) Attachment 2 - Site Plan (Figure 2) Attachment 3 - List of Documents Reviewed Attachment 4 - Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) Attachment 5 - Monitoring Wells Sampled for the Alternate Point of Compliance (APC) Demonstration Report Attachment 6 - Results of the 8 Rounds of Sampling for the APC Demonstration Report

and split sampling performed by MDEQ for Rounds 8 and the first Round of Post Shutdown Groundwater Monitoring

List of Acronyms ARAR Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency ESD Explanation of Significant Difference MCL Maximum Contaminant Level MCLG Maximum Contaminant Level Goal MDEQ Michigan Department of Environmental Quality NCP National Contingency Plan NPL National Priorities List O&M Operation and Maintenance PAH Polyaromatic Hydrocarbon PCS Polychlorinated Biphenyl PPB Parts per Billion PRP Potentially Responsible Party RA Remedial Action RAO Remedial Action Objective RD Remedial Design RI/FS Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study ROD Record of Decision VOC Volatile Organic Compound

Executive Summary

The remedy for the Organic Chemical, Inc. (OCI) Superfund Site (the Site) included excavation and disposal of surrounding soils, and extraction and treatment of groundwater contamination to MCLs. The groundwater system operated from May 1995 until July 1997. At MDEQ's request, the system was shut down at that time when the effluent from the treatment plant, discharging to Roys Creek, failed an aquatic toxicity test. It was never restarted because the remedy in the OU2 ROD allowed for an Alternate Point of Compliance (APC), which authorizes the PRPs to turn off the extraction and treatment system if certain conditions are met, while maintaining the system for future use if necessary. The Site achieved construction completion with the signing of the Preliminary Close Out Report (PCOR) on September 29, 2003. This five-year review is the second five-year review conducted for the Site. The first five-year review for this Site was completed on September 15, 1999. The trigger for this five-year review was the completion of the first five-year review signed September 15, 1999.

The assessment of this five-year review found that the remedy was constructed in accordance with the requirements of the two Record of Decisions (ROD). An Explanation of Significant Difference (ESD) was issued in 2003 to modify the treatment of contaminated soil, allow for an APC, which allows the PRPs to turn off the extraction and treatment system if certain conditions are met, while maintaining the system for future use if necessary, and allows for an APC that differs from the ROD.

The remedy is protective of human health and the environment in the short and long term. Implementation and maintenance of deed restrictions and institutional controls in case of future Site development are expected to lessen the likelihood of human exposure to contaminants. The institutional controls are listed in the Restrictive Covenants in both consent decrees. The signed and registered Restrictive Covenants can be found for the two PRP groups in the APC Demonstration Report and the Administrative Record.

Five-Year Review Summary Form

SITE IDENTIFICATION

Site name (from WasteLAN): Organic Chemical, Inc. Superfund Site

EPA ID (from WasteLAN): MID990858003

Region: 5 State: Ml City/County: Grandville/ Kent

SITE STATUS

NPL status: [X] Final [ ] Deleted [ ] Other ( specify)

Remediation status (choose all that apply): [ ] Under Construction [ ] Operating [X] Complete

Multiple Ous?* [X] YES [ ] NO Construction completion date: 09/29/2003

Has Site been put into reuse? [ ] YES [X] NO

REVIEW STATUS

Lead agency: [X] EPA [ ] State [ ] Tribe [ ] Other Federal Agency

Author name: Thomas G. Williams

Author title: Remedial Project Manager Author affiliation: U.S. EPA, Region 5

Review period:** 11/09 /2003 to 9/15 /2004

Date(s) of Site inspection: 9/18/2003 & January 16, 2004

Type of review: [X] Post-SARA [ ] Pre-SARA [ ] NPL-Removal only [ ] Non-NPL Remedial Action Site [ ] NPL State/Tribe- lead D [ ] Regional Discretion)

Review number: [ ] 1 ( first) [ ] 2 ( second) [ ] 3 ( third) [ ] Other ( specify)

Triggering action [ ] Actual RA On-site Construction at OU # N/A [ ] Actual RA Start at OU# 1 [ ] Construction Completion [X] Previous Five-Year Review Report [ ] Other (specify)

Triggering action date (from WasteLAN): 9 /15 /1999

Due date (five years after triggering action date): 9 /15 /2004 *["OU" refers to operable unit.]

** [Review period should correspond to the actual start and end dates of the Five-Year Review in WasteLAN.]

Five-Year Review Summary Form, cont'd.

Issues:

1) Work with MDEQ to see that the Site is redeveloped. 2) MDEQ has requested that the Contaminants of Concern (COC) list for the APC be

expanded. Due to the recent completion of the soil remedial action and the granting of the APC, there are no other outstanding issues.

Recommendations and Follow-up Actions:

1) Work with potential developers to redevelop the Site. 2) Work with MDEQ to evaluate the expansion of the COC list for the APC.

Protectiveness Statement(s):

The remedy is protective of human health and the environment in the short term and measures are in place to ensure protectiveness in the long-term. There are no current exposure pathways to a future site worker with appropriate institutional controls in place and followed. The remedy appears to be functioning as designed. The removal of soils, to eliminate a source of contamination, has achieved the remedial objective to implement a remedial action to protect human health and the environment.

Long-term Protectiveness:

The other remaining component of the cleanup is the APC for groundwater. Continued groundwater monitoring of the Site to see that the requirements of the APC are complied with will ensure that the remedy is protective for groundwater. If the contaminant concentration in the groundwater exceeds performance standards at or beyond the APC (unless the exceedance is benzene alone), the PRP's will be required to submit a written cause for the exceedance and submit a plan that proposes additional actions to establish compliance. If the plan is to restart the groundwater treatment plant, the PRP's will be directed to repair and upgrade the system. The PRP's are also responsible for making any repairs to the soil cover or slabs to ensure that no direct contact threats exist.

Other Comments: None.

ORGANIC CHEMICAL, INC. SUPERFUND SITE GRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN

SECOND FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT I. INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the five-year review is to determine whether the remedy at a site is protective of human health and the environment. The methods, findings, and conclusions of reviews are documented in Five-Year Review reports. In addition, Five-Year Review reports identify issues found during the review, if any, and identify recommendations to address them.

EPA is preparing this Second Five-Year Review report pursuant to CERCLA §121 and the National Contingency Plan (NCP). CERCLA §121 states:

If the President selects a remedial action that results in any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining at the site, the President shall review such remedial action no less often than each five years after the initiation of such remedial action to assure that human health and the environment are being protected by the remedial action being implemented. In addition, if upon such review it is the judgment of the President that action is appropriate at such site in accordance with section [104] or [106], the President shall take or require such action. The President shall report to the Congress a list of facilities for which such review is required, the results of all such reviews, and any actions taken as a result of such reviews. EPA interpreted this requirement further in the NCP; 40 CFR §300.430 (f)(4)(ii) states: If a remedial action is selected that results in hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, the lead agency shall review such action no less often than every five years after the initiation of the selected remedial action.

EPA, Region 5, conducted the second five-year review of the remedy implemented at

the Organic Chemical, Inc. (OCI) Superfund Site in Grandville, Michigan. This review was conducted by the Remedial Project Manager (RPM) for the entire site from November 2003 through January 2004. This report documents the results of the review.

This is the second five-year review for the OCI Superfund Site. The first five-year review was completed on September 15, 1999. The triggering action for this statutory review is the initiation of the remedial action on February 9, 1994. The five-year review is required due to the fact that hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure.

II. SITE CHRONOLOGY

Table 1 - Chronology of Site Events

EVENT DATE Proposed on NPL December 12, 1982

Listed on NPL September 8, 1983

Refinery & Bulk Oil Storage Operation OCI Operations

1941 - 1968 1968 - 1991

Phase I RI/FS Phase II RI/FS

March 29, 1989 - July 11, 1991 July 2, 1992 - March 1996

ROD OU 1 Unilateral Administrative Order

September 30, 1991 January 2, 1992

RD for Pump & Treat System January 2, 1992 - February 9, 1994

Construction of Pump & Treat System May 1995 - September 1996

Pre-Final Inspection of Pump & Treat System Operation of Pump and Treat System

January 13, 1995 May 1995 - July 1997

OU2 ROD Groundwater Consent Decree

Soil Consent Decree

February 5, 1997 February 7, 2000 February 1, 2001

Alternate Point of Compliance Demonstration February 15, 2000 - TBD

RD for Soil Remediation Soil Remediation

February 16, 2001 - September 26, 2001 September 2001 - TBD

Pre-Final Inspection for Soil Remediation September 18, 2003

Final Inspection of Entire Site January 16, 2004

ESD & PCOR September 29, 2003

First Five-Year Review September 15, 1999

Second Five-Year Review September 15, 2004

Next Five-Year Review Five Years for the signature of this document

III. BACKGROUND Physical Characteristics The OCI property is located at 3291 Chicago Drive, S.W., in the city of Grandville, Kent County, Michigan. The OCI property, approximately 5 acres, is fenced, with several buildings and structures occupying the Site (Attachments 1 and 2). The Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad, which runs southeast of the facility and along the north side of Chicago Drive, has an elevated railbed acting as a barrier to surface drainage. ThEre is no visible surface drainage linking the Site and the Grand River, which is located approximately 0.95 miles north. Two gravel quarries have been identified near the OCI Site. One quarry is located 0.3 miles northwest, and the other quarry is 0.2 miles northeast of the Site. Both quarries are inactive and filled with water. The OCI property is bordered by Tenneco Packaging Inc., on the east, by the Htrans Holdings on the west, and by Developers Inc., on the north. Residential areas are approximately 200 feet southeast of the Site and 1700 feet to the southwest. These properties along with others comprise an industrial park which extends up to I-196, approximately 2000 feet north of the OCI Site. Across I-196 is a wetland area that extends north to the Grand River, and the interstate highway transects the sensitive ecosystem and the industrial park/commercial park. Land and Resource Use The OCI property had several buildings and structures occupying the property. The chemical manufacturing operation, which was housed in two buildings along the western boundary of the property, produced small quantities of specialized industrial chemicals and pharmaceutical intermediates. The solvent recovery operation was housed in several buildings along the southeastern portion of the property. Other structures included a warehouse, several drum and storage tank areas, an office building, a boiler facility and a waste water pretreatment facility. OCI stopped operations in May 1991, because of financial problems and the inability to obtain a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Part B permit. OCI completed RCRA closure of the equipment and tanks in 1992, although never completed a complete closure. Still remaining on-site are several abandoned buildings. Much of the steel tanks and structures have been removed by scavengers. U.S. EPA is working in conjunction with the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and the PRPs to redevelop the Site for future industrial use. There are no natural resource areas associated with the OCI Site which is located in an industrial/commercial park. History of Contamination The Site was previously used for petroleum refining from 1941 to 1945, and transport and storage operations from 1945 to 1966. A succession of petroleum-related industries leased the land prior to its purchase by Spartan Chemicals. Anne R. Herald, owner of the property from approximately 1900 to 1942, issued an oil and gas lease for the entire property to Gerald J. Wagner on December 7, 1937. Mr. Wagner then leased the premises for oil and gas exploration to various third parties. During tenure of these leaseholds, two oil production wells were drilled onsite. One was a dry hole and the other was never completed or maintained. Attempts made to identify the exact locations of these wells by reviewing existing data were unsuccessful. All oil and gas exploration leases were summarily voided by Ms. Herald on February 7, 1941. Other petroleum industry operations including a refinery commenced onsite in the early 1940's. Total Pipeline Corporation, a petroleum transporter, leased an oil and gasoline warehouse and tank facility onsite during this period. Its facilities were then taken over by its parent company, Total Petroleum, Inc., which operated onsite through 1964. Leonard Fuels purchased the Site in 1964 and sold the property to Total Realty in 1966. In 1968, Spartan Chemical Company acquired the Site property for the solvent

reclamation and chemical manufacturing operations of its subsidiary, Organic Chemicals Company (now Organic Chemicals, Inc.). OCI has operated on the Site since 1968 and stopped operation in 1991. In 1979, OCI became the owner of the premises by conveyance of deed from Spartan Chemical Company. Historical aerial photographs, taken from 1960 through 1978, show changes to the physical facilities of the OCI Site. In a 1960 photograph, three large vertical tanks with two sumps for containing spills were present along the northwestern portion of the former refinery. By 1967, these tanks were no longer present. In 1973, the terrain on the western portion of the former refinery was being regraded and leveled. The ground was visibly scarred from earth moving activity. In this same year there was a seepage lagoon on the OCI property which appeared to contain liquid waste. Two new buildings and six additional vertical storage tanks had been added to the facility in 1973. A 1978 aerial photograph indicates that the west portion of the former refinery was abandoned. This area was owned by Haven-Busch, Co., and was being used as an open storage yard for this steel fabrication company. Haven-Busch, Co., has since closed both their corporate office and their steel fabrication plant and has been sold to Padnos Iron and Metal. A chemical fire occurred onsite on October 11, 1976, damaging part of the OCI facilities. The cause of the blaze was reported as being started by a spark from a metal drum dragged across a floor. The spark ignited barrels of solvents stored nearby. According to retired Grandville Fire Chief Osterink, the fire was contained in the building and prevented from spreading to other storage tanks outside. A chemical spill at the Site in November, 1979, was reported to the MDEQ by OCI. On November 3, 1979, 2,200 gallons of lacquer thinner were spilled by an operator onto the ground onsite. Some of the spilled lacquer thinner was recovered and disposed of in the onsite seepage lagoon. The OCI Site was classified, on April 14, 1980, as a potential hazardous waste site by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Site was listed on the National Priority List on September 8, 1983. EPA summarized the problem hi its Potential Hazardous Waste Site log as "known groundwater contamination by organic solvents." Between 1968 and 1980, company records indicate that OCI discharged its process waste and cooling water, which included F001-F005 hazardous wastes into the onsite seepage lagoon. In June 1980, OCI ceased discharge of wastewater to the seepage lagoon. In 1980, the company installed a wastewater pretreatment facility with discharge to the City of Grandville Sanitary Sewer system. The pretreatment facility included two 9,000 gallon sedimentation tanks and a 30,000 gallon aeration basin with pH adjustment. Also, piping that contains hazardous waste remains on-site, although it has not contributed to groundwater contamination, remains intact. Also, drums were discovered on the northeast side of the Site that were remove and additional soil was removed although additional contamination remained at a depth of approximately five feet and the excavation was backfilled with sand: Initial Response In September 1981, seepage lagoon sludges were excavated and transferred to railroad cars. The total removed soil filled approximately seven railroad cars. These sludges were disposed of at Chem-Met Services, Inc., in Wyandotte, Michigan. A Preliminary Assessment (PA) for the Site was completed by EPA in 1983. The PA documented potential groundwater contamination from the solvent-contaminated seepage lagoon. Soils beneath this pond were also found to be contaminated. A potential for drinking water contamination and endangerment of flora and fauna in nearby potential wetlands was indicated in the PA. In September 1986, MDEQ Law Enforcement Division personnel responded to a complaint of alleged illegal disposal of hazardous wastes at the facility. Reportedly, OCI personnel were disposing of sludges and other residues generated from the solvent recovery operations by placing these materials into drums and rolloff containers along with their normal nonhazardous solid waste materials. Analyses taken from solid waste storage units (rolloffs and 55 gallon drums) located at the Site revealed the presence of various

contaminants including methylene chloride, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes and arochlor 1242 polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Analyses of soil samples taken from the vicinity of the solid waste storage units revealed the presence of methylene chloride, toluene, xylenes, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloroethene, tetrachloroethene, chloroform, 1,1-dichloroethene, 1,2-dichloroethene, and Aroclor 1242 (PCBs). As a result of this investigation, OCI was cited by EPA on December 3, 1986, to be in violation of RCRA. Among the violations cited were: (1) the unreported generation of hazardous waste from a drum cutting operation; (2) the routine transport of hazardous waste from the Site by unauthorized agents; (3) failure to prepare hazardous waste manifests, and (4) shipment of hazardous waste to unauthorized facilities. Based on these findings, EPA levied fines of $22,500 on OCI. i During August/September 1987, OCI conducted a voluntary investigation in cooperation with MDEQ. Approximately 150 buried drums were discovered and removed from the southwest corner of the OCI warehouse building. Some of these drums contained sludge and liquid residues. Groundwater samples taken at that time from Prein & Newhof's monitoring well, B-11, indicated the presence of 1,1-dichloroethene, 1,1-dichloroethane, cis-l,2-dichloroethene, dibromochJoromethane, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes. Monitoring well B-ll; was located south and slightly west of the warehouse building. The drum burial area was excavated down to approximately 17 feet below grade. Soil samples from the bottom of the excavation indicated methylene chloride (13 ug/kg) and tetrachloroethene (2.7 ug/kg) contamination. OCI stopped operations in May 1991, because of financial problems and the inability to obtain a RCRA Part B permit. OCI performed RCRA closure of the equipment and tanks in 1992, however, a complete RCRA closure of the entire facility was not performed. Basis for Taking Action Contaminants The primary contaminants at the Site are associated with the past operation of the seepage pit by OCI, chemical spills at the Site and past oil related activities. These areas are: the former seepage lagoon, the former lacquer thinner spill Site and petroleum sludge lagoons (Figure 2). These contaminants include elevated levels of chlorinated solvents and benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene (BETX) compounds. Lower concentrations of other volatile and semivolatile organic compounds were also detected. The nature and extent of contamination is presented in the FFS and Phase II RI report and summarized in the following sections. Hazardous substances that have been released at the Site and have performance standards in each media include: Soil Groundwater Benzo(a)anthracene Vinyl Chloride Benzo(a)pyrene 1,2-Dichloroethane Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Bis(2-ethylhexy)phthalate Benzene Beryllium Toluene Lead Ethylenebenzene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene Xylene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Arsenic Dieldrin Barium 2,3,7,8-TCDD(TEF) Total Chromium PCB(Arochlor-1248) Copper Lead Mercury Exposure to soil and groundwater were associated with significant human health risks due to exceedances of EPA's risk management criteria for the reasonable maximum exposure scenarios. The carcinogenic risks were highest for exposure to contaminated groundwater from a possible future ingestion pathway. Soil contaminants posed the greatest

carcinogenic risk to human health through dermal contact and ingestion by future workers, primarily from Arochlor 1248, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and dioxin/furans. Non-carcinogenic risks for future workers was from lead. IV. REMEDIAL ACTIONS Remedy Selection U.S. EPA had organized this project into two operable units (OU). The first OU, OU1, action was an interim action to address contamination in the upper ground-water system (UGS) by stopping the contaminant plume migration. The final OU, OU2, was to remediate the ground water to comply with MCLs, and the soil contamination to be protective in an industrial setting. The OU2 ROD also allowed for an Alternate Point of Compliance (APC). The APC was granted on June 9, 2004, and included the OCI property and the adjacent property to the west, Htrans Holdings. The soil, which was the principal threat at the Site was to be addressed by excavation of approximately 6,000 cubic yards of the contaminated soil and on-site treatment by solidification/stabilization. After addition pre-design sampling, the volume of contaminated soils was now approximately 2,500 cubic yards and the remedy was modified to allow for excavation and off-site disposal. An ESD was issued to account for this modification. The OU1 ROD was signed for the Site on September 30, 1991. The Remedial Action Objectives (RAOs) were developed as a result of data colleted during the Phase I RI/ Focused Feasability Study. This included a single remedial activity to contain and remediate the contaminated groundwater. The selected remedy had the following specific components:

For contaminated groundwater associated with the Site: Construction and operation of a groundwater pump and treat system to contain the contaminant plume. The treated water to be discharged into Roy's Creek was to be in compliance with the substantive requirements of a NPDES permit.

The OU2 ROD was signed for the Site on February 5,1997. The RAO's for the Site, were developed form the Phase I and II RI. The OU2 ROD addressed the contaminated groundwater by treating it to meet MCLs or granting an APC if certain conditions were met. The OU2 ROD also addressed the contaminated soils by excavation and solidification/stabilization. An ESD was signed on September 29, 2003. This ESD documented the temporary shutdown of the groundwater extraction and treatment system to evaluate the need for continued operation of the system. During this shutdown, a study was conducted to evaluate the potential of an APC for the groundwater, as allowed by the ROD. The APC allows the system to be discontinued indefinitely as long as groundwater monitoring demonstrates compliance with the AP, C and other requirements within the ROD. The second modification addresses groundwater performance standards, MCLs, and a provision in the Consent Decree's Statement of Work (SOW). The last modification noted in the BSD was the off-site disposal of the material versus the originally planned on-site treatment and disposal of the hazardous material. Quarterly groundwater sampling started in the summer of 1995 and continued through October 2000 and began again in October 2001 through July 2003. Cleanup goals for the groundwater are MCLs for Contaminants of Concern identified in the Phase II RI/FS throughout the contaminant plume although granting of the APC changed it from throughout the contaminant plume to the OCI property and the adjacent property to the west, Htrans Holdings:

Groundwater Contaminant Cleanup Goal (ppb) Arsenic 50 Barium 2,000 Total Chromium 100 Copper 1,300 Lead 15 Mercury 2 1,2-Dichloroethane 5 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 Vinyl Chloride 2 Benzene 5 Toluene 1,000 Ethylbenzene 700 Xylene 10,000

The selected remedy for the OU2 ROD addressed the principal threat at the Site by excavation and off-site disposal of the contaminated soils. The following table lists the soil contaminant and the cleanup goal for that contaminant.

Soil Contaminant Cleanup Goal (ppb) Benzo(a)anthracene 3,153 Benzo(a)pyrene 2,967 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 3,519 Bis(2-ethylhexy) phthalate 14,488 Beryllium 420 Lead 900,000 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2,350 Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 2,595 Dieldrin 20 2,3,7,8-TCDD(TEF) .085 PCB (Arochlor-1248) 7,739

Restrictive Covenants will be placed on the Site. Restrictive Covenants for the groundwater can be found in Appendix H of the APC Demonstration Report. A Restrictive Covenant for the soils will be filed with the Kent County, Register of Deeds in the near future. The soils Restrictive Covenant has the following major restrictions:

1) A prohibition on all site uses that are not compatible with the industrial site uses;

2) A prohibition on demolition, excavation or the conduct of other intrusive

activities that could affect the integrity of existing building foundations and concrete slabs unless provisions are made to replace these features with an engineered barrier of equal or greater competence;

3) A prohibition on the use of groundwater for any purpose other than approved

environmental sampling and remediation activities; 4) A prohibition that any buildings constructed at the site have the provisions

to prevent the migration of volatile chemical into indoor air; 5) A prohibition on the off-site transport of soils at the site without first

testing those soils for hazardous characteristics and then managing those soils in accordance with all federal and state environmental regulations; and

6) A prohibition on subdividing the site into more than one unit to limit the possibility that workers would have repeated exposures to soils in a particular sub area of the site.

Remedy Implementation The dates that the pump and treat system remedial design was started and completed was January 2, 1992 - February 9, 1994. The groundwater system operated from May 1995 until July 1997. At MDEQ's request, the system was shut down at that time when the effluent from the treatment plant, discharging to Roys Creek, failed an aquatic toxicity test. It was never restarted because the remedy in the OU2 ROD allowed for an APC, which allows the PRPs to turn off the extraction and treatment system if certain conditions are met, while maintaining the system for future use if necessary. The State of Michigan's, Part 201, Environmental Remediation, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended (Part 201), which is an ARAR for the Site, requires a demonstration that the contaminant plume is being reduced by a naturally occurring process and that the contaminants will not exceed the groundwater performance standards at the approved APC. The work plan for this demonstration was approved on December 15, 2000. Monitoring of the well network began in September 2001 and was recently completed in June 2003. The APC Demonstration Report was submitted on September 12, 2003, and was approved on June 9, 2004. Attachment 5 shows the monitoring wells sampled in the APC Demonstration. Attachment 6, shows the results of the 8 rounds of sampling for the organic and inorganic compounds in the APC Demonstration. The only contaminant that exceeds the MCL performance standard at the APC is benzene. The reason that the SOW did not include benzene, if all the other performance standards were met, was because the oil plume that covers much of the 20 acre property contains benzene. Given that there are 12 other contaminants that have MCLs as a performance standard (7 of which are volatiles and three are toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene (TEX) from the BTEX oil designation that includes benzene) and all twelve would have to be below their respective performance standards to achieve compliance, it was considered appropriate to exclude benzene as a contaminant of concern because the oil contamination is not subject to action under CERCLA. The reason that the TEX chemicals were included as a contaminant of concern was that OCI was a solvent recycler and used the TEX chemicals extensively. In addition, the MCL for benzene is at a much lower concentration than the MCLs for the TEX chemicals. The dates for the soil remedial design start and completion are February 16, 2001 - September 26, 2001. The ROD estimated that approximately 6,000 cubic yards of soils would exceed the cleanup levels and need to undergo solidification/stabilization prior to on-site disposal. The ROD also allowed for a small part of this volume to be taken off- site for disposal as solid waste if necessary. During the remedial design, the volume of soils which needed to be removed from the site to meet the established cleanup levels was determined to be approximately 2,500 cubic yards. In addition, sampling and excavation of soils at the site revealed that a significant volume of soils may either contain higher levels of contamination or contain enough waste material that solidification/ stabilization would be difficult or impossible to implement. Since the volume and nature of wastes can change the cost-effectiveness of various disposal options, the PRPs compared the costs of off-site disposal of all soils to the costs of solidification/ stabilization and on-site disposal and identified significant savings for off-site disposal. Therefore the waste was sent offsite. Also, drums that were disposed of on the Site were remediated along with contaminated soil were removed from the Site. The soil RA was started in September 2001 and was completed in September 2003. A Unilateral Administrative Order was issued on January 2, 1992 to the Abitibi PRP Group for design/construct and operation and maintenance of the pump and treat system. Two consent decrees have been entered with regard to this Site. The first was entered on February 7, 2003, with the Abitibi PRP Group (U.S. vs. Abitibi Price Corporation, et al.) and is for the development and implementation of the APC study. The second consent decree was entered on February 1, 2001, with Total Petroleum Inc., and was for the design and implementation of the soil remediation.

No CERCLA removal actions or non-CERCLA removal actions have been performed since the signature of either ROD, although the Abitibi Price PRP Group has offered to remove contaminated sludge and water from the existing pretreatment tank if MDEQ agrees to execute an Administrative Consent Decree that would settle any and all potential liability of the Group under Part 201. System Operations/Operation and Maintenance (O&M) The groundwater system operated from May 1995 until July 1997. Although the APC has been approved, if the contaminant concentration in the groundwater exceeds performance standards at or beyond the APC (unless the exceedance is benzene alone), the PRP's will be required to submit a written cause for the exceedance and submit a plan that proposes additional actions to establish compliance. If the plan is to restart the groundwater treatment plant, the PRP's will be directed to repair the broken pipe that leads from the extraction well to the treatment system (broken by the other PRP that performed the soil remediation) and upgrade the system. The capital cost of constructing the pump and treat system was $398,000. The projected cost of operating the treatment plant without being upgraded is $ 280,000 annually. Ground water monitoring during the operation of the treatment system or with the approved APC is $127,000 annually. Attachment 5 shows the monitoring wells involved in the APC. The soil remediation requires no O&M other than maintenance of the existing concrete slabs. Contamination is present under some of these slabs which is addressed by institutional controls if they are removed as a result of future development. If additional work is required at the Site, including but not limited to replacement or maintenance of the slabs, it will be handled through the Modification Clause in the TPI Petroleum Inc., Consent Decree or by a new Site owner as appropriate. V. PROGRESS SINCE THE LAST FIVE-YEAR REVIEW

Table 2: Actions Taken Since the Last Five-Year Review

Recommendations From Previous Review Party Responsible Action Taken

Grant APC & Obtain Institutional Controls for Groundwater

EPA PRP Complete June 9, 2004

Continue Monitoring APC PRP Ongoing

Complete Soil Remediation In Accordance With OU2 ROD PRP Complete

Obtain Institutional Controls for Soil PRP Ongoing

The first five-year review recommended granting the APC, obtaining enforceable land use restrictions, continued groundwater monitoring, and remediation of the contaminated soil. Groundwater monitoring has consistently occurred over the last two years as part of the APC Demonstration which concluded that natural attenuation is occurring. VI. FIVE-YEAR REVIEW PROCESS Administrative Components Members of the MDEQ were notified of the initiation of the five- year review in December 2003. The OECI Five-Year Review team was led by Tom Williams of EPA, RPM for the OCI Site, and included the MDEQ Project Manager, and Geologist. From December 4, 2003 to January 15, 2004, the RPM established the review schedule. Its components included:

? Community Notification; ? Document Review; ? Site Inspections; ? Five-Year Review Report Development and Review.

Community Involvement Activities to involve the community in the five-year review process were initiated in October 2003 with a notification to the Community Involvement Coordinator (CIC) for the OCI Superfund Site. A notice was published on January 30, 2004 in the local newspaper, the Grand Rapids Press, that a five-year review was to be conducted. Since the notice and press release were issued, no member of the community voiced any interest or opinion concerning the five-year review process. Document Review This five-year review consisted of a review of relevant site documents including, but not limited to, the APC Demonstration Report, and the Soil Remedial Action Report. Site Inspections Site inspections were conducted on September 18, 2003 and January 16, 2004. The purpose of the first inspection was to determine if the Site met the requirements to issue a PCOR, which included the pre-final inspection for the soil remediation. The second inspection, on January 16, 2004, was the final inspection for the soil remediation. Interviews Interviews with individuals beyond the five-year review project team were not conducted. VII. TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents? The review of documents, applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs), risk assumptions, and the results of the Site inspections indicates that the remedy is functioning as intended by the OU2 ROD, as modified by the ESD. The removal of soils eliminated the principal threat at the Site. The other remaining component of the cleanup is the APC for groundwater. Continued groundwater monitoring of the Site to see that the requirements of the APC are complied with will ensure that the remedy is protective for groundwater. If the contaminant concentration in the groundwater exceeds performance standards at or beyond the APC (unless the exceedance is benzene alone), the PRP's will be required to submit a written cause for the exceedance and submit a plan that proposes additional actions to establish compliance. If the plan is to restart the groundwater treatment plant, the PRP's will be directed to repair and upgrade the system. Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action objectives (RAOs) used at the time of the remedy selection still valid? There have been no changes in the physical conditions of the OCI Site that would affect the protectiveness of the remedy. Changes in Standards and To be Considers As the remedial work has been completed, the risk based cleanup for soil in the OU2 ROD have been met. ARARs that still must be met at this time and that have been evaluated include: The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)(40 CFR 141.11-141.16). A list of ARARs is

included in Attachment 3. There have been no changes in these ARARs and no new standards or to be considers (TBCs) affecting the protectiveness of the remedy. Changes in Exposure Pathways, Toxicity, and Other Contaminant Characteristics The exposure assumptions used to develop the Human Health Risk Assessment included exposure to contaminated groundwater for future residents through ingestion, dermal contact, and dermal contact pathways, and exposure to contaminated soils from a possible future worker through surface and subsurface soil contaminants (0-10 feet below groundwater surface) through incidental ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact pathways. There have been no changes in the toxicity factors for the contaminants of concern that were used in the baseline risk assessment. These assumptions are considered to be conservative and reasonable in evaluating risk and developing risk-based cleanup levels. A change in assumptions due to VOCs at the Site requires a restriction against building construction, without regulatory approval, in areas where subsurface VOC contamination is present at concentrations that may pose an indoor air inhalation risk. No other change to these assumptions, or the cleanup levels developed from them is warranted. There has been no change to the standardized risk assessment methodology that could affect the protectiveness of the remedy. The remedy is progressing as expected. Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question the protectiveness of the remedy? No other events have affected the protectiveness of the remedy and there is no other information that calls into question the short-term protectiveness of the remedy. Technical Assessment Summary

According to the data reviewed and the Site inspections, the remedy is functioning as intended by the OU2 ROD, as modified by the ESD. There have been no changes in the physical conditions of the Site that would affect the protectiveness of the remedy. No ARARs for soil were cited in the ROD because the remediation was risk based. There have been no changes in the toxicity factors for the contaminants of concern that were used in the baseline risk assessment, and there have been no changes to the standardized risk assessment methodology that could affect the protectiveness of the remedy. On going monitoring of the APC will ensure that the groundwater remains protective to human health and the environment.

VIII. ISSUES

Table - Issues

Issue Currently Affects Protectiveness

(Y/N)

Affects Future Protectiveness

(Y/N)

Work with MDEQ to see if additional COCs are required for the APC

N Y

Work with MDEQ to see that the Site is redeveloped N N

IX. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS

Table 4 - Recommendations and Follow- Up Actions

Affects Protectiveness?

(Y/N) Issue Recommendations/ Follow-up Actions

Party Responsible

Oversight Agency

Milestone Date

Current Future Work with MDEQ to see if additional COCs are required for the APC

Work with MDEQ on this issue. MDEQ/EPA EPA ASAP N Y

Work with MDEQ to see that the Site is redeveloped.

Work with potential developers to redevelop the Site.

EPA/MDEQ/ PRP MDEQ/EPA ASAP N N

X. Protectiveness Statement The remedy is protective of human health and the environment in the short-term and measures are being put in place to ensure protectiveness in the long-term. There are no current exposure pathways and the remedy appears to be functioning as designed. The removal of soils, to eliminate the source of contamination has achieved the remedial objectives to minimize the migration of contaminants to groundwater and surface water and prevent direct contact with, or ingestion of, contaminants in soils which were remediated. Contamination that remains under concrete slabs will be dealt with through institutional controls. The other remaining component of the cleanup is groundwater containment and restoration by a pump and treat system or by allowing an APC which was granted on June 9, 2004. Continued groundwater monitoring of the Site to see that the requirements of the APC are complied with will ensure that the remedy is protective for groundwater. If the contaminant concentration in the groundwater exceeds performance standards at or beyond the APC (unless the exceedance is benzene alone), the PRP's will be required to submit a written cause for the exceedance and submit a plan that proposes additional actions to establish compliance. If the plan is to restart the groundwater treatment plant, the PRP's will be directed to repair and upgrade the system. If additional work is required at the Site, including but not limited to replacement or maintenance of the slabs, it will be handled through the Modification Clause in the TPI Petroleum Inc., Consent Decree or by a new Site owner as appropriate. XI. Next Review The next five-year review for the OCI Site is required by September 2009, five years from the date of this review.

ATTACHMENTS

00

s^rR

Sr^

il»_l

i i.

L|

n fl

i D

C

<%

•*-—

{_•]

Q

'^-

-

CO

RPO

RAT

ION

O

F (S

MER

IC4

ATTACHMENT 3

List of Documents Reviewed OCI Superfund Site Record of Decision, September 30, 1991 OCI Superfund Site Record of Decision, February 5, 1997 OCI Superfund Site First Five- Year Review, September 15, 1999 OCI Superfund Site Explanation of Significant Differences, September 29, 2003 OCI Superfund Site Preliminary Close-Out Report, September 29, 2003 OCI Superfund Site APC Demonstration Report and Addendum, September 2003 and January 14, 2004 respectively OCI Superfund Site Soil Remedial Action Completion Report, Draft March 15, 2004

ATTACHMENT 4

ARARs Safe Drinking Water Act Michigan's, Part 201, Environmental Remediation, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended Clean Water Act R323.3102-.2189 of the Michigan Water Resources Commission Act, Public Act 245 of 1929, as amended

ATTACHMENT 5

ATTACHMENT 6

TABLE 4.1 Page! of 12

SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

APC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITE

GRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN

~ " ~1

-

OCJ Performance StandardLocation \ Date

BackgroundMW-17MW-17MW-17MW-17MW-17MW-17MW-17MW-17

MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23

Source AreaMW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1

9/21/0112/T9/OP3/18/026/24/029/30/0212/16/023/31/036/18/03

1 — —

cNC

«Hg/i-

5

<1.0

Car

bon

Dis

iilf

ide

Chl

orob

enze

ne

fJi^/L M?/L

Chl

oroc

lhan

e

W/L

-

1

Chl

orof

ortn

Hg/L

-

1, 1

-Dic

hlor

oeth

ane

Wf/1-

Ifl-

Dic

hlor

oeth

ene

Mi'/f-

|

<50 <1.0 ! <1 0 <1.0 <1.0<1.0 <50<1.0<1.0<1.0

; <1.0(<1.0)

<501.6

<1.0<50 <1.0<50 i <1.0

<50(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)

<1.0 <1-0 <1.0<1.0 , <1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<5.0j. <1.0 | <50 <1.0 ; <1.0

9/24/01 112/17/013/19/026/25/029/30/0212/17/023/31/036/18/03

9/25/019/25/0112/20/013/20/023/20/026/26/026/26/0210/1/0212/18/02

MW-1 ' 12/18/02

—

_

D

D

D

DMW-1 4/1/03MW-1 6/19/03MW-1 t 6/19/03 ID

<1.0 (<1.0)n

<1.0: •i- i;'6. ^rS>

<1.0<1 0

<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<50(<1.0) kl.O ( < 1 . 0 ) j <1.0 (<5.0) <1.0(<1.0)1 '

<so : <i .o <i .o : <i.o<50 : 1.5 <1.0 <1.0<50<50

<1.0 ! <50<1.0(< 1.0)

<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)

.s^aoocflglvJg3&33bo§8fi|j;|j<ijjj$QQ;!j$sSAiSSlSQBBKfr

iMi&cSJIJSQC

Kww

;-2^22o(@i8;' SOO^SZOOS3600(3700),:i.,3400j«:*.-=i1200 (1400),;-1500:(1200)V

<50 (<1.0)<50

<50(<1.0)

<20000

<!:!!<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)

600<20000 | 660

<1.0 <1.0

<1.0•cl.O<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)

1,2-

Dic

hlor

oeth

ane

cis-

1,2-

Dic

hlor

oeth

ene

Hg/L fig/I.

5

<1.0 <1.0•cl.O <1.0<1.0 <1.0<1.0 : <1.0

<1.0<1.0 (<1 .0)

<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0 ' <1.0 <1-0<1.0 | <1.0 <1.0<1.0

<1.0 <1.0 <1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<5.0)<1.0

<1.0 (<5.0)

<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0

<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0 <1.0

<1.0 (<1.0) (<1.0 (<1.0)| <1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)

<400 <400 i <400 1400 <400<400 <400 <400

<10000 ; 510 , <200<2500 210 ! <50

<200 <200<50 <50

1500 <400730 <200 _,66

<2500 210 <50 <50 <50 140< 13000 390<13000 380

<250 <250 <250 ; 720

<50<50

<250<250 ; <250 <250 740 i <250

tran

s-1,

2-D

ichl

oroe

then

e

M,?/L

1,2-

Dic

hlor

opro

panc

liS/L

l

<1.0 <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)

2.2<1.01.7

<i .O<1.0

1.6(1.6)2.2

1.2(1.7)

48000510003400034007300

3600036000

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)

< .0< .0< .0< .0< .0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1 .0 (<1 .0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)

<400 2200<400<200<50<50<250<250

<25000 <500 | <500 \ <500 ' <500 ; 880 <500 50000 <500

24009308217010001000

<500<25000(42) ' 660(620) ,<500(<5.0) ' <500(10) <500'5i> 820(1200) oOO (<1.0), 52000 (58000) <500 (210) l 2000 (2100)<25000(7.0) 740(730)

<25000 710<500(<5.0l ' -.5'. '0il2) ! <500i.54> 1100 (1500; oOO (<1.0) olOOu (79000 -.:5i)0 (190] i 2300(2400) :

<500 <500 <5CO 1500 - 5 0 0 S6000 <500 2500 ;

<10000(1.4) 380(380) <200 (<5.0) <200 (6.3) 740(23) <200 (800;<25000(1.7) <500(330)!<500(<5.0);<500«1.0) <500 (23) 860(690)

.<200(24k<500:(23)a

40000 (40000; ' <200 7SU) , 850 (960)40000(38000) <500(190) 1000(830)

TABLE 4.1

SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8

ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN

Page 2 of 12

TABLE 4.1



Page 3 of 12

TABLE 4.1 Page 4 of 12



OCl Performance StandardLocation j Date

Source Area^cont.)MW-2MW-2MW-2MW-2MW-2MW-2MW-2MW-2

MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22

D-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-l

Eth

ylbe

nzen

e

Met

hyle

ne C

hlor

ide

H$/L iig/L

Sty

renc

Tft

rach

loro

ethe

ne

11

W/L \ iiS/L i n$/L!

700 ! - - i - 20001 ' i !

9/26/0112/18/013/20/026/25/02lu/1/0212/18/024/1/036/19/03

9/26/0112/18/013/20/023/20/026/25/0210/1/0212/17/024/2/036/19/03

1.1<1.0<1.0

<5.0 : <1.0<5.0<5.0

<1.0 1.5<1.0 i <1.0 i <1.0<1.0 I <1.0 , <1.0

<1.0 ! <5.0 i <1 0 1 <1.0<1.0 <5.0 j <1.0 | <1.0

<1.0(<1.0): <5.0(<5.0)<1.0 i <5.0

! 6.7(6.6)

D

9/25/0112/17/013/20/026/26/0210/1/0212/18/024/1/036/19/036/19/03

<2.0<1.0<1.0

<5.0 (<5.0)

<1.0(<1.0)i <1.0(<1.0)<1.0 <1.0

<1.0(<1 .0) j <1.0(<1.0)1

<1.0<1.0

1,1,

1 -T

rich

loro

e tha

ne

MS/Z-

200

1,1,

2-T

rich

loro

etha

ne

M.?/L

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)<1.0 | <1.0

1.5(1.2)

<10 <2.0 ; <2.0<5.0 <1.0<5.0 i <1.0

<1.0 1 <5.0 i <1.0<1.0 <5.0 <1.0<1.0 <5.0

<1.0(<1.0) <5.0(<5.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0<1.0(<1.0)

<5.0 | <1.0<5.0 (<5.0)

<5.0<5.0<5.0<5.0

<1.0 <5.0<1.0(<1.0)l <5.0(<5.0)

<1.0 i <5.0

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.05.2

6.3<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

<2.0<1.0

<1.0 | <1.0

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

<2.0<1.0<1.0

Tri

chlo

roet

hene

MX/L

5

1.0<1.0<1.0 '<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

m^Hi<1.0<1.0

<1.0 <1.0 i <1.0 <1.0<1.0 <1.0<1.0

3.1(2.6) <1.0(<1.0j1.2

<1.0(<1.0)j <1.0(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0 _,<1.0

<i .o t<i .o)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<i.o ; <i.o

<1.0

<1.0<1.0(<1.0)

<1.0

<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

7.5(<1.0) |<1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

1.5(1.3) <5.0(<5.0) <1.0(<1.0) i <1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)D 1.4 i <5.0 ' <1.0 1 <1.0 i <1.0

<1.0 ; <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.01.6

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

3.3(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.02.6

<1.0<1.0(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0(<1.0;

<1.0

Vin

yl C

hlor

ide

MS/L

"«

2tu

1"Si'V-S/L

2 | 10000

1.2<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

<1.0(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<3.0<3.0<3.0 ,<3.0<3.0

, <3.0 1r" <3.0

16

<6.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0

^^3_0_<3'.0

<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0

TABLE 4.1



Page 5 of 12

TABLE 4.1 P a g e 6 o f l 2




OC1 Performance StandardLocation \ Date

Source Area^cont.JD-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2

SentrvMW-4MW^lMW-4MW-4MW^lMW-4MW-4MW^


9/26/0112/18/013/20/02t,.'?5/026/25/0210/1/0212/17/0212/17/024/2/036/19/03

9/24/0112/20/013/19/026/25/029/30/0212/17/024/1/036/18/03

10/5/0110/5/0112/18/013/19/026/24/029/30/0212/17/024/1/03

MW-43 6/ IS/03

D

D

—

.

Eth

ylbc

nzen

e

Met

hyle

ne C

hlor

ide

Hg/L ng/L

^

Tet

rach

loro

ethc

ne

lig/L . tigfLI

700

1.0 <5.0

-

Tol

uene

1,1,

1-T

rich

loro

ctha

ne

lig/L ngfL

\ 1000j

<1.0 <1.0 1.0<1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<2.0

<5.0 <1.0<5.0 ; <1.0<5.0 i <1.0<10

1.9(2.0) <5.0(<5.0)<2.0

<1.0 (<1.0)1.6 _j <5.0 i <1.0

<1.0<1.0(<1.0)

<5.0 i <1.0<5.0 (<5.0) <1.0(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<2.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<2.0

<1 0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0 <1.0[ <1.0(<1.0) 4.1 (<1.0)

!L<1.0 <5.0 i <1.08.0 | <5.0 ! <1.05.677

<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0<1.0(<1.0)

1

L>$/jjJL7Q()MlHfe200?%

260gj|I200|j|t

<5.0 <1.0<5.0<5.0

<1.0<1.0

<5.0(<5.0) <1.0(<1.0)<5.0 j <1.0

<5.0(<5.0) i <1.0(<1.0)

<130 <25

<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0<1.0

200

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<2.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0

2.3 <1.0<1.0 <1.0 <1.0

<i .o(<i .o) < i .o (< i .o ) <i .b(<i .o)<1.0 i <1.0 i <1.0

<1.0(<1.0) i <1.0(<1.0)

<25 1 390<130 <25 <25 | 300<25 <5.0 1 <5.0 ! 820

<250 i <50 h <50 [$3ftPXX>fcU.i>.130 i <so <io i <io KgsS.l5oa.aM!*i

1,1,

2-T

ricM

oroe

than

e

Hg/L

-

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<2.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)| <1.0(<1.0)

<25<2518

<5015

150 <5.0 <1.0 <1.0 110 22<1. 0(460)

80 1<5.0(<5.0) <1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0) 9.6(10) 7.2(6.8)

0.0 <1.0 i <1.0 3.3 3.7

<25<25<5.0<50<10<1.0

<1.0 «1.0)<1.0

Tri

chlo

roet

hene

tigfL

5

bj^tiMg&dHfii&iIMPHKE-^i^Sl

<1.0<1.0<1.0

mmwm<1.01.5

1.9(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

<25<25<5.0<50<10<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

40(48) <5.0(<5.0) <1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0) 2 .2(2.1) 2.9(3.1) <1.0(<1.0) | <1.0(<1.0)

Vin

yl C

hlor

ide

VS/L

2

d(|$SJi76<&33i$IMHlQ&ifKl!

<1.0<1.0<1.0

pSjjfejfmty 'Jtf) 'MiifiLJ

a»af»;?jMll1.5(1.4)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0) I<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

<25<25<5.0<50<10<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

"a

Xjig/L

10000

<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<6.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0

<3.013

<3.0170

<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0

76005400730

3600440440<3.0170

<1.0(<1.0) 34 !

TABLE 4.1



P a g e 7 o f l 2

CRA 4151 (2^)





OCl Performance StandardLocation

Sentry (cant.)MW-44MW-44

Date \

10/5/0112/18/01

MW-44 3/19/02MW^4MW^4MW^14MW-44MW-44

D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3

6/25/029/30/0212/17/02 i4/1/03 i6/18/03 ;

9/26/0112/17/0112/17/013/19/026/26/0210/1/02

D-3 12/17/02D-3 i 4/2/03D-3 I 6/19/03

i

D-4 9/24/01D-4 ^D-4D-4D-4D-4D-4D-4

12/18/013/19/026/25/029/30/0212/17/024/1/036/18/03

L>

tn£

^'UJ

W/Z-

Met

hyle

ne C

hlor

ide

MS/Z-

700 !

iiioooMmum;M14QQ»

1

<J-j

W/Z-

-

Tet

rnch

loro

ethe

nc

cs/Z-

\\

<130 ! <25<50 <10

<130

§(9*30 <5074 (85)

2001JOO {1200;

430

<5.0(<5.0)<50

^ <25

<25<10<25

<10 : <10

<10 <10<1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)

<10<50(<5.0) ! <10(<1.0)

<25 <5.0j§S31310J$ :| <25

1 620mmm

410450

EgyCL^Oli680

jrsa<820).;i

, <1.04.41.5

<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

2.4(<1.0)

<25<5.0<50

<50 <10<25<50

<5.0 (<250)<25

<50(<5.0)

<5.0<5.0<5.0<5.0<5.0

<5.0 (<5.0)<5.0

<5.0(<5.0)

<5.0<10

<1.0(<50)<5.0

<10(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<10<10(<1.0)

<5.0<5.0<5.0<10<5.0<10

Tol

uene

V-X/L

1000

2804102308869

20(22)<10

$fll'00-(1200)*?

<5.0<5.0<5.0<10<5.0

1,1,

1-T

rich

loro

c th

ane

CS/Z-

200

<25<10<25<10<10

<1.0(<1.0)<10

<10(<1.0)

<5.0<5.0<5.0<10<5.0

<io : <io<1.0(<50) • 1.5 (<50)

<5.0<10(<1.0j

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)l <1.0(<1.0)

5.1<1.0(<50)

<5.0<10(3.5) <10(<1.0)

i

1,1,

2-Jr

ichl

oroe

than

e

w?/z.

-

<25<10<25<10<10

<1.0(<1.0)<10

<10 (<1.0)

<5.0<5.0<5.0<10<5.0<10

<1.0(<50)<5.0

<10(<1.0)

<1.0 _[ <1.0 ' <1.015 <1.0

<1.0 | <1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0<1.0

<i.o ! <i.o<1.0 1 <1.0

<1.0(<1.0)|<1.0(<1.0)<1.0 ! <1.0

1.3(<1.0) |<1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)

Tri

chlo

roet

heit

e

WT/Z.

5

<25<10<25<10<10

<1.0(<1.0)<10

<10(2.1)

<5.0<5.0<5.0<10<5.0<10

<1.0(<50)<5.0

<10(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

Vin

yl C

hlor

ide

MS/E-

2

<25<10<25<10<10

<1.0(<1.0)<10m&>mm<5.0<5.0<5.0<10<5.0<10

<1.0(<50)<5.0

g»fKHJ'(3;7)p?

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

a

i1j

5"»>xHS/L

10000

30002600420023002300<3.021003400

9802200]1800260012001600<3.018002100

5954174243

<3.0<3.06.3

TABLE 4.1


ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITEGRANDV1LLE, MJCHJGAN

Page 9 of 12




OCI Performance StandardLocation

Sentry (confj

D-6D-6D-6D-6D-6

Date

9/27/0112/19/013/19/02t, '25/0210/1/02

D-6 | 12/17/02D-6 4/2/03D-6 j 6/19/03

BoundaryMW-45MW-45MW-45MW^ISMW-45MW-45MW-45MW-45

MW-46MW-46MW-46MW-46MW-46MW^16MW-46MW-46MW-46

10/4/0112/19/013/19/026/24/029/30/0212/16/024/1/036/18/03

10/4/0112/19/013/18/026/24/029/30/029/30/0212/16/024/1/036/18/03

Eth

ylbe

iize

ne

f-g/L

700

2228 _j4317

tw

~Ec

-CUc

*>,j:5-s

<5.0<5.0<5.0<5.0

fi'/I-

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

24 <5.0 : <1.0

"

v-lft-

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

Tol

uene

HgfL

WOO

1.91.61.1

1,1,

1-T

Hch

loro

e th

ane

P-g/L

200

<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 <1.01.0 <1.0

33(38) ;<5.0(<5.0) <1.0(<1.0)l <1.0(<1.0) 1.4(1.3) <1.0C<1.0)1 12 ,

10(28)

U

<1.06.0

[' 1.41.9

<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0<1.0 (<1 0)

<5.0 ! <1.0<5.0(<5.0)| <1.0(<1.0)

,

<5.0

<1.0 i 13 ; <1.0<1.0(<1.0) <1.0(1.3) <1.0(<1.0)

8.1 <1.0 <1.0 ] 2.5<5.0 <1.0 <1.0<5.0<5.0

<5.0 (<5.0)<5.0

<5.0(<5.0)

6.8 <5.0

<1.0 <1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.04.3 <5.0 <1.0

<1.0 ! <5.0 ; <1.0<1.0 <5.0 <1.0<1.0 ; <5.0 <1.0<1.0 i <5.0 : <1.0

<1.0 (<1.0jj <5.0 (<5.0) i <1.0 (<1.0j<1.0 ; <5.0

<1.0 (<1.0)! <5.0 (<5.0)

<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0 <1.0

<1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1 .0 (<1 .0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1 .0 (<1 .0)<1.0

<1 .0 (<1 .0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

1,1,

2-T

rich

loro

etha

ne

f-gfl-

-

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)

Tri

chlo

roet

hene

M£/L

s

3.74.71.53.31.7

2.7 (2.7)1.6

<1. 0(2.4)

Vin

yl C

hlor

ide

V-g/i-

2

1.3

1.4•• • •s fsISJBwSM'flB^

<1.01.0 (<1.0)

<1.0 T <1.01.1 <1.0

<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

<1 .0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0<1.0(<1.0)

Xyl

ene

(Tot

al)

MX/I-

30000

162357104.4158.2

<3.0

<3.0153.53.3

<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0

248.43.3

<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0<3.0

TABLE 4.1



Page 11 of 12

1.0(<1.0) 3.8(3.8) j <1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0) <1.0(<1.0; |

CRA4151 (2V)

TABLE 4.1



Page 12 of 12

Laboratory analysis conducted by Triiiiatnx Laboratories, Inc.( ) - Laboratory ai\aiysis conducted by the Michigan Department

of Envlroiuiienta] Quality EnvLronnienlal Laboratory'NA - Not AnalyzedJ - The analyte was positively identified, the nunxencal value is the

approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.D - I^boralor)- duplicate.

TABLE 4.2 Pagel of 12

SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS METALSAPC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8

ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITE


1OCl Performance Standard

LocationBackground

MW-17MW-17MW-17

Date

9/21/0112/19/013/18/02

MW-17 6/24/02MW-17MW-17MW-17MW-17


Source AreaMW-1MW-1

9/30/0212/16/02

Alu

min

um,

Tot

al

MgA-

-

<50

Ant

imon

y,

Tot

al

Ars

enic

, T

otal

fig/L jig/L

-

<2.0<50 <2.0

Bar

ium

, T

ota

l

MS/7-

50 2000

1.91.3

<50 : <2.0 1.6<50 i <2.0 1.2110

<50 (<50)3/31/03 ; <506/18/03 :<50(<50)

9/24/0112/17/013/19/026/25/029/30/0212/17/023/31/036/18/03

9/25/019/25/01

MW-1 12/20/01MW-1 3/20/02MW-1 ; 3/20/02MW-1 6/26/02MW-1MW-1MW-1

6/26/02

10/1/02

<50<50<50

<2.0 1.8<2.0 (<1.0)

<2.0<2.0 (<1.0)

<2.0 |<2.0

Cad

miu

m,

Tot

al

V-S/L

50 <0.2487.26153

1.9(<1.0) I 62(55)1.5 73

8.0(<1.0) 77(64)

<1.08.5

<2.0 <1.0<50 <2.0 <1.0

i 90 : <2.0 <1.0

-._.

D

<50 (<50) j <2.0 (<1.0)j <1.0 (<1.0)<50 <2.0 . <1.0

<50 (<50) <2.0 (<1 0) <1.0 (<1.0)

<20<50

~1 <50

D

D

<50<50

<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0

6817

Cal

cium

, Tot

al

mg/L \

62<0.2 1 62<0.2 79<0.2 79<0.2 ; 67

<0.2(<0.2) i 67(65.4)<0.2 ; 88

Chr

omiu

m,

Tot

al

MS/1-

2

1V-&K-

i200

2.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<0.2(<0.2) ! 78(73) j 71 (<1.0)

<0.2 74<0.2 81

60 <0.2 7565 ^0.2 8172

64(65)56

74 (69)

2.52.54.02.83.1

<50 ' <2.0 j 1.7 J<50 : <2.0 1.798 <2.0

12/18/02 ! <50(<50) i<2 .0(<1.0)MW-1 1 12/18/02MW-1 4/1/03 iMW-1 6/19/03MW-1 ; 6/19/03

3.22.6 (<1.0)

D j <50 (<50) ;<2 0 (<1.0) 2.7(<1.0)<50 <2.0 • 3.4

D130 (<50) <2.0(<1.0), 3.3(3.1)130 (<50) <2.0(<1.0) 3.5(3.0)

<0.2 ! 80<0.2 (<0.2) i 74 (73.8)

<0.2 69<0.2(<0.2) 53(78.1)

38 ; <0.2 544188134149

<0.2<0.2

58110

<0.2 194<0.2 , 195

76 ! <0.2 ' 11879 i <0.2 120

5.3<1.0<i.r<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.01.4

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

2300

5.31.2

<1.01.01.3

1.2(1.2)3.4

6.5(1.4)

1.2<1.0<1.01.3

<1.01.0 (<1.0)

2.11.9(1.4)

<1.0<1.01.1

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

60 <0.2 79 ; <1.0 <1.046(44) ; < 0 . 2 ( < 0 . 2 > 59(69.8; ,<1.0 «1 0) 1.2 <••• 1.0)46(39) !<0.2(<0.2V 59(604! < 1 . 0 i c l O ) J 1 2 ( 1 . 1 . )

Iron

(II)

(F

ield

)

mg/L

-

0.02.50.00.00.00.01.52.5

0.00.00.020202.52.50.0

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0505.0

sS

sHg/L

370<100<100<100<100

<100(41)<100

2320 (26)

160J740

<100<100 1<100

<100 (85)<100

<100(31)

110220

<100<100<100<100<100

250120(190)100 (110)

79 '-O 2 300 -- 10 31 5 I 59047(46 j < 0 2 « 0 2 ; 282(248) <I.O«1.0)| 1 .3 (1 .1 )40(41) < 0 2 i < 0 . 2 ) 229 (251 i <1 0 (<1 .0 ) j 1.6(1.2)

or ; v o u ( S 9 0 >0.0 ; o50 (800)

TABLE 4.2



Page 2 of 12

Lea

d, T

otal

Mag

nesi

um,

Tot

al

ligfL j mg/L

Man

gane

se (

II)

(fie

ld)

Man

gane

se,

Tot

al

mg/L fj.g/L

! |OCI Performance Standard \ 15

LocationBackground

MW-17r~ MW-17

MW-17MW-17M "-17MW-17MW-17MW-17

MW-23MW-23MW-23MW-23M'.V-23MW-23MW-23MW-23

Source AreaMW-1MW-1MW-1 1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1MW-1

-Date ! : i

9/21/0112/19/013/18/026/24/029/30/0212/16/023/31/036/18/03

9/24/0112/17/013/19/026/25/029/30/0212/17/023/31/036/18/03

-J

!

<1.0 i 15 0.4<1.0 13 0.214<1.0 17 0.0<1.0 18 0.0<1.0 ! 16 0.0

, i<1.0(<i .0) | 14(14.5)<1.0 20

1.3(<1.0) 19(18.1)

<1.0 18<1.0 . 23<1.0 . 18<1.0 19<1.0 ! 20

<1.0(<1.0): 18(18.1)<1.0 ' 16

<1.0(<1.0) 20(20.2)'

1 19/25/019/25/0112/20/oT3/20/023/20/026/26/026/26/0210/1/0212/18/02 i12/18/02

„

b

ET~

£T

<1.0 22<1.0 25<1.0 ! 63<1.0 ; 95<1.0 ' 90<1.0 i 46<1.0 i 47

0.00.20.0

1

usHg/L

538 14592681621505

613(532)758

784 (580)

0.130.126

0.0i 6.0L o.o

0.00.00.0

133J82137

Pot

assi

um,

Tot

al

mg/L

-

Sele

nium

, T

otal

Hg/L

-

1.95.0 2.25.2 2.12.8 2.03.0

6.7(5.6)8.3

12(7.2)

<104.31.4

858 1.4119 1.3

128(112) 4.4(3.7)110 3.8

21(100) 1.0(5.3)

0.00.0R

0.0

281 : <10300 <10878 ; 6.11510 3.4

0.0 1820 3.70.00.0

<1.0 : 29 00<1.0«1.0): 18(21.3) 0.0<1.0(<1.0) 18(18.3) 0.0

4/1/03 : <1.0 296 006/19/03 <1.0(<1.0) 131(132) 0.06/19/03 ID < 1 . 0 ( < 1 . 0 ) j 114(130) 0.0

805 3.2830 3.2637 : 6.2

393 (454) 7.5 (7.3)

1.92.2(2.1)

2.21.8(1.5)

2.22.21.91.92.0

1.9(1.8)1.7

1.9(1.8)

<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0

<2.0 (<1.0)<2.0U]

<2.0 (<1.0)

<2.0<2.0U]

<2.0<2.0<2.0

<2.0f<1.0)<2.0UJ

Sodi

um,

Tot

al

mg/L

75

C3

(2cN

Hg/L

-

<1057 j 10637877

70 (72)87

94 (96.7)

7872747377

75(80.1)68

<2.0(<1.0) j 30(76.1)

14 <2.014106.96.47.26.9

<2.0134132

<2.0 78<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0

23

<10<10<w

<10 (<10)13

<10(<10)

<10<10<10<10<10

<10 (<10)<10

<10 (<10)

<10<10<10<10

20 <1053 <1049 I <10

11 <2.0 109 <1015(13.8; ' <2.0 (<!.()) 142(126) .-.-10 i<10)

372(358) i 7.3 (6 5) 16(15.4; <2.0 (<1.0) ; 141 (147, <10 (<10)2160 22

2680 (2000) . 8.5 (16)1910(2000; • 8.3(16)

18 , 2.3]10(11.8) , <2.0 (<1.0)1 2 ( 1 1 . 7 ) ' <2.0«1.0)

110 <1075(95.4} i 15(<10)95(99.7) :<10«10)l


SUMMARY OF DETECTED VGS METALS

APC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8


_. - • '

OCl Performance StandardLocation Date

Alu

min

um, T

ota

l

M£/L

Ant

imon

y, T

otal

Mg/L

Ars

enic

, T

otal

v-gft-

Bar

ium

, T

otal

V-gft-

Source Area (cant.) \ : i

MW-2 9/26/01 <50MW-2 12/18/01 <50MW-2 | 3/20/02 ! j <50MW-2MW-2MW-2MW-2MW-2

MW-22L MW-22

MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22

D-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-lD-l

' 6 /25/0210/1/0212/18/02

<5086

<2.0

50

5.0<2.0 | 4.8<2.0<2.0<2.0

4.84.0

r 4.8<50 (<50) I <2.0 (<1.0), 5.7 (3.5)

4/1/03 ; <506/19/03 57 (<50)

i

9/26/01 <5012/18/013/20/02

<50<50

3/20/02 ID 1 <506/25/02 ; <5010/1/0212/17/024/2/036/19/03

9/25/0112/17/01

93

<2.0 4.7<2.0(<1.0)! 4.5(3.8)

<2.0 <1.0<2.0 | <1.0<2.0 } <1.0<2.0<2.0<2.0

<50(<50) <2.0(<1.0)<50

60 (<50)r<50<50

3/20/02 i <506/26/0210/1/02 r

12/18/02_L4/1/036/19/03

<;50I 96

<50 (<50)<50

75 (120)6/19/03 ID 64

<2.0<2.0 (<1.0)

I~ <2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0

<2.0 (<1.0)<2.0

<2.0(<1.0)<2.0

<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)

2000

1214131212

15(12)12

" 16(16)

595357554853

59 (52)<1.0 i 83

<1.0(<1.0)[ 56(59)

7.2<1.08.46.97.7

8.3 (6.3)7.4

7.6(7.6)7.6

1767161316

17(14)15

22 (24)21

Cad

miu

m, T

otal

Pgf1-

-

<0.2<0.2

1 <0.2<0.2<0.2

0.4 (<0.2)<0.2

Cal

cium

, To

tal

mg/L

1

|

|

"5

Q

lig/L L ng/L

100 1300

8887808373

JJ5 (84.8)72

<0.2(<0.2) 97(107)

<0.2<0.2<0.2

998184

<1.3U<1.0

•cl.O<1.0

<1.0 <1.0<1.0 1.1

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

1.2<1.3U

1.3(<1.0)<1.0

Iron

(U

) (F

ield

)

mg/L

60

1]

-

2200.0 <)001515204.05.0

1.4(1.0) 0.0

<1.0<1.0

<1.0 1.0<0.2 84 <1.0<0.2 81 <1.0<0.2

<0.2 (<0.2)<0.2

[<0.2(<0.2)

8587 (88.9)

14592 (97.8)

<1.01.1

<1.0 <1.0<.1.0 (<1-0) 1.2 (<1.0)

<1.0

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2

<0.2 (<0.2)<0.2

8469778275

79 (79.2)76

<1.0<1.0

2.2<1.0 (1.1)

<1.01.3

<I .O <3.0

~5TU~<1.0 (<1-0)

<1.Q< 0 . 2 ( < 0 . 2 ) j 117(122) <1.0(<1.0)

<0.2 115 <1.0

<1.0<1.0

150.00.00.00.00.05.02.5NA

402.5301515

1.2(<1.0) 5.02.2

1.3(1.0)

I 110100

<100, 110(90) i

<100160(150)

-, 150

<100140150

<1001 <100

<100 (<20)i <100

<100(<20)

3300<100910

|n 870800

810 (769)5.0 | 74025 1280 (1300)

1.1 25 1260




r

•3

•a53-J

II

lig/L mg/L

Man

gane

se (

11) (

fiel

d)

Man

gane

se, T

ota

l

mg/L ug/L

OCI Performance Standard 15 " 1 "Location

Source Area (cont.)MW-2MW-2MW-2

Date '

\9/26/01 <1.0 24 | 0.312/18/Olj ; <1.0 24 0.03/20/02

MW-2 6/25/02MW-2 10/1/02MW-2MW-2MW-2

MW-22MW-22MW-22MW-22

12/18/024/1/036/19/03

9/26/0112/18/013/20/023/20/02

MW-22 [ 6/25/02MW-22 10/1/02MW-22 ! 12/17/02MW-22MW-22

D-lD-l

4/2/036/19/03

9/25/0112/17/01

D-l 3/20/02D-l I 6/26/02D-lD-lD-lD-lD-l

10/1/02

<1.0 23 0.0<1.0 23 i 0.0<1.0 22 0.0

1.5(<1.0) j 24(23.1) 0.0

—

D-

<1.0 23 0.0<1.0(<1.0) 33(36.5) : 0.0

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

22 0.319 j R2020

0.00.0

<1.0 : 19 0.0<1.0 22 0.0

2.6 (<1.0)i <1.0

<1.0 (2.7)

20(21.2) 0.031 0.0

20 (20.7) ! NA

i

12/18/02 j4/1/036/19/036/19/03 D

<1.0 23 0.1<1.0 17 R<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

21 1 0.022 0.022 0.1

22 (22.2) 0.021 0.0

<1.0(<1.0) 36(37.2) 0.0<1.0 36 0.0

1316141215

12(10)13

19(17)

10588

Nic

kel,

Tot

al

V-gfl-

-

1.2J2.11.81.11.5

4.6 (3.7)3.8

1.9(6.1)

1.2

Pot

assi

um, T

ota

l

mg/L

-

2.22.42.12.01.8

2.2 (2.0)2.1

2.3 (2.2)

2.21.3 1 2.0

82 : 1.7 2.079 1 1.4 1.97584

102 (93)

<L.O l.S

1.14.5(3.9)

223 7.6117(110) ; 2.8(6.3)

87127

<102.2

70 2.67382

85 (74)79

129(140)

1.23.5

4.8(3.7)4.6

1.7(6.7)126 1.7

1.92.0(1.9)

2.42.0(1.9)

2.42.12.02.01.9

2.1 (2.0)2.2

2.4(2.2)2.3

Sel

eniu

m, T

ota

l

Hg/L

<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0

<2.0 (<1.0)<2.0U]

<2.0(<1.0)

<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2-0<2.0

<2.0(<1.0)<2.0U]

<2.0 (<1.0)

<2.0<2.0U]

<2.0<2.0<2.0

<2.0(<1.0)<2.0U]

<2.0 (<1.0)<2.0

Sod

ium

, T

otal

mg/L

7573727465

75(71.9)83

73 (80.3)

717067686770

73 (75.2)81

78 (85.4)

7174717265

71 (73.6)82

75 (80.2)74

"a

Isu"cN

lig/L

-

<10<10<10<10<10

11 (<10)<10

<10(<10)

<10<1014

<10<10<10

<10 (33)<10

<10 (<10)

<10<10<10<10<10

11 (<10)<10

<10 (<10)<10




OC7 Performance StandardLocation

Source Area (cant.)D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2 j

Date

9/26/0112/18/013/20/026/25/02

Alu

min

um, T

otal

Hg/L

. ...

_ _ _

Ant

imon

y, T

otal

Ars

enic

, T

otal

jig/t ng/L

, - j 50

Bar

ium

, T

ota

l

Cad

miu

m, T

otal

lig.fl. Hg/L

2000i

<50 <2.0

6/25/02 D10/1/0212/17/02

D-2 12/17/02 DD-2 4/2/03D-2 | 6/19/03

1SenfrvMW-4 9/24/01MW-4 12/20/01MW^J _1 3/19/02MW-JMW-4MW^i

r MW-4MW-4

MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43MW-43

<50 ^ <2.0<1.0<1.0

<50 <2.0 , <I .O<50<50

<2.0 <1.0<2.0

93 <2.0<1.0<1.0

<50(<50) i<2.0(<1.0) <1.0(< 1.0)<50 <2.0 <1.0<50

68 (<50)<2.0 <1.0

66546649 149

i 59r 64 (55)

6584

<2.0 (<1.0) <1.0 (<1.0) 58(64)

<50 <2.0 19<50 <2 0 13<50 1 <2.0 11

6/25/02 <50 | <2.0 ( 119/30/0212/17/024/1/03

81 <2.0 1 21<50 (<50) j<2.0(<1.0) 22(17)

1 <506/18/03 87(<50)

<2.0 12<2.0(<1.0)| 12(11)

10/5/0110/5/01 ID12/18/01 1

<50 <2.0 ! 4.2<50<50

3/19/02 <506/24/029/30/0212/17/02

<2.0<2.0<2.0

j <50 ^ <2.0

4.23.33.6

1 3.6180 1 <2.0 1 4.7

<50(<50) !<2.0(<1.0)l 4.1 (2.2)MW-43 4/1/03 <50 <2.0 3.9MW-43 6/18/03 : 170(93) (<2.0(<1.0) 3.2(3.1)

2527

" 262423

27 (26)27

31 (26)

2926 125

H 312730

26 (22)

L 24

28 (26)

Cal

cium

, T

otal

mg/L

-

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2

<0.2 K0.2)<0.2<02 1

Chr

omiu

m,

Tot

al

T~

Hg/L fig/LI

200 2300

105 <1.082 <1.6U86858591

100(91.6)96

<1.0

1.1r <].o

1.6, <1.0 1.6

<1.0<1.0

<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0))<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

144 <1.0<0.2(<0.2)j 95(98) <2 .0(<2 .0)

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2

<0.2(<0.2)<0.2

( <0.2(<0.2)

<0.2<02 1<0.2 ~~*

7886

<1.0<1.0

91 <1.089 <1.079 <1.0

88 (88.2) <1.0(<1.0)93 <1.0

98(97.1) <1.0(<1.0)

I 1.62.5

r<i.o(<i.o)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.1

<1.01.5(1.2)

97 <1.0 <1.0102 <1.097 i

<0.2 129<0.2<0.2

|j<0.2_(<0.2)<0.2

<0.2(<0.2)

10677

98(96.1) ,93 1

88 (88.9)

<1.1U<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

1.2<1.0<1.01.96.9

1.4(2.6)2.0

Iron

(11

) (F

ield

)

mg/L

W2.50.00.0

a

co

Hg/L

790<100

,_ <100 |<100

0.0 <1000.0 <1005.05.05.0NA

20253540307.5

' 50 ~l60

^<100 (70"pi<100170 J

<ioo«2or

1166014401780 113301500

1730(1700) I1820

2640 (2400) ]J

30 83030 | 860 |5.035

1020 12250

25 | 78010 5202525

<1.0(<1.0)1 3.4(2.5) 25

1160(1100)830

520 (800)


SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS METALS


ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC SITE


OCI Performance StandardLocation

Source Area (cont, J

D-2D-2D-2D-2L'-2D-2D-2D-2D-2

Date

9/26/0112/18/013/20/02

a

isT3a%j-J

MS/L

75

<1.0<1.0<1.0

6/25/02 <1.0

a

3|

1S

mg/L

24

Man

gan

ese

(11)

(Fie

ld)

Man

gan

ese,

To

tal

mg/L ligfL

j

"«

is"S•s§

V-S/L I

Po

tass

ium

, T

ota

l

"a

3

E

1to

<Sj

mg/L fig/L

-

0.2519 ; 0.6822 0.0

!75 <1.096 <1.024 : 2.2

2.1 j <2.02.0 <2.02.0

20 i 0.0 61 j <1.0 2.06/25/02 ID <1.0 2010/1/02 i <1.0 94

12/17/0212/17/02 D

<1.0(<1.0)

0.00.0

64 <1.0 1.995 1.3

22 (21.4) i 0.0 114(100)2.0 21 0.0 108

4/2/03 [ <1.0 j 30 j 0.0 254D-2 : 6/19/03 ! <1.0 (<1.0)

Sftitrv

M\\MM\v-4MW-4MW^JMW-4MW-4MW-4MW-4

MW-J3


20(21.2) NA

i

128 (130)

' j

5.1 (4.7)5.47.7

2.5 (6.9)

9/24/01 1 <1.0 19 0.35 i 355 <1012/20/013/19/02 16/25/02 i9/30/0212/17/024/1/036/18/03

10/5/01

<1.0<1.0<1.0

212222

0.409 5530.00.0

•cl.O 19 0.0j<1.0(<1.0) 21(21) 0.0

<1.0 . 22<1.0(<1.0) 23(24.1)

440497397

454 (423)

^ 4.44.42.15.3

5.6 (4.3)0.1 462 4.90.0 584(510) 1.8(4.9)

[<1.0 29 0.15 121

10/5/01JD ; <1.0 30 0.1512/18/013/19/026/24/029/30/0212/17/024/1/036/18/03

<1.0 i 30 ; 0.182! <1.0 36 0.0

11399112

<1.0 33 ; 0.0 • 59

4.6

5.04.34.65.2

5.3 i 25 0.0 46 6.3<1.0(<1.0) 30(31) 0.0 80(64) 5.2(6.2)

<1.0 28 0.0 60 5.41.6(1.0) '27(27 .8) 0.0 43(53) 6.4(7.9)

2.02.1 (2.0)

2.0

<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0

<2.0(<1.0)<2.0

2.5 j <2.0L>71.9(1.8) |<2.0UJ (<1.0;

1

2.2" 1.8 '

22

1.92.0(1.9)

1.91.9(1.6)

2.22.32.52.82.52.0

2.2(2.1)2.2

2.1 (1.9)

<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0

<2.0(<1.0)<2.0U]

<2.0(<1.0)

<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0

<2.0(<1.0)<2.0UJ

<2.0(<1.0)

Sod

ium

, T

ota

l

mg/L

-

767270676871

76 (74.6)7383

74(78.1)

7870757284

"a

(2o~.cN

Vgfl-

-

<10<10 j<10<10<10<10

<10(<10)12

<W I<10(<10)

<iq<1U<10<10<10

81 (84.9) |<10(<10)82

71 (78.5)

646869686976

66 (67.2)75

72 (74.3)

<10<10 (27)

<10<10<10<10<1014

12(<10)16

<10(11)


SUMMARY OF DETECTED UGS METALSAFC DEMONSTRATION PLAN ROUNDS 1-8


[

1A

lum

inum

, fa

tal

Hg/LI

OCI Performance StandardLocation Date

Sentry leant.) \MW44 10/5/01MW-44MW-44MW-44MW^MMW-44MW-44MW^4

D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3

DADADADADA

12/18/013/19/026/25/029/30/0212/17/024/1/036/18/03

Ant

imon

y, T

otal

«/L

Ars

enic

, Tot

al

f2E

•£a03

lig/L ng/L

I !

- ] SO

9/26/0112/17/0112/17/01 D3/19/02

j

<50 <2.0

2000

Cad

miu

m,

Tot

al

Cal

cium

, T

otal

fig/L mg/L

[

8.8 53 <0.2<50 \ <2.0 : 8.0<50 <2.0 7.5

3838

<50 <2.0 7.5 33<50 ! <2.0 ! 8.3

<50 (<50)<50

59 (<50)

<2.0(<1.0)<2.0

<2.0(<1.0)

<50 \ <2.0

8.9 (6.5)33

35 (33)5.6 35

6.9 (6.7) 41 (28)

1.7 j 18<50 \ <2.0 2.5 22<50 <2.0 ! 1.6 20<50 <2.0 j 1.9 19

6/26/02 ! <5010/1/02 13012/17/024/2/036/19/03

9/24/01 112/18/013/19/026/25/029/30/02

DA 12/17/02D^J 4/1/03D-4 1 6/18/03

<2.0<2.0

<50(<50) j<2.0(<1.0)<50

100 (<50)<2.0

<2.0(<1.0)

1.5 18I 1.7 23

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2

<0.2 f<0.2)<0.2

<0.2 (<0.2)

6555627057

62 (61)83

68 (59.6)

3 105<0.2 113<0.2 105<0.2 119<0.2 109<0.2 110

2 . 2 ( < 1 . 0 ) : 24(21) <0.2(<0.2) ] 137(151)1.9 26

h 2.2(1.9)<0.2 247

21 (22) j <0.2 (<0.2) : 181 (190)\

<50<50<50<5099

<50 (<50)<50

<2.0<2.0<2.0

1.1 ! 36 \ <0.2 91<1.0<1.0

<2.0 1.3<2.0 1.8

<2.0(<1.0) 1.6(<1.0)<2.0 1.9

<50(<50) j<2.0(<1.0) 1.3(1.2)

34 <0.2 932829

, 3740 (35)

3935(34)

<0.2 _L 85<0.2 79<0.2 87

<0.2(<0.2)| 97(101)<0.2

<0.2 (<0.2)106

87 (85.3)

Chr

omiu

m,

Tot

al

MS/L

200

<1.0<1.2U<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

<1.0

*a

1

£

1O

«r/L

2300

<1.0<1.01.0

<1.01.0

1.1 (<1.0)1.3

1.5(1.0)

<1.0<1.0 <1.0<1.0 <1.0<1.0<1.C<1.0

<1.0«1.0)<l.O

<1.0(<1.0)

1.3<1.5U

1.2<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)•cl.O

<1.0(<1.0)

<1.0<1.01.0

<1.0(<1.0)3.2

2.4(1.2)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

1.2(<1.0)2.1

<1.0(1)

2C

c

mg/L

-

NA40352520305020

5.015150.05.010155.025

0.0250.00.00.02.52.5NA

*a

3cc

MS/L

-

70093012009501130

1850(1700)2480

3220(1000)

540150120110100160

<100(5b)270

800 (<20)

1070140

<100<100<100

<100(110)<100

<100(44)





r

OCI Performance Standard

£

11 -J M

agne

sium

, T

otal

Hg'/L • mg/L

15Location Date j

Sentry (cont.)

MW44 10/5/01MW-44MW44MW44MW44

i MW44MW44MW-44

D-3D-3 -D-3

12/18/013/19/026/25/02

— ; —

Man

gane

se (

II) (

Fie

ld)

mg/L

1

Man

gane

se,

Tot

al

5 I"

lig/L M£/f- i m£/^-

i

! !

<1.0 52<1.0 : 54<1.0 64<1.0 49

9/30/02 <1.0 i 5012/17/024/1/036/18/03

9/26/0112/17/01

<1.0(<1.0)j 51(54)<1.0 _[ 43

<1.0(<1.0)l 51(66)

: <i.o<1.0

12/17/01 DD-3 i 3/19/02D-3D-3D-3D-3D-3

D4D4D4D-lD-4D4D4D-4

6/26/0210/1/0212/17/024/2/03

6/19/03

9/24/01

. _<1.0<1.01.0

<1.0

NA0.1950.00.00.00.00.10.0

127 : 4.0 3.197 . 3.1928995

118(105)

2.73.1 2.7

'" ~

1S

elen

ium

, To

tal

fg/l-

-

<2.0<2.0<2.0

1.6 I 2.7 ; <2.03.9 . 2.4

3.9(3.1) 2.6(2.5)151 4.3 2.7

130 (88)

21242224

1 20_22

<1.0(<1.0): 29(30.4)1.0

1.6 (<1.0)

<1.0

4237 (40)

0.250.2360.236

0.00.00.00.30.00.0

1.0(3.4)

101 i <1.0148 <1.0133 <1.0

2.4 (2.2)

2.14.12.1

108 | 2.0 1.9119137

129 (129)

1.32.3

7.8(6.3)

1.92.0

2.2(2.1)384 ! 12 2.4 J

116(140)

2012/18/01 ! <1.0 | 203/19/026/25/029/30/0212/17/024/1/036/18/03

I <i.o<1.0 (<1.0)

<1.0<1.0(<1.0)

191620

21 (22.5)24

19 (20)

0.10.521

0.00.00.00.00.0NA

479584

2.6(10)

<102.4

2.4(2.2)

<2.0<2.0 (<1.0)

<2.0U]<2.0 (<1.0)

<2.05.6J

<2.0UJ<2.0<2.0<2.0

<2.0 (<1.0)<2.0R

<2.0 (<1.0)i

2.3 I <2.01.8 1 <2.0

490 1.9 1 1.6 | <2.0416 i 1.3505

518 (487)558

1.75.2(4.0)

5.6520(480) , 1.6(4.9)

1.8 <2.02.0 I

1.9(1.9)1.8

1.7(1.7)

<2.0<2.0 (<1.0)

<2.0U]<2.0(<1.0)

Sod

ium

, To

tal

0"cN

mg/L figiL

-

6965676967

71 (75.4)71

66 (70.8)

707369716657

70(71.5)77

65(71)

6867666669

66 (69.7)69

62 (65.5)

<10<10<10<10<10

<10 (<10)<10

<10 (<10)

<10<10<10<10<10<10

<10 (<10)<10

13 (<10)

<10<10<10<10<10

<10 (19)<10

<10 (<10)



ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN

Alu

min

um, T

otal

..J

; W/LOCl Performance Standard

LocationSentry (cont.j

D-6D-6D-6D-6

Datc

9/27/0112/19/013/19/026/25/02

D-6 j 10/1/02D-6 i 12/17/02D-6 4/2/03D-6 ! 6/19/03

!BoundaryMW^5MWA5MW-45MW-45MW-45

10/4/0112/19/013/19/026/24/029/30/02

MW-45 i 12/16/02

..._..

—

MW-45 | 4/1/03MW-45 j 6/18/03 |

MW^t6 10/4/01MW-46 ! 12/19/01MW-46 j 3/18/02MW-46 6/24/02MW^J6 9/30/02MW-J6 j 9/30/02MW^6 12/16/02MW-46 4/1/03MW-16 6/18/03

D

..

Ant

imon

y, T

otal

...

Vg/1-

i

Ars

enic

, T

otal

s2|

'C«ec Cad

miu

m,

Tot

al

Cal

cium

, Tot

al

Hg/L ng/L i iig/L mg/lj : !

50 I 2000 i

120 <2.0 29<50 . <2.0 I 26<50 : <2.0 19

L <50 ; <2.0 2476 : <2.0

<50(<50) <2.0(<1.0)22

16371

<0.2<0.2

100 <0.2

787898

95 ' <0.2 ; 79114

33(27) 112(91)<50 ; <2.0 24

<50 (<50)

250<50<50

<2.0(<10) ; 22(22)!

<2.0 j 13<2.0 : 6.0<2.0 6.2

i 160 <2.0 7.6' 240

230 (305)<50

69 (<50)

240<50<50<508685

<50 (<50)<50

59 (<50)

<2.0<2.0(<1.0)

<2.0<2.0(<1.0)

<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0

<2.0(<1.0)<2.0

<2.0(<1.0)

4.5

8090 C93)

<0.2 82

Chr

omiu

m, T

otal

M,?/I

WO

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<0.2(<0.2)! 89(88.1) ;<1.0 (<1.0)<0.2 92 3.2

<0.2 (<0.2) 1 95 (93), -

55465242

' 415.7(4.1) ; 48(46)

5.8 4215(4.7) ! 36(42)

15 3613 33

8.2 i 318.9 3217 : 3418 i 35

19(15) 36(34)13 33

14(13) 37(33)

<1.0(<1.0)

<0.2 ! 89 <1.0<0.2 ! 82 ; <1.0<0.2 91 <1.0<0.2 81 , 1.1<0.2 77 ; 1.1

<0.2(<0.2): 87(89.5) 1.7(1.4)<0.2 , 81 <1.0

<0.2(<0.2) : 88(87) |<1.0«1.0); j

<0.2<0.2 "<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2

<0.2 (<0.2)<0.2

<0.2 (<0.2)

898193907272

84 (85.3)88

88(84.1)

<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)

<3

is

1ngfi-

1300

1.9<1.01.01.3

<1.01.2(<1.0)

3.71.0(1.0)

1.5<1.0<1.01.72.0

2.4(2.1)1.7

1.7(1.3)

2.4<1.0<1.01.41.0

<1.02.1(1.3)

2.82.9(<1.0)

2^j

£— s

1mg/L

602.51040206040

NA

303020302025652.5

60302530303050600.0

"a

(5

1

M,?/L

-

2180126015601620860

1840 (1800)1280

2030(2100)

1220530114010401660

1260(1300)2340

2140(1300)

276016901600213017101710

1930(1899)1940

2130 (2000)

TABLE 4.2 P a g e l O o f l 2



-J

"a3E

So

lig/L j mg/L\

Man

gane

se (

II)

(fie

ld)

Man

gane

se,

Tot

al

_I_i

mg/L P-g/L Hgfl-

Pota

ssiu

m,

Tot

al

mg/L

OCI Performance Standard 15 - - - - J_ -Location

Sentn/ (cant.)D-6D-6

Date

9/27/01 1.5 . 20 0.412/19/01

D-6 i 3/19/02D-6 ! 6/25/02D-6D-6D-6D-6

BoundaryMW-45MW-45MW-45MW-45MW-45MW-45MW-45MW-45

MW-46MW-46MW-46MW-46MW-46

10/1/02

<1.0 20 0.264<1.01.7

<1.012/17/02 i !<1.0(<1.0)4/2/036/19/03

10/4/0112/19/013/19/02

<1.03.4 (<1.0)

22 : 0.01820

23 (22.9)23

0.30.00.00.7

24(24.1) ! NA

<1.0 i 20<1.0 19<1.0 1 21

6/24/02 2.2 [ 189/30/0212/16/024/1/036/18/03

10/4/0112/19/013/18/026/24/029/30/02

MW-46 9/30/02 ]DMW-46 12/16/02MW-46MW-46

4/1/036/18/03

2.0 I 174.6 (3.2)

1.0

689 5.2 2.3862- 4.51600 9.61540 8.31500 . 6.4

1230 (1,080DL) 10(9.5)1320

1230(1100):

0.40.697

0.00.00.0

19(19.3) i 0.018 0.0

1.0(<1.0) | 21 (19.9)

<1.0<1 0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0 (<1.0)<1.0

1.5(<1.0)

201922211717

0 0

627645

115.8 (8.8)

3.4]

Sele

nium

, Tot

al

Hg/L

<2.02.4 2.52.4 ] 2.22.32.3

2.4 (2.4)2.3J

2.2 (2.0)

<2.0<2.0

<2.0 (<1.0)<2.0R

<2.0 (<1.0)

2.1 ] <2.04.4 1.8

588 3.1 2.0557 1.5453

536 (474)663

546 (540)

0.350.589

0.00.00.00.0

19(20.1) ! 0.022 ! 0.1

21 (21.3) 0.0

553506592521477

5.92.12.8

5.3(4.4^ 2.7(2.5)4.2 2.9

1.8(43)

5.33.83.42.56.1

488 i 6.8534 (453) 5.2 (4)

491 4.7528(490) | 1.8(4.4)

<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0

<2.0 (<1.0)<2.0UJ

1.8(2.2) 1 <2.0(<1.0)

2.11.81.81.71.71.7

1.9(1.8)1.8

1.8(1.6)

<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0

<2.0 (<1-0)<2.0U]

<2.0(<1.0)

Sodi

um,

Tot

al

mg/L

-

124113116135102

148 (139)112

117(104)

6565717264

68 (69.6)64

75 (73.7)

736973707374

79(81.6)78

75 (80.6)

"a

cN

Hg/L

-

<10<10<1012

<10<10 (<10)

<10<10 (<10)

<1011131413

20(21)16

<10 (<10)

<10<10<10<10<10<10

<10 (<10)<10 j

<10 (<10)|



ORGANIC CHEMICALS, iNC SITEGRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN

Alu

min

um, T

otal

MS/L

OCI Performance StandardLocation \ Date

Boundary (cont.)MW-47 I 10/4/01MW-47 12/20/01MW-47 3/18/02MW^17 1 6/24/02MW-47 9/30/02MW-47 ! 12/17/02

r

Ant

imon

y, T

otal

Hgfl*

Ars

enic

, Tot

al

Bar

ium

, Tot

al

Cad

miu

m, T

otal

Hg/L ; ng/L i^g/L

50 2000

240 <2.0 14<50<50

46<2.0 9.3 33<2.0 : 11

<50 <2.081 j <2.0

<50 (<50)MW^17 4/1/03 , ; <50MW-47MW-J7

MW^ISMW-48MW-48

4/1/036/18/03

10/5/0112/20/013/19/02

DJ <50

—

MW-48 1 6/25/02MW-48MW-48MW-48MW-48

<2.0(<1.0)<2.0

33

<0.2<0.2<0.2

Cal

cium

, Tot

al

mg/L

Chr

omiu

m,

Tot

al

L __

V-Z/L

WO

89 i <1.08589

5.8 31 <0.2 9511

12(10)7.9

31 <0.232(31)

29<0.2 (<0.2)

<0.2

7587(82.1)

89<2.0 7.7 ! 31 ! <0.2 j 92

r74(<50) "<2.0(<1.0) 15(9) i 37(31)

1 55Q<50

<0.2 (<0.2) 85 (93)

<1.0<i.o— 1<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0);

<2.0 4.1 20 <0.2 110 j 1.9<2.0

<50 <2.0<50

9/30/02 i ; 21012/17/024/1/036/18/03

2.6 8.2 <0.23.3

<2.0 T 2.8<2.0

877.3 <0.2 956 <0.2 89

3.5 8.6 1 <0.2 i 82<50(<50) j<2.0(<1.0) 4.8(3.2) 14 (12) ! <0.2 (<0.2) 105(100)

<5052 (<50)

<2.0 6.6<2.0(<1.0}j 4.1(9)

1616(13)

<0.2 !_ 94<0.2 (<0.2)

a

££

!UgA-

1300

3.3<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)2.82.2

2.7(<1.0)

2.4<1.0 <1.0<1.0<i.b<1.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

93(135) <1.0(<1.0)

<1.0<1.01.7

Iron

(11

) (Fi

eld)

mg/L

-

500.04025352.5404050

302.50.00.00.0

<1.0(<1.0) 2.51.4 _j 5.0

2.2(1.17] 0.0

a

£c"

MX/L

20901280227016601080

1300(1200)11201590

2170(1400)

1800<100<100<100350

160(150)140

450 (<20)




ORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC. SITE


OCl Performance StandardLocation

Boundary (cont.)

MW-47

MW-47MW-47MW-47MW-47MW^i7MW-47

Date\

10/4/0112/20/013/18/02

"3£w<a-j

1 M£/L

d

21VI^

15 M

angan

ese

(II)

(F

ield

)

mg/L mg/Li

25 - i -

i 1.5 22 ; 0.4

6/24/029/30/0212/17/024/1/03

<1.0 20 0.0<1.0<1.0

21 0.026 0.1

<1 0 i 21 ; 0.0

<1.0(<1.0)<1.0

MW-47 j 4/1/03 ID '• <1.0MW-47

MW-48

6/18/03

10/5/01

; 2.1 (<1.0)

20 (20.4) 0.021 0.022 0.0

21 (22.6) 5.0

Man

gan

ese,

To

tal

"G

£<x).*<-ls

lig/L ng/L

562 4.7576 i 4.2485 40668 <1.0532 4.3

Pota

ssiu

m,

To

tal

mg/L

2.21.81.7

Sel

eniu

m,

To

tal

Hgfl-

-

<2.0<2.0<2.0

1.9 <2.01.9

614(544) i 4.9 (4.1) 2.0(1.9)649 4.4 | 1.8598 4.1

565 (590) 1.7(4.3)1

2.7 27 0.4MW-48 1 12/20/01 : <1.0MW-48 3/19/02

I MW48 6/25/02MW48 9/30/02MW-48MW-48MW^i8

12/17/024/1/036/18/03

_|

20 0.264<1.0 22 0.0<1.Q 21 0.0<1.0 I 20 0.0

<1.0(<1.0) 23(23.1) • 0.0<1.0 ; 21 i 0.0

<1.0(<1.0) 20(30.8) j 0.0

315 6.4J214 4.0J207 1.6177209

403 (382)370

1.32.7

1.81.7(1.7)

2.31.91.92.2

<2.0<2.0(<1.0)

<2.0U]<2.0UJ

<2.0(<1.0)

<2.0<2.0<2.0<2.0

2.0 | <2.0UJ5.4 (4.4) j 2.5 (2.4) j <2.0 (<1.0)

4.6 2.0 <2.0U]376 (380) 1.3 (6.6) | 2.0 (2.1) | <2.0 (<1.0)

Sod

ium

, T

ota

l

mg/L

7465736473

78(79.1)7981

72 (75.2)

686570

"Q

IsC"c

NMS/L

-

<10<10<10<10<10

<10(<10)<10<10

20«10)

<10<10<10

71 <10 j65

62 (63.2)60

<10<10(<10)

<1047(74.4) <10(<10)

laboratory analysis conducted by Trunatrix I-aboratories, Inc.( ) - laboratory analysis conducted by the Michigan Department

of Environmental Quality Environmental LaboratoryNA - Not AnalyzedI - The analyte was positively identified, the nLUiierical value is the

approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.UJ - Tlie analyte was not detected. The associated value is an estimate

and niay be inaccurate or impreciseD - i-aboratory duplicate.DL - Sample analyzed using a dilulion(s).R - Result out of range.

OCI Groundwater Sampling Split Data

Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land Uses

Chemical

Ground Wate

D1

Conventional Parameter

PHConventional Parameter

Chloride

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS

Metal

Aluminum (B)

Iron (B)Manganese (B)Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)

Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PC

Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mirex

Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)Benzene (I)

DibromochloropropaneD-1


PH


Chloride

Metal

Iron (B)

Manganese (B)

Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)

Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Result

r

6/19/2003

7.4

ug/L

140,000 D

790,000

ug/L

1201,300

140.2 U.5 U2 U

ug/L

.9 Uug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 Uug/L

5 U5.6

5 U7/27/2004

fiH

7.6

ug/L

170,000 D

ug/L

920

86

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

.9 U

ug/L

.02 U

ReportingLimit

0

1

20

50

20

5

0.2

0.5

2

0.9

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

5

1

5

"~cT

1

205

0.20.5

2

0.9

0.02

Residentialand

Commercial 1DW Criteria

Criteria

250,000

MHmsmHHpjffiP

aSBisiliSlglliaii&HgpSffigaFaB^gsSi2

34

2

.098

.4

44"

.02

Criteria

isifsiij

250,000

2

34

Note

-

Industrial andCommercial II,

111,1V DWCriteria

Criteria Note

250,000 1 E

V

E

E

A

A

'

A

M

A

A

Note

:*:

±2 A

A

.098

V

E

98

2 A

A

.4

.4 A

130

.02 M

11

Hiiiiiiiiifii AA

Criteria Note

250,000] E

iMMMfBi EBglgB E

298

" 2 A"

A

.4

GroundwaterSurface

Interface (GSI)Criteria

Criteria

760

Note

FF

NANAGX

3.7

.02

200

Criteria

itefeii'Bggji

760

paJBilL'IMJjfeiiHlSHSa

3.7

MX

M

XMX M

M

XX

NANote

\ Fp

NAGX

MX

M

X M

GSI Criteria forSurface Waterused as DW

Source

Criteria Note

760

-

.02

12

. .

Criteria Note

760

mm.-\ - - '

Residential andCommercial 1

GW VIAIC

Criteria Note

NLV

NLV

1 NLV

NLV

56

NLV

NLV

45 S

180 S

180; S

! ID

ID

34,000

5,600

1,200 S

Criteria Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

56^

NLV

: NLV

45 S

180 S

Industrial andCommercial II,III, IV GW VIAIC

Criteria Note

NLV

rNLV

NLV

NLV

56^NLV

NLV

45 S"~ " " r

180 S180 S

IDID

190,000

35,0001 ,200 f S

Criteria Note

NLV

NLVNLV

56NLVNLV

45' S

180 S

GroundwaterContact Criteria

ICriteria

64,000,00058,000,000

9,100,00056

1,500,000

13,000

3.3

.342.9510.02

14,000

1 1 ,000390

Criteria

58,000,000

9,100,000

561,500,000

13,000

Note

ID

" AA

AAAASM

Note

ID

3.3 AA

.34 AA

Water Solubility

Criteria Note

NA

I1 '

' NA

NA

NA

56

: NANA

44.7

180

180

510

j ^^^^K^^^^ f \

75,000,000

1 ,750,000

1,23of

Criteria Note

i

NA

NANA

56'NANA

44.7

180

Flammability andExplosivity

Screening Level

Criteria Notei

ID

I IDIDID

IDID

ID

IDID

i IDNA

i

6,400,000

68,000

NACriteria i Note

i ID

IDID

IDID

ID

ID

Acute InhalationScreening Level

Criteria Note

ID

ID' I D

ID

ID

ID

ID

: ID

ID[ ID

i" ID67,000 :

IDCriteria Note

ID

IDID

: IDID

ID

ID

Res andCom I

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

3002,000

860

Criteria

2,000

860

Ind andCom II III IV

DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

4,1005,6002,500

Criteria

5,600

2,500

Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page 1 of 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:29 PM



Chemical

Ground Wate

D-1

Pesticide

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mi rex

Semivolatile-Phenol

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol

2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol

Pentachlorophenol

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)

Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)

lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)

Semivolatile

Hexachlorobenzene (C-66)

Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)

Dibromochloropropane

02


PH


Chloride


Metal

Manganese (B)


Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mirex

Result

r

7/27/2004

ug/L

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

10 U

50 U

50 U

10 U

ug/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

ug/L

2 U

ug/L

5 U

5 U

6/79/2003

fiH

7.3

ug/L

170,000 D

600,000

ug/L

130

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

.9 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ReportingLimit

0.02

0.07

0.02

10

50

50

10

2

2

2

2

2

2

5

5

0

1

20

5

0.2

0.5

2

0.9

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

Residentialand


Criteria

.4

44

.02

150jfrjyjagjBaaEBasiSjB

HSffl&SHilm120

5

2

5

5

2

liillllslllHwmmssiBfflm

BW|HgHjaj | iro!

HJPMmCriteria

HHHBHi

250,000

*jjjffiffi£M£iEMixt.

2

34

2

.098

.4

44

.02

Note

A

M

M

A


111,1V DWCriteria

Criteria

.4

130

.02

470

Note

A

M

M

-HA

M

M

M

M

A

Note

E

E

A

A

J

i - - -A

M

5

2

5

5

2

ia^ ^ ^HglggHsS ffifc!Criteria

SsSrelmlrWTff™

250,000

ffppllpf

2

98

2

A

M

M

M

"M

A

A

Note

E

E

A

A

.4

.4 A

130

.02 ! M

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria

.02

nnmumffafflinHMm

B*

mCriteria

H BLUUMmUHHnKSiPHHMKrawm&gSw

760

tlP

3.7

*.02"


Source

Note 1 Criteria

xM'pMBj

M

NA

GX

M

ID

ID

NA

NA

ID

ID

«NA

.02

SumtBit maB&Km

Note 1 Criteria

FF

-

G X

M

X

M

XM

X M

M

760

Note

Note

.02


GW VIAIC

Criteria

180

440

34,000

1 ,200

Criteria

56

45

Note

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

-•180 S

180 ' S

ID

ID


Criteria

180

3,000

190,000

1,200

Criteria

56

45

Note

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

180 S

180 S

ID

ID


Criteria

2.9

510

.02

79,000

9,500

200

10,000

2

25

4.6

14,000

390

Criteria

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

13,000

3.3

Note

AA

S

M

AAM

AAM

AAM

AAM

Note

ID

AA

.34 AA

2.9 AA

510 S

.02; M

Water Solubility

Criteria

180

510

3,900,000

200,000

1,850,000

800,000

6,200

75,000,000

1,230

Criteria

56

44.7

180

180

510

- ,- .uoouypp

Note

Note

NA

NA

NA

NA


Screening Level

Criteria Note

ID

ID

NA

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

~I ID

i 'Dj ID

6,400,000

Criteria

ID

" NA

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

'. IDID

NA


Criteria

- -

Criteria

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

Note

"

ID

ID

IDr ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

Criteria

860


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

Criteria

2,500




Chemical Result

Ground Water

D2

Volatile

Acrylonitrile (1)Dibromochloropropane

D-2


PH


Chloride

Metal

Manganese (B)


Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mirex

Semivolatile-Phenol


2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenolPentachlorophenol

2,4,6-Trich.lorophenol

Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)





Semivolatile


Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)Dibromochloropropane

D3

6/79/2003

ug/L

5 U

5 U

7/27/2004

pH

7.5

ug/L

170,000 D

ug/L

97

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

.9 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

10 U

50 U

50 U

10 U

ug/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

ug/L

2 U

ug/L

5 U

5 U

7/27/2004

ReportingLimit

5

5

0

1

5

0.2

0.5

2

0.9

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

10

50

50

10

2

2

2

2

2

2

5

5

Residentialand


Criteria

ISSIsiillCriteria

250,000

2

34

2

.098

.4

44

.02

150

IBfiB^ Bi^^^ •H120

5

2

5

5

2

JBaiMiBtfsfeiggl

Note

A

Note

=

E

E

A

A

A

M

M |

A

A

M

M

M

M

A

Criteria

A

Note


111,1V DWCriteria

Criteria

11

niissssiilz!asHslESsJSiCriteria

•BBHBHHiii

250,000

2

98

2

.4

.4

130

.02

420

•470

Note

A

Note

E

E

A

A

! A^M

M

A 1

5 A

2

5

5

2

|ssEjisaakrijaai|Uftg

•lillaBS

11

Criteria

M

M

M

M

A

A

Note

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria

JmiilliipilSsa

Note

X

NA

Criteria ' Note

lIHiii

1

I FF

760

3.7

TJyffiBBffaflMHtiegqflpt

JS&nnHHlflm§iw

.02

SSS-SiilliiJBEiii'SIBeaiiBgBHIaBiaaiaarl

'IlililMBIIiBrr

GX

M

X

M

X M

XM

M

NA

~"GX~M

ID

1 ID

NA

NA

ID

Criteria

ID

X

NA

Note


Source

Criteria Note

Criteria Note

760

.02

j&pilHSlii

...

Criteria Note


GW VIAIC

Criteria

34,0001,200

Criteria

Note

S

Note! ~ ' "I

56

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

45 i SI

180

180 S

ID

ID

i

440

34,000

1,200

Criteria

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

Note


Criteria

190,000

1,200

Criteria

56

45

Note

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

180 S

180 S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

IDNLV

NLV

3,000

190,000

1,200

Criteria

NLV

S

Note


Criteria

14,000

390

Criteria

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

13,000

3.3

.34

2.9

510

.02

79,000

9,500

200

10,000

2

2

5

5

4.6

14,000

390

Criteria

Note

Note

ID

AA

AA

AA

S

M

AAM

AAM

AAM

AAM

Note

Water Solubility

Criteria

75,000,000

1,230

Criteria

56

44.7

180

180

510

3,900,000

200,000

Note

Note

NA

NA

NA

NA

1 ,850,000 I

800,000

I'Salliifflwtei!ml&SmisGiBBBg)

6,200

75,000,0001,230

Criteria Note


Screening Level

Criteria Note

6,400,000NA

Criteria Note

1~t ID

| ID

ID

ID

: ID

ID

ID

ID: NAi

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

6,400,000NA

Criteria Note


Criteria

Criteria

Note

ID

ID

Note

ID

ID

«?:ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID.. .

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

""ID

ID

Criteria

ID

ID

Note

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

Criteria

860

Criteria


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

Criteria

2,500

Criteria




Chemical

Ground ware

03


PH


Chloride

Metal

Manganese (B)


Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mi rex

Semivolatile-Phenol



Pentachlorophenol


Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)





Semivolatile

Dibenzofuran


Naphthalene

Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)

Benzene (I)Dibromochloropropane

Ethylbenzene (I)

Naphthalene

n-Propylbenzene (I)

Result

r

7/27/2004

EH

7.1

ug/L

160,000 D

ug/L

52

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

3.2 U

ug/L

.02 U

.03 UK

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

10 U

51 U

51 U

10 U

ug/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

ug/L

5.1 U

2 U

17 2

ug/L

5 U

10

5 U

350

110 X

140

ReportingLimit

0

1

5

0.2

0.5

2

3.2

0.02

0.03

0.02

0.07

0.02

10

51

51

10

2

2

2

2

2

5.1

2

1

5

1

5

50

5

1

Residentialand

Commercial IDW Criteria

Criteria

250,000

i$ji$$ji$i$igM^

2

34

2

.098

.88

Note

E

E

A

A

.41 Ai44

.02 | M

150

120

M

A

i

5 A

2

5

5

2

520

520llfjpfigQ

M

M

M

M

ID

A

A

AE


III, IV DWCriteria

Criteria

250,000

2

98

2

.4

3.6

Note

E

E

A

A

.4^

130

.02 M"

420

470

5

2

5

5

2

1,500

11

•3 j$®^%$3ffi

M

A

A

M

M

M

M

ID

A

A

A

E

1,500

230

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria Note

Hjiigilj

FF. .___^_ _

760 GX

3.7 X

M

X M

^^^^| ID

.02 M

~_««J

__™J^NA

^^^B^^^^ G XiSPlwSsPI<ll?l!ftlffl

ID

ID

NA

NA

ID

M

ID

X

200' X

NA

ID


Source

Criteria

760

.02

i H^^Pf ^ l ^

Note

-

"

12


GW VIAIC

Criteria

56

45

180

180

440

31,000

34,000

5,600

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

NLV

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

S

1 ,200 S

110,000

31,000 S

ID


Criteria

56

45

180

180

3,000

31 ,000

190,000

35,000

1,200

170,000

31,000

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

NLV

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

S

S

S

S

ID


Criteria

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

13,000

3.3

.34

120

2.9

510

.02

79,000

9,500

200

10,000

2

2

5

5

4.6

31,000

14,000

11,000

390

170,000

31,000

15,000

Note

ID

~AA

AA

AA

S

M

AAM

AAM

AAM

AAM

ID

S

S

S

Water Solubility

Criteria

56

44.7

180

240

180

510

3,900,000

200,000

1 ,850,000

800,000

^^ l fela) ^ SHS^

10,000

6,200

31,000

75,000,000

1,750,000

1,230

169,000

31,000

Note

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA


Screening Level

Criteria

6,400,000

68,000

43,000

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

NA

NA

ID


Criteria Note

ID

i

1

.. ..

31,000

67,000

170,000

31,000

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

S

ID

ID

S

S

ID

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

860

700


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

2,500

700




Chemical

Ground Watt

D3

Volatile

1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (|)

1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (I)

0-3

onventional Parameter-Cvanii

Cyanide (P,R)


PH


ChlorideTOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS

Metal

Manganese (B)Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)

Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)Mirex

Volatile



Ethylbenzene (I)Naphthalene

n-Propylbenzene (I)

1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (I)Vinyl chloride

Xylenes (I)

0-4


PH


Chloride

Result

>r

7/27/2004

ufl/L

69051

6/1 9/2003

ug/L

6 H

fiH

6.8

ug/L

160,000 D

990,000

ug/L

140

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

1.4 U

Ufl/L

.02 U

.02 U5

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

5 U

12

5 U

820

110 X

140

900

3.7 J

180

7/26/2004

Eh

7.4

ug/L

140,000 D

ReportingLimit

50

1

0.005

0

1

20

5

0.2

0.5

2

1.4

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

51

5

50

5

1

501

100

0

1

Residentialand


Criteria

72

Criteria

200

250,000

mm

2

34

2

.098

.4

44

.02

| JCTiKjm BafflSe* BjfflBJsS rffiiJalc

ImPiHinS lili

520

280

Criteria

250,000

Note

E

E

Note

A

E

E

A

A

A

M

A

A

E

E

A

E

Note

E


111,1V DWCriteria

Criteria

72

Criteria

200

250,000

2

98

2

.4

.4

130

.02

11

1,500

Note

E

E

Note

A

E

El~

A

A

A

M

A

;230J

A

280 1 E

Criteria

250,000

Note

I

E

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria

Criteria

760

3.7

.02

200

jKHKBfeBKB^S&iiB|wBBB| ^Hy

15IHH1S1I38SIjffiBpggMfrjigjjjiffi

Criteria

Note

Note

FF

GX

M

X

M

XM

~XM

M

X

X

NA

ID

Note

FF


Source

Criteria

Criteria

760

.02

12

Criteria

Note

Note

-

r •--Note

Residential andCommercial I

GW VIAIC

Criteria

56,000

61,000

Criteria

56

45

180~180

Note

S

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

sS

ID

' ID

34,0005,600

1,200

110,000

31 ,000

56,000

r • •

S

S

ID

S

1,100

190,000

CriteriaS

Note

NLV


Criteria

56,000

61,000

Criteria

56

45

180

180

Note

S

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

sID

ID

190,00035,000

1,200

170,00031,000

56,000

13,000

190,000

Criteria

S

ssID

S

S

Note

NLV


Criteria

56,00061,000

Criteria

57,000

""

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

13,000

3.3

.34

2.9

510

.02

14,000

11,000

390

170,000

31,000

Note

S

S

Note

ID

AA

AA

AA

S

M

S

S

1 5,000 j

56,000

1000

190,000

Criteria

S

S

Note

ID

Water Solubility

Criteria

55,890

61,150

Criteria

56

44.7

180

180

510

75,000,000

1,750,000

1,230

169,000

31,000

55,890

2,760,000

186,000

Criteria

Note

Note

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Note

NA


Screening Level

Criteria Note

56,000 ! S

ID

Criteria Note

ID

; ID

j ID

ID

ID- -I —

ID

ID

ID

i ID

NA

6,400,00068,000

NA

43,000

; NA

ID

56,000 S

33,000

70,000

Criteria Note

ID


Criteria

Criteria

Note

ID

ID

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

67,000

170,00031,000

190,000

Criteria

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

S

S

ID

ID

ID

S

Note

ID

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

1000

1000

Criteria

860

w<& ii$?w$

1000

10,000

Criteria


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

2,900

2,900

Criteria

2,500

2*£f !'.££'• 'lUvl TfttSim. - v»W

2,900

10,000

Criteria




Chemical

Ground ware

D-4

Metal


Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mirex

Semivolatile-Phenol



Pentachlorophenol


Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)Benzo(b)fluoranthene (Q)




Semivolatile

DibenzofuranHexachlorobenzene (C-66)

Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)


D-6


PH


Chloride

Metal

Iron (B)


Silver (B)

Result

r

7/26/2004

ug/L

380

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

1.4 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

10 U

51 U

51 U

10 U

ug/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

ug/L

5.1 U

2 U

ug/L

5 U

5 U

7/27/2004

Ed

7.8

ug/L

160,000 D

ug/L

1,400

620

.2 U

.5 U

ReportingLimit

5

0.2

0.5

2

1.4

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

10

51

51

10

2

2

2

2

2

5.1

2

5

5

0

1

20

5

0.2

0.5

Residentialand


Criteria

2

34

2

^Sffiss

.098

.4

44

.02

150

jjjjjMii,

120

52

5

5

2

,

§i s$i$$l$£{fafffl£

Criteria

250,000

Note

E

A

A

A

M

M

A

A

M

M

M

M

ID

A

A

Note

1 •

' E

2

34

E

E


111,1V DWCriteria

Criteria

2

98

2

.4

.4

130

.02

.420

jMiEfiBBaBgH

470

5

2

5

5

2_

11

Criteria

250,000

Note

E

A

A

A

M

M

A

A

M

M

M

M

ID

A

A

Note

_

E

E

2

98

E

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria

760

*P||{|jjBpi8ii

3.7

^^ raKl jgiflfrTnjmMfflEQMififfi

.02

iaiBS^SM^ ESE

B

SjggK& JSHHIIE^B3SaaBHBBKI8BMfU*yiaiiigflHflsaHSBiia

SBMSfiBi'SjwSSHmK.

Criteria

Note"

GX

M

*M

XM

XM

M

NA

GX

M

ID

ID

NA

NA

ID

M

ID

X

NA

Note

FF

: NA760 G X

M


Source

Criteria

760

.02

iffi&H&HHBiiiS

Criteria

!il!!!iOipQO

760

Note

Note


GW VIAIC

Criteria

56

45

180

180

440

34,000

1,200

Criteria

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

56 !

NLV


Criteria

56

45-

180

180

3,000

190,000

1 ,200

Criteria

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV56

NLV


iCriteria

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

13,000

3.3

.34

2.9

510

.02

79,000

9,500

200

10,000

2

25

5

4.6

14,000

390

Criteria

Note

AA

AA

AA

S

M

AAM

AAM

AAM

AAM

ID

Note

ID

58,000,000

9,100,000'

56

1,500,000

Water Solubility

Criteria

56

Note

NA

NA

NA

44.7 i

180

180

510

3,900,000

200,000

1 ,850,000

800,000

SlilSlliljSffi

10,000

6,200

75,000,000

1,230

Criteria Note

NA

NA

NA

56

NA


Screening Level

Criteria

- - - - -

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

6,400,000

Criteria

NA

Note

• •

ID

ID

ID

ID


Criteria Note

ID

| ID

i ID

ID

I

| ID

! IDID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

: ID

; ID

Criteria Note

j

: ID

ID

ID

ID

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

860

Criteria

2,000

860


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

2,500

Criteria

5,600

2,500



Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land UsesResidential

andCommercial IDW Criteria


111,1V DWCriteria

GroundwaterSurface



SourceReportingLimit

Ground Water

Criteria ! Note

f\ -r T \s


Semivolatile-Phenol



Pentachlorophenol


Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)


Benzofg, h, i )perylene


Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (Q)




Ethylbenzene (I)

onventional Parameter-Cvani<



130,000680000TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS


GW VIAIC



Water Solubility Flammability andExplosivity

Screening Level


Res andCom I

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria Note

NLV

Criteria

45 45

180

180

ssID

I To[

[ NLV

[ NLV

! NLV

i NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

180

180

Note

NLV

S

Criteria

13,000

3.3

NLV

NLV

ID

440

""734,000

"^ 5,600

1,200

110,000

Criteria

3,000

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

.34

2.9

5 O

79,000

9,500

200

10,000

4.6

S

Note

NLV

190,000;

35,000

1,200 [ S

170,000 j S

Criteria ! Note

1 NLV

Note Criteria [ Note

NA

Criteria

AA 44.7

Note

ID

ID

Criteria

AA

AA

180

180

510

M

3,900,000

200,000

1,850,000

800,000

Note

ID

ID

Criteria Criteria

AAM

AAM

AAM

ID 10,000

6,200

14,000

11,000

390170,000

Criteria

57,000

Note

75,000,000

1,750,000

1^230

169^000

Criteria

ID

ID

IDNA"

JD

lbID

ID

ID

ib~ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

j J?-J

i |D

ii IDT "ID"i IDT "76""i

iID

r IDi ID

i ID

Note

NA

6,400,000

68,000

I IMA43,000 i

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

67,000 i

T ID

170,000! S

Criteria Note

ID

700 700

Criteria Criteria

NLV NLV ID NA ID ID




Chemical

Ground Wate

0-6

Metal

Iron (B)


Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mi rex

Volatile

Acrylonitrile (1)

Benzene (1)


Ethylbenzene (1)

MW-1

onventional Parameter-Cyanic

Cyanide (P,R)


PH


Chloride

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSSulfate

Metal

Iron (B)

Manganese (B)

Mercury, (Total)(B,Z)Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Result

r

6/19/2003

lig/L

2,100

1,100 D

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

.9 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

5 U

51

5 U

28

6/1 9/2003

ug/L

16

fib

7

ug/L

61,000 D

1,800,000

740,000 D

ug/L

890

2,000 D

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

.9 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

ReportingLimit

20

5

0.2

0.5

2

0.9

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

5

1

5

1

0.005

0

1

20

2

20

5

0.2

0.5

2

0.9

0.02

0.02

0.07

Residentialand


Criteria

2

34

2

.098

.4

44

.02

Illllll

j|P||j||||[

74

Criteria

200

250,000

Note

EE"

A

A

A

M

" A

A

Note

A

E

E

*/is|plpK<

2

34

2

ttfete.098

.4

44

E

E

A

A

A


111,1V DWCriteria

Criteria

mfflBwiiMtmS®!

2

98

2

.4

.4

130

.02

11

*affii|jj|j||jj||gg||g

74

Criteria

200

BBBiSa

250,000

2

98

2

lillBlPP

.4

.4

130

Note

E

h

A

A

A

M

A

A

E

Note

-E

E

E

E

I A""

A

A

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria

3.7

|||i|j|Bj|l§|||lraaw^^ ig^p

mmMjramnrMTJmTmMUSisai

.02

200

Criteria

imtiB™™

Note

NA

GX

M

X

M

XM

xJ

M

X

X

NA

Note

FF

I

WKSGHlmf

3.7

;_^

*•"«, i'%01i 'igS'ffiRftvihjt ^gjitsyi

' * <?' ,03

NA

NA

GX

M

X

M

X M

X M


Source

Criteria

taSJWt&li&ttMMBmftft

Note

I

j

]I

IgjSiSiOiiMtmK iilgiffg^SSS

.02

HBgUHBgiBgwffiflBmBilOa^aarniMmafiaaaalSigiai

Criteria

-••

Note

!!


GW VIAIC

Criteria

56

45

180

180

34,000

5,600

1,200

110,000

Criteria

56

45

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

180 S

180 S

ID


Criteria Note

NLV

! NLV

56

NLV

NLV

45 S

180 S

180 S

ID1 ID

190,000

35,000

1 ,200 S

170,000 S

Criteria Note

iNLV

ii

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

56

NLV

NLV

45 S

180 S

180 S

ID


Criteria

58,000,000

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

Note

13,000 [

3.3

.34

2.9

510

.02

14,0001 1 ,000

390

170,000

Criteria

57,000

58,000,000

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

13,000

3.3

AA

AA

AA

S

M

S

Note

ID

ID

AA

.34; AA

2.9 AA

510 S

Water Solubility

Criteria

56

44.7

180

180

510

75,000,000

1,750,000

1,230

169,000

Criteria

56

44.7

Note

NA

NA

NA

NA

- -

Note

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

180

180 '

510


Screening Level

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

6,400,00068,000

43,000

Criteria

ID

ID

ID

NA

NA

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID


Criteria Note

I IDI ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

; ID

ID

67,000

ID

170,000 S

Criteria Note

ID

| ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

700

Criteria

2,000'fl«if?!$!lg

Ind andCom M III IV

DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

5,600

2,500

700

Criteria

5,600

2,500



Water Results - Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Land UsesResidential andCommercial

GW VIAIC


Source

Residentialand



111,1V DWCriteria

GroundwaterSurface

Interface (GSI)CriteriaReporting

Limit

Ground Water

34,000

5,600

210,000

1,200

9,600

1,000,000

"93,00085,000

16,000

"110,000

220,000

530,000

15,000

56,000

H

Chlorobenzene (I)

Dibromochloropropane1,2-Dichloroethane (I)

1,1 -Dichloroethane

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene

trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 280

"960

J380

Teo19,000

6,900

150

1,600870

7/27/2004

1,2-Dichloropropane (I)

Ethylbenzene (I)

Methylene chloride

Trichloroethylene

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (I)

190,000 S

Criteria NoteCriteria Note Criteria Note Criteria Note




beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane

Semivolatile-Phenol

4-Chloro-3-metnylpnenol

2-Methyl-4,6-dinitropnenol

Pentachlorophenol



Water Solubility Flammability andExplosivity

Screening Level


Res andCom I

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

S

S

Criteria : Note

190,000

35,000

470,000"

1,20059,000

2,300,000

210,000

200,000

36,000

170,000

1,400,000

530,000

97,000

56,000

13,000

190,000

Criteria

ID

Criteria i Note Criteria

S

Note

.02

14,000

11,000

86,000

39019,000

2,400,000

200,000220,000

16,000

170,000

220,000

530,000

22,000

56,000

Mi190,000

Criteria

M

Note Criteria Note

NA

Criteria Note Criteria Criteria

S

Note

75,000,000

1,750,000

472,0001,230

8,520,0005,060,000

3,500,000

6,300,000

2,800,000169,000

17,000,000

526,000

1,100,000

55,890

2,760,000

186,000

Criteria Note

6,400,000

68,000

160,000

2,500,000

380,000

530,000230,000

550,000

43,000

61,000j

56,000

33,000

70,000

Criteria

56

i NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

58,000,0009,100,000

561,500,000

13,000

45 3.3 AA

56

44.7!

NA

NA

NA

NA~

180, S

]" NLV

180 S

' ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

.34| AA

120

2.9 AA

510 S

.02 : ~M

79,000

9,500

200

180

240

180

510

3,900,000

200,000

1,850,000

NA

ID

ID

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

ID

ID

ID

67,000

ID

ID

ID

"IcT

ID

ID

ID

S

S

ID

ID

1,100,000 i SI ID"| ID

190,0001 S

Criteria ' Note

2,800,000

170,000 700 700

1000

10,000

2,900

"10,000

Criteria Criteria

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

5,600

2,500

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID




Chemical

Ground Watt

MW-1

Semivolatile-Phenol


Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)





Semivolatile


Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)

Benzene (I)


1 ,2-Dichloropropane (I)

Ethylbenzene (I)


Vinyl chloride

MW-1 7


PH


Chloride

Metal

Manganese (B)


Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mi rex

Semivolatile-Phenol



Pentachlorophenol

Result

r

7/27/2004

ug/L

10 U

ug/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

ug/L

2 U

ug/L

5 U

30

5 U

12

35

39

67

7/26/2004

fiH

7.7

ug/L

140,000 D

ug/L

530

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

.9 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

10 U

50 U

50 U

ReportingLimit

10

2

2

2

2

2

2

5

1

5

1

1

1

1

0

1

5

0.2

0.5

2

0.9

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

10

50

50

Residentialand


Criteria

120

5

2

5

5

2

JMJ88J8ijrJ!Swii!5B?ifl

74

63

Criteria

BBB

250,000

2

34

2

Note

A

M

M

M

M

A

A

A

A

E

E

A

Note

E

A

A

.098

.4

44

.02

150^"^^•^Syr- jArt

A

M

M

A


III, IV DWCriteria

Criteria

470

5

2

5

5

Note

A

M

M

M

2\ M

•SHsU

11

y|o|p %3fflp5Si!BM(ffjfjj|f]H&tWSSKaSKSBtoaBRSi

74

63

•i IflilH WsSffffJBlSnaPi

Criteria

250,000

ii lfiiEiillH2

98

2

.4

.4

130

.02

420

*$jjfc 3

A

A

A

A

E

^Note

E

E

A

A

A

M

M

A

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria

200

290SiiijpiSISiiiSjJiiiii

'mjjjjfflj$iSilii£fflffi^|mT^JagffjWSiSHEBHraSwRESi••BMHMSBSliilHHJpapJJjMftBMmMKii

Criteria

760

3.7

.02

J? - t7'£

2-8

Note

M

ID

ID

NA

NA

ID

ID

X

X

NA

X

Note

FF

G X

M

X

M

X M

X M

M

NA

G X


Source

Criteria Note

Criteria

760

.02

Note

"


GW VIAIC

Criteria Note

| NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

I

440 :

34,000

5,600

1 ,200 S

16,000

noVooo4

56,000 S

1,100.

Criteria Note

NLV

NLV

56NLV

NLV

45 j S

180 S

180 S

ID

ID

NLV

"'' NLV; NLV


Criteria

3,000

190,000

35,000

1 ,200

36,000

170,000

56,000

13,000

Criteria

56

45

180

180

Note

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV


Criteria

10,000

2

2

5

5

4.6

14,000

1 1 ,000

390

16,000

170,000

56,000

1000

Criteria

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

13,000

3.3

.34

2.9

510

.02

Note

AAM

AAM

AAM

AAM

S

S

Note

ID

AA

AA

AA

S

M

79,000

9,500

200

Water Solubility

Criteria

800,000

ffl£st8fflctQffliwJeti&**ffMf

Note

6,200

75,000,000

1,750,000

1,230

i

2,800,000]

169,000

55,890

2,760,000

Criteria

56

44.7

180

180

510

Note

NA

NA

NA

NA

3,900,000

200,000 :

1,850,000


Screening Level

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

6,400,000

68,000 ;

NA

550,000 :

43,000

56,000 ; S

33,000

Criteria Note

i••" r| IDI

ID

ID

ID

' I D

ID

ID

ID

NA

ID

ID

ID


Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

i ID

67,000

ID

ID

ID

ID

2,800,000 S

170,000 S

Criteria

ID

ID

Note

ID

...ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

700

1000

Criteria

860


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

700

2,900

Criteria

2,500




Chemical Result

Ground Water

MW-17

Semivolatile-Phenol


Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)





Semivolatile


Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)


MW-2


PH


Chloride


Metal


Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mirex

Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)

Benzene (I)


MW-22


PH

7/26/2004

ug/L

10 U

ug/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

ug/L

2 U

ug/L

5 U

5 U

6/1 9/2003

EM

7.5

ug/L

150,000 D

750,000

ug/L

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

.9 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

5 U

5.8

5 U

6/1 9/2003

pH

7.3

ReportingLimit

10

2

2

2

2

2

2

5

5

0

1

20

0.2

0^5

2

0.9

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

5

1

5

0

Residentialand


Criteria

120

5

2

5

5

2

Criteria

250,000

2

34

2

.098

.4

44

.02

Criteria

HKPfiSW

Note

- -A

M

M

MM

A

A

Note

E

A

A

A

M

A

A

Note


III, IV DWCriteria

Criteria

470

5

2

5

5

2

11

Criteria

Note

A

M

M

M

M

A

L

A

Note

250,000

2

982

BrlitfSlffliflBBi'ilJF

.4

.4

130

.02

11

3£a8l&tlMi£S£j£EJB8ga|B|ME|aM

Criteria

E

A

A

A

M

A"

A

Note

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria Note

M

I ID

t ID

NA

i NA

ID

ID

X

NA

Criteria Note

FF

jjBpKiiM

3.7 X

M

isrtnii XMX M

.02 M

|Pi8aBgBBSijSEai'3 A

200; X

NA

Criteria Note

GSI Criteria forSurface Water

used as DWSource

Criteria Note

Criteria

ij£ag tiTOIJga@jift

.02

Note

12

Criteria

" "

Note


GW VIAIC

Criteria

— -

440

34,000

1,200

Criteria

56

45

180

180

Note

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

34,000 i

5,600

1,200

Criteria

S

Note


Criteria

- - --

• •

3,000

190,000

1 ,200

Criteria

56

45

180

180

190,000

35,000

1,200

Criteria

Note

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

S

Note


Criteria

10,000

2

2

5

5

4.6

14,000

390

Criteria

56

1,500,000

13,000

3.3

.34

2.9

510

.02

Note

AAM

AAM

AAM

AAM

Note

ID

AA

AA

AA

S

M

14,000

11,000

390

Criteria Note

Water Solubility

Criteria

800,000

Wi3ft"1

P ii

6,200

75,000,000

1,230

Criteria

56

44.7

Note

Note

NA

NA

NA

180T

180,

510,

175,000,000

1 ,750:000"

1 ,230 ;

Criteria Note


Screening Level

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

I ID

6,400,000

Criteria

ID

NA

Note

... i _ .

6,400,000

68,000

Criteria

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

NA

Note


Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

Criteria

ID

Note

ID

ID

67,000

Criteria

ID-

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

Note

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

Criteria

Criteria


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

Criteria

Criteria




Chemical Result

Ground Water

MW-22


Chloride


Metal

Manganese (B)


Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mirex

Volatile

Acrylonitrile (1)


MW-22


PH


Chloride

Metal

Manganese (B)


Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mirex

Semivolatile-Phenol



6/19/2003

ug/L

180,000 D

610,000

ug/L

110

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

.9 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

5 U

5 U

7/27/2004

EH

7.5

ug/L

170,000 D

yg/L

90

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

.9 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

10 U

50 U

ReportingLimit

1

20

5

0.2

0.5

2

0.9

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

5

5

0

1

5

0.2

0.5

2

0.9

0.02

0.020.07

0.02

10

50

Residentialand


Criteria

250,000MvumMmsSsffiSB

2

34

2

.098

.4

44

.02

mUSfiiiKiiiHnMMNMMMBM

jjiisjiimS oHI BHKKtBs

Criteria

250,000

2

34

2

.098

.4

44

.02

150

^ 20

Note

E

E~

A

A

A

M

;Note

E

E

-

A

A

A

M

M


III.IV DWCriteria

Criteria

250,000

f«»^»^ S«

2

98

2

.4

.4

130

.02

Criteria

250,000

2

98

2

Note

E

. E

A

A

A

M

A

Note

E

E

A

A

.4

.4 A

130

.02

420£.!;}& 20

M

: M

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria Note

FF

II

3.7

.02

Criteria

760

3.7

SiIfefefi

3J$< sgif u§j§ii%g&S)!i£

.02

GX

M

X

M

X M

X M

M

X

NA

Note

FF

G X

M

X

M

X M

X M

M

NA


Source

Criteria

760

.02

Criteria

BgMBIBitHMOLiBB

760

^^^ l ll ^ftjfet j

Note

Note

- -

.02


GW VIAIC

Criteria Note

NLV

NLV

56 I

[NLV

45

180

NLV

S

h s180 S

ID

34,000

1,200

Criteria

56

45

180

180

ID

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV


Criteria

56

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

45 S

180

180

•

190,000

1 ,200

Criteria

56

45

180

180

S

S

ID

ID

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV


Criteria

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

13,000

3.3

.34

Note

ID

AA

AA

2.9 AA

510 S

.02 M

14,000

390

Criteria

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

13,000

3.3

.34

2.9

510

.02

79,000

9,500

Note

ID

AA

AA

AA

S

M

Water Solubility

Criteria

56

44.7

180

180

510

Note

NA

.

NA

NA

NA

75,000,000

1,230

Criteria Note

56

44.7

180

180

510

3,900,000

200,000

NA

NA

NA

NA


Screening Level

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

6,400,000

NA

Criteria Note

i

ID

• • • " " ' I " ID-

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

ID

ID


Criteria

••

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

: IDI ID

• - • • • - -r ' ~

Criteria

ID

ID

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

Res andComl

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

860

Criteria

860


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

2,500

Criteria

2,500




Chemical Result

Ground Water

MW-22

Semivolatile-Phenol

Pentachlorophenol

2 ,4 ,6-Trichlorophenol

SemivolatHe-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)


Benzo(g,h ,i)perylene



Semivolatile


Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)


Tetrachloroethylene

Vinyl chloride

MW-4


PH


Chloride

Metal

Iron (B)

Manganese (B)


Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mi rex

Semivolatile-Phenol



Pentachlorophenol


7/27/2004

uq/L

50 U

10 U

uq/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

uq/L

2 U

uq/L

5 U

5 U

8.5

6.1

7/26/2004

pH

7.2

uq/L

150,000 D

uq/L

1,900

450

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

uq/L

.9 U

uq/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ufl/L

10 U

51 U

51 U

10 U

ReportingLimit

50

10

2

2

2

2

2

2

5

5

1

1

0

1

20

5

0.2

0.5

2

0.9

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

10

51

51

10

Residentialand


Criteria

120

5

2

5

Note

A

A

M

M

5 M

2 M

AA

A

250,000

[%]Bafcaajjjffl&iffiijjj55Sj

2

34

2

.098

.4

44

.02

150

•JXJ£|! SS flfe^Sti;

120

Note

-

E

E

E

A

A

A

M

M

A


III, IV DWCriteria

Criteria

470

5

2

5

5

2

11

Criteria

250,000

2

98

Note

A

A

M

M

M

M

A

A

A

A

Note

E

" E

2 [ A

.4

.4

130

.02

420

A

\

M

M

A

470

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria

^^^K^ .

45

15

Criteria

Note

GX

M.

ID

ID

NA

NA

ID

ID

X

NA

X

Note

760

9wumStiSiaK$Wim^^^^^^ .3.7

jaKiaiBiHiiiira

jjgS&lBBJIHpJSBilii

.02

FF

NA

GX

" M

X

M

XM

XM

M

NA

G X

M


Source

Criteria Note

11

Criteria

760

.02

Note

-

-


GW VIAIC

Criteria Note

440

34,000"

1 ,200

25,000

1,100

Criteria

56

45

180

180

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV


Criteria

3,000

190,000

1,200

170,000

13,000

Criteria

56

45

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

Q

180 i S

180 S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV: NLV

' NLV


Criteria

200

10,000

2

2

Note

AAM

AAM

5 AAM

5

4.6

14,000

390

12,000

1000

AAM

Criteria Note

58,000,000

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

13.000

3.3

.34

2.9

510

.02

ID

AA

AA

AA

S

M

79,000

9,500 "

200

10,000

Water Solubility

Criteria

1,850,000

800,000

sffBS!^M-«

«h

6,200

75,000,000

1,230

200,000

2,760,000

Criteria

56

44.7

180

180

510

Note

.

Note

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

3.900,000

200,000 :

1,850,000

800,000 '


Screening Level

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

I ID

6,400,000

33,000

Criteria

NA

ID

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

ID

ID

ID

ID


Criteria : Note

200,000

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

S

ID

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

: ID

ID

ID

Res andCom I

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

Criteria

2,000

860


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

Criteria

5,600

2,500




Chemical

Ground Watt

MW-4

Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)





Semivolatile

Dibenzofuran


Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)

Benzene (I)


Ethylbenzene (I)

MW41


PH


Sulfate

Metal

Iron (B)

Mercury, (Total)(B,2)

Silver (B)

Strontium (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mirex

Semivolatile-Phenol



Pentachlorophenol


Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)

Result

r

7/26/2004

ug/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

ug/L

5.1 U

2 U

ug/L

5 U

22

5 U

28

7/27/2004

fiH

7.3

ug/L

450,000 D

ug/L

2,700

.2 U

.5 U

4,900 D

2 U

ug/L

.9 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

10 U

50 U

50 U

10 U

ug/L

2 U

ReportingLimit

2

2

2

2

2

5.1

2

5

1

5

1

0

2

20

0.2

0.5

5

2

0.9

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

10

50

50

10

2

Residentialand


Criteria

5

2

5

5

2

||||BB|H|IliiJIiliSigiiBfcUlSgMa

74

Criteria

•mjBjmHJMMBrtillBaili

2

34

MBSI*3* «8sS3»»ip&E'

2

.098

.4

44

.02

Note

A

M

M

M

M

ID

A


111,1V DWCriteria

Criteria

5

2

5

5

2

11A

A

Note

" E

-g-

A

A

A

M

150

120

M

A

5 A

^sws^^mmS^^^^B

74

Criteria

~2

98

13,000

2

.4

.4

130

Note

A

M

M

M

M

ID

A

A

A

E

Note

E

E

A

A

A

.02 M

420

470

M

A

5 A

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria

200

ffit3^i*iHtfy'SfSffl*SiavvSllllllillllrrfagtai&igaEl&i:

Criteria

BBJIBs BBBBBffiSiB!

3.7

Note

ID

ID

NA

NA

ID

M

ID

X

X

NA

Note

NA

NA

M

X

MI

^ ^ ^ ^

.02

X M

XM

M

NA

GX

M

ID


Source

Criteria Note

i

HRHBBli

rrtMm

Criteria

m

fe

Note

.02

' 1.8Q


GW VIAIC

Criteria

440

Note

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

T34,000

5,600

1,200

110,000

Criteria

56

45

180

180

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV


Criteria

3,000

190,000

35,000

1,200

170,000

Criteria

56

45

180

180

Note

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

S

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV


iCriteria

2

2

5

5

- - •

4.6

14,000

1 1 ,000

390

170,000

Criteria

58,000,000

56

1,500,000

120,000,000

13,000

3.3

.34

2.9

510

.02

79,000

9,500

200

10,000

Note

AAM

AAM

AAM

AAM

ID

S

Note

- -

ID

AA

AA

AA

S

M

2 AAM

Water Solubility

Criteria

10,000

6,200

75,000,000

1,750,000

1,230

169,000

Note

Criteria Note[

56

44.7

180

180

510

3,900,000

200,000

1,850,000

800,000

' • « 162

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA


Screening Level

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

6,400,000

68,000

NA

43,000 1

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID


Criteria

"

67,000

170,000

Criteria

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

S

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

700

Criteria


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

700

Criteria

5,600

Report: Contaminants in waters. All units are ug/L. Page Hot 21 Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:09:36 PM



Chemical

Ground Wate

MW41

Semivolatile-PNA





Semivolatile


Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)


MW-41


PH



Sulfate

Metal

Iron (B)


Silver (B)

Strontium (B)

Thallium (B)

PCS


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mirex

Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)


MW-43


PH


Chloride

Result

>r

7/27/2004

ug/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

ug/L

2 U

ug[L

5 U

5 U

6/19/2003

pH

7.3

ug/L

1,100,000

450,000 D

ug/L

2,000

.2 U

.5 U

4,900 D

2 U

ug/L

.9 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

5 U

5 U

7/26/2004

fit!

7.5

ug/L

140,000 D

ReportingLimit

2

2

2

2

2

5

5

0

20

2

20

0.2

0.5

5

2

0.9

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

5

5

0

1

Residentialand


Criteria

2

5

5

2

1^ \

Criteria

mm

34

2

ip8iiS|iiqpj

.098

.4

44

.02

Criteria

mjisiiailJiii

250,000

Note

M

M

M

M~

A

A

Note

E

E

A

A

A

M_.

"A~

Note

,


111,1V DWCriteria

Criteria

2

5

5

2

Criteria

isisssirifisi'"

2

98

13,000

2

P ^MPiii!:aaaBs!esB£§E3saga

.4

.4

130

.02

11iHffhKtojMiflKjfiaafiHHjM| BICK|yWy|

Criteria

Note

M

M

M

M

A

A

Note

E

E

A

A

A

M

A

Note

jssg8HS||SiMBjjiH

250,000 : E

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria

IgjililljSmlfflSsliffli

Criteria

Note

ID

NA

NA

ID

ID

^NA

Note

INA

BJ:M

W$$ji$$j&Mjfj

T&SSS&i&JiJ&sBm,

%ss s&u&&iBjillBBaBBPPliiaBSBfflSiBai

.02

Criteria

—

XM

XM

M

>NA

Note

FF


Source

Criteria Note

Criteria

[as iEajH ffiajI'Jismiiii&iiiiSMI SSiSamPq s m

.02

Criteria

3; p ^ ^ || ^

Note

Note


GW VIAIC

Criteria Note

ID

NLV

NLV

NLVI

440|

34,000

1 ,200 S

Criteria Note

I

NLV

NLV

56

NLV

NLV

NLV

45 S

180 S

180 S

ID

ID

34,000

1 ,200 S

Criteria Note

; NLV


Criteria

3,000

190,000

1 ,200

Criteria

56

45

180

180

190,000

1,200

Criteria

Note

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

S

Note

NLV


ICriteria

2

5

5

4.6

14,000

390

Criteria

58,000,000

56

1 ,500,000

120,000,000

13,000

3.3

.34

2.9

510

.02

Note

AAM

AAM

AAM

Note

ID

AA

AA

AA

S

M

_i14,000

390

Criteria Note

ID

Water Solubility

Criteria

^

H™SB

6,200

75,000,000

1,230

Criteria

Note

Note

NA

56

44.7

180

180

510lljflif llliflJ!«tt&

75,000,000

1,230

Criteria

NA

NA

NA

NA

•• •

-Note

NA


Screening Level

Criteria

6,400,000

Criteria

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

Note

ID

ID

|

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

6,400,000

NA

Criteria Note

ID


Criteria Note

ID

ID

" "T'D

^ ID

ID

ID

ID

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

' I DID

'•. ID

ID

ID

Criteria Note

ID

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

Criteria

2,000

Criteria

Ind andCom II Ml IV

DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

Criteria

5,600

Criteria




Chemical Result

Ground Water

MW-43

Metal

Iron (B)


Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

AldrinHeptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mirex

Semivolatile-Phenol



Pentachlorophenol


Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)



Benzo(k)fluoranthene (Q)lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Q)

Semivolatile


Volatile


Chlorobenzene (I)

DibromochloropropaneEthylbenzene (I)

Xylenes (I)

MW-44


PH


Chloride

7/26/2004

ug/L

830

66

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

1.4 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

10 U

50 U

50 U

10 U

ug/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

ug/L

2 U

ug/L

5 U

6.8

150

5 U

49

56

7/26/2004

fit!

7.6ug/L

140,000 D

ReportingLimit

- - - - - -

205

0.20.5

2

1.4

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

10

50

50

10

2

2

2

2

2

2

5

1

1

5

1

3

0

1

Residentialand


Criteria

HHlSflissi

2

34

2

.098

.4

44

.02

150

UllllllhfasMpfiSSiP

120

5

2

5

5

2

74

280

Criteria

ix A?

250,000

Note

EE

A

A

A

M

M

A

A

M

M

M

M

A

A

A

A

E

E

Note

E


111,1V DWCriteria

Criteria Note- . .i

298

2

E

E

A

A

.4

.4130.02

420

470

52552

11

A

M

M

A

A

M

M

M

M

A

A

A

A

74 E280

Criteria

E

Note

fwM ' 8-5

250,000 E

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria

760

a jiHBiHtf|w|wjirBs ^mMlRamHlBiBmIlHBHBral

Note

NA

GX


Source

Criteria

760

M 1

sSKSftBSK?iHlilmlm1.02

X M

X M

M"

••m200

IPmCriteria

!?§!¥*$!,

NA

G X

M

ID

ID

NA

NA

ID

ID

X

X

NA

Note

FF

Note

.02

!K»laPiBIIB!{BBiSigl%i>

sBSBPIfw12

Criteria

. ^SfSPP

Note


GW VIAIC

Criteria

56

45

180

180

440

34,000

5,600

210,000

1,200

110,000

190,000

Criteria

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

S-

S

Note

NLV


Criteria

56

45

180

180

3,000

190,000

35,000

470,000

1,200

170,000

190,000

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

S

Criteria Note

NLV


Criteria

58,000,000

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

13,000

Note

3.3 AA

.34 AA

2.9 | AA

510,

.02

79,000

9,500

200

10,000

2

2

5

5

4.6

14,000

1 1 ,000

86,000

390

170,000

190,000

Criteria

S

M

AAM

AAM

AAM

AAM

S

S

Note

ID

Water Solubility

Criteria Note

NA

NA

56

NA

NA

i

44.7 '

180

180:

510

3,900,000

200,000

1,850,000

800,000

B6,200

I

75,000,000

1,750,000

472,000

1,230169,000 '

186,000

Criteria Note

NA


Screening Level

Criteria Note

IDID

IDID

ID

IDIDIDNA

i IDIDID

6,400,000

68,000

160,000

43,000

70,000

Criteria

ID

IDIDIDIDID

ID

NA

Note

ID


Criteria Note

ID

ID" """

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

67,000

170,000

190,000

Criteria

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

S

S

Note

ID

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

2,000

860

70010,000

Criteria


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

5,600

2,500

70010,000

Criteria




Chemical

Ground Wate

MW-44

Metal

Iron (B)

Manganese (B)


Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mi rex

Semivolatile-Phenol



Pentachlorophenol


Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)





Semivolatile


Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)

Benzene (I)

Chlorobenzene (I)


Ethylbenzene (I)


Xylenes (I)

MW-45


PH


Chloride

Result

r

7/26/2004

ug/L

860

100

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

2.3 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

10 U

50 U

50 U7

10 U

ug/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

ug/L

2 U

ug/L

5 U

69

140

5 U

180

150

190

7/27/2004

B»

7.4

ug/L

140,000 D

ReportingLimit

20

5

0.2

0.5

2

2.3

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

10

50

50

10

2

2

2

2

2

2

5

1

1

5

1

1

3

0

1

Residentialand


Criteria

2

34

2

.098

.4

44

.02

150

120

5

2

5

5

2

zBBSiBSx&SR&sfiffg

«p$j! BCTffiipF '

280

Criteria

250,000

Note

E

E

A

A

A

M"

M

A

A

M

M

M

M

A

A

A

A

E

E "

E

Note

E


III, IV DWCriteria

Criteria

rnHHwajj

98

2

.4

.4

130

.02

420

470

5

2

5

5

2

280

Note

E

E

A

A

A

M

M

A

A

M

M

M

M

A

A

A

A

E

E

Criteria Note

250,000 E

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria

760

3.7

•H

HIijpipipiWim§28Sm&5iijSl aRra

AM

IB.02

fflfflliiMfflilfJSgJSs

1HffSsSs

200ggjEEaiai»aaa»«

fl|p ftisjsgii

mHIPit

Criteria

Note

NA

GX

M

X

M

XM

XM

M

NA

GX

M

ID

ID

NA

NA

ID

ID-

X

X

NA

Note

FF


Source

Criteria

760

.02

Note

i

Criteria Note

•• - -T- -


GW VIAIC

Criteria Note

NLV

NLV

56 iNLV

NLV

45 i S

I

180! S

180 ! S

; ID

i ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

1 NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV1

440

34,000

5,600

210,000

1 ,200 S

110,000

56,000 S

190,000 S

Criteria Note

NLV


Criteria

56

45

180

180

3,000

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

190,000

35,000

470,000 S

1 ,200 ! S

170,000

56,000

190,000

Criteria

S

S

S

Note

NLV


Criteria

58,000,000

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

13,000

3.3

.34

2.9

510

.02' ' "- "

79,000

9,500

200

10,000

2

2

5

5

4.6

14,000

11,000

86,000

390

170,000

56,000

190,000

Note

AA

AA

AA

S

M

AAM

AAM

AAM

AAM

S

S

S

Criteria Note

ID

Water Solubility

Criteria

56

44.7

Note

NA

NA

NA

NA

180

180

510

3,900,000

200,000

1,850,000

800,000

3SiillllIll§!

| ^ ^ ^ ^ g|gjS

|Sgsjl»api||JBfeajfe3gB|jj!c

6,200

75,000,000

1,750,000

472,000

1,230

169,000

55,890

186,000

Criteria

_

Note

NA


Screening Level

Criteria

6,400,000

68,000

160,000

43,000

56,000

70,000

Criteria

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

S

Note

ID


Criteria

..

- -

67,000

170,000

190,000

Criteria

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

' S

ID

S

Note

ID

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

2,000

860

700

1000

10,000

Criteria


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

5,600

2,500

700

2,900

10,000

Criteria




Chemical

Ground Wate

MW-45

Metal

Aluminum (B)

Iron (B)

Manganese (B)


Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mi rex

Semivolatile-Phenol



Pentachlorophenol


Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)





Semivolatile


Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)


MW-46


PH


Chloride

Metal

Iron (B)

Manganese (B)


Result

r

7/27/2004

ug/L

200

810

520

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

.9 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

10 U

50 U

50 U

10 U

ug/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

ug/L

2 U

ug/L

5 U

5 U

7/27/2004

Ed

7.3

ug/L

140,000 D

ug/L

1,600

630

.2 U

ReportingLimit

50

20

5

0.2

0.5

2

0.9

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

10

50

50

10

2

2

2

2

2

2

5

5

0

1

20

5

0.2

Residentialand


Criteria

•

2

34

2

.098

.4

44

.02

150

120

5

2

5

: • :

5

2

HP

Note

V

E

E

A

A

M

M

A

A

M

M

M

M

A

A

Criteria Note

iIf

250,000

IfepB

?«sT«J

E

E

E


III.IV DWCriteria

Criteria Note

V

2

98

2

.4

.4

130

.02

420

470

5

2

5

5

2

Criteria

E

E

A

A

:»-M

M

A

A

M

M

M

M

A

. . _

Note

250,000 : E

, 4 300

^ * _^. J

2

E

E

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria Note

760

MJ||j||ffllaiP|Sf

3.7

NA

NA

G X

M

X

.02

ByjiiiiiiiiHMSessmliMmjmS'VKKSiHtflyfMKKafSv

M

XM

XM

M

NA

G X

M

ID

ID

NA

NA

ID

iID

X

NA

Criteria Note

FF

NA

760 GX


Source

Criteria

760

.02

JJli||]!| Jj>g|$6»'

Criteria

WliSm&i-*.

Note

Note

760


GW VIAIC

Criteria Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

56

NLV

NLV

45 S

180 S

180 S

\ ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

440

34,000 P

1 ,200 S

Criteria Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

56


Criteria

56

45

180

180

"

3,000

190,000

1,200

Criteria

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV_. . . ._

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

56


iCriteria

64,000,000

58,000,000

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

13,000

3.3

.34

510- - -

.02

79,000

9,500

200

10,000

2

2

5

5

4.6

14,000

390

Criteria

Note

AA

AA

AA

S

M

AAM

AAM

AAM

AAM

Note

ID

58,000,000

9,100,000

56

Water Solubility

Criteria

56

44.7

180

180

510

3,900,000

200,000

1,850,000

800,000

pjjjjfeS

IPPia•

|ffiJrjj J|Pm!jJKm|j

PiHBSBaisi

6,200

75,000,000

1,230

Criteria

Note

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Note

NA

NA

NA

56


Screening Level

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID: NA

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

]

ID

6,400,000

NA

Criteria Note

: ID

ID

ID


Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

'. ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID\1

ID

ID

ID

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

300

2,000

860

Criteria

2,000

860


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

4,100

5,600

2,500

- -

-— -

Criteria

5,600

2,500




Chemical Result

Ground Water

MW-46

Metal

Silver (B)Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

AldrinHeptachlorEndosulfan (J)

Mirex

Semivolatile-Phenol



Pentachlorophenol


Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)


Benzo(g, h , i )perylene



Semivolatile


Volatile


Chlorobenzene (I)

DibromochloropropaneXylenes (I)

MW-47


PH


Chloride

Metal

Iron (B)

Manganese (B)


Silver (B)

7/27/2004

tTg/L

.5 U

2 U

ug/L

1.4 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

10 U

50 U

50 U

10 U

ug/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

ug/L

2 U

ug/L

5 U

3382

5 U

44

7/27/2004

fiH

7.4

ug/L

140,000 D

ug/L

2,300

570

.2 U

.5 U

ReportingLimit

0.5

2

1.4

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

10

50

50

10

2

2

2

2

2

2

5

11

5

3

0

1

20

5

0.2

0.5

Residentialand


Criteria

34

2

.098

.4

44

.02

150

120

5

2

5

5

2

mjfjMijmffiim^mfG

100

280

Criteria

250,000

2

34

Note

A

A

A

M

M

A

A

M

M

M

M

A

A

A

A

E

Note

E

b

[ h


III, IV DWCriteria

Criteria

98l

2

.4

.4

130

.02

420

Note

A

A

A

M

M

A

470 I

5

2

5

5

2

11

100

28o"

Criteria

250,000

A

M

M

M

M

A

A

A

A

E

Note

" E "

H E

2

98:

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria

3i7

mH1

.0

«

12

' •mMi

200

Criteria

Note

M

X

M

XM

XM

M

NA

GX

M

ID

ID

NA

NA

ID

ID

X

X

NA

Note

FF

NA

760 GX

ffWm. M


Source

Criteria

Tffiaf

Note

.02

Mim:8.

!••

m1

Criteria

_

Note

760"~


GW VIAIC

Criteria

45

180

180

440

34,000

5,600210,000

1,200

190,000

Criteria

56

Note

NLV

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

SS

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV


Criteria Note

NLV

NLV

45 S

180 S

180 S

h°| ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

1 NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

3,000

190,000

35,000470,000 S

1,200 S

190,000 S

Criteria Note

i

NLV

NLV

NLV

56

NLV


I

Criteria

1,500,000

13,000

- -

3.3J

.34

2.9

510

.02

79,000

9,500

200

10,000

2

Note

AA

AA

AA

S

M

AAM

2[AAM5

5

4.6

14,000

1 1 ,000

86,000

390

190,000Criteria

58,000,000

9,100,000

56

1,500,000

AAM

AAM

S

Note_ .

ID

Water Solubility

Criteria

44.7

180

180

510

Note

NA

NA

3,900,000

200,000

1,850,000

800,000

6,200

75,000,0001 750,000

472,000

1,230

186,000

Criteria Note

NA

56

NA

NA

NA


Screening Level

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

L NA

ID

J ID

6,400,00068,000

160,000

70,000

Criteria

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID


Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

; IDID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

67,000

190,000

Criteria

ID

ID

ID

S

Note

i

ID

ID

ID

ID

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

10,000

Criteria

-, .. ,2,000860


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

10,000

Criteria

5,600

2,500




Chemical Result

Ground Water

MW-47

Metal

Thallium (B)

PCB


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)

Mi rex

Semivolatile-Phenol



Pentachlorophenol


Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)





Semivolatile

bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether (I)


Volatile

Acrylonitrile (I)

Benzene (I)


MW-48


PH


Chloride

Metal

Manganese (B)


Silver (B)

Thallium (B)

7/27/2004

gg/L

2 U

ufl/L

.9 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

10 U

50 U

50 U

10 U

ug/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

ug/L

2.4

2 U

ug/L

5 U

15

5 U7/26/2004

EH

7.3

ug/L

170,000 D

ug/L

190

.2 U

.5 U

2 U

ReportingLimit

2

0.9

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

10

50

50

10

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

5

1

5

0

1

5

0.2

0.5

2

Residentialand


Criteria

2

iHKIBiSSSt

.098

.4

44

.02

Note

A

A

A

M

150

120

5

2

5

5

2

mmmiiigiHBmHSKBSiSI

ajgaygJjJB [8iljij9iS5|

Criteria

M

A

A

M

M

M

"

*

A

^A~

Note

250,000 E

2

34

E

2 A


111,1V DWCriteria

Criteria Note

2 A

SSlSifii&islM

.4

.4

130

.02

470

52

5

5

2

8.3HOfflPffll]aJBEBiiBiiJBilSsai

11Sisiil*§t*llSiS5ffla^KPffl^Ia

Criteria

A

A

M

M

A

A

M

M

M

M

f A

A

A

Note

250,000^ E

f' *llte^ fi

2

98

2

E

A

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria Note

3.7 X

M

XMX M

.02J M

l NA

G X

M

IDIDNANAID

15 XID

j ^ ip^ l x200| X

NA

Criteria Note

: FF

760 GX

Siiiwf ?rf=: ^3.7 X


Source

Criteria

IBiillSJiiiBilBBgaaila

Note

"

.02

Criteria Note

760

[

WT'.W


GW VIAIC

Criteria

45

180

180

" •

38,000

440

34,000

5,600

1,200

Criteria

56

Note

NLV

S

S

SID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

Note

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV


Criteria

45

180

180

210,000

3,000

190,000

35,000

1,200

Criteria

Note

NLV

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

._. . ..NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

S

Note

NLV

NLV

56'

NLV

NLV


Criteria

13,000

3.3

.34

2.9

510

.02

79,000

9,500

200

10,000

2

2

5

5

5,700

4.6

14,000

1 1 ,000

390

Criteria

Note

AA

AA

AA

S

M

AAM

AAM

AAM

AAM

Note

ID

9,100,000

56 r

1,500,000

13,000

Water Solubility

Criteria Note

I| NA]

44.7 1 "

180

180

510

3,900,000

200,000

1,850,000

800,000

*f ml$iflSliffiffili!5if?l'lilf

17,200,000

6,200

75,000,000

1,750,000

1,230

Criteria

56

Note

-

NA

NA

NA

NA


Screening Level

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID"'"" " TID

17,000,000 S

6,400,000

68,000

Criteria

ID

NA

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID


Criteria Note

ID

ID

: ID

; ID; IDi ID

1 ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

ID

,.

17,000,000 S

r 'D

ID

67,000

ID

Criteria Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria

Criteria

860


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria

Criteria

2,500




Chemical

Ground Watt

MW-48

PCS


Pesticide

Aldrin

Heptachlor

Endosulfan (J)Mirex

Semivolatile-Phenol

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol

Pentachloraphenol


Semivolatile-PNA

Benzo(a)pyrene (Q)





Semivolatile

Dibenzofuran


Volatile


Result

T

7/26/2004

ug/L

2.3 U

ug/L

.02 U

.02 U

.07 U

.02 U

ug/L

10 U

51 U

51 U

10 U

ug/L

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

2 U

ug/L

5.1 U

2 U

ug/L

5 U

9.5

ReportingLimit

2.3

0.02

0.02

0.07

0.02

10

.. 51_51

10

2

2

2

2

2

5.1

2

51

5

Residentialand


Criteria

.098

.4

44

.02

150

120

5

2

5

5

2

Note

A

A

M

M

A

A

M

M

M

M

ID

A

A


III, IV DWCriteria

Criteria

.4

.4

130

.02

420

470

5

2

5

5

2

11

Note

A

A~

GroundwaterSurface


Criteria Note

M

umiBi XMIIHiNffiili

M

M

A

A

M

M

M

M

ID

A

A

A

.02] M

NA

™

ID

ID

NA

NA

ID

ID

x

200 X

I NA


Source

Criteria

.02

12

Note


GW VIAIC

Criteria

45""

180

180

440

34,000

5,600,2(J(J

Note

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

S


Criteria

45

180

180

3,000

190,000

35,000

Note

S

S

S

ID

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID

NLV

NLV

NLV

ID


Criteria

3.3

.34

2.9

510

.02

79,000

9,500

200

10,000

2

2

5

5

4.6

14,000

1 1 ,000

Note

AA

AA

AA

S

M

AAM

AAM

AAM

AAM

ID

Water Solubility

Criteria

44.7

180

180

510

3,900,000

200,000

1,850,000800,000

10,0006,200

75,000,000

1,750,000

Note


Screening Level

Criteria

- --

Note

ID

ID

ID

ID

NA

ID

ID

ID

ID

JID

ID

ID

ID

Mb

6,400,000

68,000

IDID


Criteria Note

ID

IDID

"" IDID

ID

ID

ID

ID

r IDID

IDID

• ID

; IDID

ID

67,000

Res andCom 1

DrinkingWater

Aesthetic

Criteria


DrinkingWater

Aesthetics

Criteria


Second Five-Year Review Report Organic Chemical, Inc. Superfund … · 2017. 5. 12. · Table 1 -...

Documents

Transcript of Second Five-Year Review Report Organic Chemical, Inc. Superfund … · 2017. 5. 12. · Table 1 -...