Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
i
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY (NEMA)
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT July 2009 - June 2010
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
ii
NEMA House,Located at Plot 17/19/21 Jinja Road
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
iiiTABLE OF CONTENT
LIST OF ACRONYMS v
FOREWORD 1
CHAPTER ONE 21.0 THE STATE OF ENVIRONMENT IN UGANDA 2 1.1 The current situations and future scenarios 2 1.2 Possible policy options and responses 3
CHAPTER TWO 42.0 OVERVIEW OF NEMA’s STRATEGIC POSITION 4 2.1 Mandate, Vision, Mission, and Goal 4 2.2 The Development Objective 4 2.3 The Core Values 4 2.4 Statutory Functions 4 2.5 Institutional Set-up 5 2.5.1 NEMA Structure 5 2.5.2 Linkages with Line-Ministries and Districts 6 2.5.3 Linkages with the Districts 6 2.6 Stakeholder Collaboration 6
CHAPTER THREE 73.0 CONTRIBUTION OF NEMA TO NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL
COOPERATION 7 3.1 Contribution to National Development and regional/ international partnerships 7
CHAPTER FOUR 84.0 NEMA’S PERFORMANCE 2008/9 FY 8 4.1 NEMA’s KEY RESULT AREAS/ STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 8 4.2 Supporting factors for NEMA’s performance: 34
CHAPTER FIVE 355.0 CHALLENGES, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 35 5.1 Challenges and strategies 35 5.2 Conclusions 36
ANNEX I: PROJECTS (EIAS) APPROVED IN FY2009/10 37
ANNEX II: MEMBERS OF THE 5th NEMA BOARD 37
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
ivANNEX III: THE CURRENT STAFF ESTABLISHMENT IN NEMA 38
LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Budget performance for FY 2009/10) 9 Table 2: Highlights of the achieved outputs/results against the 2009/10 work plan 10 Table 3: Donor funded projects (2008/9, 2009/10 and 2010/11) 24 Table 4: NEMA supported micro projects in Lakes Victoria/Nakivale shore/catchments and the upper River Nile banks 32
LIST OF GRAPHS Graph 1: Status of the physical output and budget performance in FY 2009/10 30 Graph 2: Total number of projects approved by category, July 2009-June 2010 period 31 Graph 3: EIAs in 2001/10 31
LIST OF MAPS Map 1: Restoration of the degraded catchments areas and shores of Lake Victoria and banks of River Nile 32
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
vLIST OF ACRONYMS
BOD - Board of DirectorsCBD - Convention on Biological DiversityCBO - Community Based organisationCDM - Clean Development MechanismsCES - Compliance and Enforcement SystemCES - Compliance and Enforcement Strategy CFCs - ChlorofluorocarbonsCTC - Carbon Tetrachloride CSO - Civil Society OrganisationDEO - District Environment OfficerDSOERs - District State of Environment ReportsDWRM - Directorate of Water Resources ManagementEAC - East African CommunityEE/ESD - Environmental Education/Education for Sustainable DevelopmentIEC - Information Education CommunicationEFP - Environment Protection ForceEIA - Environment Impact AssessmentEIO - Expression of InterestEISs - Environment Impact StatementsELUs - Environmental Liaison UnitsEMCBPII-AF - Environment Management Capacity building Project – Additional Funding ENR - Environment and Natural ResourcesEPS - Early Production SchemeFAO - Food and Agriculture OrganisationFD - Fisheries DepartmentFY - Financial YearGEF - Global Environment FacilityGDP - Gross Domestic Product GoU - Government of UgandaHEP - Hydro Electric PowerHPMP - HydrochlorofluorocarboN Phase-out Plan ICT - Information Communication TechnologyIEC - Information Education Communication IWRM - Integrated Water Resources ManagementIYB - International Year of Biodiversity KPAs - Key Performance AreasKRAs - Key Result AreasLA - Lead Agencies LG - Local GovernmentsLVEMP - Lake Victoria Environment management ProgrammeMDGs - Millennium Development Goals
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
viMEAs - Multi Environmental AgreementsMPs - Members of ParliamentMSW - Municipal Solid Waste CompostingMoU - Memorandum of UnderstandingMWE - Ministry of Water and EnvironmentNAADS - National agricultural Advisory ServicesNBI - Nile Basin InitiativeNEA - National Environment Act, Cap. 153NEF - National environment FundNEMA - National Environment Management AuthorityNDP - National Development PlanNFA - National Forestry AuthorityNGO - Non Governmental OrganisationNSOER - National State of Environment ReportNUFFIC - Netherlands Organization International Cooperation in Higher Education NUSAF - Northern Uganda Social Action FundODS - Ozone Depleting SubstancesPFA - Prosperity for All PCE - Policy Committee on Environment PEAP - Poverty Eradication action PlanPEPD - Petroleum Exploration and Production Department PES - Payment for Ecosystem ServicesPFA - Prosperity for AllPMA - Plan for Modernisation of AgriculturePOPS - Persistent Organic PollutantsPRDP - Peace, Recovery and Development Plan for Northern UgandaPSC - Project Steering CommitteeRCE - Regional centres of Excellence/expertise RDC - Resident District CommissionerRio-MEAs - Multi-Environmental AgreementsSAICM - Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management ReviewSNA - System of National Accounting TORs - Terms of ReferenceTOTs - Training of TrainersUBOS - Uganda Bureau of StatisticsUN - United NationsUNDP - United Nations Development ProgrammeUNEP - United Nations Environment ProgrammeUNESCO - United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural OrganisationUTODA - Uganda Taxi Operators and Drivers AssociationUWA - Uganda Wildlife AuthorityWB - World BankWED - World Environment Day
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
1FOREWORD
NEMA’s activities focus on providing support to Government‘s development goal of ensuring poverty reduction in a sustainable manner, within the framework of economic stability and increased environment and natural resources productivity for improved livelihoods, environmental sustainability and socio-economic development in Uganda.
NEMA has continued to contribute to policy planning and implementation processes at both National and Local Government levels so as to ensure sustainable development in the country. Notably, NEMA has contributed to the realization of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the formulation of the National Development Plan (NDP), Prosperity For All (PFA) Program, sector policies and plans to ensure that Environment and Natural Resources Management is integrated at all levels.
NEMA made considerable achievements, as demonstrated by the 2009/10 report. These achievements have been possible because of the support from the Government of Uganda, Development Partners, Lead Agencies and Local Governments. Besides, the commitments and professionalism NEMA staff and guidance from the Policy Committee on Environment (PCE) and NEMA Board of Directors (BOD) contributed immensely to the achievements.
Notably, funding gaps and limited number of personnel are the key challenges that are limiting the capacity of NEMA, Lead Agencies and Local Governments in addressing the current and emerging environmental issues. Therefore, there is need to build the capacity of NEMA and its partners (funding, training and tooling) to address environmental problems in the country. Notably, NEMA is currently undergoing institutional review in order to manage the emerging environmental challenges related to oil and gas, climate change and weather variability and electronic wastes.
It is my conviction that this report will inform our partners on the achievements made by NEMA in 2009/10 and act as a tool for public accountability, transparency and corporate image building.
Aryamanya- Mugisha, Henry (PhD)Executive Director
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
2CHAPTER ONE
1.0 THE STATE OF ENVIRONMENT IN UGANDA
1.1 The current situations and future scenariosThe year 1972 was seen as the watershed for modern environmentalism. The first international conference on the environment – United Nations Conference on the Human Environment – was convened in Stockholm (Sweden). The conference brought together 113 nations, including Uganda, and other stakeholders to discuss issues of common concern (UNEP, 2002). In 2002, the 30 year-mark was an opportunity to assess the progress made in the past, present and the future perspectives. Decisions made since Stockholm 1972 now influence governance, business and economic activity at different levels. They define international environmental law and its application in different countries, determine international and bilateral relations among different countries and regions, and influence individual and society lifestyle choices. However, some things have not progressed, for example, the environment is still at the periphery of socio-economic development, and poverty and excessive consumption continue to put enormous pressure on the environment. As a result, sustainable development remains largely theoretical for the majority of the people in the world today. The level of awareness and action has not been commensurate with the state of the global environment today; it continues to deteriorate (UNEP 2002).
Uganda’s environment has been undergoing rapid change as documented since the publication of the first state of the environment report in 1994. By 2005, the rate of deforestation had increased from 1.76 per cent per annum, in 2000, to an unprecedented rate of 2.13 per cent, a 21.2 per cent increase (FAO 2007, UNEP 2006). Land degradation is also severe. For instance, according to Yaron and Moyini (2003), the country loses about 11 per cent of its Gross National Income per annum as a result of excessive soil erosion alone. Pollution of lakes and river systems continues unabated. Recent estimates indicate that more than 7 per cent of the original wetland area in Uganda has been converted to other land uses (UBOS 1999). This has resulted in loss of biodiversity, especially for species that thrive or breed in wetlands.
A number of factors “drivers” influence the severity and direction of environmental change, and the impacts of such change on ecosystem functioning, and health, and well-being of people. The factors that have considerable impacts on the environment are demographic changes, economic growth, social changes and governance issues, and science and technology with particular focus on e-technology. Although each driver is considered separately, there are links between the different drivers which act individually or in combination - often maximising negative impacts but sometimes producing positive change (UNEP 2006). The drivers also operate at different spatial scales, local, national or international and interact with varying political, policy, economic and social conditions, which have implications on the final environmental outcomes.
Uganda faces the challenge of ensuring adequate supply of arable land, freshwater, food security, housing and livelihood opportunities for almost twice as many people by 2025. Each of these contributes towards the achievement of sustainable development and poverty reduction efforts. The relationship between poverty and the environment is well documented and will continue to dominate the development agenda. For instance, land is a highly volatile and political issue and its control continues to be a critical factor in the
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
3country’s development. Land availability has implications on food security, it can be expected that this issue will assume growing importance in Uganda’s politics. The continued growth of the country will require a coherent and pragmatic approach to land use planning and management.
To improve on the effectiveness of its policy processes, Uganda will need to make a number of key investments such as supporting the implementation of the new National Development Plan including human and financial resources; implementing a programme of research that can provide answers to emerging issues or existing problems and the establishment of an environment management information system. This will support planning, early warning, mitigation and the management of vulnerabilities within the country. It will also enhance the inter-linkages between different environmental and social issues and avoid conflicts between policies. A strengthened NEMA that can facilitate effective and efficient responses for Uganda within this fast globalising world is also essential.
1.2 Possible policy options and responses(a) Policy review, legislations and institutional capacity enhancement to address the emerging development
challenges and the associated environmental problems. Such challenges include oil/gas, electronic wastes and climate change with the related environmental issues
(b) Integrated and effective implementation of the National Development Plan while taking into account the existing sector policies and plans to ensure sustainable utilization and management of environment and natural resources:
• Prioritization of the environment and natural resources sector;• Implementation of education for sustainable development strategy and formulation better public
education strategy; • Integration of science and technology for eco-efficiency through pollution control mechanisms like
cleaner production;• Disaster risk forecast and management capacity enhancement;• Integrated Water Resources Management Strategies/policies;• Policies and strategies for managing the fragile ecosystems; wetlands, riverbanks/lakeshores,
hilly and mountainous areas;• Inventorization and economic valuation of natural resources to enhance integration of ENR cost
and benefit values into the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and System of National Accounting (SNA)
• Afforestation/ re-afforestation and forest resources/biomass management policies and strategies;
• Land use, housing and urban development Policies and plans; • Trade and Industrialization policies and plans;• Energy policies and plans;
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
4CHAPTER TWO
2.0 OVERVIEW OF NEMA’s STRATEGIC POSITION
The National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) is a semi-autonomous institution, established in May,1995, under the National Environment Act, Cap. 153, and became operational in December 1995, as the principal agency in Uganda, charged with the responsibility of coordinating, monitoring, regulating and supervising environmental management in the country. NEMA spearheads the development of environmental policies, laws, regulations, standards and guidelines; and guides Government on sound environmental management in Uganda.
NEMA’s activities are focused on providing support to Government’s main goal of ensuring sustainable development through the National Development Plan (NDP); in accordance with the policy framework of the Government of Uganda and the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).
2.1 Mandate, Vision, Mission, and GoalThe National Environment Act (NEA), Cap. 153, stipulates the mandate of NEMA as the principal agency in Uganda responsible for the management of the environment by coordinating, monitoring, coordinating, supervising and regulating all activities in the field of environment.The Mandate is strengthened by the Vision, “An Efficient Agency, With People in Uganda Living In A Clean, Healthy, Productive And Sustainable Environment”. The Mission is “To promote and ensure sound environmental management practices for sustainable development”; while the Goal is “To promote sound environmental management and prudent use of environment and natural resources in Uganda”.
2.2 The Development ObjectiveNEMA’s development objective is to create, establish and maintain an efficient mechanism for sustainable environmental and natural resources management at the national, district and community levels.
2.3 The Core ValuesOver the years NEMA has established a culture that pursues: client focus; integrity and transparency; professional motivation and commitment; innovation and creativity; open, cross-functional and all participatory decision making and problem solving; partnerships and collaboration; and, passion for sustainable environment.
2.4 Statutory FunctionsAs a regulatory Agency, NEMA draws authority which is embedded in the National Environment Act Cap. 153, to:(a) coordinate the implementation of Government policies and the decision of the Policy Committee on Environment;(b) ensure the integration of environmental concerns in overall national planning through coordination
with the relevant ministries, departments and agencies of government;(c) liaise with the private sector, inter-governmental organisations, non-governmental and governmental
agencies of other states on issues relating to the environment;
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
5(d) propose environmental policies and strategies to the Policy Committee;(e) initiate legislative proposals, standards and guidelines on the environment in accordance with the law;(f) review and approve environmental impact assessments and environmental impact statements
submitted in accordance with the National Environment Act;(g) promote public awareness through formal and non-formal education about environmental issues; (h) undertake studies and submit such reports and recommendations with respect to the environment as
the Government or the Policy Committee may consider necessary;(i) ensure observance of proper safeguards in the planning and execution of all development projects,
including those already in existence that have or are likely to have significant impact on the environment determined in accordance with schedule II of the National Environment Act;
(j) undertake research, and disseminate information about the environment;(k) prepare and disseminate the national state of the environment report (NSOER) once in every two years;(l) mobilise, expedite and monitor resources for environmental management; and(m) perform such other functions as the government may assign to the Authority;
2.5 Institutional Set-up 2.5.1 NEMA Structure
At the apex of NEMA’s institutional set-up is the Policy Committee on Environment (PCE), chaired by the Prime Minister. The PCE consists of the Ministers responsible for the following: Environment and natural resources; Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries; Finance, and Economic Planning; Education and Sports; Trade, Tourism and Industry; Health; Gender, Labour and Social Development; Local Government; Works and Transport, and Energy and Mineral development. The Board Chairman and the Executive Director are ex-officials. The role of the PCE is to: provide policy guidance, formulate and coordinate environmental policies; liaise with the Cabinet on issues affecting the environment; identify obstacles to the implementation of those policies and programs; and, perform any other functions that may be assigned by the Government.
The Minister responsible for Environment, who is also the alternate Chairperson of the PCE, provides overall policy direction, supervision, guidance, and monitors performance of NEMA and the implementation of government policies.
NEMA is governed by Statutory Committees and Board of Directors, with a well established Secretariat carrying out the daily functions. The governance of the Authority is vested in the Board of Directors (BOD) appointed by the Minister responsible for Environment. The role of the BOD, among others, is to oversee the operations of the Authority, review the policy and strategic plan of NEMA; approve budgets and plans, monitor and evaluate the performance of NEMA, and provide guidance to the Executive Director. The recently inaugurated BOD is the fifth since the inception of NEMA.
There are two Committees of the Board in-charge of Personnel/Administration, and Finance, respectively. The Board also has five Statutory Technical Committees handling matters pertaining to: (i) Soil Conservation; (ii) Licensing of Pollution; (iii) Biodiversity Conservation; (iv) Environment Impact Assessment; and, (v) the Adhoc Committee on the Development of Environmental Standards.
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
6The NEMA Secretariat (internal structure of NEMA) is composed of the: Office of the Executive Director (including the Deputy Executive Director, and the Monitoring and Evaluation, the Legal and Public Relations Sections); Department of Finance and Administration; Department of District Support Coordination and Public Education; Department of Policy, Planning and Information; and, Department of Environment Monitoring and Compliance. The Office of the Executive Director oversees the daily operations of NEMA, and it is also responsible for providing legal advice and taking care of public relations matters.
2.5.2 Linkages with Line-Ministries and DistrictsThe line-ministries constitute the horizontal linkage with NEMA. While NEMA is responsible for monitoring, planning and coordination of environmental matters, implementation role is the responsibility of the relevant line-ministries. The Environment Liaison Units focal-points exist in each line-ministry and are charged with the responsibility of integrating environmental concerns into the respective line-ministry sectoral plans, and implementing environmental activities within their mandate, for example, reviewing Environment Impact Statements (EISs).
2.5.3 Linkages with the Districts
The districts form the vertical linkage with NEMA. The development of strong links between the resource users and the Authority is very crucial for effective implementation of the National Environment Action Plan. NEMA therefore, has focused programmes aimed at: building local government environmental planning capacity supported by an information and knowledge base, to enable them to sustainably manage the environment and natural resources within their jurisdiction
In this respect, NEMA has been over the years assisting local government to develop their respective environmental action plans, policies and bye-laws, recruitment of district environment officers, project support, tooling/equipping, among others. Hence, NEMA has focused its programme activities on building local government environment management capacity to enable them advocate and take initiatives to manage their own environment and natural resources in a sustainable manner; (the capacity building initiatives by NEMA are aimed at enhancing decentralized environment management in local governments).
2.6 Stakeholder CollaborationNEMA ensures that environmental concerns are integrated into the planning processes at national, local governments, and community levels. Since environment management is a cross-cutting matter, it calls for networking and partnership with different stakeholders, to ensure sustainable socio-economic development. The stakeholders that NEMA collaborates within environment management include: donors/development partners; lead agencies; local governments; communities; NGOs/CBOs; media; academia; the public; individuals and the private sector.
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
7CHAPTER THREE
3.0 CONTRIBUTION OF NEMA TO NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
3.1 Contribution to National Development and regional/ international partnerships
Uganda’s economy heavily relies on the environment and natural resource base. Agriculture continues to determine Uganda’s success in terms of economic growth and poverty reduction. The sector’s share of GDP remains high at 21 per cent having only recently reduced from 47.7% in the late 1990s and 41.6% in the early 2000s. The sector also continues to absorb the largest share of the labour force, for which more than 73 per cent of the population is engaged in agricultural production – in mostly the primary agricultural sub-sector. Primary sector products in particular, feature prominently in Uganda’s development plans – in the previous PEAP and now in the National Development Plan.
NEMA has played a leading role in the formulation and development of policies, plans, laws, regulations, guidelines, and standards; training and skills development; integration of environmental concerns in planning processes; and, environmental information and education and review of various sector policies.
The laws and regulations focus on aspects such as pollution and management of different natural resources.
Training and skills development includes training and equipping of different stakeholders.
Environmental information and education has led to development of environmental education curricula for primary to tertiary levels, as well as non-formal and informal sectors and integration of ENR management into university and tertiary institutional programs
NEMA has participated fully in the formulation of national development programs/projects like plan for the National Development Plan (NDP), the Plan for the Modernization of Agriculture (PMA), National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS), Northern Uganda Social Action Fund (NUSAF), Peace, Recovery and Development Plan for Northern Uganda (PRDP) and Prosperity for All (PFA) Strategy and implementation of the MDGs.
NEMA participates in regional and international projects, fora and organizations to enhance sound environment management and sustainable development with particular focus on the international conventions (ratification and domestication) and cross border environmental resources. Such fora or organizations include Lake Victoria Environment Management Program (LVEMP), Nile Basin Initiative (NBI), East African Community (EAC), Multi Environmental Agreements (MEAs), UNDP, UNEP and other regional/international partners.
Currently NEMA is coordinating/ implementing/ participating in some international projects related to the following:• Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Municipal Solid Waste Composting Project• Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM)• Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)• Ozone Depleting Substances• Rio-MEAs (Multi-Environmental Agreements)
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
8CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 NEMA’S PERFORMANCE 2008/9 FY
One of the key outputs of NEMA is an annual report, and this has been done since its inception in 1996. The 2009/10 Report, however, has been enriched in scope, targeting a wider readership at all levels of governance in Uganda, as well as other partners and stakeholders.
NEMA’s annual report is important because it serves the purpose of legal requirements by Government of Uganda, NEMA Financial and Accounting Regulations and requirements by programmes/projects. The annual report is also essential for public accountability for resources utilized and corporate image building.
One of the core functions of NEMA is to ensure compliance with the environmental laws and regulations among different regulated communities, to ensure a clean and healthy environment. The Compliance and Enforcement Strategy (CES) of NEMA aims at achieving 100% internal organizational performance and 70% facility (developments – e.g., projects) compliance to environment-related legal requirements by the year 2014. The key expected outcomes of successful implementation of this strategy include: increased self monitoring and auditing; reduced public complaints; reduced water, air and land pollution; increased EIA and permit applications; increased regulated community participation in compliance monitoring; reinforced credibility of environmental protection efforts; and, reduced ecosystem loss and increased ecosystem restoration and ecosystem services.
The long term impact of the CES will be improved environmental quality, public health and increased economic benefits to individuals, to society, and Uganda’s economy, by reducing costs and liabilities both at the level of an individual entity and implementation of development initiatives, respectively. The Strategy has the following key result areas achieve the desired goal, namely: enhance compliance monitoring, enforcement and reporting; strengthen compliance assistance for increased impact; ensure timely review and processing of EIA and permit applications; enhance data collection, processing and analysis for decision making; enhance provision of ecosystem services; environment integration into policies, plans and programmes/projects at national and local government levels strengthened.
4.1 NEMA’s KEY RESULT AREAS/ STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES The performance pillars that are in NEMA’s five-year Strategic Plan emphasize continuous performance improvement to meet the emerging environmental issues and development challenges like oil and gas, urban waste management and climate. The performance pillars are:a) Environmental compliance and enforcement of environmental law, regulations and standards enhanced;b) Environment integration into policies, plans and programs/projects at national and local government
levels strengthened;c) Access to environmental information, education/awareness, and public participation enhanced;d) NEMA’s institutional capacity to perform its mandate strengthened; ande) National, regional and international partnerships and network for effective environment management
and sustainable development enhanced.
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
9NEMA’s strategic objectives and key performance areas feed into the ENR Platinum Indicators and sector outcomes that focus on sustainable and productive natural resources base and healthy environment for improved livelihoods (poverty reduction, economic growth and environmental health)
(a) Resources accessed and utilized Table 1 below shows the budget performance for FY 2009/10
Table 1: The budget performance for FY 2009_10GOU Wage Non Wage Development TotalApproved 2,313,000,000 2,497,000,000 1,050,000,000 5,860,000,000Released 2,243,000,000 2,204,000,000 735,000,000 5,182,800,000 (88%)Spent 2,243,000,000 2,188,680,000 732,380,038 5,164,060,310 (99.6%)EMCBPII-AF
Approved 10,500,000,000 - - 10,500,000,000Released 1,500,000,000 - - 1,500,000,000 (14%)Spent 1,500,000,000 - - 1,500,000,000 (100%)
Explanatory note to the above table:• There was a budget short fall of Ugx 680,000,000 (12% of the approved GOU budget); this affected the
annual workplan as such some of the planned activities were not implemented;• EMCBPII-Additional Finance (World Bank funded project) became effective in September, 2009 (in the
course of the financial year) while 10,500,000,000 was provided in the MTEF during the BFP process and approved by Parliament. However, the project released only Ugx 1.5 billion in the whole financial year; NEMA committed and utilized all the released fund; this affected the activities that should have been supported by the project
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
10
(b
) O
utpu
ts a
nd re
sults
aga
inst
pla
ns
Tabl
e 2
show
s th
e hi
ghlig
hts
of th
e ac
tual
/ach
ieve
d ou
tput
s/re
sults
aga
inst
the
annu
al w
orkp
lan:
Tabl
e 2:
Hig
hlig
hts
of th
e ac
hiev
ed o
utpu
ts/re
sults
aga
inst
the
2009
-10
wor
kpla
n
KEY
RES
ULT
A
REA
S / S
TRA
TEG
IC
OB
JEC
TIVE
S
AC
TIVI
TY
DES
CR
IPTI
ON
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
NEX
PLA
NA
TOR
Y R
EMA
RK
SPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
IND
ICA
TOR
PLA
NN
EDA
CH
IEVE
DPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
RA
TIN
G
1
ENVI
RO
NM
ENTA
L C
OM
PLIA
NC
EA
ND
EN
FOR
CEM
ENT
OF
THE
LAW
,ST
REN
GTH
ENED
Envi
ronm
enta
l Com
plia
nce
Insp
ectio
ns
Car
ry o
ut
insp
ectio
ns
and
audi
ts
(cou
ntry
-wid
e fa
cilit
y an
d la
nd
use
insp
ectio
ns
and
audi
ts
Gov
ernm
ents
.
Num
ber o
f In
spec
tions
600
insp
ectio
ns
and
audi
ts
(cou
ntry
-wid
e fa
cilit
y an
d la
nd
use
insp
ectio
ns
and
audi
ts
7211
120.
2%(C
ompa
red
to
115%
in F
Y 20
08
/ 200
9)
The
incr
ease
is d
ue to
: (a)
incr
ease
d fa
cilit
y/in
dust
ry
insp
ectio
ns in
Kam
pala
, Jin
ja, M
ukon
o, W
akis
o, Ig
anga
, M
bale
, Tor
oro,
Bus
ia, L
ira, G
ulu,
Aru
a, N
ebbi
, Moy
o,
Kobo
ko, A
djum
ani,
Mas
aka,
and
Mba
rara
; (b)
incr
ease
d in
cide
nces
of n
oise
pol
lutio
n; (c
) est
ablis
hmen
t of N
EMA
Fiel
d O
ffice
for o
il an
d ga
s in
spec
tions
; (d)
mul
ti-se
ctor
al
surv
eilla
nce
/ ins
pect
ions
.M
onito
ring
of
Affo
rest
atio
n of
Bar
e H
ills
in R
uhaa
ma,
N
tung
amo
2 M
onito
ring
visi
ts2
Visi
ts
unde
rtake
n10
0% a
chie
ved
The
Com
mun
ities
hav
e re
ques
ted
for m
ore
supp
ort f
or tr
ee-
plan
ting.
1 It i
s w
orth
not
ing
that
som
e in
dust
ries
and
nois
e po
llutio
n so
urce
s w
ere
insp
ecte
d m
ore
than
onc
e, fo
r fol
low
up
purp
oses
, in
line
with
the
requ
ired
com
plia
nce
mea
sure
s. T
his
partl
y ex
plai
ns th
e in
crea
se in
the
num
ber o
f in
spec
tions
und
erta
ken.
The
re a
re o
ver 2
,500
pro
ject
s w
ith E
IA a
ppro
val.
Acco
rdin
gly
the
Insp
ectio
ns a
nd A
udits
Sec
tion
has
step
ped
up a
nd p
riorit
ized
faci
lity
com
plia
nce
insp
ectio
ns. T
he c
ompl
ianc
e be
havi
or in
dica
tes
that
with
con
sist
ent f
ollo
w u
p, fa
cilit
ies
tend
to c
ompl
y w
ith m
ost o
f the
env
ironm
enta
l req
uire
men
ts. M
ost o
f the
faci
litie
s ar
e im
plem
entin
g re
quire
d co
rrect
ive
actio
ns fo
llow
ing
the
com
plia
nce/
audi
t ins
pect
ions
und
erta
ken
by N
EMA,
in c
olla
bora
tion
with
the
resp
ectiv
e Le
ad A
genc
ies
and
loca
l Gov
ernm
ents
. The
maj
ority
of m
anuf
actu
ring
indu
strie
s di
scha
rgin
g ef
fluen
t wer
e, h
owev
er, f
ound
not
hav
ing
efflu
ent t
reat
men
t pla
nts
(ETP
s) a
nd/o
r by
-pas
sing
the
ETPs
(tho
se th
at h
ave)
. Tho
se w
ithou
t ETP
s ha
ve in
itiat
ed th
e pr
oces
s of
con
stru
ctin
g th
e pl
ants
and
thos
e fo
und
by-p
assi
ng th
eir t
reat
men
t sys
tem
s ar
e un
der s
urve
illanc
e. T
here
are
ove
r 2,5
00 p
roje
cts
with
EIA
app
rova
l. Ac
cord
ingl
y th
e In
spec
tions
and
Aud
its S
ectio
n ha
s st
eppe
d up
and
prio
ritiz
ed fa
cilit
y co
mpl
ianc
e in
spec
tions
. The
com
plia
nce
beha
vior
indi
cate
s th
at w
ith c
onsi
sten
t fol
low
up,
faci
litie
s te
nd to
com
ply
with
mos
t of t
he e
nviro
nmen
tal r
equi
rem
ents
. Mos
t of t
he fa
cilit
ies
are
impl
emen
ting
requ
ired
corre
ctiv
e ac
tions
follo
win
g th
e co
mpl
ianc
e/au
dit i
nspe
ctio
ns u
nder
take
n by
NEM
A, in
col
labo
ratio
n w
ith th
e re
spec
tive
Lead
Ag
enci
es a
nd lo
cal G
over
nmen
ts. T
he m
ajor
ity o
f man
ufac
turin
g in
dust
ries
disc
harg
ing
efflu
ent w
ere,
how
ever
, fou
nd n
ot h
avin
g ef
fluen
t tre
atm
ent p
lant
s (E
TPs)
and
/or b
y-pa
ssin
g th
e ET
Ps (t
hose
that
hav
e). T
hose
with
out E
TPs
have
initi
ated
the
proc
ess
of c
onst
ruct
ing
the
plan
ts a
nd th
ose
foun
d by
-pas
sing
thei
r tre
atm
ent s
yste
ms
are
unde
r sur
veilla
nce.
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
11
Tabl
e 2:
Hig
hlig
hts
of th
e ac
hiev
ed o
utpu
ts/re
sults
aga
inst
the
2009
-10
wor
kpla
n (C
ontin
ued
from
pag
e 10
)
KEY
RES
ULT
A
REA
S / S
TRA
TEG
IC
OB
JEC
TIVE
S
AC
TIVI
TY
DES
CR
IPTI
ON
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
NEX
PLA
NA
TOR
Y R
EMA
RK
SPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
IND
ICA
TOR
PLA
NN
EDA
CH
IEVE
DPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
RA
TIN
GR
ecei
ve
and
revi
ew
Envi
ronm
enta
l Au
dits
No.
of
Envi
ronm
enta
l Au
dits
rece
ived
an
d re
view
ed
NA
279
Aud
its
rece
ived
(c
ompa
red
to 1
20
durin
g in
FY
2008
/9)
Out
of t
he 2
79
audi
ts re
ceiv
ed,
a to
tal 9
7 (3
5%)
revi
ewed
and
co
mpl
ianc
e ag
reem
ents
si
gned
with
de
velo
pers
/ fa
cilit
y ow
ners
.
Abou
t 152
repo
rts, h
owev
er, w
ere
rece
ived
tow
ards
the
end
of th
e la
st tw
o qu
arte
rs a
nd c
ould
not
be
clea
red
with
in
the
finan
cial
yea
r; an
d, la
te o
r no
subm
issi
on o
f rev
iew
co
mm
ents
from
lead
age
ncie
s; d
elay
ed re
spon
se to
dra
ft co
mpl
ianc
e ag
reem
ents
by
deve
lope
rs /
faci
lity
owne
rs.
Rev
iew
and
ap
prov
al o
f EIA
R
epor
ts
No.
of E
IAs
rece
ived
, re
view
ed a
nd
appr
oved
NA
395
EIAs
ap
prov
ed
(com
pare
d to
519
pr
ojec
ts
appr
oved
in
FY20
08/0
9)
98%
of t
he
rece
ived
EIA
s w
ere
revi
ewed
Appr
oval
of s
ome
proj
ects
is d
elay
ed d
ue p
artly
to g
aps
or a
nom
alie
s in
EIA
repo
rts s
ubm
itted
and
del
ayed
su
bmis
sion
s of
revi
ew re
ports
from
som
e Le
ad A
genc
ies
2 Due
to in
crea
sed
com
plia
nce-
insp
ectio
ns a
num
ber o
f fac
ilitie
s th
at w
ere
foun
d no
n-co
mpl
iant
wer
e re
quire
d, a
mon
g ot
her c
orre
ctiv
e m
easu
res,
to c
arry
out
env
ironm
enta
l aud
its.
This
exp
lain
s in
crea
sed
expo
nent
ial
incr
ease
in n
umbe
r of a
udits
und
erta
ken
and
subm
itted
for r
evie
w. T
he m
ost n
otab
le s
ubm
issi
ons
cam
e fro
m te
leco
mm
unic
atio
n co
mpa
nies
, fue
l sta
tions
, and
man
ufac
turin
g in
dust
ries.
For
fuel
sta
tions
in p
artic
ular
, was
a
form
al n
otic
e fro
m th
e M
inis
try o
f Ene
rgy
and
Min
eral
Dev
elop
men
t req
uirin
g co
nduc
t of e
nviro
nmen
tal a
udits
as
part
of re
licen
sing
pro
cess
. Ove
rall,
this
has
impr
oved
com
plia
nce
amon
g th
e re
gula
ted
entit
ies.
Due
to
incr
ease
d co
mpl
ianc
e-in
spec
tions
a n
umbe
r of f
acilit
ies
that
wer
e fo
und
non-
com
plia
nt w
ere
requ
ired,
am
ong
othe
r cor
rect
ive
mea
sure
s, to
car
ry o
ut e
nviro
nmen
tal a
udits
. Th
is e
xpla
ins
incr
ease
d ex
pone
ntia
l inc
reas
e in
num
ber o
f aud
its u
nder
take
n an
d su
bmitt
ed fo
r rev
iew
. The
mos
t not
able
sub
mis
sion
s ca
me
from
tele
com
mun
icat
ion
com
pani
es, f
uel s
tatio
ns, a
nd m
anuf
actu
ring
indu
strie
s. F
or fu
el s
tatio
ns in
par
ticul
ar, w
as a
form
al
notic
e fro
m th
e M
inis
try o
f Ene
rgy
and
Min
eral
Dev
elop
men
t req
uirin
g co
nduc
t of e
nviro
nmen
tal a
udits
as
part
of re
licen
sing
pro
cess
. Ove
rall,
this
has
impr
oved
com
plia
nce
amon
g th
e re
gula
ted
entit
ies.
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
12
Tabl
e 2:
Hig
hlig
hts
of th
e ac
hiev
ed o
utpu
ts/re
sults
aga
inst
the
2009
-10
wor
kpla
n (C
ontin
ued
from
pag
e 11
)
KEY
RES
ULT
A
REA
S / S
TRA
TEG
IC
OB
JEC
TIVE
S
AC
TIVI
TY
DES
CR
IPTI
ON
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
NEX
PLA
NA
TOR
Y R
EMA
RK
SPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
IND
ICA
TOR
PLA
NN
EDA
CH
IEVE
DPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
RA
TIN
GSp
ecia
l in
spec
tions
on
poly
ethy
lene
m
ater
ials
No.
of
Insp
ectio
ns,
qu
antit
ies
seiz
ed.
25
insp
ectio
ns
20 in
spec
tions
car
ried
out (
500
carto
ns o
f po
lyet
hyle
ne m
ater
ials
se
ized
and
sto
red
at U
RA
80%
ach
ieve
men
tTh
e de
laye
d im
plem
enta
tion
on th
e to
tal b
an
on th
e po
lyet
hyle
ne m
ater
ials
affe
cted
the
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
the
ban
Supp
ort t
o Ka
mpa
la
Met
ropo
litan
Po
lice
(trai
ning
, fu
ndin
g, to
olin
g an
d eq
uipp
ing)
Envi
ronm
ent
Des
k in
Uga
nda
Polic
e Fo
rce
supp
orte
d
Ope
ratio
nal
supp
ort t
o En
viro
nmen
t D
esk
at U
gand
a Po
lice
HQ
s
Envi
ronm
ent D
esk
at
Polic
e H
Qs
supp
orte
d in
co
mpl
ianc
e/en
forc
emen
t ac
tiviti
es
50%
Inad
equa
te fu
ndin
g an
d lim
ited
num
ber o
f Po
lice
pers
onne
l affe
cted
requ
ired
supp
ort
from
the
polic
e.
Poss
ibly
the
Envi
ronm
ent P
rote
ctio
n Fo
rce
will
supp
ort N
EMA
and
othe
r Lea
d Ag
enci
es
and
com
plem
ent t
he e
fforts
from
the
Polic
ePu
blic
dis
clos
ure
of fa
cilit
ies
com
plia
nce
No.
of f
acilit
ies
disc
lose
dAs
sess
men
t an
d pu
blic
atio
n/D
iscl
osur
e of
fa
cilit
y co
mpl
ianc
e le
vels
List
of k
ey e
nviro
nmen
tal
pollu
ters
and
deg
rade
rs
publ
iciz
ed in
new
spap
ers
45%
The
disc
losu
re p
roce
dure
s an
d gu
idel
ines
ha
ve n
ot b
een
prod
uced
due
to in
adeq
uate
fu
ndin
g
Purc
hase
of
lega
l mat
eria
ls
for t
he le
gal
cham
bers
to
enh
ance
co
mpl
ianc
e an
d en
forc
emen
t
No.
of c
opie
s of
th
e C
ompe
ndiu
m
of th
e la
ws
of
Uga
nda
Purc
hase
and
di
ssem
inat
e le
gal
docu
men
ts to
key
Le
ad A
genc
ies
Nil
Not
impl
emen
ted
due
to in
adeq
uate
fund
ing
Trai
ning
of
Envi
ronm
enta
l In
spec
tors
(in
clud
e po
lice)
No.
of w
orks
hops
co
nduc
ted;
nu
mbe
r of
insp
ecto
rs tr
aine
d
2 Tr
aini
ng
Wor
kshw
ops;
14
0 In
spec
tors
Tr
aine
d
1 W
orks
hop;
80
Insp
ecto
rs
train
edO
ne tr
aini
ng fo
r 80
Insp
ecto
rs –
57
% a
chie
ved
The
seco
nd tr
aini
ng w
as d
elay
ed a
nd ro
lled
over
to th
e ne
xt q
uarte
r due
to re
adju
stm
ent
and
re-p
riorit
izat
ion
of a
ctiv
ities
und
er
EMC
BP-II
fund
ing.
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
13
Tab
le 2
: Hig
hlig
hts
of th
e ac
hiev
ed o
utpu
ts/re
sults
aga
inst
the
2009
-10
wor
kpla
n (C
ontin
ued
from
pag
e 12
)
KEY
RES
ULT
A
REA
S / S
TRA
TEG
IC
OB
JEC
TIVE
S
AC
TIVI
TY
DES
CR
IPTI
ON
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
NEX
PLA
NA
TOR
Y R
EMA
RK
SPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
IND
ICA
TOR
PLA
NN
EDA
CH
IEVE
DPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
RA
TIN
GPr
intin
g of
3
regu
latio
ns o
n ai
r qu
ality
, vib
ratio
ns
and
was
te
man
agem
ent.
No.
of c
opie
s pr
inte
d3
Reg
ulat
ions
N
ilN
ATh
e re
gula
tions
hav
e no
t bee
n pr
oduc
ed d
ue to
inad
equa
te fu
ndin
g in
FY
2009
/10
Res
tora
tion
of fr
agile
deg
rade
d ec
osys
tem
sSu
ppor
t to
20 m
icro
-pr
ojec
ts to
rest
ore
the
degr
aded
frag
ile
ecos
yste
ms
with
in
Lake
Vic
toria
and
th
e up
per N
ile
catc
hmen
t are
as
(Tre
e pl
antin
g)
No.
of m
icro
-pr
ojec
ts
supp
orte
d;
num
ber o
f tre
es
plan
ted
and
ac
reag
e co
vere
d
20 m
icro
pro
ject
s31
rest
orat
ion
mic
ro p
roje
cts
supp
orte
d in
the
dist
ricts
of
Rak
ai, I
sing
iro, M
asak
a,
Mpi
gi, M
ukon
o, W
akis
o,
Kayu
nga,
Jin
ja, M
ayug
e,
Bugi
ri an
d Ka
mul
i
155%
The
high
per
form
ance
rate
has
bee
n du
e to
fund
ing
from
NEF
and
the
incr
easi
ng d
eman
d fo
r tre
e se
edlin
gs
from
inst
itutio
ns/s
choo
ls a
nd c
hurc
hes
Dem
arca
tion
and
rest
orat
ion
of 6
de
grad
ed fr
agile
ec
osys
tem
s (w
etla
nds
and
river
bank
s/la
kesh
ores
)
No.
of d
egra
ded
fragi
le
ecos
yste
ms
rest
ored
Dem
arca
tion
and
rest
orat
ion
of C
hots
a Ba
y (K
isor
o), K
yetin
da
(Kam
pala
), G
arug
a-N
kum
ba
wet
land
s (W
akis
o) a
nd
Buja
ga w
etla
nds
(Mba
rara
)
Com
mun
ity m
obiliz
ed fo
r the
re
stor
atio
n of
the
wet
land
s.
All t
he 6
wet
land
s ha
ve b
een
dem
arca
ted
70%
Rest
orat
ion
of th
e we
tland
s ha
s be
en
slow
or in
effe
ctive
bec
ause
they
are
st
ill hu
man
deg
radi
ng h
uman
act
ivitie
s lik
e cu
ltivat
ion
and
settl
emen
ts w
ith th
e we
tland
s; e
victio
ns h
ave
been
diff
icult
due
to re
sista
nce
and
lack
of s
uppo
rt an
d co
mm
itmen
ts fr
om o
ther
par
tner
s/Le
ad
Agen
cies.
Thi
s ha
s af
fect
ed m
ost
of th
e we
tland
s pa
rticu
larly
urb
an e
cosy
stem
s lik
e Ky
etin
da a
nd K
inaw
atak
aPr
otec
tion
of G
reen
Be
lts in
Urb
an a
reas
in
Mba
le, K
ampa
la
and
Bush
enyi
tow
ns
No.
of g
reen
belts
pr
otec
ted
Prot
ectio
n of
3
gree
nbel
ts in
M
bale
, Kam
pala
an
d Bu
shen
yi
Urb
an A
utho
ritie
s
The
3 U
rban
Aut
horit
ies
have
bee
n co
nsul
ted.
Gro
und
leve
ling
and
land
scap
ing
com
men
ced
in
Bush
enyi
-Isha
ka T
own
40%
This
act
ivity
has
bee
n af
fect
ed b
y in
adeq
uate
fund
ing
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
14
Tab
le 2
: Hig
hlig
hts
of th
e ac
hiev
ed o
utpu
ts/re
sults
aga
inst
the
2009
-10
wor
kpla
n (C
ontin
ued
from
pag
e 13
)
KEY
RES
ULT
A
REA
S / S
TRA
TEG
IC
OB
JEC
TIVE
S
AC
TIVI
TY
DES
CR
IPTI
ON
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
NEX
PLA
NA
TOR
Y R
EMA
RK
SPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
IND
ICA
TOR
PLA
NN
EDA
CH
IEVE
DPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
RA
TIN
GSu
ppor
t EIA
and
Aud
it pr
oces
ses
with
in N
EMA
and
Lea
d A
genc
ies
Mee
tings
of
Envi
ronm
enta
l Pr
actit
ione
rs
Com
mitt
ee
Num
ber o
f m
eetin
gs h
eld.
8 m
eetin
gs4
mee
tings
hel
d50
% a
chie
ved
The
aver
age
perfo
rman
ce is
at
tribu
ted
to th
e fa
ctor
of l
ack
of
quor
um a
nd d
elay
s du
e to
cha
nged
in
com
posit
ion
of m
embe
rshi
p.Tr
aini
ng o
f En
viro
nmen
tal
Prac
titio
ners
Num
ber o
f Pr
actit
ione
rs
train
ed
81 P
ract
ition
ers
Nil
NA
Activ
ities
not
impl
emen
ted
due
to
the
non-
avai
labi
lity
of fu
nds
from
th
e in
itial
tagg
ed N
EF s
ourc
eO
rgan
ize
Qua
rterly
m
eetin
gs fo
r th
e St
atut
ory
Com
mitt
ees
Num
ber o
f qu
arte
rly
mee
tings
4 m
eetin
gs
(Bio
dive
rsity
; EI
A; P
ollu
tion
Lice
nsin
g; S
oils
)
2 m
eetin
gs h
eld
– Bi
odiv
ersi
ty a
nd
Pollu
tion
Lice
nsin
g50
% a
chie
ved
EIA
and
Soils
com
mitt
ees
not y
et
been
re-c
onst
itute
d.
Supp
ort
impl
emen
tatio
n of
N
BSAP
/ABS
Num
ber o
f Su
ppor
t act
iviti
es
carri
ed o
ut
1 M
eetin
g1
Cap
acity
-bui
ldin
g W
orks
hop
– on
trai
ning
law
enf
orce
men
t offi
cer
on e
nviro
nmen
tal l
aws
for t
he
prot
ectio
n of
she
a-nu
t tre
e sp
ecie
s in
nor
ther
n (L
ira) U
gand
a.
100%
ac
hiev
emen
tM
ore
cove
rage
nee
ded.
Sup
port
for c
omm
unity
-bas
ed tr
ee-p
lant
ing
for r
esto
ratio
n of
deg
rade
d sh
ea-b
utte
r tre
e ar
eas.
Fol
low
-up
enfo
rcem
ent i
s ne
eded
.Fa
cilit
ate
form
ulat
ion
of o
rdin
ance
s/by
elaw
s in
4
L.G
s (N
akas
eke,
Bu
daka
, Isi
ngiro
and
Bu
kede
a)
Num
ber o
f di
stric
ts fa
cilit
ated
to
form
ulat
e by
e-la
ws
and
ordi
nanc
es
4 di
stric
ts
– Bu
daka
, Bu
kede
a,
Nak
asek
e an
d Is
ingi
ro
Two
dist
ricts
faci
litat
ed –
Bud
aka
and
Buke
dea
50%
- pa
rtly
due
to b
udge
t cut
s in
G
oU M
TEF.
Isin
giro
and
Nak
asek
e w
ill be
fa
cilit
ated
in F
Y 20
10/1
1.
Org
aniz
e tra
inin
g fo
r po
lice
and
Judi
ciar
y on
env
ironm
enta
l cr
imes
and
cas
e m
anag
emen
t
Num
ber
of tr
aini
ng
wor
ksho
ps a
nd
Polic
e O
ffice
rs
train
ed
2 re
gion
al
wor
ksho
ps1
regi
onal
wor
ksho
p he
ld a
nd o
ver
70 P
olic
e O
ffice
rs tr
aine
d50
%Li
mite
d fu
ndin
g af
fect
ed th
e se
cond
pla
nned
trai
ning
in
Kara
moj
a re
gion
.
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
15
Tabl
e 2:
Hig
hlig
hts
of th
e ac
hiev
ed o
utpu
ts/re
sults
aga
inst
the
2009
-10
wor
kpla
n (C
ontin
ued
from
pag
e 14
)
KEY
RES
ULT
A
REA
S / S
TRA
TEG
IC
OB
JEC
TIVE
S
AC
TIVI
TY
DES
CR
IPTI
ON
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
NEX
PLA
NA
TOR
Y R
EMA
RK
SPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
IND
ICA
TOR
PLA
NN
EDA
CH
IEVE
DPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
RA
TIN
GO
rgan
ize
train
ing
on c
ompl
ianc
e/en
forc
emen
t for
M
Ps
Num
ber o
f MPs
se
nsiti
zed
NA
NA
NA
Not
fund
ed d
ue to
bud
get c
uts.
Con
stru
ctio
n of
a
com
mer
cial
in
cine
rato
r (pu
blic
-pr
ivat
e se
ctor
pa
rtner
ship
)
TOR
dev
elop
ed,
the
priv
ate
sect
or c
ompa
ny
iden
tifie
d an
d la
nd a
cqui
red
TOR
de
velo
pmen
t, pu
blic
-priv
ate
partn
ersh
ip
esta
blis
hmen
t an
d la
nd
acqu
isiti
on
TOR
for t
he c
onsu
ltanc
y de
velo
ped
30%
Not
fina
lized
due
to in
adeq
uate
fu
ndin
g
Mun
icip
al S
olid
Was
te (M
SW) C
ompo
stin
g
Prep
arat
ory
activ
ities
Awar
enes
s m
eetin
g w
ith
the
8 ad
ditio
nal
urba
n co
unci
ls;
1 m
eetin
g pe
r new
si
teH
eld
betw
een
Feb-
Apr
201
010
0%M
OU
s be
twee
n th
e U
rban
Au
thor
ities
and
NEM
A pr
epar
ed
Prep
arat
ion
and
Sign
ing
of M
oUs
MoU
s to
be si
gned
by
Jun
e 20
10M
oUs
final
ized
and
sig
ned
100%
The
MO
Us
prov
ide
for
resp
onsi
bilit
ies
and
oblig
atio
ns
of e
ntiti
es (N
EMA
and
Urb
an
Auth
oriti
es) i
n th
e pr
ojec
tPr
ocur
emen
t of
equi
pmen
t (ol
d an
d ne
w s
ites)
an
d co
nsul
tant
(d
esig
n an
d su
perv
isio
n –n
ew
site
s)
Prep
arat
ion
of b
id
docu
men
ts fo
r w
heel
load
ers
– ol
d si
tes;
EIO
for
cons
ulta
nt d
esig
n an
d su
perv
isio
n;
Issu
e R
FP fo
r de
sign
and
su
perv
isio
n.
Bids
aw
aitin
g ev
alua
tion
EIO
ev
alua
ted
and
the
RFP
sen
t out
to
shor
t-lis
ted
firm
s
90%
Inco
rpor
atio
n of
issu
es
rais
ed d
urin
g th
e aw
aren
ess
wor
ksho
ps; D
elay
s in
bid
ding
do
cum
enta
tion
for t
he w
heel
lo
ader
s; P
rocu
rem
ent p
lan
to b
e fo
llow
ed k
eenl
y; P
repa
ratio
n fo
r th
e su
perv
isin
g m
issi
on w
ith th
e W
orld
Ban
k
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
16
Ta
ble
2: H
ighl
ight
s of
the
achi
eved
out
puts
/resu
lts a
gain
st th
e 20
09-1
0 w
orkp
lan
(Con
tinue
d fr
om p
age
15)
KEY
RES
ULT
A
REA
S /
STR
ATE
GIC
O
BJE
CTI
VES
AC
TIVI
TY D
ESC
RIP
TIO
N
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
N
EXPL
AN
ATO
RY
REM
AR
KS
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E IN
DIC
ATO
RPL
AN
NED
AC
HIE
VED
PERF
ORM
ANCE
RA
TING
MSW
com
post
ing
Com
plet
ion
of K
abal
e M
SW C
ompo
stin
g si
teKa
bale
MSW
C
ompo
stin
g si
te
com
plet
ed
Com
petit
ion
of
Kaba
le s
ite b
y Ju
ne,
2010
Kaba
le s
ite c
ompl
eted
90%
The
site
aw
aits
adm
inis
trativ
e ha
nd o
ver
to K
abal
e M
unic
ipal
Cou
ncil
Addi
tiona
l equ
ipm
ent f
or
the
first
9 s
ites
(9 s
kip
load
ers
and
90 s
kips
)
Num
ber o
f ski
p loa
ders
an
d sk
ips
supp
lied
Proc
urem
ent a
nd
deliv
ery
of 9
ski
p lo
ader
s an
d 90
ski
ps
Bids
aw
aitin
g ev
alua
tion
30D
elay
in th
e bi
ddin
g do
cum
enta
tion
clea
ranc
es a
ffect
ed th
e pr
ocur
emen
t pr
oces
s
MSW
C tr
aini
ng fo
r M
unic
ipal
ities
Num
ber o
f m
unic
ipal
ities
trai
ned
Trai
n 9
mun
icip
aliti
esC
ompo
stin
g pe
rson
nel
train
ed in
9 p
roje
ct
mun
icip
aliti
es
100%
This
was
han
ds-o
n te
chni
cal t
rain
ing
cond
ucte
d fo
r 3 m
onth
s by
a te
am o
f the
W
orld
Ban
k co
ntra
cted
con
sulta
nts
from
In
dia
Cap
acity
bui
ldin
g fo
r Uga
nda
Polic
e in
env
ironm
enta
l m
ains
tream
ing
and
enfo
rcem
ent
Num
ber o
f tra
inin
g w
orks
hops
and
Pol
ice
Offi
cers
trai
ned
At le
ast 2
regi
onal
w
orks
hops
1 re
gion
al w
orks
hop
held
and
ove
r 70
Polic
e O
ffice
rs tr
aine
d
50%
The
train
ing
for K
aram
oja
regi
on w
as
affe
cted
by
the
budg
et c
uts
due
to
inad
equa
te fu
ndin
g
Prom
ote
the
use
of
econ
omic
inst
rum
ents
to
enha
nce
envi
ronm
enta
l co
mpl
ianc
e
No
of tr
aini
ng
wor
ksho
ps c
arrie
d ou
tC
ondu
ct 3
trai
ning
w
orks
hops
for k
ey
Lead
Age
ncie
s
2 tra
inin
g w
orks
hops
co
nduc
ted
for M
FPED
, M
AAIF
, MO
LG, N
PA
and
Loca
l Gov
ts
66.6
%N
ot a
ll th
e tra
inin
g w
orks
hops
cou
ld b
e ca
rried
out
bec
ause
lim
ited
fund
ing
Initi
ate,
For
mul
ate,
Rev
iew
And
Im
plem
ent
Polic
y, L
egal
Fra
mew
ork,
Reg
ulat
ions
, In
stitu
tiona
l St
ruct
ures
And
Gui
delin
es A
nd C
oord
inat
e W
ith A
ll St
akeh
olde
rs W
ith R
espe
ct T
o En
hanc
emen
t Of S
ervi
ce D
eliv
ery
In T
he E
nviro
nmen
t Man
agem
ent S
ub-S
ecto
r.In
itiat
e, fi
naliz
e or
am
end
legi
slat
ion
to c
ater
for
emer
ging
issu
es.
Reg
ulat
ions
dra
fted
Inte
grat
ion
of th
e
ban
of p
olye
thyl
ene
mat
eria
ls in
to th
e W
aste
Man
agem
ent
Reg
ulat
ions
Dra
fted
regu
latio
ns
on th
e ba
n of
po
lyet
hyle
ne m
ater
ials
is
read
y fo
r gaz
ettin
g
95%
The
activ
ities
requ
ire a
lot o
f mon
ey
of m
oney
bec
ause
they
invo
lve
a lo
t of
con
sulti
ng a
nd e
ngag
ing
man
y st
akeh
olde
rs. S
ome
aspe
cts
of th
ese
activ
ities
hav
e be
en in
corp
orat
ed in
the
wor
kpla
n in
EM
CBP
II-AF
e.g
.,
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
17
Ta
ble
2: H
ighl
ight
s of
the
achi
eved
out
puts
/resu
lts a
gain
st th
e 20
09-1
0 w
orkp
lan
(Con
tinue
d fr
om p
age
16)
KEY
RES
ULT
A
REA
S /
STR
ATE
GIC
O
BJE
CTI
VES
AC
TIVI
TY D
ESC
RIP
TIO
N
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
N
EXPL
AN
ATO
RY
REM
AR
KS
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E IN
DIC
ATO
RPL
AN
NED
AC
HIE
VED
PERF
ORM
ANCE
RA
TING
Reg
ulat
ions
dra
fted
Dra
ft e-
was
te
man
agem
ent
legi
slat
ion
In p
roce
ss40
%(a
) R
evie
w a
nd fi
naliz
atio
n of
Oil
spille
rs
regu
latio
ns;
Reg
ulat
ions
dra
fted
Rev
iew
and
fin
aliz
atio
n of
Oil
spille
rs re
gula
tions
In p
roce
ss(b
) R
evie
w a
nd fi
naliz
atio
n of
Air
Qua
lity
Reg
ulat
ions
Reg
ulat
ions
dra
fted
Rev
iew
and
fin
aliz
atio
n of
Air
Qua
lity
Reg
ulat
ions
In p
roce
ss
Ensu
re E
ffect
ive
Com
plia
nce
and
Enfo
rcem
ent O
f Set
Env
ironm
enta
l Leg
al F
ram
ewor
k Th
roug
h C
apac
ity B
uild
ing
and
Stre
ngth
enin
g O
f Ins
titut
iona
l A
rran
gem
ents
Trai
ning
in B
ye la
w
form
ulat
ion
and
enfo
rcem
ent f
or lo
cal
gove
rnm
ents
No
of tr
aini
ngs
carri
ed
out.
N
o. o
f dis
trict
s
4 di
stric
ts (
Buda
ka,
Buke
dea,
Nak
asek
e an
d Is
ingi
ro)
200
polit
ical
lea
ders
an
d te
chni
cal d
istri
ct
staf
f
Trai
ning
don
e in
tw
o di
stric
ts o
f Bud
aka
and
Buke
dea
50%
Ther
e is
nee
d fo
r fol
low
up
and
train
ing
activ
ities
don
e to
ass
ess
the
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
the
train
ing.
Fun
ds s
houl
d be
allo
cate
d fo
r thi
s ac
tivity
. Ve
ry fe
w d
istri
cts
have
dev
elop
ed b
y-la
ws
on e
nviro
nmen
tal m
anag
emen
t. Th
ey d
o no
t hav
e th
e fu
nds
and
lack
the
tech
nica
l ski
lls to
dev
elop
byl
aws.
St
reng
then
And
Em
pow
er L
ead
Age
ncie
s A
nd L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ents
To
Car
ry O
ut M
onito
ring,
Com
plia
nce
Ass
ista
nce
And
Enf
orce
men
t And
Inst
itute
A
Supp
ortiv
e C
ondu
cive
Env
ironm
ent F
or R
egul
ated
Com
mun
ities
And
Inve
stor
s.Tr
ain
pros
ecut
ion
agen
cies
on
envi
ronm
enta
l co
mpl
ianc
e &
enfo
rcem
ent r
egul
atio
ns
& gu
idel
ines
. Dev
elop
ca
se d
ocum
enta
tion
& pr
osec
utio
n pr
oces
s gu
idel
ines
.
No.
of p
rose
cutio
n ag
enci
es tr
aine
dTr
ain
50 o
ffice
rs fr
om
the
key
pros
ecut
ion
agen
cies
Not
impl
emen
ted
Affe
cted
by
inad
equa
te fu
ndin
g
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
18
Tabl
e 2:
Hig
hlig
hts
of th
e ac
hiev
ed o
utpu
ts/re
sults
aga
inst
the
2009
-10
wor
kpla
n (C
ontin
ued
from
pag
e 17
)
KEY
RES
ULT
A
REA
S /
STR
ATE
GIC
O
BJE
CTI
VES
AC
TIVI
TY
DES
CR
IPTI
ON
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
NEX
PLA
NA
TOR
Y R
EMA
RK
SPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
IND
ICA
TOR
PLA
NN
EDA
CH
IEVE
DPE
RFOR
MAN
CE
RATI
NG
Sens
itiza
tion
of m
agis
trate
s in
en
viro
nmen
tal l
aw
No.
of m
agis
trate
s se
nsiti
zed
Sens
itize
60
mag
istra
tes
Not
Impl
emen
ted
Sens
itiza
tion
of
Mem
bers
of P
arlia
men
t in
env
ironm
enta
l law
co
ncep
ts
No.
of M
Ps o
f se
nsiti
zed
Sens
itize
60
MPs
Not
Impl
emen
ted
due
to
inad
equa
te fu
ndin
g
2EN
VIR
ON
MEN
TAL
INTE
GR
ATI
ON
A
T N
ATI
ON
AL
AN
D L
OC
AL
GO
VER
NM
ENT
LEVE
LS
STR
ENG
THEN
ED
Rev
iew
of t
he N
atio
nal E
nviro
nmen
t Man
agem
ent P
olic
yC
omm
ence
the
revi
ew o
f th
e N
atio
nal E
nviro
nmen
t M
anag
emen
t Pol
icy
Rev
iew
pro
cess
co
mm
ence
dIn
itial
pro
cess
es
com
men
ced
incl
udin
g TO
Rs,
Sta
keho
lder
re
view
of T
OR
s
Term
s of
Ref
eren
ce
deve
lope
d50
%R
evie
w P
roce
ss to
be
com
plet
ed in
FY
2010
/11
Inte
grat
ion
of E
NR
at N
atio
nal a
nd L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent l
evel
sIn
tegr
ate
ENR
con
cern
s in
to th
e N
DP
and
PFA
ENR
inte
grat
ed in
to
the
ND
P an
d PF
AEN
R s
ecto
r wor
king
pa
pers
to in
form
the
ND
P de
velo
ped
Wet
land
, Wild
life,
For
estry
, En
viro
nmen
t, W
eath
er,
Clim
ate
and
Clim
ate
chan
ge p
aper
s co
mpl
eted
an
d su
bmitt
ed to
NPA
and
in
corp
orat
ion
in th
e N
DP
95%
ENR
inte
grat
ed a
s su
ppor
ting
sect
or in
the
ND
P
Supp
ort e
nviro
nmen
tal
mai
nstre
amin
g in
80
loca
l go
vern
men
ts
No.
of l
ocal
go
vern
men
ts c
over
edD
istri
ct B
FPs
revi
ewed
, ke
y di
stric
t per
sonn
el
in a
t lea
st 3
dis
trict
s tra
ined
3 di
stric
ts i.
e. B
utal
eja,
M
asin
di a
nd N
akas
ongo
la
supp
orte
d to
revi
ew th
eir
BFPs
, and
Offi
cial
s fro
m
Jinj
a, M
ayug
e, K
amul
i, Ka
liro,
Igan
ga, N
amut
umba
an
d Bu
giri
train
ed in
en
viro
nmen
tal m
ains
tream
ing
and
Budg
etin
g
100%
Proc
ess
to b
e re
plic
ated
in
othe
r dis
trict
s
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
19
Tabl
e 2:
Hig
hlig
hts
of th
e ac
hiev
ed o
utpu
ts/re
sults
aga
inst
the
2009
-10
wor
kpla
n (C
ontin
ued
from
pag
e 18
)
KEY
RES
ULT
AR
EAS
/ ST
RA
TEG
IC O
BJE
CTI
VES
AC
TIVI
TY
DES
CR
IPTI
ON
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
NEX
PLA
NA
TOR
Y R
EMA
RK
SPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
IND
ICA
TOR
PLA
NN
EDA
CH
IEVE
DPE
RFOR
MAN
CE
RATI
NGEc
onom
ic v
alua
tion
of th
e co
ntrib
utio
n th
e fo
rest
sec
tor t
o th
e ec
onom
y
Valu
atio
n of
the
cont
ribut
ion
of th
e fo
rest
sec
tor t
o th
e ec
onom
y
Valu
atio
n pr
oces
s co
mm
ence
dTO
Rs
deve
lope
d,
Con
sulta
nts
iden
tifie
d an
d st
eerin
g co
mm
ittee
put
in
plac
e
70%
Lim
ited
fund
ing
slow
ed
the
proc
ess
Annu
al fo
rum
on
sus
tain
able
de
velo
pmen
t pol
icy
initi
ativ
es w
ith
deve
lope
rs/p
rivat
e se
ctor
and
lead
ag
enci
es
Foru
m o
rgan
ized
Topi
cs/th
emes
on
Sus
tain
able
de
velo
pmen
t di
scus
sed
Stak
ehol
ders
incl
udin
g;
Min
iste
rs, M
Ps, G
ovt o
ffici
als,
D
evel
opm
ent p
artn
ers,
Ac
adem
ia, C
SOs,
the
Priv
ate
sect
or c
ame
toge
ther
to
disc
uss
vario
us to
pics
on
Sust
aina
ble
Dev
elop
men
t di
scus
sed
90%
Sele
ctio
n co
mm
ittee
pu
t in
plac
e id
entif
ied
the
mem
bers
of t
he
Thin
k Ta
nk b
ut fo
llow
-up
mee
tings
did
not
take
pl
ace
due
limite
d fu
nds
3A
CC
ESS
TO
ENVI
RO
NM
ENTA
L IN
FOR
MA
TIO
N,
AW
AR
ENES
S/ED
UC
ATI
ON
AN
D
PUB
LIC
PA
RTI
CIP
ATI
ON
EN
HA
NC
ED
Initi
ate
the
proc
ess
of
NSO
ER fo
r 201
0Pr
epar
atio
n pr
oces
s fo
r 201
0 N
SOER
sta
rted
Initi
al p
roce
sses
co
mpl
eted
NSO
ER C
onte
nt a
nd T
OR
s de
velo
ped
and
Con
sulta
nt
iden
tifie
d. S
ome
of th
e th
emat
ic re
ports
dev
elop
ed
90%
NSO
ER to
be
com
plet
ed
and
laun
ched
in F
Y 20
10/1
1
Supp
ort t
o 40
dis
trict
s to
pro
duce
Dis
trict
St
ate
of E
nviro
nmen
t R
epor
ts (D
SOER
s)
Num
ber
of d
istri
cts
supp
orte
d40
dis
trict
s su
ppor
ted
to d
evel
op D
SOER
s45
dis
trict
s su
ppor
ted
to
deve
lop
DSO
ERs
113%
Mor
e di
stric
ts n
eed
supp
ort t
o pr
epar
e an
d pr
oduc
e D
SOER
s
Supp
ort N
EMA
Libr
ary
NEM
A Li
brar
y up
grad
edEx
pand
read
ing
spac
e in
the
libra
ry a
nd
equi
p w
ith u
p to
dat
e pr
int a
nd e
lect
roni
c in
form
atio
n/m
ater
ials
Mor
e sp
ace
crea
ted
(mor
e us
ers)
and
mor
e re
adin
g m
ater
ials
ava
iled
92%
Phot
ocop
ier a
nd in
tern
et
conn
ectiv
ity re
quire
d fo
r us
ers
Upg
rade
NEM
A w
ebsi
te h
ostin
g an
d de
sign
Impr
oved
acc
ess
to
upda
ted
web
site
Bette
r des
igne
d an
d up
date
d w
ebsi
teEa
sy a
cces
s, m
ore
and
upda
ted
info
rmat
ion
94%
Som
e co
mpo
nent
s ar
e st
ill re
mai
ning
suc
h as
th
e co
nten
t man
agem
ent
syst
em
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
20
Tabl
e 2:
Hig
hlig
hts
of th
e ac
hiev
ed o
utpu
ts/re
sults
aga
inst
the
2009
-10
wor
kpla
n (C
ontin
ued
from
pag
e 19
)
KEY
RES
ULT
A
REA
S / S
TRA
TEG
IC
OB
JEC
TIVE
S
AC
TIVI
TY
DES
CR
IPTI
ON
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
NEX
PLA
NA
TOR
Y R
EMA
RK
SPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
IND
ICA
TOR
PLA
NN
EDA
CH
IEVE
DPE
RFOR
MAN
CE
RATI
NGPu
blis
h Q
uarte
rly N
EMA
New
slet
ter
4 is
sues
of t
he
New
slet
ter p
rodu
ced
and
dist
ribut
ed
Prod
uce
Qua
rterly
N
ewsl
ette
r
Qua
rterly
N
ewsl
ette
r pr
oduc
ed
100%
The
key
issu
es th
at th
e Q
uarte
rly N
ewsl
ette
r co
vere
d ar
e cl
imat
e ch
ange
, was
te m
anag
emen
t, w
etla
nd d
egra
datio
n an
d bi
odiv
ersi
ty lo
ss.
Org
anis
e 2
TOTs
on
EE/
ESD
for t
each
ers
and
staf
f of
sch
ools
and
terti
ary
inst
itutio
ns
TOTs
of s
choo
ls
and
terti
ary
inst
itutio
ns
cond
ucte
d
160
200
125%
Teac
hers
and
Tut
ors
in N
akas
eke,
Iban
da, L
ira (f
or
the
north
ern
regi
on) a
nd Is
ingi
ro d
istri
cts
Trai
ned
Org
anis
e sc
hool
co
mpe
titio
ns o
n En
viron
men
t Edu
catio
n (E
E)
Scho
ol E
E co
mpe
titio
n co
nduc
ted
41
25%
Org
aniz
ed 1
Sch
ool E
E co
mpe
titio
n in
Kat
akw
i D
istri
ct
Org
anis
e w
orks
hops
for
Educ
atio
n fo
r Sus
tain
able
D
evel
opm
ent (
ESD
) for
sc
hool
s an
d st
aff
Wor
ksho
ps
for
univ
ersi
ties
cond
ucte
d
66
100%
6 un
iver
sitie
s (M
aker
ere,
Mba
rara
, Uga
nda
Mar
tyrs
(U
MU
), G
ulu,
Nku
mba
and
Bus
item
a) c
over
ed a
nd
have
com
men
ced
inte
grat
ion
proc
esse
s.ES
D c
lubs
form
ed a
t Mak
erer
e an
d U
MU
; ESD
in
corp
orat
ed in
the
MSC
and
1 B
sc a
cade
mic
pr
ogra
mm
es.
ESD
inte
grat
ed in
the
UM
U S
trate
gic
plan
.Es
tabl
ish
Reg
iona
l ce
ntre
s of
Exc
elle
nce/
ex
perti
se (R
CE)
for E
SD in
un
iver
sitie
s
Reg
iona
l Cen
tres
of E
xper
tise
in E
SD
esta
blis
hed
52
40%
Gre
ater
Kam
pala
and
Gre
ater
Mas
aka
Regi
onal
Ce
ntre
s of
Exc
elle
nce
(RCE
s) e
stab
lishe
d
Prep
arat
ory/
cons
ulta
tive
mee
tings
for t
he G
reat
er
North
and
Gre
ater
Eas
t to
in G
ulu
and
Busit
ema
were
not
hel
d du
e to
lack
of f
undi
ng. (
RCE
core
co
mm
ittee
s ha
ve b
een
form
ed to
fina
lise
prop
osal
s)C
omm
emor
atio
n of
the
Wor
ld E
nviro
nmen
t Day
(W
ED)
Wor
ld E
nviro
nmen
t D
ay o
rgan
ized
at
natio
nal a
nd lo
cal
leve
ls; E
nviro
nmen
t re
late
d da
ys
com
mem
orat
ed
Org
aniz
e W
ED a
nd th
e In
tern
atio
nal
Year
of
Biod
iver
sity
(IY
B) in
Ka
nung
u D
istri
ct
WED
an
d IY
B or
gani
zed
in K
anun
gu
Dis
trict
100%
Org
anize
d W
ED 2
010
Natio
nal c
eleb
ratio
ns
at K
ihih
i, Ka
nung
u Di
stric
t und
er th
e th
eme
“Inte
rnat
iona
l Yea
r of B
iodi
vers
ity (I
YB) a
nd W
orld
En
viron
men
t Day
WED
: Bio
dive
rsity
for N
atio
nal
Pros
perit
y: C
onse
rve
it”; m
ount
ed N
EMA
exhi
bitio
ns
Kanu
ngu
is a
case
of a
rich
bio
dive
rsity
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
21
Tabl
e 2:
Hig
hlig
hts
of th
e ac
hiev
ed o
utpu
ts/re
sults
aga
inst
the
2009
-10
wor
kpla
n (C
ontin
ued
from
pag
e 20
)
KEY
RES
ULT
A
REA
S /
STR
ATE
GIC
O
BJE
CTI
VES
AC
TIVI
TY
DES
CR
IPTI
ON
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
NEX
PLA
NA
TOR
Y R
EMA
RK
SPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
IND
ICA
TOR
PLA
NN
EDA
CH
IEVE
DPE
RFOR
MAN
CE
RATI
NG
Org
anis
e n
atio
nal m
ultim
edia
st
rate
gic
envi
ronm
enta
l ed
ucat
ion
prog
ram
Nat
iona
l m
ultim
edia
st
rate
gic
envi
ronm
enta
l ed
ucat
ion
prog
ram
co
nduc
ted
Org
aniz
e na
tiona
l m
ultim
edia
stra
tegi
c en
viro
nmen
tal e
duca
tion
prog
ram
--
Affe
cted
by
inad
equa
te fu
ndin
g
Esta
blis
h be
st p
ract
ices
in
scho
ols
thro
ugh
surv
ey/
docu
men
tatio
n an
d de
mo
proj
ects
Woo
dlot
s es
tabl
ishe
d in
sc
hool
s
2211
50%
Woo
dlot
s es
tabl
ished
in s
choo
ls in
the
East
and
Wes
t: Ny
akas
ura
Scho
ol,
Kiira
Col
lege
But
iki, B
usog
a Co
llege
M
wiri,
Bup
adhe
ngo
PS, K
amul
i Girl
s PS
, Nam
asag
ali C
olle
ge, S
t. Ka
lem
ba
SS, B
unya
SS,
Wan
yang
e G
irls
SS;
Onl
y a
fract
ion
of fu
nds
were
rele
ased
.Q
uarte
rly p
rodu
ctio
n of
In
form
atio
n, E
duca
tion
and
Com
mun
icatio
n (IE
C) m
ater
ials
on k
ey e
nviro
nmen
tal c
once
rns,
fo
r exh
ibiti
ons,
pro
mot
iona
l tra
inin
g, p
erfo
rman
ce
reco
gniti
ons/
awar
ds a
nd
spec
ific
awar
enes
s pr
ogra
ms/
purp
ose-
spec
ific
IEC
No.
of I
EC
mat
eria
ls a
nd
publ
icat
ions
pr
oduc
ed
Qua
rterly
and
pur
pose
-sp
ecifi
c p
rodu
ctio
n of
IEC
m
ater
ials
25,0
00-3
0,00
0
copi
es o
f mat
eria
ls
prod
uced
on
clim
ate
chan
ge,
wast
e m
anag
emen
t, w
etla
nd
degr
adat
ion,
bi
odiv
ersi
ty lo
ss
and
gas/
oil
90%
The
IEC
mat
eria
ls p
rodu
ced
incl
ude
bann
ers,
stic
kers
, tea
r dro
ps,
caps
, t-s
hirts
, exh
ibiti
on m
ater
ials
, in
form
atio
n ja
cket
s, b
ronc
hure
s,
char
ts, a
tlase
s, fa
ct s
heet
s an
d IE
C
activ
ities
like
radi
o/tv
pro
gram
s an
d ba
selin
e su
rvey
s
Build
ing
the
capa
city
of
med
ia h
ouse
s/jo
urna
lists
in
envi
ronm
enta
l pub
licity
and
re
porti
ng
A pa
rtner
ship
trip
or
gani
zed
with
the
key
med
ia h
ouse
s
Org
anize
a p
artn
ersh
ip fi
eld
visi
t to
wes
tern
Uga
nda
with
key
New
s Ed
itors
to
fam
iliariz
e th
emse
lves
with
en
viro
nmen
tal s
ituat
ion
on
grou
nd (o
ppor
tuni
ties
and
chal
leng
es)
5 da
y tri
p or
gani
zed
100%
Invo
lvem
ent o
f the
med
ia is
a g
ood
appr
oach
in e
nhan
cing
effe
ctiv
e en
viro
nmen
tal r
epor
ting
and
publ
icity
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
22
Tabl
e 2:
Hig
hlig
hts
of th
e ac
hiev
ed o
utpu
ts/re
sults
aga
inst
the
2009
-10
wor
kpla
n (C
ontin
ued
from
pag
e 21
)
KEY
RES
ULT
A
REA
S /
STR
ATE
GIC
O
BJE
CTI
VES
AC
TIVI
TY
DES
CR
IPTI
ON
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
NEX
PLA
NA
TOR
Y R
EMA
RK
SPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
IND
ICA
TOR
PLA
NN
EDA
CH
IEVE
DPE
RFOR
MAN
CE
RATI
NG
Prod
uce
do
cum
enta
ries
on s
alie
nt
envi
ronm
enta
l pr
oble
ms
No.
of
docu
men
tarie
s pr
oduc
ed
Prod
uced
2 d
ocum
enta
ries
on c
limat
e ch
ange
; wet
land
de
grad
atio
n an
d w
aste
m
anag
emen
t
2 vi
deo
docu
men
tarie
s pr
oduc
ed a
nd
diss
emin
ated
thro
ugh
TV p
rogr
ams
and
wor
ksho
ps/M
eetin
gs
80%
The
docu
men
tarie
s ar
e lim
ited
to
Engl
ish
lang
uage
due
to re
sour
ce
cons
train
ts fo
r tra
nsla
tions
into
the
key
loca
l lan
guag
es
Org
aniz
e 1
wor
ksho
p fo
r En
viro
nmen
tal
Jour
nalis
ts
1 w
orks
hop
Org
aniz
e a
sens
itiza
tion
wor
ksho
p fo
r jou
rnal
ists
1 w
orks
hop
orga
nize
d90
%Th
e wo
rksh
op ra
ised
awa
rene
ss o
n en
viron
men
t pro
tect
ion
and
indi
vidua
l, in
stitu
tiona
l and
cor
pora
te r
espo
nsib
ilitie
s to
ward
s en
viron
men
t man
agem
ent
A fo
llow
up w
orks
hop
need
s to
be
orga
nize
d to
est
ablis
h wh
at im
pact
th
e ef
forts
hav
e ha
d on
the
com
mun
ity
perc
eptio
n of
the
envir
onm
ent a
nd w
hat
mor
e ne
eds
to b
e do
ne.
4EN
HA
NC
ING
TH
E IN
STIT
UTI
ON
AL
CA
PAC
ITY
OF
NEM
A A
ND
ITS
PAR
TNER
S
Mon
itorin
g an
d su
perv
isio
n fo
r effe
ctiv
e en
viro
nmen
t in
tegr
atio
n in
the
dist
ricts
No
of d
istri
cts
mon
itore
d an
d su
perv
ised
fo
r effe
ctiv
e en
viro
nmen
t in
tegr
atio
n
3617
47M
onito
ring
and
supe
rvisi
on w
as
cond
ucte
d in
the
dist
ricts
of:
Mor
oto,
Na
kapi
ripiri
ti, K
anun
gu, A
mur
ia, B
ukwo
, M
pigi
, Mas
aka,
Rak
ai, J
inja
, Tor
oro,
M
ukon
o, M
bara
ra, K
ayun
ga, H
oim
a,
Isin
giro
, Ruk
ungi
ri an
d Nt
unga
mo.
As a
resu
lt of
men
torin
g an
d su
perv
ision
of
LG
s, th
ere
is im
prov
ed e
nviro
nmen
t m
ains
tream
ing
into
dist
rict p
lann
ing,
bu
dget
ing
and
impl
emen
tatio
n.
Envir
onm
ent a
ctivi
ties
such
rest
orat
ion,
aw
aren
ess,
impl
emen
tatio
n of
mitig
atio
n m
easu
res
are
bein
g fu
nded
alth
ough
th
e fu
ndin
g is
still
low.
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
23
Tabl
e 2:
Hig
hlig
hts
of th
e ac
hiev
ed o
utpu
ts/re
sults
aga
inst
the
2009
-10
wor
kpla
n (C
ontin
ued
from
pag
e 22
)
KEY
RESU
LT
AREA
S /
STRA
TEGI
C OB
JECT
IVES
AC
TIVI
TY
DES
CR
IPTI
ON
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
NEX
PLA
NA
TOR
Y R
EMA
RK
SPE
RFOR
MAN
CE
IND
ICA
TOR
PLA
NN
EDA
CH
IEVE
DPE
RFOR
MAN
CE
RATI
NG
Con
duct
Ann
ual
Envir
onm
ent O
fficer
s’ re
view
mee
ting
Annu
al E
Os
mee
ting
cond
ucte
d
10
0Th
e ac
tivity
was
pla
nned
and
exp
ecte
d to
be
fund
ed u
nder
G
oU. D
ue to
bud
get c
uts
the
activ
ity w
as n
ot fu
nded
. The
ac
tivity
is n
ow e
xpec
ted
to b
e ex
ecut
ed in
the
FY 2
010/
11C
ondu
ct R
egio
nal
Envir
onm
ent O
fficer
s’ re
view
mee
tings
Reg
iona
l EO
s m
eetin
gs
cond
ucte
d
30
0Th
e ac
tivity
was
pla
nned
and
exp
ecte
d to
be
fund
ed u
nder
G
oU. D
ue to
bud
get c
uts
the
activ
ity w
as n
ot fu
nded
. The
ac
tivity
is n
ow e
xpec
ted
to b
e ex
ecut
ed in
the
FY 2
010/
11Su
ppor
t Mic
ro
proj
ects
in th
e ar
ea
of tr
ee p
lant
ing,
tre
e nu
rser
y es
tabl
ishm
ent a
nd
ener
gy s
avin
g te
chno
logi
es in
the
dist
ricts
No.
of m
icro
pr
ojec
ts
supp
orte
d (im
plem
ente
d th
ru o
ther
pa
rtner
s)
4745
96NE
MA
supp
orte
d 45
micr
o pr
ojects
in th
e ar
eas o
f tre
e pla
nting
, nu
rser
y esta
blish
men
t and
ene
rgy s
aving
tech
nolog
ies in
28
distri
cts o
f:Ku
mi, N
amut
umba
, Buk
edea
, Kat
akwi
, Kan
ungu
,Kab
eram
aido,
So
roti,
Moy
o, N
ebbi,
Mar
acha
-Ter
ego,
Yum
be, L
uwer
o,
Fortp
orta
l,Jinj
a, E
nteb
e, B
undib
ugyo
, Ruk
ungir
i, Mba
rara
, M
pigi, W
akiso
, Muk
ono,
May
uge,
Kayu
nga,
Kam
uli, B
ugiri,
M
asak
a,Ra
kai, I
singir
o.
653
acre
s of la
nd w
as p
lante
d wi
th tr
ees w
ithin
shor
es/b
anks
and
catch
men
t are
as o
f Lak
es V
ictor
ia/ N
akiva
le an
d Ri
ver N
ile.
Imple
men
tatio
n of
the
micr
o pr
ojects
has
cont
ribut
ed to
im
prov
ed e
nviro
nmen
tal c
ondit
ions.
The
micr
o pr
ojects
hav
e als
o de
mon
strat
ed th
e fa
ct th
at co
mm
unitie
s with
little
supp
ort/
facil
itatio
n an
d se
nsitiz
ation
can
imple
men
t env
ironm
enta
l ac
tivitie
s and
resto
re d
egra
ded
ecos
yste
ms.
Invo
lvem
ent o
f th
e co
mm
unitie
s has
impr
oved
own
ersh
ip an
d su
staina
bility
of
proje
cts.
Org
aniz
e th
e an
nual
Boa
rd fi
eld
envi
ronm
enta
l in
spec
tions
and
pr
ojec
t mon
itorin
g
The
annu
al
Boar
d fie
ld v
isit
orga
nize
d
Annu
al Bo
ard
field
vis
it to
w
este
rn a
nd
mid
-wes
tern
U
gand
a
Annu
al Bo
ard
field
visit o
rgan
ized;
NE
MA
Boar
d of
Dire
ctors
visit
ed
Buliis
a, H
oima,
Kam
weng
e,
Kaba
role,
Bun
dibug
yo, K
ases
e an
d Bu
shen
yi dis
tricts
100%
NEM
A M
anag
emen
t org
anize
s ann
ual fi
eld vi
sit fo
r the
Boa
rd o
f Di
recto
rs to
inte
ract
with
loca
l gov
ernm
ents,
civil
socie
ty, p
rivat
e se
ctor c
ompa
nies a
nd th
e co
mm
unity
; the
field
visits
focu
s on
envir
onm
enta
l insp
ectio
ns, p
rojec
t mon
itorin
g an
d as
sess
men
t of
env
ironm
enta
l opp
ortu
nities
and
chall
enge
s in
distri
cts
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
24
Tabl
e 2:
Hig
hlig
hts
of th
e ac
hiev
ed o
utpu
ts/re
sults
aga
inst
the
2009
-10
wor
kpla
n (C
ontin
ued
from
pag
e 23
)
KEY
RES
ULT
A
REA
S / S
TRA
TEG
IC
OB
JEC
TIVE
S
AC
TIVI
TY
DES
CR
IPTI
ON
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E D
ESC
RIP
TIO
NEX
PLA
NA
TOR
Y R
EMA
RK
SPE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
IND
ICA
TOR
PLA
NN
EDA
CH
IEVE
DPE
RFOR
MAN
CE
RATI
NG
5PA
RTI
CIP
ATI
ON
IN
NA
TIO
NA
L,
REG
ION
AL
AN
D
INTE
RN
ATI
ON
AL
FOR
A O
N
ENVI
RO
NM
ENT
MA
NG
EMEN
T A
ND
SU
STA
INA
BLE
D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Parti
cipa
tion
in
natio
nal,
regi
onal
an
d in
tern
atio
nal
fora
on
envi
ronm
ent
and
sust
aina
ble
deve
lopm
ent
No.
of f
ora/
proj
ects
that
N
EAM
has
pa
rtici
pate
d in
Org
aniz
e a
natio
nal
foru
m o
n su
stai
nabl
e de
velo
pmen
t
The
annu
al fo
rum
on
sus
tain
able
de
velo
pmen
t or
gani
zed
100%
Cre
atio
n an
d op
erat
iona
lisat
ion
of N
atio
nal
Thin
k Ta
nk fo
r Sus
tain
able
Dev
elop
men
t to
be e
ffect
ed in
201
0/11
FY
Tabl
e 3:
Don
or F
unde
d Pr
ojec
ts (2
008/
9, 2
009/
10 a
nd 2
010/
11)
Don
orPr
ojec
t (N
ame,
sta
rt
and
end
date
)Pr
ojec
t Tot
al B
udge
tPr
ojec
t Foc
usD
onor
GoU
Obj
ectiv
esK
ey A
ctiv
ities
Key
Ach
ieve
men
tsB
enef
icia
ries
The
Wor
ld
Bank
(C
redi
t)
Envi
ronm
ent
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity
Build
ing
Proj
ect I
I (E
MC
MBP
II) a
nd
EMC
BPII-
Addi
tiona
l Fi
nanc
e (E
CBP
II-AF
(2
009/
10 to
201
1/12
)
FY20
08/9
:5,
274,
457,
705
FY20
09/1
010
.5 b
n (1
.5
bn d
isbu
rsed
)FY
2010
/11:
4,40
7,94
0,00
0
• En
viro
nmen
t m
anag
emen
t ca
paci
ty b
uild
ing
at N
atio
nal,
Loca
l Gov
t and
C
omm
unity
le
vels
• M
unic
ipal
Sol
id W
aste
Com
post
ing
in 1
7 U
rban
Au
thor
ities
of L
ira, S
orot
i, M
bale
, Jin
ja, M
ukon
o, F
ort
Porta
l, Ka
sese
, Mba
rara
and
Kab
ale
(1st
pha
se),
and
Arua
, Gul
u, T
oror
o, B
usia
, Ent
ebbe
, Mity
ana,
H
oim
a an
d M
asin
di (2
nd P
hase
)- co
nstru
ctio
ns a
nd
equi
ppin
g of
sol
id w
aste
com
post
ing
plan
s)•
Supp
ort t
o oi
l and
gas
sec
tor (
train
ing,
tool
ing/
equi
ppin
g an
d re
gula
tory
revi
ews)
• In
stitu
tiona
l sup
port
to N
EMA
to e
nhan
ce
envi
ronm
enta
l com
plia
nce
and
enfo
rcem
ent
• Th
e 1st
pha
se
mun
icip
al s
olid
w
aste
s ha
ve b
een
cons
truct
ed a
nd
equi
pped
Urb
an
Auth
oriti
es
and
othe
r lo
cal
gove
rnm
ents
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
25
Tabl
e 3:
Don
or F
unde
d Pr
ojec
ts (2
008/
9, 2
009/
10 a
nd 2
010/
11) C
ontin
ued
from
Pag
e 24
Don
orPr
ojec
t (N
ame,
sta
rt
and
end
date
)Pr
ojec
t Tot
al B
udge
tPr
ojec
t Foc
usD
onor
GoU
Obj
ectiv
esK
ey A
ctiv
ities
Key
Ach
ieve
men
tsB
enef
icia
ries
UN
EP/R
OA
(Uni
ted
Nat
ions
En
viro
nmen
t Pr
ogra
mm
e,
Reg
iona
l O
ffice
for
Afric
a
Supp
ort f
or
Com
mun
ity
Parti
cipa
tion
in
Deg
rade
d Ba
re H
ills
in R
uhaa
ma
Cou
nty,
N
tung
amo
dist
rict
Star
t dat
e: S
epte
mbe
r 20
08
End
date
: Mar
ch 2
010
(ext
ende
d to
Aug
ust
2010
)
USD
100
,000
USD
100
,000
Pers
onne
l an
d su
perv
isio
n/m
onito
ring
The
over
all o
bjec
tive
of th
e pr
ojec
t is
to p
rote
ct th
e hi
lly
area
s in
Ruh
aam
a C
ount
y fro
m fu
rther
de
grad
atio
n th
roug
h af
fore
stat
ion
and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
com
mun
ity
actio
n pl
ans
for t
he
sust
aina
ble
use
of
natu
ral r
esou
rces
in
hilly
are
as o
f U
gand
a.
Mob
ilizin
g di
stric
t and
com
mun
ity
repr
esen
tativ
esU
nder
taki
ng, a
t thr
ee (3
) sel
ecte
d si
tes,
affo
rest
atio
n an
d re
stor
atio
n of
deg
rade
d hi
lly a
reas
and
tra
in lo
cal c
omm
uniti
es in
the
esta
blis
hmen
t and
man
agem
ent
of s
uch
activ
ities
.Es
tabl
ish
tree
nurs
erie
sC
ompi
ling
reco
rd o
f pro
ject
im
plem
enta
tion
and
expe
rienc
es
for p
urpo
ses
of p
rom
otin
g ad
optio
n of
goo
d pr
actic
es
Proj
ect s
ucce
ssfu
lly
impl
emen
ted.
80 h
a pl
ante
d w
ith p
ines
an
d gr
ivel
lia (a
t Ito
jo-3
0ha,
R
wei
kini
ro-3
0 an
d Ire
nga
20 h
a). A
tota
l of 9
6,00
0 se
edlin
gs p
lant
ed a
nd th
e su
rviv
al ra
te w
as g
ood
betw
een
80-9
0%C
omm
uniti
es n
ow w
ant
NEM
A to
ass
ist t
hem
in u
p sc
alin
g th
e pr
ojec
t
Loca
l com
mun
ities
in
the
thre
e su
b-co
untie
s of
Itoj
o,
Rw
eiki
niro
and
N
tung
amo
Gov
ernm
ent,
loca
l go
vern
men
ts, N
GO
s
UN
EP a
nd o
ther
de
velo
pmen
t par
tner
s
GEF
– 3
th
roug
h U
ND
P (S
lova
kia)
Supp
ortin
g C
ount
ry
Actio
n on
the
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e C
BD P
OW
PA
(Con
vent
ion
on
Biol
ogic
al D
iver
sity
Pr
ogra
mm
e of
Wor
k on
Pro
tect
ed A
reas
)St
art d
ate:
Nov
embe
r 20
08En
d da
te: N
ovem
ber
2010
USD
234
,200
In k
ind
-USD
12
9,00
0
Cas
h-
35,0
00
(not
yet
pr
ovid
ed)
Enha
nce
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e C
BD p
rogr
amm
e of
wor
k on
pro
tect
ed
area
s w
ith p
artic
ular
fo
cus
on v
alua
tion
of
prot
ecte
d ar
eas
and
gove
rnan
ce
Rev
iew
in a
par
ticip
ator
y w
ay fo
rms
of c
onse
rvat
ion
and
prom
ote
them
thro
ugh
partn
ersh
ips
Rec
ogni
ze a
nd p
rom
ote
inno
vativ
e pr
otec
ted
area
go
vern
ance
type
sC
ondu
ct n
atio
nal –
leve
l as
sess
men
ts o
f the
con
tribu
tion
of
prot
ecte
d ar
eas,
to th
e co
untry
’s
econ
omy
and
cultu
re a
nd to
the
achi
evem
ent o
f the
Mille
nniu
m
Dra
ft re
ports
on
gove
rnan
ce p
rodu
ced.
Rep
ort p
rese
nted
and
re
view
ed b
y th
e Pr
ojec
t St
eerin
g C
omm
ittee
(P
SC).
The
repo
rt is
to b
e pr
esen
ted
to a
t a n
atio
nal
stak
ehol
ders
revi
ew
wor
ksho
p on
29
July
201
0D
raft
repo
rts o
n va
luat
ion
prod
uced
.
Gov
ernm
ent i
nclu
ding
lo
cal g
over
nmen
tsPr
otec
ted
area
s
man
ager
sLo
cal c
omm
uniti
es
espe
cial
ly th
ose
bord
erin
g pr
otec
ted
area
sG
EF a
nd o
ther
in
tern
atio
nal p
artn
ers
Gov
ernm
ent i
nclu
ding
lo
cal g
over
nmen
ts
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
26
Tabl
e 3:
Don
or F
unde
d Pr
ojec
ts (2
008/
9, 2
009/
10 a
nd 2
010/
11) C
ontin
ued
from
Pag
e 25
D
onor
Proj
ect (
Nam
e, s
tart
an
d en
d da
te)
Proj
ect T
otal
Bud
get
Proj
ect F
ocus
Don
orG
oUO
bjec
tives
Key
Act
iviti
esK
ey A
chie
vem
ents
Ben
efic
iarie
sD
evel
opm
ent G
oals
; an
d in
tegr
ate
the
use
of e
cono
mic
val
uatio
n in
nat
iona
l pla
nnin
g pr
oces
ses
Rep
ort p
rese
nted
and
re
view
ed b
y th
e Pr
ojec
t St
eerin
g C
omm
ittee
(P
SC).
The
repo
rt is
to b
e pr
esen
ted
to a
t a n
atio
nal
stak
ehol
ders
revi
ew
wor
ksho
p on
29
July
201
0
Prot
ecte
d ar
eas
man
ager
s,
tour
ope
rato
rs, o
wne
rs o
f lo
dges
in p
rote
cted
are
as
Loca
l com
mun
ities
es
peci
ally
thos
e bo
rder
ing
prot
ecte
d ar
eas
GEF
and
oth
er in
tern
atio
nal
partn
ers
GEF
th
roug
h U
ND
P-Ka
mpa
la
Prep
arat
ion
of th
e 4th
Nat
iona
l Rep
ort
to th
e C
onve
ntio
n on
Bi
olog
ical
Div
ersi
ty
Star
t dat
e: D
ecem
ber
2008
End
date
: May
200
9
USD
20,
000
Pers
onne
lPr
epar
e a
repo
rt in
dica
ting
prog
ress
U
gand
a ha
s m
ade
tow
ards
the
achi
evem
ent o
f the
20
10 b
iodi
vers
ity ta
rget
an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e co
nven
tion
in
gene
ral,
chal
leng
es
and
reco
mm
enda
tions
to
enh
ance
im
plem
enta
tion
Con
sult
key
stak
ehol
ders
invo
lved
in
biod
iver
sity
con
serv
atio
n an
d m
anag
emen
t
Prov
ide
over
view
of
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e C
onve
ntio
n, 2
010
biod
iver
sity
targ
et
Prep
are
the
repo
rt an
d su
bmit
to C
BD
Secr
etar
iat
Stak
ehol
ders
wer
e co
nsul
ted.
Nat
iona
l sta
keho
lder
s re
view
wor
ksho
p w
as
cond
ucte
d.
Fina
l rep
ort p
rodu
ced
and
subm
itted
to th
e C
BD
Secr
etar
iat i
n M
ay 2
009.
Cop
ies
of th
e re
port
circ
ulat
ed to
sta
keho
lder
s th
roug
h e-
mai
l.
Gov
ernm
ent
Prot
ecte
d ar
eas
man
ager
sLo
cal g
over
nmen
tsN
GO
sIn
tern
atio
nal c
omm
unity
(th
roug
h th
e pr
oduc
tion
of
Glo
bal B
iodi
vers
ity O
utlo
ok
GEF
(th
roug
h U
NEP
-N
airo
bi)
Dev
elop
ing
and
Expe
rimen
tal
Met
hodo
logy
for
Test
ing
Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Pay
men
t for
Ec
osys
tem
Ser
vice
s to
En
hanc
e C
onse
rvat
ion
in P
rodu
ctiv
e La
ndsc
apes
in U
gand
aSt
art D
ate:
Apr
il 20
10
(Act
ual J
une
2010
.En
d da
te: A
pril
2014
USD
900
,000
n ki
nd-
USD
180,
000
Cas
h-
USD
320,
000
To t
est t
he
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
PES
as
a v
iabl
e m
eans
for
finan
cing
bio
dive
rsity
co
nser
vatio
n ou
tsid
e pr
otec
ted
area
s in
Uga
nda
usin
g an
exp
erim
enta
l m
etho
dolo
gy
Pilo
ting
of P
ES
sche
me(
s) b
ased
on
exp
erim
enta
l m
etho
dolo
gyU
pdat
ing
loca
l in
stitu
tions
’ sci
entif
ic a
nd
mon
itorin
g pr
ogra
ms
and
stre
ngth
enin
g ca
paci
ty fo
r PES
Dis
sem
inat
ing,
and
re
plic
atin
g go
od
prac
tices
Ince
ptio
n w
orks
hop
held
in
Jun
e in
Hoi
ma
dist
rict
Col
lect
ion
of b
asel
ine
info
rmat
ion
in th
e pr
oces
s
Loca
l for
est o
wne
rsG
over
nmen
t and
Loc
al
gove
rnm
ents
NG
Os
invo
lved
in
biod
iver
sity
con
serv
atio
nTh
e in
tern
atio
nal c
omm
unity
(th
roug
h ec
osys
tem
se
rvic
es)
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
27
Tabl
e 3:
Don
or F
unde
d Pr
ojec
ts (2
008/
9, 2
009/
10 a
nd 2
010/
11) C
ontin
ued
from
Pag
e 26
D
onor
Proj
ect (
Nam
e,
star
t and
end
dat
e)Pr
ojec
t Tot
al B
udge
tPr
ojec
t Foc
usD
onor
GoU
Obj
ectiv
esK
ey A
ctiv
ities
Key
Ach
ieve
men
tsB
enef
icia
ries
Mul
tilat
eral
Fu
nd
Secr
etar
iat
of th
e M
ontre
al
Prot
ocol
on
Subs
tanc
es
That
Dep
lete
Th
e O
zone
La
yer.
Impl
emen
ting
Agen
cy
is G
TZ-
Prok
lima
Term
inal
Pha
se-
Out
Man
agem
ent
Plan
(TPM
P) fo
r U
gand
a- T
echn
ical
As
sist
ance
and
eq
uipm
ent f
or
Cap
acity
-bui
ldin
g -
for P
hase
-out
use
of
Chl
orof
luor
ocar
bons
(C
FCs)
; and
Car
bon
Tetra
chlo
ride
(CTC
) ph
ase-
out m
ainl
y th
roug
h aw
aren
ess-
rais
ing.
2008
-201
0
USD
215,
000
(214
,500
se
cure
d)
Pers
onne
lTo
ass
ist t
he
Gov
ernm
ent o
f U
gand
a to
pha
se
out t
he u
se o
f ozo
ne
depl
etin
g su
bsta
nces
in
the
Ref
riger
atio
n an
d Ai
r-con
ditio
ning
se
ctor
; thu
s,
ensu
ring
that
th
e co
untry
is in
co
mpl
ianc
e w
ith
both
the
2008
–
2010
pha
se o
ut
oblig
atio
ns a
s es
tabl
ishe
d un
der
the
Mon
treal
Pr
otoc
ol.
Impl
emen
tatio
n an
d en
forc
emen
t of t
he
impo
rt qu
ota;
Tra
inin
g of
Cus
tom
s O
ffice
rs;
Trai
ning
of T
echn
icia
ns;
Con
vers
ion
of re
frige
ratio
n eq
uipm
ent t
o us
e oz
one-
frien
dly
refri
gera
nts
(und
er th
e In
cent
ive
Sche
me
Prog
ram
me)
; R
evita
lisin
g th
e R
ecov
ery
and
Rec
yclin
g ac
tiviti
es;
Awar
enes
s-ra
isin
g on
C
TC p
hase
-out
(Com
plet
e Ph
ase
of C
FCs
and
CTC
(no
impo
rtatio
n) b
y D
ecem
ber,
2010
)
• Te
chni
cian
s tra
ined
.•
Tool
-kits
pro
vide
d fo
r tra
inin
g, e
tc.
• In
vent
ory
carri
ed o
ut
on fa
cilit
ies
usin
g O
DS-
depe
nden
t equ
ipm
ent.
• C
onve
rsio
n of
CFC
-de
pend
ent e
quip
men
t for
se
lect
ed H
ealth
Uni
ts.
• C
olla
bora
tion
with
the
Cus
tom
s D
epar
tmen
t of
Uga
nda
Rev
enue
Aut
horit
y in
mon
itorin
g an
d ve
rifyi
ng
OD
Ss im
porte
d –
in o
rder
to
aver
t ille
gal t
rade
in O
DSs
.•
Awar
enes
s-ra
isin
g am
ong
the
regu
late
d co
mm
uniti
es.
Uga
nda
Nat
iona
l As
soci
atio
n fo
r R
efrig
erat
ion
and
Air
Con
ditio
ning
(UN
ARA)
Mul
tilat
eral
Fu
nd
Secr
etar
iat
of th
e M
ontre
al
Prot
ocol
Im
plem
entin
g Ag
ency
is
UN
EP
Hyd
roch
loro
flu
oroc
arbo
N P
hase
-ou
t Pla
n (H
PMP)
2008
- 20
10
USD
30,
000
(USD
15,
000
disb
urse
d
Pers
onne
lTo
faci
litat
e ac
cele
rate
d ph
ase-
out o
f the
HC
FCs
in th
e re
frige
ratio
n an
d ai
r-con
ditio
ning
se
ctor
of U
gand
a.
HC
FCs
are
ozon
e-fri
endl
y bu
t co
ntrib
ute
to g
loba
l-w
arm
ing
HC
FC S
urve
y du
ring
Augu
st –
Sep
tem
ber,
2010
; Rev
iew
of O
zone
R
egul
atio
ns fo
r Uga
nda
by O
ctob
er, 2
010;
Pr
epar
atio
n of
the
HPM
P fo
r Uga
nda.
Surv
ey T
eam
has
bee
n co
nstit
uted
as
cont
ract
ed b
y U
NEP
.
Surv
ey m
etho
dolo
gy
harm
onis
ed.
To b
e un
derta
ken
by
UN
ARA
Glo
bal
Envi
ronm
ent
Faci
lity(
GEF
)
Enab
ling
Activ
ities
fo
r the
Sto
ckho
lm
Con
vent
ion
on
Pers
iste
nt O
rgan
ic
Pollu
tant
s (P
OPs
):
USD
493
,000
(USD
464
,964
di
sbur
sed)
Pers
onne
lG
loba
l Env
ironm
ent
Faci
lity
(GEF
)En
ablin
g Ac
tiviti
es fo
r the
St
ockh
olm
Con
vent
ion
on P
ersi
sten
t Org
anic
Po
lluta
nts
(PO
Ps):
Nat
iona
l Im
plem
enta
tion
Glo
bal E
nviro
nmen
t Fac
ility
(GEF
)En
ablin
g Ac
tiviti
es fo
r the
St
ockh
olm
Con
vent
ion
on P
ersi
sten
t Org
anic
Po
lluta
nts
(PO
Ps):
Nat
iona
l Im
plem
enta
tion
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
28
Tabl
e 3:
Don
or F
unde
d Pr
ojec
ts (2
008/
9, 2
009/
10 a
nd 2
010/
11) C
ontin
ued
from
Pag
e 27
D
onor
Proj
ect (
Nam
e, s
tart
an
d en
d da
te)
Proj
ect T
otal
Bud
get
Proj
ect F
ocus
Don
orG
oUO
bjec
tives
Key
Act
iviti
esK
ey A
chie
vem
ents
Ben
efic
iarie
sN
atio
nal
Impl
emen
tatio
n Pl
an fo
r U
gand
a.St
art D
ate:
Jul
y 20
05En
d da
te: M
arch
200
9
Plan
for U
gand
a.St
art D
ate:
Jul
y 20
05En
d da
te: M
arch
200
9
Plan
for U
gand
a.St
art D
ate:
July
200
5En
d da
te: M
arch
200
9)
Uni
ted
Nat
ions
D
evel
opm
ent
Prog
ram
me
(UN
DP)
unde
r th
e SA
ICM
Q
uick
Sta
rt Pr
ogra
mm
e
Uga
nda/
UN
DP/
UN
EP p
artn
ersh
ip
initi
ativ
e fo
r the
St
rate
gic
Appr
oach
to
Inte
rnat
iona
l Che
mic
als
Man
agem
ent (
SAIC
M)
Star
t Dat
e: N
ovem
ber
2007
End
date
: Sep
tem
ber
2010
USD
250
,000
Pers
onne
lU
nite
d N
atio
ns
Dev
elop
men
t Pr
ogra
mm
e(U
ND
P)un
der t
he
SAIC
M Q
uick
Sta
rt Pr
ogra
mm
e
Uga
nda/
UN
DP/
UN
EP
partn
ersh
ip in
itiat
ive
for
the
Stra
tegi
c Ap
proa
ch
to In
tern
atio
nal
Che
mic
als
Man
agem
ent (
SAIC
M)
Star
t Dat
e: N
ovem
ber
2007
End
date
: Sep
tem
ber
2010
Uni
ted
Nat
ions
Dev
elop
men
t Pr
ogra
mm
e(U
ND
P)un
der t
he S
AIC
M Q
uick
St
art P
rogr
amm
e
Uga
nda/
UN
DP/
UN
EP
partn
ersh
ip in
itiat
ive
for
the
Stra
tegi
c Ap
proa
ch to
In
tern
atio
nal C
hem
ical
s M
anag
emen
t (SA
ICM
)St
art D
ate:
Nov
embe
r 20
07En
d da
te: S
epte
mbe
r 20
10
Uni
ted
Nat
ions
En
viro
nmen
t Pr
ogra
mm
e(U
NEP
)
Proj
ect f
or th
e D
evel
opm
ent o
f a
Met
hodo
logy
to
Dev
elop
, Rev
ise,
H
arm
oniz
e an
d C
ompl
ete
Legi
slat
ion
on P
OPs
and
oth
er
rela
ted
area
s St
art d
ate;
Jul
y 20
10En
d da
te; N
ovem
ber
2010
USD
39,
000
Pers
onne
lU
nite
d N
atio
ns
Envi
ronm
ent
Prog
ram
me
(UN
EP)
Proj
ect f
or th
e D
evel
opm
ent o
f a
Met
hodo
logy
to
Dev
elop
, Rev
ise,
H
arm
oniz
e an
d C
ompl
ete
Legi
slat
ion
on P
OPs
and
oth
er
rela
ted
area
s St
art d
ate;
Jul
y 20
10En
d da
te; N
ovem
ber
2010
Uni
ted
Nat
ions
Env
ironm
ent
Prog
ram
me
(UN
EP)
GO
U
UN
DP/
UN
EPTh
e U
ND
P-U
NEP
Po
verty
and
En
viro
nmen
t Ini
tiativ
e (P
EI)
Mar
ch, 2
005
– 31
st
Dec
embe
r, 20
09
USD
577
,487
(USD
563
,524
di
sbur
sed)
Pers
onne
l•
Incl
usio
n of
en
viro
nmen
tal
sust
aina
bilit
y in
Nat
iona
l D
evel
opm
ent
Stra
tegi
es
• En
gage
men
t in
PEAP
Rev
iew
pr
oces
s•
Enga
gem
ent i
n na
tiona
l bud
getin
g pr
oces
s
• EN
R in
clud
ed in
the
ND
P as
su
ppor
ting
sect
or•
A re
treat
org
aniz
ed fo
r M
embe
rs o
f the
Par
liam
enta
ry
Com
mitt
ee o
n N
atur
al
Res
ourc
es
Loca
l Gov
ts: M
asin
di,
Nak
ason
gola
and
Bu
tale
ja D
istri
cts
CBO
s:N
sona
Dev
t Ass
ocia
tion
(Kay
unga
Dis
trict
)
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
29
Tabl
e 3:
Don
or F
unde
d Pr
ojec
ts (2
008/
9, 2
009/
10 a
nd 2
010/
11) C
ontin
ued
from
Pag
e 28
Don
orPr
ojec
t (N
ame,
st
art a
nd e
nd d
ate)
Proj
ect T
otal
Bud
get
Proj
ect F
ocus
Don
orG
oUO
bjec
tives
Key
Act
iviti
esK
ey A
chie
vem
ents
Ben
efic
iarie
s•
Incr
easi
ng n
atio
nal
budg
et a
lloca
tions
to
EN
R•
Build
ing
the
long
-te
rm c
apac
ity o
f th
e go
vern
men
t to
inte
grat
e en
viro
nmen
tal
conc
erns
into
th
e de
sign
and
im
plem
enta
tion
of
deve
lopm
ent p
lans
an
d pr
ogra
ms
• Fa
cilit
atio
n of
fo
rmul
atio
n of
Dis
trict
En
viro
nmen
t M
anag
emen
t Po
licie
s•
Supp
ortin
g in
nova
tive
activ
ities
de
mon
stra
ting
pove
rty-
envi
ronm
ent
linka
ges
and
com
mun
icat
ion
of b
est
prac
tices
• EN
R h
as b
een
incl
uded
in B
udge
t cal
l C
ircul
ar (B
CC
) by
MFP
ED•
PEI f
acilit
ated
the
parti
cipa
tion
of N
EMA
in L
ocal
Gov
t BFP
pro
cess
es•
Awar
enes
s pr
ogra
ms
carri
ed o
ut o
n en
viro
nmen
t-pov
erty
link
ages
• In
tegr
ated
Eco
syst
em A
sses
smen
t ca
rried
out
in L
ake
Kyog
a ca
tchm
ent
and
the
findi
ngs
diss
emin
ated
at
natio
nal a
nd lo
cal g
ovt l
evel
s•
Faci
litat
ed th
e fo
rmul
atio
n of
Dis
trict
Env
M
gnt P
olic
ies
for M
asin
di, N
akas
ongo
la
and
Buta
leja
dis
trict
s•
Supp
orte
d th
e di
stric
ts o
f But
alej
a,
Nak
ason
gola
, Bud
uda,
Muk
ono,
M
asak
a an
d Ka
yung
a to
impl
emen
t m
icro
-pro
ject
s/be
st p
ract
ices
that
de
mon
stra
te e
nviro
nmen
t-pov
erty
lin
kage
s lik
e tre
e pl
antin
g an
d en
ergy
co
nser
vatio
n
The
Env.
Pr
otec
tion
Con
cern
(TEC
O)
in M
asak
a D
istri
ctAs
soci
atio
n fo
r C
onse
rvat
ion
(AC
A) in
Muk
ono
Dis
trict
Net
herla
nds
Org
aniz
atio
n In
tern
atio
nal
Coo
pera
tion
in H
ighe
r Ed
ucat
ion
(NU
FFIC
)
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g fo
r Env
ironm
ent
Man
agem
ent i
n U
gand
a
USD
1,7
75,2
16Pe
rson
nel
• En
hanc
ed C
apac
ity
of N
EMA
and
that
of
its
thre
e pa
rtner
in
stitu
tions
(DW
D,
UW
ASN
ET a
nd D
pt
of O
ccup
atio
nal
Hea
lth- M
GLS
D)
in n
on-fo
rmal
ed
ucat
ion
and
train
ing
for
envi
ronm
ent
man
agem
ent
• N
on fo
rmal
ed
ucat
ion
(trai
ning
w
orks
hops
and
aw
aren
ess
prog
ram
s)•
Form
al
educ
atio
n
(pro
fess
iona
l tra
inin
g fo
r en
viro
nmen
t m
anag
emen
t)
• Po
licy
rese
arch
in w
ater
, was
te
man
agem
ent,
sani
tatio
n an
d w
etla
nd
man
agem
ent c
arrie
d ou
t•
350
stud
ents
of U
gand
a Te
chni
cal
Col
lege
s tra
ined
thro
ugh
Dis
tanc
e Le
arni
ng P
rogr
am•
12 N
EMA
Staf
f and
par
tner
s tra
ined
in
envi
ronm
ent m
anag
emen
t•
350
staf
f fro
m G
ovt m
inis
tries
, pa
rast
atal
s , l
ocal
gov
ts a
nd N
GO
s tra
ined
in e
nviro
nmen
t man
agem
ent
Mak
erer
e U
nive
rsity
Kyam
bogo
U
nive
rsity
Uga
nda
Tech
C
olle
ges
(Lira
, El
gon,
Kic
hwam
ba
and
Bush
enyi
)N
EMA,
Min
istri
es,
Loca
l Gov
ts,
NG
Os
and
the
Priv
ate
Sect
or
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
30
Tabl
e 3:
Don
or F
unde
d Pr
ojec
ts (2
008/
9, 2
009/
10 a
nd 2
010/
11) C
ontin
ued
from
Pag
e 29
D
onor
Proj
ect (
Nam
e,
star
t and
end
dat
e)Pr
ojec
t Tot
al B
udge
tPr
ojec
t Foc
usD
onor
GoU
Obj
ectiv
esK
ey A
ctiv
ities
Key
Ach
ieve
men
tsB
enef
icia
ries
• En
hanc
ed c
apac
ity o
f si
x (6
) pos
t sec
onda
ry
inst
itutio
ns (K
U, M
UK
and
the
4 Tc
s) i
n fo
rmal
edu
catio
n an
d en
viro
nmen
t man
agem
ent
• To
olin
g an
d eq
uipp
ing
sele
cted
in
stitu
tions
(M
aker
ere
and
Kyam
bogo
un
iver
sitie
s)
• C
urric
ula
in 6
sel
ecte
d in
stitu
tions
enh
ance
d to
incl
ude
envi
ronm
ent m
anag
emen
t•
4 U
nive
rsity
Sta
ff at
tain
ed M
Sc D
egre
es
and
1 on
goin
g Ph
D•
Mak
erer
e an
d Ky
ambo
go u
nive
rsiti
es
equi
pped
with
com
pute
rs a
nd a
cces
sorie
s
(UW
ASN
ET, D
pt
of O
ccup
atio
nal
Hea
lth, D
WD
, D
istri
ct O
ffici
als)
O
ther
Ach
ieve
men
ts
The
follo
win
g ke
y ac
hiev
emen
ts n
ot p
lann
ed fo
r by
NEM
A bu
t sup
porte
d by
oth
er p
artn
ers:
(a)
Fiel
d m
onito
ring
by th
e PC
E in
the
oil/g
as s
ub re
gion
(Alb
ertin
e G
rabe
n; H
oim
a, B
uliis
a, A
mur
u an
d Ar
ua d
istri
cts)
;
(b
) C
apac
ity b
uild
ing
wor
ksho
ps a
nd p
rogr
ams
by L
ead
Agen
cies
and
oth
er p
artn
ers
like
UK
Envi
ronm
ent A
genc
y;
(c
) Su
ppor
t fro
m O
PM fo
r tec
hnic
al s
uppo
rt to
Bud
uda
disa
ster
man
agem
ent;
(d)
Prep
arat
ion
of th
e se
cond
edi
tion
of th
e En
viro
nmen
tal S
ensi
tivity
Atla
s fo
r the
Alb
ertin
e G
rabe
n;
(e
) N
EMA
parti
cipa
ted
in th
e pr
epar
atio
n of
the
Wat
er A
tlas
for A
frica
and
pro
vide
d in
form
atio
n fo
r sel
ecte
d si
tes
in U
gand
a;
(f)
Pa
rtici
patio
n in
Sub
sidi
ary
Body
on
Scie
ntifi
c, T
echn
ical
and
Tec
hnol
ogic
al A
dvic
e (S
BSTT
A-14
) of C
BD in
Nai
robi
;
(g
) Pa
rtici
patio
n in
the
2009
Wat
er a
nd E
nviro
nmen
t Joi
nt S
ecto
r Rev
iew
;
(h
) Pa
rtici
patio
n in
the
2010
Wat
er a
nd E
nviro
nmen
t Joi
nt T
echn
ical
Rev
iew
;
(i)
Jo
int e
nviro
nmen
tal i
nspe
ctio
ns w
ith th
e Po
licy
Com
mitt
ee o
n En
viro
nmen
t (PC
E) i
n w
etla
nds
with
in K
ampa
la;
(j)
Cap
acity
bui
ldin
g/tra
inin
g on
oil/
gas
with
sup
port
from
the
Oil
for D
evel
opm
ent P
rogr
am fu
nded
by
the
Nor
weg
ian
Gov
ernm
ent;
(k)
Dev
elop
men
t of t
he im
plem
enta
tion
plan
for E
duca
tion
for S
usta
inab
le D
evel
opm
ent (
ESD
) in
partn
ersh
ip w
ith U
NES
CO
.
(a
) St
atus
and
tren
ds
The
gra
ph b
elow
sho
ws
the
stat
us o
f the
phy
sica
l out
put a
nd b
udge
t per
form
ance
s in
FY
2009
/10:
N
otab
ly, t
he b
udge
t cut
s af
fect
ed a
ctiv
ity im
plem
enta
tion
by 1
7% in
rela
tions
hip
to th
e ap
prov
ed a
nnua
l wor
kpla
n (m
ainl
y fu
nded
by
GO
U fu
ndin
g)
Gra
ph 1
:
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
31Trends in the approval of Development Projects (Environment Impact Assessments-EIAs)
The graphs showing the trends in the approval of development projects- Environment Impact Assessments (EIA)
(i) EIAs approved in FY 2009/10 (by categories of projects)(i) Total Number of Projects approved by category, July 2009 - June, 2010 Period
ii) EIAs approved in 2001/2-2009/10
As noted above:
• The number of EIAs has been increasing steadily due to the rapid growth in infrastructure development;
• ICT (telecommunication infrastructures) is the major category of projects approved. • The number of EIAs rose from 370 (2007/8) to 519 (2008/9) and dropped to 395 in 2009/10 possibly
due to the emergence of more telecom companies like Warid and Orange in 2008/9 and favorable investment conditions and the subsequent economic recess/credit crunch in 2009/10
Graph 2:
Graph 3:
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
32Table 4: NEMA-Supported micro projects in Lakes Victoria/Nakivale shore/catchment and
the upper Nile River banksDistrict Qty of seedlings Acres Cost (Ugx) Date of planting Survival rate (%)
1. Rakai 65,000 130 32,500,000 November, 2009 702. Masaka 33,000 102 25,500,000 November, 2009 753. Mpigi 21,000 42 10,500,000 November, 2009 704. Mukono 22,000 44 11,000,000 November, 2009 805. Wakiso 12,000 25 6,000,000 November, 2009 606. Jinja 21,600 30 12,200,000 March, 2010 807. Mayuge 14,400 40 13,600,000 March, 2010 708. Bugiri 26,400 40 9,600,000 March, 2010 809. Kayunga 9,600 20 4,800,000 March, 2010 6010. Kamuli 19,200 40 9,600,000 March, 2010 6011. Isingiro 80,000 140 35,000,000 March, 2010 70Total 324,200 653 170,300,000
Buleleje LC1, Bumoozi parishQty of seedlings = 8000Acreage = 16
Busaana S.SQty of seedlings = 2400Acreage = 5
Wanyange Parish, Wanyange Girls SchQty of seedlings = 14400Acreage = 30
S
W E
N
Restoration the degraded Catchment Areas and Shores of L. Victoria and Banks of R. Nile
Bukwenge Parish Nabwigulu S/C , Kamuli Girls P. SQty of seedlings = 7200Acreage = 15
Namasagali Parish, Namasagali CollegeQty of seedlings = 7200Acreage = 15
Uganda Martrys S.SQty of seedlings = 1440Acreage = 3
Kayunga Town Council District HqtsQty of seedlings = 2880Acreage = 3
Kyanja LC1, Bigoye parish Goma S/cQty of seedlings = 2500Acreage = 25
St. Marthias Kalemba S.S, NazigoQty of seedlings = 2880Acreage = 6
Naddangira Parish, Kakiri S/cQty of seedlings = 10000Acreage = 20
Nkumba Central, Sabaddu A Parish, Katabi S/cQty of seedlings = 2000Acreage = 5
Bongole Parish, Buwama S/cQty of seedlings = 3000Acreage = 6
Katebo LC1, Bulunda Parish, Buwama S/cQty of seedlings = 10000Acreage = 20
Kitabona LC 1, Kiti Parish, Bukulula S/c Qty of seedlings = 33000Acreage = 66
Bethlem LC 1, NabigasaQty of seedlings = 1500Acreage = 43
Kasozi LC 1 Rakai Town CouncilQty of seedlings = 1500Acreage = 24
Kanamiti LC 1 - Mayanja Parish, KakuutoQty of seedlings = 12000Acreage = 24
Kidama Wakawaka Beach, Beach MgtUnit/IgQty of seedlings = 9600Acreage = 30
Maziriga, Lwanga, Maziriga P.SQty of seedlings = 9600Acreage = 10
Busitema UniversityQty of seedlings = 14400Acreage = 30
Bunya Parish, Bunya S.SQty of seedlings = 10600Acreage = 20
Lake Victoria
BugiriMayuge
Jinja
Mukono
Wakiso
Mpigi
Kayunga
Kamuli
Masaka
RakaiLegend
Open Water
Planted Tree specie- Musizi, Grevellia, Terminalia
Part of Covered districts around L. Victoria and River Nile200 0 Kilometers200
Bupadengo Parish Nawanyango S/cQty of seedlings = 4800Acreage = 10
Namilyango LC1, Namilyango Parish, Goma S/cQty of seedlings = 9500Acreage = 19
Busia
Map 1:
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
33(b) Performance against the ENR platinum indicators
Notably, NEMA’s planning and performance processes fit into the following ENR Sub-sector Platinum Indicators:
ENR Platinum Indicators NEMA’s contribution in 2009/10
1. Percentage of national forest/tree cover Support to tree planting micro projects- 653 acres of trees planted by schools and churches, and support to tree nursery establishment by local governments, institutions, communities and individuals, and other tree planting projects
2. Percentage of national wetland coverage Community mobilization of 6 wetlands3. Percentage of polluter establishments
(industries) with active (in use) mitigation/emission reducing facilities
721 environmental inspections and audits carried and 395 EIAs approved to ensure environmental safeguards in development process
4. Percentage of households living in clean and healthy homesteads
Support to 9 Municipal Councils in solid waste management through solid waste composting, and school, public and community education/awareness programs
(c) Impacts of NEMA’s activitiesKey Performance Area (KRA)
Key Output Area Impacts/outcomes
1. Enhancing environmental compliance and enforcement
• Environmental inspections and audits
• Restoration of degraded fragile ecosystems
• Review and approval of Environment Impact Assessments
• Increased environmental inspections and audits has made some companies to invest in alternatives, waste treatment plants and cleaner technologies
• Some restored wetlands like Garuga-Inkumba in Wakiso wetlands have attracted economic activities like fish farming
• Most financial institutions use EIA certificates as one of the guarantees for investment loans
• Some projects like Bujjagali Power Project use EIA processes and conditions to register for carbon trade (CDM)
2. Strengthening ENR integration into policies/plans/projects at National and Local Government levels
• Integration of ENR at national level
• Integration of ENR at local government level
• ENR integrated into the NDP as supporting sector• ENR integrated into District Development Plans and budgets
(funding for ENR in districts has increased from 0-6% in 2002/3 to 2009/10 respectively
3. Increasing access to environmental information, education and public participation
• Production of NSOER and atlases
• Support to the production of District State of Environment Reports ( DSOERs)
• Upgrading of NEMA Website and the library
• Production of IEC materials• School and institutional
education programs• Partnership with the media
• Increased access to and demand for information;• NSOER and the atlases are used by academia, researchers
and sectors• DSOERs have been included in the minimum performance
conditions/indicators for Districts (for the annual Local Govt Performance Assessment)
• Environment has been integrated into school curricula and tertiary/university academic and non-academic programs
• Regional Centres of Excellence (RCEs) for education for sustainable development (ESD) through universities
• Improved environmental reporting and publicity by the media
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
34Key Performance Area (KRA)
Key Output Area Impacts/outcomes
4. Enhancing the institutional capacity of NEMA at its Partners
• Institutional support to NEMA and its partners
• Increased effectiveness and efficiency in service delivery• Increased collaboration and participation of partners
5. Strengthening national, regional and international partnerships and networking for effective environment management and sustainable development
• Participation in national , regional and international fora on environment and sustainable development
• Increased collaboration and networking at national, regional and international levels
• Participation in international projects like POPs (Persistent Organic Pollutants), Ozone Depleting Substances (ODSs) and CDM/MSW Composting
• Domestication of international conventions through RIO-Multi Environment Agreements (RIO-MEAs)
4.2 Supporting factors for NEMA’s performance:
The key critical success or supporting/enabling factors for NEMA’s performances are:• Availability of professional and competent staff;• Continued support from Government of Uganda and Development Partners;• Guidance from the Policy Committee on Environment (PCE) and Board of Directors of NEMA;• Continued support from private sector institutions and particularly the financial institutions that require EIA
certificates and other environmental requirements before landing investment loans to developer;• Integration of environmental concerns in development policies, plans, programs and projects at both
central and local government levels;• Establishment of Environment Management Units in Lead Agencies and Local Governments;• Increased recognition of corporate social responsibility as a competitive strategy in the market by the
private sector; • Increased capacity building for compliance monitoring and enforcement at national and local government
levels; and• Increased public awareness to elicit self-regulation.
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
35CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 CHALLENGES, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Challenges and strategies Level Challenges Recommended/current strategies for continuous
improvementPolicy related challenges
Un-coordinated policy planning and implementation
Development of a harmonized and coordinated framework for policy planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation through the Office of the Prime Minister and National Planning Authority
Inadequacy of the current National Environment Management Policy to manage the emerging environmental challenges like oil/gas, electronic wastes..
Fast track the review of the current National Environment Management Policy
Increasing number of local governments with inadequate capacity (human and financial resources)
Government should increase conditional grants, and logistic and project support to ENR department in local governments (not only for wetland management as it is now)
Inadequate prioritization of ENR in the planning and budgeting processes at both National and Local Government levels
ENR ,as a back-bone of economic growth in Uganda, should be re-prioritized and attract increased budget support during planning and budgeting processes at both National and Local Government levels
Institutional and operational
General apathy that environment management is the sole responsibility of NEMA; lack of public and stakeholder responsiveness to environmental issues
Increased public education and awareness on the current and emerging environmental problems with focus on individual, community and institutional responsibilities and obligations
Weak enforcement of the Environmental Law and the existing regulations
Operationalization of the Environment Protection Force (EPF) would add value to the current compliance assistance and enforcement efforts
Un-coordinated activity implementation strategies within the sectors, Lead Agencies and Local Governments
Joint ENR sub sector planning and coordinated implementation, inter sector and inter agency coordination framework
Low capacity (personnel, finance and logistics) Lead Agencies and Local Governments
Capacity building for Lead Agencies; budget support, training and tooling
Delayed and inadequate funding for activity implementation
Increased funding and timely disbursements for activity implementation
Limited capacity of NEMA (personnel, finance and logistics) to effectively handle the increasing and emerging environmental problems
Increase support to NEMA, specialized training and re-tooling
Poor attitude and deliberate resistance by developers and resource users
Emerging environmental challenges
Oil and gas exploration and production and the related environmental challenges
Institutional capacity enhancement through policy reviews, legislations, budget support, specialized training, tooling and equipping
Urban solid and electronic wastes, and polyethylene materials and associated occupational health risks
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
36Level Challenges Recommended/current strategies
for continuous improvementClimate change and weather variability with the related challenges like disaster risks such as floods, mass movements and droughtsThe increasing population, urbanization and industrialization with the related environmental problems like Water and soil pollution within urban/growing industrial areas, deforestation and degradation of fragile ecosystems
5.2 Conclusions
NEMA has continued to improve on its internal effectiveness and efficiency and increasing support to its partners. However, there is need for more support (funding, equipping, personnel and training) to meet the emerging development challenges and the corresponding environmental issues such as oil and gas, climate change and electronic wastes;
NEMA has improved on its internal system for EIA processing to ensure regulated and environmentally friendly development processes in Uganda. However, there is need for more support to the Lead Agencies to ensure that EIAs are reviewed timely as scheduled in the Environment Act; and
For NEMA to perform its mandate and realize the set objectives and targets, its partners, particularly the Lead Agencies and local governments need to get adequate support. Notably, the increasing number of local governments has created more demand for support from NEMA while conditional grant (from the central government) for districts is inadequate. This issue needs to be addressed by the Ministry of Water and Environment and the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development.
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
37ANNEX I: PROJECTS (EIAS) APPROVED IN FY2009/10
a. Review and Approval of EIA Reports (Projects)
1. EIA Reports Received = 464
2. EIA Reports Approved = 395
3. EIA Reports Approved as %age of Received = 85%
b. Total Projects Approved By Quarter, Category, and Percentage
CATEGORY2009 QUARTER 2010 QUARTER GRAND
TOTAL PERCENTJuly - September
October - December
January - March
April - June
Information Communication Technology 64 36 39 33 172 43.5%Infrastructure – Roads, Housing, Renovations 10 16 14 11 51 13%Minerals, Mining, Quarry, Oil/Gas 03 12 18 15 48 12.1%Fuel Service Facility 16 09 09 07 41 10.4%Processing, Manufacturing Industries 04 14 07 04 29 7.4%Wildlife, Hotels, Leisure, Tourism 05 04 04 03 16 4%Energy Production 01 03 02 05 11 2.8%Land-use Change – Agriculture, Forestry, Livestock 02 02 02 03 09 2.3%Waste Management and Infrastructure 01 Nil 04 01 06 1.5%Water Supply and Sanitation Facility 03 Nil 01 01 05 1.3%Wetlands, Fisheries Resources Management Nil Nil 04 Nil 04 1.0%Education 02 Nil Nil Nil 02 0.5%Pest, Vector Control Nil Nil Nil 01 01 0.2%
Total = 111 96 104 84 395 100%
ANNEX II: MEMBERS OF THE 5th NEMA BOARDNAME TITLE
1. Mr. Patrick Kahangire Board Chairman2. Hon. Amongin Aporu Christine Vice Chairperson3. Mrs. Miriam Kankunda Member4. Eng. Mugisha Shillingi Member5. Lt. Col. Steven Basaliza Mwesige Member6. Dr. Wilson K. Kasolo Member7. Mr. Komayombi Bulegeya James Member8. Mr. Magona Mweru Ismael Member9. Mr. Justus Tindigarukayo Kashagire Member10. Dr. Alex Opio Member
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
38ANNEX III: THE CURRENT STAFF ESTABLISHMENT IN NEMA
NAME TITLEEXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S OFFICE1. Aryamanya-Mugisha, Henry Executive Director2. Dr. Gerald Musoke Sawula Deputy Executive Director3. Christine Akello Senior Legal Council4. Fred Onyai Internal Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist5. James Elungat Internal Auditor6. Allen Asasira Procurement Officer7. Jessica Naiga Ayebazibwe Legal Council8. Naomi Namara Karekaho Public Relations OfficerDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND MONITORING9. Arnold Waiswa Ayazika Director-Environmental Monitoring and Compliance10. Festus Bagoora Natural Resources Management Specialist - Soils and Land use11. Matovu George Lubega Natural Resources Management Specialist-Aquatic Biodiversity12. Francis Mary Ogwal Natural Resources Management Specialist-Biodiversity and Rangelands13. Vacant Environmental Impact Assessment Coordinator14. Herbert Oule Senior Environment Inspector15. Margaret Aanyu Environmental Impact Assessment Officer16. Grace Birikadde Environmental Audits and Monitoring Officer17. Isaac Ntujju Environment Inspector18. Alex Winyi Kiiza Environment Impact Assessment officer19. Dick Lufafa Environmental Audits and Monitoring Officer20. Christine Kasedde Environmental Impact Assessment OfficerDEPARTMENT OF DISTRICT SUPPORT COORDINATION AND PUBLIC EDUCATION21. Beatrice Adimola Director-Distric Support and Coordination22. Daniel Babikwa Environmental Education Coordinator23. Odipio Edward Adraku District Support Coordinator24. Persis Basemera Environmental Education Officer25. Emmy Wasajja District Support Officer26. Everest Mugambwa Kizito Information, Education and Communication Officer27. Elizabeth Mutayanjulwa Environmental Education and Materials Production Officer28. Herbert Nabaasa District Support Officer29. Evelyn Lutalo Najjemba District Support Officer30.DEPARTMENT OF POLICY PLANNING AND INFORMATION31. Eugene Telly Muramira Director-Policy, Planning and Information32. Ronald Kaggwa Environmental Economist33. Kitutu Kimono Mary Goretti Environmental Information Systems Specialist34. Firipo Mpabulungi Geographical Information Systems Officer35. Eva Wamala Mutongole Librarian36. Kato Phillip Network Administrator37. Annet Bukirwa Assistant LibrarianDEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION38. Aristarco Mujuzi Kasekende Director-Finance and Administration39. Kasagga Allan Chief Accountant40. Jolly Kamwesigye Human Resources Manager41. Nampeera Florence Accountant42. Shirley Aiik Accounts Assistant
Annual Performance Report 2009/10
N E M A
39NAME TITLE
43. Joy Kagoda Senior Personal Secretary-Executive Director’s Office44. Maria Specioza Kagusuuru Senior Personal Secretary-Finance and Administration45. Rhona Namara Senior Personal Secretary-Deputy Executive Director’s Office46. Nabankema Judith Stores and Registry Assistant47. Bonnie Birungi Departmental Secretary-Environmental Monitoring and Compliance48. Prossy Businge Departmental Secretary-Policy Planning and Information49. Edith Kanyesigye Departmental Secretary-Finance and Administration50. Perry Kiza Departmental Secretary-Policy Planning and Information51. Jackson Kalemera Driver52. Samuel Katende Driver53. Moses Hasahya Driver54. Joseph Kateregga Driver55. Robert Kayondo Kennedy Driver56. Phillip Ismail Driver57. Edward Mbabazi Driver58. Moses Sebuliba Driver59. Harriet Namara Receptionist60. Charles Tindiwensi Driver61. Margaret Nabuma Cleaner62. John Sabiiti Office Messenger63. Tino Jane Rose Office Refreshment Assistant64. Ruth Nalumansi Office Refreshment Assistant65. Alfred Malan Office Messenger66. Vacant Cleaner
Top Related