XDR-TB Francesco Blasi Department Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Italy.
-
Upload
roland-osborne -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of XDR-TB Francesco Blasi Department Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Italy.
XDR-TBXDR-TBFrancesco Blasi
Department Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Italy
Disclosures
• I have accepted grants, speaking and conference invitations from Almirall, Angelini, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chiesi, GSK, Guidotti-Malesci, Menarini, Novartis, Pfizer, and Zambon
• I have had recent or ongoing consultancy with Almirall, Angelini, AstraZeneca, GSK, Menarini, Mundipharma and Novartis
92 countries notified at least one case of XDR-TB
GLOBAL TB PROGRAMME
Ref: Global TB Control Report 2013
Definitions
MDR-TB = Strains resistant to at least INH and RIF (most important 1st-line drugs)
XDR-TB = MDR TB strains with additional resistance to any fluoroquinolone and any of the 3 injectable second-line drugs (amikacin, kanamycin, capreomycin)
TDR, XXDR = Resistance to all drugs (not standardised defin)
MDR TB XDR TBTB with any drug resistance
TDR/XXDR TB
• There is little/no treatment for XDR-/TDR-TB
• Several new drugs with no pre-existing resistance could have promising data by 2014
– Bedaquiline, delamanid, PA-824, sutezolid, SQ109
• Proposal: initiate global study of combinations of NCEs in patients with XDR-/TDR-TB at select centers with aim of cure
– Potential collaborators: Janssen, Otsuka, TB Alliance, Pfizer, Sequella
– Help patients who would otherwise die
– Combines a “compassionate use” program with a clinical trial to advance understanding of entirely novel regimens, which can then be applied in DS- and MDR-TB
New Chemical Entities in XDR-TB
NIX-TB: “RESCUE” STUDY FOR XDR-TB
Delamanid
Delamanid added to a background MDR-TB regimen improves significantly SS-C conversion at month 2 (45.4 vs 29.6%)
11
Delamanid (ERJ 2014)
Results• Favourable outcomes were observed in 143/192 patients
(74.5%) who receiveddelamanid ≥6 months, compared to 126/229 patients (55.0%) who received delamanid for ≤2 months.
• Mortality was reduced to 1.0% among those receiving long-term delamanid, versus short-term/no delamanid (8.3%), p<0.001.
• Treatment benefit was also seen among patients with extensively drug-resistant disease.
Conclusion
Delamanid for 6 months in combination with an optimized background regimen can improve outcomes and reduce mortality among patients with both MDR- and XDR-TB.
12
New drugs: Bedaquiline (BDQ) – a diarylquinoline First drug developed for TB in forty years
Only data from Phase IIb trials available , further efficacy and safety data needed from rigorously conducted Phase III trials
On December 28, 2012, the U.S. FDA approved BDQ
In early 2013, WHO commissioned independent review of data, assessment of validity of surrogate markers for MDR-TB outcome, and cost-effectiveness study
In January 2013, WHO held an Expert Committee meeting to get advice
In June 2013, after STAG-TB endorsement and through publication of interim guidelines, WHO recommended BDQ use for MDR-TB under five strict conditions
WHO has disseminated its guidelines to all Member States and is working on operational manual and other guidance
Bedaquiline: Interim WHO policy guidance
BDQ may be added to a WHO-recommended regimen in adult patients with pulmonary MDR-TB, under five specific conditions (conditional recommendation, very low confidence in estimates of effect):
1. Treatment under close monitoring (eg, sound protocols)2. Proper patient selection (caution: PLHIV and >65; no: children & pregnancy)3. Patient informed consent required4. Treatment design based on WHO recommendations (eg, DST, dose, never adding a single drug to a failing regimen)5. Active pharmacovigilance (esp. cardiac, liver and renal toxicities)
Urgent WHO call: acceleration of phase III trial; accurate DST; prospective collection of operational data on BDQ implementation
Bedaquiline (Bq) and PA-824
EBA at 2 w: PA-824+moxi+Z
better than: bq, bq+Z, bq+PA-824
Comparable to WHO Cat 1
16
The cost (€) to treat TB and M/XDR is enormous: prevention is cost-effective
Cost per case Susceptible
MDR-TB XDR-TB
Estonia* 2,615 15,344 15,344
France 5,691
Germany 7,7,51 55,003 188.466
UK 6,234 62,343
Netherlands 8,340 46,990 148,136
Italy 9,294
Finland 8,243
Spain 9,384
AVERAGE 7,848 54,779 168,310
20
Interventions over time: Interventions over time: old weapons might
be useful again to manage XDR
First sanatorium First sanatorium Germany, 1857Germany, 1857 First Dispensary, First Dispensary,
Scotland, 1897Scotland, 1897
Koch, Mtb,Koch, Mtb,18821882
Drugs, 1945-1962Drugs, 1945-1962
MMR,1950-1980MMR,1950-1980
Fox:Ambulatory treatment, 1968Fox:Ambulatory treatment, 1968
Styblo model, 1978Styblo model, 1978
DOTS, 1991DOTS, 1991
sanatoriasanatoria Outbreak Management,Outbreak Management,
Risk Group ManagementRisk Group Management
screeningscreening
BCG vaccinationBCG vaccination
drug therapydrug therapy
Socio-economic improvementSocio-economic improvement
Pneumotorax, Italy, 1907Pneumotorax, Italy, 1907
2121
Ad5 Ag85AMcMaster CanSino
VPM 1002Max Planck, VPM,
TBVI
Hybrid-I + IC31
SSI, TBVI, EDCTP,
Intercell
Immunotherapeutic:
Mycobacterial – whole cell
or extract
ID93 + GLA-SE IDRI, Aeras
Hyvac 4/ AERAS-404 + IC31
SSI, sanofi-pasteur, Aeras, Intercell
H56 + IC31SSI, Aeras, Intercell
MVA85A/AERAS-485
OETC, Aeras
AERAS-402/ Crucell Ad35Crucell, Aeras
RUTI
Archivel Farma, S.LM. Vaccae
Anhui Longcom,
China
M72 + AS01
GSK, Aeras
MTBVACTBVI, Zaragoza,
Biofabri
rBCG
Viral vector
Protein/adjuvant
Attenuated M.tb
Hybrid-I + CAF01
SSI, TBVI
Global TB Vaccine Pipeline 2014: good but needs to keep growing
GLOBAL TB PROGRAMME
BCG evidence and MVA85A phase 2b trial results
Safe Showing it is feasible to test vaccine candidates in large
trials, but…
No detectable efficacy
• BCG: efficacy in disseminated pediatric forms proven. Efficacy against adult contagious forms variable. Revaccination efficacy nihil or dubious
• MVA85A:
GLOBAL TB PROGRAMME
Reality check about vaccines
1.Today we do not have a potent pre- and post-exposure vaccine, we have BCG
2.Today we do not have yet clarity about correlates of immunity and bio-markers
3.Today, we do not fully understand pathogenesis and immunity
25
Global Policy: MDR-TB and XDR-TB
1. Strengthen basic TB control, to prevent M/XDR-TB
2. Scale-up programmatic management and care of MDR-TB and XDR-TB
3. Strengthen laboratory services for adequate and timely diagnosis of MDR-TB and XDR-TB
4. Ensure availability of quality drugs and their rational use
5. Expand MDR-TB and XDR-TB surveillance 6. Introduce infection control, especially in high HIV
prevalence settings7. Mobilize urgently resources domestically and
internationally8. Promote research and development into new
diagnostics, drugs and vaccines
26
Global Policy: MDR-TB and XDR-TB
1. Strengthen basic TB control, to prevent M/XDR-TB2. Scale-up programmatic management and care of
MDR-TB and XDR-TB
3. Strengthen laboratory services for adequate and timely diagnosis of MDR-TB and XDR-TB
4. Ensure availability of quality drugs and their rational use
5. Expand MDR-TB and XDR-TB surveillance 6. Introduce infection control, especially in high HIV
prevalence settings7. Mobilize urgently resources domestically and
internationally8. Promote research and development into new
diagnostics, drugs and vaccines
27
Global Policy: MDR-TB and XDR-TB
1. Strengthen basic TB control, to prevent M/XDR-TB2. Scale-up programmatic management and care of
MDR-TB and XDR-TB 3. Strengthen laboratory services for adequate and
timely diagnosis of MDR-TB and XDR-TB
4. Ensure availability of quality drugs and their rational use
5. Expand MDR-TB and XDR-TB surveillance 6. Introduce infection control, especially in high HIV
prevalence settings7. Mobilize urgently resources domestically and
internationally8. Promote research and development into new
diagnostics, drugs and vaccines
28
Global Policy: MDR-TB and XDR-TB
1. Strengthen basic TB control, to prevent M/XDR-TB2. Scale-up programmatic management and care of
MDR-TB and XDR-TB 3. Strengthen laboratory services for adequate and
timely diagnosis of MDR-TB and XDR-TB4. Ensure availability of quality drugs and their
rational use5. Expand MDR-TB and XDR-TB surveillance
6. Introduce infection control, especially in high HIV prevalence settings
7. Mobilize urgently resources domestically and internationally
8. Promote research and development into new diagnostics, drugs and vaccines
29
Global Policy: MDR-TB and XDR-TB
1. Strengthen basic TB control, to prevent M/XDR-TB2. Scale-up programmatic management and care of
MDR-TB and XDR-TB 3. Strengthen laboratory services for adequate and
timely diagnosis of MDR-TB and XDR-TB4. Ensure availability of quality drugs and their rational
use5. Expand MDR-TB and XDR-TB surveillance 6. Introduce infection control, especially in high HIV
prevalence settings7. Mobilize urgently resources domestically and
internationally
8. Promote research and development into new diagnostics, drugs and vaccines
Conclusion• MDRTB and XDRTB are caused by humans, they don’t exist in nature. The most common causes are inappropriate treatment by the practitioner and lack of patient adherence
• That said, we desperately need newer shorter regimens. The most effective of which will be combination of new molecules
• The critical path initiative of testing several drugs in combination rather than sequentially is an effective approach
• New drugs need to be used carefully to preserve their sensitivity and effectiveness