Presented by:Bill Taylor
University of Wyoming Cooperative Extension ServiceNortheast Area Community Development Educator
Conflict Manageme
nt
2
WHAT ARE YOUR ATTITUDES TOWARDS
CONFLICT?
• Worksheet: What Are Your Attitudes on Conflict?; 8 minutesDo worksheet, then read suggested answers
3
Conflict is natural, inevitable and necessary !
Conflict creates tension and pressure for change and
all change creates
some conflict.
4
WHAT HAPPENS DURING A CONFLICT?
• Emotions rise.• Communication decreases and becomes
more indirect (triangulation)• Opponents are demonized• Sides are taken; camps are formed in the
organization• Issues become blurred and new issues added
5
WHAT HAPPENS DURING A CONFLICT? (CONT.)
• Differences are magnified; similarities minimized
• Competitive processes (including rigid commitments and dirty tricks) are increasingly employed
• Stop helping, attempt to avoid the situation
6
BENEFITS TO CONFLICT
• Identify problems that need to be solved• Bring about change• Change the way we think about things• Help clarify our purpose, what’s important to
us or the organization.
7
BENEFITS TO CONFLICT (CONT.)
• Personal and group leadership development• Organizational/interpersonal growth and
commitment• Creative decision making• Others?
8
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF CONFLICT, IN YOUR EXPERIENCE, HAS RESULTED IN A
POSITIVE OUTCOME?
17%
30%
30%
23% 1. 75-100%2. 50-75%3. 25-50%4. 0-25%
9
Inaction
Legis
lative
Negotiati
onFa
cilita
tionM
ediation
Arbitr
ation
Administrati
veJu
dicial
Nonviolent A
ction
Violence
Increasing Formality & 3rd Party Influence
CONTINUUM OF APPROACHES TO CONFLICT
10
POTENTIAL RESPONSES TO CONFLICT
• Do nothing: – Yield (and change their beliefs)– Yield (and retain their beliefs)– Stonewall/Avoidance– Exit (flight)
11
POTENTIAL RESPONSES TO CONFLICT (CONT.)
• Fight (exercise power):– Guerrilla warfare: Looks like doing nothing, but
isn't– Open warfare
12
POTENTIAL RESPONSES TO CONFLICT (CONT.)
• Negotiate: – Contend. Try to win; defeat the other side– Compromise. Split the difference; find the
middle– Problem Solve. Look for new solutions which
address the concerns of all parties
13
POTENTIAL RESPONSES TO CONFLICT (CONT.)
• Seek Assisted Negotiation: Use a third party to aid in finding a mutually agreeable solution to a shared problem – Mediation– Fact finder– Ombudsman
14
POTENTIAL RESPONSES TO CONFLICT (CONT.)
• Rely on a third party decision maker – Supervisor– Arbitrator – Court
15
Personal Antagonism
Shift from non-personal, external disagreement to the other person being
seen as the problem
SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION OF CONFLICT
16
Issue Proliferation
Antagonism moves from specific to general
“You slighted me
back in 1975?”
“I don’t like your horse
either !”
SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION OF CONFLICT
17
Problem
Triangulation
Talk about, not with
SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION OF CONFLICT
18
DID YOU SAY WHAT I HEARD?
19
• Personal discomfort • Overly protective or defensive emotional
responses by self or others • Emotional or hostile
environment
BARRIERS TO COMMUNICATIONAND AGREEMENT
20
TOOLS TO REDUCE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
• Move meeting to neutral & comfortable location
• Turn off cell phones• Modify seating arrangements• Provide alternative ways to participate • Others?
21
TOOLS TO REDUCE STRUCTURAL FACTORS
• Simplify the message• Combine messages and show linkages• Active listening• Ask speaker to restate message in different
words• Ask open-ended questions• Put unrelated messages “in the bin”• Others?
22
When emotions are understood…
• Differences may be negotiated without becoming too personal
• Participants may not get upset as quickly
EMOTIONS IN CONFLICT SITUATIONS
23
People are most comfortable in the “emotional zone” they are accustomed to.
• Those who grew up in hostile settings tend to explode or implode.
• Those who grew up in nurturing environments may interpret explosiveness as hostility and recoil from a hostile person
• They may speak past each other
EMOTIONAL OR HOSTILE ENVIRONMENTS
24
TOOLS TO REDUCE EMOTIONAL FACTORS
• Separate the people from the problem• Use active listening• Paraphrasing• Mirroring• Reframing • Others?
25
TOOLS TO REDUCE SOCIAL FACTORS
• Awareness• Encourage collaborative behavior• Address stereotypes • Draw silent parties out• Speak directly with decision-maker• Provide neutral data source• Make base line explicit • Others?
26
OPEN QUESTIONS• Examples:– Probing questions: Ask for more info– Clarifying: Sharpen your understanding of what
has been said– Justifying: ask for evidence for the view they’ve
expressed– Consequential: reality testing, ask about
potential solutions or look at potential consequences
27
REFRAMING
• Definition: responding to the speaker in a way that validates what they are feeling but also helps them move forward.– “Her desk is a mess!” • Reframed: “One issue is how neat the office should
be.”
– “I don’t want anyone trespassing on my property.”• Reframed: “Property boundaries are an issue.”
28
OTHER LISTENING TOOLS
• Paraphrase• Take notes • Demonstrate that you hear what they are
saying
29
HOSTILE/ABUSIVE BEHAVIOR
• “[H]ostile/abusive behavior [differs] from angry behavior [in that] hostile/abusive behavior is intended, consciously or unconsciously to have some or all of the following effects:– Put you off balance.– Manipulate and control you.– Demean you in some way.– Cause you to feel guilty.– Intimidate you.
30
TWELVE STEPS FOR DEALING WITH HOSTILITY
• Deal with feelings first.• Avoid coming across as bureaucratic.• Recognize that each situation is different.• Strive to control the interaction.• Begin defusing early.• Be assertive, not aggressive or passive.• If you lose control of yourself, you lose, period.• What you focus on, you get more of.
31
TWELVE STEPS FOR DEALING WITH HOSTILITY (CONT.)
• Don’t supply ammunition.• Don’t ask questions you don’t want to hear
answers to.• Avoid inadvertent errors.• Avoid high risk, high gain behavior.
32
CONFLICT RESOLUTION STYLES WORKSHEET
* Worksheet: Conflict Resolution Styles; 5 minutes
33
WHICH METHOD DO YOU TEND TO USE WITH FOLLOWERS?
7%
23%
23%
13%
33% 1. Avoidance2. Accommodating3. Win/Lose4. Compromising5. Problem Solving
34
WHICH METHOD DO YOU TEND TO USE WITH PEERS?
33%
13%
20%
17%
17% 1. Avoidance2. Accommodating3. Win/Lose4. Compromising5. Problem Solving
35
WHICH METHOD DO YOU TEND TO USE WITH SUPERVISORS?
20%
17%
20%
23%
20% 1. Avoidance2. Accommodating3. Win/Lose4. Compromising5. Problem Solving
36
CARP• C: Control
• A: Acknowledge
• R: Refocus
• P: Problem Solve
37
STEP 1: INITIATING AND TAKING CONTROL
• First impressions:– Eye contact– Pay attention– Posture– Positive and friendly tone of voice– Greeting (if other party does the initiating)– Keep it short– Develop rapport– Get and use their name
38
STEP 2: ACKNOWLEDGE
• Ask what happened.• Address their apparent emotions: – Acknowledgement.– Empathy.– Collect information (use active listening).
• Give an apology if the facts warrant (but don’t give ammunition).
39
STEP 3: REFOCUS THE CONVERSATION
• Think about the language you use initially– Use cooperative rather than competitive
language (but don’t make unintended promises).– Use “we” (except where it makes no sense).– Use appropriate tone and word stress– Avoid repeating hot words and phrases.– Replace some statements (“We can’t…”) with
questions (“How do you see us doing this under our existing rules?”).
40
STEP 3: REFOCUS THE CONVERSATION (CONT.)
• Use verbal self-defense to re-establish control:– Use surprise (in tone and content).– Ask a “when” question (move speaker from the
general to the specific).– Use a neutral (mechanical) tone (generalize and
paraphrase without comment or agreement).– Engage in a topic-grab, taking something neutral
the speaker says (e.g. number of children) and comment on it or ask a question.
41
STEP 3: REFOCUS THE CONVERSATION (CONT.)
• Physically move to their side (dance of conflict)– Now you are facing the problem together
• Act like a broken record (repeating one or two short sentences until the angry person starts to hear you).
• Be silent.• Say “you’re right”—find something in the tirade
you can agree to (but again, do not give ammunition).
42
STEP 4: PROBLEM SOLVE
• Give options.– This allows subjects to feel they are in charge of
their question.– In “teaching you, they may teach themselves”—
by letting them generate options subject to both sides’ interests and requirements, subjects gain a better perspective on why they have received a “no” so far.
– The subject and you may create an option that satisfies both sides.
43
DEALING WITH THE PUBLIC
* Handout: Diffusing Public Anger; review; 5 minutes
44
KINDS OF POWER
Exploitive Manipulative
Nutritive Competitive
Collaborative
45
Exploitive
WHICH POWER DO YOU USE MOST OFTEN?
7%
27%
23%
27%
17% 1. Exploitive2. Manipulative3. Competitive4. Nutritive5. Collaborative
46
10%
33%
20%
17%
20%
WHICH POWER IS MOST OFTEN USED OVER YOU?
1. Exploitive2. Manipulative3. Competitive4. Nutritive5. Collaborative
Competitive
47
WILL COLLABORATIVE CONFLICT RESOLUTION WORK?
50%
50% 1. Yes2. No
48
COLLABORATIVE PROCESSES MAY WORK IF…
• Issues can be easily defined• The dispute is not over constitutional rights
or societal values• There are enough diverse issues to provide
opportunities for trade-offs• The parties are readily
identifiable
49
COLLABORATIVE PROCESSES MAY WORK IF… (CONT.)
• All parties have a legitimate spokesperson• There is relative power balance
between the parties (i.e. nobody can dictate the outcome)
• A continuing relationship is likely• There is a realistic time deadline• Parties are motivated to negotiate issues on
their merits
50
COLLABORATIVE PROCESS –WHO SHOULD ATTEND?
• All stakeholders – be inclusive
– Blockers– Approvers– Experts– Interested public
51
• Don’t react to outbursts• Do use only “I” statements, not “you”
statements• Do use symbolic gestures to show your sincerity – hand
shake, call, card, etc.• Do put yourself in their shoes – (What are they feeling?
Why? What are their needs?)• Don’t deduce their intention from your fears• Don’t blame them for your problem• Do discuss each other’s perceptions
COLLABORATIVE PROCESS DO’S AND DON’TS
52
• Do look for chances to act inconsistently with their perception of you
• Don’t reveal statements made in confidence to the facilitator – the neutral party
• Don’t use names or derogatory personal statements• Do have everyone participate actively• Do allow each person to speak• Do give spokesmen authority to speak for their groups• Don’t put out media releases without consensus
COLLABORATIVE PROCESS DO’S AND DON’TS (CONT.)
53
PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE DISPUTE MANAGEMENT
How to Get to “Yes”• Separate the people from the problem• Focus on interests, not positions• Invent options for mutual gain• Insist on using objective criteria
54
STEP 1: SEPARATING THE PEOPLE FROM THE PROBLEM
• All conflicts involve two interests:– Substance– Relationship
• Relationships are based on: – Accurate perceptions– Clear communication– Appropriate emotions– Forward-looking, purposive outlook
55
STEP 2: FOCUS ON INTERESTS, NOT POSITIONS
• Interests = party’s goals• Positions = means to accomplish interests
56
POSITIONS
• “There will be no pets in this house”• “He wants $100,000 for the house but I won’t
pay a penny more than $95,000.”• “We won’t negotiate until the protests stop.”
57
IDENTIFYING INTERESTS
• Ask “Why?”• Ask “Why not?”• Each side has multiple interests.• Talk about interests.• Acknowledge their interests are part of the
issue.
58
DISCUSS ISSUES, INTERESTS
• Address the problem before the answer.• Look forward, not back.• Be concrete on facts, interests, issues– Be flexible on position.
• Be hard on the problem – soft on people
59
HANDLING PROBLEM PEOPLE
* Handout: Handling Problem People; review; 5 minutesReferences: Coping With Difficult People by Bramson
Difficult Conversations by Stone, Patton, Heen
60
STEP 3: GENERATE A VARIETY OF OPTIONS
• More options, more likely to find a win-win solution
61
INVENTING OPTIONS
• 4 obstacles– Premature judgment– Searching for the single answer– Assumption of a fixed pie– “Solving their problem is their problem.”
62
INVENTING OPTIONS (CONT.)
• Separate inventing from deciding–Use brainstorming to produce many ideas• Before brainstorming– Define your purpose– Choose a few participants or break into small
groups– Change the environment– Design informal atmosphere– Choose facilitator
63
INVENTING OPTIONS (CONT.)
– During brainstorming• Seat side-by-side – facing the problem• Clarify ground rules, including no criticism• Brainstorm• Record ideas in full view
– After brainstorming• Discuss pluses & minuses of each idea• Star most promising ideas• Invent improvements of promising ideas• Set time to evaluate ideas and decide which to pursue
64
INVENTING OPTIONS (CONT.)
• Broaden your options– Look through eyes of different experts– Invent agreements of different strengths– Change scope of proposed agreement
65
INVENTING OPTIONS (CONT.)
• Look for mutual gain– Identify shared interests– Dovetail differing interests– Ask for their preferences
66
INVENTING OPTIONS (CONT.)
• Make their decision easy– Put yourself in their shoes– Give them answer that makes it easy for them to
make a decision favorable to you– Don’t make threats– Do what you can to improve the consequences
for them
67
INVENTING OPTIONS (CONT.)
• Make their decision easy (cont.)
– Help them see consequences of “yes” and “no”• BATNA – Best Alternative To A Negotiated Agreement
– Parties need to be aware of what will be their best outcome if no agreement can be reached
– How prepared are you to settle for your BATNA? How much impetus does this give you to find an agreement?
– What will be the BATNA of the other parties?
68
STEP 4: USE OBJECTIVE CRITERIA
• Insist on using objective criteria– Materials/ideas presented as fact must be
substantiated– Find sources of unbiased information– Technical experts– Technical review teams
69
FAIR PROCESSES
• Majority rule• Take turns• Share• Binding arbitration • Consensus
70
FINAL BARGAINING AND AGREEMENT
• Caution: During final negotiation – parties will often revert to traditional styles
• Slow the process down • Remind each other of fair standards and
criteria • Take turns playing “devil’s advocate”• Ask “What if…?”
71
WORKABLE AGREEMENTS* Handout: Workable Agreements; review; 2 minutes
72
TURNING ADVERSARIES INTO PARTNERS
“Your goal is not to win over them, to win them over.” – Getting Past No
Five Steps1. Go to the balcony
– Step back– Don’t try to control them, control yourself– Reflect on the alternatives– Don’t react
73
TURNING ADVERSARIES INTO PARTNERS (CONT.)
• Five steps (cont.)
2. Step to their side• Conflict dance – literally step to their side, avoid
facing off• Defuse their anger, fear, hostility, suspicion• Don’t attack, listen• Try to take their side in as many ways as possible
74
TURNING ADVERSARIES INTO PARTNERS (CONT.)
• Five steps (cont.)
3. Reframe• Don’t reject – take them back to meeting each
other’s challenges• Take what they say and say it back to see if you have
the same perspective• Ask problem solving questions
• What would you do if…?• What if we were to…?
• Don’t reject, reframe
75
TURNING ADVERSARIES INTO PARTNERS (CONT.)
• Five steps (cont.)
4. Build them a Golden Bridge– Try to identify and satisfy their unmet interests,
particularly human needs.– Help them save face and have some victoryDon’t push, make it easy for them to move your
direction
76
TURNING ADVERSARIES INTO PARTNERS (CONT.)
• Five steps (cont.)
5. Use power to educate– Educate them to costs of not agreeing (without
threats)– Ask reality testing questions, warn but don’t
threaten– Explain your BATNA
77
PUTTING THE LESSON TO WORK
* Role Play: Oak Tree Role Play; see instructions; 25 minutes
78
30%
37%
33%
THIS WORKSHOP…
1. Provided new information2. Reinforced what I already knew3. Provided no new information
79
13%
20%
30%
20%
17%
HOW MUCH KNOWLEDGE DID YOU GAIN?
1. A lot2. A moderate amount3. Some4. Not much5. None
80
MY ATTENDANCE TODAY MOTIVATED ME TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT.
17%
23%
23%
17%
20% 1. A lot2. A moderate amount3. Some4. Not much5. None
81
• * Please complete printed evaluation form– Leave at seat or at front.
ANY QUESTIONS/COMMENTS?
Top Related